A search for quantum black holes in electron+jet and muon+jet invariant mass spectra is performed with 140 fb$^{-1}$ of data collected by the ATLAS detector in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV at the Large Hadron Collider. The observed invariant mass spectrum of lepton+jet pairs is consistent with Standard Model expectations. Upper limits are set at 95% confidence level on the production cross-sections times branching fractions for quantum black holes decaying into a lepton and a quark in a search region with invariant mass above 2.0 TeV. The resulting quantum black hole lower mass threshold limit is 9.2 TeV in the Arkani-Hamed-Dimopoulos-Dvali model, and 6.8 TeV in the Randall-Sundrum model.
The 95% CL model-independent upper limits on $\sigma \times Br$ for the non-SM signal production with decay into the lepton+jet. The limits take into account statistical and systematic uncertainties. Circles along the solid red line indicate the lower border of the SR (threshold of SR, Th$_\mathrm{SR}$), above which the observed limit is computed. The expected limits are shown by the dashed line. The $\pm 1\sigma$ and $\pm 2\sigma$ bands of expected limits are shown in green and yellow, respectively. The limits are obtained with pseudo-experiments.
The combined 95% CL upper limits on $\sigma \times Br$ as a function of threshold mass, $M_\mathrm{th}$, for QBH production with decay into lepton+jet for ADD-model (extra dimensions n = 6). The limits take into account statistical and systematic uncertainties. Circles along the solid red line indicate the mass $M_\mathrm{th}$ of the signal where the observed limit is computed. The expected limits are shown by the dashed line. The $\pm 1\sigma$ and $\pm 2\sigma$ bands are shown in green and yellow, respectively. The theoretically predicted $\sigma \times Br$ for the QBH production and decay is shown as the solid blue curve with squares.
The combined 95% CL upper limits on $\sigma \times Br$ as a function of threshold mass, $M_\mathrm{th}$, for QBH production with decay into lepton+jet for RS1-model (extra dimensions n = 1). The limits take into account statistical and systematic uncertainties. Circles along the solid red line indicate the mass $M_\mathrm{th}$ of the signal where the observed limit is computed. The expected limits are shown by the dashed line. The $\pm 1\sigma$ and $\pm 2\sigma$ bands are shown in green and yellow, respectively. The theoretically predicted $\sigma \times Br$ for the QBH production and decay is shown as the solid blue curve with squares.
In relativistic heavy-ion collisions, a global spin polarization, $P_\mathrm{H}$, of $\Lambda$ and $\bar{\Lambda}$ hyperons along the direction of the system angular momentum was discovered and measured across a broad range of collision energies and demonstrated a trend of increasing $P_\mathrm{H}$ with decreasing $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$. A splitting between $\Lambda$ and $\bar{\Lambda}$ polarization may be possible due to their different magnetic moments in a late-stage magnetic field sustained by the quark-gluon plasma which is formed in the collision. The results presented in this study find no significant splitting at the collision energies of $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=19.6$ and $27$ GeV in the RHIC Beam Energy Scan Phase II using the STAR detector, with an upper limit of $P_{\bar{\Lambda}}-P_{\Lambda}<0.24$% and $P_{\bar{\Lambda}}-P_{\Lambda}<0.35$%, respectively, at a 95% confidence level. We derive an upper limit on the na\"ive extraction of the late-stage magnetic field of $B<9.4\cdot10^{12}$ T and $B<1.4\cdot10^{13}$ T at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=19.6$ and $27$ GeV, respectively, although more thorough derivations are needed. Differential measurements of $P_\mathrm{H}$ were performed with respect to collision centrality, transverse momentum, and rapidity. With our current acceptance of $|y|<1$ and uncertainties, we observe no dependence on transverse momentum and rapidity in this analysis. These results challenge multiple existing model calculations following a variety of different assumptions which have each predicted a strong dependence on rapidity in this collision-energy range.
The first-order event-plane resolution determined by the STAR EPD as a function of collision centrality is roughly doubled in comparison to previous analyses using the STAR BBC. We see $R_{\rm EP}^{(1)}$ peak for mid-central collisions.
The mid-central $P_{\rm H}$ measurements reported in this work are shown alongside previous measurements in the upper panel, and are consistent with previous measurements at the energies studied here. The difference between integrated $P_{\bar{\Lambda}}$ and $P_{\Lambda}$ is shown at $\sqrt{s_{\rm{NN}}}$=19.6 and 27 GeV alongside previous measurements in the lower panel. The splittings observed with these high-statistics data sets are consistent with zero. Statistical uncertainties are represented as lines while systematic uncertainties are represented as boxes. The previous $P_{\bar{\Lambda}}-P_{\Lambda}$ result at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=7.7$ GeV is outside the axis range, but is consistent with zero within $2\sigma$.
$P_{\rm H}$ measurements are shown as a function of collision centrality at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$=19.6 and 27 GeV. Statistical uncertainties are represented as lines while systematic uncertainties are represented as boxes. $P_{\rm H}$ increases with collision centrality at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$=19.6 and 27 GeV, as expected from an angular-momentum-driven phenomenon.
Global polarizations ($P$) of $\Lambda$ ($\bar{\Lambda}$) hyperons have been observed in non-central heavy-ion collisions. The strong magnetic field primarily created by the spectator protons in such collisions would split the $\Lambda$ and $\bar{\Lambda}$ global polarizations ($\Delta P = P_{\Lambda} - P_{\bar{\Lambda}} < 0$). Additionally, quantum chromodynamics (QCD) predicts topological charge fluctuations in vacuum, resulting in a chirality imbalance or parity violation in a local domain. This would give rise to an imbalance ($\Delta n = \frac{N_{\text{L}} - N_{\text{R}}}{\langle N_{\text{L}} + N_{\text{R}} \rangle} \neq 0$) between left- and right-handed $\Lambda$ ($\bar{\Lambda}$) as well as a charge separation along the magnetic field, referred to as the chiral magnetic effect (CME). This charge separation can be characterized by the parity-even azimuthal correlator ($\Delta\gamma$) and parity-odd azimuthal harmonic observable ($\Delta a_{1}$). Measurements of $\Delta P$, $\Delta\gamma$, and $\Delta a_{1}$ have not led to definitive conclusions concerning the CME or the magnetic field, and $\Delta n$ has not been measured previously. Correlations among these observables may reveal new insights. This paper reports measurements of correlation between $\Delta n$ and $\Delta a_{1}$, which is sensitive to chirality fluctuations, and correlation between $\Delta P$ and $\Delta\gamma$ sensitive to magnetic field in Au+Au collisions at 27 GeV. For both measurements, no correlations have been observed beyond statistical fluctuations.
Figure 1
Figure 2ab
Figure 2c
The deconfined quark-gluon plasma (QGP) created in relativistic heavy-ion collisions enables the exploration of the fundamental properties of matter under extreme conditions. Non-central collisions can produce strong magnetic fields on the order of $10^{18}$ Gauss, which offers a probe into the electrical conductivity of the QGP. In particular, quarks and anti-quarks carry opposite charges and receive contrary electromagnetic forces that alter their momenta. This phenomenon can be manifested in the collective motion of final-state particles, specifically in the rapidity-odd directed flow, denoted as $v_1(\mathsf{y})$. Here we present the charge-dependent measurements of $dv_1/d\mathsf{y}$ near midrapidities for $\pi^{\pm}$, $K^{\pm}$, and $p(\bar{p})$ in Au+Au and isobar ($_{44}^{96}$Ru+$_{44}^{96}$Ru and $_{40}^{96}$Zr+$_{40}^{96}$Zr) collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=$ 200 GeV, and in Au+Au collisions at 27 GeV, recorded by the STAR detector at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider. The combined dependence of the $v_1$ signal on collision system, particle species, and collision centrality can be qualitatively and semi-quantitatively understood as several effects on constituent quarks. While the results in central events can be explained by the $u$ and $d$ quarks transported from initial-state nuclei, those in peripheral events reveal the impacts of the electromagnetic field on the QGP. Our data put valuable constraints on the electrical conductivity of the QGP in theoretical calculations.
Directed flow of $p$ and $\bar{p}$ vs rapidity in Au+Au 200 GeV 50-80% centrality.
Directed flow of $p$ and $\bar{p}$ vs rapidity in Zr+Zr and Ru+Ru 200 GeV (combined) 50-80% centrality.
Directed flow of $p$ and $\bar{p}$ vs rapidity in Au+Au 27 GeV 50-80% centrality.
A precision measurement of the matrix elements for $\eta\to\pi^+\pi^-\pi^0$ and $\eta\to\pi^0\pi^0\pi^0$ decays is performed using a sample of $(10087\pm44)\times10^6$$J/\psi$ decays collected with the BESIII detector. The decay $J/\psi \to \gamma \eta$ is used to select clean samples of 631,686 $\eta\to\pi^+\pi^-\pi^0$ decays and 272,322 $\eta\to\pi^0\pi^0\pi^0$ decays. The matrix elements for both channels are in reasonable agreement with previous measurements. The non-zero $gX^2Y$ term for the decay mode $\eta\to\pi^+\pi^-\pi^0$ is confirmed, as reported by the KLOE Collaboration, while the other higher-order terms are found to be insignificant. Dalitz plot asymmetries in the $\eta\to\pi^+\pi^-\pi^0$ decay are also explored and are found to be consistent with charge conjugation invariance. In addition, a cusp effect is investigated in the $\eta\to\pi^0\pi^0\pi^0$ decay, and no obvious structure around the $\pi^+\pi^-$ mass threshold is observed.
The acceptance corrected $\eta\to\pi^+\pi^-\pi^0$ data from 10 billion $J/\psi$ events collected at BESIII and the corresponding statistical uncertainties in the Dalitz plot variables $X$ and $Y$. The data are divided into $20\times20$ bins in $X$ and $Y$, and only the bins with non-zero event are listed in the table. The first two columns in the table are the center values of $X$ and $Y$, respectively. The last column is the acceptance corrected data and the corresponding statistical uncertainties.
The acceptance corrected $\eta\to\pi^0\pi^0\pi^0$ data from 10 billion $J/\psi$ events collected at BESIII and the corresponding statistical uncertainties in the Dalitz plot variables $X$ and $Y$. The data are divided into $20\times20$ bins in $X$ and $Y$, and only the bins with non-zero event are listed in the table. The first two columns in the table are the center values of $X$ and $Y$, respectively. The last column is the acceptance corrected data and the corresponding statistical uncertainties.
Measurements of the suppression and correlations of dijets is performed using 3 $\mu$b$^{-1}$ of Xe+Xe data at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.44$ TeV collected with the ATLAS detector at the LHC. Dijets with jets reconstructed using the $R=0.4$ anti-$k_t$ algorithm are measured differentially in jet $p_{\text{T}}$ over the range of 32 GeV to 398 GeV and the centrality of the collisions. Significant dijet momentum imbalance is found in the most central Xe+Xe collisions, which decreases in more peripheral collisions. Results from the measurement of per-pair normalized and absolutely normalized dijet $p_{\text{T}}$ balance are compared with previous Pb+Pb measurements at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} =5.02$ TeV. The differences between the dijet suppression in Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb are further quantified by the ratio of pair nuclear-modification factors. The results are found to be consistent with those measured in Pb+Pb data when compared in classes of the same event activity and when taking into account the difference between the center-of-mass energies of the initial parton scattering process in Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb collisions. These results should provide input for a better understanding of the role of energy density, system size, path length, and fluctuations in the parton energy loss.
The centrality intervals in Xe+Xe collisions and their corresponding TAA with absolute uncertainties.
The centrality intervals in Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb collisions for matching SUM ET FCAL intervals and respective TAA values for Xe+Xe collisions.
The performance of the jet energy scale (JES) for jets with $|y| < 2.1$ evaluated as a function of pT_truth in different centrality bins. Simulated hard scatter events were overlaid onto events from a dedicated sample of minimum-bias Xe+Xe data.
A search for physics beyond the standard model (SM) in the final state with a hadronically decaying tau lepton and a neutrino is presented. This analysis is based on data recorded by the CMS experiment from proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV at the LHC, corresponding to a total integrated luminosity of 138 fb$^{=1}$. The transverse mass spectrum is analyzed for the presence of new physics. No significant deviation from the SM prediction is observed. Limits are set on the production cross section of a W' boson decaying into a tau lepton and a neutrino. Lower limits are set on the mass of the sequential SM-like heavy charged vector boson and the mass of a quantum black hole. Upper limits are placed on the couplings of a new boson to the SM fermions. Constraints are put on a nonuniversal gauge interaction model and an effective field theory model. For the first time, upper limits on the cross section of $t$-channel leptoquark (LQ) exchange are presented. These limits are translated into exclusion limits on the LQ mass and on its coupling in the $t$-channel. The sensitivity of this analysis extends into the parameter space of LQ models that attempt to explain the anomalies observed in B meson decays. The limits presented for the various interpretations are the most stringent to date. Additionally, a model-independent limit is provided.
The transverse mass distribution of $ au$ leptons and missing transverse momentum observed in the Run-2 data (black dots with statistical uncertainty) as well as the expectation from SM processes (stacked histograms). Different signal hypotheses normalized to 10 fb$^{-1}$ are illustrated as dashed lines for exemplary SSM W$\prime$ boson, QBH and EFT signal hypotheses. The ratios of the background-subtracted data yields to the expected background yields are presented in the lower panel. The combined statistical and systematic uncertainties in the background are represented by the grey shaded band in the ratio panel.
Bayesian upper exclusion limits at 95% CL on the product of the cross section and branching fraction of a W$\prime$ boson decaying to a $\tau$ lepton and a neutrino in the SSM model. For this model, W$\prime$ boson masses of up to 4.8 TeV can be excluded. The limit is given by the intersection of the observed (solid) limit and the theoretical cross section (blue dotted curve). The 68 and 95% quantiles of the limits are represented by the green and yellow bands, respectively. The $\sigma \mathcal{B}$ for an SSM W' boson, along with its associated uncertainty, calculated at NNLO precision in QCD is shown.
Bayesian 95% CL model-independent upper limit on the product of signal cross sections and branching fraction for the $\tau+\nu$ decay for a back-to-back $\tau$ lepton plus $p_{T}^{miss}$ topology. To calculate this limit, all events for signal, background, and data are summed starting from a minimum $m_{T}$ threshold and then divided by the total number of events. No assumption on signal shape is included in this limit. The expected (dashed line) and observed (solid line) limits are shown as well as the 68% and 95% CL uncertainty bands (green and yellow, respectively).
Several extensions of the Standard Model predict the production of dark matter particles at the LHC. A search for dark matter particles produced in association with a dark Higgs boson decaying into $W^{+}W^{-}$ in the $\ell^\pm\nu q \bar q'$ final states with $\ell=e,\mu$ is presented. This analysis uses 139 fb$^{-1}$ of $pp$ collisions recorded by the ATLAS detector at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV. The $W^\pm \to q\bar q'$ decays are reconstructed from pairs of calorimeter-measured jets or from track-assisted reclustered jets, a technique aimed at resolving the dense topology from a pair of boosted quarks using jets in the calorimeter and tracking information. The observed data are found to agree with Standard Model predictions. Scenarios with dark Higgs boson masses ranging between 140 and 390 GeV are excluded.
Probability of finding at least one TAR jet, where the p<sub>T</sub>-leading TAR jet passes the m<sub>Wcand</sub> and D<sub>2</sub><sup>β=1</sup> requirements, as a function of m<sub>s</sub>. The probability is determined in a sample of signal events with m<sub>Z'</sub>=500 GeV, with the preselections applied.
Probability of finding at least one TAR jet, where the p<sub>T</sub>-leading TAR jet passes the m<sub>Wcand</sub> and D<sub>2</sub><sup>β=1</sup> requirements, as a function of m<sub>s</sub>. The probability is determined in a sample of signal events with m<sub>Z'</sub>=1000 GeV, with the preselections applied.
Probability of finding at least one TAR jet, where the p<sub>T</sub>-leading TAR jet passes the m<sub>Wcand</sub> and D<sub>2</sub><sup>β=1</sup> requirements, as a function of m<sub>s</sub>. The probability is determined in a sample of signal events with m<sub>Z'</sub>=1700 GeV, with the preselections applied.
