Expected and observed 95% CL upper limits on the V' boson production cross section as functions of the resonance mass mV' in the HVT model A.

Expected and observed 95% CL upper limits on the V' boson production cross section as functions of the resonance mass mV' in the HVT model B.

Expected and observed 95% CL upper limits on the V' boson production cross section as functions of the resonance mass mV' in the HVT model C.

Expected and observed 95% CL exclusion contour in gF-gH parameter space for the DIQ channel at 3 TeV. Here, model A corresponds to (0.556, 0.562) and model B to (-2.928, 0.146)

Expected and observed 95% CL exclusion contour in gF-gH parameter space for the DIQ channel at 4 TeV.

Expected and observed 95% CL exclusion contour in gF-gH parameter space for the DIL channel at 3 TeV.

Expected and observed 95% CL exclusion contour in gF-gH parameter space for the DIL channel at 4 TeV.

Expected and observed 95% CL exclusion contour in gH-gF parameter space for the DIB channel at 3 TeV.

Expected and observed 95% CL exclusion contour in gH-gF parameter space for the DIB channel at 4 TeV.

Expected and observed 95% CL exclusion contour in gF-gH parameter space for the Full Combined channel at 3 TeV.

Expected and observed 95% CL exclusion contour in gF-gH parameter space for the Full Combined channel at 4 TeV.

Expected and observed 95% CL exclusion contour in g_q12-g_q3 parameter space at m_V' = 3 TeV. Uncertainty bands shown as separate contour lines. Channels not in combination are shown separately.

Expected and observed 95% CL exclusion contour in g_q12-g_q3 parameter space at m_V' = 4 TeV. Uncertainty bands shown as separate contour lines. Channels not in combination are shown separately.

Expected and observed 95% CL upper limits on the W' production cross section in the HVT Model A benchmark, compared with the theoretical prediction.

Expected and observed 95% CL upper limits on the W' production cross section in the HVT Model B benchmark, compared with the theoretical prediction.

Expected and observed 95% CL upper limits on the W' production cross section in the HVT Model C benchmark, compared with the theoretical prediction.

Expected and observed 95% CL upper limits on the Z' production cross section in the HVT Model A benchmark, compared with the theoretical prediction.

Expected and observed 95% CL upper limits on the Z' production cross section in the HVT Model B benchmark, compared with the theoretical prediction.

Expected and observed 95% CL upper limits on the Z' production cross section in the HVT Model C benchmark, compared with the theoretical prediction.

The postfit pDNN distributions in the SR $\mu$ 3b3j assuming $m_{H^\pm} = 600$ GeV. Postfit signal for $m_{H^\pm} = 600$ GeV is also shown. Beneath plot the ratio of data to predictions is shown.

The postfit pDNN distributions in the SR e 2b2j assuming $m_{H^\pm} = 1$ TeV. The signal for $m_{H^\pm} = 1$ TeV is also shown before the fit, assuming a cross section of 1 pb.Beneath plot the ratio of data to predictions is shown.

The postfit pDNN distributions in the SR $\mu$ 2b2j assuming $m_{H^\pm} = 1$ TeV. The signal for $m_{H^\pm} = 1$ TeV is also shown before the fit, assuming a cross section of 1 pb.Beneath plot the ratio of data to predictions is shown.

The postfit pDNN distributions in the SR e 3b3j assuming $m_{H^\pm} = 1$ TeV. The signal for $m_{H^\pm} = 1$ TeV is also shown before the fit, assuming a cross section of 1 pb.Beneath plot the ratio of data to predictions is shown.

The postfit pDNN distributions in the SR $\mu$ 3b3j assuming $m_{H^\pm} = 1$ TeV. The signal for $m_{H^\pm} = 1$ TeV is also shown before the fit, assuming a cross section of 1 pb.Beneath plot the ratio of data to predictions is shown.

Observed and expected 95% CL limits on the cross section times branching ratio for different $H^{\pm}$ mass hypotheses with $ρ_{tc} = 0.4$, $ρ_{tt} = 0.6$ . The inner (green) band and the outer (yellow) band represent the regions containing 68% and 95%, respectively, of the distribution of limits expected under the background-only hypothesis. Theoretical prediction with different $ρ_{tc}$ and $ρ_{tt}$ couplingsare shown with the grey bands representing the corresponding uncertainties due to the factorization and renormalization scales and the PDFs.

