$\eta$ distributions of fake tracks in minimum-bias collision events and chargino tracks in 3 TeV wino signal events. The normalization is arbitrary. The details of fake track reconstruction is described in Sect. 5.2. The fake-track distribution is shown only within the range $|\eta|<2$.

Probability of finding a fake track in an event as a function of the average number of $pp$ interactions per bunch crossing ($\left<\mu\right>$). The probabilities for the tracks reconstructed with $N_{\mathrm{layer}}^{\mathrm{hit}}=4$ (5) are shown by the open (filled) markers, and they are presented separately for the three tracker layouts, the default layout ($\#$1) in black circles, the alternative layouts of $\#$2 in magenta squares and $\#$3 in red upward triangles. The probabilities for the layout $\#$2 are shown only at $\left<\mu\right>=200$. The estimate from the mixed sample of non-diffractive and diffractive events for the default layout is shown by the blue diamond for comparison purpose.

Expected discovery significance for the wino model with 30 ab$^{-1}$ with the requirement of $N_{\mathrm{layer}}^{\mathrm{hit}}=5$. The grey (red) bands show the significance using the default (alternative) layout $\#$1 ($\#$3). The difference between the solid and hatched bands corresponds to the different pileup conditions of $\left<\mu\right>=200$ and 500. The band width corresponds to the significance variation due to the two models assumed for soft QCD processes.

Expected discovery significance for the higgsino model with 30 ab$^{-1}$ with the requirement of $N_{\mathrm{layer}}^{\mathrm{hit}}=5$. The grey (red) bands show the significance using the default (alternative) layout $\#$1 ($\#$3). The difference between the solid and hatched bands corresponds to the different pileup conditions of $\left<\mu\right>=200$ and 500. The band width corresponds to the significance variation due to the two models assumed for soft QCD processes.

Expected discovery significance for the wino model with 30 ab$^{-1}$ with the requirements of $N_{\mathrm{layer}}^{\mathrm{hit}}=5$ and a good time-fit quality. The background reduction rate with the time information is assumed to be the same for both pileup conditions. The grey (red) bands show the significance using the default (alternative) layout $\#$1 ($\#$3). The difference between the solid and hatched bands corresponds to the different pileup conditions of $\left<\mu\right>=200$ and 500. The band width corresponds to the significance variation due to the two models assumed for soft QCD processes.

Expected discovery significance for the higgsino model with 30 ab$^{-1}$ with the requirements of $N_{\mathrm{layer}}^{\mathrm{hit}}=5$ and a good time-fit quality. The background reduction rate with the time information is assumed to be the same for both pileup conditions. The grey (red) bands show the significance using the default (alternative) layout $\#$1 ($\#$3). The difference between the solid and hatched bands corresponds to the different pileup conditions of $\left<\mu\right>=200$ and 500. The band width corresponds to the significance variation due to the two models assumed for soft QCD processes.

Summary of reach for charginos using a disappearing-track signature. The FCC-hh 5$\sigma$-discovery reach assuming the alternative layout, the average number of $pp$ interactions per bunch crossing of 500, only non-diffractive soft-QCD processes and a use of the time information of the pixel detector is shown in blue. The reach for the wino scenario is obtained by extrapolating the sensitivity curve in Fig. 6. The 5$\sigma$-discovery reach and the 95% CL exclusion sensitivity are taken from [46]. The observed exclusion in the ATLAS search with 36 fb$^{-1}$ of Run 2 data [39, 47] are shown as well.

Radial distances (in mm) of the first five layers from the beam line for the three inner-tracker layouts considered in this study.

Signal acceptance for the 3 TeV wino and 1 TeV higgsino with $|\eta|<1$ for the three inner-tracker layouts. The acceptances are provided separately for the requirements of $N_{\mathrm{layer}}^{\mathrm{hit}}=4$ and 5. The alternative layout $\#$3 has significantly higher acceptance than the others because the relevant layers are located closer to the beam line, particularly for the higgsino case with $N_{\mathrm{layer}}^{\mathrm{hit}}=5$.

Signal and background yields as well as the discovery significance for the 3 TeV wino and 1 TeV higgsino with 30 ab$^{-1}$ with the requirements of $N_{\mathrm{layer}}^{\mathrm{hit}}=5$ under the pileup condition of $\left<\mu\right>=200$. The fake-track background rate is assumed to be same for both alternative layouts. The kinematic selection requirements on the leading jet $p_{T}$ and $E_{\text{T}}^{\text{miss}}$ are also given.

