HEPData Search

Max results

Sort by

relevance
collaborations
title
date
latest

Reverse order

Showing 1 of 1 results

Date

Collaboration

ATLAS 1

Subject_areas

hep-ex 1

Phrases Reset

Cross Section 1
Inclusive 1
Integrated Cross Section 1
Proton-Proton Scattering 1
Scharm 1
Stop 1
Supersymmetry 1

Reset Show 7 Next 5

Reactions Reset

P P --> SCHARM SCHARMBAR X 1
P P --> STOP STOPBAR X 1

Observables

Acceptance 1
BR 1
CUTFLOW 1
EXCLUSION 1
Efficiency 1
N 1
SIG 1
SR 1

Reset Show 8 Next 5

Authors

Sharma, Abhishek 2
Aaboud, Morad 1
Aad, Georges 1
Abbott, Brad 1
Abdinov, Ovsat 1
Abeloos, Baptiste 1
Abidi, Syed Haider 1
Abouzeid, Ossama 1
Abraham, Nicola 1
Abramowicz, Halina 1
Abreu Juliao Ochoa De Castro, Maria Ines 1
Abreu, Henso 1
Abulaiti, Yiming 1
Acharya, Bobby Samir 1
Adachi, Shunsuke 1
Adamczyk, Leszek 1
Adelman, Jahred 1
Adersberger, Michael 1
Adye, Tim 1
Affolder, Tony 1

Reset Show 20 Next 5

Version 3
Search for supersymmetry in final states with charm jets and missing transverse momentum in 13 TeV $pp$ collisions with the ATLAS detector

The ATLAS collaboration Aaboud, Morad ; Aad, Georges ; Abbott, Brad ; et al.

JHEP 09 (2018) 050, 2018.

https://inspirehep.net/literature/1672099 Inspire Record 1672099 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.83011 https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.83011

A search for supersymmetric partners of top quarks decaying as $\tilde{t}_1\to c\tilde\chi^0_1$ and supersymmetric partners of charm quarks decaying as $\tilde{c}_1\to c\tilde\chi^0_1$, where $\tilde\chi^0_1$ is the lightest neutralino, is presented. The search uses 36.1 ${\rm fb}^{-1}$ $pp$ collision data at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV collected by the ATLAS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider and is performed in final states with jets identified as containing charm hadrons. Assuming a 100% branching ratio to $c\tilde\chi^0_1$, top and charm squarks with masses up to 850 GeV are excluded at 95% confidence level for a massless lightest neutralino. For $m_{\tilde{t}_1,\tilde{c}_1}-m_{\tilde\chi^0_1}

132 data tables match query

Table 1

Acceptance for SR1 in the $\tilde{t}_1/\tilde{c}_1-\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ mass plane.

Table 1

Acceptance for best expected CLS SR in the $\tilde{t}_1/\tilde{c}_1-\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ mass plane.

Table 1

Acceptance for SR1 in the $\tilde{t}_1/\tilde{c}_1-\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ mass plane.

Table 2

Acceptance for SR2 in the $\tilde{t}_1/\tilde{c}_1-\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ mass plane.

Table 2

Acceptance for SR1 in the $\tilde{t}_1/\tilde{c}_1-\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ mass plane.

Table 2

Acceptance for SR2 in the $\tilde{t}_1/\tilde{c}_1-\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ mass plane.

Table 3

Acceptance for SR3 in the $\tilde{t}_1/\tilde{c}_1-\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ mass plane.

Table 3

Acceptance for SR2 in the $\tilde{t}_1/\tilde{c}_1-\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ mass plane.

Table 3

Acceptance for SR3 in the $\tilde{t}_1/\tilde{c}_1-\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ mass plane.

Table 4

Acceptance for SR4 in the $\tilde{t}_1/\tilde{c}_1-\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ mass plane.

Table 4

Acceptance for SR3 in the $\tilde{t}_1/\tilde{c}_1-\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ mass plane.

Table 4

Acceptance for SR4 in the $\tilde{t}_1/\tilde{c}_1-\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ mass plane.

Table 5

Acceptance for SR5 in the $\tilde{t}_1/\tilde{c}_1-\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ mass plane.

