HEPData Search

Showing 9 of 229 results

High Statistics Study of ($\sim$ 10$^6$ events) of $J/\psi$ Production and $\Upsilon$ Production in the energy range 150 to 280 GeV by $\pi^\pm$, $p^\pm$ incident particle

The Saclay-CERN-College de France-Ecole Poly-Orsay collaboration Badier, J. ; Boucrot, J. ; Bourotte, J. ; et al.

AIP Conf.Proc. 68 (1981) 201-204, 1981.

Inspire Record 154782 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.49656

We have performed in the NA3 experiment the study of high mass dimuon production by a hadronic unseparated beam on hydrogen and platinum targets. The comparison of the production cross‐section for proton and antiproton together with the differential cross‐section dσ/dx allows us to compare the data with a production mechanism involving quark‐antiquark and gluon‐gluon interactions. The cosΘ* distribution of the same J/ψ data have also been analysed and results will be presented. Finally we have observed T production from 150 GeV/c incident pions.

4 data tables

Table 1

No description provided.

Table 2

No description provided.

Table 3

No description provided.

More…

Test of {QED} in $e^+ e^-$ Annihilation at Energies Between 12-{GeV} and 31.6-{GeV}

The TASSO collaboration Brandelik, R. ; Braunschweig, W. ; Gather, K. ; et al.

Phys.Lett.B 94 (1980) 259-265, 1980.

Inspire Record 153127 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.45228

We have measured the reactions e + e − → e + e − → μ + μ − and e + e − → γγ at c.m. energies between 12 and 31.6 GeV. Excellent agreement with the predictions of QED has been found, resulting in cut off parameters Λ + > 112 GeV and Λ − > 139 GeV for the first process and Λ + > 34 GeV and Λ − > 42 GeV (95% c.1.) for the last one. A limit on the Weinberg angle of sin 2 θ W < 0.55 (95% c.1.) has been obtained.

3 data tables

Table 1

SIG(C=QED) QED predictions for the cross sections. Only statistical errors are given.

Table 2

SIG(C=QED) QED predictions for the cross sections. Only statistical errors are given.

Table 3

SIG(C=QED) QED predictions for the cross sections. Only statistical errors are given.

Inclusive $\rho^0$ Production in Anti-neutrino $p$ Charged Current Interactions

Derrick, M. ; Gregory, P. ; Lopinto, F. ; et al.

Phys.Lett.B 91 (1980) 307-310, 1980.

Inspire Record 8534 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.6495

Using data from the Fermilab 15 ft hydrogen bubble chamber, we have studied inclusive ϱ 0 production in antineutrino-proton charged-current interactions. We measure (0.21 ± 0.03) ϱ 0 /event, corresponding to ϱ 0 / π − =0.12 ± 0.02. As a function of Q 2 and for hadronic masses above a threshold region, the ϱ 0 / π − ratio shows little variation. At least 50% of the ϱ 0 's are consistent with coming from the current fragmentation region. The results agree reasonably well with the predictions of the quark fragmentation model of Feynman and field.

4 data tables

Table 1

AVERAGE BEAM ENERGY 31 GEV.

Table 2

No description provided.

Table 3

No description provided.

More…

Confirmation of the Existence of the $\Sigma_c$ $^{++}$ and $\Lambda_c$ $^+$ Charmed Baryons

Baltay, C. ; Caroumbalis, D. ; French, H. ; et al.

Phys.Rev.Lett. 42 (1979) 1721, 1979.

Inspire Record 140761 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.50280

In a broadband neutrino exposure of the Fermilab 15-ft bubble chamber, we observe the production of the Σc++(2426) charmed baryon followed by its decay to Λc+(2260) and π+. We find the mass of the Λc+ to be 2257±10 MeV and the m(Σc++)−m(Λc+) mass difference to be 168±3 MeV. Previously unseen two-body decay modes of the Λc+(2260) are observed.

1 data table

Table 1

No description provided.

Measurement of the Relative Total Hadronic Cross-section R at {PETRA}

The Aachen-DESY-Annecy(LAPP)-MIT-NIKHEF-Beijing collaboration Barber, D. ; Becker, U. ; Boehm, A. ; et al.

Phys.Rev.Lett. 42 (1979) 1113, 1979.

Inspire Record 140059 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.3235

We report the first measurement of the ratio R=(σe+e−→hadrons)(σe+e−→μ+μ−) (with negligible τ-lepton contribution) at a center-of-mass energy s=13 GeV and s=17 GeV, from the just finished electron-positron colliding-beam facility PETRA. The detector, MARK-J, has an approximately 4π solid angle and measures γ, e, μ, and charged and neutral hadrons simultaneously. Our results yield R(s=17 GeV)=4.9±0.6 (statistical) ±0.7 (systematic error), and R(s=13 GeV)=4.6±0.5 (statistical) ±0.7 (systematic error). The ratio R(s=17 GeV)R(s=13 GeV) is 1.08±0.18.

2 data tables

Table 1

No description provided.

Table 2

No description provided.

Measurement of the Elastic Scattering of Neutrinos and Anti-neutrinos by Protons

Entenberg, A. ; Horstkotte, J. ; Kozanecki, W. ; et al.

Phys.Rev.Lett. 42 (1979) 1198, 1979.

Inspire Record 140053 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.20799

We have observed 217 (66) events of the process νp→νp (ν¯p→ν¯p) with an estimated background of 82 (28). The neutral-to-charged-current ratios are σ(νp→νp)σ(νn→μ−p)=0.11±0.02 and σ(ν¯p→ν¯p)σ(ν¯p→μ+n)=0.19±0.05 for 0.40<Q2<0.90 (GeV/c)2, where -Q2 is the square of the momentum transfer to the nucleon. These yield σ(ν¯p→ν¯p)σ(νp→νp)=0.53±0.17. The neutral-current form factors at Q2=0 are GE=0.5−0.5+0.25, GM=1.0−0.04+0.35, and gA=0.5−0.15+0.2.

1 data table

Table 1

No description provided.

Reaction $\pi^- p \to \eta n$ in the 15-{GeV}/$c$ to 40-{GeV}/$c$ Momentum Range

The Serpukhov-CERN collaboration Apel, W.D. ; Augenstein, K.H. ; Bertolucci, E. ; et al.

Nucl.Phys.B 152 (1979) 1, 1979.

Inspire Record 133409 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.41487

A high-statistics measurement of the reaction π − p→ η n; η →2 γ has been performed at the 70 GeV Serpukhov accelerator for 15, 20, 25, 30 and 40 GeV/ c incident pion momentum using the NICE set-up with its associated 648-channel hodoscope spectrometer for γ-ray detection. It is found that the spin-flip and non-spin-flip amplitudes can be parametrized, for small | t |, as exponentials with the same slopes to within a few percent. For | t | ≳ 1 (GeV/ c ) 2 there is a break in the differential cross section. In addition, the A 2 effective trajectory deviates markedly for | t | ≳ 1 GeV/ c ) 2 from the linear behaviour valid for smaller | t |.

4 data tables

Table 1

No description provided.

Table 2

No description provided.

Table 3

No description provided.

More…