The acceptance- and efficiency-corrected yields for the $\mathrm{B}^{+}$ mesons, scaled by $T_{\mathrm{AA}}$ and $N_{\text{MB}}$ in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02$ TeV. The results are shown as a function of the event $\langle N_{part} \rangle$.

The acceptance- and efficiency-corrected $\mathrm{B}^{0}_{\mathrm{s}}/\mathrm{B}^{+}$ yields in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02$. TeV. The results are shown as a function of the meson $p_T$.

The acceptance- and efficiency-corrected $\mathrm{B}^{0}_{\mathrm{s}}/\mathrm{B}^{+}$ yields in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02$. The results are shown as a function of the event $\langle N_{part} \rangle$.

Reconstruction level differential cross section spectla, obtained for the central acceptance, $|\eta| < 3$, for events with Pomeron-Proton ($\mathrm{I\!P}\mathrm{p} + \gamma \mathrm{p}$) topology compared to the to the EPOS-LHC predictions, broken down into the non-diffractive (ND), central diffractive (CD), single diffractive (SD) and double diffractive (DD) components. Forward Rapidity Gap definition: $|\eta| < 2.5$: $p_{T}^{track} < 200$ MeV and $\sum \limits_{bin} E^{PF} < 6$ GeV $|\eta| \in [2.5,3.0]$: $\sum \limits_{bin} E_{neutral}^{PF} < 13.4$ GeV

The number of high purity tracksin the first $\eta$ bin after a gap of $4.5 \leq \Delta\eta^F < 5.0$ for events with the Pomeron-Proton ($\mathrm{I\!P}\mathrm{p} + \gamma \mathrm{p}$) topology Forward Rapidity Gap definition: $|\eta| < 2.5$: $p_{T}^{track} < 200$ MeV and $\sum \limits_{bin} E^{PF} < 6$ GeV $|\eta| \in [2.5,3.0]$: $\sum \limits_{bin} E_{neutral}^{PF} < 13.4$ GeV

The transeverse momentum of high purity tracksin the first $\eta$ bin after a gap of $4.5 \leq \Delta\eta^F < 5.0$ for events with the Pomeron-Proton ($\mathrm{I\!P}\mathrm{p} + \gamma \mathrm{p}$) topology Forward Rapidity Gap definition: $|\eta| < 2.5$: $p_{T}^{track} < 200$ MeV and $\sum \limits_{bin} E^{PF} < 6$ GeV $|\eta| \in [2.5,3.0]$: $\sum \limits_{bin} E_{neutral}^{PF} < 13.4$ GeV

The total energy of all Particle Flow candidatesin the first $\eta$ bin after a gap of $4.5 \leq \Delta\eta^F < 5.0$ for events with the Pomeron-Proton ($\mathrm{I\!P}\mathrm{p} + \gamma \mathrm{p}$) topology Forward Rapidity Gap definition: $|\eta| < 2.5$: $p_{T}^{track} < 200$ MeV and $\sum \limits_{bin} E^{PF} < 6$ GeV $|\eta| \in [2.5,3.0]$: $\sum \limits_{bin} E_{neutral}^{PF} < 13.4$ GeV

Unfolded diffraction enhanced differential cross section for events with Pomeron-Lead ($\mathrm{I\!P}\mathrm{Pb}$) topology, defined on the region $|\eta| < 5.2$, compared to hadron level predictions of the MC generators. The data are corrected for the contribution from events with undetectable energy in the HF calorimeter adjacent to the rapidity gap. The corrections are obtained using the EPOS-LHC MC sample. Forward Rapidity Gap definition: $|\eta| < 2.5$: $p_{T}^{track} < 200$ MeV and $\sum \limits_{bin} E^{PF} < 6$ GeV $|\eta| \in [2.5,3.0]$: $\sum \limits_{bin} E_{neutral}^{PF} < 13.4$ GeV $|\eta| > 3.0$: No particles

