Differential production cross-sections for prompt $D^{+} + D^{-}$ mesons in bins of $(p_{\mathrm{T}}, y)$. The first uncertainty is statistical, and the second is the total systematic.

Differential production cross-sections for prompt $D_{s}^{+} + D_{s}^{-}$ mesons in bins of $(p_{\mathrm{T}}, y)$. The first uncertainty is statistical, and the second is the total systematic.

Differential production cross-sections for prompt $D_{s}^{+} + D_{s}^{-}$ mesons in bins of $(p_{\mathrm{T}}, y)$. The first uncertainty is statistical, and the second is the total systematic.

Differential production cross-sections for prompt $D^{*+} + D^{*-}$ mesons in bins of $(p_{\mathrm{T}}, y)$. The first uncertainty is statistical, and the second is the total systematic.

Differential production cross-sections for prompt $D^{*+} + D^{*-}$ mesons in bins of $(p_{\mathrm{T}}, y)$. The first uncertainty is statistical, and the second is the total systematic.

The ratios of differential production cross-sections, $R_{13/5}$, for prompt $D^{0} + \bar{D}^{0}$ mesons in bins of $(p_{\mathrm{T}}, y)$. The first uncertainty is statistical, and the second is the total systematic.

The ratios of differential production cross-sections, $R_{13/5}$, for prompt $D^{0} + \bar{D}^{0}$ mesons in bins of $(p_{\mathrm{T}}, y)$. The first uncertainty is statistical, and the second is the total systematic.

The ratios of differential production cross-sections, $R_{13/5}$, for prompt $D^{+} + D^{-}$ mesons in bins of $(p_{\mathrm{T}}, y)$. The first uncertainty is statistical, and the second is the total systematic.

The ratios of differential production cross-sections, $R_{13/5}$, for prompt $D^{+} + D^{-}$ mesons in bins of $(p_{\mathrm{T}}, y)$. The first uncertainty is statistical, and the second is the total systematic.

The ratios of differential production cross-sections, $R_{13/5}$, for prompt $D_{s}^{+} + D_{s}^{-}$ mesons in bins of $(p_{\mathrm{T}}, y)$. The first uncertainty is statistical, and the second is the total systematic.

The ratios of differential production cross-sections, $R_{13/5}$, for prompt $D_{s}^{+} + D_{s}^{-}$ mesons in bins of $(p_{\mathrm{T}}, y)$. The first uncertainty is statistical, and the second is the total systematic.

The ratios of differential production cross-sections, $R_{13/5}$, for prompt $D^{*+} + D^{*-}$ mesons in bins of $(p_{\mathrm{T}}, y)$. The first uncertainty is statistical, and the second is the total systematic.

The ratios of differential production cross-sections, $R_{13/5}$, for prompt $D^{*+} + D^{*-}$ mesons in bins of $(p_{\mathrm{T}}, y)$. The first uncertainty is statistical, and the second is the total systematic.

The ratios of differential production cross-section-times-branching fraction measurements for prompt $D^{+}$ and $D^{0}$ mesons in bins of $(p_{\mathrm{T}}, y)$. The first uncertainty is statistical, and the second is the total systematic. All values are given in percent.

The ratios of differential production cross-section-times-branching fraction measurements for prompt $D^{+}$ and $D^{0}$ mesons in bins of $(p_{\mathrm{T}}, y)$. The first uncertainty is statistical, and the second is the total systematic. All values are given in percent.

The ratios of differential production cross-section-times-branching fraction measurements for prompt $D_{s}^{+}$ and $D^{0}$ mesons in bins of $(p_{\mathrm{T}}, y)$. The first uncertainty is statistical, and the second is the total systematic. All values are given in percent.

The ratios of differential production cross-section-times-branching fraction measurements for prompt $D_{s}^{+}$ and $D^{0}$ mesons in bins of $(p_{\mathrm{T}}, y)$. The first uncertainty is statistical, and the second is the total systematic. All values are given in percent.

The ratios of differential production cross-section-times-branching fraction measurements for prompt $D^{*+}$ and $D^{0}$ mesons in bins of $(p_{\mathrm{T}}, y)$. The first uncertainty is statistical, and the second is the total systematic. All values are given in percent.

The ratios of differential production cross-section-times-branching fraction measurements for prompt $D^{*+}$ and $D^{0}$ mesons in bins of $(p_{\mathrm{T}}, y)$. The first uncertainty is statistical, and the second is the total systematic. All values are given in percent.

The ratios of differential production cross-section-times-branching fraction measurements for prompt $D_{s}^{+}$ and $D^{+}$ mesons in bins of $(p_{\mathrm{T}}, y)$. The first uncertainty is statistical, and the second is the total systematic. All values are given in percent.

The ratios of differential production cross-section-times-branching fraction measurements for prompt $D_{s}^{+}$ and $D^{+}$ mesons in bins of $(p_{\mathrm{T}}, y)$. The first uncertainty is statistical, and the second is the total systematic. All values are given in percent.

The ratios of differential production cross-section-times-branching fraction measurements for prompt $D^{*+}$ and $D^{+}$ mesons in bins of $(p_{\mathrm{T}}, y)$. The first uncertainty is statistical, and the second is the total systematic. All values are given in percent.

The ratios of differential production cross-section-times-branching fraction measurements for prompt $D^{*+}$ and $D^{+}$ mesons in bins of $(p_{\mathrm{T}}, y)$. The first uncertainty is statistical, and the second is the total systematic. All values are given in percent.

The ratios of differential production cross-section-times-branching fraction measurements for prompt $D_{s}^{+}$ and $D^{*+}$ mesons in bins of $(p_{\mathrm{T}}, y)$. The first uncertainty is statistical, and the second is the total systematic. All values are given in percent.

The ratios of differential production cross-section-times-branching fraction measurements for prompt $D_{s}^{+}$ and $D^{*+}$ mesons in bins of $(p_{\mathrm{T}}, y)$. The first uncertainty is statistical, and the second is the total systematic. All values are given in percent.

Normalized distribution of the variable $\Delta^{p_{\mathrm{T}}}_{13}$, defined in Eq (16) of the paper, in data after unfolding to particle level.

Normalized distribution of the variable $\Delta^{p_{\mathrm{T}}}_{23}$, defined in Eq (16) of the paper, in data after unfolding to particle level.

Normalized distribution of the variable $\Delta^{p_{\mathrm{T}}}_{14}$, defined in Eq (16) of the paper, in data after unfolding to particle level.

Normalized distribution of the variable $\Delta^{p_{\mathrm{T}}}_{24}$, defined in Eq (16) of the paper, in data after unfolding to particle level.

Normalized distribution of the variable $\Delta\phi_{12}$, defined in Eq (16) of the paper, in data after unfolding to particle level.

Normalized distribution of the variable $\Delta\phi_{13}$, defined in Eq (16) of the paper, in data after unfolding to particle level.

Normalized distribution of the variable $\Delta\phi_{23}$, defined in Eq (16) of the paper, in data after unfolding to particle level.

Normalized distribution of the variable $\Delta\phi_{14}$, defined in Eq (16) of the paper, in data after unfolding to particle level.

Normalized distribution of the variable $\Delta\phi_{24}$, defined in Eq (16) of the paper, in data after unfolding to particle level.

Normalized distribution of the variable $\Delta y_{12}$, defined in Eq (16) of the paper, in data after unfolding to particle level.

Normalized distribution of the variable $\Delta y_{34}$, defined in Eq (16) of the paper, in data after unfolding to particle level.

Normalized distribution of the variable $\Delta y_{13}$, defined in Eq (16) of the paper, in data after unfolding to particle level.

Normalized distribution of the variable $\Delta y_{23}$, defined in Eq (16) of the paper, in data after unfolding to particle level.

Normalized distribution of the variable $\Delta y_{14}$, defined in Eq (16) of the paper, in data after unfolding to particle level.

Normalized distribution of the variable $\Delta y_{24}$, defined in Eq (16) of the paper, in data after unfolding to particle level.

Normalized distribution of the variable $\phi_{1+2} - \phi_{3+4}$, defined in Eq (16) of the paper, in data after unfolding to particle level.

Normalized distribution of the variable $\phi_{1+3} - \phi_{2+4}$, defined in Eq (16) of the paper, in data after unfolding to particle level.

Normalized distribution of the variable $\phi_{1+4} - \phi_{2+3}$, defined in Eq (16) of the paper, in data after unfolding to particle level.

Summary of results for cross-section of non-prompt $J/\psi$ decaying to a muon pair for 8 TeV data in nb/GeV. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.

Summary of results for cross-section of prompt $\psi(2S)$ decaying to a muon pair for 7 TeV data in nb/GeV. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.

Summary of results for cross-section of prompt $\psi(2S)$ decaying to a muon pair for 8 TeV data in nb/GeV. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.

Summary of results for cross-section of non-prompt $\psi(2S)$ decaying to a muon pair for 7 TeV data in nb/GeV. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.

Summary of results for cross-section of non-prompt $\psi(2S)$ decaying to a muon pair for 8 TeV data in nb/GeV. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.

Summary of results for non-prompt fraction of $J/\psi$ decaying to a muon pair as a percentage for 7 TeV data. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.

Summary of results for non-prompt fraction of $J/\psi$ decaying to a muon pair as a percentage for 8 TeV data. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.

Summary of results for non-prompt fraction of $\psi(2S)$ decaying to a muon pair as a percentage for 7 TeV data. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.

Summary of results for non-prompt fraction of $\psi(2S)$ decaying to a muon pair as a percentage for 8 TeV data. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.

Summary of results for prompt $\psi(2S)$ over $J/\psi$ ratio as a percentage for 7 TeV data. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.

Summary of results for prompt $\psi(2S)$ over $J/\psi$ ratio as a percentage for 8 TeV data. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.

Summary of results for non-prompt $\psi(2S)$ over $J/\psi$ ratio as a percentage for 7 TeV data. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.

Summary of results for non-prompt $\psi(2S)$ over $J/\psi$ ratio as a percentage for 8 TeV data. Uncertainties are statistical and systematic, respectively.

Mean weight correction factor for $J/\psi$ under the "longitudinal" spin-alignment hypothesis for 7 TeV.

Mean weight correction factor for $J/\psi$ under the "transverse zero" spin-alignment hypothesis for 7 TeV.

Mean weight correction factor for $J/\psi$ under the "transverse positive" spin-alignment transverse positive hypothesis for 7 TeV.

Mean weight correction factor for $J/\psi$ under the "transverse negative" spin-alignment hypothesis for 7 TeV.

Mean weight correction factor for $J/\psi$ under the "off-($\lambda_{\theta}$--$\lambda_{\phi}$)-plane positive" spin-alignment hypothesis for 7 TeV.

Mean weight correction factor for $J/\psi$ under the "off-($\lambda_{\theta}$--$\lambda_{\phi}$)-plane negative" spin-alignment hypothesis for 7 TeV.

Mean weight correction factor for $\psi(2S)$ under the "longitudinal" spin-alignment hypothesis for 7 TeV.

Mean weight correction factor for $\psi(2S)$ under the "transverse zero" spin-alignment hypothesis for 7 TeV.

