Inclusive Y(2S) $R_{AA}$ as a function of centrality in Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV. The bin corresponding to $N_{part}$ = 162 is for 0-60% centrality. Global uncertainty of 20.5% not shown.

Inclusive Y(1S) yield as a function of centrality in Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV. The bin corresponding to $N_{part}$ = 162 is for 0-60% centrality.

Inclusive Y(2S) yield as a function of centrality in Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV. The bin corresponding to $N_{part}$ = 162 is for 0-60% centrality.

Y(2S)/Y(1S) ratio as a function of centrality in Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV. The bin corresponding to $N_{part}$ = 162 is for 0-60% centrality.

$\Delta N_p$ multiplicity distributions in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=27$ GeV for 0-5 percent, 30-40 percent and 70-80 percent collision centralities at midrapidity.

$\Delta N_p$ multiplicity distributions in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=39$ GeV for 0-5 percent, 30-40 percent and 70-80 percent collision centralities at midrapidity.

$\Delta N_p$ multiplicity distributions in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=62.4$ GeV for 0-5 percent, 30-40 percent and 70-80 percent collision centralities at midrapidity.

$\Delta N_p$ multiplicity distributions in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=200$ GeV for 0-5 percent, 30-40 percent and 70-80 percent collision centralities at midrapidity.

Reference multiplicity distributions obtained from Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV data (black markers), Glauber model (red histogram), and unfolding approach to separate single and pileup contributions. Vertical lines represent statistical uncertainties. Single, pileup, and single+pileup collisions are shown in solid blue markers, dashed green, and dashed pink lines, respectively. The 0–5% central events and 5–60% mid-central to peripheral events are indicated by black arrows. The ratio of the single+pileup to the measured multiplicity distribution is shown in the lower panel.

Reference multiplicity distributions obtained from Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV data (black markers), Glauber model (red histogram), and unfolding approach to separate single and pileup contributions. Vertical lines represent statistical uncertainties. Single, pileup, and single+pileup collisions are shown in solid blue markers, dashed green, and dashed pink lines, respectively. The 0–5% central events and 5–60% mid-central to peripheral events are indicated by black arrows. The ratio of the single+pileup to the measured multiplicity distribution is shown in the lower panel.

Proton cumulants as a function of reference multiplicity (black circles) from $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV Au+Au collisions. Centrality-binned results with and without centrality bin width corrections are represented by red circles and blue squares, respectively. Vertical dashed lines indicate the centrality classes, from right to left: 0–5%, 5–10%, 10–20%. Data points in this figure are only corrected for detector efficiency but not for the pileup effect, which will be discussed in a later section.

Proton cumulants as a function of reference multiplicity (black circles) from $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV Au+Au collisions. Centrality-binned results with and without centrality bin width corrections are represented by red circles and blue squares, respectively. Vertical dashed lines indicate the centrality classes, from right to left: 0–5%, 5–10%, 10–20%. Data points in this figure are only corrected for detector efficiency but not for the pileup effect, which will be discussed in a later section.

Proton cumulants as a function of reference multiplicity (black circles) from $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV Au+Au collisions. Centrality-binned results with and without centrality bin width corrections are represented by red circles and blue squares, respectively. Vertical dashed lines indicate the centrality classes, from right to left: 0–5%, 5–10%, 10–20%. Data points in this figure are only corrected for detector efficiency but not for the pileup effect, which will be discussed in a later section.

Proton cumulants as a function of reference multiplicity from $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV Au+Au collisions. Pileup corrected and uncorrected cumulants as a function of reference multiplicity are represented by black circles and blue open squares, respectively. Red circles and blue-filled squares represent the results of centrality binned data.

Proton cumulants as a function of reference multiplicity from $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV Au+Au collisions. Pileup corrected and uncorrected cumulants as a function of reference multiplicity are represented by black circles and blue open squares, respectively. Red circles and blue-filled squares represent the results of centrality binned data.

Ratios of proton cumulants as a function of reference multiplicity from $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV Au+Au collisions. Pileup corrected and uncorrected cumulants are represented by black circles and blue open squares, respectively. Red circles and blue-filled squares represent the results of centrality binned data.

Ratios of proton cumulants as a function of reference multiplicity from $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV Au+Au collisions. Pileup corrected and uncorrected cumulants are represented by black circles and blue open squares, respectively. Red circles and blue-filled squares represent the results of centrality binned data.

UrQMD results of the proton cumulant ratios up to sixth order in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$= 3 GeV. The black circles are without VF correction while blue squares and red triangles are results with VFC which used $N_{\rm part}$ distributions from UrQMD and Glauber models, respectively. The blue crosses are calculations using UrQMD events with b $\leq$ 3 fm. The above results are applied CBWC except for the one (blue crosses) using b $\leq$3 fm events.

UrQMD results of the proton cumulant ratios up to sixth order in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$= 3 GeV. The black circles are without VF correction while blue squares and red triangles are results with VFC which used $N_{\rm part}$ distributions from UrQMD and Glauber models, respectively. The blue crosses are calculations using UrQMD events with b $\leq$ 3 fm. The above results are applied CBWC except for the one (blue crosses) using b $\leq$3 fm events.

Proton cumulants up to sixth order in $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV Au+Au collisions. Data without volume fluctuation correction is shown as grey open squares while data with volume fluctuation correction using $N_{\rm part}$ distributions from Glauber and UrQMD models are shown as black circles and black open triangles, respectively. The corresponding centrality binned cumulants are shown in blue squares, red circles, and orange triangles, respectively. Similarly to Fig. 6, the vertical dashed lines indicate the centrality classes.

Proton cumulants up to sixth order in $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV Au+Au collisions. Data without volume fluctuation correction is shown as grey open squares while data with volume fluctuation correction using $N_{\rm part}$ distributions from Glauber and UrQMD models are shown as black circles and black open triangles, respectively. The corresponding centrality binned cumulants are shown in blue squares, red circles, and orange triangles, respectively. Similarly to Fig. 6, the vertical dashed lines indicate the centrality classes.

Proton cumulant ratios up to sixth order in $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV Au+Au collisions. Data without volume fluctuation correction are shown as grey open squares while data with volume fluctuation correction using $N_{\rm part}$ distributions from Glauber and UrQMD models are shown as black circles and black open triangles, respectively. The corresponding centrality binned cumulants are shown in blue squares, red circles, and orange triangles, respectively. Similarly to Fig. 6, the vertical dashed lines indicate the centrality classes.

Proton cumulant ratios up to sixth order in $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV Au+Au collisions. Data without volume fluctuation correction are shown as grey open squares while data with volume fluctuation correction using $N_{\rm part}$ distributions from Glauber and UrQMD models are shown as black circles and black open triangles, respectively. The corresponding centrality binned cumulants are shown in blue squares, red circles, and orange triangles, respectively. Similarly to Fig. 6, the vertical dashed lines indicate the centrality classes.

UrQMD results of proton cumulant ratios up to sixth order in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV. The vertical dashed lines indicate the centrality classes.

Experimental results on centrality dependence of cumulants (left panels) and cumulant ratios (right panels) up to sixth order of the proton multiplicity distributions in Au+Au collisions at $N_{\rm part}$ = 3 GeV. The open squares are data without VF correction while red circles and blue triangles are results with VF correction with $N_{\rm part}$ distributions from Glauber and UrQMD models, respectively.

Experimental results on centrality dependence of cumulants (left panels) and cumulant ratios (right panels) up to sixth order of the proton multiplicity distributions in Au+Au collisions at $N_{\rm part}$ = 3 GeV. The open squares are data without VF correction while red circles and blue triangles are results with VF correction with $N_{\rm part}$ distributions from Glauber and UrQMD models, respectively.

Same as Fig. 14 but for correlation function (left panels) and their normalized ratios (right panels).

Same as Fig. 14 but for correlation function (left panels) and their normalized ratios (right panels).

Cumulants and cumulant ratios of proton multiplicity distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV. The transverse momentum window is $p_{\rm T}$ from $0.4<p_{\rm T}<2.0$ GeV/$c$ and the rapidity window is $−0.5<y<0$. Statistical and systematic uncertainties are represented by black and gray bars, respectively. UrQMD predictions are depicted by gold bands.

Cumulants and cumulant ratios of proton multiplicity distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV. The transverse momentum window is $p_{\rm T}$ from $0.4<p_{\rm T}<2.0$ GeV/$c$ and the rapidity window is $−0.5<y<0$. Statistical and systematic uncertainties are represented by black and gray bars, respectively. UrQMD predictions are depicted by gold bands.

Same as Fig. 16 but for correlation functions and correlation function ratios of proton multiplicity distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV.

Same as Fig. 16 but for correlation functions and correlation function ratios of proton multiplicity distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV.

The transverse-momentum and rapidity dependence of cumulant ratios of proton multiplicity distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV. In the left column, the $p_{\rm T}$ analysis window is $0.4<p_{\rm T}<2.0$ GeV/$c$ while the rapidity window is varied in the range $y_{\rm min}<y<0$. In the right column, the rapidit$y$ analysis window is $−0.5<y<0$ while the $p_{\rm T}$ is varied in the range $0.4<p_{\rm T}<p_{\rm T}^{\rm max}$ GeV/$c$. The most central (0–5%) and peripheral (50–60%) events are depicted by black squares and blue triangles, respectively. Statistical and systematic uncertainties are represented by black and gray bars, respectively. UrQMD simulations for the top 0–5% and 50–60% are shown by gold and blue bands, respectively.

