Backward [$x_F$ < 0] $A^{J/\psi}_N$ vs high $p_T$ for $p$+$p$, $p$+Al, and $p$+Au collisions.

$A^{J/\psi}_N$ vs $x_F$ for $p$+$p$, $p$+Al, and $p$+Au collisions.

$A^{J/\psi}_N$ vs $x_F$ for $p$+$p$, $p$+Al, and $p$+Au collisions.

$A^{J/\psi}_N$ vs $x_F$ for $p$+$p$, $p$+Al, and $p$+Au collisions.

$A^{J/\psi}_N$ vs $x_F$ for $p$+$p$, $p$+Al, and $p$+Au collisions.

Centrality dependence of (a) $v_2${2} and (b) $v_2${4}. (a) The red points indicate no pseudorapidity gap whereas the magenta points indicate a pseudorapidity gap of |$\Delta\eta$| > 2.0. (b) The black points indicate $v_2${4} with no pseudorapidity gap, the blue points indicate a two-subevent method with |$\Delta\eta$| > 2.0 but where some short-range pairs are allowed, and the red points indicate a two-subevent method with |$\Delta\eta$| > 2.0 where no short-range pairs are allowed.

Centrality dependence of (a) $v_2${2} and (b) $v_2${4}. (a) The red points indicate no pseudorapidity gap whereas the magenta points indicate a pseudorapidity gap of |$\Delta\eta$| > 2.0. (b) The black points indicate $v_2${4} with no pseudorapidity gap, the blue points indicate a two-subevent method with |$\Delta\eta$| > 2.0 but where some short-range pairs are allowed, and the red points indicate a two-subevent method with |$\Delta\eta$| > 2.0 where no short-range pairs are allowed.

Multi-particle $v_2$ as a function of centrality in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. The magenta open diamonds indicate the $v_2${SP }, the blue open squares indicate $v_2${4}, the black open circles indicate $v_2${6}, and the green filled diamonds indicate $v_2${8}.

Multi-particle $v_2$ as a function of centrality in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. The magenta open diamonds indicate the $v_2${SP }, the blue open squares indicate $v_2${4}, the black open circles indicate $v_2${6}, and the green filled diamonds indicate $v_2${8}.

Multi-particle $v_2$ as a function of centrality in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. The magenta open diamonds indicate the $v_2${SP }, the blue open squares indicate $v_2${4}, the black open circles indicate $v_2${6}, and the green filled diamonds indicate $v_2${8}.

Multi-particle $v_2$ as a function of centrality in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. The magenta open diamonds indicate the $v_2${SP }, the blue open squares indicate $v_2${4}, the black open circles indicate $v_2${6}, and the green filled diamonds indicate $v_2${8}.

Cumulant method estimate of $\sigma_{v_{2}}$ / $\langle v_{2} \rangle$ as a function of centrality in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. The data are shown as black open squares. The same calculation as done in data is done in ampt, shown as a solid green line. Calculations of $\sigma_{\epsilon_{2}}$ /$ \langle\epsilon_{2}\rangle$ performed in the Monte Carlo Glauber model are shown as blue lines. The solid blue line is the Monte Carlo Glauber calculation done using the same estimate as the data, the dashed blue line is the direct calculation of the moments of the MC Glauber $\epsilon_{2}$ distribution.

Centrality dependence of $v_3${2, |$\Delta\eta$| > 2} in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, shown as magenta diamonds. The systematic uncertainty is indicated as a shaded magenta band. Also shown as black squares are $\sqrt{\langle v^{2}_{3}\rangle}$ as determined from the folding analysis, which is shown in the next section.

Centrality dependence of $v_3${2, |$\Delta\eta$| > 2} in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, shown as magenta diamonds. The systematic uncertainty is indicated as a shaded magenta band. Also shown as black squares are $\sqrt{\langle v^{2}_{3}\rangle}$ as determined from the folding analysis, which is shown in the next section.

