Search for supersymmetry using vector boson fusion signatures and missing transverse momentum in $pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with the ATLAS detector

The ATLAS collaboration Aad, Georges ; Aakvaag, Erlend ; Abbott, Braden Keim ; et al.
JHEP 12 (2024) 116, 2024.
Inspire Record 2835159 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.156776

This paper presents a search for supersymmetric particles in models with highly compressed mass spectra, in events consistent with being produced through vector boson fusion. The search uses 140 fb$^{-1}$ of proton-proton collision data at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV collected by the ATLAS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider. Events containing at least two jets with a large gap in pseudorapidity, large missing transverse momentum, and no reconstructed leptons are selected. A boosted decision tree is used to separate events consistent with the production of supersymmetric particles from those due to Standard Model backgrounds. The data are found to be consistent with Standard Model predictions. The results are interpreted using simplified models of $R$-parity-conserving supersymmetry in which the lightest supersymmetric partner is a bino-like neutralino with a mass similar to that of the lightest chargino and second-to-lightest neutralino, both of which are wino-like. Lower limits at 95% confidence level on the masses of next-to-lightest supersymmetric partners in this simplified model are established between 117 and 120 GeV when the lightest supersymmetric partners are within 1 GeV in mass.

12 data tables

Observed and predicted background distributions of the BDT score in $\text{SR}_\text{2j}$ after the exclusion fit. The nominal, pre-fit prediction of an example benchmark signal with $(m(\widetilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}/\widetilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}), \widetilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}) = (100, 99)$ GeV is shown in red. The 'Other' category contains rare backgrounds from diboson, triboson and top-quark production processes. The hatched band represents the post-fit experimental, theoretical, and statistical uncertainties in the total background. The bottom panel of each plot shows the ratio between the data and the post-fit background prediction.

Observed and predicted background distributions of the BDT score in $\text{SR}_{\geq3\text{j}}$ after the exclusion fit. The nominal, pre-fit prediction of an example benchmark signal with $(m(\widetilde{\chi}_{2}^{0}/\widetilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}), \widetilde{\chi}_{1}^{0}) = (100, 99)$ GeV is shown in red. The 'Other' category contains rare backgrounds from diboson, triboson and top-quark production processes. The hatched band represents the post-fit experimental, theoretical, and statistical uncertainties in the total background. The bottom panel of each plot shows the ratio between the data and the post-fit background prediction.

Expected (dashed black line) and observed (solid red line) 95% CL exclusion limits on the compressed SUSY simplified model with a bino-like LSP and wino-like NLSPs being considered. These are shown with $\pm1\sigma_\text{exp}$ (yellow band) from experimental systematic and statistical uncertainties, and with $\pm1\sigma^{\text{SUSY}}_{\text{theory}}$ (red dotted lines) from signal cross-section uncertainties, respectively. The limits set by the ATLAS searches using the soft lepton signature is illustrated by the blue region while the limit imposed by the LEP experiments is shown in grey.

More…

Measurement of top-quark pair production in association with charm quarks in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with the ATLAS detector

The ATLAS collaboration Aad, Georges ; Aakvaag, Erlend ; Abbott, Braden Keim ; et al.
Phys.Lett.B 860 (2025) 139177, 2025.
Inspire Record 2829504 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.154444

Inclusive cross-sections for top-quark pair production in association with charm quarks are measured with proton-proton collision data at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 140 fb$^{-1}$, collected with the ATLAS experiment at the LHC between 2015 and 2018. The measurements are performed by requiring one or two charged leptons (electrons and muons), two $b$-tagged jets, and at least one additional jet in the final state. A custom flavor-tagging algorithm is employed for the simultaneous identification of $b$-jets and $c$-jets. In a fiducial phase space that replicates the acceptance of the ATLAS detector, the cross-sections for $t\bar{t}+ {\geq} 2c$ and $t\bar{t}+1c$ production are measured to be $1.28^{+0.27}_{-0.24}\;\text{pb}$ and $6.4^{+1.0}_{-0.9}\;\text{pb}$, respectively. The measurements are primarily limited by uncertainties in the modeling of inclusive $t\bar{t}$ and $t\bar{t}+b\bar{b}$ production, in the calibration of the flavor-tagging algorithm, and by data statistics. Cross-section predictions from various $t\bar{t}$ simulations are largely consistent with the measured cross-section values, though all underpredict the observed values by 0.5 to 2.0 standard deviations. In a phase-space volume without requirements on the $t\bar{t}$ decay products and the jet multiplicity, the cross-section ratios of $t\bar{t}+ {\geq} 2c$ and $t\bar{t}+1c$ to total $t\bar{t}+\text{jets}$ production are determined to be $(1.23 \pm 0.25) \%$ and $(8.8 \pm 1.3) \%$.

22 data tables

Measured cross-section values in the fiducial phase space and inclusive volume for the various $t\bar{t}+jets$ categories.

Post-fit agreement between data and MC prediction for $SR_{\mathrm{loose}}^{1\ell5j}$ signal region, which uses the invariant mass of the two geometrically closest c-tagged jets, $m_{\mathit{cc}}^{\mathrm{min}\Delta R}$, as an observable. The hatched uncertainty bands include all uncertainties and their correlations. The last bins contain overflow events. "Other Top" includes single-top-quark production and associated production of $t\bar{t}$ and single top quarks with bosons. "Non-Top" includes W+jets, Z+jets, and diboson processes.

Post-fit agreement between data and MC prediction for the $SR_{\mathrm{tight}}^{1\ell5j}$ signal region, which uses the invariant mass of the two geometrically closest jets tagged with c@11%, $m_{\mathit{cc}}^{\mathrm{min}\Delta R}$, as an observable. The hatched uncertainty bands include all uncertainties and their correlations. The last bins contain overflow events. "Other Top" includes single-top-quark production and associated production of $t\bar{t}$ and single top quarks with bosons. "Non-Top" includes W+jets, Z+jets, and diboson processes.

More…

Measurement of $t\bar{t}$ production in association with additional $b$-jets in the $e\mu$ final state in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$=13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

The ATLAS collaboration Aad, Georges ; Aakvaag, Erlend ; Abbott, Braden Keim ; et al.
JHEP 01 (2025) 068, 2025.
Inspire Record 2809112 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.153521

This paper presents measurements of top-antitop quark pair ($t\bar{t}$) production in association with additional $b$-jets. The analysis utilises 140 fb$^{-1}$ of proton-proton collision data collected with the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV. Fiducial cross-sections are extracted in a final state featuring one electron and one muon, with at least three or four $b$-jets. Results are presented at the particle level for both integrated cross-sections and normalised differential cross-sections, as functions of global event properties, jet kinematics, and $b$-jet pair properties. Observable quantities characterising $b$-jets originating from the top quark decay and additional $b$-jets are also measured at the particle level, after correcting for detector effects. The measured integrated fiducial cross-sections are consistent with $t\bar{t}b\bar{b}$ predictions from various next-to-leading-order matrix element calculations matched to a parton shower within the uncertainties of the predictions. State-of-the-art theoretical predictions are compared with the differential measurements; none of them simultaneously describes all observables. Differences between any two predictions are smaller than the measurement uncertainties for most observables.

