Comparison between data and MC simulation in the dimuon control samples before and after performing the simultaneous fit across all the control samples and the signal region assuming the absence of any signal. Plot correspond to the mono-V category. The hadronic recoil $p_{T}$ in dilepton events is used as a proxy for $p_{T}^{miss}$ in the signal region. The leading contribution is represented by Z+jets production. The other backgrounds include top quark, diboson, and W+jets processes.

Comparison between data and MC simulation in the dielectron control samples before and after performing the simultaneous fit across all the control samples and the signal region assuming the absence of any signal. Plot correspond to the monojet category. The hadronic recoil $p_{T}$ in dilepton events is used as a proxy for $p_{T}^{miss}$ in the signal region. The leading contribution is represented by Z+jets production. The other backgrounds include top quark, diboson, and W+jets processes.

Comparison between data and MC simulation in the dielectron control samples before and after performing the simultaneous fit across all the control samples and the signal region assuming the absence of any signal. Plot correspond to the mono-V category. The hadronic recoil $p_{T}$ in dilepton events is used as a proxy for $p_{T}^{miss}$ in the signal region. The leading contribution is represented by Z+jets production. The other backgrounds include top quark, diboson, and W+jets processes.

Comparison between data and MC simulation in the single-muon control samples before and after performing the simultaneous fit across all the control samples and the signal region assuming the absence of any signal. Plot correspond to the monojet category. The hadronic recoil $p_{T}$ in dilepton events is used as a proxy for $p_{T}^{miss}$ in the signal region. The leading contribution is represented by W+jets production. The other backgrounds include top quark, diboson, Z+jets, and QCD multijet processes.

Comparison between data and MC simulation in the single-muon control samples before and after performing the simultaneous fit across all the control samples and the signal region assuming the absence of any signal. Plot correspond to the mono-V category. The hadronic recoil $p_{T}$ in dilepton events is used as a proxy for $p_{T}^{miss}$ in the signal region. The leading contribution is represented by W+jets production. The other backgrounds include top quark, diboson, Z+jets, and QCD multijet processes.

Comparison between data and MC simulation in the single-electron control samples before and after performing the simultaneous fit across all the control samples and the signal region assuming the absence of any signal. Plot correspond to the monojet category. The hadronic recoil $p_{T}$ in dilepton events is used as a proxy for $p_{T}^{miss}$ in the signal region. The leading contribution is represented by Z+jets production. The other backgrounds include top quark, diboson, Z+jets, and QCD multijet processes.

Comparison between data and MC simulation in the single-electron control samples before and after performing the simultaneous fit across all the control samples and the signal region assuming the absence of any signal. Plot correspond to the mono-V category. The hadronic recoil $p_{T}$ in dilepton events is used as a proxy for $p_{T}^{miss}$ in the signal region. The leading contribution is represented by W+jets production. The other backgrounds include top quark, diboson, Z+jets, and QCD multijet processes.

Observed $p_{T}^{miss}$ distribution in the monojet signal region compared with the post-fit background expectations for various SM processes. The last bin includes all events with $p_{T}^{miss} > 1250$ GeV for the monojet category. The expected background distributions are evaluated after performing a combined fit to the data in all the control samples, not including the signal region. Expected signal distribution for a 2 TeV axial-vector mediator, decaying to 1 GeV DM particles, is overlaid.

Observed $p_{T}^{miss}$ distribution in the mono-V signal region compared with the post-fit background expectations for various SM processes. The last bin includes all events with $p_{T}^{miss} > 750$ GeV for the mono-V category. The expected background distributions are evaluated after performing a combined fit to the data in all the control samples, not including the signal region. Expected signal distribution for a 2 TeV axial-vector mediator, decaying to 1 GeV DM particles, is overlaid.

Observed $p_{T}^{miss}$ distribution in the monojet signal region compared with the post-fit background expectations for various SM processes. The last bin includes all events with $p_{T}^{miss} > 1250$ GeV for the monojet category. The expected background distributions are evaluated after performing a combined fit to the data in all the control samples, as well as in the signal region. The fit is performed assuming the absence of any signal. Expected signal distribution for a 2 TeV axial-vector mediator, decaying to 1 GeV DM particles, is overlaid.

