Figure 3 (middle right): The $m^∗_{jjj}$ postfit spectra in the SR4a. The lower panel shows the pull distribution.

Figure 3 (lower): The $m^∗_{jjj}$ postfit spectra in the SR5a. The lower panel shows the pull distribution.

Figure 4 (upper left): The $m^∗_{jjj}$ postfit spectra in the SR1b. The lower panel shows the pull distribution.

Figure 4 (upper right): The $m^∗_{jjj}$ postfit spectra in the SR2b. The lower panel shows the pull distribution.

Figure 4 (middle left): The $m^∗_{jjj}$ postfit spectra in the SR3b. The lower panel shows the pull distribution.

Figure 4 (middle right): The $m^∗_{jjj}$ postfit spectra in the SR4b. The lower panel shows the pull distribution.

Figure 4 (lower): The $m^∗_{jjj}$ postfit spectra in the SR5b. The lower panel shows the pull distribution.

Figure 5. The upper limits on the production cross section times branching fraction $\sigma B$, at 95% CL, for the process $pp → g_{KK} → gR → gWW$. The black (red) line contour indicates the observed (expected) exclusion region of the gKK and R masses. The red dashed lines show the 68% CL band of the expected limit contour.

The black line contour indicates the observed exclusion region of the gKK and R masses.

The red line contour indicates the expected central exclusion region of the gKK and R masses.

The dashed red line contour indicates the +1 s.t.d. expected exclusion region of the gKK and R masses.

The dashed red line contour indicates the -1 s.t.d. expected exclusion region of the gKK and R masses.

Differential cross sections of Higgs boson production. See also HepData record of the original publication: https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins1851456

Covariance matrix for the differential cross sections of Higgs boson production

SMEFT parameterization for the differential cross sections of Higgs boson production, and for the Higgs boson decay widths

Differential cross sections of W Gamma production. See also HepData record of the original publication: https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins1978840

Covariance matrix for the differential cross sections of W Gamma production

SMEFT parameterization for the differential cross sections of W Gamma production

Differential cross sections of Z production. See also HepData record of the original publication: https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins1837084

Covariance matrix for the differential cross sections of Z production

SMEFT parameterization for the differential cross sections of Z production

Differential cross sections of WW production. See also HepData record of the original publication: https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins1814328

Covariance matrix for the differential cross sections of WW production

SMEFT parameterization for the differential cross sections of WW production

Differential cross sections of ttbar production. See also HepData record of the original publication: https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins1901295

Covariance matrix for the differential cross sections of ttbar production

SMEFT parameterization for the differential cross sections of ttbar production

Differential cross sections of inclusive jet production. See also HepData record of the original publication: https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins1972986

Covariance matrix for the differential cross sections of inclusive jet production

SMEFT parameterization for the differential cross sections of inclusive jet production

Measurements of electroweak precision observables

Covariance matrix for the electroweak precision observables

SMEFT parameterization for the electroweak precision observables

The differential cross sections as a function of the dijet mass for the double b tagging category during 2017.

The differential cross sections as a function of the dijet mass for the double b tagging category during 2018.

The differential cross sections as a function of the dijet mass for the single b tagging category during 2016.

The differential cross sections as a function of the dijet mass for the single b tagging category during 2017.

The differential cross sections as a function of the dijet mass for the single b tagging category during 2018.

The differential cross sections as a function of the dijet mass for the muon-in-jet tagging category during 2016.

The differential cross sections as a function of the dijet mass for the muon-in-jet tagging category during 2017.

The differential cross sections as a function of the dijet mass for the muon-in-jet tagging category during 2018.

The differential cross sections as a function of the dijet mass for the inclusive single b tagging category during 2016.

The differential cross sections as a function of the dijet mass for the inclusive single b tagging category during 2017.

The differential cross sections as a function of the dijet mass for the inclusive single b tagging category during 2018.

The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section times branching fraction for a resonance decaying to bb. The branching fraction is assumed to be approximately 13%. The theory predictions beyond 4500 GeV denote null values.