The elliptic ($v_2$) and triangular ($v_3$) azimuthal anisotropy coefficients in central $^{3}$He+Au, $d$+Au, and $p$+Au collisions at $\mbox{$\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}$}$ = 200 GeV are measured as a function of transverse momentum ($p_{\mathrm{T}}$) at mid-rapidity ($|\eta|<$0.9), via the azimuthal angular correlation between two particles both at $|\eta|<$0.9. While the $v_2(p_{\mathrm{T}})$ values depend on the colliding systems, the $v_3(p_{\mathrm{T}})$ values are system-independent within the uncertainties, suggesting an influence on eccentricity from sub-nucleonic fluctuations in these small-sized systems. These results also provide stringent constraints for the hydrodynamic modeling of these systems.
v2 and v3 in 0-10% He+Au collisions at 200 GeV
v2 and v3 in 0-10% d+Au collisions at 200 GeV
v2 and v3 in UC p+Au collisions at 200 GeV
A measurement of the top-quark mass ($m_t$) in the $t\bar{t}\rightarrow~\textrm{lepton}+\textrm{jets}$ channel is presented, with an experimental technique which exploits semileptonic decays of $b$-hadrons produced in the top-quark decay chain. The distribution of the invariant mass $m_{\ell\mu}$ of the lepton, $\ell$ (with $\ell=e,\mu$), from the $W$-boson decay and the muon, $\mu$, originating from the $b$-hadron decay is reconstructed, and a binned-template profile likelihood fit is performed to extract $m_t$. The measurement is based on data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 36.1 fb$^{-1}$ of $\sqrt{s} = 13~\textrm{TeV}$$pp$ collisions provided by the Large Hadron Collider and recorded by the ATLAS detector. The measured value of the top-quark mass is $m_{t} = 174.41\pm0.39~(\textrm{stat.})\pm0.66~(\textrm{syst.})\pm0.25~(\textrm{recoil})~\textrm{GeV}$, where the third uncertainty arises from changing the PYTHIA8 parton shower gluon-recoil scheme, used in top-quark decays, to a recently developed setup.
Top mass measurement result.
List of all the individual sources of systematic uncertainty considered in the analysis. The individual sources, each corresponding to an independent nuisance parameter in the fit, are grouped into categories, as indicated in the first column. The second column shows the impact of each of the individual sources on the measurement, obtained as the shift on the top mass induced by a positive shift of the each of the nuisance parameters by its post-fit uncertainty. Sources for which no impact is indicated are neglected in the fit procedure as their impact on the total prediction is negligible in any of the bins. The last column shows the statistical uncertainty in each of the reported numbers as estimated with the bootstrap method.
Ranking, from top to bottom, of the main systematic uncertainties (excluding recoil) showing the pulls and the impact of the systematic uncertainties on the top mass, from the combined opposite sign (OS) and same sign (SS) binned-template profile likelihood fit to data. The OS or SS refers to the charge signs of the primary lepton and the soft muon. The gamma parameters are NPs used to describe the effect of the limited statistics of the sample.
Inclusive and differential measurements of the top-antitop ($t\bar{t}$) charge asymmetry $A_\text{C}^{t\bar{t}}$ and the leptonic asymmetry $A_\text{C}^{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ are presented in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 13$ TeV recorded by the ATLAS experiment at the CERN Large Hadron Collider. The measurement uses the complete Run 2 dataset, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$, combines data in the single-lepton and dilepton channels, and employs reconstruction techniques adapted to both the resolved and boosted topologies. A Bayesian unfolding procedure is performed to correct for detector resolution and acceptance effects. The combined inclusive $t\bar{t}$ charge asymmetry is measured to be $A_\text{C}^{t\bar{t}} = 0.0068 \pm 0.0015$, which differs from zero by 4.7 standard deviations. Differential measurements are performed as a function of the invariant mass, transverse momentum and longitudinal boost of the $t\bar{t}$ system. Both the inclusive and differential measurements are found to be compatible with the Standard Model predictions, at next-to-next-to-leading order in quantum chromodynamics perturbation theory with next-to-leading-order electroweak corrections. The measurements are interpreted in the framework of the Standard Model effective field theory, placing competitive bounds on several Wilson coefficients.
- - - - - - - - Overview of HEPData Record - - - - - - - - <br/><br/> <b>Results:</b> <ul> <li><a href="132116?version=1&table=Resultsforchargeasymmetryinclusive">$A_C^{t\bar{t}}$</a> <li><a href="132116?version=1&table=Resultsforchargeasymmetryvsmtt">$A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$</a> <li><a href="132116?version=1&table=Resultsforchargeasymmetryvspttt">$A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$</a> <li><a href="132116?version=1&table=Resultsforchargeasymmetryvsbetatt">$A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$</a> <li><a href="132116?version=1&table=Resultsforleptonicchargeasymmetryinclusive">$A_C^{\ell\bar{\ell}}$</a> <li><a href="132116?version=1&table=Resultsforchargeasymmetryvsllmll">$A_C^{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$</a> <li><a href="132116?version=1&table=Resultsforchargeasymmetryvsllptll">$A_C^{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ vs $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$</a> <li><a href="132116?version=1&table=Resultsforchargeasymmetryvsllbetall">$A_C^{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$</a> </ul> <b>Bounds on the Wilson coefficients:</b> <ul> <li><a href="132116?version=1&table=BoundsonWilsoncoefficientschargeasymmetryinclusive">$A_C^{t\bar{t}}$</a> <li><a href="132116?version=1&table=BoundsonWilsoncoefficientschargeasymmetryvsmtt">$A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$</a> </ul> <b>Ranking of systematic uncertainties:</b></br> Inclusive:<a href="132116?version=1&table=NPrankingchargeasymmetryinclusive">$A_C^{t\bar{t}}$</a></br> <b>$A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$:</b> <ul> <li><a href="132116?version=1&table=NPrankingchargeasymmetryvsbetattbin0">$\beta_{z,t\bar{t}} \in[0,0.3]$</a> <li><a href="132116?version=1&table=NPrankingchargeasymmetryvsbetattbin1">$\beta_{z,t\bar{t}} \in[0.3,0.6]$</a> <li><a href="132116?version=1&table=NPrankingchargeasymmetryvsbetattbin2">$\beta_{z,t\bar{t}} \in[0.6,0.8]$</a> <li><a href="132116?version=1&table=NPrankingchargeasymmetryvsbetattbin3">$\beta_{z,t\bar{t}} \in[0.8,1]$</a> </ul> <b>$A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$:</b> <ul> <li><a href="132116?version=1&table=NPrankingchargeasymmetryvsmttbin0">$m_{t\bar{t}}$ < $500$GeV</a> <li><a href="132116?version=1&table=NPrankingchargeasymmetryvsmttbin1">$m_{t\bar{t}} \in [500,750]$GeV</a> <li><a href="132116?version=1&table=NPrankingchargeasymmetryvsmttbin2">$m_{t\bar{t}} \in [750,1000]$GeV</a> <li><a href="132116?version=1&table=NPrankingchargeasymmetryvsmttbin3">$m_{t\bar{t}} \in [1000,1500]$GeV</a> <li><a href="132116?version=1&table=NPrankingchargeasymmetryvsmttbin4">$m_{t\bar{t}}$ > $1500$GeV</a> </ul> <b>$A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$:</b> <ul> <li><a href="132116?version=1&table=NPrankingchargeasymmetryvsptttbin0">$p_{T,t\bar{t}} \in [0,30]$GeV</a> <li><a href="132116?version=1&table=NPrankingchargeasymmetryvsptttbin1">$p_{T,t\bar{t}} \in[30,120]$GeV</a> <li><a href="132116?version=1&table=NPrankingchargeasymmetryvsptttbin2">$p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ > $120$GeV</a> </ul> Inclusive leptonic:<a href="132116?version=1&table=NPrankingleptonicchargeasymmetryinclusive">$A_C^{\ell\bar{\ell}}$</a></br> <b>$A_C^{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$</b> <ul> <li><a href="132116?version=1&tableNPrankingchargeasymmetry=vsllbetallbin0">$\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}} \in [0,0.3]$</a> <li><a href="132116?version=1&tableNPrankingchargeasymmetry=vsllbetallbin1">$\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}} \in [0.3,0.6]$</a> <li><a href="132116?version=1&tableNPrankingchargeasymmetry=vsllbetallbin2">$\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}} \in [0.6,0.8]$</a> <li><a href="132116?version=1&tableNPrankingchargeasymmetry=vsllbetallbin3">$\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}} \in [0.8,1]$</a> </ul> <b>$A_C^{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$</b> <ul> <li><a href="132116?version=1&table=NPrankingchargeasymmetryvsllmllbin0">$m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ < $200$GeV</a> <li><a href="132116?version=1&table=NPrankingchargeasymmetryvsllmllbin1">$m_{\ell\bar{\ell}} \in [200,300]$GeV</a> <li><a href="132116?version=1&table=NPrankingchargeasymmetryvsllmllbin2">$m_{\ell\bar{\ell}} \in [300,400]$Ge$</a> <li><a href="132116?version=1&table=NPrankingchargeasymmetryvsllmllbin3">$m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ > $400$GeV</a> </ul> <b>$A_C^{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ vs $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$</b> <ul> <li><a href="132116?version=1&table=NPrankingchargeasymmetryvsllptllbin0">$p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}\in [0,20]$GeV</a> <li><a href="132116?version=1&table=NPrankingchargeasymmetryvsllptllbin1">$p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}\in[20,70]$GeV</a> <li><a href="132116?version=1&table=NPrankingchargeasymmetryvsllptllbin2">$p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ > $70$GeV</a> </ul> <b>NP correlations:</b> <ul> <li><a href="132116?version=1&table=NPcorrelationschargeasymmetryinclusive">$A_C^{t\bar{t}}$</a> <li><a href="132116?version=1&table=NPcorrelationschargeasymmetryvsmtt">$A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$</a> <li><a href="132116?version=1&table=NPcorrelationschargeasymmetryvspttt">$A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$</a> <li><a href="132116?version=1&table=NPcorrelationschargeasymmetryvsbetatt">$A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$</a> <li><a href="132116?version=1&table=NPcorrelationsleptonicchargeasymmetryinclusive">$A_c^{\ell\bar{\ell}}$</a> <li><a href="132116?version=1&table=NPcorrelationschargeasymmetryvsllmll">$A_c^{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$</a> <li><a href="132116?version=1&table=NPcorrelationschargeasymmetryvsllptll">$A_C^{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ vs $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$</a> <li><a href="132116?version=1&table=NPcorrelationschargeasymmetryvsllbetall">$A_C^{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$</a> </ul> <b>Covariance matrices:</b> <ul> <li><a href="132116?version=1&table=Covariancematrixchargeasymmetryvsmtt">$A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$</a> <li><a href="132116?version=1&table=Covariancematrixchargeasymmetryvspttt">$A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$</a> <li><a href="132116?version=1&table=Covariancematrixchargeasymmetryvsbetatt">$A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$</a> <li><a href="132116?version=1&table=Covariancematrixleptonicchargeasymmetryvsllmll">$A_c^{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$</a> <li><a href="132116?version=1&table=Covariancematrixleptonicchargeasymmetryvsllptll">$A_C^{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ vs $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$</a> <li><a href="132116?version=1&table=Covariancematrixleptonicchargeasymmetryvsllbetall">$A_C^{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$</a> </ul>
The unfolded inclusive charge asymmetry. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NNLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed, and the impact of the linear term of the Wilson coefficient on the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ prediction is shown for two different values. The scale uncertainty is obtained by varying renormalisation and factorisation scales independently by a factor of 2 or 0.5 around $\mu_0$ to calculate the maximum and minimum value of the asymmetry, respectively. The nominal value $\mu_0$ is chosen as $H_T/4$. The variations in which one scale is multiplied by 2 while the other scale is divided by 2 are excluded. Finally, the scale and MC integration uncertainties are added in quadrature.
The unfolded differential charge asymmetry as a function of the invariant mass of the top pair system. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NNLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed, and the impact of the linear term of the Wilson coefficient on the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ prediction is shown for two different values. The scale uncertainty is obtained by varying renormalisation and factorisation scales independently by a factor of 2 or 0.5 around $\mu_0$ to calculate the maximum and minimum value of the asymmetry, respectively. The nominal value $\mu_0$ is chosen as $H_T/4$. The variations in which one scale is multiplied by 2 while the other scale is divided by 2 are excluded. Finally, the scale and MC integration uncertainties are added in quadrature.
We present the first measurements of transverse momentum spectra of $\pi^{\pm}$, $K^{\pm}$, $p(\bar{p})$ at midrapidity ($|y| < 0.1$) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 193 GeV with the STAR detector at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC). The centrality dependence of particle yields, average transverse momenta, particle ratios and kinetic freeze-out parameters are discussed. The results are compared with the published results from Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} =$ 200 GeV in STAR. The results are also compared to those from A Multi Phase Transport (AMPT) model.
'Identified transverse momentum spectra of $\pi^{+}$ at midrapidity (|y| < 0.1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 193 GeV'
'Identified transverse momentum spectra of $K^{+}$ at midrapidity (|y| < 0.1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 193 GeV'
'Identified transverse momentum spectra of p at midrapidity (|y| < 0.1) in U+U collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 193 GeV'
A combination of measurements of the inclusive top-quark pair production cross-section performed by ATLAS and CMS in proton-proton collisions at centre-of-mass energies of 7 and 8 TeV at the LHC is presented. The cross-sections are obtained using top-quark pair decays with an opposite-charge electron-muon pair in the final state and with data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of about 5 fb$^{-1}$ at $\sqrt{s}=7$ TeV and about 20 fb$^{-1}$ at $\sqrt{s}=8$ TeV for each experiment. The combined cross-sections are determined to be $178.5 \pm 4.7$ pb at $\sqrt{s}=7$ TeV and $243.3^{+6.0}_{-5.9}$ pb at $\sqrt{s}=8$ TeV with a correlation of 0.41, using a reference top-quark mass value of 172.5 GeV. The ratio of the combined cross-sections is determined to be $R_{8/7}= 1.363\pm 0.032$. The combined measured cross-sections and their ratio agree well with theory calculations using several parton distribution function (PDF) sets. The values of the top-quark pole mass (with the strong coupling fixed at 0.118) and the strong coupling (with the top-quark pole mass fixed at 172.5 GeV) are extracted from the combined results by fitting a next-to-next-to-leading-order plus next-to-next-to-leading-log QCD prediction to the measurements. Using a version of the NNPDF3.1 PDF set containing no top-quark measurements, the results obtained are $m_t^\text{pole} = 173.4^{+1.8}_{-2.0}$ GeV and $\alpha_\text{s}(m_Z)= 0.1170^{+ 0.0021}_{-0.0018}$.
Full covariance matrix including all systematic uncertainties expressed as nuisance parameters. With the exception of the cross section parameters, all parameters were normalised to 1 before the fit. Therefore, the diagonal elements represent the constraint in quadrature.
Full covariance matrix including all systematic uncertainties expressed as nuisance parameters. With the exception of the cross section parameters, all parameters were normalised to 1 before the fit. Therefore, the diagonal elements represent the constraint in quadrature.
The first measurement of the ${\rm e}^{+}{\rm e}^{-}$ pair production at low lepton pair transverse momentum ($p_{\rm T,ee}$) and low invariant mass ($m_{\rm ee}$) in non-central Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV at the LHC is presented. The dielectron production is studied with the ALICE detector at midrapidity ($|\eta_{\rm e}| < 0.8$) as a function of invariant mass ($0.4 \leq m_{\rm ee} < 2.7$ GeV/$c^2$) in the 50$-$70% and 70$-$90% centrality classes for $p_{\rm T,ee} < 0.1$ GeV/$c$, and as a function of $p_{\rm T,ee}$ in three $m_{\rm ee}$ intervals in the most peripheral Pb$-$Pb collisions. Below a $p_{\rm T,ee}$ of 0.1 GeV/$c$, a clear excess of ${\rm e}^{+}{\rm e}^{-}$ pairs is found compared to the expectations from known hadronic sources and predictions of thermal radiation from the medium. The $m_{\rm ee}$ excess spectra are reproduced, within uncertainties, by different predictions of the photon$-$photon production of dielectrons, where the photons originate from the extremely strong electromagnetic fields generated by the highly Lorentz-contracted Pb nuclei. Lowest-order quantum electrodynamic (QED) calculations, as well as a model that takes into account the impact-parameter dependence of the average transverse momentum of the photons, also provide a good description of the $p_{\rm T,ee}$ spectra. The measured $\sqrt{\langle p_{\rm T,ee}^{2} \rangle}$ of the excess $p_{\rm T,ee}$ spectrum in peripheral Pb$-$Pb collisions is found to be comparable to the values observed previously at RHIC in a similar phase-space region.
Differential $e^+e^-$ yield in 50--70\% Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV as a function of $m_{\rm ee}$ for $p_{\rm T,ee} < 0.1$ GeV/$c$. Electrons are measured within $|\eta_{\rm e}| < 0.8$ and $p_{\rm T,e} > 0.2$ GeV/$c$. The quoted upper limits correspond to a 90% confidence level.
Differential $e^+e^-$ yield in 70--90\% Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV as a function of $m_{\rm ee}$ for $p_{\rm T,ee} < 0.1$ GeV/$c$. Electrons are measured within $|\eta_{\rm e}| < 0.8$ and $p_{\rm T,e} > 0.2$ GeV/$c$.
Differential excess $e^+e^-$ yield in 50--70\% Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV as a function of $m_{\rm ee}$ for $p_{\rm T,ee} < 0.1$ GeV/$c$. Electrons are measured within $|\eta_{\rm e}| < 0.8$ and $p_{\rm T,e} > 0.2$ GeV/$c$. The quoted upper limits correspond to a 90% confidence level.
