Heavy flavor electron RdA 0-20% $d$+Au collisions. The nuclear modification factor, $R_{dA}$, for electrons from open heavy flavor decays, for the (a) most central and (b) most peripheral centrality bins.

Heavy flavor electron $R_{dA}$ 20-40% $d$+Au collisions. The nuclear modification factor, $R_{dA}$, for electrons from open heavy flavor decays, for the (a) most central and (b) most peripheral centrality bins.

Heavy flavor electron $R_{dA}$ 40-60% $d$+Au collisions. The nuclear modification factor, $R_{dA}$, for electrons from open heavy flavor decays, for the (a) most central and (b) most peripheral centrality bins.

Heavy flavor electron $R_{dA}$ 60-88% $d$+Au collisions. The nuclear modification factor, $R_{dA}$, for electrons from open heavy flavor decays, for the (a) most central and (b) most peripheral centrality bins.

$J/\psi$ $R_{CP}$ for 0-20%, 20-40%, and 40-60% (central) relative to 60-86% (peripheral) Au+Au collisions at 62.4 GeV. Type A errors are point-to-point uncorrelated, Type B errors are point-to-point correlated, and Type C are global systematic from the uncertainty in the peripheral $<N_{coll}>$ value.

$J/\psi$ $R_{CP}$ for 0-40% (central) relative to 40-86% (peripheral) Au+Au collisions at 39 GeV. Type A errors are point-to-point uncorrelated, Type B errors are point-to-point correlated, and Type C are global systematic from the uncertainty in the peripheral $<N_{coll}>$ value.

$J/\psi$ $R_{AA}$ at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 39 and 62.4 GeV. Type A errors are point-to-point uncorrelated, Type B errors are point-to-point correlated, and Type C are global systematic from the uncertainty in the peripheral $<N_{coll}>$ value.

$J/\psi$ $R_{AA}$ at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 39 and 62.4 GeV.

Direct photon cross section. (a) The invariant cross sections of the direct photon in $p+p$ [3, 4] and $d$+Au collisions. The $p+p$ fit result with the empirical parameterization described in the text is shown as well as NLO pQCD calculations, and the scaled $p+p$ fit is compared with the $d$+Au data. The closed and open symbols show the results from the virtual photon and $\pi_{0}$-tagging methods, respectively. The asterisk symbols show the result from the statistical subtraction method for $d$+Au data, overlapping with the virtual photon result in 3 < $p_{T}$ < 5 GeV/c. The values in the table are equal to this mean value. The bars and bands represent the point-to-point (ptp.) and $p_{T}$-correlated (cor.) uncertainties, respectively. (b) The $p+p$ data over the fit. The uncertainties of the fit due to both point-to-point (ptp.) and pT -correlated uncertainties of the data are summed quadratically, and the sum is shown as dotted lines. The NLO pQCD calculations divided by the fit are also shown.

Direct photon cross section. (a) The invariant cross sections of the direct photon in $p+p$ [3, 4] and $d$+Au collisions. The $p+p$ fit result with the empirical parameterization described in the text is shown as well as NLO pQCD calculations, and the scaled $p+p$ fit is compared with the $d$+Au data. The closed and open symbols show the results from the virtual photon and $\pi_{0}$-tagging methods, respectively. The asterisk symbols show the result from the statistical subtraction method for $d$+Au data, overlapping with the virtual photon result in 3 < $p_{T}$ < 5 GeV/c. The values in the table are equal to this mean value. The bars and bands represent the point-to-point (ptp.) and $p_{T}$-correlated (cor.) uncertainties, respectively. (b) The $p+p$ data over the fit. The uncertainties of the fit due to both point-to-point (ptp.) and pT -correlated uncertainties of the data are summed quadratically, and the sum is shown as dotted lines. The NLO pQCD calculations divided by the fit are also shown.

(a) The invariant cross sections of the direct photon in $p+p$ [3, 4] and $d$+Au collisions. The $p+p$ fit result with the empirical parameterization described in the text is shown as well as NLO pQCD calculations, and the scaled $p+p$ fit is compared with the $d$+Au data. The closed and open symbols show the results from the virtual photon and $\pi_{0}$-tagging methods, respectively. The asterisk symbols show the result from the statistical subtraction method for $d$+Au data, overlapping with the virtual photon result in 3 < $p_{T}$ < 5 GeV/c. The values in the table are equal to this mean value. The bars and bands represent the point-to-point (ptp.) and $p_{T}$-correlated (cor.) uncertainties, respectively. (b) The $p+p$ data over the fit. The uncertainties of the fit due to both point-to-point (ptp.) and pT -correlated uncertainties of the data are summed quadratically, and the sum is shown as dotted lines. The NLO pQCD calculations divided by the fit are also shown.

