The $\Delta\phi_{ch,Z}$ spectra for events with Z boson $p_{T}^Z > 40$ GeV and charged-hadrons with $1 <p_T < 2$ GeV in PbPb for centrality interval of 0-30% collisions.

The $\Delta\phi_{ch,Z}$ spectra for events with Z boson $p_{T}^Z > 40$ GeV and charged-hadrons with $2 <p_T < 4$ GeV in PbPb for centrality interval of 0-30% collisions.

The $\Delta\phi_{ch,Z}$ spectra for events with Z boson $p_{T}^Z > 40$ GeV and charged-hadrons with $4 <p_T < 10$ GeV in PbPb for centrality interval of 0-30% collisions.

The $\Delta\phi_{ch,Z}$ spectra for events with Z boson $p_{T}^Z > 40$ GeV and charged-hadrons with $1 <p_T < 2$ GeV in PbPb for centrality interval of 30-50% collisions.

The $\Delta\phi_{ch,Z}$ spectra for events with Z boson $p_{T}^Z > 40$ GeV and charged-hadrons with $2 <p_T < 4$ GeV in PbPb for centrality interval of 30-50% collisions.

The $\Delta\phi_{ch,Z}$ spectra for events with Z boson $p_{T}^Z > 40$ GeV and charged-hadrons with $4 <p_T < 10$ GeV in PbPb for centrality interval of 30-50% collisions.

The $\Delta\phi_{ch,Z}$ spectra for events with Z boson $p_{T}^Z > 40$ GeV and charged-hadrons with $1 <p_T < 2$ GeV in PbPb for centrality interval of 50-90% collisions.

The $\Delta\phi_{ch,Z}$ spectra for events with Z boson $p_{T}^Z > 40$ GeV and charged-hadrons with $2 <p_T < 4$ GeV in PbPb for centrality interval of 50-90% collisions.

The $\Delta\phi_{ch,Z}$ spectra for events with Z boson $p_{T}^Z > 40$ GeV and charged-hadrons with $4 <p_T < 10$ GeV in PbPb for centrality interval of 50-90% collisions.

The $\Delta\phi_{ch,Z}$ spectra for events with Z boson $p_{T}^Z > 40$ GeV and charged-hadrons with $1 <p_T < 2$ GeV in PbPb for centrality interval of 0-90% collisions.

The $\Delta\phi_{ch,Z}$ spectra for events with Z boson $p_{T}^Z > 40$ GeV and charged-hadrons with $2 <p_T < 4$ GeV in PbPb for centrality interval of 0-90% collisions.

The $\Delta\phi_{ch,Z}$ spectra for events with Z boson $p_{T}^Z > 40$ GeV and charged-hadrons with $4 <p_T < 10$ GeV in PbPb for centrality interval of 0-90% collisions.

The $\Delta y_{ch,Z}$ spectra for events with Z boson $p_{T}^Z > 40$ GeV and charged-hadrons with $1 <p_T < 2$ GeV in pp collisions.

The $\Delta y_{ch,Z}$ spectra for events with Z boson $p_{T}^Z > 40$ GeV and charged-hadrons with $2 <p_T < 4$ GeV in pp collisions.

The $\Delta y_{ch,Z}$ spectra for events with Z boson $p_{T}^Z > 40$ GeV and charged-hadrons with $4 <p_T < 10$ GeV in pp collisions.

The $\Delta y_{ch,Z}$ spectra for events with Z boson $p_{T}^Z > 40$ GeV and charged-hadrons with $1 <p_T < 2$ GeV in PbPb for centrality interval of 0-30% collisions.

The $\Delta y_{ch,Z}$ spectra for events with Z boson $p_{T}^Z > 40$ GeV and charged-hadrons with $2 <p_T < 4$ GeV in PbPb for centrality interval of 0-30% collisions.

The $\Delta y_{ch,Z}$ spectra for events with Z boson $p_{T}^Z > 40$ GeV and charged-hadrons with $4 <p_T < 10$ GeV in PbPb for centrality interval of 0-30% collisions.

The $\Delta y_{ch,Z}$ spectra for events with Z boson $p_{T}^Z > 40$ GeV and charged-hadrons with $1 <p_T < 2$ GeV in PbPb for centrality interval of 30-50% collisions.