The first measurement of event-by-event antideuteron number fluctuations in high energy heavy-ion collisions is presented. The measurements are carried out at midrapidity ($|\eta| < 0.8$) as a function of collision centrality in Pb$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = 5.02$ TeV using the ALICE detector. A significant negative correlation between the produced antiprotons and antideuterons is observed in all collision centralities. The results are compared with coalescence calculations, which fail to describe the measurement, in particular if a correlated production of protons and neutrons is assumed. Thermal-statistical model calculations describe the data within uncertainties only for correlation volumes that are different with respect to those describing proton yields and a similar measurement of net-proton number fluctuations.
Second order to first order cumulant ratio of the $\overline{d}$ multiplicity distribution as a function of collision centrality in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
Pearson correlation between the measured $\overline{p}$ and $\overline{d}$ as a function of collision centrality in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.
Dependence of $\overline{p}$-$\overline{d}$ correlation on pseudorapidity acceptance of $\overline{p}$ and $\overline{d}$ selection in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV. Results are for 0.0--10.0$\%$ collision centrality.
We report about the properties of the underlying event measured with ALICE at the LHC in pp and p$-$Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=5.02$ TeV. The event activity, quantified by charged-particle number and summed-$p_{\rm T}$ densities, is measured as a function of the leading-particle transverse momentum ($p_{\rm T}^{\rm trig}$). These quantities are studied in three azimuthal-angle regions relative to the leading particle in the event: toward, away, and transverse. Results are presented for three different $p_{\rm T}$ thresholds (0.15, 0.5, and 1 GeV/$c$) at mid-pseudorapidity ($|\eta|<0.8$). The event activity in the transverse region, which is the most sensitive to the underlying event, exhibits similar behaviour in both pp and p$-$Pb collisions, namely, a steep increase with $p_{\rm T}^{\rm trig}$ for low $p_{\rm T}^{\rm trig}$, followed by a saturation at $p_{\rm T}^{\rm trig} \approx 5$ GeV/$c$. The results from pp collisions are compared with existing measurements at other centre-of-mass energies. The quantities in the toward and away regions are also analyzed after the subtraction of the contribution measured in the transverse region. The remaining jet-like particle densities are consistent in pp and p$-$Pb collisions for $p_{\rm T}^{\rm trig}>10$ GeV/$c$, whereas for lower $p_{\rm T}^{\rm trig}$ values the event activity is slightly higher in p$-$Pb than in pp collisions. The measurements are compared with predictions from the PYTHIA 8 and EPOS LHC Monte Carlo event generators.
Fig. 4: Number density $N_{\rm ch}$ (left) and $\Sigma p_{\rm T}$ (right) distributions as a function of $p_{\rm T}^{\rm trig}$ in Transverse, Away, and Toward regions for $p_{\rm T} >$ 0.5 GeV/$c$. The shaded areas and the error bars around the data points represent the systematic and statistical uncertainties, respectively.
Fig. 5: Number density $N_{\rm ch}$ (left) and $\Sigma p_{\rm T}$ (right) distributions as a function of $p_{\rm T}^{\rm trig}$ in Transverse, Away, and Toward regions for $p_{\rm T} >$ 0.5 GeV/$c$. The shaded areas and the error bars around the data points represent the systematic and statistical uncertainties, respectively.
Fig. 6a: Number density $N_{\rm ch}$ (left) and $\Sigma p_{\rm T}$ (right) distributions as a function of $p_{\rm T}^{\rm trig}$ in Away and Toward regions after the subtraction of Number density $N_{\rm ch}$ and $\Sigma p_{\rm T}$ distributions in the transverse region for pp collisions for $p_{\rm T} >$ 0.5 GeV/$c$. The shaded areas and the error bars around the data points represent the systematic and statistical uncertainties, respectively.
Notwithstanding decades of progress since Yukawa first developed a description of the force between nucleons in terms of meson exchange, a full understanding of the strong interaction remains a major challenge in modern science. One remaining difficulty arises from the non-perturbative nature of the strong force, which leads to the phenomenon of quark confinement at distances on the order of the size of the proton. Here we show that in relativistic heavy-ion collisions, where quarks and gluons are set free over an extended volume, two species of produced vector (spin-1) mesons, namely $\phi$ and $K^{*0}$, emerge with a surprising pattern of global spin alignment. In particular, the global spin alignment for $\phi$ is unexpectedly large, while that for $K^{*0}$ is consistent with zero. The observed spin-alignment pattern and magnitude for the $\phi$ cannot be explained by conventional mechanisms, while a model with a connection to strong force fields, i.e. an effective proxy description within the Standard Model and Quantum Chromodynamics, accommodates the current data. This connection, if fully established, will open a potential new avenue for studying the behaviour of strong force fields.
Global spin alignment of $\phi$ and $K^{*0}$ vector mesons in heavy-ion collisions. The measured matrix element $\rho_{00}$ as a function of beam energy for the $\phi$ and $K^{*0}$ vector mesons within the indicated windows of centrality, transverse momentum ($p_T$) and rapidity ($y$). The open symbols indicate ALICE results for Pb+Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV at $p_{T}$ values of 2.0 and 1.4 GeV/c for the $\phi$ and $K^{*0}$ mesons, respectively, corresponding to the $p_{T}$ bin nearest to the mean $p_{T}$ for the 1.0 – 5.0 GeV/$c$ range assumed for each meson in the present analysis. The red solid curve is a fit to data in the range of $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 19.6$ to 200 GeV, based on a theoretical calculation with a $\phi$-meson field. Parameter sensitivity of $\rho_{00}$ to the $\phi$-meson field is shown in Ref.5. The red dashed line is an extension of the solid curve with the fitted parameter $G_s^{(y)}$. The black dashed line represents $\rho_{00}=1/3.$
Global spin alignment of $\phi$ and $K^{*0}$ vector mesons in heavy-ion collisions. The measured matrix element $\rho_{00}$ as a function of beam energy for the $\phi$ and $K^{*0}$ vector mesons within the indicated windows of centrality, transverse momentum ($p_T$) and rapidity ($y$). The open symbols indicate ALICE results for Pb+Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV at $p_{T}$ values of 2.0 and 1.4 GeV/c for the $\phi$ and $K^{*0}$ mesons, respectively, corresponding to the $p_{T}$ bin nearest to the mean $p_{T}$ for the 1.0 – 5.0 GeV/$c$ range assumed for each meson in the present analysis. The red solid curve is a fit to data in the range of $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 19.6$ to 200 GeV, based on a theoretical calculation with a $\phi$-meson field. Parameter sensitivity of $\rho_{00}$ to the $\phi$-meson field is shown in Ref.5. The red dashed line is an extension of the solid curve with the fitted parameter $G_s^{(y)}$. The black dashed line represents $\rho_{00}=1/3.$
Example of combinatorial background subtracted invariant mass distributions and the extracted yields as a function of $\cos \theta^*$ for $\phi$ and $K^{*0}$ mesons. \textbf{a)} example of $\phi \rightarrow K^+ + K^-$ invariant mass distributions, with combinatorial background subtracted, integrated over $\cos \theta^*$; \textbf{b)} example of $K^{*0} (\overline{K^{*0}}) \rightarrow K^{-} \pi^{+} (K^{+} \pi^{-})$ invariant mass distributions, with combinatorial background subtracted, integrated over $\cos \theta^*$; \textbf{c)} extracted yields of $\phi$ as a function of $\cos \theta^*$; \textbf{d)} extracted yields of $K^{*0}$ as a function of $\cos \theta^*$.
This paper presents studies of Bose-Einstein correlations (BEC) in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV, using data from the ATLAS detector at the CERN Large Hadron Collider. Data were collected in a special low-luminosity configuration with a minimum-bias trigger and a high-multiplicity track trigger, accumulating integrated luminosities of 151 $\mu$b$^{-1}$ and 8.4 nb$^{-1}$ respectively. The BEC are measured for pairs of like-sign charged particles, each with $|\eta|$ < 2.5, for two kinematic ranges: the first with particle $p_T$ > 100 MeV and the second with particle $p_T$ > 500 MeV. The BEC parameters, characterizing the source radius and particle correlation strength, are investigated as functions of charged-particle multiplicity (up to 300) and average transverse momentum of the pair (up to 1.5 GeV). The double-differential dependence on charged-particle multiplicity and average transverse momentum of the pair is also studied. The BEC radius is found to be independent of the charged-particle multiplicity for high charged-particle multiplicity (above 100), confirming a previous observation at lower energy. This saturation occurs independent of the transverse momentum of the pair.
Comparison of single-ratio two-particle correlation functions, C<sub>2</sub><sup>data</sup>(Q) and C<sub>2</sub><sup>MC</sup>(Q), with the two-particle double-ratio correlation function, R<sub>2</sub>(Q), for the high-multiplicity track (HMT) events using the opposite hemisphere (OHP) like-charge particles pairs reference sample for k<sub>T</sub> - interval 1000 < k<sub>T</sub> ≤ 1500 MeV.
Comparison of single-ratio two-particle correlation functions, C<sub>2</sub><sup>data</sup>(Q) and C<sub>2</sub><sup>MC</sup>(Q), with the two-particle double-ratio correlation function, R<sub>2</sub>(Q), for the high-multiplicity track (HMT) events using the unlike-charge particle (UCP) pairs reference sample for k<sub>T</sub> - interval 1000 < k<sub>T</sub> ≤ 1500 MeV.
The Bose-Einstein correlation (BEC) parameter R as a function of n<sub>ch</sub> for MB events using different MC generators in the calculation of R<sub>2</sub>(Q). The uncertainties shown are statistical. The lower panel of each plot shows the ratio of the BEC parameters obtained using EPOS LHC (red circles), Pythia 8 Monash (blue squares) and Herwig++ UE-EE-5 (green triangles) compared with the parameters obtained using Pythia 8 A2. The gray band in the lower panels is the MC systematic uncertainty, obtained as explained in the text.
In high-energy heavy-ion collisions, partonic collectivity is evidenced by the constituent quark number scaling of elliptic flow anisotropy for identified hadrons. A breaking of this scaling and dominance of baryonic interactions is found for identified hadron collective flow measurements in $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV Au+Au collisions. In this paper, we report measurements of the first- and second-order azimuthal anisotropic parameters, $v_1$ and $v_2$, of light nuclei ($d$, $t$, $^{3}$He, $^{4}$He) produced in $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV Au+Au collisions at the STAR experiment. An atomic mass number scaling is found in the measured $v_1$ slopes of light nuclei at mid-rapidity. For the measured $v_2$ magnitude, a strong rapidity dependence is observed. Unlike $v_2$ at higher collision energies, the $v_2$ values at mid-rapidity for all light nuclei are negative and no scaling is observed with the atomic mass number. Calculations by the Jet AA Microscopic Transport Model (JAM), with baryonic mean-field plus nucleon coalescence, are in good agreement with our observations, implying baryonic interactions dominate the collective dynamics in 3 GeV Au+Au collisions at RHIC.
The rapidity and $p_{T}$ dependencies of $v_{1}$ for $p$ in 10-40% mid-central Au+Au collisions at 3 GeV.
The rapidity and $p_{T}$ dependencies of $v_{1}$ for $d$ in 10-40% mid-central Au+Au collisions at 3 GeV.
The $p_{T}$ dependencies of $v_{1}$ within $-0.1<y<0$ for $t$ in 10-40% mid-central Au+Au collisions at 3 GeV.
We report cumulants of the proton multiplicity distribution from dedicated fixed-target Au+Au collisions at 3.0 GeV, measured by the STAR experiment in the kinematic acceptance of rapidity ($y$) and transverse momentum ($p_{\rm T}$) within $-0.5 < y<0$ and $0.4 < p_{\rm T} <2.0 $ GeV/$c$. In the most central 0--5% collisions, a proton cumulant ratio is measured to be $C_4/C_2=-0.85 \pm 0.09 ~(\rm stat.) \pm 0.82 ~(\rm syst.)$, which is less than unity, the Poisson baseline. The hadronic transport UrQMD model reproduces our $C_4/C_2$ in the measured acceptance. Compared to higher energy results and the transport model calculations, the suppression in $C_4/C_2$ is consistent with fluctuations driven by baryon number conservation and indicates an energy regime dominated by hadronic interactions. These data imply that the QCD critical region, if created in heavy-ion collisions, could only exist at energies higher than 3 GeV.
$\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3.0 GeV data (black markers), GM (red histogram), and single and pile-up contributions from unfolding. Vertical lines on markers represent statistical uncertainties. Single, pile-up and single+pile-up collisions are shown in solid blue markers, dashed green and dashed magenta curves, respectively. Analysis is performed on 0–5% central events, indicated by a black arrow.
$\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3.0 GeV data (black markers), GM (red histogram), and single and pile-up contributions from unfolding. Vertical lines on markers represent statistical uncertainties. Single, pile-up and single+pile-up collisions are shown in solid blue markers, dashed green and dashed magenta curves, respectively. Analysis is performed on 0–5% central events, indicated by a black arrow.
Centrality dependence of the proton cumulant ratios for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3.0 GeV. Protons are from $-0.5 < y < 0$ and $0.4 < p_{T} < 2.0$ GeV/$c$. Systematic uncertainties are represented by gray bars. Statistical uncertainties are smaller than marker size. CBWC is applied to all cumulant ratios. While open squares represent the data without the VFC correction, blue triangles and red circles are the results with VFC using the $\langle N_{\rm{part}} \rangle$ distributions from the UrQMD and Glauber models, respectively. UrQMD model results are represented as gold dashed line.
Partons traversing the strongly interacting medium produced in heavy-ion collisions are expected to lose energy depending on their color charge and mass. We measure the nuclear modification factors for charm- and bottom-decay electrons, defined as the ratio of yields, scaled by the number of binary nucleon-nucleon collisions, in $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 200 GeV Au+Au collisions to $p$+$p$ collisions ($R_{\rm AA}$), or in central to peripheral Au+Au collisions ($R_{\rm CP}$). We find the bottom-decay electron $R_{\rm AA}$ and $R_{\rm CP}$ to be significantly higher than that of charm-decay electrons. Model calculations including mass-dependent parton energy loss in a strongly coupled medium are consistent with the measured data. These observations provide clear evidence of mass ordering of charm and bottom quark energy loss when traversing through the strongly coupled medium created in heavy-ion collisions.
Fit to the $\rm log_{10}(DCA/cm)$ of candidate electrons with $p_{\rm T}$ $\in$ [3.5,4.5] GeV/$c$ in 0-80% Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=200$ GeV, where the DCA is defined as the 3D distance-of-closest approach of the track to the primary vertex. The solid blue line shows the full template fit, and the various other lines show the individual components. The bottom panel shows the residual distribution of the template fit scaled by the statistical uncertainties.
Invariant yield of the electrons from decays of prompt $J/\psi$, $\Upsilon$, Drell-Yan and light vector mesons in 0-80% Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 200 GeV.
Invariant yield of heavy flavor hadron decayed electrons in 0-80% Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 200 GeV.
A search for a heavy resonance decaying into a top quark and a W boson in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV is presented. The data analyzed were recorded with the CMS detector at the LHC and correspond to an integrated luminosity of 138 fb$^{-1}$. The top quark is reconstructed as a single jet and the W boson, from its decay into an electron or muon and the corresponding neutrino. A top quark tagging technique based on jet clustering with a variable distance parameter and simultaneous jet grooming is used to identify jets from the collimated top quark decay. The results are interpreted in the context of two benchmark models, where the heavy resonance is either an excited bottom quark b$^*$ or a vector-like quark B. A statistical combination with an earlier search by the CMS Collaboration in the all-hadronic final state is performed to place upper cross section limits on these two models. The new analysis extends the lower range of resonance mass probed from 1.4 down to 0.7 TeV. For left-handed, right-handed, and vector-like couplings, b$^*$ masses up to 3.0, 3.0, and 3.2 TeV are excluded at 95% confidence level, respectively. The observed upper limits represent the most stringent constraints on the b$^*$ model to date.
Distributions of MtW in the 1b category. The data are shown by filled markers, where the horizontal bars indicate the bin widths. The individual background contributions are given by filled histograms. The expected signal for a LH b* with mb∗ = 2.4 TeV is shown by a dashed line. The shaded region is the uncertainty in the total background estimate. The lower panel shows the ratio of data to the background estimate, with the total uncertainty on the predicted background displayed as the gray band.
Distributions of MtW in the 2b category. The data are shown by filled markers, where the horizontal bars indicate the bin widths. The individual background contributions are given by filled histograms. The expected signal for a LH b* with mb∗ = 2.4 TeV is shown by a dashed line. The shaded region is the uncertainty in the total background estimate. The lower panel shows the ratio of data to the background estimate, with the total uncertainty on the predicted background displayed as the gray band.