$R_{dA}$ ($d$+Au data/scaled $p+p$ fit). Nuclear modification factor for $d$+Au, $R_{dA}$, as a function of $p_{T}$ . The closed and open symbols show the results from the virtual- and real-photon measurements, respectively. The values in the table are equal to this mean value. The bars and bands represent the point-to-point (ptp.) and $p_{T}$-correlated (cor.) uncertainties, respectively. The box on the right shows the uncertainty of $T_{dA}$ for $d$+Au. The curves indicate the theoretical calculations [24] with different combinations of the CNM effects such as the Cronin enhancement, isospin effect, nuclear shadowing and initial state energy loss.

$R_{dA}$ ($d$+Au data/scaled $p+p$ fit). Nuclear modification factor for $d$+Au, $R_{dA}$, as a function of $p_{T}$ . The closed and open symbols show the results from the virtual- and real-photon measurements, respectively. The values in the table are equal to this mean value. The bars and bands represent the point-to-point (ptp.) and $p_{T}$-correlated (cor.) uncertainties, respectively. The box on the right shows the uncertainty of $T_{dA}$ for $d$+Au. The curves indicate the theoretical calculations [24] with different combinations of the CNM effects such as the Cronin enhancement, isospin effect, nuclear shadowing and initial state energy loss.

$R_{AA}$ (Au+Au MB data/scaled $p+p$ fit). Nuclear modification factors for Au+Au (MB) and $d$+Au as a function of $p_{T}$ . The triangle symbols show results from the (closed) virtual [1] and (open) real photon [5] measurements, respectively. The values in the table are equal to this mean value. The bars and bands represent the point-to-point (ptp.) and $p_{T}$-correlated (cor.) uncertainties, respectively. The (+) symbols for $R_{dA}$ for $p_{T}$ < 5 GeV/$c$ illustrates the difference in magnitude for $R_{AA}$ between Au+Au and $d$+Au collisions.

$R_{AA}$ (Au+Au MB data/scaled $p+p$ fit). Nuclear modification factors for Au+Au (MB) and $d$+Au as a function of $p_{T}$ . The triangle symbols show results from the (closed) virtual [1] and (open) real photon [5] measurements, respectively. The values in the table are equal to this mean value. The bars and bands represent the point-to-point (ptp.) and $p_{T}$-correlated (cor.) uncertainties, respectively. The (+) symbols for $R_{dA}$ for $p_{T}$ < 5 GeV/$c$ illustrates the difference in magnitude for $R_{AA}$ between Au+Au and $d$+Au collisions.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of PT for full range. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of Z for full range. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of Z for full range. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of X for x > 0.032. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of X for x > 0.032. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of PT for x > 0.032. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of PT for x > 0.032. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of Z for x > 0.032. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of Z for x > 0.032. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of X for x > 0.032 and 0.05 < y < 0.10. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of X for x > 0.032 and 0.05 < y < 0.10. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of PT for x > 0.032 and 0.05 < y < 0.10. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of PT for x > 0.032 and 0.05 < y < 0.10. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of Z for x > 0.032 and 0.05 < y < 0.10. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of Z for x > 0.032 and 0.05 < y < 0.10. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of X for x > 0.032 and 0.10 < y < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of X for x > 0.032 and 0.10 < y < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of PT for x > 0.032 and 0.10 < y < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of PT for x > 0.032 and 0.10 < y < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of Z for x > 0.032 and 0.10 < y < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of Z for x > 0.032 and 0.10 < y < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of X for x > 0.032 and 0.20 < y < 0.90. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of X for x > 0.032 and 0.20 < y < 0.90. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of PT for x > 0.032 and 0.20 < y < 0.90. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of PT for x > 0.032 and 0.20 < y < 0.90. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of Z for x > 0.032 and 0.20 < y < 0.90. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of Z for x > 0.032 and 0.20 < y < 0.90. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of X for 0.10 < z < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of X for 0.10 < z < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of PT for 0.10 < z < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of PT for 0.10 < z < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of Z for 0.10 < z < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of Z for 0.10 < z < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of X for 0.20 < z < 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of X for 0.20 < z < 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of PT for 0.20 < z < 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of PT for 0.20 < z < 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of Z for 0.20 < z < 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of Z for 0.20 < z < 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of X for z > 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of X for z > 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of PT for z > 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of PT for z > 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of Z for z > 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of Z for z > 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Collins data measurments.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the combined 2007 and 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of X for 2007+2010 full range. Also shown are the mean values of other variables.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the combined 2007 and 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of X for 2007+2010 full range. Also shown are the mean values of other variables.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the combined 2007 and 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of PT for 2007+2010 full range. Also shown are the mean values of other variables.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the combined 2007 and 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of PT for 2007+2010 full range. Also shown are the mean values of other variables.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the combined 2007 and 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of Z for 2007+2010 full range. Also shown are the mean values of other variables.