The transverse-momentum and rapidity dependence of cumulant ratios of proton multiplicity distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV. In the left column, the $p_{\rm T}$ analysis window is $0.4<p_{\rm T}<2.0$ GeV/$c$ while the rapidity window is varied in the range $y_{\rm min}<y<0$. In the right column, the rapidit$y$ analysis window is $−0.5<y<0$ while the $p_{\rm T}$ is varied in the range $0.4<p_{\rm T}<p_{\rm T}^{\rm max}$ GeV/$c$. The most central (0–5%) and peripheral (50–60%) events are depicted by black squares and blue triangles, respectively. Statistical and systematic uncertainties are represented by black and gray bars, respectively. UrQMD simulations for the top 0–5% and 50–60% are shown by gold and blue bands, respectively.

The transverse-momentum and rapidity dependence of cumulant ratios of proton multiplicity distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV. In the left column, the $p_{\rm T}$ analysis window is $0.4<p_{\rm T}<2.0$ GeV/$c$ while the rapidity window is varied in the range $y_{\rm min}<y<0$. In the right column, the rapidit$y$ analysis window is $−0.5<y<0$ while the $p_{\rm T}$ is varied in the range $0.4<p_{\rm T}<p_{\rm T}^{\rm max}$ GeV/$c$. The most central (0–5%) and peripheral (50–60%) events are depicted by black squares and blue triangles, respectively. Statistical and systematic uncertainties are represented by black and gray bars, respectively. UrQMD simulations for the top 0–5% and 50–60% are shown by gold and blue bands, respectively.

The transverse-momentum and rapidity dependence of cumulant ratios of proton multiplicity distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV. In the left column, the $p_{\rm T}$ analysis window is $0.4<p_{\rm T}<2.0$ GeV/$c$ while the rapidity window is varied in the range $y_{\rm min}<y<0$. In the right column, the rapidit$y$ analysis window is $−0.5<y<0$ while the $p_{\rm T}$ is varied in the range $0.4<p_{\rm T}<p_{\rm T}^{\rm max}$ GeV/$c$. The most central (0–5%) and peripheral (50–60%) events are depicted by black squares and blue triangles, respectively. Statistical and systematic uncertainties are represented by black and gray bars, respectively. UrQMD simulations for the top 0–5% and 50–60% are shown by gold and blue bands, respectively.

As in Fig. 18 but for transverse-momentum and rapidity dependence of correlation function ratios of proton multiplicity distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV.

As in Fig. 18 but for transverse-momentum and rapidity dependence of correlation function ratios of proton multiplicity distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV.

As in Fig. 18 but for transverse-momentum and rapidity dependence of correlation function ratios of proton multiplicity distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV.

As in Fig. 18 but for transverse-momentum and rapidity dependence of correlation function ratios of proton multiplicity distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV.

Collision energy dependence of the cumulant ratios: $C_2/C_1=\sigma/M$, $C_3/C_2=S\sigma$, and $C_4/C_2=\kappa\sigma^2$, for protons (open squares) and net protons (red circles) from top 0–5% (top panels) and 50–60% (bottom panels) Au+Au collisions at RHIC. The points for protons are shifted horizontally for clarity. The new result for protons from $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV Au+Au collisions is shown as a filled square. UrQMD results with $|y|<0.5$ for protons are shown as gold bands while those for net protons are shown as green dashed lines or green bands. At 3GeV, the model results for protons (−0.5) are shown as blue crosses. UrQMD results of proton and net-proton $C_4/C_2$, see right panels, are almost totally overlapped. The open cross is the result of the model with a fixed impact parameter $b < 3$ fm. The hydrodynamic calculations, for 5% central Au+Au collisions, for protons from $|y|<0.5$ are shown as dashed red linea and the result of the 3 GeV protons from $−0.5<y<0$ is shown as an open red star.

Collision energy dependence of the cumulant ratios: $C_2/C_1=\sigma/M$, $C_3/C_2=S\sigma$, and $C_4/C_2=\kappa\sigma^2$, for protons (open squares) and net protons (red circles) from top 0–5% (top panels) and 50–60% (bottom panels) Au+Au collisions at RHIC. The points for protons are shifted horizontally for clarity. The new result for protons from $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV Au+Au collisions is shown as a filled square. UrQMD results with $|y|<0.5$ for protons are shown as gold bands while those for net protons are shown as green dashed lines or green bands. At 3GeV, the model results for protons (−0.5) are shown as blue crosses. UrQMD results of proton and net-proton $C_4/C_2$, see right panels, are almost totally overlapped. The open cross is the result of the model with a fixed impact parameter $b < 3$ fm. The hydrodynamic calculations, for 5% central Au+Au collisions, for protons from $|y|<0.5$ are shown as dashed red linea and the result of the 3 GeV protons from $−0.5<y<0$ is shown as an open red star.

Collision energy dependence of the cumulant ratios: $C_2/C_1=\sigma/M$, $C_3/C_2=S\sigma$, and $C_4/C_2=\kappa\sigma^2$, for protons (open squares) and net protons (red circles) from top 0–5% (top panels) and 50–60% (bottom panels) Au+Au collisions at RHIC. The points for protons are shifted horizontally for clarity. The new result for protons from $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV Au+Au collisions is shown as a filled square. UrQMD results with $|y|<0.5$ for protons are shown as gold bands while those for net protons are shown as green dashed lines or green bands. At 3GeV, the model results for protons (−0.5) are shown as blue crosses. UrQMD results of proton and net-proton $C_4/C_2$, see right panels, are almost totally overlapped. The open cross is the result of the model with a fixed impact parameter $b < 3$ fm. The hydrodynamic calculations, for 5% central Au+Au collisions, for protons from $|y|<0.5$ are shown as dashed red linea and the result of the 3 GeV protons from $−0.5<y<0$ is shown as an open red star.

Collision energy dependence of the cumulant ratios: $C_2/C_1=\sigma/M$, $C_3/C_2=S\sigma$, and $C_4/C_2=\kappa\sigma^2$, for protons (open squares) and net protons (red circles) from top 0–5% (top panels) and 50–60% (bottom panels) Au+Au collisions at RHIC. The points for protons are shifted horizontally for clarity. The new result for protons from $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV Au+Au collisions is shown as a filled square. UrQMD results with $|y|<0.5$ for protons are shown as gold bands while those for net protons are shown as green dashed lines or green bands. At 3GeV, the model results for protons (−0.5) are shown as blue crosses. UrQMD results of proton and net-proton $C_4/C_2$, see right panels, are almost totally overlapped. The open cross is the result of the model with a fixed impact parameter $b < 3$ fm. The hydrodynamic calculations, for 5% central Au+Au collisions, for protons from $|y|<0.5$ are shown as dashed red linea and the result of the 3 GeV protons from $−0.5<y<0$ is shown as an open red star.

Collision energy dependence of the cumulant ratios: $C_2/C_1=\sigma/M$, $C_3/C_2=S\sigma$, and $C_4/C_2=\kappa\sigma^2$, for protons (open squares) and net protons (red circles) from top 0–5% (top panels) and 50–60% (bottom panels) Au+Au collisions at RHIC. The points for protons are shifted horizontally for clarity. The new result for protons from $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV Au+Au collisions is shown as a filled square. UrQMD results with $|y|<0.5$ for protons are shown as gold bands while those for net protons are shown as green dashed lines or green bands. At 3GeV, the model results for protons (−0.5) are shown as blue crosses. UrQMD results of proton and net-proton $C_4/C_2$, see right panels, are almost totally overlapped. The open cross is the result of the model with a fixed impact parameter $b < 3$ fm. The hydrodynamic calculations, for 5% central Au+Au collisions, for protons from $|y|<0.5$ are shown as dashed red linea and the result of the 3 GeV protons from $−0.5<y<0$ is shown as an open red star.

Collision energy dependence of the cumulant ratios: $C_2/C_1=\sigma/M$, $C_3/C_2=S\sigma$, and $C_4/C_2=\kappa\sigma^2$, for protons (open squares) and net protons (red circles) from top 0–5% (top panels) and 50–60% (bottom panels) Au+Au collisions at RHIC. The points for protons are shifted horizontally for clarity. The new result for protons from $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 3 GeV Au+Au collisions is shown as a filled square. UrQMD results with $|y|<0.5$ for protons are shown as gold bands while those for net protons are shown as green dashed lines or green bands. At 3GeV, the model results for protons (−0.5) are shown as blue crosses. UrQMD results of proton and net-proton $C_4/C_2$, see right panels, are almost totally overlapped. The open cross is the result of the model with a fixed impact parameter $b < 3$ fm. The hydrodynamic calculations, for 5% central Au+Au collisions, for protons from $|y|<0.5$ are shown as dashed red linea and the result of the 3 GeV protons from $−0.5<y<0$ is shown as an open red star.

