Upper limits at $95\%$ CL on the LQ-fermion couplings, $|y_{e u}|$, versus $S_{e u}$ mass for scalar LQs coupled to electrons.

Observed and Expected UL exclusions on the $BR(H\to S)$ of generic signals with $m_{A'} = 1.0\;GeV$ and $BR(A' \rightarrow \pi\pi) = 1.0$.

The observed data in the dielectron channel and the fitted signal-plus-background templates, shown for the $S_{e d}$ scenario with a candidate LQ mass of 2.5 TeV. Distributions of events are binned in the reconstructed dilepton mass, rapidity, and cosine theta.

Observed and Expected UL exclusions on the number of 'signal' yields in sideband A from the model agnostic fit, assuming no 'SUEP-like' signal contamination in the CRs.

Upper limits at $95\%$ CL on the LQ-fermion couplings, $|y_{e d}|$, versus $S_{e d}$ mass for scalar LQs coupled to electrons.

Postfit values for SR in the B-Only CR+SR and CR-Only fits with the prefit signal overlayed for reference

The observed data in the dimuon channel and the fitted signal-plus-background templates, shown for the $S_{\mu u}$ scenario with a candidate LQ mass of 2.5 TeV. Distributions of events are binned in the reconstructed dilepton mass, rapidity, and cosine theta.

Postfit values for PR in the B-Only CR+SR and CR-Only fits with the prefit signal overlayed for reference

Upper limits at $95\%$ CL on the LQ-fermion couplings, $|y_{\mu u}|$, versus $S_{\mu u}$ mass for scalar LQs coupled to muons.

Postfit values for CRDY in the B-Only CR+SR and CR-Only fits with the prefit signal overlayed for reference

The observed data in the dimuon channel and the fitted signal-plus-background templates, shown for the $S_{\mu d}$ scenario with a candidate LQ mass of 2.5 TeV. Distributions of events are binned in the reconstructed dilepton mass, rapidity, and cosine theta.

Postfit values for CRTT in the B-Only CR+SR and CR-Only fits with the prefit signal overlayed for reference

Upper limits at $95\%$ CL on the LQ-fermion couplings, $|y_{\mu d}|$, versus $S_{\mu d}$ mass for scalar LQs coupled to muons.

Per-selection efficiencies on Generic - $m_{A'} = 1.0\;GeV$ $BR(A' \rightarrow \pi\pi) = 1.0$ Hadronic - $m_{A'} = 0.7\;GeV$ and $BR(A' \rightarrow ee) = BR(A' \rightarrow \mu\mu) = 0.15$ $BR(A' \rightarrow \pi\pi) = 0.7$ Leptonic - $m_{A'} = 0.5\;GeV$ and $BR(A' \rightarrow ee) = BR(A' \rightarrow \mu\mu) = 0.2$ and $BR(A' \rightarrow \pi\pi) = 0.6$ samples. Selections: 2 OSSF leptons, one SUEP cluster, $60\leq Z_{m}\leq 120$ GeV, $p_{T}^Z\geq 25$ GeV, veto events with b-tagged jets, $p_{T}^{SUEP} > 60\;GeV$, and $dR^{Ak4}_{Ak15} < 1.5$. Efficiencies are the ratio of the histogram size at the selection step to the previous step (except twoLepton vs. initial). The final column is the total cumulative efficiency (dR vs. initial). Note that these selection numbers were all calculated using samples generated with 600,000 events for each signal point considered.

The observed data in the dielectron channel and the fitted signal-plus-background templates, shown for the $V_{e u}$ scenario with a candidate LQ mass of 2.5 TeV. Distributions of events are binned in the reconstructed dilepton mass, rapidity, and cosine theta.

Interpolated observed and expected UL exclusions on $BR(H\to S) = 1$ for generic signals with $m_{A'} = 1.0\;GeV$ and $BR(A' \rightarrow \pi\pi) = 1.0$. The discreate heatmap points can be found in the UL Generic (Observed & Expected) figure in this sandbox

Upper limits at $95\%$ CL on the LQ-fermion couplings, $|g_{e u}|$, versus $V_{e u}$ mass for vector LQs coupled to electrons.

