IRing2 for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=5

IRing2 for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=2

IRing2 for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=3

IRing2 for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=4

IRing2 for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=5

IRing2 for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=2

IRing2 for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=3

IRing2 for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=4

IRing2 for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=5

IRing128 for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=2

IRing128 for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=3

IRing128 for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=4

IRing128 for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=5

IRing128 for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=2

IRing128 for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=3

IRing128 for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=4

IRing128 for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=5

IRing128 for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=2

IRing128 for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=3

IRing128 for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=4

IRing128 for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=5

ICyl16 for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=2

ICyl16 for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=3

ICyl16 for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=4

ICyl16 for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=5

ICyl16 for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=2

ICyl16 for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=3

ICyl16 for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=4

ICyl16 for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=5

ICyl16 for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=2

ICyl16 for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=3

ICyl16 for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=4

ICyl16 for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=5

IRing2 covariance for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=2 (Table 1)

IRing2 covariance for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=3 (Table 2)

IRing2 covariance for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=4 (Table 3)

IRing2 covariance for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=5 (Table 4)

IRing2 covariance for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=2 (Table 5)

IRing2 covariance for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=3 (Table 6)

IRing2 covariance for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=4 (Table 7)

IRing2 covariance for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=5 (Table 8)

IRing2 covariance for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=2 (Table 9)

IRing2 covariance for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=3 (Table 10)

IRing2 covariance for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=4 (Table 11)

IRing2 covariance for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=5 (Table 12)

IRing128 covariance for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=2 (Table 13)

IRing128 covariance for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=3 (Table 14)

IRing128 covariance for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=4 (Table 15)

IRing128 covariance for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=5 (Table 16)

IRing128 covariance for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=2 (Table 17)

IRing128 covariance for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=3 (Table 18)

IRing128 covariance for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=4 (Table 19)

IRing128 covariance for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=5 (Table 20)

IRing128 covariance for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=2 (Table 21)

IRing128 covariance for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=3 (Table 22)

IRing128 covariance for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=4 (Table 23)

IRing128 covariance for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=5 (Table 24)

ICyl16 covariance for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=2 (Table 25)

ICyl16 covariance for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=3 (Table 26)

ICyl16 covariance for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=4 (Table 27)

ICyl16 covariance for HT2>=500 GeV, NJets>=5 (Table 28)

ICyl16 covariance for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=2 (Table 29)

ICyl16 covariance for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=3 (Table 30)

ICyl16 covariance for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=4 (Table 31)

ICyl16 covariance for HT2>=1000 GeV, NJets>=5 (Table 32)

ICyl16 covariance for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=2 (Table 33)

ICyl16 covariance for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=3 (Table 34)

ICyl16 covariance for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=4 (Table 35)

ICyl16 covariance for HT2>=1500 GeV, NJets>=5 (Table 36)

IRing2 covariance, complete

1-IRing128 covariance, complete

1-ICyl16 covariance, complete

Normalized distributions of Tranverse Thrust Minor for 5 lower limit values of leading particle PT.

Normalized distributions of Tranverse Sphericity for 4 ranges of leading particle PT.

Normalized distributions of Tranverse Sphericity for 5 lower limit values of leading particle PT.

Mean Values of Thrust, Thrust Minor and Sphericity verses Multiplicity.

Mean Values of Thrust, Thrust Minor and Sphericity verses charged particle PT scalar sum.

Numbers of observed and background events for SR3L low for each bin of the distribution in Meff. The table corresponds to Fig. 4(d). The statistical and systematic uncertainties are combined for the predicted numbers.

Numbers of observed and background events for SR3L high for each bin of the distribution in Meff. The table corresponds to Fig. 4(e). The statistical and systematic uncertainties are combined for the predicted numbers.

The efficiencies are calculated for all simplified models. For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The simplified model is for direct production of squarks that decay into two steps into q q W Z W Z chi1^0 chi1^0 (see Fig. 6c in the paper).

The efficiencies are calculated for all simplified extra dimension model (see Fig. 8d in the paper). For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination.

The efficiencies are calculated for all simplified models. For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The simplified model is for direct production of gluinos that decay via sleptons into q q q q l l (l l) chi1^0 chi1^0 + neutrinos (see Fig. 6d in the paper).

The efficiencies are calculated for all simplified models. For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The simplified model is for direct production of gluinos that decay into q q q q W W chi1^0 chi1^0 (see Fig. 6a in the paper).

The efficiencies are calculated for all simplified models. For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The simplified model is for direct production of gluinos that decay into t tbar t tbar chi1^0 chi1^0 (see Fig. 5a in the paper). This particular model assumes that top quark is much heavier than gluino.

The efficiencies are calculated for all mSUGRA models (see Fig. 8a in the paper). For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The model assumes tan(beta)=30, A0=2m0, and mu>0.

The efficiencies are calculated for all simplified models. For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The simplified model is for direct production of gluinos. A gluino decays into t c chi1^0 (see Fig. 5c in the paper). This particular model assumes that m(chi1^0) = m(stop) - 20 GeV.

The efficiencies are calculated for all GMSB models (see Fig. 8c in the paper). For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The model assumes mmess=250 TeV, m5=3, mu>0, and Cgrav=1.

The efficiencies are calculated for all simplified models. For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The simplified model is for direct production of bottom squarks. A bottom squark decays into t chi1^(+-) and chi1^(+-) --> W^(+-) chi1^0 (see Fig. 7a in the paper). This particular model assumes that m(chi1^0)=60 GeV.

The efficiencies are calculated for all simplified models. For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The simplified model is for direct production of gluinos and top squarks. Top squarks undergo R-parity violating decays into b s and gluinos decay into t stop (see Fig. 5d in the paper).

The efficiencies are calculated for all simplified models. For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The simplified model is for direct production of bottom squarks. A bottom squark decays into t chi1^(+-) and chi1^(+-) --> W^(+-) chi1^0 (see Fig. 7b in the paper). This particular model assumes that m(chi1^0)=2(chi1^0).

The efficiencies are calculated for all mSUGRA/CMSSM models with bRPV (see Fig. 8b in the paper). For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The model assumes tan(beta)=30, A0=2m0, mu>0, and bRPV.

The efficiencies are calculated for all simplified models. For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The simplified model is for direct production of squarks. Squarks decay into q q l l (l l) chi1^0 chi1^0 + neutrinos (see Fig. 6e in the paper).

The efficiencies are calculated for all simplified models. For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The simplified model is for direct pair-production of gluinos that decay via a two-step process into q q q q W Z W Z chi1^0 chi1^0 (see Fig. 6b in the paper).

The efficiencies are calculated for all simplified models. For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The simplified model is for direct pair production of gluinos. A gluino decays into t stop. Consequently, a top squark squark decays into b chi1^(+-) and chi1^(+-) --> W^(+-) chi1^0 (see Fig. 5b in the paper). This particular model assumes that m(stop) < m(gluino), m(chi1^0)=6 GeV, and m(chi1^(+-))=118 GeV.

The acceptances (in percent, %) are calculated for all simplified models. For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The simplified model is for direct production of squarks that decay into two steps into q q W Z W Z chi1^0 chi1^0 (see Fig. 6c in the paper).

The acceptances (in percent, %) are calculated for all simplified extra dimension model (see Fig. 8d in the paper). For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination.

