Yield ratios of chi_c2 over chi_c1 mesons as a function of costh (HX) in the J/psi pT range 12-18 GeV

Yield ratios of chi_c2 over chi_c1 mesons as a function of costh (HX) in the J/psi pT range 18-30 GeV

Yield ratios of chi_c2 over chi_c1 mesons as a function of costh (HX) in the J/psi pT range 8-12 GeV

The dimuon $M_{OSSF}^{20}$ distribution in the 4L($\mu\mu$) 0B, $S_{T}$>400 GeV signal region. The last bin does not contain the overflow events. The signal is shown with $g_{t}^2\mathcal{B}(\phi - {\mu\mu})$=0.05.

The dimuon $M_{OSSF}^{300}$ distribution in the 4L($\mu\mu$) 0B, $S_{T}$>400 GeV signal region. The last bin does not contain the overflow events. The signal is shown with $g_{t}^2\mathcal{B}(\phi - {\mu\mu})$=0.05.

The dimuon $M_{OSSF}^{20}$ distribution in the 4L($\mu\mu$) 1B signal region. The last bin does not contain the overflow events. The signal is shown with $g_{t}^2\mathcal{B}(\phi - {\mu\mu})$=0.05.

The dimuon $M_{OSSF}^{300}$ distribution in the 4L($\mu\mu$) 1B signal region. The last bin does not contain the overflow events. The signal is shown with $g_{t}^2\mathcal{B}(\phi - {\mu\mu})$=0.05.

The 95% confidence level exclusion limits on the product of the total production cross section of tt$\phi$(S) and $\mathcal{B}(\phi - {ee})$.

The 95% confidence level exclusion limits on the product of the total production cross section of tt$\phi$(PS) and $\mathcal{B}(\phi - {ee})$.

The 95% confidence level exclusion limits on the product of the total production cross section of tt$\phi$(S) and $\mathcal{B}(\phi - {\mu\mu})$.

The 95% confidence level exclusion limits on the product of the total production cross section of tt$\phi$(PS) and $\mathcal{B}(\phi - {\mu\mu})$.

The 95% confidence level exclusion limits on $g_{t}^2\mathcal{B}(\phi - {ee})$ for tt$\phi$(S).

The 95% confidence level exclusion limits on $g_{t}^2\mathcal{B}(\phi - {ee})$ for tt$\phi$(PS).

The 95% confidence level exclusion limits on $g_{t}^2\mathcal{B}(\phi - {\mu\mu})$ for tt$\phi$(S).

The 95% confidence level exclusion limits on $g_{t}^2\mathcal{B}(\phi - {\mu\mu})$ for tt$\phi$(PS).

The $M_{T}$ distribution in the WZ-enriched region. The last bin contains the overflow events.

The $L_{T}$ distribution in the ttZ-enriched region. The last bin contains the overflow events.

The $S_{T}$ distribution in the ZZ-enriched region. The last bin contains the overflow events.

The $L_{T}$ distribution in the MisID-enriched region. The last bin contains the overflow events.

The $L_{T}+p^{miss}_{T}$ distribution in the 3L below-Z signal region. The last bin contains the overflow events.

The $M_{T}$ distribution in the 3L on-Z signal region. The last bin contains the overflow events.

The $L_{T}+p^{miss}_{T}$ distribution in the 3L above-Z signal region. The last bin contains the overflow events.

The $L_{T}+p^{miss}_{T}$ distribution in the 3L OSSF0 signal region. The last bin contains the overflow events.

The $L_{T}+p^{miss}_{T}$ distribution in the 4L OSSF0 signal region. The last bin contains the overflow events.

The $L_{T}+p^{miss}_{T}$ distribution in the 4L OSSF1 signal region. The last bin contains the overflow events.

The $L_{T}+p^{miss}_{T}$ distribution in the 4L OSSF2 signal region. The last bin contains the overflow events.

The dielectron $M_{OSSF}^{20}$ distribution in the 3L(ee) 0B, $S_{T}$<400 GeV signal region. The last bin does not contain the overflow events. The signal is shown with $g_{t}^2\mathcal{B}(\phi - {ee})$=0.05.

The dielectron $M_{OSSF}^{300}$ distribution in the 3L(ee) 0B, $S_{T}$<400 GeV signal region. The last bin does not contain the overflow events. The signal is shown with $g_{t}^2\mathcal{B}(\phi - {ee})$=0.05.

The dielectron $M_{OSSF}^{20}$ distribution in the 3L(ee) 0B, 400<$S_{T}$<800 GeV signal region. The last bin does not contain the overflow events. The signal is shown with $g_{t}^2\mathcal{B}(\phi - {ee})$=0.05.

The dielectron $M_{OSSF}^{300}$ distribution in the 3L(ee) 0B, 400<$S_{T}$<800 GeV signal region. The last bin does not contain the overflow events. The signal is shown with $g_{t}^2\mathcal{B}(\phi - {ee})$=0.05.

The dielectron $M_{OSSF}^{20}$ distribution in the 3L(ee) 0B, $S_{T}$>800 GeV signal region. The last bin does not contain the overflow events. The signal is shown with $g_{t}^2\mathcal{B}(\phi - {ee})$=0.05.

The dielectron $M_{OSSF}^{300}$ distribution in the 3L(ee) 0B, $S_{T}$>800 GeV signal region. The last bin does not contain the overflow events. The signal is shown with $g_{t}^2\mathcal{B}(\phi - {ee})$=0.05.

The dielectron $M_{OSSF}^{20}$ distribution in the 3L(ee) 1B, $S_{T}$<400 GeV signal region. The last bin does not contain the overflow events. The signal is shown with $g_{t}^2\mathcal{B}(\phi - {ee})$=0.05.

The dielectron $M_{OSSF}^{300}$ distribution in the 3L(ee) 1B, $S_{T}$<400 GeV signal region. The last bin does not contain the overflow events. The signal is shown with $g_{t}^2\mathcal{B}(\phi - {ee})$=0.05.

The dielectron $M_{OSSF}^{20}$ distribution in the 3L(ee) 1B, 400<$S_{T}$<800 GeV signal region. The last bin does not contain the overflow events. The signal is shown with $g_{t}^2\mathcal{B}(\phi - {ee})$=0.05.

The dielectron $M_{OSSF}^{300}$ distribution in the 3L(ee) 1B, 400<$S_{T}$<800 GeV signal region. The last bin does not contain the overflow events. The signal is shown with $g_{t}^2\mathcal{B}(\phi - {ee})$=0.05.

The dielectron $M_{OSSF}^{20}$ distribution in the 3L(ee) 1B, $S_{T}$>800 GeV signal region. The last bin does not contain the overflow events. The signal is shown with $g_{t}^2\mathcal{B}(\phi - {ee})$=0.05.

The dielectron $M_{OSSF}^{300}$ distribution in the 3L(ee) 1B, $S_{T}$>800 GeV signal region. The last bin does not contain the overflow events. The signal is shown with $g_{t}^2\mathcal{B}(\phi - {ee})$=0.05.

The dielectron $M_{OSSF}^{20}$ distribution in the 4L(ee) 0B, $S_{T}$<400 GeV signal region. The last bin does not contain the overflow events. The signal is shown with $g_{t}^2\mathcal{B}(\phi - {ee})$=0.05.

The dielectron $M_{OSSF}^{300}$ distribution in the 4L(ee) 0B, $S_{T}$<400 GeV signal region. The last bin does not contain the overflow events. The signal is shown with $g_{t}^2\mathcal{B}(\phi - {ee})$=0.05.

The dielectron $M_{OSSF}^{20}$ distribution in the 4L(ee) 0B, $S_{T}$>400 GeV signal region. The last bin does not contain the overflow events. The signal is shown with $g_{t}^2\mathcal{B}(\phi - {ee})$=0.05.

The dielectron $M_{OSSF}^{300}$ distribution in the 4L(ee) 0B, $S_{T}$>400 GeV signal region. The last bin does not contain the overflow events. The signal is shown with $g_{t}^2\mathcal{B}(\phi - {ee})$=0.05.

The dielectron $M_{OSSF}^{20}$ distribution in the 4L(ee) 1B signal region. The last bin does not contain the overflow events. The signal is shown with $g_{t}^2\mathcal{B}(\phi - {ee})$=0.05.

The dielectron $M_{OSSF}^{300}$ distribution in the 4L(ee) 1B signal region. The last bin does not contain the overflow events. The signal is shown with $g_{t}^2\mathcal{B}(\phi - {ee})$=0.05.

The dimuon $M_{OSSF}^{20}$ distribution in the 3L($\mu\mu$) 0B, $S_{T}$<400 GeV signal region. The last bin does not contain the overflow events. The signal is shown with $g_{t}^2\mathcal{B}(\phi - {\mu\mu})$=0.05.

The dimuon $M_{OSSF}^{300}$ distribution in the 3L($\mu\mu$) 0B, $S_{T}$<400 GeV signal region. The last bin does not contain the overflow events. The signal is shown with $g_{t}^2\mathcal{B}(\phi - {\mu\mu})$=0.05.

The dimuon $M_{OSSF}^{20}$ distribution in the 3L($\mu\mu$) 0B, 400<$S_{T}$<800 GeV signal region. The last bin does not contain the overflow events. The signal is shown with $g_{t}^2\mathcal{B}(\phi - {\mu\mu})$=0.05.

The dimuon $M_{OSSF}^{300}$ distribution in the 3L($\mu\mu$) 0B, 400<$S_{T}$<800 GeV signal region. The last bin does not contain the overflow events. The signal is shown with $g_{t}^2\mathcal{B}(\phi - {\mu\mu})$=0.05.

The dimuon $M_{OSSF}^{20}$ distribution in the 3L($\mu\mu$) 0B, $S_{T}$>800 GeV signal region. The last bin does not contain the overflow events. The signal is shown with $g_{t}^2\mathcal{B}(\phi - {\mu\mu})$=0.05.

The dimuon $M_{OSSF}^{300}$ distribution in the 3L($\mu\mu$) 0B, $S_{T}$>800 GeV signal region. The last bin does not contain the overflow events. The signal is shown with $g_{t}^2\mathcal{B}(\phi - {\mu\mu})$=0.05.

The dimuon $M_{OSSF}^{20}$ distribution in the 3L($\mu\mu$) 1B, $S_{T}$<400 GeV signal region. The last bin does not contain the overflow events. The signal is shown with $g_{t}^2\mathcal{B}(\phi - {\mu\mu})$=0.05.

The dimuon $M_{OSSF}^{300}$ distribution in the 3L($\mu\mu$) 1B, $S_{T}$<400 GeV signal region. The last bin does not contain the overflow events. The signal is shown with $g_{t}^2\mathcal{B}(\phi - {\mu\mu})$=0.05.

The dimuon $M_{OSSF}^{20}$ distribution in the 3L($\mu\mu$) 1B, 400<$S_{T}$<800 GeV signal region. The last bin does not contain the overflow events. The signal is shown with $g_{t}^2\mathcal{B}(\phi - {\mu\mu})$=0.05.

