Measured $\frac{d\sigma}{d(-t^{\prime})}~[\mathrm{nb/GeV^{2}}]$ for reaction $\gamma p\to \{\Lambda \bar{\Lambda}\} p$ including data of $6.5 \leq E_{\gamma} \leq 11.5$ [GeV], splitted in 10 energy bins (each as a column in the table). The observable $(-t^{\prime})$ is in unit of $[\mathrm{nb/GeV^{2}}]$ and is divided into bins of width 0.03 $[\mathrm{GeV^{2}}]$ (each as a row in the table). The global systematic uncertainty is 19% (not included in the table), with contributions of 5% from kinematic fitting, 10% from data selection, 5% from flux normalization, 13% from tracking efficiency, 3% from model dependence, and 6% from run-period variations.

Measured $\frac{d\sigma}{d(-t^{\prime})}~[\mathrm{nb/GeV^{2}}]$ for reaction $\gamma p\to \{p \bar{\Lambda}\} \Lambda$ including data of $6.5 \leq E_{\gamma} \leq 11.5$ [GeV], splitted in 10 energy bins (each as a column in the table). The observable $(-t^{\prime})$ is in unit of $[\mathrm{nb/GeV^{2}}]$ and is divided into bins of width 0.075 $[\mathrm{GeV^{2}}]$ (each as a row in the table). The global systematic uncertainty is 22% (not included in the table), with contributions of 2% from kinematic fitting, 10% from data selection, 5% from flux normalization, 15% from tracking efficiency, 3% from model dependence, and 10% from run-period variations.

Measured $\frac{d\sigma}{d(-t^{\prime})}~[\mathrm{nb/GeV^{2}}]$ for reaction $\gamma p\to \{p \bar{p}\} p$ including data of $6.5 \leq E_{\gamma} \leq 11.5$ [GeV], splitted in 10 energy bins (each as a column in the table). The observable $(-t^{\prime})$ is in unit of $[\mathrm{nb/GeV^{2}}]$ and is divided into bins of width 0.01 $[\mathrm{GeV^{2}}]$ (each as a row in the table). The global systematic uncertainty is 13% (not included in the table), with contributions of 8% from kinematic fitting, 4% from data selection, 5% from flux normalization, 8% from tracking efficiency, 3% from model dependence, and 1% from run-period variations.

Measured $\frac{d\sigma}{d(-t^{\prime})}~[\mathrm{nb/GeV^{2}}]$ for reaction $\gamma p\to \{p \bar{p}\} p$ including data of $3.5 \leq E_{\gamma} \leq 6.0$ [GeV], splitted in 5 energy bins (each as a column in the table). The observable $(-t^{\prime})$ is in unit of $[\mathrm{nb/GeV^{2}}]$ and is divided into bins of width 0.1 $[\mathrm{GeV^{2}}]$ (each as a row in the table). The global systematic uncertainty is 13% (not included in the table), with contributions of 8% from kinematic fitting, 4% from data selection, 5% from flux normalization, 8% from tracking efficiency, 3% from model dependence, and 1% from run-period variations.

Measured total cross section $\sigma(\gamma\,p\to\{\Lambda\bar{\Lambda}\}p)$ in unit of [nb] with beam energy in the range $5.0 < E_{\gamma} < 11.5~[\mathrm{GeV}]$ with various bin width. The table only includes point-to-point statistical uncertainties. The global systematic uncertainty is 19% (not included in the table), with contributions of 5% from kinematic fitting, 10% from data selection, 5% from flux normalization, 13% from tracking efficiency, 3% from model dependence, and 6% from run-period variations.

Measured total cross section $\sigma(\gamma\,p\to\{p\bar{\Lambda}\}\Lambda)$ in unit of [nb] with beam energy in the range $5.0 < E_{\gamma} < 11.5~[\mathrm{GeV}]$ with various bin width. The table only includes point-to-point statistical uncertainties. The global systematic uncertainty is 22% (not included in the table), with contributions of 2% from kinematic fitting, 10% from data selection, 5% from flux normalization, 15% from tracking efficiency, 3% from model dependence, and 10% from run-period variations.

