Neutron proton elastic scattering from 1-GeV to 6-GeV.

Kreisler, M. ; Martin, F. ; Perl, Martin L. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.Lett. 16 (1966) 1217-1220, 1966.
Inspire Record 49861 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.3557

None

5 data tables

'1'. '2'. '3'.

No description provided.

No description provided.

More…

Neutron-proton elastic scattering from 3 to 10 gev

Besliu, C. ; Besliu, T. ; Constantinescu, A. ; et al.
Nuovo Cim.A 59S10 (1969) 1-8, 1969.
Inspire Record 58947 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.37480

None

1 data table

'1'. '2'. '3'.


Elastic n-p charge-exchange scattering at 8 GeV/c

Manning, G. ; Parham, A.G. ; Jafar, J.D. ; et al.
Nuovo Cim.A 41 (1966) 167-188, 1966.
Inspire Record 1185251 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.1062

The differential cross-section for elastic charge-exchange scattering of neutrons on protons has been measured at 8 GeV/c over forward laboratory scattering angles (0÷90) mrad (square of four-momentum transfer 0<−t<0.5 (GeV/c)2). The method utilized acoustic spark chambers and about 1900 elastic-scattering events were analysed. A value of (dσ/dΩ)lab=(20±6) mb/sr (dσ/dt=(0.93±0.28) mb/(GeV/c)2) was obtained for the forward differential cross-section and an estimated (0.06±0.03) mb for the elastic charge exchange cross-section. Both cross-sections show the decreased values expected from Pomeranchuk’s second theorem (1) when compared with results at lower energies (2). Further comparison shows that the narrow forward peak in the distribution of dσ/dt previously observed for −t<0.05, is still present at 8 GeV/c, varying in shape only slowly, if at all, with energy. For −t>0.1 however, energy dependence is apparent. The results also suggest that the interaction is spin-dependent and/or that the real parts of the scattering amplitudes in the isospin states 0 and 1 are different. Comparisons with the theoretical predictions show good agreement with the value of forward cross-section given by the Regge pole approach ofAhmadzadeh (3). The model ofRingland andPhillips (4) for single-pion exchange with absorption agrees with our results for −t<0.01 but a predicted secondary peak at −t∼0.08 is not observed.

3 data tables

'2'. '3'.

'2'. '3'.

No description provided.