The dimuon $M_{OSSF}^{300}$ distribution in the 3L($\mu\mu$) 1B, 400<$S_{T}$<800 GeV signal region. The last bin does not contain the overflow events. The signal is shown with $g_{t}^2\mathcal{B}(\phi - {\mu\mu})$=0.05.

The dimuon $M_{OSSF}^{20}$ distribution in the 3L($\mu\mu$) 1B, $S_{T}$>800 GeV signal region. The last bin does not contain the overflow events. The signal is shown with $g_{t}^2\mathcal{B}(\phi - {\mu\mu})$=0.05.

The dimuon $M_{OSSF}^{300}$ distribution in the 3L($\mu\mu$) 1B, $S_{T}$>800 GeV signal region. The last bin does not contain the overflow events. The signal is shown with $g_{t}^2\mathcal{B}(\phi - {\mu\mu})$=0.05.

Product of the fiducial acceptance and the event selection efficiency for the type-III Seesaw signal model at various signal mass hypotheses calculated after all analysis selection requirements.

Product of the fiducial acceptance and the event selection efficiency for the tt$\phi$ signal models at various signal mass hypotheses calculated after all analysis selection requirements.

The observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the universal quark coupling $g_{q}$ as a function of resonance mass for a vector mediator of interactions between quarks and dark matter.

The observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the universal quark coupling $g_{q}^{'}$ as a function of resonance mass for a vector mediator of interactions between quarks.

The 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for Randall–Sundrum gravitons. Limits are compared to the predicted cross section.

The 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for dijet resonances decaying to gluon-gluon. Limits are compared to predicted cross section for color-octet scalars.

The 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for dijet resonances decaying to quark-gluon. Limits are compared to predicted cross sections for string resonances and excited quarks.

The 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance for dijet resonances decaying to quark-quark. Limits are compared to predicted cross sections for axigluons, colorons, scalar diquarks, new gauge bosons W' and Z' with SM-like couplings and dark matter mediators.

Observed differential dijet spectrum. The cross-section is calculated by dividing the event yield by the bin width and luminosity.

P-value for H(A) -> ZA(H) -> bbbar production as a function of mA and mH. The limits are computed using the asymptotic CLs method, combining the ee and μμ channels.

The dijet mass distribution in data and simulated background events after requiring all the analysis selections, for μμ + ee events. The various signal hypotheses displayed have been scaled to a cross section of 1 pb for display purposes.

The llbb mass distribution in data and simulated background events after requiring all the analysis selections, for μμ + ee events. The various signal hypotheses displayed have been scaled to a cross section of 1 pb for display purposes.

The rho distributions for the same-flavour category events corresponding to a signal hypothesis with mH = 261 GeV and mA = 150 GeV. The signal is normalised to its theoretical cross section.

The rho distributions for the mixed-flavour category events corresponding to a signal hypothesis with mH = 261 GeV and mA = 150 GeV.

The rho distributions for the same-flavour category events corresponding to a signal hypothesis with mH = 442 GeV and mA = 193 GeV. The signal is normalised to its theoretical cross section.

The rho distributions for the mixed-flavour category events corresponding to a signal hypothesis with mH = 442 GeV and mA = 193 GeV.

Fraction of data and simulated signal events passing different stages of the analysis selection. The selection corresponding to each line includes the selection of the upper lines. Data are required to pass the trigger selection. The uncertainties quoted are statistical only.

Upper limits at 95% CL on the product of the cross section, branching fraction, and acceptance as a function of resonance mass for a narrow vector resonance decaying into a pair of quark jets. The acceptance is calculated for the analysis selection, namely three wide jets with $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ > 72 GeV and |$\eta$| < 2.5, and |$\eta_{1}$ − $\eta_{2}$| < 1.1. The observed limits (solid curve), expected limits (dashed curve) and their variation at the 1 and 2 standard deviation levels (shaded bands) are shown. The dashed-dotted curve shows the expected cross section times acceptance for a DM mediator.

Figure 3: Upper limits at 95% CL on the universal quark coupling $g'_{\mathrm{q}}$ , as a function of resonance mass, for a narrow vector resonance that only couples to quarks. The observed limits (solid curve), expected limits (dashed curve) and their variation at the 1 and 2 standard deviation levels (shaded bands) are shown. The dashed-dotted curve shows the coupling strength for which the cross section for dijet production in this model is the same as for a DM mediator.

$p_{\rm T}$-differential invariant cross section of electrons from heavy-flavour hadron decays in p--Pb collisions in 40--60\% centrality

$p_{\rm T}$-differential invariant cross section of electrons from heavy-flavour hadron decays in p--Pb collisions in 60--100\% centrality

HFe $R_{\rm pPb}$ in p--Pb

HFe $Q_{\rm pPb}$ in p--Pb, 0--20\% centrality

HFe $Q_{\rm pPb}$ in p--Pb, 20--40\% centrality

HFe $Q_{\rm pPb}$ in p--Pb, 40--60\% centrality

HFe $Q_{\rm pPb}$ in p--Pb, 60--100\% centrality

HFe $Q_{\rm cp}$ in p--Pb, 0--20\% centrality

HFe $Q_{\rm cp}$ in p--Pb, 20--40\% centrality

HFe $Q_{\rm cp}$ in p--Pb, 40--60\% centrality

HFe cross section in Pb-Pb, 60-80 centrality

HFe RAA in Pb-Pb, 0-10 centrality

HFe RAA in Pb-Pb, 30-50 centrality

HFe RAA in Pb-Pb, 60-80 centrality

The measured absolute cross sections in bins of |y(Z)|, using dressed level leptons. The cross sections are normalized by the bin width.

The measured absolute cross sections in bins of Z pt, using dressed level leptons. The cross sections are normalized by the bin width.

The measured absolute cross sections in bins of |y(Z)|, using born level leptons. The cross sections are normalized by the bin width.

The measured absolute cross sections in bins of $\phi^{\scriptscriptstyle *}_\eta$, using dressed level leptons. The cross sections are normalized by the bin width.

The measured absolute cross sections in bins of Z pt, using born level leptons. The cross sections are normalized by the bin width. The first bin (0-1 GeV) is not shown as large differences were observed in aMC@NLO and POWHEG predictions at Born level.

The measured absolute cross sections in bins of Z pt different |y(Z)| bins, using dressed level leptons. The cross sections are normalized by the bin width.

The measured absolute cross sections in bins of $\phi^{\scriptscriptstyle *}_\eta$, using born level leptons. The cross sections are normalized by the bin width.

The measured absolute cross sections in bins of Z pt different |y(Z)| bins, using born level leptons. The cross sections are normalized by the bin width. The first bin (0-1 GeV) is not shown as large differences were observed in aMC@NLO and POWHEG predictions at Born level.

The measured normalized cross sections (left) in bins of Z pt in |y(Z)| bins, using dressed level leptons.

The measured normalized cross sections (left) in bins of Z pt in |y(Z)| bins, using born level leptons. The first bin (0-1 GeV) is not shown as large differences were observed in aMC@NLO and POWHEG predictions at Born level.

The measured normalized cross sections in bins of Z pt, using born level leptons. The first bin (0-1 GeV) is not shown as large differences were observed in aMC@NLO and POWHEG predictions at Born level.

The measured normalized cross sections in bins of $\phi^{\scriptscriptstyle *}_\eta$, using born level leptons.

The measured normalized cross sections in bins of |y(Z)|, using born level leptons.

Covariance matrix using dressed level leptons for all bins used in bins of Z pt in the dimuon final state.

Covariance matrix using dressed level leptons for all bins used in bins of Z pt in the dielectron final state.

Covariance matrix using dressed level leptons for all bins used in bins of |y(Z)| in the dimuon final state.

Covariance matrix using dressed level leptons for all bins used in bins of |y(Z)| in the dielectron final state.

Covariance matrix using dressed level leptons for all bins used in bins of $\phi^{\scriptscriptstyle *}_\eta$ in the dimuon final state.

Covariance matrix using dressed level leptons for all bins used in bins of $\phi^{\scriptscriptstyle *}_\eta$ in the dielectron final state.

Covariance matrix using dressed level leptons for all bins used in bins of Z pt for the 0 < |y(Z)| < 0.4 bin in the dimuon final state.

Covariance matrix using dressed level leptons for all bins used in bins of Z pt for the 0.4 < |y(Z)| < 0.8 bin in the dimuon final state.

Covariance matrix using dressed level leptons for all bins used in bins of Z pt for the 0.8 < |y(Z)| < 1.2 bin in the dimuon final state.

Covariance matrix using dressed level leptons for all bins used in bins of Z pt for the 1.2 < |y(Z)| < 1.6 bin in the dimuon final state.

Covariance matrix using dressed level leptons for all bins used in bins of Z pt for the 1.6 < |y(Z)| < 2.4 bin in the dimuon final state.

Covariance matrix using dressed level leptons for all bins used in bins of Z pt for the 0 < |y(Z)| < 0.4 bin in the dielectron final state.

Covariance matrix using dressed level leptons for all bins used in bins of Z pt for the 0.4 < |y(Z)| < 0.8 bin in the dielectron final state.

Covariance matrix using dressed level leptons for all bins used in bins of Z pt for the 0.8 < |y(Z)| < 1.2 bin in the dielectron final state.

Covariance matrix using dressed level leptons for all bins used in bins of Z pt for the 1.2 < |y(Z)| < 1.6 bin in the dielectron final state.

Covariance matrix using dressed level leptons for all bins used in bins of Z pt for the 1.6 < |y(Z)| < 2.4 bin in the dielectron final state.

Covariance matrix using born level leptons for all bins used in bins of Z pt in the dimuon final state.

Covariance matrix using born level leptons for all bins used in bins of Z pt in the dielectron final state.

Covariance matrix using born level leptons for all bins used in bins of |y(Z)| in the dimuon final state.

Covariance matrix using born level leptons for all bins used in bins of |y(Z)| in the dielectron final state.

Covariance matrix using born level leptons for all bins used in bins of $\phi^{\scriptscriptstyle *}_\eta$ in the dimuon final state.

Covariance matrix using born level leptons for all bins used in bins of $\phi^{\scriptscriptstyle *}_\eta$ in the dielectron final state.

Covariance matrix using born level leptons for all bins used in bins of Z pt for the 0 < |y(Z)| < 0.4 bin in the dimuon final state.

Covariance matrix using born level leptons for all bins used in bins of Z pt for the 0.4 < |y(Z)| < 0.8 bin in the dimuon final state.

Covariance matrix using born level leptons for all bins used in bins of Z pt for the 0.8 < |y(Z)| < 1.2 bin in the dimuon final state.

Covariance matrix using born level leptons for all bins used in bins of Z pt for the 1.2 < |y(Z)| < 1.6 bin in the dimuon final state.

Covariance matrix using born level leptons for all bins used in bins of Z pt for the 1.6 < |y(Z)| < 2.4 bin in the dimuon final state.

Covariance matrix using born level leptons for all bins used in bins of Z pt for the 0 < |y(Z)| < 0.4 bin in the dielectron final state.

Covariance matrix using born level leptons for all bins used in bins of Z pt for the 0.4 < |y(Z)| < 0.8 bin in the dielectron final state.