Upper limits on the production cross section times branching fraction of the b* LH hypothesis at a 95% CL. Dashed colored lines show the expected limits from the l+jets and all-hadronic channels, where the latter start at resonance masses of 1.4 TeV. The observed and expected limits from the combination are shown as solid and dashed black lines, respectively. The green and yellow bands show the 68 and 95% confidence intervals on the combined expected limits.
The STAR Collaboration reports measurements of back-to-back azimuthal correlations of di-$\pi^0$s produced at forward pseudorapidities ($2.6<\eta<4.0$) in $p$+$p$, $p+$Al, and $p+$Au collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 200 GeV. We observe a clear suppression of the correlated yields of back-to-back $\pi^0$ pairs in $p+$Al and $p+$Au collisions compared to the $p$+$p$ data. The observed suppression of back-to-back pairs as a function of transverse momentum suggests nonlinear gluon dynamics arising at high parton densities. The larger suppression found in $p+$Au relative to $p+$Al collisions exhibits a dependence of the saturation scale, $Q_s^2$, on the mass number, $A$. A linear scaling of the suppression with $A^{1/3}$ is observed with a slope of $-0.09$$\pm$$0.01$.
The correlation functions (corrected for nonuniform detector efficiency in $\phi$; not corrected for the absolute detection efficiency) vs. azimuthal angle difference between forward ($2.6<\eta<4.0$) $\pi^{0}$s in $p$+$p$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{_{NN}}}}=200$ GeV at low $p_{T}$ ($p^{trig}_{T}$=2-2.5 GeV/c, $p^{asso}_{T}$=1-1.5 GeV/c)
The correlation functions (corrected for nonuniform detector efficiency in $\phi$; not corrected for the absolute detection efficiency) vs. azimuthal angle difference between forward ($2.6<\eta<4.0$) $\pi^{0}$s in $p+$Al collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{_{NN}}}}=200$ GeV at low $p_{T}$ ($p^{trig}_{T}$=2-2.5 GeV/c, $p^{asso}_{T}$=1-1.5 GeV/c)
The correlation functions (corrected for nonuniform detector efficiency in $\phi$; not corrected for the absolute detection efficiency) vs. azimuthal angle difference between forward ($2.6<\eta<4.0$) $\pi^{0}$s in $p+$Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{_{NN}}}}=200$ GeV at low $p_{T}$ ($p^{trig}_{T}$=2-2.5 GeV/c, $p^{asso}_{T}$=1-1.5 GeV/c)
Proton-proton interactions resulting in final states with two photons are studied in a search for the signature of flavor-changing neutral current interactions of top quarks (t) and Higgs bosons (H). The analysis is based on data collected at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV with the CMS detector at the LHC, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 137 fb$^{-1}$. No significant excess above the background prediction is observed. Upper limits on the branching fractions ($\mathcal{B}$) of the top quark decaying to a Higgs boson and an up (u) or charm quark (c) are derived through a binned fit to the diphoton invariant mass spectrum. The observed (expected) 95% confidence level upper limits are found to be 0.019 (0.031)% for $\mathcal B$(t $\to$ Hu) and 0.073 (0.051)% for $\mathcal{B}$(t $\to$ Hc). These are the strictest upper limits yet determined.
Expected and observed 95\% CL upper limits on the branching fraction of the top quark decaying to the Higgs boson and a light-flavor quark (either an up or a charm quark)
A search for low-mass dilepton resonances in Higgs boson decays is conducted in the four-lepton final state. The decay is assumed to proceed via a pair of beyond the standard model particles, or one such particle and a Z boson. The search uses proton-proton collision data collected with the CMS detector at the CERN LHC, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 137 fb$^{-1}$, at a center-of-mass energy $\sqrt{s} =$ 13 TeV. No significant deviation from the standard model expectation is observed. Upper limits at 95% confidence level are set on model-independent Higgs boson decay branching fractions. Additionally, limits on dark photon and axion-like particle production, based on two specific models, are reported.
Exclusion limit for BrHXX_Br2Xee
Exclusion limit for BrHXX_Br2Xmumu
Exclusion limit for BrHXX_Br2Xll
We report measurements of the longitudinal double-spin asymmetry, $A_{LL}$, for inclusive jet and dijet production in polarized proton-proton collisions at midrapidity and center-of-mass energy $\sqrt{s}$ = 510 GeV, using the high luminosity data sample collected by the STAR experiment in 2013. These measurements complement and improve the precision of previous STAR measurements at the same center-of-mass energy that probe the polarized gluon distribution function at partonic momentum fraction 0.015 $\lesssim x \lesssim$ 0.25. The dijet asymmetries are separated into four jet-pair topologies, which provide further constraints on the $x$ dependence of the polarized gluon distribution function. These measurements are in agreement with previous STAR measurements and with predictions from current next-to-leading order global analyses. They provide more precise data at low dijet invariant mass that will better constraint the shape of the polarized gluon distribution function of the proton.
Parton jet $p_T$ vs $A_{LL}$ values with associated uncertainties.
Parton dijet $M_{inv}$ vs $A_{LL}$ values with associated uncertainties, for topology A.
Parton dijet $M_{inv}$ vs $A_{LL}$ values with associated uncertainties, for topology B.
The STAR collaboration presents jet substructure measurements related to both the momentum fraction and the opening angle within jets in \pp and \AuAu collisions at \sqrtsn $= 200$ GeV. The substructure observables include SoftDrop groomed momentum fraction (\zg), groomed jet radius (\rg), and subjet momentum fraction (\zsj) and opening angle (\tsj). The latter observable is introduced for the first time. Fully corrected subjet measurements are presented for \pp collisions and are compared to leading order Monte Carlo models. The subjet \tsj~distributions reflect the jets leading opening angle and are utilized as a proxy for the resolution scale of the medium in \AuAu collisions. We compare data from \AuAu collisions to those from \pp which are embedded in minimum-bias \AuAu events in order to include the effects of detector smearing and the heavy-ion collision underlying event. The subjet observables are shown to be more robust to the background than \zg~and \rg. We observe no significant modifications of the subjet observables within the two highest-energy, back-to-back jets, resulting in a distribution of opening angles and the splittings that are vacuum-like. We also report measurements of the differential di-jet momentum imbalance ($A_{\rm{J}}$) for jets of varying \tsj. We find no qualitative differences in energy loss signatures for varying angular scales in the range $0.1 < $\tsj $ < 0.3$, leading to the possible interpretation that energy loss in this population of high momentum di-jet pairs, is due to soft medium-induced gluon radiation from a single color-charge as it traverses the medium.
$z_{g}$ for HardCore Trigger jets in AuAu Data anti-kT R$=$0.4
$z_{g}$ for HardCore Trigger jets in pp$+$AuAu Data anti-kT R$=$0.4
$z_{g}$ for Matched Trigger jets in AuAu Data anti-kT R$=$0.4
We study the spin-exotic $J^{PC} = 1^{-+}$ amplitude in single-diffractive dissociation of 190 GeV$/c$ pions into $\pi^-\pi^-\pi^+$ using a hydrogen target and confirm the $\pi_1(1600) \to \rho(770) \pi$ amplitude, which interferes with a nonresonant $1^{-+}$ amplitude. We demonstrate that conflicting conclusions from previous studies on these amplitudes can be attributed to different analysis models and different treatment of the dependence of the amplitudes on the squared four-momentum transfer and we thus reconcile their experimental findings. We study the nonresonant contributions to the $\pi^-\pi^-\pi^+$ final state using pseudo-data generated on the basis of a Deck model. Subjecting pseudo-data and real data to the same partial-wave analysis, we find good agreement concerning the spectral shape and its dependence on the squared four-momentum transfer for the $J^{PC} = 1^{-+}$ amplitude and also for amplitudes with other $J^{PC}$ quantum numbers. We investigate for the first time the amplitude of the $\pi^-\pi^+$ subsystem with $J^{PC} = 1^{--}$ in the $3\pi$ amplitude with $J^{PC} = 1^{-+}$ employing the novel freed-isobar analysis scheme. We reveal this $\pi^-\pi^+$ amplitude to be dominated by the $\rho(770)$ for both the $\pi_1(1600)$ and the nonresonant contribution. We determine the $\rho(770)$ resonance parameters within the three-pion final state. These findings largely confirm the underlying assumptions for the isobar model used in all previous partial-wave analyses addressing the $J^{PC} = 1^{-+}$ amplitude.
Results for the spin-exotic $1^{-+}1^+[\pi\pi]_{1^{-\,-}}\pi P$ wave from the free-isobar partial-wave analysis performed in the first $t^\prime$ bin from $0.100$ to $0.141\;(\text{GeV}/c)^2$. The plotted values represent the intensity of the coherent sum of the dynamic isobar amplitudes $\{\mathcal{T}_k^\text{fit}\}$ as a function of $m_{3\pi}$, where the coherent sums run over all $m_{\pi^-\pi^+}$ bins indexed by $k$. These intensity values are given in number of events per $40\;\text{MeV}/c^2$ $m_{3\pi}$ interval and correspond to the orange points in Fig. 8(a). In the "Resources" section of this $t^\prime$ bin, we provide the JSON file named <code>transition_amplitudes_tBin_0.json</code> for download, which contains for each $m_{3\pi}$ bin the values of the transition amplitudes $\{\mathcal{T}_k^\text{fit}\}$ for all $m_{\pi^-\pi^+}$ bins, their covariances, and further information. The data in this JSON file are organized in independent bins of $m_{3\pi}$. The information in these bins can be accessed via the key <code>m3pi_bin_<#>_t_prime_bin_0</code>. Each independent $m_{3\pi}$ bin contains <ul> <li>the kinematic ranges of the $(m_{3\pi}, t^\prime)$ cell, which are accessible via the keys <code>m3pi_lower_limit</code>, <code>m3pi_upper_limit</code>, <code>t_prime_lower_limit</code>, and <code>t_prime_upper_limit</code>.</li> <li>the $m_{\pi^-\pi^+}$ bin borders, which are accessible via the keys <code>m2pi_lower_limits</code> and <code>m2pi_upper_limits</code>.</li> <li>the real and imaginary parts of the transition amplitudes $\{\mathcal{T}_k^\text{fit}\}$ for all $m_{\pi^-\pi^+}$ bins, which are accessible via the keys <code>transition_amplitudes_real_part</code> and <code>transition_amplitudes_imag_part</code>, respectively.</li> <li>the covariance matrix of the real and imaginary parts of the $\{\mathcal{T}_k^\text{fit}\}$ for all $m_{\pi^-\pi^+}$ bins, which is accessible via the key <code>covariance_matrix</code>. Note that this matrix is real-valued and that its rows and columns are indexed such that $(\Re,\Im)$ pairs of the transition amplitudes are arranged with increasing $k$.</li> <li>the normalization factors $\mathcal{N}_a$ in Eq. (13) for all $m_{\pi^-\pi^+}$ bins, which are accessible via the key <code>normalization_factors</code>.</li> <li>the shape of the zero mode, i.e., the values of $\tilde\Delta_k$ for all $m_{\pi^-\pi^+}$ bins, which is accessible via the key <code>zero_mode_shape</code>.</li> <li>the reference wave, which is accessible via the key <code>reference_wave</code>. Note that this is always the $4^{++}1^+\rho(770)\pi G$ wave.</li> </ul>
Results for the spin-exotic $1^{-+}1^+[\pi\pi]_{1^{-\,-}}\pi P$ wave from the free-isobar partial-wave analysis performed in the second $t^\prime$ bin from $0.141$ to $0.194\;(\text{GeV}/c)^2$. The plotted values represent the intensity of the coherent sum of the dynamic isobar amplitudes $\{\mathcal{T}_k^\text{fit}\}$ as a function of $m_{3\pi}$, where the coherent sums run over all $m_{\pi^-\pi^+}$ bins indexed by $k$. These intensity values are given in number of events per $40\;\text{MeV}/c^2$ $m_{3\pi}$ interval and correspond to the orange points in Fig. 15(a) in the supplemental material of the paper. In the "Resources" section of this $t^\prime$ bin, we provide the JSON file named <code>transition_amplitudes_tBin_1.json</code> for download, which contains for each $m_{3\pi}$ bin the values of the transition amplitudes $\{\mathcal{T}_k^\text{fit}\}$ for all $m_{\pi^-\pi^+}$ bins, their covariances, and further information. The data in this JSON file are organized in independent bins of $m_{3\pi}$. The information in these bins can be accessed via the key <code>m3pi_bin_<#>_t_prime_bin_1</code>. Each independent $m_{3\pi}$ bin contains <ul> <li>the kinematic ranges of the $(m_{3\pi}, t^\prime)$ cell, which are accessible via the keys <code>m3pi_lower_limit</code>, <code>m3pi_upper_limit</code>, <code>t_prime_lower_limit</code>, and <code>t_prime_upper_limit</code>.</li> <li>the $m_{\pi^-\pi^+}$ bin borders, which are accessible via the keys <code>m2pi_lower_limits</code> and <code>m2pi_upper_limits</code>.</li> <li>the real and imaginary parts of the transition amplitudes $\{\mathcal{T}_k^\text{fit}\}$ for all $m_{\pi^-\pi^+}$ bins, which are accessible via the keys <code>transition_amplitudes_real_part</code> and <code>transition_amplitudes_imag_part</code>, respectively.</li> <li>the covariance matrix of the real and imaginary parts of the $\{\mathcal{T}_k^\text{fit}\}$ for all $m_{\pi^-\pi^+}$ bins, which is accessible via the key <code>covariance_matrix</code>. Note that this matrix is real-valued and that its rows and columns are indexed such that $(\Re,\Im)$ pairs of the transition amplitudes are arranged with increasing $k$.</li> <li>the normalization factors $\mathcal{N}_a$ in Eq. (13) for all $m_{\pi^-\pi^+}$ bins, which are accessible via the key <code>normalization_factors</code>.</li> <li>the shape of the zero mode, i.e., the values of $\tilde\Delta_k$ for all $m_{\pi^-\pi^+}$ bins, which is accessible via the key <code>zero_mode_shape</code>.</li> <li>the reference wave, which is accessible via the key <code>reference_wave</code>. Note that this is always the $4^{++}1^+\rho(770)\pi G$ wave.</li> </ul>
Results for the spin-exotic $1^{-+}1^+[\pi\pi]_{1^{-\,-}}\pi P$ wave from the free-isobar partial-wave analysis performed in the third $t^\prime$ bin from $0.194$ to $0.326\;(\text{GeV}/c)^2$. The plotted values represent the intensity of the coherent sum of the dynamic isobar amplitudes $\{\mathcal{T}_k^\text{fit}\}$ as a function of $m_{3\pi}$, where the coherent sums run over all $m_{\pi^-\pi^+}$ bins indexed by $k$. These intensity values are given in number of events per $40\;\text{MeV}/c^2$ $m_{3\pi}$ interval and correspond to the orange points in Fig. 15(b) in the supplemental material of the paper. In the "Resources" section of this $t^\prime$ bin, we provide the JSON file named <code>transition_amplitudes_tBin_2.json</code> for download, which contains for each $m_{3\pi}$ bin the values of the transition amplitudes $\{\mathcal{T}_k^\text{fit}\}$ for all $m_{\pi^-\pi^+}$ bins, their covariances, and further information. The data in this JSON file are organized in independent bins of $m_{3\pi}$. The information in these bins can be accessed via the key <code>m3pi_bin_<#>_t_prime_bin_2</code>. Each independent $m_{3\pi}$ bin contains <ul> <li>the kinematic ranges of the $(m_{3\pi}, t^\prime)$ cell, which are accessible via the keys <code>m3pi_lower_limit</code>, <code>m3pi_upper_limit</code>, <code>t_prime_lower_limit</code>, and <code>t_prime_upper_limit</code>.</li> <li>the $m_{\pi^-\pi^+}$ bin borders, which are accessible via the keys <code>m2pi_lower_limits</code> and <code>m2pi_upper_limits</code>.</li> <li>the real and imaginary parts of the transition amplitudes $\{\mathcal{T}_k^\text{fit}\}$ for all $m_{\pi^-\pi^+}$ bins, which are accessible via the keys <code>transition_amplitudes_real_part</code> and <code>transition_amplitudes_imag_part</code>, respectively.</li> <li>the covariance matrix of the real and imaginary parts of the $\{\mathcal{T}_k^\text{fit}\}$ for all $m_{\pi^-\pi^+}$ bins, which is accessible via the key <code>covariance_matrix</code>. Note that this matrix is real-valued and that its rows and columns are indexed such that $(\Re,\Im)$ pairs of the transition amplitudes are arranged with increasing $k$.</li> <li>the normalization factors $\mathcal{N}_a$ in Eq. (13) for all $m_{\pi^-\pi^+}$ bins, which are accessible via the key <code>normalization_factors</code>.</li> <li>the shape of the zero mode, i.e., the values of $\tilde\Delta_k$ for all $m_{\pi^-\pi^+}$ bins, which is accessible via the key <code>zero_mode_shape</code>.</li> <li>the reference wave, which is accessible via the key <code>reference_wave</code>. Note that this is always the $4^{++}1^+\rho(770)\pi G$ wave.</li> </ul>
We report the first multi-differential measurements of strange hadrons of $K^{-}$, $\phi$ and $\Xi^{-}$ yields as well as the ratios of $\phi/K^-$ and $\phi/\Xi^-$ in Au+Au collisions at ${\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}} = \rm{3\,GeV}}$ with the STAR experiment fixed target configuration at RHIC. The $\phi$ mesons and $\Xi^{-}$ hyperons are measured through hadronic decay channels, $\phi\rightarrow K^+K^-$ and $\Xi^-\rightarrow \Lambda\pi^-$. Collision centrality and rapidity dependence of the transverse momentum spectra for these strange hadrons are presented. The $4\pi$ yields and ratios are compared to thermal model and hadronic transport model predictions. At this collision energy, thermal model with grand canonical ensemble (GCE) under-predicts the $\phi/K^-$ and $\phi/\Xi^-$ ratios while the result of canonical ensemble (CE) calculations reproduce $\phi/K^-$, with the correlation length $r_c \sim 2.7$ fm, and $\phi/\Xi^-$, $r_c \sim 4.2$ fm, for the 0-10% central collisions. Hadronic transport models including high mass resonance decays could also describe the ratios. While thermal calculations with GCE work well for strangeness production in high energy collisions, the change to CE at $\rm{3\,GeV}$ implies a rather different medium property at high baryon density.
