Figure 4, normalized differential cross section for $\cos\theta_{2}^{r}$

Figure 4, normalized differential cross section for $\cos\theta_{1}^{n}$

Figure 4, normalized differential cross section for $\cos\theta_{2}^{n}$

Figure 5, normalized differential cross section for $\cos\theta_{1}^{k*}$

Figure 5, normalized differential cross section for $\cos\theta_{2}^{k*}$

Figure 5, normalized differential cross section for $\cos\theta_{1}^{r*}$

Figure 5, normalized differential cross section for $\cos\theta_{2}^{r*}$

Figure 6, normalized differential cross section for $\cos\theta_{1}^{k}\cos\theta_{2}^{k}$

Figure 6, normalized differential cross section for $\cos\theta_{1}^{r}\cos\theta_{2}^{r}$

Figure 6, normalized differential cross section for $\cos\theta_{1}^{n}\cos\theta_{2}^{n}$

Figure 7, normalized differential cross section for $\cos\theta_{1}^{r}\cos\theta_{2}^{k}+\cos\theta_{1}^{k}\cos\theta_{2}^{r}$

Figure 7, normalized differential cross section for $\cos\theta_{1}^{r}\cos\theta_{2}^{k}-\cos\theta_{1}^{k}\cos\theta_{2}^{r}$

Figure 7, normalized differential cross section for $\cos\theta_{1}^{n}\cos\theta_{2}^{r}+\cos\theta_{1}^{r}\cos\theta_{2}^{n}$

Figure 7, normalized differential cross section for $\cos\theta_{1}^{n}\cos\theta_{2}^{r}-\cos\theta_{1}^{r}\cos\theta_{2}^{n}$

Figure 7, normalized differential cross section for $\cos\theta_{1}^{n}\cos\theta_{2}^{k}+\cos\theta_{1}^{k}\cos\theta_{2}^{n}$

Figure 7, normalized differential cross section for $\cos\theta_{1}^{n}\cos\theta_{2}^{k}-\cos\theta_{1}^{k}\cos\theta_{2}^{n}$

Figure 6, normalized differential cross section for $\cos\varphi$

Figure 6, normalized differential cross section for $\cos\varphi_{\mathrm{lab}}$

Figure 6, normalized differential cross section for $|\Delta\phi_{\ell\ell}|$

Figure 8, statistical covariance matrix for normalized differential cross sections (note, the figure in the paper is for the corresponding correlation matrix)

Figure 8, systematic covariance matrix for normalized differential cross sections (note, the figure in the paper is for the corresponding correlation matrix)

Table 3, measured coefficients

Figure 12, statistical covariance matrix for coefficients (note, the figure in the paper is for the corresponding correlation matrix)

Figure 12, systematic covariance matrix for coefficients (note, the figure in the paper is for the corresponding correlation matrix)

Table 6, sums and differences of B coefficients

Table 7, values of $f_\text{SM}$

The 95% CL upper limits on the production cross section times the branching fraction as a function of mA in the case of a gluon fusion production

The 95% CL upper limits on the production cross section times the branching fraction as a function of mA in the case of a b-associated production and an intrinsic width corresponding to 10% of the mass

The 95% CL upper limits on the production cross section times the branching fraction as a function of mA in the case of a gluon fusion production and an intrinsic width corresponding to 10% of the mass

Expected limit contour for GGM scenario

Observed limit contour for GGM scenario

Expected limit contour for GGM scenario

Observed limit contour for GGM scenario

Expected limit contour for Neutralino BF scenario

Observed limit contour for Neutralino BF scenario

Expected limit contour for Chargino BF scenario

Observed limit contour for Chargino BF scenario

Expected limit contour for T5Wg

Observed limit contour for T5Wg

Expected limit contour for Gluino BF scenario

Observed limit contour for Gluino BF scenario

Covariance matrix for all bins (additional material)

Correlation matrix for all bins (additional material)

Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section of a Z' resonance decaying to a pair of SM bosons.

Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section of a V' resonance decaying to a pair of SM bosons.

Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section of a V' resonance decaying to a pair of SM bosons.

Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section of a graviton decaying to a pair of SM bosons.

Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the product of the Z' cross section and the Z' -> WW branching fraction as a function of the Z' resonance mass.

Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the product of the bulk graviton cross section and the G -> WW branching fraction as a function of the G resonance mass.

Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the product of the W' cross section and the W' -> WZ branching fraction as a function of the W' resonance mass.

Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the product of the bulk graviton cross section and the G -> ZZ branching fraction as a function of the G resonance mass.

Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the product of the W' cross section and the W' -> WH branching fraction as a function of the W' resonance mass.

Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the product of the Z' cross section and the Z' -> ZH branching fraction as a function of the Z' resonance mass.

Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the product of the bulk graviton cross section and the G -> HH branching fraction as a function of the G resonance mass.