Centrality dependence of $c_3${4} for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. (a) Calculations using both arms: $c_3${4} (black circles), $c_3${4}$_{ab|ab}$ (blue diamonds), $c_3${4}$_{aa|bb}$ (red squares), and comparison to STAR [36] (black stars). (b) Comparison of $c_3${4} determined using both arms (open symbols) and a single arm (closed symbols). Note that the open black circles are the same in (a) and (b).

Centrality dependence of $c_3${4} for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. (a) Calculations using both arms: $c_3${4} (black circles), $c_3${4}$_{ab|ab}$ (blue diamonds), $c_3${4}$_{aa|bb}$ (red squares), and comparison to STAR [36] (black stars). (b) Comparison of $c_3${4} determined using both arms (open symbols) and a single arm (closed symbols). Note that the open black circles are the same in (a) and (b).

Centrality dependence of $c_3${4} for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. (a) Calculations using both arms: $c_3${4} (black circles), $c_3${4}$_{ab|ab}$ (blue diamonds), $c_3${4}$_{aa|bb}$ (red squares), and comparison to STAR [36] (black stars). (b) Comparison of $c_3${4} determined using both arms (open symbols) and a single arm (closed symbols). Note that the open black circles are the same in (a) and (b).

Folding results for (a) $v_2$, (b) $\sigma_{v_{2}}$ , and (c) $\sigma_{v_{2}}$ / $\langle v_{2}\rangle$. The black lines above and below the points indicate the systematic uncertainties. The red (green) boxes indicate the statistical uncertainties at the 68.27% (95.45%) confidence level. In the case of $\langle v_{2}\rangle$, the statistical uncertainties at the 68.27% confidence level are too small to be seen, and the uncertainties at the 95.45% confidence level are visible but noticeably smaller than the marker size. Shown as blue squares are the same quantities as determined using the cumulant based calculation—these points are slightly offset in the x-coordinate to improve visibility.

Folding results for (a) $v_2$, (b) $\sigma_{v_{2}}$ , and (c) $\sigma_{v_{2}}$ / $\langle v_{2}\rangle$. The black lines above and below the points indicate the systematic uncertainties. The red (green) boxes indicate the statistical uncertainties at the 68.27% (95.45%) confidence level. In the case of $\langle v_{2}\rangle$, the statistical uncertainties at the 68.27% confidence level are too small to be seen, and the uncertainties at the 95.45% confidence level are visible but noticeably smaller than the marker size. Shown as blue squares are the same quantities as determined using the cumulant based calculation—these points are slightly offset in the x-coordinate to improve visibility.

Folding results for (a) $v_2$, (b) $\sigma_{v_{2}}$ , and (c) $\sigma_{v_{2}}$ / $\langle v_{2}\rangle$. The black lines above and below the points indicate the systematic uncertainties. The red (green) boxes indicate the statistical uncertainties at the 68.27% (95.45%) confidence level. In the case of $\langle v_{2}\rangle$, the statistical uncertainties at the 68.27% confidence level are too small to be seen, and the uncertainties at the 95.45% confidence level are visible but noticeably smaller than the marker size. Shown as blue squares are the same quantities as determined using the cumulant based calculation—these points are slightly offset in the x-coordinate to improve visibility.

Folding results for (a) $\langle v_{3}\rangle$, (b) $\sigma_{v_{3}}$ , and (c) $\sigma_{v_{3}}$ /$\langle v_{3}\rangle$. The black lines above and below the points indicate the systematic uncertainties. The red (green) boxes indicate the statistical uncertainties at the 68.27% (95.45%) confidence level. The $\sigma_{v_{3}}$ /$\langle v_{3}\rangle$ values are all ≈ 0.52, the apparent limiting value of this quantity for the Bessel-Gaussian distribution.

Folding results for (a) $\langle v_{3}\rangle$, (b) $\sigma_{v_{3}}$ , and (c) $\sigma_{v_{3}}$ /$\langle v_{3}\rangle$. The black lines above and below the points indicate the systematic uncertainties. The red (green) boxes indicate the statistical uncertainties at the 68.27% (95.45%) confidence level. The $\sigma_{v_{3}}$ /$\langle v_{3}\rangle$ values are all ≈ 0.52, the apparent limiting value of this quantity for the Bessel-Gaussian distribution.