Observed $p_{T}^{miss}$ distribution in the mono-V signal region compared with the post-fit background expectations for various SM processes. The last bin includes all events with $p_{T}^{miss} > 750$ GeV for the mono-V category. The expected background distributions are evaluated after performing a combined fit to the data in all the control samples, not including as well as in the signal region. The fit is performed assuming the absence of any signal. Expected signal distribution for a 2 TeV axial-vector mediator, decaying to 1 GeV DM particles, is overlaid.

Observed exclusion limits at 95% CL on $\mu = \sigma/\sigma_{th}$ in the $m_{med}-m_{DM}$ plane assuming a vector mediator. N.B.: the granularity in the presented limit values is reduced with respect to the published result.

Expected exclusion limits at 95% CL on $\mu = \sigma/\sigma_{th}$ in the $m_{med}-m_{DM}$ plane assuming a vector mediator. N.B.: the granularity in the presented limit values is reduced with respect to the published result.

Observed exclusion limits at 95% CL on $\mu = \sigma/\sigma_{th}$ in the $m_{med}-m_{DM}$ plane assuming an axial-vector mediator. N.B.: the granularity in the presented limit values is reduced with respect to the published result.

Expected exclusion limits at 95% CL on $\mu = \sigma/\sigma_{th}$ in the $m_{med}-m_{DM}$ plane assuming an axial-vector mediator. N.B.: the granularity in the presented limit values is reduced with respect to the published result.

Observed exclusion contour at 95% CL on $\mu = \sigma/\sigma_{th}$ in the $m_{med}-m_{DM}$ plane assuming a vector mediator.

Expected exclusion contour at 95% CL on $\mu = \sigma/\sigma_{th}$ in the $m_{med}-m_{DM}$ plane assuming a vector mediator.

Observed exclusion contour at 95% CL on $\mu = \sigma/\sigma_{th}$ in the $m_{med}-m_{DM}$ plane assuming an axial-vector mediator.

Expected exclusion contour at 95% CL on $\mu = \sigma/\sigma_{th}$ in the $m_{med}-m_{DM}$ plane assuming an axial-vector mediator.

Exclusion limits at 95% CL on $\mu = \sigma/\sigma_{th}$ vs $m_{med}$ for $m_{DM} = 1$ GeV assuming a scalar mediator.

Observed exclusion limits at 95% CL on $\mu = \sigma/\sigma_{th}$ in the $m_{med}-m_{DM}$ plane assuming a pseudoscalar mediator. N.B.: the granularity in the presented limit values is reduced with respect to the published result.

Expected exclusion limits at 95% CL on $\mu = \sigma/\sigma_{th}$ in the $m_{med}-m_{DM}$ plane assuming a pseudoscalar mediator. N.B.: the granularity in the presented limit values is reduced with respect to the published result.

Observed exclusion contour at 95% CL on $\mu = \sigma/\sigma_{th}$ in the $m_{med}-m_{DM}$ plane assuming a pseudoscalar mediator.

Expected exclusion contour at 95% CL on $\mu = \sigma/\sigma_{th}$ in the $m_{med}-m_{DM}$ plane assuming a pseudoscalar mediator.

Observed exclusion contour at 95% CL in the $g_{q}-m_{med}$ plane assuming a vector mediator.

Exclusion exclusion contour at 95% CL in the $g_{q}-m_{med}$ plane assuming a vector mediator.

Observed exclusion contour at 95% CL in the $g_{q}-m_{med}$ plane assuming an axial-vector mediator.

Exclusion exclusion contour at 95% CL in the $g_{q}-m_{med}$ plane assuming an axial-vector mediator.

Observed upper limits at 90% CL on $\sigma_{DM-nucleon}$ vs $m_{med}$ for vector mediator

Expected upper limits at 90% CL on $\sigma_{DM-nucleon}$ vs $m_{med}$ for vector mediator

Observed upper limits at 90% CL on $\sigma_{DM-nucleon}$ vs $m_{med}$ for axial-vector mediator

Expected upper limits at 90% CL on $\sigma_{DM-nucleon}$ vs $m_{med}$ for axial-vector mediator

Observed upper limits at 90% CL on velocity averaged DM annihilation cross section derived from those placed for pseudoscalar mediators.

Expected upper limits at 90% CL on velocity averaged DM annihilation cross section derived from those placed for pseudoscalar mediators.

Correlations between the predicted background yields in all the $p_{T}^{miss}$ bins of the monojet signal region.

Correlations between the predicted background yields in all the $p_{T}^{miss}$ bins of the mono-V signal region.