Table 5

Acceptance for SR4 in the $\tilde{t}_1/\tilde{c}_1-\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ mass plane.

Table 5

Acceptance for SR5 in the $\tilde{t}_1/\tilde{c}_1-\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ mass plane.

Table 6

Acceptance for best expected CLS SR in the $\tilde{t}_1/\tilde{c}_1-\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ mass plane.

Table 6

Acceptance for SR5 in the $\tilde{t}_1/\tilde{c}_1-\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ mass plane.

Table 6

Acceptance for best expected CLS SR in the $\tilde{t}_1/\tilde{c}_1-\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ mass plane.

Table 7

Detector efficiency for SR1 in the $\tilde{t}_1/\tilde{c}_1-\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ mass plane.

Table 7

Detector efficiency for best expected CLS SR in the $\tilde{t}_1/\tilde{c}_1-\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ mass plane.

Table 7

Detector efficiency for SR1 in the $\tilde{t}_1/\tilde{c}_1-\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ mass plane.

Table 8

Detector efficiency for SR2 in the $\tilde{t}_1/\tilde{c}_1-\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ mass plane.

Table 8

Detector efficiency for SR1 in the $\tilde{t}_1/\tilde{c}_1-\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ mass plane.

Table 8

Detector efficiency for SR2 in the $\tilde{t}_1/\tilde{c}_1-\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ mass plane.

Table 9

Detector efficiency for SR3 in the $\tilde{t}_1/\tilde{c}_1-\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ mass plane.

Table 9

Detector efficiency for SR2 in the $\tilde{t}_1/\tilde{c}_1-\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ mass plane.

Table 9

Detector efficiency for SR3 in the $\tilde{t}_1/\tilde{c}_1-\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ mass plane.

Table 10

Detector efficiency for SR4 in the $\tilde{t}_1/\tilde{c}_1-\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ mass plane.

Table 10

Detector efficiency for SR3 in the $\tilde{t}_1/\tilde{c}_1-\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ mass plane.

Table 10

Detector efficiency for SR4 in the $\tilde{t}_1/\tilde{c}_1-\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ mass plane.

Table 11

Detector efficiency for SR5 in the $\tilde{t}_1/\tilde{c}_1-\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ mass plane.

Table 11

Detector efficiency for SR4 in the $\tilde{t}_1/\tilde{c}_1-\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ mass plane.

Table 11

Detector efficiency for SR5 in the $\tilde{t}_1/\tilde{c}_1-\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ mass plane.

Table 12

Detector efficiency for best expected CLS SR in the $\tilde{t}_1/\tilde{c}_1-\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ mass plane.

Table 12

Detector efficiency for SR5 in the $\tilde{t}_1/\tilde{c}_1-\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ mass plane.

Table 12

Detector efficiency for best expected CLS SR in the $\tilde{t}_1/\tilde{c}_1-\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ mass plane.

Table 13

Expected exclusion limit at 95% CL in the $m(\tilde t_1/\tilde c_1)$-$m(\tilde\chi^0_1)$ plane for the stop/scharm pair production scenario.

Table 13

Expected exclusion limit at 95% CL in the $m(\tilde t_1/\tilde c_1)$-$m(\tilde\chi^0_1)$ plane for the stop/scharm pair production scenario.

Table 13

Expected exclusion limit at 95% CL in the $m(\tilde t_1/\tilde c_1)$-$m(\tilde\chi^0_1)$ plane for the stop/scharm pair production scenario.

Table 14

Observed exclusion limit at 95% CL in the $m(\tilde t_1/\tilde c_1)$-$m(\tilde\chi^0_1)$ plane for the stop/scharm pair production scenario.

Table 14

Observed exclusion limit at 95% CL in the $m(\tilde t_1/\tilde c_1)$-$m(\tilde\chi^0_1)$ plane for the stop/scharm pair production scenario.

Table 14

Observed exclusion limit at 95% CL in the $m(\tilde t_1/\tilde c_1)$-$m(\tilde\chi^0_1)$ plane for the stop/scharm pair production scenario.

Table 15

SR1 expected exclusion limit at 95% CL in the $m(\tilde t_1/\tilde c_1)$-$m(\tilde\chi^0_1)$ plane for the stop/scharm pair production scenario.

