Expected and observed combined limits at 95% CL on the production cross-section of vector-like T in an $(X,T)$ doublet (50% $T\rightarrow Zt$, 50% $T\rightarrow Ht$).

Expected and observed combined limits at 95% CL on the production cross-section of vector-like T in a $T$ singlet (50% $T\rightarrow Wb$, 25% $T\rightarrow Zt$, 25% $T\rightarrow Ht$).

Expected and observed combined limits at 95% CL on the production cross-section of vector-like B for 100% $B\rightarrow Zb$.

Expected and observed combined limits at 95% CL on the production cross-section of vector-like B in a $(B,Y)$ doublet (50% $B\rightarrow Zb$, 50% $B\rightarrow Hb$).

Expected and observed combined limits at 95% CL on the production cross-section of vector-like B in a B singlet (50% $B\rightarrow Wt$, 25% $B\rightarrow Zb$, 25% $B\rightarrow Hb$).

Distribution of the final discriminant after the combined background-only fit in the 2$\ell$ 2$b$ double-tag 1 signal region. The signal contribution is the expected distribution for a singlet TT with a mass of 1.2 TeV. The last bin contains overflow.

Distribution of the final discriminant after the combined background-only fit in the 2$\ell$ 2$b$ top-tag signal region. The signal contribution is the expected distribution for a singlet TT with a mass of 1.2 TeV. The last bin contains overflow.

Distribution of the final discriminant after the combined background-only fit in the 2$\ell$ 1$b$ $V$-tag signal region. The signal contribution is the expected distribution for a singlet TT with a mass of 1.2 TeV. The last bin contains overflow.

Distribution of the final discriminant after the combined background-only fit in the 2$\ell$ 1$b$ no-tag signal region. The signal contribution is the expected distribution for a singlet TT with a mass of 1.2 TeV. The last bin contains overflow.

Distribution of the final discriminant after the combined background-only fit in the 3$\ell$ $VV$ control region. The signal contribution is the expected distribution for a singlet TT with a mass of 1.2 TeV. The last bin contains overflow.

Distribution of the final discriminant after the combined background-only fit in the 3$\ell$ $H$-tag signal region. The signal contribution is the expected distribution for a singlet TT with a mass of 1.2 TeV. The last bin contains overflow.

Distribution of the final discriminant after the combined background-only fit in the 3$\ell$ top-tag signal region. The signal contribution is the expected distribution for a singlet TT with a mass of 1.2 TeV. The last bin contains overflow.

Distribution of the final discriminant after the combined background-only fit in the 2$\ell$ 1$b$ control region. The signal contribution is the expected distribution for a singlet TT with a mass of 1.2 TeV. The last bin contains overflow.

Distribution of the final discriminant after the combined background-only fit in the 2$\ell$ 2$b$ control region. The signal contribution is the expected distribution for a singlet TT with a mass of 1.2 TeV. The last bin contains overflow.

p-$\pi^{+}$ + antip-$\pi^{-}$ correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV for $m_\text{T} \in [1.20, 1.50)$ GeV/$c^2$

p-$\pi^{+}$ + antip-$\pi^{-}$ correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV for $m_\text{T} \in [1.50, 2.00)$ GeV/$c^2$

p-$\pi^{+}$ + antip-$\pi^{-}$ correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV for $m_\text{T} \in [2.00, 2.50)$ GeV/$c^2$

Spectral temperature parameter for $\Delta^{++}$(1232) from p-$\pi^{+}$ + antip-$\pi^{-}$ correlations in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV

Width of the $\Delta^{++}$(1232) from p-$\pi^{+}$ + antip-$\pi^{-}$ correlations in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV

Core source size of p-$\pi^{+}$ + antip-$\pi^{-}$ pairs in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV

p-$\pi^{-}$ + p-$\pi^{+}$ correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV for $m_\text{T} \in [0.54, 0.75)$ GeV/$c^2$

p-$\pi^{-}$ + p-$\pi^{+}$ correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV for $m_\text{T} \in [0.75, 0.95)$ GeV/$c^2$

p-$\pi^{-}$ + p-$\pi^{+}$ correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV for $m_\text{T} \in [0.95, 1.20)$ GeV/$c^2$

p-$\pi^{-}$ + p-$\pi^{+}$ correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV for $m_\text{T} \in [1.20, 1.50)$ GeV/$c^2$

p-$\pi^{-}$ + p-$\pi^{+}$ correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV for $m_\text{T} \in [1.50, 2.00)$ GeV/$c^2$

p-$\pi^{-}$ + p-$\pi^{+}$ correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV for $m_\text{T} \in [2.00, 2.50)$ GeV/$c^2$

Spectral temperature parameter for $\Delta^{0}$(1232) from p-$\pi^{-}$ + p-$\pi^{+}$ correlations in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV

Width of the $\Delta^{0}$(1232) from p-$\pi^{-}$ + p-$\pi^{+}$ correlations in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV

Core source size of p-$\pi^{-}$ + p-$\pi^{+}$ pairs in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV

(p-p)-$\pi^{+}$ + (antip-antip)-$\pi^{-}$ lower-order correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV

(p-p)-$\pi^{-}$ + (antip-antip)-$\pi^{+}$ lower-order correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV

(p-$\pi^{+}$)-p + (antip-$\pi^{-}$)-antip lower-order correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV

(p-$\pi^{-}$)-p + (antip-$\pi^{+}$)-antip lower-order correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV

(p-p-$\pi^{+}$) + (antip-antip-$\pi^{-}$) triplet correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV

Total lower-order contribution of p-p-$\pi^{+}$ + antip-antip-$\pi^{-}$ in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV

(p-p-$\pi^{-}$) + (antip-antip-$\pi^{+}$) triplet correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV

Total lower-order contribution of p-p-$\pi^{-}$ + antip-antip-$\pi^{+}$ in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV

Cumulant of p-p-$\pi^{+}$ + antip-antip-$\pi^{-}$ in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV

Cumulant of p-p-$\pi^{-}$ + antip-antip-$\pi^{+}$ in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV

Common ancestor p-$\pi^{+}$ + antip-$\pi^{-}$ correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with PYTHIA 8.2 (Monash 13 Tune) for $m_\text{T} \in [0.54, 0.75)$ GeV/$c^2$

Non-common ancestor p-$\pi^{+}$ + antip-$\pi^{-}$ correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with PYTHIA 8.2 (Monash 13 Tune) for $m_\text{T} \in [0.54, 0.75)$ GeV/$c^2$

Common ancestor p-$\pi^{+}$ + antip-$\pi^{-}$ correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with PYTHIA 8.2 (Monash 13 Tune) for $m_\text{T} \in [0.75, 0.95)$ GeV/$c^2$

Non-common ancestor p-$\pi^{+}$ + antip-$\pi^{-}$ correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with PYTHIA 8.2 (Monash 13 Tune) for $m_\text{T} \in [0.75, 0.95)$ GeV/$c^2$

Common ancestor p-$\pi^{+}$ + antip-$\pi^{-}$ correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with PYTHIA 8.2 (Monash 13 Tune) for $m_\text{T} \in [0.95, 1.20)$ GeV/$c^2$

Non-common ancestor p-$\pi^{+}$ + antip-$\pi^{-}$ correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with PYTHIA 8.2 (Monash 13 Tune) for $m_\text{T} \in [0.95, 1.20)$ GeV/$c^2$

Common ancestor p-$\pi^{+}$ + antip-$\pi^{-}$ correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with PYTHIA 8.2 (Monash 13 Tune) for $m_\text{T} \in [1.20, 1.50)$ GeV/$c^2$

Non-common ancestor p-$\pi^{+}$ + antip-$\pi^{-}$ correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with PYTHIA 8.2 (Monash 13 Tune) for $m_\text{T} \in [1.20, 1.50)$ GeV/$c^2$

Common ancestor p-$\pi^{+}$ + antip-$\pi^{-}$ correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with PYTHIA 8.2 (Monash 13 Tune) for $m_\text{T} \in [1.50, 2.00)$ GeV/$c^2$

Non-common ancestor p-$\pi^{+}$ + antip-$\pi^{-}$ correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with PYTHIA 8.2 (Monash 13 Tune) for $m_\text{T} \in [1.50, 2.00)$ GeV/$c^2$

Common ancestor p-$\pi^{+}$ + antip-$\pi^{-}$ correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with PYTHIA 8.2 (Monash 13 Tune) for $m_\text{T} \in [2.00, 2.50)$ GeV/$c^2$

Non-common ancestor p-$\pi^{+}$ + antip-$\pi^{-}$ correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with PYTHIA 8.2 (Monash 13 Tune) for $m_\text{T} \in [2.00, 2.50)$ GeV/$c^2$

Common ancestor p-$\pi^{-}$ + antip-$\pi^{+}$ correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with PYTHIA 8.2 (Monash 13 Tune) for $m_\text{T} \in [0.54, 0.75)$ GeV/$c^2$

Non-common ancestor p-$\pi^{-}$ + antip-$\pi^{+}$ correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with PYTHIA 8.2 (Monash 13 Tune) for $m_\text{T} \in [0.54, 0.75)$ GeV/$c^2$

Common ancestor p-$\pi^{-}$ + antip-$\pi^{+}$ correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with PYTHIA 8.2 (Monash 13 Tune) for $m_\text{T} \in [0.75, 0.95)$ GeV/$c^2$

Non-common ancestor p-$\pi^{-}$ + antip-$\pi^{+}$ correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with PYTHIA 8.2 (Monash 13 Tune) for $m_\text{T} \in [0.75, 0.95)$ GeV/$c^2$

Common ancestor p-$\pi^{-}$ + antip-$\pi^{+}$ correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with PYTHIA 8.2 (Monash 13 Tune) for $m_\text{T} \in [0.95, 1.20)$ GeV/$c^2$

Non-common ancestor p-$\pi^{-}$ + antip-$\pi^{+}$ correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with PYTHIA 8.2 (Monash 13 Tune) for $m_\text{T} \in [0.95, 1.20)$ GeV/$c^2$

Common ancestor p-$\pi^{-}$ + antip-$\pi^{+}$ correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with PYTHIA 8.2 (Monash 13 Tune) for $m_\text{T} \in [1.20, 1.50)$ GeV/$c^2$

Non-common ancestor p-$\pi^{-}$ + antip-$\pi^{+}$ correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with PYTHIA 8.2 (Monash 13 Tune) for $m_\text{T} \in [1.20, 1.50)$ GeV/$c^2$

Common ancestor p-$\pi^{-}$ + antip-$\pi^{+}$ correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with PYTHIA 8.2 (Monash 13 Tune) for $m_\text{T} \in [1.50, 2.00)$ GeV/$c^2$

Non-common ancestor p-$\pi^{-}$ + antip-$\pi^{+}$ correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with PYTHIA 8.2 (Monash 13 Tune) for $m_\text{T} \in [1.50, 2.00)$ GeV/$c^2$

Common ancestor p-$\pi^{-}$ + antip-$\pi^{+}$ correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with PYTHIA 8.2 (Monash 13 Tune) for $m_\text{T} \in [2.00, 2.50)$ GeV/$c^2$

Non-common ancestor p-$\pi^{-}$ + antip-$\pi^{+}$ correlation function in high-multiplicity (0-0.17%) pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV with PYTHIA 8.2 (Monash 13 Tune) for $m_\text{T} \in [2.00, 2.50)$ GeV/$c^2$

Invariant mass $m_{J}$ of the resonance candidates in the region defined with forward photon $\eta_{\gamma} > 1.3$ and anti-tagged large-$R$ jet after the fit to data under the background-only hypothesis. The total systematic uncertainty is shown as the hatched band. Three representative $Z^{`}$ signal distributions are overlaid as red lines. The signal is shown for $g_q=0.2$ with production cross sections of 309 fb, 143 fb, and 34.2 fb for $m_{Z^{`}}=(20,~50,~\text{and}~125~\text{GeV}$), respectively.

Observed (expected) upper exclusion limits at 95$\%$ CL on the coupling strength $g_q$ of a new vector $Z^{`}$ particle decaying to a $q\bar q$ pair for a LHC DM WG benchmark signal model where decay rates for all decay modes except $Z^{`}\to q \bar q$ are set to 0, and the interference between the $Z^{`}$ and the SM $Z$ boson is neglected.

Observed (solid lines) and expected (dashed lines) upper exclusion limits at 95$\%$ CL on the product of the $Z^{`}$ production production cross section, branching ratio for $Z^{`}\to q\bar q$ and acceptance ($\sigma_{Z^{`}}\times B(Z^{`}\to q\bar q)\times A$) of a new $Z^{`}$ resonance for a LHC DM WG benchmark signal model where all decay modes except $Z^{`}\to q \bar q$ are set to 0, and the interference between the $Z^{`}$ and the SM $Z$ boson is neglected.

The measured differential cross-sections and the predictions from the GM-VFNS calculation for the $D_s^\pm$ meson in bins of $p_T$ for $|\eta| < 2.5$. The statistical, systematic (excluding branching ratio) and branching ratio uncertainties are shown separately for data, while the total theory uncertainties are shown for GM-VFNS.

Inclusive $D^\pm$ meson production cross-sections in different fiducial volumes defined by $|\eta|<2.5$ and different $p_T$ regions. For the ATLAS measurements, the statistical, systematic (excluding branching ratio) and branching ratio uncertainties are shown separately; for the theoretical predictions, the total theoretical uncertainties are shown.

Inclusive $D_s^\pm$ meson production cross-sections in different fiducial volumes defined by $|\eta|<2.5$ and different $p_T$ regions. For the ATLAS measurements, the statistical, systematic (excluding branching ratio) and branching ratio uncertainties are shown separately; for the theoretical predictions, the total theoretical uncertainties are shown.

The measured $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{recoil}}$ distributions in the top control region, compared with the background predictions as estimated after the simultaneous, binned background-only fit to the data in the control regions. The last bin of the distribution contains overflows.

The measured $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{recoil}}$ distributions in the $Z\rightarrow\mu\mu$ control region, compared with the background predictions as estimated after the simultaneous, binned background-only fit to the data in the control regions. The last bin of the distribution contains overflows.

The measured $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{recoil}}$ distributions in the $Z\rightarrow ee$ control region, compared with the background predictions as estimated after the simultaneous, binned background-only fit to the data in the control regions. The last bin of the distribution contains overflows.

The measured $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{recoil}}$ distributions in the signal region, compared with the background predictions as estimated after the simultaneous, binned background-only fit to the data in the control regions. The last bin of the distribution contains overflows.

Observed exclusion contour at 95% CL in the $m_{Z_{A}}-m_\chi$ parameter plane for the axial-vector mediator model.

1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ up observed exclusion contour at 95% CL in the $m_{Z_{A}}-m_\chi$ parameter plane for the axial-vector mediator model.

1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ down observed exclusion contour at 95% CL in the $m_{Z_{A}}-m_\chi$ parameter plane for the axial-vector mediator model.

Expected exclusion contour at 95% CL in the $m_{Z_{A}}-m_\chi$ parameter plane for the axial-vector mediator model.

1 $\sigma$ up expected exclusion contour at 95% CL in the $m_{Z_{A}}-m_\chi$ parameter plane for the axial-vector mediator model.