The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section times branching fraction, multiplied by signal acceptance, for a resonance decaying to bb. The acceptance is defined exclusively via the geometric requirements $p_{T}>30$ GeV, $|\eta|<2.5$, and $|\Delta \eta|<1.1$. The branching fraction is assumed to be approximately 13%. The theory predictions beyond 4500 GeV denote null values.

The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section times branching fraction, multiplied by signal acceptance and efficiency, for a resonance decaying to bb. The product of acceptance and efficiency corresponds to the values in Figure 2. The branching fraction is assumed to be approximately 13%. The theory predictions beyond 4500 GeV denote null values.

The coupling strengths to SM bosons $g_H$ and fermions $g_F$ of a Z' boson with mass 2.0 TeV and 2.5 TeV, which are excluded at 95\% CL for the HVT model.

The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for dijet resonances decaying to a b quark and a gluon. Limits are compared to predictions for single b* production, the resonant component of the b* production via contact interactions (CI), and the total b* signal from the sum of these two production modes. The acceptance is defined exclusively via the geometric requirements $p_{T}>30$ GeV, $|\eta|<2.5$, and $|\Delta \eta|<1.1$. The branching fraction is assumed to be approximately 85%

Distribution of the mass of the AK8 jet selected as the $\phi$ boson candidate for data and simulated background events in the (TopL, XbbL) validation region for the electron channel. The distribution is shown before the final fit for signal extraction.

Invariant mass distribution of the T quark candidates selected in the $T\to tH$ channel, for events with at least one forward jet in the signal region (TopT, XbbT). For these events, the reconstructed mass of the Higgs boson candidate is required to be between 110 and 140 GeV. Distribution is shown for events in the muon channel. The first (last) bin of the distribution also includes underflow (overflow) events. The lower panel reports the data minus the expected number of events normalized to the statistical uncertainty of the data. The orange band represents the systematic uncertainties, also normalized to the statistical uncertainty of the data.

Invariant mass distribution of the T quark candidates selected in the $T\to tH$ channel, for events with at least one forward jet in the signal region (TopT, XbbT). For these events, the reconstructed mass of the Higgs boson candidate is required to be between 110 and 140 GeV. Distribution is shown for events in the electron channel. The first (last) bin of the distribution also includes underflow (overflow) events. The lower panel reports the data minus the expected number of events normalized to the statistical uncertainty of the data. The orange band represents the systematic uncertainties, also normalized to the statistical uncertainty of the data.

Invariant mass distribution of the T quark candidates selected in the $T\to tH$ channel, for events with at least one forward jet in the signal region (TopL, XbbT). For these events, the reconstructed mass of the Higgs boson candidate is required to be between 110 and 140 GeV. Distribution is shown for events in the muon channel. The first (last) bin of the distribution also includes underflow (overflow) events. The lower panel reports the data minus the expected number of events normalized to the statistical uncertainty of the data. The orange band represents the systematic uncertainties, also normalized to the statistical uncertainty of the data.

Invariant mass distribution of the T quark candidates selected in the $T\to tH$ channel, for events with at least one forward jet in the signal region (TopL, XbbT). For these events, the reconstructed mass of the Higgs boson candidate is required to be between 110 and 140 GeV. Distribution is shown for events in the electron channel. The first (last) bin of the distribution also includes underflow (overflow) events. The lower panel reports the data minus the expected number of events normalized to the statistical uncertainty of the data. The orange band represents the systematic uncertainties, also normalized to the statistical uncertainty of the data.

Observed 95% CL upper limits on the single T quark production cross section times the branching fraction of the $T\to t\phi \to bl\nu b\bar{b}$ channel as a function of $m_{T}$ and $m_{\phi}$ masses.