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 0

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 1

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 2

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 3

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 4

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 5

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 0

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 1

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 2

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 3

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 4

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 5

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 0

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 1

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 2

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 3

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 4

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 5

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 0

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 1

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 2

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 3

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 4

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 5

dN/deta phis=045 deg, pt=0.151 GeV/c

dN/deta phis=045 deg, pt=0.153 GeV/c

dN/deta phis=090 deg, pt=0.51 GeV/c

dN/deta phis=090 deg, pt=12 GeV/c

dN/deta phis=4590 deg, pt=0.151 GeV/c

sigma vs phis pt=0.151 GeV/c

sigma vs phis pt=0.153 GeV/c

sigma vs phis pt=0.51 GeV/c

sigma vs phis pt=12 GeV/c

sigma vs pt phis=045 deg

sigma vs pt phis=090 deg

sigma vs pt phis=4590 deg

background uncertainty caps in the figure

flow uncertainty curves in the figure

leadage uncertainty arrows in the figure

total uncertainty boxes in the figure

background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0

background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1

background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2

background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3

background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4

background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5

background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 0

background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 1

background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 2

background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 3

background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 4

background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 5

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 0

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 1

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 2

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 3

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 4

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 5

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 0

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 1

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 2

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 3

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 4

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 5

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 0

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 1

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 2

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 3

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 4

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 5

d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c

d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c

0^{o} < phi_{s} < 45^{o}

45^{o} < phi_{s} < 90^{o}

Previous in-plane result published in 2004

Previous out-of-plane result published in 2004

3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, 0^{o} < phi_{s} < 45^{o}

3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, 45^{o} < phi_{s} < 90^{o}

3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<3 GeV/c, 0^{o} < phi_{s} < 45^{o}

3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<3 GeV/c, 45^{o} < phi_{s} < 90^{o}

4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, 0^{o} < phi_{s} < 45^{o}

4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, 45^{o} < phi_{s} < 90^{o}

4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<3 GeV/c, 0^{o} < phi_{s} < 45^{o}

4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<3 GeV/c, 45^{o} < phi_{s} < 90^{o}

3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c

4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c

3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c

3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 0^{o}15^{o}

3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 75^{o}90^{o}

Cone region, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c

one region, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c

one region, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c

one region, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c

i region, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c

Pi region, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c

i region, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c

i region, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c

d+Au, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c

20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, (a) 0^{o}<#phi_{s}<15^{o}

20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, (b) 75^{o}<#phi_{s}<90^{o}

20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, (a) 0^{o}<phi_{s}<15^{o}

20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, (b) 75^{o}<phi_{s}<90^{o}

20-60% Au+Au, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 0, jet

20-60% Au+Au, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 1, jet

20-60% Au+Au, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 2, jet

20-60% Au+Au, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 3, jet

20-60% Au+Au, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 4, jet

20-60% Au+Au, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 5, jet

1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, jet

0-60% Au+Au, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/, slice 0, ridge

20-60% Au+Au, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 1, ridge

20-60% Au+Au, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 2, ridge

20-60% Au+Au, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 3, ridge

20-60% Au+Au, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 4, ridge

20-60% Au+Au, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 5, ridge

1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, ridge

jet (Deltaphi|<1.0, |Deltaeta|<0.7) 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c

jet (Deltaphi|<1.0, |Deltaeta|<0.7) 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c

ridge (Deltaphi|<1.0, |Deltaeta|>0.7) 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c

ridge (Deltaphi|<1.0, |Deltaeta|>0.7) 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c

ridge (Deltaphi|<1.0, |Deltaeta|>0.7) 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c

ridge (Deltaphi|<1.0, |Deltaeta|>0.7) 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c

3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c Ridge (75^{o}<|phi_{s}|<90^{o}) / Ridge (0^{o}<|phi_{s}|<15^{o})

4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c Ridge (75^{o}<|phi_{s}|<90^{o}) / Ridge (0^{o}<|phi_{s}|<15^{o})

3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c Ridge (30^{o}<|phi_{s}|<45^{o}) / Ridge (0^{o}<|phi_{s}|<15^{o})

4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c Ridge (30^{o}<|phi_{s}|<45^{o}) / Ridge (0^{o}<|phi_{s}|<15^{o})

3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c Ridge (0^{o}<|phi_{s}|<15^{o}) / Jet (0^{o}<|phi_{s}|<15^{o})

4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c Ridge (0^{o}<|phi_{s}|<15^{o}) / Jet (0^{o}<|phi_{s}|<15^{o})

3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, cone region

4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, cone region

3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, jetlike

4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, jetlike

3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, pi region

4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, pi region

3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, ridge

4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, ridge

fig17_ampl_pt_inclusive

3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 0^{o}<phi_{s}<45^{o}, cone region

3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 0^{o}<phi_{s}<45^{o}, jetlike

3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 0^{o}<phi_{s}<45^{o}, pi region

3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 0^{o}<phi_{s}<45^{o}, pi region ridge

3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 0^{o}<phi_{s}<45^{o}, ridge

3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 45^{o}<phi_{s}<90^{o}, cone region

3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 45^{o}<phi_{s}<90^{o}, jetlike

3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 45^{o}<phi_{s}<90^{o}, pi region

3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 45^{o}<phi_{s}<90^{o}, pi region ridge

3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 45^{o}<phi_{s}<90^{o}, ridge

4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 0^{o}<phi_{s}<45^{o}, cone region

4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 0^{o}<phi_{s}<45^{o}, jetlike

4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 0^{o}<phi_{s}<45^{o}, pi region

4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 0^{o}<phi_{s}<45^{o}, pi region ridge

4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 0^{o}<phi_{s}<45^{o}, ridge

4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 45^{o}<phi_{s}<90^{o}, cone region

4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 45^{o}<phi_{s}<90^{o}, jetlike

4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 45^{o}<phi_{s}<90^{o}, pi region

4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 45^{o}<phi_{s}<90^{o}, pi region ridge

4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 45^{o}<phi_{s}<90^{o}, ridge

jetlike eta sigma

cone peak phi sigma

jetlike phi sigma

ridge phi sigma

jetlike eta sigma

cone peak phi sigma

jetlike phi sigma

ridge phi sigma

dAu jetlike eta sigma

dAu jetlike phi sigma

cone peak centroid

cone peak centroid

cone peak centroid

cone peak centroid

cone peak centroid

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 0

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 1

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 2

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 3

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 4

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 5

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 0

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 1

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 2

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 3

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 4

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 5

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 0

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 1

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 2

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 3

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 4

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 5

d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c

d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 0

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 1

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 2

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 3

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 4

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 5

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 0

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 1

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 2

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 3

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 4

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 5

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 0

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 1

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 2

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 3

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 4

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 5

d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c

d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c

v_{2} /3

v_{3}

v_{4}

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 0

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 1

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 2

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 3

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 4

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 5

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 0

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 1

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 2

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 3

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 4

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 5

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 0

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 1

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 2

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 3

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 4

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 5

d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c

d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty EP^{ } include |Deltaeta|<0.5 particles, slice 0

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty EP^{ } include |Deltaeta|<0.5 particles, slice 1

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty EP^{ } include |Deltaeta|<0.5 particles, slice 2

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty EP^{ } include |Deltaeta|<0.5 particles, slice 3

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty EP^{ } include |Deltaeta|<0.5 particles, slice 4

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty EP^{ } include |Deltaeta|<0.5 particles, slice 5

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Difference of the above results default results in Fig.21, slice 0

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Difference of the above results default results in Fig.21, slice 1

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Difference of the above results default results in Fig.21, slice 2

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Difference of the above results default results in Fig.21, slice 3

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Difference of the above results default results in Fig.21, slice 4

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Difference of the above results default results in Fig.21, slice 5

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty EP^{ } include |Deltaeta|<0.5 particles, slice 0

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty EP^{ } include |Deltaeta|<0.5 particles, slice 1

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty EP^{ } include |Deltaeta|<0.5 particles, slice 2

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty EP^{ } include |Deltaeta|<0.5 particles, slice 3

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty EP^{ } include |Deltaeta|<0.5 particles, slice 4

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty EP^{ } include |Deltaeta|<0.5 particles, slice 5

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Difference of the above results default results in Fig.21, slice 0

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Difference of the above results default results in Fig.21, slice 1

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Difference of the above results default results in Fig.21, slice 2

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Difference of the above results default results in Fig.21, slice 3

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Difference of the above results default results in Fig.21, slice 4

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Difference of the above results default results in Fig.21, slice 5

background subtracted correlation EP^{ } include |Deltaeta|<0.5 particles, slice 0

background subtracted correlation EP^{ } include |Deltaeta|<0.5 particles, slice 1

background subtracted correlation EP^{ } include |Deltaeta|<0.5 particles, slice 2

background subtracted correlation EP^{ } include |Deltaeta|<0.5 particles, slice 3

background subtracted correlation EP^{ } include |Deltaeta|<0.5 particles, slice 4

background subtracted correlation EP^{ } include |Deltaeta|<0.5 particles, slice 5

background subtracted correlation Difference of the above results default results in Fig.21, slice 0

background subtracted correlation Difference of the above results default results in Fig.21, slice 1

background subtracted correlation Difference of the above results default results in Fig.21, slice 2

background subtracted correlation Difference of the above results default results in Fig.21, slice 3

background subtracted correlation Difference of the above results default results in Fig.21, slice 4

background subtracted correlation Difference of the above results default results in Fig.21, slice 5

d+Au background subtracted correlation EP^{ } include |Deltaeta|<0.5 particles

difference from default results, slice 0

difference from default results, slice 1

difference from default results, slice 2

difference from default results, slice 3

difference from default results, slice 4

difference from default results, slice 5

raw signal

bkgd <v2t*v2>

bkgd <v2t>*<v2> (previous inclusive analysis)

bkgd <v2t*v2> subtracted

bkgd <v2t>*<v2> subtracted (previous inclusive analysis)

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5

d+Au raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c

d+Au raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c

d+Au raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c

d+Au raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c

d+Au raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0

background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3

background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1

background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1

background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4

d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7

background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0

d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5

d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1

The correlation differences $\Delta\langle A^{2}\rangle=\delta\langle A^{2}_{UD}\rangle-\delta\langle A^{2}_{ LR}\rangle$ and $\Delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle=\delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle_{ UD}-\delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle_{ LR}$ as a function of $p_{T}$. The data are from 20-40% central (upper) and 0-20% central (lower) Au+Au collisions.