Signal and background yields as well as the discovery significance for the 3 TeV wino and 1 TeV higgsino with 30 ab$^{-1}$ with the requirements of $N_{\mathrm{layer}}^{\mathrm{hit}}=5$ under the pileup condition of $\left<\mu\right>=500$. The fake-track background rate is assumed to be same for both alternative layouts. The kinematic selection requirements on the leading jet $p_{T}$ and $E_{\text{T}}^{\text{miss}}$ are also given.

v_{2}{EP} vs. p_{T} of average prompt D0, D+, D*+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 10-30% in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8 The first (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the other sources The second (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the B feed-down contribution.

v_{2}{EP} vs. p_{T} of prompt D0 mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 10-30% in the 60% small-q_{2}^{TPC} sample in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8 The first (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the other sources The second (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the B feed-down contribution.

v_{2}{EP} vs. p_{T} of prompt D0 mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 10-30% in the 20% large-q_{2}^{TPC} sample in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8 The first (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the other sources The second (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the B feed-down contribution.

v_{2}{EP} vs. p_{T} of prompt D+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 10-30% in the 60% small-q_{2}^{TPC} sample in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8 The first (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the other sources The second (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the B feed-down contribution.

v_{2}{EP} vs. p_{T} of prompt D+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 10-30% in the 20% large-q_{2}^{TPC} sample in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8 The first (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the other sources The second (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the B feed-down contribution.

v_{2}{EP} vs. p_{T} of prompt D0 mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 30-50% in the 60% small-q_{2}^{TPC} sample in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8 The first (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the other sources The second (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the B feed-down contribution.

v_{2}{EP} vs. p_{T} of prompt D0 mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 30-50% in the 20% large-q_{2}^{TPC} sample in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8 The first (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the other sources The second (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the B feed-down contribution.

v_{2}{EP} vs. p_{T} of prompt D+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 30-50% in the 60% small-q_{2}^{TPC} sample in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8 The first (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the other sources The second (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the B feed-down contribution.

v_{2}{EP} vs. p_{T} of prompt D+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 30-50% in the 20% large-q_{2}^{TPC} sample in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8 The first (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the other sources The second (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the B feed-down contribution.

v_{2}{EP} vs. p_{T} of average prompt D0, D+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 10-30% in the 60% small-q_{2}^{TPC} sample in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8 The first (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the other sources The second (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the B feed-down contribution.

v_{2}{EP} vs. p_{T} of average prompt D0, D+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 10-30% in the 20% large-q_{2}^{TPC} sample in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8 The first (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the other sources The second (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the B feed-down contribution.

v_{2}{EP} vs. p_{T} of average prompt D0, D+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 30-50% in the 60% small-q_{2}^{TPC} sample in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8 The first (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the other sources The second (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the B feed-down contribution.

v_{2}{EP} vs. p_{T} of average prompt D0, D+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 30-50% in the 20% large-q_{2}^{TPC} sample in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8 The first (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the other sources The second (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the B feed-down contribution.

Ratio of v_{2}{EP} in the 60% small-q_{2}^{TPC} sample to the unbiased sample vs. p_{T} of average prompt D0, D+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 10-30% in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8.

Ratio of v_{2}{EP} in the 20% large-q_{2}^{TPC} sample to the unbiased sample vs. p_{T} of average prompt D0, D+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 10-30% in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8.

Ratio of v_{2}{EP} in the 60% small-q_{2}^{TPC} sample to the unbiased sample vs. p_{T} of average prompt D0, D+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 30-50% in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8.

Ratio of v_{2}{EP} in the 20% large-q_{2}^{TPC} sample to the unbiased sample vs. p_{T} of average prompt D0, D+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 30-50% in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8.

v_{2}{EP} vs. p_{T} of average prompt D0, D+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 10-30% in the 60% small-q_{2}^{V0A} sample in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8 The first (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the other sources The second (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the B feed-down contribution.

v_{2}{EP} vs. p_{T} of average prompt D0, D+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 10-30% in the 20% large-q_{2}^{V0A} sample in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8 The first (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the other sources The second (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the B feed-down contribution.

v_{2}{EP} vs. p_{T} of average prompt D0, D+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 30-50% in the 60% small-q_{2}^{V0A} sample in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8 The first (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the other sources The second (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the B feed-down contribution.

v_{2}{EP} vs. p_{T} of average prompt D0, D+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 30-50% in the 20% large-q_{2}^{V0A} sample in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8 The first (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the other sources The second (sys) error is the systematic uncertainty from the B feed-down contribution.

