The nuclear modification factor of charged particles having |eta|<1 in XeXe collisions at sqrt(s_NN)=5.44 TeV. The first systematic uncertainty describes uncertainties that are not fully correlated across points, while the second systematic uncertainty is a normalization uncertainty that is fully correlated across all points.

The nuclear modification factor of charged particles having |eta|<1 in XeXe collisions at sqrt(s_NN)=5.44 TeV. The first systematic uncertainty describes uncertainties that are not fully correlated across points, while the second systematic uncertainty is a normalization uncertainty that is fully correlated across all points.

The RXePb of charged particles having |eta|<1 in XeXe collisions at sqrt(s_NN)=5.44 TeV and PbPb collisions at sqrt(s_NN)=5.02 TeV. The first systematic uncertainty describes uncertainties that are not fully correlated across points, while the second systematic uncertainty is a normalization uncertainty that is fully correlated across all points. Bins where no data point has been reported are denoted as 'empty'.

The RXePb of charged particles having |eta|<1 in XeXe collisions at sqrt(s_NN)=5.44 TeV and PbPb collisions at sqrt(s_NN)=5.02 TeV. The first systematic uncertainty describes uncertainties that are not fully correlated across points, while the second systematic uncertainty is a normalization uncertainty that is fully correlated across all points.

The RXePb of charged particles having |eta|<1 in XeXe collisions at sqrt(s_NN)=5.44 TeV and PbPb collisions at sqrt(s_NN)=5.02 TeV. The first systematic uncertainty describes uncertainties that are not fully correlated across points, while the second systematic uncertainty is a normalization uncertainty that is fully correlated across all points.

The RXePb of charged particles having |eta|<1 in XeXe collisions at sqrt(s_NN)=5.44 TeV and PbPb collisions at sqrt(s_NN)=5.02 TeV. The first systematic uncertainty describes uncertainties that are not fully correlated across points, while the second systematic uncertainty is a normalization uncertainty that is fully correlated across all points.

The average N_part, N_coll, and TAA for various centrality classes of XeXe collisions at 5.44 TeV.

The expected upper limits on the production cross-section times the product of branching ratios for the benchmark signal scenario involving a scalar particle $X$ with narrow width decaying via $X\rightarrow aa\rightarrow 4\gamma$, $\sigma_X\times B(X\rightarrow aa)\times B(a\rightarrow\gamma\gamma)^2$. The limits for $m_{a}$ = 5 GeV and 10 GeV do not cover as large a range as the other mass points, since the region of interest is limited to $ m_{a} < 0.01 \times m_{X}$. Additionally, the expected limits are not provided for a small number of points, indicated with a hyphen, because of a technical failure with the computation.

The observed upper limits on the production cross-section times the product of branching ratios for the benchmark signal scenario involving a scalar particle $X$ with narrow width decaying via $X\rightarrow aa\rightarrow 6\pi^0$, $\sigma_X\times B(X\rightarrow aa)\times B(a\rightarrow 3\pi^0)^2$. The limits for $m_{a}$ = 5 GeV and 10 GeV do not cover as large a range as the other mass points, since the region of interest is limited to $ m_{a} < 0.01 \times m_{X}$.

The expected upper limits on the production cross-section times the product of branching ratios for the benchmark signal scenario involving a scalar particle $X$ with narrow width decaying via $X\rightarrow aa\rightarrow 6\pi^0$, $\sigma_X\times B(X\rightarrow aa)\times B(a\rightarrow 3\pi^0)^2$. The limits for $m_{a}$ = 5 GeV and 10 GeV do not cover as large a range as the other mass points, since the region of interest is limited to $ m_{a} < 0.01 \times m_{X}$. Additionally, the expected limits are not provided for a small number of points, indicated with a hyphen, because of a technical failure with the computation.

Observed 95% CL upper limits on the visible cross section as a function of $m_X$ and the fraction of events in the low-$\Delta E$ category.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 0.1 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 0.5 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 0.7 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 1 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 2 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 5 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 10 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 0.5 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 0.7 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 1 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 2 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 5 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 10 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 0.1 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 0.5 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 0.7 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 1 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 2 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 5 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 10 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 0.5 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 0.7 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 1 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 2 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 5 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 10 GeV.

Selection efficiency for photons originating from the BSM process $X\rightarrow\gamma\gamma$, where the $X$ particle is a high-mass narrow-width scalar particle originating from the gluon--gluon fusion process.

