Exclusive Vector Meson Production in Muon - Proton Scattering

del Papa, C. ; Dorfan, David E. ; Flatte, Stanley M. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.D 19 (1979) 1303, 1979.
Inspire Record 130570 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.24312

From a muon-proton scattering experiment with a streamer chamber at the Stanford Linear Accelerator we present results in the ranges 0.3<Q2<4.7 GeV2 and 1.7<W<4.7 GeV for the reactions μ+p→μpV where V is a vector meson (ρ0, ω, or φ). It is shown that in ρ production the skewing parameter and the longitudinal-transverse ratio change significantly as Q2 increases above 1 GeV2. The cross section for ρ0 production as a function of Q2 falls below the vector-meson-dominance prediction. The ratio of the cross section for exclusive vector-meson production to the total cross section falls by a factor of 10 between photoproduction and a Q2 of 2 GeV2, yet the ratio of ω to ρ production remains constant at the photoproduction value out to Q2>2 GeV2.

4 data tables

THE ABSOLUTE TOTAL CROSS SECTION IS FROM A FIT TO THE MIT-SLAC ELECTRON SCATTERING DATA BY W. ATWOOD AND S. STEIN.

No description provided.

FOR 0.6 < M(PI+ PI-) < 0.9 GEV, USING THE METHOD OF MOMENTS.

More…

Measurement of Anti-proton - Proton Small Angle Elastic Scattering at Low Momentum

Linssen, L. ; Beard, C.I. ; Birsa, R. ; et al.
Nucl.Phys.A 469 (1987) 726, 1987.
Inspire Record 245092 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.37014

Two high statistics measurements of antiproton-proton small-angle elastic scattering, at p = 233 MeV/ c and p = 272 MeV/ c , are presented. The measurements were carried out at the LEAR facility at CERN. By the Coulomb-nuclear interference method, values are obtained for the real-to-imaginary ratio ρ of the p̄p forward nuclear scattering amplitude and for its exponential slope b : ρ = + 0.041 ± 0.026 and b = 71.5 ± 4.5 (GeV/ c ) −2 at 233 MeV/ c and ρ = −0.014 ± 0.027 and b = 47.7 ± 2.7 (GeV/ c ) −2 at 272 MeV/ c . The method to derive these values is discussed in detail and so are the uncertainties contributing to their systematic error. The results are compared with predictions from forward dispersion relation calculations and with predictions from p̄p potential models.

3 data tables

The corrected cross section is the measured divided by the average folding correction given in the paper.

The corrected cross section is the measured divided by the average folding Correction given in the paper.

Fits to data use the value of total cross sections of 263 & 296 mb for 272 & 233 Mev respectively derived from the authors total cross sections measurement. ETA is the spin dependence parameter.


Real to Imaginary Ratio of the $\bar{p} p$ Forward Elastic Scattering Amplitude at 550-{MeV}/$c$, 757-{MeV}/$c$ and 1077-{MeV}/$c$

Schiavon, P. ; Birsa, R. ; Bos, K. ; et al.
Nucl.Phys.A 505 (1989) 595-609, 1989.
Inspire Record 277295 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.36894

The ratio of the real to the imaginary part of the pp forward elastic-scattering amplitude ϱ has been measured at 550, 757, and 1077 MeV/ c at LEAR, using the Coulomb-nuclear interference method. The results obtained for ρ and b , the nuclear slope, are ϱ = 0.084 ± 0.051 and b = 20.9 ± 2.1 (GeV/ c ) −2 at 550 MeV/ c , ϱ = 0.102 ± 0.043 and b = 18.0 ± 0.5 (GeV/ c ) −2 = at 757 MeV/ c , and ϱ = 0.059 ± 0.035 and b = 15.2 ± 0.3 (GeV/ c ) −2 at 1077 MeV/ c .

4 data tables

Error on SLOPE is statistical only.

Measured differential cross sections corrected for small-angle trigger efficiency and absorption losses. Statistical errors only.

Measured differential cross sections corrected for small-angle trigger efficiency and absorption losses. Statistical errors only.

More…

Measurement of $d \sigma / d \Omega$ and A(on) in $\bar{p} p$ Elastic Scattering Between 497-{MeV}/$c$ and 1550-{MeV}/$c$

Kunne, R.A. ; Beard, C.I. ; Birsa, R. ; et al.
Nucl.Phys.B 323 (1989) 1-36, 1989.
Inspire Record 267175 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.48676

Measurements have been made of the differential cross section and asymmetry A on for p p elastic scattering at 15 incident momenta between 497 MeV/ c and 1550 MeV/ c . The angular range where both particles have enough energy to traverse target and setup has been covered. The results are compared with predictions of various N N potential models. None of these models fully explains the present results, although the general trend of the data is predicted correctly.

16 data tables

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

More…