Ratio of v_{2}{EP} in the 60% small-q_{2}^{V0A} sample to the unbiased sample vs. p_{T} of average prompt D0, D+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 10-30% in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8.

Ratio of v_{2}{EP} in the 20% large-q_{2}^{V0A} sample to the unbiased sample vs. p_{T} of average prompt D0, D+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 10-30% in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8.

Ratio of v_{2}{EP} in the 60% small-q_{2}^{V0A} sample to the unbiased sample vs. p_{T} of average prompt D0, D+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 30-50% in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8.

Ratio of v_{2}{EP} in the 20% large-q_{2}^{V0A} sample to the unbiased sample vs. p_{T} of average prompt D0, D+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 30-50% in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8.

v_{2}{SP} vs. p_{T} of charged particles in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 10-30% in the rapidity interval |eta|<0.8.

v_{2}{SP} vs. p_{T} of charged particles in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 10-30% in the 60% small-q_{2}^{V0A} sample in the rapidity interval |eta|<0.8.

v_{2}{SP} vs. p_{T} of charged particles in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 10-30% in the 20% large-q_{2}^{V0A} sample in the rapidity interval |eta|<0.8.

v_{2}{SP} vs. p_{T} of charged particles in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 30-50% in the rapidity interval |eta|<0.8.

v_{2}{SP} vs. p_{T} of charged particles in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 30-50% in the 60% small-q_{2}^{V0A} sample in the rapidity interval |eta|<0.8.

v_{2}{SP} vs. p_{T} of charged particles in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 30-50% in the 20% large-q_{2}^{V0A} sample in the rapidity interval |eta|<0.8.

Ratio of v_{2}{SP} in the 60% small-q_{2}^{V0A} sample to the unbiased sample vs. p_{T} of charged particles in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 10-30% in the rapidity interval |eta|<0.8.

Ratio of v_{2}{SP} in the 20% large-q_{2}^{V0A} sample to the unbiased sample vs. p_{T} of charged particles in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 10-30% in the rapidity interval |eta|<0.8.

Ratio of v_{2}{SP} in the 60% small-q_{2}^{V0A} sample to the unbiased sample vs. p_{T} of charged particles in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 30-50% in the rapidity interval |eta|<0.8.

Ratio of v_{2}{SP} in the 20% large-q_{2}^{V0A} sample to the unbiased sample vs. p_{T} of charged particles in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 30-50% in the rapidity interval |eta|<0.8.

Ratio of the p_{T} distribution in the 60% small-q_{2}^{TPC} sample to the unbiased sample of prompt D0 mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 10-30% in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8.

Ratio of the p_{T} distribution in the 60% small-q_{2}^{TPC} sample to the unbiased sample of prompt D+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 10-30% in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8.

Ratio of the p_{T} distribution in the 20% large-q_{2}^{TPC} sample to the unbiased sample of prompt D0 mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 10-30% in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8.

Ratio of the p_{T} distribution in the 20% large-q_{2}^{TPC} sample to the unbiased sample of prompt D+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 10-30% in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8.

Ratio of the p_{T} distribution in the 60% small-q_{2}^{TPC} sample to the unbiased sample of prompt D0 mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 30-50% in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8.

Ratio of the p_{T} distribution in the 60% small-q_{2}^{TPC} sample to the unbiased sample of prompt D+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 30-50% in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8.

Ratio of the p_{T} distribution in the 20% large-q_{2}^{TPC} sample to the unbiased sample of prompt D0 mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 30-50% in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8.

Ratio of the p_{T} distribution in the 20% large-q_{2}^{TPC} sample to the unbiased sample of prompt D+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 30-50% in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8.

Ratio of the p_{T} distribution in the 60% small-q_{2}^{TPC} sample to the unbiased sample of average prompt D0, D+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 10-30% in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8.

Ratio of the p_{T} distribution in the 20% large-q_{2}^{TPC} sample to the unbiased sample of average prompt D0, D+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 10-30% in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8.