Unfolded diffraction enhanced differential cross section for events with Pomeron-Proton ($\mathrm{I\!P}\mathrm{p} + \gamma \mathrm{p}$) topology, defined on the region $|\eta| < 5.2$, compared to hadron level predictions of the MC generators. The data are corrected for the contribution from events with undetectable energy in the HF calorimeter adjacent to the rapidity gap. The corrections are obtained using the EPOS-LHC MC sample. Forward Rapidity Gap definition: $|\eta| < 2.5$: $p_{T}^{track} < 200$ MeV and $\sum \limits_{bin} E^{PF} < 6$ GeV $|\eta| \in [2.5,3.0]$: $\sum \limits_{bin} E_{neutral}^{PF} < 13.4$ GeV $|\eta| > 3.0$: No particles

Unfolded diffractive enhanced differential cross section spectla for events with Pomeron-Lead ($\mathrm{I\!P}\mathrm{Pb}$) topology, compared to the to the hadron-level EPOS-LHC predictions, broken down into the non-diffractive (ND), central diffractive (CD), single diffractive (SD) and double diffractive (DD) components. Forward Rapidity Gap definition: $|\eta| < 2.5$: $p_{T}^{track} < 200$ MeV and $\sum \limits_{bin} E^{PF} < 6$ GeV $|\eta| \in [2.5,3.0]$: $\sum \limits_{bin} E_{neutral}^{PF} < 13.4$ GeV $|\eta| > 3.0$: No particles

Unfolded diffractive enhanced differential cross section spectla for events with Pomeron-Proton ($\mathrm{I\!P}\mathrm{p} + \gamma \mathrm{p}$) topology, compared to the to the hadron-level EPOS-LHC predictions, broken down into the non-diffractive (ND), central diffractive (CD), single diffractive (SD) and double diffractive (DD) components. Forward Rapidity Gap definition: $|\eta| < 2.5$: $p_{T}^{track} < 200$ MeV and $\sum \limits_{bin} E^{PF} < 6$ GeV $|\eta| \in [2.5,3.0]$: $\sum \limits_{bin} E_{neutral}^{PF} < 13.4$ GeV $|\eta| > 3.0$: No particles

Unfolded diffractive enhanced differential cross section spectla for events with Pomeron-Lead ($\mathrm{I\!P}\mathrm{Pb}$) topology, compared to the to the hadron-level QGSJET II predictions, broken down into the non-diffractive (ND), central diffractive (CD), single diffractive (SD) and double diffractive (DD) components. Forward Rapidity Gap definition: $|\eta| < 2.5$: $p_{T}^{track} < 200$ MeV and $\sum \limits_{bin} E^{PF} < 6$ GeV $|\eta| \in [2.5,3.0]$: $\sum \limits_{bin} E_{neutral}^{PF} < 13.4$ GeV $|\eta| > 3.0$: No particles

Unfolded diffractive enhanced differential cross section spectla for events with Pomeron-Proton ($\mathrm{I\!P}\mathrm{p} + \gamma \mathrm{p}$) topology, compared to the to the hadron-level QGSJET II predictions, broken down into the non-diffractive (ND), central diffractive (CD), single diffractive (SD) and double diffractive (DD) components. Forward Rapidity Gap definition: $|\eta| < 2.5$: $p_{T}^{track} < 200$ MeV and $\sum \limits_{bin} E^{PF} < 6$ GeV $|\eta| \in [2.5,3.0]$: $\sum \limits_{bin} E_{neutral}^{PF} < 13.4$ GeV $|\eta| > 3.0$: No particles