Observed (solid line) and expected (dashed line) 95% CL upper limit on the single T quark production cross section times the branching fraction of the $T \to t\phi\to bl\nu b\bar{b}$ channel as a function of the $m_{T}$, for fixed value of $m_{\phi}$ = 25 GeV. The inner (green) and outer (yellow) bands represent the regions containing 68% and 95%, respectively, of the limit values expected under the background-only hypothesis.

Observed (solid line) and expected (dashed line) 95% CL upper limit on the single T quark production cross section times the branching fraction of the $T \to t\phi\to bl\nu b\bar{b}$ channel as a function of the $m_{T}$, for fixed value of $m_{\phi}$ = 50 GeV. The inner (green) and outer (yellow) bands represent the regions containing 68% and 95%, respectively, of the limit values expected under the background-only hypothesis.

Observed (solid line) and expected (dashed line) 95% CL upper limit on the single T quark production cross section times the branching fraction of the $T \to t\phi\to bl\nu b\bar{b}$ channel as a function of the $m_{T}$, for fixed value of $m_{\phi}$ = 75 GeV. The inner (green) and outer (yellow) bands represent the regions containing 68% and 95%, respectively, of the limit values expected under the background-only hypothesis.

Observed (solid line) and expected (dashed line) 95% CL upper limit on the single T quark production cross section times the branching fraction of the $T \to t\phi\to bl\nu b\bar{b}$ channel as a function of the $m_{T}$, for fixed value of $m_{\phi}$ = 100 GeV. The inner (green) and outer (yellow) bands represent the regions containing 68% and 95%, respectively, of the limit values expected under the background-only hypothesis.

Observed (solid line) and expected (dashed line) 95% CL upper limit on the single T quark production cross section times the branching fraction of the $T \to t\phi\to bl\nu b\bar{b}$ channel as a function of the $m_{T}$, for fixed value of $m_{\phi}$ = 125 GeV. The inner (green) and outer (yellow) bands represent the regions containing 68% and 95%, respectively, of the limit values expected under the background-only hypothesis.

Observed (solid line) and expected (dashed line) 95% CL upper limit on the single T quark production cross section times the branching fraction of the $T \to t\phi\to bl\nu b\bar{b}$ channel as a function of the $m_{T}$, for fixed value of $m_{\phi}$ = 150 GeV. The inner (green) and outer (yellow) bands represent the regions containing 68% and 95%, respectively, of the limit values expected under the background-only hypothesis.

Observed (solid line) and expected (dashed line) 95% CL upper limit on the single T quark production cross section times the branching fraction of the $T \to t\phi\to bl\nu b\bar{b}$ channel as a function of the $m_{T}$, for fixed value of $m_{\phi}$ = 175 GeV. The inner (green) and outer (yellow) bands represent the regions containing 68% and 95%, respectively, of the limit values expected under the background-only hypothesis.

Observed (solid line) and expected (dashed line) 95% CL upper limit on the single T quark production cross section times the branching fraction of the $T \to t\phi\to bl\nu b\bar{b}$ channel as a function of the $m_{T}$, for fixed value of $m_{\phi}$ = 200 GeV. The inner (green) and outer (yellow) bands represent the regions containing 68% and 95%, respectively, of the limit values expected under the background-only hypothesis.

Observed (solid line) and expected (dashed line) 95% CL upper limit on the single T quark production cross section times the branching fraction of the $T \to t\phi\to bl\nu b\bar{b}$ channel as a function of the $m_{T}$, for fixed value of $m_{\phi}$ = 250 GeV. The inner (green) and outer (yellow) bands represent the regions containing 68% and 95%, respectively, of the limit values expected under the background-only hypothesis.

Observed (solid line) and expected (dashed line) 95% CL upper limit on the single T quark production cross section times the branching fraction of the $T \to tH$ channel as a function of the $m_{T}$ mass. The inner (green) and the outer (yellow) bands represent the region containing 68% and 95%, respectively, of the limit values expected under the background-only hypothesis. The solid red (blue) curve shows the theoretical expectation at NLO for a singlet T quark assuming a narrow-width resonance of width 1% (5%) of the resonance mass [6,7].