Mean weight correction factor for $\psi(2S)$ under the "transverse positive" spin-alignment hypothesis for 7 TeV.

Mean weight correction factor for $\psi(2S)$ under the "transverse negative" spin-alignment hypothesis for 7 TeV.

Mean weight correction factor for $\psi(2S)$ under the "off-($\lambda_{\theta}$--$\lambda_{\phi}$)-plane positive" spin-alignment hypothesis for 7 TeV.

Mean weight correction factor for $\psi(2S)$ under the "off-($\lambda_{\theta}$--$\lambda_{\phi}$)-plane negative" spin-alignment hypothesis for 7 TeV.

Mean weight correction factor for $J/\psi$ under the "longitudinal" spin-alignment hypothesis for 8 TeV. Those intervals not measured in the analysis at low $p_{T}$, high rapidity are also excluded here.

Mean weight correction factor for $J/\psi$ under the "transverse zero" spin-alignment hypothesis for 8 TeV. Those intervals not measured in the analysis at low $p_{T}$, high rapidity are also excluded here.

Mean weight correction factor for $J/\psi$ under the "transverse positive" spin-alignment hypothesis for 8 TeV. Those intervals not measured in the analysis at low $p_{T}$, high rapidity are also excluded here.

Mean weight correction factor for $J/\psi$ under the "transverse negative" spin-alignment hypothesis for 8 TeV. Those intervals not measured in the analysis at low $p_{T}$, high rapidity are also excluded here.

Mean weight correction factor for $J/\psi$ under the "off-($\lambda_{\theta}$--$\lambda_{\phi}$)-plane positive" spin-alignment hypothesis for 8 TeV. Those intervals not measured in the analysis at low $p_{T}$, high rapidity are also excluded here.

Mean weight correction factor for $J/\psi$ under the "off-($\lambda_{\theta}$--$\lambda_{\phi}$)-plane negative" spin-alignment hypothesis for 8 TeV. Those intervals not measured in the analysis at low $p_{T}$, high rapidity are also excluded here.

Mean weight correction factor for $\psi(2S)$ under the "longitudinal" spin-alignment hypothesis for 8 TeV. Those intervals not measured in the analysis at low $p_{T}$, high rapidity are also excluded here.

Mean weight correction factor for $\psi(2S)$ under the "transverse zero" spin-alignment hypothesis for 8 TeV. Those intervals not measured in the analysis at low $p_{T}$, high rapidity are also excluded here.

Mean weight correction factor for $\psi(2S)$ under the "transverse positive" spin-alignment hypothesis for 8 TeV. Those intervals not measured in the analysis at low $p_{T}$, high rapidity are also excluded here.

Mean weight correction factor for $\psi(2S)$ under the "transverse negative" spin-alignment hypothesis for 8 TeV. Those intervals not measured in the analysis at low $p_{T}$, high rapidity are also excluded here.

Mean weight correction factor for $\psi(2S)$ under the "off-($\lambda_{\theta}$--$\lambda_{\phi}$)-plane positive" spin-alignment hypothesis for 8 TeV. Those intervals not measured in the analysis at low $p_{T}$, high rapidity are also excluded here.

Mean weight correction factor for $\psi(2S)$ under the "off-($\lambda_{\theta}$--$\lambda_{\phi}$)-plane negative" spin-alignment hypothesis for 8 TeV. Those intervals not measured in the analysis at low $p_{T}$, high rapidity are also excluded here.

psi(2S) double-differential cross section times branching fraction and the corresponding scaling factors to obtain the cross sections for different polarization scenarios (azimuthal polarization parameter in the center of mass helicity frame lambda_theta^HX = +1, -1, +0.03) as a function of pT for |y| < 1.2.

Ratio of psi(2S) to J/psi differential cross section times branching fractions assuming unpolarized productions as a function of pT for |y| < 1.2.

Measured double-differential inclusive-jet cross section for the range 1.5 <= |y| < 2.0 and for anti-kT jets with radius parameter R = 0.4. It is based on the data sample of proton-proton collisions at 7 TeV of centre-of-mass energy collected in 2011 by the ATLAS experiment at the LHC. The data sample corresponds to the integrated luminosity of 4.5 fb^-1. The statistical uncertainties arising from data and MC simulation have been combined. All the components of the systematic uncertainty are shown. They are: all the components of the jet energy scale uncertainty (jesX), the uncertainty of the jet energy resolution (jer), the uncertainty of the jet angular resolution (jar), the uncertainty of data unfolding (unfold), the uncertainty of the jet quality selection (qual), the luminosity uncertainty (lumi). All the components are assumed to be independent of each other. Each component is assumed to be fully correlated in pT and eta. Concerning the shape of the different components, Gaussian distribution assumption works for most of them. The three columns correspond to three different sets of the systematic uncertainty built with nominal, stronger or weaker assumptions on correlations between the jet energy scale uncertainty components. For more information on the systematic uncertainties, see the reference paper.

Measured double-differential inclusive-jet cross section for the range 2.0 <= |y| < 2.5 and for anti-kT jets with radius parameter R = 0.4. It is based on the data sample of proton-proton collisions at 7 TeV of centre-of-mass energy collected in 2011 by the ATLAS experiment at the LHC. The data sample corresponds to the integrated luminosity of 4.5 fb^-1. The statistical uncertainties arising from data and MC simulation have been combined. All the components of the systematic uncertainty are shown. They are: all the components of the jet energy scale uncertainty (jesX), the uncertainty of the jet energy resolution (jer), the uncertainty of the jet angular resolution (jar), the uncertainty of data unfolding (unfold), the uncertainty of the jet quality selection (qual), the luminosity uncertainty (lumi). All the components are assumed to be independent of each other. Each component is assumed to be fully correlated in pT and eta. Concerning the shape of the different components, Gaussian distribution assumption works for most of them. The three columns correspond to three different sets of the systematic uncertainty built with nominal, stronger or weaker assumptions on correlations between the jet energy scale uncertainty components. For more information on the systematic uncertainties, see the reference paper.

Measured double-differential inclusive-jet cross section for the range 2.5 <= |y| < 3.0 and for anti-kT jets with radius parameter R = 0.4. It is based on the data sample of proton-proton collisions at 7 TeV of centre-of-mass energy collected in 2011 by the ATLAS experiment at the LHC. The data sample corresponds to the integrated luminosity of 4.5 fb^-1. The statistical uncertainties arising from data and MC simulation have been combined. All the components of the systematic uncertainty are shown. They are: all the components of the jet energy scale uncertainty (jesX), the uncertainty of the jet energy resolution (jer), the uncertainty of the jet angular resolution (jar), the uncertainty of data unfolding (unfold), the uncertainty of the jet quality selection (qual), the luminosity uncertainty (lumi). All the components are assumed to be independent of each other. Each component is assumed to be fully correlated in pT and eta. Concerning the shape of the different components, Gaussian distribution assumption works for most of them. The three columns correspond to three different sets of the systematic uncertainty built with nominal, stronger or weaker assumptions on correlations between the jet energy scale uncertainty components. For more information on the systematic uncertainties, see the reference paper.

Measured double-differential inclusive-jet cross section for the range 0.0 <= |y| < 0.5 and for anti-kT jets with radius parameter R = 0.6. It is based on the data sample of proton-proton collisions at 7 TeV of centre-of-mass energy collected in 2011 by the ATLAS experiment at the LHC. The data sample corresponds to the integrated luminosity of 4.5 fb^-1. The statistical uncertainties arising from data and MC simulation have been combined. All the components of the systematic uncertainty are shown. They are: all the components of the jet energy scale uncertainty (jesX), the uncertainty of the jet energy resolution (jer), the uncertainty of the jet angular resolution (jar), the uncertainty of data unfolding (unfold), the uncertainty of the jet quality selection (qual), the luminosity uncertainty (lumi). All the components are assumed to be independent of each other. Each component is assumed to be fully correlated in pT and eta. Concerning the shape of the different components, Gaussian distribution assumption works for most of them. The three columns correspond to three different sets of the systematic uncertainty built with nominal, stronger or weaker assumptions on correlations between the jet energy scale uncertainty components. For more information on the systematic uncertainties, see the reference paper.

Measured double-differential inclusive-jet cross section for the range 0.5 <= |y| < 1.0 and for anti-kT jets with radius parameter R = 0.6. It is based on the data sample of proton-proton collisions at 7 TeV of centre-of-mass energy collected in 2011 by the ATLAS experiment at the LHC. The data sample corresponds to the integrated luminosity of 4.5 fb^-1. The statistical uncertainties arising from data and MC simulation have been combined. All the components of the systematic uncertainty are shown. They are: all the components of the jet energy scale uncertainty (jesX), the uncertainty of the jet energy resolution (jer), the uncertainty of the jet angular resolution (jar), the uncertainty of data unfolding (unfold), the uncertainty of the jet quality selection (qual), the luminosity uncertainty (lumi). All the components are assumed to be independent of each other. Each component is assumed to be fully correlated in pT and eta. Concerning the shape of the different components, Gaussian distribution assumption works for most of them. The three columns correspond to three different sets of the systematic uncertainty built with nominal, stronger or weaker assumptions on correlations between the jet energy scale uncertainty components. For more information on the systematic uncertainties, see the reference paper.

Measured double-differential inclusive-jet cross section for the range 1.0 <= |y| < 1.5 and for anti-kT jets with radius parameter R = 0.6. It is based on the data sample of proton-proton collisions at 7 TeV of centre-of-mass energy collected in 2011 by the ATLAS experiment at the LHC. The data sample corresponds to the integrated luminosity of 4.5 fb^-1. The statistical uncertainties arising from data and MC simulation have been combined. All the components of the systematic uncertainty are shown. They are: all the components of the jet energy scale uncertainty (jesX), the uncertainty of the jet energy resolution (jer), the uncertainty of the jet angular resolution (jar), the uncertainty of data unfolding (unfold), the uncertainty of the jet quality selection (qual), the luminosity uncertainty (lumi). All the components are assumed to be independent of each other. Each component is assumed to be fully correlated in pT and eta. Concerning the shape of the different components, Gaussian distribution assumption works for most of them. The three columns correspond to three different sets of the systematic uncertainty built with nominal, stronger or weaker assumptions on correlations between the jet energy scale uncertainty components. For more information on the systematic uncertainties, see the reference paper.

Measured double-differential inclusive-jet cross section for the range 1.5 <= |y| < 2.0 and for anti-kT jets with radius parameter R = 0.6. It is based on the data sample of proton-proton collisions at 7 TeV of centre-of-mass energy collected in 2011 by the ATLAS experiment at the LHC. The data sample corresponds to the integrated luminosity of 4.5 fb^-1. The statistical uncertainties arising from data and MC simulation have been combined. All the components of the systematic uncertainty are shown. They are: all the components of the jet energy scale uncertainty (jesX), the uncertainty of the jet energy resolution (jer), the uncertainty of the jet angular resolution (jar), the uncertainty of data unfolding (unfold), the uncertainty of the jet quality selection (qual), the luminosity uncertainty (lumi). All the components are assumed to be independent of each other. Each component is assumed to be fully correlated in pT and eta. Concerning the shape of the different components, Gaussian distribution assumption works for most of them. The three columns correspond to three different sets of the systematic uncertainty built with nominal, stronger or weaker assumptions on correlations between the jet energy scale uncertainty components. For more information on the systematic uncertainties, see the reference paper.