Fraction of photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for photons originating from the BSM process $X\rightarrow\gamma\gamma$, where the $X$ particle is a high-mass narrow-width scalar particle originating from the gluon--gluon fusion process.

'Transverse spin transfer of $\Lambda$ in transversely polarized proton-proton collisions at 200 GeV.'

'Transverse spin transfer of $\bar{\Lambda}$ in transversely polarized proton-proton collisions at 200 GeV.'

'Transverse spin transfer $\Lambda$ in transversely polarized proton-proton collisions at 200 GeV.'

'Transverse spin transfer of $\bar{\Lambda}$ in transversely polarized proton-proton collisions at 200 GeV.'

Spin transfer $D_{LL}$ for positive and negative $\eta$ versus $p_T$ for JP1 and L2JetHigh triggered data samples, together with results previously published in [Phys.Rev. D80 (2009) 111102 (R)].

Spin transfer $D_{LL}$ for positive and negative $\eta$ versus $p_T$ for JP1 and L2JetHigh triggered data samples, together with results previously published in [Phys.Rev. D80 (2009) 111102 (R)]. Results updated with $\alpha_{\Lambda (\bar{\Lambda})} = 0.732$.

Spin transfer $D_{LL}$ for positive $\eta$ versus $p_T$.

Spin transfer $D_{LL}$ for positive $\eta$ versus $p_T$. Results updated with $\alpha_{\Lambda (\bar{\Lambda})} = 0.732$

Distribution of $\lambda_{1}^{1}$ (width) reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Distribution of $\lambda_{2}^{1}$ (thrust) reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Distribution of $\varepsilon$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Distribution of $z_{g}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Distribution of $\Delta R_{g}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Distribution of $n_{SD}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Distribution of $\tau_{21}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Distribution of $\tau_{32}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Distribution of $\tau_{43}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Distribution of $C_{1}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Distribution of $C_{1}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Distribution of $C_{1}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Distribution of $C_{1}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Distribution of $C_{1}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Distribution of $C_{2}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Distribution of $C_{2}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Distribution of $C_{2}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Distribution of $C_{2}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Distribution of $C_{2}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Distribution of $C_{3}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Distribution of $C_{3}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Distribution of $C_{3}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Distribution of $C_{3}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Distribution of $C_{3}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Distribution of $M_{2}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Distribution of $N_{2}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Distribution of $N_{3}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Distribution of $M_{2}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Distribution of $N_{2}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Distribution of $N_{3}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Distribution of $\lambda_{0}^{0}$ (N) reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Distribution of $\lambda_{0}^{2}$ ($p_{T}^{d,*})$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Distribution of $\lambda_{0.5}^{1}$ (LHA) reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Distribution of $\lambda_{1}^{1}$ (width) reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Distribution of $\lambda_{2}^{1}$ (thrust) reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Distribution of $\varepsilon$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Distribution of $z_{g}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Distribution of $\Delta R_{g}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Distribution of $n_{SD}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Distribution of $\tau_{21}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Distribution of $\tau_{32}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Distribution of $\tau_{43}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Distribution of $C_{1}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Distribution of $C_{1}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Distribution of $C_{1}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Distribution of $C_{1}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Distribution of $C_{1}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Distribution of $C_{2}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Distribution of $C_{2}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Distribution of $C_{2}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Distribution of $C_{2}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Distribution of $C_{2}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Distribution of $C_{3}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Distribution of $C_{3}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Distribution of $C_{3}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Distribution of $C_{3}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Distribution of $C_{3}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Distribution of $M_{2}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Distribution of $N_{2}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Distribution of $N_{3}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Distribution of $M_{2}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Distribution of $N_{2}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Distribution of $N_{3}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Covariance matrix for $\lambda_{0}^{0}$ (N) reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Covariance matrix for $\lambda_{0}^{2}$ ($p_{T}^{d,*})$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Covariance matrix for $\lambda_{0.5}^{1}$ (LHA) reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Covariance matrix for $\lambda_{1}^{1}$ (width) reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Covariance matrix for $\lambda_{2}^{1}$ (thrust) reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Covariance matrix for $\varepsilon$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Covariance matrix for $z_{g}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Covariance matrix for $\Delta R_{g}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Covariance matrix for $n_{SD}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Covariance matrix for $\tau_{21}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Covariance matrix for $\tau_{32}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Covariance matrix for $\tau_{43}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Covariance matrix for $C_{1}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Covariance matrix for $C_{1}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Covariance matrix for $C_{1}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Covariance matrix for $C_{1}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Covariance matrix for $C_{1}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Covariance matrix for $C_{2}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Covariance matrix for $C_{2}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Covariance matrix for $C_{2}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Covariance matrix for $C_{2}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Covariance matrix for $C_{2}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Covariance matrix for $C_{3}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Covariance matrix for $C_{3}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Covariance matrix for $C_{3}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Covariance matrix for $C_{3}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Covariance matrix for $C_{3}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Covariance matrix for $M_{2}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Covariance matrix for $N_{2}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Covariance matrix for $N_{3}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Covariance matrix for $M_{2}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Covariance matrix for $N_{2}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Covariance matrix for $N_{3}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from charged particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Covariance matrix for $\lambda_{0}^{0}$ (N) reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Covariance matrix for $\lambda_{0}^{2}$ ($p_{T}^{d,*})$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Covariance matrix for $\lambda_{0.5}^{1}$ (LHA) reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Covariance matrix for $\lambda_{1}^{1}$ (width) reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Covariance matrix for $\lambda_{2}^{1}$ (thrust) reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Covariance matrix for $\varepsilon$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Covariance matrix for $z_{g}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Covariance matrix for $\Delta R_{g}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Covariance matrix for $n_{SD}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Covariance matrix for $\tau_{21}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Covariance matrix for $\tau_{32}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Covariance matrix for $\tau_{43}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Covariance matrix for $C_{1}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Covariance matrix for $C_{1}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Covariance matrix for $C_{1}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Covariance matrix for $C_{1}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Covariance matrix for $C_{1}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Covariance matrix for $C_{2}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Covariance matrix for $C_{2}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Covariance matrix for $C_{2}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Covariance matrix for $C_{2}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Covariance matrix for $C_{2}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Covariance matrix for $C_{3}^{(0.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Covariance matrix for $C_{3}^{(0.2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Covariance matrix for $C_{3}^{(0.5)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Covariance matrix for $C_{3}^{(1.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Covariance matrix for $C_{3}^{(2.0)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Covariance matrix for $M_{2}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Covariance matrix for $N_{2}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Covariance matrix for $N_{3}^{(1)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Covariance matrix for $M_{2}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Covariance matrix for $N_{2}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Covariance matrix for $N_{3}^{(2)}$ reconstructed from all particles with pt > 1 GeV, unfolded to the particle level.

