Normalisation factors for the major background processes and ttW ($\Delta \eta < 0$) from the fit using only statistical uncertainties (fixing Nuisance Parameters (NP) to their fitted values) to data in all analysis regions.

Normalisation factors for the major background processes and ttW ($\Delta \eta < 0$) from the fit using using both statistical and systematic uncertainties to data in all analysis regions.

Correlation matrix between the Normalisation Factors in the fit using only statistical uncertainties (fixing Nuisance Parameters (NP) to their fitted values) to data in all analysis regions.

The most relevant systematic uncertainties ranked by their impact on the leptonic charge asymmetry ($A_c^{\ell}$) parameter at reconstructed level. The impact of the uncertainties is shown before and after the combined profile-likelihood fit to data in the signal and control regions. Pulls introduced by the fitting procedure are also shown. The entries shown in bold are the uncertainties of the freely floating background normalisations. ME stands for "matrix element", PS for "parton shower" and JER for "jet energy resolution". The gamma-uncertainties refer to the MC statistical uncertainties in a specific region and bin.

The most relevant systematic uncertainties ranked by their impact on the ttW Normalisation Factor ($\Delta \eta < 0$) parameter at reconstructed level. The impact of the uncertainties is shown before and after the combined profile-likelihood fit to data in the signal and control regions. Pulls introduced by the fitting procedure are also shown. ME stands for "matrix element", PS for "parton shower" and JER for "jet energy resolution". The gamma-uncertainties refer to the MC statistical uncertainties in a specific region and bin.

The predicted and observed numbers of events in the control and signal regions. The predictions are shown before the fit to data. The indicated uncertainties consider statistical as well as all experimental and theoretical systematic uncertainties. Background categories with event yields with a value of 1.0e-6 have a negligible contribution to the region and are manually set to that value.

The predicted and observed numbers of events in the control and signal regions. The predictions are shown after the fit to data. The indicated uncertainties consider statistical as well as all experimental and theoretical systematic uncertainties. Background categories with event yields with a value of 1.0e-6 have a negligible contribution to the region and are manually set to that value.

Correlation matrix of all the parameters including nuisance parameters used in the profile likelihood unfolding fit on $A_{C}$.

The unfolded differential charge asymmetry as a function of the transverse momentum of the top pair system. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NNLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The scale uncertainty is obtained by varying renormalisation and factorisation scales independently by a factor of 2 or 0.5 around $\mu_0$ to calculate the maximum and minimum value of the asymmetry, respectively. The nominal value $\mu_0$ is chosen as $H_T/4$. The variations in which one scale is multiplied by 2 while the other scale is divided by 2 are excluded. Finally, the scale and MC integration uncertainties are added in quadrature.

The unfolded differential charge asymmetry as a function of the longitudinal boost of the top pair system. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NNLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The scale uncertainty is obtained by varying renormalisation and factorisation scales independently by a factor of 2 or 0.5 around $\mu_0$ to calculate the maximum and minimum value of the asymmetry, respectively. The nominal value $\mu_0$ is chosen as $H_T/4$. The variations in which one scale is multiplied by 2 while the other scale is divided by 2 are excluded. Finally, the scale and MC integration uncertainties are added in quadrature.

The unfolded inclusive leptonic asymmetry. The unfolded $A_C^{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ is obtained in the reduced phase-space defined by the requirement $|\Delta |\eta_{\ell\bar{\ell}}||<2.5$. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The theory uncertainty is obtained by varying both scales by a factor of 0.5 or 2.0 to calculate the minimum and maximum value of the asymmetry, respectively.

The unfolded differential leptonic asymmetry as a function of the invariant mass of the di-lepton pair. The unfolded $A_C^{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ is obtained in the reduced phase-space defined by the requirement $|\Delta |\eta_{\ell\bar{\ell}}||<2.5$. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The theory uncertainty is obtained by varying both scales by a factor of 0.5 or 2.0 to calculate the minimum and maximum value of the asymmetry, respectively.

The unfolded differential leptonic asymmetry as a function of the transverse momentum of the di-lepton pair. The unfolded $A_C^{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ is obtained in the reduced phase-space defined by the requirement $|\Delta |\eta_{\ell\bar{\ell}}||<2.5$. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The theory uncertainty is obtained by varying both scales by a factor of 0.5 or 2.0 to calculate the minimum and maximum value of the asymmetry, respectively.