The observed data in the dielectron channel and the fitted signal-plus-background templates, shown for the $V_{e d}$ scenario with a candidate LQ mass of 2.5 TeV. Distributions of events are binned in the reconstructed dilepton mass, rapidity, and cosine theta.

Upper limits at $95\%$ CL on the LQ-fermion couplings, $|g_{e d}|$, versus $V_{e d}$ mass for vector LQs coupled to electrons.

The observed data in the dimuon channel and the fitted signal-plus-background templates, shown for the $V_{\mu u}$ scenario with a candidate LQ mass of 2.5 TeV. Distributions of events are binned in the reconstructed dilepton mass, rapidity, and cosine theta.

Upper limits at $95\%$ CL on the LQ-fermion couplings, $|g_{\mu u}|$, versus $V_{\mu u}$ mass for vector LQs coupled to muons.

The observed data in the dimuon channel and the fitted signal-plus-background templates, shown for the $V_{\mu d}$ scenario with a candidate LQ mass of 2.5 TeV. Distributions of events are binned in the reconstructed dilepton mass, rapidity, and cosine theta.

Upper limits at $95\%$ CL on the LQ-fermion couplings, $|g_{\mu d}|$, versus $V_{\mu d}$ mass for vector LQs coupled to muons.

Distributions of the number of hits in the cluster (Nhits) for the CSC category in the out-of-time (OOT) region. The last histogram bin contains all overflow events.

The 95% CL observed and expected upper limits on the VLL production cross section as a function of the VLL mass for the pseudoscalar mean proper decay length c$\tau$ = 0.025 m. The pseudoscalar mass is 2 GeV.

The 95% CL observed and expected upper limits on the VLL production cross section as a function of the pseudoscalar mean proper decay length c$\tau$ for VLL Mass of 700 GeV. The pseudoscalar mass is 2 GeV.

The 95% CL observed upper limits on the VLL production cross section as a function of the VLL mass and the pseudoscalar mean proper decay length c$\tau$. The pseudoscalar mass is 2 GeV.

The 95% CL observed exclusion contour on the VLL production cross section as a function of the VLL mass and the pseudoscalar mean proper decay length c$\tau$. The pseudoscalar mass is 2 GeV.

Selection efficiencies in the CSC category signal region (SR) for different signal hypothesis. The pseudoscalar mass is 2 GeV.

Selection efficiencies in the DT category signal region (SR) for different signal hypothesis. The pseudoscalar mass is 2 GeV.

Comparison of the shapes extrapolated with a linear or quadratic extrapolation of the QCD contribution in the W+ signal region.

Comparison of the shapes extrapolated with a linear or quadratic extrapolation of the QCD contribution in the W- signal region.

Post-fit distributions of the transverse mass in the W+ signal region.

Post-fit distributions of the transverse mass in the W- signal region.

Post-fit distributions of the dimuon mass in the Z boson signal region.

Example plot for the extrapolation of the QCD contribution from a region with inverted relative isolation criterion to the W+ signal region in the transverse mass bin 12 < mT < 18 GeV. The values corresponding to the smallest relative muon isolation are extrapolated with a linear (smaller value) and quadratic (larger value) function.

Example plot for the extrapolation of the QCD contribution from a region with inverted relative isolation criterion to the W- signal region in the transverse mass bin 12 < mT < 18 GeV.The values corresponding to the smallest relative muon isolation are extrapolated with a linear (smaller value) and quadratic (larger value) function.

Example plot for the extrapolation of the QCD contribution from a region with inverted relative isolation criterion to the W+ signal region in the transverse mass bin 102 < mT < 108 GeV.The values corresponding to the smallest relative muon isolation are extrapolated with a linear (larger value) and quadratic (smaller value) function.

Example plot for the extrapolation of the QCD contribution from a region with inverted relative isolation criterion to the W- signal region in the transverse mass bin 102 < mT < 108 GeV.The values corresponding to the smallest relative muon isolation are extrapolated with a linear (smaller value) and quadratic (larger value) function.

The table compares theoretical and measured values of the product of the fiducial cross sections and branching fractions. The theoretical predictions are generated with DYTurbo in combination with three different PDF sets. All values are normalized to the corresponding measured value. The relative uncertainties on the measured values are given separately with and without the contribution from the luminosity uncertainty.