211 data tables

- - - - - - - - Overview of HEPData Record - - - - - - - - <br/><br/> ATLAS public webpage of paper: <a href="https://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/PAPERS/TOPQ-2019-03/">link</a><br/><br/> <b>Fiducial phase space definitions:</b><br/> <i>Particle level:</i> <ul> <li> Common: N E = N MU = 1, CHARGE E != CHARGE MU <li> NJETS &gt;= 2, NBJETS &gt;= 2 <li> NJETS &gt;= 3, NBJETS &gt;= 3 <li> NJETS &gt;= 4, NBJETS &gt;= 3 <li> NJETS &gt;= 4, NBJETS &gt;= 4 <li> NJETS &gt;= 5, NBJETS &gt;= 4 </ul><br/> <b>Objects definitions:</b> <ul> <li> LEP PT &gt; 28 GeV, ABS ETARAP LEP &lt; 2.5 <li> JET PT &gt; 25 GeV, ABS ETARAP JET &lt; 2.5, R JET = 0.4 <li> BJET: &gt;=1 b-hadron with PT &gt; 5 GeV is associated to the jet via ghost matching </ul><br/> <b>Particle level:</b><br/> <br/>Data from Table 06: <a href="153521?table="Fiducial xsec results>Fiducial xsec results </a><br/><br/> <u>1D:</u><br/> Data bootstraps: <ul> <li> Data from Figure 09: <a href="153521?table=Bootstrap $N_{b-jets}$ in $≥2b$">Bootstrap $N_{b-jets}$ in $≥2b$ </a> <li> Data from Figure 10a: <a href="153521?table=Bootstrap $N_{b-jets}$ in $≥3b$">Bootstrap $N_{b-jets}$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Figure 10b: <a href="153521?table=Bootstrap $N_{c/l-jets}$ in $≥3b$">Bootstrap $N_{c/l-jets}$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Figure 10c: <a href="153521?table=Bootstrap $H_{T}^{had}$ in $≥3b$">Bootstrap $H_{T}^{had}$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Figure 10d: <a href="153521?table=Bootstrap $\Delta R_{avg}^{bb}$ in $≥3b$">Bootstrap $\Delta R_{avg}^{bb}$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Figure 11a: <a href="153521?table=Bootstrap $p_{T}(b_{1})$ in $≥3b$">Bootstrap $p_{T}(b_{1})$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Figure 11b: <a href="153521?table=Bootstrap $p_{T}(b_{2})$ in $≥3b$">Bootstrap $p_{T}(b_{2})$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Figure 11c: <a href="153521?table=Bootstrap $p_{T}(b_{1}^{top})$ in $≥3b$">Bootstrap $p_{T}(b_{1}^{top})$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Figure 11d: <a href="153521?table=Bootstrap $p_{T}(b_{2}^{top})$ in $≥3b$">Bootstrap $p_{T}(b_{2}^{top})$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Figure 12a: <a href="153521?table=Bootstrap $p_{T}(b_{3})$ in $≥3b$">Bootstrap $p_{T}(b_{3})$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Figure 12b: <a href="153521?table=Bootstrap $p_{T}(b_{1}^{add})$ in $≥3b$">Bootstrap $p_{T}(b_{1}^{add})$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Figure 13a: <a href="153521?table=Bootstrap $m(b_{1}b_{2})$ in $≥3b$">Bootstrap $m(b_{1}b_{2})$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Figure 13b: <a href="153521?table=Bootstrap $p_{T}(b_{1}b_{2})$ in $≥3b$">Bootstrap $p_{T}(b_{1}b_{2})$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Figure 13c: <a href="153521?table=Bootstrap $m(bb^{top})$ in $≥3b$">Bootstrap $m(bb^{top})$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Figure 13d: <a href="153521?table=Bootstrap $p_{T}(bb^{top})$ in $≥3b$">Bootstrap $p_{T}(bb^{top})$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Figure 14a: <a href="153521?table=Bootstrap $\Delta R(e\mu bb^{top}, b_{1}^{add})$ in $≥3b$">Bootstrap $\Delta R(e\mu bb^{top}, b_{1}^{add})$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Figure 14b: <a href="153521?table=Bootstrap $\Delta R(e\mu bb^{top}, l/c-jet_{1})$ in $≥3b≥1l/c$">Bootstrap $\Delta R(e\mu bb^{top}, l/c-jet_{1})$ in $≥3b≥1l/c$ </a> <li> Data from Figure 14c: <a href="153521?table=Bootstrap $p_{T}(l/c-jet_{1})$ in $≥3b≥1l/c$">Bootstrap $p_{T}(l/c-jet_{1})$ in $≥3b≥1l/c$ </a> <li> Data from Figure 14d: <a href="153521?table=Bootstrap $p_{T}(l/c-jet_{1})-p_{T}(b_{1}^{add})$ in $≥3b≥1l/c$">Bootstrap $p_{T}(l/c-jet_{1})-p_{T}(b_{1}^{add})$ in $≥3b≥1l/c$ </a> <li> Data from Figure 15a: <a href="153521?table=Bootstrap $m(bb^{min\Delta R})$ in $≥4b$">Bootstrap $m(bb^{min\Delta R})$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Figure 15b: <a href="153521?table=Bootstrap $p_{T}(bb^{min\Delta R})$ in $≥4b$">Bootstrap $p_{T}(bb^{min\Delta R})$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Figure 15c: <a href="153521?table=Bootstrap $m(bb^{add})$ in $≥4b$">Bootstrap $m(bb^{add})$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Figure 15d: <a href="153521?table=Bootstrap $p_{T}(bb^{add})$ in $≥4b$">Bootstrap $p_{T}(bb^{add})$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Figure 01a (aux): <a href="153521?table=Bootstrap $|\eta(b_{3})|$ in $≥3b$">Bootstrap $|\eta(b_{3})|$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Figure 01b (aux): <a href="153521?table=Bootstrap $|\eta(b_{1}^{add})|$ in $≥3b$">Bootstrap $|\eta(b_{1}^{add})|$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Figure 02a (aux): <a href="153521?table=Bootstrap $\Delta R(b_{1}b_{2})$ in $≥3b$">Bootstrap $\Delta R(b_{1}b_{2})$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Figure 02b (aux): <a href="153521?table=Bootstrap $m(e\mu bb^{top})$ in $≥3b$">Bootstrap $m(e\mu bb^{top})$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Figure 03a (aux): <a href="153521?table=Bootstrap $|\eta(l/c-jet_{1})|$ in $≥3b≥1l/c$">Bootstrap $|\eta(l/c-jet_{1})|$ in $≥3b≥1l/c$ </a> <li> Data from Figure 03b (aux): <a href="153521?table=Bootstrap $\Delta\eta_{max}^{jj}$ in $≥3b$">Bootstrap $\Delta\eta_{max}^{jj}$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Figure 04a (aux): <a href="153521?table=Bootstrap $H_{T}^{all}$ in $≥3b$">Bootstrap $H_{T}^{all}$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Figure 04b (aux): <a href="153521?table=Bootstrap $m(e\mu b_{1}b_{2})$ in $≥3b$">Bootstrap $m(e\mu b_{1}b_{2})$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Figure 05a (aux): <a href="153521?table=Bootstrap $|\eta(b_{1})|$ in $≥3b$">Bootstrap $|\eta(b_{1})|$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Figure 05b (aux): <a href="153521?table=Bootstrap $|\eta(b_{2})|$ in $≥3b$">Bootstrap $|\eta(b_{2})|$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Figure 05c (aux): <a href="153521?table=Bootstrap $|\eta(b_{1}^{top})|$ in $≥3b$">Bootstrap $|\eta(b_{1}^{top})|$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Figure 05d (aux): <a href="153521?table=Bootstrap $|\eta(b_{2}^{top})|$ in $≥3b$">Bootstrap $|\eta(b_{2}^{top})|$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Figure 06a (aux): <a href="153521?table=Bootstrap $p_{T}(b_{1})$ in $≥4b$">Bootstrap $p_{T}(b_{1})$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Figure 06b (aux): <a href="153521?table=Bootstrap $p_{T}(b_{2})$ in $≥4b$">Bootstrap $p_{T}(b_{2})$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Figure 06c (axu): <a href="153521?table=Bootstrap $p_{T}(b_{1}^{top})$ in $≥4b$">Bootstrap $p_{T}(b_{1}^{top})$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Figure 06d (aux): <a href="153521?table=Bootstrap $p_{T}(b_{2}^{top})$ in $≥4b$">Bootstrap $p_{T}(b_{2}^{top})$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Figure 07a (aux): <a href="153521?table=Bootstrap $p_{T}(b_{3})$ in $≥4b$">Bootstrap $p_{T}(b_{3})$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Figure 07b (aux): <a href="153521?table=Bootstrap $p_{T}(b_{4})$ in $≥4b$">Bootstrap $p_{T}(b_{4})$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Figure 07c (aux): <a href="153521?table=Bootstrap $p_{T}(b_{1}^{add})$ in $≥4b$">Bootstrap $p_{T}(b_{1}^{add})$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Figure 07d (aux): <a href="153521?table=Bootstrap $p_{T}(b_{2}^{add})$ in $≥4b$">Bootstrap $p_{T}(b_{2}^{add})$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Figure 08a (aux): <a href="153521?table=Bootstrap $m(b_{1}b_{2})$ in $≥4b$">Bootstrap $m(b_{1}b_{2})$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Figure 08b (aux): <a href="153521?table=Bootstrap $p_{T}(b_{1}b_{2})$ in $≥4b$">Bootstrap $p_{T}(b_{1}b_{2})$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Figure 09a (aux): <a href="153521?table=Bootstrap $m(bb^{top})$ in $≥4b$">Bootstrap $m(bb^{top})$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Figure 09b (aux): <a href="153521?table=Bootstrap $p_{T}(bb^{top})$ in $≥4b$">Bootstrap $p_{T}(bb^{top})$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Figure 10a (aux): <a href="153521?table=Bootstrap $H_{T}^{all}$ in $≥4b$">Bootstrap $H_{T}^{all}$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Figure 10b (aux): <a href="153521?table=Bootstrap $m(e\mu b_{1}b_{2})$ in $≥4b$">Bootstrap $m(e\mu b_{1}b_{2})$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Figure 11a (aux): <a href="153521?table=Bootstrap $m(e\mu bb^{top})$ in $≥4b$">Bootstrap $m(e\mu bb^{top})$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Figure 11b (aux): <a href="153521?table=Bootstrap $H_{T}^{had}$ in $≥4b$">Bootstrap $H_{T}^{had}$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Figure 11c (aux): <a href="153521?table=Bootstrap min$\Delta R(bb)$ in $≥4b$">Bootstrap min$\Delta R(bb)$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Figure 11d (aux): <a href="153521?table=Bootstrap $\Delta R(e\mu bb^{top}, b_{1}^{add})$ in $≥4b$">Bootstrap $\Delta R(e\mu bb^{top}, b_{1}^{add})$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Figure 12a (aux): <a href="153521?table=Bootstrap $\Delta R_{avg}^{bb}$ in $≥4b$">Bootstrap $\Delta R_{avg}^{bb}$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Figure 12b (aux): <a href="153521?table=Bootstrap $\Delta\eta_{max}^{jj}$ in $≥4b$">Bootstrap $\Delta\eta_{max}^{jj}$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Figure 12c (aux): <a href="153521?table=Bootstrap $N_{l/c-jets}$ in $≥4b$">Bootstrap $N_{l/c-jets}$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Figure 13a (aux): <a href="153521?table=Bootstrap $p_{T}(l/c-jet_{1})$ in $≥4b≥1l/c$">Bootstrap $p_{T}(l/c-jet_{1})$ in $≥4b≥1l/c$ </a> <li> Data from Figure 13b (aux): <a href="153521?table=Bootstrap $|\eta(l/c-jet_{1})|$ in $≥4b≥1l/c$">Bootstrap $|\eta(l/c-jet_{1})|$ in $≥4b≥1l/c$ </a> <li> Data from Figure 13c (aux): <a href="153521?table=Bootstrap $\Delta R(e\mu bb^{top}, l/c-jet_{1})$ in $≥4b≥1l/c$">Bootstrap $\Delta R(e\mu bb^{top}, l/c-jet_{1})$ in $≥4b≥1l/c$ </a> <li> Data from Figure 13d (aux): <a href="153521?table=Bootstrap $p_{T}(l/c-jet_{1})-p_{T}(b_{1}^{add})$ in $≥4b≥1l/c$">Bootstrap $p_{T}(l/c-jet_{1})-p_{T}(b_{1}^{add})$ in $≥4b≥1l/c$ </a> <li> Data from Figure 14a (aux): <a href="153521?table=Bootstrap $|\eta(b_{1})|$ in $≥4b$">Bootstrap $|\eta(b_{1})|$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Figure 14b (aux): <a href="153521?table=Bootstrap $|\eta(b_{2})|$ in $≥4b$">Bootstrap $|\eta(b_{2})|$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Figure 14c (aux): <a href="153521?table=Bootstrap $|\eta(b_{1}^{top})|$ in $≥4b$">Bootstrap $|\eta(b_{1}^{top})|$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Figure 14d (aux): <a href="153521?table=Bootstrap $|\eta(b_{2}^{top})|$ in $≥4b$">Bootstrap $|\eta(b_{2}^{top})|$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Figure 15a (aux): <a href="153521?table=Bootstrap $|\eta(b_{3})|$ in $≥4b$">Bootstrap $|\eta(b_{3})|$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Figure 15b (aux): <a href="153521?table=Bootstrap $|\eta(b_{4})|$ in $≥4b$">Bootstrap $|\eta(b_{4})|$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Figure 15c (aux): <a href="153521?table=Bootstrap $|\eta(b_{1}^{add})|$ in $≥4b$">Bootstrap $|\eta(b_{1}^{add})|$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Figure 15d (aux): <a href="153521?table=Bootstrap $|\eta(b_{2}^{add})|$ in $≥4b$">Bootstrap $|\eta(b_{2}^{add})|$ in $≥4b$ </a> </ul><br/> Measurements: <ul> <li> Data from Table 01 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Diff. XS $N_{b-jets}$ in $≥2b$">Diff. XS $N_{b-jets}$ in $≥2b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 02 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Diff. XS $H_{T}^{had}$ in $≥3b$">Diff. XS $H_{T}^{had}$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 03 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Diff. XS $H_{T}^{all}$ in $≥3b$">Diff. XS $H_{T}^{all}$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 04 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Diff. XS $\Delta R_{avg}^{bb}$ in $≥3b$">Diff. XS $\Delta R_{avg}^{bb}$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 05 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Diff. XS $\Delta\eta_{max}^{jj}$ in $≥3b$">Diff. XS $\Delta\eta_{max}^{jj}$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 06 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Diff. XS $p_{T}(b_{1})$ in $≥3b$">Diff. XS $p_{T}(b_{1})$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 07 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Diff. XS $p_{T}(b_{1}^{top})$ in $≥3b$">Diff. XS $p_{T}(b_{1}^{top})$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 08 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Diff. XS $p_{T}(b_{2})$ in $≥3b$">Diff. XS $p_{T}(b_{2})$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 09 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Diff. XS $p_{T}(b_{2}^{top})$ in $≥3b$">Diff. XS $p_{T}(b_{2}^{top})$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 10 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Diff. XS $p_{T}(b_{3})$ in $≥3b$">Diff. XS $p_{T}(b_{3})$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 11 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Diff. XS $p_{T}(b_{1}^{add})$ in $≥3b$">Diff. XS $p_{T}(b_{1}^{add})$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 12 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Diff. XS $|\eta(b_{1})|$ in $≥3b$">Diff. XS $|\eta(b_{1})|$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 13 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Diff. XS $|\eta(b_{1}^{top})|$ in $≥3b$">Diff. XS $|\eta(b_{1}^{top})|$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 14 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Diff. XS $|\eta(b_{2})|$ in $≥3b$">Diff. XS $|\eta(b_{2})|$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 15 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Diff. XS $|\eta(b_{2}^{top})|$ in $≥3b$">Diff. XS $|\eta(b_{2}^{top})|$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 16 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Diff. XS $|\eta(b_{3})|$ in $≥3b$">Diff. XS $|\eta(b_{3})|$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 17 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Diff. XS $|\eta(b_{1}^{add})|$ in $≥3b$">Diff. XS $|\eta(b_{1}^{add})|$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 18 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Diff. XS $m(b_{1}b_{2})$ in $≥3b$">Diff. XS $m(b_{1}b_{2})$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 19 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Diff. XS $p_{T}(b_{1}b_{2})$ in $≥3b$">Diff. XS $p_{T}(b_{1}b_{2})$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 20 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Diff. XS $m(bb^{top})$ in $≥3b$">Diff. XS $m(bb^{top})$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 21 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Diff. XS $p_{T}(bb^{top})$ in $≥3b$">Diff. XS $p_{T}(bb^{top})$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 22 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Diff. XS $m(e\mu b_{1}b_{2})$ in $≥3b$">Diff. XS $m(e\mu b_{1}b_{2})$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 23 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Diff. XS $m(e\mu bb^{top})$ in $≥3b$">Diff. XS $m(e\mu bb^{top})$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 24 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Diff. XS $\Delta R(b_{1}b_{2})$ in $≥3b$">Diff. XS $\Delta R(b_{1}b_{2})$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 25 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Diff. XS $N_{l/c-jets}$ in $≥3b$">Diff. XS $N_{l/c-jets}$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 26 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Diff. XS $\Delta R(e\mu b_{1}b_{2},b_{3})$ in $≥3b$">Diff. XS $\Delta R(e\mu b_{1}b_{2},b_{3})$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 27 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Diff. XS $\Delta R(e\mu bb^{top}, b_{1}^{add})$ in $≥3b$">Diff. XS $\Delta R(e\mu bb^{top}, b_{1}^{add})$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 28 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Diff. XS $\Delta R(e\mu bb^{top},l/c-jet)$ in $≥3b≥1l/c$">Diff. XS $\Delta R(e\mu bb^{top},l/c-jet)$ in $≥3b≥1l/c$ </a> <li> Data from Table 29 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Diff. XS $p_{T}(l/c-jet_{1}) - p_{T}(b_{1}^{add})$ in $≥3b≥1l/c$">Diff. XS $p_{T}(l/c-jet_{1}) - p_{T}(b_{1}^{add})$ in $≥3b≥1l/c$ </a> <li> Data from Table 30 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Diff. XS $|\eta(l/c-jet_{1})|$ in $≥3b≥1l/c$">Diff. XS $|\eta(l/c-jet_{1})|$ in $≥3b≥1l/c$ </a> <li> Data from Table 31 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Diff. XS $p_{T}(l/c-jet_{1})$ in $≥3b≥1l/c$">Diff. XS $p_{T}(l/c-jet_{1})$ in $≥3b≥1l/c$ </a> <li> Data from Table 32 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Diff. XS $H_{T}^{had}$ in $≥4b$">Diff. XS $H_{T}^{had}$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 33 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Diff. XS $H_{T}^{all}$ in $≥4b$">Diff. XS $H_{T}^{all}$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 34 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Diff. XS $\Delta R_{avg}^{bb}$ in $≥4b$">Diff. XS $\Delta R_{avg}^{bb}$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 35 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Diff. XS $\Delta\eta_{max}^{jj}$ in $≥4b$">Diff. XS $\Delta\eta_{max}^{jj}$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 36 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Diff. XS $p_{T}(b_{1})$ in $≥4b$">Diff. XS $p_{T}(b_{1})$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 37 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Diff. XS $p_{T}(b_{1}^{top})$ in $≥4b$">Diff. XS $p_{T}(b_{1}^{top})$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 38 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Diff. XS $p_{T}(b_{2})$ in $≥4b$">Diff. XS $p_{T}(b_{2})$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 39 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Diff. XS $p_{T}(b_{2}^{top})$ in $≥4b$">Diff. XS $p_{T}(b_{2}^{top})$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 40 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Diff. XS $p_{T}(b_{3})$ in $≥4b$">Diff. XS $p_{T}(b_{3})$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 41 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Diff. XS $p_{T}(b_{1}^{add})$ in $≥4b$">Diff. XS $p_{T}(b_{1}^{add})$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 42 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Diff. XS $p_{T}(b_{4})$ in $≥4b$">Diff. XS $p_{T}(b_{4})$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 43 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Diff. XS $p_{T}(b_{2}^{add})$ in $≥4b$">Diff. XS $p_{T}(b_{2}^{add})$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 44 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Diff. XS $|\eta(b_{1})|$ in $≥4b$">Diff. XS $|\eta(b_{1})|$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 45 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Diff. XS $|\eta(b_{1}^{top})|$ in $≥4b$">Diff. XS $|\eta(b_{1}^{top})|$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 46 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Diff. XS $|\eta(b_{2})|$ in $≥4b$">Diff. XS $|\eta(b_{2})|$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 47 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Diff. XS $|\eta(b_{2}^{top})|$ in $≥4b$">Diff. XS $|\eta(b_{2}^{top})|$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 48 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Diff. XS $|\eta(b_{3})|$ in $≥4b$">Diff. XS $|\eta(b_{3})|$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 49 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Diff. XS $|\eta(b_{1}^{add})|$ in $≥4b$">Diff. XS $|\eta(b_{1}^{add})|$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 50 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Diff. XS $|\eta(b_{4})|$ in $≥4b$">Diff. XS $|\eta(b_{4})|$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 51 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Diff. XS $|\eta(b_{2}^{add})|$ in $≥4b$">Diff. XS $|\eta(b_{2}^{add})|$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 52 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Diff. XS $m(b_{1}b_{2})$ in $≥4b$">Diff. XS $m(b_{1}b_{2})$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 53 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Diff. XS $p_{T}(b_{1}b_{2})$ in $≥4b$">Diff. XS $p_{T}(b_{1}b_{2})$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 54 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Diff. XS $m(bb^{top})$ in $≥4b$">Diff. XS $m(bb^{top})$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 55 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Diff. XS $p_{T}(bb^{top})$ in $≥4b$">Diff. XS $p_{T}(bb^{top})$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 56 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Diff. XS $m(e\mu b_{1}b_{2})$ in $≥4b$">Diff. XS $m(e\mu b_{1}b_{2})$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 57 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Diff. XS $m(e\mu bb^{top})$ in $≥4b$">Diff. XS $m(e\mu bb^{top})$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 58 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Diff. XS $m(bb^{min\Delta R})$ in $≥4b$">Diff. XS $m(bb^{min\Delta R})$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 59 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Diff. XS $p_{T}(bb^{min\Delta R})$ in $≥4b$">Diff. XS $p_{T}(bb^{min\Delta R})$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 60 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Diff. XS $m(bb^{add})$ in $≥4b$">Diff. XS $m(bb^{add})$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 61 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Diff. XS $p_{T}(bb^{add})$ in $≥4b$">Diff. XS $p_{T}(bb^{add})$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 62 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Diff. XS $min\Delta R(bb)$ in $≥4b$">Diff. XS $min\Delta R(bb)$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 63 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Diff. XS $\Delta R(b_{1}b_{2})$ in $≥4b$">Diff. XS $\Delta R(b_{1}b_{2})$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 64 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Diff. XS $N_{l/c-jets}$ in $≥4b$">Diff. XS $N_{l/c-jets}$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 65 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Diff. XS $\Delta R(e\mu b_{1}b_{2},b_{3})$ in $≥4b$">Diff. XS $\Delta R(e\mu b_{1}b_{2},b_{3})$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 66 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Diff. XS $\Delta R(e\mu bb^{top}, b_{1}^{add})$ in $≥4b$">Diff. XS $\Delta R(e\mu bb^{top}, b_{1}^{add})$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 67 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Diff. XS $\Delta R(e\mu bb^{top}, l/c-jet_{1})$ in $≥4b≥1l/c$">Diff. XS $\Delta R(e\mu bb^{top}, l/c-jet_{1})$ in $≥4b≥1l/c$ </a> <li> Data from Table 68 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Diff. XS $p_{T}(l/c-jet_{1}) - p_{T}(b_{1}^{add})$ in $≥4b≥1l/c$">Diff. XS $p_{T}(l/c-jet_{1}) - p_{T}(b_{1}^{add})$ in $≥4b≥1l/c$ </a> <li> Data from Table 69 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Diff. XS $|\eta(l/c-jet_{1})|$ in $≥4b≥1l/c$">Diff. XS $|\eta(l/c-jet_{1})|$ in $≥4b≥1l/c$ </a> <li> Data from Table 70 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Diff. XS $p_{T}(l/c-jet_{1})$ in $≥4b≥1l/c$">Diff. XS $p_{T}(l/c-jet_{1})$ in $≥4b≥1l/c$ </a> </ul><br/> <u>2D:</u><br/> Correlation matrices: <ul> <li> Data from Table 71 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx $N_{b-jets}$ in $≥2b$">Corr. mtrx $N_{b-jets}$ in $≥2b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 72 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx $N_{b-jets}$ in $≥3b$">Corr. mtrx $N_{b-jets}$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 73 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx $H_{T}^{had}$ in $≥3b$">Corr. mtrx $H_{T}^{had}$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 74 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx $H_{T}^{all}$ in $≥3b$">Corr. mtrx $H_{T}^{all}$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 75 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx $\Delta R_{avg}^{bb}$ in $≥3b$">Corr. mtrx $\Delta R_{avg}^{bb}$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 76 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx $\Delta\eta_{max}^{jj}$ in $≥3b$">Corr. mtrx $\Delta\eta_{max}^{jj}$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 77 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx $p_{T}(b_{1})$ in $≥3b$">Corr. mtrx $p_{T}(b_{1})$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 78 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx $p_{T}(b_{1}^{top})$ in $≥3b$">Corr. mtrx $p_{T}(b_{1}^{top})$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 79 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx $p_{T}(b_{2})$ in $≥3b$">Corr. mtrx $p_{T}(b_{2})$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 80 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx $p_{T}(b_{2}^{top})$ in $≥3b$">Corr. mtrx $p_{T}(b_{2}^{top})$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 81 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx $p_{T}(b_{3})$ in $≥3b$">Corr. mtrx $p_{T}(b_{3})$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 82 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx $p_{T}(b_{1}^{add})$ in $≥3b$">Corr. mtrx $p_{T}(b_{1}^{add})$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 83 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx $|\eta(b_{1})|$ in $≥3b$">Corr. mtrx $|\eta(b_{1})|$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 84 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx $|\eta(b_{1}^{top})|$ in $≥3b$">Corr. mtrx $|\eta(b_{1}^{top})|$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 85 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx $|\eta(b_{2})|$ in $≥3b$">Corr. mtrx $|\eta(b_{2})|$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 86 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx $|\eta(b_{2}^{top})|$ in $≥3b$">Corr. mtrx $|\eta(b_{2}^{top})|$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 87 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx $|\eta(b_{3})|$ in $≥3b$">Corr. mtrx $|\eta(b_{3})|$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 88 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx $|\eta(b_{1}^{add})|$ in $≥3b$">Corr. mtrx $|\eta(b_{1}^{add})|$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 89 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx $m(b_{1}b_{2})$ in $≥3b$">Corr. mtrx $m(b_{1}b_{2})$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 90 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx $p_{T}(b_{1}b_{2})$ in $≥3b$">Corr. mtrx $p_{T}(b_{1}b_{2})$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 91 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx $m(bb^{top})$ in $≥3b$">Corr. mtrx $m(bb^{top})$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 92 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx $p_{T}(bb^{top})$ in $≥3b$">Corr. mtrx $p_{T}(bb^{top})$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 93 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx $m(e\mu b_{1}b_{2})$ in $≥3b$">Corr. mtrx $m(e\mu b_{1}b_{2})$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 94 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx $m(e\mu bb^{top})$ in $≥3b$">Corr. mtrx $m(e\mu bb^{top})$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 95 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx $\Delta R(b_{1}b_{2})$ in $≥3b$">Corr. mtrx $\Delta R(b_{1}b_{2})$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 96 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx $N_{l/c-jets}$ in $≥3b$">Corr. mtrx $N_{l/c-jets}$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 97 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx $\Delta R(e\mu b_{1}b_{2},b_{3})$ in $≥3b$">Corr. mtrx $\Delta R(e\mu b_{1}b_{2},b_{3})$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 98 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx $\Delta R(e\mu bb^{top}, b_{1}^{add})$ in $≥3b$">Corr. mtrx $\Delta R(e\mu bb^{top}, b_{1}^{add})$ in $≥3b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 99 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx $\Delta R(e\mu bb^{top},l/c-jet)$ in $≥3b≥1l/c$">Corr. mtrx $\Delta R(e\mu bb^{top},l/c-jet)$ in $≥3b≥1l/c$ </a> <li> Data from Table 100 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx $p_{T}(l/c-jet_{1})-p_{T}(b_{1}^{add})$ in $≥3b≥1l/c$">Corr. mtrx $p_{T}(l/c-jet_{1})-p_{T}(b_{1}^{add})$ in $≥3b≥1l/c$ </a> <li> Data from Table 101 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx $|\eta(l/c-jet_{1})|$ in $≥3b≥1l/c$">Corr. mtrx $|\eta(l/c-jet_{1})|$ in $≥3b≥1l/c$ </a> <li> Data from Table 102 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx $p_{T}(l/c-jet_{1})$ in $≥3b≥1l/c$">Corr. mtrx $p_{T}(l/c-jet_{1})$ in $≥3b≥1l/c$ </a> <li> Data from Table 103 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx $H_{T}^{had}$ in $≥4b$">Corr. mtrx $H_{T}^{had}$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 104 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx $H_{T}^{all}$ in $≥4b$">Corr. mtrx $H_{T}^{all}$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 105 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx $\Delta R_{avg}^{bb}$ in $≥4b$">Corr. mtrx $\Delta R_{avg}^{bb}$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 106 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx $\Delta\eta_{max}^{jj}$ in $≥4b$">Corr. mtrx $\Delta\eta_{max}^{jj}$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 107 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx $p_{T}(b_{1})$ in $≥4b$">Corr. mtrx $p_{T}(b_{1})$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 108 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx $p_{T}(b_{1}^{top})$ in $≥4b$">Corr. mtrx $p_{T}(b_{1}^{top})$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 109 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx $p_{T}(b_{2})$ in $≥4b$">Corr. mtrx $p_{T}(b_{2})$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 110 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx $p_{T}(b_{2}^{top})$ in $≥4b$">Corr. mtrx $p_{T}(b_{2}^{top})$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 111 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx $p_{T}(b_{3})$ in $≥4b$">Corr. mtrx $p_{T}(b_{3})$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 112 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx $p_{T}(b_{1}^{add})$ in $≥4b$">Corr. mtrx $p_{T}(b_{1}^{add})$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 113 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx $p_{T}(b_{4})$ in $≥4b$">Corr. mtrx $p_{T}(b_{4})$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 114 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx $p_{T}(b_{2}^{add})$ in $≥4b$">Corr. mtrx $p_{T}(b_{2}^{add})$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 115 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx $|\eta(b_{1})|$ in $≥4b$">Corr. mtrx $|\eta(b_{1})|$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 116 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx $|\eta(b_{1}^{top})|$ in $≥4b$">Corr. mtrx $|\eta(b_{1}^{top})|$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 117 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx $|\eta(b_{2})|$ in $≥4b$">Corr. mtrx $|\eta(b_{2})|$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 118 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx $|\eta(b_{2}^{top})|$ in $≥4b$">Corr. mtrx $|\eta(b_{2}^{top})|$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 119 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx $|\eta(b_{3})|$ in $≥4b$">Corr. mtrx $|\eta(b_{3})|$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 120 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx $|\eta(b_{1}^{add})|$ in $≥4b$">Corr. mtrx $|\eta(b_{1}^{add})|$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 121 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx $|\eta(b_{4})|$ in $≥4b$">Corr. mtrx $|\eta(b_{4})|$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 122 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx $|\eta(b_{2}^{add})|$ in $≥4b$">Corr. mtrx $|\eta(b_{2}^{add})|$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 123 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx $m(b_{1}b_{2})$ in $≥4b$">Corr. mtrx $m(b_{1}b_{2})$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 124 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx $p_{T}(b_{1}b_{2})$ in $≥4b$">Corr. mtrx $p_{T}(b_{1}b_{2})$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 125 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx $m(bb^{top})$ in $≥4b$">Corr. mtrx $m(bb^{top})$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 126 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx $p_{T}(bb^{top})$ in $≥4b$">Corr. mtrx $p_{T}(bb^{top})$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 127 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx $m(e\mu b_{1}b_{2})$ in $≥4b$">Corr. mtrx $m(e\mu b_{1}b_{2})$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 128 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx $m(e\mu bb^{top})$ in $≥4b$">Corr. mtrx $m(e\mu bb^{top})$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 129 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx $m(bb^{min\Delta R})$ in $≥4b$">Corr. mtrx $m(bb^{min\Delta R})$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 130 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx $p_{T}(bb^{min\Delta R})$ in $≥4b$">Corr. mtrx $p_{T}(bb^{min\Delta R})$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 131 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx $m(bb^{add})$ in $≥4b$">Corr. mtrx $m(bb^{add})$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 132 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx $p_{T}(bb^{add})$ in $≥4b$">Corr. mtrx $p_{T}(bb^{add})$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 133 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx min$\Delta R(bb)$ in $≥4b$">Corr. mtrx min$\Delta R(bb)$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 134 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx $\Delta R(b_{1}b_{2})$ in $≥4b$">Corr. mtrx $\Delta R(b_{1}b_{2})$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 135 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx $N_{l/c-jets}$ in $≥4b$">Corr. mtrx $N_{l/c-jets}$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 136 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx $\Delta R(e\mu b_{1}b_{2},b_{3})$ in $≥4b$">Corr. mtrx $\Delta R(e\mu b_{1}b_{2},b_{3})$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 137 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx $\Delta R(e\mu bb^{top}, b_{1}^{add})$ in $≥4b$">Corr. mtrx $\Delta R(e\mu bb^{top}, b_{1}^{add})$ in $≥4b$ </a> <li> Data from Table 138 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx $\Delta R(e\mu bb^{top}, l/c-jet_{1})$ in $≥4b≥1l/c$">Corr. mtrx $\Delta R(e\mu bb^{top}, l/c-jet_{1})$ in $≥4b≥1l/c$ </a> <li> Data from Table 139 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx $p_{T}(l/c-jet_{1})-p_{T}(b_{1}^{add})$ in $≥4b≥1l/c$">Corr. mtrx $p_{T}(l/c-jet_{1})-p_{T}(b_{1}^{add})$ in $≥4b≥1l/c$ </a> <li> Data from Table 140 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx $|\eta(l/c-jet_{1})|$ in $≥4b≥1l/c$">Corr. mtrx $|\eta(l/c-jet_{1})|$ in $≥4b≥1l/c$ </a> <li> Data from Table 141 (aux): <a href="153521?table=Corr. mtrx $p_{T}(l/c-jet_{1})$ in $≥4b≥1l/c$">Corr. mtrx $p_{T}(l/c-jet_{1})$ in $≥4b≥1l/c$ </a> </ul><br/>