The unfolded differential leptonic asymmetry as a function of the longitudinal boost of the di-lepton pair. The unfolded $A_C^{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ is obtained in the reduced phase-space defined by the requirement $|\Delta |\eta_{\ell\bar{\ell}}||<2.5$. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The theory uncertainty is obtained by varying both scales by a factor of 0.5 or 2.0 to calculate the minimum and maximum value of the asymmetry, respectively.

Individual 68% and 95% CL bounds on the relevant Wilson coefficients of the SM Effective Field Theory in units of $\text{TeV}^{-2}$. The bounds are derived from the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ inclusive measurement. The experimental uncertainties are accounted for, in the form of the complete covariance matrix that keeps track of correlations between bins for the differential measurement. The theory uncertainty from the NNLO QCD + NLO EW calculation is included by explicitly varying the renormalization and factorization scales, or the parton density functions, in the calculation and registering the variations in the intervals.

Individual 68% and 95% CL bounds on the relevant Wilson coefficients of the SM Effective Field Theory in units of $\text{TeV}^{-2}$. The bounds are derived from the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement. The experimental uncertainties are accounted for, in the form of the complete covariance matrix that keeps track of correlations between bins for the differential measurement. The theory uncertainty from the NNLO QCD + NLO EW calculation is included by explicitly varying the renormalization and factorization scales, or the parton density functions, in the calculation and registering the variations in the intervals.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ inclusive measurement. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [0,0.3]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [0.3,0.6]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [0.6,0.8]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [0.8,1]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $m_{t\bar{t}}$ < 500 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $m_{t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [500,750] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $m_{t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [750,1000] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $m_{t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [1000,1500] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $m_{t\bar{t}}$ > 1500 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ < 30 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [30,120] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ > 120 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ inclusive measurement. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$[0,0.3]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$[0.3,0.6]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$[0.6,0.8]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$[0.8,1]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ < 200 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$ [200,300] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$ [300,400] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ > 400 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ < 20 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$ [20, 70] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ > 70 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ inclusive measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ inclusive measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement. The total (stat. + syst.) uncertainties are considered.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ measurement. The total (stat. + syst.) uncertainties are considered.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement. The total (stat. + syst.) uncertainties are considered.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement. The total (stat. + syst.) uncertainties are considered.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement. The total (stat. + syst.) uncertainties are considered.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement. The total (stat. + syst.) uncertainties are considered.

Correlation coefficients $\rho_{i,j}$ for the statistical and systematic uncertainties between the $i$-th and $j$-th bin of the differential $A_E$ measurement as a function of the jet scattering angle $\theta_j$

The effects on the energy asymmetry of $1\sigma$ variations in its influencing nuisance parameters for the three $\theta_j$ bins. These are extracted from the samples of the posterior distribution with $\sigma_i^{(j)} = c_{ij}/\sqrt{c_{jj}}$ being the estimated shift of bin $i$ in conjunction with a shift $\Delta\theta_j$ of nuisance parameter $j$. The data statistical (Data stat.) uncertainty is obtained from running the unfolding with all nuisance parameters being fixed to their post-marginalised values, the MC statistical uncertainty on the response matrix ($t\bar{t}$ response MC stat.) is evaluated using a bootstrapping method from the covariance matrix of the ensemble of repeated unfolding results with varied response matrices. The $\gamma$ variations denote the statistical uncertainties of the background predictions in the corresponding bin of the $\Delta E$ vs $\theta_{j}$ distribution. The numbers appended to the $W$+jets PDF variations denote the corresponding NNPDF3.0 PDF sets.

The effects on the energy asymmetry of $1\sigma$ variations in its influencing nuisance parameters for the three $\theta_j$ bins. These are extracted from the samples of the posterior distribution with $\sigma_i^{(j)} = c_{ij}/\sqrt{c_{jj}}$ being the estimated shift of bin $i$ in conjunction with a shift $\Delta\theta_j$ of nuisance parameter $j$. The data statistical (Data stat.) uncertainty is obtained from running the unfolding with all nuisance parameters being fixed to their post-marginalised values, the MC statistical uncertainty on the response matrix ($t\bar{t}$ response MC stat.) is evaluated using a bootstrapping method from the covariance matrix of the ensemble of repeated unfolding results with varied response matrices. The $\gamma$ variations denote the statistical uncertainties of the background predictions in the corresponding bin of the $\Delta E$ vs $\theta_{j}$ distribution. The numbers appended to the $W$+jets PDF variations denote the corresponding NNPDF3.0 PDF sets.