Measured total cross section $\sigma(\gamma\,p\to\{p\bar{p}\}p)$ in unit of [nb] with beam energy in the range $3.5 < E_{\gamma} < 11.5~[\mathrm{GeV}]$ with various bin width. The table only includes point-to-point statistical uncertainties. The global systematic uncertainty is 13% (not included in the table), with contributions of 8% from kinematic fitting, 4% from data selection, 5% from flux normalization, 8% from tracking efficiency, 3% from model dependence, and 1% from run-period variations.

Data from Figure 3, panel a, U+U

Data from Figure 3, panel b, Au+Au

Data from Figure 3, panel b, U+U

Data from Figure 6, panel a, 0-0.5% Centrality, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 6, panel b, 0-0.5% Centrality, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 6, panel c, 0-0.5% Centrality, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 22, panel a, U+U/Au+Au

Data from Figure 22, panel a, U+U/Au+Au

Data from Figure 30, upper row panel a, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 30, upper row panel b, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 30, upper row panel c, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 30, upper row panel d, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 30, middle row panel a, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 30, middle row panel b, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 30, middle row panel c, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 30, middle row panel d, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 30, lower row panel a, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 30, lower row panel b, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 30, lower row panel c, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 30, lower row panel d, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 31, panel a, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 31, panel a, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 31, panel b, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 31, panel b, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 31, panel c, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 31, panel c, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 31, panel d, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 31, panel d, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 31, panel e, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 31, panel e, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 31, panel f, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 31, panel f, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 31, panel g, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 31, panel g, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 31, panel g, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 31, panel g, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 31, panel i, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 31, panel i, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 31, panel g, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 31, panel g, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 31, panel k, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 31, panel k, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 31, panel l, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 31, panel l, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 32, upper row panel a, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 32, upper row panel b, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 32, upper row panel c, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 32, upper row panel d, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 32, middle row panel a, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 32, middle row panel b, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 32, middle row panel c, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 32, middle row panel d, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 32, lower row panel a, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 32, lower row panel b, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 32, lower row panel c, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 32, lower row panel d, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 33, panel a, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 33, panel a, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 33, panel b, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 33, panel b, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 33, panel c, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 33, panel c, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 33, panel d, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 33, panel d, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 33, panel e, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 33, panel e, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 33, panel f, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 33, panel f, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 33, panel g, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 33, panel g, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 33, panel g, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 33, panel g, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 33, panel i, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 33, panel i, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 33, panel g, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 33, panel g, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 33, panel k, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 33, panel k, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 33, panel l, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 33, panel l, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 34, upper row panel a, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 34, upper row panel b, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 34, upper row panel c, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 34, upper row panel d, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 34, middle row panel a, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 34, middle row panel b, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 34, middle row panel c, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 34, middle row panel d, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 34, lower row panel a, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 34, lower row panel b, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 34, lower row panel c, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 34, lower row panel d, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 35, panel a, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 35, panel a, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 35, panel b, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 35, panel b, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 35, panel c, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 35, panel c, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 35, panel d, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 35, panel d, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 35, panel e, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 35, panel e, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 35, panel f, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 35, panel f, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 35, panel g, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 35, panel g, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 35, panel g, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 35, panel g, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 35, panel i, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 35, panel i, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 35, panel g, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 35, panel g, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 35, panel k, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 35, panel k, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 35, panel l, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 35, panel l, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 36, upper row panel a, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 36, upper row panel b, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 36, upper row panel c, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 36, upper row panel d, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 36, middle row panel a, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 36, middle row panel b, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 36, middle row panel c, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 36, middle row panel d, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 36, lower row panel a, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 36, lower row panel b, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 36, lower row panel c, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 36, lower row panel d, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 37, panel a, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 37, panel a, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 37, panel b, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 37, panel b, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 37, panel c, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 37, panel c, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 37, panel d, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 37, panel d, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 37, panel e, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 37, panel e, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 37, panel f, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 37, panel f, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 37, panel g, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 37, panel g, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 37, panel g, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 37, panel g, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 37, panel i, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 37, panel i, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 37, panel g, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 37, panel g, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 37, panel k, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 37, panel k, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 37, panel l, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 37, panel l, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 38, upper row panel a, 2subevent method, four p_{T} ranges