Measured and predicted fiducial cross-section results for additional b-jet production in four phase-space regions. The dashes (–) indicate that the predictions are not available. The differences between the various MC generator predictions are smaller than the size of theoretical uncertainties (20%–50%, not presented here) in the predictions.

Data bootstraps post unfolding for the normalised differential cross-section in the phase space with at least two $b$-jets as a function of the number of $b$-jets compared with predictions. The replicas are obtained by reweighting each observed data event by a random integer generated according to Poisson statistics, using the BootstrapGenerator software package (https://gitlab.cern.ch/atlas-physics/sm/StandardModelTools_BootstrapGenerator/BootstrapGenerator), which implements a technique described in ATL-PHYS-PUB-2021-011 (https://cds.cern.ch/record/2759945). The ATLAS event number and run number of each event are used as seed to uniquely but reproducibly initialise the random number generator for each event. The last bin contains the overflow.

More…

Observation of $t\bar{t}$ production in the lepton+jets and dilepton channels in $p$+Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}=8.16$ TeV with the ATLAS detector

The ATLAS collaboration Aad, Georges ; Aakvaag, Erlend ; Abbott, Braden Keim ; et al.
JHEP 11 (2024) 101, 2024.
Inspire Record 2784411 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.153893

This paper reports the observation of top-quark pair production in proton-lead collisions in the ATLAS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider. The measurement is performed using 165 nb$^{-1}$ of $p$+Pb data collected at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}=8.16$ TeV in 2016. Events are categorised in two analysis channels, consisting of either events with exactly one lepton (electron or muon) and at least four jets, or events with two opposite-charge leptons and at least two jets. In both channels at least one $b$-tagged jet is also required. Top-quark pair production is observed with a significance over five standard deviations in each channel. The top-quark pair production cross-section is measured to be $\sigma_{t\bar{t}}= 58.1\pm 2.0\;\mathrm{(stat.)\;^{+4.8}_{-4.4} \;\mathrm{(syst.)}}\;\mathrm{nb}$, with a total uncertainty of 9%. In addition, the nuclear modification factor is measured to be $R_{p\mathrm{A}} = 1.090\pm0.039\;(\mathrm{stat.})\;^{+0.094}_{-0.087}\;(\mathrm{syst.})$. The measurements are found to be in good agreement with theory predictions involving nuclear parton distribution functions.

18 data tables

The figure shows the pre-fit distribution of events as a function of $H_{\mathrm{T}}^{\ell,j} = \sum_{\ell,j} p_{T}^{\ell,j}$, scalar sum of $p_T$ for all jets and leptons in the $\ell+$jets channel, in proton-lead (p+Pb) collisions at a center-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 8.16$ TeV, with an integrated luminosity of 165 nb$^{-1}$. The data correspond to the $1\ell 1b$ $e$+jets channel in a pre-fit configuration. The stacked histograms represent different processes contributing to the event yield, including top quark pair production ($t\bar{t}$), single top, $W$ boson production with $b$, $c$, and light quarks, $Z$ boson production with $b$, $c$, and light quarks, diboson, and fake lepton backgrounds.