Reconstruction level diffraction enhanced differential cross section spectrum for Pomeron-Proton ($\mathrm{I\!P}\mathrm{p} + \gamma \mathrm{p}$) topology corrected for the contribution from events with undetectable energy in the HF calorimeter adjacent to the rapidity gap, compared with the spectrum obtained with events satisfying the ZDC veto requirement $E_{ZDC−} < 1 \mathrm{~TeV}$ which selects only the events without lead nuclear break up (without correction for HF undetectable energy). Forward Rapidity Gap definition: $|\eta| < 2.5$: $p_{T}^{track} < 200$ MeV and $\sum \limits_{bin} E^{PF} < 6$ GeV $|\eta| \in [2.5,3.0]$: $\sum \limits_{bin} E_{neutral}^{PF} < 13.4$ GeV $|\eta| > 3.0$: No particles

Differential cross section times dimuon branching fraction of Y(1S) as a function of $y^{Y}_{CM}$ in pPb collisions. The global uncertainty arises from the integrated luminosity uncertainty in pPb collisions.

Differential cross section times dimuon branching fraction of Y(2S) as a function of $y^{Y}_{CM}$ in pPb collisions. The global uncertainty arises from the integrated luminosity uncertainty in pPb collisions.

Differential cross section times dimuon branching fraction of Y(3S) as a function of $y^{Y}_{CM}$ in pPb collisions. The global uncertainty arises from the integrated luminosity uncertainty in pPb collisions.

Differential cross section times dimuon branching fraction of Y(1S) as a function of pT in pp collisions. The global uncertainty arises from the integrated luminosity uncertainty in pp collisions.

Differential cross section times dimuon branching fraction of Y(2S) as a function of pT in pp collisions. The global uncertainty arises from the integrated luminosity uncertainty in pp collisions.

Differential cross section times dimuon branching fraction of Y(3S) as a function of pT in pp collisions. The global uncertainty arises from the integrated luminosity uncertainty in pp collisions.

Differential cross section times dimuon branching fraction of Y(1S) as a function of $|y^{Y}_{CM}|$ in pp collisions. The global uncertainty arises from the integrated luminosity uncertainty in pp collisions.

Differential cross section times dimuon branching fraction of Y(2S) as a function of $|y^{Y}_{CM}|$ in pp collisions. The global uncertainty arises from the integrated luminosity uncertainty in pp collisions.

Differential cross section times dimuon branching fraction of Y(3S) as a function of $|y^{Y}_{CM}|$ in pp collisions. The global uncertainty arises from the integrated luminosity uncertainty in pp collisions.

Nuclear modification factor of Y(1S) as a function of pT. The global uncertainty arises from the integrated luminosity uncertainties in pPb and pp collisions.

Nuclear modification factor of Y(2S) as a function of pT. The global uncertainty arises from the integrated luminosity uncertainties in pPb and pp collisions.

Nuclear modification factor of Y(3S) as a function of pT. The global uncertainty arises from the integrated luminosity uncertainties in pPb and pp collisions.

Nuclear modification factor of Y(1S) as a function of $y^{Y}_{CM}$. The global uncertainty arises from the integrated luminosity uncertainties in pPb and pp collisions.

Nuclear modification factor of Y(2S) as a function of $y^{Y}_{CM}$. The global uncertainty arises from the integrated luminosity uncertainties in pPb and pp collisions.

Nuclear modification factor of Y(3S) as a function of $y^{Y}_{CM}$. The global uncertainty arises from the integrated luminosity uncertainties in pPb and pp collisions.

Nuclear modification factor of Y(1S) at forward and backward $y^{Y}_{CM}$ for pT < 6 GeV/c. The global uncertainty arises from the integrated luminosity uncertainties in pPb and pp collisions.

Nuclear modification factor of Y(2S) at forward and backward $y^{Y}_{CM}$ for pT < 6 GeV/c. The global uncertainty arises from the integrated luminosity uncertainties in pPb and pp collisions.

Nuclear modification factor of Y(3S) at forward and backward $y^{Y}_{CM}$ for pT < 6 GeV/c. The global uncertainty arises from the integrated luminosity uncertainties in pPb and pp collisions.

Nuclear modification factor of Y(1S) at forward and backward $y^{Y}_{CM}$ for 6 < pT < 30 GeV/c. The global uncertainty arises from the integrated luminosity uncertainties in pPb and pp collisions.

