NUMUBAR NUCLEON --> MU+ X
Neutral Current
[12.363]
Max results
Sort by Reverse order

Showing 2 of 2 results

Measurement of the Ratios of Neutral Current to Charged Current Cross-sections of Neutrino and Anti-neutrinos Interactions in Ne

The Aachen-Bonn-CERN-Democritos-London-Oxford-Saclay collaboration Bosetti, P.C. ; Fritze, P. ; Grassler, H. ; et al.
Nucl.Phys.B 217 (1983) 1-10, 1983.
Inspire Record 12766 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.33963

The ratios of neutral current to charged current cross sections of neutrino and antineutrino interactions in heavy Ne/H 2 mixture have been measured in BEBC. The beam was the CERN SPS 200 GeV/ c narrow band beam. The ratios were obtained using a cut in the transverse momentum of the hadronic system. In the standard Glashow-Salam-Weinberg model, our results correspond to the value of sin 2 θ w = 0.182 ± 0.020 ± 0.012. By combining this experiment with data from a hydrogen target the coupling constants u L 2 and L 2 are found to be 0.15 ± 0.04 and 0.19 ± 0.05, respectively.

2 data tables
Table 1

No description provided.

Table 2

No description provided.


A Precise Determination of the Electroweak Mixing Angle from Semileptonic Neutrino Scattering

The CHARM collaboration Allaby, J.V. ; Amaldi, U. ; Barbiellini, G. ; et al.
Z.Phys.C 36 (1987) 611, 1987.
Inspire Record 249672 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.15697

The cross-section ratio of neutral-current and charged-current semileptonic interactions of muon-neutrinos on isoscalar nuclei has been measured with the result:Rv=0.3093±0.0031 for hadronic energy larger than 4 GeV. From this ratio we determined the electroweak mixing angle sin2θW, wheremc is the charm-quark mass in GeV/c2. Comparison with direct measurements ofmw andmz determines the radiative shift of the intermediate boson mass Δr=0.077±0.025(exp.)±0.038(syst.), in agreement with the prediction. Assuming the validity of the electroweak standard theory we determined ϱ=0.990−0.013(mc−1.5)±0.009(exp.)±0.003(theor.).

3 data tables
Table 1

No description provided.

Table 2

No description provided.

Table 3

STATISTICAL ERROR IN THE VALUE CITED IS REDUCING, WHEN CUT IS MORE STRINGENT?.