Data from Figure 38, upper row panel b, 2subevent method, four p_{T} ranges

Data from Figure 38, upper row panel c, 2subevent method, four p_{T} ranges

Data from Figure 38, upper row panel d, 2subevent method, four p_{T} ranges

Data from Figure 38, middle row panel a, 2subevent method, four p_{T} ranges

Data from Figure 38, middle row panel b, 2subevent method, four p_{T} ranges

Data from Figure 38, middle row panel c, 2subevent method, 0.2< p_{T} <2 Gev/c, 0.5<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 38, middle row panel c, 2subevent method, 0.2< p_{T} <3 Gev/c, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 38, middle row panel d, 2subevent method, four p_{T} ranges

Data from Figure 38, lower row panel a, 2subevent method, four p_{T} ranges

Data from Figure 38, lower row panel b, 2subevent method, four p_{T} ranges

Data from Figure 38, lower row panel c, 2subevent method, 0.2< p_{T} <2 Gev/c, 0.5<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 38, lower row panel c, 2subevent method, 0.2< p_{T} <3 Gev/c, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 38, lower row panel d, 2subevent method, four p_{T} ranges

Corrected Yield R=0.5 pi0+jet 15-20 pp at sqrt{s_{NN}}=200 GeV

Corrected Yield R=0.2 gamma+jet 10-15 pp at sqrt{s_{NN}}=200 GeV

Corrected Yield R=0.5 gamma+jet 10-15 pp at sqrt{s_{NN}}=200 GeV

Corrected Yield R=0.5 pi0+jet 10-15 AuAu 0-15% at sqrt{s_{NN}}=200 GeV

Corrected Yield R=0.2 pi0+jet 10-15 AuAu 0-15% at sqrt{s_{NN}}=200 GeV

Corrected Yield R=0.5 pi0+jet 15-20 AuAu 0-15% at sqrt{s_{NN}}=200 GeV

Corrected Yield R=0.2 pi0+jet 15-20 AuAu 0-15% at sqrt{s_{NN}}=200 GeV

Corrected Yield R=0.2 gamma+jet 10-15 AuAu 0-15% at sqrt{s_{NN}}=200 GeV

Corrected Yield R=0.5 gamma+jet 10-15 AuAu 0-15% at sqrt{s_{NN}}=200 GeV

IAA(Δφ) R=0.5 gamma+jet 10-15 GeV/c

IAA(Δφ) R=0.2 gamma+jet 10-15 GeV/c

IAA(Δφ) R=0.5 pi0+jet 10-15 GeV/c

IAA(Δφ) R=0.2 pi0+jet 10-15 GeV/c

IAA(Δφ) R=0.5 pi0+jet 15-20 GeV/c

IAA(Δφ) R=0.2 pi0+jet 15-20 GeV/c

$v_2${2, $1.1<|\Delta\eta|< 7.8$} of $\rm K^0_\rm S$ as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ in high-multiplicity p--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

$v_2${2, $1.1<|\Delta\eta|< 7.8$} of $\Lambda$ + $\overline \Lambda$ as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ in high-multiplicity p--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

$v_2${2, $1.1<|\Delta\eta|< 6.4$} of $\mathrm{\pi}^{\pm}$ as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ in high-multiplicity pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 13$ TeV.

$v_2${2, $1.1<|\Delta\eta|< 6.4$} of $\rm K^+$ + $\rm K^-$ as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ in high-multiplicity pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 13$ TeV.

$v_2${2, $1.1<|\Delta\eta|< 6.4$} of p + $\rm\overline p$ as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ in high-multiplicity pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 13$ TeV.

$v_2${2, $1.1<|\Delta\eta|< 6.4$} of $\rm K^0_\rm S$ as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ in high-multiplicity pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 13$ TeV.

$v_2${2, $1.1<|\Delta\eta|< 6.4$} of $\Lambda$ + $\overline \Lambda$ as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ in high-multiplicity pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 13$ TeV.

Mean transverse momentum $\langle p_{T} \rangle$ for $\Lambda$ and $K^{0}_{S}$ at mid-rapidity as a function of $N_{\text{part}}$ at 3 GeV.

Hadron 4$\pi$ yields per mean number of participants yield as a function of $N_{\text{part}}$.