Ratio of the p_{T} distribution in the 60% small-q_{2}^{TPC} sample to the unbiased sample of average prompt D0, D+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 30-50% in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8.

Ratio of the p_{T} distribution in the 20% large-q_{2}^{TPC} sample to the unbiased sample of average prompt D0, D+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 30-50% in the rapidity interval |y|<0.8.

Invariant mass distribution of the selected $\mathrm{B}^+\mathrm{K}^-$ candidates in data

Invariant mass distribution of the selected $\mathrm{B}^0 \mathrm{K}^{0}_{\mathrm{S}}$ candidates in data

The observed signal yields ($N$), natural widths ($\Gamma$), and mass differences from the fits to the $m_{\mathrm{BK}}$ distributions in data, for the two channels: $\mathrm{B}^+\mathrm{K}^-$ and $\mathrm{B}^0 \mathrm{K}^{0}_{\mathrm{S}}$. The uncertainties are statistical only.

The measured ratios of branching fractions

The measured ratios of cross sections times branching fractions

The measured mass differences $M(\mathrm{B}^{(*)0}_{\mathrm{s1,2}})-M^{\mathrm{PDG}}_{\mathrm{B}}-M^{\mathrm{PDG}}_{\mathrm{K}}$

The measured masses of $\mathrm{B}^{*}_{\mathrm{s2}}(5840)^0$ and $\mathrm{B}_{\mathrm{s1}}(5830)^0$ mesons

The measured mass differences between neutral and charged B mesons

The measured $\mathrm{B}^{*}_{\mathrm{s2}}(5840)^0$ natural width

Acceptance x efficiency versus resonance mass for both lephad and hadhad channels in the RS bulk model with k/MPl = 1

Acceptance x efficiency versus resonance mass for both lephad and hadhad channels in the RS bulk model with k/MPl = 2

Acceptance x efficiency versus resonance mass for both lephad and hadhad channels in the scalar model

Upper limits on the production cross-section times the HH to bbtautau branching ratio for non-resonant HH at 95% CLS and their interpretation as multiples of the SM prediction

Upper limits on the production cross-section times the HH to bbtautau branching ratio divided by the SM prediction for non-resonant HH at 95% CL

Post-fit expected number of signal and background events and observed number of data events after applying the selection criteria and requiring exactly 2 b-tagged jets and assuming a background-only hypothesis

Post-fit expected number of signal and background events and observed number of data events in the last two bins of the non-resonant BDT score distribution of the SM signal after applying the selection criteria and requiring exactly 2 b-tagged jets and assuming a background-only hypothesis

Transverse momentum spectra of charged particles in V0M IV multiplicity class

Transverse momentum spectra of charged particles in V0M V multiplicity class

Transverse momentum spectra of charged particles in V0M VI multiplicity class

Transverse momentum spectra of charged particles in V0M VII multiplicity class

Transverse momentum spectra of charged particles in V0M VIII multiplicity class

Transverse momentum spectra of charged particles in V0M IX multiplicity class

Transverse momentum spectra of charged particles in V0M X multiplicity class

Transverse momentum spectra of $\pi^{+} + \pi^{-}$ in V0M multiplicity class I

Transverse momentum spectra of $\pi^{+} + \pi^{-}$ in V0M multiplicity class II

Transverse momentum spectra of $\pi^{+} + \pi^{-}$ in V0M multiplicity class III

Transverse momentum spectra of $\pi^{+} + \pi^{-}$ in V0M multiplicity class IV

Transverse momentum spectra of $\pi^{+} + \pi^{-}$ in V0M multiplicity class V

Transverse momentum spectra of $\pi^{+} + \pi^{-}$ in V0M multiplicity class VI

Transverse momentum spectra of $\pi^{+} + \pi^{-}$ in V0M multiplicity class VII

Transverse momentum spectra of $\pi^{+} + \pi^{-}$ in V0M multiplicity class VIII

