Femtoscopic radii as a function od pair transverse momentum $k_{\rm T}$ for seven centrality ranges.

One-dimensional femtoscopic radius $R_{\mathrm inv}$ as a function od pair transverse momentum $k_{\rm T}$ for seven centrality ranges.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.

Ratio of $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.

Centrality dependence of the average $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ variation in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$.

Centrality dependence of the average $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ variation in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$.

Centrality dependence of the average $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ variation in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$.

Centrality dependence of the average $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ variation in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$.

Average $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ variation as a function of the absolute values of the $q_{2}^{TPC}$, centrality 5-10%.

Average $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ variation as a function of the absolute values of the $q_{2}^{V0C}$, centrality 5-10%.

Average $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ variation as a function of the self-normalized values of the $q_{2}^{TPC}$, centrality 5-10%.

Average $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ variation as a function of the self-normalized values of the $q_{2}^{V0C}$, centrality 5-10%.

Average $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ variation as a function of the absolute values of the $q_{2}^{TPC}$, centrality 30-40%.

Average $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ variation as a function of the absolute values of the $q_{2}^{V0C}$, centrality 30-40%.

Average $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ variation as a function of the self-normalized values of the $q_{2}^{TPC}$, centrality 30-40%.

Average $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ variation as a function of the self-normalized values of the $q_{2}^{V0C}$, centrality 30-40%.

Average $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ variation as a function of the absolute values of the $q_{2}^{TPC}$, centrality 50-60%.

Average $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ variation as a function of the absolute values of the $q_{2}^{V0C}$, centrality 50-60%.

Average $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ variation as a function of the self-normalized values of the $q_{2}^{TPC}$, centrality 50-60%.

Average $\rm v_{2}\{{SP}\}$ variation as a function of the self-normalized values of the $q_{2}^{V0C}$, centrality 50-60%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.

Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of charged hadrons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ to unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.

Fig. 10: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm large-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 0-5%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 5-10%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 10-20%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 20-30%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 30-40%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 40-50%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{TPC}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified pions in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified kaons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.

Fig. 11: Ratio of the $p_{\rm T}$ distribution of identified protons in the $\rm small-q_{2}^{V0C}$ sample to the unbiased sample, centrality 50-60%.

The differential cross section of $Z$ boson production scaled by 1/$p_\mathrm{T}^{Z}$, (1/$p_\mathrm{T}^{Z}$) $d\sigma /dp_\mathrm{T}^{Z}$, for $-3<y^\mathrm{*}_{Z}<2$.

The differential cross section of $Z$ boson production scaled by 1/$p_\mathrm{T}^{Z}$, (1/$p_\mathrm{T}^{Z}$) $d\sigma /dp_\mathrm{T}^{Z}$, for $-2<y^\mathrm{*}_{Z}<0$ and $0<y^\mathrm{*}_{Z}<2.

Centrality bias corrected $Z$ boson yields per event for $-3<y^\mathrm{*}_{Z}<2$ scaled by by $\langle N_{coll}\rangle$. (To remove the centrality bias correction each value may be multiplied by the approriate correction value found in arXiv:1412.0976.).

The rapidity differential Z boson yields per event scaled by $\langle N_{coll}\rangle$ for three centrality ranges.

Acceptance times efficiency for the tight channel of the Razor analysis for the direct squark-squark model.

Acceptance for the 1tau channel of the Taus+jets+MET analysis for the gluino simplified model.

Efficiency for the 1tau channel of the Taus+jets+MET analysis for the gluino simplified model.

Acceptance for the 2tau channel of the Taus+jets+MET analysis for the gluino simplified model.

Efficiency for the 2tau channel of the Taus+jets+MET analysis for the gluino simplified model.

Acceptance for the 1tau channel of the Taus+jets+MET analysis for the squark simplified model.

Efficiency for the 1tau channel of the Taus+jets+MET analysis for the squark simplified model.

Acceptance for the 2tau channel of the Taus+jets+MET analysis for the squark simplified model.

Efficiency for the 2tau channel of the Taus+jets+MET analysis for the squark simplified model.

Observed limit on the cross-section times branching ratio in fb at 95% CL for the direct squark-squark model.

Observed limit on the cross-section times branching ratio in fb at 95% CL for the gluino simplified model, obtained by the Taus+jets+MET analysis.

Observed limit on the cross-section times branching ratio in fb at 95% CL for the squark simplified model, obtained by the Taus+jets+MET analysis.

Observed 95% CL cross section times branching ratio upper limit on pMSSM qLqL production with M1=60 GeV and $m_{\tilde g}=$1.6 TeV interpreted by the 0L analysis including its two dedicated signal regions.