Covariances $c_{ij}$ for the highest ranked systematic uncertainties in the energy asymmetry measurement differential in $\theta_j$.

Covariances $c_{ij}$ for the highest ranked systematic uncertainties in the energy asymmetry measurement differential in $\theta_j$.

Definition of the fiducial phase space with lepton candidate ($\ell$), hadronic top candidate ($j_h$), leptonic top candidate ($j_l$) and associated jet candidate ($j_a$).

Definition of the fiducial phase space with lepton candidate ($\ell$), hadronic top candidate ($j_h$), leptonic top candidate ($j_l$) and associated jet candidate ($j_a$).

Bounds on individual Wilson coefficients $C($TeV$/\Lambda)^2$ from the energy asymmetry, obtained from a combined fit to its values in all three $\theta_j$ bins.

Bounds on individual Wilson coefficients $C($TeV$/\Lambda)^2$ from the energy asymmetry, obtained from a combined fit to its values in all three $\theta_j$ bins.

The measured cross-sections for $Wj$ production in four bins of $\eta^{\mu}$. The uncertainties shown are statistical, systematic and due to the luminosity determination.

The measured cross-sections for $Wj$ production in four bins of $\eta^{\rm jet}$. The uncertainties shown are statistical, systematic and due to the luminosity determination.

The measured cross-sections for $Wj$ production in five bins of $p^{\rm jet}_T$. The uncertainties shown are statistical, systematic and due to the luminosity determination.

The measured cross-sections for $Z^0 j$ production in four bins of $y^Z$. The uncertainties shown are statistical, systematic and due to the luminosity determination.

The measured cross-sections for $Z^0 j$ production in four bins of $\eta^{\rm jet}$. The uncertainties shown are statistical, systematic and due to the luminosity determination.

The measured cross-sections for $Z^0 j$ production in bins of $p^{\rm jet}_T$. The uncertainties shown are statistical, systematic and due to the luminosity determination.

The measured cross-sections for $Z^0 j$ production in bins of $|\Delta\phi|$. The uncertainties shown are statistical, systematic and due to the luminosity determination.

The correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties on the $W^+j$ production cross-section measurements presented in Table 1 in bins of $\eta^{\mu}$, where the rows and columns correspond to the individual bins.

The correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties on the $W^-j$ production cross-section measurements presented in Table 1 in bins of $\eta^{\mu}$, where the rows and columns correspond to the individual bins.

The correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties on the $W^+j$ production cross-section measurements presented in Table 5 in bins of $\eta^{\rm jet}$, where the rows and columns correspond to the individual bins.

The correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties on the $W^-j$ production cross-section measurements presented in Table 5 in bins of $\eta^{\rm jet}$, where the rows and columns correspond to the individual bins.

The correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties on the $W^+j$ production cross-section measurements presented in Table 3 in bins of $p_T^{\rm jet}$, where the rows and columns correspond to the individual bins.

The correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties on the $W^-j$ production cross-section measurements presented in Table 3 in bins of $p_T^{\rm jet}$, where the rows and columns correspond to the individual bins.

The correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties on the $Z^0 j$ production cross-section measurements presented in Table 4 as a function of $y^Z$, where the rows and columns correspond to the individual bins.

The correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties on the $Z^0 j$ production cross-section measurements presented in Table 5 as a function of $\eta^{\rm jet}$, where the rows and columns correspond to the individual bins.

The correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties on the $Z^0 j$ production cross-section measurements presented in Table 6 as a function of $p_T^{\rm jet}$, where the rows and columns correspond to the individual bins.

The correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties on the $Z^0 j$ production cross-section measurements presented in Table 7 as a function of $|\Delta\phi|$, where the rows and columns correspond to the individual bins.

The correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties on the $W^+j$ and $W^-j$ production cross-section measurements presented in Table 1 in bins of $\eta^\mu$. The matrix is used to calculate the ratio and asymmetry of $W^+j$ and $W^-j$ production as a function of $\eta^\mu$.

The correlation matrix for the systematic uncertainties on the $W^+j$, $W^-j$ and $Z^0 j$ production cross-section measurements presented in Tables 2 and 5 in bins of $\eta^{\rm jet}$. The matrix is used to calculate the ratios of $Wj$ to $Z^0 j$ production and the charge ratio and asymmetry of $Wj$ production in the total fiducial region.