Fourier fit coefficients for CNT-MPCN ($d$-going) correlations, as a function of collision system and $\pi^0$ $p_T$: (a) the negative of the dipole coefficient, $-c_1$; (b) the quadrupole coefficient $c_2$; (c) the ratio ${-c_2}/{c_1}$.

Fourier fit coefficients for CNT-MPCN ($d$-going) correlations, as a function of collision system and $\pi^0$ $p_T$: Fractional systematic uncertainty on the quadrupole coefficient $c_2$ for $d$+Au.

Fourier fit coefficients for CNT-MPCN ($d$-going) correlations, as a function of collision system and $\pi^0$ $p_T$: Fractional systematic uncertainty on the quadrupole coefficient $c_2$ for $d$+Au and $p$+$p$.

System centrality dependence of correlation coefficients $-c_1$, $c_2$, and the ratio ${-c_2}/{c_1}$ as a function of $N_{part}$.

System centrality dependence of correlation coefficients $-c_1$, $c_2$, and the ratio ${-c_2}/{c_1}$ as a function of $N_{part}$.

Differential cross sections for the GAMMA P --> K+ LAMBDA reaction as a function of photon energy Egamma for the kaon c.m. production polar angle 0.9 < cos(theta) < 1.0.

Differential cross sections for the GAMMA P --> K+ SIGMA0 reaction as a function of photon energy Egamma for the kaon c.m. production polar angle 0.6 < cos(theta) < 0.7.

Differential cross sections for the GAMMA P --> K+ SIGMA0 reaction as a function of photon energy Egamma for the kaon c.m. production polar angle 0.7 < cos(theta) < 0.8.

Differential cross sections for the GAMMA P --> K+ SIGMA0 reaction as a function of photon energy Egamma for the kaon c.m. production polar angle 0.8 < cos(theta) < 0.9.

Differential cross sections for the GAMMA P --> K+ SIGMA0 reaction as a function of photon energy Egamma for the kaon c.m. production polar angle 0.9 < cos(theta) < 1.0.

Differential cross sections for the GAMMA P --> K+ LAMBDA reaction as a function of |t-tmin| for 1.5 < Egamma < 1.6 GeV.

Differential cross sections for the GAMMA P --> K+ LAMBDA reaction as a function of |t-tmin| for 1.6 < Egamma < 1.7 GeV.

Differential cross sections for the GAMMA P --> K+ LAMBDA reaction as a function of |t-tmin| for 1.7 < Egamma < 1.8 GeV.

Differential cross sections for the GAMMA P --> K+ LAMBDA reaction as a function of |t-tmin| for 1.8 < Egamma < 1.9 GeV.

Differential cross sections for the GAMMA P --> K+ LAMBDA reaction as a function of |t-tmin| for 1.9 < Egamma < 2.0 GeV.

Differential cross sections for the GAMMA P --> K+ LAMBDA reaction as a function of |t-tmin| for 2.0 < Egamma < 2.1 GeV.

Differential cross sections for the GAMMA P --> K+ LAMBDA reaction as a function of |t-tmin| for 2.1 < Egamma < 2.2 GeV.

Differential cross sections for the GAMMA P --> K+ LAMBDA reaction as a function of |t-tmin| for 2.2 < Egamma < 2.3 GeV.

Differential cross sections for the GAMMA P --> K+ LAMBDA reaction as a function of |t-tmin| for 2.3 < Egamma < 2.4 GeV.

Differential cross sections for the GAMMA P --> K+ LAMBDA reaction as a function of |t-tmin| for 2.4 < Egamma < 2.5 GeV.

Differential cross sections for the GAMMA P --> K+ LAMBDA reaction as a function of |t-tmin| for 2.5 < Egamma < 2.6 GeV.

Differential cross sections for the GAMMA P --> K+ LAMBDA reaction as a function of |t-tmin| for 2.6 < Egamma < 2.7 GeV.

Differential cross sections for the GAMMA P --> K+ LAMBDA reaction as a function of |t-tmin| for 2.7 < Egamma < 2.8 GeV.

Differential cross sections for the GAMMA P --> K+ LAMBDA reaction as a function of |t-tmin| for 2.8 < Egamma < 2.9 GeV.

Differential cross sections for the GAMMA P --> K+ LAMBDA reaction as a function of |t-tmin| for 2.9 < Egamma < 3.0 GeV.

Differential cross sections for the GAMMA P --> K+ SIGMA0 reaction as a function of |t-tmin| for 1.5 < Egamma < 1.6 GeV.