The charge asymmetry correlations $\delta\langle A^{2}\rangle$ (left panels) and $\delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle$ (center panels), and correlation differences $\Delta\langle A^{2}\rangle=\delta\langle A^{2}_{ UD}\rangle-\delta\langle A^{2}_{ LR}\rangle$ and $\Delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle=\delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle_{ UD}-\delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle_{ LR}$ (right panels), as a function of the azimuthal elliptic anisotropy of high-$p_{T}$ ($p_{T}>2$~GeV/$c$) particles (upper panels) and low-$p_{T}$ ($p_{T}<2$~GeV/$c$) particles (lower panels). Data are from 20-40% Au+Au collisions. The particle $p_{T}$ range of $0.15<p_{T}<2$~GeV/$c$ is used for both EP construction and asymmetry calculation.

The charge asymmetry correlations $\delta\langle A^{2}\rangle$ (left panels) and $\delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle$ (center panels), and correlation differences $\Delta\langle A^{2}\rangle=\delta\langle A^{2}_{ UD}\rangle-\delta\langle A^{2}_{ LR}\rangle$ and $\Delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle=\delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle_{ UD}-\delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle_{ LR}$ (right panels), as a function of the azimuthal elliptic anisotropy of high-$p_{T}$ ($p_{T}>2$~GeV/$c$) particles (upper panels) and low-$p_{T}$ ($p_{T}<2$~GeV/$c$) particles (lower panels). Data are from 20-40% Au+Au collisions. The particle $p_{T}$ range of $0.15<p_{T}<2$~GeV/$c$ is used for both EP construction and asymmetry calculation.

The wedge size dependences of charge multiplicity asymmetry correlations (upper panel), and their differences between out-of-plane and in-plane, $\Delta\langle A^{2}\rangle$ and $\Delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle$ (lower panel) for 20-40% central Au+Au collisions.

The wedge size dependences of charge multiplicity asymmetry correlations (upper panel), and their differences between out-of-plane and in-plane, $\Delta\langle A^{2}\rangle$ and $\Delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle$ (lower panel) for 20-40% central Au+Au collisions.

Charge multiplicity asymmetry correlations as a function of the wedge location, $\phi_{ w}$, in 20-40% central Au+Au collisions. The wedge size is $30^{\circ}$. The curves are the characteristic $\cos(2\phi_{ w}$) to guide the eye.

The wedge size dependence of the difference between the same-sign and opposite-sign, $\Delta\langle A^{2}\rangle-\Delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle$.

The values of $\Delta\langle A^{2}\rangle-\Delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle$, scaled by $N_{part}$, as a function of the measured average elliptic anisotropy $<v^{obs}_{2}}>$ in Au+Au collisions. The centrality bin number is labeled by each data point, 0 for 70-80% up to 8 for 0-5%.

$\Delta=\Delta\langle A^{2}\rangle-\Delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle$ as a function of $v^{obs}_{2}$, the event-by-event elliptical anisotropy of particle distributions relative to the second-harmonic event plane reconstructed from TPC tracks (left panel) and the first harmonic event plane reconstructed from the ZDC-SMD neutron signals (middle panel), in 20-40% central Au+Au collisions. Right panel: Average $\Delta$ for events with $|v^{obs}_{2}|<0.04$ relative to the TPC event plane as a function of centrality.

$\Delta=\Delta\langle A^{2}\rangle-\Delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle$ as a function of $v^{obs}_{2}$, the event-by-event elliptical anisotropy of particle distributions relative to the second-harmonic event plane reconstructed from TPC tracks (left panel) and the first harmonic event plane reconstructed from the ZDC-SMD neutron signals (middle panel), in 20-40% central Au+Au collisions. Right panel: Average $\Delta$ for events with $|v^{obs}_{2}|<0.04$ relative to the TPC event plane as a function of centrality.

$\Delta=\Delta\langle A^{2}\rangle-\Delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle$ as a function of $v^{obs}_{2}$, the event-by-event elliptical anisotropy of particle distributions relative to the second-harmonic event plane reconstructed from TPC tracks (left panel) and the first harmonic event plane reconstructed from the ZDC-SMD neutron signals (middle panel), in 20-40% central Au+Au collisions. Right panel: Average $\Delta$ for events with $|v^{obs}_{2}|<0.04$ relative to the TPC event plane as a function of centrality.

Left panel: $\Delta\langle A^{2}\rangle$ and $\Delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle$ as a function of $v^{obs}_{2}$ with a random EP in 20-40% Au+Au collisions. The lines depict the results with reconstructed EP lower right panel for comparison. Middle panel: The differences in $\Delta\langle A^{2}\rangle$ and $\Delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle$ between the reconstructed EP and random EP results, respectively. Right panel: $\Delta=\Delta\langle A^{2}\rangle-\Delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle$ as a function of $v^{obs}_{2}$ with a random EP (open triangles).

Left panel: $\Delta\langle A^{2}\rangle$ and $\Delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle$ as a function of $v^{obs}_{2}$ with a random EP in 20-40% Au+Au collisions. The lines depict the results with reconstructed EP lower right panel for comparison. Middle panel: The differences in $\Delta\langle A^{2}\rangle$ and $\Delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle$ between the reconstructed EP and random EP results, respectively. Right panel: $\Delta=\Delta\langle A^{2}\rangle-\Delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle$ as a function of $v^{obs}_{2}$ with a random EP (open triangles).

Left panel: $\Delta\langle A^{2}\rangle$ and $\Delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle$ as a function of $v^{obs}_{2}$ with a random EP in 20-40% Au+Au collisions. The lines depict the results with reconstructed EP lower right panel for comparison. Middle panel: The differences in $\Delta\langle A^{2}\rangle$ and $\Delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle$ between the reconstructed EP and random EP results, respectively. Right panel: $\Delta=\Delta\langle A^{2}\rangle-\Delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle$ as a function of $v^{obs}_{2}$ with a random EP (open triangles).

The correlation differences, $\langle A^{2}_{ LR}\rangle-\langle A^{2}_{ UD}\rangle$ and $\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle_{ LR}-\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle_{ UD}$, scaled by the number of participants $(\pi/4)^2 N_{part}$. Also shown are $\langle \cos(\phi_{\alpha}+\phi_{\beta}-2\phi_{c})\rangle/v_{2,c} \approx \langle \cos(\phi_{\alpha}+\phi_{\beta}-2\psi_{ RP}) \rangle$ of same- and opposite-sign particle pairs ($\alpha$ and $\beta$) calculated from particles used for the charge asymmetry correlations with particle $c$ from those used for EP construction. The upper panel shows the default results where particles are divided according to $\eta$; the lower panel shows results with particles divided randomly into two halves and compared to published correlators.

The correlation differences, $\langle A^{2}_{ LR}\rangle-\langle A^{2}_{ UD}\rangle$ and $\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle_{ LR}-\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle_{ UD}$, scaled by the number of participants $(\pi/4)^2 N_{part}$. Also shown are $\langle \cos(\phi_{\alpha}+\phi_{\beta}-2\phi_{c})\rangle/v_{2,c} \approx \langle \cos(\phi_{\alpha}+\phi_{\beta}-2\psi_{ RP}) \rangle$ of same- and opposite-sign particle pairs ($\alpha$ and $\beta$) calculated from particles used for the charge asymmetry correlations with particle $c$ from those used for EP construction. The upper panel shows the default results where particles are divided according to $\eta$; the lower panel shows results with particles divided randomly into two halves and compared to published correlators.

Upper panel: Positively charged particle multiplicity distributions versus the azimuthal angle, $\phi$, in 30-40% central Au+Au collisions. The data are shown separately for $\eta>0$ and $\eta<0$. The magnetic polarities of the STAR magnet have been summed and the $p_{T}$ is integrated over the range $0.15<p_{T}<2$~GeV/$c$. The inverse of these distributions, properly normalized, were used to correct for the track efficiency versus $\phi$. Lower panel: Reconstructed event-plane azimuthal angle distributions in 30-40% central Au+Au collisions. Particles within $0.15 < p_{T} < 2$~GeV/$c$ from $\eta<0$ and $\eta>0$ were used separately to reconstruct the EP.

