Blaes, R.
NUCLEUS NUCLEUS --> SHOWER X
SIG
Max results
Sort by Reverse order

Showing 3 of 3 results

A Measurement of Cross-sections for $^{16}$O Al and $^{16}$O Pb Interactions at 60-{GeV}/$c$ and 200-{GeV}/$c$ Per Nucleon

The NA36 collaboration Barnes, P.D. ; Blaes, R. ; Braun, H. ; et al.
Phys.Lett.B 206 (1988) 146-150, 1988.
Inspire Record 252004 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.6494

Cross sections are measured for 16 O collisions with A1 and Pb. Dependences on beam momentum and atomic number are compared with data obtained at much lower beam momenta.

4 data tables
Table 1

MODEL DEPENDENT ESTIMATION.

Table 2

No description provided.

Table 3

No description provided.

More…

Rescattering probed by the emission of slow target associated particles in high-energy heavy ion interactions

The EMU01 collaboration Adamovich, M.I ; Aggarwal, M.M ; Alexandrov, Y.A ; et al.
Phys.Lett.B 363 (1995) 230-236, 1995.
Inspire Record 406952 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.28438

In this letter the distribution of slow target associated particles emitted in Au + Emulsion interactions at 11.6 A GeV/ c is studied. The three models RQMD, FRITIOF and VENUS are used for comparisons and especially their treatment of rescattering is investigated.

6 data tables
Table 1

No description provided.

Table 2

PROJECTILE ASSOCIATED HE-FRAGMENTS.

Table 3

No description provided.

More…

Limiting Fragmentation in Oxygen Induced Emulsion Interactions at 14.6-a/{GeV}, 60-a/{GeV} and 200-a/{GeV}

The EMU01 collaboration Adamovich, M.I. ; Aggarwal, M.M. ; Arora, R. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.Lett. 62 (1989) 2801, 1989.
Inspire Record 268021 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.20041

Pseudorapidity distributions of relativistic singly charged particles in oxygen-induced emulsion interactions at 14.6, 60, and 200 GeV/nucleon are studied. Limiting fragmentation behavior is observed in both the target and projectile fragmentation regions for a central as well as for a minimum-bias sample. Comparisons with the fritiof model reveal that the picture of fragmenting strings successfully describes the observed data.

2 data tables
Table 1

NUCLEUS IS AVERAGE NUCLEUS OF EMULSION.

Table 2

NUCLEUS IS AVERAGE NUCLEUS OF EMULSION.