1 $\sigma$ down expected exclusion contour at 95% CL in the $m_{Z_{A}}-m_\chi$ parameter plane for the axial-vector mediator model.

2 $\sigma$ up expected exclusion contour at 95% CL in the $m_{Z_{A}}-m_\chi$ parameter plane for the axial-vector mediator model.

2 $\sigma$ down expected exclusion contour at 95% CL in the $m_{Z_{A}}-m_\chi$ parameter plane for the axial-vector mediator model.

Observed exclusion contour at 95% CL in the $m_{Z_{P}}-m_\chi$ parameter plane for the pseudo-scalar mediator model.

1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ up observed exclusion contour at 95% CL in the $m_{Z_{P}}-m_\chi$ parameter plane for the pseudo-scalar mediator model.

1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ down observed exclusion contour at 95% CL in the $m_{Z_{P}}-m_\chi$ parameter plane for the pseudo-scalar mediator model.

Expected exclusion contour at 95% CL in the $m_{Z_{P}}-m_\chi$ parameter plane for the pseudo-scalar mediator model.

1 $\sigma$ up expected exclusion contour at 95% CL in the $m_{Z_{P}}-m_\chi$ parameter plane for the pseudo-scalar mediator model.

1 $\sigma$ down expected exclusion contour at 95% CL in the $m_{Z_{P}}-m_\chi$ parameter plane for the pseudo-scalar mediator model.

2 $\sigma$ up expected exclusion contour at 95% CL in the $m_{Z_{P}}-m_\chi$ parameter plane for the pseudo-scalar mediator model.

2 $\sigma$ down expected exclusion contour at 95% CL in the $m_{Z_{P}}-m_\chi$ parameter plane for the pseudo-scalar mediator model.

A comparison of the inferred limits with the constraints from direct-detection experiments on the spin-dependent WIMP-neutron and WIMP-proton scattering cross section as a function of the WIMP mass, in the context of the simplified model with axial-vector couplings. Limits are shown at 90% CL.

Observed excluded regions at the 95% CL in the ($\tilde{t}_1,\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$)mass plane for the decay channel $\tilde{t}_1 \to c + \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$ ($\mathcal{B}=100\%$)

1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ up observed excluded regions at the 95% CL in the ($\tilde{t}_1,\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$)mass plane for the decay channel $\tilde{t}_1 \to c + \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$ ($\mathcal{B}=100\%$)

1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ down observed excluded regions at the 95% CL in the ($\tilde{t}_1,\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$)mass plane for the decay channel $\tilde{t}_1 \to c + \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$ ($\mathcal{B}=100\%$)

Expected excluded regions at the 95% CL in the ($\tilde{t}_1,\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$)mass plane for the decay channel $\tilde{t}_1 \to c + \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$ ($\mathcal{B}=100\%$)

1 $\sigma$ up expected excluded regions at the 95% CL in the ($\tilde{t}_1,\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$)mass plane for the decay channel $\tilde{t}_1 \to c + \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$ ($\mathcal{B}=100\%$)

1 $\sigma$ down expected excluded regions at the 95% CL in the ($\tilde{t}_1,\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$)mass plane for the decay channel $\tilde{t}_1 \to c + \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$ ($\mathcal{B}=100\%$)

2 $\sigma$ up expected excluded regions at the 95% CL in the ($\tilde{t}_1,\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$)mass plane for the decay channel $\tilde{t}_1 \to c + \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$ ($\mathcal{B}=100\%$)

2 $\sigma$ down expected excluded regions at the 95% CL in the ($\tilde{t}_1,\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$)mass plane for the decay channel $\tilde{t}_1 \to c + \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$ ($\mathcal{B}=100\%$)

Observed excluded regions at the 95% CL in the ($\tilde{t}_1,\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$)mass plane for the decay channel $\tilde{t}_1 \to b + ff^{'} + \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$ ($\mathcal{B}=100\%$)

1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ up observed excluded regions at the 95% CL in the ($\tilde{t}_1,\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$)mass plane for the decay channel $\tilde{t}_1 \to b + ff^{'} + \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$ ($\mathcal{B}=100\%$)

1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ down observed excluded regions at the 95% CL in the ($\tilde{t}_1,\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$)mass plane for the decay channel $\tilde{t}_1 \to b + ff^{'} + \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$ ($\mathcal{B}=100\%$)

Expected excluded regions at the 95% CL in the ($\tilde{t}_1,\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$)mass plane for the decay channel $\tilde{t}_1 \to b + ff^{'} + \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$ ($\mathcal{B}=100\%$)

1 $\sigma$ up expected excluded regions at the 95% CL in the ($\tilde{t}_1,\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$)mass plane for the decay channel $\tilde{t}_1 \to b + ff^{'} + \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$ ($\mathcal{B}=100\%$)

1 $\sigma$ down expected excluded regions at the 95% CL in the ($\tilde{t}_1,\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$)mass plane for the decay channel $\tilde{t}_1 \to b + ff^{'} + \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$ ($\mathcal{B}=100\%$)

2 $\sigma$ up expected excluded regions at the 95% CL in the ($\tilde{t}_1,\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$)mass plane for the decay channel $\tilde{t}_1 \to b + ff^{'} + \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$ ($\mathcal{B}=100\%$)

2 $\sigma$ down expected excluded regions at the 95% CL in the ($\tilde{t}_1,\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$)mass plane for the decay channel $\tilde{t}_1 \to b + ff^{'} + \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$ ($\mathcal{B}=100\%$)

Observed exclusion plane at 95% CL as a function of sbottom and neutralino masses for the decay channel $\tilde{b}_1 \to b + \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$ ($\mathcal{B}=100\%$)

1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ up observed exclusion plane at 95% CL as a function of sbottom and neutralino masses for the decay channel $\tilde{b}_1 \to b + \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$ ($\mathcal{B}=100\%$)

1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ down observed exclusion plane at 95% CL as a function of sbottom and neutralino masses for the decay channel $\tilde{b}_1 \to b + \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$ ($\mathcal{B}=100\%$)

Expected exclusion plane at 95% CL as a function of sbottom and neutralino masses for the decay channel $\tilde{b}_1 \to b + \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$ ($\mathcal{B}=100\%$)

1 $\sigma$ up expected exclusion plane at 95% CL as a function of sbottom and neutralino masses for the decay channel $\tilde{b}_1 \to b + \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$ ($\mathcal{B}=100\%$)

1 $\sigma$ down expected exclusion plane at 95% CL as a function of sbottom and neutralino masses for the decay channel $\tilde{b}_1 \to b + \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$ ($\mathcal{B}=100\%$)

2 $\sigma$ up expected exclusion plane at 95% CL as a function of sbottom and neutralino masses for the decay channel $\tilde{b}_1 \to b + \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$ ($\mathcal{B}=100\%$)

2 $\sigma$ down expected exclusion plane at 95% CL as a function of sbottom and neutralino masses for the decay channel $\tilde{b}_1 \to b + \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$ ($\mathcal{B}=100\%$)

Observed exclusion region at 95$\%$ CL as a function of squark mass and the squark--neutralino massdifference for $\tilde{q} \to q + \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$ and $\tilde{q}_\mathrm{L} + \tilde{q}_\mathrm{R}$with ($\tilde{u},\tilde{d},\tilde{c},\tilde{s}$).

1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ up observed exclusion region at 95$\%$ CL as a function of squark mass and the squark--neutralino massdifference for $\tilde{q} \to q + \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$ and $\tilde{q}_\mathrm{L} + \tilde{q}_\mathrm{R}$with ($\tilde{u},\tilde{d},\tilde{c},\tilde{s}$).

1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ down observed exclusion region at 95$\%$ CL as a function of squark mass and the squark--neutralino massdifference for $\tilde{q} \to q + \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$ and $\tilde{q}_\mathrm{L} + \tilde{q}_\mathrm{R}$with ($\tilde{u},\tilde{d},\tilde{c},\tilde{s}$).

Expected exclusion region at 95$\%$ CL as a function of squark mass and the squark--neutralino massdifference for $\tilde{q} \to q + \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$ and $\tilde{q}_\mathrm{L} + \tilde{q}_\mathrm{R}$with ($\tilde{u},\tilde{d},\tilde{c},\tilde{s}$).

1 $\sigma$ up expected exclusion region at 95$\%$ CL as a function of squark mass and the squark--neutralino massdifference for $\tilde{q} \to q + \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$ and $\tilde{q}_\mathrm{L} + \tilde{q}_\mathrm{R}$with ($\tilde{u},\tilde{d},\tilde{c},\tilde{s}$).

1 $\sigma$ down expected exclusion region at 95$\%$ CL as a function of squark mass and the squark--neutralino massdifference for $\tilde{q} \to q + \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$ and $\tilde{q}_\mathrm{L} + \tilde{q}_\mathrm{R}$with ($\tilde{u},\tilde{d},\tilde{c},\tilde{s}$).

2 $\sigma$ up expected exclusion region at 95$\%$ CL as a function of squark mass and the squark--neutralino massdifference for $\tilde{q} \to q + \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$ and $\tilde{q}_\mathrm{L} + \tilde{q}_\mathrm{R}$with ($\tilde{u},\tilde{d},\tilde{c},\tilde{s}$).

2 $\sigma$ down expected exclusion region at 95$\%$ CL as a function of squark mass and the squark--neutralino massdifference for $\tilde{q} \to q + \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}$ and $\tilde{q}_\mathrm{L} + \tilde{q}_\mathrm{R}$with ($\tilde{u},\tilde{d},\tilde{c},\tilde{s}$).

Observed and expected exclusions at $95\%$ CL on the Horndeski dark-energy model for $m_{\phi}=0.1$ GeV and $c_{i\neq 2}=0$, $c_{2}=1$, expressed in terms of the visible cross section as a function of the suppression scale $M_{2}$.

$95\%$ CL observed and expected lower limits on the fundamental Planck scale in $4+n$ dimensions, $M_D$, as a function of the number of extra dimensions $n$, considering nominal LO signal cross sections.

Observed and expected 95$\%$ CL upper limits on the coupling $c_{\stackrel{\sim}{\smash{G}}}$ as a function of the effective scale $f_a$ for ALP mass of 1 MeV. The bands indicate the $\pm 1\sigma$ theory uncertainties in the observed limit and the $\pm 1\sigma$and $\pm 2\sigma$ ranges of the expected limit in the absence of a signal. The 95$\%$ CL limits are computed with no suppression of the events with $\hat{s} > f_a^2$.

Observed exclusion contour at 95% CL in the $m_{Z_{V}}-m_\chi$ parameter plane for the vector mediator model.

1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ up observed exclusion contour at 95% CL in the $m_{Z_{V}}-m_\chi$ parameter plane for the vector mediator model.

1 $\sigma_{\mathrm{theory}}^{\mathrm{PDF+scale}}$ down observed exclusion contour at 95% CL in the $m_{Z_{V}}-m_\chi$ parameter plane for the vector mediator model.

Expected exclusion contour at 95% CL in the $m_{Z_{V}}-m_\chi$ parameter plane for the vector mediator model.

1 $\sigma$ up expected exclusion contour at 95% CL in the $m_{Z_{V}}-m_\chi$ parameter plane for the vector mediator model.

1 $\sigma$ down expected exclusion contour at 95% CL in the $m_{Z_{V}}-m_\chi$ parameter plane for the vector mediator model.

2 $\sigma$ up expected exclusion contour at 95% CL in the $m_{Z_{V}}-m_\chi$ parameter plane for the vector mediator model.

2 $\sigma$ down expected exclusion contour at 95% CL in the $m_{Z_{V}}-m_\chi$ parameter plane for the vector mediator model.

A comparison of the inferred limits with the constraints from direct-detection experiments on the spin-independent WIMP-nucleon scattering cross section as a function of the WIMP mass, in the context of the simplified model with vector couplings. Limits are shown at 90% CL.

Inferred 95% CL limits on the WIMP annihilation rate as a function of WIMP mass, for the pseudoscalar mediator model. The annihilation rate is defined as the product of cross section $\sigma$ and relative velocity $v_{rel}$, averaged over the DM velocity distribution ($\langle\sigma v_{rel}\rangle$). Both the $qq$ and $gg$ annihilation channels are considered in the calculation of the annihilation rate

95% CL upper limits on the cross-section $\sigma$ in the $m_{Z_A}-m_{\chi}$ parameter plane for the axial-vector mediator model.

95% CL upper limits on the cross-section $\sigma$ in the $m_{Z_P}-m_{\chi}$ parameter plane for the pseudo-scalar mediator model.

Contribution to the total SR background uncertainty in exclusive bins of the SR, as obtained from the CR-only fit. In the table, the contribution of each source of systematic is shown as the sum in quadrature of the individual contributions represented by the corresponding nuisance parameters.

Expected and observed backgrounds, before and after a binned likelihood fit in the control regions, in the exclusive SR bin EM0.

Expected and observed backgrounds, before and after a binned likelihood fit in the control regions, in the exclusive SR bin EM1.

Expected and observed backgrounds, before and after a binned likelihood fit in the control regions, in the exclusive SR bin EM2.

Expected and observed backgrounds, before and after a binned likelihood fit in the control regions, in the exclusive SR bin EM3.

Expected and observed backgrounds, before and after a binned likelihood fit in the control regions, in the exclusive SR bin EM4.

Expected and observed backgrounds, before and after a binned likelihood fit in the control regions, in the exclusive SR bin EM5.

Expected and observed backgrounds, before and after a binned likelihood fit in the control regions, in the exclusive SR bin EM6.

Expected and observed backgrounds, before and after a binned likelihood fit in the control regions, in the exclusive SR bin EM7.

Expected and observed backgrounds, before and after a binned likelihood fit in the control regions, in the exclusive SR bin EM8.

Expected and observed backgrounds, before and after a binned likelihood fit in the control regions, in the exclusive SR bin EM9.

Expected and observed backgrounds, before and after a binned likelihood fit in the control regions, in the exclusive SR bin EM10.

Expected and observed backgrounds, before and after a binned likelihood fit in the control regions, in the exclusive SR bin EM11.

Expected and observed backgrounds, before and after a binned likelihood fit in the control regions, in the exclusive SR bin EM12.

Expected and observed backgrounds, before and after a binned likelihood fit in the control regions, in the inclusive SR IM0.

Expected and observed backgrounds, before and after a binned likelihood fit in the control regions, in the inclusive SR IM1.

Expected and observed backgrounds, before and after a binned likelihood fit in the control regions, in the inclusive SR IM2.

Expected and observed backgrounds, before and after a binned likelihood fit in the control regions, in the inclusive SR IM3.

Expected and observed backgrounds, before and after a binned likelihood fit in the control regions, in the inclusive SR IM4.

Expected and observed backgrounds, before and after a binned likelihood fit in the control regions, in the inclusive SR IM5.

Expected and observed backgrounds, before and after a binned likelihood fit in the control regions, in the inclusive SR IM6.

Expected and observed backgrounds, before and after a binned likelihood fit in the control regions, in the inclusive SR IM7.

Expected and observed backgrounds, before and after a binned likelihood fit in the control regions, in the inclusive SR IM8.