$K^-$ (a), invariant yields as a function of $m_T-m_0$ for various rapidity regions in 0--10\% central Au+Au collisions at ${\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = \mathrm{3\,GeV}}$. Statistics and systematic uncertainties are added quadratic here for plotting. Solid and dashed black lines depict $m_T$ exponential function fits to the measured data points with arbitrate scaling factors in each rapidity windows.
$\phi$ meson (b) invariant yields as a function of $m_T-m_0$ for various rapidity regions in 0--10\% central Au+Au collisions at ${\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = \mathrm{3\,GeV}}$. Statistics and systematic uncertainties are added quadratic here for plotting. Solid and dashed black lines depict $m_T$ exponential function fits to the measured data points with arbitrate scaling factors in each rapidity windows.
$\Xi^-$ (c) invariant yields as a function of $m_T-m_0$ for various rapidity regions in 0--10\% central Au+Au collisions at ${\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = \mathrm{3\,GeV}}$. Statistics and systematic uncertainties are added quadratic here for plotting. Solid and dashed black lines depict $m_T$ exponential function fits to the measured data points with arbitrate scaling factors in each rapidity windows.
We report on the measurements of directed flow $v_1$ and elliptic flow $v_2$ for hadrons ($\pi^{\pm}$, $K^{\pm}$, $K_{S}^0$, $p$, $\phi$, $\Lambda$ and $\Xi^{-}$) from Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3 GeV and $v_{2}$ for ($\pi^{\pm}$, $K^{\pm}$, $p$ and $\overline{p}$) at 27 and 54.4 GeV with the STAR experiment. While at the two higher energy midcentral collisions the number-of-constituent-quark (NCQ) scaling holds, at 3 GeV the $v_{2}$ at midrapidity is negative for all hadrons and the NCQ scaling is absent. In addition, the $v_1$ slopes at midrapidity for almost all observed hadrons are found to be positive, implying dominant repulsive baryonic interactions. The features of negative $v_2$ and positive $v_1$ slope at 3 GeV can be reproduced with a baryonic mean-field in transport model calculations. These results imply that the medium in such collisions is likely characterized by baryonic interactions.
Event plane resolution as a function of collision centrality from Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$=3 (a), 27 and 54.4 GeV (b). In case of the 3 GeV collisions, $\Psi_{1}$ is used to determine the event plane resolutions for the first and second harmonic coefficients shown as $R_{11}$ and $R_{12}$ in left panel. In the 27 and 54.4 GeV collisions, $\Psi_{2}$ is used to evaluate the second order event plane resolution, see right panel. In all cases, the statistic uncertainties are smaller than symbol sizes.
Rapidity($y$) dependence of $v_1$ (top panels) and $v_2$ (bottom panels) of proton and $\Lambda$ baryons (left panels), pions (middle panels) and kaons (right panels) in 10-40% centrality for the $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3GeV Au+Au collisions. Statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown as bars and gray bands, respectively. Some uncertainties are smaller than the data points. The UrQMD and JAM results are shown as bands:golden, red and blue bands stand for JAM mean-field, UrQMD mean-field and UrQMD cascade mode, respectively. The value of the incompressibility $\kappa$ = 380 MeV is used in the mean-field option. More detailed model descriptions and data comparisons can be found in Supplemental Material.
Rapidity($y$) dependence of $v_1$ (top panels) and $v_2$ (bottom panels) of proton and $\Lambda$ baryons (left panels), pions (middle panels) and kaons (right panels) in 10-40% centrality for the $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3GeV Au+Au collisions. Statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown as bars and gray bands, respectively. Some uncertainties are smaller than the data points. The UrQMD and JAM results are shown as bands:golden, red and blue bands stand for JAM mean-field, UrQMD mean-field and UrQMD cascade mode, respectively. The value of the incompressibility $\kappa$ = 380 MeV is used in the mean-field option. More detailed model descriptions and data comparisons can be found in Supplemental Material.
Global hyperon polarization, $\overline{P}_\mathrm{H}$, in Au+Au collisions over a large range of collision energy, $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}$, was recently measured and successfully reproduced by hydrodynamic and transport models with intense fluid vorticity of the quark-gluon plasma. While naïve extrapolation of data trends suggests a large $\overline{P}_\mathrm{H}$ as the collision energy is reduced, the behavior of $\overline{P}_\mathrm{H}$ at small $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}<7.7$ GeV is unknown. Operating the STAR experiment in fixed-target mode, we measured the polarization of $\Lambda$ hyperons along the direction of global angular momentum in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}=3$ GeV. The observation of substantial polarization of $4.91\pm0.81(\rm stat.)\pm0.15(\rm syst.)$% in these collisions may require a reexamination of the viscosity of any fluid created in the collision, of the thermalization timescale of rotational modes, and of hadronic mechanisms to produce global polarization.
The measured invariant-mass distributions of two classes of $\Lambda$-hyperon decays. The decay classes are defined using the scalar triple product $\left(\vec{p}_\Lambda\times\vec{p}_p^*\right)\cdot \vec{B}_{\rm STAR}$, which is positive for right decays and negative for left decays. The right decay class has a notably sharper invariant-mass distribution than the left decay class, and this is due to the effects of daughter tracks crossing in the STAR TPC with the STAR magnetic field anti-parallel to the lab frame's z direction. The opposite pattern is obtained by flipping the sign of the STAR magnetic field or by reconstructing $\bar{\Lambda}$ hyperons.
The signal polarizations extracted according to the restricted invariant-mass method as a function of $\phi_\Lambda - \phi_p^*$, for positive-rapidity $\Lambda$ hyperons. The sinusoidal behavior is driven by non-zero net $v_1$. The vertical shift corresponds to the vorticity-driven polarization; in collider mode, where the net $v_1$ is zero, this dependence on $\phi_\Lambda - \phi_p^*$ does not exist.
The integrated Global $\Lambda$-hyperon Polarization in mid-central collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}=3$ GeV. The trend of increasing $\overline{P}_{\rm H}$ with decreasing $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ is maintained at this low collision energy. Previous experimental results are scaled by the updated $\Lambda$-hyperon decay parameter $\alpha_\Lambda=0.732$ for comparison with this result. Recent model calculations extended to low collision energy show disagreement between our data and AMPT and rough agreement with the 3-Fluid Dynamics (3FD) model. Previous measurements shown alongside our data can be found at: https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins750410?version=2; https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins1510474?version=1; https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins1672785?version=2; https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins1752507?version=2.
The chiral magnetic effect (CME) refers to charge separation along a strong magnetic field due to imbalanced chirality of quarks in local parity and charge-parity violating domains in quantum chromodynamics. The experimental measurement of the charge separation is made difficult by the presence of a major background from elliptic azimuthal anisotropy. This background and the CME signal have different sensitivities to the spectator and participant planes, and could thus be determined by measurements with respect to these planes. We report such measurements in Au+Au collisions at a nucleon-nucleon center-of-mass energy of 200 GeV at the Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collider. It is found that the charge separation, with the flow background removed, is consistent with zero in peripheral (large impact parameter) collisions. Some indication of finite CME signals is seen in mid-central (intermediate impact parameter) collisions. Significant residual background effects may, however, still be present.
The centrality dependencies of the $v_{2}\{\psi_\mathrm{TPC}\}$ for Au+Au collision at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$=200 GeV.
The centrality dependencies of the $v_{2}\{\psi_\mathrm{ZDC}\}$ for Au+Au collision at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$=200 GeV.
The centrality dependencies of the $\Delta\gamma\{\psi_\mathrm{TPC}\}$ for Au+Au collision at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$=200 GeV.
In particle collider experiments, elementary particle interactions with large momentum transfer produce quarks and gluons (known as partons) whose evolution is governed by the strong force, as described by the theory of quantum chromodynamics (QCD). These partons subsequently emit further partons in a process that can be described as a parton shower which culminates in the formation of detectable hadrons. Studying the pattern of the parton shower is one of the key experimental tools for testing QCD. This pattern is expected to depend on the mass of the initiating parton, through a phenomenon known as the dead-cone effect, which predicts a suppression of the gluon spectrum emitted by a heavy quark of mass $m_{\rm{Q}}$ and energy $E$, within a cone of angular size $m_{\rm{Q}}$/$E$ around the emitter. Previously, a direct observation of the dead-cone effect in QCD had not been possible, owing to the challenge of reconstructing the cascading quarks and gluons from the experimentally accessible hadrons. We report the direct observation of the QCD dead cone by using new iterative declustering techniques to reconstruct the parton shower of charm quarks. This result confirms a fundamental feature of QCD. Furthermore, the measurement of a dead-cone angle constitutes a direct experimental observation of the non-zero mass of the charm quark, which is a fundamental constant in the standard model of particle physics.
The $R(\theta)$ variable for charm/inclusive emissions in three bins of $E_{Rad}$: 5-10, 10-20 and 20-35 GeV.
A search for lepton-flavor-violating $Z\to e\tau$ and $Z\to\mu\tau$ decays with $pp$ collision data recorded by the ATLAS detector at the LHC is presented. This analysis uses 139 fb$^{-1}$ of Run 2 $pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV and is combined with the results of a similar ATLAS search in the final state in which the $\tau$-lepton decays hadronically, using the same data set as well as Run 1 data. The addition of leptonically decaying $\tau$-leptons significantly improves the sensitivity reach for $Z\to\ell\tau$ decays. The $Z\to\ell\tau$ branching fractions are constrained in this analysis to $\mathcal{B}(Z\to e\tau)<7.0\times10^{-6}$ and $\mathcal{B}(Z\to \mu\tau)<7.2\times10^{-6}$ at 95% confidence level. The combination with the previously published analyses sets the strongest constraints to date: $\mathcal{B}(Z\to e\tau)<5.0\times10^{-6}$ and $\mathcal{B}(Z\to \mu\tau)<6.5\times10^{-6}$ at 95% confidence level.
The best-fit predicted and observed distributions of the combined NN output in the low-$p_\text{T}$-SR for the $e\tau_\mu$ channel. The first and last bin include underflow and overflow events, respectively.
The best-fit predicted and observed distributions of the combined NN output in the low-$p_\text{T}$-SR for the $\mu\tau_e$ channel. The first and last bin include underflow and overflow events, respectively.
The best-fit predicted and observed distributions of the combined NN output in the high-$p_\text{T}$-SR for the $e\tau_\mu$ channel. The first and last bin include underflow and overflow events, respectively.
A search is presented for long-lived particles produced in pairs in proton-proton collisions at the LHC operating at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV. The data were collected with the CMS detector during the period from 2015 through 2018, and correspond to a total integrated luminosity of 140 fb$^{-1}$. This search targets pairs of long-lived particles with mean proper decay lengths between 0.1 and 100 mm, each of which decays into at least two quarks that hadronize to jets, resulting in a final state with two displaced vertices. No significant excess of events with two displaced vertices is observed. In the context of $R$-parity violating supersymmetry models, the pair production of long-lived neutralinos, gluinos, and top squarks is excluded at 95% confidence level for cross sections larger than 0.08 fb, masses between 800 and 3000 GeV, and mean proper decay lengths between 1 and 25 mm.
Event yields in the control samples in data. The ''one-vertex'' events correspond to events containing exactly one vertex with the specified number of tracks. The ''two-vertex'' events have two or more vertices containing the specified numbers of tracks. We seek the signal in the $\geq$5-track two-vertex sample.
The distribution of distances between vertices in the $x$-$y$ plane, $d_{\mathrm{VV}}$, for three simulated multijet signals each with a mass of 1600 GeV, with the background template distribution overlaid. The production cross section for each signal model is assumed to be the lower limit excluded by CMS-EXO-17-018, corresponding to values of 0.8, 0.25, and 0.15 fb for the samples with $c\tau =$ 0.3, 1.0, and 10 mm, respectively. The last bin includes the overflow events. The two vertical pink dashed lines separate the regions used in the fit.
Multijet signal efficiencies as a function of the signal mass and lifetime for events satisfying all event and vertex requirements, with corrections based on systematic differences in the vertex reconstruction efficiency between data and simulation.
Measurements of both the inclusive and differential production cross sections of a top-quark-antiquark pair in association with a $Z$ boson ($t\bar{t}Z$) are presented. The measurements are performed by targeting final states with three or four isolated leptons (electrons or muons) and are based on $\sqrt{s} = 13$ TeV proton-proton collision data with an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$, recorded from 2015 to 2018 with the ATLAS detector at the CERN Large Hadron Collider. The inclusive cross section is measured to be $\sigma_{t\bar{t}Z} = 0.99 \pm 0.05$ (stat.) $\pm 0.08$ (syst.) pb, in agreement with the most precise theoretical predictions. The differential measurements are presented as a function of a number of kinematic variables which probe the kinematics of the $t\bar{t}Z$ system. Both absolute and normalised differential cross-section measurements are performed at particle and parton levels for specific fiducial volumes and are compared with theoretical predictions at different levels of precision, based on a $\chi^{2}/$ndf and $p$-value computation. Overall, good agreement is observed between the unfolded data and the predictions.
The measured $t\bar{t}\text{Z}$ cross-section value and its uncertainty based on the fit results from the combined trilepton and tetralepton channels. The value corresponds to the phase-space region where the difermion mass from the Z boson decay lies in the range $70 < m_{f\bar{f}} < 110$ GeV.
The measured $t\bar{t}\text{Z}$ cross-section value and its uncertainty based on the fit results from the combined trilepton and tetralepton channels. The value corresponds to the phase-space region where the difermion mass from the Z boson decay lies in the range $70 < m_{f\bar{f}} < 110$ GeV.
List of relative uncertainties of the measured inclusive $t\bar{t}\text{Z}$ cross section from the combined fit. The uncertainties are symmetrised for presentation and grouped into the categories described in the text. The quadratic sum of the individual uncertainties is not equal to the total uncertainty due to correlations introduced by the fit.
A search for supersymmetry in events with four or more charged leptons (electrons, muons and $\tau$-leptons) is presented. The analysis uses a data sample corresponding to $139\,\mbox{fb\(^{-1}\)}$ of proton-proton collisions delivered by the Large Hadron Collider at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV and recorded by the ATLAS detector. Four-lepton signal regions with up to two hadronically decaying $\tau$-leptons are designed to target several supersymmetric models, while a general five-lepton signal region targets any new physics phenomena leading to a final state with five charged leptons. Data yields are consistent with Standard Model expectations and results are used to set upper limits on contributions from processes beyond the Standard Model. Exclusion limits are set at the 95% confidence level in simplified models of general gauge-mediated supersymmetry, excluding higgsino masses up to $540$ GeV. In $R$-parity-violating simplified models with decays of the lightest supersymmetric particle to charged leptons, lower limits of $1.6$ TeV, $1.2$ TeV, and $2.5$ TeV are placed on wino, slepton and gluino masses, respectively.
The $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ distribution in SR0-ZZ$^{\mathrm{loose}}$ and SR0-ZZ$^{\mathrm{tight}}$ for events passing the signal region requirements except the $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ requirement. Distributions for data, the estimated SM backgrounds after the background-only fit, and an example SUSY scenario are shown. "Other" is the sum of the $tWZ$, $t\bar{t}WW$, $t\bar{t} ZZ$, $t\bar{t} WH$, $t\bar{t} HH$, $t\bar{t} tW$, and $t\bar{t}t\bar{t}$ backgrounds. The last bin captures the overflow events. The lower panel shows the ratio of the observed data to the expected SM background yield in each bin. Both the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background are included in the shaded band. The red arrows indicate the $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ selections in the signal regions.