Transverse momentum spectra of $\pi^{+} + \pi^{-}$ in V0M multiplicity class IX

Transverse momentum spectra of $\pi^{+} + \pi^{-}$ in V0M multiplicity class X

Transverse momentum spectra of $K^{+} + K^{-}$ in V0M multiplicity class I

Transverse momentum spectra of $K^{+} + K^{-}$ in V0M multiplicity class II

Transverse momentum spectra of $K^{+} + K^{-}$ in V0M multiplicity class III

Transverse momentum spectra of $K^{+} + K^{-}$ in V0M multiplicity class IV

Transverse momentum spectra of $K^{+} + K^{-}$ in V0M multiplicity class V

Transverse momentum spectra of $K^{+} + K^{-}$ in V0M multiplicity class VI

Transverse momentum spectra of $K^{+} + K^{-}$ in V0M multiplicity class VII

Transverse momentum spectra of $K^{+} + K^{-}$ in V0M multiplicity class VIII

Transverse momentum spectra of $K^{+} + K^{-}$ in V0M multiplicity class IX

Transverse momentum spectra of $K^{+} + K^{-}$ in V0M multiplicity class X

Transverse momentum spectra of $p + \bar{p}$ in V0M multiplicity class I

Transverse momentum spectra of $p + \bar{p}$ in V0M multiplicity class II

Transverse momentum spectra of $p + \bar{p}$ in V0M multiplicity class III

Transverse momentum spectra of $p + \bar{p}$ in V0M multiplicity class IV

Transverse momentum spectra of $p + \bar{p}$ in V0M multiplicity class V

Transverse momentum spectra of $p + \bar{p}$ in V0M multiplicity class VI

Transverse momentum spectra of $p + \bar{p}$ in V0M multiplicity class VII

Transverse momentum spectra of $p + \bar{p}$ in V0M multiplicity class VIII

Transverse momentum spectra of $p + \bar{p}$ in V0M multiplicity class IX

Transverse momentum spectra of $p + \bar{p}$ in V0M multiplicity class X

Transverse momentum spectra of $K* + \bar{K}*$ in V0M multiplicity class I

Transverse momentum spectra of $K* + \bar{K}*$ in V0M multiplicity class II

Transverse momentum spectra of $K* + \bar{K}*$ in V0M multiplicity class III

Transverse momentum spectra of $K* + \bar{K}*$ in V0M multiplicity class IV + V

Transverse momentum spectra of $K* + \bar{K}*$ in V0M multiplicity class VI

Transverse momentum spectra of $K* + \bar{K}*$ in V0M multiplicity class VII

Transverse momentum spectra of $K* + \bar{K}*$ in V0M multiplicity class VIII

Transverse momentum spectra of $K* + \bar{K}*$ in V0M multiplicity class IX

Transverse momentum spectra of $K* + \bar{K}*$ in V0M multiplicity class X

Transverse momentum spectra of $\phi$ in V0M multiplicity class I

Transverse momentum spectra of $\phi$ in V0M multiplicity class II

Transverse momentum spectra of $\phi$ in V0M multiplicity class III

Transverse momentum spectra of $\phi$ in V0M multiplicity class IV + V

Transverse momentum spectra of $\phi$ in V0M multiplicity class VI

Transverse momentum spectra of $\phi$ in V0M multiplicity class VII

Transverse momentum spectra of $\phi$ in V0M multiplicity class VIII

Transverse momentum spectra of $\phi$ in V0M multiplicity class IX

Transverse momentum spectra of $\phi$ in V0M multiplicity class X

Unidentified particle spectral modification in V0M Class IX pp collisions.

$\pi^{+}+\pi^{-}$ spectral modification in V0M Class IX pp collisions.

$K^{+}+K^{-}$ spectral modification in V0M Class IX pp collisions.

$p+\bar{p}$ spectral modification in V0M Class IX pp collisions.

$\Lambda + \bar{\Lambda}$ spectral modification in V0M Class IX pp collisions.

$\Xi^{-} + \bar{\Xi}^{+}$ spectral modification in V0M Class IX pp collisions.

$K* + \bar{K}*$ spectral modification in V0M Class IX pp collisions.

$\phi$ spectral modification in V0M Class IX pp collisions.

Unidentified particle spectral modification in V0M Class I pp collisions.

$\pi^{+}+\pi^{-}$ spectral modification in V0M Class I pp collisions.

$K^{+}+K^{-}$ spectral modification in V0M Class I pp collisions.

$p+\bar{p}$ spectral modification in V0M Class I pp collisions.

$\Lambda + \bar{\Lambda}$ spectral modification in V0M Class I pp collisions.

$\Xi^{-} + \bar{\Xi}^{+}$ spectral modification in V0M Class I pp collisions.

$K* + \bar{K}*$ spectral modification in V0M Class I pp collisions.

$\phi$ spectral modification in V0M Class I pp collisions.