The $\Delta y_{ch,Z}$ spectra for events with Z boson $p_{T}^Z > 40$ GeV and charged-hadrons with $2 <p_T < 4$ GeV in PbPb for centrality interval of 30-50% collisions.

The $\Delta y_{ch,Z}$ spectra for events with Z boson $p_{T}^Z > 40$ GeV and charged-hadrons with $4 <p_T < 10$ GeV in PbPb for centrality interval of 30-50% collisions.

The $\Delta y_{ch,Z}$ spectra for events with Z boson $p_{T}^Z > 40$ GeV and charged-hadrons with $1 <p_T < 2$ GeV in PbPb for centrality interval of 50-90% collisions.

The $\Delta y_{ch,Z}$ spectra for events with Z boson $p_{T}^Z > 40$ GeV and charged-hadrons with $2 <p_T < 4$ GeV in PbPb for centrality interval of 50-90% collisions.

The $\Delta y_{ch,Z}$ spectra for events with Z boson $p_{T}^Z > 40$ GeV and charged-hadrons with $4 <p_T < 10$ GeV in PbPb for centrality interval of 50-90% collisions.

The $\Delta y_{ch,Z}$ spectra for events with Z boson $p_{T}^Z > 40$ GeV and charged-hadrons with $1 <p_T < 2$ GeV in PbPb for centrality interval of 0-90% collisions.

The $\Delta y_{ch,Z}$ spectra for events with Z boson $p_{T}^Z > 40$ GeV and charged-hadrons with $2 <p_T < 4$ GeV in PbPb for centrality interval of 0-90% collisions.

The $\Delta y_{ch,Z}$ spectra for events with Z boson $p_{T}^Z > 40$ GeV and charged-hadrons with $4 <p_T < 10$ GeV in PbPb for centrality interval of 0-90% collisions.

The invariant yields of $\phi$ and $\omega+\rho$ mesons as a function of $\langle N_{\rm part}\rangle$ in Au+Au collisions. The systematic uncertainties of type-A (uncorrelated) are combined with statistical uncertainties in quadrature and are labeled as stat. Type-B (correlated) systematic uncertainties are listed as sys.

$R_{AA}$ of $\phi$ meson as a function of $p_T$ for in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{_{NN}}}=200$~GeV, compared with Cu+Au collisions at $1.2<|y|<2.2$. The systematic uncertainties of type-A (uncorrelated) are combined with statistical uncertainties in quadrature and are labeled as stat. Type-B (correlated) systematic uncertainties are listed as sys.

$R_{AA}$ of $\phi$ meson as a function of $\langle N_{\rm part}\rangle$ for $1.2<|y|<2.2$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{_{NN}}}=200$~GeV. The systematic uncertainties of type-A (uncorrelated) are combined with statistical uncertainties in quadrature and are labeled as stat. Type-B (correlated) systematic uncertainties are listed as sys.

Data from Figure 3, panel a, U+U

Data from Figure 3, panel b, Au+Au

Data from Figure 3, panel b, U+U

Data from Figure 6, panel a, 0-0.5% Centrality, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 6, panel b, 0-0.5% Centrality, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 6, panel c, 0-0.5% Centrality, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 22, panel a, U+U/Au+Au