Expected and observed backgrounds, before and after a binned likelihood fit in the control regions, in the inclusive SR IM9.

Expected and observed backgrounds, before and after a binned likelihood fit in the control regions, in the inclusive SR IM10.

Expected and observed backgrounds, before and after a binned likelihood fit in the control regions, in the inclusive SR IM11.

Expected and observed backgrounds, before and after a binned likelihood fit in the control regions, in the inclusive SR IM12.

Cutflow of several signal benchmarks. A cut on the truth $E_\mathrm{T}^\mathrm{miss}$ at 150 GeV is applied.

Cutflow of several signal benchmarks. A cut on the truth $E_\mathrm{T}^\mathrm{miss}$ at 350 GeV is applied.

Target asymmetry for $p\pi^0$ as a function of the polar angle for bins of the incident photon energy in the range of $E_\gamma$ = 650-2600 MeV.

Target asymmetry for $p\pi^0$ as a function of the $p\pi0$ invariant mass for bins of the incident photon energy in the range of $E_\gamma$ = 650-2600 MeV.

Target asymmetry for $p\pi^0$ as a function of the $\phi^*$ angle for bins of the incident photon energy in the range of $E_\gamma$ = 650-2600 MeV.

Double polarization observables for $\pi^0\pi^0$ as a function of the polar angle for bins of the incident photon energy in the range of $E_\gamma$ = 650-950 MeV.

Double polarization observables for $\pi^0\pi^0$ as a function of the $\pi^0\pi0$ invariant mass for bins of the incident photon energy in the range of $E_\gamma$ = 650-950 MeV.

Double polarization observables for $\pi^0\pi^0$ as a function of the polar angle for bins of the incident photon energy in the range of $E_\gamma$ = 650-950 MeV.

Double polarization observables for $p\pi^0$ as a function of the $p\pi0$ invariant mass for bins of the incident photon energy in the range of $E_\gamma$ = 650-950 MeV.

Double polarization observables for $\pi^0\pi^0$ as a function of the $\phi^*$ angle for bins of the incident photon energy in the range of $E_\gamma$ = 650-950 MeV.

Double polarization observables for $p\pi^0$ as a function of the $\phi^*$ angle for bins of the incident photon energy in the range of $E_\gamma$ = 650-950 MeV.

Target asymmetries for $\pi^0\pi^0$ as a function of $\cos\vartheta$, invariant mass and $\phi^*$ for bins of the incident photon energy in the range of $E_\gamma$ = 650-800 MeV.

Target asymmetries for $\pi^0\pi^0$ as a function of $\cos\vartheta$, invariant mass and $\phi^*$ for bins of the incident photon energy in the range of $E_\gamma$ = 800-950 MeV.

Target asymmetries for $\pi^0\pi^0$ as a function of $\cos\vartheta$, invariant mass and $\phi^*$ for bins of the incident photon energy in the range of $E_\gamma$ = 950-1100 MeV.

Target asymmetries for $\pi^0\pi^0$ as a function of $\cos\vartheta$, invariant mass and $\phi^*$ for bins of the incident photon energy in the range of $E_\gamma$ = 1100-1250 MeV.

Target asymmetries for $p\pi^0$ as a function of $\cos\vartheta$, invariant mass and $\phi^*$ for bins of the incident photon energy in the range of $E_\gamma$ = 650-800 MeV.

Target asymmetries for $p\pi^0$ as a function of $\cos\vartheta$, invariant mass and $\phi^*$ for bins of the incident photon energy in the range of $E_\gamma$ = 800-950 MeV.

Target asymmetries for $p\pi^0$ as a function of $\cos\vartheta$, invariant mass and $\phi^*$ for bins of the incident photon energy in the range of $E_\gamma$ = 950-1100 MeV.

Target asymmetries for $p\pi^0$ as a function of $\cos\vartheta$, invariant mass and $\phi^*$ for bins of the incident photon energy in the range of $E_\gamma$ = 1100-1250 MeV.

Double polarization observables for $\pi^0\pi^0$ as a function of $\cos\vartheta$, invariant mass and $\phi^*$ for bins of the incident photon energy in the range of $E_\gamma$ = 650-800 MeV.

Double polarization observables for $\pi^0\pi^0$ as a function of $\cos\vartheta$, invariant mass and $\phi^*$ for bins of the incident photon energy in the range of $E_\gamma$ = 800-950 MeV.

Double polarization observables for $p\pi^0$ as a function of $\cos\vartheta$, invariant mass and $\phi^*$ for bins of the incident photon energy in the range of $E_\gamma$ = 650-800 MeV.

Double polarization observables for $p\pi^0$ as a function of $\cos\vartheta$, invariant mass and $\phi^*$ for bins of the incident photon energy in the range of $E_\gamma$ = 800-950 MeV.

Data compared to the SM prediction in each region of the positive \lam{} analysis, after the fit to data. The shaded bands represent the total post-fit uncertainty on the prediction.

Fit results in the ($\kappa_{Z}$, $\kappa_{W}$) plane, using the negative-$\lambda_{WZ}$ analysis. The results are overlaid with the confidence regions (shown in blue) from a separate fit using a combination of the Higgs boson measurements collected in Nature 607 (2022) 52. This fit assumes that all Higgs boson couplings besides the ones represented are positive, and that only SM particles contribute to loop processes. Confidence regions are constructed from the log-likelihood ratio $\Lambda_{LR}=-2\ln(L/L_{max})$, where $L_{\max}$ is the likelihood for the best-fit point, which is shown as a black dot for the VBF $WH$ analysis or a blue dot for the Higgs combination. The $1\sigma$, $2\sigma$, and $5\sigma$ regions are defined by $\Lambda_{LR}$ values smaller than 2.30, 6.18, and 28.7, respectively. The SM value is marked with a star, while green triangles mark the points with $\kappa_{Z} = \pm1$, $\kappa_{W} = \mp1$.

$p_{T}$ dependence of $v_{2}$ for $\pi^{+}$ in Au+Au collisions at 3.9 GeV

$p_{T}$ dependence of $v_{2}$ for $\pi^{+}$ in Au+Au collisions at 4.5 GeV

$p_{T}$ dependence of $v_{2}$ for $\pi^{-}$ in Au+Au collisions at 3 GeV

$p_{T}$ dependence of $v_{2}$ for $\pi^{-}$ in Au+Au collisions at 3.2 GeV

$p_{T}$ dependence of $v_{2}$ for $\pi^{-}$ in Au+Au collisions at 3.5 GeV

$p_{T}$ dependence of $v_{2}$ for $\pi^{-}$ in Au+Au collisions at 3.9 GeV

$p_{T}$ dependence of $v_{2}$ for $\pi^{-}$ in Au+Au collisions at 4.5 GeV

$p_{T}$ dependence of $v_{2}$ for $K^{+}$ in Au+Au collisions at 3 GeV

$p_{T}$ dependence of $v_{2}$ for $K^{+}$ in Au+Au collisions at 3.2 GeV

$p_{T}$ dependence of $v_{2}$ for $K^{+}$ in Au+Au collisions at 3.5 GeV

$p_{T}$ dependence of $v_{2}$ for $K^{+}$ in Au+Au collisions at 3.9 GeV

$p_{T}$ dependence of $v_{2}$ for $K^{+}$ in Au+Au collisions at 4.5 GeV

$p_{T}$ dependence of $v_{2}$ for $K^{-}$ in Au+Au collisions at 3 GeV

$p_{T}$ dependence of $v_{2}$ for $K^{-}$ in Au+Au collisions at 3.2 GeV

$p_{T}$ dependence of $v_{2}$ for $K^{-}$ in Au+Au collisions at 3.5 GeV

$p_{T}$ dependence of $v_{2}$ for $K^{-}$ in Au+Au collisions at 3.9 GeV

$p_{T}$ dependence of $v_{2}$ for $K^{-}$ in Au+Au collisions at 4.5 GeV

$p_{T}$ dependence of $v_{2}$ for $K^{0}_{S}$ in Au+Au collisions at 3 GeV

$p_{T}$ dependence of $v_{2}$ for $K^{0}_{S}$ in Au+Au collisions at 3.2 GeV

$p_{T}$ dependence of $v_{2}$ for $K^{0}_{S}$ in Au+Au collisions at 3.5 GeV

$p_{T}$ dependence of $v_{2}$ for $K^{0}_{S}$ in Au+Au collisions at 3.9 GeV

$p_{T}$ dependence of $v_{2}$ for $K^{0}_{S}$ in Au+Au collisions at 4.5 GeV

$p_{T}$ dependence of $v_{2}$ for $p$ in Au+Au collisions at 3 GeV

$p_{T}$ dependence of $v_{2}$ for $p$ in Au+Au collisions at 3.2 GeV

$p_{T}$ dependence of $v_{2}$ for $p$ in Au+Au collisions at 3.5 GeV

$p_{T}$ dependence of $v_{2}$ for $p$ in Au+Au collisions at 3.9 GeV

$p_{T}$ dependence of $v_{2}$ for $p$ in Au+Au collisions at 4.5 GeV

$p_{T}$ dependence of $v_{2}$ for $\Lambda$ in Au+Au collisions at 3 GeV

$p_{T}$ dependence of $v_{2}$ for $\Lambda$ in Au+Au collisions at 3.2 GeV

$p_{T}$ dependence of $v_{2}$ for $\Lambda$ in Au+Au collisions at 3.5 GeV

$p_{T}$ dependence of $v_{2}$ for $\Lambda$ in Au+Au collisions at 3.9 GeV

$p_{T}$ dependence of $v_{2}$ for $\Lambda$ in Au+Au collisions at 4.5 GeV

The number of constituent quarks $n_q$ scaled $v_2$ as a function of $n_q$ scaled transverse kinetic energy for $\pi^{+}$ at 3 GeV

The number of constituent quarks $n_q$ scaled $v_2$ as a function of $n_q$ scaled transverse kinetic energy for $\pi^{+}$ at 3.2 GeV

The number of constituent quarks $n_q$ scaled $v_2$ as a function of $n_q$ scaled transverse kinetic energy for $\pi^{+}$ at 3.5 GeV

The number of constituent quarks $n_q$ scaled $v_2$ as a function of $n_q$ scaled transverse kinetic energy for $\pi^{+}$ at 3.9 GeV

The number of constituent quarks $n_q$ scaled $v_2$ as a function of $n_q$ scaled transverse kinetic energy for $\pi^{+}$ at 4.5 GeV

The number of constituent quarks $n_q$ scaled $v_2$ as a function of $n_q$ scaled transverse kinetic energy for $\pi^{-}$ at 3 GeV

The number of constituent quarks $n_q$ scaled $v_2$ as a function of $n_q$ scaled transverse kinetic energy for $\pi^{-}$ at 3.2 GeV

The number of constituent quarks $n_q$ scaled $v_2$ as a function of $n_q$ scaled transverse kinetic energy for $\pi^{-}$ at 3.5 GeV

The number of constituent quarks $n_q$ scaled $v_2$ as a function of $n_q$ scaled transverse kinetic energy for $\pi^{-}$ at 3.9 GeV

The number of constituent quarks $n_q$ scaled $v_2$ as a function of $n_q$ scaled transverse kinetic energy for $\pi^{-}$ at 4.5 GeV

The number of constituent quarks $n_q$ scaled $v_2$ as a function of $n_q$ scaled transverse kinetic energy for $K^{+}$ at 3 GeV

The number of constituent quarks $n_q$ scaled $v_2$ as a function of $n_q$ scaled transverse kinetic energy for $K^{+}$ at 3.2 GeV

The number of constituent quarks $n_q$ scaled $v_2$ as a function of $n_q$ scaled transverse kinetic energy for $K^{+}$ at 3.5 GeV

The number of constituent quarks $n_q$ scaled $v_2$ as a function of $n_q$ scaled transverse kinetic energy for $K^{+}$ at 3.9 GeV

The number of constituent quarks $n_q$ scaled $v_2$ as a function of $n_q$ scaled transverse kinetic energy for $K^{+}$ at 4.5 GeV

The number of constituent quarks $n_q$ scaled $v_2$ as a function of $n_q$ scaled transverse kinetic energy for $K^{-}$ at 3 GeV

The number of constituent quarks $n_q$ scaled $v_2$ as a function of $n_q$ scaled transverse kinetic energy for $K^{-}$ at 3.2 GeV

The number of constituent quarks $n_q$ scaled $v_2$ as a function of $n_q$ scaled transverse kinetic energy for $K^{-}$ at 3.5 GeV

The number of constituent quarks $n_q$ scaled $v_2$ as a function of $n_q$ scaled transverse kinetic energy for $K^{-}$ at 3.9 GeV

The number of constituent quarks $n_q$ scaled $v_2$ as a function of $n_q$ scaled transverse kinetic energy for $K^{-}$ at 4.5 GeV

The number of constituent quarks $n_q$ scaled $v_2$ as a function of $n_q$ scaled transverse kinetic energy for $K^{0}_{S}$ at 3 GeV

The number of constituent quarks $n_q$ scaled $v_2$ as a function of $n_q$ scaled transverse kinetic energy for $K^{0}_{S}$ at 3.2 GeV

The number of constituent quarks $n_q$ scaled $v_2$ as a function of $n_q$ scaled transverse kinetic energy for $K^{0}_{S}$ at 3.5 GeV

The number of constituent quarks $n_q$ scaled $v_2$ as a function of $n_q$ scaled transverse kinetic energy for $K^{0}_{S}$ at 3.9 GeV

The number of constituent quarks $n_q$ scaled $v_2$ as a function of $n_q$ scaled transverse kinetic energy for $K^{0}_{S}$ at 4.5 GeV

The number of constituent quarks $n_q$ scaled $v_2$ as a function of $n_q$ scaled transverse kinetic energy for $p$ at 3 GeV

The number of constituent quarks $n_q$ scaled $v_2$ as a function of $n_q$ scaled transverse kinetic energy for $p$ at 3.2 GeV

The number of constituent quarks $n_q$ scaled $v_2$ as a function of $n_q$ scaled transverse kinetic energy for $p$ at 3.5 GeV

The number of constituent quarks $n_q$ scaled $v_2$ as a function of $n_q$ scaled transverse kinetic energy for $p$ at 3.9 GeV

The number of constituent quarks $n_q$ scaled $v_2$ as a function of $n_q$ scaled transverse kinetic energy for $p$ at 4.5 GeV

The number of constituent quarks $n_q$ scaled $v_2$ as a function of $n_q$ scaled transverse kinetic energy for $\Lambda$ at 3 GeV

The number of constituent quarks $n_q$ scaled $v_2$ as a function of $n_q$ scaled transverse kinetic energy for $\Lambda$ at 3.2 GeV

The number of constituent quarks $n_q$ scaled $v_2$ as a function of $n_q$ scaled transverse kinetic energy for $\Lambda$ at 3.5 GeV

The number of constituent quarks $n_q$ scaled $v_2$ as a function of $n_q$ scaled transverse kinetic energy for $\Lambda$ at 3.9 GeV

The number of constituent quarks $n_q$ scaled $v_2$ as a function of $n_q$ scaled transverse kinetic energy for $\Lambda$ at 4.5 GeV

The energy dependence of $p_T$ integrated $v_2$ for $\pi^{\pm}$, $K^{\pm}$, $K^{0}_{S}$, $p$, and $\Lambda$ in 10-40\% centrality from Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\text{NN}}}$ = 3.0, 3.2, 3.5, 3.9, and 4.5 GeV.