Covariance matrix using born level leptons for all bins used in bins of Z pt for the 0.8 < |y(Z)| < 1.2 bin in the dielectron final state.

Covariance matrix using born level leptons for all bins used in bins of Z pt for the 1.2 < |y(Z)| < 1.6 bin in the dielectron final state.

Covariance matrix using born level leptons for all bins used in bins of Z pt for the 1.6 < |y(Z)| < 2.4 bin in the dielectron final state.

The measured normalized cross sections in bins of Z pt, using dressed level leptons.

The measured normalized cross sections in bins of $\phi^{\scriptscriptstyle *}_\eta$, using dressed level leptons.

The measured normalized cross sections in bins of |y(Z)|, using dressed level leptons.

The relative statistical and systematic uncertainties in % from various sources for the absolute cross section measurements in bins of Z pt on dimuons.

The relative statistical and systematic uncertainties in % from various sources for the absolute cross section measurements in bins of Z pt on dielectrons.

The relative statistical and systematic uncertainties in % from various sources for the absolute cross section measurements in bins of |y(Z)| on dimuons.

The relative statistical and systematic uncertainties in % from various sources for the absolute cross section measurements in bins of |y(Z)| on dielectrons.

The relative statistical and systematic uncertainties in % from various sources for the absolute cross section measurements in bins of $\phi^{\scriptscriptstyle *}_\eta$ on dimuons.

The relative statistical and systematic uncertainties in % from various sources for the absolute cross section measurements in bins of $\phi^{\scriptscriptstyle *}_\eta$ on dielectrons.

The relative statistical and systematic uncertainties in % from various sources for the normalized cross section measurements in bins of Z pt on dimuons.

The relative statistical and systematic uncertainties in % from various sources for the normalized cross section measurements in bins of Z pt on dielectrons.

The relative statistical and systematic uncertainties in % from various sources for the normalized cross section measurements in bins of |y(Z)| on dimuons.

The relative statistical and systematic uncertainties in % from various sources for the normalized cross section measurements in bins of |y(Z)| on dielectrons.

The relative statistical and systematic uncertainties in % from various sources for the normalized cross section measurements in bins of $\phi^{\scriptscriptstyle *}_\eta$ on dimuons.

The relative statistical and systematic uncertainties in % from various sources for the normalized cross section measurements in bins of $\phi^{\scriptscriptstyle *}_\eta$ on dielectrons.

The relative statistical and systematic uncertainties in % from various sources for the absolute double-differential cross section measurements in bins of Z pt for the 0 < |y(Z)| < 0.4 bin in the dimuon final state.

The relative statistical and systematic uncertainties in % from various sources for the absolute double-differential cross section measurements in bins of Z pt for the 0.4 < |y(Z)| < 0.8 bin in the dimuon final state.

The relative statistical and systematic uncertainties in % from various sources for the absolute double-differential cross section measurements in bins of Z pt for the 0.8 < |y(Z)| < 1.2 bin in the dimuon final state.

The relative statistical and systematic uncertainties in % from various sources for the absolute double-differential cross section measurements in bins of Z pt for the 1.2 < |y(Z)| < 1.6 bin in the dimuon final state.

The relative statistical and systematic uncertainties in % from various sources for the absolute double-differential cross section measurements in bins of Z pt for the 1.6 < |y(Z)| < 2.4 bin in the dimuon final state.

The relative statistical and systematic uncertainties in % from various sources for the absolute double-differential cross section measurements in bins of Z pt for the 0 < |y(Z)| < 0.4 bin in the dielectron final state.

The relative statistical and systematic uncertainties in % from various sources for the absolute double-differential cross section measurements in bins of Z pt for the 0.4 < |y(Z)| < 0.8 bin in the dielectron final state.

The relative statistical and systematic uncertainties in % from various sources for the absolute double-differential cross section measurements in bins of Z pt for the 0.8 < |y(Z)| < 1.2 bin in the dielectron final state.

The relative statistical and systematic uncertainties in % from various sources for the absolute double-differential cross section measurements in bins of Z pt for the 1.2 < |y(Z)| < 1.6 bin in the dielectron final state.

The relative statistical and systematic uncertainties in % from various sources for the absolute double-differential cross section measurements in bins of Z pt for the 1.6 < |y(Z)| < 2.4 bin in the dielectron final state.

Rapidity dependence (in 0-90% centrality class) of the inclusive J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is the uncorrelated systematic, while the third one is a rapidity-correlated systematic uncertainty.

The minimum and maximum variations for the $R_{\rm AA}$ of prompt J/$\psi$ with respect to the $R_{\rm AA}$ values of inclusive J/$\psi$ reported in Table 4. The variations correspond to two extreme hypotheses on the unknown contribution of non-prompt J/$\psi$.

Rapidity dependence (in 0-90% centrality class) of the ratio of the inclusive J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$ at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$= 5.02 and 2.76 TeV. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is the uncorrelated systematic, while the third one is a rapidity-correlated systematic uncertainty.

Transverse momentum dependence (in 0-20% centrality class) of the inclusive J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is the uncorrelated systematic, while the third one is a $p_{\rm T}$-correlated systematic uncertainty.

The minimum and maximum variations for the $R_{\rm AA}$ of prompt J/$\psi$ with respect to the $R_{\rm AA}$ values of inclusive J/$\psi$ reported in Table 7. The variations correspond to two extreme hypotheses on the unknown contribution of non-prompt J/$\psi$.

Transverse momentum dependence (in 0-20% centrality class) of the ratio of the inclusive J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$ at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$= 5.02 and 2.76 TeV. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is the uncorrelated systematic, while the third one is a $p_{\rm T}$-correlated systematic uncertainty.

Transverse momentum dependence (in 20-40% centrality class) of the inclusive J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is the uncorrelated systematic, while the third one is a $p_{\rm T}$-correlated systematic uncertainty.

The minimum and maximum variations for the $R_{\rm AA}$ of prompt J/$\psi$ with respect to the $R_{\rm AA}$ values of inclusive J/$\psi$ reported in Table 10. The variations correspond to two extreme hypotheses on the unknown contribution of non-prompt J/$\psi$.

Transverse momentum dependence (in 20-40% centrality class) of the ratio of the inclusive J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$ at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$= 5.02 and 2.76 TeV. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is the uncorrelated systematic, while the third one is a $p_{\rm T}$-correlated systematic uncertainty.

Transverse momentum dependence (in 40-90% centrality class) of the inclusive J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is the uncorrelated systematic, while the third one is a $p_{\rm T}$-correlated systematic uncertainty.

The minimum and maximum variations for the $R_{\rm AA}$ of prompt J/$\psi$ with respect to the $R_{\rm AA}$ values of inclusive J/$\psi$ reported in Table 13. The variations correspond to two extreme hypotheses on the unknown contribution of non-prompt J/$\psi$.

Transverse momentum dependence (in 40-90% centrality class) of the ratio of the inclusive J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$ at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$= 5.02 and 2.76 TeV. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is the uncorrelated systematic, while the third one is a $p_{\rm T}$-correlated systematic uncertainty.

Rapidity dependence (in 0-20% centrality class) of the inclusive J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is the uncorrelated systematic, while the third one is a rapidity-correlated systematic uncertainty.

The minimum and maximum variations for the $R_{\rm AA}$ of prompt J/$\psi$ with respect to the $R_{\rm AA}$ values of inclusive J/$\psi$ reported in Table 16. The variations correspond to two extreme hypotheses on the unknown contribution of non-prompt J/$\psi$.

Rapidity dependence (in 20-40% centrality class) of the inclusive J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is the uncorrelated systematic, while the third one is a rapidity-correlated systematic uncertainty.

The minimum and maximum variations for the $R_{\rm AA}$ of prompt J/$\psi$ with respect to the $R_{\rm AA}$ values of inclusive J/$\psi$ reported in Table 18. The variations correspond to two extreme hypotheses on the unknown contribution of non-prompt J/$\psi$.

Rapidity dependence (in 40-90% centrality class) of the inclusive J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is the uncorrelated systematic, while the third one is a rapidity-correlated systematic uncertainty.

The minimum and maximum variations for the $R_{\rm AA}$ of prompt J/$\psi$ with respect to the $R_{\rm AA}$ values of inclusive J/$\psi$ reported in Table 20. The variations correspond to two extreme hypotheses on the unknown contribution of non-prompt J/$\psi$.

$\langle N_{part} \rangle$-dependence (for 0.3 < $p_{\rm T}$ < 2 $GeV/c$) of the inclusive J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is the uncorrelated systematic, while the third one is a centrality-correlated systematic uncertainty. The $\langle N_{part} \rangle$ values correspond descendingly to the centrality classes 0–10%, 10–20%, 20–30%, 30–40%, 40–50%, 50–60%, and 60–90%.

The minimum and maximum variations for the $R_{\rm AA}$ of prompt J/$\psi$ with respect to the $R_{\rm AA}$ values of inclusive J/$\psi$ reported in Table 22. The variations correspond to two extreme hypotheses on the unknown contribution of non-prompt J/$\psi$.

$\langle N_{part} \rangle$-dependence (for 0.3 < $p_{\rm T}$ < 2 $GeV/c$) of the ratio of the inclusive J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$ at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$= 5.02 and 2.76 TeV. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is the uncorrelated systematic, while the third one is a centrality-correlated systematic uncertainty. The $\langle N_{part} \rangle$ values correspond descendingly to the centrality classes 0–10%, 10–20%, 20–30%, 30–40%, 40–50%, 50–60%, and 60–90%.

$\langle N_{part} \rangle$-dependence (for 2 < $p_{\rm T}$ < 5 $GeV/c$) of the inclusive J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is the uncorrelated systematic, while the third one is a centrality-correlated systematic uncertainty. The $\langle N_{part} \rangle$ values correspond descendingly to the centrality classes 0–10%, 10–20%, 20–30%, 30–40%, 40–50%, 50–60%, and 60–90%.

The minimum and maximum variations for the $R_{\rm AA}$ of prompt J/$\psi$ with respect to the $R_{\rm AA}$ values of inclusive J/$\psi$ reported in Table 25. The variations correspond to two extreme hypotheses on the unknown contribution of non-prompt J/$\psi$.

$\langle N_{part} \rangle$-dependence (for 2 < $p_{\rm T}$ < 5 $GeV/c$) of the ratio of the inclusive J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$ at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$= 5.02 and 2.76 TeV. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is the uncorrelated systematic, while the third one is a centrality-correlated systematic uncertainty. The $\langle N_{part} \rangle$ values correspond descendingly to the centrality classes 0–10%, 10–20%, 20–30%, 30–40%, 40–50%, 50–60%, and 60–90%.

$\langle N_{part} \rangle$-dependence (for 5 < $p_{\rm T}$ < 8 $GeV/c$) of the inclusive J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is the uncorrelated systematic, while the third one is a centrality-correlated systematic uncertainty. The $\langle N_{part} \rangle$ values correspond descendingly to the centrality classes 0–10%, 10–20%, 20–30%, 30–40%, 40–50%, 50–60%, and 60–90%.

