$p_{\rm T}$-differential production cross section of muons from heavy-flavour hadron decays in $3.7 < y < 4$.

$p_{\rm T}$-differential production cross section of muons from heavy-flavour hadron decays in $3.4 < y < 3.7$.

$p_{\rm T}$-differential production cross section of muons from heavy-flavour hadron decays in $3.1 < y < 3.4$.

$p_{\rm T}$-differential production cross section of muons from heavy-flavour hadron decays in $2.8 < y < 3.1$.

$p_{\rm T}$-differential production cross section of muons from heavy-flavour hadron decays in $2.5 < y < 2.8$.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$-differential production cross section of muons from heavy-flavour hadron decays at forward rapidity in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7$ TeV to that at $\sqrt{s} = 5.02$ TeV.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$-differential production cross section of muons from heavy-flavour hadron decays in $3.7 < y < 4$ to that in $2.5 < y < 2.8$ in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=5.02$ TeV.

Expected and observed events in the 16 discovery regions along with the according control regions.

Expected signal yield and acceptance x efficiency, estimated background and observed number of events in data for the full range of simulated masses in the MS-agnostic R-hadron search.

Expected signal yield and acceptance x efficiency, estimated background and observed number of events in data for the full range of simulated masses in the full-detector R-hadron search.

p0-values and model-independent upper limits on cross-section x acceptance x efficiency for the 16 discovery regions.

Expected signal yield and acceptance x efficiency, estimated background and observed number of events in data for the full range of simulated masses in the MS-agnostic search for metastable gluino R-hadrons.

Expected signal yield and acceptance x efficiency, estimated background and observed number of events in data for the full range of simulated masses in the full-detector direct-stau search.

Expected signal yield and acceptance x efficiency, estimated background and observed number of events in data for the full range of simulated masses in the full-detector chargino search.

Upper cross-section limit in gluino R-hadron search.

Upper cross-section limit in sbottom R-hadron search.

Upper cross-section limit in stop R-hadron search.

Upper cross-section limit in stau search.

Upper cross-section limit in chargino search.

Lower mass limit as function of gluino lifetime.

Acceptance x efficiency, acceptance and efficiency for the full range of simulated masses in the MS-agnostic R-hadron search.

Upper cross-section limit in meta-stable gluino R-hadron search.

Flavor composition of 800 GeV stop R-hadrons simulated using the generic model as a function of radial distance from the interaction point.

Flavor composition of 800 GeV anti-stop R-hadrons simulated using the generic model as a function of radial distance from the interaction point.

Flavor composition of 800 GeV stop R-hadrons simulated using the Regge model as a function of radial distance from the interaction point.

Flavor composition of 800 GeV anti-stop R-hadrons simulated using the Regge model as a function of radial distance from the interaction point.

ETmiss trigger efficiency as function of true ETmiss (EtmissTurnOn).

Single-muon trigger efficiency as function of $|\eta|$ and $\beta$ (SingleMuTurnOn).

Candidate reconstruction efficiency for ID+Calo selection (IDCaloEff).

Candidate reconstruction efficiency for loose selection (LooseEff).

Efficiency for a loose candidate to be promoted to a tight candidate (TightPromotionEff).

Resolution and average of reconstructed dE/dx mass for a given simulated mass for ID+calo candidates.

Resolution and average of reconstructed ToF mass for a given simulated mass for ID+calo candidates.

Resolution and average of reconstructed ToF mass for a given simulated mass for FullDet candidates.

Predicted ratio of cross sections for inclusive isolated-photon production as a function of $E_{\rm T}^{\gamma}$ for $0.6<|\eta^{\gamma}|<1.37$.

Measured ratio of cross sections for inclusive isolated-photon production as a function of $E_{\rm T}^{\gamma}$ for $1.56<|\eta^{\gamma}|<1.81$.

Predicted ratio of cross sections for inclusive isolated-photon production as a function of $E_{\rm T}^{\gamma}$ for $1.56<|\eta^{\gamma}|<1.81$.

Measured ratio of cross sections for inclusive isolated-photon production as a function of $E_{\rm T}^{\gamma}$ for $1.81<|\eta^{\gamma}|<2.37$.

Predicted ratio of cross sections for inclusive isolated-photon production as a function of $E_{\rm T}^{\gamma}$ for $1.81<|\eta^{\gamma}|<2.37$.