Nuclear modification factor of Y(2S) at forward and backward $y^{Y}_{CM}$ for 6 < pT < 30 GeV/c. The global uncertainty arises from the integrated luminosity uncertainties in pPb and pp collisions.

Nuclear modification factor of Y(3S) at forward and backward $y^{Y}_{CM}$ for 6 < pT < 30 GeV/c. The global uncertainty arises from the integrated luminosity uncertainties in pPb and pp collisions.

RFB of Y(1S) versus $N^{|\eta_{lab}|<2.4}_{tracks}$.

RFB of Y(2S) versus $N^{|\eta_{lab}|<2.4}_{tracks}$.

RFB of Y(3S) versus $N^{|\eta_{lab}|<2.4}_{tracks}$.

RFB of Y(1S) versus $E^{|\eta_{lab}|>4}_{T}$.

RFB of Y(2S) versus $E^{|\eta_{lab}|>4}_{T}$.

RFB of Y(3S) versus $E^{|\eta_{lab}|>4}_{T}$.

Nuclear modification factor of Y(1S), Y(2S), and Y(3S) integrated over pT and $y^{Y}_{CM}$. The global uncertainty arises from the integrated luminosity uncertainties in pPb and pp collisions.

MG/PTJET for SD (0.5,1.5) in PP collision

MG/PTJET for SD (0.1,0.0) in PbPb collision and PP collision smeared for PTJET 160-180

Ratio of MG/PTJET for SD (0.1,0.0) between PbPb collision and PP collision smeared for PTJET 160-180

MG/PTJET for SD (0.5,1.5) in PbPb collision and PP collision smeared for PTJET 160-180

Ratio of MG/PTJET for SD (0.5,1.5) between PbPb collision and PP collision smeared for PTJET 160-180

MG/PTJET for SD (0.1,0.0) in PbPb collision and PP collision smeared for centrality class 0-10%

Ratio of MG/PTJET for SD (0.1,0.0) between PbPb collision and PP collision smeared for centrality class 0-10%

MG/PTJET for SD (0.5,1.5) in PbPb collision and PP collision smeared for centrality class 0-10%

Ratio of MG/PTJET for SD (0.5,1.5) between PbPb collision and PP collision smeared for centrality class 0-10%

The test statistic q as a function of $\mu_{\mathrm{ttH}}$ for all decay modes at 7+8 TeV and at 13 TeV, separately, and for all decay modes at all CM energies. The expected SM result for the overall combination is also shown.

Charged particles are selected with $p_{\rm T} > 0.5 $ GeV and $|\eta| < 2.4$. Trigger particles correspond to those with energy $ E> 5 $ GeV located in $side^-$ (defined as $-5 < \eta < -3$) and/or $side^+$ (defined as $3 < \eta < 5$). A veto corresponds to the absence of a trigger particle with $ E> 5 $GeV in $side^-$ and/or $side^+$ .

Charged particles are selected with $p_{\rm T} > 0.5 $ GeV and $|\eta| < 2.4$. Trigger particles correspond to those with energy $ E> 5 $ GeV located in $side^-$ (defined as $-5 < \eta < -3$) and/or $side^+$ (defined as $3 < \eta < 5$). A veto corresponds to the absence of a trigger particle with $ E> 5 $GeV in $side^-$ and/or $side^+$ .

Charged particles are selected with $p_{\rm T} > 0.5 $ GeV and $|\eta| < 2.4$. Trigger particles correspond to those with energy $ E> 5 $ GeV located in $side^-$ (defined as $-5 < \eta < -3$) and/or $side^+$ (defined as $3 < \eta < 5$). A veto corresponds to the absence of a trigger particle with $ E> 5 $GeV in $side^-$ and/or $side^+$ .