Measured double-differential inclusive-jet cross section for the range 2.0 <= |y| < 2.5 and for anti-kT jets with radius parameter R = 0.6. It is based on the data sample of proton-proton collisions at 7 TeV of centre-of-mass energy collected in 2011 by the ATLAS experiment at the LHC. The data sample corresponds to the integrated luminosity of 4.5 fb^-1. The statistical uncertainties arising from data and MC simulation have been combined. All the components of the systematic uncertainty are shown. They are: all the components of the jet energy scale uncertainty (jesX), the uncertainty of the jet energy resolution (jer), the uncertainty of the jet angular resolution (jar), the uncertainty of data unfolding (unfold), the uncertainty of the jet quality selection (qual), the luminosity uncertainty (lumi). All the components are assumed to be independent of each other. Each component is assumed to be fully correlated in pT and eta. Concerning the shape of the different components, Gaussian distribution assumption works for most of them. The three columns correspond to three different sets of the systematic uncertainty built with nominal, stronger or weaker assumptions on correlations between the jet energy scale uncertainty components. For more information on the systematic uncertainties, see the reference paper.

Measured double-differential inclusive-jet cross section for the range 2.5 <= |y| < 3.0 and for anti-kT jets with radius parameter R = 0.6. It is based on the data sample of proton-proton collisions at 7 TeV of centre-of-mass energy collected in 2011 by the ATLAS experiment at the LHC. The data sample corresponds to the integrated luminosity of 4.5 fb^-1. The statistical uncertainties arising from data and MC simulation have been combined. All the components of the systematic uncertainty are shown. They are: all the components of the jet energy scale uncertainty (jesX), the uncertainty of the jet energy resolution (jer), the uncertainty of the jet angular resolution (jar), the uncertainty of data unfolding (unfold), the uncertainty of the jet quality selection (qual), the luminosity uncertainty (lumi). All the components are assumed to be independent of each other. Each component is assumed to be fully correlated in pT and eta. Concerning the shape of the different components, Gaussian distribution assumption works for most of them. The three columns correspond to three different sets of the systematic uncertainty built with nominal, stronger or weaker assumptions on correlations between the jet energy scale uncertainty components. For more information on the systematic uncertainties, see the reference paper.

Mean number of jets in rapidity interval as a function of leading dijet scalar mean pT in GeV.

First azimuthal angular moment as a function of leading dijet rapidity separation.

First azimuthal angular moment as a function of leading dijet scalar mean pT in GeV.

Ratio of second azimuthal angular moment to first as a function of leading dijet rapidity separation.

Ratio of second azimuthal angular moment to first as a function of leading dijet scalar mean pT in GeV.

First azimuthal angular moment as a function of leading dijet rapidity separation.

First azimuthal angular moment as a function of leading dijet scalar mean pT in GeV.

Ratio of second azimuthal angular moment to first as a function of leading dijet rapidity separation.

Ratio of second azimuthal angular moment to first as a function of leading dijet scalar mean pT in GeV.

Differential cross section as a function of dijet azimuthal separation for events satisfying 0 < dijet rapidity separation <= 1.

Differential cross section as a function of dijet azimuthal separation for events satisfying 1 < dijet rapidity separation <= 2.

Differential cross section as a function of dijet azimuthal separation for events satisfying 2 < dijet rapidity separation <= 3.

Differential cross section as a function of dijet azimuthal separation for events satisfying 3 < dijet rapidity separation <= 4.

Differential cross section as a function of dijet azimuthal separation for events satisfying 4 < dijet rapidity separation <= 5.

Differential cross section as a function of dijet azimuthal separation for events satisfying 5 < dijet rapidity separation <= 6.

Differential cross section as a function of dijet azimuthal separation for events satisfying 6 < dijet rapidity separation <= 7.

Differential cross section as a function of dijet azimuthal separation for events satisfying 7 < dijet rapidity separation <= 8.

Differential cross section as a function of dijet azimuthal separation for events satisfying 0 < dijet rapidity separation <= 1.

Differential cross section as a function of dijet azimuthal separation for events satisfying 1 < dijet rapidity separation <= 2.

Differential cross section as a function of dijet azimuthal separation for events satisfying 2 < dijet rapidity separation <= 3.

Differential cross section as a function of dijet azimuthal separation for events satisfying 3 < dijet rapidity separation <= 4.

Differential cross section as a function of dijet azimuthal separation for events satisfying 4 < dijet rapidity separation <= 5.

Differential cross section as a function of dijet azimuthal separation for events satisfying 5 < dijet rapidity separation <= 6.

Differential cross section as a function of dijet azimuthal separation for events satisfying 6 < dijet rapidity separation <= 7.

Differential cross section as a function of dijet azimuthal separation for events satisfying 7 < dijet rapidity separation <= 8.

Gap fraction as a function of veto scale in GeV for events satisfying 0 < dijet rapidity separation <= 1.

Gap fraction as a function of veto scale in GeV for events satisfying 1 < dijet rapidity separation <= 2.

Gap fraction as a function of veto scale in GeV for events satisfying 2 < dijet rapidity separation <= 3.

Gap fraction as a function of veto scale in GeV for events satisfying 3 < dijet rapidity separation <= 4.

Gap fraction as a function of veto scale in GeV for events satisfying 4 < dijet rapidity separation <= 5.

Gap fraction as a function of veto scale in GeV for events satisfying 5 < dijet rapidity separation <= 6.

Gap fraction as a function of veto scale in GeV for events satisfying 6 < dijet rapidity separation <= 7.

Gap fraction as a function of veto scale in GeV for events satisfying 7 < dijet rapidity separation <= 8.

Second azimuthal angular moment as a function of leading dijet rapidity separation.

Second azimuthal angular moment as a function of leading dijet scalar mean pT in GeV.

Second azimuthal angular moment as a function of leading dijet rapidity separation.

Second azimuthal angular moment as a function of leading dijet scalar mean pT in GeV.

Breakdown of systematic uncertainties (in %) for the inclusive $b$-jet cross-section $\sigma(Zb)\times N_{b\text{-jet}}$ as a function of $b$-jet $p_T$.

The inclusive $b$-jet cross-section $\sigma(Zb)\times N_{b\text{-jet}}$ as a function of $b$-jet $|y|$ together with the corresponding non-perturbative corrections.

Breakdown of systematic uncertainties (in %) for the inclusive $b$-jet cross-section $\sigma(Zb)\times N_{b\text{-jet}}$ as a function of $b$-jet $|y|$.

The inclusive $b$-jet cross-section $\sigma(Zb)\times N_{b\text{-jet}}$ as a function of $y_{\text{boost}}(Z,b)$ together with the corresponding non-perturbative corrections.

Breakdown of systematic uncertainties (in %) for the inclusive $b$-jet cross-section $\sigma(Zb)\times N_{b\text{-jet}}$ as a function of $y_{\text{boost}}(Z,b)$.

The inclusive $b$-jet cross-section $\sigma^{*}(Zb)\times N_{b\text{-jet}}$ as a function of $\Delta y(Z,b)$ together with the corresponding non-perturbative corrections.

Breakdown of systematic uncertainties (in %) for the inclusive $b$-jet cross-section $\sigma^{*}(Zb)\times N_{b\text{-jet}}$ as a function of $\Delta y(Z,b)$.

The inclusive $b$-jet cross-section $\sigma^{*}(Zb)\times N_{b\text{-jet}}$ as a function of $\Delta\phi(Z,b)$ together with the corresponding non-perturbative corrections.

Breakdown of systematic uncertainties (in %) for the inclusive $b$-jet cross-section $\sigma^{*}(Zb)\times N_{b\text{-jet}}$ as a function of $\Delta\phi(Z,b)$.

The inclusive $b$-jet cross-section $\sigma^{*}(Zb)\times N_{b\text{-jet}}$ as a function of $\Delta R(Z,b)$ together with the corresponding non-perturbative corrections.

Breakdown of systematic uncertainties (in %) for the inclusive $b$-jet cross-section $\sigma^{*}(Zb)\times N_{b\text{-jet}}$ as a function of $\Delta R(Z,b)$.

The cross-section $\sigma(Zb)$ as a function of $Z$ boson $p_T$ together with the corresponding non-perturbative corrections.

Breakdown of systematic uncertainties (in %) for the cross-section $\sigma(Zb)$ as a function of $Z$ boson $p_T$.

The cross-section $\sigma(Zb)$ as a function of $Z$ boson $|y|$ together with the corresponding non-perturbative corrections.

Breakdown of systematic uncertainties (in %) for the cross-section $\sigma(Zb)$ as a function of $Z$ boson $|y|$.

Integrated $Z+\ge 2$ $b$-jets cross-section.

Breakdown of systematic uncertainties (in %) for the integrated $Z+\ge 2$ $b$-jets cross-section.

The cross-section $\sigma(Zbb)$ as a function of $\Delta R(b,b)$ together with the corresponding non-perturbative corrections.

Breakdown of systematic uncertainties (in %) for the cross-section $\sigma(Zbb)$ as a function of $\Delta R(b,b)$.

The cross-section $\sigma(Zbb)$ as a function of $\Delta m(b,b)$ together with the corresponding non-perturbative corrections.

Breakdown of systematic uncertainties (in %) for the cross-section $\sigma(Zbb)$ as a function of $\Delta m(b,b)$.

The cross-section $\sigma(Zbb)$ as a function of $Z$ boson $p_T$ together with the corresponding non-perturbative corrections.

Breakdown of systematic uncertainties (in %) for the cross-section $\sigma(Zbb)$ as a function of $Z$ boson $p_T$.

The cross-section $\sigma(Zbb)$ as a function of $Z$ boson $|y|$ together with the corresponding non-perturbative corrections.

Breakdown of systematic uncertainties (in %) for the cross-section $\sigma(Zbb)$ as a function of $Z$ boson $|y|$.

Detailed list of the contribution of each source of uncertainty to the total uncertainty on the measured values of $\sigma(tq)$, $\sigma(\bar{t}q)$, $R_t$, and $\sigma(tq+\bar{t}q)$. The evaluation of the systematic uncertainties has a statistical uncertainty of $0.3\,\%$. Uncertainties contributing less than $1.0\,\%$ are marked with "$<1$" in the paper. To provide numerical values for this table in HEPdata, these uncertainties are approximated with $\pm 0.5\,\%$. This approximation is applied to all measurements for the following uncertainties$:$ JES statistical, JES physics modeling, JES mixed detector and modeling, JES close-by-jets, JES pileup, $b$-JES, jet vertex fraction, mistag efficiency and $W+\;$jets shape variation. For the measurement of $\sigma(tq)$ the approximation is applied in addition to the following uncertainties$:$ JES flavor response, $c$-tagging efficiency, $t\bar{t}$ generator + parton shower and $t\bar{t}$ ISR/FSR. For the measurement of $\sigma(\bar{t}q)$ the approximation is applied in addition to these uncertainties$:$ JES flavor response, $b/\bar{b}$ acceptance, and $t\bar{t}$ ISR/FSR. For the measurement of $R_t$ the approximation is applied in addition to these uncertainties$:$ JES detector, $b$-tagging efficiency, $c$-tagging efficiency, $b/\bar{b}$ acceptance and $tq$ scale variations. For the measurement of $\sigma(tq+\bar{t}q)$ the approximation is applied in addition to these uncertainties$:$ JES flavor response, $c$-tagging efficiency, $b/\bar{b}$ acceptance, $t\bar{t}$ generator + parton shower and $t\bar{t}$ ISR/FSR.

