The production of dark matter in association with Higgs bosons is predicted in several extensions of the Standard Model. An exploration of such scenarios is presented, considering final states with missing transverse momentum and $b$-tagged jets consistent with a Higgs boson. The analysis uses proton-proton collision data at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV recorded by the ATLAS experiment at the LHC during Run 2, amounting to an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$. The analysis, when compared with previous searches, benefits from a larger dataset, but also has further improvements providing sensitivity to a wider spectrum of signal scenarios. These improvements include both an optimised event selection and advances in the object identification, such as the use of the likelihood-based significance of the missing transverse momentum and variable-radius track-jets. No significant deviation from Standard Model expectations is observed. Limits are set, at 95% confidence level, in two benchmark models with two Higgs doublets extended by either a heavy vector boson $Z'$ or a pseudoscalar singlet $a$ and which both provide a dark matter candidate $\chi$. In the case of the two-Higgs-doublet model with an additional vector boson $Z'$, the observed limits extend up to a $Z'$ mass of 3 TeV for a mass of 100 GeV for the dark matter candidate. The two-Higgs-doublet model with a dark matter particle mass of 10 GeV and an additional pseudoscalar $a$ is excluded for masses of the $a$ up to 520 GeV and 240 GeV for $\tan \beta = 1$ and $\tan \beta = 10$ respectively. Limits on the visible cross-sections are set and range from 0.05 fb to 3.26 fb, depending on the missing transverse momentum and $b$-quark jet multiplicity requirements.
<b>- - - - - - - - Overview of HEPData Record - - - - - - - -</b> <br><br> <b>Exclusion contours:</b> <ul> <li><a href="?table=LimitContour_ZP2HDM_obs">Observed 95% CL exclusion limit for the Z'-2HDM model</a> <li><a href="?table=LimitContour_ZP2HDM_exp">Expected 95% CL exclusion limit for the Z'-2HDM model</a> <li><a href="?table=LimitContour_ZP2HDM_exp_1s">Expected +- 1sigma 95% CL exclusion limit for the Z'-2HDM model</a> <li><a href="?table=LimitContour_ZP2HDM_exp_2s">Expected +- 2sigma 95% CL exclusion limit for the Z'-2HDM model</a> <li><a href="?table=LimitContour_2HDMa_tb1_sp0p35_obs">Observed 95% CL exclusion limit for ggF production in the 2HDM+a model</a> <li><a href="?table=LimitContour_2HDMa_tb1_sp0p35_exp">Expected 95% CL exclusion limit for ggF production in the 2HDM+a model</a> <li><a href="?table=LimitContour_2HDMa_tb1_sp0p35_exp_1s">Expected +- 1 sigma 95% CL exclusion limit for ggF production in the 2HDM+a model</a> <li><a href="?table=LimitContour_2HDMa_tb1_sp0p35_exp_2s">Expected +- 2 sigma 95% CL exclusion limit for ggF production in the 2HDM+a model</a> <li><a href="?table=LimitContour_2HDMa_tb10_sp0p35_obs">Observed 95% CL exclusion limit for bbA production in the 2HDM+a model</a> <li><a href="?table=LimitContour_2HDMa_tb10_sp0p35_exp">Expected 95% CL exclusion limit for bbA production in the 2HDM+a model</a> <li><a href="?table=LimitContour_2HDMa_tb10_sp0p35_exp_1s">Expected +- 1 sigma 95% CL exclusion limit for bbA production in the 2HDM+a model</a> <li><a href="?table=LimitContour_2HDMa_tb10_sp0p35_exp_2s">Expected +- 2 sigma 95% CL exclusion limit for bbA production in the 2HDM+a model</a> <li><a href="?table=LimitContour_ZP2HDM_2018CONF_obs">Observed 95% CL exclusion limit for the Z'-2HDM model with the benchmark used in arXiv:1707.01302.