Differential cross sections for the GAMMA P --> K+ SIGMA0 reaction as a function of |t-tmin| for 1.6 < Egamma < 1.7 GeV.

Differential cross sections for the GAMMA P --> K+ SIGMA0 reaction as a function of |t-tmin| for 1.7 < Egamma < 1.8 GeV.

Differential cross sections for the GAMMA P --> K+ SIGMA0 reaction as a function of |t-tmin| for 1.8 < Egamma < 1.9 GeV.

Differential cross sections for the GAMMA P --> K+ SIGMA0 reaction as a function of |t-tmin| for 1.9 < Egamma < 2.0 GeV.

Differential cross sections for the GAMMA P --> K+ SIGMA0 reaction as a function of |t-tmin| for 2.0 < Egamma < 2.1 GeV.

Differential cross sections for the GAMMA P --> K+ SIGMA0 reaction as a function of |t-tmin| for 2.1 < Egamma < 2.2 GeV.

Differential cross sections for the GAMMA P --> K+ SIGMA0 reaction as a function of |t-tmin| for 2.2 < Egamma < 2.3 GeV.

Differential cross sections for the GAMMA P --> K+ SIGMA0 reaction as a function of |t-tmin| for 2.3 < Egamma < 2.4 GeV.

Differential cross sections for the GAMMA P --> K+ SIGMA0 reaction as a function of |t-tmin| for 2.4 < Egamma < 2.5 GeV.

Differential cross sections for the GAMMA P --> K+ SIGMA0 reaction as a function of |t-tmin| for 2.5 < Egamma < 2.6 GeV.

Differential cross sections for the GAMMA P --> K+ SIGMA0 reaction as a function of |t-tmin| for 2.6 < Egamma < 2.7 GeV.

Differential cross sections for the GAMMA P --> K+ SIGMA0 reaction as a function of |t-tmin| for 2.7 < Egamma < 2.8 GeV.

Differential cross sections for the GAMMA P --> K+ SIGMA0 reaction as a function of |t-tmin| for 2.8 < Egamma < 2.9 GeV.

Differential cross sections for the GAMMA P --> K+ SIGMA0 reaction as a function of |t-tmin| for 2.9 < Egamma < 3.0 GeV.

Photon-beam asymmetries for the GAMMA P --> K+ LAMBDA reaction as a function of photon energy Egamma for the kaon c.m. production polar angle 0.6 < cos(theta) < 0.75.

Photon-beam asymmetries for the GAMMA P --> K+ LAMBDA reaction as a function of photon energy Egamma for the kaon c.m. production polar angle 0.75 < cos(theta) < 0.9.

Photon-beam asymmetries for the GAMMA P --> K+ LAMBDA reaction as a function of photon energy Egamma for the kaon c.m. production polar angle 0.9 < cos(theta) < 1.0.

Photon-beam asymmetries for the GAMMA P --> K+ SIGMA0 reaction as a function of photon energy Egamma for the kaon c.m. production polar angle 0.6 < cos(theta) < 0.75.

Photon-beam asymmetries for the GAMMA P --> K+ SIGMA0 reaction as a function of photon energy Egamma for the kaon c.m. production polar angle 0.75 < cos(theta) < 0.9.

Photon-beam asymmetries for the GAMMA P --> K+ SIGMA0 reaction as a function of photon energy Egamma for the kaon c.m. production polar angle 0.9 < cos(theta) < 1.0.

Photon-beam asymmetries for the GAMMA P --> K+ LAMBDA reaction as a function of photon energy Egamma for the kaon c.m. production polar angle 0.6 < cos(theta) < 1.0.

Photon-beam asymmetries for the GAMMA P --> K+ SIGMA0 reaction as a function of photon energy Egamma for the kaon c.m. production polar angle 0.6 < cos(theta) < 1.0.

Unfolded distributions of $\Sigma p_{T}$ density in Z events, as a function of $p_{T}^{\mu\mu}$ in the towards ($\Delta\phi< 60^{\circ}$) region. Error bars represent the statistical and systematic uncertainties added in quadrature.

Unfolded distributions of $\Sigma p_{T}$ density in Z events, as a function of $p_{T}^{\mu\mu}$ in the transverse ($60^{\circ} <\Delta\phi< 120^{\circ}$) region. Error bars represent the statistical and systematic uncertainties added in quadrature.