Folding results for (a) $\langle v_{3}\rangle$, (b) $\sigma_{v_{3}}$ , and (c) $\sigma_{v_{3}}$ /$\langle v_{3}\rangle$. The black lines above and below the points indicate the systematic uncertainties. The red (green) boxes indicate the statistical uncertainties at the 68.27% (95.45%) confidence level. The $\sigma_{v_{3}}$ /$\langle v_{3}\rangle$ values are all ≈ 0.52, the apparent limiting value of this quantity for the Bessel-Gaussian distribution.

The elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, for $\Omega^{-}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ in pPb collision at 8.16 TeV.

The elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, for $D^{0}$ mesons as a function of $p_{T}$ in pPb collision at 8.16 TeV.

The elliptic flow after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}$, for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ in pPb collision at 8.16 TeV.

The elliptic flow after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}$, for $\Lambda$ as a function of $p_{T}$ in pPb collision at 8.16 TeV.

The elliptic flow after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}$, for $\Xi^{-}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ in pPb collision at 8.16 TeV.

The elliptic flow after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}$, for $\Omega^{-}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ in pPb collision at 8.16 TeV.

The elliptic flow after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}$, for $D^{0}$ mesons as a function of $p_{T}$ in pPb collision at 8.16 TeV.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}/n_{q}$, for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ in pPb collision at 8.16 TeV.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}/n_{q}$, for $\Lambda$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ in pPb collision at 8.16 TeV.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}/n_{q}$, for $\Xi^{-}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ in pPb collision at 8.16 TeV.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}/n_{q}$, for $\Omega^{-}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ in pPb collision at 8.16 TeV.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}/n_{q}$, for $D^{0}$ meson as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ in pPb collision at 8.16 TeV.

The elliptic flow after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}$, for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ in PbPb collision at 5.02 TeV.

The elliptic flow after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}$, for $\Lambda$ as a function of $p_{T}$ in PbPb collision at 5.02 TeV.

The elliptic flow after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}$, for $\Xi^{-}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ in PbPb collision at 5.02 TeV.

The elliptic flow after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}$, for $\Omega^{-}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ in PbPb collision at 5.02 TeV.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}/n_{q}$, for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ in PbPb collision at 5.02 TeV.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}/n_{q}$, for $\Lambda$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ in PbPb collision at 5.02 TeV.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}/n_{q}$, for $\Xi^{-}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ in PbPb collision at 5.02 TeV.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}/n_{q}$, for $\Omega^{-}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ in PbPb collision at 5.02 TeV.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark after correcting back-to-back jet contribution, $v_{2}^{sub}/n_{q}$, for $D^{0}$ meson as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ in PbPb collision at 5.02 TeV.

$(\mathrm{d}N_{\phi}/\mathrm{d}y)/\left\langle N_\mathrm{part}\right\rangle$ as a function of $\left\langle N_\mathrm{part}\right\rangle$ measured in the muon decay channel at forward rapidity in pp and Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}= 2.76$ TeV, for $2 < p_\mathrm{T} <5$ GeV/c.

$R_{\mathrm{AA}}$ of the $\phi$ meson as a function of $\langle N_{\mathrm{part}} \rangle$ for $2.5<y<4$ and $2 < p_\mathrm{T} <5$ GeV/c.

pT-differential yield of prompt D/s+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{sNN}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 0-10% in the rapidity interval |y|<0.5. Branching ratio of Ds->phipi->KKpi : 0.0227.

pT-differential yield of prompt D0 mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{sNN}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 30-50% in the rapidity interval |y|<0.5. Branching ratio of D0->Kpi : 0.0393.

pT-differential yield of prompt D+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{sNN}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 30-50% in the rapidity interval |y|<0.5. Branching ratio of D+->Kpipi : 0.0946.