Measured double ratio of cross sections for inclusive isolated-photon production and Z-boson production as a function of $E_{\rm T}^{\gamma}$ for $|\eta^{\gamma}|<0.6$.

Predicted double ratio of cross sections for inclusive isolated-photon production and Z-boson production as a function of $E_{\rm T}^{\gamma}$ for $|\eta^{\gamma}|<0.6$.

Measured double ratio of cross sections for inclusive isolated-photon production and Z-boson production as a function of $E_{\rm T}^{\gamma}$ for $0.6<|\eta^{\gamma}|<1.37$.

Predicted double ratio of cross sections for inclusive isolated-photon production and Z-boson production as a function of $E_{\rm T}^{\gamma}$ for $0.6<|\eta^{\gamma}|<1.37$.

Measured double ratio of cross sections for inclusive isolated-photon production and Z-boson production as a function of $E_{\rm T}^{\gamma}$ for $1.56<|\eta^{\gamma}|<1.81$.

Predicted double ratio of cross sections for inclusive isolated-photon production and Z-boson production as a function of $E_{\rm T}^{\gamma}$ for $1.56<|\eta^{\gamma}|<1.81$.

Measured double ratio of cross sections for inclusive isolated-photon production and Z-boson production as a function of $E_{\rm T}^{\gamma}$ for $1.81<|\eta^{\gamma}|<2.37$.

Predicted double ratio of cross sections for inclusive isolated-photon production and Z-boson production as a function of $E_{\rm T}^{\gamma}$ for $1.81<|\eta^{\gamma}|<2.37$.

$\eta$ distributions of fake tracks in minimum-bias collision events and chargino tracks in 3 TeV wino signal events. The normalization is arbitrary. The details of fake track reconstruction is described in Sect. 5.2. The fake-track distribution is shown only within the range $|\eta|<2$.

Probability of finding a fake track in an event as a function of the average number of $pp$ interactions per bunch crossing ($\left<\mu\right>$). The probabilities for the tracks reconstructed with $N_{\mathrm{layer}}^{\mathrm{hit}}=4$ (5) are shown by the open (filled) markers, and they are presented separately for the three tracker layouts, the default layout ($\#$1) in black circles, the alternative layouts of $\#$2 in magenta squares and $\#$3 in red upward triangles. The probabilities for the layout $\#$2 are shown only at $\left<\mu\right>=200$. The estimate from the mixed sample of non-diffractive and diffractive events for the default layout is shown by the blue diamond for comparison purpose.

Expected discovery significance for the wino model with 30 ab$^{-1}$ with the requirement of $N_{\mathrm{layer}}^{\mathrm{hit}}=5$. The grey (red) bands show the significance using the default (alternative) layout $\#$1 ($\#$3). The difference between the solid and hatched bands corresponds to the different pileup conditions of $\left<\mu\right>=200$ and 500. The band width corresponds to the significance variation due to the two models assumed for soft QCD processes.

Expected discovery significance for the higgsino model with 30 ab$^{-1}$ with the requirement of $N_{\mathrm{layer}}^{\mathrm{hit}}=5$. The grey (red) bands show the significance using the default (alternative) layout $\#$1 ($\#$3). The difference between the solid and hatched bands corresponds to the different pileup conditions of $\left<\mu\right>=200$ and 500. The band width corresponds to the significance variation due to the two models assumed for soft QCD processes.

Expected discovery significance for the wino model with 30 ab$^{-1}$ with the requirements of $N_{\mathrm{layer}}^{\mathrm{hit}}=5$ and a good time-fit quality. The background reduction rate with the time information is assumed to be the same for both pileup conditions. The grey (red) bands show the significance using the default (alternative) layout $\#$1 ($\#$3). The difference between the solid and hatched bands corresponds to the different pileup conditions of $\left<\mu\right>=200$ and 500. The band width corresponds to the significance variation due to the two models assumed for soft QCD processes.

Expected discovery significance for the higgsino model with 30 ab$^{-1}$ with the requirements of $N_{\mathrm{layer}}^{\mathrm{hit}}=5$ and a good time-fit quality. The background reduction rate with the time information is assumed to be the same for both pileup conditions. The grey (red) bands show the significance using the default (alternative) layout $\#$1 ($\#$3). The difference between the solid and hatched bands corresponds to the different pileup conditions of $\left<\mu\right>=200$ and 500. The band width corresponds to the significance variation due to the two models assumed for soft QCD processes.