Unfolded distributions of $\Sigma p_{T}$ density in Z events, as a function of $p_{T}^{\mu\mu}$ in the away ($\Delta\phi> 120^{\circ}$) region. Error bars represent the statistical and systematic uncertainties added in quadrature.

The $p_T ^{miss}$ distributions for muon channel comparing the data and background model with systematic uncertainty.

The $m_T$ distributions for electron channel comparing the data and background model with systematic uncertainty, after fitting the background-only model to the data.

The $m_T$ distributions for muon channel comparing the data and background model with systematic uncertainty, after fitting the background-only model to the data.

Expected and observed limits on the product of cross section and branching fraction of a new spin-2 heavy resonance X$\rightarrow$ZZ, assuming zero width, based on the combined analysis of the electron and muon channels.

Expected and observed limits on the product of cross section and branching fraction of a new spin-2 heavy resonance X$\rightarrow$ZZ, assuming zero width, based on the combined analysis of the electron channels.

Expected and observed limits on the product of cross section and branching fraction of a new spin-2 heavy resonance X$\rightarrow$ZZ, assuming zero width, based on the combined analysis of the muon channels.

Expected and observed limits on the product of cross section and branching fraction of a new spin-2 heavy resonance X$\rightarrow$ZZ based on a combined analysis of the electron and muon channels. The more generic version of the bulk graviton model takes 0/10%/20%/30% mass width of the resonance into consideration, assuming gluon-gluon fusion production.

Expected and observed limits on the product of cross section and branching fraction of a new spin-2 heavy resonance X$\rightarrow$ZZ based on a combined analysis of the electron and muon channels. The more generic version of the bulk graviton model takes 0/10%/20%/30% mass width of the resonance into consideration, assuming qq annihilation production.

The observed distribution of the dijet invariant mass in the $\ell$+jets decay channel in the 0 b tagged jet category. The vertical bars on the data points represent the statistical uncertainties. The integral in the $\rm{e}$($\mu$)+jets channel (including overflow events) is 1375 (2406).

The observed distribution of the dijet invariant mass in the $\ell$+jets decay channel in the 1 b tagged jet category. The vertical bars on the data points represent the statistical uncertainties. The integral in the $\rm{e}$($\mu$)+jets channel (including overflow events) is 61 (129).

The observed distribution of the dijet invariant mass in the $\ell$+jets decay channel in the $\geq$2 b tagged jet category. The vertical bars on the data points represent the statistical uncertainties. The integral in the $\rm{e}$($\mu$)+jets channel (including overflow events) is 19 (33).

The observed distribution of the the minimum angular distance $\Delta R$ between all pairs of jets $j$ and $j'$ in the $\ell$+jets decay channel in the 0 b tagged jet category. The vertical bars on the data points represent the statistical uncertainties. The integral in the $\rm{e}$($\mu$)+jets channel (including overflow events) is 1375 (2406).

The observed distribution of the the minimum angular distance $\Delta R$ between all pairs of jets $j$ and $j'$ in the $\ell$+jets decay channel in the 1 b tagged jet category. The vertical bars on the data points represent the statistical uncertainties. The integral in the $\rm{e}$($\mu$)+jets channel (including overflow events) is 61 (129).

The observed distribution of the the minimum angular distance $\Delta R$ between all pairs of jets $j$ and $j'$ in the $\ell$+jets decay channel in the $\geq$2 b tagged jet category. The vertical bars on the data points represent the statistical uncertainties. The integral in the $\rm{e}$($\mu$)+jets channel (including overflow events) is 19 (33).

The observed distribution of the jet multiplicity in the $\rm{e}^\pm \mu^\mp$ decay channel for events passing the dilepton criteria. The error bars indicate the statistical uncertainties. The last bin of the distributions contains the overflow events.

The observed distribution of the scalar $p_{\rm{T}}$ sum of all jets in the $\rm{e}^\pm \mu^\mp$ decay channel for events passing the dilepton criteria. The error bars indicate the statistical uncertainties. The last bin of the distributions contains the overflow events.

The observed distribution of the invariant mass of the lepton pair in the $\rm{e}^\pm \mu^\mp$ decay channel after requiring at least two jets. The error bars indicate the statistical uncertainties. The integral is 24. The last bin of the distributions contains the overflow events.

The observed distribution of the $p_{\rm{T}}$ of the lepton pair in the $\rm{e}^\pm \mu^\mp$ decay channel after requiring at least two jets. The error bars indicate the statistical uncertainties. The integral is 24. The last bin of the distributions contains the overflow events.