The $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ distribution in SR0-ZZ$_{\mathrm{bveto}}^{\mathrm{loose}}$ and SR0-ZZ$_{\mathrm{bveto}}^{\mathrm{tight}}$ for events passing the signal region requirements except the $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ requirement. Distributions for data, the estimated SM backgrounds after the background-only fit, and an example SUSY scenario are shown. "Other" is the sum of the $tWZ$, $t\bar{t}WW$, $t\bar{t} ZZ$, $t\bar{t} WH$, $t\bar{t} HH$, $t\bar{t} tW$, and $t\bar{t}t\bar{t}$ backgrounds. The last bin captures the overflow events. The lower panel shows the ratio of the observed data to the expected SM background yield in each bin. Both the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background are included in the shaded band. The red arrows indicate the $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ selections in the signal regions.
The $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ distribution in SR5L. Distributions for data, the estimated SM backgrounds after the background-only fit, and an example SUSY scenario are shown. "Other" is the sum of the $tWZ$, $t\bar{t}WW$, $t\bar{t} ZZ$, $t\bar{t} WH$, $t\bar{t} HH$, $t\bar{t} tW$, and $t\bar{t}t\bar{t}$ backgrounds. The last bin captures the overflow events. The lower panel shows the ratio of the observed data to the expected SM background yield in each bin. Both the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the SM background are included in the shaded band.
A search for pair production of bottom squarks in events with hadronically decaying $\tau$-leptons, $b$-tagged jets and large missing transverse momentum is presented. The analyzed dataset is based on proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV delivered by the Large Hadron Collider and recorded by the ATLAS detector from 2015 to 2018, and corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$. The observed data are compatible with the expected Standard Model background. Results are interpreted in a simplified model where each bottom squark is assumed to decay into the second-lightest neutralino $\tilde \chi_2^0$ and a bottom quark, with $\tilde \chi_2^0$ decaying into a Higgs boson and the lightest neutralino $\tilde \chi_1^0$. The search focuses on final states where at least one Higgs boson decays into a pair of hadronically decaying $\tau$-leptons. This allows the acceptance and thus the sensitivity to be significantly improved relative to the previous results at low masses of the $\tilde \chi_2^0$, where bottom-squark masses up to 850 GeV are excluded at the 95% confidence level, assuming a mass difference of 130 GeV between $\tilde \chi_2^0$ and $\tilde \chi_1^0$. Model-independent upper limits are also set on the cross section of processes beyond the Standard Model.
The expected exclusion contour at $95\%$ CL as a function of the M(Sbottom) vs. M(N2) with the $\Delta M$(N2,N1) = 130 GeV. Masses within the contour are excluded.
The observed exclusion contour at $95\%$ CL as a function of the M(Sbottom) vs. M(N2) with the $\Delta M$(N2,N1) = 130 GeV. Masses within the contour are excluded.
Acceptance in the Single-bin SR as a function of the M(Sbottom) vs. M(N2) with the $\Delta M$(N2,N1) = 130 GeV. Keep in mind that the acceptance is given in units of $10^{-4}$.
We report high-precision measurements of the longitudinal double-spin asymmetry, $A_{LL}$, for midrapidity inclusive jet and dijet production in polarized $pp$ collisions at a center-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s}=200\,\mathrm{GeV}$. The new inclusive jet data are sensitive to the gluon helicity distribution, $\Delta g(x,Q^2)$, for gluon momentum fractions in the range from $x \simeq 0.05$ to $x \simeq 0.5$, while the new dijet data provide further constraints on the $x$ dependence of $\Delta g(x,Q^2)$. The results are in good agreement with previous measurements at $\sqrt{s}=200\,\mathrm{GeV}$ and with recent theoretical evaluations of prior world data. Our new results have better precision and thus strengthen the evidence that $\Delta g(x,Q^2)$ is positive for $x > 0.05$.
Jet yield versus jet transverse momentum $p_{T}$ at the detector level and at the parton level. Table includes data for the JP2 trigger conditions and the corresponding simulations.
Jet yield versus jet transverse momentum $p_{T}$ at the detector level and at the parton level. Table includes data for the JP1 trigger conditions and the corresponding simulations.
Dijet yield versus the dijet $M_{inv}$ at the detector level and at the parton level. Table includes data for the JP1 and JP2 trigger conditions and the corresponding simulations.
Measurements of four-lepton differential and integrated fiducial cross-sections in events with two same-flavour, opposite-charge electron or muon pairs are presented. The data correspond to 139 fb$^{-1}$ of $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV proton-proton collisions, collected by the ATLAS detector during Run 2 of the Large Hadron Collider (2015-2018). The final state has contributions from a number of interesting Standard Model processes that dominate in different four-lepton invariant mass regions, including single $Z$ boson production, Higgs boson production and on-shell $ZZ$ production, with a complex mix of interference terms, and possible contributions from physics beyond the Standard Model. The differential cross-sections include the four-lepton invariant mass inclusively, in slices of other kinematic variables, and in different lepton flavour categories. Also measured are dilepton invariant masses, transverse momenta, and angular correlation variables, in four regions of four-lepton invariant mass, each dominated by different processes. The measurements are corrected for detector effects and are compared with state-of-the-art Standard Model calculations, which are found to be consistent with the data. The $Z\rightarrow 4\ell$ branching fraction is extracted, giving a value of $\left(4.41 \pm 0.30\right) \times 10^{-6}$. Constraints on effective field theory parameters and a model based on a spontaneously broken $B-L$ gauge symmetry are also evaluated. Further reinterpretations can be performed with the provided information.
Inclusive differential cross section for four leptons (Max = 1710~GeV).
Inclusive differential cross section for four muons (Max = 1320~GeV)
Inclusive differential cross section for four electrons (Max = 887~GeV).
Searches for new resonances in the diphoton final state, with spin 0 as predicted by theories with an extended Higgs sector and with spin 2 using a warped extra-dimension benchmark model, are presented using 139 fb$^{-1}$ of $\sqrt{s} = $ 13 TeV $pp$ collision data collected by the ATLAS experiment at the LHC. No significant deviation from the Standard Model is observed and upper limits are placed on the production cross-section times branching ratio to two photons as a function of the resonance mass.
The expected and observed upper limits at 95\% CL on the fiducial cross-section times branching ratio to two photons of a narrow-width (Γ_X = 4 MeV) spin-0 resonance as a function of its mass m_X. For masses greater than 1000 GeV, pseudo-experiments are used to verify the expected and observed limits, and used in place of the asymptotic limit when differences are observed.
The expected and observed upper limits at 95\% CL on the fiducial cross-section times branching ratio to two photons of a narrow-width (Γ_X = 4 MeV) spin-0 resonance as a function of its mass m_X. For masses greater than 1000 GeV, pseudo-experiments are used to verify the expected and observed limits, and used in place of the asymptotic limit when differences are observed.
The expected and observed upper limits at 95\% CL on the production cross-section times branching ratio to two photons of the lightest KK graviton as a function of its mass for k/Mpl=0.10. For masses greater than 1000 GeV, pseudo-experiments are used to verify the expected and observed limits, and used in place of the asymptotic limit when differences are observed.
Results of a search for new physics in final states with an energetic jet and large missing transverse momentum are reported. The search uses proton-proton collision data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$ at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV collected in the period 2015-2018 with the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider. Compared to previous publications, in addition to an increase of almost a factor of four in the data size, the analysis implements a number of improvements in the signal selection and the background determination leading to enhanced sensitivity. Events are required to have at least one jet with transverse momentum above 150 GeV and no reconstructed leptons ($e$, $\mu$ or $\tau$) or photons. Several signal regions are considered with increasing requirements on the missing transverse momentum starting at 200 GeV. Overall agreement is observed between the number of events in data and the Standard Model predictions. Model-independent 95 % confidence-level limits on visible cross sections for new processes are obtained in the range between 736 fb and 0.3 fb with increasing missing transverse momentum. Results are also translated into improved exclusion limits in models with pair-produced weakly interacting dark-matter candidates, large extra spatial dimensions, supersymmetric particles in several compressed scenarios, axion-like particles, and new scalar particles in dark-energy-inspired models. In addition, the data are translated into bounds on the invisible branching ratio of the Higgs boson.
- - - - - - - - Overview of HEPData Record - - - - - - - - <br/><br/> <b>Post-fit $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{recoil}}$ distribution:</b> <ul> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=HistogramCR1mu0b">CR1mu0b</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=HistogramCR1e0b">CR1e0b</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=HistogramCR1L1b">CR1L1b</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=HistogramCR2mu">CR2mu</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=HistogramCR2e">CR2e</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=HistogramSR">SR</a> </ul> <b>Exclusion contours:</b> <ul> <li>Dark Matter axial-vector mediator: <ul> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=ContourobsDMA">observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourobs_p1DMA">+1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourobs_m1DMA">-1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=ContourexpDMA">expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourexp_p1DMA">+1 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourexp_m1DMA">-1 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourexp_p2DMA">+2 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourexp_m2DMA">-2 $\sigma$ expected</a> </ul> <li>Dark Matter pseudo-scalar mediator: <ul> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=ContourobsDMP">observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourobs_p1DMP">+1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourobs_m1DMP">-1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=ContourexpDMP">expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourexp_p1DMP">+1 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourexp_m1DMP">-1 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourexp_p2DMP">+2 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourexp_m2DMP">-2 $\sigma$ expected</a> </ul> <li>Dark Matter vector mediator: <ul> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=ContourobsDMV">observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourobs_p1DMV">+1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourobs_m1DMV">-1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=ContourexpDMV">expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourexp_p1DMV">+1 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourexp_m1DMV">-1 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourexp_p2DMV">+2 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourexp_m2DMV">-2 $\sigma$ expected</a> </ul> <li>Dark Matter spin-dependent WIMP-nucleon scattering cross-section: <a href="102093?version=1&table=ContourSDneutron">observed</a> <li>Dark Matter spin-independent WIMP-nucleon scattering cross-section: <a href="102093?version=1&table=ContourSInucleon">observed</a> <li>Dark Matter WIMP annihilation rate: <a href="102093?version=1&table=ContourID">observed</a> <li>SUSY stop pair production: <ul> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourg_obsTT_directCC">observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourg_obs_p1TT_directCC">+1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourg_obs_m1TT_directCC">-1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourg_expTT_directCC">expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourg_exp_p1TT_directCC">+1 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourg_exp_m1TT_directCC">-1 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourg_exp_p2TT_directCC">+2 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourg_exp_m2TT_directCC">-2 $\sigma$ expected</a> </ul> <li>SUSY stop pair production (4-body decay): <ul> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourg_obsTT_bffN">observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourg_obs_p1TT_bffN">+1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourg_obs_m1TT_bffN">-1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourg_expTT_bffN">expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourg_exp_p1TT_bffN">+1 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourg_exp_m1TT_bffN">-1 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourg_exp_p2TT_bffN">+2 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourg_exp_m2TT_bffN">-2 $\sigma$ expected</a> </ul> <li>SUSY sbottom pair production: <ul> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourg_obsBB">observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourg_obs_p1BB">+1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourg_obs_m1BB">-1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourg_expBB">expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourg_exp_p1BB">+1 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourg_exp_m1BB">-1 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourg_exp_p2BB">+2 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourg_exp_m2BB">-2 $\sigma$ expected</a> </ul> <li>SUSY squark pair production: <ul> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourg_obsSS">observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourg_obs_p1SS">+1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourg_obs_m1SS">-1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ observed</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourg_expSS">expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourg_exp_p1SS">+1 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourg_exp_m1SS">-1 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourg_exp_p2SS">+2 $\sigma$ expected</a> <li><a href="102093?version=1&table=Contourg_exp_m2SS">-2 $\sigma$ expected</a> </ul> <li>Dark energy: <a href="102093?version=1&table=ContourDE">observed and expected</a> <li>ADD: <a href="102093?version=1&table=ContourADD">observed and expected</a> <li>Axion-like particles: <a href="102093?version=1&table=ContourALPs">observed and expected</a> </ul> <b>Impact of systematic uncertainties:</b> <a href="102093?version=1&table=Tablesystimpacts">Table</a><br/><br/> <b>Yields of exclusive regions:</b> <a href="102093?version=1&table=TableyieldsEM0">EM0</a> <a href="102093?version=1&table=TableyieldsEM1">EM1</a> <a href="102093?version=1&table=TableyieldsEM2">EM2</a> <a href="102093?version=1&table=TableyieldsEM3">EM3</a> <a href="102093?version=1&table=TableyieldsEM4">EM4</a> <a href="102093?version=1&table=TableyieldsEM5">EM5</a> <a href="102093?version=1&table=TableyieldsEM6">EM6</a> <a href="102093?version=1&table=TableyieldsEM7">EM7</a> <a href="102093?version=1&table=TableyieldsEM8">EM8</a> <a href="102093?version=1&table=TableyieldsEM9">EM9</a> <a href="102093?version=1&table=TableyieldsEM10">EM10</a> <a href="102093?version=1&table=TableyieldsEM11">EM11</a> <a href="102093?version=1&table=TableyieldsEM12">EM12</a><br/><br/> <b>Yields of inclusive regions:</b> <a href="102093?version=1&table=TableyieldsIM0">IM0</a> <a href="102093?version=1&table=TableyieldsIM1">IM1</a> <a href="102093?version=1&table=TableyieldsIM2">IM2</a> <a href="102093?version=1&table=TableyieldsIM3">IM3</a> <a href="102093?version=1&table=TableyieldsIM4">IM4</a> <a href="102093?version=1&table=TableyieldsIM5">IM5</a> <a href="102093?version=1&table=TableyieldsIM6">IM6</a> <a href="102093?version=1&table=TableyieldsIM7">IM7</a> <a href="102093?version=1&table=TableyieldsIM8">IM8</a> <a href="102093?version=1&table=TableyieldsIM9">IM9</a> <a href="102093?version=1&table=TableyieldsIM10">IM10</a> <a href="102093?version=1&table=TableyieldsIM11">IM11</a> <a href="102093?version=1&table=TableyieldsIM12">IM12</a><br/><br/> <b>Cutflows:</b><br/><br/> Signals filtered with a truth $E_\mathrm{T}^\mathrm{miss}$ cut at: <ul> <li> <a href="102093?version=1&table=Tablecutflows150GeV">150 GeV</a> <li> <a href="102093?version=1&table=Tablecutflows350GeV">350 GeV</a> </ul>
The measured $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{recoil}}$ distributions in the $W \rightarrow \mu \nu $ control region, compared with the background predictions as estimated after the simultaneous, binned background-only fit to the data in the control regions. The last bin of the distribution contains overflows.
The measured $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{recoil}}$ distributions in the $W \rightarrow e \nu$ control region, compared with the background predictions as estimated after the simultaneous, binned background-only fit to the data in the control regions. The last bin of the distribution contains overflows.
A search for charged Higgs bosons decaying into a top quark and a bottom quark is presented. The data analysed correspond to 139 fb$^{-1}$ of proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$=13TeV, recorded with the ATLAS detector at the LHC. The production of a heavy charged Higgs boson in association with a top quark and a bottom quark, $pp\rightarrow tbH^{+}\rightarrow tbtb$, is explored in the $H^+$ mass range from 200 to 2000 GeV using final states with jets and one electron or muon. Events are categorised according to the multiplicity of jets and $b$-tagged jets, and multivariate analysis techniques are used to discriminate between signal and background events. No significant excess above the background-only hypothesis is observed and exclusion limits are derived for the production cross-section times branching ratio of a charged Higgs boson as a function of its mass; they range from 3.6 pb at 200 GeV to 0.036 pb at 2000 GeV at 95% confidence level. The results are interpreted in the hMSSM and $M_h^{125}$ scenarios.
Observed and expected upper limits for the production of $H^+\rightarrow tb$ in association with a top quark and a bottom quark. The bands surrounding the expected limit show the 68% and 95% confidence intervals. The red lines show the observed and expected 95% CL exclusion limits obtained with the 36 fb$^{-1}$ data sample. Theory predictions are shown for two representative values of $\tan\beta$ in the hMSSM benchmark scenario. Uncertainties in the predicted $H^+$ cross-sections or branching ratios are not considered.
Observed and expected limits on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{H^+}$ in the hMSSM scenario. Limits are shown for $\tan\beta$ values in the range of 0.5-60 due to the availability of the model prediction. The bands surrounding the expected limits show the 68% and 95% confidence intervals. Uncertainties in the predicted $H^+$ cross-sections or branching ratios are not considered.
Observed and expected limits on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{H^+}$ in the $M_h^{125}$ scenario. Limits are shown for $\tan\beta$ values in the range of 0.5-60 due to the availability of the model prediction. The bands surrounding the expected limits show the 68% and 95% confidence intervals. Uncertainties in the predicted $H^+$ cross-sections or branching ratios are not considered.