The acceptances (in percent, %) are calculated for all simplified models. For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The simplified model is for direct production of gluinos that decay via sleptons into q q q q l l (l l) chi1^0 chi1^0 + neutrinos (see Fig. 6d in the paper).

The acceptances (in percent, %) are calculated for all simplified models. For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The simplified model is for direct production of gluinos that decay into q q q q W W chi1^0 chi1^0 (see Fig. 6a in the paper).

The acceptances (in percent, %) are calculated for all simplified models. For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The simplified model is for direct production of gluinos that decay into t tbar t tbar chi1^0 chi1^0 (see Fig. 5a in the paper). This particular model assumes that top quark is much heavier than gluino.

The acceptances (in percent, %) are calculated for all mSUGRA models (see Fig. 8a in the paper). For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The model assumes tan(beta)=30, A0=2m0, and mu>0.

The acceptances (in percent, %) are calculated for all simplified models. For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The simplified model is for direct production of gluinos. A gluino decays into t c chi1^0 (see Fig. 5c in the paper). This particular model assumes that m(chi1^0) = m(stop) - 20 GeV.

The acceptances (in percent, %) are calculated for all GMSB models (see Fig. 8c in the paper). For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The model assumes mmess=250 TeV, m5=3, mu>0, and Cgrav=1.

The acceptances (in percent, %) are calculated for all simplified models. For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The simplified model is for direct production of bottom squarks. A bottom squark decays into t chi1^(+-) and chi1^(+-) --> W^(+-) chi1^0 (see Fig. 7a in the paper). This particular model assumes that m(chi1^0)=60 GeV.

The acceptances (in percent, %) are calculated for all simplified models. For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The simplified model is for direct production of gluinos and top squarks. Top squarks undergo R-parity violating decays into bs and gluinos decay into t stop (see Fig. 5d in the paper).

The acceptances (in percent, %) are calculated for all simplified models. For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The simplified model is for direct production of bottom squarks. A bottom squark decays into t chi1^(+-) and chi1^(+-) --> W chi1^0 (see Fig. 7b in the paper). This particular model assumes that m(chi1^0)=2(chi1^0).

The acceptances (in percent, %) are calculated for all mSUGRA/CMSSM models with bRPV (see Fig. 8b in the paper). For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The model assumes tan(beta)=30, A0=2m0, mu>0, and bRPV.

The acceptances (in percent, %) are calculated for all simplified models. For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The simplified model is for direct production of squarks. Squarks decay into q q l l (l l) chi1^0 chi1^0 + neutrinos (see Fig. 6e in the paper).

The acceptances (in percent, %) are calculated for all simplified models. For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The simplified model is for direct pair-production of gluinos that decay via a two-step process into q q q q W Z W Z chi1^0 chi1^0 (see Fig. 6b in the paper).

The acceptances (in percent, %) are calculated for all simplified models. For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The simplified model is for direct pair production of gluinos. A gluino decays into t stop. Consequently, a top squark squark decays into b chi1^(+-) and chi1^(+-) --> W^(+-) chi1^0 (see Fig. 5b in the paper). This particular model assumes that m(stop) < m(gluino), m(chi1^0)=6 GeV, and m(chi1^(+-))=118 GeV.

The limits on observed cross section are calculated for all simplified models. The simplified models are for direct pair production of squarks that decay into two steps into q q W Z W Z chi1^0 chi1^0 (see Fig. 6c in the paper).

The limits on observed cross sections are calculated for all simplified models. The simplified models are for direct pair-production of gluinos that decay via sleptons into q q q q l l (l l) chi1^0 chi1^0 + neutrinos (see Fig. 6d in the paper).

The limits on observed cross sections are calculated for all simplified models. The simplified models are for direct production of gluinos that decay into q q q q W W chi1^0 chi1^0 (see Fig. 6a in the paper).

The limits on observed cross sections are calculated for all simplified models. The simplified models are for direct production of gluinos that decay into t tbar t tbar chi1^0 chi1^0 (see Fig. 5a in the paper). This particular model assumes that top quark is much heavier than gluino.

The limits on observed cross sections are calculated for all simplified models. The simplified models are for direct pair production of gluinos. A gluino decays into t c chi1^0 (see Fig. 5c in the paper). This particular model assumes that m(chi1^0) = m(stop) - 20 GeV.

The limits on observed cross sections are calculated for all simplified models. The simplified models are for direct production of bottom squarks. A bottom squark decays into t chi1^(+-) and chi1^(+-) --> W^(+-) chi1^0 (see Fig. 7a in the paper). This particular model assumes that m(chi1^0)=60 GeV.

The limits on observed cross sections are calculated for all simplified models. The simplified models are for direct production of gluinos and top squarks. Top squarks undergo R-parity violating decays into bs and gluinos decay into t stop (see Fig. 5d in the paper).

The limits on observed cross sections are calculated for all simplified models. The simplified models are for direct production of bottom squarks. A bottom squark decays into t chi1^(+-) and chi1^(+-) --> W^(+-) chi1^0 (see Fig. 7b in the paper). This particular model assumes that m(chi1^0)=2(chi1^0).

The limits on observed cross sections are calculated for all simplified models. The simplified models are for direct production of squarks. Squarks decay into q q l l (l l) chi1^0 chi1^0 + neutrinos (see Fig. 6e in the paper).

The limits on observed cross sections are calculated for all simplified models. The simplified models are for direct pair-production of gluinos that decay via a two-step process into q q q q W Z W Z chi1^0 chi1^0 (see Fig. 6b in the paper).

The limits on observed cross sections are calculated for all simplified models. The simplified models are for direct pair production of gluinos. A gluino decays into t stop. Consequently, a top squark squark decays into b chi1^(+-) and chi1^(+-) --> W^(+-) chi1^0 (see Fig. 5b in the paper). This particular model assumes that m(stop) < m(gluino), m(chi1^0)=6 GeV, and m(chi1^(+-))=118 GeV.

The signal event yields are calculated for all simplified models. For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The simplified model is for direct production of squarks that decay into two steps into q q W Z W Z chi1^0 chi1^0 (see Fig. 6c in the paper).

The signal event yields are calculated for all simplified extra dimension model (see Fig. 8d in the paper). For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination.

The signal event yields are calculated for all simplified models. For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The simplified model is for direct production of gluinos that decay via sleptons into q q q q l l (l l) chi1^0 chi1^0 + neutrinos (see Fig. 6d in the paper).

The signal event yields are calculated for all simplified models. For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The simplified model is for direct production of gluinos that decay into q q q q W W chi1^0 chi1^0 (see Fig. 6a in the paper).

The signal event yields are calculated for all simplified models. For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The simplified model is for direct production of gluinos that decay into t tbar t tbar chi1^0 chi1^0 (see Fig. 5a in the paper). This particular model assumes that top quark is much heavier than gluino.

The signal event yields are calculated for all mSUGRA models (see Fig. 8a in the paper). For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The model assumes tan(beta)=30, A0=2m0, and mu>0.

The signal event yields are calculated for all simplified models. For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The simplified model is for direct production of gluinos. A gluino decays into t c chi1^0 (see Fig. 5c in the paper). This particular model assumes that m(chi1^0) = m(stop)-20 GeV.

The signal event yields are calculated for all GMSB models (see Fig. 8c in the paper). For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The model assumes mmess=250 TeV, m5=3, mu>0, and Cgrav=1.