The observed distribution of the $p_{\rm{T}}^{\rm{miss}}$ in the $\mu^\pm \mu^\mp$ decay channel for events passing the dilepton criteria and Z boson veto. The error bars indicate the statistical uncertainties. The last bin of the distributions contains the overflow events.

The observed distribution of the invariant mass of the lepton pair in the $\mu^\pm \mu^\mp$ decay channel for events passing the dilepton criteria, Z boson veto, and $p_{\rm{T}}^{\rm{miss}}>35$ GeV requirement. The error bars indicate the statistical uncertainties. The last bin of the distributions contains the overflow events.

Differential cross section dsigma(Z+c)/dpTZ times branching ratio and differential cross sections ratio dsigma(Z+c)/dpTZ / dsigma(Z+b)/dpTZ for three ranges of the transverse momentum of the Z boson and combining the dielectron and dimuon Z0 decay channels

Differential cross section dsigma(Z+c)/dpTjet times branching ratio and differential cross sections ratio dsigma(Z+c)/dpTZ / dsigma(Z+b)/dpTjet for three ranges of the transverse momentum of the jet and combining the dielectron and dimuon Z0 decay channels

Transverse momentum distribution of the selected muon-inside-a-jet for events with an identified muon among the jet constituents in the dielectron channel

Transverse momentum distribution of the selected muon-inside-a-jet for events with an identified muon among the jet constituents in the dimuon channel

The invariant mass distribution of three-prong secondary vertices for events selected in the D± mode, in the dielectron channel

The invariant mass distribution of three-prong secondary vertices for events selected in the D ± mode, in the dimuon channel

The invariant mass distribution of the three-track system composed of a two-prong secondary vertex and a primary particle for events selected in the D∗(2010)± mode, in the dielectron channel

The invariant mass distribution of the three-track system composed of a two-prong secondary vertex and a primary particle for events selected in the D ∗ (2010) ± mode, in the dimuon channel

Transverse momentum distribution of the c-tagged jet normalized to unity, in simulated W+c and Z+c samples and in W+c data events.

Number of reconstructed secondary vertices normalized to unity, in simulated W+c and Z+c samples and in W+c data events.

Distribution of the corrected secondary-vertex mass normalized to unity, in simulated W + c and Z + c samples, and in W + c data events.

Distribution of the JP discriminant for the D± mode normalized to unity, in simulated W + c and Z + c samples, and in W + c data events.

Distribution of the JP discriminant for the D∗(2010) ± mode normalized to unity, in simulated W + c and Z + c samples, and in W + c data events.

Distribution of the corrected secondary-vertex mass normalized to unity from simulated Z + b and eμ-tt data events

Corrected secondary-vertex mass distributions, after background subtraction in the dielectron channel for events selected in the semileptonic mode.

Corrected secondary-vertex mass distributions, after background subtraction in the dimuon channel for events selected in the semileptonic mode.

Background-subtracted distributions of the JP discriminant in the dielectron channel for Z + jets events with a D± → K∓ π± π± candidate.

Background-subtracted distributions of the JP discriminant in the dimuon channel for Z + jets events with a D± → K∓ π± π± candidate.

Background-subtracted distributions of the JP discriminant in the dielectron channel for Z +jets events with a D∗(2010)± → D0 π± → K∓ π± π± candidate.

Background-subtracted distributions of the JP discriminant in the dimuon channel for Z +jets events with a D∗(2010)± → D0 π± → K∓ π± π± candidate.

ontributions to the systematic uncertainty in the measured Z+c cross section and in the (Z+c)/(Z+b) cross section ratio.

Differential Z + c cross section as a function of the transverse momentum of the Z boson

(Z +c)/(Z +b) cross section ratio as a function of the transverse momentum of teh Z boson

Differential Z + c cross section as a function of the transverse momentum of the jet

(Z +c)/(Z +b) cross section ratio as a function of the transverse momentum of the jet.

Figure 3 (upper). Distribution of $M_{T2}(ll)$ in a control region enriched in $t\bar{t}$ events defined by requiring at least 2 jets, at least one of them b-tagged, and missing transverse momentum below 80 GeV. For the plot, simulated yields are normalized to data using the yields in the $M_{T2}(ll)$ < 100 GeV region.

Figure 4 (upper). Expected and observed yields in the five $t\bar{t}Z$ control regions, which are defined by different requirements on the number of reconstructed jets and b jets, before the fit.