The energy dependence of $n_{q}$ scaled $v_{2}$ ratios of $v_{2}^{q}(\pi^{+}) / v_{2}^{q}(K^{+})$ and $v_{2}^{q}(p) / v_{2}^{q}(K^{+})$ at ($m_T - m_0$)/$n_q$ = 0.4 GeV/$c^2$

Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the cross section for the resonant production of a new spin-2 particle $\mathrm{X}^{(2)}$ which decays to Higgs boson pairs, $\sigma(\mathrm{pp} \to \mathrm{X}^{(2)} \to \mathrm{HH})$, given for different values of $m_\mathrm{X}$ in the range 260-1000 GeV.

Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the cross section for the resonant production of a new scalar particle $\mathrm{X}$ which decays to a SM Higgs boson and a new scalar particle $\mathrm{Y}$ which subsequently decay to a pair of photons and a pair of tau leptons, $\sigma(\mathrm{pp} \to \mathrm{X} \to \mathrm{YH} \to \gamma\gamma\tau\tau)$. The limits are shown for different values of $m_\mathrm{Y}$ in the range 50-800 GeV and at particular values of $m_\mathrm{X}$ in the range 300-1000 GeV.

Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the cross section for the resonant production of a new scalar particle $\mathrm{X}$ which decays to a SM Higgs boson and a new scalar particle $\mathrm{Y}$ which subsequently decay to a pair of photons and a pair of tau leptons, $\sigma(\mathrm{pp} \to \mathrm{X} \to \mathrm{YH} \to \gamma\gamma\tau\tau)$. The limits are shown for different values of $m_\mathrm{X}$ in the range 300-1000 GeV and at particular values of $m_\mathrm{Y}$ in the range 50-800 GeV.

Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the cross section for the resonant production of a new scalar particle $\mathrm{X}$ which decays to a SM Higgs boson and a new scalar particle $\mathrm{Y}$ which subsequently decay to a pair of photons and a pair of tau leptons, $\sigma(\mathrm{pp} \to \mathrm{X} \to \mathrm{YH} \to \gamma\gamma\tau\tau)$. The limits are shown for different values of $m_\mathrm{X}$ in the range 300-1000 GeV and $m_\mathrm{Y}$ in the range 50-800 GeV.

Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the cross section for the resonant production of a new scalar particle $\mathrm{X}$ which decays to a SM Higgs boson and a new scalar particle $\mathrm{Y}$, multiplied by the $\mathrm{Y} \to \gamma\gamma$ branching fraction, $\sigma(\mathrm{pp} \to \mathrm{X} \to \mathrm{YH})B(\mathrm{Y} \to \gamma\gamma)$. The limits are shown for different values of $m_\mathrm{Y}$ in the range 70-125 GeV and at particular values of $m_\mathrm{X}$ in the range 300-1000 GeV.

Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the cross section for the resonant production of a new scalar particle $\mathrm{X}$ which decays to a SM Higgs boson and a new scalar particle $\mathrm{Y}$, multiplied by the $\mathrm{Y} \to \gamma\gamma$ branching fraction, $\sigma(\mathrm{pp} \to \mathrm{X} \to \mathrm{YH})B(\mathrm{Y} \to \gamma\gamma)$. The limits are shown for different values of $m_\mathrm{X}$ in the range 300-800 GeV and at particular values of $m_\mathrm{Y}$ in the range 70-125 GeV.

Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the cross section for the resonant production of a new scalar particle $\mathrm{X}$ which decays to a SM Higgs boson and a new scalar particle $\mathrm{Y}$, multiplied by the $\mathrm{Y} \to \gamma\gamma$ branching fraction, $\sigma(\mathrm{pp} \to \mathrm{X} \to \mathrm{YH})B(\mathrm{Y} \to \gamma\gamma)$. The limits are shown for different values of $m_\mathrm{X}$ in the range 300-1000 GeV and $m_\mathrm{Y}$ in the range 70-125 GeV.

Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the cross section for the resonant production of a new scalar particle $\mathrm{X}$ which decays to a SM Higgs boson and a new scalar particle $\mathrm{Y}$, multiplied by the $\mathrm{Y} \to \gamma\gamma$ branching fraction, $\sigma(\mathrm{pp} \to \mathrm{X} \to \mathrm{YH})B(\mathrm{Y} \to \gamma\gamma)$. The limits are shown for different values of $m_\mathrm{Y}$ in the range 125-800 GeV and at particular values of $m_\mathrm{X}$ in the range 300-1000 GeV.

Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the cross section for the resonant production of a new scalar particle $\mathrm{X}$ which decays to a SM Higgs boson and a new scalar particle $\mathrm{Y}$, multiplied by the $\mathrm{Y} \to \gamma\gamma$ branching fraction, $\sigma(\mathrm{pp} \to \mathrm{X} \to \mathrm{YH})B(\mathrm{Y} \to \gamma\gamma)$. The limits are shown for different values of $m_\mathrm{X}$ in the range 300-800 GeV and at particular values of $m_\mathrm{Y}$ in the range 125-800 GeV.

Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the cross section for the resonant production of a new scalar particle $\mathrm{X}$ which decays to a SM Higgs boson and a new scalar particle $\mathrm{Y}$, multiplied by the $\mathrm{Y} \to \gamma\gamma$ branching fraction, $\sigma(\mathrm{pp} \to \mathrm{X} \to \mathrm{YH})B(\mathrm{Y} \to \gamma\gamma)$. The limits are shown for different values of $m_\mathrm{X}$ in the range 300-1000 GeV and $m_\mathrm{Y}$ in the range 125-800 GeV.

Figure 8(left) of the article. Differential fiducial cross-section of the Z boson $p_T$ in events with $Z \left( \rightarrow \ell\ell \right) + 1 b$-jet. The thin inner band corresponds to the statistical uncertainty of the data, and the outer band to statistical and systematic uncertainties of the data, added in quadrature.

Figure 8(right) of the article. Differential fiducial cross-section of the leading $b$-jet $p_T$ in events with $Z \left( \rightarrow \ell\ell \right) + 1 b$-jet. The thin inner band corresponds to the statistical uncertainty of the data, and the outer band to statistical and systematic uncertainties of the data, added in quadrature.

Figure 9 of the article. Differential fiducial cross-section of the $\Delta R$ between the $Z$ boson and the leading $b$-jet in events with $Z \left( \rightarrow \ell\ell \right) + 1 b$-jet. The thin inner band corresponds to the statistical uncertainty of the data, and the outer band to statistical and systematic uncertainties of the data, added in quadrature.

Figure 10(left) of the article. Differential fiducial cross-section of the $\Delta \phi$ between the leading and sub-leading $b$-jets in events with $Z \left( \rightarrow \ell\ell \right) + 2 b$-jets. The thin inner band corresponds to the statistical uncertainty of the data, and the outer band to statistical and systematic uncertainties of the data, added in quadrature.

Figure 10(right) of the article. Differential fiducial cross-section of the invariant mass of the leading and sub-leading $b$-jets in events with $Z \left( \rightarrow \ell\ell \right) + 2 b$-jets. The thin inner band corresponds to the statistical uncertainty of the data, and the outer band to statistical and systematic uncertainties of the data, added in quadrature.

Figure 11(left) of the article. Differential fiducial cross-section of the Z boson $p_T$ in events with $Z \left( \rightarrow \ell\ell \right) + 1 c$-jet. The thin inner band corresponds to the statistical uncertainty of the data, and the outer band to statistical and systematic uncertainties of the data, added in quadrature.

Figure 11(right) of the article. Differential fiducial cross-section of the leading $c$-jet $p_T$ in events with $Z \left( \rightarrow \ell\ell ight) + 1 c$-jet. The thin inner band corresponds to the statistical uncertainty of the data, and the outer band to statistical and systematic uncertainties of the data, added in quadrature.

Figure 12 of the article. Differential fiducial cross-section of the leading $c$-jet $x_F$ in events with $Z \left( \rightarrow \ell\ell \right) + 1 c$-jet. The thin inner band corresponds to the statistical uncertainty of the data, and the outer band to statistical and systematic uncertainties of the data, added in quadrature.

Correction factors from parton level done with flavour dressing algorithms as seen in Ref. [2] of the paper to hadron level with R 0.3 cone labelling (see Tables 18 & 24) for the differential cross-section of the Z boson $p_T$ in events with $Z (\rightarrow ll) \ge 1 $ b-jets. Systematic errors include Sherpa 2.2.11 and MGaMC+Py8 FxFx uncertainties for what concerns the passage from hadron level flavour dressing to hadron level cone labelling, plus statistical uncertainty of Pythia8 simulations used for parton to hadron corrections. See Table 4.

Correction factors from parton level done with flavour dressing algorithms as seen in Ref. [2] of the paper to hadron level with R 0.3 cone labelling (see Tables 19 & 25) for the differential cross-section of the Z boson $p_T$ in events with $Z (\rightarrow ll) \ge 1 $ c-jets. Systematic errors include Sherpa 2.2.11 and MGaMC+Py8 FxFx uncertainties for what concerns the passage from hadron level flavour dressing to hadron level cone labelling, plus statistical uncertainty of Pythia8 simulations used for parton to hadron corrections. See Table 9.

Correction factors from parton level done with flavour dressing algorithms as seen in Ref. [2] of the paper to hadron level with R 0.3 cone labelling (see Tables 20 & 26) for the differential cross-section of the leading $b$-jet $p_T$ in events with $Z (\rightarrow ll) \ge 1 $ b-jets. Systematic errors include Sherpa 2.2.11 and MGaMC+Py8 FxFx uncertainties for what concerns the passage from hadron level flavour dressing to hadron level cone labelling, plus statistical uncertainty of Pythia8 simulations used for parton to hadron corrections. See Table 5.

Correction factors from parton level done with flavour dressing algorithms as seen in Ref. [2] of the paper to hadron level with R 0.3 cone labelling (see Tables 21 & 27) for the differential cross-section of the leading $c$-jet $p_T$ in events with $Z (\rightarrow ll) \ge 1 $ c-jets. Systematic errors include Sherpa 2.2.11 and MGaMC+Py8 FxFx uncertainties for what concerns the passage from hadron level flavour dressing to hadron level cone labelling, plus statistical uncertainty of Pythia8 simulations used for parton to hadron corrections. See Table 10.

Correction factors from parton level done with flavour dressing algorithms as seen in Ref. [2] of the paper to hadron level with R 0.3 cone labelling (see Tables 22 & 28) for the differential cross-section of the leading $c$-jet $x_F$ in events with $Z (\rightarrow ll) \ge 1 $ c-jets. Systematic errors include Sherpa 2.2.11 and MGaMC+Py8 FxFx uncertainties for what concerns the passage from hadron level flavour dressing to hadron level cone labelling, plus statistical uncertainty of Pythia8 simulations used for parton to hadron corrections. See Table 11.

Correction factors from parton level done with flavour dressing algorithms as seen in Ref. [2] of the paper of the paper to hadron level with R 0.3 cone labelling (see Tables 23 & 29) for the differential cross-section of $\Delta R$ between the $Z$ boson and the leading $b$-jet in events with $Z (\rightarrow ll) \ge 1 $ b-jets. Systematic errors include Sherpa 2.2.11 and MGaMC+Py8 FxFx uncertainties for what concerns the passage from hadron level flavour dressing to hadron level cone labelling, plus statistical uncertainty of Pythia8 simulations used for parton to hadron corrections. See Table 6.

Correction factors from hadron level done with flavour dressing algorithms as seen in Ref. [2] of the paper to hadron level R 0.3 cone labelling for the differential cross-section of the Z boson $p_T$ in events with $Z (\rightarrow ll) \ge 1 $ b-jets. Systematic errors include Sherpa 2.2.11 and MGaMC+Py8 FxFx uncertainties. See Table 12.

Correction factors from hadron level done with flavour dressing algorithms as seen in Ref. [2] of the paper to hadron level with R 0.3 cone labelling for the differential cross-section of the Z boson $p_T$ in events with $Z (\rightarrow ll) \ge 1 $ c-jets. Systematic errors include Sherpa 2.2.11 and MGaMC+Py8 FxFx uncertainties. See Table 13.

Correction factors from hadron level done with flavour dressing algorithms as seen in Ref. [2] of the paper to hadron level with R 0.3 cone labelling for the differential cross-section of the leading $b$-jet $p_T$ in events with $Z (\rightarrow ll) \ge 1 $ b-jets. Systematic errors include Sherpa 2.2.11 and MGaMC+Py8 FxFx uncertainties. See Table 14.

Correction factors from hadron level done with flavour dressing algorithms as seen in Ref. [2] of the paper to hadron level with R 0.3 cone labelling for the differential cross-section of the leading $c$-jet $p_T$ in events with $Z (\rightarrow ll) \ge 1 $ c-jets. Systematic errors include Sherpa 2.2.11 and MGaMC+Py8 FxFx uncertainties. See Table 15.

Correction factors from hadron level done with flavour dressing algorithms as seen in Ref. [2] of the paper to hadron level with R 0.3 cone labelling for the differential cross-section of the leading $c$-jet $x_F$ in events with $Z (\rightarrow ll) \ge 1 $ c-jets. Systematic errors include Sherpa 2.2.11 and MGaMC+Py8 FxFx uncertainties. See Table 16.

Correction factors from hadron level done with flavour dressing algorithms as seen in Ref. [2] of the paper of the paper to hadron level with R 0.3 cone labelling for the differential cross-section of $\Delta R$ between the $Z$ boson and the leading $b$-jet in events with $Z (\rightarrow ll) \ge 1 $ b-jets. Systematic errors include Sherpa 2.2.11 and MGaMC+Py8 FxFx uncertainties. See Table 17.

Correction factors from parton level to hadron level for the differential cross-section of the Z boson $p_T$ in events with $Z (\rightarrow ll) \ge 1 $ b-jets. Systematic errors statistical uncertainty of Pythia8 simulations. See Table 12.

Correction factors from parton level to hadron level for the differential cross-section of the Z boson $p_T$ in events with $Z (\rightarrow ll) \ge 1 $ c-jets. Systematic errors include statistical uncertainty of Pythia8 simulations. See Table 13.

Correction factors from parton level to hadron level for the differential cross-section of the leading $b$-jet $p_T$ in events with $Z (\rightarrow ll) \ge 1 $ b-jets. Systematic errors include statistical uncertainty of Pythia8 simulations. See Table 14.

Correction factors from parton level to hadron level for the differential cross-section of the leading $c$-jet $p_T$ in events with $Z (\rightarrow ll) \ge 1 $ c-jets. Systematic errors include statistical uncertainty of Pythia8 simulations. See Table 15.

Correction factors from parton level to hadron level for the differential cross-section of the leading $c$-jet $x_F$ in events with $Z (\rightarrow ll) \ge 1 $ c-jets. Systematic errors include statistical uncertainty of Pythia8 simulations. See Table 16.

Correction factors from parton level to hadron level for the differential cross-section of $\Delta R$ between the $Z$ boson and the leading $b$-jet in events with $Z (\rightarrow ll) \ge 1 $ b-jets. Systematic errors include statistical uncertainty of Pythia8 simulations. See Table 17.