The minimum and maximum variations for the $R_{\rm AA}$ of prompt J/$\psi$ with respect to the $R_{\rm AA}$ values of inclusive J/$\psi$ reported in Table 28. The variations correspond to two extreme hypotheses on the unknown contribution of non-prompt J/$\psi$.

$\langle N_{part} \rangle$-dependence (for 5 < $p_{\rm T}$ < 8 $GeV/c$) of the ratio of the inclusive J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$ at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$= 5.02 and 2.76 TeV. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is the uncorrelated systematic, while the third one is a centrality-correlated systematic uncertainty. The $\langle N_{part} \rangle$ values correspond descendingly to the centrality classes 0–10%, 10–20%, 20–30%, 30–40%, 40–50%, 50–60%, and 60–90%.

$\langle N_{part} \rangle$-dependence (for 8 < $p_{\rm T}$ < 12 $GeV/c$) of the inclusive J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is the uncorrelated systematic, while the third one is a centrality-correlated systematic uncertainty. The $\langle N_{part} \rangle$ values correspond descendingly to the centrality classes 0–10%, 10–20%, 20–30%, 30–40%, 40–50%, 50–60%, and 60–90%.

The minimum and maximum variations for the $R_{\rm AA}$ of prompt J/$\psi$ with respect to the $R_{\rm AA}$ values of inclusive J/$\psi$ reported in Table 31. The variations correspond to two extreme hypotheses on the unknown contribution of non-prompt J/$\psi$.

$\langle N_{part} \rangle$-dependence (for 0.3 < $p_{\rm T}$ < 8 $GeV/c$) of the inclusive J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is the uncorrelated systematic, while the third one is a centrality-correlated systematic uncertainty. The $\langle N_{part} \rangle$ values correspond descendingly to the centrality classes 0–10%, 10–20%, 20–30%, 30–40%, 40–50%, 50–60%, 60–70%, 70–80% and 80–90%. The values, already published in https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2016.12.064 (Figure.4), were updated with the improved $\langle T_{AA} \rangle$ calculations reported in https://cds.cern.ch/record/2636623.

The minimum and maximum variations for the $R_{\rm AA}$ of prompt J/$\psi$ with respect to the $R_{\rm AA}$ values of inclusive J/$\psi$ reported in Table 33. The variations correspond to two extreme hypotheses on the unknown contribution of non-prompt J/$\psi$.

$\langle N_{part} \rangle$-dependence (for 2.5 < $y$ < 3) of the inclusive J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is the uncorrelated systematic, while the third one is a centrality-correlated systematic uncertainty. The $\langle N_{part} \rangle$ values correspond descendingly to the centrality classes 0–10%, 10–20%, 20–30%, 30–40%, 40–50%, 50–60%, and 60–90%.

The minimum and maximum variations for the $R_{\rm AA}$ of prompt J/$\psi$ with respect to the $R_{\rm AA}$ values of inclusive J/$\psi$ reported in Table 35. The variations correspond to two extreme hypotheses on the unknown contribution of non-prompt J/$\psi$.

$\langle N_{part} \rangle$-dependence (for 3 < $y$ < 3.5) of the inclusive J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is the uncorrelated systematic, while the third one is a centrality-correlated systematic uncertainty. The $\langle N_{part} \rangle$ values correspond descendingly to the centrality classes 0–10%, 10–20%, 20–30%, 30–40%, 40–50%, 50–60%, and 60–90%.

The minimum and maximum variations for the $R_{\rm AA}$ of prompt J/$\psi$ with respect to the $R_{\rm AA}$ values of inclusive J/$\psi$ reported in Table 37. The variations correspond to two extreme hypotheses on the unknown contribution of non-prompt J/$\psi$.

$\langle N_{part} \rangle$-dependence (for 3.5 < $y$ < 4) of the inclusive J/$\psi$ $R_{\rm AA}$. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is the uncorrelated systematic, while the third one is a centrality-correlated systematic uncertainty. The $\langle N_{part} \rangle$ values correspond descendingly to the centrality classes 0–10%, 10–20%, 20–30%, 30–40%, 40–50%, 50–60%, and 60–90%.

The minimum and maximum variations for the $R_{\rm AA}$ of prompt J/$\psi$ with respect to the $R_{\rm AA}$ values of inclusive J/$\psi$ reported in Table 39. The variations correspond to two extreme hypotheses on the unknown contribution of non-prompt J/$\psi$.

$p_{\rm T}$-differential yields of the inclusive J/$\psi$ in various centrality classes. The first uncertainty is statistical, while the second is the uncorrelated systematic.

$\langle N_{part} \rangle$-dependence of the inclusive J/$\psi$ average $p_{\rm T}$. The first uncertainty is statistical, while the second is the uncorrelated systematic. The $\langle N_{part} \rangle$ values correspond descendingly to the centrality classes 0–10%, 10–20%, 20–30%, 30–40%, 40–50%, 50–60%, and 60–90%.

$\langle N_{part} \rangle$-dependence of the inclusive J/$\psi$ $r_{\rm AA}$. The first uncertainty is the quadratic sum of the statistical and uncorrelated systematic ones, while the second is a centrality-correlated systematic uncertainty. The $\langle N_{part} \rangle$ values correspond descendingly to the centrality classes 0–10%, 10–20%, 20–30%, 30–40%, 40–50%, 50–60%, and 60–90%.

The $\bar\Lambda$ global polarization as function of transverse momentum ($p_{\mathrm{T}}$) for 15-50% centrality in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=2.76$~TeV.

The $\bar\Lambda$ global polarization as function of transverse momentum ($p_{\mathrm{T}}$) for 5-15% centrality in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=2.76$~TeV.

The $\bar\Lambda$ global polarization as function of transverse momentum ($p_{\mathrm{T}}$) for 15-50% centrality in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=5.02$~TeV.

The $\bar\Lambda$ global polarization as function of transverse momentum ($p_{\mathrm{T}}$) for 5-15% centrality in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=5.02$~TeV.

The $\bar\Lambda$ global polarization as function of centrality for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=2.76$~TeV.

The $\bar\Lambda$ global polarization as function of centrality for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=5.02$~TeV.

The $\Lambda$ global polarization as function of centrality for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=2.76$~TeV.

The $\Lambda$ global polarization as function of centrality for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=5.02$~TeV.

The $\Lambda$ global polarization as function of transverse momentum ($p_{\mathrm{T}}$) for 15-50% centrality in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=2.76$~TeV.

The $\Lambda$ global polarization as function of transverse momentum ($p_{\mathrm{T}}$) for 5-15% centrality in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=2.76$~TeV.

The $\Lambda$ global polarization as function of transverse momentum ($p_{\mathrm{T}}$) for 15-50% centrality in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=5.02$~TeV.

The $\Lambda$ global polarization as function of transverse momentum ($p_{\mathrm{T}}$) for 5-15% centrality in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=5.02$~TeV.

The $\Lambda$ global polarization as function of centrality for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=2.76$~TeV.

The $\Lambda$ global polarization as function of centrality for Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=5.02$~TeV.

The correction $R_{\mathrm{SP}}^{(1)}$ for finite resolution of the spectator plane angle $\Psi_{\mathrm{SP}}$ as a function of collision centrality for LHC10h data set.

The correction $R_{\mathrm{SP}}^{(1)}$ for finite resolution of the spectator plane angle $\Psi_{\mathrm{SP}}$ as a function of collision centrality for LHC11h data set.

The correction $R_{\mathrm{SP}}^{(1)}$ for finite resolution of the spectator plane angle $\Psi_{\mathrm{SP}}$ as a function of collision centrality for LHC15h data set.

Exclusion limits assuming the approximate-NNLO+NNLL cross sections

Exclusion limits assuming the approximate-NNLO+NNLL cross sections

Exclusion limits assuming the approximate-NNLO+NNLL cross sections (u d s c)

Exclusion limits assuming the approximate-NNLO+NNLL cross sections (single flavor)

Exclusion limits assuming the approximate-NNLO+NNLL cross sections

Exclusion limits assuming the approximate-NNLO+NNLL cross sections

Exclusion limits assuming the approximate-NNLO+NNLL cross sections

Exclusion limits assuming the approximate-NNLO+NNLL cross sections

Exclusion limits assuming the approximate-NNLO+NNLL cross sections

Exclusion limits assuming the approximate-NNLO+NNLL cross sections (u d s c)

Exclusion limits assuming the approximate-NNLO+NNLL cross sections (single flavor)

Exclusion limits assuming the approximate-NNLO+NNLL cross sections

Exclusion limits assuming the approximate-NNLO+NNLL cross sections

Exclusion limits assuming the approximate-NNLO+NNLL cross sections

Exclusion limits assuming the approximate-NNLO+NNLL cross sections

Exclusion limits assuming the approximate-NNLO+NNLL cross sections

Exclusion limits assuming the approximate-NNLO+NNLL cross sections (single flavor)

Exclusion limits assuming the approximate-NNLO+NNLL cross sections

Exclusion limits assuming the approximate-NNLO+NNLL cross sections

Exclusion limits assuming the approximate-NNLO+NNLL cross sections

Exclusion limits assuming the approximate-NNLO+NNLL cross sections

Exclusion limits assuming the approximate-NNLO+NNLL cross sections

Exclusion limits assuming the approximate-NNLO+NNLL cross sections (u d s c)

Exclusion limits assuming the approximate-NNLO+NNLL cross sections

Exclusion limits assuming the approximate-NNLO+NNLL cross sections

Exclusion limits assuming the approximate-NNLO+NNLL cross sections

Exclusion limits assuming the approximate-NNLO+NNLL cross sections

Exclusion limits assuming the approximate-NNLO+NNLL cross sections (u d s c)

Exclusion limits assuming the approximate-NNLO+NNLL cross sections (single flavor)

Simulated signal yields for representative gluino signal model compressed points in the aggregate search regions. The uncertainties shown are statistical.

Simulated signal yields for representative gluino signal model light-LSP points in the aggregate search regions. The uncertainties shown are statistical.

Simulated signal yields for representative squark signal model compressed points in the aggregate search regions. The uncertainties shown are statistical.

Simulated signal yields for representative squark signal model light-LSP points in the aggregate search regions. The uncertainties shown are statistical.

Pre-fit background correlation matrix $\rho_{xy}$ for the 174 analysis bins.

Pre-fit background covariance matrix $\sigma_{xy}$ for the 174 analysis bins.

Absolute cumulative efficiencies in percent for each step of the event selection process, listed for four representative gluino pair production signal models with m(gluino) ~ m(LSP). Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

Absolute cumulative efficiencies in percent for each step of the event selection process, listed for four representative gluino pair production signal models with m(gluino) >> m(LSP). Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

Absolute cumulative efficiencies in percent for each step of the event selection process, listed for three representative squark pair production signal models with m(squark) ~ m(LSP). Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

Absolute cumulative efficiencies in percent for each step of the event selection process, listed for three representative squark pair production signal models with m(squark) >> m(LSP). Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

The 95% CL observed and expected upper limits on the production cross sections of the T1bbbb signal model as a function of the gluino and LSP masses.