Data from Figure 22, panel a, U+U/Au+Au

Data from Figure 30, upper row panel a, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 30, upper row panel b, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 30, upper row panel c, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 30, upper row panel d, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 30, middle row panel a, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 30, middle row panel b, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 30, middle row panel c, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 30, middle row panel d, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 30, lower row panel a, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 30, lower row panel b, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 30, lower row panel c, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 30, lower row panel d, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 31, panel a, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 31, panel a, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 31, panel b, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 31, panel b, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 31, panel c, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 31, panel c, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 31, panel d, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 31, panel d, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 31, panel e, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 31, panel e, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 31, panel f, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 31, panel f, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 31, panel g, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 31, panel g, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 31, panel g, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 31, panel g, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 31, panel i, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 31, panel i, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 31, panel g, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 31, panel g, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 31, panel k, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 31, panel k, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 31, panel l, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 31, panel l, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 32, upper row panel a, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 32, upper row panel b, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 32, upper row panel c, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 32, upper row panel d, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 32, middle row panel a, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 32, middle row panel b, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 32, middle row panel c, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 32, middle row panel d, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 32, lower row panel a, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 32, lower row panel b, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 32, lower row panel c, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 32, lower row panel d, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 33, panel a, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 33, panel a, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 33, panel b, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 33, panel b, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 33, panel c, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 33, panel c, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 33, panel d, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 33, panel d, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 33, panel e, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 33, panel e, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 33, panel f, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 33, panel f, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 33, panel g, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 33, panel g, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 33, panel g, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 33, panel g, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 33, panel i, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 33, panel i, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 33, panel g, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 33, panel g, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 33, panel k, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 33, panel k, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 33, panel l, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 33, panel l, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 34, upper row panel a, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 34, upper row panel b, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 34, upper row panel c, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 34, upper row panel d, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 34, middle row panel a, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 34, middle row panel b, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 34, middle row panel c, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 34, middle row panel d, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 34, lower row panel a, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 34, lower row panel b, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 34, lower row panel c, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 34, lower row panel d, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 35, panel a, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 35, panel a, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 35, panel b, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 35, panel b, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 35, panel c, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 35, panel c, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 35, panel d, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 35, panel d, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 35, panel e, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 35, panel e, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 35, panel f, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 35, panel f, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 35, panel g, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 35, panel g, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 35, panel g, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 35, panel g, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 35, panel i, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 35, panel i, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 35, panel g, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 35, panel g, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 35, panel k, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 35, panel k, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 35, panel l, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 35, panel l, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 36, upper row panel a, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 36, upper row panel b, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 36, upper row panel c, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 36, upper row panel d, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 36, middle row panel a, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 36, middle row panel b, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 36, middle row panel c, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 36, middle row panel d, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 36, lower row panel a, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 36, lower row panel b, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 36, lower row panel c, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 36, lower row panel d, 2subevent method, 0.5<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 37, panel a, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 37, panel a, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 37, panel b, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 37, panel b, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 37, panel c, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 37, panel c, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 37, panel d, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 37, panel d, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 37, panel e, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 37, panel e, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 37, panel f, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 37, panel f, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 37, panel g, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 37, panel g, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 37, panel g, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 37, panel g, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 37, panel i, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 37, panel i, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 37, panel g, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 37, panel g, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 37, panel k, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 37, panel k, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 37, panel l, Au+Au, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 37, panel l, U+U, 2subevent method, 0.2<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 38, upper row panel a, 2subevent method, four p_{T} ranges

Data from Figure 38, upper row panel b, 2subevent method, four p_{T} ranges

Data from Figure 38, upper row panel c, 2subevent method, four p_{T} ranges

Data from Figure 38, upper row panel d, 2subevent method, four p_{T} ranges

Data from Figure 38, middle row panel a, 2subevent method, four p_{T} ranges

Data from Figure 38, middle row panel b, 2subevent method, four p_{T} ranges

Data from Figure 38, middle row panel c, 2subevent method, 0.2< p_{T} <2 Gev/c, 0.5<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 38, middle row panel c, 2subevent method, 0.2< p_{T} <3 Gev/c, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 38, middle row panel d, 2subevent method, four p_{T} ranges

Data from Figure 38, lower row panel a, 2subevent method, four p_{T} ranges

Data from Figure 38, lower row panel b, 2subevent method, four p_{T} ranges

Data from Figure 38, lower row panel c, 2subevent method, 0.2< p_{T} <2 Gev/c, 0.5<p_{T}<2 GeV/c

Data from Figure 38, lower row panel c, 2subevent method, 0.2< p_{T} <3 Gev/c, 0.5<p_{T}<3 GeV/c

Data from Figure 38, lower row panel d, 2subevent method, four p_{T} ranges

$\xi$ distributions for different jet $p_T$ bins.

$\xi$ distributions for different jet $p_T$ bins.

The $j_T/p_{T}^{\rm jet}$ distributions for different jet $p_T$ bins.