Figure 4 (lower). Expected and observed yields in the five $t\bar{t}Z$ control regions, which are defined by different requirements on the number of reconstructed jets and b jets, after the fit.

Figure 5 (left). Distribution of $M_{T2}(ll)$ of SF events falling within in the Z boson mass window with at least two jets and no b jet, $p_{T}^{miss} > 80$ GeV and $M_{T2}(ll) > 100$ GeV.

Figure 5 (center). Distribution of $M_{T2}(blbl)$ of SF events falling within in the Z boson mass window with at least two jets and no b jet, $p_{T}^{miss} > 80$ GeV and $M_{T2}(ll) > 100$ GeV.

Figure 5 (right). Distribution of $p_{T}^{miss}$ of SF events falling within in the Z boson mass window with at least two jets and no b jet, $p_{T}^{miss} > 80$ GeV and $M_{T2}(ll) > 100$ GeV.

Figure 6. Event yields in the 13 Drell-Yan and multiboson control regions for events with SF leptons falling within the Z boson mass window and no b jets, after renormalizing with the scale factors obtained from the fit procedure described in the text.

Figure 7 (left). Distributions of $M_{T2}(ll)$ for observed events in the dimuon channel compared to the predicted SM background.

Figure 7 (center). Distributions of $M_{T2}(ll)$ for observed events in the dielectron channel compared to the predicted SM background.

Figure 7 (right). Distributions of $M_{T2}(ll)$ for observed events in the electron-muon channel compared to the predicted SM background.

Figure 8 (left). Distributions of $M_{T2}(ll)$ for all lepton flavors for the defined selection.

Figure 8 (center). Distributions of $M_{T2}(blbl)$ for all lepton flavors for the defined selection, after requiring $M_{T2}(ll) > 100$ GeV.

Figure 8 (right). Distributions of $p_{T}^{miss}$ for all lepton flavors for the defined selection, after requiring $M_{T2}(ll) > 100$ GeV.

Figure 9 (upper). Predicted backgrounds and observed yields in the dielectron and dimuon search regions. The yields are post fit and correspond to the numbers quoted in Tab. 4 of the publication.

Figure 9 (lower). Predicted backgrounds and observed yields in the electron-muon search regions. The yields are post fit and correspond to the numbers quoted in Tab. 4 of the publication.

Figure 10. Predicted backgrounds and observed yields in all search regions combined. The yields are post fit and correspond to the numbers quoted in Tab. 4 of the publication.

Figure 11 (upper). Observed limits for the T2tt model in the top squark - LSP mass plane. The numbers indicate the 95% CL upper limit on the cross section times the square of the branching fraction at each point of the plane.

Figure 11 (upper). Observed exclusion region at 95% CL assuming 100% branching fraction.

Figure 11 (upper). Expected exclusion region at 95% CL assuming 100% branching fraction.

Figure 11 (lower). Observed limits for the T2bW model in the top squark - LSP mass plane. The numbers indicate the 95% CL upper limit on the cross section times the square of the branching fraction at each point of the plane.

Figure 11 (lower). Observed exclusion region at 95% CL assuming 100% branching fraction.

Figure 11 (lower). Expected exclusion region at 95% CL assuming 100% branching fraction.

Figure 12 (upper left). Observed limits for the T8bbllnunu model in the top squark - LSP mass plane. The numbers indicate the 95% CL upper limit on the cross section times the square of the branching fraction at each point of the plane. $m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_{1}} = 0.5 (m_{\tilde{t}_{1}} + m_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}})$, $m_{\tilde{l}} = 0.05 (m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_{1}} - m_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}) + m_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}$

Figure 12 (upper left). Observed exclusion region at 95% CL assuming 100% branching fraction. $m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_{1}} = 0.5 (m_{\tilde{t}_{1}} + m_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}})$, $m_{\tilde{l}} = 0.05 (m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_{1}} - m_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}) + m_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}$

Figure 12 (upper left). Expected exclusion region at 95% CL assuming 100% branching fraction. $m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_{1}} = 0.5 (m_{\tilde{t}_{1}} + m_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}})$, $m_{\tilde{l}} = 0.05 (m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_{1}} - m_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}) + m_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}$

Figure 12 (upper left). Observed limits for the T8bbllnunu model in the top squark - LSP mass plane. The numbers indicate the 95% CL upper limit on the cross section times the square of the branching fraction at each point of the plane. $m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_{1}} = 0.5 (m_{\tilde{t}_{1}} + m_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}})$, $m_{\tilde{l}} = 0.5 (m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_{1}} - m_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}) + m_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}$