Summary of reach for charginos using a disappearing-track signature. The FCC-hh 5$\sigma$-discovery reach assuming the alternative layout, the average number of $pp$ interactions per bunch crossing of 500, only non-diffractive soft-QCD processes and a use of the time information of the pixel detector is shown in blue. The reach for the wino scenario is obtained by extrapolating the sensitivity curve in Fig. 6. The 5$\sigma$-discovery reach and the 95% CL exclusion sensitivity are taken from [46]. The observed exclusion in the ATLAS search with 36 fb$^{-1}$ of Run 2 data [39, 47] are shown as well.

Radial distances (in mm) of the first five layers from the beam line for the three inner-tracker layouts considered in this study.

Signal acceptance for the 3 TeV wino and 1 TeV higgsino with $|\eta|<1$ for the three inner-tracker layouts. The acceptances are provided separately for the requirements of $N_{\mathrm{layer}}^{\mathrm{hit}}=4$ and 5. The alternative layout $\#$3 has significantly higher acceptance than the others because the relevant layers are located closer to the beam line, particularly for the higgsino case with $N_{\mathrm{layer}}^{\mathrm{hit}}=5$.

Signal and background yields as well as the discovery significance for the 3 TeV wino and 1 TeV higgsino with 30 ab$^{-1}$ with the requirements of $N_{\mathrm{layer}}^{\mathrm{hit}}=5$ under the pileup condition of $\left<\mu\right>=200$. The fake-track background rate is assumed to be same for both alternative layouts. The kinematic selection requirements on the leading jet $p_{T}$ and $E_{\text{T}}^{\text{miss}}$ are also given.

Signal and background yields as well as the discovery significance for the 3 TeV wino and 1 TeV higgsino with 30 ab$^{-1}$ with the requirements of $N_{\mathrm{layer}}^{\mathrm{hit}}=5$ under the pileup condition of $\left<\mu\right>=500$. The fake-track background rate is assumed to be same for both alternative layouts. The kinematic selection requirements on the leading jet $p_{T}$ and $E_{\text{T}}^{\text{miss}}$ are also given.

v_{2}{EP} vs. p_{T} of average prompt D0, D+, D*+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 10-30% in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8 The first (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the other sources The second (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the B feed-down contribution.

v_{2}{EP} vs. p_{T} of prompt D0 mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 10-30% in the 60% small-q_{2}^{TPC} sample in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8 The first (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the other sources The second (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the B feed-down contribution.

v_{2}{EP} vs. p_{T} of prompt D0 mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 10-30% in the 20% large-q_{2}^{TPC} sample in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8 The first (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the other sources The second (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the B feed-down contribution.

v_{2}{EP} vs. p_{T} of prompt D+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 10-30% in the 60% small-q_{2}^{TPC} sample in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8 The first (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the other sources The second (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the B feed-down contribution.

v_{2}{EP} vs. p_{T} of prompt D+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 10-30% in the 20% large-q_{2}^{TPC} sample in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8 The first (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the other sources The second (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the B feed-down contribution.

v_{2}{EP} vs. p_{T} of prompt D0 mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 30-50% in the 60% small-q_{2}^{TPC} sample in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8 The first (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the other sources The second (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the B feed-down contribution.

v_{2}{EP} vs. p_{T} of prompt D0 mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 30-50% in the 20% large-q_{2}^{TPC} sample in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8 The first (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the other sources The second (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the B feed-down contribution.

v_{2}{EP} vs. p_{T} of prompt D+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 30-50% in the 60% small-q_{2}^{TPC} sample in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8 The first (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the other sources The second (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the B feed-down contribution.

v_{2}{EP} vs. p_{T} of prompt D+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 30-50% in the 20% large-q_{2}^{TPC} sample in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8 The first (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the other sources The second (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the B feed-down contribution.

v_{2}{EP} vs. p_{T} of average prompt D0, D+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 10-30% in the 60% small-q_{2}^{TPC} sample in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8 The first (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the other sources The second (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the B feed-down contribution.

v_{2}{EP} vs. p_{T} of average prompt D0, D+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 10-30% in the 20% large-q_{2}^{TPC} sample in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8 The first (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the other sources The second (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the B feed-down contribution.

v_{2}{EP} vs. p_{T} of average prompt D0, D+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 30-50% in the 60% small-q_{2}^{TPC} sample in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8 The first (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the other sources The second (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the B feed-down contribution.

v_{2}{EP} vs. p_{T} of average prompt D0, D+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 30-50% in the 20% large-q_{2}^{TPC} sample in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8 The first (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the other sources The second (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the B feed-down contribution.