NSC(6,3) vs centrality in Pb-Pb collisions at 5.02 TeV

NSC(5,4) vs centrality in Pb-Pb collisions at 5.02 TeV

Comparison between the values of the near-side associated peak yield for D mesons (average of D$^{0}$, D$^{+}$, and D$^{*+}$) and $\Lambda_\mathrm{c}^{+}$ correlated with charged particles, as a function of the charm-hadron $p_{\rm T}$, for associated particle $ p_{\rm T} > 0.3 $ GeV/$c$. The rapidity range for the charm hadrons is $|y^{\rm D,\Lambda_{c}^{+}}| < 0.5$. Correlations are integrated for $|\Delta\eta|=|\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D,\Lambda_{c}^{+}}| < 1$.

Comparison between the values of the near-side associated peak yield for D mesons (average of D$^{0}$, D$^{+}$, and D$^{*+}$) and $\Lambda_\mathrm{c}^{+}$ correlated with charged particles, as a function of the charm-hadron $p_{\rm T}$, for associated particle $ 0.3 < p_{\rm T} < 1 $ GeV/$c$. The rapidity range for the charm hadrons is $|y^{\rm D,\Lambda_{c}^{+}}| < 0.5$. Correlations are integrated for $|\Delta\eta|=|\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D,\Lambda_{c}^{+}}| < 1$.

Comparison between the values of the near-side associated peak yield for D mesons (average of D$^{0}$, D$^{+}$, and D$^{*+}$) and $\Lambda_\mathrm{c}^{+}$ correlated with charged particles, as a function of the charm-hadron $p_{\rm T}$, for associated particle $ p_{\rm T} > 1.0 $ GeV/$c$. The rapidity range for the charm hadrons is $|y^{\rm D,\Lambda_{c}^{+}}| < 0.5$. Correlations are integrated for $|\Delta\eta|=|\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D,\Lambda_{c}^{+}}| < 1$.

Ratio between the values of the near-side associated peak yield of the $\Lambda_\mathrm{c}^{+}$ and D mesons (average of D$^{0}$, D$^{+}$, and D$^{*+}$) azimuthal correlation distribution with charged particles, as a function of the charm-hadron $p_{\rm T}$, for associated particle $ p_{\rm T} > 0.3 $ GeV/$c$. The rapidity range for the charm hadrons is $|y^{\rm D,\Lambda_{c}^{+}}| < 0.5$. Correlations are integrated for $|\Delta\eta|=|\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D,\Lambda_{c}^{+}}| < 1$.

Ratio between the values of the near-side associated peak yield of the $\Lambda_\mathrm{c}^{+}$ and D mesons (average of D$^{0}$, D$^{+}$, and D$^{*+}$) azimuthal correlation distribution with charged particles, as a function of the charm-hadron $p_{\rm T}$, for associated particle $ 0.3 < p_{\rm T} < 1 $ GeV/$c$. The rapidity range for the charm hadrons is $|y^{\rm D,\Lambda_{c}^{+}}| < 0.5$. Correlations are integrated for $|\Delta\eta|=|\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D,\Lambda_{c}^{+}}| < 1$.

Ratio between the values of the near-side associated peak yield of the $\Lambda_\mathrm{c}^{+}$ and D mesons (average of D$^{0}$, D$^{+}$, and D$^{*+}$) azimuthal correlation distribution with charged particles, as a function of the charm-hadron $p_{\rm T}$, for associated particle $ p_{\rm T} > 1.0 $ GeV/$c$. The rapidity range for the charm hadrons is $|y^{\rm D,\Lambda_{c}^{+}}| < 0.5$. Correlations are integrated for $|\Delta\eta|=|\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D,\Lambda_{c}^{+}}| < 1$.

Comparison between the values of the near-side associated peak width for D mesons (average of D$^{0}$, D$^{+}$, and D$^{*+}$) and $\Lambda_\mathrm{c}^{+}$ correlated with charged particles, as a function of the charm-hadron $p_{\rm T}$, for associated particle $ p_{\rm T} > 0.3 $ GeV/$c$. The rapidity range for the charm hadrons is $|y^{\rm D,\Lambda_{c}^{+}}| < 0.5$. Correlations are integrated for $|\Delta\eta|=|\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D,\Lambda_{c}^{+}}| < 1$.

Comparison between the values of the near-side associated peak width for D mesons (average of D$^{0}$, D$^{+}$, and D$^{*+}$) and $\Lambda_\mathrm{c}^{+}$ correlated with charged particles, as a function of the charm-hadron $p_{\rm T}$, for associated particle $ 0.3 < p_{\rm T} < 1.0 $ GeV/$c$. The rapidity range for the charm hadrons is $|y^{\rm D,\Lambda_{c}^{+}}| < 0.5$. Correlations are integrated for $|\Delta\eta|=|\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D,\Lambda_{c}^{+}}| < 1$.

Comparison between the values of the near-side associated peak width for D mesons (average of D$^{0}$, D$^{+}$, and D$^{*+}$) and $\Lambda_\mathrm{c}^{+}$ correlated with charged particles, as a function of the charm-hadron $p_{\rm T}$, for associated particle $ p_{\rm T} > 1.0 $ GeV/$c$. The rapidity range for the charm hadrons is $|y^{\rm D,\Lambda_{c}^{+}}| < 0.5$. Correlations are integrated for $|\Delta\eta|=|\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D,\Lambda_{c}^{+}}| < 1$.

Ratio between the values of the near-side associated peak width of the $\Lambda_\mathrm{c}^{+}$ and D mesons (average of D$^{0}$, D$^{+}$, and D$^{*+}$) azimuthal correlation distribution with charged particles, as a function of the charm-hadron $p_{\rm T}$, for associated particle $ p_{\rm T} > 0.3 $ GeV/$c$. The rapidity range for the charm hadrons is $|y^{\rm D,\Lambda_{c}^{+}}| < 0.5$. Correlations are integrated for $|\Delta\eta|=|\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D,\Lambda_{c}^{+}}| < 1$.

Ratio between the values of the near-side associated peak width of the $\Lambda_\mathrm{c}^{+}$ and D mesons (average of D$^{0}$, D$^{+}$, and D$^{*+}$) azimuthal correlation distribution with charged particles, as a function of the charm-hadron $p_{\rm T}$, for associated particle $ 0.3 < p_{\rm T} < 1.0 $ GeV/$c$. The rapidity range for the charm hadrons is $|y^{\rm D,\Lambda_{c}^{+}}| < 0.5$. Correlations are integrated for $|\Delta\eta|=|\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D,\Lambda_{c}^{+}}| < 1$.

Ratio between the values of the near-side associated peak width of the $\Lambda_\mathrm{c}^{+}$ and D mesons (average of D$^{0}$, D$^{+}$, and D$^{*+}$) azimuthal correlation distribution with charged particles, as a function of the charm-hadron $p_{\rm T}$, for associated particle $ p_{\rm T} > 1.0 $ GeV/$c$. The rapidity range for the charm hadrons is $|y^{\rm D,\Lambda_{c}^{+}}| < 0.5$. Correlations are integrated for $|\Delta\eta|=|\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D,\Lambda_{c}^{+}}| < 1$.

Comparison between the values of the away-side associated peak yield for D mesons (average of D$^{0}$, D$^{+}$, and D$^{*+}$) and $\Lambda_\mathrm{c}^{+}$ correlated with charged particles, as a function of the charm-hadron $p_{\rm T}$, for associated particle $ p_{\rm T} > 0.3 $ GeV/$c$. The rapidity range for the charm hadrons is $|y^{\rm D,\Lambda_{c}^{+}}| < 0.5$. Correlations are integrated for $|\Delta\eta|=|\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D,\Lambda_{c}^{+}}| < 1$.

Comparison between the values of the away-side associated peak yield for D mesons (average of D$^{0}$, D$^{+}$, and D$^{*+}$) and $\Lambda_\mathrm{c}^{+}$ correlated with charged particles, as a function of the charm-hadron $p_{\rm T}$, for associated particle $ 0.3 < p_{\rm T} < 1 $ GeV/$c$. The rapidity range for the charm hadrons is $|y^{\rm D,\Lambda_{c}^{+}}| < 0.5$. Correlations are integrated for $|\Delta\eta|=|\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D,\Lambda_{c}^{+}}| < 1$.

Comparison between the values of the away-side associated peak yield for D mesons (average of D$^{0}$, D$^{+}$, and D$^{*+}$) and $\Lambda_\mathrm{c}^{+}$ correlated with charged particles, as a function of the charm-hadron $p_{\rm T}$, for associated particle $ p_{\rm T} > 1.0 $ GeV/$c$. The rapidity range for the charm hadrons is $|y^{\rm D,\Lambda_{c}^{+}}| < 0.5$. Correlations are integrated for $|\Delta\eta|=|\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D,\Lambda_{c}^{+}}| < 1$.

Ratio between the values of the away-side associated peak yield of the $\Lambda_\mathrm{c}^{+}$ and D mesons (average of D$^{0}$, D$^{+}$, and D$^{*+}$) azimuthal correlation distribution with charged particles, as a function of the charm-hadron $p_{\rm T}$, for associated particle $ p_{\rm T} > 0.3 $ GeV/$c$. The rapidity range for the charm hadrons is $|y^{\rm D,\Lambda_{c}^{+}}| < 0.5$. Correlations are integrated for $|\Delta\eta|=|\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D,\Lambda_{c}^{+}}| < 1$.

Ratio between the values of the away-side associated peak yield of the $\Lambda_\mathrm{c}^{+}$ and D mesons (average of D$^{0}$, D$^{+}$, and D$^{*+}$) azimuthal correlation distribution with charged particles, as a function of the charm-hadron $p_{\rm T}$, for associated particle $ 0.3 < p_{\rm T} < 1 $ GeV/$c$. The rapidity range for the charm hadrons is $|y^{\rm D,\Lambda_{c}^{+}}| < 0.5$. Correlations are integrated for $|\Delta\eta|=|\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D,\Lambda_{c}^{+}}| < 1$.

Ratio between the values of the away-side associated peak yield of the $\Lambda_\mathrm{c}^{+}$ and D mesons (average of D$^{0}$, D$^{+}$, and D$^{*+}$) azimuthal correlation distribution with charged particles, as a function of the charm-hadron $p_{\rm T}$, for associated particle $ p_{\rm T} > 1.0 $ GeV/$c$. The rapidity range for the charm hadrons is $|y^{\rm D,\Lambda_{c}^{+}}| < 0.5$. Correlations are integrated for $|\Delta\eta|=|\eta_{\rm ch}-\eta_{\rm D,\Lambda_{c}^{+}}| < 1$.

JPSI v2 in Au+Au collisions as a function of pT (GeV/c) for 10%--40% centrality with pT binned by [0, 2], [2, 5], and [5, 10] GeV/c.

Distributions of the number of hits in the cluster (Nhits) for the DT category in the out-of-time (OOT) region. The last histogram bin contains all overflow events.

Distributions of the number of hits in the cluster (Nhits) for the CSC category in the out-of-time (OOT) region. The last histogram bin contains all overflow events.

The 95% CL observed and expected upper limits on the VLL production cross section as a function of the VLL mass for the pseudoscalar mean proper decay length c$\tau$ = 0.025 m. The pseudoscalar mass is 2 GeV.

The 95% CL observed and expected upper limits on the VLL production cross section as a function of the pseudoscalar mean proper decay length c$\tau$ for VLL Mass of 700 GeV. The pseudoscalar mass is 2 GeV.

The 95% CL observed upper limits on the VLL production cross section as a function of the VLL mass and the pseudoscalar mean proper decay length c$\tau$. The pseudoscalar mass is 2 GeV.

The 95% CL observed exclusion contour on the VLL production cross section as a function of the VLL mass and the pseudoscalar mean proper decay length c$\tau$. The pseudoscalar mass is 2 GeV.

Selection efficiencies in the CSC category signal region (SR) for different signal hypothesis. The pseudoscalar mass is 2 GeV.

Selection efficiencies in the DT category signal region (SR) for different signal hypothesis. The pseudoscalar mass is 2 GeV.

The cluster reconstruction efficiency, including both DT and CSC clusters, as a function of the simulated r and |z| decay positions of the pseudoscalar into photons in events with MET > 200 GeV, for a VLL mass of 300 GeV and a pseudoscalar mass of 2 GeV, and a range of ctau values uniformly distributed between 0.01 and 0.1 m.

The cluster reconstruction efficiency, including both DT and CSC clusters, as a function of the simulated r and |z| decay positions of the pseudoscalar into photons in events with MET > 200 GeV, for a VLL mass of 500 GeV and a pseudoscalar mass of 2 GeV, and a range of ctau values uniformly distributed between 0.01 and 0.1 m.

Source radius $r_0$ as a function of〈$m_\mathrm{T}$〉for the assumption of a purely Gaussian source. The blue crosses result from fitting the p–p correlation function with the strong Argonne v18 potential. The green squared crosses (red triangular crosses) result from fitting the p–Λ correlation functions with the strong χEFT LO (NLO) potential. Statistical (lines) and systematic (boxes) uncertainties are shown separately.

Source radius $r_{core}$ as a function of〈$m_{T}$〉for the assumption of a Gaussian source with added resonances. The blue crosses result from fitting the p–p correlation function with the strong Argonnev18 potential. The green squared crosses (red triangular crosses) result from fitting the p–Λ correlation functions withthe strong χEFT LO (NLO) potential. Statistical (lines) and systematic (boxes) uncertainties are shown separately.

Source radius as a function of $r_\mathrm{core}$ for the assumption of a Gaussian source with added resonances. The blue crosses result from fitting the p–p correlation function with the strong Argonnev18 potential. The green squared crosses (red triangular crosses) result from fitting the p–Λ correlation functions withthe strong χEFT LO (NLO) potential. Statistical (lines) and systematic (boxes) uncertainties are shown separately.

Source radius $r_{core}$ as a function of〈$m_{T}$〉for the assumption of a Gaussian source with added resonances. The blue crosses result from fitting the p–p correlation function with the strong Argonnev18 potential. The green squared crosses (red triangular crosses) result from fitting the p–Λ correlation functions withthe strong χEFT LO (NLO) potential. Statistical (lines) and systematic (boxes) uncertainties are shown separately.

Source radius as a function of $r_\mathrm{core}$ for the assumption of a Gaussian source with added resonances. The blue crosses result from fitting the p–p correlation function with the strong Argonnev18 potential. The green squared crosses (red triangular crosses) result from fitting the p–Λ correlation functions withthe strong χEFT LO (NLO) potential. Statistical (lines) and systematic (boxes) uncertainties are shown separately.

A plot identical to Fig. 5, where the red p–Λ points are obtained by using an Usmani potential tuned to point iv) described in Table 1 in Phys.Lett.B 850 (2024) 138550

The direct-photon fraction r in high-multiplicity pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV as a function of transverse momentum for 1 < $p_{\rm T}$ < 6 GeV/$c$. r is the ratio of direct GAMMA to inclusive GAMMA.