Observed excluded phase-space regions, based on 95% CL limits, as a function of $m_{H^{\pm}}$ and $ρ_{tc}$ for various assumed $ρ_{tt}$ values represented with different colors. The limits are extracted from the pDNN distributions based on g2HDM assuming all the extra Yukawa couplings except $ρ_{tt}$ and $ρ_{tc}$ are zero. The results are obtained from the 95% CL limits on the cross section times branching fraction in Fig 6.

Expected excluded phase-space regions, based on 95% CL limits, as a function of $m_{H^{\pm}}$ and $ρ_{tc}$ for various assumed $ρ_{tt}$ values represented with different colors. The limits are extracted from the pDNN distributions based on g2HDM assuming all the extra Yukawa couplings except $ρ_{tt}$ and $ρ_{tc}$ are zero. The results are obtained from the 95% CL limits on the cross section times branching fraction in Fig 6.

Observed excluded phase-space regions, based on 95% CL limits, as a function of $m_{H^{\pm}}$ and $ρ_{tc}$ for various assumed $ρ_{tt}$ values represented with different colors. The limits are extracted from the pDNN distributions based on g2HDM assuming all the extra Yukawa couplings except $ρ_{tt}$ and $ρ_{tc}$ are zero. The results are obtained from the 95% CL limits on the cross section times branching fraction in Fig 6.

Expected excluded phase-space regions, based on 95% CL limits, as a function of $m_{H^{\pm}}$ and $ρ_{tc}$ for various assumed $ρ_{tt}$ values represented with different colors. The limits are extracted from the pDNN distributions based on g2HDM assuming all the extra Yukawa couplings except $ρ_{tt}$ and $ρ_{tc}$ are zero. The results are obtained from the 95% CL limits on the cross section times branching fraction in Fig 6.

Observed excluded phase-space regions, based on 95% CL limits, as a function of $m_{H^{\pm}}$ and $ρ_{tc}$ for various assumed $ρ_{tt}$ values represented with different colors. The limits are extracted from the pDNN distributions based on g2HDM assuming all the extra Yukawa couplings except $ρ_{tt}$ and $ρ_{tc}$ are zero. The results are obtained from the 95% CL limits on the cross section times branching fraction in Fig 6.

Expected excluded phase-space regions, based on 95% CL limits, as a function of $m_{H^{\pm}}$ and $ρ_{tc}$ for various assumed $ρ_{tt}$ values represented with different colors. The limits are extracted from the pDNN distributions based on g2HDM assuming all the extra Yukawa couplings except $ρ_{tt}$ and $ρ_{tc}$ are zero. The results are obtained from the 95% CL limits on the cross section times branching fraction in Fig 6.

Observed excluded phase-space regions, based on 95% CL limits, as a function of $m_{H^{\pm}}$ and $ρ_{tc}$ for various assumed $ρ_{tt}$ values represented with different colors. The limits are extracted from the pDNN distributions based on g2HDM assuming all the extra Yukawa couplings except $ρ_{tt}$ and $ρ_{tc}$ are zero. The results are obtained from the 95% CL limits on the cross section times branching fraction in Fig 6.

Expected excluded phase-space regions, based on 95% CL limits, as a function of $m_{H^{\pm}}$ and $ρ_{tc}$ for various assumed $ρ_{tt}$ values represented with different colors. The limits are extracted from the pDNN distributions based on g2HDM assuming all the extra Yukawa couplings except $ρ_{tt}$ and $ρ_{tc}$ are zero. The results are obtained from the 95% CL limits on the cross section times branching fraction in Fig 6.

Observed excluded phase-space regions, based on 95% CL limits, as a function of $m_{H^{\pm}}$ and $ρ_{tc}$ for various assumed $ρ_{tt}$ values represented with different colors. The limits are extracted from the pDNN distributions based on g2HDM assuming all the extra Yukawa couplings except $ρ_{tt}$ and $ρ_{tc}$ are zero. The results are obtained from the 95% CL limits on the cross section times branching fraction in Fig 6.

Expected excluded phase-space regions, based on 95% CL limits, as a function of $m_{H^{\pm}}$ and $ρ_{tc}$ for various assumed $ρ_{tt}$ values represented with different colors. The limits are extracted from the pDNN distributions based on g2HDM assuming all the extra Yukawa couplings except $ρ_{tt}$ and $ρ_{tc}$ are zero. The results are obtained from the 95% CL limits on the cross section times branching fraction in Fig 6.