The $j_T/p_{T}^{\rm jet}$ distributions for different jet $p_T$ bins.

$r$ distributions for different jet $p_T$ bins.

Normalized $p_{\mathrm{T}}$-spectrum ratio as a function as a function of centrality in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $E_{\mathrm{T}} \in$ $0.5 \leq |\eta|\leq 0.8$.

Normalized $p_{\mathrm{T}}$-spectrum ratio as a function as a function of centrality in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $N_{\mathrm{tracklets}} \in$ $0.5 \leq |\eta|\leq 0.8$.

Normalized $p_{\mathrm{T}}$-spectrum ratio as a function as a function of centrality in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $N_{\mathrm{ch}} \in$ $-3.7<\eta<-1.7$ and $2.8 < \eta <5.1$.

Event fraction distribution as a function of $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $N_{\mathrm{ch}} \in -3.7<\eta<-1.7$ and $2.8 < \eta <5.1$.

Event fraction distribution as a function of $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $N_{\mathrm{ch}} \in |\eta|\leq 0.8$.

Event fraction distribution as a function of $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $E_{\mathrm{T}} \in |\eta|\leq 0.8$.

Correlation between $\langle p_{\mathrm{T}} \rangle / \langle p_{\mathrm{T}} \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ and $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $N_{\mathrm{ch}}$ $\in$ $|\eta| \leq 0.8$.

Correlation between $\langle p_{\mathrm{T}} \rangle / \langle p_{\mathrm{T}} \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ and $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $N_{\mathrm{ch}}$ $\in$ $0.5 \leq |\eta| \leq 0.8$.

Correlation between $\langle p_{\mathrm{T}} \rangle / \langle p_{\mathrm{T}} \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ and $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $E_{\mathrm{T}}$ $\in$ $|\eta| \leq 0.8$.

Correlation between $\langle p_{\mathrm{T}} \rangle / \langle p_{\mathrm{T}} \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ and $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $E_{\mathrm{T}}$ $\in$ $0.5 \leq |\eta| \leq 0.8$.

Correlation between $\langle p_{\mathrm{T}} \rangle / \langle p_{\mathrm{T}} \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ and $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $N_{\mathrm{tracklets}}$ $\in$ $|\eta| \leq 0.8$.

Correlation between $\langle p_{\mathrm{T}} \rangle / \langle p_{\mathrm{T}} \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ and $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $N_{\mathrm{tracklets}}$ $\in$ $0.5 \leq |\eta| \leq 0.8$.

Correlation between $\langle p_{\mathrm{T}} \rangle / \langle p_{\mathrm{T}} \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ and $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $N_{\mathrm{tracklets}}$ $\in$ $0.3 \leq |\eta| \leq 0.6$.

Correlation between $\langle p_{\mathrm{T}} \rangle / \langle p_{\mathrm{T}} \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ and $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $N_{\mathrm{tracklets}}$ $\in$ $0.7 \leq |\eta| \leq 1$.

Correlation between $\langle p_{\mathrm{T}} \rangle / \langle p_{\mathrm{T}} \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ and $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $N_{\mathrm{ch}}$ $\in$ $-3.7<\eta<-1.7$ and $2.8 < \eta <5.1$.

Extracted $c_{\mathrm{s}}^{2}$ as a function of the minimum pseudorapidity gap between the centrality estimation and transverse-momentum spectra measurement in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$.

$k_{2}/k_{2}^{0-5\%}$ as a function of $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $N_{\mathrm{ch}}$ $\in$ $|\eta| \leq 0.8$.

$k_{2}/k_{2}^{0-5\%}$ as a function of $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $E_{\mathrm{T}}$ $\in$ $|\eta| \leq 0.8$.

$k_{2}/k_{2}^{0-5\%}$ as a function of $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $N_{\mathrm{ch}}$ $\in$ $-3.7<\eta<-1.7$ and $2.8 < \eta <5.1$.

$k_{3}/k_{3}^{0-5\%}$ as a function of $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $N_{\mathrm{ch}}$ $\in$ $|\eta| \leq 0.8$.

$k_{3}/k_{3}^{0-5\%}$ as a function of $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $E_{\mathrm{T}}$ $\in$ $|\eta| \leq 0.8$.