Upper panel: Positively charged particle multiplicity distributions versus the azimuthal angle, $\phi$, in 30-40% central Au+Au collisions. The data are shown separately for $\eta>0$ and $\eta<0$. The magnetic polarities of the STAR magnet have been summed and the $p_{T}$ is integrated over the range $0.15<p_{T}<2$~GeV/$c$. The inverse of these distributions, properly normalized, were used to correct for the track efficiency versus $\phi$. Lower panel: Reconstructed event-plane azimuthal angle distributions in 30-40% central Au+Au collisions. Particles within $0.15 < p_{T} < 2$~GeV/$c$ from $\eta<0$ and $\eta>0$ were used separately to reconstruct the EP.

The relative charge asymmetry correlations, $\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle_{ UD}/\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle_{ LR}$, as a function of the number of participants, $N_{part}$, for four combinations of $\eta$ ranges used for EP reconstruction and asymmetry calculation.

The asymmetry correlations, $\langle A^{2}_{+,{ UD}}\rangle$ (left panel), $\langle A^{2}_{-,{ UD}}\rangle$ (middle panel), and $\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle_{ UD}$ (right panel), multiplied by the number of participants $N_{part}$, before and after the corrections for the $\phi$-dependent acceptance $\times$ efficiency. The colored curves are the corresponding statistical fluctuations and detector effects. The results are separated for $\eta>0$ and $\eta<0$. Only $\eta>0$ is shown for $\langle A^{2}_{+,{ UD}}\rangle$ and $\eta<0$ for $\langle A^{2}_{-,{ UD}}\rangle$ for clarity.

The asymmetry correlations, $\langle A^{2}_{+,{ UD}}\rangle$ (left panel), $\langle A^{2}_{-,{ UD}}\rangle$ (middle panel), and $\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle_{ UD}$ (right panel), multiplied by the number of participants $N_{part}$, before and after the corrections for the $\phi$-dependent acceptance $\times$ efficiency. The colored curves are the corresponding statistical fluctuations and detector effects. The results are separated for $\eta>0$ and $\eta<0$. Only $\eta>0$ is shown for $\langle A^{2}_{+,{ UD}}\rangle$ and $\eta<0$ for $\langle A^{2}_{-,{ UD}}\rangle$ for clarity.

The asymmetry correlations, $\langle A^{2}_{+,{ UD}}\rangle$ (left panel), $\langle A^{2}_{-,{ UD}}\rangle$ (middle panel), and $\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle_{ UD}$ (right panel), multiplied by the number of participants $N_{part}$, before and after the corrections for the $\phi$-dependent acceptance $\times$ efficiency. The colored curves are the corresponding statistical fluctuations and detector effects. The results are separated for $\eta>0$ and $\eta<0$. Only $\eta>0$ is shown for $\langle A^{2}_{+,{ UD}}\rangle$ and $\eta<0$ for $\langle A^{2}_{-,{ UD}}\rangle$ for clarity.

Left panel: Statistical fluctuation and detector effects in the charge asymmetry variance (multiplied by the number of participants $N_{part}$) from the $\eta<0$ region. The dotted curve shows the $1/N$ approximation, the dashed curve shows the statistical fluctuations $\langle A^{2}_{-,{ LR,stat}}\rangle$ obtained by the (50-50) method (see the text). The solid curve connecting the solid points shows the net effect of the statistical fluctuations and detector non-uniformities, $\langle A^{2}_{-,{ LR,stat+det}}\rangle$, obtained by the adding-$\pi$ method, and the crosses shows the same but obtained from the ``scramble'' method. See the text for details. Middle panel: The statistical fluctuation effects relative to the $1/N$ approximation (thin curves) and the effects due to the imperfect detector (thick curves). The dashed curves are for the region $\eta>0$ and the solid curves are for $\eta<0$. Right panel: The ratios of the statistical fluctuation and detector effects $\langle A^{2}_{+,{ LR,stat+det}}\rangle/\langle A^{2}_{-,{ LR,stat+det}}\rangle$ and $\langle A^{2}_{+,{ UD,stat+det}}\rangle/\langle A^{2}_{+,{ LR,stat+det}}\rangle$, separately for the $\eta>0$ and $\eta<0$ regions. The $\phi$-acceptance correction was applied for the results in this figure.

Left panel: Statistical fluctuation and detector effects in the charge asymmetry variance (multiplied by the number of participants $N_{part}$) from the $\eta<0$ region. The dotted curve shows the $1/N$ approximation, the dashed curve shows the statistical fluctuations $\langle A^{2}_{-,{ LR,stat}}\rangle$ obtained by the (50-50) method (see the text). The solid curve connecting the solid points shows the net effect of the statistical fluctuations and detector non-uniformities, $\langle A^{2}_{-,{ LR,stat+det}}\rangle$, obtained by the adding-$\pi$ method, and the crosses shows the same but obtained from the ``scramble'' method. See the text for details. Middle panel: The statistical fluctuation effects relative to the $1/N$ approximation (thin curves) and the effects due to the imperfect detector (thick curves). The dashed curves are for the region $\eta>0$ and the solid curves are for $\eta<0$. Right panel: The ratios of the statistical fluctuation and detector effects $\langle A^{2}_{+,{ LR,stat+det}}\rangle/\langle A^{2}_{-,{ LR,stat+det}}\rangle$ and $\langle A^{2}_{+,{ UD,stat+det}}\rangle/\langle A^{2}_{+,{ LR,stat+det}}\rangle$, separately for the $\eta>0$ and $\eta<0$ regions. The $\phi$-acceptance correction was applied for the results in this figure.

Left panel: Statistical fluctuation and detector effects in the charge asymmetry variance (multiplied by the number of participants $N_{part}$) from the $\eta<0$ region. The dotted curve shows the $1/N$ approximation, the dashed curve shows the statistical fluctuations $\langle A^{2}_{-,{ LR,stat}}\rangle$ obtained by the (50-50) method (see the text). The solid curve connecting the solid points shows the net effect of the statistical fluctuations and detector non-uniformities, $\langle A^{2}_{-,{ LR,stat+det}}\rangle$, obtained by the adding-$\pi$ method, and the crosses shows the same but obtained from the ``scramble'' method. See the text for details. Middle panel: The statistical fluctuation effects relative to the $1/N$ approximation (thin curves) and the effects due to the imperfect detector (thick curves). The dashed curves are for the region $\eta>0$ and the solid curves are for $\eta<0$. Right panel: The ratios of the statistical fluctuation and detector effects $\langle A^{2}_{+,{ LR,stat+det}}\rangle/\langle A^{2}_{-,{ LR,stat+det}}\rangle$ and $\langle A^{2}_{+,{ UD,stat+det}}\rangle/\langle A^{2}_{+,{ LR,stat+det}}\rangle$, separately for the $\eta>0$ and $\eta<0$ regions. The $\phi$-acceptance correction was applied for the results in this figure.

The asymmetry correlations, $\langle A^{2}_{+,{ UD}}\rangle$ (left panel), $\langle A^{2}_{-,{ UD}}\rangle$ (middle panel), and $\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle_{ UD}$ (right panel), multiplied by the number of participants $N_{part}$, separately for $\eta>0$ and $\eta<0$. The star and triangle depict the results from $d$+Au collisions. The net effects of the statistical fluctuations and detector non-uniformities are shown as the curves.

The asymmetry correlations, $\langle A^{2}_{+,{ UD}}\rangle$ (left panel), $\langle A^{2}_{-,{ UD}}\rangle$ (middle panel), and $\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle_{ UD}$ (right panel), multiplied by the number of participants $N_{part}$, separately for $\eta>0$ and $\eta<0$. The star and triangle depict the results from $d$+Au collisions. The net effects of the statistical fluctuations and detector non-uniformities are shown as the curves.

The asymmetry correlations, $\langle A^{2}_{+,{ UD}}\rangle$ (left panel), $\langle A^{2}_{-,{ UD}}\rangle$ (middle panel), and $\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle_{ UD}$ (right panel), multiplied by the number of participants $N_{part}$, separately for $\eta>0$ and $\eta<0$. The star and triangle depict the results from $d$+Au collisions. The net effects of the statistical fluctuations and detector non-uniformities are shown as the curves.

The statistical and detector effect subtracted asymmetry correlations, $\delta\langle A^{2}_{+,0^{\circ}\pm\Delta\phi_{w}}\rangle$ (left panel), $\delta\langle A^{2}_{-,0^{\circ}\pm\Delta\phi_{w}}\rangle$ (middle panel), and $\delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle_{ LR}$ (right panel), multiplied by the number of participants $N_{part}$, before and after the corrections for the $\phi$-dependent acceptance $\times$ efficiency.

The statistical and detector effect subtracted asymmetry correlations, $\delta\langle A^{2}_{+,0^{\circ}\pm\Delta\phi_{w}}\rangle$ (left panel), $\delta\langle A^{2}_{-,0^{\circ}\pm\Delta\phi_{w}}\rangle$ (middle panel), and $\delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle_{ LR}$ (right panel), multiplied by the number of participants $N_{part}$, before and after the corrections for the $\phi$-dependent acceptance $\times$ efficiency.