Ratio of v_{2}{EP} in the 60% small-q_{2}^{TPC} sample to the unbiased sample vs. p_{T} of average prompt D0, D+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 10-30% in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8.

Ratio of v_{2}{EP} in the 20% large-q_{2}^{TPC} sample to the unbiased sample vs. p_{T} of average prompt D0, D+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 10-30% in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8.

Ratio of v_{2}{EP} in the 60% small-q_{2}^{TPC} sample to the unbiased sample vs. p_{T} of average prompt D0, D+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 30-50% in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8.

Ratio of v_{2}{EP} in the 20% large-q_{2}^{TPC} sample to the unbiased sample vs. p_{T} of average prompt D0, D+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 30-50% in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8.

v_{2}{EP} vs. p_{T} of average prompt D0, D+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 10-30% in the 60% small-q_{2}^{V0A} sample in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8 The first (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the other sources The second (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the B feed-down contribution.

v_{2}{EP} vs. p_{T} of average prompt D0, D+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 10-30% in the 20% large-q_{2}^{V0A} sample in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8 The first (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the other sources The second (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the B feed-down contribution.

v_{2}{EP} vs. p_{T} of average prompt D0, D+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 30-50% in the 60% small-q_{2}^{V0A} sample in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8 The first (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the other sources The second (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the B feed-down contribution.

v_{2}{EP} vs. p_{T} of average prompt D0, D+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 30-50% in the 20% large-q_{2}^{V0A} sample in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8 The first (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the other sources The second (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the B feed-down contribution.

Ratio of v_{2}{EP} in the 60% small-q_{2}^{V0A} sample to the unbiased sample vs. p_{T} of average prompt D0, D+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 10-30% in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8.

Ratio of v_{2}{EP} in the 20% large-q_{2}^{V0A} sample to the unbiased sample vs. p_{T} of average prompt D0, D+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 10-30% in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8.

Ratio of v_{2}{EP} in the 60% small-q_{2}^{V0A} sample to the unbiased sample vs. p_{T} of average prompt D0, D+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 30-50% in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8.

Ratio of v_{2}{EP} in the 20% large-q_{2}^{V0A} sample to the unbiased sample vs. p_{T} of average prompt D0, D+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 30-50% in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8.

v_{2}{SP} vs. p_{T} of charged particles in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 10-30% in the rapidity interval |eta|<0.8.

v_{2}{SP} vs. p_{T} of charged particles in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 10-30% in the 60% small-q_{2}^{V0A} sample in the rapidity interval |eta|<0.8.

v_{2}{SP} vs. p_{T} of charged particles in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 10-30% in the 20% large-q_{2}^{V0A} sample in the rapidity interval |eta|<0.8.

v_{2}{SP} vs. p_{T} of charged particles in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 30-50% in the rapidity interval |eta|<0.8.

v_{2}{SP} vs. p_{T} of charged particles in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 30-50% in the 60% small-q_{2}^{V0A} sample in the rapidity interval |eta|<0.8.

v_{2}{SP} vs. p_{T} of charged particles in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 30-50% in the 20% large-q_{2}^{V0A} sample in the rapidity interval |eta|<0.8.

Ratio of v_{2}{SP} in the 60% small-q_{2}^{V0A} sample to the unbiased sample vs. p_{T} of charged particles in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 10-30% in the rapidity interval |eta|<0.8.

Ratio of v_{2}{SP} in the 20% large-q_{2}^{V0A} sample to the unbiased sample vs. p_{T} of charged particles in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 10-30% in the rapidity interval |eta|<0.8.

Ratio of v_{2}{SP} in the 60% small-q_{2}^{V0A} sample to the unbiased sample vs. p_{T} of charged particles in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 30-50% in the rapidity interval |eta|<0.8.