Resolved search distribution of average dijet mass for the data, along with the resulting fit to the functional form for the inclusive selection

Resolved search distribution of average dijet mass for the data, along with the resulting fit to the functional form for the b-tagged selection

Signal efficiency as a function of stop mass for the inclusive and b-tagged selections. Efficiency is estimated from the number of events in the simulated sample passing the full signal selection in a two sigma window around the true mass compared with the total number of events generated. No generator-level requirements are applied in the generation.

Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the signal cross section as a function of stop mass. The branching fraction to quarks is assumed to be 100%. The boosted analysis probes 80 <= stop mass <= 400 GeV, while the resolved analysis searches for stop masses >= 400 GeV. Limits using the inclusive selection for stop to qq' assuming the RPV coupling lambda''. Theory cross sections correspond to the values agreed upon in the LHC SUSY cross section group.

Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the signal cross section as a function of stop mass. The branching fraction to quarks is assumed to be 100%. The boosted analysis probes 80 <= stop mass <= 400 GeV, while the resolved analysis searches for stop masses >= 400 GeV. Limits using the inclusive selection for stop to qq' assuming the RPV coupling lambda''. Theory cross sections correspond to the values agreed upon in the LHC SUSY cross section group.

Distribution of $d_{BV}$ in $\geq$5-track one-vertex events for data and simulated multijet signals with $m$ = 800 GeV, production cross section 1 fb, and $c\tau$ = 0.3, 1.0, and 10 mm. Event preselection and vertex selection criteria have been applied. The last bin includes the overflow events.

Distribution of the distance between vertices in the $x$-$y$ plane in events with two 3-track vertices. The points show the data ($d_{VV}$), and the solid lines show the background template ($d_{VV}^{C}$) normalized to the data. The last bin includes the overflow events. The dotted lines indicate the boundaries between the three bins used in the fit.