The statistical and detector effect subtracted asymmetry correlations, $\delta\langle A^{2}_{+,0^{\circ}\pm\Delta\phi_{w}}\rangle$ (left panel), $\delta\langle A^{2}_{-,0^{\circ}\pm\Delta\phi_{w}}\rangle$ (middle panel), and $\delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle_{ LR}$ (right panel), multiplied by the number of participants $N_{part}$, before and after the corrections for the $\phi$-dependent acceptance $\times$ efficiency.

Dynamical charge asymmetry variance after removing the statistical and detector effects, $\delta\langle A^{2}_{\pm,{ LR}}\rangle=\langle A^{2}_{\pm,{ LR}}\rangle-\langle A^{2}_{\pm,{ LR,stat+det}}\rangle$, scaled by the number of participants $N_{part}$. The results are consistent between positive and negative $\eta$ regions and between positive and negative charges.

The second-harmonic event-plane resolution of sub-events ($\eta<0$ and $\eta>0$) as a function of the number of participants.

Charge multiplicity asymmetry correlations, $\delta\langle A^{2}\rangle$ (left panel) and $\delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle$ (middle panel), and their differences between UD\ and LR\ (right panel) as a function of the event-plane resolution $\epsilon_{ EP}(f)=\sqrt{\mean{\cos2(\psi_{{ EP},\eta>0}(f)-\psi_{{ EP},\eta<0}(f))}}$ in 20-30% central Au+Au collisions. The solid lines are free linear fits to the data, while the dashed lines are linear fits with the intercept fixed to zero at $\epsilon_{ EP}(f)=0$.

Charge multiplicity asymmetry correlations, $\delta\langle A^{2}\rangle$ (left panel) and $\delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle$ (middle panel), and their differences between UD\ and LR\ (right panel) as a function of the event-plane resolution $\epsilon_{ EP}(f)=\sqrt{\mean{\cos2(\psi_{{ EP},\eta>0}(f)-\psi_{{ EP},\eta<0}(f))}}$ in 20-30% central Au+Au collisions. The solid lines are free linear fits to the data, while the dashed lines are linear fits with the intercept fixed to zero at $\epsilon_{ EP}(f)=0$.

TCharge multiplicity asymmetry correlations, $\delta\langle A^{2}\rangle$ (left panel) and $\delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle$ (middle panel), and their differences between UD\ and LR\ (right panel) as a function of the event-plane resolution $\epsilon_{ EP}(f)=\sqrt{\mean{\cos2(\psi_{{ EP},\eta>0}(f)-\psi_{{ EP},\eta<0}(f))}}$ in 20-30% central Au+Au collisions. The solid lines are free linear fits to the data, while the dashed lines are linear fits with the intercept fixed to zero at $\epsilon_{ EP}(f)=0$.

The TPC second-harmonic (upper left) and ZDC-SMD first harmonic (upper right) event-plane resolution as a function of $v^{obs}_{2}$ in 20-40% central Au+Au collisions. The TPC second-harmonic (lower left) and ZDC-SMD first harmonic (lower right) event-plane resolution for events with $|v^{obs}_{2}|<0.04$ as a function of centrality.

The TPC second-harmonic (upper left) and ZDC-SMD first harmonic (upper right) event-plane resolution as a function of $v^{obs}_{2}$ in 20-40% central Au+Au collisions. The TPC second-harmonic (lower left) and ZDC-SMD first harmonic (lower right) event-plane resolution for events with $|v^{obs}_{2}|<0.04$ as a function of centrality.

The TPC second-harmonic (upper left) and ZDC-SMD first harmonic (upper right) event-plane resolution as a function of $v^{obs}_{2}$ in 20-40% central Au+Au collisions. The TPC second-harmonic (lower left) and ZDC-SMD first harmonic (lower right) event-plane resolution for events with $|v^{obs}_{2}|<0.04$ as a function of centrality.

The TPC second-harmonic (upper left) and ZDC-SMD first harmonic (upper right) event-plane resolution as a function of $v^{obs}_{2}$ in 20-40% central Au+Au collisions. The TPC second-harmonic (lower left) and ZDC-SMD first harmonic (lower right) event-plane resolution for events with $|v^{obs}_{2}|<0.04$ as a function of centrality.

$m_{\rm inv}$ dependences of $\Delta\gamma$ in 20-50$\%$ Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV.

The $\pi$ pair $\Delta\gamma$ at $m_{\rm inv} > m_{\rm inv}^{\rm low}$ for the data identified by TPC and more extended $p_T$ range identified by TPC and TOF.

The elliptic flow $v_2$ in bins of $q_2$ for the three centrality bins in the 20-50$\%$ range of Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV.

$m_{\rm inv}$ dependences of the $\Delta\gamma$ from ESE-selected event samples A (50$\%$ largest $q_{2}$) and B (50$\%$ smallest $q_{2}$) in 20-50$\%$ Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV.

$m_{\rm inv}$ dependences of the $\rm \Delta\gamma_{A} - \Delta\gamma_{B}$ in 20-50$\%$ Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV.

$\Delta\gamma_{\rm A}$ versus $\Delta\gamma_{\rm B}$ in 20-50$\%$ Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV. (The data are arranged as function of mass)

raw correlation, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 3.

raw correlation, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 4.

raw correlation, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 5.

flow background with default flow, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 0.

flow background with default flow, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 1.

flow background with default flow, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 2.

flow background with default flow, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 3.

flow background with default flow, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 4.

flow background with default flow, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 5.

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 0.

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 1.

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 2.

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 3.

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 4.

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 5.

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 0.

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 1.

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 2.

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 3.

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 4.

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 5.

background-subtracted correlation, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 0.

background-subtracted correlation, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 1.

background-subtracted correlation, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 2.

background-subtracted correlation, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 3.

background-subtracted correlation, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 4.

background-subtracted correlation, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 5.

background-subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 0.

background-subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 1.

background-subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 2.

background-subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 3.

background-subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 4.

background-subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 5.

background-subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 0.

background-subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 1.

background-subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 2.

background-subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 3.

background-subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 4.

background-subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 5.

background normalization systematic uncertainty band, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 0.

background normalization systematic uncertainty band, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 1.

background normalization systematic uncertainty band, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 2.

background normalization systematic uncertainty band, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 3.

background normalization systematic uncertainty band, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 4.

background normalization systematic uncertainty band, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1, slice 5.

d+Au background-subtracted correlation, Au+Au 200 GeV, 20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, |#eta|<1.

Parameters of Gaussian fit to the background subtracted dihadron correlations as a function of phi_s.

Parameters of Gaussian fit to the background subtracted dihadron correlations as a function of phi_s.

Parameters of Gaussian fit to the background subtracted dihadron correlations as a function of phi_s.

Parameters of Gaussian fit to the background subtracted dihadron correlations as a function of phi_s.

Parameters of Gaussian fit to the background subtracted dihadron correlations as a function of phi_s.

Parameters of Gaussian fit to the background subtracted dihadron correlations as a function of phi_s.

Parameters of Gaussian fit to the background subtracted dihadron correlations as a function of phi_s.

Parameters of Gaussian fit to the background subtracted dihadron correlations as a function of phi_s.

Parameters of Gaussian fit to the background subtracted dihadron correlations as a function of phi_s.

Event by event net-proton multiplicity, $\Delta N_{p}$, distributions for Au+Au collisions at √sNN = 27, 54.4, and 200 GeV in 0-10% and 30-40% centralities at midrapidity (|y| < 0.5) for the transverse momentum range of 0.4 < $p_{T}$ (GeV/c) < 2.0. These distributions are normalized by the corresponding numbers of events and are not corrected for detector efficiencies. Statistical uncertainties are shown as vertical lines. The dashed lines show the Skellam distributions for each collision energy and centrality. The bottom panel shows the ratio of the data to the Skellam expectations.

Event by event net-proton multiplicity, $\Delta N_{p}$, distributions for Au+Au collisions at √sNN = 27, 54.4, and 200 GeV in 0-10% and 30-40% centralities at midrapidity (|y| < 0.5) for the transverse momentum range of 0.4 < $p_{T}$ (GeV/c) < 2.0. These distributions are normalized by the corresponding numbers of events and are not corrected for detector efficiencies. Statistical uncertainties are shown as vertical lines. The dashed lines show the Skellam distributions for each collision energy and centrality. The bottom panel shows the ratio of the data to the Skellam expectations.

Event by event net-proton multiplicity, $\Delta N_{p}$, distributions for Au+Au collisions at √sNN = 27, 54.4, and 200 GeV in 0-10% and 30-40% centralities at midrapidity (|y| < 0.5) for the transverse momentum range of 0.4 < $p_{T}$ (GeV/c) < 2.0. These distributions are normalized by the corresponding numbers of events and are not corrected for detector efficiencies. Statistical uncertainties are shown as vertical lines. The dashed lines show the Skellam distributions for each collision energy and centrality. The bottom panel shows the ratio of the data to the Skellam expectations.