Charged particles are selected with $p_{\rm T} > 0.5 $ GeV and $|\eta| < 2.4$. Trigger particles correspond to those with energy $ E> 5 $ GeV located in $side^-$ (defined as $-5 < \eta < -3$) and/or $side^+$ (defined as $3 < \eta < 5$). A veto corresponds to the absence of a trigger particle with $ E> 5 $GeV in $side^-$ and/or $side^+$ .

Charged particles are selected with $p_{\rm T} > 0.5 $ GeV and $|\eta| < 2.4$. Trigger particles correspond to those with energy $ E> 5 $ GeV located in $side^-$ (defined as $-5 < \eta < -3$) and/or $side^+$ (defined as $3 < \eta < 5$). A veto corresponds to the absence of a trigger particle with $ E> 5 $GeV in $side^-$ and/or $side^+$ .

Charged particles are selected with $p_{\rm T} > 0.5 $ GeV and $|\eta| < 2.4$. Trigger particles correspond to those with energy $ E> 5 $ GeV located in $side^-$ (defined as $-5 < \eta < -3$) and/or $side^+$ (defined as $3 < \eta < 5$). A veto corresponds to the absence of a trigger particle with $ E> 5 $GeV in $side^-$ and/or $side^+$ .

Charged particles are selected with $p_{\rm T} > 0.5 $ GeV and $|\eta| < 2.4$. Trigger particles correspond to those with energy $ E> 5 $ GeV located in $side^-$ (defined as $-5 < \eta < -3$) and/or $side^+$ (defined as $3 < \eta < 5$). A veto corresponds to the absence of a trigger particle with $ E> 5 $GeV in $side^-$ and/or $side^+$ .

Charged particles are selected with $p_{\rm T} > 0.5 $ GeV and $|\eta| < 2.4$. Trigger particles correspond to those with energy $ E> 5 $ GeV located in $side^-$ (defined as $-5 < \eta < -3$) and/or $side^+$ (defined as $3 < \eta < 5$). A veto corresponds to the absence of a trigger particle with $ E> 5 $GeV in $side^-$ and/or $side^+$ .

Charged particles are selected with $p_{\rm T} > 0.5 $ GeV and $|\eta| < 2.4$. Trigger particles correspond to those with energy $ E> 5 $ GeV located in $side^-$ (defined as $-5 < \eta < -3$) and/or $side^+$ (defined as $3 < \eta < 5$). A veto corresponds to the absence of a trigger particle with $ E> 5 $GeV in $side^-$ and/or $side^+$ .

Charged particles are selected with $p_{\rm T} > 0.5 $ GeV and $|\eta| < 2.4$. Trigger particles correspond to those with energy $ E> 5 $ GeV located in $side^-$ (defined as $-5 < \eta < -3$) and/or $side^+$ (defined as $3 < \eta < 5$). A veto corresponds to the absence of a trigger particle with $ E> 5 $GeV in $side^-$ and/or $side^+$ .

Charged particles are selected with $p_{\rm T} > 0.5 $ GeV and $|\eta| < 2.4$. Trigger particles correspond to those with energy $ E> 5 $ GeV located in $side^-$ (defined as $-5 < \eta < -3$) and/or $side^+$ (defined as $3 < \eta < 5$). A veto corresponds to the absence of a trigger particle with $ E> 5 $GeV in $side^-$ and/or $side^+$ .

Charged particles are selected with $p_{\rm T} > 0.5 $ GeV and $|\eta| < 2.4$. Trigger particles correspond to those with energy $ E> 5 $ GeV located in $side^-$ (defined as $-5 < \eta < -3$) and/or $side^+$ (defined as $3 < \eta < 5$). A veto corresponds to the absence of a trigger particle with $ E> 5 $GeV in $side^-$ and/or $side^+$ .

The nuclear modification factor of charged particles having |eta|<1 in XeXe collisions at sqrt(s_NN)=5.44 TeV. The first systematic uncertainty describes uncertainties that are not fully correlated across points, while the second systematic uncertainty is a normalization uncertainty that is fully correlated across all points.

