The $v_2$ as a function of $p_T$ for 20-30% central Au + Au collisions at midrapidity for $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 7.7 GeV, 11.5 GeV, 19.6 GeV, 27 GeV and 39 GeV.

$\varepsilon$ (Glauber) as a function of $p_T$ for various collision centralities (10-20%, 30-40% and 50-60%) in Au + Au collisions at midrapidity for $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 7.7 GeV, 11.5 GeV, 19.6 GeV, 27 GeV and 39 GeV.

$\varepsilon$ (CGC) as a function of $p_T$ for various collision centralities (10-20%, 30-40% and 50-60%) in Au + Au collisions at midrapidity for $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 7.7 GeV, 11.5 GeV, 19.6 GeV, 27 GeV and 39 GeV.

$v_2${EtaSubs} as a function of $p_T$ for various collision centralities (10-20%, 30-40% and 50-60%) in Au + Au collisions at midrapidity for $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 7.7 GeV, 11.5 GeV, 19.6 GeV, 27 GeV and 39 GeV.

The $v_2${EP} vs. $\eta$ for 10-40% centrality in Au + Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 7.7 GeV, 11.5 GeV, 19.6 GeV, 27 GeV and 39 GeV.

The $v_2${EP} vs. $\eta$ for 10-40% centrality in Au + Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

The $v_2${4} vs. $p_T$ at midrapidity for various collision energies ($\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 7.7 GeV, 11.5 GeV, 19.6 GeV, 27 GeV and 39 GeV).

The $v_2${4} vs. $p_T$ at midrapidity for $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

The $v_2${4} vs. $p_T$ at midrapidity for $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Sample correlations in $\Delta\phi$ ($|\Delta\eta|<$ 1.78) for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV, 0-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV, 0-95% $d$+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, 40-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, and 0-12% central Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. The data are averaged between positive and negative $\Delta\phi$ and reflected in the plot.

Background subtracted sample correlations for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ on the near-side for 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV, 0-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV, 0-95% $d$+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, 40-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV and 0-12% central Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. The dependence of the jet-like correlation is shown as a function of $\Delta\eta$ ($|\Delta\phi|<$ 0.78). The data are averaged between positive and negative $\Delta\eta$.

Background subtracted sample correlations for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ on the near-side for 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV, 0-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV, 0-95% $d$+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, 40-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV and 0-12% central Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. The dependence of the jet-like correlation is shown as a function of $\Delta\phi$ ($|\Delta\eta|<$ 1.78). The data are averaged between positive and negative $\Delta\phi$.

Dependence of jet-like yield on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV. 5% systematic error due to the uncertainty on the associated particle's efficiency is not shown.

Dependence of jet-like yield on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV. 5% systematic error due to the uncertainty on the associated particle's efficiency is not shown.

Dependence of jet-like yield on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for $d$+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. 5% systematic error due to the uncertainty on the associated particle's efficiency is not shown.

Dependence of jet-like yield on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. 5% systematic error due to the uncertainty on the associated particle's efficiency is not shown.

Dependence of jet-like yield on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. 5% systematic error due to the uncertainty on the associated particle's efficiency is not shown.

Dependence of jet-like yield on $p_T^{\mathrm{trigger}}$ for 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV, 0-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV, 0-95% $d$+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, 40-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV and 0-12% central Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. The 5% systematic error due to the uncertainty on the associated particle's efficiency is not shown.

Dependence of jet-like yield on $p_T^{\mathrm{associated}}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ for 0-60% Cu+Cu and 0-80% Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV and 0-95% $d$+Au, 0-60% Cu+Cu, 0-12% Au+Au and 40-80% Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. The 5% systematic error due to the uncertainty on the associated particle's efficiency is not shown.