pT-differential yield of prompt D*+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{sNN}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 30-50% in the rapidity interval |y|<0.5. Branching ratio of D*+->D0pi->Kpipi : 0.0393*0.677.

pT-differential yield of prompt D/s+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{sNN}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 30-50% in the rapidity interval |y|<0.5. Branching ratio of Ds->phipi->KKpi : 0.0227.

pT-differential yield of prompt D0 mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{sNN}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 60-80% in the rapidity interval |y|<0.5. Branching ratio of D0->Kpi : 0.0393.

pT-differential yield of prompt D+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{sNN}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 60-80% in the rapidity interval |y|<0.5. Branching ratio of D+->Kpipi : 0.0946.

pT-differential yield of prompt D*+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{sNN}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 60-80% in the rapidity interval |y|<0.5. Branching ratio of D*+->D0pi->Kpipi : 0.0393*0.677.

pT-differential yield of prompt D/s+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{sNN}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 60-80% in the rapidity interval |y|<0.5. Branching ratio of Ds->phipi->KKpi : 0.0227.

Ratio of D+ to D0 meson yield in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{sNN}=5.02 TeV, 0-10% centrality, in |y| < 0.5 as a function of pT. Branching ratio of D+->Kpipi : 0.0946. Branching ratio of D0->Kpi : 0.0393.

Ratio of D*+ to D0 meson yield in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{sNN}=5.02 TeV, 0-10% centrality, in |y| < 0.5 as a function of pT. Branching ratio of D*+->D0pi->Kpipi : 0.0393*0.677. Branching ratio of D0->Kpi : 0.0393.

Ratio of Ds to D0 meson yield in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{sNN}=5.02 TeV, 0-10% centrality, in |y| < 0.5 as a function of pT. Branching ratio of Ds->phipi->KKpi : 0.0227. Branching ratio of D0->Kpi : 0.0393.

Ratio of Ds to D+ meson yield in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{sNN}=5.02 TeV, 0-10% centrality, in |y| < 0.5 as a function of pT. Branching ratio of Ds->phipi->KKpi : 0.0227. Branching ratio of D+->Kpipi : 0.0946.

Ratio of D+ to D0 meson yield in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{sNN}=5.02 TeV, 30-50% centrality, in |y| < 0.5 as a function of pT. Branching ratio of D+->Kpipi : 0.0946. Branching ratio of D0->Kpi : 0.0393.

Ratio of D*+ to D0 meson yield in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{sNN}=5.02 TeV, 30-50% centrality, in |y| < 0.5 as a function of pT. Branching ratio of D*+->D0pi->Kpipi : 0.0393*0.677. Branching ratio of D0->Kpi : 0.0393.

Ratio of Ds to D0 meson yield in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{sNN}=5.02 TeV, 30-50% centrality, in |y| < 0.5 as a function of pT. Branching ratio of Ds->phipi->KKpi : 0.0227. Branching ratio of D0->Kpi : 0.0393.

Ratio of Ds to D+ meson yield in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{sNN}=5.02 TeV, 30-50% centrality, in |y| < 0.5 as a function of pT. Branching ratio of Ds->phipi->KKpi : 0.0227. Branching ratio of D+->Kpipi : 0.0946.

Ratio of D+ to D0 meson yield in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{sNN}=5.02 TeV, 60-80% centrality, in |y| < 0.5 as a function of pT. Branching ratio of D+->Kpipi : 0.0946. Branching ratio of D0->Kpi : 0.0393.

Ratio of D*+ to D0 meson yield in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{sNN}=5.02 TeV, 60-80% centrality, in |y| < 0.5 as a function of pT. Branching ratio of D*+->D0pi->Kpipi : 0.0393*0.677. Branching ratio of D0->Kpi : 0.0393.

Ratio of Ds to D0 meson yield in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{sNN}=5.02 TeV, 60-80% centrality, in |y| < 0.5 as a function of pT. Branching ratio of Ds->phipi->KKpi : 0.0227. Branching ratio of D0->Kpi : 0.0393.