The nuclear modification factor of charged particles having |eta|<1 in XeXe collisions at sqrt(s_NN)=5.44 TeV. The first systematic uncertainty describes uncertainties that are not fully correlated across points, while the second systematic uncertainty is a normalization uncertainty that is fully correlated across all points.

The RXePb of charged particles having |eta|<1 in XeXe collisions at sqrt(s_NN)=5.44 TeV and PbPb collisions at sqrt(s_NN)=5.02 TeV. The first systematic uncertainty describes uncertainties that are not fully correlated across points, while the second systematic uncertainty is a normalization uncertainty that is fully correlated across all points. Bins where no data point has been reported are denoted as 'empty'.

The RXePb of charged particles having |eta|<1 in XeXe collisions at sqrt(s_NN)=5.44 TeV and PbPb collisions at sqrt(s_NN)=5.02 TeV. The first systematic uncertainty describes uncertainties that are not fully correlated across points, while the second systematic uncertainty is a normalization uncertainty that is fully correlated across all points.

The RXePb of charged particles having |eta|<1 in XeXe collisions at sqrt(s_NN)=5.44 TeV and PbPb collisions at sqrt(s_NN)=5.02 TeV. The first systematic uncertainty describes uncertainties that are not fully correlated across points, while the second systematic uncertainty is a normalization uncertainty that is fully correlated across all points.

The RXePb of charged particles having |eta|<1 in XeXe collisions at sqrt(s_NN)=5.44 TeV and PbPb collisions at sqrt(s_NN)=5.02 TeV. The first systematic uncertainty describes uncertainties that are not fully correlated across points, while the second systematic uncertainty is a normalization uncertainty that is fully correlated across all points.

The average N_part, N_coll, and TAA for various centrality classes of XeXe collisions at 5.44 TeV.

The expected and observed constraints on chargino lifetime and mass. The ratio of the vacuum expectation values of the two Higgs doublets, $\tan \beta$, is fixed to 5 with $\mu > 0$, where $\mu$ is the higgsino mass parameter. The direct chargino production cross section includes both $\widetilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}\widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1}$ and $\widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1}\widetilde{\chi}^\mp_{1}$ production in roughly a 2:1 ratio for all chargino masses considered, and the branching fraction of $\widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1} \rightarrow \widetilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}\mathrm{\pi^{\pm}}$ is set to 100%. Chargino masses that are less than those on the curve are excluded at 95% CL.

The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section for direct production of charginos and their branching fraction to $\widetilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}\mathrm{\pi^{\pm}}$ as a function of chargino mass and lifetime. The ratio of the vacuum expectation values of the two Higgs doublets, $\tan \beta$, is fixed to 5 with $\mu > 0$, where $\mu$ is the higgsino mass parameter. The direct chargino production cross section includes both $\widetilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}\widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1}$ and $\widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1}\widetilde{\chi}^\mp_{1}$ production in roughly a 2:1 ratio for all chargino masses considered, and the branching fraction of $\widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1} \rightarrow \widetilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}\mathrm{\pi^{\pm}}$ is set to 100%.

Signal acceptance for each of the generated chargino masses and lifetimes for $\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p} \rightarrow \widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1} \widetilde{\chi}^\mp_{1}$ events. The denominator for the acceptance is the total number of $\widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1} \widetilde{\chi}^\mp_{1}$ events generated, with no generator-level filtering, while the numerator is the number of those events that are selected by the disappearing track signal selection, after being processed with the same reconstruction software used on the data. The acceptance corresponds to the 2015 data-taking period. The uncertainties are only the statistical uncertainties resulting from the sizes of the generated samples.

Signal acceptance for each of the generated chargino masses and lifetimes for $\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p} \rightarrow \widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1} \widetilde{\chi}^\mp_{1}$ events. The denominator for the acceptance is the total number of $\widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1} \widetilde{\chi}^\mp_{1}$ events generated, with no generator-level filtering, while the numerator is the number of those events that are selected by the disappearing track signal selection, after being processed with the same reconstruction software used on the data. The acceptance corresponds to the 2016A data-taking period. The uncertainties are only the statistical uncertainties resulting from the sizes of the generated samples.