The signal event yields are calculated for all simplified models. For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The simplified model is for direct production of bottom squarks. A bottom squark decays into t chi1^(+-) and chi1^(+-) --> W^(+-) chi1^0 (see Fig. 7a in the paper). This particular model assumes that m(chi1^0)=60 GeV.

The signal event yields are calculated for all simplified models. For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The simplified model is for direct production of gluinos and top squarks. Top squarks undergo R-parity violating decays into bs and gluinos decay into t stop (see Fig. 5d in the paper).

The signal event yields are calculated for all simplified models. For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The simplified model is for direct production of bottom squarks. A bottom squark decays into t chi1^(+-) and chi1^(+-) --> W^(+-) chi1^0 (see Fig. 7b in the paper). This particular model assumes that m(chi1^0)=2(chi1^0).

The signal event yields are calculated for all mSUGRA/CMSSM models with bRPV (see Fig. 8b in the paper). For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The model assumes tan(beta)=30, A0=2m0, mu>0, and bRPV.

The signal event yields are calculated for all simplified models. For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The simplified model is for direct production of squarks. Squarks decay into q q l l (l l) chi1^0 chi1^0 + neutrinos (see Fig. 6e in the paper).

The signal event yields are calculated for all simplified models. For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The simplified model is for direct pair-production of gluinos that decay via a two-step process into q q q q W Z W Z chi1^0 chi1^0 (see Fig. 6b in the paper).

The signal event yields are calculated for all simplified models. For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The simplified model is for direct pair-production of gluinos. A gluino decays into t stop. Consequently, a top squark squark decays into b chi1^(+-) and chi1^(+-) --> W^(+-) chi1^0 (see Fig. 5b in the paper). This particular model assumes that m(stop) < m(gluino), m(chi1^0)=6 GeV, and m(chi1^(+-))=118 GeV.

Experimental uncertainties on the signal event yields are calculated for all simplified models. For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The simplified model is for direct production of squarks that decay into two steps into q q W Z W Z chi1^0 chi1^0 (see Fig. 6c in the paper).

Experimental uncertainties on the signal event yields are calculated for all simplified extra dimension model (see Fig. 8d in the paper). For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination.

Experimental uncertainties on the signal event yields are calculated for all simplified models. For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The simplified model is for direct production of gluinos that decay via sleptons into q q q q l l (l l) chi1^0 chi1^0 + neutrinos (see Fig. 6d in the paper).

Experimental uncertainties on the signal event yields are calculated for all simplified models. For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The simplified model is for direct production of gluinos that decay into q q q q W W chi1^0 chi1^0 (see Fig. 6a in the paper).

Experimental uncertainties on the signal event yields are calculated for all simplified models. For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The simplified model is for direct production of gluinos that decay into t tbar t tbar chi1^0 chi1^0 (see Fig. 5a in the paper). This particular model assumes that top quark is much heavier than gluino.

Experimental uncertainties on the signal event yields are calculated for all mSUGRA models (see Fig. 8a in the paper). For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The model assumes tan(beta)=30, A0=2m0, and mu>0.

Experimental uncertainties on the signal event yields are calculated for all simplified models. For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The simplified model is for direct production of gluinos. A gluino decays into t c chi1^0 (see Fig. 5c in the paper). This particular model assumes that m(chi1^0) = m(stop) - 20 GeV.

Experimental uncertainties on the signal event yields are calculated for all GMSB models (see Fig. 8c in the paper). For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The model assumes mmess=250 TeV, m5=3, mu>0, and Cgrav=1.

Experimental uncertainties on the signal event yields are calculated for all simplified models. For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The simplified model is for direct production of bottom squarks. A bottom squark decays into t chi1^(+-) and chi1^(+-) --> W^(+-) chi1^0 (see Fig. 7a in the paper). This particular model assumes that m(chi1^0)=60 GeV.

Experimental uncertainties on the signal event yields are calculated for all simplified models. For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The simplified model is for direct production of gluinos and top squarks. Top squarks undergo R-parity violating decays into bs and gluinos decay into t stop (see Fig. 5d in the paper).

Experimental uncertainties on the signal event yields are calculated for all simplified models. For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The simplified model is for direct production of bottom squarks. A bottom squark decays into t chi1^(+-) and chi1^(+-) --> W^(+-) chi1^0 (see Fig. 7b in the paper). This particular model assumes that m(chi1^0)=2(chi1^0).

Experimental uncertainties on the signal event yields are calculated for all mSUGRA/CMSSM models with bRPV (see Fig. 8b in the paper). For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The model assumes tan(beta)=30, A0=2m0, mu>0, and bRPV.

Experimental uncertainties on the signal event yields are calculated for all simplified models. For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The simplified model is for direct production of squarks. Squarks decay into q q l l (l l) chi1^0 chi1^0 + neutrinos (see Fig. 6e in the paper).

Experimental uncertainties on the signal event yields are calculated for all simplified models. For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The simplified model is for direct pair-production of gluinos that decay via a two-step process into q q q q W Z W Z chi1^0 chi1^0 (see Fig. 6b in the paper).

Experimental uncertainties on the signal event yields are calculated for all simplified models. For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The simplified model is for direct pair-production of gluinos. A gluino decays into t stop. Consequently, a top squark squark decays into b chi1^(+-) and chi1^(+-) --> W^(+-) chi1^0 (see Fig. 5b in the paper). This particular model assumes that m(stop) < m(gluino), m(chi1^0)=6 GeV, and m(chi1^(+-))=118 GeV.

Statistical uncertainties on the signal event yields are calculated for all simplified models. For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The simplified model is for direct production of squarks that decay into two steps into q q W Z W Z chi1^0 chi1^0 (see Fig. 6c in the paper).

Statistical uncertainties on the signal event yields are calculated for all simplified extra dimension model (see Fig. 8d in the paper). For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination.

Statistical uncertainties on the signal event yields are calculated for all simplified models. For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The simplified model is for direct production of gluinos that decay via sleptons into q q q q l l (l l) chi1^0 chi1^0 + neutrinos (see Fig. 6d in the paper).

Statistical uncertainties on the signal event yields are calculated for all simplified models. For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The simplified model is for direct production of gluinos that decay into q q q q W W chi1^0 chi1^0 (see Fig. 6a in the paper).

Statistical uncertainties on the signal event yields are calculated for all simplified models. For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The simplified model is for direct production of gluinos that decay into t tbar t tbar chi1^0 chi1^0 (see Fig. 5a in the paper). This particular model assumes that top quark is much heavier than gluino.

Statistical uncertainties on the signal event yields are calculated for all mSUGRA models (see Fig. 8a in the paper). For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The model assumes tan(beta)=30, A0=2m0, and mu>0.

Statistical uncertainties on the signal event yields are calculated for all simplified models. For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The simplified model is for direct production of gluinos. A gluino decays into t c chi1^0 (see Fig. 5c in the paper). This particular model assumes that m(chi1^0) = m(stop) - 20 GeV.

Statistical uncertainties on the signal event yields are calculated for all GMSB models (see Fig. 8c in the paper). For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The model assumes mmess=250 TeV, m5=3, mu>0, and Cgrav=1.

Statistical uncertainties on the signal event yields are calculated for all simplified models. For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The simplified model is for direct production of bottom squarks. A bottom squark decays into t chi1^(+-) and chi1^(+-) --> W^(+-) chi1^0 (see Fig. 7a in the paper). This particular model assumes that m(chi1^0)=60 GeV.