Table 15

SR1 expected exclusion limit at 95% CL in the $m(\tilde t_1/\tilde c_1)$-$m(\tilde\chi^0_1)$ plane for the stop/scharm pair production scenario.

Table 15

SR1 expected exclusion limit at 95% CL in the $m(\tilde t_1/\tilde c_1)$-$m(\tilde\chi^0_1)$ plane for the stop/scharm pair production scenario.

Table 16

SR1 observed exclusion limit at 95% CL in the $m(\tilde t_1/\tilde c_1)$-$m(\tilde\chi^0_1)$ plane for the stop/scharm pair production scenario.

Table 16

SR1 observed exclusion limit at 95% CL in the $m(\tilde t_1/\tilde c_1)$-$m(\tilde\chi^0_1)$ plane for the stop/scharm pair production scenario.

Table 16

SR1 observed exclusion limit at 95% CL in the $m(\tilde t_1/\tilde c_1)$-$m(\tilde\chi^0_1)$ plane for the stop/scharm pair production scenario.

Table 17

SR2 expected exclusion limit at 95% CL in the $m(\tilde t_1/\tilde c_1)$-$m(\tilde\chi^0_1)$ plane for the stop/scharm pair production scenario.

Table 17

SR2 expected exclusion limit at 95% CL in the $m(\tilde t_1/\tilde c_1)$-$m(\tilde\chi^0_1)$ plane for the stop/scharm pair production scenario.

Table 17

SR2 expected exclusion limit at 95% CL in the $m(\tilde t_1/\tilde c_1)$-$m(\tilde\chi^0_1)$ plane for the stop/scharm pair production scenario.

Table 18

SR2 observed exclusion limit at 95% CL in the $m(\tilde t_1/\tilde c_1)$-$m(\tilde\chi^0_1)$ plane for the stop/scharm pair production scenario.

Table 18

SR2 observed exclusion limit at 95% CL in the $m(\tilde t_1/\tilde c_1)$-$m(\tilde\chi^0_1)$ plane for the stop/scharm pair production scenario.

Table 18

SR2 observed exclusion limit at 95% CL in the $m(\tilde t_1/\tilde c_1)$-$m(\tilde\chi^0_1)$ plane for the stop/scharm pair production scenario.

Table 19

SR3 expected exclusion limit at 95% CL in the $m(\tilde t_1/\tilde c_1)$-$m(\tilde\chi^0_1)$ plane for the stop/scharm pair production scenario.

Table 19

SR3 expected exclusion limit at 95% CL in the $m(\tilde t_1/\tilde c_1)$-$m(\tilde\chi^0_1)$ plane for the stop/scharm pair production scenario.

Table 19

SR3 expected exclusion limit at 95% CL in the $m(\tilde t_1/\tilde c_1)$-$m(\tilde\chi^0_1)$ plane for the stop/scharm pair production scenario.

Table 20

SR3 observed exclusion limit at 95% CL in the $m(\tilde t_1/\tilde c_1)$-$m(\tilde\chi^0_1)$ plane for the stop/scharm pair production scenario.

Table 20

SR3 observed exclusion limit at 95% CL in the $m(\tilde t_1/\tilde c_1)$-$m(\tilde\chi^0_1)$ plane for the stop/scharm pair production scenario.

Table 20

SR3 observed exclusion limit at 95% CL in the $m(\tilde t_1/\tilde c_1)$-$m(\tilde\chi^0_1)$ plane for the stop/scharm pair production scenario.

Table 21

SR4 expected exclusion limit at 95% CL in the $m(\tilde t_1/\tilde c_1)$-$m(\tilde\chi^0_1)$ plane for the stop/scharm pair production scenario.

Table 21

SR4 expected exclusion limit at 95% CL in the $m(\tilde t_1/\tilde c_1)$-$m(\tilde\chi^0_1)$ plane for the stop/scharm pair production scenario.

Table 21

SR4 expected exclusion limit at 95% CL in the $m(\tilde t_1/\tilde c_1)$-$m(\tilde\chi^0_1)$ plane for the stop/scharm pair production scenario.

Table 22

SR4 observed exclusion limit at 95% CL in the $m(\tilde t_1/\tilde c_1)$-$m(\tilde\chi^0_1)$ plane for the stop/scharm pair production scenario.