</a> <li><a href="?table=LimitContour_ZP2HDM_2018CONF_exp">Expected 95% CL exclusion limit for the Z'-2HDM model with the benchmark used in arXiv:1707.01302.</a> <li><a href="?table=LimitContour_ZP2HDM_2018CONF_exp_1s">Expected +- 1 sigma 95% CL exclusion limit for the Z'-2HDM model with the benchmark used in arXiv:1707.01302.</a> <li><a href="?table=LimitContour_ZP2HDM_2018CONF_exp_2s">Expected +- 2 sigma 95% CL exclusion limit for the Z'-2HDM model with the benchmark used in arXiv:1707.01302.</a> </ul> <b>Upper limits on cross-sections:</b> <ul> <li><a href="?table=Limits_ZP2HDM">95% CL upper limit on the cross-section for the Z'-2HDM model</a> <li><a href="?table=Limits_2HDMa_tb1_sp0p35">95% CL upper limit on the ggF cross-section in the 2HDM+a model</a> <li><a href="?table=Limits_2HDMa_tb10_sp0p35">95% CL upper limit on the bbA cross-section in the 2HDM+a model</a> <li><a href="?table=MIL">95% CL upper limit on the visible cross-section</a> </ul> <b>Theoretical cross-sections:</b> <ul> <li><a href="?table=CrossSections_ZP2HDM">Cross-section for the Z'-2HDM model</a> <li><a href="?table=CrossSections_2HDMa_tb1_sp0p35">Cross-section for ggF production in the 2HDM+a model</a> <li><a href="?table=CrossSections_2HDMa_tb10_sp0p35">Cross-section for bbA production in the 2HDM+a model</a> </ul> <b>Kinematic distributions:</b> <ul> <li><a href="?table=SR_post_plot_2b_150_200">Higgs candidate invariant mass in the region with 2 b-jets and missing energy between 150-200 GeV</a> <li><a href="?table=SR_post_plot_2b_200_350">Higgs candidate invariant mass in the region with 2 b-jets and missing energy between 200-350 GeV</a> <li><a href="?table=SR_post_plot_2b_350_500">Higgs candidate invariant mass in the region with 2 b-jets and missing energy between 350-500 GeV</a> <li><a href="?table=SR_post_plot_2b_500_750">Higgs candidate invariant mass in the region with 2 b-jets and missing energy between 500-750 GeV</a> <li><a href="?table=SR_post_plot_2b_750">Higgs candidate invariant mass in the region with 2 b-jets and missing energy higher than 750 GeV</a> <li><a href="?table=SR_post_plot_3b_150_200">Higgs candidate invariant mass in the region with at least 3 b-jets and missing energy between 150-200 GeV</a> <li><a href="?table=SR_post_plot_3b_200_350">Higgs candidate invariant mass in the region with at least 3 b-jets and missing energy between 200-350 GeV</a> <li><a href="?table=SR_post_plot_3b_350_500">Higgs candidate invariant mass in the region with at least 3 b-jets and missing energy between 350-500 GeV</a> <li><a href="?table=SR_post_plot_3b_500">Higgs candidate invariant mass in the region with at least 3 b-jets and missing energy higher than 500 GeV</a> <li><a href="?table=MET_post_plot_0L2b">Missing energy in events with 0 leptons and 2 b-jets</a> <li><a href="?table=MET_post_plot_0L3b">Missing energy in events with 0 leptons and at least 3 b-jets</a> <li><a href="?table=CR_post_plot_CR1">Yields in the different missing energy bins and muon-charge of the 1-lepton control region</a> <li><a href="?table=CR_post_plot_CR2">Yields in the different METlepInv bins of the 2-lepton control region</a> </ul> <b>Cut flows:</b> The tables contain three columns, corresponding to the Z'-2HDM and 2HDM+a model assuming 100% ggF or bbA production respectively. <ul> <li><a href="?table=Resolved_150_200_2b">Signal region with 2 b-jets and missing energy between 150-200 GeV</a> <li><a href="?table=Resolved_200_350_2b">Signal region with 2 b-jets and missing energy between 200-350 GeV</a> <li><a href="?table=Resolved_350_500_2b">Signal region with 2 b-jets and missing energy between 