Observed 95% CL cross section times branching ratio upper limit on pMSSM qLqL production with M2=(M1+mqL)/2 and $m_{\tilde g}=$1.6 TeV interpreted by the 0L analysis including its two dedicated signal regions.

Observed 95% CL cross section times branching ratio upper limit on pMSSM qLqL production with M1=60 GeV with $m_{\tilde g}=$2.2 TeV interpreted by the 0L analysis including its two dedicated signal regions.

Observed 95% CL cross section times branching ratio upper limit on pMSSM qLqL production with M2=(M1+mqL)/2 and $m_{\tilde g}=$2.2 TeV interpreted by the 0L analysis including its two dedicated signal regions.

Observed 95% CL cross section times branching ratio upper limit on pMSSM qLqL production with M1=60 GeV and $m_{\tilde g}=$3.0 TeV interpreted by the 0L analysis including its two dedicated signal regions.

Observed 95% CL cross section times branching ratio upper limit on pMSSM qLqL production with M2=(M1+mqL)/2 and $m_{\tilde g}=$3.0 TeV interpreted by the 0L analysis including its two dedicated signal regions.

Observed and expected limits on the cross-section times branching ratio in fb at 95% CL for the gluino-mediated stop model with off-shell stops, for mass points with four- or five-body gluino decays, obtained by the SS/3L and 0/1L3B analyses.

: Cut flow for signal regions 0L_4jt+ and 0L_5jt of baseline signal points normalized to 20.3 fb$^\mathrm{-1}$. The point used for the 0L_4jt+ cutflow is mqL = 1150 GeV, M1 = 60 GeV, M2 = 1000 GeV, m(gluino) = 2200 GeV. The point used for the 0L_5jt cutflow is mqL = 950 GeV, M1 = 100 GeV, M2 = 525 GeV, m(gluino) = 2200 GeV.

Cut flow for the 1L(H)_7-jet SR (electron channel) for the main background from the $t\bar{t}$ production. The events are normalized to 20.3 fb$^\mathrm{-1}$.

Cut flow for the 1L(H)_7-jet SR (muon channel) for the main background from the $t\bar{t}$ production. The events are normalized to 20.3 fb$^\mathrm{-1}$.

Cut flow for 1L(H)_7-jet SR (electron channel). The signal point is taken from the gluino simplified model with 1-step decay via charginos and parameters $m_{\tilde{g}}$ = 1145 GeV, $m_{{\tilde \chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ = 785 GeV, $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}}$ = 425 GeV; 20000 events were generated for this point. The events are normalized to 20.3 fb$^\mathrm{-1}$.

Cut flow for 1L(H)_7-jet SR (muon channel). The signal point is taken from the gluino simplified model with 1-step decay via charginos and parameters $m_{\tilde{g}}$ = 1145 GeV, $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ = 785 GeV, $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}}$ = 425 GeV; 20000 events were generated for this point. The events are normalized to 20.3 fb$^\mathrm{-1}$.

Cut flow for 1L(H)_7-jet SR (electron channel). The signal point is taken from the gluino simplified model with 1-step decay via charginos and parameters $m_{\tilde{g}}$ = 1025 GeV, $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ = 545 GeV, $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}}$ = 65 GeV; 20000 events were generated for this point. The events are normalized to 20.3 fb$^\mathrm{-1}$.

Cut flow for 1L(H)_7-jet SR (muon channel). The signal point is taken from the gluino simplified model with 1-step decay via charginos and parameters $m_{\tilde{g}}$ = 1025 GeV, $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ = 545 GeV, $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}}$ = 65 GeV; 20000 events were generated for this point. The events are normalized to 20.3 fb$^\mathrm{-1}$.

Cut flow for 0LRaz_SR$_{\rm loose}$ and 0LRaz_SR$_{\rm tight}$ signal regions of baseline signal point ($m(\tilde{q}, \tilde{\chi}_1^0)=(850, 100)$ GeV) normalized to 20.3 fb$^{-1}$. 5000 events were generated for ths point.

Expected exclusion limits in the gluino-neutralino mass plane, for the higgsino-bino GGM model with $\mu < 0$, using the merged $\rm{SR}^{\gamma b}_{L}$ and $\rm{SR}^{\gamma b}_{H}$ analyses.

Observed exclusion limits in the $M_3$-$\mu$ plane, for the higgsino-bino GGM model with $\mu > 0$, using the merged $\rm{SR}^{\gamma j}_{L}$ and $\rm{SR}^{\gamma j}_{H}$ analyses.

Expected exclusion limits in the $M_3$-$\mu$ plane, for the higgsino-bino GGM model with $\mu > 0$, using the merged $\rm{SR}^{\gamma j}_{L}$ and $\rm{SR}^{\gamma j}_{H}$ analyses.