Dependence of the widths in $\Delta\phi$ on $p_T^{\mathrm{trigger}}$ for 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for 0-95% $d$+Au, 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV and $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, 0-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV, and 0-12% and 40-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Dependence of the widths in $\Delta\phi$ on $p_T^{\mathrm{associated}}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ for 0-95% $d$+Au, 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV and $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, 0-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV, and 0-12% and 40-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Dependence of the widths in $\Delta\phi$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

Dependence of the widths in $\Delta\phi$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for 0-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

Dependence of the widths in $\Delta\phi$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for 0-95% $d$+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Dependence of the widths in $\Delta\phi$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Dependence of the widths in $\Delta\phi$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Dependence of the widths in $\Delta\eta$ on $p_T^{\mathrm{trigger}}$ for 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for 0-95% $d$+Au, 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV and $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, 0-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV, and 0-12% and 40-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Dependence of the widths in $\Delta\eta$ on $p_T^{\mathrm{associated}}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ for 0-95% $d$+Au, 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV and $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, 0-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV, and 0-12% and 40-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Dependence of the widths in $\Delta\eta$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

Dependence of the widths in $\Delta\eta$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for 0-80% Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

Dependence of the widths in $\Delta\eta$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for 0-95% $d$+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Dependence of the widths in $\Delta\eta$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for 0-60% Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Dependence of the widths in $\Delta\eta$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Dependence of ridge yield on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

Dependence of ridge yield on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

Dependence of ridge yield on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Dependence of ridge yield on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Ratio of the ridge and jet-like yields on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

Ratio of the ridge and jet-like yields on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

Ratio of the ridge and jet-like yields on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Ratio of the ridge and jet-like yields on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Dependence of $V_{3\Delta}/V_{2\Delta}$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

Dependence of $V_{3\Delta}/V_{2\Delta}$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 GeV.

Dependence of $V_{3\Delta}/V_{2\Delta}$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for $d$+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Dependence of $V_{3\Delta}/V_{2\Delta}$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Cu+Cu at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Dependence of $V_{3\Delta}/V_{2\Delta}$ on $N_{part}$ for 3 $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ $<$ 6 GeV/$c$ and 1.5 GeV/$c$ $<$ $p_T^{associated}$ $<$ $p_T^{trigger}$ for Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Charged particle $v_1(\eta)$ for 40-80 % centrality in Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV.

Charged particle $v_1(p_t)$ in 200 GeV Au+Au for three centralities and two pseudorapidity ranges.

Charged particle $v_1(\eta)$ for mid-central (30-60%) Au+Au and Cu+Cu collisions at 200 GeV and 62.4 GeV.

Charged particle $v_1$ versus centrality for Au+Au and Cu+Cu collisions at 200 GeV and 62.4 GeV in two pseudorapidity ranges.

Charged particle $v_1$ versus $\eta-y_{beam}$, for 30 − 60% Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV.

Charged particle $v_1$ versus $\eta-y_{beam}$, for 30 − 60% Cu+Cu collisions at 200 GeV.

Charged particle $v_1$ versus $\eta-y_{beam}$, for 30 − 60% Au+Au collisions at 62.4 GeV.

Charged particle $v_1$ versus $\eta-y_{beam}$, for 30 − 60% Cu+Cu collisions at 62.4 GeV.

Differential cross section per nucleon as a function of transverse momentum for UPSILON production on the P target.

$\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ dependence of $<p_t>$ fluctuations for central collisions and STAR full acceptance. CERES fluctuation data (12.3 and 17.3 GeV) were linearly extrapolated to the STAR $\eta$ acceptance

Hijing-1.37 $<p_t>$ fluctuations for central collisions and the STAR acceptance at three energies, for quench-on, quench-off and jets-off collisions.

Directed flow of charged particles as a function of pseudorapidity, for centrality 10%-70%.

Directed flow of charged particles as a function of pseudorapidity, for centrality 10%-70%.

Directed flow of charged particles as a function of pseudorapidity, for centrality 10%-70%.

$v_1$ versus rapidity for charged particles.

$v_1$ versus rapidity for pions.

$v_1$ versus rapidity for protons.

Directed flow of charged particles as a function of pseudorapidity for the 60-70% and 70-80% centrality classes.