The results of a search for direct pair production of top squarks and for dark matter in events with two opposite-charge leptons (electrons or muons), jets and missing transverse momentum are reported, using 139 fb$^{-1}$ of integrated luminosity from proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 13$ TeV, collected by the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider during Run 2 (2015-2018). This search considers the pair production of top squarks and is sensitive across a wide range of mass differences between the top squark and the lightest neutralino. Additionally, spin-0 mediator dark-matter models are considered, in which the mediator is produced in association with a pair of top quarks. The mediator subsequently decays to a pair of dark-matter particles. No significant excess of events is observed above the Standard Model background, and limits are set at 95% confidence level. The results exclude top squark masses up to about 1 TeV, and masses of the lightest neutralino up to about 500 GeV. Limits on dark-matter production are set for scalar (pseudoscalar) mediator masses up to about 250 (300) GeV.
Two-body selection. Distributions of $m_{T2}$ in $SR^{2-body}_{110,\infty}$ for (a) different-flavour and (b) same-flavour events satisfying the selection criteria of the given SR, except the one for the presented variable, after the background fit. The contributions from all SM backgrounds are shown as a histogram stack. ''Others'' includes contributions from $VVV$, $t\bar{t} t$, $t\bar{t}$, $t\bar{t} W$, $t\bar{t} WW$, $t\bar{t} WZ$, $t\bar{t} H$, and $tZ$ processes. The hatched bands represent the total statistical and systematic uncertainty. The rightmost bin of each plot includes overflow events. Reference dark-matter signal models are overlayed for comparison. Red arrows in the upper panels indicate the signal region selection criteria. The bottom panels show the ratio of the observed data to the total SM background prediction, with hatched bands representing the total uncertainty in the background prediction.
Two-body selection. Distributions of $m_{T2}$ in $SR^{2-body}_{110,\infty}$ for (a) different-flavour and (b) same-flavour events satisfying the selection criteria of the given SR, except the one for the presented variable, after the background fit. The contributions from all SM backgrounds are shown as a histogram stack. ''Others'' includes contributions from $VVV$, $t\bar{t} t$, $t\bar{t}$, $t\bar{t} W$, $t\bar{t} WW$, $t\bar{t} WZ$, $t\bar{t} H$, and $tZ$ processes. The hatched bands represent the total statistical and systematic uncertainty. The rightmost bin of each plot includes overflow events. Reference dark-matter signal models are overlayed for comparison. Red arrows in the upper panels indicate the signal region selection criteria. The bottom panels show the ratio of the observed data to the total SM background prediction, with hatched bands representing the total uncertainty in the background prediction.
Three-body selection. Distributions of $M_{\Delta}^R$ in (a,b) $SR_{W}^{3-body}$ and (c,d) $SR_{T}^{3-body}$ for (left) same-flavour and (right) different-flavour events satisfying the selection criteria of the given SR, except the one for the presented variable, after the background fit. The contributions from all SM backgrounds are shown as a histogram stack. ''Others'' includes contributions from $VVV$, $t\bar{t} t$, $t\bar{t}t\bar{t}$, $t\bar{t} W$, $t\bar{t} WW$, $t\bar{t} WZ$, $t\bar{t} H$, and $tZ$ processes. The hatched bands represent the total statistical and systematic uncertainty. The rightmost bin of each plot includes overflow events. Reference top squark pair production signal models are overlayed for comparison. Red arrows in the upper panels indicate the signal region selection criteria. The bottom panels show the ratio of the observed data to the total SM background prediction, with hatched bands representing the total uncertainty in the background prediction; red arrows show data outside the vertical-axis range.
We report on the first measurement of charm-strange meson $D_s^{\pm}$ production at midrapidity in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{_{\rm NN}}}$ = 200 GeV from the STAR experiment. The yield ratio between strange ($D_{s}^{\pm}$) and non-strange ($D^{0}$) open-charm mesons is presented and compared to model calculations. A significant enhancement, relative to a PYTHIA simulation of $p$+$p$ collisions, is observed in the $D_{s}^{\pm}/D^0$ yield ratio in Au+Au collisions over a large range of collision centralities. Model calculations incorporating abundant strange-quark production in the quark-gluon plasma (QGP) and coalescence hadronization qualitatively reproduce the data. The transverse-momentum integrated yield ratio of $D_{s}^{\pm}/D^0$ at midrapidity is consistent with a prediction from a statistical hadronization model with the parameters constrained by the yields of light and strange hadrons measured at the same collision energy. These results suggest that the coalescence of charm quarks with strange quarks in the QGP plays an important role in $D_{s}^{\pm}$ meson production in heavy-ion collisions.
The $KK\pi$ invariant mass distribution (Counts per 8 MeV/$c^{2}$ bin) for right-sign combinations in 0-80% Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{_{\rm NN}}}$ = 200 GeV.
$D_s^{\pm}$ invariant yield as a function of $p_{T}$ in 0-10% centrality bin of Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{_{\rm NN}}}$ = 200 GeV. The $p_T$ bins are 1.5 < $p_T$ < 2.5 GeV/c, 2.5 < $p_T$ < 3.5 GeV/c, 3.5 < $p_T$ < 5.0 GeV/c and 5.0 < $p_T$ < 8.0 GeV/c.
$D_s^{\pm}$ invariant yield as a function of $p_{T}$ in 10-40% centrality bin of Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{_{\rm NN}}}$ = 200 GeV. The $p_T$ bins are 1.0 < $p_T$ < 2.0 GeV/c, 2.0 < $p_T$ < 2.5 GeV/c, 2.5 < $p_T$ < 3.5 GeV/c, 3.5 < $p_T$ < 5.0 GeV/c and 5.0 < $p_T$ < 8.0 GeV/c.
A search for pair production of third-generation scalar leptoquarks decaying into a top quark and a $\tau$-lepton is presented. The search is based on a dataset of $pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV recorded with the ATLAS detector during Run 2 of the Large Hadron Collider, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$. Events are selected if they have one light lepton (electron or muon) and at least one hadronically decaying $\tau$-lepton, or at least two light leptons. In addition, two or more jets, at least one of which must be identified as containing $b$-hadrons, are required. Six final states, defined by the multiplicity and flavour of lepton candidates, are considered in the analysis. Each of them is split into multiple event categories to simultaneously search for the signal and constrain several leading backgrounds. The signal-rich event categories require at least one hadronically decaying $\tau$-lepton candidate and exploit the presence of energetic final-state objects, which is characteristic of signal events. No significant excess above the Standard Model expectation is observed in any of the considered event categories, and 95% CL upper limits are set on the production cross section as a function of the leptoquark mass, for different assumptions about the branching fractions into $t\tau$ and $b\nu$. Scalar leptoquarks decaying exclusively into $t\tau$ are excluded up to masses of 1.43 TeV while, for a branching fraction of 50% into $t\tau$, the lower mass limit is 1.22 TeV.
Selection efficiency times acceptance summed over the seven signal regions as a function of $m_{\mathrm{LQ}_{3}^{\mathrm{d}}}$, assuming B = 1.
Selection efficiency times acceptance summed over the seven signal regions as a function of $m_{\mathrm{LQ}_{3}^{\mathrm{d}}}$, assuming B = 1.
Summary of the observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the cross section for $\mathrm{LQ}_{3}^{\mathrm{d}}$ pair production as a function of $m_{\mathrm{LQ}_{3}^{\mathrm{d}}}$ under the assumptions of B=1.
The results of a search for gluino and squark pair production with the pairs decaying via the lightest charginos into a final state consisting of two $W$ bosons, the lightest neutralinos ($\tilde\chi^0_1$), and quarks, are presented. The signal is characterised by the presence of a single charged lepton ($e^{\pm}$ or $\mu^{\pm}$) from a $W$ boson decay, jets, and missing transverse momentum. The analysis is performed using 139 fb$^{-1}$ of proton-proton collision data taken at a centre-of-mass energy $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV delivered by the Large Hadron Collider and recorded by the ATLAS experiment. No statistically significant excess of events above the Standard Model expectation is found. Limits are set on the direct production of squarks and gluinos in simplified models. Masses of gluino (squark) up to 2.2 TeV (1.4 TeV) are excluded at 95% confidence level for a light $\tilde\chi^0_1$.
Post-fit $m_{T}$ distribution in the SR 2J b-veto N-1 region. N-1 refers to all cuts except for the requirement on $m_T$ being applied. Uncertainties include statistical and systematic uncertainties. The value 9999 is used as a placeholder for infinity.
Post-fit $m_{T}$ distribution in the SR 2J b-veto N-1 region. N-1 refers to all cuts except for the requirement on $m_T$ being applied. Uncertainties include statistical and systematic uncertainties. The value 9999 is used as a placeholder for infinity.
Post-fit $m_{T}$ distribution in the SR 2J b-tag N-1 region. N-1 refers to all cuts except for the requirement on $m_T$ being applied. Uncertainties include statistical and systematic uncertainties. The value 9999 is used as a placeholder for infinity.
Global polarization of $\Xi$ and $\Omega$ hyperons has been measured for the first time in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{_{NN}}}$ = 200 GeV. The measurements of the $\Xi^-$ and $\bar{\Xi}^+$ hyperon polarization have been performed by two independent methods, via analysis of the angular distribution of the daughter particles in the parity violating weak decay $\Xi\rightarrow\Lambda+\pi$, as well as by measuring the polarization of the daughter $\Lambda$-hyperon, polarized via polarization transfer from its parent. The polarization, obtained by combining the results from the two methods and averaged over $\Xi^-$ and $\bar{\Xi}^+$, is measured to be $\langle P_\Xi \rangle = 0.47\pm0.10~({\rm stat.})\pm0.23~({\rm syst.})\,\%$ for the collision centrality 20%-80%. The $\langle P_\Xi \rangle$ is found to be slightly larger than the inclusive $\Lambda$ polarization and in reasonable agreement with a multi-phase transport model (AMPT). The $\langle P_\Xi \rangle$ is found to follow the centrality dependence of the vorticity predicted in the model, increasing toward more peripheral collisions. The global polarization of $\Omega$, $\langle P_\Omega \rangle = 1.11\pm0.87~({\rm stat.})\pm1.97~({\rm syst.})\,\%$ was obtained by measuring the polarization of daughter $\Lambda$ in the decay $\Omega \rightarrow \Lambda + K$, assuming the polarization transfer factor $C_{\Omega\Lambda}=1$.
$\Xi$ and $\Omega$ global polarization in Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV. Decay parameter from PDG2020, $\alpha_{\Xi}$=-$\alpha_{\bar{\Xi}}$=-0.401, is used.
The energy dependence of $\Lambda$ and $\bar{\Lambda}$ global polarization. Note that the results from previous measurements are rescaled using updated decay parameters (PDG2020), $\alpha_{\Lambda}$=0.732 and $\alpha_{\bar{\Lambda}}$=-0.758. The original data can be found in <a href="https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins1510474">this page</a>.
Centrality dependence of $\Xi$ global poalrization in Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV. Decay parameter from PDG2020, $\alpha_{\Xi}$=-$\alpha_{\bar{\Xi}}$=-0.401, is used.
Exclusive dimuon production in ultraperipheral collisions (UPC), resulting from photon-photon interactions in the strong electromagnetic fields of colliding high-energy lead nuclei, $\mathrm{PbPb}(\gamma\gamma) \rightarrow \mu^+\mu^- (\mathrm{Pb}^{(\star)}\mathrm{Pb}^{(\star)} )$, is studied using $\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{int}} = 0.48$ nb$^{-1}$ of $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}=5.02$ TeV lead-lead collision data at the LHC with the ATLAS detector. Dimuon pairs are measured in the fiducial region $p_{\mathrm{T}\mu} > 4$ GeV, $|\eta_{\mu}| < 2.4$, invariant mass $m_{\mu\mu} > 10$ GeV, and $p_{\mathrm{T,\mu\mu}} < 2$ GeV. The primary background from single-dissociative processes is extracted from the data using a template fitting technique. Differential cross sections are presented as a function of $m_{\mu\mu}$, absolute pair rapidity ($|y_{\mu\mu}|$), scattering angle in the dimuon rest frame ($|\cos \vartheta^{\star}_{\mu\mu}|$) and the colliding photon energies. The total cross section of the UPC $\gamma \gamma \rightarrow \mu^{+}\mu^{-}$ process in the fiducial volume is measured to be $\sigma_{\mathrm{fid}}^{\mu\mu} = 34.1 \! \pm \! 0.3 \mathrm{(stat.)} \! \pm \! 0.7 \mathrm{(syst.)}$ $\mu\mathrm{b}$. Generally good agreement is found with calculations from STARlight, which incorporate the leading-order Breit-Wheeler process with no final-state effects, albeit differences between the measurements and theoretical expectations are observed. In particular, the measured cross sections at larger $|y_{\mu\mu}|$ are found to be about 10-20% larger in data than in the calculations, suggesting the presence of larger fluxes of photons in the initial state. Modification of the dimuon cross sections in the presence of forward and/or backward neutron production is also studied and is found to be associated with a harder incoming photon spectrum, consistent with expectations.
Differential UPC dimuon cross sections shown as a function of $|y_{\mu\mu}|$ in the interval $10 < |m_{\mu\mu}| < 20$ GeV.
Differential UPC dimuon cross sections shown as a function of $|y_{\mu\mu}|$ in the interval $20 < |m_{\mu\mu}| < 40$ GeV.
Differential UPC dimuon cross sections shown as a function of $|y_{\mu\mu}|$ in the interval $40 < |m_{\mu\mu}| < 80$ GeV.
A search is performed for the electroweak pair production of charginos and associated production of a chargino and neutralino, each of which decays through an $R$-parity-violating coupling into a lepton and a $W$, $Z$, or Higgs boson. The trilepton invariant-mass spectrum is constructed from events with three or more leptons, targeting chargino decays that include an electron or muon and a leptonically decaying $Z$ boson. The analyzed dataset corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$ of proton-proton collision data produced by the Large Hadron Collider at a center-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV and collected by the ATLAS experiment between 2015 and 2018. The data are found to be consistent with predictions from the Standard Model. The results are interpreted as limits at 95% confidence level on model-independent cross sections for processes beyond the Standard Model. Limits are also set on the production of charginos and neutralinos for a Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model with an approximate $B$-$L$ symmetry. Charginos and neutralinos with masses between 100 GeV and 1100 GeV are excluded depending on the assumed decay branching fractions into a lepton (electron, muon, or $\tau$-lepton) plus a boson ($W$, $Z$, or Higgs).