$k_{3}/k_{3}^{0-5\%}$ as a function of $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $N_{\mathrm{ch}}$ $\in$ $-3.7<\eta<-1.7$ and $2.8 < \eta <5.1$.

$\gamma_{\langle [p_{\mathrm{T}}] \rangle}/\gamma_{\langle [p_{\mathrm{T}}] \rangle}^{0-5\%}$ as a function of $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $N_{\mathrm{ch}}$ $\in$ $|\eta| \leq 0.8$.

$\gamma_{\langle [p_{\mathrm{T}}] \rangle}/\gamma_{\langle [p_{\mathrm{T}}] \rangle}^{0-5\%}$ as a function of $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $E_{\mathrm{T}}$ $\in$ $|\eta| \leq 0.8$.

$\gamma_{\langle [p_{\mathrm{T}}] \rangle}/\gamma_{\langle [p_{\mathrm{T}}] \rangle}^{0-5\%}$ as a function of $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $N_{\mathrm{ch}}$ $\in$ $-3.7<\eta<-1.7$ and $2.8 < \eta <5.1$.

$\Gamma_{\langle [p_{\mathrm{T}}] \rangle}/\Gamma_{\langle [p_{\mathrm{T}}] \rangle}^{0-5\%}$ as a function of $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $N_{\mathrm{ch}}$ $\in$ $|\eta| \leq 0.8$.

$\Gamma_{\langle [p_{\mathrm{T}}] \rangle}/\Gamma_{\langle [p_{\mathrm{T}}] angle}^{0-5\%}$ as a function of $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $E_{\mathrm{T}}$ $\in$ $|\eta| \leq 0.8$.

$\Gamma_{\langle [p_{\mathrm{T}}] \rangle}/\Gamma_{\langle [p_{\mathrm{T}}] \rangle}^{0-5\%}$ as a function of $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $N_{\mathrm{ch}}$ $\in$ $-3.7<\eta<-1.7$ and $2.8 < \eta <5.1$.

$\kappa_{\langle [p_{\mathrm{T}}] \rangle}/\kappa_{\langle [p_{\mathrm{T}}] \rangle}^{0-5\%}$ as a function of $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $N_{\mathrm{ch}}$ $\in$ $|\eta| \leq 0.8$.

$\kappa_{\langle [p_{\mathrm{T}}] \rangle}/\kappa_{\langle [p_{\mathrm{T}}] \rangle}^{0-5\%}$ as a function of $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $E_{\mathrm{T}}$ $\in$ $|\eta| \leq 0.8$.

$\kappa_{\langle [p_{\mathrm{T}}] \rangle}/\kappa_{\langle [p_{\mathrm{T}}] \rangle}^{0-5\%}$ as a function of $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $N_{\mathrm{ch}}$ $\in$ $-3.7<\eta<-1.7$ and $2.8 < \eta <5.1$.

Correlation between $\langle p_{\mathrm{T}} \rangle / \langle p_{\mathrm{T}} \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ and $\langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle / \langle \mathrm{d}N_{\mathrm{ch}}/\mathrm{d}\eta \rangle ^{\mathrm{0-5\%}}$ in $\mathrm{Pb}-\mathrm{Pb}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02~\mathrm{TeV}$. Data points are shown for centrality estimator based on $N_{\mathrm{ch}}$ $\in$ $0.5 \leq |\eta| \leq 0.8$ with $0.45 \leq p_{\mathrm{T}} \leq 50~\mathrm{GeV}/c.$.