The efficiency times acceptance of the SMS models for T1bbbb as function of the gluino and LSP masses. The efficiency times acceptance is given for the total signal across the set of 174 search regions.

Exclusion limits assuming the approximate-NNLO+NNLL cross sections

Exclusion limits assuming the approximate-NNLO+NNLL cross sections

The observed significance of the SMS models for T1bbbb as function of the gluino and LSP masses.

The 95% CL observed and expected upper limits on the production cross sections of the T1qqqq signal model as a function of the gluino and LSP masses.

The efficiency times acceptance of the SMS models for T1qqqq as function of the gluino and LSP masses. The efficiency times acceptance is given for the total signal across the set of 174 search regions.

Exclusion limits assuming the approximate-NNLO+NNLL cross sections

Exclusion limits assuming the approximate-NNLO+NNLL cross sections

The observed significance of the SMS models for T1qqqq as function of the gluino and LSP masses.

The 95% CL observed and expected upper limits on the production cross sections of the T1tttt signal model as a function of the gluino and LSP masses.

The efficiency times acceptance of the SMS models for T1tttt as function of the gluino and LSP masses. The efficiency times acceptance is given for the total signal across the set of 174 search regions.

Exclusion limits assuming the approximate-NNLO+NNLL cross sections

Exclusion limits assuming the approximate-NNLO+NNLL cross sections

The observed significance of the SMS models for T1tttt as function of the gluino and LSP masses.

The 95% CL observed and expected upper limits on the production cross sections of the T2bb signal model as a function of the bottom squark and LSP masses.

The efficiency times acceptance of the SMS models for T2bb as function of the bottom squark and LSP masses. The efficiency times acceptance is given for the total signal across the set of 174 search regions.

Exclusion limits assuming the approximate-NNLO+NNLL cross sections

Exclusion limits assuming the approximate-NNLO+NNLL cross sections

The observed significance of the SMS models for T2bb as function of the bottom squark and LSP masses.

Exclusion limits assuming the approximate-NNLO+NNLL cross sections (single flavor)

Exclusion limits assuming the approximate-NNLO+NNLL cross sections (u d s c)

The 95% CL observed and expected upper limits on the production cross sections of the T2qq signal model as a function of the LSP and light squark masses.

The efficiency times acceptance of the SMS models for T2qq as function of the LSP and light squark masses. The efficiency times acceptance is given for the total signal across the set of 174 search regions.

Exclusion limits assuming the approximate-NNLO+NNLL cross sections (u d s c)

Exclusion limits assuming the approximate-NNLO+NNLL cross sections (u d s c)

The observed significance of the SMS models for T2qq as function of the LSP and light squark masses.

The 95% CL observed and expected upper limits on the production cross sections of the T2tt signal model as a function of the top squark and LSP masses.

The efficiency times acceptance of the SMS models for T2tt as function of the top squark and LSP masses. The efficiency times acceptance is given for the total signal across the set of 174 search regions.

Exclusion limits assuming the approximate-NNLO+NNLL cross sections

Exclusion limits assuming the approximate-NNLO+NNLL cross sections

The observed significance of the SMS models for T2tt as function of the top squark and LSP masses.

The 95% CL observed and expected upper limits on the production cross sections of the T5qqqqVV signal model as a function of the gluino and LSP masses.

The efficiency times acceptance of the SMS models for T5qqqqVV as function of the gluino and LSP masses. The efficiency times acceptance is given for the total signal across the set of 174 search regions.

Exclusion limits assuming the approximate-NNLO+NNLL cross sections

Exclusion limits assuming the approximate-NNLO+NNLL cross sections

The observed significance of the SMS models for T5qqqqVV as function of the gluino and LSP masses.

Observed yields and post-fit background predictions for Njets 2-3.

Observed yields and post-fit background predictions for Njets 4-5.

Observed yields and post-fit background predictions for Njets 6-7.

Observed yields and post-fit background predictions for Njets 8-9.

Observed yields and post-fit background predictions for Njets >=10.

Observed yields and pre-fit background predictions for Njets 2-3.

Observed yields and pre-fit background predictions for Njets 4-5.

Observed yields and pre-fit background predictions for Njets 6-7.

Observed yields and pre-fit background predictions for Njets 8-9.

Observed yields and pre-fit background predictions for Njets >=10.

Observed yields and pre-fit background predictions for aggregated bins.

$\mathrm{M_{\mathrm{T}}}$ distribution for the $\mathrm{e}\mu$ control region.

$\mathrm{M_{\mathrm{T}}}$ distribution for the WZ control region.

$\mathrm{M_{\mathrm{T}}}$ distribution for the ZZ control region.

$\mathrm{M_{\mathrm{T}}}$ distribution for the signal region, events with $|\eta_{\gamma}|<1$.

$\mathrm{M_{\mathrm{T}}}$ distribution for the signal region, events with $|\eta_{\gamma}|>1$.

Muon reconstruction, identification, and isolation efficiency as a function of $|\eta|$ and $\mathrm{p_\mathrm{T}}$.

Photon efficiency as a function of $|\eta|$ and $\mathrm{p_\mathrm{T}}$.

Expected yields for different processes after several selection stages. The preselection requires two leptons and at least one photon with $\mathrm{p_\mathrm{T}}$ larger than 25, 20, and 25 GeV, respectively; in addition the dilepton $\mathrm{p_\mathrm{T}}$ must be larger than 60 GeV, and the $\mathrm{p_\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ larger than 70 GeV. The signal prediction corresponds to $0.1 \sigma_{\mathrm{\mathrm{ZH}}}$ at $m_{H}$ = 125 GeV.

Expected and observed upper limits at 95\% confidence level on the product of $\sigma_{\mathrm{\mathrm{ZH}}}$ and $\mathcal{B}$($\mathrm{H}$ -> $\mathrm{invisible}+\gamma$) as a function of $m_{\mathrm{\mathrm{H}}}$.

$\Omega^{-}+\bar{\Omega^{+}}$ transverse momentum spectrum - V0M multiplicity classes. Total systematic uncertainties include both correlated and uncorrelated uncertainties across multiplicity. Uncorrelated systematic originating from the multiplicity dependence of the efficiency (2%) is not included.

$K^{0}_{S}$, $\Lambda+\bar{\Lambda}$, $\Xi^{-}+\bar{\Xi^{+}}$, $\Omega^{-}+\bar{\Omega^{+}}$ integrated yields - INEL>0. V0M multiplicity dependent yields are already listed in Table 8c.

$K^{0}_{S}$, $\Lambda+\bar{\Lambda}$, $\Xi^{-}+\bar{\Xi^{+}}$, $\Omega^{-}+\bar{\Omega^{+}}$ integrated yields - INEL>0. V0M multiplicity dependent yields at 7 TeV are listed in the corresponding repository ("https://www.hepdata.net/record/77284").

$\Lambda+\bar{\Lambda}/K^{0}_{S}$, $\Xi^{-}+\bar{\Xi^{+}}/K^{0}_{S}$ - Tracklets08 multiplicity classes

$\Omega^{-}+\bar{\Omega^{+}}/K^{0}_{S}$ - Tracklets08 multiplicity classes

$\Lambda+\bar{\Lambda}/K^{0}_{S}$, $\Xi^{-}+\bar{\Xi^{+}}/K^{0}_{S}$ - Tracklets0815 multiplicity classes

$\Omega^{-}+\bar{\Omega^{+}}/K^{0}_{S}$ - Tracklets0815 multiplicity classes

$\Lambda+\bar{\Lambda}/K^{0}_{S}$, $\Xi^{-}+\bar{\Xi^{+}}/K^{0}_{S}$ - V0M multiplicity classes

$\Omega^{-}+\bar{\Omega^{+}}/K^{0}_{S}$ - V0M multiplicity classes

$K^{0}_{S}$ transverse momentum spectrum ratios to INEL>0 - V0M multiplicity classes. Total systematic uncertainties include both correlated and uncorrelated uncertainties across multiplicity. Uncorrelated systematic originating from the multiplicity dependence of the efficiency (2%) is not included.

$K^{0}_{S}$ transverse momentum spectrum - SPDtracklets08 multiplicity classes. Total systematic uncertainties include both correlated and uncorrelated uncertainties across multiplicity. Uncorrelated systematic originating from the multiplicity dependence of the efficiency (2%) is not included.

$K^{0}_{S}$ transverse momentum spectrum ratios to INEL>0 - SPDtracklets08 multiplicity classes. Total systematic uncertainties include both correlated and uncorrelated uncertainties across multiplicity. Uncorrelated systematic originating from the multiplicity dependence of the efficiency (2%) is not included.

$K^{0}_{S}$ transverse momentum spectrum - SPDtracklets0815 multiplicity classes. Total systematic uncertainties include both correlated and uncorrelated uncertainties across multiplicity. Uncorrelated systematic originating from the multiplicity dependence of the efficiency (2%) is not included.

$K^{0}_{S}$ transverse momentum spectrum ratios to INEL>0 - SPDtracklets0815 multiplicity classes. Total systematic uncertainties include both correlated and uncorrelated uncertainties across multiplicity. Uncorrelated systematic originating from the multiplicity dependence of the efficiency (2%) is not included.

$\Lambda+\bar{\Lambda}$ transverse momentum spectrum ratios to INEL>0 - V0M multiplicity classes. Total systematic uncertainties include both correlated and uncorrelated uncertainties across multiplicity. Uncorrelated systematic originating from the multiplicity dependence of the efficiency (2%) is not included.

$\Lambda+\bar{\Lambda}$ transverse momentum spectrum - SPDtracklets08 multiplicity classes. Total systematic uncertainties include both correlated and uncorrelated uncertainties across multiplicity. Uncorrelated systematic originating from the multiplicity dependence of the efficiency (2%) is not included.

$\Lambda+\bar{\Lambda}$ transverse momentum spectrum ratios to INEL>0 - SPDtracklets08 multiplicity classes. Total systematic uncertainties include both correlated and uncorrelated uncertainties across multiplicity. Uncorrelated systematic originating from the multiplicity dependence of the efficiency (2%) is not included.

$\Lambda+\bar{\Lambda}$ transverse momentum spectrum - SPDtracklets0815 multiplicity classes. Total systematic uncertainties include both correlated and uncorrelated uncertainties across multiplicity. Uncorrelated systematic originating from the multiplicity dependence of the efficiency (2%) is not included.

$\Lambda+\bar{\Lambda}$ transverse momentum spectrum ratios to INEL>0 - SPDtracklets0815 multiplicity classes. Total systematic uncertainties include both correlated and uncorrelated uncertainties across multiplicity. Uncorrelated systematic originating from the multiplicity dependence of the efficiency (2%) is not included.

$\Xi^{-}+\bar{\Xi^{+}}$ transverse momentum spectrum ratios to INEL>0 - V0M multiplicity classes. Total systematic uncertainties include both correlated and uncorrelated uncertainties across multiplicity. Uncorrelated systematic originating from the multiplicity dependence of the efficiency (2%) is not included.

$\Xi^{-}+\bar{\Xi^{+}}$ transverse momentum spectrum - SPDtracklets08 multiplicity classes. Total systematic uncertainties include both correlated and uncorrelated uncertainties across multiplicity. Uncorrelated systematic originating from the multiplicity dependence of the efficiency (2%) is not included.