Table 22

SR4 observed exclusion limit at 95% CL in the $m(\tilde t_1/\tilde c_1)$-$m(\tilde\chi^0_1)$ plane for the stop/scharm pair production scenario.

Table 22

SR4 observed exclusion limit at 95% CL in the $m(\tilde t_1/\tilde c_1)$-$m(\tilde\chi^0_1)$ plane for the stop/scharm pair production scenario.

Table 23

SR5 expected exclusion limit at 95% CL in the $m(\tilde t_1/\tilde c_1)$-$m(\tilde\chi^0_1)$ plane for the stop/scharm pair production scenario.

Table 23

SR5 expected exclusion limit at 95% CL in the $m(\tilde t_1/\tilde c_1)$-$m(\tilde\chi^0_1)$ plane for the stop/scharm pair production scenario.

Table 23

SR5 expected exclusion limit at 95% CL in the $m(\tilde t_1/\tilde c_1)$-$m(\tilde\chi^0_1)$ plane for the stop/scharm pair production scenario.

Table 24

SR5 observed exclusion limit at 95% CL in the $m(\tilde t_1/\tilde c_1)$-$m(\tilde\chi^0_1)$ plane for the stop/scharm pair production scenario.

Table 24

SR5 observed exclusion limit at 95% CL in the $m(\tilde t_1/\tilde c_1)$-$m(\tilde\chi^0_1)$ plane for the stop/scharm pair production scenario.

Table 24

SR5 observed exclusion limit at 95% CL in the $m(\tilde t_1/\tilde c_1)$-$m(\tilde\chi^0_1)$ plane for the stop/scharm pair production scenario.

Table 25

Upper limits on signal cross sections and exclusion limits at 95% CL for SR1 in the $m(\tilde t_1/\tilde c_1)$-$m(\tilde\chi^0_1)$ plane for the stop/scharm pair production scenario.

Table 25

Upper limits on signal cross sections and exclusion limits at 95% CL for the best expected SR in the $m(\tilde t_1/\tilde c_1)$-$m(\tilde\chi^0_1)$ plane for the stop/scharm pair production scenario.

Table 25

Upper limits on signal cross sections and exclusion limits at 95% CL for SR1 in the $m(\tilde t_1/\tilde c_1)$-$m(\tilde\chi^0_1)$ plane for the stop/scharm pair production scenario.

Table 26

Upper limits on signal cross sections and exclusion limits at 95% CL for SR2 in the $m(\tilde t_1/\tilde c_1)$-$m(\tilde\chi^0_1)$ plane for the stop/scharm pair production scenario.

Table 26

Upper limits on signal cross sections and exclusion limits at 95% CL for SR1 in the $m(\tilde t_1/\tilde c_1)$-$m(\tilde\chi^0_1)$ plane for the stop/scharm pair production scenario.

Table 26

Upper limits on signal cross sections and exclusion limits at 95% CL for SR2 in the $m(\tilde t_1/\tilde c_1)$-$m(\tilde\chi^0_1)$ plane for the stop/scharm pair production scenario.

Table 27

Upper limits on signal cross sections and exclusion limits at 95% CL for SR3 in the $m(\tilde t_1/\tilde c_1)$-$m(\tilde\chi^0_1)$ plane for the stop/scharm pair production scenario.

Table 27

Upper limits on signal cross sections and exclusion limits at 95% CL for SR2 in the $m(\tilde t_1/\tilde c_1)$-$m(\tilde\chi^0_1)$ plane for the stop/scharm pair production scenario.

Table 27

Upper limits on signal cross sections and exclusion limits at 95% CL for SR3 in the $m(\tilde t_1/\tilde c_1)$-$m(\tilde\chi^0_1)$ plane for the stop/scharm pair production scenario.

Table 28

Upper limits on signal cross sections and exclusion limits at 95% CL for SR4 in the $m(\tilde t_1/\tilde c_1)$-$m(\tilde\chi^0_1)$ plane for the stop/scharm pair production scenario.

Table 28

Upper limits on signal cross sections and exclusion limits at 95% CL for SR3 in the $m(\tilde t_1/\tilde c_1)$-$m(\tilde\chi^0_1)$ plane for the stop/scharm pair production scenario.