Net-proton $C_{6}/C_{2}$ as a function of rapidity (left) and transverse momentum acceptance (right) from $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 27 GeV (crosses), 54.4 (open squares), and 200 GeV (filled circles) Au+Au collisions. The upper and lower plots are for 0-10% and 30-40% centralities, respectively. The error bars are statistical and caps are systematic errors. Points for different beam energies are staggered horizontally to improve clarity. UrQMD transport model results are shown as shaded and hatched bands. The Skellam expectation ($C_{6}/C_{2} = 1) is shown as long-dashed lines.

Net-proton $C_{6}/C_{2}$ as a function of rapidity (left) and transverse momentum acceptance (right) from $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 27 GeV (crosses), 54.4 (open squares), and 200 GeV (filled circles) Au+Au collisions. The upper and lower plots are for 0-10% and 30-40% centralities, respectively. The error bars are statistical and caps are systematic errors. Points for different beam energies are staggered horizontally to improve clarity. UrQMD transport model results are shown as shaded and hatched bands. The Skellam expectation ($C_{6}/C_{2} = 1) is shown as long-dashed lines.

Net-proton $C_{6}/C_{2}$ as a function of rapidity (left) and transverse momentum acceptance (right) from $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 27 GeV (crosses), 54.4 (open squares), and 200 GeV (filled circles) Au+Au collisions. The upper and lower plots are for 0-10% and 30-40% centralities, respectively. The error bars are statistical and caps are systematic errors. Points for different beam energies are staggered horizontally to improve clarity. UrQMD transport model results are shown as shaded and hatched bands. The Skellam expectation ($C_{6}/C_{2} = 1) is shown as long-dashed lines.

Net-proton $C_{6}/C_{2}$ as a function of rapidity (left) and transverse momentum acceptance (right) from $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 27 GeV (crosses), 54.4 (open squares), and 200 GeV (filled circles) Au+Au collisions. The upper and lower plots are for 0-10% and 30-40% centralities, respectively. The error bars are statistical and caps are systematic errors. Points for different beam energies are staggered horizontally to improve clarity. UrQMD transport model results are shown as shaded and hatched bands. The Skellam expectation ($C_{6}/C_{2} = 1) is shown as long-dashed lines.

Net-proton $C_{6}/C_{2}$ as a function of rapidity (left) and transverse momentum acceptance (right) from $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 27 GeV (crosses), 54.4 (open squares), and 200 GeV (filled circles) Au+Au collisions. The upper and lower plots are for 0-10% and 30-40% centralities, respectively. The error bars are statistical and caps are systematic errors. Points for different beam energies are staggered horizontally to improve clarity. UrQMD transport model results are shown as shaded and hatched bands. The Skellam expectation ($C_{6}/C_{2} = 1) is shown as long-dashed lines.

Net-proton $C_{6}/C_{2}$ as a function of rapidity (left) and transverse momentum acceptance (right) from $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 27 GeV (crosses), 54.4 (open squares), and 200 GeV (filled circles) Au+Au collisions. The upper and lower plots are for 0-10% and 30-40% centralities, respectively. The error bars are statistical and caps are systematic errors. Points for different beam energies are staggered horizontally to improve clarity. UrQMD transport model results are shown as shaded and hatched bands. The Skellam expectation ($C_{6}/C_{2} = 1) is shown as long-dashed lines.

Collisions centrality dependence of net-proton $C_{6}/C_{2}$ in Au+Au collisions for |$y$| < 0.5 and 0.4 < $p_{T}$ (GeV/c) < 2.0. The error bars are statistical and caps are systematic errors. Points for different beam energies are staggered horizontally to improve clarity. A shaded band shows the results from UrQMD model calculations. UrQMD calculations from the above three collision energies are consistent among them so they are merged in order to reduce statistical fluctuations. Details on these calculations can be found in the Supplemental Material at [URL will be inserted by publisher]. The lattice QCD calculations [16, 17] for T = 160 MeV and $\mu_{B}$ < 110 MeV. are shown as a blue band at $\langle N_{part}\rangle$ $\approx$ 340.

Collisions centrality dependence of net-proton $C_{6}/C_{2}$ in Au+Au collisions for |$y$| < 0.5 and 0.4 < $p_{T}$ (GeV/c) < 2.0. The error bars are statistical and caps are systematic errors. Points for different beam energies are staggered horizontally to improve clarity. A shaded band shows the results from UrQMD model calculations. UrQMD calculations from the above three collision energies are consistent among them so they are merged in order to reduce statistical fluctuations. Details on these calculations can be found in the Supplemental Material at [URL will be inserted by publisher]. The lattice QCD calculations [16, 17] for T = 160 MeV and $\mu_{B}$ < 110 MeV. are shown as a blue band at $\langle N_{part}\rangle$ $\approx$ 340.

Collisions centrality dependence of net-proton $C_{6}/C_{2}$ in Au+Au collisions for |$y$| < 0.5 and 0.4 < $p_{T}$ (GeV/c) < 2.0. The error bars are statistical and caps are systematic errors. Points for different beam energies are staggered horizontally to improve clarity. A shaded band shows the results from UrQMD model calculations. UrQMD calculations from the above three collision energies are consistent among them so they are merged in order to reduce statistical fluctuations. Details on these calculations can be found in the Supplemental Material at [URL will be inserted by publisher]. The lattice QCD calculations [16, 17] for T = 160 MeV and $\mu_{B}$ < 110 MeV. are shown as a blue band at $\langle N_{part}\rangle$ $\approx$ 340.

Distributions of reconstructed protons (black circles) from embedding simulations in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at 0-2.5% centrality. Red lines are fits with the binomial distribution, and green dotted lines represent the fit with the beta-binomial distributions using α that gives the minimal chi2/ndf. Each panel shows the result from the given combinations of embedded protons and antiprotons. The ratio of fits to the embedding data is shown for each panel.

Distributions of reconstructed protons (black circles) from embedding simulations in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at 0-2.5% centrality. Red lines are fits with the binomial distribution, and green dotted lines represent the fit with the beta-binomial distributions using α that gives the minimal chi2/ndf. Each panel shows the result from the given combinations of embedded protons and antiprotons. The ratio of fits to the embedding data is shown for each panel.

Distributions of reconstructed protons (black circles) from embedding simulations in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at 0-2.5% centrality. Red lines are fits with the binomial distribution, and green dotted lines represent the fit with the beta-binomial distributions using α that gives the minimal chi2/ndf. Each panel shows the result from the given combinations of embedded protons and antiprotons. The ratio of fits to the embedding data is shown for each panel.

Distributions of reconstructed protons (black circles) from embedding simulations in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at 0-2.5% centrality. Red lines are fits with the binomial distribution, and green dotted lines represent the fit with the beta-binomial distributions using α that gives the minimal chi2/ndf. Each panel shows the result from the given combinations of embedded protons and antiprotons. The ratio of fits to the embedding data is shown for each panel.

Distributions of reconstructed protons (black circles) from embedding simulations in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at 0-2.5% centrality. Red lines are fits with the binomial distribution, and green dotted lines represent the fit with the beta-binomial distributions using α that gives the minimal chi2/ndf. Each panel shows the result from the given combinations of embedded protons and antiprotons. The ratio of fits to the embedding data is shown for each panel.

Distributions of reconstructed protons (black circles) from embedding simulations in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at 0-2.5% centrality. Red lines are fits with the binomial distribution, and green dotted lines represent the fit with the beta-binomial distributions using α that gives the minimal chi2/ndf. Each panel shows the result from the given combinations of embedded protons and antiprotons. The ratio of fits to the embedding data is shown for each panel.

Distributions of reconstructed protons (black circles) from embedding simulations in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at 0-2.5% centrality. Red lines are fits with the binomial distribution, and green dotted lines represent the fit with the beta-binomial distributions using α that gives the minimal chi2/ndf. Each panel shows the result from the given combinations of embedded protons and antiprotons. The ratio of fits to the embedding data is shown for each panel.

Distributions of reconstructed protons (black circles) from embedding simulations in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at 0-2.5% centrality. Red lines are fits with the binomial distribution, and green dotted lines represent the fit with the beta-binomial distributions using α that gives the minimal chi2/ndf. Each panel shows the result from the given combinations of embedded protons and antiprotons. The ratio of fits to the embedding data is shown for each panel.

Distributions of reconstructed protons (black circles) from embedding simulations in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at 0-2.5% centrality. Red lines are fits with the binomial distribution, and green dotted lines represent the fit with the beta-binomial distributions using α that gives the minimal chi2/ndf. Each panel shows the result from the given combinations of embedded protons and antiprotons. The ratio of fits to the embedding data is shown for each panel.

Distributions of reconstructed protons (black circles) from embedding simulations in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at 0-2.5% centrality. Red lines are fits with the binomial distribution, and green dotted lines represent the fit with the beta-binomial distributions using α that gives the minimal chi2/ndf. Each panel shows the result from the given combinations of embedded protons and antiprotons. The ratio of fits to the embedding data is shown for each panel.

Distributions of reconstructed protons (black circles) from embedding simulations in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at 0-2.5% centrality. Red lines are fits with the binomial distribution, and green dotted lines represent the fit with the beta-binomial distributions using α that gives the minimal chi2/ndf. Each panel shows the result from the given combinations of embedded protons and antiprotons. The ratio of fits to the embedding data is shown for each panel.

