Using about 3.9 million hadronic Z decays from e+e- collisions recorded by the OPAL detector at LEP at centre-of-mass energies near MZ the branching ratio for the decay D_s -> tau nu_tau has been measured to be (7.0 +/- 2.1(stat) +/- 2.0 (syst))%. This result can be used to derive the decay constant of the D_s meson: f(D_s) = 286 +/- 44(stat) +/- 41(syst) MeV.
FORMFACTOR(NAME=FP,C=DECAY CONSTANT) is pseudoscalar meson decay constant.
We report the first measurement of a structure dependent component in the decay K^+ -> mu^+ nu gamma. Using the kinematic region where the muon kinetic energy is greater than 137 MeV and the photon energy is greater than 90 MeV, we find that the absolute value of the sum of the vector and axial-vector form factors is |F_V+F_A| =0.165 \pm 0.007 \pm 0.011. This corresponds to a branching ratio of BR(SD^+) = (1.33 \pm 0.12 \pm 0.18) \times 10^{-5}. We also set the limit -0.04 < F_V-F_A < 0.24 at 90% c.l.
Q2 independence of the formfactors is assumed.
None
The Dalitz plot parameters G, H, and K are used in the standard parameterization of the matrix element squared (see PDG): M**2 = 1 + G*X + H*X**2 + K*Y**2,where X = (s3-s0)/m(PI)**2 and Y = (s1-s2)/m(PI)**2, s1 = (pK - pPI0)**2, s2 = (pK - pPI0)**2, s3 = (pK - pPI+)**2, s0 = (s1+s2+s3)/3.
We studied the electroproduction of the Delta(1232) resonance via the reaction p(e,e'p)\pi0 at four-momentum transfers Qsq = 2.8 and 4.0 GeV^2. This is the highest Qsq for which exclusive resonance electroproduction has ever been observed. Decay angular distributions for Delta to p-pi0$ were measured over a wide range of barycentric energies covering the resonance. The $N-\Delta$ transition form factor G*_M and ratios of resonant multipoles E{1+}/M{1+} and S{1+}/M{1+} were extracted from the decay angular distributions. These ratios remain small, indicating that perturbative QCD is not applicable for this reaction at these momentum transfers.
CONST(NAME=E1+/M1+) and CONST(NAME=S1+/M1+) are the ratios of the electric quadrupole moment to magnetic dipole moment and Coulomb quadrupole moment to magnetic dipole moment, respectively (see paper). Resonance only.
CONST(NAME=E1+/M1+) and CONST(NAME=S1+/M1+) are the ratios of the electric quadrupole moment to magnetic dipole moment and Coulomb quadrupole moment to magnetic dipole moment, respectively (see paper). Resonance only.
CONST(NAME=E1+/M1+) and CONST(NAME=S1+/M1+) are the ratios of the electric quadrupole moment to magnetic dipole moment and Coulomb quadrupole moment to ma gnetic dipole moment, respectively (see paper). Resonance + background.
We present the first measurement of the form factor ratios g1/f1 (direct axial-vector to vector), g2/f1 (second class current) and f2/f1 (weak magnetism) for the decay Xi0 -> Sigma+ e- anti-nu/e using the KTeV (E799) beam line and detector at Fermilab. From the Sigma+ polarization measured with the decay Sigma+ -> p pi0 and the e- - anti-nu/e correlation, we measure g1/f1 to be 1.32 +0.21-0.17(stat.) +/- 0.05(syst.), assuming the SU(3)f (flavor) values for g2/f1 and f2/f1. Our results are all consistent with exact SU(3)f symmetry.
Vector(F1) to axial(G1) formfactor ratio. Total systematic error is 0.054.
The Sigma^- mean squared charge radius has been measured in the space-like Q^2 range 0.035-0.105 GeV^2/c^2 by elastic scattering of a Sigma^- beam off atomic electrons. The measurement was performed with the SELEX (E781) spectrometer using the Fermilab hyperon beam at a mean energy of 610 GeV/c. We obtain <r^2> = (0.61 +/- 0.12 (stat.) +/- 0.09 (syst.)) fm^2. The proton and pi^- charge radii were measured as well and are consistent with results of other experiments. Our result agrees with the recently measured strong interaction radius of the Sigma^-.
Total systematic errors are given.
Quasielastic e-d scattering measurements were performed up to q 2 = 100 fm −2 . Only the electron was detected. The ratio R= ( d 2 ω d Ω d E′) ed d ω d Ω) ep was measured at the quasielastic peak; the magnetic form factor G M N of the neutron was deduced using the assumption G E N = 0.
No description provided.
CONST(NAME=MU) is the magnetic moment. The magnetic formfarctor (GM) is evaluated ander assumption of GE=0.
The cross section for inelastic electron-proton scattering was measured at incident electron energies of 1.5 to 6 GeV by magnetic analysis of the scattered electrons at angles between 10° and 35°. For invariant masses of the hardonic final state W ⩽ 1.4 GeV. the measured spectra are compared with theoretical predictions for electroproduction of the Δ(1236) isobar. The magnetic dipole transition form factor G ∗ M ( q 2 ) of the (γ N Δ)-vertex is derived for momentum transfers q 2 = 0.2 − 2.34 (GeV/ c ) 2 ard found to decrease more rapidly with q 2 than the proton form factors.
Axis error includes +- 0.0/0.0 contribution.
The reaction e+d→e′+n+p was studied at electron scattering angles θ ⩽ 35° for four-momentum transfers of 0.39, 0.565 and 0.78 (GeV/ c ) 2 . By recording electron-neutron and electron-proton coincidences, the ratio of the electron scattering cross sections on quasi-free neutrons and protons was determined. An estimate of the binding effects, based on a Chew-Low-extrapolation, was made. Values for the neutron form factors were derived.
Axis error includes +- 0.0/0.0 contribution (Due to the different effective solid angles for neutron and proton detection in the counters).
No description provided.
Using 4.8 fb$~{-1}$ of data taken with the CLEO II detector, the branching fraction for the Cabibbo-suppressed decay $D~+\to\pi~0\ell~+\nu$ measured relative to the Cabibbo favored decay $D~+\to\bar{K~0}\ell~+\nu$ is found to be $0.046\pm 0.014\pm 0.017$. Using $V_{cs}$ and $V_{cd}$ from unitarity constraints, we determine $| f_+~{\pi}(0)/f_+~K(0)|~2=0.9\pm 0.3\pm 0.3$ We also present a 90% confidence level upper limit for the branching ratio of the decay $D~+ \to \eta e~+\nu_e$ relative to that for $D~+ \to \pi~0 e~+\nu_e$ of 1.5.
Formfactors for the D+ (D-) decay into pseudoscalar P. Charge conjugate states are implied. LEPTON+ means E+ or MU+. VCD and VCS are the elements of the CKM matrix (See R.M.Barnett et al (PDG), PR D54, 1 (1996)).
Forum