The table compares theoretical and measured values of the product of the total cross sections and branching fractions. The theoretical predictions are generated with DYTurbo in combination with three different PDF sets. All values are normalized to the corresponding measured value. The relative uncertainties on the measured values are given separately with and without the contribution from the luminosity uncertainty.

The table compares theoretical and measured ratios of the product of the fiducial cross sections and branching fractions. The theoretical predictions are generated with DYTurbo in combination with three different PDF sets. All values are normalized to the corresponding measured value.

The table compares theoretical and measured ratios of the product of the total cross sections and branching fractions. The theoretical predictions are generated with DYTurbo in combination with three different PDF sets. All values are normalized to the corresponding measured value.

Comparison of the measured and theoretical cross sections for Z, W+, W-, and W production at different center-of-mass energies. The theoretical predictions are generated with DYTurbo in combination with the NNPDF 3.1 PDF set.

Distributions of events for $\mathcal{D}_{\text{bkg}}$ observable in the $\gamma$-tagged (left) and Untagged (right) categories of the $\text{H}\to 4\ell$ candidate events. Observed events (black markers) and expected background estimates (solid histograms) from MC simulation (ZZ/Z$\gamma^*$) or control samples in data (Z+X) are shown. The $\gamma \text{H}$ signal contribution, stacked on top of background, is shown with an open histogram for an assumed cross section of $\sigma_{\gamma H}\times{\cal B}(H\to 4\ell)=1$ fb for either the $c_{\gamma\gamma}$ (solid) and $c_{z\gamma}$ (dashed) coupling hypothesis.

Distributions of events for $\mathcal{D}_{\text{bkg}}$ observable in the $\gamma$-tagged (left) and Untagged (right) categories of the $\text{H}\to 4\ell$ candidate events. Observed events (black markers) and expected background estimates (solid histograms) from MC simulation (ZZ/Z$\gamma^*$) or control samples in data (Z+X) are shown. The $\gamma \text{H}$ signal contribution, stacked on top of background, is shown with an open histogram for an assumed cross section of $\sigma_{\gamma H}\times{\cal B}(H\to 4\ell)=1$ fb for either the $c_{\gamma\gamma}$ (solid) and $c_{z\gamma}$ (dashed) coupling hypothesis.

The $M_{PNet}$ distributions for the number of observed events (black markers) compared with the backgrounds estimated in the fit to the data (filled histograms) in the $b \bar b$ channel. Fail (left), medium (middle) and tight (right) regions of the $\gamma$-tagged (lower) and Untagged (upper) categories are shown. The signal contribution, stacked on top of background, is shown with an open histogram for an assumed cross section of $\sigma_{\gamma H}{\cal B}( b\bar b)=10$ fb.

The $M_{PNet}$ distributions for the number of observed events (black markers) compared with the backgrounds estimated in the fit to the data (filled histograms) in the $b \bar b$ channel. Fail (left), medium (middle) and tight (right) regions of the $\gamma$-tagged (lower) and Untagged (upper) categories are shown. The signal contribution, stacked on top of background, is shown with an open histogram for an assumed cross section of $\sigma_{\gamma H}{\cal B}( b\bar b)=10$ fb.

The $M_{PNet}$ distributions for the number of observed events (black markers) compared with the backgrounds estimated in the fit to the data (filled histograms) in the $b \bar b$ channel. Fail (left), medium (middle) and tight (right) regions of the $\gamma$-tagged (lower) and Untagged (upper) categories are shown. The signal contribution, stacked on top of background, is shown with an open histogram for an assumed cross section of $\sigma_{\gamma H}{\cal B}( b\bar b)=10$ fb.

The $M_{PNet}$ distributions for the number of observed events (black markers) compared with the backgrounds estimated in the fit to the data (filled histograms) in the $b \bar b$ channel. Fail (left), medium (middle) and tight (right) regions of the $\gamma$-tagged (lower) and Untagged (upper) categories are shown. The signal contribution, stacked on top of background, is shown with an open histogram for an assumed cross section of $\sigma_{\gamma H}{\cal B}( b\bar b)=10$ fb.