Mid-rapidity yield ratios of $\Lambda/p$, $\Xi/\Lambda$, and $K^0_{S}/\Lambda$ at 3 GeV.

The transverse-momentum spectra of $\Lambda$ for different rapidities.

The transverse-momentum spectra of $\Lambda$ for different rapidities.

The transverse-momentum spectra of $\Lambda$ for different rapidities.

The transverse-momentum spectra of $\Lambda$ for different rapidities.

The transverse-momentum spectra of $\Lambda$ for different rapidities.

The transverse-momentum spectra of $\Lambda$ for different rapidities.

The transverse-momentum spectra of $K^{0}_{S}$ for different rapidities.

The transverse-momentum spectra of $K^{0}_{S}$ for different rapidities.

The transverse-momentum spectra of $K^{0}_{S}$ for different rapidities.

The transverse-momentum spectra of $K^{0}_{S}$ for different rapidities.

The transverse-momentum spectra of $K^{0}_{S}$ for different rapidities.

The transverse-momentum spectra of $K^{0}_{S}$ for different rapidities.

Hadron mass dependence of mean transverse momentum $\langle p_{T} \rangle$.

Data from Figure 2, panel b, U+U, 0-0.5% Centrality, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 3, panel a, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 3, panel b, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 3, panel c, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 3, panel d, 0-5% Centrality, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 3, panel e, 0-5% Centrality, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 3, panel f, 0-5% Centrality, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 4, panel a, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 4, panel a, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 4, panel b, Au+Au, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 4, panel b, U+U, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 4, panel c, Au+Au, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 4, panel c, U+U, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 4, panel d, Au+Au, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 4, panel d, U+U, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 5, panel a, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 5, panel a, Au+Au, standard method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 5, panel a, Au+Au, difference, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 5, panel b, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 5, panel b, Au+Au, standard, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 5, panel b, Au+Au, difference, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 5, panel c, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 5, panel c, Au+Au, standard, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 5, panel c, Au+Au, difference, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Transverse momentum spectra of inclusive protons in 20-40% Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3 GeV. The statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown respectively.

Transverse momentum spectra of inclusive protons in 40-80% Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3 GeV. The statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown respectively.

Transverse momentum spectra of primordial protons in 0-10% Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3 GeV. The statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown respectively.

Transverse momentum spectra of primordial protons in 10-20% Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3 GeV. The statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown respectively.

Transverse momentum spectra of primordial protons in 20-40% Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3 GeV. The statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown respectively.

Transverse momentum spectra of primordial protons in 40-80% Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3 GeV. The statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown respectively.

Transverse momentum spectra of deuterons in 0-10% Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3 GeV. The statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown respectively.

Transverse momentum spectra of deuterons in 10-20% Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3 GeV. The statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown respectively.

Transverse momentum spectra of deuterons in 20-40% Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3 GeV. The statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown respectively.

Transverse momentum spectra of deuterons in 40-80% Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3 GeV. The statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown respectively.

Transverse momentum spectra of tritons in 0-10% Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3 GeV. The statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown respectively.

Transverse momentum spectra of tritons in 10-20% Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3 GeV. The statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown respectively.

Transverse momentum spectra of tritons in 20-40% Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3 GeV. The statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown respectively.

Transverse momentum spectra of tritons in 40-80% Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3 GeV. The statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown respectively.

Transverse momentum spectra of $^{3}He$ in 0-10% Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3 GeV. The statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown respectively.

Transverse momentum spectra of $^{3}He$ in 10-20% Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3 GeV. The statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown respectively.

Transverse momentum spectra of $^{3}He$ in 20-40% Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3 GeV. The statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown respectively.

Transverse momentum spectra of $^{3}He$ in 40-80% Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3 GeV. The statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown respectively.

Transverse momentum spectra of $^{4}He$ in 0-10% Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3 GeV. The statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown respectively.

Transverse momentum spectra of $^{4}He$ in 10-20% Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3 GeV. The statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown respectively.

Transverse momentum spectra of $^{4}He$ in 20-40% Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3 GeV. The statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown respectively.

Transverse momentum spectra of $^{4}He$ in 40-80% Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3 GeV. The statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown respectively.

Averaged transverse momentum ($<p_{T}>$) of primordial protons at different centralities in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3 GeV. The statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown respectively.