Statistical uncertainties on the signal event yields are calculated for all simplified models. For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The simplified model is for direct production of gluinos and top squarks. Top squarks undergo R-parity violating decays into bs and gluinos decay into t stop (see Fig. 5d in the paper).

Statistical uncertainties on the signal event yields are calculated for all simplified models. For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The simplified model is for direct production of bottom squarks. A bottom squark decays into t chi1^(+-) and chi1^(+-) --> W^(+-) chi1^0 (see Fig. 7b in the paper). This particular model assumes that m(chi1^0)=2(chi1^0).

Statistical uncertainties on the signal event yields are calculated for all mSUGRA/CMSSM models with bRPV (see Fig. 8b in the paper). For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The model assumes tan(beta)=30, A0=2m0, mu>0, and bRPV.

Statistical uncertainties on the signal event yields are calculated for all simplified models. For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The simplified model is for direct production of squarks. Squarks decay into q q l l (l l) chi1^0 chi1^0 + neutrinos (see Fig. 6e in the paper).

Statistical uncertainties on the signal event yields are calculated for all simplified models. For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The simplified model is for direct pair-production of gluinos that decay via a two-step process into q q q q W Z W Z chi1^0 chi1^0 (see Fig. 6b in the paper).

Statistical uncertainties on the signal event yields are calculated for all simplified models. For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The simplified model is for direct pair-production of gluinos. A gluino decays into t stop. Consequently, a top squark squark decays into b chi1^(+-) and chi1^(+-) --> W ^(+-) chi1^0 (see Fig. 5b in the paper). This particular model assumes that m(stop) < m(gluino), m(chi1^0)=6 GeV, and m(chi1^(+-))=118 GeV.

The confidence levels are calculated for all simplified models. For each model, the observed and expected values are given. The simplified model is for direct production of gluinos that decay into t tbar t tbar chi1^0 chi1^0 (see Fig. 5a in the paper). This particular model assumes that top quark is much heavier than gluino.

The confidence levels are calculated for all simplified models. For each model, the observed and expected values are given. The simplified model is for direct production of squarks that decay into two steps into q q W Z W Z chi1^0 chi1^0 (see Fig. 6c in the paper).

The confidence levels are calculated for all simplified models. For each model, the values are given for the five signal regions and their combination. The simplified model is for direct pair-production of gluinos that decay via a two-step process into q q q q W Z W Z chi1^0 chi1^0 (see Fig. 6b in the paper).

The confidence levels are calculated for all simplified models. For each model, the expected and observed values are given. The simplified model is for direct production of gluinos that decay via sleptons into q q q q l l (l l) chi1^0 chi1^0 + neutrinos (see Fig. 6d in the paper).

The confidence levels are calculated for all simplified models. For each model, the expected and observed values are given. The simplified model is for direct pair-production of gluinos. A gluino decays into t stop. Consequently, a top squark squark decays into b chi1^(+-) and chi1^(+-) --> W^(+-) chi1^0 (see Fig. 5b in the paper). This particular model assumes that m(stop) < m(gluion), m(chi1^0)=6 GeV, and m(chi1^(+-))=118 GeV.

The confidence levels are calculated for all simplified models. For each model, the expected and observed values are given. The simplified model is for direct production of gluinos. A gluino decays into t c chi1^0 (see Fig. 5c in the paper). This particular model assumes that m(chi1^0) = m(stop) - 20 GeV.

The confidence levels are calculated for all simplified models. For each model, the expected and observed values are given. The simplified model is for direct production of bottom squarks. A bottom squark decays into t chi1^(+-) and chi1^(+-) --> W^(+-) chi1^0 (see Fig. 7b in the paper). This particular model assumes that m(chi1^0)=2(chi1^0).

The confidence levels are calculated for all simplified models. For each model, the expected and observed values are given. The simplified model is for direct production of bottom squarks. A bottom squark decays into t chi1^(+-) and chi1^(+-) --> W^(+-) chi1^0 (see Fig. 7a in the paper). This particular model assumes that m(chi1^0)=60 GeV.

The confidence levels are calculated for all simplified models. For each model, the expected and observed values are given. The simplified model is for direct production of squarks. Squarks decay into q q l l (l l) chi1^0 chi1^0 + neutrinos (see Fig. 6e in the paper).

The confidence levels are calculated for all GMSB models (see Fig. 8c in the paper). For each model, the expected and observed values are given. The model assumes mmess=250 TeV, m5=3, mu>0, and Cgrav=1.

The confidence levels are calculated for all simplified models. For each model, the expected and observed values are given. The simplified model is for direct production of gluinos and top squarks. Top squarks undergo R-parity violating decays into bs and gluinos decay into t stop (see Fig. 5d in the paper).

The confidence levels are calculated for all mSUGRA/CMSSM models with bRPV (see Fig. 8b in the paper). For each model, the expected and observed values are given. The model assumes tan(beta)=30, A0=2m0, mu>0, and bRPV.

The confidence levels are calculated for all simplified extra dimension model (see Fig. 8d in the paper). For each model, the expected and observed values are given.

The confidence levels are calculated for all simplified models. For each model, the expected and observed values are given. The simplified model is for direct production of gluinos that decay into q q q q W W chi1^0 chi1^0 (see Fig. 6a in the paper).

The confidence levels are calculated for all mSUGRA models (see Fig. 8a in the paper). For each model, the expected and observed values are given. The model assumes tan(beta)=30, A0=2m0, and mu>0.

Normalised differential cross-section as a function of $\sum_{n_{\text{ch}}} p_{\text{T}}$.

Normalised double-differential cross-section as a function of $\sum_{n_{\text{ch}}} p_{\text{T}}$ vs. $n_\text{ch}$ in $n_\text{ch} < 20$.

Normalised double-differential cross-section as a function of $\sum_{n_{\text{ch}}} p_{\text{T}}$ vs. $n_\text{ch}$ in $ 20 \leq n_\text{ch} < 40$.

Normalised double-differential cross-section as a function of $\sum_{n_{\text{ch}}} p_{\text{T}}$ vs. $n_\text{ch}$ in $ 40 \leq n_\text{ch} < 60$.

Normalised double-differential cross-section as a function of $\sum_{n_{\text{ch}}} p_{\text{T}}$ vs. $n_\text{ch}$ in $ 60 \leq n_\text{ch} < 80$.

Normalised double-differential cross-section as a function of $\sum_{n_{\text{ch}}} p_{\text{T}}$ vs. $n\text{ch}$ in $ n_\text{ch} \geq 80$.

The $\chi^2$ and NDF for measured absolute differential cross-sections obtained by comparing the different predictions with the unfolded data. Global($n_\text{ch},\Sigma_{n_{\text{ch}}} p_{\text{T}}$) denotes the scenario in which the covariance matrix is built including the correlations of systematic uncertainties between the two observables $n_{\text{ch}}$ and $\Sigma_{n_{\text{ch}}} p_{\text{T}}$

Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $n_\text{ch}$.

Absolute differential cross-section as a function of $\sum_{n_{\text{ch}}} p_{\text{T}}$.

Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $\sum_{n_{\text{ch}}} p_{\text{T}}$ vs. $n_\text{ch}$ in $n_\text{ch} < 20$.

Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $\sum_{n_{\text{ch}}} p_{\text{T}}$ vs. $n_\text{ch}$ in $ 20 \leq n_\text{ch} < 40$.

Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $\sum_{n_{\text{ch}}} p_{\text{T}}$ vs. $n_\text{ch}$ in $ 40 \leq n_\text{ch} < 60$.

Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $\sum_{n_{\text{ch}}} p_{\text{T}}$ vs. $n_\text{ch}$ in $ 60 \leq n_\text{ch} < 80$.

Absolute double-differential cross-section as a function of $\sum_{n_{\text{ch}}} p_{\text{T}}$ vs. $n\text{ch}$ in $ n_\text{ch} \geq 80$.

Mean value of N(C=CHARGED) v jet PT for R=0.8.

Mean value of N(C=CHARGED) v jet PT for R=1.0.

Mean value of PT(C=AVERAGE) v jet PT for R=0.2.

Mean value of PT(C=AVERAGE) v jet PT for R=0.4.

Mean value of PT(C=AVERAGE) v jet PT for R=0.6.

Mean value of PT(C=AVERAGE) v jet PT for R=0.8.

Mean value of PT(C=AVERAGE) v jet PT for R=1.0.

Mean value of SUM(PT) v jet PT for R=0.2.

Mean value of SUM(PT) v jet PT for R=0.4.

Mean value of SUM(PT) v jet PT for R=0.6.

Mean value of SUM(PT) v jet PT for R=0.8.

Mean value of SUM(PT) v jet PT for R=1.0.

Distribution of the variable N(C=CHARGED) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.2 and jet PT in the range 4 to 5 GeV.

Distribution of the variable N(C=CHARGED) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.2 and jet PT in the range 5 to 6 GeV.

Distribution of the variable N(C=CHARGED) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.2 and jet PT in the range 6 to 8 GeV.

Distribution of the variable N(C=CHARGED) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.2 and jet PT in the range 8 to 11 GeV.

Distribution of the variable N(C=CHARGED) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.2 and jet PT in the range 11 to 14 GeV.

Distribution of the variable N(C=CHARGED) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.2 and jet PT in the range 14 to 19 GeV.

Distribution of the variable N(C=CHARGED) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.2 and jet PT in the range 19 to 24 GeV.

Distribution of the variable N(C=CHARGED) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.2 and jet PT in the range 24 to 31 GeV.

Distribution of the variable N(C=CHARGED) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.2 and jet PT in the range 31 to 50 GeV.

Distribution of the variable N(C=CHARGED) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.2 and jet PT in the range 50 to 100 GeV.

Distribution of the variable N(C=CHARGED) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.4 and jet PT in the range 4 to 5 GeV.

Distribution of the variable N(C=CHARGED) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.4 and jet PT in the range 5 to 6 GeV.

Distribution of the variable N(C=CHARGED) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.4 and jet PT in the range 6 to 8 GeV.

Distribution of the variable N(C=CHARGED) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.4 and jet PT in the range 8 to 11 GeV.

Distribution of the variable N(C=CHARGED) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.4 and jet PT in the range 11 to 14 GeV.

Distribution of the variable N(C=CHARGED) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.4 and jet PT in the range 14 to 19 GeV.

Distribution of the variable N(C=CHARGED) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.4 and jet PT in the range 19 to 24 GeV.

Distribution of the variable N(C=CHARGED) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.4 and jet PT in the range 24 to 31 GeV.

Distribution of the variable N(C=CHARGED) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.4 and jet PT in the range 31 to 50 GeV.

Distribution of the variable N(C=CHARGED) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.4 and jet PT in the range 50 to 100 GeV.

Distribution of the variable N(C=CHARGED) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.6 and jet PT in the range 4 to 5 GeV.

Distribution of the variable N(C=CHARGED) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.6 and jet PT in the range 5 to 6 GeV.

Distribution of the variable N(C=CHARGED) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.6 and jet PT in the range 6 to 8 GeV.

Distribution of the variable N(C=CHARGED) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.6 and jet PT in the range 8 to 11 GeV.

Distribution of the variable N(C=CHARGED) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.6 and jet PT in the range 11 to 14 GeV.

Distribution of the variable N(C=CHARGED) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.6 and jet PT in the range 14 to 19 GeV.

Distribution of the variable N(C=CHARGED) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.6 and jet PT in the range 19 to 24 GeV.

Distribution of the variable N(C=CHARGED) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.6 and jet PT in the range 24 to 31 GeV.

Distribution of the variable N(C=CHARGED) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.6 and jet PT in the range 31 to 50 GeV.

Distribution of the variable N(C=CHARGED) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.6 and jet PT in the range 50 to 100 GeV.

Distribution of the variable N(C=CHARGED) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.8 and jet PT in the range 4 to 5 GeV.

Distribution of the variable N(C=CHARGED) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.8 and jet PT in the range 5 to 6 GeV.

Distribution of the variable N(C=CHARGED) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.8 and jet PT in the range 6 to 8 GeV.

Distribution of the variable N(C=CHARGED) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.8 and jet PT in the range 8 to 11 GeV.

Distribution of the variable N(C=CHARGED) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.8 and jet PT in the range 11 to 14 GeV.

Distribution of the variable N(C=CHARGED) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.8 and jet PT in the range 14 to 19 GeV.

Distribution of the variable N(C=CHARGED) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.8 and jet PT in the range 19 to 24 GeV.

Distribution of the variable N(C=CHARGED) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.8 and jet PT in the range 24 to 31 GeV.

Distribution of the variable N(C=CHARGED) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.8 and jet PT in the range 31 to 50 GeV.

Distribution of the variable N(C=CHARGED) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.8 and jet PT in the range 50 to 100 GeV.

Distribution of the variable N(C=CHARGED) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=1.0 and jet PT in the range 4 to 5 GeV.

Distribution of the variable N(C=CHARGED) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=1.0 and jet PT in the range 5 to 6 GeV.

Distribution of the variable N(C=CHARGED) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=1.0 and jet PT in the range 6 to 8 GeV.

Distribution of the variable N(C=CHARGED) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=1.0 and jet PT in the range 8 to 11 GeV.

Distribution of the variable N(C=CHARGED) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=1.0 and jet PT in the range 11 to 14 GeV.

Distribution of the variable N(C=CHARGED) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=1.0 and jet PT in the range 14 to 19 GeV.

Distribution of the variable N(C=CHARGED) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=1.0 and jet PT in the range 19 to 24 GeV.

Distribution of the variable N(C=CHARGED) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=1.0 and jet PT in the range 24 to 31 GeV.

Distribution of the variable N(C=CHARGED) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=1.0 and jet PT in the range 31 to 50 GeV.

Distribution of the variable N(C=CHARGED) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=1.0 and jet PT in the range 50 to 100 GeV.

Distribution of the variable PT(C=AVERAGE) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.2 and jet PT in the range 4 to 5 GeV.

Distribution of the variable PT(C=AVERAGE) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.2 and jet PT in the range 5 to 6 GeV.

Distribution of the variable PT(C=AVERAGE) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.2 and jet PT in the range 6 to 8 GeV.

Distribution of the variable PT(C=AVERAGE) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.2 and jet PT in the range 8 to 11 GeV.

Distribution of the variable PT(C=AVERAGE) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.2 and jet PT in the range 11 to 14 GeV.

Distribution of the variable PT(C=AVERAGE) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.2 and jet PT in the range 14 to 19 GeV.