Distribution of the distance between vertices in the $x$-$y$ plane in events with one 4-track vertex and one 3-track vertex. The points show the data ($d_{VV}$), and the solid lines show the background template ($d_{VV}^{C}$) normalized to the data. The last bin includes the overflow events. The dotted lines indicate the boundaries between the three bins used in the fit.

Distribution of the distance between vertices in the $x$-$y$ plane in events with two 4-track vertices. The points show the data ($d_{VV}$), and the solid lines show the background template ($d_{VV}^{C}$) normalized to the data. The last bin includes the overflow events. The dotted lines indicate the boundaries between the three bins used in the fit.

Distribution of the distance between vertices in the $x$-$y$ plane in events with two $\geq$5-track vertices. The points show the data ($d_{VV}$), and the solid lines show the background template ($d_{VV}^{C}$) normalized to the data. The last bin includes the overflow events. The dotted lines indicate the boundaries between the three bins used in the fit.

Observed 95% C.L. upper limits on $\sigma\mathcal{B}^2$ for the multijet signals as a function of mass and mean proper decay length.

Observed 95% C.L. upper limits on $\sigma\mathcal{B}^2$ for the dijet signals as a function of mass and mean proper decay length.

Mass exclusion curves for the multijet signals, assuming gluino pair production cross sections and 100% branching fraction.

Mass exclusion curves for the dijet signals, assuming top squark pair production cross sections and 100% branching fraction.

Observed and expected 95% C.L. upper limits on $\sigma\mathcal{B}^2$ for the multijet signals as a function of mass for a fixed $c\tau$ of 0.3 mm. The gluino pair production cross section is overlaid. The uncertainties in the theoretical cross section include those due to the renormalization and factorization scales, and the parton distribution functions.

Observed and expected 95% C.L. upper limits on $\sigma\mathcal{B}^2$ for the dijet signals as a function of mass for a fixed $c\tau$ of 0.3 mm. The top squark pair production cross section is overlaid. The uncertainties in the theoretical cross section include those due to the renormalization and factorization scales, and the parton distribution functions.

Observed and expected 95% C.L. upper limits on $\sigma\mathcal{B}^2$ for the multijet signals as a function of mass for a fixed $c\tau$ of 1.0 mm. The gluino pair production cross section is overlaid. The uncertainties in the theoretical cross section include those due to the renormalization and factorization scales, and the parton distribution functions.

Observed and expected 95% C.L. upper limits on $\sigma\mathcal{B}^2$ for the dijet signals as a function of mass for a fixed $c\tau$ of 1.0 mm. The top squark pair production cross section is overlaid. The uncertainties in the theoretical cross section include those due to the renormalization and factorization scales, and the parton distribution functions.

Observed and expected 95% C.L. upper limits on $\sigma\mathcal{B}^2$ for the multijet signals as a function of mass for a fixed $c\tau$ of 10 mm. The gluino pair production cross section is overlaid. The uncertainties in the theoretical cross section include those due to the renormalization and factorization scales, and the parton distribution functions.

Observed and expected 95% C.L. upper limits on $\sigma\mathcal{B}^2$ for the dijet signals as a function of mass for a fixed $c\tau$ of 10 mm. The top squark pair production cross section is overlaid. The uncertainties in the theoretical cross section include those due to the renormalization and factorization scales, and the parton distribution functions.

Observed and expected 95% C.L. upper limits on $\sigma\mathcal{B}^2$ for the multijet signals as a function of $c\tau$ for a fixed mass of 800 GeV.

Observed and expected 95% C.L. upper limits on $\sigma\mathcal{B}^2$ for the dijet signals as a function of $c\tau$ for a fixed mass of 800 GeV.

Observed and expected 95% C.L. upper limits on $\sigma\mathcal{B}^2$ for the multijet signals as a function of $c\tau$ for a fixed mass of 1600 GeV.

Observed and expected 95% C.L. upper limits on $\sigma\mathcal{B}^2$ for the dijet signals as a function of $c\tau$ for a fixed mass of 1600 GeV.

Observed and expected 95% C.L. upper limits on $\sigma\mathcal{B}^2$ for the multijet signals as a function of $c\tau$ for a fixed mass of 2400 GeV.

Observed and expected 95% C.L. upper limits on $\sigma\mathcal{B}^2$ for the dijet signals as a function of $c\tau$ for a fixed mass of 2400 GeV.