Ratio of Ds to D+ meson yield in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{sNN}=5.02 TeV, 60-80% centrality, in |y| < 0.5 as a function of pT. Branching ratio of Ds->phipi->KKpi : 0.0227. Branching ratio of D+->Kpipi : 0.0946.

pT-differential nuclear modification factor of prompt D0 mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{sNN}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 0-10% in the rapidity interval |y|<0.5.

pT-differential nuclear modification factor of prompt D+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{sNN}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 0-10% in the rapidity interval |y|<0.5.

pT-differential nuclear modification factor of prompt D*+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{sNN}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 0-10% in the rapidity interval |y|<0.5.

pT-differential nuclear modification factor of prompt D/s+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{sNN}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 0-10% in the rapidity interval |y|<0.5.

pT-differential nuclear modification factor of average prompt D0, D+, D*+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{sNN}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 0-10% in the rapidity interval |y|<0.5.

pT-differential nuclear modification factor of prompt D0 mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{sNN}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 30-50% in the rapidity interval |y|<0.5.

pT-differential nuclear modification factor of prompt D+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{sNN}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 30-50% in the rapidity interval |y|<0.5.

pT-differential nuclear modification factor of prompt D*+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{sNN}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 30-50% in the rapidity interval |y|<0.5.

pT-differential nuclear modification factor of prompt D/s+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{sNN}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 30-50% in the rapidity interval |y|<0.5.

pT-differential nuclear modification factor of average prompt D0, D+, D*+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{sNN}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 30-50% in the rapidity interval |y|<0.5.

pT-differential nuclear modification factor of prompt D0 mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{sNN}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 60-80% in the rapidity interval |y|<0.5.

pT-differential nuclear modification factor of prompt D+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{sNN}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 60-80% in the rapidity interval |y|<0.5.

pT-differential nuclear modification factor of prompt D*+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{sNN}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 60-80% in the rapidity interval |y|<0.5.

pT-differential nuclear modification factor of prompt D/s+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{sNN}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 60-80% in the rapidity interval |y|<0.5.

pT-differential nuclear modification factor of average prompt D0, D+, D*+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{sNN}=5.02 TeV in the centrality class 60-80% in the rapidity interval |y|<0.5.

pT-differential nuclear modification factor of average prompt D0, D+, D*+ mesons in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{sNN}=2.76 TeV in the centrality class 0-10% in the rapidity interval |y|<0.5.

Ratio of prompt D meson (D0, D+, D*+ average) and charged particles nuclear modification factors (RAA) as a function of pT for D mesons with |y|<0.5 and charged particles with |eta|<0.8, measured in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{sNN}=5.02 TeV in the 0-10% centrality class.

Ratio of prompt D meson (D0, D+, D*+ average) and charged particles nuclear modification factors (RAA) as a function of pT for D mesons with |y|<0.5 and charged particles with |eta|<0.8, measured in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{sNN}=5.02 TeV in the 30-50% centrality class.

Ratio of prompt D meson (D0, D+, D*+ average) and charged particles nuclear modification factors (RAA) as a function of pT for D mesons with |y|<0.5 and charged particles with |eta|<0.8, measured in Pb-Pb collisions at sqrt{sNN}=5.02 TeV in the 60-80% centrality class.

Differential cross-sections multiplied by dimuon branching fractions for $\Upsilon$(1S), $\Upsilon$(2S) and $\Upsilon$(3S) states versus $p_T$ integrated over $y$ between 2.0 and 4.5.

Differential cross-sections multiplied by dimuon branching fractions for $\Upsilon$(1S), $\Upsilon$(2S) and $\Upsilon$(3S) states versus $y$ integrated over $p_T$ from 0 to 15 GeV/c.

Ratios of double-differential cross-sections times dimuon branching fractions for $\Upsilon$(2S) to $\Upsilon$(1S).

Ratios of double-differential cross-sections times dimuon branching fractions for $\Upsilon$(3S) to $\Upsilon$(1S).