Ratio of v_{2}{SP} in the 20% large-q_{2}^{V0A} sample to the unbiased sample vs. p_{T} of charged particles in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 30-50% in the rapidity interval |eta|<0.8.

Ratio of the p_{T} distribution in the 60% small-q_{2}^{TPC} sample to the unbiased sample of prompt D0 mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 10-30% in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8.

Ratio of the p_{T} distribution in the 60% small-q_{2}^{TPC} sample to the unbiased sample of prompt D+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 10-30% in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8.

Ratio of the p_{T} distribution in the 20% large-q_{2}^{TPC} sample to the unbiased sample of prompt D0 mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 10-30% in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8.

Ratio of the p_{T} distribution in the 20% large-q_{2}^{TPC} sample to the unbiased sample of prompt D+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 10-30% in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8.

Ratio of the p_{T} distribution in the 60% small-q_{2}^{TPC} sample to the unbiased sample of prompt D0 mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 30-50% in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8.

Ratio of the p_{T} distribution in the 60% small-q_{2}^{TPC} sample to the unbiased sample of prompt D+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 30-50% in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8.

Ratio of the p_{T} distribution in the 20% large-q_{2}^{TPC} sample to the unbiased sample of prompt D0 mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 30-50% in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8.

Ratio of the p_{T} distribution in the 20% large-q_{2}^{TPC} sample to the unbiased sample of prompt D+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 30-50% in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8.

Ratio of the p_{T} distribution in the 60% small-q_{2}^{TPC} sample to the unbiased sample of average prompt D0, D+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 10-30% in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8.

Ratio of the p_{T} distribution in the 20% large-q_{2}^{TPC} sample to the unbiased sample of average prompt D0, D+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 10-30% in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8.

Ratio of the p_{T} distribution in the 60% small-q_{2}^{TPC} sample to the unbiased sample of average prompt D0, D+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 30-50% in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8.

Ratio of the p_{T} distribution in the 20% large-q_{2}^{TPC} sample to the unbiased sample of average prompt D0, D+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 30-50% in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8.

Invariant mass distribution of the selected $\mathrm{B}^+\mathrm{K}^-$ candidates in data

Invariant mass distribution of the selected $\mathrm{B}^0 \mathrm{K}^{0}_{\mathrm{S}}$ candidates in data

The observed signal yields ($N$), natural widths ($\Gamma$), and mass differences from the fits to the $m_{\mathrm{BK}}$ distributions in data, for the two channels: $\mathrm{B}^+\mathrm{K}^-$ and $\mathrm{B}^0 \mathrm{K}^{0}_{\mathrm{S}}$. The uncertainties are statistical only.

The measured ratios of branching fractions

The measured ratios of cross sections times branching fractions

The measured mass differences $M(\mathrm{B}^{(*)0}_{\mathrm{s1,2}})-M^{\mathrm{PDG}}_{\mathrm{B}}-M^{\mathrm{PDG}}_{\mathrm{K}}$

The measured masses of $\mathrm{B}^{*}_{\mathrm{s2}}(5840)^0$ and $\mathrm{B}_{\mathrm{s1}}(5830)^0$ mesons

The measured mass differences between neutral and charged B mesons

The measured $\mathrm{B}^{*}_{\mathrm{s2}}(5840)^0$ natural width

Acceptance x efficiency versus resonance mass for both lephad and hadhad channels in the RS bulk model with k/MPl = 1

Acceptance x efficiency versus resonance mass for both lephad and hadhad channels in the RS bulk model with k/MPl = 2

Acceptance x efficiency versus resonance mass for both lephad and hadhad channels in the scalar model

Upper limits on the production cross-section times the HH to bbtautau branching ratio for non-resonant HH at 95% CLS and their interpretation as multiples of the SM prediction

Upper limits on the production cross-section times the HH to bbtautau branching ratio divided by the SM prediction for non-resonant HH at 95% CL

Post-fit expected number of signal and background events and observed number of data events after applying the selection criteria and requiring exactly 2 b-tagged jets and assuming a background-only hypothesis

Post-fit expected number of signal and background events and observed number of data events in the last two bins of the non-resonant BDT score distribution of the SM signal after applying the selection criteria and requiring exactly 2 b-tagged jets and assuming a background-only hypothesis