The unfolded differential charge asymmetry as a function of the longitudinal boost of the top pair system. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NNLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The scale uncertainty is obtained by varying renormalisation and factorisation scales independently by a factor of 2 or 0.5 around $\mu_0$ to calculate the maximum and minimum value of the asymmetry, respectively. The nominal value $\mu_0$ is chosen as $H_T/4$. The variations in which one scale is multiplied by 2 while the other scale is divided by 2 are excluded. Finally, the scale and MC integration uncertainties are added in quadrature.

The unfolded inclusive leptonic asymmetry. The unfolded $A_C^{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ is obtained in the reduced phase-space defined by the requirement $|\Delta |\eta_{\ell\bar{\ell}}||<2.5$. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The theory uncertainty is obtained by varying both scales by a factor of 0.5 or 2.0 to calculate the minimum and maximum value of the asymmetry, respectively.

The unfolded differential leptonic asymmetry as a function of the invariant mass of the di-lepton pair. The unfolded $A_C^{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ is obtained in the reduced phase-space defined by the requirement $|\Delta |\eta_{\ell\bar{\ell}}||<2.5$. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The theory uncertainty is obtained by varying both scales by a factor of 0.5 or 2.0 to calculate the minimum and maximum value of the asymmetry, respectively.

The unfolded differential leptonic asymmetry as a function of the transverse momentum of the di-lepton pair. The unfolded $A_C^{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ is obtained in the reduced phase-space defined by the requirement $|\Delta |\eta_{\ell\bar{\ell}}||<2.5$. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The theory uncertainty is obtained by varying both scales by a factor of 0.5 or 2.0 to calculate the minimum and maximum value of the asymmetry, respectively.

The unfolded differential leptonic asymmetry as a function of the longitudinal boost of the di-lepton pair. The unfolded $A_C^{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ is obtained in the reduced phase-space defined by the requirement $|\Delta |\eta_{\ell\bar{\ell}}||<2.5$. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The theory uncertainty is obtained by varying both scales by a factor of 0.5 or 2.0 to calculate the minimum and maximum value of the asymmetry, respectively.

Individual 68% and 95% CL bounds on the relevant Wilson coefficients of the SM Effective Field Theory in units of $\text{TeV}^{-2}$. The bounds are derived from the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ inclusive measurement. The experimental uncertainties are accounted for, in the form of the complete covariance matrix that keeps track of correlations between bins for the differential measurement. The theory uncertainty from the NNLO QCD + NLO EW calculation is included by explicitly varying the renormalization and factorization scales, or the parton density functions, in the calculation and registering the variations in the intervals.

Individual 68% and 95% CL bounds on the relevant Wilson coefficients of the SM Effective Field Theory in units of $\text{TeV}^{-2}$. The bounds are derived from the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement. The experimental uncertainties are accounted for, in the form of the complete covariance matrix that keeps track of correlations between bins for the differential measurement. The theory uncertainty from the NNLO QCD + NLO EW calculation is included by explicitly varying the renormalization and factorization scales, or the parton density functions, in the calculation and registering the variations in the intervals.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ inclusive measurement. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [0,0.3]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [0.3,0.6]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [0.6,0.8]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [0.8,1]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $m_{t\bar{t}}$ < 500 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $m_{t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [500,750] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $m_{t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [750,1000] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $m_{t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [1000,1500] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $m_{t\bar{t}}$ > 1500 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ < 30 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [30,120] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ > 120 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ inclusive measurement. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$[0,0.3]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$[0.3,0.6]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$[0.6,0.8]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$[0.8,1]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ < 200 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$ [200,300] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$ [300,400] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ > 400 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ < 20 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$ [20, 70] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ > 70 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ inclusive measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ inclusive measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement. The total (stat. + syst.) uncertainties are considered.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ measurement. The total (stat. + syst.) uncertainties are considered.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement. The total (stat. + syst.) uncertainties are considered.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement. The total (stat. + syst.) uncertainties are considered.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement. The total (stat. + syst.) uncertainties are considered.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement. The total (stat. + syst.) uncertainties are considered.

CHARGE FLOW IN NONDIFFRACTIVE PROTON-LIKE AND KAON-LIKE JETS.

CHARGE FLOW IN NONDIFFRACTIVE PROTON-LIKE AND PION-LIKE JETS.

CHARGE FLOW IN NONDIFFRACTIVE PROTON-LIKE AND PION-LIKE JETS.

CHARGE AND ENERGY FLOWS IN NONDIFFRACTIVE PROTON-LIKE JET.