Corrected Yield R=0.5 pi0+jet 15-20 pp at sqrt{s_{NN}}=200 GeV

Corrected Yield R=0.2 gamma+jet 10-15 pp at sqrt{s_{NN}}=200 GeV

Corrected Yield R=0.5 gamma+jet 10-15 pp at sqrt{s_{NN}}=200 GeV

Corrected Yield R=0.5 pi0+jet 10-15 AuAu 0-15% at sqrt{s_{NN}}=200 GeV

Corrected Yield R=0.2 pi0+jet 10-15 AuAu 0-15% at sqrt{s_{NN}}=200 GeV

Corrected Yield R=0.5 pi0+jet 15-20 AuAu 0-15% at sqrt{s_{NN}}=200 GeV

Corrected Yield R=0.2 pi0+jet 15-20 AuAu 0-15% at sqrt{s_{NN}}=200 GeV

Corrected Yield R=0.2 gamma+jet 10-15 AuAu 0-15% at sqrt{s_{NN}}=200 GeV

Corrected Yield R=0.5 gamma+jet 10-15 AuAu 0-15% at sqrt{s_{NN}}=200 GeV

IAA(Δφ) R=0.5 gamma+jet 10-15 GeV/c

IAA(Δφ) R=0.2 gamma+jet 10-15 GeV/c

IAA(Δφ) R=0.5 pi0+jet 10-15 GeV/c

IAA(Δφ) R=0.2 pi0+jet 10-15 GeV/c

IAA(Δφ) R=0.5 pi0+jet 15-20 GeV/c

IAA(Δφ) R=0.2 pi0+jet 15-20 GeV/c

Global polarization of $\Lambda$ and $\bar\Lambda$ and their difference in 20-50\% centrality in Ru+Ru collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Global polarization of $\Lambda$ and $\bar\Lambda$ and their difference in 20-50\% centrality in Zr+Zr collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Global polarization of $\Lambda$ and $\bar\Lambda$ and their difference in 20-50\% centrality in Ru+Ru&Zr+Zr collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Global polarization of $\Lambda$+$\bar\Lambda$ as a function of centrality in the combined Ru+Ru and Zr+Zr collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV (left panel). The data in Au+Au collisions is from Phys. Rev. C 98 (2018) 014910.

Global polarization of $\Lambda$+$\bar\Lambda$ in 20-50\% centrality centrality in the combined Ru+Ru and Zr+Zr collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV (right panel). The data in Au+Au collisions is from Phys. Rev. C 98 (2018) 014910.

Global polarization of $\Lambda$+$\bar\Lambda$ as a function of the average number of participants $\langle N_{\rm part} \rangle$ in the combined Ru+Ru and Zr+Zr collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. The data in Au+Au collisions is from Phys. Rev. C 98 (2018) 014910.

The transverse momentum dependence of $\Lambda$+$\bar\Lambda$ $P_{\rm H}$ for 20\%-60\% centrality in the combined Ru+Ru and Zr+Zr collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, together with the results for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. The data in Au+Au collisions is from Phys. Rev. C 98 (2018) 014910.

The pseudorapidity dependence of $\Lambda$+$\bar\Lambda$ $P_{\rm H}$ for 20\%-60\% centrality in the combined Ru+Ru and Zr+Zr collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, together with the results for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. The data in Au+Au collisions is from Phys. Rev. C 98 (2018) 014910.

The polarization coefficient $P_{y,c0}$ of $\Lambda\!+\!\bar\Lambda$ from method-1 and method-2 as a function of centrality (left panel) in isobar Ru+Ru and Zr+Zr collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. In this figure, $P_{H}$ is same data as in Figure 4.

The polarization coefficient $P_{y,c0}$ of $\Lambda\!+\!\bar\Lambda$ from method-1 and method-2 for 20-50\% centrality (right panel) in isobar Ru+Ru and Zr+Zr collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. In this figure, $P_{H}$ is same data as in Figure 4.

The polarization coefficient $P_{y,c2}$ of $\Lambda\!+\!\bar\Lambda$ from method-1 and method-2 as a function of centrality (left panel) in isobar Ru+Ru and Zr+Zr collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

The polarization coefficient $P_{y,c2}$ of $\Lambda\!+\!\bar\Lambda$ from method-1 and method-2 for 20-50\% centrality (right panel) in isobar Ru+Ru and Zr+Zr collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

Global polarization of $\Xi^{-}$+$\bar\Xi^{+}$ from polarization transfer method and direct measurement method as a function of centrality (left panel) in Ru+Ru and Zr+Zr collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. In this figure, $P_{H}$ of inclusive $\Lambda+\bar\Lambda$ is same data as in Figure 4.