Distribution of the variable PT(C=AVERAGE) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.2 and jet PT in the range 19 to 24 GeV.

Distribution of the variable PT(C=AVERAGE) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.2 and jet PT in the range 24 to 31 GeV.

Distribution of the variable PT(C=AVERAGE) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.2 and jet PT in the range 31 to 50 GeV.

Distribution of the variable PT(C=AVERAGE) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.2 and jet PT in the range 50 to 100 GeV.

Distribution of the variable PT(C=AVERAGE) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.4 and jet PT in the range 4 to 5 GeV.

Distribution of the variable PT(C=AVERAGE) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.4 and jet PT in the range 5 to 6 GeV.

Distribution of the variable PT(C=AVERAGE) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.4 and jet PT in the range 6 to 8 GeV.

Distribution of the variable PT(C=AVERAGE) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.4 and jet PT in the range 8 to 11 GeV.

Distribution of the variable PT(C=AVERAGE) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.4 and jet PT in the range 11 to 14 GeV.

Distribution of the variable PT(C=AVERAGE) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.4 and jet PT in the range 14 to 19 GeV.

Distribution of the variable PT(C=AVERAGE) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.4 and jet PT in the range 19 to 24 GeV.

Distribution of the variable PT(C=AVERAGE) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.4 and jet PT in the range 24 to 31 GeV.

Distribution of the variable PT(C=AVERAGE) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.4 and jet PT in the range 31 to 50 GeV.

Distribution of the variable PT(C=AVERAGE) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.4 and jet PT in the range 50 to 100 GeV.

Distribution of the variable PT(C=AVERAGE) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.6 and jet PT in the range 4 to 5 GeV.

Distribution of the variable PT(C=AVERAGE) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.6 and jet PT in the range 5 to 6 GeV.

Distribution of the variable PT(C=AVERAGE) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.6 and jet PT in the range 6 to 8 GeV.

Distribution of the variable PT(C=AVERAGE) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.6 and jet PT in the range 8 to 11 GeV.

Distribution of the variable PT(C=AVERAGE) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.6 and jet PT in the range 11 to 14 GeV.

Distribution of the variable PT(C=AVERAGE) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.6 and jet PT in the range 14 to 19 GeV.

Distribution of the variable PT(C=AVERAGE) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.6 and jet PT in the range 19 to 24 GeV.

Distribution of the variable PT(C=AVERAGE) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.6 and jet PT in the range 24 to 31 GeV.

Distribution of the variable PT(C=AVERAGE) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.6 and jet PT in the range 31 to 50 GeV.

Distribution of the variable PT(C=AVERAGE) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.6 and jet PT in the range 50 to 100 GeV.

Distribution of the variable PT(C=AVERAGE) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.8 and jet PT in the range 4 to 5 GeV.

Distribution of the variable PT(C=AVERAGE) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.8 and jet PT in the range 5 to 6 GeV.

Distribution of the variable PT(C=AVERAGE) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.8 and jet PT in the range 6 to 8 GeV.

Distribution of the variable PT(C=AVERAGE) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.8 and jet PT in the range 8 to 11 GeV.

Distribution of the variable PT(C=AVERAGE) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.8 and jet PT in the range 11 to 14 GeV.

Distribution of the variable PT(C=AVERAGE) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.8 and jet PT in the range 14 to 19 GeV.

Distribution of the variable PT(C=AVERAGE) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.8 and jet PT in the range 19 to 24 GeV.

Distribution of the variable PT(C=AVERAGE) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.8 and jet PT in the range 24 to 31 GeV.

Distribution of the variable PT(C=AVERAGE) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.8 and jet PT in the range 31 to 50 GeV.

Distribution of the variable PT(C=AVERAGE) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.8 and jet PT in the range 50 to 100 GeV.

Distribution of the variable PT(C=AVERAGE) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=1.0 and jet PT in the range 4 to 5 GeV.

Distribution of the variable PT(C=AVERAGE) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=1.0 and jet PT in the range 5 to 6 GeV.

Distribution of the variable PT(C=AVERAGE) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=1.0 and jet PT in the range 6 to 8 GeV.

Distribution of the variable PT(C=AVERAGE) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=1.0 and jet PT in the range 8 to 11 GeV.

Distribution of the variable PT(C=AVERAGE) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=1.0 and jet PT in the range 11 to 14 GeV.

Distribution of the variable PT(C=AVERAGE) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=1.0 and jet PT in the range 14 to 19 GeV.

Distribution of the variable PT(C=AVERAGE) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=1.0 and jet PT in the range 19 to 24 GeV.

Distribution of the variable PT(C=AVERAGE) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=1.0 and jet PT in the range 24 to 31 GeV.

Distribution of the variable PT(C=AVERAGE) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=1.0 and jet PT in the range 31 to 50 GeV.

Distribution of the variable PT(C=AVERAGE) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=1.0 and jet PT in the range 50 to 100 GeV.

Distribution of the variable SUM(PT) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.2 and jet PT in the range 4 to 5 GeV.

Distribution of the variable SUM(PT) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.2 and jet PT in the range 5 to 6 GeV.

Distribution of the variable SUM(PT) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.2 and jet PT in the range 6 to 8 GeV.

Distribution of the variable SUM(PT) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.2 and jet PT in the range 8 to 11 GeV.

Distribution of the variable SUM(PT) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.2 and jet PT in the range 11 to 14 GeV.

Distribution of the variable SUM(PT) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.2 and jet PT in the range 14 to 19 GeV.

Distribution of the variable SUM(PT) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.2 and jet PT in the range 19 to 24 GeV.

Distribution of the variable SUM(PT) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.2 and jet PT in the range 24 to 31 GeV.

Distribution of the variable SUM(PT) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.2 and jet PT in the range 31 to 50 GeV.

Distribution of the variable SUM(PT) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.2 and jet PT in the range 50 to 100 GeV.

Distribution of the variable SUM(PT) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.4 and jet PT in the range 4 to 5 GeV.

Distribution of the variable SUM(PT) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.4 and jet PT in the range 5 to 6 GeV.

Distribution of the variable SUM(PT) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.4 and jet PT in the range 6 to 8 GeV.

Distribution of the variable SUM(PT) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.4 and jet PT in the range 8 to 11 GeV.

Distribution of the variable SUM(PT) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.4 and jet PT in the range 11 to 14 GeV.

Distribution of the variable SUM(PT) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.4 and jet PT in the range 14 to 19 GeV.

Distribution of the variable SUM(PT) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.4 and jet PT in the range 19 to 24 GeV.

Distribution of the variable SUM(PT) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.4 and jet PT in the range 24 to 31 GeV.

Distribution of the variable SUM(PT) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.4 and jet PT in the range 31 to 50 GeV.

Distribution of the variable SUM(PT) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.4 and jet PT in the range 50 to 100 GeV.

Distribution of the variable SUM(PT) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.6 and jet PT in the range 4 to 5 GeV.

Distribution of the variable SUM(PT) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.6 and jet PT in the range 5 to 6 GeV.

Distribution of the variable SUM(PT) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.6 and jet PT in the range 6 to 8 GeV.

Distribution of the variable SUM(PT) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.6 and jet PT in the range 8 to 11 GeV.

Distribution of the variable SUM(PT) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.6 and jet PT in the range 11 to 14 GeV.

Distribution of the variable SUM(PT) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.6 and jet PT in the range 14 to 19 GeV.