Signal acceptance for each of the generated chargino masses and lifetimes for $\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p} \rightarrow \widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1} \widetilde{\chi}^\mp_{1}$ events. The denominator for the acceptance is the total number of $\widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1} \widetilde{\chi}^\mp_{1}$ events generated, with no generator-level filtering, while the numerator is the number of those events that are selected by the disappearing track signal selection, after being processed with the same reconstruction software used on the data. The acceptance corresponds to the 2016B data-taking period. The uncertainties are only the statistical uncertainties resulting from the sizes of the generated samples.

Signal acceptance for each of the generated chargino masses and lifetimes for $\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p} \rightarrow \widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1} \widetilde{\chi}^0_{1}$ events. The denominator for the acceptance is the total number of $\widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1} \widetilde{\chi}^0_{1}$ events generated, with no generator-level filtering, while the numerator is the number of those events that are selected by the disappearing track signal selection, after being processed with the same reconstruction software used on the data. The acceptance corresponds to the 2015 data-taking period. The uncertainties are only the statistical uncertainties resulting from the sizes of the generated samples.

Signal acceptance for each of the generated chargino masses and lifetimes for $\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p} \rightarrow \widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1} \widetilde{\chi}^0_{1}$ events. The denominator for the acceptance is the total number of $\widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1} \widetilde{\chi}^0_{1}$ events generated, with no generator-level filtering, while the numerator is the number of those events that are selected by the disappearing track signal selection, after being processed with the same reconstruction software used on the data. The acceptance corresponds to the 2016A data-taking period. The uncertainties are only the statistical uncertainties resulting from the sizes of the generated samples.

Signal acceptance for each of the generated chargino masses and lifetimes for $\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p} \rightarrow \widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1} \widetilde{\chi}^0_{1}$ events. The denominator for the acceptance is the total number of $\widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1} \widetilde{\chi}^0_{1}$ events generated, with no generator-level filtering, while the numerator is the number of those events that are selected by the disappearing track signal selection, after being processed with the same reconstruction software used on the data. The acceptance corresponds to the 2016B data-taking period. The uncertainties are only the statistical uncertainties resulting from the sizes of the generated samples.

Predicted signal yields for the 2015 data-taking period, corresponding to $2.7\,\text{fb}^{-1}$, after the application of each of the disappearing track selections for three chargino lifetime hypotheses ($\tau = 0.3$, $3.3$, and $33\,\text{ns}{}$) with a chargino mass of $700\,\text{GeV}{}$. The selections listed are cumulative, i.e., only the events and objects passing a given selection are considered in subsequent selections. The uncertainties shown include only the statistical uncertainty resulting from the limited sizes of the generated samples.

Predicted signal yields for the 2016A data-taking period, corresponding to $8.3\,\text{fb}^{-1}$, after the application of each of the disappearing track selections for three chargino lifetime hypotheses ($\tau = 0.3$, $3.3$, and $33\,\text{ns}{}$) with a chargino mass of $700\,\text{GeV}{}$. The selections listed are cumulative, i.e., only the events and objects passing a given selection are considered in subsequent selections. The uncertainties shown include only the statistical uncertainty resulting from the limited sizes of the generated samples.

Predicted signal yields for the 2016B data-taking period, corresponding to $27.4\,\text{fb}^{-1}$, after the application of each of the disappearing track selections for three chargino lifetime hypotheses ($\tau = 0.3$, $3.3$, and $33\,\text{ns}{}$) with a chargino mass of $700\,\text{GeV}{}$. The selections listed are cumulative, i.e., only the events and objects passing a given selection are considered in subsequent selections. The uncertainties shown include only the statistical uncertainty resulting from the limited sizes of the generated samples.