The figure shows the post-fit distribution of events as a function of $H_{\mathrm{T}}^{\ell,j} = \sum_{\ell,j} p_{T}^{\ell,j}$, scalar sum of $p_T$ for all jets and leptons in the $\ell+$jets channel, in proton-lead (p+Pb) collisions at a center-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 8.16$ TeV, with an integrated luminosity of 165 nb$^{-1}$. The data correspond to the $1\ell 1b$ $e$+jets channel in a pre-fit configuration. The stacked histograms represent different processes contributing to the event yield, including top quark pair production ($t\bar{t}$), single top, $W$ boson production with $b$, $c$, and light quarks, $Z$ boson production with $b$, $c$, and light quarks, diboson, and fake lepton backgrounds.

The figure shows the pre-fit distribution of events as a function of $H_{\mathrm{T}}^{\ell,j} = \sum_{\ell,j} p_{T}^{\ell,j}$, scalar sum of $p_T$ for all jets and leptons in the $\ell+$jets channel, in proton-lead (p+Pb) collisions at a center-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 8.16$ TeV, with an integrated luminosity of 165 nb$^{-1}$. The data correspond to the $1\ell 1b$ $\mu$+jets channel in a pre-fit configuration. The stacked histograms represent different processes contributing to the event yield, including top quark pair production ($t\bar{t}$), single top, $W$ boson production with $b$, $c$, and light quarks, $Z$ boson production with $b$, $c$, and light quarks, diboson, and fake lepton backgrounds.

More…

Search for a resonance decaying into a scalar particle and a Higgs boson in the final state with two bottom quarks and two photons in proton-proton collisions at a center of mass energy of 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector

The ATLAS collaboration Aad, Georges ; Aakvaag, Erlend ; Abbott, Braden Keim ; et al.
JHEP 11 (2024) 047, 2024.
Inspire Record 2779339 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.151649

A search for the resonant production of a heavy scalar $X$ decaying into a Higgs boson and a new lighter scalar $S$, through the process $X \to S(\to bb) H(\to \gamma\gamma)$, where the two photons are consistent with the Higgs boson decay, is performed. The search is conducted using an integrated luminosity of 140 fb$^{-1}$ of proton-proton collision data at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV recorded with the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider. The search is performed over the mass range 170 $\leq$$m_{X}$$\leq$ 1000 GeV and 15 $\leq$$m_{S}$$\leq$ 500 GeV. Parameterised neural networks are used to enhance the signal purity and to achieve continuous sensitivity in a domain of the ($m_{X}$, $m_{S}$) plane. No significant excess above the expected background is found and 95% CL upper limits are set on the cross section times branching ratio, ranging from 39 fb to 0.09 fb. The largest deviation from the background-only expectation occurs for ($m_{X}$, $m_{S}$) = (575, 200) GeV with a local (global) significance of 3.5 (2.0) standard deviations.

6 data tables

Number of events for the 2 b-jet process category obtained from a background-only fit to data in the signal region and sideband. In the signal region the yield in the most signal-like bin of the PNN distribution, parameterised to the signal point mass (mX, mS) = (250, 100) GeV, is also provided. The uncertainties are symmetrised around the central value. The uncertainty in the total background is calculated taking correlations between the individual contributions into account. For the single Higgs boson processes, 'Other' includes the following production modes: VBF, WH, tHq, and tHW.

Number of events for the 1 b-jet process category obtained from a background-only fit to data in the signal region and sideband. In the signal region the yield in the most signal-like bin of the PNN distribution, parameterised to the signal point mass (mX, mS) = (1000, 70) GeV, is also provided. The uncertainties are symmetrised around the central value. The uncertainty in the total background is calculated taking correlations between the individual contributions into account. For the single Higgs boson processes, 'Other' includes the following production modes: VBF, WH, tHq, and tHW.

Expected and observed 95% CL upper limits on the signal cross section times the branching ratio of X → SH → b b $\gamma \gamma$ shown in the (mX, mS) plane, for each evaluated point. The values of the expected limit one and two standard deviations from the nominal value are also shown. The band at mS = 125 GeV is not included as these signal points are equivalent to those already probed in Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 052001.

More…

Search for pair-produced higgsinos decaying via Higgs or $Z$ bosons to final states containing a pair of photons and a pair of $b$-jets with the ATLAS detector

The ATLAS collaboration Aad, Georges ; Abbott, Braden Keim ; Abeling, Kira ; et al.
Phys.Lett.B 856 (2024) 138938, 2024.
Inspire Record 2773395 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.144072

A search is presented for the pair production of higgsinos $\tilde{\chi}$ in gauge-mediated supersymmetry models, where the lightest neutralinos $\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ decay into a light gravitino $\tilde{G}$ in association with either a Higgs $h$ or a $Z$ boson. The search is performed with the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider using 139 fb$^{-1}$ of proton-proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV. It targets final states in which a Higgs boson decays into a photon pair, while the other Higgs or $Z$ boson decays into a $b\bar{b}$ pair, with missing transverse momentum associated with the two gravitinos. Search regions dependent on the amount of missing transverse momentum are defined by the requirements that the diphoton mass should be consistent with the mass of the Higgs boson, and the $b\bar{b}$ mass with the mass of the Higgs or $Z$ boson. The main backgrounds are estimated with data-driven methods using the sidebands of the diphoton mass distribution. No excesses beyond Standard Model expectations are observed and higgsinos with masses up to 320 GeV are excluded, assuming a branching fraction of 100% for $\tilde{\chi}_1^0\rightarrow h\tilde{G}$. This analysis excludes higgsinos with masses of 130 GeV for branching fractions to $h\tilde{G}$ as low as 36%, thus providing complementarity to previous ATLAS searches in final states with multiple leptons or multiple $b$-jets, targeting different decays of the electroweak bosons.

25 data tables

<b>- - - - - - - - Overview of HEPData Record - - - - - - - -</b> <b>Histograms:</b><ul> <li><a href=?table=Distribution1>Figure 3a: $m_{\gamma\gamma}$ Distribution in VR1</a> <li><a href=?table=Distribution2>Figure 3b: $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ Distribution in VR1</a> <li><a href=?table=Distribution3>Figure 3c: $m_{\gamma\gamma}$ Distribution in VR2</a> <li><a href=?table=Distribution4>Figure 3d: $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ Distribution in VR2</a> <li><a href=?table=Distribution5>Figure 4a: N-1 $m_{\gamma\gamma}$ Distribution for SR1h</a> <li><a href=?table=Distribution6>Figure 4b: N-1 $m_{\gamma\gamma}$ Distribution for SR1Z</a> <li><a href=?table=Distribution7>Figure 4c: N-1 $m_{\gamma\gamma}$ Distribution for SR2</a> <li><a href=?table=Distribution8>Auxiliary Figure 1: Signal and Validation Region Yields</a> </ul> <b>Tables:</b><ul> <li><a href=?table=YieldsTable1>Table 3: Signal Region Yields & Model-independent Limits</a> <li><a href=?table=Cutflow1>Auxiliary Table 1: Benchmark Signal Cutflows</a> </ul> <b>Cross section limits:</b><ul> <li><a href=?table=X-sectionU.L.1>Figure 5: 1D Cross-section Limits</a> <li><a href=?table=X-sectionU.L.2>Auxiliary Figure 3: 2D Cross-section Limits</a> </ul> <b>2D CL limits:</b><ul> <li><a href=?table=Exclusioncontour1>Figure 6: Expected Limit on $\mathrm{BF}(\tilde{\chi}_1^0\rightarrow h\tilde{G})$</a> <li><a href=?table=Exclusioncontour2>Figure 6: $+1\sigma$ Variation for Expected Limit on $\mathrm{BF}(\tilde{\chi}_1^0\rightarrow h\tilde{G})$</a> <li><a href=?table=Exclusioncontour3>Figure 6: $-1\sigma$ Variation for Expected Limit on $\mathrm{BF}(\tilde{\chi}_1^0\rightarrow h\tilde{G})$</a> <li><a href=?table=Exclusioncontour4>Figure 6: Observed Limit on $\mathrm{BF}(\tilde{\chi}_1^0\rightarrow h\tilde{G})$</a> <li><a href=?table=Exclusioncontour5>Figure 6: $+1\sigma$ Variation for Observed Limit on $\mathrm{BF}(\tilde{\chi}_1^0\rightarrow h\tilde{G})$</a> <li><a href=?table=Exclusioncontour6>Figure 6: $-1\sigma$ Variation for Observed Limit on $\mathrm{BF}(\tilde{\chi}_1^0\rightarrow h\tilde{G})$</a> </ul> <b>2D Acceptance and Efficiency maps:</b><ul> <li><a href=?table=Acceptance1>Auxiliary Figure 4a: Acceptances SR1h</a> <li><a href=?table=Acceptance2>Auxiliary Figure 4b: Acceptances SR1Z</a> <li><a href=?table=Acceptance3>Auxiliary Figure 4c: Acceptances SR2</a> <li><a href=?table=Efficiency1>Auxiliary Figure 5a: Efficiencies SR1h</a> <li><a href=?table=Efficiency2>Auxiliary Figure 5b: Efficiencies SR1Z</a> <li><a href=?table=Efficiency3>Auxiliary Figure 5c: Efficiencies SR2</a> </ul>

Distribution of the diphoton invariant mass in validation region VR1. The solid histograms are stacked to show the SM expectations after the 2&times;2D background estimation technique is applied. Background and signal predictions are normalised to the luminosity. The background category "h (other)" includes events originating from VBF, Vh, ggF, thq, thW and bb&#772;h, all subdominant in this signature. Statistical and systematic uncertainties are indicated by the shaded area. The lower panel of each plot shows the ratio of the data to the SM prediction for the respective bin. The first and last bins include the underflows and overflows respectively.