Two times the difference of the negative log-likelihood (NLL) as a function of σ(pp →(q$^{light}$)H$^{\pm}$) B(H$^{\pm}$ → tb, t → blν) and σ(pp → bH$^{\pm}$)B(H$^{\pm}$ → tb, t → blν) with the best fit point extracted from the pDNN distribution for the $H^{\pm}$ mass $m_{H^{\pm}} = 600$ GeV. The solid and dashed contours represent the observed and expected limits, respectively. The points along the contours represent 68% and 95% CL regions, extracted from the 2∆NLL values of 2.30 and 5.99, respectively. The g2HDM predictions are also shown. The points along the g2HDM prediction line represent different $ρ_{tt}$, $ρ_{tc}$ coupling sets, with all other extra Yukawa couplings assumed to be zero.

Two times the difference of the negative log-likelihood (NLL) as a function of σ(pp →(q$^{light}$)H$^{\pm}$) B(H$^{\pm}$ → tb, t → blν) and σ(pp → bH$^{\pm}$)B(H$^{\pm}$ → tb, t → blν) with the best fit point extracted from the pDNN distribution for the $H^{\pm}$ mass $m_{H^{\pm}} = 600$ GeV. The solid and dashed contours represent the observed and expected limits, respectively. The points along the contours represent 68% and 95% CL regions, extracted from the 2∆NLL values of 2.30 and 5.99, respectively. The g2HDM predictions are also shown. The points along the g2HDM prediction line represent different $ρ_{tt}$, $ρ_{tc}$ coupling sets, with all other extra Yukawa couplings assumed to be zero.

Two times the difference of the negative log-likelihood (NLL) as a function of σ(pp →(q$^{light}$)H$^{\pm}$) B(H$^{\pm}$ → tb, t → blν) and σ(pp → bH$^{\pm}$)B(H$^{\pm}$ → tb, t → blν) with the best fit point extracted from the pDNN distribution for the $H^{\pm}$ mass $m_{H^{\pm}} = 1000$ GeV. The solid and dashed contours represent the observed and expected limits, respectively. The points along the contours represent 68% and 95% CL regions, extracted from the 2∆NLL values of 2.30 and 5.99, respectively. The g2HDM predictions are also shown. The points along the g2HDM prediction line represent different $ρ_{tt}$, $ρ_{tc}$ coupling sets, with all other extra Yukawa couplings assumed to be zero.

Two times the difference of the negative log-likelihood (NLL) as a function of σ(pp →(q$^{light}$)H$^{\pm}$) B(H$^{\pm}$ → tb, t → blν) and σ(pp → bH$^{\pm}$)B(H$^{\pm}$ → tb, t → blν) with the best fit point extracted from the pDNN distribution for the $H^{\pm}$ mass $m_{H^{\pm}} = 1000$ GeV. The solid and dashed contours represent the observed and expected limits, respectively. The points along the contours represent 68% and 95% CL regions, extracted from the 2∆NLL values of 2.30 and 5.99, respectively. The g2HDM predictions are also shown. The points along the g2HDM prediction line represent different $ρ_{tt}$, $ρ_{tc}$ coupling sets, with all other extra Yukawa couplings assumed to be zero.

Covariance for spin correlation coefficients in beam basis for $p_{T}(t)$ vs. $|cos(\theta)|$ bins

Results for Eigenstate decomposition for $|\Phi^{+} \rangle$ in Helicity basis in $m(t\bar{t})$ vs. $|cos(\theta)|$ bins

Results for Eigenstate decomposition for $|\Phi^{-} \rangle$ in Helicity basis in $m(t\bar{t})$ vs. $|cos(\theta)|$ bins

Results for Eigenstate decomposition for $|\Psi^{+} \rangle$ in Helicity basis in $m(t\bar{t})$ vs. $|cos(\theta)|$ bins

Results for Eigenstate decomposition for $|\Psi^{-} \rangle$ in Helicity basis in $m(t\bar{t})$ vs. $|cos(\theta)|$ bins

Results for Eigenstate decomposition for $|\uparrow \uparrow \rangle$ in Beam basis in $m(t\bar{t})$ vs. $|cos(\theta)|$ bins

Results for Eigenstate decomposition for $|\downarrow \downarrow \rangle$ in Beam basis in $m(t\bar{t})$ vs. $|cos(\theta)|$ bins

Results for Eigenstate decomposition for $|\Psi^{+} \rangle$ in Beam basis in $m(t\bar{t})$ vs. $|cos(\theta)|$ bins