CHARGE AND ENERGY FLOWS IN NONDIFFRACTIVE PROTON-LIKE JET.

CHARGE AND ENERGY FLOWS IN NONDIFFRACTIVE KAON-LIKE JET.

CHARGE AND ENERGY FLOWS IN NONDIFFRACTIVE KAON-LIKE JET.

CHARGE AND ENERGY FLOWS IN NONDIFFRACTIVE K+ P EVENTS.

CHARGE AND ENERGY FLOWS IN NONDIFFRACTIVE PI+ P EVENTS.

CHARGE AND ENERGY FLOWS IN NONDIFFRACTIVE PROTON-LIKE JET.

CHARGE AND ENERGY FLOWS IN NONDIFFRACTIVE PROTON-LIKE JET.

CHARGE AND ENERGY FLOWS IN NONDIFFRACTIVE KAON-LIKE JET.

CHARGE AND ENERGY FLOWS IN NONDIFFRACTIVE KAON-LIKE JET.

Here THETA is the angle (in c.m. system) between the plane containing partons 1 and 3 and the plane containing partons 4 and 5: cos(theta) = [p1*p3]*[p4*p ]/(|[p1*p3]|*|[p4*p5]|). The estimated systematic uncertainty is 6 PCT.

Here M is scaled invariant mass of jet pairs. The estimated systematic uncertainty is 6 PCT.

Here M is scaled invariant mass of jet pairs. The estimated systematic uncertainty is 6 PCT.

Here M is scaled invariant mass of jet pairs. The estimated systematic uncertainty is 6 PCT.

The estimated systematic uncertainty is 6 PCT. 4-JET events in their center-of-mass system.

The estimated systematic uncertainty is 6 PCT. 4-JET events in their center-of-mass system.

The estimated systematic uncertainty is 6 PCT. 4-JET events in their center-of-mass system.

The estimated systematic uncertainty is 6 PCT. 4-JET events in their center-of-mass system.

Errors are statistical only. The estimated systematic uncertainty is 6 PCT. 4-JET events in their center-of-mass system.

Errors are statistical only. The estimated systematic uncertainty is 6 PCT. 4-JET events in their center-of-mass system.

Errors are statistical only. The estimated systematic uncertainty is 6 PCT. 4-JET events in their center-of-mass system.

Errors are statistical only. The estimated systematic uncertainty is 6 PCT. 4-JET events in their center-of-mass system.

Errors are statistical only. The estimated systematic uncertainty is 6 PCT. The measured distribution of cosine of space angles between pairs of jets for the 4-JET events in their center-of-mass system.

Errors are statistical only. The estimated systematic uncertainty is 6 PCT. The measured distribution of cosine of space angles between pairs of jets for the 4-JET events in their center-of-mass system.

Errors are statistical only. The estimated systematic uncertainty is 6 PCT. The measured distribution of cosine of space angles between pairs of jets for the 4-JET events in their center-of-mass system.

Errors are statistical only. The estimated systematic uncertainty is 6 PCT. The measured distribution of cosine of space angles between pairs of jets for the 4-JET events in their center-of-mass system.

Errors are statistical only. The estimated systematic uncertainty is 6 PCT. The measured distribution of cosine of space angles between pairs of jets for the 4-JET events in their center-of-mass system.

Errors are statistical only. The estimated systematic uncertainty is 6 PCT. The measured distribution of cosine of space angles between pairs of jets for the 4-JET events in their center-of-mass system.

Errors are statistical only. The estimated systematic uncertainty is 6 PCT. The measured distribution of scaled jets pair masses for the 4-JET events in their center-of-mass system.

Errors are statistical only. The estimated systematic uncertainty is 6 PCT. The measured distribution of scaled jets pair masses for the 4-JET events in their center-of-mass system.

Errors are statistical only. The estimated systematic uncertainty is 6 PCT. The measured distribution of scaled jets pair masses for the 4-JET events in their center-of-mass system.

Errors are statistical only. The estimated systematic uncertainty is 6 PCT. The measured distribution of scaled jets pair masses for the 4-JET events in their center-of-mass system.

Errors are statistical only. The estimated systematic uncertainty is 6 PCT. The measured distribution of scaled jets pair masses for the 4-JET events in their center-of-mass system.

Errors are statistical only. The estimated systematic uncertainty is 6 PCT. The measured distribution of scaled jets pair masses for the 4-JET events in their center-of-mass system.

Errors are statistical only. The estimated systematic uncertainty is 6 PCT. Here THETA is 'Bengtsson-Zerwas' (BZ) angle defined as COS(THETA(N=BZ)) = [p3*p4]*[p5*p6]/(|p3*p4|*|p5*p6|), where P(i) are jet momentum in the center-o f-mass frame.