This is the HEPData space for the trilepton resonance wino search, the full resolution figures can be found here https://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/PAPERS/SUSY-2018-36/. The full statistical likelihoods have been provided for this analysis. They can be downloaded by clicking on the purple 'Resources' buttun above where they can then be found in the 'Common Resources' area. A detailed README for how to use the likelihoods is also included in this download. <b>Exclusion contours:</b> <ul display="inline-block"> <li><a href="?table=Obs.%20data%20vs%20SM%20bkg.%20exp.%20in%20CRs%20and%20VRs">Obs. data vs SM bkg. exp. in CRs and VRs</a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0%20">$\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0 </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Up%20">$\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Up </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Down%20">$\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Down </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0%20">$\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0 </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Up%20">$\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Up </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Down%20">$\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Down </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0%20">$\ell=e$, Obs_0 </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Up%20">$\ell=e$, Obs_0_Up </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Down%20">$\ell=e$, Obs_0_Down </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0%20">$\ell=e$, Exp_0 </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Up%20">$\ell=e$, Exp_0_Up </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Down%20">$\ell=e$, Exp_0_Down </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0%20">$\ell=\mu$, Obs_0 </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Up%20">$\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Up </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Down%20">$\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Down </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0%20">$\ell=\mu$, Exp_0 </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Up%20">$\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Up </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Down%20">$\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Down </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0%20">$\ell=\tau$, Obs_0 </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0_Up%20">$\ell=\tau$, Obs_0_Up </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0_Down%20">$\ell=\tau$, Obs_0_Down </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0%20">$\ell=\tau$, Exp_0 </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0_Up%20">$\ell=\tau$, Exp_0_Up </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0_Down%20">$\ell=\tau$, Exp_0_Down </a> </ul> <b>Triangle Exclusion contours:</b> <ul display="inline-block"> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20200%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 200 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20200%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 200 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20200%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 200 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20200%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 200 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20200%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 200 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20200%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 200 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20200%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 200 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20200%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 200 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20300%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 300 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20300%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 300 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20300%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 300 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20300%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 300 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20300%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 300 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20300%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 300 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20300%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 300 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20300%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 300 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20400%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 400 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20400%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 400 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20400%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 400 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20400%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 400 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20400%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 400 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20400%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 400 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20400%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 400 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20400%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 400 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20500%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 500 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20500%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 500 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20500%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 500 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20500%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 500 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20500%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 500 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20500%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 500 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20500%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 500 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20500%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 500 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20ObsLimVal">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, ObsLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20ExpLimVal">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, ExpLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20ObsLimVal">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, ObsLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20ExpLimVal">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, ExpLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20ObsLimVal">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, ObsLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20ExpLimVal">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, ExpLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20ObsLimVal">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, ObsLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20ExpLimVal">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, ExpLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20ObsLimVal">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, ObsLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20ExpLimVal">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, ExpLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20ObsLimVal">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, ObsLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20ExpLimVal">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, ExpLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20ObsLimVal">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, ObsLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20ExpLimVal">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, ExpLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20ObsLimVal">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, ObsLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20ExpLimVal">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, ExpLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20ObsLimVal">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, ObsLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20ExpLimVal">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, ExpLimVal</a> </ul> <b>Upper limits:</b> <ul display="inline-block"> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20upperLimit_XS_gr%20">$\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, upperLimit_XS_gr </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20expectedUpperLimit_XS_gr%20">$\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, expectedUpperLimit_XS_gr </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=e$,%20upperLimit_XS_gr%20">$\ell=e$, upperLimit_XS_gr </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=e$,%20expectedUpperLimit_XS_gr%20">$\ell=e$, expectedUpperLimit_XS_gr </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\mu$,%20upperLimit_XS_gr%20">$\ell=\mu$, upperLimit_XS_gr </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\mu$,%20expectedUpperLimit_XS_gr%20">$\ell=\mu$, expectedUpperLimit_XS_gr </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\tau$,%20upperLimit_XS_gr%20">$\ell=\tau$, upperLimit_XS_gr </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\tau$,%20expectedUpperLimit_XS_gr%20">$\ell=\tau$, expectedUpperLimit_XS_gr </a> </ul> <b>Kinematic distributions:</b> <ul display="inline-block"> <li><a href="?table=Variable%20bin%20$m_{Z\ell}$%20for%20SRFR%20">Variable bin $m_{Z\ell}$ for SRFR </a> <li><a href="?table=Variable%20bin%20$m_{Z\ell}$%20for%20SR4$\ell$%20">Variable bin $m_{Z\ell}$ for SR4$\ell$ </a> <li><a href="?table=Variable%20bin%20$m_{Z\ell}$%20for%20SR3$\ell$%20">Variable bin $m_{Z\ell}$ for SR3$\ell$ </a> <li><a href="?table=N-1%20for%20SR3$\ell$,%20$E^{miss}_{T}$%20">N-1 for SR3$\ell$, $E^{miss}_{T}$ </a> <li><a href="?table=N-1%20for%20SR3$\ell$,%20$m^{min}_{T}$%20">N-1 for SR3$\ell$, $m^{min}_{T}$ </a> <li><a href="?table=N-1%20for%20SR4$\ell$,%20$E^{miss,SF}_{T}$%20">N-1 for SR4$\ell$, $E^{miss,SF}_{T}$ </a> <li><a href="?table=N-1%20for%20SRFR,%20$m^{asym}_{Z\ell}$%20">N-1 for SRFR, $m^{asym}_{Z\ell}$ </a> <li><a href="?table=$m_{Z\ell}$%20for%20SRFR%20">$m_{Z\ell}$ for SRFR </a> <li><a href="?table=$m_{Z\ell}$%20for%20SR4$\ell$%20">$m_{Z\ell}$ for SR4$\ell$ </a> <li><a href="?table=$m_{Z\ell}$%20for%20SR3$\ell$%20">$m_{Z\ell}$ for SR3$\ell$ </a> <li><a href="?table=$L_{T}$%20for%20SR4$\ell$%20">$L_{T}$ for SR4$\ell$ </a> </ul> <b>Cut flows:</b> <ul display="inline-block"> <li><a href="?table=Yields%20Table">Yields Table</a> <li><a href="?table=Model-Independent%20Results%20Table,%20SRFR">Model-Independent Results Table, SRFR</a> <li><a href="?table=Model-Independent%20Results%20Table,%20SR4$\ell$">Model-Independent Results Table, SR4$\ell$</a> <li><a href="?table=Model-Independent%20Results%20Table,%20SR3$\ell$">Model-Independent Results Table, SR3$\ell$</a> <li><a href="?table=Cutflow%20Table">Cutflow Table</a> </ul> <b>Acceptances and Efficiencies:</b> <ul display="inline-block"> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SRFR%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Acceptance in the SRFR region with $\ell=$$(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SRFR%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$e$">Acceptance in the SRFR region with $\ell=$$e$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SRFR%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\mu$">Acceptance in the SRFR region with $\ell=$$\mu$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SRFR%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\tau$">Acceptance in the SRFR region with $\ell=$$\tau$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SR4$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Acceptance in the SR4$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SR4$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$e$">Acceptance in the SR4$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$e$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SR4$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\mu$">Acceptance in the SR4$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$\mu$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SR4$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\tau$">Acceptance in the SR4$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$\tau$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SR3$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Acceptance in the SR3$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SR3$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$e$">Acceptance in the SR3$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$e$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SR3$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\mu$">Acceptance in the SR3$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$\mu$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SR3$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\tau$">Acceptance in the SR3$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$\tau$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SRFR%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Efficiency in the SRFR region with $\ell=$$(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SRFR%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$e$">Efficiency in the SRFR region with $\ell=$$e$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SRFR%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\mu$">Efficiency in the SRFR region with $\ell=$$\mu$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SRFR%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\tau$">Efficiency in the SRFR region with $\ell=$$\tau$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SR4$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Efficiency in the SR4$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SR4$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$e$">Efficiency in the SR4$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$e$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SR4$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\mu$">Efficiency in the SR4$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$\mu$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SR4$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\tau$">Efficiency in the SR4$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$\tau$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SR3$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Efficiency in the SR3$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SR3$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$e$">Efficiency in the SR3$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$e$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SR3$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\mu$">Efficiency in the SR3$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$\mu$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SR3$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\tau$">Efficiency in the SR3$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$\tau$</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20Acceptance%20in%20SRFR,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Triangle, Acceptance in SRFR, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20Acceptance%20in%20SR4$\ell$,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Triangle, Acceptance in SR4$\ell$, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20Acceptance%20in%20SR3$\ell$,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Triangle, Acceptance in SR3$\ell$, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20Efficiency%20in%20SRFR,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Triangle, Efficiency in SRFR, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20Efficiency%20in%20SR4$\ell$,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Triangle, Efficiency in SR4$\ell$, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20Efficiency%20in%20SR3$\ell$,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Triangle, Efficiency in SR3$\ell$, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20by%20Final%20State%20in%20SRFR">Acceptance by Final State in SRFR</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20by%20Final%20State%20in%20SR4$\ell$">Acceptance by Final State in SR4$\ell$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20by%20Final%20State%20in%20SR3$\ell$">Acceptance by Final State in SR3$\ell$</a> </ul>
This is the HEPData space for the trilepton resonance wino search, the full resolution figures can be found here https://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/PAPERS/SUSY-2018-36/. The full statistical likelihoods have been provided for this analysis. They can be downloaded by clicking on the purple 'Resources' buttun above where they can then be found in the 'Common Resources' area. A detailed README for how to use the likelihoods is also included in this download. <b>Exclusion contours:</b> <ul display="inline-block"> <li><a href="?table=Obs.%20data%20vs%20SM%20bkg.%20exp.%20in%20CRs%20and%20VRs">Obs. data vs SM bkg. exp. in CRs and VRs</a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0%20">$\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0 </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Up%20">$\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Up </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Down%20">$\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Down </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0%20">$\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0 </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Up%20">$\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Up </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Down%20">$\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Down </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0%20">$\ell=e$, Obs_0 </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Up%20">$\ell=e$, Obs_0_Up </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Down%20">$\ell=e$, Obs_0_Down </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0%20">$\ell=e$, Exp_0 </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Up%20">$\ell=e$, Exp_0_Up </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Down%20">$\ell=e$, Exp_0_Down </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0%20">$\ell=\mu$, Obs_0 </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Up%20">$\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Up </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Down%20">$\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Down </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0%20">$\ell=\mu$, Exp_0 </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Up%20">$\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Up </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Down%20">$\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Down </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0%20">$\ell=\tau$, Obs_0 </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0_Up%20">$\ell=\tau$, Obs_0_Up </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0_Down%20">$\ell=\tau$, Obs_0_Down </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0%20">$\ell=\tau$, Exp_0 </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0_Up%20">$\ell=\tau$, Exp_0_Up </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0_Down%20">$\ell=\tau$, Exp_0_Down </a> </ul> <b>Triangle Exclusion contours:</b> <ul display="inline-block"> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20600%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 600 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20800%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 800 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20900%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 900 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20200%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 200 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20200%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 200 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20200%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 200 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20200%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 200 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20200%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 200 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20200%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 200 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20200%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 200 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20200%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 200 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20300%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 300 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20300%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 300 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20300%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 300 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20300%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 300 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20300%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 300 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20300%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 300 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20300%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 300 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20300%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 300 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20400%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 400 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20400%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 400 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20400%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 400 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20400%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 400 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20400%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 400 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20400%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 400 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20400%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 400 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20400%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 400 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20500%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, 500 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20500%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, 500 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20500%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, 500 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20500%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, 500 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20500%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, 500 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20500%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, 500 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20500%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Obs%20Lim">Triangle, 500 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Obs Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20500%20GeV,%20$\ell=\tau$,%20Exp%20Lim">Triangle, 500 GeV, $\ell=\tau$, Exp Lim</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20ObsLimVal">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, ObsLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20ExpLimVal">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, ExpLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20ObsLimVal">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, ObsLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20ExpLimVal">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, ExpLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20ObsLimVal">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, ObsLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20ExpLimVal">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, ExpLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20ObsLimVal">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, ObsLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20ExpLimVal">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, ExpLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20ObsLimVal">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, ObsLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20ExpLimVal">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, ExpLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20ObsLimVal">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, ObsLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=e$,%20ExpLimVal">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=e$, ExpLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20ObsLimVal">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, ObsLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SRFR,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20ExpLimVal">Triangle, SRFR, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, ExpLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20ObsLimVal">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, ObsLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR4$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20ExpLimVal">Triangle, SR4$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, ExpLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Up">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Obs_0_Down">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Obs_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Up">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Up</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20Exp_0_Down">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, Exp_0_Down</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20ObsLimVal">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, ObsLimVal</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20SR3$\ell$,%20700%20GeV,%20$\ell=\mu$,%20ExpLimVal">Triangle, SR3$\ell$, 700 GeV, $\ell=\mu$, ExpLimVal</a> </ul> <b>Upper limits:</b> <ul display="inline-block"> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20upperLimit_XS_gr%20">$\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, upperLimit_XS_gr </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$,%20expectedUpperLimit_XS_gr%20">$\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$, expectedUpperLimit_XS_gr </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=e$,%20upperLimit_XS_gr%20">$\ell=e$, upperLimit_XS_gr </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=e$,%20expectedUpperLimit_XS_gr%20">$\ell=e$, expectedUpperLimit_XS_gr </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\mu$,%20upperLimit_XS_gr%20">$\ell=\mu$, upperLimit_XS_gr </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\mu$,%20expectedUpperLimit_XS_gr%20">$\ell=\mu$, expectedUpperLimit_XS_gr </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\tau$,%20upperLimit_XS_gr%20">$\ell=\tau$, upperLimit_XS_gr </a> <li><a href="?table=$\ell=\tau$,%20expectedUpperLimit_XS_gr%20">$\ell=\tau$, expectedUpperLimit_XS_gr </a> </ul> <b>Kinematic distributions:</b> <ul display="inline-block"> <li><a href="?table=Variable%20bin%20$m_{Z\ell}$%20for%20SRFR%20">Variable bin $m_{Z\ell}$ for SRFR </a> <li><a href="?table=Variable%20bin%20$m_{Z\ell}$%20for%20SR4$\ell$%20">Variable bin $m_{Z\ell}$ for SR4$\ell$ </a> <li><a href="?table=Variable%20bin%20$m_{Z\ell}$%20for%20SR3$\ell$%20">Variable bin $m_{Z\ell}$ for SR3$\ell$ </a> <li><a href="?table=N-1%20for%20SR3$\ell$,%20$E^{miss}_{T}$%20">N-1 for SR3$\ell$, $E^{miss}_{T}$ </a> <li><a href="?table=N-1%20for%20SR3$\ell$,%20$m^{min}_{T}$%20">N-1 for SR3$\ell$, $m^{min}_{T}$ </a> <li><a href="?table=N-1%20for%20SR4$\ell$,%20$E^{miss,SF}_{T}$%20">N-1 for SR4$\ell$, $E^{miss,SF}_{T}$ </a> <li><a href="?table=N-1%20for%20SRFR,%20$m^{asym}_{Z\ell}$%20">N-1 for SRFR, $m^{asym}_{Z\ell}$ </a> <li><a href="?table=$m_{Z\ell}$%20for%20SRFR%20">$m_{Z\ell}$ for SRFR </a> <li><a href="?table=$m_{Z\ell}$%20for%20SR4$\ell$%20">$m_{Z\ell}$ for SR4$\ell$ </a> <li><a href="?table=$m_{Z\ell}$%20for%20SR3$\ell$%20">$m_{Z\ell}$ for SR3$\ell$ </a> <li><a href="?table=$L_{T}$%20for%20SR4$\ell$%20">$L_{T}$ for SR4$\ell$ </a> </ul> <b>Cut flows:</b> <ul display="inline-block"> <li><a href="?table=Yields%20Table">Yields Table</a> <li><a href="?table=Model-Independent%20Results%20Table,%20SRFR">Model-Independent Results Table, SRFR</a> <li><a href="?table=Model-Independent%20Results%20Table,%20SR4$\ell$">Model-Independent Results Table, SR4$\ell$</a> <li><a href="?table=Model-Independent%20Results%20Table,%20SR3$\ell$">Model-Independent Results Table, SR3$\ell$</a> <li><a href="?table=Cutflow%20Table">Cutflow Table</a> </ul> <b>Acceptances and Efficiencies:</b> <ul display="inline-block"> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SRFR%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Acceptance in the SRFR region with $\ell=$$(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SRFR%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$e$">Acceptance in the SRFR region with $\ell=$$e$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SRFR%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\mu$">Acceptance in the SRFR region with $\ell=$$\mu$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SRFR%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\tau$">Acceptance in the SRFR region with $\ell=$$\tau$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SR4$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Acceptance in the SR4$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SR4$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$e$">Acceptance in the SR4$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$e$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SR4$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\mu$">Acceptance in the SR4$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$\mu$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SR4$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\tau$">Acceptance in the SR4$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$\tau$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SR3$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Acceptance in the SR3$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SR3$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$e$">Acceptance in the SR3$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$e$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SR3$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\mu$">Acceptance in the SR3$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$\mu$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20in%20the%20SR3$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\tau$">Acceptance in the SR3$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$\tau$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SRFR%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Efficiency in the SRFR region with $\ell=$$(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SRFR%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$e$">Efficiency in the SRFR region with $\ell=$$e$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SRFR%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\mu$">Efficiency in the SRFR region with $\ell=$$\mu$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SRFR%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\tau$">Efficiency in the SRFR region with $\ell=$$\tau$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SR4$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Efficiency in the SR4$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SR4$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$e$">Efficiency in the SR4$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$e$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SR4$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\mu$">Efficiency in the SR4$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$\mu$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SR4$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\tau$">Efficiency in the SR4$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$\tau$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SR3$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Efficiency in the SR3$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SR3$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$e$">Efficiency in the SR3$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$e$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SR3$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\mu$">Efficiency in the SR3$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$\mu$</a> <li><a href="?table=Efficiency%20in%20the%20SR3$\ell$%20region%20with%20$\ell=$$\tau$">Efficiency in the SR3$\ell$ region with $\ell=$$\tau$</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20Acceptance%20in%20SRFR,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Triangle, Acceptance in SRFR, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20Acceptance%20in%20SR4$\ell$,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Triangle, Acceptance in SR4$\ell$, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20Acceptance%20in%20SR3$\ell$,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Triangle, Acceptance in SR3$\ell$, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20Efficiency%20in%20SRFR,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Triangle, Efficiency in SRFR, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20Efficiency%20in%20SR4$\ell$,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Triangle, Efficiency in SR4$\ell$, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Triangle,%20Efficiency%20in%20SR3$\ell$,%20$\ell=(e,%20\mu,%20\tau)$">Triangle, Efficiency in SR3$\ell$, $\ell=(e, \mu, \tau)$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20by%20Final%20State%20in%20SRFR">Acceptance by Final State in SRFR</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20by%20Final%20State%20in%20SR4$\ell$">Acceptance by Final State in SR4$\ell$</a> <li><a href="?table=Acceptance%20by%20Final%20State%20in%20SR3$\ell$">Acceptance by Final State in SR3$\ell$</a> </ul>
The observed data and the SM background expectation in the CRs (pre-fit) and VRs (post-fit). The ''Other'' category mostly consists of tW Z, ttW, and tZ processes. The hatched bands indicate the combined theoretical, experimental, and MC statistical uncertainties. The bottom panel shows the fractional difference between the observed data and expected yields for the CRs and the significance of the difference for the VRs, computed following the profile likelihood method described in Ref. [arXiv: physics/0702156].
Forum