Results for Eigenstate decomposition for $|\Psi^{-} \rangle$ in Beam basis in $m(t\bar{t})$ vs. $|cos(\theta)|$ bins

Results for Purity in Helicity basis in $m(t\bar{t})$ vs. $|cos(\theta)|$ bins

Results for Purity in Beam basis in $m(t\bar{t})$ vs. $|cos(\theta)|$ bins

Results for Entropy in Helicity basis in $m(t\bar{t})$ vs. $|cos(\theta)|$ bins

Results for Entropy in Beam basis in $m(t\bar{t})$ vs. $|cos(\theta)|$ bins

Results for Entanglement in Helicity basis in $m(t\bar{t})$ vs. $|cos(\theta)|$ bins

Results for Entanglement in Beam basis in $m(t\bar{t})$ vs. $|cos(\theta)|$ bins

Results for Eigenstate decomposition for $|\Phi^{+} \rangle$ in Helicity basis in $p_{T}(t)$ vs. $|cos(\theta)|$ bins

Results for Eigenstate decomposition for $|\Phi^{-} \rangle$ in Helicity basis in $p_{T}(t)$ vs. $|cos(\theta)|$ bins

Results for Eigenstate decomposition for $|\Psi^{+} \rangle$ in Helicity basis in $p_{T}(t)$ vs. $|cos(\theta)|$ bins

Results for Eigenstate decomposition for $|\Psi^{-} \rangle$ in Helicity basis in $p_{T}(t)$ vs. $|cos(\theta)|$ bins

Results for Eigenstate decomposition for $|\uparrow \uparrow \rangle$ in Beam basis in $p_{T}(t)$ vs. $|cos(\theta)|$ bins

Results for Eigenstate decomposition for $|\downarrow \downarrow \rangle$ in Beam basis in $p_{T}(t)$ vs. $|cos(\theta)|$ bins

Results for Eigenstate decomposition for $|\Psi^{+} \rangle$ in Beam basis in $p_{T}(t)$ vs. $|cos(\theta)|$ bins

Results for Eigenstate decomposition for $|\Psi^{-} \rangle$ in Beam basis in $p_{T}(t)$ vs. $|cos(\theta)|$ bins

Results for Purity in Helicity basis in $p_{T}(t)$ vs. $|cos(\theta)|$ bins

Results for Purity in Beam basis in $p_{T}(t)$ vs. $|cos(\theta)|$ bins

Results for Entropy in Helicity basis in $p_{T}(t)$ vs. $|cos(\theta)|$ bins

Results for Entropy in Beam basis in $p_{T}(t)$ vs. $|cos(\theta)|$ bins

Results for Entanglement in Helicity basis in $p_{T}(t)$ vs. $|cos(\theta)|$ bins

Results for Entanglement in Beam basis in $p_{T}(t)$ vs. $|cos(\theta)|$ bins

The $v_{3}\{2,\lvert\Delta\eta\rvert>2\}$ ratios for charged particles as functions of centrality in NeNe to OO collisions at 5.36 TeV.

The distributions of the variables used in the simultaneous fit for the SR. The black points with error bars represent the data and their statistical uncertainties, whereas the shaded band represents the predicted uncertainties. The bottom panel in each figure shows the ratio of the number of events observed in data to that of the total SM prediction. The last bin of each plot has been extended to include the overflow contribution.

Expected and observed 95% upper limits on the product of the cross section and branching fraction$\sigma(\mathrm{pp} \ ightarrow W\mathrm{a})\mathcal{B}(W ightarrow \ell^{+} v_{\ell})\mathcal{B}(\mathrm{a} \rightarrow Z\gamma)\mathcal{B}(Z \rightarrow \ell^{+} \ell^{-})$ s a function of the ALP mass from 110 to 400 GeV

Expected and observed 95% upper limits on the photophobic ALP model parameter $1/f_{\mathrm{a}}$ as a function of ALP mass reinterpreted from $1/f_{\mathrm{a}}=2~\mathrm{TeV}^{-1}$

Upper limits at $95\%$ CL on the LQ-fermion couplings, $|y_{e u}|$, versus $S_{e u}$ mass for scalar LQs coupled to electrons.

Observed and Expected UL exclusions on the $BR(H\to S)$ of generic signals with $m_{A'} = 1.0\;GeV$ and $BR(A' \rightarrow \pi\pi) = 1.0$.