350-500 GeV</a> <li><a href="?table=Merged_500_750_2w0b">Signal region with 2 b-jets and missing energy between 500-750 GeV</a> <li><a href="?table=Merged_750_2w0b">Signal region with 2 b-jets and missing energy higher than 750 GeV</a> <li><a href="?table=Resolved_150_200_3pb">Signal region with at least 3 b-jets and missing energy between 150-200 GeV</a> <li><a href="?table=Resolved_200_350_3pb">Signal region with at least 3 b-jets and missing energy between 200-350 GeV</a> <li><a href="?table=Resolved_350_500_3pb">Signal region with at least 3 b-jets and missing energy between 350-500 GeV</a> <li><a href="?table=Merged_2w1pb">Signal region with at least 3 b-jets and missing energy higher than 500 GeV</a> </ul> <b>Acceptance and efficiencies:</b> <ul> <li><a href="?table=AcceptanceTimesEfficiency_a2HDM_bb_2_150_noHiggsWindowCut">2HDM+a model, bbA production, 2 b-jets, MET=150-200 GeV</a> <li><a href="?table=AcceptanceTimesEfficiency_a2HDM_bb_2_200_noHiggsWindowCut">2HDM+a model, bbA production, 2 b-jets, MET=200-350 GeV</a> <li><a href="?table=AcceptanceTimesEfficiency_a2HDM_bb_2_350_noHiggsWindowCut">2HDM+a model, bbA production, 2 b-jets, MET=350-500 GeV</a> <li><a href="?table=AcceptanceTimesEfficiency_a2HDM_bb_2_500_noHiggsWindowCut">2HDM+a model, bbA production, 2 b-jets, MET=500-750 GeV</a> <li><a href="?table=AcceptanceTimesEfficiency_a2HDM_bb_2_750ptv_noHiggsWindowCut">2HDM+a model, bbA production, 2 b-jets, MET higher than 750 GeV</a> <li><a href="?table=AcceptanceTimesEfficiency_a2HDM_bb_3_150_noHiggsWindowCut">2HDM+a model, bbA production, at least 3 b-jets, MET=150-200 GeV</a> <li><a href="?table=AcceptanceTimesEfficiency_a2HDM_bb_3_200_noHiggsWindowCut">2HDM+a model, bbA production, at least 3 b-jets, MET=200-350 GeV</a> <li><a href="?table=AcceptanceTimesEfficiency_a2HDM_bb_3_350_noHiggsWindowCut">2HDM+a model, bbA production, at least 3 b-jets, MET=350-500 GeV</a> <li><a href="?table=AcceptanceTimesEfficiency_a2HDM_bb_3_500ptv_noHiggsWindowCut">2HDM+a model, bbA production, at least 3 b-jets, MET higher than GeV</a> <li><a href="?table=AcceptanceTimesEfficiency_a2HDM_ggF_2_150_noHiggsWindowCut">2HDM+a model, ggF production, 2 b-jets, MET=150-200 GeV</a> <li><a href="?table=AcceptanceTimesEfficiency_a2HDM_ggF_2_200_noHiggsWindowCut">2HDM+a model, ggF production, 2 b-jets, MET=200-350 GeV</a> <li><a href="?table=AcceptanceTimesEfficiency_a2HDM_ggF_2_350_noHiggsWindowCut">2HDM+a model, ggF production, 2 b-jets, MET=350-500 GeV</a> <li><a href="?table=AcceptanceTimesEfficiency_a2HDM_ggF_2_500_noHiggsWindowCut">2HDM+a model, ggF production, 2 b-jets, MET=500-750 GeV</a> <li><a href="?table=AcceptanceTimesEfficiency_a2HDM_ggF_2_750ptv_noHiggsWindowCut">2HDM+a model, ggF production, 2 b-jets, MET higher than 750 GeV</a> <li><a href="?table=AcceptanceTimesEfficiency_a2HDM_ggF_3_150_noHiggsWindowCut">2HDM+a model, ggF production, at least 3 b-jets, MET=150-200 GeV</a> <li><a href="?table=AcceptanceTimesEfficiency_a2HDM_ggF_3_200_noHiggsWindowCut">2HDM+a model, ggF production, at least 3 b-jets, MET=200-350 GeV</a> <li><a href="?table=AcceptanceTimesEfficiency_a2HDM_ggF_3_350_noHiggsWindowCut">2HDM+a model, ggF production, at least 3 b-jets, MET=350-500 GeV</a> <li><a href="?table=AcceptanceTimesEfficiency_a2HDM_ggF_3_500ptv_noHiggsWindowCut">2HDM+a model, ggF production, at least 3 b-jets, MET higher than 500 GeV</a> <li><a href="?table=AcceptanceTimesEfficiency_zp2hdm_CMS_2_150_noHiggsWindowCut">Z'-2HDM model, 2 b-jets, MET=150-200 GeV</a> <li><a href="?table=AcceptanceTimesEfficiency_zp2hdm_CMS_2_200_noHiggsWindowCut">Z'-2HDM model, 