The Sivers asymmetry, from the combined 2007 and 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of Z for 2007+2010 full range. Also shown are the mean values of other variables.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of PT for full range. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of Z for full range. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of Z for full range. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of X for x > 0.032. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of X for x > 0.032. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of PT for x > 0.032. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of PT for x > 0.032. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of Z for x > 0.032. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of Z for x > 0.032. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of X for x > 0.032 and 0.05 < y < 0.10. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of X for x > 0.032 and 0.05 < y < 0.10. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of PT for x > 0.032 and 0.05 < y < 0.10. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of PT for x > 0.032 and 0.05 < y < 0.10. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of Z for x > 0.032 and 0.05 < y < 0.10. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of Z for x > 0.032 and 0.05 < y < 0.10. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of X for x > 0.032 and 0.10 < y < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of X for x > 0.032 and 0.10 < y < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of PT for x > 0.032 and 0.10 < y < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of PT for x > 0.032 and 0.10 < y < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of Z for x > 0.032 and 0.10 < y < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of Z for x > 0.032 and 0.10 < y < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of X for x > 0.032 and 0.20 < y < 0.90. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of X for x > 0.032 and 0.20 < y < 0.90. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of PT for x > 0.032 and 0.20 < y < 0.90. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of PT for x > 0.032 and 0.20 < y < 0.90. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of Z for x > 0.032 and 0.20 < y < 0.90. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of Z for x > 0.032 and 0.20 < y < 0.90. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of X for 0.10 < z < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of X for 0.10 < z < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of PT for 0.10 < z < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of PT for 0.10 < z < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of Z for 0.10 < z < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of Z for 0.10 < z < 0.20. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of X for 0.20 < z < 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of X for 0.20 < z < 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of PT for 0.20 < z < 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of PT for 0.20 < z < 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of Z for 0.20 < z < 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of Z for 0.20 < z < 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of X for z > 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of X for z > 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of PT for z > 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of PT for z > 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for positive hadrons as a function of Z for z > 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the 2010 data set, for negative hadrons as a function of Z for z > 0.35. Also shown are the mean values of other variables plus the correlation with the Sivers data measurments.

The Collins asymmetry, from the combined 2007 and 2010 data sets, for positive hadrons as a function of X for 2007+2010 full range. Also shown are the mean values of other variables.

The Collins asymmetry, from the combined 2007 and 2010 data sets, for negative hadrons as a function of X for 2007+2010 full range. Also shown are the mean values of other variables.

The Collins asymmetry, from the combined 2007 and 2010 data sets, for positive hadrons as a function of PT for 2007+2010 full range. Also shown are the mean values of other variables.

The Collins asymmetry, from the combined 2007 and 2010 data sets, for negative hadrons as a function of PT for 2007+2010 full range. Also shown are the mean values of other variables.

The Collins asymmetry, from the combined 2007 and 2010 data sets, for positive hadrons as a function of Z for 2007+2010 full range. Also shown are the mean values of other variables.

The Collins asymmetry, from the combined 2007 and 2010 data sets, for negative hadrons as a function of Z for 2007+2010 full range. Also shown are the mean values of other variables.

INVARIANT YIELDS

RAA

RAA

RAA

RAA

pT AVERAGE RAA

Sloss

Sloss

Sloss

n_eff(xT)

n_eff(xT)

n_eff(xT)

n_eff(xT)

c$\bar{c}$ production cross section as a function of rapidity in $p$+$p$ collisions, measured using semileptonic decay to electrons (closed square) and to muons (closed circle).

Transverse momentum distribution of $R_{AA}$ for negative muons from heavy-flavor mesons decay in Cu+Cu collisions in the following centrality classes: 40-94% (top panel), 20-40% (middle panel) and 0-20% (bottom panel). Also shown in the bottom panel is a theoretical calculation from [39,40], discussed in Section V.