Ratios of differential cross-sections times dimuon branching fractions versus $p_T$ over $y$ for $\Upsilon$(2S) to $\Upsilon$(1S) and $\Upsilon$(3S) to $\Upsilon$(1S).

Ratios of differential cross-sections times dimuon branching fractions versus $y$ over $p_T$ for $\Upsilon$(2S) to $\Upsilon$(1S) and $\Upsilon$(3S) to $\Upsilon$(1S).

The cross-section ratios between 13 TeV and 8 TeV in different bins of $p_T$ and $y$ for $\Upsilon$(1S).

The cross-section ratios between 13 TeV and 8 TeV in different bins of $p_T$ and $y$ for $\Upsilon$(2S).

The cross-section ratios between 13 TeV and 8 TeV in different bins of $p_T$ and $y$ for $\Upsilon$(3S).

Ratios of differential cross-sections between 13 TeV and 8 TeV measurements versus $p_T$ over $y$ for $\Upsilon$(1S), $\Upsilon$(2S) and $\Upsilon$(3S).

Ratios of differential cross-sections between 13 TeV and 8 TeV measurements versus $y$ over $p_T$ for $\Upsilon$(1S), $\Upsilon$(2S) and $\Upsilon$(3S).

(a) Centrality dependence of $v^{even}_{1}$ for $0.4 \lt p_{T} \lt 0.7$ GeV/c for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{_{NN}}} = 200, 39$ and $19.6$ GeV; (b) $K$ vs. $\langle N_{ch} \rangle^{-1}$ for the $v^{even}_{1}$ values shown in (a). The $\langle N_{ch} \rangle$ values correspond to the centrality intervals indicated in panel (a).

Comparison of the $\sqrt{s_{_{NN}}}$ dependence of $v^{even}_{1}$ and $v_3$ for $0.4 \lt p_{T} \lt 0.7$ GeV/c in 0-10 central Au+Au collisions.

The expected and observed constraints on chargino lifetime and mass. The ratio of the vacuum expectation values of the two Higgs doublets, $\tan \beta$, is fixed to 5 with $\mu > 0$, where $\mu$ is the higgsino mass parameter. The direct chargino production cross section includes both $\widetilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}\widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1}$ and $\widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1}\widetilde{\chi}^\mp_{1}$ production in roughly a 2:1 ratio for all chargino masses considered, and the branching fraction of $\widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1} \rightarrow \widetilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}\mathrm{\pi^{\pm}}$ is set to 100%. Chargino masses that are less than those on the curve are excluded at 95% CL.

The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section for direct production of charginos and their branching fraction to $\widetilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}\mathrm{\pi^{\pm}}$ as a function of chargino mass and lifetime. The ratio of the vacuum expectation values of the two Higgs doublets, $\tan \beta$, is fixed to 5 with $\mu > 0$, where $\mu$ is the higgsino mass parameter. The direct chargino production cross section includes both $\widetilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}\widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1}$ and $\widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1}\widetilde{\chi}^\mp_{1}$ production in roughly a 2:1 ratio for all chargino masses considered, and the branching fraction of $\widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1} \rightarrow \widetilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}\mathrm{\pi^{\pm}}$ is set to 100%.

Signal acceptance for each of the generated chargino masses and lifetimes for $\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p} \rightarrow \widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1} \widetilde{\chi}^\mp_{1}$ events. The denominator for the acceptance is the total number of $\widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1} \widetilde{\chi}^\mp_{1}$ events generated, with no generator-level filtering, while the numerator is the number of those events that are selected by the disappearing track signal selection, after being processed with the same reconstruction software used on the data. The acceptance corresponds to the 2015 data-taking period. The uncertainties are only the statistical uncertainties resulting from the sizes of the generated samples.

Signal acceptance for each of the generated chargino masses and lifetimes for $\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p} \rightarrow \widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1} \widetilde{\chi}^\mp_{1}$ events. The denominator for the acceptance is the total number of $\widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1} \widetilde{\chi}^\mp_{1}$ events generated, with no generator-level filtering, while the numerator is the number of those events that are selected by the disappearing track signal selection, after being processed with the same reconstruction software used on the data. The acceptance corresponds to the 2016A data-taking period. The uncertainties are only the statistical uncertainties resulting from the sizes of the generated samples.