Differential t-channel top-quark production cross sections and normalized differential t-channel top-quark production cross sections as functions of ABS(YRAP(T)).

The cross sections for top-quark and top-antiquark production in the t-channel, together with the cross-section ratio.

Differential t-channel top-quark production cross sections and normalized differential t-channel top-quark production cross sections as functions of ABS(YRAP(TBAR)).

Parametrization factors for the $m_{t}$ dependence [see Eq. (4) in the paper] of $\sigma(tq)$, $\sigma(\bar tq)$, and $\sigma(t q+\bar t q)$.

The cross sections for top-quark and top-antiquark production in the t-channel, together with the cross-section ratio.

The value of $|V_{tb}|^{2}$ is extracted by dividing the measured value of $\sigma(t q+\bar t q)$ by the prediction of the approximate NNLO calculation. The experimental and theoretical uncertainties are added in quadrature.

Event yields for the 2-jet-$\ell^{+}$ and 2-jet-$\ell^{-}$ HPR channels. The expectation for the signal and background yields correspond to the result of the binned maximum-likelihood fit described in Sec. $\mathrm{VI~D}$ in the paper. The uncertainty of the expectations is the normalization uncertainty of each process after the fit, as described in Sec. $\mathrm{VII~F}$ in the paper.

Migration matrix relating the parton level $p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)$ shown on the $y$ axis and the reconstruction level $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\ell \nu b)$ shown on the $x$ axis for the top-quark $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ distribution.

Migration matrix relating the parton level $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\bar t)$ shown on the $y$ axis and the reconstruction level $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\ell \nu b)$ shown on the $x$ axis for the top-antiquark $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ distribution.

Migration matrix relating the parton level $|y(t)|$ shown on the $y$ axis and the reconstruction level $|y(\ell \nu b)|$ shown on the $x$ axis for the top-quark $|y|$ distribution.

Migration matrix relating the parton level $|y(\bar t)|$ shown on the $y$ axis and the reconstruction level $|y(\ell \nu b)|$ shown on the $x$ axis for the top-antiquark $|y|$ distribution.

Differential t-channel top-quark production cross section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)$ with the uncertainties for each bin given in percent.

Differential t-channel top-quark production cross section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\bar t)$ with the uncertainties for each bin given in percent.

Differential t-channel top-quark production cross section as a function of $|y(t)|$ with the uncertainties for each bin given in percent.

Differential t-channel top-quark production cross section as a function of $|y(\bar t)|$ with the uncertainties for each bin given in percent.

Normalized differential t-channel top-quark production cross section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)$ with the uncertainties for each bin given in percent.

Normalized differential t-channel top-quark production cross section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\bar t)$ with the uncertainties for each bin given in percent.

Normalized differential t-channel top-quark production cross section as a function of $|y(t)|$ with the uncertainties for each bin given in percent.

Normalized differential t-channel top-quark production cross section as a function of $|y(\bar t)|$ with the uncertainties for each bin given in percent.

Comparison between the measured differential cross sections and the predictions from the NLO calculation using the MSTW2008 PDF set. For each variable and prediction a $\chi^{2}$ value is calculated with HERAfitter using the covariance matrix of each measured spectrum. The theory uncertainties of the predictions are treated as uncorrelated. The number of degrees of freedom (NDF) is equal to the number of bins in the measured spectrum.

Detailed list of the contribution of each source of uncertainty to the total relative uncertainty on the measured $\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma}{\mathrm{d}p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)}$ distribution given in percent for each bin. The list includes only those uncertainties that contribute with more than $1\%$. The following uncertainties contribute to the total uncertainty with less than $1\%$ to each bin content$:$ JES detector, JES statistical, JES physics modeling, JES mixed detector and modeling, JES close-by jets, JES pileup, JES flavor composition, JES flavor response, jet-vertex fraction, $b/\bar{b}$ acceptance, $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ modeling, $W+$ jets shape variation, and $t \bar{t}$ generator. In cases when the uncertainty is report to be "$<1\%$" in the table of the paper the uncertainty is approximated by a value of $0.5\%$.

Detailed list of the contribution of each source of uncertainty to the total relative uncertainty on the measured $\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma}{\mathrm{d}p_{\mathrm{T}}(\bar t)}$ distribution given in percent for each bin. The list includes only those uncertainties that contribute with more than $1\%$. The following uncertainties contribute to the total uncertainty with less than $1\%$ to each bin content$:$ JES detector, JES statistical, JES physics modeling, JES mixed detector and modeling, JES close-by jets, JES pileup, JES flavor composition, JES flavor response, $b-$JES, jet-vertex fraction, mistag efficiency, $b/\bar{b}$ acceptance, $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ modeling, $W+$ jets shape variation, and $t \bar{t}$ generator. In cases when the uncertainty is report to be "$<1\%$" in the table of the paper the uncertainty is approximated by a value of $0.5\%$.

Detailed list of the contribution of each source of uncertainty to the total relative uncertainty on the measured $\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma}{\mathrm{d}|y(t)|}$ distribution given in percent for each bin. The list includes only those uncertainties that contribute with more than $1\%$. The following uncertainties contribute to the total uncertainty with less than $1\%$ to each bin content$:$ JES detector, JES statistical, JES physics modeling, JES mixed detector and modeling, JES close-by jets, JES pileup, JES flavor composition, JES flavor response, jet-vertex fraction, $b/\bar{b}$ acceptance, $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ modeling, $W+$ jets shape variation, $t \bar{t}$ generator, $t \bar{t}$ ISR/FSR, and unfolding. In cases when the uncertainty is report to be "$<1\%$" in the table of the paper the uncertainty is approximated by a value of $0.5\%$.

Detailed list of the contribution of each source of uncertainty to the total relative uncertainty on the measured $\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma}{\mathrm{d}|y(\bar t)|}$ distribution given in percent for each bin. The list includes only those uncertainties that contribute with more than $1\%$. The following uncertainties contribute to the total uncertainty with less than $1\%$ to each bin content$:$ JES detector, JES statistical, JES physics modeling, JES mixed detector and modeling, JES close-by jets, JES pileup, JES flavor composition, JES flavor response, $b-$JES, jet-vertex fraction, $b/\bar{b}$ acceptance, mistag efficiency, $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ modeling, $W+$ jets shape variation, $t \bar{t}$ generator, $t \bar{t}$ ISR/FSR, and unfolding. In cases when the uncertainty is report to be "$<1\%$" in the table of the paper the uncertainty is approximated by a value of $0.5\%$.

Detailed list of the contribution of each source of uncertainty to the total relative uncertainty on the measured $\dfrac{1}{\sigma}\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma}{\mathrm{d}p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)}$ distribution given in percent for each bin. The list includes only those uncertainties that contribute with more than $1\%$. The JES $\eta$ intercalibration uncertainty has a sign switch from the first to the second bin. For the $tq$ generator $+$ parton shower uncertainty a sign switch is denoted with $\mp$. The following uncertainties contribute to the total uncertainty with less than $1\%$ to each bin content$:$ JES detector, JES statistical, JES physics modeling, JES mixed detector and modeling, JES close-by jets, JES pileup, JES flavor composition, JES flavor response, $b-$JES, jet-vertex fraction, $b/\bar{b}$ acceptance, $c-$tagging efficiency, $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ modeling, lepton uncertainties, $W+$ jets shape variation, and $t \bar{t}$ generator. In cases when the uncertainty is report to be "$<1\%$" in the table of the paper the uncertainty is approximated by a value of $0.5\%$.

Detailed list of the contribution of each source of uncertainty to the total relative uncertainty on the measured $\dfrac{1}{\sigma}\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma}{\mathrm{d}p_{\mathrm{T}}(\bar t)}$ distribution given in percent for each bin. The list includes only those uncertainties that contribute with more than $1\%$. Sign switches within one uncertainty are denoted with $\mp$ and $\pm$. The following uncertainties contribute to the total uncertainty with less than $1\%$ to each bin content$:$ JES detector, JES statistical, JES physics modeling, JES mixed detector and modeling, JES close-by jets, JES pileup, JES flavor composition, JES flavor response, $b-$JES, jet-vertex fraction, $b/\bar{b}$ acceptance, mistag efficiency, $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ modeling, lepton uncertainties, $W+$ jets shape variation, and $t \bar{t}$ generator. In cases when the uncertainty is report to be "$<1\%$" in the table of the paper the uncertainty is approximated by a value of $0.5\%$.

Detailed list of the contribution of each source of uncertainty to the total relative uncertainty on the measured $\dfrac{1}{\sigma}\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma}{\mathrm{d}|y(t)|}$ distribution given in percent for each bin. The list includes only those uncertainties that contribute with more than $1\%$. Sign switches within one uncertainty are denoted with $\mp$ and $\pm$. The following uncertainties contribute to the total uncertainty with less than $1\%$ to each bin content$:$ JES detector, JES statistical, JES physics modeling, JES mixed detector and modeling, JES close-by jets, JES pileup, JES flavor composition, JES flavor response, b-JES, jet-vertex fraction, $b/\bar{b}$ acceptance, $b-$tagging efficiency, $c-$tagging efficiency, mistag efficiency, $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ modeling, lepton uncertainties, $W+$jets shape variation, $t \bar{t}$ generator, $t \bar{t}$ISR/FSR, and unfolding. In cases when the uncertainty is report to be "$<1\%$" in the table of the paper the uncertainty is approximated by a value of $0.5\%$.

Detailed list of the contribution of each source of uncertainty to the total relative uncertainty on the measured $\dfrac{1}{\sigma}\dfrac{\mathrm{d}\sigma}{\mathrm{d}|y(\bar t)|}$ distribution given in percent for each bin. The list includes only those uncertainties that contribute with more than $1\%$. Sign switches within one uncertainty are denoted with $\mp$ and $\pm$. The following uncertainties contribute to the total uncertainty with less than $1\%$ to each bin content $:$ JES detector, JES statistical, JES physics modeling, JES mixed detector and modeling, JES close-by jets, JES pileup, JES flavor composition, JES flavor response, b-JES, jet energy resolution, jet-vertex fraction, $b/\bar{b}$ acceptance, $b-$tagging efficiency, $c-$ tagging efficiency, mistag efficiency, $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ modeling, lepton uncertainties, $W+$ jets shape variation, $t \bar{t}$ generator, $t \bar{t}$ ISR/FSR, and unfolding. In cases when the uncertainty is report to be "$<1\%$" in the table of the paper the uncertainty is approximated by a value of $0.5\%$.

Statistical correlation matrices for the differential cross section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)$.

Statistical correlation matrices for the differential cross section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\bar t)$.