The $M_{PNet}$ distributions for the number of observed events (black markers) compared with the backgrounds estimated in the fit to the data (filled histograms) in the $b \bar b$ channel. Fail (left), medium (middle) and tight (right) regions of the $\gamma$-tagged (lower) and Untagged (upper) categories are shown. The signal contribution, stacked on top of background, is shown with an open histogram for an assumed cross section of $\sigma_{\gamma H}{\cal B}( b\bar b)=10$ fb.

The $M_{PNet}$ distributions for the number of observed events (black markers) compared with the backgrounds estimated in the fit to the data (filled histograms) in the $b \bar b$ channel. Fail (left), medium (middle) and tight (right) regions of the $\gamma$-tagged (lower) and Untagged (upper) categories are shown. The signal contribution, stacked on top of background, is shown with an open histogram for an assumed cross section of $\sigma_{\gamma H}{\cal B}( b\bar b)=10$ fb.

Constraints on $\sigma_{\gamma H}$ from the combination of the $H\to b \bar b$ and $4\ell$ channels. The results are shown with only $c_{\gamma\gamma}$ and $\tilde{c}_{\gamma\gamma}$ floating in the fit (blue) and with all four couplings allowed to float (black). Observed (solid) and expected (dashed) likelihood scans are shown. The dashed horizontal lines show the 68\% and 95\% CL intervals.

Constraints on $\sigma_{\gamma H}$ from the combination of the $H\to b \bar b$ and $4\ell$ channels. The results are shown with only $c_{\gamma\gamma}$ and $\tilde{c}_{\gamma\gamma}$ floating in the fit (blue) and with all four couplings allowed to float (black). Observed (solid) and expected (dashed) likelihood scans are shown. The dashed horizontal lines show the 68\% and 95\% CL intervals.

Constraints on $\sigma_{\gamma H}$ from the combination of the $H\to b \bar b$ and $4\ell$ channels. The results are shown with only $c_{\gamma\gamma}$ and $\tilde{c}_{\gamma\gamma}$ floating in the fit (blue) and with all four couplings allowed to float (black). Observed (solid) and expected (dashed) likelihood scans are shown. The dashed horizontal lines show the 68\% and 95\% CL intervals.

Constraints on $\sigma_{\gamma H}$ from the combination of the $H\to b \bar b$ and $4\ell$ channels. The results are shown with only $c_{\gamma\gamma}$ and $\tilde{c}_{\gamma\gamma}$ floating in the fit (blue) and with all four couplings allowed to float (black). Observed (solid) and expected (dashed) likelihood scans are shown. The dashed horizontal lines show the 68\% and 95\% CL intervals.