$\Xi^{-}+\bar{\Xi^{+}}$ transverse momentum spectrum ratios to INEL>0 - SPDtracklets08 multiplicity classes. Total systematic uncertainties include both correlated and uncorrelated uncertainties across multiplicity. Uncorrelated systematic originating from the multiplicity dependence of the efficiency (2%) is not included.

$\Xi^{-}+\bar{\Xi^{+}}$ transverse momentum spectrum - SPDtracklets0815 multiplicity classes. Total systematic uncertainties include both correlated and uncorrelated uncertainties across multiplicity. Uncorrelated systematic originating from the multiplicity dependence of the efficiency (2%) is not included.

$\Xi^{-}+\bar{\Xi^{+}}$ transverse momentum spectrum ratios to INEL>0 - SPDtracklets0815 multiplicity classes. Total systematic uncertainties include both correlated and uncorrelated uncertainties across multiplicity. Uncorrelated systematic originating from the multiplicity dependence of the efficiency (2%) is not included.

$\Omega^{-}+\bar{\Omega^{+}}$ transverse momentum spectrum ratios to INEL>0 - V0M multiplicity classes. Total systematic uncertainties include both correlated and uncorrelated uncertainties across multiplicity. Uncorrelated systematic originating from the multiplicity dependence of the efficiency (2%) is not included.

$\Omega^{-}+\bar{\Omega^{+}}$ transverse momentum spectrum - SPDtracklets08 multiplicity classes. Total systematic uncertainties include both correlated and uncorrelated uncertainties across multiplicity. Uncorrelated systematic originating from the multiplicity dependence of the efficiency (2%) is not included.

$\Omega^{-}+\bar{\Omega^{+}}$ transverse momentum spectrum ratios to INEL>0 - SPDtracklets08 multiplicity classes. Total systematic uncertainties include both correlated and uncorrelated uncertainties across multiplicity. Uncorrelated systematic originating from the multiplicity dependence of the efficiency (2%) is not included.

$\Omega^{-}+\bar{\Omega^{+}}$ transverse momentum spectrum - SPDtracklets0815 multiplicity classes. Total systematic uncertainties include both correlated and uncorrelated uncertainties across multiplicity. Uncorrelated systematic originating from the multiplicity dependence of the efficiency (2%) is not included.

$\Omega^{-}+\bar{\Omega^{+}}$ transverse momentum spectrum ratios to INEL>0 - SPDtracklets0815 multiplicity classes. Total systematic uncertainties include both correlated and uncorrelated uncertainties across multiplicity. Uncorrelated systematic originating from the multiplicity dependence of the efficiency (2%) is not included.

$K^{0}_{S}$, $\Lambda+\bar{\Lambda}$, $\Xi^{-}+\bar{\Xi^{+}}$ average transverse momentum vs multiplicity - SPDtracklets08 multiplicity classes

$\Omega^{-}+\bar{\Omega^{+}}$ average transverse momentum vs multiplicity - SPDtracklets08 multiplicity classes

$K^{0}_{S}$, $\Lambda+\bar{\Lambda}$, $\Xi^{-}+\bar{\Xi^{+}}$ average transverse momentum vs multiplicity - SPDtracklets0815 multiplicity classes

$\Omega^{-}+\bar{\Omega^{+}}$ average transverse momentum vs multiplicity - SPDtracklets0815 multiplicity classes

$K^{0}_{S}$, $\Lambda+\bar{\Lambda}$, $\Xi^{-}+\bar{\Xi^{+}}$ average transverse momentum vs multiplicity - V0M multiplicity classes

$\Omega^{-}+\bar{\Omega^{+}}$ average transverse momentum vs multiplicity - V0M multiplicity classes

$K^{0}_{S}$, $\Lambda+\bar{\Lambda}$, $\Xi^{-}+\bar{\Xi^{+}}$ self-normalized yields vs self-normalized multiplicity - V0M multiplicity classes

$\Omega^{-}+\bar{\Omega^{+}}$ self-normalized yields vs self-normalized multiplicity - V0M multiplicity classes

$K^{0}_{S}$, $\Lambda+\bar{\Lambda}$, $\Xi^{-}+\bar{\Xi^{+}}$ self-normalized yields vs self-normalized multiplicity - SPDTracklets08 multiplicity classes

$\Omega^{-}+\bar{\Omega^{+}}$ self-normalized yields vs self-normalized multiplicity - SPDTracklets08 multiplicity classes

$K^{0}_{S}$, $\Lambda+\bar{\Lambda}$, $\Xi^{-}+\bar{\Xi^{+}}$ self-normalized yields vs self-normalized multiplicity - SPDTracklets0815 multiplicity classes

$\Omega^{-}+\bar{\Omega^{+}}$ self-normalized yields vs self-normalized multiplicity - SPDTracklets0815 multiplicity classes

$K^{0}_{S}$ transverse momentum spectra ratios SPDTracklets-to-V0M

$\Lambda+\bar{\Lambda}$ transverse momentum spectra ratios SPDTracklets-to-V0M

$\Xi^{-}+\bar{\Xi^{+}}$ transverse momentum spectra ratios SPDTracklets-to-V0M

$K^{0}_{S}$, $\Lambda+\bar{\Lambda}$, $\Xi^{-}+\bar{\Xi^{+}}$ integrated yields vs multiplicity - SPDtracklets08 multiplicity classes

$\Omega^{-}+\bar{\Omega^{+}}$, $K^{0}_{S}$ integrated yields vs multiplicity - SPDtracklets08 multiplicity classes

$K^{0}_{S}$, $\Lambda+\bar{\Lambda}$, $\Xi^{-}+\bar{\Xi^{+}}$ integrated yields vs multiplicity - SPDtracklets0815 multiplicity classes

$\Omega^{-}+\bar{\Omega^{+}}$, $K^{0}_{S}$ integrated yields vs multiplicity - SPDtracklets0815 multiplicity classes

$K^{0}_{S}$, $\Lambda+\bar{\Lambda}$, $\Xi^{-}+\bar{\Xi^{+}}$ integrated yields vs multiplicity - V0M multiplicity classes

$\Omega^{-}+\bar{\Omega^{+}}$, $K^{0}_{S}$ integrated yields vs multiplicity - V0M multiplicity classes

$K^{0}_{S}$, $\Lambda+\bar{\Lambda}$, $\Xi^{-}+\bar{\Xi^{+}}$ integrated yields (no extr.) vs multiplicity - SPDtracklets08 multiplicity classes

$\Omega^{-}+\bar{\Omega^{+}}$ integrated yields (no extr.) vs multiplicity - SPDtracklets08 multiplicity classes

$K^{0}_{S}$, $\Lambda+\bar{\Lambda}$, $\Xi^{-}+\bar{\Xi^{+}}$ integrated yields (no extr.) vs multiplicity - SPDtracklets0815 multiplicity classes

$\Omega^{-}+\bar{\Omega^{+}}$ integrated yields (no extr.) vs multiplicity - SPDtracklets0815 multiplicity classes

$K^{0}_{S}$, $\Lambda+\bar{\Lambda}$, $\Xi^{-}+\bar{\Xi^{+}}$ integrated yields (no extr.) vs multiplicity - V0M multiplicity classes

$\Omega^{-}+\bar{\Omega^{+}}$ integrated yields (no extr.) vs multiplicity - V0M multiplicity classes

Model-independent constraints on the coupling strength modifier as a function of the heavy scalar boson mass, for a relative width of 1.0%.

Model-independent constraints on the coupling strength modifier as a function of the heavy scalar boson mass, for a relative width of 2.5%.

Model-independent constraints on the coupling strength modifier as a function of the heavy scalar boson mass, for a relative width of 5.0%.

Model-independent constraints on the coupling strength modifier as a function of the heavy scalar boson mass, for a relative width of 10.0%.

Model-independent constraints on the coupling strength modifier as a function of the heavy scalar boson mass, for a relative width of 25.0%.

Model-independent constraints on the coupling strength modifier as a function of the heavy pseudoscalar boson mass, for a relative width of 0.5%.

Model-independent constraints on the coupling strength modifier as a function of the heavy pseudoscalar boson mass, for a relative width of 1.0%.

Model-independent constraints on the coupling strength modifier as a function of the heavy pseudoscalar boson mass, for a relative width of 2.5%.

Model-independent constraints on the coupling strength modifier as a function of the heavy pseudoscalar boson mass, for a relative width of 5.0%.

Model-independent constraints on the coupling strength modifier as a function of the heavy pseudoscalar boson mass, for a relative width of 10.0%.

Model-independent constraints on the coupling strength modifier as a function of the heavy pseudoscalar boson mass, for a relative width of 25.0%.

Model-independent constraints on the coupling strength modifier as a function of the heavy pseudoscalar boson mass, for a relative width of 0.5%.

Model-independent constraints on the coupling strength modifier as a function of the heavy pseudoscalar boson mass, for a relative width of 1.0%.

Model-independent constraints on the coupling strength modifier as a function of the heavy pseudoscalar boson mass, for a relative width of 2.5%.

Model-independent constraints on the coupling strength modifier as a function of the heavy pseudoscalar boson mass, for a relative width of 5.0%.

Model-independent constraints on the coupling strength modifier as a function of the heavy pseudoscalar boson mass, for a relative width of 10.0%.

Model-independent constraints on the coupling strength modifier as a function of the heavy pseudoscalar boson mass, for a relative width of 25.0%.