Statistical correlation matrices for the differential cross section as a function of $|y(t)|$.

Statistical correlation matrices for the differential cross section as a function of $|y(\bar t)|$.

Statistical correlation matrices for the normalized differential cross section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(t)$.

Statistical correlation matrices for the normalized differential cross section as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\bar t)$.

Statistical correlation matrices for the normalized differential cross section as a function of $|y(t)|$.

Statistical correlation matrices for the normalized differential cross section as a function of $|y(\bar t)|$.

Inclusive Jet cross section with R = 0.5 in the rapidity bin 1.5 < |y| < 2. The total uncorrelated uncertainty includes statistical one and systematic uncorrelated. The total systematic uncertainty includes all other sources, especially the luminosity uncertainty of 2.2%. The total error can be obtained as a quadratic sum of uncorrelated and correlated one. The NP correction can be used to scale theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Inclusive Jet cross section with R = 0.5 in the rapidity bin 2 < |y| < 2.5. The total uncorrelated uncertainty includes statistical one and systematic uncorrelated. The total systematic uncertainty includes all other sources, especially the luminosity uncertainty of 2.2%. The total error can be obtained as a quadratic sum of uncorrelated and correlated one. The NP correction can be used to scale theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Inclusive Jet cross section with R = 0.5 in the rapidity bin 2.5 < |y| < 3. The total uncorrelated uncertainty includes statistical one and systematic uncorrelated. The total systematic uncertainty includes all other sources, especially the luminosity uncertainty of 2.2%. The total error can be obtained as a quadratic sum of uncorrelated and correlated one. The NP correction can be used to scale theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Inclusive Jet cross section with R = 0.7 in the rapidity bin 0 < |y| < 0.5. The total uncorrelated uncertainty includes statistical one and systematic uncorrelated. The total systematic uncertainty includes all other sources, especially the luminosity uncertainty of 2.2%. The total error can be obtained as a quadratic sum of uncorrelated and correlated one. The NP correction can be used to scale theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Inclusive Jet cross section with R = 0.7 in the rapidity bin 0.5 < |y| < 1. The total uncorrelated uncertainty includes statistical one and systematic uncorrelated. The total systematic uncertainty includes all other sources, especially the luminosity uncertainty of 2.2%. The total error can be obtained as a quadratic sum of uncorrelated and correlated one. The NP correction can be used to scale theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Inclusive Jet cross section with R = 0.7 in the rapidity bin 1 < |y| < 1.5. The total uncorrelated uncertainty includes statistical one and systematic uncorrelated. The total systematic uncertainty includes all other sources, especially the luminosity uncertainty of 2.2%. The total error can be obtained as a quadratic sum of uncorrelated and correlated one. The NP correction can be used to scale theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Inclusive Jet cross section with R = 0.7 in the rapidity bin 1.5 < |y| < 2. The total uncorrelated uncertainty includes statistical one and systematic uncorrelated. The total systematic uncertainty includes all other sources, especially the luminosity uncertainty of 2.2%. The total error can be obtained as a quadratic sum of uncorrelated and correlated one. The NP correction can be used to scale theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Inclusive Jet cross section with R = 0.7 in the rapidity bin 2 < |y| < 2.5. The total uncorrelated uncertainty includes statistical one and systematic uncorrelated. The total systematic uncertainty includes all other sources, especially the luminosity uncertainty of 2.2%. The total error can be obtained as a quadratic sum of uncorrelated and correlated one. The NP correction can be used to scale theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Inclusive Jet cross section with R = 0.7 in the rapidity bin 2.5 < |y| < 3. The total uncorrelated uncertainty includes statistical one and systematic uncorrelated. The total systematic uncertainty includes all other sources, especially the luminosity uncertainty of 2.2%. The total error can be obtained as a quadratic sum of uncorrelated and correlated one. The NP correction can be used to scale theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Jet radius ratio R(0.5, 0.7) in the rapidity bin 0 < |y| < 0.5. The total uncorrelated uncertainty includes statistical one and systematic uncorrelated. The total systematic uncertainty includes all other sources. The total error can be obtained as a quadratic sum of uncorrelated and correlated one. The NP correction can be used to scale theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Jet radius ratio R(0.5, 0.7) in the rapidity bin 0.5 < |y| < 1. The total uncorrelated uncertainty includes statistical one and systematic uncorrelated. The total systematic uncertainty includes all other sources. The total error can be obtained as a quadratic sum of uncorrelated and correlated one. The NP correction can be used to scale theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Jet radius ratio R(0.5, 0.7) in the rapidity bin 1 < |y| < 1.5. The total uncorrelated uncertainty includes statistical one and systematic uncorrelated. The total systematic uncertainty includes all other sources. The total error can be obtained as a quadratic sum of uncorrelated and correlated one. The NP correction can be used to scale theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Jet radius ratio R(0.5, 0.7) in the rapidity bin 1.5 < |y| < 2. The total uncorrelated uncertainty includes statistical one and systematic uncorrelated. The total systematic uncertainty includes all other sources. The total error can be obtained as a quadratic sum of uncorrelated and correlated one. The NP correction can be used to scale theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Jet radius ratio R(0.5, 0.7) in the rapidity bin 2 < |y| < 2.5. The total uncorrelated uncertainty includes statistical one and systematic uncorrelated. The total systematic uncertainty includes all other sources. The total error can be obtained as a quadratic sum of uncorrelated and correlated one. The NP correction can be used to scale theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Jet radius ratio R(0.5, 0.7) in the rapidity bin 2.5 < |y| < 3. The total uncorrelated uncertainty includes statistical one and systematic uncorrelated. The total systematic uncertainty includes all other sources. The total error can be obtained as a quadratic sum of uncorrelated and correlated one. The NP correction can be used to scale theory prediction to compare to data at particle level.

Measured double-differential dijet cross sections for the range 1.5 <= y* < 2.0 and jet radius parameter R = 0.4. The statistical uncertainties from data and MC simulation have been combined. The three columns correspond to nominal, stronger or weaker correlations between jet energy scale uncertainty components.

Measured double-differential dijet cross sections for the range 2.0 <= y* < 2.5 and jet radius parameter R = 0.4. The statistical uncertainties from data and MC simulation have been combined. The three columns correspond to nominal, stronger or weaker correlations between jet energy scale uncertainty components.

Measured double-differential dijet cross sections for the range 2.5 <= y* < 3.0 and jet radius parameter R = 0.4. The statistical uncertainties from data and MC simulation have been combined. The three columns correspond to nominal, stronger or weaker correlations between jet energy scale uncertainty components.

Measured double-differential dijet cross sections for the range 0.0 <= y* < 0.5 and jet radius parameter R = 0.6. The statistical uncertainties from data and MC simulation have been combined. The three columns correspond to nominal, stronger or weaker correlations between jet energy scale uncertainty components.

Measured double-differential dijet cross sections for the range 0.5 <= y* < 1.0 and jet radius parameter R = 0.6. The statistical uncertainties from data and MC simulation have been combined. The three columns correspond to nominal, stronger or weaker correlations between jet energy scale uncertainty components.

Measured double-differential dijet cross sections for the range 1.0 <= y* < 1.5 and jet radius parameter R = 0.6. The statistical uncertainties from data and MC simulation have been combined. The three columns correspond to nominal, stronger or weaker correlations between jet energy scale uncertainty components.

Measured double-differential dijet cross sections for the range 1.5 <= y* < 2.0 and jet radius parameter R = 0.6. The statistical uncertainties from data and MC simulation have been combined. The three columns correspond to nominal, stronger or weaker correlations between jet energy scale uncertainty components.

Measured double-differential dijet cross sections for the range 2.0 <= y* < 2.5 and jet radius parameter R = 0.6. The statistical uncertainties from data and MC simulation have been combined. The three columns correspond to nominal, stronger or weaker correlations between jet energy scale uncertainty components.

Measured double-differential dijet cross sections for the range 2.5 <= y* < 3.0 and jet radius parameter R = 0.6. The statistical uncertainties from data and MC simulation have been combined. The three columns correspond to nominal, stronger or weaker correlations between jet energy scale uncertainty components.

The DY pre-FSR cross section measurements for the combined dimuon and dielectron channels normalized to the Z-peak region in the full acceptance.

The DY dimuon rapidity spectrum within the detector acceptance, normalized to the Z-peak region, for the mass bin 20-30 GeV. The two columns correspond to pre-FSR and post-FSR. The uncertainties are the total experimental uncertainties.

The DY dimuon rapidity spectrum within the detector acceptance, normalized to the Z-peak region, for the mass bin 30-45 GeV. The two columns correspond to pre-FSR and post-FSR. The uncertainties are the total experimental uncertainties.

The DY dimuon rapidity spectrum within the detector acceptance, normalized to the Z-peak region, for the mass bin 45-60 GeV. The two columns correspond to pre-FSR and post-FSR. The uncertainties are the total experimental uncertainties.

The DY dimuon rapidity spectrum within the detector acceptance, normalized to the Z-peak region, for the mass bin 60-120 GeV. The two columns correspond to pre-FSR and post-FSR. The uncertainties are the total experimental uncertainties.

The DY dimuon rapidity spectrum within the detector acceptance, normalized to the Z-peak region, for the mass bin 120-200 GeV. The two columns correspond to pre-FSR and post-FSR. The uncertainties are the total experimental uncertainties.

The DY dimuon rapidity spectrum within the detector acceptance, normalized to the Z-peak region, for the mass bin 200-1500 GeV. The two columns correspond to pre-FSR and post-FSR. The uncertainties are the total experimental uncertainties.

Distributions of 0.5*|YZ-YJet| normalized to unity. The data are shown after correcting for efficiency and resolution, and displayed with statistical and systematic uncertainties combined in quadrature.

Distributions of |YPho| normalized to unity. The data are shown after correcting for efficiency and resolution, and displayed with statistical and systematic uncertainties combined in quadrature.

Distributions of |YJet| normalized to unity. The data are shown after correcting for efficiency and resolution, and displayed with statistical and systematic uncertainties combined in quadrature.

Distributions of 0.5*|YPho+YJet| normalized to unity. The data are shown after correcting for efficiency and resolution, and displayed with statistical and systematic uncertainties combined in quadrature.

Distributions of 0.5*|YPho-YJet| normalized to unity. The data are shown after correcting for efficiency and resolution, and displayed with statistical and systematic uncertainties combined in quadrature.

Differential cross-section measurement for B+ production multiplied by the branching ratio to the J/PSI < MU+ MU- > K+ final state in B+ pT intervals in the B+ rapidity range 1.5<|y|<2.25 The first quoted uncertainty is statistical, the second uncertainty is systematic.

Differential cross-section measurement for B+ production multiplied by the branching ratio to the J/PSI < MU+ MU- > K+ final state in B+ pt intervals in the B+ rapidity (y) range 0<|y|<2.25. The first quoted uncertainty is statistical, the second uncertainty is systematic.

Differential cross-section measurement for B+ production multiplied by the branching ratio to the J/PSI < MU+ MU- > K+ final state in B+ rapidity intervals in the B+ pT range 9 GeV - 120 GeV. The first quoted uncertainty is statistical, the second uncertainty is systematic.