Signal acceptance for each of the generated chargino masses and lifetimes for $\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p} \rightarrow \widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1} \widetilde{\chi}^\mp_{1}$ events. The denominator for the acceptance is the total number of $\widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1} \widetilde{\chi}^\mp_{1}$ events generated, with no generator-level filtering, while the numerator is the number of those events that are selected by the disappearing track signal selection, after being processed with the same reconstruction software used on the data. The acceptance corresponds to the 2016B data-taking period. The uncertainties are only the statistical uncertainties resulting from the sizes of the generated samples.

Signal acceptance for each of the generated chargino masses and lifetimes for $\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p} \rightarrow \widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1} \widetilde{\chi}^0_{1}$ events. The denominator for the acceptance is the total number of $\widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1} \widetilde{\chi}^0_{1}$ events generated, with no generator-level filtering, while the numerator is the number of those events that are selected by the disappearing track signal selection, after being processed with the same reconstruction software used on the data. The acceptance corresponds to the 2015 data-taking period. The uncertainties are only the statistical uncertainties resulting from the sizes of the generated samples.

Signal acceptance for each of the generated chargino masses and lifetimes for $\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p} \rightarrow \widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1} \widetilde{\chi}^0_{1}$ events. The denominator for the acceptance is the total number of $\widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1} \widetilde{\chi}^0_{1}$ events generated, with no generator-level filtering, while the numerator is the number of those events that are selected by the disappearing track signal selection, after being processed with the same reconstruction software used on the data. The acceptance corresponds to the 2016A data-taking period. The uncertainties are only the statistical uncertainties resulting from the sizes of the generated samples.

Signal acceptance for each of the generated chargino masses and lifetimes for $\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p} \rightarrow \widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1} \widetilde{\chi}^0_{1}$ events. The denominator for the acceptance is the total number of $\widetilde{\chi}^\pm_{1} \widetilde{\chi}^0_{1}$ events generated, with no generator-level filtering, while the numerator is the number of those events that are selected by the disappearing track signal selection, after being processed with the same reconstruction software used on the data. The acceptance corresponds to the 2016B data-taking period. The uncertainties are only the statistical uncertainties resulting from the sizes of the generated samples.

Predicted signal yields for the 2015 data-taking period, corresponding to $2.7\,\text{fb}^{-1}$, after the application of each of the disappearing track selections for three chargino lifetime hypotheses ($\tau = 0.3$, $3.3$, and $33\,\text{ns}{}$) with a chargino mass of $700\,\text{GeV}{}$. The selections listed are cumulative, i.e., only the events and objects passing a given selection are considered in subsequent selections. The uncertainties shown include only the statistical uncertainty resulting from the limited sizes of the generated samples.

Predicted signal yields for the 2016A data-taking period, corresponding to $8.3\,\text{fb}^{-1}$, after the application of each of the disappearing track selections for three chargino lifetime hypotheses ($\tau = 0.3$, $3.3$, and $33\,\text{ns}{}$) with a chargino mass of $700\,\text{GeV}{}$. The selections listed are cumulative, i.e., only the events and objects passing a given selection are considered in subsequent selections. The uncertainties shown include only the statistical uncertainty resulting from the limited sizes of the generated samples.

Predicted signal yields for the 2016B data-taking period, corresponding to $27.4\,\text{fb}^{-1}$, after the application of each of the disappearing track selections for three chargino lifetime hypotheses ($\tau = 0.3$, $3.3$, and $33\,\text{ns}{}$) with a chargino mass of $700\,\text{GeV}{}$. The selections listed are cumulative, i.e., only the events and objects passing a given selection are considered in subsequent selections. The uncertainties shown include only the statistical uncertainty resulting from the limited sizes of the generated samples.

The observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the production cross section times branching ratio for SM non-resonant Higgs pair production.