Constraints on the square of $|c_{\gamma\gamma}|$ (or $|\tilde{c}_{\gamma\gamma}|$) and $|c_{z\gamma}|$ (or $|\tilde{c}_{z\gamma}|$) from the combination of the $H\to b \bar b$ and $4\ell$ channels. The other couplings are either fixed to the null SM expectation (blue) or are left floating in the fit (red). Observed (solid) and expected (dashed) likelihood scans are shown. The dashed horizontal lines show the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Constraints on the square of $|c_{\gamma\gamma}|$ (or $|\tilde{c}_{\gamma\gamma}|$) and $|c_{z\gamma}|$ (or $|\tilde{c}_{z\gamma}|$) from the combination of the $H\to b \bar b$ and $4\ell$ channels. The other couplings are either fixed to the null SM expectation (blue) or are left floating in the fit (red). Observed (solid) and expected (dashed) likelihood scans are shown. The dashed horizontal lines show the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Constraints on the square of $|c_{\gamma\gamma}|$ (or $|\tilde{c}_{\gamma\gamma}|$) and $|c_{z\gamma}|$ (or $|\tilde{c}_{z\gamma}|$) from the combination of the $H\to b \bar b$ and $4\ell$ channels. The other couplings are either fixed to the null SM expectation (blue) or are left floating in the fit (red). Observed (solid) and expected (dashed) likelihood scans are shown. The dashed horizontal lines show the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Constraints on the square of $|c_{\gamma\gamma}|$ (or $|\tilde{c}_{\gamma\gamma}|$) and $|c_{z\gamma}|$ (or $|\tilde{c}_{z\gamma}|$) from the combination of the $H\to b \bar b$ and $4\ell$ channels. The other couplings are either fixed to the null SM expectation (blue) or are left floating in the fit (red). Observed (solid) and expected (dashed) likelihood scans are shown. The dashed horizontal lines show the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Constraints on the square of $|c_{\gamma\gamma}|$ (or $|\tilde{c}_{\gamma\gamma}|$) and $|c_{z\gamma}|$ (or $|\tilde{c}_{z\gamma}|$) from the combination of the $H\to b \bar b$ and $4\ell$ channels. The other couplings are either fixed to the null SM expectation (blue) or are left floating in the fit (red). Observed (solid) and expected (dashed) likelihood scans are shown. The dashed horizontal lines show the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Constraints on the square of $|c_{\gamma\gamma}|$ (or $|\tilde{c}_{\gamma\gamma}|$) and $|c_{z\gamma}|$ (or $|\tilde{c}_{z\gamma}|$) from the combination of the $H\to b \bar b$ and $4\ell$ channels. The other couplings are either fixed to the null SM expectation (blue) or are left floating in the fit (red). Observed (solid) and expected (dashed) likelihood scans are shown. The dashed horizontal lines show the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Constraints on the square of $|c_{\gamma\gamma}|$ (or $|\tilde{c}_{\gamma\gamma}|$) and $|c_{z\gamma}|$ (or $|\tilde{c}_{z\gamma}|$) from the combination of the $H\to b \bar b$ and $4\ell$ channels. The other couplings are either fixed to the null SM expectation (blue) or are left floating in the fit (red). Observed (solid) and expected (dashed) likelihood scans are shown. The dashed horizontal lines show the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Constraints on the square of $|c_{\gamma\gamma}|$ (or $|\tilde{c}_{\gamma\gamma}|$) and $|c_{z\gamma}|$ (or $|\tilde{c}_{z\gamma}|$) from the combination of the $H\to b \bar b$ and $4\ell$ channels. The other couplings are either fixed to the null SM expectation (blue) or are left floating in the fit (red). Observed (solid) and expected (dashed) likelihood scans are shown. The dashed horizontal lines show the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Constraints on $\kappa_{u}$, $\kappa_{d}$, $\kappa_{s}$, and $\kappa_{c}$ are shown using the $H\to 4\ell$ channel.In scenario one (black), all couplings except the one being shown are fixed at their SM values. In scenario two (blue), the Yukawa couplings for the three other light quarks are left unconstrained, and BSM contributions are allowed: $\kappa_{ZZ}^2 \le 1$ and $\Gamma^\textrm{BSM}_H \ge 0$. Both observed (solid) and expected (dashed) constraints are presented. The dashed horizontal lines indicate