Transverse momentum dependence of $(p + \bar{p})/\phi$ yield ratios in low multiplicity pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7$ (TeV).

Transverse momentum dependence of $(K^{+} + K^{-})/(\pi^{+} + \pi^{-})$ yield ratios in low multiplicity pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7$ (TeV).

Transverse momentum dependence of $(p + \bar{p})/(\pi^{+} + \pi^{-})$ yield ratios in low multiplicity pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7$ (TeV).

Transverse momentum dependence of $\Lambda/K^{0}_{s}$ yield ratios in low multiplicity pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7$ (TeV).

Transverse momentum dependence of $(p + \bar{p})/\phi$ yield ratios in high multiplicity pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7$ (TeV).

Transverse momentum dependence of $(K^{+} + K^{-})/(\pi^{+} + \pi^{-})$ yield ratios in high multiplicity pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7$ (TeV).

Transverse momentum dependence of $(p + \bar{p})/(\pi^{+} + \pi^{-})$ yield ratios in high multiplicity pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7$ (TeV).

Transverse momentum dependence of $\Lambda/K^{0}_{s}$ yield ratios in high multiplicity pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7$ (TeV).

Transverse momentum dependence of $(p + \bar{p})/\phi$ ratio in low-$p_{T}$ interval in pp collisions as a function of $\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta \rangle_{|\eta|<0.5}$.

Transverse momentum dependence of $(K^{+} + K^{-})/(\pi^{+} + \pi^{-})$ ratio in low-$p_{T}$ interval in pp collisions as a function of $\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta \rangle_{|\eta|<0.5}$.

Transverse momentum dependence of $(p + \bar{p})/(\pi^{+} + \pi^{-})$ ratio in low-$p_{T}$ interval in pp collisions as a function of $\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta \rangle_{|\eta|<0.5}$.

Transverse momentum dependence of $\Lambda/K^{0}_{s}$ ratio in low-$p_{T}$ interval in pp collisions as a function of $\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta \rangle_{|\eta|<0.5}$.

Transverse momentum dependence of $(p + \bar{p})/\phi$ ratio in mid-$p_{T}$ interval in pp collisions as a function of $\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta \rangle_{|\eta|<0.5}$.

Transverse momentum dependence of $(K^{+} + K^{-})/(\pi^{+} + \pi^{-})$ ratio in mid-$p_{T}$ interval in pp collisions as a function of $\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta \rangle_{|\eta|<0.5}$.

Transverse momentum dependence of $(p + \bar{p})/(\pi^{+} + \pi^{-})$ ratio in mid-$p_{T}$ interval in pp collisions as a function of $\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta \rangle_{|\eta|<0.5}$.

Transverse momentum dependence of $\Lambda/K^{0}_{s}$ ratio in mid-$p_{T}$ interval in pp collisions as a function of $\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta \rangle_{|\eta|<0.5}$.

Transverse momentum dependence of $(p + \bar{p})/\phi$ ratio in high-$p_{T}$ interval in pp collisions as a function of $\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta \rangle_{|\eta|<0.5}$.

Transverse momentum dependence of $(K^{+} + K^{-})/(\pi^{+} + \pi^{-})$ ratio in high-$p_{T}$ interval in pp collisions as a function of $\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta \rangle_{|\eta|<0.5}$.

Transverse momentum dependence of $(p + \bar{p})/(\pi^{+} + \pi^{-})$ ratio in high-$p_{T}$ interval in pp collisions as a function of $\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta \rangle_{|\eta|<0.5}$.

Transverse momentum dependence of $\Lambda/K^{0}_{s}$ ratio in high-$p_{T}$ interval in pp collisions as a function of $\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta \rangle_{|\eta|<0.5}$.

Integrated $(K^{+} + K^{-})$/$(\pi^{+} + \pi^{-})$ ratios as a function of $\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta\rangle$ in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7$ TeV.

Integrated $(K^{*} + \bar{K}^{*})$/$(\pi^{+} + \pi^{-})$ ratios as a function of $\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta\rangle$ in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7$ TeV.

Integrated $\phi$/$(\pi^{+} + \pi^{-})$ ratios as a function of $\langle dN_{ch}/d\eta\rangle$ in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 7$ TeV.