Directed flow of charged particles as a function of pseudorapidity for the 10-20%, 20-30%, 30-40%, 40-50% and 50-60% centrality classes.

Directed flow of charged particles as a function of pseudorapidity for the 5-10% centrality class.

Directed flow of charged particles as a function of pseudorapidity for the 0-5% centrality class.

$v_1${3} versus $p_t$ measured in the main TPC (|$\eta$| < 1.3), for centrality 10%-70%.

$v_1${3} versus $p_t$ measured in the Forward TPC (2.5 < |$\eta$| < 4.0), for different centralities.

Directed flow of charged particles as a function of impact parameter for the mid-pseudorapidity region (|$\eta$| < 1.3) and the forward pseudorapidity region (2.5 < |$\eta$| < 4.0.

Charged particle $v_1$ for Au+Au collisions (10%-70%) at 200 GeV as a function of $\eta-y_{beam}$.

Charged particle $v_1$ for Au+Au collisions (10%-70%) at 62.4 GeV as a function of $\eta-y_{beam}$.

Charged particle $v_1$ for Pb+Pb collisions (12.5%-33.5%) at 17.2 GeV as a function of $y-y_{beam}$.

Average transverse momentum per event for Au+Au at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV for the 5% most central collisions.

$<\Delta p_{t,i}\Delta p_{t,j}>$ as a function of centrality and incident energy for Au+Au collisions compared with HIJING results.

(d$N/\textrm{d}\eta)<\Delta p_{t,i}\Delta p_{t,j}>$ as a function of centrality and incident energy for Au+Au collisions compared with HIJING results.

$(<\Delta p_{t,i}\Delta p_{t,j}>)^{1/2}/<<p_{t}>>$ as a function of centrality and incident energy for Au+Au collisions compared with HIJING results.

$(<\Delta p_{t,i}\Delta p_{t,j}>)^{1/2}/<<p_{t}>>$ as a function of incident energy for 0-5% most central Au+Au collisions compared with CERES results.

Differential cross sections for D0 production from the (K- PI+ PI+ PI-) decay mode.

Differential cross sections for D*+ production from the ((K- PI+) PI+) decay mode.

Differential cross sections for D*+ production from the ((K- PI+ PI+ PI-) PI+) decay mode.

Differential cross sections for D*0 production from the ((K- PI+) PI0) decay mode.

Differential cross sections for D*0 production from the ((K- PI+ PI+ PI-) PI0) decay mode.

Averaged differential cross sections for the four different processes. The error is the quadratic combination of statistical and systematic error, excluding those errors common to all momenta which affect the total cross section but not the shape.

The proton plus antiproton fraction and differential production rate per hadronic Z0 decay.

Differential production rates of charged pions per Z0 decay into light (u,d,s) and c and b quarks. The errors are combined statistical and systematic.

Differential production rates of charged kaons per Z0 decay into light (u,d,s) and c and b quarks. The errors are combined statistical and systematic.

Differential production rates of charged protons plus antiprotons per Z0 decay into light (u,d,s) and c and b quarks. The errors are combined statistical and systematic.

Differential production rates of stable charged particles per Z0 decay intolight (u,d,s) and c and b quarks. The errors are combined statistical and syste matic.

Differential production rate for positive and negative charged pions into light quark jets from hadronic Z0 decays. Also shown are the normalization differences. The ratios are defined as:-. R(Q=PI+)=(1/2N(Q=Z0))*D(N(QUARK --> PI+) + N(QUARKBAR --> PI-))/DX. R(Q=PI-)=(1/2N(Q=Z0))*D(N(QUARK --> PI-) + N(QUARKBAR --> PI+))/DX.

Differential production rate for positive and negative charged kaons into light quark jets from hadronic Z0 decays. Also shown are the normalization differences. The ratios are defined as:-. R(Q=K+)=(1/2N(Q=Z0))*D(N(QUARK --> K+) + N(QUARKBAR --> K-))/DX. R(Q=K-)=(1/2N(Q=Z0))*D(N(QUARK --> K-) + N(QUARKBAR --> K+))/DX.