Table 28

Upper limits on signal cross sections and exclusion limits at 95% CL for SR4 in the $m(\tilde t_1/\tilde c_1)$-$m(\tilde\chi^0_1)$ plane for the stop/scharm pair production scenario.

Table 29

Upper limits on signal cross sections and exclusion limits at 95% CL for SR5 in the $m(\tilde t_1/\tilde c_1)$-$m(\tilde\chi^0_1)$ plane for the stop/scharm pair production scenario.

Table 29

Upper limits on signal cross sections and exclusion limits at 95% CL for SR4 in the $m(\tilde t_1/\tilde c_1)$-$m(\tilde\chi^0_1)$ plane for the stop/scharm pair production scenario.

Table 29

Upper limits on signal cross sections and exclusion limits at 95% CL for SR5 in the $m(\tilde t_1/\tilde c_1)$-$m(\tilde\chi^0_1)$ plane for the stop/scharm pair production scenario.

Table 30

Upper limits on signal cross sections and exclusion limits at 95% CL for the best expected SR in the $m(\tilde t_1/\tilde c_1)$-$m(\tilde\chi^0_1)$ plane for the stop/scharm pair production scenario.

Table 30

Upper limits on signal cross sections and exclusion limits at 95% CL for SR5 in the $m(\tilde t_1/\tilde c_1)$-$m(\tilde\chi^0_1)$ plane for the stop/scharm pair production scenario.

Table 30

Upper limits on signal cross sections and exclusion limits at 95% CL for the best expected SR in the $m(\tilde t_1/\tilde c_1)$-$m(\tilde\chi^0_1)$ plane for the stop/scharm pair production scenario.

Table 31

Minimum branching ratio excluded at 95% CL, assuming no sensitivity for other decay possibilities, in the $m(\tilde t_1/\tilde c_1)$-$m(\tilde\chi^0_1)$ plane for the stop/scharm pair production scenario.

Table 31

Table 32

The signal region with the best expected CLS value for each signal in the $\tilde{t}_1/\tilde{c}_1-\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ mass plane.

Table 32

The signal region with the best expected CLS value for each signal in the $\tilde{t}_1/\tilde{c}_1-\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ mass plane.

Table 32

The signal region with the best expected CLS value for each signal in the $\tilde{t}_1/\tilde{c}_1-\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ mass plane.

Table 33

Expected exclusion limit at 95% CL in the $m(\tilde t_1/\tilde c_1)$-$\Delta m$ plane for the stop/scharm pair production scenario.

Table 33

Expected exclusion limit at 95% CL in the $m(\tilde t_1/\tilde c_1)$-$\Delta m$ plane for the stop/scharm pair production scenario.

Table 33

Expected exclusion limit at 95% CL in the $m(\tilde t_1/\tilde c_1)$-$\Delta m$ plane for the stop/scharm pair production scenario.

Table 34

Observed exclusion limit at 95% CL in the $m(\tilde t_1/\tilde c_1)$-$\Delta m$ plane for the stop/scharm pair production scenario.

Table 34

Observed exclusion limit at 95% CL in the $m(\tilde t_1/\tilde c_1)$-$\Delta m$ plane for the stop/scharm pair production scenario.

Table 34

Observed exclusion limit at 95% CL in the $m(\tilde t_1/\tilde c_1)$-$\Delta m$ plane for the stop/scharm pair production scenario.

Table 35

Comparison between data and expectation after the background-only fit for the $E_{T}^{miss}$ distribution in SR1. The shaded band indicates detector-related systematic uncertainties and the statistical uncertainties of the MC samples, while the error bars on the data points indicate the data's statistical uncertainty. The final bin in each histogram includes the overflow. The lower panel shows the ratio of the data to the SM prediction after the background-only fit. The distribution is also shown for a representative signal point.

Table 35

Table 36

Comparison between data and expectation after the background-only fit for the $E_{T}^{miss}$ distribution in SR2. The shaded band indicates detector-related systematic uncertainties and the statistical uncertainties of the MC samples, while the error bars on the data points indicate the data's statistical uncertainty. The final bin in each histogram includes the overflow. The lower panel shows the ratio of the data to the SM prediction after the background-only fit. The distribution is also shown for a representative signal point.