$\langle\beta_{T}\rangle$ from blast-wave fit to PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 2.76 TeV

$T_{kin}$ from blast-wave fit to PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 2.76 TeV

$n$ from blast-wave fit to PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 2.76 TeV

$\langle\beta_{T}\rangle$ from blast-wave fit to pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 5.02 TeV

$T_{kin}$ from blast-wave fit to pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 5.02 TeV

$n$ from blast-wave fit to pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 5.02 TeV

$\langle\beta_{T}\rangle$ from blast-wave fit to pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 7 TeV

$T_{kin}$ from blast-wave fit to pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 7 TeV

$n$ from blast-wave fit to pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 7 TeV

Dijet mass spectra after the background only fit with the background prediction in the high-mass region with two b-tags.

Dijet mass spectra after the background only fit with the background prediction in the low-mass region with two b-tags.

The online b-tagging efficiency with respect to the offline b-tagging efficiency as a function of pT. The b-tagging online and offline working points correspond to an efficiency of 60% and 70%, respectively.

Observed and expected 95% credibility-level upper limits on the cross-section for the b* model in the high-mass region with inclusive b-jet selection.

Observed and expected 95% credibility-level upper limits on the cross-section times branching ratio for the SSM and leptophobic Z' models in the low- and high-mass region with two b-tags selection.

Observed and expected 95% credibility-level upper limits on the cross-section for DM Z' models in the low-mass region with two b-tags selection. The Z' is expected to decay to all five quark flavors other than the top quark and the mediator to SM quark coupling (gSM) equal to 0.1 is assumed.

Observed and expected 95% credibility-level upper limits on the cross-section times branching ratio for DM Z'->bb models in the high-mass region with two b-tags selection. The Z' is expected to decay to bb only and the mediator to SM quark coupling (gSM) equal to 0.25 is assumed.

Observed and expected 95% credibility-level upper limits on cross section times acceptance times branching ratio of X --> bb, including kinematic acceptance and b-tagging efficiencies, for resonances with intrinsic width smaller than the detector resolution. The width of the Gaussian reconstructed shape is dominated by the dijet mass resolution. The table shows the limits obtained from the high-mass inclusive one b-tag selection.

Observed and expected 95% credibility-level upper limits on cross section times acceptance times branching ratio of X --> bb, including kinematic acceptance and b-tagging efficiencies, for resonances with intrinsic width smaller than the detector resolution. The width of the Gaussian reconstructed shape is dominated by the dijet mass resolution. The table shows the limits obtained from the combined low- and high-mass two b-tags selection.

The mass distributions for the inclusive one b-tagged selection and two b-tagged selection using an integrated luminosity of 36.1 $fb^{-1}$. The inclusive one b-tagged Pythia8 MC distribution is normalized to the inclusive one b-tagged data. The two b-tagged Pythia8 MC distribution is normalized to the two b-tagged data. The systematic uncertainty band is dominated by the b-tagging scale factor and the b-jet energy scale.

Signal acceptance times efficiency for inclusive 1 b-tag and 2 b-tag categories as a function of the simulated b* and the Z' masses.

Signal acceptance times efficiency for 2 b-tag categories as a function of the simulated Z' masses.

The flavor composition of the simulated dijet background as a function of dijet mass before tagging. The fraction of the six combinations of the b-jet , c-jet and light-flavor jet are shown. All offline selections are applied.

The flavor composition of the simulated dijet background as a function of dijet mass with inclusive one b-tag. The fraction of the six combinations of the b-jet , c-jet and light-flavor jet are shown. All offline selections are applied.

The flavor composition of the simulated dijet background as a function of dijet mass with two b-tags. The fraction of the six combinations of the b-jet , c-jet and light-flavor jet are shown. All offline selections are applied.

Observed and expected 95% credibility-level upper limits on cross section times acceptance times branching ratio of X --> bb, including kinematic acceptance and b-tagging efficiencies, for resonances exhibiting a generic Gaussian shape at particle level. The table shows the limits obtained from the inclusive b-jet selection. The limits corresponding to Gaussian-shaped resonances with width of Γ(X)/m(X) = 3%.

Observed and expected 95% credibility-level upper limits on cross section times acceptance times branching ratio of X --> bb, including kinematic acceptance and b-tagging efficiencies, for resonances exhibiting a generic Gaussian shape at particle level. The table shows the limits obtained from the inclusive b-jet selection. The limits corresponding to Gaussian-shaped resonances with width of Γ(X)/m(X) = 7%.