Distribution of the missing transverse momentum in validation region VR1. The solid histograms are stacked to show the SM expectations after the 2&times;2D background estimation technique is applied. Background and signal predictions are normalised to the luminosity. The background category "h (other)" includes events originating from VBF, Vh, ggF, thq, thW and bb&#772;h, all subdominant in this signature. Statistical and systematic uncertainties are indicated by the shaded area. The lower panel of each plot shows the ratio of the data to the SM prediction for the respective bin. The first and last bins include the underflows and overflows respectively.

More…

Measurements of the production cross-section for a $Z$ boson in association with $b$- or $c$-jets in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 13$ TeV with the ATLAS detector

The ATLAS collaboration Aad, Georges ; Aakvaag, Erlend ; Abbott, Braden Keim ; et al.
Eur.Phys.J.C 84 (2024) 984, 2024.
Inspire Record 2771257 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.151815

This paper presents a measurement of the production cross-section of a $Z$ boson in association with $b$- or $c$-jets, in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 13$ TeV with the ATLAS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider using data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 140 fb$^{-1}$. Inclusive and differential cross-sections are measured for events containing a $Z$ boson decaying into electrons or muons and produced in association with at least one $b$-jet, at least one $c$-jet, or at least two $b$-jets with transverse momentum $p_\textrm{T} > 20$ GeV and rapidity $|y| < 2.5$. Predictions from several Monte Carlo generators based on next-to-leading-order matrix elements interfaced with a parton-shower simulation, with different choices of flavour schemes for initial-state partons, are compared with the measured cross-sections. The results are also compared with novel predictions, based on infrared and collinear safe jet flavour dressing algorithms. Selected $Z + \ge 1 c$-jet observables, optimized for sensitivity to intrinsic-charm, are compared with benchmark models with different intrinsic-charm fractions.

29 data tables

Figure 6(left) of the article. Measured fiducial cross sections for events with $Z (\rightarrow ll) \ge 1 $ b-jets. The thin inner band corresponds to the statistical uncertainty of the data, and the outer band to statistical and systematic uncertainties of the data, added in quadrature.

Figure 6(right) of the article. Measured fiducial cross sections for events with $Z (\rightarrow ll) \ge 2 $ b-jets. The thin inner band corresponds to the statistical uncertainty of the data, and the outer band to statistical and systematic uncertainties of the data, added in quadrature.

Figure 7 of the article. Measured fiducial cross sections for events with $Z (\rightarrow ll) \ge 1 $ c-jets. The thin inner band corresponds to the statistical uncertainty of the data, and the outer band to statistical and systematic uncertainties of the data, added in quadrature.

More…

Measurement of $t$-channel production of single top quarks and antiquarks in $pp$ collisions at 13 TeV using the full ATLAS Run 2 data sample

The ATLAS collaboration Aad, Georges ; Abbott, Braden Keim ; Abeling, Kira ; et al.
JHEP 05 (2024) 305, 2024.
Inspire Record 2764820 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.150693

The production of single top quarks and top antiquarks via the $t$-channel exchange of a virtual $W$ boson is measured in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV at the LHC using $140\,\mathrm{fb^{-1}}$ of ATLAS data. The total cross-sections are determined to be $\sigma(tq)=137^{+8}_{-8}\,\mathrm{pb}$ and $\sigma(\bar{t}q)=84^{+6}_{-5}\,\mathrm{pb}$ for top-quark and top-antiquark production, respectively. The combined cross-section is found to be $\sigma(tq+\bar{t}q)=221^{+13}_{-13}\,\mathrm{pb}$ and the cross-section ratio is $R_{t}=\sigma(tq)/\sigma(\bar{t}q)=1.636^{+0.036}_{-0.034}$. The predictions at next-to-next-to-leading-order in quantum chromodynamics are in good agreement with these measurements. The predicted value of $R_{t}$ using different sets of parton distribution functions is compared with the measured value, demonstrating the potential to further constrain the functions when using this result in global fits. The measured cross-sections are interpreted in an effective field theory approach, setting limits at the 95% confidence level on the strength of a four-quark operator and an operator coupling the third quark generation to the Higgs boson doublet: $-0.37 < C_{Qq}^{3,1}/\Lambda^2 < 0.06$ and $-0.87 < C_{\phi Q}^{3}/\Lambda^2 < 1.42$. The constraint $|V_{tb}|>0.95$ at the 95% confidence level is derived from the measured value of $\sigma(tq+\bar{t}q)$. In a more general approach, pairs of CKM matrix elements involving top quarks are simultaneously constrained, leading to confidence contours in the corresponding two-dimensional parameter spaces.

21 data tables

The 17 variables used for the training of the NN ordered by their discriminating power. The jet that is not \(b\)-tagged is referred to as the untagged jet. The charged lepton is denoted \(\ell\). The sphericity tensor \(S^{\alpha\beta}\) used to define the sphericity \(S\) is formed with the three-momenta \(\vec{p}_i\) of the reconstructed objects, namely the jets, the charged lepton and the reconstructed neutrino. The tensor is given by \(S^{\alpha\beta}=\frac{\sum_i p_i^\alpha p_i^\beta}{\sum_i |\vec{p}_i|^2}\) where \(\alpha\) and \(\beta\) correspond to the spatial components $x$, $y$ and $z$.

The impact of different groups of systematic uncertainties on the \(\sigma(tq)\) , \(\sigma(\bar t q)\), \(\sigma(tq + \bar t q)\) and \(R_t\), given in %.

The impact of the eight most important systematic uncertainties on the \(\sigma(tq)\) , \(\sigma(\bar t q)\) and \(\sigma(tq + \bar t q)\), given in %. The sequence of the uncertainties is given by the impact on \(\sigma(tq + \bar t q)\)

More…

Studies of the energy dependence of diboson polarization fractions and the Radiation Amplitude Zero effect in WZ production with the ATLAS detector

The ATLAS collaboration Aad, Georges ; Aakvaag, Erlend ; Abbott, Braden Keim ; et al.
Phys.Rev.Lett. 133 (2024) 101802, 2024.
Inspire Record 2762099 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.149992

This Letter presents the first study of the energy-dependence of diboson polarization fractions in $WZ \rightarrow \ell\nu \ell'\ell'~(\ell, \ell'=e, \mu)$ production. The data set used corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 140 fb$^{-1}$ of proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV recorded by the ATLAS detector. Two fiducial regions with an enhanced presence of events featuring two longitudinally-polarized bosons are defined. A non-zero fraction of events with two longitudinally-polarized bosons is measured with an observed significance of 5.2 standard deviations in the region with $100<p_T^Z\leq200$ GeV and 1.6 standard deviations in the region with $p_T^Z>200$ GeV, where $p_T^Z$ is the transverse momentum of the $Z$ boson. This Letter also reports the first study of the Radiation Amplitude Zero effect. Events with two transversely-polarized bosons are analyzed for the $\Delta Y(\ell_W Z)$ and $\Delta Y(WZ)$ distributions defined respectively as the rapidity difference between the lepton from the $W$ boson decay and the $Z$ boson and the rapidity difference between the $W$ boson and the $Z$ boson. Significant suppression of events near zero is observed in both distributions. Unfolded $\Delta Y(\ell_W Z)$ and $\Delta Y(WZ)$ distributions are also measured and compared to theoretical predictions.

45 data tables

Polarization fractions in the region with $100<p_T^Z\leq200$ GeV using three unconstrained parameters.

Polarization fractions in the region with $p_T^Z>200$ GeV using three unconstrained parameters.

Fraction of events where both bosons are longitudinally polarized in the region with $100<p_T^Z\leq200$ GeV using two unconstrained parameters.

More…

A search for top-squark pair production, in final states containing a top quark, a charm quark and missing transverse momentum, using the 139 fb$^{-1}$ of $pp$ collision data collected by the ATLAS detector

The ATLAS collaboration Aad, Georges ; Abbott, Braden Keim ; Abeling, Kira ; et al.
JHEP 07 (2024) 250, 2024.
Inspire Record 2759516 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.144439

This paper presents a search for top-squark pair production in final states with a top quark, a charm quark and missing transverse momentum. The data were collected with the ATLAS detector during LHC Run 2 and corresponds to an integrated luminosity of 139fb$^{-1}$ of proton-proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV. The analysis is motivated by an extended Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model featuring a non-minimal flavour violation in the second- and third-generation squark sector. The top squark in this model has two possible decay modes, either $\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow c\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ or $\tilde{t}_1\rightarrow t\tilde{\chi}_1^0$, where the $\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ is undetected. The analysis is optimised assuming that both of the decay modes are equally probable, leading to the most likely final state of $tc + E_{\text{T}}^{\text{miss}}$. Good agreement is found between the Standard Model expectation and the data in the search regions. Exclusion limits at 95% CL are obtained in the $m(\tilde{t}_1)$ vs $m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ plane and, in addition, limits on the branching ratio of the $\tilde{t}_1\rightarrow t\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ decay as a function of $m(\tilde{t}_1)$ are also produced. Top-squark masses of up to 800 GeV are excluded for scenarios with light neutralinos, and top-squark masses up to 600 GeV are excluded in scenarios where the neutralino and the top squark are almost mass degenerate.