Averaged transverse momentum ($<p_{T}>$) of deuterons at different centralities in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3 GeV. The statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown respectively.

Averaged transverse momentum ($<p_{T}>$) of tritons at different centralities in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3 GeV. The statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown respectively.

Averaged transverse momentum ($<p_{T}>$) of $^{3}He$ at different centralities in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3 GeV. The statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown respectively.

Averaged transverse momentum ($<p_{T}>$) of $^{4}He$ at different centralities in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3 GeV. The statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown respectively.

Integral Yield (dN/dy) of inclusive protons at different centralities in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3 GeV. The statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown respectively.

Integral Yield (dN/dy) of primordial protons at different centralities in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3 GeV. The statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown respectively.

Integral Yield (dN/dy) of deuterons at different centralities in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3 GeV. The statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown respectively.

Integral Yield (dN/dy) of tritons at different centralities in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3 GeV. The statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown respectively.

Integral Yield (dN/dy) of $^{3}He$ at different centralities in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3 GeV. The statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown respectively.

Integral Yield (dN/dy) of $^{4}He$ at different centralities in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3 GeV. The statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown respectively.

$4\pi$ yield for primordial protons and light nuclei at different centralities in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3 GeV. The statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown respectively.

deuteron to proton ratios at different centralities in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3 GeV. The statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown respectively.

triton to proton ratios at different centralities in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3 GeV. The statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown respectively.

helium3 to proton ratios at different centralities in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3 GeV. The statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown respectively.

helium4 to proton ratios at different centralities in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3 GeV. The statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown respectively.

Transverse momentum dependence of $\sqrt[A-1]{B_{A}} (GeV^{2}/c^{3})$ of deuterons at different centralities in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3 GeV. The statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown respectively.

Transverse momentum dependence of $\sqrt[A-1]{B_{A}} (GeV^{2}/c^{3})$ of tritons at different centralities in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3 GeV. The statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown respectively.

Transverse momentum dependence of $\sqrt[A-1]{B_{A}} (GeV^{2}/c^{3})$ of $^{3}He$ at different centralities in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3 GeV. The statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown respectively.

Rapidity dependence of $\sqrt[A-1]{B_{A}} (GeV^{2}/c^{3})$ of deuterons at different centralities in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3 GeV. The statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown respectively.

Rapidity dependence of $\sqrt[A-1]{B_{A}} (GeV^{2}/c^{3})$ of tritons at different centralities in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3 GeV. The statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown respectively.

Rapidity dependence of $\sqrt[A-1]{B_{A}} (GeV^{2}/c^{3})$ of $^{3}He$ at different centralities in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3 GeV. The statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown respectively.

Centrality dependence of $N_{p}\times N_{t}/N_{d}^{2}$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3 GeV. The statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown respectively.

Centrality dependence of $N_{^{4}He} \times N_{p}/N_{^{3}He} \times N_{d}$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3 GeV. The statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown respectively.

Centrality dependence of $N_{^{4}He} \times N_{d}/N_{^{3}He} \times N_{t}$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3 GeV. The statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown respectively.

Rapidity dependence of $N_{p} \times N_{t}/N_{d}^{2}$ at different centralities in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3 GeV. The statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown respectively.

Rapidity dependence of $N_{^{4}He} \times N_{p}/N_{^{3}He} \times N_{d}$ at different centralities in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3 GeV. The statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown respectively.

Rapidity dependence of $N_{^{4}He} \times N_{d}/N_{^{3}He} \times N_{t}$ at different centralities in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 3 GeV. The statistical and systematic uncertainties are shown respectively.

Net-proton cumulant ratios, (a) $C_{2}/C_{1}$, (b) $C_{3}/C_{2}$, (c) $C_{4}/C_{2}$, (d) $C_{5}/C_{1}$, and (e) $C_{6}/C_{2}$ as a function of charged-particle multiplicity from $\sqrt{s}=200$ GeV $p$+$p$ collisions. Black solid lines and red bands represent the statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively. Cyan points represent event averages for $3 < m_{\rm ch}^{\rm TPC} < 30$, and they are plotted at the corresponding value of $m_{\rm ch}^{\rm TPC}$. The uncertainties on the cyan points are smaller than the marker size. The Skellam baselines are shown as dotted lines. The results of the PYTHIA8 calculations are shown by hatched-golden bands. The golden bands at $m_{\rm ch}^{\rm TPC}\approx 6$ are the results from the PYTHIA8 calculations averaged over multiplicities.