Global polarization of $\Xi^{-}$+$\bar\Xi^{+}$ from polarization transfer method and direct measurement method for 20-50\% centrality (right panel) in Ru+Ru and Zr+Zr collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV . In this figure, $P_{H}$ of inclusive $\Lambda+\bar\Lambda$ is same data as in Figure 4.

$R_{\rm p}$ vs. $m_{\rm T}$ for $0-10\%$ centrality for Pb-Pb collisions at 5020 GeV.

$R_{\rm p}$ vs. $m_{\rm T}$ for $10-30\%$ centrality for Pb-Pb collisions at 5020 GeV.

$R_{\rm p}$ vs. $m_{\rm T}$ for $30-50\%$ centrality for Pb-Pb collisions at 5020 GeV.

$R_{\rm N}$ vs. $m_{\rm T}$ for $0-10\%$ centrality for Pb-Pb collisions at 5020 GeV.

$R_{\rm N}$ vs. $m_{\rm T}$ for $10-30\%$ centrality for Pb-Pb collisions at 5020 GeV.

$R_{\rm N}$ vs. $m_{\rm T}$ for $30-50\%$ centrality for Pb-Pb collisions at 5020 GeV.

$R_{\rm d}$ vs. $m_{\rm T}$ for $0-10\%$ centrality for Pb-Pb collisions at 5020 GeV.

$R_{\rm d}$ vs. $m_{\rm T}$ for $10-30\%$ centrality for Pb-Pb collisions at 5020 GeV.

$R_{\rm d}$ vs. $m_{\rm T}$ for $30-50\%$ centrality for Pb-Pb collisions at 5020 GeV.

$R_{\rm p}$ vs. '<dN_{ch}/d \eta>^{1/3}' for mT bin 0 for Pb-Pb collisions at 5020 GeV.

$R_{\rm p}$ vs. '<dN_{ch}/d \eta>^{1/3}' for mT bin 1 for Pb-Pb collisions at 5020 GeV.

$R_{\rm p}$ vs. '<dN_{ch}/d \eta>^{1/3}' for mT bin 2 for Pb-Pb collisions at 5020 GeV.

$R_{\rm p}$ vs. '<dN_{ch}/d \eta>^{1/3}' for mT bin 3 for Pb-Pb collisions at 5020 GeV.

$R_{\rm p}$ vs. '<dN_{ch}/d \eta>^{1/3}' for mT bin 4 for Pb-Pb collisions at 5020 GeV.

$R_{\rm p}$ vs. '<dN_{ch}/d \eta>^{1/3}' for mT bin 5 for Pb-Pb collisions at 5020 GeV.

$R_{\rm p}$ vs. '<dN_{ch}/d \eta>^{1/3}' for mT bin 6 for Pb-Pb collisions at 5020 GeV.

$R_{\rm p}$ vs.'<dN_{ch}/d \eta>^{1/3}' for mT bin 7 for Pb-Pb collisions at 5020 GeV.

proton-deuteron (same charge) correlation function for centrality 0-10% from Pb-Pb collisions at 5020 GeV

proton-deuteron (same charge) correlation function for centrality 10-30% from Pb-Pb collisions at 5020 GeV

proton-deuteron (same charge) correlation function for centrality 30-50% from Pb-Pb collisions at 5020 GeV

The unfolded dijet balance distribution, $(1/N_{dijet})(dN_{dijet}/dx_{j})$, as function of $x_{j}$ for the $10-60$, $60-120$, $120-185$, $185-250$ and $250-400$ multiplicity ranges with leading and subleading jets at forward and midrapidity regions, respectively.

The unfolded dijet balance distribution, $(1/N_{dijet})(dN_{dijet}/dx_{j})$, as function of $x_{j}$ for the $10-60$, $60-120$, $120-185$, $185-250$ and $250-400$ multiplicity ranges with leading and subleading jets at backward and midrapidity regions, respectively.

The ratio of unfolded dijet balance distribution to the lower multiplicity range, $10-60$, as function of $x_{j}$ for the $60-120$, $120-185$, $185-250$ and $250-400$ ranges with both jets at the midrapidity regions.