Distribution of the variable SUM(PT) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.6 and jet PT in the range 19 to 24 GeV.

Distribution of the variable SUM(PT) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.6 and jet PT in the range 24 to 31 GeV.

Distribution of the variable SUM(PT) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.6 and jet PT in the range 31 to 50 GeV.

Distribution of the variable SUM(PT) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.6 and jet PT in the range 50 to 100 GeV.

Distribution of the variable SUM(PT) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.8 and jet PT in the range 4 to 5 GeV.

Distribution of the variable SUM(PT) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.8 and jet PT in the range 5 to 6 GeV.

Distribution of the variable SUM(PT) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.8 and jet PT in the range 6 to 8 GeV.

Distribution of the variable SUM(PT) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.8 and jet PT in the range 8 to 11 GeV.

Distribution of the variable SUM(PT) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.8 and jet PT in the range 11 to 14 GeV.

Distribution of the variable SUM(PT) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.8 and jet PT in the range 14 to 19 GeV.

Distribution of the variable SUM(PT) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.8 and jet PT in the range 19 to 24 GeV.

Distribution of the variable SUM(PT) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.8 and jet PT in the range 24 to 31 GeV.

Distribution of the variable SUM(PT) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.8 and jet PT in the range 31 to 50 GeV.

Distribution of the variable SUM(PT) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=0.8 and jet PT in the range 50 to 100 GeV.

Distribution of the variable SUM(PT) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=1.0 and jet PT in the range 4 to 5 GeV.

Distribution of the variable SUM(PT) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=1.0 and jet PT in the range 5 to 6 GeV.

Distribution of the variable SUM(PT) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=1.0 and jet PT in the range 6 to 8 GeV.

Distribution of the variable SUM(PT) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=1.0 and jet PT in the range 8 to 11 GeV.

Distribution of the variable SUM(PT) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=1.0 and jet PT in the range 11 to 14 GeV.

Distribution of the variable SUM(PT) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=1.0 and jet PT in the range 14 to 19 GeV.

Distribution of the variable SUM(PT) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=1.0 and jet PT in the range 19 to 24 GeV.

Distribution of the variable SUM(PT) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=1.0 and jet PT in the range 24 to 31 GeV.

Distribution of the variable SUM(PT) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=1.0 and jet PT in the range 31 to 50 GeV.

Distribution of the variable SUM(PT) in the AWAY and TRANSVERSE regions for R=1.0 and jet PT in the range 50 to 100 GeV.

Measured differential cross section as a function of observable $ \Delta R (l,l)$. Error on the measured cross-section include all the systematic uncertainties. SM predictions are produced with the event generators at particle level: Sherpa 2.2.4, Sherpa 2.2.11, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, and MiNNLO$_{PS}$. Fixed order calculations results use MATRIX NNLO. Error represent statistical uncertainty and theoretical uncertainty (PDF and Scale variations).

Measured differential cross section as a function of observable $ N_{jets}$. Error on the measured cross-section include all the systematic uncertainties. SM predictions are produced with the event generators at particle level: Sherpa 2.2.4, Sherpa 2.2.11, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, and MiNNLO$_{PS}$. Fixed order calculations results use MATRIX NNLO. Error represent statistical uncertainty and theoretical uncertainty (PDF and Scale variations).

Measured differential cross section as a function of observable $ p_{T}^{Jet1}$. Error on the measured cross-section include all the systematic uncertainties. SM predictions are produced with the event generators at particle level: Sherpa 2.2.4, Sherpa 2.2.11, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, and MiNNLO$_{PS}$. Fixed order calculations results use MATRIX NNLO. Error represent statistical uncertainty and theoretical uncertainty (PDF and Scale variations).

Measured differential cross section as a function of observable $ p_{T}^{Jet2}$. Error on the measured cross-section include all the systematic uncertainties. SM predictions are produced with the event generators at particle level: Sherpa 2.2.4, Sherpa 2.2.11, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, and MiNNLO$_{PS}$. Fixed order calculations results use MATRIX NNLO. Error represent statistical uncertainty and theoretical uncertainty (PDF and Scale variations).

Measured differential cross section as a function of observable $ p_{T}^{Jet2}/p_{T}^{Jet1}$. Error on the measured cross-section include all the systematic uncertainties. SM predictions are produced with the event generators at particle level: Sherpa 2.2.4, Sherpa 2.2.11, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, and MiNNLO$_{PS}$. Fixed order calculations results use MATRIX NNLO. Error represent statistical uncertainty and theoretical uncertainty (PDF and Scale variations).

Measured differential cross section as a function of observable $ m_{jj}$. Error on the measured cross-section include all the systematic uncertainties. SM predictions are produced with the event generators at particle level: Sherpa 2.2.4, Sherpa 2.2.11, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, and MiNNLO$_{PS}$. Fixed order calculations results use MATRIX NNLO. Error represent statistical uncertainty and theoretical uncertainty (PDF and Scale variations).

Measured differential cross section as a function of observable $ m_{ll\gamma j}$. Error on the measured cross-section include all the systematic uncertainties. SM predictions are produced with the event generators at particle level: Sherpa 2.2.4, Sherpa 2.2.11, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, and MiNNLO$_{PS}$. Fixed order calculations results use MATRIX NNLO. Error represent statistical uncertainty and theoretical uncertainty (PDF and Scale variations).

Measured differential cross section as a function of observable $ H_{T}$. Error on the measured cross-section include all the systematic uncertainties. SM predictions are produced with the event generators at particle level: Sherpa 2.2.4, Sherpa 2.2.11, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, and MiNNLO$_{PS}$. Fixed order calculations results use MATRIX NNLO. Error represent statistical uncertainty and theoretical uncertainty (PDF and Scale variations).

Measured differential cross section as a function of observable $ p_{T}^{\gamma} / \sqrt{H_{T}}$. Error on the measured cross-section include all the systematic uncertainties. SM predictions are produced with the event generators at particle level: Sherpa 2.2.4, Sherpa 2.2.11, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, and MiNNLO$_{PS}$. Fixed order calculations results use MATRIX NNLO. Error represent statistical uncertainty and theoretical uncertainty (PDF and Scale variations).

Measured differential cross section as a function of observable $ \Delta \phi (Jet,\gamma)$. Error on the measured cross-section include all the systematic uncertainties. SM predictions are produced with the event generators at particle level: Sherpa 2.2.4, Sherpa 2.2.11, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, and MiNNLO$_{PS}$. Fixed order calculations results use MATRIX NNLO. Error represent statistical uncertainty and theoretical uncertainty (PDF and Scale variations).

Measured differential cross section as a function of observable $ p_{T}^{ll\gamma j}$. Error on the measured cross-section include all the systematic uncertainties. SM predictions are produced with the event generators at particle level: Sherpa 2.2.4, Sherpa 2.2.11, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, and MiNNLO$_{PS}$. Fixed order calculations results use MATRIX NNLO. Error represent statistical uncertainty and theoretical uncertainty (PDF and Scale variations).

Measured differential cross section as a function of observable $ \phi_{CS}$. Error on the measured cross-section include all the systematic uncertainties. SM predictions are produced with the event generators at particle level: Sherpa 2.2.4, Sherpa 2.2.11, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, and MiNNLO$_{PS}$. Fixed order calculations results use MATRIX NNLO. Error represent statistical uncertainty and theoretical uncertainty (PDF and Scale variations).