The observed $m_{T}$ and $m_{jj}$ distributions in the ejj (upper left), $\mu$~jj (upper right), $\tau_{h}$~jj (lower left), and $0\ell$~jj (lower right) signal regions compared with the post-fit SM background yields from the fit described in the text. The pre-fit background yields and shapes are determined using data-driven methods for the major backgrounds, and based on simulation for the smaller backgrounds. Expected signal distributions are overlaid. The last bin in the $m_{T}$ distributions of the $1\ell$~jj channels include all events with $m_{T} > 210$~GeV. The last bin of the $m_{jj}$ distributions of the $0\ell$~jj channel include all events with $m_{jj} > 3800$~GeV.

The observed $m_{T}$ and $m_{jj}$ distributions in the ejj (upper left), $\mu$~jj (upper right), $\tau_{h}$~jj (lower left), and $0\ell$~jj (lower right) signal regions compared with the post-fit SM background yields from the fit described in the text. The pre-fit background yields and shapes are determined using data-driven methods for the major backgrounds, and based on simulation for the smaller backgrounds. Expected signal distributions are overlaid. The last bin in the $m_{T}$ distributions of the $1\ell$~jj channels include all events with $m_{T} > 210$~GeV. The last bin of the $m_{jj}$ distributions of the $0\ell$~jj channel include all events with $m_{jj} > 3800$~GeV.

Combined 95% CL UL on the cross section as a function of $m(\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0})=m(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm})$. The results correspond to $\Delta m=1$ GeV (left) and $\Delta m=50$ GeV (right) mass gaps between the chargino and the lightest neutralino in the light slepton model. The top row shows the expected limits, and the bottom row shows the observed limits.

Combined 95% CL UL on the cross section as a function of $m(\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0})=m(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm})$. The results correspond to $\Delta m=1$ GeV (left) and $\Delta m=50$ GeV (right) mass gaps between the chargino and the lightest neutralino in the light slepton model. The top row shows the expected limits, and the bottom row shows the observed limits.

Combined 95% CL UL on the cross section as a function of $m(\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0})=m(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm})$. The results correspond to $\Delta m=1$ GeV (left) and $\Delta m=50$ GeV (right) mass gaps between the chargino and the lightest neutralino in the light slepton model. The top row shows the expected limits, and the bottom row shows the observed limits.

Combined 95% CL UL on the cross section as a function of $m(\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0})=m(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm})$. The results correspond to $\Delta m=1$ GeV (left) and $\Delta m=50$ GeV (right) mass gaps between the chargino and the lightest neutralino in the light slepton model. The top row shows the expected limits, and the bottom row shows the observed limits.

(Left) Expected and observed 95% confidence level upper limit (UL) on the signal cross section as a function of $m(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm})$ and $\Delta m$, assuming the light slepton model with slepton mass defined as the average of the \tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0} and \tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm} masses, $x_{\widetilde{\ell}}=0.5$. The lower left edge of each bin represents the \{$m(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm})$,$\Delta m$\} combination used to calculate the UL on the signal cross section. For example, the lowest and leftmost bin corresponds to the UL on the signal cross section for the scenario with $m(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}) = 100$ GeV and $\Delta m = 1$ GeV. (Right) Combined 95% CL UL on the cross section as a function of $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}}=m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$, for $\Delta m=1$ GeV and $\Delta m=30$ GeV mass gaps between the chargino and the neutralino, assuming the light slepton model.

(Left) Expected and observed 95% confidence level upper limit (UL) on the signal cross section as a function of $m(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm})$ and $\Delta m$, assuming the light slepton model with slepton mass defined as the average of the \tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0} and \tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm} masses, $x_{\widetilde{\ell}}=0.5$. The lower left edge of each bin represents the \{$m(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm})$,$\Delta m$\} combination used to calculate the UL on the signal cross section. For example, the lowest and leftmost bin corresponds to the UL on the signal cross section for the scenario with $m(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}) = 100$ GeV and $\Delta m = 1$ GeV. (Right) Combined 95% CL UL on the cross section as a function of $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}}=m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$, for $\Delta m=1$ GeV and $\Delta m=30$ GeV mass gaps between the chargino and the neutralino, assuming the light slepton model.

(Left) Expected and observed 95% confidence level upper limit (UL) on the signal cross section as a function of $m(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm})$ and $\Delta m$, assuming the light slepton model with slepton mass defined as the average of the \tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0} and \tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm} masses, $x_{\widetilde{\ell}}=0.5$. The lower left edge of each bin represents the \{$m(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm})$,$\Delta m$\} combination used to calculate the UL on the signal cross section. For example, the lowest and leftmost bin corresponds to the UL on the signal cross section for the scenario with $m(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}) = 100$ GeV and $\Delta m = 1$ GeV. (Right) Combined 95% CL UL on the cross section as a function of $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}}=m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$, for $\Delta m=1$ GeV and $\Delta m=30$ GeV mass gaps between the chargino and the neutralino, assuming the light slepton model.