Contour of exclusion in wino production cross section from the photon+$\ell$ analysis, as a function of the wino mass parameter $m_{\tilde{W}}$. The expected limit is shown along with its $\pm 1$ and $\pm 2$ standard deviation values.

Numbers of selected data events at progressive stages of the selection, for each SR for the diphoton, photon+j and photon+$\ell$ analyses. Where no number is shown the cut was not applied.

Expected number of signal events at progressive stages of the selection, shown for points in the parameter space that typify the region for which each selection of the diphoton, photon+j and photon+$\ell$ analyses is optimized, and scaled to an integrated luminosity of $20.3\,\mathrm{fb}^{-1}$. Where no number is shown the cut was not applied.

Expected number of signal events at progressive stages of the $\rm{SR}^{\gamma b}_{H}$ selection, shown for data and signal Monte Carlo datasets.

Expected number of signal events at progressive stages of the $\rm{SR}^{\gamma b}_{L}$ selection, shown for data and signal Monte Carlo datasets.

$\rm{SR}^{\gamma\gamma}_{S-H}$ and $\rm{SR}^{\gamma\gamma}_{S-L}$ signal acceptance*efficiency across the strong-production parameter space, for $m_{\tilde{g}}$ between 1550 and 1600 GeV.

$\rm{SR}^{\gamma\gamma}_{S-H}$ and $\rm{SR}^{\gamma\gamma}_{S-L}$ signal acceptance*efficiency across the strong-production parameter space, for $m_{\tilde{g}} = 1500$ GeV.

$\rm{SR}^{\gamma\gamma}_{S-H}$ and $\rm{SR}^{\gamma\gamma}_{S-L}$ signal acceptance*efficiency across the strong-production parameter space, for $m_{\tilde{g}}$ between 1350 and 1450 GeV.

$\rm{SR}^{\gamma\gamma}_{S-H}$ and $\rm{SR}^{\gamma\gamma}_{S-L}$ signal acceptance*efficiency across the strong-production parameter space, for $m_{\tilde{g}}$ between 1250 and 1300 GeV.

$\rm{SR}^{\gamma\gamma}_{S-H}$ and $\rm{SR}^{\gamma\gamma}_{S-L}$ signal acceptance*efficiency across the strong-production parameter space, for $m_{\tilde{g}}$ between 1150 and 1200 GeV.

$\rm{SR}^{\gamma\gamma}_{S-H}$ and $\rm{SR}^{\gamma\gamma}_{S-L}$ signal acceptance*efficiency across the strong-production parameter space, for $m_{\tilde{g}}$ between 1000 and 1100 GeV.

$\rm{SR}^{\gamma\gamma}_{W-H}$ and $\rm{SR}^{\gamma\gamma}_{W-L}$ signal acceptance*efficiency for $m_{\tilde{W}}$ between 650 and 800 GeV.

$\rm{SR}^{\gamma\gamma}_{W-H}$ and $\rm{SR}^{\gamma\gamma}_{W-L}$ signal acceptance*efficiency for $m_{\tilde{W}}$ between 400 and 600 GeV.

$\rm{SR}^{\gamma\gamma}_{W-H}$ and $\rm{SR}^{\gamma\gamma}_{W-L}$ signal acceptance*efficiency for $m_{\tilde{W}}$ between 100 and 400 GeV.

$\rm{SR}^{\gamma b}_{H}$ signal acceptance*efficiency for combined strong and weak production across the $\mu<0$ higgsino-bino parameter space.

$\rm{SR}^{\gamma b}_{L}$ signal acceptance*efficiency for combined strong and weak production across the $\mu<0$ higgsino-bino parameter space.

$\rm{SR}^{\gamma j}_{H}$ signal acceptance*efficiency for combined strong and weak production across the $\mu>0$ higgsino-bino parameter space.

$\rm{SR}^{\gamma j}_{L}$ signal acceptance*efficiency for combined strong and weak production across the $\mu>0$ higgsino-bino parameter space.

Acceptance-times-efficiency (a*e) for the photon+$\ell$ analysis SRs.

The total NLO+NLL strong production cross sections with uncertainties for GGM gluino-neutralino signal points for the diphoton and photon+b analyses. In the variant of the grid used in the diphoton analysis, the electroweak production cross section is negligible.

The total NLO cross sections with uncertainties for GGM wino-bino signal points, for all final states, for the diphoton analysis. The direct bino production cross section is negligible.

The NLO gaugino pair production cross sections with relative uncertainties for GGM gluino-neutralino signal points for the photon+b analysis.

The best signal region used for each signal point in the photon+b analysis.

The total NLO+NLL cross sections with uncertainties for the strong production GGM signal grid for the photon+j analysis.

The total NLO cross sections with uncertainties for the electroweak production GGM signal grid for the photon+j analysis.

The best signal region used for each signal point in the photon+j analysis.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.