The ratio of unfolded dijet balance distribution to the lower multiplicity range, $10-60$, as function of $x_{j}$ for the $60-120$, $120-185$, $185-250$ and $250-400$ ranges with leading and subleading jets at midrapidity and forward regions, respectively.

The ratio of unfolded dijet balance distribution to the lower multiplicity range, $10-60$, as function of $x_{j}$ for the $60-120$, $120-185$, $185-250$ and $250-400$ ranges with leading and subleading jets at midrapidity and backward regions, respectively.

The ratio of unfolded dijet balance distribution to the lower multiplicity range, $10-60$, as function of $x_{j}$ for the $60-120$, $120-185$, $185-250$ and $250-400$ ranges with leading and subleading jets at forward and midrapidity regions, respectively.

The ratio of unfolded dijet balance distribution to the lower multiplicity range, $10-60$, as function of $x_{j}$ for the $60-120$, $120-185$, $185-250$ and $250-400$ ranges with leading and subleading jets at backward and midrapidity regions, respectively.

Mean xj ratio, $\langle x_{j} \rangle$, in the range $10-60$ as unfolded for different multiplicities, for different leading and subleading jet combinations for the midrapidity, forward, and backward regions

The reconstructed (raw) dijet balance distribution, $(1/N_{dijet})(dN_{dijet}/dx_{j})$, as function of $x_{j}$ for the $10-60$, $60-120$, $120-185$, $185-250$ and $250-400$ multiplicity ranges with both jets at the midrapidity regions.

The reconstructed (raw) dijet balance distribution, $(1/N_{dijet})(dN_{dijet}/dx_{j})$, as function of $x_{j}$ for the $10-60$, $60-120$, $120-185$, $185-250$ and $250-400$ multiplicity ranges with leading and subleading jets at midrapidity and forward regions, respectively.

The reconstructed (raw) dijet balance distribution, $(1/N_{dijet})(dN_{dijet}/dx_{j})$, as function of $x_{j}$ for the $10-60$, $60-120$, $120-185$, $185-250$ and $250-400$ multiplicity ranges with leading and subleading jets at midrapidity and backward regions, respectively.

The reconstructed (raw) dijet balance distribution, $(1/N_{dijet})(dN_{dijet}/dx_{j})$, as function of $x_{j}$ for the $10-60$, $60-120$, $120-185$, $185-250$ and $250-400$ multiplicity ranges with leading and subleading jets at forward and midrapidity regions, respectively.

The reconstructed (raw) dijet balance distribution, $(1/N_{dijet})(dN_{dijet}/dx_{j})$, as function of $x_{j}$ for the $10-60$, $60-120$, $120-185$, $185-250$ and $250-400$ multiplicity ranges with leading and subleading jets at backward and midrapidity regions, respectively.

The ratio of reconstructed (raw) dijet balance distribution to the lower multiplicity range, $10-60$, as function of $x_{j}$ for the $60-120$, $120-185$, $185-250$ and $250-400$ ranges with both jets at the midrapidity regions.

The ratio of reconstructed (raw) dijet balance distribution to the lower multiplicity range, $10-60$, as function of $x_{j}$ for the $60-120$, $120-185$, $185-250$ and $250-400$ ranges with leading and subleading jets at midrapidity and forward regions, respectively.

The ratio of reconstructed (raw) dijet balance distribution to the lower multiplicity range, $10-60$, as function of $x_{j}$ for the $60-120$, $120-185$, $185-250$ and $250-400$ ranges with leading and subleading jets at midrapidity and backward regions, respectively.

The ratio of reconstructed (raw) dijet balance distribution to the lower multiplicity range, $10-60$, as function of $x_{j}$ for the $60-120$, $120-185$, $185-250$ and $250-400$ ranges with leading and subleading jets at forward and midrapidity regions, respectively.

The ratio of reconstructed (raw) dijet balance distribution to the lower multiplicity range, $10-60$, as function of $x_{j}$ for the $60-120$, $120-185$, $185-250$ and $250-400$ ranges with leading and subleading jets at backward and midrapidity regions, respectively.

Mean xj ratio, $\langle x_{j} \rangle$, in the range $10-60$ as reconstructed (raw) for different multiplicities, for different leading and subleading jet combinations for the midrapidity, forward, and backward regions