The observed data in the dielectron channel and the fitted signal-plus-background templates, shown for the $S_{e d}$ scenario with a candidate LQ mass of 2.5 TeV. Distributions of events are binned in the reconstructed dilepton mass, rapidity, and cosine theta.

Observed and Expected UL exclusions on the number of 'signal' yields in sideband A from the model agnostic fit, assuming no 'SUEP-like' signal contamination in the CRs.

Upper limits at $95\%$ CL on the LQ-fermion couplings, $|y_{e d}|$, versus $S_{e d}$ mass for scalar LQs coupled to electrons.

Postfit values for SR in the B-Only CR+SR and CR-Only fits with the prefit signal overlayed for reference

The observed data in the dimuon channel and the fitted signal-plus-background templates, shown for the $S_{\mu u}$ scenario with a candidate LQ mass of 2.5 TeV. Distributions of events are binned in the reconstructed dilepton mass, rapidity, and cosine theta.

Postfit values for PR in the B-Only CR+SR and CR-Only fits with the prefit signal overlayed for reference

Upper limits at $95\%$ CL on the LQ-fermion couplings, $|y_{\mu u}|$, versus $S_{\mu u}$ mass for scalar LQs coupled to muons.

Postfit values for CRDY in the B-Only CR+SR and CR-Only fits with the prefit signal overlayed for reference

The observed data in the dimuon channel and the fitted signal-plus-background templates, shown for the $S_{\mu d}$ scenario with a candidate LQ mass of 2.5 TeV. Distributions of events are binned in the reconstructed dilepton mass, rapidity, and cosine theta.

Postfit values for CRTT in the B-Only CR+SR and CR-Only fits with the prefit signal overlayed for reference

Upper limits at $95\%$ CL on the LQ-fermion couplings, $|y_{\mu d}|$, versus $S_{\mu d}$ mass for scalar LQs coupled to muons.

Per-selection efficiencies on Generic - $m_{A'} = 1.0\;GeV$ $BR(A' \rightarrow \pi\pi) = 1.0$ Hadronic - $m_{A'} = 0.7\;GeV$ and $BR(A' \rightarrow ee) = BR(A' \rightarrow \mu\mu) = 0.15$ $BR(A' \rightarrow \pi\pi) = 0.7$ Leptonic - $m_{A'} = 0.5\;GeV$ and $BR(A' \rightarrow ee) = BR(A' \rightarrow \mu\mu) = 0.2$ and $BR(A' \rightarrow \pi\pi) = 0.6$ samples. Selections: 2 OSSF leptons, one SUEP cluster, $60\leq Z_{m}\leq 120$ GeV, $p_{T}^Z\geq 25$ GeV, veto events with b-tagged jets, $p_{T}^{SUEP} > 60\;GeV$, and $dR^{Ak4}_{Ak15} < 1.5$. Efficiencies are the ratio of the histogram size at the selection step to the previous step (except twoLepton vs. initial). The final column is the total cumulative efficiency (dR vs. initial). Note that these selection numbers were all calculated using samples generated with 600,000 events for each signal point considered.

The observed data in the dielectron channel and the fitted signal-plus-background templates, shown for the $V_{e u}$ scenario with a candidate LQ mass of 2.5 TeV. Distributions of events are binned in the reconstructed dilepton mass, rapidity, and cosine theta.

Interpolated observed and expected UL exclusions on $BR(H\to S) = 1$ for generic signals with $m_{A'} = 1.0\;GeV$ and $BR(A' \rightarrow \pi\pi) = 1.0$. The discreate heatmap points can be found in the UL Generic (Observed & Expected) figure in this sandbox

Upper limits at $95\%$ CL on the LQ-fermion couplings, $|g_{e u}|$, versus $V_{e u}$ mass for vector LQs coupled to electrons.

The observed data in the dielectron channel and the fitted signal-plus-background templates, shown for the $V_{e d}$ scenario with a candidate LQ mass of 2.5 TeV. Distributions of events are binned in the reconstructed dilepton mass, rapidity, and cosine theta.

Upper limits at $95\%$ CL on the LQ-fermion couplings, $|g_{e d}|$, versus $V_{e d}$ mass for vector LQs coupled to electrons.

The observed data in the dimuon channel and the fitted signal-plus-background templates, shown for the $V_{\mu u}$ scenario with a candidate LQ mass of 2.5 TeV. Distributions of events are binned in the reconstructed dilepton mass, rapidity, and cosine theta.

Upper limits at $95\%$ CL on the LQ-fermion couplings, $|g_{\mu u}|$, versus $V_{\mu u}$ mass for vector LQs coupled to muons.