The direct-photon inelastic cross section in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV as a function of transverse momentum for 1 < $p_{\rm T}$ < 6 GeV/$c$

The direct-photon invariant differential yield in high-multiplicity pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV as a function of transverse momentum for 1 < $p_{\rm T}$ < 6 GeV/$c$

The integrated photon yield in inelastic and high-multiplicity pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV as a function of charged particle multiplicity

The dielectron cross section in inelastic pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV as a function of invariant mass for 1 < $p_{\rm T,ee}$ < 2 GeV/$c$.

The dielectron cross section in high-multiplicity pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV as a function of invariant mass for 1 < $p_{\rm T,ee}$ < 2 GeV/$c$.

The dielectron cross section in inelastic pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV as a function of invariant mass for 3 < $p_{\rm T,ee}$ < 6 GeV/$c$.

The dielectron cross section in high-multiplicity pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV as a function of invariant mass for 3 < $p_{\rm T,ee}$ < 6 GeV/$c$.

$\rm \Xi_c^+/D^0$ ratio as a function of $p_{\rm T}$ in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV for $|y|<0.5$.

$\rm \Xi_c^0/\Lambda_c^+$ ratio as a function of $p_{\rm T}$ in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV for $|y|<0.5$.

$\rm \Xi_c^{0,+}/\Sigma_c^{0,+,++}$ ratio as a function of $p_{\rm T}$ in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV for $|y|<0.5$.

The $p_{\rm T}-$ integrated cross section of prompt $\Xi^{0}_{\rm c}-$baryon production in pp collisions at 13 TeV for $|y| < 0.5$.

The $p_{\rm T}-$ integrated cross section of prompt $\Xi^{0}_{\rm c}-$baryon production in pp collisions at 13 TeV for $|y| < 0.5$.

The $p_{\rm T}-$ integrated cross section of prompt $\Xi^{+}_{\rm c}-$baryon production in pp collisions at 13 TeV for $|y| < 0.5$.

The branching-fraction ratio $\rm {\rm BR}(\Xi_c^0\rightarrow \Xi^-e^+\nu_e)/\rm {\rm BR}(\Xi_c^0\rightarrow \Xi^{-}\pi^+)$ in pp collisions at 13 TeV for $|y| < 0.5$.

Differential away-side a function of Deltaphi 0%-20% collisions. Systematic uncertainties for background subtraction and global scale uncertainties are given.

Differential away-side a function of Deltaphi 0%-20% collisions. Systematic uncertainties for background subtraction and global scale uncertainties are given.

Differential away-side a function of Deltaphi 0%-20% collisions. Systematic uncertainties for background subtraction and global scale uncertainties are given.

Differential away-side a function of Deltaphi 0%-20% collisions. Systematic uncertainties for background subtraction and global scale uncertainties are given.

Differential away-side a function of Deltaphi 0%-20% collisions. Systematic uncertainties for background subtraction and global scale uncertainties are given.

Differential away-side a function of Deltaphi 0%-20% collisions. Systematic uncertainties for background subtraction and global scale uncertainties are given.

Differential away-side a function of Deltaphi 0%-20% collisions. Systematic uncertainties for background subtraction and global scale uncertainties are given.

Differential away-side a function of Deltaphi 0%-20% collisions. Systematic uncertainties for background subtraction and global scale uncertainties are given.

Differential away-side a function of Deltaphi 0%-20% collisions. Systematic uncertainties for background subtraction and global scale uncertainties are given.

Differential away-side a function of Deltaphi 0%-20% collisions. Systematic uncertainties for background subtraction and global scale uncertainties are given.

Differential away-side a function of Deltaphi 0%-20% collisions. Systematic uncertainties for background subtraction and global scale uncertainties are given.

Differential away-side a function of Deltaphi 20%-40% collisions. Systematic uncertainties for background subtraction and global scale uncertainties are given.

Differential away-side a function of Deltaphi 20%-40% collisions. Systematic uncertainties for background subtraction and global scale uncertainties are given.

Differential away-side a function of Deltaphi 20%-40% collisions. Systematic uncertainties for background subtraction and global scale uncertainties are given.

Differential away-side a function of Deltaphi 20%-40% collisions. Systematic uncertainties for background subtraction and global scale uncertainties are given.

Differential away-side a function of Deltaphi 20%-40% collisions. Systematic uncertainties for background subtraction and global scale uncertainties are given.

Differential away-side a function of Deltaphi 20%-40% collisions. Systematic uncertainties for background subtraction and global scale uncertainties are given.

Differential away-side a function of Deltaphi 20%-40% collisions. Systematic uncertainties for background subtraction and global scale uncertainties are given.

Differential away-side a function of Deltaphi 20%-40% collisions. Systematic uncertainties for background subtraction and global scale uncertainties are given.

Differential away-side a function of Deltaphi 20%-40% collisions. Systematic uncertainties for background subtraction and global scale uncertainties are given.

Differential away-side a function of Deltaphi 20%-40% collisions. Systematic uncertainties for background subtraction and global scale uncertainties are given.

Differential away-side a function of Deltaphi 20%-40% collisions. Systematic uncertainties for background subtraction and global scale uncertainties are given.

Differential away-side a function of Deltaphi 20%-40% collisions. Systematic uncertainties for background subtraction and global scale uncertainties are given.

Differential away-side $\Delta_{AA}$ for ${\pi/2<\Delta\phi<\pi}$

Differential away-side $\Delta_{AA}$ for ${\pi/2<\Delta\phi<\pi}$

Differential away-side $\Delta_{AA}$ for ${\pi/2<\Delta\phi<\pi}$

The unfolded charged particle thrust distribution of inelastic proton-proton collisions with at least three charged particles with transverse momentum higher than 0.5 GeV and pseudorapidity between -2.4 and 2.4. The total area of the histogram is normalised to 1.

The unfolded charged particle broadening distribution of inelastic proton-proton collisions with at least three charged particles with transverse momentum higher than 0.5 GeV and pseudorapidity between -2.4 and 2.4. The total area of the histogram is normalised to 1.

The unfolded charged particle isotropy distribution of inelastic proton-proton collisions with at least three charged particles with transverse momentum higher than 0.5 GeV and pseudorapidity between -2.4 and 2.4. The total area of the histogram is normalised to 1.

The unfolded charged particle transverse thrust distribution of inelastic proton-proton collisions with at least three charged particles with transverse momentum higher than 0.5 GeV and pseudorapidity between -2.4 and 2.4. The total area of the histogram is normalised to 1.

The unfolded charged particle transverse spherocity distribution of inelastic proton-proton collisions with at least three charged particles with transverse momentum higher than 0.5 GeV and pseudorapidity between -2.4 and 2.4. The total area of the histogram is normalised to 1.

The correlations of the uncertainties in the normalised charged particle multiplicity distribution of inelastic proton-proton collisions with at least three charged particles with transverse momentum higher than 0.5 GeV and pseudorapidity between -2.4 and 2.4.

The correlations of the uncertainties in the normalised charged particle invariant mass distribution of inelastic proton-proton collisions with at least three charged particles with transverse momentum higher than 0.5 GeV and pseudorapidity between -2.4 and 2.4.

The correlations of the uncertainties in the normalised charged particle sphericity distribution of inelastic proton-proton collisions with at least three charged particles with transverse momentum higher than 0.5 GeV and pseudorapidity between -2.4 and 2.4.

The correlations of the uncertainties in the normalised charged particle thrust distribution of inelastic proton-proton collisions with at least three charged particles with transverse momentum higher than 0.5 GeV and pseudorapidity between -2.4 and 2.4.

The correlations of the uncertainties in the normalised charged particle broadening distribution of inelastic proton-proton collisions with at least three charged particles with transverse momentum higher than 0.5 GeV and pseudorapidity between -2.4 and 2.4.

The correlations of the uncertainties in the normalised charged particle isotropy distribution of inelastic proton-proton collisions with at least three charged particles with transverse momentum higher than 0.5 GeV and pseudorapidity between -2.4 and 2.4.

The correlations of the uncertainties in the normalised charged particle transverse thrust distribution of inelastic proton-proton collisions with at least three charged particles with transverse momentum higher than 0.5 GeV and pseudorapidity between -2.4 and 2.4.

The correlations of the uncertainties in the normalised charged particle transverse spherocity distribution of inelastic proton-proton collisions with at least three charged particles with transverse momentum higher than 0.5 GeV and pseudorapidity between -2.4 and 2.4.

The unfolded charged particle invariant mass distribution in a slice of multiplicity from inelastic proton-proton collisions with at least three charged particles with transverse momentum higher than 0.5 GeV and pseudorapidity between -2.4 and 2.4. The total area of the histogram is normalised to the fraction of events in this panel among all the panels.

The unfolded charged particle invariant mass distribution in a slice of multiplicity from inelastic proton-proton collisions with at least three charged particles with transverse momentum higher than 0.5 GeV and pseudorapidity between -2.4 and 2.4. The total area of the histogram is normalised to the fraction of events in this panel among all the panels.

The unfolded charged particle invariant mass distribution in a slice of multiplicity from inelastic proton-proton collisions with at least three charged particles with transverse momentum higher than 0.5 GeV and pseudorapidity between -2.4 and 2.4. The total area of the histogram is normalised to the fraction of events in this panel among all the panels.

The unfolded charged particle invariant mass distribution in a slice of multiplicity from inelastic proton-proton collisions with at least three charged particles with transverse momentum higher than 0.5 GeV and pseudorapidity between -2.4 and 2.4. The total area of the histogram is normalised to the fraction of events in this panel among all the panels.

The unfolded charged particle invariant mass distribution in a slice of multiplicity from inelastic proton-proton collisions with at least three charged particles with transverse momentum higher than 0.5 GeV and pseudorapidity between -2.4 and 2.4. The total area of the histogram is normalised to the fraction of events in this panel among all the panels.

The unfolded charged particle sphericity distribution in a slice of multiplicity from inelastic proton-proton collisions with at least three charged particles with transverse momentum higher than 0.5 GeV and pseudorapidity between -2.4 and 2.4. The total area of the histogram is normalised to the fraction of events in this panel among all the panels.

The unfolded charged particle sphericity distribution in a slice of multiplicity from inelastic proton-proton collisions with at least three charged particles with transverse momentum higher than 0.5 GeV and pseudorapidity between -2.4 and 2.4. The total area of the histogram is normalised to the fraction of events in this panel among all the panels.

The unfolded charged particle sphericity distribution in a slice of multiplicity from inelastic proton-proton collisions with at least three charged particles with transverse momentum higher than 0.5 GeV and pseudorapidity between -2.4 and 2.4. The total area of the histogram is normalised to the fraction of events in this panel among all the panels.

The unfolded charged particle sphericity distribution in a slice of multiplicity from inelastic proton-proton collisions with at least three charged particles with transverse momentum higher than 0.5 GeV and pseudorapidity between -2.4 and 2.4. The total area of the histogram is normalised to the fraction of events in this panel among all the panels.

The unfolded charged particle sphericity distribution in a slice of multiplicity from inelastic proton-proton collisions with at least three charged particles with transverse momentum higher than 0.5 GeV and pseudorapidity between -2.4 and 2.4. The total area of the histogram is normalised to the fraction of events in this panel among all the panels.

The unfolded charged particle thrust distribution in a slice of multiplicity from inelastic proton-proton collisions with at least three charged particles with transverse momentum higher than 0.5 GeV and pseudorapidity between -2.4 and 2.4. The total area of the histogram is normalised to the fraction of events in this panel among all the panels.

The unfolded charged particle thrust distribution in a slice of multiplicity from inelastic proton-proton collisions with at least three charged particles with transverse momentum higher than 0.5 GeV and pseudorapidity between -2.4 and 2.4. The total area of the histogram is normalised to the fraction of events in this panel among all the panels.

The unfolded charged particle thrust distribution in a slice of multiplicity from inelastic proton-proton collisions with at least three charged particles with transverse momentum higher than 0.5 GeV and pseudorapidity between -2.4 and 2.4. The total area of the histogram is normalised to the fraction of events in this panel among all the panels.

The unfolded charged particle thrust distribution in a slice of multiplicity from inelastic proton-proton collisions with at least three charged particles with transverse momentum higher than 0.5 GeV and pseudorapidity between -2.4 and 2.4. The total area of the histogram is normalised to the fraction of events in this panel among all the panels.

The unfolded charged particle thrust distribution in a slice of multiplicity from inelastic proton-proton collisions with at least three charged particles with transverse momentum higher than 0.5 GeV and pseudorapidity between -2.4 and 2.4. The total area of the histogram is normalised to the fraction of events in this panel among all the panels.

The unfolded charged particle broadening distribution in a slice of multiplicity from inelastic proton-proton collisions with at least three charged particles with transverse momentum higher than 0.5 GeV and pseudorapidity between -2.4 and 2.4. The total area of the histogram is normalised to the fraction of events in this panel among all the panels.

The unfolded charged particle broadening distribution in a slice of multiplicity from inelastic proton-proton collisions with at least three charged particles with transverse momentum higher than 0.5 GeV and pseudorapidity between -2.4 and 2.4. The total area of the histogram is normalised to the fraction of events in this panel among all the panels.

The unfolded charged particle broadening distribution in a slice of multiplicity from inelastic proton-proton collisions with at least three charged particles with transverse momentum higher than 0.5 GeV and pseudorapidity between -2.4 and 2.4. The total area of the histogram is normalised to the fraction of events in this panel among all the panels.

The unfolded charged particle broadening distribution in a slice of multiplicity from inelastic proton-proton collisions with at least three charged particles with transverse momentum higher than 0.5 GeV and pseudorapidity between -2.4 and 2.4. The total area of the histogram is normalised to the fraction of events in this panel among all the panels.

The unfolded charged particle broadening distribution in a slice of multiplicity from inelastic proton-proton collisions with at least three charged particles with transverse momentum higher than 0.5 GeV and pseudorapidity between -2.4 and 2.4. The total area of the histogram is normalised to the fraction of events in this panel among all the panels.

The unfolded charged particle isotropy distribution in a slice of multiplicity from inelastic proton-proton collisions with at least three charged particles with transverse momentum higher than 0.5 GeV and pseudorapidity between -2.4 and 2.4. The total area of the histogram is normalised to the fraction of events in this panel among all the panels.

The unfolded charged particle isotropy distribution in a slice of multiplicity from inelastic proton-proton collisions with at least three charged particles with transverse momentum higher than 0.5 GeV and pseudorapidity between -2.4 and 2.4. The total area of the histogram is normalised to the fraction of events in this panel among all the panels.

The unfolded charged particle isotropy distribution in a slice of multiplicity from inelastic proton-proton collisions with at least three charged particles with transverse momentum higher than 0.5 GeV and pseudorapidity between -2.4 and 2.4. The total area of the histogram is normalised to the fraction of events in this panel among all the panels.

The unfolded charged particle isotropy distribution in a slice of multiplicity from inelastic proton-proton collisions with at least three charged particles with transverse momentum higher than 0.5 GeV and pseudorapidity between -2.4 and 2.4. The total area of the histogram is normalised to the fraction of events in this panel among all the panels.

The unfolded charged particle isotropy distribution in a slice of multiplicity from inelastic proton-proton collisions with at least three charged particles with transverse momentum higher than 0.5 GeV and pseudorapidity between -2.4 and 2.4. The total area of the histogram is normalised to the fraction of events in this panel among all the panels.