Errors are statistical only. The estimated systematic uncertainty is 6 PCT. Here THETA is 'Nachtmann-Reiter' (NR) angle defined as COS(THETA(N=NR))= (p3-p4)*(p5-p6)/(|p3-p4|*|p5-p6|).

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

Axis error includes +- 10/10 contribution (DUE TO BACKGROUND).

Axis error includes +- 10/10 contribution (DUE TO BACKGROUND).

Axis error includes +- 10/10 contribution (DUE TO BACKGROUND).

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of the di-jet mass M and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the inclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XI (=XBJ/XP) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the inclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XI (=XBJ/XP) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the inclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XI (=XBJ/XP) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the inclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XI (=XBJ/XP) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the inclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XP and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the inclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XP and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the inclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XP and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the inclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XP and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the inclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of X (=XBJ) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the inclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of X (=XBJ) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the inclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of X (=XBJ) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the inclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of X (=XBJ) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the inclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of Y (inelasticity) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the inclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of ETAPRIME ((ETARAP(P=3)-ETARAP(P=4))/2) and ET.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the inclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of ETAPRIME ((ETARAP(P=3)-ETARAP(P=4))/2) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the inclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of ETARAP(forward jet in lab frame) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the inclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of ETARAP(backward jet in lab frame) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the inclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive single jet cross section as a function of ET and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Aachen alogrithm.

Inclusive dijet cross section as a function Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Aachen alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of ET and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Aachen alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of the di-jet mass M and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Aachen alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XI (=XBJ/XP) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Aachen alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XI (=XBJ/XP) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Aachen alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XI (=XBJ/XP) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Aachen alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XI (=XBJ/XP) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Aachen alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XP and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Aachen alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XP and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Aachen alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XP and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Aachen alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XP and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Aachen alogrithm.

Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Aachen alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of X (=XBJ) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Aachen alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of X (=XBJ) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Aachen alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of X (=XBJ) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Aachen alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of Y (inelasticity) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Aachen alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of ETAPRIME ((ETARAP(P=3)-ETARAP(P=4))/2) and ET.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Aachen alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of ETAPRIME ((ETARAP(P=3)-ETARAP(P=4))/2) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Aachen alogrithm.

Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Aachen alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of ETARAP(forward jet in lab frame) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Aachen alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of ETARAP(backward jet in lab frame) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Aachen alogrithm.

Inclusive dijet cross section as a function Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the exclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of ET and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the exclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of the di-jet mass M and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the exclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XI (=XBJ/XP) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the exclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XI (=XBJ/XP) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the exclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XI (=XBJ/XP) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the exclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XI (=XBJ/XP) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the exclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XP and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the exclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XP and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the exclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XP and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the exclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XP and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the exclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of X (=XBJ) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the exclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of X (=XBJ) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the exclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of X (=XBJ) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the exclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of X (=XBJ) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the exclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of Y (inelasticity) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the exclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of ETAPRIME ((ETARAP(P=3)-ETARAP(P=4))/2) and ET.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the exclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of ETAPRIME ((ETARAP(P=3)-ETARAP(P=4))/2) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the exclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of ETARAP(forward jet in lab frame) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the exclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of ETARAP(backward jet in lab frame) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the exclusive kT alogrithm.

Inclusive dijet cross section as a function Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Cambridge jet alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of ET and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Cambridge jet alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of the di-jet mass M and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Cambridge jet alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XI (=XBJ/XP) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Cambridge jet alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XI (=XBJ/XP) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Cambridge jet alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XI (=XBJ/XP) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Cambridge jet alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XI (=XBJ/XP) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Cambridge jet alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XP and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Cambridge jet alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XP and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Cambridge jet alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XP and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Cambridge jet alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of XP and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Cambridge jet alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of X (=XBJ) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Cambridge jet alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of X (=XBJ) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Cambridge jet alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of X (=XBJ) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Cambridge jet alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of X (=XBJ) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Cambridge jet alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of Y (inelasticity) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Cambridge jet alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of ETAPRIME ((ETARAP(P=3)-ETARAP(P=4))/2) and ET.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Cambridge jet alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of ETAPRIME ((ETARAP(P=3)-ETARAP(P=4))/2) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Cambridge jet alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of ETARAP(forward jet in lab frame) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Cambridge jet alogrithm.

Inclusive di-jet cross section as a function of ETARAP(backward jet in lab frame) and Q**2.. Data are analysed in the Breit frame using the Cambridge jet alogrithm.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.