2-dimensional aTGC limits in lepton + jet events in WW and WZ production

2-dimensional aTGC limits in lepton + jet events in WW and WZ production

2-dimensional aTGC limits in LEP paramatrization in lepton + jet events in WW and WZ production

2-dimensional aTGC limits in LEP paramatrization in lepton + jet events in WW and WZ production

2-dimensional aTGC limits in LEP paramatrization in lepton + jet events in WW and WZ production

Figure 4, normalized differential cross section for $\cos\theta_{1}^{n}$

Figure 6, normalized differential cross section for $\cos\theta_{1}^{n}\cos\theta_{2}^{n}$

Figure 5, normalized differential cross section for $\cos\theta_{1}^{r*}$

Figure 4, normalized differential cross section for $\cos\theta_{1}^{r}$

Figure 6, normalized differential cross section for $\cos\theta_{1}^{r}\cos\theta_{2}^{r}$

Figure 5, normalized differential cross section for $\cos\theta_{2}^{k*}$

Figure 4, normalized differential cross section for $\cos\theta_{2}^{k}$

Figure 4, normalized differential cross section for $\cos\theta_{2}^{n}$

Figure 5, normalized differential cross section for $\cos\theta_{2}^{r*}$

Figure 4, normalized differential cross section for $\cos\theta_{2}^{r}$

Figure 6, normalized differential cross section for $\cos\varphi$

Figure 6, normalized differential cross section for $\cos\varphi_{\mathrm{lab}}$

Figure 7, normalized differential cross section for $\cos\theta_{1}^{n}\cos\theta_{2}^{k}+\cos\theta_{1}^{k}\cos\theta_{2}^{n}$

Figure 7, normalized differential cross section for $\cos\theta_{1}^{n}\cos\theta_{2}^{k}-\cos\theta_{1}^{k}\cos\theta_{2}^{n}$

Figure 7, normalized differential cross section for $\cos\theta_{1}^{n}\cos\theta_{2}^{r}+\cos\theta_{1}^{r}\cos\theta_{2}^{n}$

Figure 7, normalized differential cross section for $\cos\theta_{1}^{n}\cos\theta_{2}^{r}-\cos\theta_{1}^{r}\cos\theta_{2}^{n}$

Figure 7, normalized differential cross section for $\cos\theta_{1}^{r}\cos\theta_{2}^{k}+\cos\theta_{1}^{k}\cos\theta_{2}^{r}$

Figure 7, normalized differential cross section for $\cos\theta_{1}^{r}\cos\theta_{2}^{k}-\cos\theta_{1}^{k}\cos\theta_{2}^{r}$

Table 7, values of $f_\text{SM}$

Figure 6, normalized differential cross section for $|\Delta\phi_{\ell\ell}|$

Table 3, measured coefficients

Figure 8, statistical covariance matrix for normalized differential cross sections (note, the figure in the paper is for the corresponding correlation matrix)

Figure 12, statistical covariance matrix for coefficients (note, the figure in the paper is for the corresponding correlation matrix)

Table 6, sums and differences of B coefficients

Figure 8, systematic covariance matrix for normalized differential cross sections (note, the figure in the paper is for the corresponding correlation matrix)

Figure 12, systematic covariance matrix for coefficients (note, the figure in the paper is for the corresponding correlation matrix)

The $\Upsilon$(1S) $v_2$ coefficient in three centrality intervals integrated over the transverse momentum range 2~$<$~$p_{\rm T}$~$<$~15 GeV/$c$ in Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV.

The 95% CL upper limits on the production cross section times the branching fraction as a function of mA in the case of a b-associated production and an intrinsic width corresponding to 10% of the mass

The 95% CL upper limits on the production cross section times the branching fraction as a function of mA in the case of a gluon fusion production

The 95% CL upper limits on the production cross section times the branching fraction as a function of mA in the case of a gluon fusion production and an intrinsic width corresponding to 10% of the mass

The timing distribution of the backgrounds predicted to contribute to the signal region, compared to those for a representative signal model. The time is defined by the jet in the event with the largest $t_{\mathrm{jet}}$ passing the relevant selection. The distributions for the major backgrounds are taken from control regions and normalized to the predictions. The observed data is shown by the black points.

The distribution (normalized to unity) of $\mathrm{HEF}$ for a data sample enriched in beam halo and noise jets (satisfying $|\eta| < 1.48$, $p_\mathrm{T} > 30 \,\mathrm{GeV}$, $PV_{\rm track}^{\rm fraction} < 1/12$, $t_{\mathrm{jet}} < -3\,\mathrm{ns}$, $E_{\mathrm{ECAL}} > 20\,\mathrm{GeV}$ and $t^{\mathrm{RMS}}_\mathrm{jet}/t_{\mathrm{jet}} < 0.4$) and for signal jets passing signal region selections (except on $\mathrm{HEF}$).

Selection efficiencies for the GMSB model with $m_{\tilde{g}}=2400$ and various proper decay lengths

The product of the acceptance and efficiency in the $c\tau_{0}$ vs. $m_{\tilde{g}}$ plane for the GMSB model, after all requirements.

The distribution (normalized to unity) of $E_{\mathrm{HCAL}}$ for a data sample enriched in beam halo and noise jets (satisfying $|\eta| < 1.48$, $p_\mathrm{T} > 30 \,\mathrm{GeV}$, $PV_{\rm track}^{\rm fraction} < 1/12$, $t_{\mathrm{jet}} < -3\,\mathrm{ns}$, $E_{\mathrm{ECAL}} > 20\,\mathrm{GeV}$ and $t^{\mathrm{RMS}}_\mathrm{jet}/t_{\mathrm{jet}} < 0.4$) and for signal jets passing signal region selections (except on $E_{\mathrm{HCAL}}$).

Selection efficiencies for the GMSB model with $m_{\tilde{g}}=3000$ and various proper decay lengths

The observed upper limits at $95\%$ CL for the gluino pair production cross section in the GMSB model, shown in the plane of $m_{\tilde{g}}$ and $c\tau_{0}$. A branching fraction of $100\%$ for the gluino decay to a gluon and a gravitino is assumed.

The distribution (normalized to unity) of $t^{\mathrm{RMS}}_\mathrm{jet}/t_{\mathrm{jet}}$ for data sample enriched in jets from noise (satisfying $|\eta| < 1.48$, $p_\mathrm{T} > 30\,\mathrm{GeV}$, $PV_{\rm track}^{\rm fraction} > 1/12$, $\mathrm{HEF} > 0.2$, $t_{\mathrm{jet}} < -3\,\mathrm{ns}$, $E_{\mathrm{ECAL}} > 20 \,\mathrm{GeV}$ and $E^{\mathrm{CSC}}_\mathrm{ECAL}/E_{\mathrm{ECAL}} < 0.8$) and for signal jets passing signal region selections (except on $t^{\mathrm{RMS}}_\mathrm{jet}/t_{\mathrm{jet}}$ and $t^{\mathrm{RMS}}_\mathrm{jet}$)

The observed upper limits at $95\%$ CL for the gluino pair production cross section in the GMSB model, shown in the plane of $m_{\tilde{g}}$ and $c\tau_{0}$. A branching fraction of $100\%$ for the gluino decay to a gluon and a gravitino is assumed.

The observed and expected upper limits at $95\%$ CL on the gluino pair production cross section for a gluino GMSB model with $m_{\tilde{g}}=2400$ GeV. The one (two) standard deviation variation in the expected limit is shown in the inner green (outer yellow) band. The blue solid line shows the observed limit obtained by the CMS displaced jet search

The distribution (normalized to unity) of $t^{\mathrm{RMS}}_\mathrm{jet}$ for data sample enriched in jets from noise (satisfying $|\eta| < 1.48$, $p_\mathrm{T} > 30\,\mathrm{GeV}$, $PV_{\rm track}^{\rm fraction} > 1/12$, $\mathrm{HEF} > 0.2$, $t_{\mathrm{jet}} < -3\,\mathrm{ns}$, $E_{\mathrm{ECAL}} > 20 \,\mathrm{GeV}$ and $E^{\mathrm{CSC}}_\mathrm{ECAL}/E_{\mathrm{ECAL}} < 0.8$) and for signal jets passing signal region selections (except on $t^{\mathrm{RMS}}_\mathrm{jet}/t_{\mathrm{jet}}$ and $t^{\mathrm{RMS}}_\mathrm{jet}$)

The distribution (normalized to unity) of $PV_{\rm track}^{\rm fraction}$ for a data sample enriched in main bunch backgrounds (satisfying $p_\mathrm{T} > 30\,\mathrm{GeV}$, $|\eta| < 1.48$, $E^{\mathrm{CSC}}_\mathrm{ECAL}/E_{\mathrm{ECAL}} < 0.8$, $|t_{\mathrm{jet}}| < 3\,\mathrm{ns}$ and $E_{\mathrm{ECAL}} >20\,\mathrm{GeV}$) and for signal jets passing signal selections (except on $PV_{\rm track}^{\rm fraction}$).

The distribution (normalized to unity) of $E^{\mathrm{CSC}}_\mathrm{ECAL}/E_{\mathrm{ECAL}}$ for a data sample enriched in beam halo (satisfying $p_\mathrm{T} > 30\,\mathrm{GeV}$, $|\eta| < 1.48$, $PV_{\rm track}^{\rm fraction} < 1/12$, $\mathrm{HEF} < 0.2$, $t^{\mathrm{RMS}}_\mathrm{jet}/t_{\mathrm{jet}} < 0.4$, $t_{\mathrm{jet}} < -3\,\mathrm{ns}$ and $E_{\mathrm{ECAL}} > 20\,\mathrm{GeV}$) and for signal jets passing signal selections (except on $E^{\mathrm{CSC}}_\mathrm{ECAL}/E_{\mathrm{ECAL}}$)

The distribution (normalized to unity) of $\mathrm{max}(\Delta \phi_{\mathrm{DT}})$ for a data sample enriched in cosmic muons (satisfying $E^{\mathrm{CSC}}_\mathrm{ECAL}/E_{\mathrm{ECAL}} < 0.8$, $p_\mathrm{T} > 30\,\mathrm{GeV}$, $|\eta| < 1.48$, $PV_{\rm track}^{\rm fraction} < 1/12$, $\mathrm{HEF} > 0.2$, $t^{\mathrm{RMS}}_\mathrm{jet}/t_{\mathrm{jet}} < 0.4$, $t_{\mathrm{jet}} > 3\,\mathrm{ns}$, $E_{\mathrm{ECAL}} > 20\,\mathrm{GeV}$ and failing the HCAL noise rejection quality filters) and for signal jets passing signal selections (except on $\mathrm{max}(\Delta \phi_{\mathrm{DT}})$).

The distribution (normalized to unity) of $\mathrm{max}(\Delta \phi_{\mathrm{RPC}})$ for a data sample enriched in cosmic muons (satisfying $E^{\mathrm{CSC}}_\mathrm{ECAL}/E_{\mathrm{ECAL}} < 0.8$, $p_\mathrm{T} > 30\,\mathrm{GeV}$, $|\eta| < 1.48$, $PV_{\rm track}^{\rm fraction} < 1/12$, $\mathrm{HEF} > 0.2$, $t^{\mathrm{RMS}}_\mathrm{jet}/t_{\mathrm{jet}} < 0.4$, $t_{\mathrm{jet}} > 3\,\mathrm{ns}$, $E_{\mathrm{ECAL}} > 20\,\mathrm{GeV}$ and failing the HCAL noise rejection quality filters) and for signal jets passing signal selections (except on $\mathrm{max}(\Delta \phi_{\mathrm{RPC}})$).

Distribution of $t_{\mathrm{jet}}$ for jets with the full Run 2 dataset with no cleaning selection applied (a) and after all jet cleaning selections are applied (b) in events satisfying the trigger requirements and satisfying $p_T^\mathrm{miss} > 300$. The jets are required to pass an inverted selection of $PV_{\rm track}^{\rm fraction} > 1/12$ to enrich the sample in those originating from main and satellite bunch backgrounds. The cleaning selections are shown to reduce the backgrounds by many orders of magnitude.

Distribution of $t_{\mathrm{jet}}$ for jets with the full Run 2 dataset in events satisfying the trigger requirements and satisfying $p_T^\mathrm{miss} < 300$. The jets are required to pass an inverted selection of $PV_{\rm track}^{\rm fraction} > 1/12$ to enrich the sample in those originating from main and satellite bunch backgrounds (all other jet cleaning selections are applied). Clear contributions from jets from satellite bunch collisions can be seen peaked around -5, 5 and 10 ns.