The unfolded charged particle transverse thrust distribution in a slice of multiplicity from inelastic proton-proton collisions with at least three charged particles with transverse momentum higher than 0.5 GeV and pseudorapidity between -2.4 and 2.4. The total area of the histogram is normalised to the fraction of events in this panel among all the panels.

The unfolded charged particle transverse thrust distribution in a slice of multiplicity from inelastic proton-proton collisions with at least three charged particles with transverse momentum higher than 0.5 GeV and pseudorapidity between -2.4 and 2.4. The total area of the histogram is normalised to the fraction of events in this panel among all the panels.

The unfolded charged particle transverse thrust distribution in a slice of multiplicity from inelastic proton-proton collisions with at least three charged particles with transverse momentum higher than 0.5 GeV and pseudorapidity between -2.4 and 2.4. The total area of the histogram is normalised to the fraction of events in this panel among all the panels.

The unfolded charged particle transverse thrust distribution in a slice of multiplicity from inelastic proton-proton collisions with at least three charged particles with transverse momentum higher than 0.5 GeV and pseudorapidity between -2.4 and 2.4. The total area of the histogram is normalised to the fraction of events in this panel among all the panels.

The unfolded charged particle transverse thrust distribution in a slice of multiplicity from inelastic proton-proton collisions with at least three charged particles with transverse momentum higher than 0.5 GeV and pseudorapidity between -2.4 and 2.4. The total area of the histogram is normalised to the fraction of events in this panel among all the panels.

The unfolded charged particle transverse spherocity distribution in a slice from multiplicity of inelastic proton-proton collisions with at least three charged particles with transverse momentum higher than 0.5 GeV and pseudorapidity between -2.4 and 2.4. The total area of the histogram is normalised to the fraction of events in this panel among all the panels.

The unfolded charged particle transverse spherocity distribution in a slice from multiplicity of inelastic proton-proton collisions with at least three charged particles with transverse momentum higher than 0.5 GeV and pseudorapidity between -2.4 and 2.4. The total area of the histogram is normalised to the fraction of events in this panel among all the panels.

The unfolded charged particle transverse spherocity distribution in a slice from multiplicity of inelastic proton-proton collisions with at least three charged particles with transverse momentum higher than 0.5 GeV and pseudorapidity between -2.4 and 2.4. The total area of the histogram is normalised to the fraction of events in this panel among all the panels.

The unfolded charged particle transverse spherocity distribution in a slice from multiplicity of inelastic proton-proton collisions with at least three charged particles with transverse momentum higher than 0.5 GeV and pseudorapidity between -2.4 and 2.4. The total area of the histogram is normalised to the fraction of events in this panel among all the panels.

The unfolded charged particle transverse spherocity distribution in a slice from multiplicity of inelastic proton-proton collisions with at least three charged particles with transverse momentum higher than 0.5 GeV and pseudorapidity between -2.4 and 2.4. The total area of the histogram is normalised to the fraction of events in this panel among all the panels.

The unfolded joint normalised distribution of charged particle invariant mass and multiplicity from inelastic proton-proton collisions with at least three charged particles with transverse momentum higher than 0.5 GeV and pseudorapidity between -2.4 and 2.4. The total area of the histogram is normalised to 1.

The unfolded joint normalised distribution of charged particle sphericity and multiplicity from inelastic proton-proton collisions with at least three charged particles with transverse momentum higher than 0.5 GeV and pseudorapidity between -2.4 and 2.4. The total area of the histogram is normalised to 1.

The unfolded joint normalised distribution of charged particle thrust and multiplicity from inelastic proton-proton collisions with at least three charged particles with transverse momentum higher than 0.5 GeV and pseudorapidity between -2.4 and 2.4. The total area of the histogram is normalised to 1.

The unfolded joint normalised distribution of charged particle broadening and multiplicity from inelastic proton-proton collisions with at least three charged particles with transverse momentum higher than 0.5 GeV and pseudorapidity between -2.4 and 2.4. The total area of the histogram is normalised to 1.

The unfolded joint normalised distribution of charged particle isotropy and multiplicity from inelastic proton-proton collisions with at least three charged particles with transverse momentum higher than 0.5 GeV and pseudorapidity between -2.4 and 2.4. The total area of the histogram is normalised to 1.

The unfolded joint normalised distribution of charged particle transverse thrust and multiplicity from inelastic proton-proton collisions with at least three charged particles with transverse momentum higher than 0.5 GeV and pseudorapidity between -2.4 and 2.4. The total area of the histogram is normalised to 1.

The unfolded joint normalised distribution of charged particle transverse spherocity and multiplicity of inelastic proton-proton collisions with at least three charged particles with transverse momentum higher than 0.5 GeV and pseudorapidity between -2.4 and 2.4. The total area of the histogram is normalised to 1.

The correlations of the uncertainties in the joint normalised distribution of charged particle invariant mass and multiplicity from inelastic proton-proton collisions with at least three charged particles with transverse momentum higher than 0.5 GeV and pseudorapidity between -2.4 and 2.4.

The correlations of the uncertainties in the joint normalised distribution of charged particle sphericity and multiplicity from inelastic proton-proton collisions with at least three charged particles with transverse momentum higher than 0.5 GeV and pseudorapidity between -2.4 and 2.4.

The correlations of the uncertainties in the joint normalised distribution of charged particle thrust and multiplicity from inelastic proton-proton collisions with at least three charged particles with transverse momentum higher than 0.5 GeV and pseudorapidity between -2.4 and 2.4.

The correlations of the uncertainties in the joint normalised distribution of charged particle broadening and multiplicity from inelastic proton-proton collisions with at least three charged particles with transverse momentum higher than 0.5 GeV and pseudorapidity between -2.4 and 2.4.

The correlations of the uncertainties in the joint normalised distribution of charged particle isotropy and multiplicity from inelastic proton-proton collisions with at least three charged particles with transverse momentum higher than 0.5 GeV and pseudorapidity between -2.4 and 2.4.

The correlations of the uncertainties in the joint normalised distribution of charged particle transverse thrust and multiplicity from inelastic proton-proton collisions with at least three charged particles with transverse momentum higher than 0.5 GeV and pseudorapidity between -2.4 and 2.4.

The correlations of the uncertainties in the joint normalised distribution of charged particle transverse spherocity and multiplicity from inelastic proton-proton collisions with at least three charged particles with transverse momentum higher than 0.5 GeV and pseudorapidity between -2.4 and 2.4.

I_{AA} of Au+Au 0%-15% collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200 GeV for R = 0.5 of pi^{0}+jet with E_{T,trig}= 11-15 GeV.

Yield Ratio R=0.2/R=0.5 of Au+Au 0%-15% collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200 GeV of gamma_{dir}+jet with E_{T,trig}= 15-20 GeV.

Yield Ratio R=0.2/R=0.5 of Au+Au 0%-15% collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200 GeV of pi^{0}+jet with E_{T,trig}= 11-15 GeV.

Yield Ratio R=0.2/R=0.5 of p+p collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200 GeV of gamma_{dir}+jet with E_{T,trig}= 15-20 GeV.

Yield Ratio R=0.2/R=0.5 of p+p collisions at sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200 GeV of pi^{0}+jet with E_{T,trig}= 11-15 GeV.

Example description

Differential fiducial cross sections for the number of jets

Example description

Differential fiducial cross sections for the leading jet pT

Example description

Normalized transverse momentum correlator, $\sqrt{ \langle\langle \Delta p_{{\rm T}1}\Delta p_{{\rm T}2} \rangle\rangle }/\langle\langle p_{\rm T} \rangle\rangle $, as a function of the average number of participant nucleons, $\langle{ N_{\rm part}}\rangle$, in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

Normalized transverse momentum correlator, $\sqrt{ \langle\langle \Delta p_{{\rm T}1}\Delta p_{{\rm T}2} \rangle\rangle }/\langle\langle p_{\rm T} \rangle\rangle $, as a function of the average number of participant nucleons, $\langle{ N_{\rm part}}\rangle$, in Xe--Xe collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 5.44 TeV

Normalized transverse momentum correlator, $\sqrt{ \langle\langle \Delta p_{{\rm T}1}\Delta p_{{\rm T}2} \rangle\rangle }/\langle\langle p_{\rm T} \rangle\rangle $, as a function of the average number of participant nucleons, $\langle{ N_{\rm part}}\rangle$, in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

Normalized transverse momentum correlator, $\sqrt{ \langle\langle \Delta p_{{\rm T}1}\Delta p_{{\rm T}2} \rangle\rangle }/\langle\langle p_{\rm T} \rangle\rangle $ as a function of the charged-particle multiplicity density for spherocity-integrated events in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=5.02$ TeV

Normalized transverse momentum correlator, $\sqrt{ \langle\langle \Delta p_{{\rm T}1}\Delta p_{{\rm T}2} \rangle\rangle }/\langle\langle p_{\rm T} \rangle\rangle $ as a function of the charged-particle multiplicity density for jetty events in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=5.02$ TeV

Normalized transverse momentum correlator, $\sqrt{ \langle\langle \Delta p_{{\rm T}1}\Delta p_{{\rm T}2} \rangle\rangle }/\langle\langle p_{\rm T} \rangle\rangle $ as a function of the charged-particle multiplicity density for isotropic events in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=5.02$ TeV

Normalized transverse momentum correlator, $\sqrt{ \langle\langle \Delta p_{{\rm T}1}\Delta p_{{\rm T}2} \rangle\rangle }/\langle\langle p_{\rm T} \rangle\rangle $ as a function of the charged-particle multiplicity density for spherocity-integrated events in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV

Normalized transverse momentum correlator, $\sqrt{ \langle\langle \Delta p_{{\rm T}1}\Delta p_{{\rm T}2} \rangle\rangle }/\langle\langle p_{\rm T} \rangle\rangle $ as a function of the charged-particle multiplicity density for jetty events in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV

Normalized transverse momentum correlator, $\sqrt{ \langle\langle \Delta p_{{\rm T}1}\Delta p_{{\rm T}2} \rangle\rangle }/\langle\langle p_{\rm T} \rangle\rangle $ as a function of the charged-particle multiplicity density for isotropic events in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV

The Charged-hadron yields as a function of pT in different y selections in p+Pb collisions.

The K^{0}_{S} yields as a function of pT in different y selections in Pb+Pb photo-nuclear collisions.

The #Lambda yields as a function of pT in different y selections in Pb+Pb photo-nuclear collisions.

The #Xi^{-} yields as a function of pT in different y selections in Pb+Pb photo-nuclear collisions.

The K^{0}_{S} yields as a function of pT in different y selections in p+Pb collisions.

The #Lambda yields as a function of pT in different y selections in p+Pb collisions.

The #Xi^{-} yields as a function of pT in different y selections in p+Pb collisions.

The Charged-hadron and identified-hadron yields as a function of y in Pb+Pb photo-nuclear collisions.

The Charged-hadron and identified-hadron yields as a function of y in Pb+Pb photo-nuclear collisions.

The Charged-hadron and identified-hadron yields as a function of y in p+Pb collisions.

The Charged-hadron and identified-hadron yields as a function of y in p+Pb collisions.

The meanpT of charged hadrons and identified hadrons as a function of Nchrec in Pb+Pb photo-nuclear collisions.

The meanpT of charged hadrons and identified hadrons as a function of Nchrec in Pb+Pb photo-nuclear collisions.

The meanpT of charged hadrons and identified hadrons as a function of Nchrec in Pb+Pb photo-nuclear collisions.

The meanpT of charged hadrons and identified hadrons as a function of Nchrec in p+Pb collisions.

The meanpT of charged hadrons and identified hadrons as a function of Nchrec in p+Pb collisions.

The baryon to meson ratio as a function of pT in Pb+Pb photo-nuclear collisions.

The baryon to meson ratio as a function of pT in Pb+Pb photo-nuclear collisions.

The baryon to meson ratio as a function of pT in p+Pb collisions.

The baryon to meson ratio as a function of pT in p+Pb collisions.

The ratios of identified-strange-hadron yield to charged-hadron yields as a function of Nchrec in Pb+Pb photo-nuclear collisions.

The ratios of identified-strange-hadron yield to charged-hadron yields as a function of Nchrec in Pb+Pb photo-nuclear collisions.

The ratios of identified-strange-hadron yield to charged-hadron yields as a function of Nchrec in Pb+Pb photo-nuclear collisions.

The ratios of identified-strange-hadron yield to charged-hadron yields as a function of Nchrec in p+Pb collisions.

The ratios of identified-strange-hadron yield to charged-hadron yields as a function of Nchrec in p+Pb collisions.

Systematic covariance matrix for the differential cross-section distribution.

Post-fit distribution of the GNN score evaluated with $m_{H/A}$ = 400 GeV in the validation region in the 2LOS region with $\geq 8$ jets. These regions do not enter the fit. The post-fit background prediction is obtained using the post-fit nuisance parameters from the background-only fit in the control and signal regions.

Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the cross-section times branching ratio,$ \sigma(pp \rightarrow t\bar{t}H/A ) \times B(H/A \rightarrow t\bar{t})$, as a function of $m_{H/A}$, obtained using the 1L/2LOS final states.

Observed and expected 95% CL lower limits on tanβ as a function of the $m_{H/A}$ mass obtained using the 1L/2LOS final states, assuming a Type-II 2HDM in the alignment limit. Values of tanβ below the observed limit are excluded. The scenario where both the scalar $H$ and pseudo-scalar $A$ contribute with $m_H = m_A$ is shown.

Observed and expected 95% CL lower limits on tanβ as a function of the $m_{H/A}$ mass obtained using the 1L/2LOS final states, assuming a Type-II 2HDM in the alignment limit. Values of tanβ below the observed limit are excluded. The scenario with the contribution from scalar $H$ only is shown.

Observed and expected 95% CL lower limits on tanβ as a function of the $m_{H/A}$ mass obtained using the 1L/2LOS final states, assuming a Type-II 2HDM in the alignment limit. Values of tanβ below the observed limit are excluded. The scenario with the contribution from pseudo-scalar $A$ only is shown.

Expected and observed 95% CL upper limits on the cross-section times branching ratio,$ \sigma(pp \rightarrow t\bar{t}H/A ) \times B(H/A \rightarrow t\bar{t})$, as a function of $m_{H/A}$, obtained from the combination of the 1L/2LOS and 2LSS/ML final states.

Expected and observed 95% CL lower limits on tanβ as a function of the $m_{H/A}$ mass obtained using the 1L/2LOS and 2LSS/ML final states, assuming a Type-II 2HDM in the alignment limit. Values of tanβ below the observed limit are excluded. The scenario where both the scalar $H$ and pseudo-scalar $A$ contribute with $m_H = m_A$ is shown.

Expected and observed 95% CL lower limits on tanβ as a function of the $m_{H/A}$ mass obtained using the 1L/2LOS and 2LSS/ML final states, assuming a Type-II 2HDM in the alignment limit. Values of tanβ below the observed limit are excluded. The scenario with the contribution from scalar $H$ only is shown.