The observed data in the dimuon channel and the fitted signal-plus-background templates, shown for the $V_{\mu d}$ scenario with a candidate LQ mass of 2.5 TeV. Distributions of events are binned in the reconstructed dilepton mass, rapidity, and cosine theta.

Upper limits at $95\%$ CL on the LQ-fermion couplings, $|g_{\mu d}|$, versus $V_{\mu d}$ mass for vector LQs coupled to muons.

Slices of 2D distributions of observed events and the post-fit templates in the TT pass region, projected onto the plane of leading jet mass mJ1, including expected radion signal at 1.5 TeV.

Slices of 2D distributions of observed events and the post-fit templates in the TT pass region, projected onto the plane of leading jet mass mJ1, including expected radion signal at 1.5 TeV.

Slices of 2D distributions of observed events and the post-fit templates in the TT pass region, projected onto the plane of leading jet mass mJ1, including expected radion signal at 1.5 TeV.

Slices of 2D distributions of observed events and the post-fit templates in the LL pass region, projected onto the plane of corrected HH mass (mHH) mHH, including expected radion signal at 1.5 TeV.

Slices of 2D distributions of observed events and the post-fit templates in the LL pass region, projected onto the plane of corrected HH mass (mHH) mHH, including expected radion signal at 1.5 TeV.

Slices of 2D distributions of observed events and the post-fit templates in the LL pass region, projected onto the plane of corrected HH mass (mHH) mHH, including expected radion signal at 1.5 TeV.

Slices of 2D distributions of observed events and the post-fit templates in the TT pass region, projected onto the plane of corrected HH mass (mHH) mHH, including expected radion signal at 1.5 TeV.

Slices of 2D distributions of observed events and the post-fit templates in the TT pass region, projected onto the plane of corrected HH mass (mHH) mHH, including expected radion signal at 1.5 TeV.

Slices of 2D distributions of observed events and the post-fit templates in the TT pass region, projected onto the plane of corrected HH mass (mHH) mHH, including expected radion signal at 1.5 TeV.

Slices of 2D distributions of observed events and the post-fit templates in the semi-resolved pass region, projected onto the plane of corrected HH mass (mHH) mHH, including expected radion signal at 1.5 TeV.

Slices of 2D distributions of observed events and the post-fit templates in the semi-resolved pass region, projected onto the plane of corrected HH mass (mHH) mHH, including expected radion signal at 1.5 TeV.

Slices of 2D distributions of observed events and the post-fit templates in the semi-resolved pass region, projected onto the plane of corrected HH mass (mHH) mHH, including expected radion signal at 1.5 TeV.

Slices of 2D distributions of observed events and the post-fit templates in the semi-resolved pass region, projected onto the plane of leading jet mass mJ1, including expected radion signal at 1.5 TeV.

Slices of 2D distributions of observed events and the post-fit templates in the semi-resolved pass region, projected onto the plane of leading jet mass mJ1, including expected radion signal at 1.5 TeV.

Slices of 2D distributions of observed events and the post-fit templates in the semi-resolved pass region, projected onto the plane of leading jet mass mJ1, including expected radion signal at 1.5 TeV.

The observed (solid black line) and expected (dashed black line) upper limits at 95% CL on $\sigma$(pp->X)B(X->HH->4b) for the narrow spin-0 radion model. The green (yellow) bands represent one (two) standard deviations from the expected limit. The predicted theoretical cross sections are also shown.

The observed (solid black line) and expected (dashed black line) upper limits at 95% CL on $\sigma$(pp->X)B(X->HH->4b) for the narrow width spin-2 bulk graviton model. The green (yellow) bands represent one (two) standard deviations from the expected limit. The predicted theoretical cross sections are also shown.

The observed (solid black line) and expected (dashed black line) upper limits at 95% CL on $\sigma$(pp->X)B(X->HH->4b) for the 10%-width spin-0 radion model. The green (yellow) bands represent one (two) standard deviations from the expected limit. The predicted theoretical cross sections are also shown.

The observed (solid black line) and expected (dashed black line) upper limits at 95% CL on $\sigma$(pp->X)B(X->HH->4b) for the 10%-width spin-2 bulk graviton model. The green (yellow) bands represent one (two) standard deviations from the expected limit. The predicted theoretical cross sections are also shown.

Absolute differential ttbar production cross section measured as function of ttbar rapidity in bins of ttbar mass at the parton level in the full phase space.