the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Constraints on $\kappa_{u}$, $\kappa_{d}$, $\kappa_{s}$, and $\kappa_{c}$ are shown using the $H\to 4\ell$ channel.In scenario one (black), all couplings except the one being shown are fixed at their SM values. In scenario two (blue), the Yukawa couplings for the three other light quarks are left unconstrained, and BSM contributions are allowed: $\kappa_{ZZ}^2 \le 1$ and $\Gamma^\textrm{BSM}_H \ge 0$. Both observed (solid) and expected (dashed) constraints are presented. The dashed horizontal lines indicate the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Constraints on $\kappa_{u}$, $\kappa_{d}$, $\kappa_{s}$, and $\kappa_{c}$ are shown using the $H\to 4\ell$ channel.In scenario one (black), all couplings except the one being shown are fixed at their SM values. In scenario two (blue), the Yukawa couplings for the three other light quarks are left unconstrained, and BSM contributions are allowed: $\kappa_{ZZ}^2 \le 1$ and $\Gamma^\textrm{BSM}_H \ge 0$. Both observed (solid) and expected (dashed) constraints are presented. The dashed horizontal lines indicate the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Constraints on $\kappa_{u}$, $\kappa_{d}$, $\kappa_{s}$, and $\kappa_{c}$ are shown using the $H\to 4\ell$ channel.In scenario one (black), all couplings except the one being shown are fixed at their SM values. In scenario two (blue), the Yukawa couplings for the three other light quarks are left unconstrained, and BSM contributions are allowed: $\kappa_{ZZ}^2 \le 1$ and $\Gamma^\textrm{BSM}_H \ge 0$. Both observed (solid) and expected (dashed) constraints are presented. The dashed horizontal lines indicate the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Constraints on $\kappa_{u}$, $\kappa_{d}$, $\kappa_{s}$, and $\kappa_{c}$ are shown using the $H\to 4\ell$ channel.In scenario one (black), all couplings except the one being shown are fixed at their SM values. In scenario two (blue), the Yukawa couplings for the three other light quarks are left unconstrained, and BSM contributions are allowed: $\kappa_{ZZ}^2 \le 1$ and $\Gamma^\textrm{BSM}_H \ge 0$. Both observed (solid) and expected (dashed) constraints are presented. The dashed horizontal lines indicate the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Constraints on $\kappa_{u}$, $\kappa_{d}$, $\kappa_{s}$, and $\kappa_{c}$ are shown using the $H\to 4\ell$ channel.In scenario one (black), all couplings except the one being shown are fixed at their SM values. In scenario two (blue), the Yukawa couplings for the three other light quarks are left unconstrained, and BSM contributions are allowed: $\kappa_{ZZ}^2 \le 1$ and $\Gamma^\textrm{BSM}_H \ge 0$. Both observed (solid) and expected (dashed) constraints are presented. The dashed horizontal lines indicate the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Constraints on $\kappa_{u}$, $\kappa_{d}$, $\kappa_{s}$, and $\kappa_{c}$ are shown using the $H\to 4\ell$ channel.In scenario one (black), all couplings except the one being shown are fixed at their SM values. In scenario two (blue), the Yukawa couplings for the three other light quarks are left unconstrained, and BSM contributions are allowed: $\kappa_{ZZ}^2 \le 1$ and $\Gamma^\textrm{BSM}_H \ge 0$. Both observed (solid) and expected (dashed) constraints are presented. The dashed horizontal lines indicate the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Constraints on $\kappa_{u}$, $\kappa_{d}$, $\kappa_{s}$, and $\kappa_{c}$ are shown using the $H\to 4\ell$ channel.In scenario one (black), all couplings except the one being shown are fixed at their SM values. In scenario two (blue), the Yukawa couplings for the three other light quarks are left unconstrained, and BSM contributions are allowed: $\kappa_{ZZ}^2 \le 1$ and $\Gamma^\textrm{BSM}_H \ge 0$. Both observed (solid) and expected (dashed) constraints are presented. The dashed horizontal lines indicate the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Constraints on $\kappa_{u}$, $\kappa_{d}$, $\kappa_{s}$, and $\kappa_{c}$ are shown using the $H\to 4\ell$ channel.In scenario one (black), all couplings except the one being shown are fixed at their SM values. In scenario two (blue), the Yukawa couplings for