Differential production rate for positive and negative protons into light quark jets from hadronic Z0 decays. Also shown are the normalization differences.The ratios are defined as:-. R(Q=P+)=(1/2N(Q=Z0))*D(N(QUARK --> P+) + N(QUARKBAR --> PBAR))/DX. R(Q=PBAR)=(1/2N(Q=Z0))*D(N(QUARK --> PBAR) + N(QUARKBAR --> P+))/DX.

Measurment of the scaling form of the MU+ MU- cross section in the XL range0.15 to 0.20 from the hydrogen target.

Measurment of the scaling form of the MU+ MU- cross section in the XL range0.20 to 0.25 from the hydrogen target.

Measurment of the scaling form of the MU+ MU- cross section in the XL range0.25 to 0.30 from the hydrogen target.

Measurment of the scaling form of the MU+ MU- cross section in the XL range0.30 to 0.35 from the hydrogen target.

Measurment of the scaling form of the MU+ MU- cross section in the XL range0.35 to 0.40 from the hydrogen target.

Measurment of the scaling form of the MU+ MU- cross section in the XL range0.40 to 0.45 from the hydrogen target.

Measurment of the scaling form of the MU+ MU- cross section in the XL range0.45 to 0.50 from the hydrogen target.

Measurment of the scaling form of the MU+ MU- cross section in the XL range0.50 to 0.55 from the hydrogen target.

Measurment of the scaling form of the MU+ MU- cross section in the XL range0.55 to 0.60 from the hydrogen target.

Measurment of the scaling form of the MU+ MU- cross section in the XL range0.60 to 0.65 from the hydrogen target.

Measurment of the scaling form of the MU+ MU- cross section in the XL range0.65 to 0.70 from the hydrogen target.

Measurment of the scaling form of the MU+ MU- cross section in the XL range0.70 to 0.75 from the hydrogen target.

Measurment of the scaling form of the MU+ MU- cross section in the XL range0.75 to 0.80 from the hydrogen target.

Measurment of the scaling form of the MU+ MU- cross section in the XL range-0.05 to 0.05 from the deuterium target.

Measurment of the scaling form of the MU+ MU- cross section in the XL range0.05 to 0.10 from the deuterium target.

Measurment of the scaling form of the MU+ MU- cross section in the XL range0.10 to 0.15 from the deuterium target.

Measurment of the scaling form of the MU+ MU- cross section in the XL range0.15 to 0.20 from the deuterium target.

Measurment of the scaling form of the MU+ MU- cross section in the XL range0.20 to 0.25 from the deuterium target.

Measurment of the scaling form of the MU+ MU- cross section in the XL range0.25 to 0.30 from the deuterium target.

Measurment of the scaling form of the MU+ MU- cross section in the XL range0.30 to 0.35 from the deuterium target.

Measurment of the scaling form of the MU+ MU- cross section in the XL range0.35 to 0.40 from the deuterium target.

Measurment of the scaling form of the MU+ MU- cross section in the XL range0.40 to 0.45 from the deuterium target.

Measurment of the scaling form of the MU+ MU- cross section in the XL range0.45 to 0.50 from the deuterium target.

Measurment of the scaling form of the MU+ MU- cross section in the XL range0.50 to 0.55 from the deuterium target.

Measurment of the scaling form of the MU+ MU- cross section in the XL range0.55 to 0.60 from the deuterium target.

Measurment of the scaling form of the MU+ MU- cross section in the XL range0.60 to 0.65 from the deuterium target.

Measurment of the scaling form of the MU+ MU- cross section in the XL range0.65 to 0.70 from the deuterium target.

Measurment of the scaling form of the MU+ MU- cross section in the XL range0.70 to 0.75 from the deuterium target.

Measurment of the scaling form of the MU+ MU- cross section in the XL range0.75 to 0.80 from the deuterium target.