Double Differential distributions for B/S0 production.

PT distributions for B0 production.

PT distributions for B+ production.

PT distributions for B/S0 production.

Rapidity distributions for B0 production.

Rapidity distributions for B+ production.

Rapidity distributions for B/S0 production.

The fiducial and acceptance corrected UPSI(3S) production cross sections (times di-muon branching ratio) as a function of PT for the |rapidity| range < 2.4. Note these are integrated cross sections and the acceptance-corrected cross sections assume the UPSI(3S) are unpolarized with the variations due to the 4 extreme polarization scenarios shown in the last 4 columns. The fiducial cross sections do not need to make any assumptions on the polarizations scenarios. The luminosity uncertainty of 4% is not included in the systematic errors.

The fiducial and acceptance corrected UPSI(1S) production cross sections (times di-muon branching ratio) as a function of PT for the |rapidity| range < 0.4. Note these are integrated cross sections and the acceptance-corrected cross sections assume the UPSI(1S) are unpolarized with the variations due to the 4 extreme polarization scenarios shown in the last 4 columns. The fiducial cross sections do not need to make any assumptions on the polarizations scenarios. The luminosity uncertainty of 4% is not included in the systematic errors.

The fiducial and acceptance corrected UPSI(2S) production cross sections (times di-muon branching ratio) as a function of PT for the |rapidity| range < 0.4. Note these are integrated cross sections and the acceptance-corrected cross sections assume the UPSI(2S) are unpolarized with the variations due to the 4 extreme polarization scenarios shown in the last 4 columns. The fiducial cross sections do not need to make any assumptions on the polarizations scenarios. The luminosity uncertainty of 4% is not included in the systematic errors.

The fiducial and acceptance corrected UPSI(3S) production cross sections (times di-muon branching ratio) as a function of PT for the |rapidity| range < 0.4. Note these are integrated cross sections and the acceptance-corrected cross sections assume the UPSI(3S) are unpolarized with the variations due to the 4 extreme polarization scenarios shown in the last 4 columns. The fiducial cross sections do not need to make any assumptions on the polarizations scenarios. The luminosity uncertainty of 4% is not included in the systematic errors.

The fiducial and acceptance corrected UPSI(1S) production cross sections (times di-muon branching ratio) as a function of PT for the |rapidity| range 0.4 to 0.8. Note these are integrated cross sections and the acceptance-corrected cross sections assume the UPSI(1S) are unpolarized with the variations due to the 4 extreme polarization scenarios shown in the last 4 columns. The fiducial cross sections do not need to make any assumptions on the polarizations scenarios. The luminosity uncertainty of 4% is not included in the systematic errors.

The fiducial and acceptance corrected UPSI(2S) production cross sections (times di-muon branching ratio) as a function of PT for the |rapidity| range 0.4 to 0.8. Note these are integrated cross sections and the acceptance-corrected cross sections assume the UPSI(2S) are unpolarized with the variations due to the 4 extreme polarization scenarios shown in the last 4 columns. The fiducial cross sections do not need to make any assumptions on the polarizations scenarios. The luminosity uncertainty of 4% is not included in the systematic errors.

The fiducial and acceptance corrected UPSI(3S) production cross sections (times di-muon branching ratio) as a function of PT for the |rapidity| range 0.4 to 0.8. Note these are integrated cross sections and the acceptance-corrected cross sections assume the UPSI(3S) are unpolarized with the variations due to the 4 extreme polarization scenarios shown in the last 4 columns. The fiducial cross sections do not need to make any assumptions on the polarizations scenarios. The luminosity uncertainty of 4% is not included in the systematic errors.

The fiducial and acceptance corrected UPSI(1S) production cross sections (times di-muon branching ratio) as a function of PT for the |rapidity| range 0.8 to 1.2. Note these are integrated cross sections and the acceptance-corrected cross sections assume the UPSI(1S) are unpolarized with the variations due to the 4 extreme polarization scenarios shown in the last 4 columns. The fiducial cross sections do not need to make any assumptions on the polarizations scenarios. The luminosity uncertainty of 4% is not included in the systematic errors.

The fiducial and acceptance corrected UPSI(2S) production cross sections (times di-muon branching ratio) as a function of PT for the |rapidity| range 0.8 to 1.2. Note these are integrated cross sections and the acceptance-corrected cross sections assume the UPSI(2S) are unpolarized with the variations due to the 4 extreme polarization scenarios shown in the last 4 columns. The fiducial cross sections do not need to make any assumptions on the polarizations scenarios. The luminosity uncertainty of 4% is not included in the systematic errors.

The fiducial and acceptance corrected UPSI(3S) production cross sections (times di-muon branching ratio) as a function of PT for the |rapidity| range 0.8 to 1.2. Note these are integrated cross sections and the acceptance-corrected cross sections assume the UPSI(3S) are unpolarized with the variations due to the 4 extreme polarization scenarios shown in the last 4 columns. The fiducial cross sections do not need to make any assumptions on the polarizations scenarios. The luminosity uncertainty of 4% is not included in the systematic errors.

The fiducial and acceptance corrected UPSI(1S) production cross sections (times di-muon branching ratio) as a function of PT for the |rapidity| range 1.2 to 1.6. Note these are integrated cross sections and the acceptance-corrected cross sections assume the UPSI(1S) are unpolarized with the variations due to the 4 extreme polarization scenarios shown in the last 4 columns. The fiducial cross sections do not need to make any assumptions on the polarizations scenarios. The luminosity uncertainty of 4% is not included in the systematic errors.

The fiducial and acceptance corrected UPSI(2S) production cross sections (times di-muon branching ratio) as a function of PT for the |rapidity| range 1.2 to 1.6. Note these are integrated cross sections and the acceptance-corrected cross sections assume the UPSI(2S) are unpolarized with the variations due to the 4 extreme polarization scenarios shown in the last 4 columns. The fiducial cross sections do not need to make any assumptions on the polarizations scenarios. The luminosity uncertainty of 4% is not included in the systematic errors.

The fiducial and acceptance corrected UPSI(3S) production cross sections (times di-muon branching ratio) as a function of PT for the |rapidity| range 1.2 to 1.6. Note these are integrated cross sections and the acceptance-corrected cross sections assume the UPSI(3S) are unpolarized with the variations due to the 4 extreme polarization scenarios shown in the last 4 columns. The fiducial cross sections do not need to make any assumptions on the polarizations scenarios. The luminosity uncertainty of 4% is not included in the systematic errors.

The fiducial and acceptance corrected UPSI(1S) production cross sections (times di-muon branching ratio) as a function of PT for the |rapidity| range 1.6 to 2.0. Note these are integrated cross sections and the acceptance-corrected cross sections assume the UPSI(1S) are unpolarized with the variations due to the 4 extreme polarization scenarios shown in the last 4 columns. The fiducial cross sections do not need to make any assumptions on the polarizations scenarios. The luminosity uncertainty of 4% is not included in the systematic errors.

The fiducial and acceptance corrected UPSI(2S) production cross sections (times di-muon branching ratio) as a function of PT for the |rapidity| range 1.6 to 2.0. Note these are integrated cross sections and the acceptance-corrected cross sections assume the UPSI(2S) are unpolarized with the variations due to the 4 extreme polarization scenarios shown in the last 4 columns. The fiducial cross sections do not need to make any assumptions on the polarizations scenarios. The luminosity uncertainty of 4% is not included in the systematic errors.

The fiducial and acceptance corrected UPSI(3S) production cross sections (times di-muon branching ratio) as a function of PT for the |rapidity| range 1.6 to 2.0. Note these are integrated cross sections and the acceptance-corrected cross sections assume the UPSI(3S) are unpolarized with the variations due to the 4 extreme polarization scenarios shown in the last 4 columns. The fiducial cross sections do not need to make any assumptions on the polarizations scenarios. The luminosity uncertainty of 4% is not included in the systematic errors.

The fiducial and acceptance corrected UPSI(1S) production cross sections (times di-muon branching ratio) as a function of PT for the |rapidity| range 2.0 to 2.4. Note these are integrated cross sections and the acceptance-corrected cross sections assume the UPSI(1S) are unpolarized with the variations due to the 4 extreme polarization scenarios shown in the last 4 columns. The fiducial cross sections do not need to make any assumptions on the polarizations scenarios. The luminosity uncertainty of 4% is not included in the systematic errors.

The fiducial and acceptance corrected UPSI(2S) production cross sections (times di-muon branching ratio) as a function of PT for the |rapidity| range 2.0 to 2.4. Note these are integrated cross sections and the acceptance-corrected cross sections assume the UPSI(2S) are unpolarized with the variations due to the 4 extreme polarization scenarios shown in the last 4 columns. The fiducial cross sections do not need to make any assumptions on the polarizations scenarios. The luminosity uncertainty of 4% is not included in the systematic errors.

The fiducial and acceptance corrected UPSI(3S) production cross sections (times di-muon branching ratio) as a function of PT for the |rapidity| range 2.0 to 2.4. Note these are integrated cross sections and the acceptance-corrected cross sections assume the UPSI(3S) are unpolarized with the variations due to the 4 extreme polarization scenarios shown in the last 4 columns. The fiducial cross sections do not need to make any assumptions on the polarizations scenarios. The luminosity uncertainty of 4% is not included in the systematic errors.

The fiducial and acceptance corrected UPSI(1S) production cross sections (times di-muon branching ratio) as a function of rapidity for PT < 50 GeV/c. Note these are integrated cross sections and the acceptance-corrected cross sections assume the UPSI(1S) are unpolarized with the variations due to the 4 extreme polarization scenarios shown in the last 4 columns. The fiducial cross sections do not need to make any assumptions on the polarizations scenarios. The luminosity uncertainty of 4% is not included in the systematic errors.

The fiducial and acceptance corrected UPSI(2S) production cross sections (times di-muon branching ratio) as a function of rapidity for PT < 50 GeV/c. Note these are integrated cross sections and the acceptance-corrected cross sections assume the UPSI(2S) are unpolarized with the variations due to the 4 extreme polarization scenarios shown in the last 4 columns. The fiducial cross sections do not need to make any assumptions on the polarizations scenarios. The luminosity uncertainty of 4% is not included in the systematic errors.

The fiducial and acceptance corrected UPSI(3S) production cross sections (times di-muon branching ratio) as a function of rapidity for PT < 50 GeV/c. Note these are integrated cross sections and the acceptance-corrected cross sections assume the UPSI(3S) are unpolarized with the variations due to the 4 extreme polarization scenarios shown in the last 4 columns. The fiducial cross sections do not need to make any assumptions on the polarizations scenarios. The luminosity uncertainty of 4% is not included in the systematic errors.

The ratios of the UPSI(3S) to UPSI(1S) fiducial and acceptance cross sections as a function of PT for the |rapidiy| range < 2.4.

The ratios of the UPSI(2S) to UPSI(1S) fiducial and acceptance cross sections as a function of PT for the |rapidiy| range < 2.4.

The ratios of the UPSI(3S) to UPSI(2S) fiducial and acceptance cross sections as a function of PT for the |rapidiy| range < 2.4.