(Left) Expected and observed 95% confidence level upper limit (UL) on the signal cross section as a function of $m(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm})$ and $\Delta m$, assuming the \tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm} and \tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0} decays proceed via $W^{*}$ and $Z^{*}$. The lower left edge of each bin represents the \{$m(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm})$,$\Delta m$\} combination used to calculate the UL on the signal cross section. For example, the lowest and leftmost bin corresponds to the UL on the signal cross section for the scenario with $m(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}) = 100$ GeV and $\Delta m = 1$ GeV. (Right) The 95% CL UL on the cross section as a function of $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}}=m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$, for $\Delta m=1$ GeV and $\Delta m=30$ GeV mass gaps between the chargino and the neutralino, after combining 0 lepton and 1 lepton channels, assuming the \tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm} and \tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0} decays proceed via $W^{*}$ and $Z^{*}$.

(Left) Expected and observed 95% confidence level upper limit (UL) on the signal cross section as a function of $m(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm})$ and $\Delta m$, assuming the \tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm} and \tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0} decays proceed via $W^{*}$ and $Z^{*}$. The lower left edge of each bin represents the \{$m(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm})$,$\Delta m$\} combination used to calculate the UL on the signal cross section. For example, the lowest and leftmost bin corresponds to the UL on the signal cross section for the scenario with $m(\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}) = 100$ GeV and $\Delta m = 1$ GeV. (Right) The 95% CL UL on the cross section as a function of $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}}=m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$, for $\Delta m=1$ GeV and $\Delta m=30$ GeV mass gaps between the chargino and the neutralino, after combining 0 lepton and 1 lepton channels, assuming the \tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm} and \tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0} decays proceed via $W^{*}$ and $Z^{*}$.

Example description

Combined 95% CL expected upper limit on the signal cross section as a function of $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}}=m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ for a $\Delta m=1$ GeV mass gap between the chargino and the lightest neutralino in the $W Z$ model.

Combined 95% CL expected upper limit on the signal cross section as a function of $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}}=m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ for a $\Delta m=50$ GeV mass gap between the chargino and the lightest neutralino in the $W Z$ model.

Combined 95% CL observed upper limit on the signal cross section as a function of $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}}=m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ for a $\Delta m=1$ GeV mass gap between the chargino and the lightest neutralino in the $W Z$ model.

Combined 95% CL observed upper limit on the signal cross section as a function of $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}}=m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ for a $\Delta m=50$ GeV mass gap between the chargino and the lightest neutralino in the $W Z$ model.

Covariance matrix from the combined fit of the $m_{ extrm{jj}}$ and $m_{ extrm{T}}$ distributions in the $0\ell extrm{jj}$ and $1\ell extrm{jj}$ search regions.

Expected and observed exclusion limits at the 95\% CL as a function of $m(\mathrm{H}^{\pm})$ for $\sigma_\mathrm{VBF}(\mathrm{H}^{\pm}) \, \mathcal{B}(\mathrm{H}^{\pm} \rightarrow \mathrm{W}^{\pm}\mathrm{Z})$ in the $\mathrm{ZV}$ final state.

Expected and observed exclusion limits at the 95\% CL as a function of $m(\mathrm{H}^{\pm\pm})$ for $\sigma_\mathrm{VBF}(\mathrm{H}^{\pm\pm}) \, \mathcal{B}(\mathrm{H}^{\pm\pm} \rightarrow \mathrm{W}^{\pm}\mathrm{W}^{\pm})$ in the $\mathrm{WV}$ final state.

Expected and observed exclusion limits at the 95\% CL for $s_{\mathrm{H}}$ in the Georgi-Machacek model.

$\mathrm{m_{\mathrm{WV}}}$ distribution in the $\mathrm{WV}$ channel. The predicted yields are shown with their best-fit normalizations from the background-only fit.

$\mathrm{m_{\mathrm{ZV}}}$ distribution in the $\mathrm{ZV}$ channel. The predicted yields are shown with their best-fit normalizations from the background-only fit.

Covariance matrix for all the $\mathrm{m_{\mathrm{WV}}}$ bins used in the $\mathrm{WV}$ channel. The mass distributions are binned as follows: $\mathrm{m_{\mathrm{WV}}}$ = [600, 700, 800, 900, 1000, 1200, 1500, 2000, $\infty$] GeV. The covariance matrix from the background-only fit is shown.

Covariance matrix for all the $\mathrm{m_{\mathrm{ZV}}}$ bins used in the $\mathrm{ZV}$ channel. The mass distributions are binned as follows: $\mathrm{m_{\mathrm{ZV}}}$ = [600, 700, 800, 900, 1000, 1200, 1500, 2000, $\infty$] GeV. The covariance matrix from the background-only fit is shown.

Summary of typical systematic uncertainties for the signal.

Numbers of observed events for all signal regions, including predicted background contributions and expected signal yields.

Limits on anomalous quartic couplings at 95% CL.

Expected and observed 95% CL upper limits on the cross section times the branching ratio sigma(P P --> W+- a)B(a --> W+- W-+) as a function of ALP mass

Expected and observed 95% CL upper limits on the photophobic ALP model parameter 1/f_a as a function of ALP mass.

Observed signal strength, and observed signal cross section.