Observed and expected 95% credibility-level upper limits on cross section times acceptance times branching ratio of X --> bb, including kinematic acceptance and b-tagging efficiencies, for resonances exhibiting a generic Gaussian shape at particle level. The table shows the limits obtained from the inclusive b-jet selection. The limits corresponding to Gaussian-shaped resonances with width of Γ(X)/m(X) = 10%.

Observed and expected 95% credibility-level upper limits on cross section times acceptance times branching ratio of X --> bb, including kinematic acceptance and b-tagging efficiencies, for resonances exhibiting a generic Gaussian shape at particle level. The table shows the limits obtained from the inclusive b-jet selection. The limits corresponding to Gaussian-shaped resonances with width of Γ(X)/m(X) = 15%.

Observed and expected 95% credibility-level upper limits on cross section times acceptance times branching ratio of X --> bb, including kinematic acceptance and b-tagging efficiencies, for resonances exhibiting a generic Gaussian shape at particle level. The table shows the limits obtained from the combined low- and high-mass two b-tags selection. The limits corresponding to Gaussian-shaped resonances with width of Γ(X)/m(X) = 3%.

Observed and expected 95% credibility-level upper limits on cross section times acceptance times branching ratio of X --> bb, including kinematic acceptance and b-tagging efficiencies, for resonances exhibiting a generic Gaussian shape at particle level. The table shows the limits obtained from the combined low- and high-mass two b-tags selection. The limits corresponding to Gaussian-shaped resonances with width of Γ(X)/m(X) = 7%.

Observed and expected 95% credibility-level upper limits on cross section times acceptance times branching ratio of X --> bb, including kinematic acceptance and b-tagging efficiencies, for resonances exhibiting a generic Gaussian shape at particle level. The table shows the limits obtained from the combined low- and high-mass two b-tags selection. The limits corresponding to Gaussian-shaped resonances with width of Γ(X)/m(X) = 10%.

Observed and expected 95% credibility-level upper limits on cross section times acceptance times branching ratio of X --> bb, including kinematic acceptance and b-tagging efficiencies, for resonances exhibiting a generic Gaussian shape at particle level. The table shows the limits obtained from the combined low- and high-mass two b-tags selection. The limits corresponding to Gaussian-shaped resonances with width of Γ(X)/m(X) = 15%.

d$\sigma$/dy for non-prompt J/$\psi$ in p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_NN}=5.02 TeV$

d$^2\sigma$/d$y$d$p_{\rm T}$ in bins of $p_T^{J/\psi}$ for non-prompt J/$\psi$ in p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV. The data point in the first $p_{\rm T}$ bin is un upper limit at 95% Confidence Level.

Nuclear modification factor ($R_{pPb}$) in bins of $p_T^{J/\psi}$ for non-prompt J/$\psi$ in p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV. The data point in the first $p_{\rm T}$ bin is un upper limit at 95% Confidence Level.

Nuclear modification factor ($R_{pPb}$) for non-prompt J/$\psi$ integrated over $p_{\rm T}$ in p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV at mid-rapidity.

d$^2\sigma$/d $p_{\rm{T}}$dy versus $p_T^{J/\psi}$ for prompt J/$\psi$ in p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.

Nuclear modification factor ($R_{pPb}$) in bins of $p_T^{J/\psi}$ for prompt J/$\psi$ in p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.

Nuclear modification factor ($R_{pPb}$) for prompt J/$\psi$ integrated over $p_{\rm T}$ in p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV at mid-rapidity.

Beauty production cross section at mid-rapidity (d$sigma$/d$y$) in p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.

d$\sigma$/dy for prompt J/$\psi$ in p-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_NN}=5.02 TeV$ integrated over $p_{\rm T}$>0.

Ratio of the measured ETA to PI0 ratio to the one obtained via m_T scaling in NSD p-Pb collisions with centre-of-mass energy/nucleon=5.02 TeV.

The nuclear modification factor RPPB of PI0 as a function of pT in NSD p-Pb collisions with centre-of-mass energy/nucleon=5.02 TeV, the overall normalization uncertainty of 5.96 % is not included.

The nuclear modification factor RPPB of ETA as a function of pT in NSD p-Pb collisions with centre-of-mass energy/nucleon=5.02 TeV, the overall normalization uncertainty of 5.96 % is not included.