Contribution to the delayed time of jets from the $\beta$ of the gluino is plotted against the delay contribution from the difference (assuming straight line paths) between the path taken by the gluino and the particle forming the jet from the path length for a particle travelling directly to the same position on the ECAL barrel for gluino $c\tau_{0} = 10$ m and mass of 1000 Gev (top) and 3000 GeV (bottom). The dominant contribution is shown to be the gluino $\beta$.

The observed upper limits at $95\%$ CL for the gluino pair production cross section relative to the theoretical cross section in the GMSB model, shown in the plane of $m_{\tilde{g}}$ and $c\tau_{0}$. A branching fraction of $100\%$ for the gluino decay to a gluon and a gravitino is assumed. The area below the thick black curve represents the observed exclusion region, while the dashed red lines indicate the expected limits and their $\pm 1$ standard deviation ranges from experimental uncertainties. The thin black lines show the effect of the theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

The expected upper limits at $95\%$ CL for the gluino pair production cross section relative to the theoretical cross section in the GMSB model, shown in the plane of $m_{\tilde{g}}$ and $c\tau_{0}$. A branching fraction of $100\%$ for the gluino decay to a gluon and a gravitino is assumed. The area below the thick black curve represents the observed exclusion region, while the dashed red lines indicate the expected limits and their $\pm 1$ standard deviation ranges from experimental uncertainties. The thin black lines show the effect of the theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

The expected plus 1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{experiment}}$ upper limits at $95\%$ CL for the gluino pair production cross section relative to the theoretical cross section in the GMSB model, shown in the plane of $m_{\tilde{g}}$ and $c\tau_{0}$. A branching fraction of $100\%$ for the gluino decay to a gluon and a gravitino is assumed. The area below the thick black curve represents the observed exclusion region, while the dashed red lines indicate the expected limits and their $\pm 1$ standard deviation ranges from experimental uncertainties. The thin black lines show the effect of the theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

The expected minus 1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{experiment}}$ upper limits at $95\%$ CL for the gluino pair production cross section relative to the theoretical cross section in the GMSB model, shown in the plane of $m_{\tilde{g}}$ and $c\tau_{0}$. A branching fraction of $100\%$ for the gluino decay to a gluon and a gravitino is assumed. The area below the thick black curve represents the observed exclusion region, while the dashed red lines indicate the expected limits and their $\pm 1$ standard deviation ranges from experimental uncertainties. The thin black lines show the effect of the theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

The expected upper limits at $95\%$ CL for the gluino pair production cross section in the GMSB model, shown in the plane of $m_{\tilde{g}}$ and $c\tau_{0}$. A branching fraction of $100\%$ for the gluino decay to a gluon and a gravitino is assumed. The area below the thick black curve represents the observed exclusion region, while the dashed red lines indicate the expected limits and their $\pm 1$ standard deviation ranges from experimental uncertainties. The thin black lines show the effect of the theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

The expected plus 1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{experiment}}$ upper limits at $95\%$ CL for the gluino pair production cross section in the GMSB model, shown in the plane of $m_{\tilde{g}}$ and $c\tau_{0}$. A branching fraction of $100\%$ for the gluino decay to a gluon and a gravitino is assumed. The area below the thick black curve represents the observed exclusion region, while the dashed red lines indicate the expected limits and their $\pm 1$ standard deviation ranges from experimental uncertainties. The thin black lines show the effect of the theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

The expected minus 1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{experiment}}$ upper limits at $95\%$ CL for the gluino pair production cross section in the GMSB model, shown in the plane of $m_{\tilde{g}}$ and $c\tau_{0}$. A branching fraction of $100\%$ for the gluino decay to a gluon and a gravitino is assumed. The area below the thick black curve represents the observed exclusion region, while the dashed red lines indicate the expected limits and their $\pm 1$ standard deviation ranges from experimental uncertainties. The thin black lines show the effect of the theoretical uncertainties on the signal cross section.

$p_{\rm{T}}$ differential cross section of prompt D0 mesons obtained from the analysis without vertexing reconstruction in p-Pb collisions at $\mathbf{\sqrt{{\textit s}_{\rm NN}}~=~5.02~TeV}$.

$p_{\rm{T}}$ differential cross section of inclusive D0 mesons from the analysis without vertexing reconstruction in p-Pb collisions at $\mathbf{\sqrt{{\textit s}_{\rm NN}}~=~5.02~TeV}$.

$p_{\rm{T}}$ differential cross section of inclusive D0 mesons from the analysis without vertexing reconstruction in pp collisions at $\mathbf{\sqrt{{\textit s}}~=~5.02~TeV}$ multiplied by A=208.

$p_{\rm{T}}$ differential cross section of prompt D0 mesons in pp collisions at $\mathbf{\sqrt{\textit s}~=~5.02~TeV}$ multiplied by A=208. For $0<p_{\rm{T}}<1$ GeV/$c$ the cross section is obtained from the analysis without vertexing recostruction and for $p_{\rm{T}}>1$ GeV/c the analysis with vertexing reconstruction is used.

$p_{\rm{T}}$ differential cross section of prompt D* mesons in pp collisions at $\mathbf{\sqrt{{\textit s}}~=~5.02~TeV}$ multiplied by A=208.

$p_{\rm{T}}$ differential cross section of prompt D+ mesons in pp collisions at $\mathbf{\sqrt{{\textit s}}~=~5.02~TeV}$ multiplied by A=208.

$p_{\rm{T}}$ differential cross section of prompt Ds mesons in pp collisions at $\mathbf{\sqrt{{\textit s}}~=~5.02~TeV}$ multiplied by A=208.

$p_{\rm{T}}$ differential cross section of prompt D0 mesons in p-Pb collisions at $\mathbf{\sqrt{{\textit s}_{\rm NN}}~=~5.02~TeV}$. For $0<p_{\rm{T}}<1$ GeV/$c$ the cross section is obtained from the analysis without vertexing recostruction and for $p_{\rm{T}}>1$ GeV/c the analysis with vertexing reconstruction is used.

$p_{\rm{T}}$ differential cross section of prompt D* mesons in p-Pb collisions at $\mathbf{\sqrt{{\textit s}_{\rm NN}}~=~5.02~TeV}$.

$p_{\rm{T}}$ differential cross section of prompt D+ mesons in p-Pb collisions at $\mathbf{\sqrt{{\textit s}_{\rm NN}}~=~5.02~TeV}$.

$p_{\rm{T}}$ differential cross section of prompt Ds mesons in p-Pb collisions at $\mathbf{\sqrt{{\textit s}_{\rm NN}}~=~5.02~TeV}$.

Ratio of prompt Ds+ over D+ production cross section as a function of the charged particle pseudorapidity density in p-Pb collisions at $\mathbf{\sqrt{{\textit s}_{\rm NN}}~=~5.02~TeV}$.

$R_{\rm{pPb}}$ of prompt D* mesons in p-Pb collisions at $\mathbf{\sqrt{{\textit s}_{\rm NN}}~=~5.02~TeV}$.

$R_{\rm{pPb}}$ of prompt Ds mesons in p-Pb collisions at $\mathbf{\sqrt{{\textit s}_{\rm NN}}~=~5.02~TeV}$.

$R_{\rm{pPb}}$ of prompt D0 mesons in p-Pb collisions at $\mathbf{\sqrt{{\textit s}_{\rm NN}}~=~5.02~TeV}$.

$R_{\rm{pPb}}$ of prompt D+ mesons in p-Pb collisions at $\mathbf{\sqrt{{\textit s}_{\rm NN}}~=~5.02~TeV}$.

$R_{\rm{pPb}}$ of prompt non-strange D mesons in p-Pb collisions at $\mathbf{\sqrt{{\textit s}_{\rm NN}}~=~5.02~TeV}$.

$Q_{\rm pPb}$ of prompt D mesons in different centrality classes in p-Pb collisions at $\mathbf{\sqrt{{\textit s}_{\rm NN}}~=~5.02~TeV}$

Ratio of prompt Ds+ over D+ production cross section as a function of the charged particle pseudorapidity density in p-Pb collisions at $\mathbf{\sqrt{{\textit s}_{\rm NN}}~=~5.02~TeV}$.

$Q_{\rm CP}$ of prompt D mesons in different centrality classes in p-Pb collisions at $\mathbf{\sqrt{{\textit s}_{\rm NN}}~=~5.02~TeV}$

Ratio of prompt D*+ over D0 production cross section as a function of transverse momentum in p-Pb collisions at $\mathbf{\sqrt{{\textit s}_{\rm NN}}~=~5.02~TeV}$

Ratio of prompt Ds+ over D+ production cross section as a function of transverse momentum in p-Pb collisions at $\mathbf{\sqrt{{\textit s}_{\rm NN}}~=~5.02~TeV}$

Ratio of prompt D+ over D0 production cross section as a function of transverse momentum in p-Pb collisions at $\mathbf{\sqrt{{\textit s}_{\rm NN}}~=~5.02~TeV}$

Ratio of prompt Ds+ over D0 production cross section as a function of transverse momentum in p-Pb collisions at $\mathbf{\sqrt{{\textit s}_{\rm NN}}~=~5.02~TeV}$

$\bar{d}$/d ratio as a function of transverse momentum in the 10-20% V0A multiplicity class

$\bar{d}$/d ratio as a function of transverse momentum in the 20-40% V0A multiplicity class

$\bar{d}$/d ratio as a function of transverse momentum in the 40-60% V0A multiplicity class

$\bar{d}$/d ratio as a function of transverse momentum in the 60-100% V0A multiplicity class

Transverse momentum distribution of $^{3}\overline{\mathrm{He}}$ for all non single diffractive (NSD) p-Pb collisions.

Transverse momentum distribution of $^{3}\mathrm{He}$ for all non single diffractive (NSD) p-Pb collisions.

Integrated yield of nuclei produced in NSD p-Pb collisions normalised by the spin degeneracy factor as a function of the mass number

Coalescence parameter $B_2$ as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ in the 0-10% V0A multiplicity class

Transverse momentum distributions of deuterons in the 10-20% V0A multiplicity class

Coalescence parameter $B_2$ as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ in the 10-20% V0A multiplicity class

Coalescence parameter $B_2$ as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ in the 20-40% V0A multiplicity class

Coalescence parameter $B_2$ as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ in the 40-60% V0A multiplicity class

Coalescence parameter $B_2$ as a function of $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ in the 60-100% V0A multiplicity class

Mean transverse momentum of deuteron produced in p-Pb collisions as a function of the charged particle multiplicity density ad mid-rapidity

Deuteron over proton ratio in p-Pb collisions as a function of the charged particle multiplicity density ad mid-rapidity

Transverse momentum distributions of deuterons in the 20-40% V0A multiplicity class

Transverse momentum distributions of deuterons in the 40-60% V0A multiplicity class

Transverse momentum distributions of deuterons in the 60-100% V0A multiplicity class

Transverse momentum distributions of anti-deuterons in the 0-10% V0A multiplicity class

Transverse momentum distributions of anti-deuterons in the 10-20% V0A multiplicity class

Transverse momentum distributions of anti-deuterons in the 20-40% V0A multiplicity class

Transverse momentum distributions of anti-deuterons in the 40-60% V0A multiplicity class