the three other light quarks are left unconstrained, and BSM contributions are allowed: $\kappa_{ZZ}^2 \le 1$ and $\Gamma^\textrm{BSM}_H \ge 0$. Both observed (solid) and expected (dashed) constraints are presented. The dashed horizontal lines indicate the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Constraints on $\kappa_{u}$, $\kappa_{d}$, $\kappa_{s}$, and $\kappa_{c}$ are shown using the $H\to 4\ell$ channel.In scenario one (black), all couplings except the one being shown are fixed at their SM values. In scenario two (blue), the Yukawa couplings for the three other light quarks are left unconstrained, and BSM contributions are allowed: $\kappa_{ZZ}^2 \le 1$ and $\Gamma^\textrm{BSM}_H \ge 0$. Both observed (solid) and expected (dashed) constraints are presented. The dashed horizontal lines indicate the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Constraints on $\kappa_{u}$, $\kappa_{d}$, $\kappa_{s}$, and $\kappa_{c}$ are shown using the $H\to 4\ell$ channel.In scenario one (black), all couplings except the one being shown are fixed at their SM values. In scenario two (blue), the Yukawa couplings for the three other light quarks are left unconstrained, and BSM contributions are allowed: $\kappa_{ZZ}^2 \le 1$ and $\Gamma^\textrm{BSM}_H \ge 0$. Both observed (solid) and expected (dashed) constraints are presented. The dashed horizontal lines indicate the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Constraints on $\kappa_{u}$, $\kappa_{d}$, $\kappa_{s}$, and $\kappa_{c}$ are shown using the $H\to 4\ell$ channel.In scenario one (black), all couplings except the one being shown are fixed at their SM values. In scenario two (blue), the Yukawa couplings for the three other light quarks are left unconstrained, and BSM contributions are allowed: $\kappa_{ZZ}^2 \le 1$ and $\Gamma^\textrm{BSM}_H \ge 0$. Both observed (solid) and expected (dashed) constraints are presented. The dashed horizontal lines indicate the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Constraints on $\kappa_{u}$, $\kappa_{d}$, $\kappa_{s}$, and $\kappa_{c}$ are shown using the $H\to 4\ell$ channel.In scenario one (black), all couplings except the one being shown are fixed at their SM values. In scenario two (blue), the Yukawa couplings for the three other light quarks are left unconstrained, and BSM contributions are allowed: $\kappa_{ZZ}^2 \le 1$ and $\Gamma^\textrm{BSM}_H \ge 0$. Both observed (solid) and expected (dashed) constraints are presented. The dashed horizontal lines indicate the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Constraints on $\kappa_{u}$, $\kappa_{d}$, $\kappa_{s}$, and $\kappa_{c}$ are shown using the $H\to 4\ell$ channel.In scenario one (black), all couplings except the one being shown are fixed at their SM values. In scenario two (blue), the Yukawa couplings for the three other light quarks are left unconstrained, and BSM contributions are allowed: $\kappa_{ZZ}^2 \le 1$ and $\Gamma^\textrm{BSM}_H \ge 0$. Both observed (solid) and expected (dashed) constraints are presented. The dashed horizontal lines indicate the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Constraints on $\kappa_{u}$, $\kappa_{d}$, $\kappa_{s}$, and $\kappa_{c}$ are shown using the $H\to 4\ell$ channel.In scenario one (black), all couplings except the one being shown are fixed at their SM values. In scenario two (blue), the Yukawa couplings for the three other light quarks are left unconstrained, and BSM contributions are allowed: $\kappa_{ZZ}^2 \le 1$ and $\Gamma^\textrm{BSM}_H \ge 0$. Both observed (solid) and expected (dashed) constraints are presented. The dashed horizontal lines indicate the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Constraints on $\kappa_{u}$, $\kappa_{d}$, $\kappa_{s}$, and $\kappa_{c}$ are shown using the $H\to 4\ell$ channel.In scenario one (black), all couplings except the one being shown are fixed at their SM values. In scenario two (blue), the Yukawa couplings for the three other light quarks are left unconstrained, and BSM contributions are allowed: $\kappa_{ZZ}^2 \le 1$ and $\Gamma^\textrm{BSM}_H \ge 0$. Both observed (solid) and expected (dashed) constraints are presented. The dashed horizontal lines indicate the 68% and 95% CL intervals.