Comparison of $R_{AA}$ as a function of $N_{part}$ between heavy-flavor muons reconstructed at forward rapidity ($1.4<y<1.9$) and $p_T >$ 2 GeV in Cu+Cu collisions (red squares) and nonphotonic electrons reconstructed at midrapidity and $p_T>$ 3 GeV in Au+Au collisions (blue circles).

Comparison of $R_{AA}$ as a function of $N_{part}$ between heavy-flavor muons reconstructed at forward rapidity ($1.4<y<1.9$) and $p_T >$ 2 GeV in Cu+Cu collisions (red squares) and nonphotonic electrons reconstructed at midrapidity and $p_T>$ 3 GeV in Au+Au collisions (blue circles).

$J/\psi$ invariant yield as a function of $p_T$ for each centrality at $|y|$ < 0.35. The type C systematic uncertainty for each distribution is given as a percentage in the legend. Type A represents uncertainties that are uncorrelated from point to point, Type B represents uncertainties that are correlated from point to point, and Type C represents uncertainties in the overall normalization.

$J/\psi$ invariant yield as a function of $p_T$ for each centrality at $|y|$ < 0.35. The type C systematic uncertainty for each distribution is given as a percentage in the legend. Type A represents uncertainties that are uncorrelated from point to point, Type B represents uncertainties that are correlated from point to point, and Type C represents uncertainties in the overall normalization.

$J/\psi$ invariant yield as a function of $p_T$ for each centrality at $|y|$ < 0.35. The type C systematic uncertainty for each distribution is given as a percentage in the legend. Type A represents uncertainties that are uncorrelated from point to point, Type B represents uncertainties that are correlated from point to point, and Type C represents uncertainties in the overall normalization.

$J/\psi$ invariant yield as a function of $p_T$ for each centrality at $|y|$ < 0.35. The type C systematic uncertainty for each distribution is given as a percentage in the legend. Type A represents uncertainties that are uncorrelated from point to point, Type B represents uncertainties that are correlated from point to point, and Type C represents uncertainties in the overall normalization.

$J/\psi$ invariant yield as a function of $p_T$ for each centrality for −2.2 < $y$ < −1.2. The type C systematic uncertainty for each distribution is given as a percentage in the legend. Type A represents uncertainties that are uncorrelated from point to point, Type B represents uncertainties that are correlated from point to point, and Type C represents uncertainties in the overall normalization.

$J/\psi$ invariant yield as a function of $p_T$ for each centrality for −2.2 < $y$ < −1.2. The type C systematic uncertainty for each distribution is given as a percentage in the legend. Type A represents uncertainties that are uncorrelated from point to point, Type B represents uncertainties that are correlated from point to point, and Type C represents uncertainties in the overall normalization.

$J/\psi$ invariant yield as a function of $p_T$ for each centrality for −2.2 < $y$ < −1.2. The type C systematic uncertainty for each distribution is given as a percentage in the legend. Type A represents uncertainties that are uncorrelated from point to point, Type B represents uncertainties that are correlated from point to point, and Type C represents uncertainties in the overall normalization.

$J/\psi$ invariant yield as a function of $p_T$ for each centrality for −2.2 < $y$ < −1.2. The type C systematic uncertainty for each distribution is given as a percentage in the legend. Type A represents uncertainties that are uncorrelated from point to point, Type B represents uncertainties that are correlated from point to point, and Type C represents uncertainties in the overall normalization.

$J/\psi$ invariant yield as a function of $p_T$ for each centrality for −2.2 < $y$ < −1.2. The type C systematic uncertainty for each distribution is given as a percentage in the legend. Type A represents uncertainties that are uncorrelated from point to point, Type B represents uncertainties that are correlated from point to point, and Type C represents uncertainties in the overall normalization.

$J/\psi$ invariant yield as a function of $p_T$ for each centrality for −2.2 < $y$ < −1.2. The type C systematic uncertainty for each distribution is given as a percentage in the legend. Type A represents uncertainties that are uncorrelated from point to point, Type B represents uncertainties that are correlated from point to point, and Type C represents uncertainties in the overall normalization.

$J/\psi$ invariant yield as a function of $p_T$ for each centrality for −2.2 < $y$ < −1.2. The type C systematic uncertainty for each distribution is given as a percentage in the legend. Type A represents uncertainties that are uncorrelated from point to point, Type B represents uncertainties that are correlated from point to point, and Type C represents uncertainties in the overall normalization.