Distributions of reconstructed protons (black circles) from embedding simulations in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at 0-2.5% centrality. Red lines are fits with the binomial distribution, and green dotted lines represent the fit with the beta-binomial distributions using α that gives the minimal chi2/ndf. Each panel shows the result from the given combinations of embedded protons and antiprotons. The ratio of fits to the embedding data is shown for each panel.

Distributions of reconstructed protons (black circles) from embedding simulations in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at 0-2.5% centrality. Red lines are fits with the binomial distribution, and green dotted lines represent the fit with the beta-binomial distributions using α that gives the minimal chi2/ndf. Each panel shows the result from the given combinations of embedded protons and antiprotons. The ratio of fits to the embedding data is shown for each panel.

Distributions of reconstructed protons (black circles) from embedding simulations in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at 0-2.5% centrality. Red lines are fits with the binomial distribution, and green dotted lines represent the fit with the beta-binomial distributions using α that gives the minimal chi2/ndf. Each panel shows the result from the given combinations of embedded protons and antiprotons. The ratio of fits to the embedding data is shown for each panel.

Distributions of reconstructed protons (black circles) from embedding simulations in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at 0-2.5% centrality. Red lines are fits with the binomial distribution, and green dotted lines represent the fit with the beta-binomial distributions using α that gives the minimal chi2/ndf. Each panel shows the result from the given combinations of embedded protons and antiprotons. The ratio of fits to the embedding data is shown for each panel.

Distributions of reconstructed protons (black circles) from embedding simulations in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at 0-2.5% centrality. Red lines are fits with the binomial distribution, and green dotted lines represent the fit with the beta-binomial distributions using α that gives the minimal chi2/ndf. Each panel shows the result from the given combinations of embedded protons and antiprotons. The ratio of fits to the embedding data is shown for each panel.

Distributions of reconstructed protons (black circles) from embedding simulations in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at 0-2.5% centrality. Red lines are fits with the binomial distribution, and green dotted lines represent the fit with the beta-binomial distributions using α that gives the minimal chi2/ndf. Each panel shows the result from the given combinations of embedded protons and antiprotons. The ratio of fits to the embedding data is shown for each panel.

Distributions of reconstructed protons (black circles) from embedding simulations in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at 0-2.5% centrality. Red lines are fits with the binomial distribution, and green dotted lines represent the fit with the beta-binomial distributions using α that gives the minimal chi2/ndf. Each panel shows the result from the given combinations of embedded protons and antiprotons. The ratio of fits to the embedding data is shown for each panel.

Distributions of reconstructed protons (black circles) from embedding simulations in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at 0-2.5% centrality. Red lines are fits with the binomial distribution, and green dotted lines represent the fit with the beta-binomial distributions using α that gives the minimal chi2/ndf. Each panel shows the result from the given combinations of embedded protons and antiprotons. The ratio of fits to the embedding data is shown for each panel.

Distributions of reconstructed protons (black circles) from embedding simulations in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at 0-2.5% centrality. Red lines are fits with the binomial distribution, and green dotted lines represent the fit with the beta-binomial distributions using α that gives the minimal chi2/ndf. Each panel shows the result from the given combinations of embedded protons and antiprotons. The ratio of fits to the embedding data is shown for each panel.

Distributions of reconstructed protons (black circles) from embedding simulations in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at 0-2.5% centrality. Red lines are fits with the binomial distribution, and green dotted lines represent the fit with the beta-binomial distributions using α that gives the minimal chi2/ndf. Each panel shows the result from the given combinations of embedded protons and antiprotons. The ratio of fits to the embedding data is shown for each panel.

Distributions of reconstructed protons (black circles) from embedding simulations in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at 0-2.5% centrality. Red lines are fits with the binomial distribution, and green dotted lines represent the fit with the beta-binomial distributions using α that gives the minimal chi2/ndf. Each panel shows the result from the given combinations of embedded protons and antiprotons. The ratio of fits to the embedding data is shown for each panel.

Distributions of reconstructed protons (black circles) from embedding simulations in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at 0-2.5% centrality. Red lines are fits with the binomial distribution, and green dotted lines represent the fit with the beta-binomial distributions using α that gives the minimal chi2/ndf. Each panel shows the result from the given combinations of embedded protons and antiprotons. The ratio of fits to the embedding data is shown for each panel.

Distributions of reconstructed protons (black circles) from embedding simulations in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at 0-2.5% centrality. Red lines are fits with the binomial distribution, and green dotted lines represent the fit with the beta-binomial distributions using α that gives the minimal chi2/ndf. Each panel shows the result from the given combinations of embedded protons and antiprotons. The ratio of fits to the embedding data is shown for each panel.

Distributions of reconstructed protons (black circles) from embedding simulations in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at 0-2.5% centrality. Red lines are fits with the binomial distribution, and green dotted lines represent the fit with the beta-binomial distributions using α that gives the minimal chi2/ndf. Each panel shows the result from the given combinations of embedded protons and antiprotons. The ratio of fits to the embedding data is shown for each panel.

Distributions of reconstructed protons (black circles) from embedding simulations in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at 0-2.5% centrality. Red lines are fits with the binomial distribution, and green dotted lines represent the fit with the beta-binomial distributions using α that gives the minimal chi2/ndf. Each panel shows the result from the given combinations of embedded protons and antiprotons. The ratio of fits to the embedding data is shown for each panel.

Distributions of reconstructed protons (black circles) from embedding simulations in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at 0-2.5% centrality. Red lines are fits with the binomial distribution, and green dotted lines represent the fit with the beta-binomial distributions using α that gives the minimal chi2/ndf. Each panel shows the result from the given combinations of embedded protons and antiprotons. The ratio of fits to the embedding data is shown for each panel.

Distributions of reconstructed protons (black circles) from embedding simulations in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at 0-2.5% centrality. Red lines are fits with the binomial distribution, and green dotted lines represent the fit with the beta-binomial distributions using α that gives the minimal chi2/ndf. Each panel shows the result from the given combinations of embedded protons and antiprotons. The ratio of fits to the embedding data is shown for each panel.

Distributions of reconstructed protons (black circles) from embedding simulations in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at 0-2.5% centrality. Red lines are fits with the binomial distribution, and green dotted lines represent the fit with the beta-binomial distributions using α that gives the minimal chi2/ndf. Each panel shows the result from the given combinations of embedded protons and antiprotons. The ratio of fits to the embedding data is shown for each panel.

Distributions of reconstructed protons (black circles) from embedding simulations in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at 0-2.5% centrality. Red lines are fits with the binomial distribution, and green dotted lines represent the fit with the beta-binomial distributions using α that gives the minimal chi2/ndf. Each panel shows the result from the given combinations of embedded protons and antiprotons. The ratio of fits to the embedding data is shown for each panel.

Distributions of reconstructed protons (black circles) from embedding simulations in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at 0-2.5% centrality. Red lines are fits with the binomial distribution, and green dotted lines represent the fit with the beta-binomial distributions using α that gives the minimal chi2/ndf. Each panel shows the result from the given combinations of embedded protons and antiprotons. The ratio of fits to the embedding data is shown for each panel.

Distributions of reconstructed protons (black circles) from embedding simulations in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at 0-2.5% centrality. Red lines are fits with the binomial distribution, and green dotted lines represent the fit with the beta-binomial distributions using α that gives the minimal chi2/ndf. Each panel shows the result from the given combinations of embedded protons and antiprotons. The ratio of fits to the embedding data is shown for each panel.

Distributions of reconstructed protons (black circles) from embedding simulations in 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at 0-2.5% centrality. Red lines are fits with the binomial distribution, and green dotted lines represent the fit with the beta-binomial distributions using α that gives the minimal chi2/ndf. Each panel shows the result from the given combinations of embedded protons and antiprotons. The ratio of fits to the embedding data is shown for each panel.

Cumulants and their ratios up to the sixth order corrected for non-binomial efficiencies for 200 GeV Au+Au collisions at 0-5% centrality. The CBWC is applied for 2.5% centrality bin width. Results from the conventional efficiency correction are shown as black filled circles, results from the unfolding with the binomial detector response are shown as black open circles, and results from beta-binomial detector response with $\alpha+\sigma$, $\alpha$ and $\alpha-\sigma$ are shown in green triangles, red squares and blue triangles, respectively. C5, C6, C2/C1, C5/C1 and C6/C2 are scaled by constant shown in each column.

Collision centrality dependence of net-proton C6/C2 in Au+Au collisions for $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV within |y| < 0.5 and 0.4 < pT (GeV/c) < 2.0. Results with and without the CBWC are overlaid. The results are corrected for detector efficiencies. Points for different calculation methods are staggered horizontally to improve clarity.

Collision centrality dependence of net-proton C6/C2 in Au+Au collisions for $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 27, 54.4, and 200 GeV within |y| < 0.5 and 0.4 < pT (GeV/c) < 2.0. Points for different beam energies are staggered horizontally to improve clarity. Shaded and hatched bands show the results from UrQMD model calculations The lattice QCD calculations [13, 14] for T = 160 MeV and $\mu_{B}$ < 110 MeV. are shown as a blue band at $\langle N_{part}\rangle$ $\approx$ 340.