The acceptance-corrected UPSI(1S) production cross section, integrated and differential in PT, times the respective dimuon branching fraction, integrated over the rapidity range |y| < 1.2. The first (sys) error is the quadratic sum of all systematic uncertainties excluding that associated with the polarization of the UPSI(1S) which is shown separately as the second (sys) value. The latter has been obtained by calculating the acceptance with the +68 and -68% CL as given by the measured UPSI(1S) polarization [see. PRL 110 (2013) 081802].

The acceptance-corrected UPSI(2S) production cross section, integrated and differential in PT, times the respective dimuon branching fraction, integrated over the rapidity range |y| < 1.2. The first (sys) error is the quadratic sum of all systematic uncertainties excluding that associated with the polarization of the UPSI(2S) which is shown separately as the second (sys) value. The latter has been obtained by calculating the acceptance with the +68 and -68% CL as given by the measured UPSI(2S) polarization [see. PRL 110 (2013) 081802].

The acceptance-corrected UPSI(3S) production cross section, integrated and differential in PT, times the respective dimuon branching fraction, integrated over the rapidity range |y| < 1.2. The first (sys) error is the quadratic sum of all systematic uncertainties excluding that associated with the polarization of the UPSI(3S) which is shown separately as the second (sys) value. The latter has been obtained by calculating the acceptance with the +68 and -68% CL as given by the measured UPSI(3S) polarization [see. PRL 110 (2013) 081802].

Correlation coefficients for the differential cross-section of $Z \to e^+ e^-$ at 7 TeV between bins of $Z$ rapidity, $y_{Z}$. Both statistical and systematic contributions are included.

Correlation coefficients for the differential cross-section of $Z \to e^+ e^-$ at 7 TeV between bins of $\phi^*$. Both statistical and systematic contributions are included.

Inclusive Jet Cross Section for |rapidity| 1.5 TO 2.0 as a function of the jet transverse momentum. The (sys) error is the total systematic error, including the luminosity uncertainty of 2.2%.

Inclusive Jet Cross Section for |rapidity| 2.0 TO 2.5 as a function of the jet transverse momentum. The (sys) error is the total systematic error, including the luminosity uncertainty of 2.2%.

DiJet Cross Section for |rapidity| < 0.5 as a function of the dijet invariant mass. The (sys) error is the total systematic error, including the luminosity uncertainty of 2.2%.

DiJet Cross Section for |rapidity| 0.5 TO 1.0 as a function of the dijet invariant mass. The (sys) error is the total systematic error, including the luminosity uncertainty of 2.2%.

DiJet Cross Section for |rapidity| 1.0 TO 1.5 as a function of the dijet invariant mass. The (sys) error is the total systematic error, including the luminosity uncertainty of 2.2%.

DiJet Cross Section for |rapidity| 1.5 TO 2.0 as a function of the dijet invariant mass. The (sys) error is the total systematic error, including the luminosity uncertainty of 2.2%.

DiJet Cross Section for |rapidity| 2.0 TO 2.5 as a function of the dijet invariant mass. The (sys) error is the total systematic error, including the luminosity uncertainty of 2.2%.

Measured transverse momentum distributions of identified charged hadrons (PI-, K- and PBAR) and at a centre-of-mass energy of 2760 GeV.

Measured transverse momentum distributions of identified charged hadrons (PI+, K+ and P) and at a centre-of-mass energy of 7000 GeV.

Measured transverse momentum distributions of identified charged hadrons (PI-, K- and PBAR) and at a centre-of-mass energy of 7000 GeV.

Measured transverse momentum distributions of identified charged hadrons (PI+, K+ and P) and at a centre-of-mass energy of 900 GeV for multiplicity class 1 (Nrec=0-9).

Measured transverse momentum distributions of identified charged hadrons (PI-, K- and PBAR) and at a centre-of-mass energy of 900 GeV for multiplicity class 1 (Nrec=0-9).

Measured transverse momentum distributions of identified charged hadrons (PI+, K+ and P) and at a centre-of-mass energy of 2760 GeV for multiplicity class 1 (Nrec=0-9).

Measured transverse momentum distributions of identified charged hadrons (PI-, K- and PBAR) and at a centre-of-mass energy of 2760 GeV for multiplicity class 1 (Nrec=0-9).

Measured transverse momentum distributions of identified charged hadrons (PI+, K+ and P) and at a centre-of-mass energy of 7000 GeV for multiplicity class 1 (Nrec=0-9).

Measured transverse momentum distributions of identified charged hadrons (PI-, K- and PBAR) and at a centre-of-mass energy of 7000 GeV for multiplicity class 1 (Nrec=0-9).

Measured transverse momentum distributions of identified charged hadrons (PI+, K+ and P) and at a centre-of-mass energy of 900 GeV for multiplicity class 2 (Nrec=10-19).

Measured transverse momentum distributions of identified charged hadrons (PI-, K- and PBAR) and at a centre-of-mass energy of 900 GeV for multiplicity class 2 (Nrec=10-19).

Measured transverse momentum distributions of identified charged hadrons (PI+, K+ and P) and at a centre-of-mass energy of 2760 GeV for multiplicity class 2 (Nrec=10-19).

Measured transverse momentum distributions of identified charged hadrons (PI-, K- and PBAR) and at a centre-of-mass energy of 2760 GeV for multiplicity class 2 (Nrec=10-19).

Measured transverse momentum distributions of identified charged hadrons (PI+, K+ and P) and at a centre-of-mass energy of 7000 GeV for multiplicity class 2 (Nrec=10-19).

Measured transverse momentum distributions of identified charged hadrons (PI-, K- and PBAR) and at a centre-of-mass energy of 7000 GeV for multiplicity class 2 (Nrec=10-19).

Measured transverse momentum distributions of identified charged hadrons (PI+, K+ and P) and at a centre-of-mass energy of 900 GeV for multiplicity class 3 (Nrec=20-29).

Measured transverse momentum distributions of identified charged hadrons (PI-, K- and PBAR) and at a centre-of-mass energy of 900 GeV for multiplicity class 3 (Nrec=20-29).

Measured transverse momentum distributions of identified charged hadrons (PI+, K+ and P) and at a centre-of-mass energy of 2760 GeV for multiplicity class 3 (Nrec=20-29).

Measured transverse momentum distributions of identified charged hadrons (PI-, K- and PBAR) and at a centre-of-mass energy of 2760 GeV for multiplicity class 3 (Nrec=20-29).

Measured transverse momentum distributions of identified charged hadrons (PI+, K+ and P) and at a centre-of-mass energy of 7000 GeV for multiplicity class 3 (Nrec=20-29).

Measured transverse momentum distributions of identified charged hadrons (PI-, K- and PBAR) and at a centre-of-mass energy of 7000 GeV for multiplicity class 3 (Nrec=20-29).

Measured transverse momentum distributions of identified charged hadrons (PI+, K+ and P) and at a centre-of-mass energy of 900 GeV for multiplicity class 4 (Nrec=30-39).

Measured transverse momentum distributions of identified charged hadrons (PI-, K- and PBAR) and at a centre-of-mass energy of 900 GeV for multiplicity class 4 (Nrec=30-39).

Measured transverse momentum distributions of identified charged hadrons (PI+, K+ and P) and at a centre-of-mass energy of 2760 GeV for multiplicity class 4 (Nrec=30-39).

Measured transverse momentum distributions of identified charged hadrons (PI-, K- and PBAR) and at a centre-of-mass energy of 2760 GeV for multiplicity class 4 (Nrec=30-39).

Measured transverse momentum distributions of identified charged hadrons (PI+, K+ and P) and at a centre-of-mass energy of 7000 GeV for multiplicity class 4 (Nrec=30-39).

Measured transverse momentum distributions of identified charged hadrons (PI-, K- and PBAR) and at a centre-of-mass energy of 7000 GeV for multiplicity class 4 (Nrec=30-39).

Measured transverse momentum distributions of identified charged hadrons (PI+, K+ and P) and at a centre-of-mass energy of 900 GeV for multiplicity class 5 (Nrec=40-49).

Measured transverse momentum distributions of identified charged hadrons (PI-, K- and PBAR) and at a centre-of-mass energy of 900 GeV for multiplicity class 5 (Nrec=40-49).

Measured transverse momentum distributions of identified charged hadrons (PI+, K+ and P) and at a centre-of-mass energy of 2760 GeV for multiplicity class 5 (Nrec=40-49).

Measured transverse momentum distributions of identified charged hadrons (PI-, K- and PBAR) and at a centre-of-mass energy of 2760 GeV for multiplicity class 5 (Nrec=40-49).

Measured transverse momentum distributions of identified charged hadrons (PI+, K+ and P) and at a centre-of-mass energy of 7000 GeV for multiplicity class 5 (Nrec=40-49).

Measured transverse momentum distributions of identified charged hadrons (PI-, K- and PBAR) and at a centre-of-mass energy of 7000 GeV for multiplicity class 5 (Nrec=40-49).

Measured transverse momentum distributions of identified charged hadrons (PI+, K+ and P) and at a centre-of-mass energy of 900 GeV for multiplicity class 6 (Nrec=50-59).

Measured transverse momentum distributions of identified charged hadrons (PI-, K- and PBAR) and at a centre-of-mass energy of 900 GeV for multiplicity class 6 (Nrec=50-59).

Measured transverse momentum distributions of identified charged hadrons (PI+, K+ and P) and at a centre-of-mass energy of 2760 GeV for multiplicity class 6 (Nrec=50-59).

Measured transverse momentum distributions of identified charged hadrons (PI-, K- and PBAR) and at a centre-of-mass energy of 2760 GeV for multiplicity class 6 (Nrec=50-59).

Measured transverse momentum distributions of identified charged hadrons (PI+, K+ and P) and at a centre-of-mass energy of 7000 GeV for multiplicity class 6 (Nrec=50-59).

Measured transverse momentum distributions of identified charged hadrons (PI-, K- and PBAR) and at a centre-of-mass energy of 7000 GeV for multiplicity class 6 (Nrec=50-59).

Measured transverse momentum distributions of identified charged hadrons (PI+, K+ and P) and at a centre-of-mass energy of 900 GeV for multiplicity class 7 (Nrec=60-69).

Measured transverse momentum distributions of identified charged hadrons (PI-, K- and PBAR) and at a centre-of-mass energy of 900 GeV for multiplicity class 7 (Nrec=60-69).

Measured transverse momentum distributions of identified charged hadrons (PI+, K+ and P) and at a centre-of-mass energy of 2760 GeV for multiplicity class 7 (Nrec=60-69).

Measured transverse momentum distributions of identified charged hadrons (PI-, K- and PBAR) and at a centre-of-mass energy of 2760 GeV for multiplicity class 7 (Nrec=60-69).

Measured transverse momentum distributions of identified charged hadrons (PI+, K+ and P) and at a centre-of-mass energy of 7000 GeV for multiplicity class 7 (Nrec=60-69).

Measured transverse momentum distributions of identified charged hadrons (PI-, K- and PBAR) and at a centre-of-mass energy of 7000 GeV for multiplicity class 7 (Nrec=60-69).

Measured transverse momentum distributions of identified charged hadrons (PI+, K+ and P) and at a centre-of-mass energy of 2760 GeV for multiplicity class 8 (Nrec=70-79).