Figure 12 (upper left). Observed exclusion region at 95% CL assuming 100% branching fraction. $m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_{1}} = 0.5 (m_{\tilde{t}_{1}} + m_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}})$, $m_{\tilde{l}} = 0.5 (m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_{1}} - m_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}) + m_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}$

Figure 12 (upper left). Expected exclusion region at 95% CL assuming 100% branching fraction. $m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_{1}} = 0.5 (m_{\tilde{t}_{1}} + m_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}})$, $m_{\tilde{l}} = 0.5 (m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_{1}} - m_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}) + m_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}$

Figure 12 (lower). Observed limits for the T8bbllnunu model in the top squark - LSP mass plane. The numbers indicate the 95% CL upper limit on the cross section times the square of the branching fraction at each point of the plane. $m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_{1}} = 0.5 (m_{\tilde{t}_{1}} + m_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}})$, $m_{\tilde{l}} = 0.95 (m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_{1}} - m_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}) + m_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}$

Figure 12 (lower). Observed exclusion region at 95% CL assuming 100% branching fraction. $m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_{1}} = 0.5 (m_{\tilde{t}_{1}} + m_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}})$, $m_{\tilde{l}} = 0.95 (m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_{1}} - m_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}) + m_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}$

Figure 12 (lower). Expected exclusion region at 95% CL assuming 100% branching fraction. $m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_{1}} = 0.5 (m_{\tilde{t}_{1}} + m_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}})$, $m_{\tilde{l}} = 0.95 (m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_{1}} - m_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}) + m_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}$

Figure 13. Observed limits for the T2tt model in the top squark - LSP mass plane combining the dilepton final state with single-lepton and the all-hadronic final states. The numbers indicate the 95% CL upper limit on the cross section times the square of the branching fraction at each point of the plane.

Figure 13. Observed exclusion region at 95% CL assuming 100% branching fraction.

Figure 13. Expected exclusion region at 95% CL assuming 100% branching fraction.

Figure 14. Observed limits for the T2bW model in the top squark - LSP mass plane combining the dilepton final state with single-lepton and the all-hadronic final states. The numbers indicate the 95% CL upper limit on the cross section times the square of the branching fraction at each point of the plane.

Figure 14. Observed exclusion region at 95% CL assuming 100% branching fraction.

Figure 14. Expected exclusion region at 95% CL assuming 100% branching fraction.

Additional Figure 3. Observed limits for the T2tt model in the top squark - LSP mass plane using aggregate signal regions. The numbers indicate the 95% CL upper limit on the cross section times the square of the branching fraction at each point of the plane.

Additional Figure 3. Observed exclusion region at 95% CL assuming 100% branching fraction.

Additional Figure 3. Expected exclusion region at 95% CL assuming 100% branching fraction.

Table 5. Ratios of $\mu=\frac{\sigma$}{\sigma_{theory}}$ of the 95% CL expected and observed limits to simplified model expectations for different DM particle masses and mediator masses.

Table 6. Expected and observed event yields, summed over all lepton flavors, in aggregate signal regions.

Table 7 (upper). Covariance matrix for the background prediction in aggregate signal regions.

Table 7 (lower). Correlation matrix for the background prediction in aggregate signal regions.

Additional Figure 1. Correlation matrix of the 13 signal regions, split into same-flavor (SF) and different-flavor (DF) regions.

Additional Figure 2. Covariance matrix of the 13 signal regions, split into same-flavor (SF) and different-flavor (DF) regions.

Limit on the signal strength of the DM signal in a simplified model with a scalar mediator.

Limit on the signal strength of the DM signal in a simplified model with a pseudoscalar mediator.

Expected and observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the production cross section and the branching fraction, $\sigma$(qq -> ZH) B(H -> inv.), as a function of the SM-like Higgs boson mass. The limits consider only quark-induced Higgs boson production.

The 95% CL upper limits on the Wilson coefficient $\lambda(1\mathrm{TeV} / \Lambda_{U})^{d_{U}-1}$ of the unparticle-quark coupling operator.

The 95% CL lower limits on the reduced Planck mass $M_{D}$ as a function of the number of extra dimensions $d$.

The covariance matrix of the bin contents of the background fit. Because the matrix is symmetric by definiton, only the upper half is provided here for presentational purposes. The full matrix can be obtained by mirroring the given half along the diagonal.