Measured inclusive fiducial H->ZZ->4l cross section as a function of the center-of-mass energy.

Postfit reconstructed distributions of the Higgs boson transverse momentum.

Postfit reconstructed distributions of the Higgs boson rapidity.

Higgs fiducial cross section in bins of pT of the Higgs boson.

Higgs fiducial cross section in bins of absolute value of rapidity of the Higgs boson.

Correlation matrix of fit in different final states

Correlation matrix of fit in pT(4l) bins

Correlation matrix of fit in abs(y(4l)) bins

Example description

Example description

Example description

Example description

Example description

Example description

Example description

Example description

Example description

Example description

Example description

Example description

Example description

Example description

Example description

Example description

Example description

Example description

Example description

Example description

Example description

Example description

Example description

Example description

Example description

Example description

Example description

Example description

Example description

Example description

Example description

Example description

Example description

Example description

Example description

Example description

Example description

Example description

Example description

Lower limits on tab$eta$ as a function of m(A) in the mhEFT(125) scenario. Values below the black solid line are excluded at $95%$ CL

Matrix of the correlations of the systematic uncertainties between pairs of physics parameters, as obtained from the analysis to data at 13 TeV.

Matrix of the correlations between the physics parameters as obtained from the combination between the CMS 8 TeV and 13 TeV results. Correlations include both statistical and systematic uncertainties.

Postfit pulls, constraints, and impacts (both nominal and 'global') for all nuisance parameters in the W-like Z boson mass fit (flip odd/even events to choose muon charge), sorted by the absolute value of the nominal impact.

Postfit pulls, constraints, and impacts (both nominal and 'global') for all nuisance parameters in the W-like Z boson mass fit (charge difference), sorted by the absolute value of the nominal impact.

Postfit pulls, constraints, and impacts (only nominal) for all nuisance parameters in the Z boson mass fit (using dimuon mass), sorted by the absolute value of the nominal impact.

Postfit pulls, constraints, and impacts (only nominal) for all nuisance parameters in the W boson mass fit (helicity cross section fit), sorted by the absolute value of the nominal impact.

$d\sigma^{W}/d\mathit{p}_{T}\ (pb\,/\,GeV)$: Generator-level $\mathit{p}_{T}^{W}$ distribution and uncertainty. The last column reports the result of a simultaneous fit to the single muon $(\mathit{p}_{T}^{μ}, \mathit{\eta}^{μ}, \mathit{q}^{μ})$ distribution in $W$ boson decays and the dimuon $(\mathit{p}_{T}^{μμ},\mathit{y}^{μμ})$ distribution in $Z$ boson events. The measured cross section in each bin is reported after dividing the value by the corresponding bin width.

$d\sigma^{Z}/d|\mathit{y}|\ (pb)$: Unfolded measured $\mathit{y}^{Z}$ distribution compared with the generator-level predictions before the likelihood fit or after the W-like $\mathit{m}_{Z}$ fit or from the direct fit to the $(\mathit{p}_{T}^{μμ},\mathit{y}^{μμ})$ distribution. The measured cross section in each bin is reported after dividing the value by the corresponding bin width.

$d\sigma^{Z}/d\mathit{p}_{T}\ (pb\,/\,GeV)$: Unfolded measured $\mathit{p}_{T}^{Z}$ distribution compared with the generator-level predictions before the likelihood fit or after the W-like $\mathit{m}_{Z}$ fit or from the direct fit to the $(\mathit{p}_{T}^{μμ},\mathit{y}^{μμ})$ distribution. The measured cross section in each bin is reported after dividing the value by the corresponding bin width.

$d\sigma^{W}/d\mathit{p}_{T}\ (pb\,/\,GeV)$: Generator-level $\mathit{p}_{T}^{W}$ distribution and uncertainty, before and after running the helicity fit. The measured cross section in each bin is reported after dividing the value by the corresponding bin width.

$d\sigma^{W}/d|\mathit{y}|\ (pb)$: Generator-level $\mathit{y}^{Z}$ distribution and uncertainty, before and after running the helicity fit. The measured cross section in each bin is reported after dividing the value by the corresponding bin width.

Comparison of the nominal $\mathit{m}_{W}$ measurement and its uncertainty (total or only from $\mathit{p}_{T}^{W}$ modeling), with the alternative measurements using different approaches to the $\mathit{p}_{T}^{W}$ modeling and its uncertainty. The first column reports the measured mass for each configuration, while the second one shows the difference between the measurement and the main result.

Comparison of the nominal $\mathit{m}_{W}$ measurement and its uncertainty (total or only from the CT18Z PDF set), with the alternative measurements using different PDFs and their uncertainty before the scaling procedure described in the paper text. The measured mass values are those reported in Table A.7 of the paper. The first column reports the measured mass for each configuration, while the second one shows the difference between the measurement and the main result.

Comparison of the nominal $\mathit{m}_{W}$ measurement and its uncertainty (total or only from the CT18Z PDF set), with the alternative measurements using different PDFs and their uncertainty after the scaling procedure described in the paper text. The measured mass values are those reported in Table A.7 of the paper. The scale factors for the PDF uncertainties from each set are reported in Table A.3 of the paper. The first column reports the measured mass for each configuration, while the second one shows the difference between the measurement and the main result.