$J/\psi$ invariant yield as a function of $p_T$ for each centrality for −2.2 < $y$ < −1.2. The type C systematic uncertainty for each distribution is given as a percentage in the legend. Type A represents uncertainties that are uncorrelated from point to point, Type B represents uncertainties that are correlated from point to point, and Type C represents uncertainties in the overall normalization.

$J/\psi$ nuclear modification factor, $R_{dAu}$, as a function of $p_T$ for (a) backward rapidity 0–100% centrality integrated $d$+Au collisions. Type A represents uncertainties that are uncorrelated from point to point, Type B represents uncertainties that are correlated from point to point, and Type C represents uncertainties in the overall normalization.

$J/\psi$ nuclear modification factor, $R_{dAu}$, as a function of $p_T$ for (b) midrapidity 0–100% centrality integrated $d$+Au collisions. Type A represents uncertainties that are uncorrelated from point to point, Type B represents uncertainties that are correlated from point to point, and Type C represents uncertainties in the overall normalization.

$J/\psi$ nuclear modification factor, $R_{dAu}$, as a function of $p_T$ for (c) forward rapidity 0–100% centrality integrated $d$+Au collisions. Type A represents uncertainties that are uncorrelated from point to point, Type B represents uncertainties that are correlated from point to point, and Type C represents uncertainties in the overall normalization.

$J/\psi$ —> $\mu^+\mu^-$ $R_{dAu}$, as a function of $p_T$ for a) central events at −2.2 < $y$ < −1.2. Type A represents uncertainties that are uncorrelated from point to point, Type B represents uncertainties that are correlated from point to point, and Type C represents uncertainties in the overall normalization.

$J/\psi$ —> $\mu^+\mu^-$ $R_{dAu}$, as a function of $p_T$ for b) midcentral events at −2.2 < $y$ < −1.2. Type A represents uncertainties that are uncorrelated from point to point, Type B represents uncertainties that are correlated from point to point, and Type C represents uncertainties in the overall normalization.

$J/\psi$ —> $\mu^+\mu^-$ $R_{dAu}$, as a function of $p_T$ for c) midperipheral events at −2.2 < $y$ < −1.2. Type A represents uncertainties that are uncorrelated from point to point, Type B represents uncertainties that are correlated from point to point, and Type C represents uncertainties in the overall normalization.

$J/\psi$ —> $\mu^+\mu^-$ $R_{dAu}$, as a function of $p_T$ for d) peripheral events at −2.2 < $y$ < −1.2. The 60–88% $R_{dAu}$ point at $p_T$ = 5.75 GeV/$c$ has been left off the figure, as it is above the plotted range and has very large uncertainties, however it is included in the table. Type A represents uncertainties that are uncorrelated from point to point, Type B represents uncertainties that are correlated from point to point, and Type C represents uncertainties in the overall normalization.

$J/\psi$ —> $e^+e^-$ $R_{dAu}$, as a function of $p_T$ for a) central, b) midcentral, c) midperipheral, and d) peripheral events at $|y|$ < 0.35. Type A represents uncertainties that are uncorrelated from point to point, Type B represents uncertainties that are correlated from point to point, and Type C represents uncertainties in the overall normalization.

$J/\psi$ —> $\mu^+\mu^-$ $R_{dAu}$, as a function of $p_T$ for a) central events at 1.2 < $y$ < 2.2. Type A represents uncertainties that are uncorrelated from point to point, Type B represents uncertainties that are correlated from point to point, and Type C represents uncertainties in the overall normalization.

$J/\psi$ —> $\mu^+\mu^-$ $R_{dAu}$, as a function of $p_T$ for b) midcentral events at 1.2 < $y$ < 2.2. Type A represents uncertainties that are uncorrelated from point to point, Type B represents uncertainties that are correlated from point to point, and Type C represents uncertainties in the overall normalization.

$J/\psi$ —> $\mu^+\mu^-$ $R_{dAu}$, as a function of $p_T$ for c) midperipheral events at 1.2 < $y$ < 2.2. Type A represents uncertainties that are uncorrelated from point to point, Type B represents uncertainties that are correlated from point to point, and Type C represents uncertainties in the overall normalization.

$J/\psi$ —> $\mu^+\mu^-$ $R_{dAu}$, as a function of $p_T$ for d) peripheral events at 1.2 < $y$ < 2.2. Type A represents uncertainties that are uncorrelated from point to point, Type B represents uncertainties that are correlated from point to point, and Type C represents uncertainties in the overall normalization.