2 b-jets, MET=200-350 GeV</a> <li><a href="?table=AcceptanceTimesEfficiency_zp2hdm_CMS_2_350_noHiggsWindowCut">Z'-2HDM model, 2 b-jets, MET=350-500 GeV</a> <li><a href="?table=AcceptanceTimesEfficiency_zp2hdm_CMS_2_500_noHiggsWindowCut">Z'-2HDM model, 2 b-jets, MET=500-750 GeV</a> <li><a href="?table=AcceptanceTimesEfficiency_zp2hdm_CMS_2_750ptv_noHiggsWindowCut">Z'-2HDM model, 2 b-jets, MET higher than 750 GeV</a> <li><a href="?table=AcceptanceTimesEfficiency_zp2hdm_CMS_3_150_noHiggsWindowCut">Z'-2HDM model, at least 3 b-jets, MET=150-200 GeV</a> <li><a href="?table=AcceptanceTimesEfficiency_zp2hdm_CMS_3_200_noHiggsWindowCut">Z'-2HDM model, at least 3 b-jets, MET=200-350 GeV</a> <li><a href="?table=AcceptanceTimesEfficiency_zp2hdm_CMS_3_350_noHiggsWindowCut">Z'-2HDM model, at least 3 b-jets, MET=350-500 GeV</a> <li><a href="?table=AcceptanceTimesEfficiency_zp2hdm_CMS_3_500ptv_noHiggsWindowCut">Z'-2HDM model, at least 3 b-jets, MET higher than 500 GeV</a> </ul>
Observed 95% CL exclusion limit for the Zprime-2HDM model.
Expected 95% CL exclusion limit for the Zprime-2HDM model.
We describe the properties of six-jet events, with the six-jet mass exceeding 520GeV/c2, produced at the Fermilab proton-antiproton collider operating at a center-of-mass energy of 1.8 TeV. Observed distributions for a set of 20 multijet variables are compared with predictions from the HERWIG QCD parton shower Monte Carlo program, the NJETS leading order QCD matrix element Monte Carlo program, and a phase-space model in which six-jet events are distributed uniformly over the kinematically allowed region of the six-body phase space. In general the QCD predictions provide a good description of the observed six-jet distributions.
The 6Jet mass spectrum.
Dalitz X distribution for jet 3 in the reduced 3-JET final state.
Dalitz X distribution for jet 4 in the reduced 3-JET final state.
The 132 pbt - 1 of data collected by ALEPH from 1991 to 1994 have been used to analyze η and ω production in τ decays. The following branching fractions have been measured: \(B\left( {{\tau ^ - } \to {\nu _\tau }\omega {h^ - }} \right) = \left( {1.91 \pm 0.07 \pm 0.06} \right) \times {10^{ - 2}},\)\(B\left( {{\tau ^ - } \to {\nu _\tau }\omega {h^ - }{\pi ^0}} \right) = \left( {4.3 \pm 0.6 \pm 0.5} \right) \times {10^{ - 3}},\)\(B\left( {{\tau ^ - } \to {\nu _\tau }\eta {K^ - }} \right) = \left( {2.9_{ - 1.2}^{ + 1.3} \pm 0.7} \right) \times {10^{ - 4}},\)\(B\left( {{\tau ^ - } \to {\nu _\tau }\eta {h^ - }{\pi ^0}} \right) = \left( {1.8 \pm 0.4 \pm 0.2} \right) \times {10^{ - 3}}\) and the 95% C.L. limit B(τ− → ντηπt -) < 6.2 × 10t - 4 has been obtained. The ωπt- and ηπt -π0 rates and dynamics are found in agreement with the predictions made from e+e∼ - annihilation data with the help of isospin invariance (CVC).
$\pi^+\pi^-\pi^0$ mass distribution (two entries per event) in the $\pi^{\pm}\pi^+\pi^-\pi^0$ final state for the one-photon sample. The bin size has been chosen to display the detailed shape of the $\omega$ peak. The non-resonant contribution is represented by a simple polynomial. Non-$\tau$ background has been subtracted. The error has been set to zero if it is smaller than the point size.
$\pi^+\pi^-\pi^0$ mass distributions (two entries per event) in the $\pi^{\pm}\pi^+\pi^-\pi^0$ final state for the two-photon sample. The bin size has been chosen to display the detailed shape of the $\omega$ peak. The non-resonant contribution is represented by a simple polynomial. Non-$\tau$ background has been subtracted. The error has been set to zero if it is smaller than the point size.