Measured differential cross section as a function of observable $ \cos \theta_{CS}$. Error on the measured cross-section include all the systematic uncertainties. SM predictions are produced with the event generators at particle level: Sherpa 2.2.4, Sherpa 2.2.11, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, and MiNNLO$_{PS}$. Fixed order calculations results use MATRIX NNLO. Error represent statistical uncertainty and theoretical uncertainty (PDF and Scale variations).

Measured differential cross section as a function of observable $ p_{T}^{ll\gamma} / m_{ll\gamma}$. Error on the measured cross-section include all the systematic uncertainties. SM predictions are produced with the event generators at particle level: Sherpa 2.2.4, Sherpa 2.2.11, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, and MiNNLO$_{PS}$. Fixed order calculations results use MATRIX NNLO. Error represent statistical uncertainty and theoretical uncertainty (PDF and Scale variations).

Measured differential cross section as a function of observable $ p_{T}^{ll\gamma} / m_{ll\gamma}$. Error on the measured cross-section include all the systematic uncertainties. SM predictions are produced with the event generators at particle level: Sherpa 2.2.4, Sherpa 2.2.11, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, and MiNNLO$_{PS}$. Fixed order calculations results use MATRIX NNLO. Error represent statistical uncertainty and theoretical uncertainty (PDF and Scale variations).

Measured differential cross section as a function of observable $ p_{T}^{ll\gamma} / m_{ll\gamma}$. Error on the measured cross-section include all the systematic uncertainties. SM predictions are produced with the event generators at particle level: Sherpa 2.2.4, Sherpa 2.2.11, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, and MiNNLO$_{PS}$. Fixed order calculations results use MATRIX NNLO. Error represent statistical uncertainty and theoretical uncertainty (PDF and Scale variations).

Measured differential cross section as a function of observable $ p_{T}^{ll} - p_{T}^{\gamma}$. Error on the measured cross-section include all the systematic uncertainties. SM predictions are produced with the event generators at particle level: Sherpa 2.2.4, Sherpa 2.2.11, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, and MiNNLO$_{PS}$. Fixed order calculations results use MATRIX NNLO. Error represent statistical uncertainty and theoretical uncertainty (PDF and Scale variations).

Measured differential cross section as a function of observable $ p_{T}^{ll} - p_{T}^{\gamma}$. Error on the measured cross-section include all the systematic uncertainties. SM predictions are produced with the event generators at particle level: Sherpa 2.2.4, Sherpa 2.2.11, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, and MiNNLO$_{PS}$. Fixed order calculations results use MATRIX NNLO. Error represent statistical uncertainty and theoretical uncertainty (PDF and Scale variations).

Measured differential cross section as a function of observable $ p_{T}^{ll} - p_{T}^{\gamma}$. Error on the measured cross-section include all the systematic uncertainties. SM predictions are produced with the event generators at particle level: Sherpa 2.2.4, Sherpa 2.2.11, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, and MiNNLO$_{PS}$. Fixed order calculations results use MATRIX NNLO. Error represent statistical uncertainty and theoretical uncertainty (PDF and Scale variations).

Measured differential cross section as a function of observable $ p_{T}^{ll\gamma j}$. Error on the measured cross-section include all the systematic uncertainties. SM predictions are produced with the event generators at particle level: Sherpa 2.2.4, Sherpa 2.2.11, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, and MiNNLO$_{PS}$. Fixed order calculations results use MATRIX NNLO. Error represent statistical uncertainty and theoretical uncertainty (PDF and Scale variations).

Measured differential cross section as a function of observable $ p_{T}^{ll\gamma j}$. Error on the measured cross-section include all the systematic uncertainties. SM predictions are produced with the event generators at particle level: Sherpa 2.2.4, Sherpa 2.2.11, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, and MiNNLO$_{PS}$. Fixed order calculations results use MATRIX NNLO. Error represent statistical uncertainty and theoretical uncertainty (PDF and Scale variations).

Measured differential cross section as a function of observable $ p_{T}^{ll\gamma j}$. Error on the measured cross-section include all the systematic uncertainties. SM predictions are produced with the event generators at particle level: Sherpa 2.2.4, Sherpa 2.2.11, MadGraph5_aMC@NLO, and MiNNLO$_{PS}$. Fixed order calculations results use MATRIX NNLO. Error represent statistical uncertainty and theoretical uncertainty (PDF and Scale variations).

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ p_{T}^{\gamma} / \sqrt{H_{T}}$ (Fig. 8 (b))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ H_{T}$ (Fig. 8 (a))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ \Delta \phi (Jet,\gamma)$ (Fig. 8 (c))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ \Delta R (l,l)$ (Fig. 5 (d))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ p_{T}^{ll} - p_{T}^{\gamma}$ (Fig. 5 (b))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ p_{T}^{ll} - p_{T}^{\gamma} \textrm{ in bin } p_{T}^{ll} + p_{T}^{\gamma} < 200 GeV$ (Fig. 11 (a))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ p_{T}^{ll} - p_{T}^{\gamma} \textrm{ in bin } 200 GeV < p_{T}^{ll} + p_{T}^{\gamma} < 300 GeV$ (Fig. 11 (b))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ p_{T}^{ll} - p_{T}^{\gamma} \textrm{ in bin } p_{T}^{ll} + p_{T}^{\gamma} > 300 GeV$ (Fig. 11 (c))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ m_{jj}$ (Fig. 7 (a))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ m_{ll\gamma j}$ (Fig. 7 (b))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ N_{jets}$ (Fig. 6 (a))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ p_{T}^{Jet1}$ (Fig. 6 (b))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ p_{T}^{Jet2}$ (Fig. 6 (c))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ p_{T}^{Jet2}/p_{T}^{Jet1}$ (Fig. 6 (d))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ p_{T}^{ll}$ (Fig. 5 (a))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ p_{T}^{ll\gamma j}$ (Fig. 8 (d))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ p_{T}^{ll\gamma j} \textrm{ in bin } p_{T}^{ll\gamma} < 50 GeV$ (Fig. 12 (a))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ p_{T}^{ll\gamma j} \textrm{ in bin } 50 GeV < p_{T}^{ll\gamma} < 75 GeV$ (Fig. 12 (b))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ p_{T}^{ll\gamma j} \textrm{ in bin } p_{T}^{ll\gamma} > 75 GeV$ (Fig. 12 (c))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ p_{T}^{ll\gamma} / m_{ll\gamma} \textrm{ in bin } 125 GeV < m_{ll\gamma} < 200 GeV$ (Fig. 10 (a))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ p_{T}^{ll\gamma} / m_{ll\gamma} \textrm{ in bin } 200 GeV < m_{ll\gamma} < 300 GeV$ (Fig. 10 (b))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ p_{T}^{ll\gamma} / m_{ll\gamma} \textrm{ in bin } m_{ll\gamma} > 300 GeV$ (Fig. 10 (c))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ p_{T}^{ll} + p_{T}^{\gamma}$ (Fig. 5 (c))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ \cos \theta_{CS}$ (Fig. 9 (b))

Correlation matrix of the statistical uncertainties in the measured fiducial cross section for the observable $ \phi_{CS}$ (Fig. 9 (a))

The expected limit contour in the GLUINO-NEUTRALINO plane.

The observed limit contour in the SQUARK-NEUTRALINO plane.

The expected limit contour in the SQUARK-NEUTRALINO plane.