Table 36

Table 37

Comparison between data and expectation after the background-only fit for the $E_{T}^{miss}$ distribution in SR3. The shaded band indicates detector-related systematic uncertainties and the statistical uncertainties of the MC samples, while the error bars on the data points indicate the data's statistical uncertainty. The final bin in each histogram includes the overflow. The lower panel shows the ratio of the data to the SM prediction after the background-only fit. The distribution is also shown for a representative signal point.

Table 37

Table 38

Comparison between data and expectation after the background-only fit for the $E_{T}^{miss}$ distribution in SR4. The shaded band indicates detector-related systematic uncertainties and the statistical uncertainties of the MC samples, while the error bars on the data points indicate the data's statistical uncertainty. The final bin in each histogram includes the overflow. The lower panel shows the ratio of the data to the SM prediction after the background-only fit. The distribution is also shown for a representative signal point.

Table 38

Table 39

Comparison between data and expectation after the background-only fit for the $E_{T}^{miss}$ distribution in SR5. The shaded band indicates detector-related systematic uncertainties and the statistical uncertainties of the MC samples, while the error bars on the data points indicate the data's statistical uncertainty. The final bin in each histogram includes the overflow. The lower panel shows the ratio of the data to the SM prediction after the background-only fit. The distribution is also shown for a representative signal point.

Table 39

Table 40

Cutflow for the $(m_{\tilde{t}}, m_{\tilde{\chi}}) = (450,425)$ GeV signal point for signal region SR1.

Table 40

Cutflow for the $(m_{\tilde{t}}, m_{\tilde{\chi}}) = (450,425)$ GeV signal point for signal region SR1.

Table 40

Cutflow for the $(m_{\tilde{t}}, m_{\tilde{\chi}}) = (450,425)$ GeV signal point for signal region SR1.

Table 41

Cutflow for the $(m_{\tilde{t}}, m_{\tilde{\chi}}) = (500,420)$ GeV signal point for signal region SR2.

Table 41

Cutflow for the $(m_{\tilde{t}}, m_{\tilde{\chi}}) = (500,420)$ GeV signal point for signal region SR2.

Table 41

Cutflow for the $(m_{\tilde{t}}, m_{\tilde{\chi}}) = (500,420)$ GeV signal point for signal region SR2.

Table 42

Cutflow for the $(m_{\tilde{t}}, m_{\tilde{\chi}}) = (500,350)$ GeV signal point for signal region SR3.

Table 42

Cutflow for the $(m_{\tilde{t}}, m_{\tilde{\chi}}) = (500,350)$ GeV signal point for signal region SR3.

Table 42

Cutflow for the $(m_{\tilde{t}}, m_{\tilde{\chi}}) = (500,350)$ GeV signal point for signal region SR3.

Table 43

Cutflow for the $(m_{\tilde{t}}, m_{\tilde{\chi}}) = (600,350)$ GeV signal point for signal region SR4.

Table 43

Cutflow for the $(m_{\tilde{t}}, m_{\tilde{\chi}}) = (600,350)$ GeV signal point for signal region SR4.

Table 43

Cutflow for the $(m_{\tilde{t}}, m_{\tilde{\chi}}) = (600,350)$ GeV signal point for signal region SR4.

Table 44

Cutflow for the $(m_{\tilde{t}}, m_{\tilde{\chi}}) = (900,1)$ GeV signal point for signal region SR5.

Table 44

Cutflow for the $(m_{\tilde{t}}, m_{\tilde{\chi}}) = (900,1)$ GeV signal point for signal region SR5.

Table 44

Cutflow for the $(m_{\tilde{t}}, m_{\tilde{\chi}}) = (900,1)$ GeV signal point for signal region SR5.

More…

Date

Collaboration

Subject_areas

Phrases Reset

Reactions Reset

Observables

Authors

Version 3 Search for supersymmetry in final states with charm jets and missing transverse momentum in 13 TeV $pp$ collisions with the ATLAS detector

Version 3
Search for supersymmetry in final states with charm jets and missing transverse momentum in 13 TeV $pp$ collisions with the ATLAS detector