Measured transverse momentum distributions of identified charged hadrons (PI-, K- and PBAR) and at a centre-of-mass energy of 2760 GeV for multiplicity class 8 (Nrec=70-79).

Measured transverse momentum distributions of identified charged hadrons (PI+, K+ and P) and at a centre-of-mass energy of 7000 GeV for multiplicity class 8 (Nrec=70-79).

Measured transverse momentum distributions of identified charged hadrons (PI-, K- and PBAR) and at a centre-of-mass energy of 7000 GeV for multiplicity class 8 (Nrec=70-79).

Measured transverse momentum distributions of identified charged hadrons (PI+, K+ and P) and at a centre-of-mass energy of 2760 GeV for multiplicity class 9 (Nrec=80-89).

Measured transverse momentum distributions of identified charged hadrons (PI-, K- and PBAR) and at a centre-of-mass energy of 2760 GeV for multiplicity class 9 (Nrec=80-89).

Measured transverse momentum distributions of identified charged hadrons (PI+, K+ and P) and at a centre-of-mass energy of 7000 GeV for multiplicity class 9 (Nrec=80-89).

Measured transverse momentum distributions of identified charged hadrons (PI-, K- and PBAR) and at a centre-of-mass energy of 7000 GeV for multiplicity class 9 (Nrec=80-89).

Measured transverse momentum distributions of identified charged hadrons (PI+, K+ and P) and at a centre-of-mass energy of 7000 GeV for multiplicity class 10 (Nrec=90-99).

Measured transverse momentum distributions of identified charged hadrons (PI-, K- and PBAR) and at a centre-of-mass energy of 7000 GeV for multiplicity class 10 (Nrec=90-99).

Measured transverse momentum distributions of identified charged hadrons (PI+, K+ and P) and at a centre-of-mass energy of 7000 GeV for multiplicity class 11 (Nrec=100-109).

Measured transverse momentum distributions of identified charged hadrons (PI-, K- and PBAR) and at a centre-of-mass energy of 7000 GeV for multiplicity class 11 (Nrec=100-109).

Measured transverse momentum distributions of identified charged hadrons (PI+, K+ and P) and at a centre-of-mass energy of 7000 GeV for multiplicity class 12 (Nrec=110-119).

Measured transverse momentum distributions of identified charged hadrons (PI-, K- and PBAR) and at a centre-of-mass energy of 7000 GeV for multiplicity class 12 (Nrec=110-119).

Tsallis-Pareto-type fits to the PI+ data at a centre-of-mass energy of 900 GeV tabulated as a function of the multiplicity class Fit A - using the combined statistical and systematic error. Fit B - using the systematic error only as the statistical error is small.

Tsallis-Pareto-type fits to the PI- data at a centre-of-mass energy of 900 GeV tabulated as a function of the multiplicity class Fit A - using the combined statistical and systematic error. Fit B - using the systematic error only as the statistical error is small.

Tsallis-Pareto-type fits to the K+ data at a centre-of-mass energy of 900 GeV tabulated as a function of the multiplicity class Fit A - using the combined statistical and systematic error. Fit B - using the systematic error only as the statistical error is small.

Tsallis-Pareto-type fits to the K- data at a centre-of-mass energy of 900 GeV tabulated as a function of the multiplicity class Fit A - using the combined statistical and systematic error. Fit B - using the systematic error only as the statistical error is small.

Tsallis-Pareto-type fits to the P data at a centre-of-mass energy of 900 GeV tabulated as a function of the multiplicity class Fit A - using the combined statistical and systematic error. Fit B - using the systematic error only as the statistical error is small.

Tsallis-Pareto-type fits to the PBAR data at a centre-of-mass energy of 900 GeV tabulated as a function of the multiplicity class Fit A - using the combined statistical and systematic error. Fit B - using the systematic error only as the statistical error is small.

Tsallis-Pareto-type fits to the PI+ data at a centre-of-mass energy of 2760 GeV tabulated as a function of the multiplicity class Fit A - using the combined statistical and systematic error. Fit B - using the systematic error only as the statistical error is small.

Tsallis-Pareto-type fits to the PI- data at a centre-of-mass energy of 2760 GeV tabulated as a function of the multiplicity class Fit A - using the combined statistical and systematic error. Fit B - using the systematic error only as the statistical error is small.

Tsallis-Pareto-type fits to the K+ data at a centre-of-mass energy of 2760 GeV tabulated as a function of the multiplicity class Fit A - using the combined statistical and systematic error. Fit B - using the systematic error only as the statistical error is small.

Tsallis-Pareto-type fits to the K- data at a centre-of-mass energy of 2760 GeV tabulated as a function of the multiplicity class Fit A - using the combined statistical and systematic error. Fit B - using the systematic error only as the statistical error is small.

Tsallis-Pareto-type fits to the P data at a centre-of-mass energy of 2760 GeV tabulated as a function of the multiplicity class Fit A - using the combined statistical and systematic error. Fit B - using the systematic error only as the statistical error is small.

Tsallis-Pareto-type fits to the PBAR data at a centre-of-mass energy of 2760 GeV tabulated as a function of the multiplicity class Fit A - using the combined statistical and systematic error. Fit B - using the systematic error only as the statistical error is small.

Tsallis-Pareto-type fits to the PI+ data at a centre-of-mass energy of 7000 GeV tabulated as a function of the multiplicity class Fit A - using the combined statistical and systematic error. Fit B - using the systematic error only as the statistical error is small.

Tsallis-Pareto-type fits to the PI- data at a centre-of-mass energy of 7000 GeV tabulated as a function of the multiplicity class Fit A - using the combined statistical and systematic error. Fit B - using the systematic error only as the statistical error is small.

Tsallis-Pareto-type fits to the K+ data at a centre-of-mass energy of 7000 GeV tabulated as a function of the multiplicity class Fit A - using the combined statistical and systematic error. Fit B - using the systematic error only as the statistical error is small.

Tsallis-Pareto-type fits to the K- data at a centre-of-mass energy of 7000 GeV tabulated as a function of the multiplicity class Fit A - using the combined statistical and systematic error. Fit B - using the systematic error only as the statistical error is small.

Tsallis-Pareto-type fits to the P data at a centre-of-mass energy of 7000 GeV tabulated as a function of the multiplicity class Fit A - using the combined statistical and systematic error. Fit B - using the systematic error only as the statistical error is small.

Tsallis-Pareto-type fits to the PBAR data at a centre-of-mass energy of 7000 GeV tabulated as a function of the multiplicity class Fit A - using the combined statistical and systematic error. Fit B - using the systematic error only as the statistical error is small.

Inclusive b-jet double-differential cross sections and their ratio to inclusive jet cross sections in the |rapidity| range 0.0 to 0.5, using a jet resolution R value of 0.5.

Inclusive b-jet double-differential cross sections and their ratio to inclusive jet cross sections in the |rapidity| range 0.5 to 1.0, using a jet resolution R value of 0.5.

Inclusive b-jet double-differential cross sections and their ratio to inclusive jet cross sections in the |rapidity| range 1.0 to 1.5, using a jet resolution R value of 0.5.

Inclusive b-jet double-differential cross sections and their ratio to inclusive jet cross sections in the |rapidity| range 1.5 to 2.0, using a jet resolution R value of 0.5.

Inclusive b-jet double-differential cross sections and their ratio to inclusive jet cross sections in the |rapidity| range 2.0 to 2.2, using a jet resolution R value of 0.5.

Inclusive b-jet (with muon) differential cross sections in the |rapidity| range 0.0 to 2.4, using a jet resolution R value of 0.5. Muon visible range corresponds to PT(MU) > 9 GeV and |pseudorapidity(MU)| range 0.0 to 2.4.

Inclusive b-jet differential cross sections in the |rapidity| range 0.0 to 2.4, using a jet resolution R value of 0.5. Extrapolated result from muuon visible range PT(MU) > 9 GeV and |pseudorapidity(MU)| < 2.4.

Inclusive b-jet (with muon) differential cross sections in the PT range greater than 30 GeV, using a jet resolution R value of 0.5. Muon visible range corresponds to PT(MU) > 9 GeV and |pseudorapidity(MU)| < 2.4.

Inclusive b-jet differential cross sections in the PT range greater than 30 GeV, using a jet resolution R value of 0.5. Extrapolated result from muon visible range PT(MU) > 9 GeV and |pseudorapidity(MU)| < 2.4.

Double differential cross section for UPSI(1S) production times the dimuon branching fraction as a function of PT for the rapidity region 3.0-3.5. The second systematic (sys) error is due to the unknown polarisation of the UPSI(1S).

Double differential cross section for UPSI(1S) production times the dimuon branching fraction as a function of PT for the rapidity region 3.5-4.0. The second systematic (sys) error is due to the unknown polarisation of the UPSI(1S).

Double differential cross section for UPSI(1S) production times the dimuon branching fraction as a function of PT for the rapidity region 4.0-4.5. The second systematic (sys) error is due to the unknown polarisation of the UPSI(1S).

Double differential cross section for UPSI(2S) production times the dimuon branching fraction as a function of PT for the rapidity region 2.0-2.5. The second systematic (sys) error is due to the unknown polarisation of the UPSI(2S).

Double differential cross section for UPSI(2S) production times the dimuon branching fraction as a function of PT for the rapidity region 2.5-3.0. The second systematic (sys) error is due to the unknown polarisation of the UPSI(2S).

Double differential cross section for UPSI(2S) production times the dimuon branching fraction as a function of PT for the rapidity region 3.0-3.5. The second systematic (sys) error is due to the unknown polarisation of the UPSI(2S).

Double differential cross section for UPSI(2S) production times the dimuon branching fraction as a function of PT for the rapidity region 3.5-4.0. The second systematic (sys) error is due to the unknown polarisation of the UPSI(2S).

Double differential cross section for UPSI(2S) production times the dimuon branching fraction as a function of PT for the rapidity region 4.0-4.5. The second systematic (sys) error is due to the unknown polarisation of the UPSI(2S).

Double differential cross section for UPSI(3S) production times the dimuon branching fraction as a function of PT for the rapidity region 2.0-2.5. The second systematic (sys) error is due to the unknown polarisation of the UPSI(3S).

Double differential cross section for UPSI(3S) production times the dimuon branching fraction as a function of PT for the rapidity region 2.5-3.0. The second systematic (sys) error is due to the unknown polarisation of the UPSI(3S).

Double differential cross section for UPSI(3S) production times the dimuon branching fraction as a function of PT for the rapidity region 3.0-3.5. The second systematic (sys) error is due to the unknown polarisation of the UPSI(3S).

Double differential cross section for UPSI(3S) production times the dimuon branching fraction as a function of PT for the rapidity region 3.5-4.0. The second systematic (sys) error is due to the unknown polarisation of the UPSI(3S).

Double differential cross section for UPSI(3S) production times the dimuon branching fraction as a function of PT for the rapidity region 4.0-4.5. The second systematic (sys) error is due to the unknown polarisation of the UPSI(3S).

Ratios of cross section with respect to the UPSI(1S) cross section as a function of PT in the rapidity range 2.0-4.4. The second systematic (sys) error is due to the unknown polarisation of the three states.