Correlation matrix of systematic uncertainties for $\sigma^{\pm}$. The statistical and integrated luminosity uncertainties are not included. The first and the last eleven indices correspond to the systematic uncertainites of $W^+$ ($\sigma^+_{1-11}$) and $W^-$ ($\sigma^-_{1-11}$) cross sections, respectively, in 11 muon pseudorapidity bins. The values are expressed as percentages.

Correlation matrix of statistical uncertainties for $\sigma^{\pm}$. The first and the last eleven indices correspond to the statistical uncertainites of $W^+$ ($\sigma^+_{1-11}$) and $W^-$ ($\sigma^-_{1-11}$) cross sections, respectively, in 11 muon pseudorapidity bins. The values are expressed as percentages.

Correlation matrix of systematic uncertainties for $\mathcal{A}$. The values are expressed as percentages.

Unfolded measurements of AFB in each M-|y| bin (e+e-).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in muon channel for |y|<1 for cos(theta)<0 and cos(theta)<0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in muon channel for |y|<1 for cos(theta)<0 and cos(theta)>0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in muon channel for |y|<1 for cos(theta)>0 and cos(theta)<0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in muon channel for |y|<1 for cos(theta)>0 and cos(theta)>0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in muon channel for 1<|y|<1.25 for cos(theta)<0 and cos(theta)<0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in muon channel for 1<|y|<1.25 for cos(theta)<0 and cos(theta)>0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in muon channel for 1<|y|<1.25 for cos(theta)>0 and cos(theta)<0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in muon channel for 1<|y|<1.25 for cos(theta)>0 and cos(theta)>0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in muon channel for 1.25<|y|<1.5 for cos(theta)<0 and cos(theta)<0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in muon channel for 1.25<|y|<1.5 for cos(theta)<0 and cos(theta)>0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in muon channel for 1.25<|y|<1.5 for cos(theta)>0 and cos(theta)<0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in muon channel for 1.25<|y|<1.5 for cos(theta)>0 and cos(theta)>0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in muon channel for 1.5<|y|<2.4 for cos(theta)<0 and cos(theta)<0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in muon channel for 1.5<|y|<2.4 for cos(theta)<0 and cos(theta)>0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in muon channel for 1.5<|y|<2.4 for cos(theta)>0 and cos(theta)<0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in muon channel for 1.5<|y|<2.4 for cos(theta)>0 and cos(theta)>0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in electron channel for |y|<1 for cos(theta)<0 and cos(theta)<0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in electron channel for |y|<1 for cos(theta)<0 and cos(theta)>0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in electron channel for |y|<1 for cos(theta)>0 and cos(theta)<0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in electron channel for |y|<1 for cos(theta)>0 and cos(theta)>0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in electron channel for 1<|y|<1.25 for cos(theta)<0 and cos(theta)<0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in electron channel for 1<|y|<1.25 for cos(theta)<0 and cos(theta)>0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in electron channel for 1<|y|<1.25 for cos(theta)>0 and cos(theta)<0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in electron channel for 1<|y|<1.25 for cos(theta)>0 and cos(theta)>0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in electron channel for 1.25|y|<1.5 for cos(theta)<0 and cos(theta)<0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in electron channel for 1.25|y|<1.5 for cos(theta)<0 and cos(theta)>0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in electron channel for 1.25|y|<1.5 for cos(theta)>0 and cos(theta)<0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in electron channel for 1.25|y|<1.5 for cos(theta)>0 and cos(theta)>0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in electron channel for 1.5<|y|<2.4 for cos(theta)<0 and cos(theta)>0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in electron channel for 1.5<|y|<2.4 for cos(theta)<0 and cos(theta)>0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in electron channel for 1.5<|y|<2.4 for cos(theta)>0 and cos(theta)<0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in electron channel for 1.5<|y|<2.4 for cos(theta)>0 and cos(theta)>0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in electron channel for 2.4<|y|<5 for cos(theta)<0 and cos(theta)<0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in electron channel for 2.4<|y|<5 for cos(theta)<0 and cos(theta)>0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in electron channel for 2.4<|y|<5 for cos(theta)>0 and cos(theta)<0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).

Covariance matrix of Drell-Yan AFB in electron channel for 2.4<|y|<5 for cos(theta)>0 and cos(theta)>0. The covariance matrix is built in 2 dimensions, 14x14(mass) for cos(theta), --, -+, +-, ++ combination where + means positive cos(theta) and - implies the negative cos(theta).