Measurement of nucleon structure functions in neutrino scattering.

The CHORUS collaboration Onengut, G. ; van Dantzig, R. ; de Jong, M. ; et al.
Phys.Lett.B 632 (2006) 65-75, 2006.
Inspire Record 699123 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.6187

After completion of the data taking for the νμ→ντ oscillation search, the CHORUS lead–scintillator calorimeter was used in the 1998 run as an active target. High-statistics samples of charged-current interactions were collected in the CERN SPS west area neutrino beam. This beam contained predominantly muon (anti-)neutrinos from sign-selected pions and kaons. We measure the flux and energy spectrum of the incident neutrinos and compare them with beam simulations. The neutrino–nucleon and anti-neutrino–nucleon differential cross-sections are measured in the range 0.01<x<0.7 , 0.05<y<0.95 , 10<Eν<200 GeV . We extract the neutrino–nucleon structure functions F2(x,Q2) , xF3(x,Q2) , and R(x,Q2) and compare these with results from other experiments.

121 data tables

The measured F2 and xF3 at X = 0.020.

The measured F2 and xF3 at X = 0.045.

The measured F2 and xF3 at X = 0.080.

More…

Measurement of the A-dependence of deep inelastic electron scattering

Gomez, J. ; Arnold, R.G. ; Bosted, Peter E. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.D 49 (1994) 4348-4372, 1994.
Inspire Record 359103 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.22575

Cross sections for deep-inelastic electron scattering from liquid deuterium, gaseous He4, and solid Be, C, Al, Ca, Fe, Ag, and Au targets were measured at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center using electrons with energies ranging from 8 to 24.5 GeV. These data cover a range in the Bjorken variable x from 0.089 to 0.8, and in momentum transfer Q2 from 2 to 15 (GeV/c)2. The ratios of cross sections per nucleon (σAσd)is for isoscalar nuclei have been extracted from the data. These ratios are greater than unity in the range 0.1<x<0.3, while for 0.3<x<0.8 they are less than unity and decrease logarithmically with atomic weight A, or linearly with average nuclear density. No Q2 dependence in the ratios was observed over the kinematic range of the data. These results are compared to various theoretical predictions.

26 data tables

Additional overall systematic error of 2.1 pct plus a target to target systematic error of 1 pct.

Additional overall systematic error of 2.1 pct plus a target to target systematic error of 2.1 pct.

Additional overall systematic error of 2.1 pct plus a target to target systematic error of 0.6 pct.

More…