Background-subtracted $\omega\pi$ mass spectrum for the data presented here, plotted as black dots. The error has been set to zero if it is smaller than the point size.
The properties of high-mass multijet events produced at the Fermilab proton-antiproton collider are compared with leading order QCD matrix element predictions, QCD parton shower Monte Carlo predictions, and the predictions from a model in which events are distributed uniformly over the available multibody phase-space. Multijet distributions corresponding to (4N-4) variables that span the N-body parameter space are found to be well described by the QCD calculations for inclusive three-jet, four-jet, and five-jet events. The agreement between data, QCD Matrix Element calculations, and QCD parton shower Monte Carlo predictions suggests that 2 -> 2 scattering plus gluon radiation provides a good first approximation to the full LO QCD matrix element for events with three, four, or even five jets in the final state.
3-jet mass distribution.
Inclusive 3-jet Dalitz X3 distribution.
Inclusive 3-jet Dalitz X4 distribution.
The properties of two-, three-, four-, five-, and six-jet events with multijet masses >600 GeV /c2 are compared with QCD predictions. The shapes of the multijet-mass and leading-jet-angular distributions are approximately independent of jet multiplicity and are well described by the NJETS matrix element calculation and the HERWIG parton shower Monte Carlo predictions. The observed jet transverse momentum distributions for three- and four-jet events discriminate between the matrix element and parton shower predictions, the data favoring the matrix element calculation.
Exclusive 2-jet mass distribution.
Exclusive 3-jet mass distribution.
Exclusive 4-jet mass distribution.
From a sample of about 75000 τ decays identified with the ALEPH detector, K 0 production in 1-prong hadronic decays is investigated by tagging the K L 0 component in a hadronic calorimeter. Results are given for the final states ν τ h − K 0 and ν τ h − π 0 K 0 where the h − is separated into π and K contributions by means of the dE / dx measurement in in the central detector. The resulting branching ratios are: ( Bτ → ν τ π − K 0 ) = (0.88±0.14±0.09)%, ( Bτ → ν τ K − K 0 ) = (0.29±0.12±0.03)%, ( Bτ → ν τ π − π 0 K 0 ) = (0.33±0.14±0.07)% aand ( Bτ → ν τ K − π 0 K 0 ) = (0.05±0.05±0.01)%. The K ∗ decay rate in the K 0 π channel agrees with that in the Kπ 0 mode: the combined value for the branching ratio is (Bτ → ν τ K ∗− ) = (1.45±0.13±0.11)% .
Invariant mass distribution for the $K^0\pi$ system data. The numbers have been read from the plot in the paper.
Form a sample of about 75000 τ decays measured in the ALEPH detector, 1-prong charged kaon decays are identified by the dE / dx measurement in the central detector. The resulting branching ratios for the inclusive and exclusive modes are: B ( τ → ν τ K − ≥ 0 π 0 ≥ 0 K 0 ) = (1.60±0.07±0.12)%, B ( τ → ν τ K − = (0.64±0.05±0.05)%, B ( τ → ν τ − π 0 = (0.53±0.05±0.07)% and B ( τ → ν τ K − π 0 π 0 ) = (0.04±0.03±0.02)%. Exclusive modes are corrected for measured K L 0 production. The rate for τ → ν τ K − agrees well with the prediction based on τ - μ universality.
Invariant mass distribution of the $K\pi^0$ final state, as obtained from a $dE/dx$ fit in each mass bin. The numbers have been read from the plot in the paper, with the errors simply set to zero if they are smaller than the point size.
Distributions are presented of event shape variables, jet roduction rates and charged particle momenta obtained from 53 000 hadronicZ decays. They are compared to the predictions of the QCD+hadronization models JETSET, ARIADNE and HERWIG, and are used to optimize several model parameters. The JETSET and ARIADNE coherent parton shower (PS) models with running αs and string fragmentation yield the best description of the data. The HERWIG parton shower model with cluster fragmentation fits the data less well. The data are in better agreement with JETSET PS than with JETSETO(αS2) matrix elements (ME) even when the renormalization scale is optimized.
Sphericity distribution.
Sphericity distribution.
Aplanarity distribution.
Forum