Rapidity-acceptance dependence of the net-proton cumulant ratios, (a) $C_{4}/C_{2}$, (b) $C_{5}/C_{1}$, and (c) $C_{6}/C_{2}$ shown as a function of the charged-particle multiplicity, $m_{\rm ch}^{\rm TPC}$, from $\sqrt{s}=200$ GeV $p$+$p$ collisions. Solid squares, triangles, and circles represent the results with $|y|<0.1$, $0.3$, and $0.5$, respectively. Black solid lines and colored bands show the statistical and systematic uncertainties.The data points and their uncertainties for $|y|<0.1$ and $0.3$ are slightly shifted for clarity. The Skellam baselines are shown by dotted lines.

Net-proton cumulant ratios, (a) $C_{4}/C_{2}$, (b) $C_{5}/C_{1}$, and (c) $C_{6}/C_{2}$ as a function of charged-particle multiplicity for $p$+$p$ collisions and Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV for $|y|<0.5$ and $0.4<p_{\rm T}<2.0$ GeV/$c$. Cyan markers represent event averages for $3<m_{\rm ch}^{\rm TPC}<30$ from the $p$+$p$ collisions. Results from Au+Au collisions are shown as triangles for the 0-40%, 40-50%, 50-60%, 60-70%, and 70-80% centrality bins. Red and grey bands show the systematic uncertainties for $p$+$p$ collisions and Au+Au collisions, respectively. The $m_{\rm ch}^{\rm TPC}$ values are not corrected for the reconstruction efficiency of the TPC. The golden bands at $m_{\rm ch}^{\rm TPC}\approx 6$ represent the results from PYTHIA8 calculations averaged over multiplicity. The Skellam baselines are shown in dotted lines. The purple bands show corresponding susceptibility ratios of baryon number from lattice QCD calculations, where the multiplicity range is chosen arbitrary.

Net-proton cumulant ratios, (a) $C_{4}/C_{2}$, (b) $C_{5}/C_{1}$, and (c) $C_{6}/C_{2}$ as a function of charged-particle multiplicity for $p$+$p$ collisions and Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV for $|y|<0.5$ and $0.4<p_{\rm T}<2.0$ GeV/$c$. Cyan markers represent event averages for $3<m_{\rm ch}^{\rm TPC}<30$ from the $p$+$p$ collisions. Results from Au+Au collisions are shown as triangles for the 0-40%, 40-50%, 50-60%, 60-70%, and 70-80% centrality bins. Red and grey bands show the systematic uncertainties for $p$+$p$ collisions and Au+Au collisions, respectively. The $m_{\rm ch}^{\rm TPC}$ values are not corrected for the reconstruction efficiency of the TPC. The golden bands at $m_{\rm ch}^{\rm TPC}\approx 6$ represent the results from PYTHIA8 calculations averaged over multiplicity. The Skellam baselines are shown in dotted lines. The purple bands show corresponding susceptibility ratios of baryon number from lattice QCD calculations, where the multiplicity range is chosen arbitrary.

Figure 1b, lower panel, subevent

Figure 2a, full-event

Figure 2b, subevent

Figure 3b

Figure 3c

Figure 3e

Figure 3f

Figure 4a

Figure 4b

Figure 5a, full-event

Figure 5b, subevent

Figure 5c, full-event

Figure 5d, subevent

Figure 6a

Figure 6b

Figure 7a, full-event

Figure 7b, subevent

Figure 7c, full-event

Figure 7d, subevent

Figure 8a, full-event

Figure 8b, subevent

Figure 9a, full-event

Figure 9b, subevent

Figure 10a, full-event

Figure 10b, subevent

Figure 11a, full-event

Figure 11b, full-event

Figure 11c, full-event

Figure 11d, subevent

Figure 11e, subevent

Figure 11f, subevent

Figure 12a, full-event

Figure 12b, subevent

Figure 13

Figure 14a

Figure 14b