66 data tables

<b>- - - - - - - - Overview of HEPData Record - - - - - - - -</b> <br><br> <b>Exclusion contours:</b> <ul> <li><a href="?table=mass_obs">Observed exclusion contour in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$</a> <li><a href="?table=mass_exp">Expected exclusion contour in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$</a> <li><a href="?table=mass_band_1">$\pm1\sigma$ exclusion contour in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$</a> <li><a href="?table=mass_band_2">$\pm1\sigma$ exclusion contour in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$</a> <li><a href="?table=br_m1_obs">Observed exclusion contour in the $m_{\tilde{t}_1} - $BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1)$ plane, assuming $m_{\tilde\chi^0_1} = 1 \mathrm{GeV}$</a> <li><a href="?table=br_m1_exp">Expected exclusion contour in the $m_{\tilde{t}_1} - $BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1)$ plane, assuming $m_{\tilde\chi^0_1} = 1 \mathrm{GeV}$</a> <li><a href="?table=br_m1_band_1">$\pm1\sigma$ exclusion contour in the $m_{\tilde{t}_1} - $BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1)$ plane, assuming $m_{\tilde\chi^0_1} = 1 \mathrm{GeV}$</a> <li><a href="?table=br_m1_band_2">$\pm1\sigma$ exclusion contour in the $m_{\tilde{t}_1} - $BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1)$ plane, assuming $m_{\tilde\chi^0_1} = 1 \mathrm{GeV}$</a> </ul> <b>Upper limits:</b> <ul> <li><a href="?table=mass_upperLimits_obs">Observed upper limits on the top-spartner pair production cross-section at the 95% CL in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$</a> <li><a href="?table=br_m1_upperLimits_obs">Observed upper limits on the top-spartner pair production cross-section at the 95% CL in the $m_{\tilde{t}_1} - $BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1)$ plane, assuming $m_{\tilde\chi^0_1} = 1 \mathrm{GeV}$.</a> <li><a href="?table=mass_upperLimits_exp">Expected upper limits on the top-spartner pair production cross-section at the 95% CL in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$</a> <li><a href="?table=br_m1_upperLimits_exp">Expected upper limits on the top-spartner pair production cross-section at the 95% CL in the $m_{\tilde{t}_1} - $BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1)$ plane, assuming $m_{\tilde\chi^0_1} = 1 \mathrm{GeV}$.</a> </ul> <b>Kinematic distributions:</b> <ul> <li><a href="?table=SRA_ntop">SRA region number of top-tagged jets distribution</a> <li><a href="?table=SRA_mttwo">SRA region $m_{\mathrm{T2}}(j^{b}_{R=1.0}, c)$ distribution</a> <li><a href="?table=SRB_ptc">SRB region leading c-tagged jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$</a> <li><a href="?table=SRB_mtj">SRB region $m_{\mathrm{T}}(j, E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}})_{\mathrm{close}}$ distribution</a> <li><a href="?table=SRC_metsig">SRC region missing transverse momentum significance distribution</a> <li><a href="?table=SRC_mtj">SRC region $m_{\mathrm{T}}(j, E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}})_{\mathrm{close}}$ distribution</a> <li><a href="?table=SRD_NN">SRD NN signal score distribution</a> <li><a href="?table=SRD_meff">SRD $m_{\mathrm{eff}}$ distribution</a> </ul> <b>Pull distributions:</b> <ul> <li><a href="?table=SRABCPull">Pull plots showing the SRA, SRB and SRC post-fit data and SM agreement using the background-only fit configuration</a> <li><a href="?table=SRDPull">Pull plots showing the SRD post-fit data and SM agreement using the background-only fit configuration</a> </ul> <b>Cut flows:</b> <ul> <li><a href="?table=cutflow_SRA">Cutflow of 3 signal points in the SRA region.</a> <li><a href="?table=cutflow_SRB">Cutflow of 3 signal points in the SRB region.</a> <li><a href="?table=cutflow_SRC">Cutflow of 3 signal points in the SRC region.</a> <li><a href="?table=cutflow_SRD750">Cutflow of 3 signal points in the SRD750 region.</a> <li><a href="?table=cutflow_SRD1000">Cutflow of 3 signal points in the SRD1000 region.</a> <li><a href="?table=cutflow_SRD1250">Cutflow of 3 signal points in the SRD1250 region.</a> <li><a href="?table=cutflow_SRD1500">Cutflow of 3 signal points in the SRD1500 region.</a> <li><a href="?table=cutflow_SRD1750">Cutflow of 3 signal points in the SRD1750 region.</a> <li><a href="?table=cutflow_SRD2000">Cutflow of 3 signal points in the SRD2000 region.</a> </ul> <b>Acceptance and efficiencies:</b> <ul> <li> <b>SRA_bin1:</b> <a href="?table=Acc_SRA_bin1">Acceptance table of the SRA$^{[450,575]}$ in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$.</a> <a href="?table=Eff_SRA_bin1">Efficiency table of the SRA$^{[450,575]}$ in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$.</a> <li> <b>SRA_bin2:</b> <a href="?table=Acc_SRA_bin2">Acceptance table of the SRA$^{\geq 575}$ in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$.</a> <a href="?table=Eff_SRA_bin2">Efficiency table of the SRA$^{\geq 575}$ in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$.</a> <li> <b>SRB_bin1:</b> <a href="?table=Acc_SRB_bin1">Acceptance table of the SRB$^{[100,150]}$ in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$.</a> <a href="?table=Eff_SRB_bin1">Efficiency table of the SRB$^{[100,150]}$ in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$.</a> <li> <b>SRB_bin2:</b> <a href="?table=Acc_SRB_bin2">Acceptance table of the SRB$^{[150,400]}$ in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$.</a> <a href="?table=Eff_SRB_bin2">Efficiency table of the SRB$^{[150,400]}$ in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$.</a> <li> <b>SRB_bin3:</b> <a href="?table=Acc_SRB_bin3">Acceptance table of the SRB$^{\geq 400}$ in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$.</a> <a href="?table=Eff_SRB_bin3">Efficiency table of the SRB$^{\geq 400}$ in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$.</a> <li> <b>SRC_bin1:</b> <a href="?table=Acc_SRC_bin1">Acceptance table of the SRC$^{[100,150]}$ in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$.</a> <a href="?table=Eff_SRC_bin1">Efficiency table of the SRC$^{[100,150]}$ in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$.</a> <li> <b>SRC_bin2:</b> <a href="?table=Acc_SRC_bin2">Acceptance table of the SRC$^{[150,300]}$ in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$.</a> <a href="?table=Eff_SRC_bin2">Efficiency table of the SRC$^{[150,300]}$ in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$.</a> <li> <b>SRC_bin3:</b> <a href="?table=Acc_SRC_bin3">Acceptance table of the SRC$^{[300,500]}$ in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$.</a> <a href="?table=Eff_SRC_bin3">Efficiency table of the SRC$^{[300,500]}$ in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$.</a> <li> <b>SRC_bin4:</b> <a href="?table=Acc_SRC_bin4">Acceptance table of the SRC$^{\geq 500}$ in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$.</a> <a href="?table=Eff_SRC_bin4">Efficiency table of the SRC$^{\geq 500}$ in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$.</a> <li> <b>SRD_bin1:</b> <a href="?table=Acc_SRD_bin1">Acceptance table of the SRD750 in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$.</a> <a href="?table=Eff_SRD_bin1">Efficiency table of the SRD750 in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$.</a> <li> <b>SRD_bin2:</b> <a href="?table=Acc_SRD_bin2">Acceptance table of the SRD1000 in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$.</a> <a href="?table=Eff_SRD_bin2">Efficiency table of the SRD1000 in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$.</a> <li> <b>SRD_bin3:</b> <a href="?table=Acc_SRD_bin3">Acceptance table of the SRD1250 in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$.</a> <a href="?table=Eff_SRD_bin3">Efficiency table of the SRD1250 in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$.</a> <li> <b>SRD_bin4:</b> <a href="?table=Acc_SRD_bin4">Acceptance table of the SRD1500 in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$.</a> <a href="?table=Eff_SRD_bin4">Efficiency table of the SRD1500 in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$.</a> <li> <b>SRD_bin5:</b> <a href="?table=Acc_SRD_bin5">Acceptance table of the SRD1750 in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$.</a> <a href="?table=Eff_SRD_bin5">Efficiency table of the SRD1750 in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$.</a> <li> <b>SRD_bin6:</b> <a href="?table=Acc_SRD_bin6">Acceptance table of the SRD2000 in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$.</a> <a href="?table=Eff_SRD_bin6">Efficiency table of the SRD2000 in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$.</a> </ul> <b>Truth Code snippets</b> are available under "Resources" (purple button on the left)

Observed exclusion limits at the 95% CL in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$.

Observed exclusion limits at the 95% CL in the $\tilde{t}_1 - \tilde\chi^0_1$ mass plane, assuming BR$(\tilde{t}_1 \rightarrow t + \tilde\chi^0_1) = 0.5$ and a $+1 \sigma$ deviation of the NNLO+NNLL theoretical cross-section of a $\tilde{t}_1$ pair-production.

More…