Expected and observed 95% CL lower limits on tanβ as a function of the $m_{H/A}$ mass obtained using the 1L/2LOS and 2LSS/ML final states, assuming a Type-II 2HDM in the alignment limit. Values of tanβ below the observed limit are excluded. The scenario with the contribution from pseudo-scalar $A$ only is shown.

Expected and Observed 95% CL upper limits on the $ \sigma(pp \rightarrow t\bar{t})\times B(S_8\rightarrow t\bar{t})$ production cross-section as a function of $m_{S_8}$, obtained from the combination of the 1L/2LOS and 2LSS/ML final states. The expected limits from the individual 1L/2LOS and 2LSS/ML analyses are also shown.

Post-fit distribution of the GNN scores evaluated with $m_{H/A}$ = 700 GeV in the 1L region with $\geq 10$ jets and four $b$-tagged jets. The fit is performed under the background-only hypothesis.

Post-fit distribution of the GNN scores evaluated with $m_{H/A}$ = 700 GeV in the 2LOS region with $\geq 8$ jets and $\geq 4$ $b$-tagged jets. The fit is performed under the background-only hypothesis.

Post-fit distribution of the GNN scores evaluated with $m_{H/A}=$1000 GeV,in the 1L region with $\geq 10$ jets four $b$-tagged jets. The fit is performed under the background-only hypothesis.

Post-fit distribution of the GNN scores evaluated with $m_{H/A}=$1000 GeV in the 2LOS region with $\geq 8$ jets and $\geq 4$ $b$-tagged jets. The fit is performed under the background-only hypothesis.

Post-fit distribution of the most important global features used in the GNN training, Sum of the pcb scores of the six jets with the highest scores ($\sum_{i\in[1,6]}\mathrm{pcb}_i$), in the region where the training is performed, i.e., the region with $\geq 9$ jets and $\geq3$ $b$-tagged jets in the 1L channel. The fit is performed under the background-only hypothesis using the GNN scores evaluated with $m_{H/A} = 400$ GeV.

Post-fit distribution of the most important global features used in the GNN training, Sum of the pcb scores of the six jets with the highest scores ($\sum_{i\in[1,6]}\mathrm{pcb}_i$), in the region where the training is performed i.e.the region with $\geq 7$ jets and $\geq3$ $b$-tagged jets in the 2LOS channel. The fit is performed under the background-only hypothesis using the GNN scores evaluated with $m_{H/A} = 400$ GeV.

Post-fit distribution of the most important global features used in the GNN training, $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ sum of all reconstructed leptons and jets ($\mathrm{H}_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{all}}$), in the region where the training is performed, i.e., the region with $\geq 9$ jets and $\geq3$ $b$-tagged jets in the 1L channel. The fit is performed under the background-only hypothesis using the GNN scores evaluated with $m_{H/A} = 400$ GeV.

Post-fit distribution of the most important global features used in the GNN training, $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ sum of all reconstructed leptons and jets ($\mathrm{H}_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{all}}$), in the region where the training is performed, i.e. the region with $\geq 7$ jets and $\geq3$ $b$-tagged jets in the 2LOS channel. The fit is performed under the background-only hypothesis using the GNN scores evaluated with $m_{H/A} = 400$ GeV.

Post-fit distribution of the most important global features used in the GNN training, Number of jets, in the region where the training is performed, i.e., the region with $\geq 9$ jets and $\geq3$ $b$-tagged jets in the 1L channel. The fit is performed under the background-only hypothesis using the GNN scores evaluated with $m_{H/A} = 400$ GeV.

Post-fit distribution of the most important global features used in the GNN training, Number of jets, in the region where the training is performed, i.e., the region with $\geq 7$ jets and $\geq3$ $b$-tagged jets in the 2LOS channel. The fit is performed under the background-only hypothesis using the GNN scores evaluated with $m_{H/A} = 400$ GeV.

The energy-energy correlator distributions constructed with charged particles with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 1$ GeV for energy weight $n=1$ and jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ selection $140 < p_{\mathrm{T,jet}} < 160$ GeV. The results are shown for different centrality bins in PbPb collisions and for pp collisions.

The energy-energy correlator distributions constructed with charged particles with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 1$ GeV for energy weight $n=1$ and jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ selection $160 < p_{\mathrm{T,jet}} < 180$ GeV. The results are shown for different centrality bins in PbPb collisions and for pp collisions.

The energy-energy correlator distributions constructed with charged particles with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 1$ GeV for energy weight $n=1$ and jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ selection $160 < p_{\mathrm{T,jet}} < 180$ GeV. The results are shown for different centrality bins in PbPb collisions and for pp collisions.

The energy-energy correlator distributions constructed with charged particles with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 1$ GeV for energy weight $n=1$ and jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ selection $180 < p_{\mathrm{T,jet}} < 200$ GeV. The results are shown for different centrality bins in PbPb collisions and for pp collisions.

The energy-energy correlator distributions constructed with charged particles with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 1$ GeV for energy weight $n=1$ and jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ selection $180 < p_{\mathrm{T,jet}} < 200$ GeV. The results are shown for different centrality bins in PbPb collisions and for pp collisions.

The energy-energy correlator distributions constructed with charged particles with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 1$ GeV for energy weight $n=2$ and jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ selection $120 < p_{\mathrm{T,jet}} < 140$ GeV. The results are shown for different centrality bins in PbPb collisions and for pp collisions.

The energy-energy correlator distributions constructed with charged particles with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 1$ GeV for energy weight $n=2$ and jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ selection $120 < p_{\mathrm{T,jet}} < 140$ GeV. The results are shown for different centrality bins in PbPb collisions and for pp collisions.

The energy-energy correlator distributions constructed with charged particles with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 1$ GeV for energy weight $n=2$ and jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ selection $140 < p_{\mathrm{T,jet}} < 160$ GeV. The results are shown for different centrality bins in PbPb collisions and for pp collisions.

The energy-energy correlator distributions constructed with charged particles with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 1$ GeV for energy weight $n=2$ and jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ selection $140 < p_{\mathrm{T,jet}} < 160$ GeV. The results are shown for different centrality bins in PbPb collisions and for pp collisions.

The energy-energy correlator distributions constructed with charged particles with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 1$ GeV for energy weight $n=2$ and jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ selection $160 < p_{\mathrm{T,jet}} < 180$ GeV. The results are shown for different centrality bins in PbPb collisions and for pp collisions.

The energy-energy correlator distributions constructed with charged particles with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 1$ GeV for energy weight $n=2$ and jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ selection $160 < p_{\mathrm{T,jet}} < 180$ GeV. The results are shown for different centrality bins in PbPb collisions and for pp collisions.

The energy-energy correlator distributions constructed with charged particles with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 1$ GeV for energy weight $n=2$ and jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ selection $180 < p_{\mathrm{T,jet}} < 200$ GeV. The results are shown for different centrality bins in PbPb collisions and for pp collisions.

The energy-energy correlator distributions constructed with charged particles with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 1$ GeV for energy weight $n=2$ and jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ selection $180 < p_{\mathrm{T,jet}} < 200$ GeV. The results are shown for different centrality bins in PbPb collisions and for pp collisions.

The energy-energy correlator distributions constructed with charged particles with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 2$ GeV for energy weight $n=1$ and jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ selection $120 < p_{\mathrm{T,jet}} < 140$ GeV. The results are shown for different centrality bins in PbPb collisions and for pp collisions.

The energy-energy correlator distributions constructed with charged particles with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 2$ GeV for energy weight $n=1$ and jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ selection $120 < p_{\mathrm{T,jet}} < 140$ GeV. The results are shown for different centrality bins in PbPb collisions and for pp collisions.

The energy-energy correlator distributions constructed with charged particles with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 2$ GeV for energy weight $n=1$ and jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ selection $140 < p_{\mathrm{T,jet}} < 160$ GeV. The results are shown for different centrality bins in PbPb collisions and for pp collisions.

The energy-energy correlator distributions constructed with charged particles with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 2$ GeV for energy weight $n=1$ and jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ selection $140 < p_{\mathrm{T,jet}} < 160$ GeV. The results are shown for different centrality bins in PbPb collisions and for pp collisions.

The energy-energy correlator distributions constructed with charged particles with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 2$ GeV for energy weight $n=1$ and jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ selection $160 < p_{\mathrm{T,jet}} < 180$ GeV. The results are shown for different centrality bins in PbPb collisions and for pp collisions.

The energy-energy correlator distributions constructed with charged particles with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 2$ GeV for energy weight $n=1$ and jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ selection $160 < p_{\mathrm{T,jet}} < 180$ GeV. The results are shown for different centrality bins in PbPb collisions and for pp collisions.

The energy-energy correlator distributions constructed with charged particles with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 2$ GeV for energy weight $n=1$ and jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ selection $180 < p_{\mathrm{T,jet}} < 200$ GeV. The results are shown for different centrality bins in PbPb collisions and for pp collisions.

The energy-energy correlator distributions constructed with charged particles with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 2$ GeV for energy weight $n=1$ and jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ selection $180 < p_{\mathrm{T,jet}} < 200$ GeV. The results are shown for different centrality bins in PbPb collisions and for pp collisions.

The energy-energy correlator distributions constructed with charged particles with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 2$ GeV for energy weight $n=2$ and jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ selection $120 < p_{\mathrm{T,jet}} < 140$ GeV. The results are shown for different centrality bins in PbPb collisions and for pp collisions.

The energy-energy correlator distributions constructed with charged particles with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 2$ GeV for energy weight $n=2$ and jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ selection $120 < p_{\mathrm{T,jet}} < 140$ GeV. The results are shown for different centrality bins in PbPb collisions and for pp collisions.

The energy-energy correlator distributions constructed with charged particles with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 2$ GeV for energy weight $n=2$ and jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ selection $140 < p_{\mathrm{T,jet}} < 160$ GeV. The results are shown for different centrality bins in PbPb collisions and for pp collisions.

The energy-energy correlator distributions constructed with charged particles with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 2$ GeV for energy weight $n=2$ and jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ selection $140 < p_{\mathrm{T,jet}} < 160$ GeV. The results are shown for different centrality bins in PbPb collisions and for pp collisions.

The energy-energy correlator distributions constructed with charged particles with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 2$ GeV for energy weight $n=2$ and jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ selection $160 < p_{\mathrm{T,jet}} < 180$ GeV. The results are shown for different centrality bins in PbPb collisions and for pp collisions.

The energy-energy correlator distributions constructed with charged particles with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 2$ GeV for energy weight $n=2$ and jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ selection $160 < p_{\mathrm{T,jet}} < 180$ GeV. The results are shown for different centrality bins in PbPb collisions and for pp collisions.

The energy-energy correlator distributions constructed with charged particles with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 2$ GeV for energy weight $n=2$ and jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ selection $180 < p_{\mathrm{T,jet}} < 200$ GeV. The results are shown for different centrality bins in PbPb collisions and for pp collisions.

The energy-energy correlator distributions constructed with charged particles with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 2$ GeV for energy weight $n=2$ and jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ selection $180 < p_{\mathrm{T,jet}} < 200$ GeV. The results are shown for different centrality bins in PbPb collisions and for pp collisions.

The energy-energy correlator PbPb/pp ratios constructed with charged particles with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 1$ GeV for energy weight $n=1$ and jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ selection $120 < p_{\mathrm{T,jet}} < 140$ GeV. The results are shown for different centrality bins in PbPb collisions.

The energy-energy correlator PbPb/pp ratios constructed with charged particles with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 1$ GeV for energy weight $n=1$ and jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ selection $120 < p_{\mathrm{T,jet}} < 140$ GeV. The results are shown for different centrality bins in PbPb collisions.

The energy-energy correlator PbPb/pp ratios constructed with charged particles with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 1$ GeV for energy weight $n=1$ and jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ selection $140 < p_{\mathrm{T,jet}} < 160$ GeV. The results are shown for different centrality bins in PbPb collisions.

The energy-energy correlator PbPb/pp ratios constructed with charged particles with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 1$ GeV for energy weight $n=1$ and jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ selection $140 < p_{\mathrm{T,jet}} < 160$ GeV. The results are shown for different centrality bins in PbPb collisions.

The energy-energy correlator PbPb/pp ratios constructed with charged particles with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 1$ GeV for energy weight $n=1$ and jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ selection $160 < p_{\mathrm{T,jet}} < 180$ GeV. The results are shown for different centrality bins in PbPb collisions.

The energy-energy correlator PbPb/pp ratios constructed with charged particles with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 1$ GeV for energy weight $n=1$ and jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ selection $160 < p_{\mathrm{T,jet}} < 180$ GeV. The results are shown for different centrality bins in PbPb collisions.

The energy-energy correlator PbPb/pp ratios constructed with charged particles with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 1$ GeV for energy weight $n=1$ and jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ selection $180 < p_{\mathrm{T,jet}} < 200$ GeV. The results are shown for different centrality bins in PbPb collisions.

The energy-energy correlator PbPb/pp ratios constructed with charged particles with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 1$ GeV for energy weight $n=1$ and jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ selection $180 < p_{\mathrm{T,jet}} < 200$ GeV. The results are shown for different centrality bins in PbPb collisions.

The energy-energy correlator PbPb/pp ratios constructed with charged particles with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 1$ GeV for energy weight $n=2$ and jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ selection $120 < p_{\mathrm{T,jet}} < 140$ GeV. The results are shown for different centrality bins in PbPb collisions.

The energy-energy correlator PbPb/pp ratios constructed with charged particles with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 1$ GeV for energy weight $n=2$ and jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ selection $120 < p_{\mathrm{T,jet}} < 140$ GeV. The results are shown for different centrality bins in PbPb collisions.

The energy-energy correlator PbPb/pp ratios constructed with charged particles with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 1$ GeV for energy weight $n=2$ and jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ selection $140 < p_{\mathrm{T,jet}} < 160$ GeV. The results are shown for different centrality bins in PbPb collisions.

The energy-energy correlator PbPb/pp ratios constructed with charged particles with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 1$ GeV for energy weight $n=2$ and jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ selection $140 < p_{\mathrm{T,jet}} < 160$ GeV. The results are shown for different centrality bins in PbPb collisions.

The energy-energy correlator PbPb/pp ratios constructed with charged particles with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 1$ GeV for energy weight $n=2$ and jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ selection $160 < p_{\mathrm{T,jet}} < 180$ GeV. The results are shown for different centrality bins in PbPb collisions.

The energy-energy correlator PbPb/pp ratios constructed with charged particles with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 1$ GeV for energy weight $n=2$ and jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ selection $160 < p_{\mathrm{T,jet}} < 180$ GeV. The results are shown for different centrality bins in PbPb collisions.

The energy-energy correlator PbPb/pp ratios constructed with charged particles with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 1$ GeV for energy weight $n=2$ and jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ selection $180 < p_{\mathrm{T,jet}} < 200$ GeV. The results are shown for different centrality bins in PbPb collisions.

The energy-energy correlator PbPb/pp ratios constructed with charged particles with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 1$ GeV for energy weight $n=2$ and jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ selection $180 < p_{\mathrm{T,jet}} < 200$ GeV. The results are shown for different centrality bins in PbPb collisions.

The energy-energy correlator PbPb/pp ratios constructed with charged particles with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 2$ GeV for energy weight $n=1$ and jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ selection $120 < p_{\mathrm{T,jet}} < 140$ GeV. The results are shown for different centrality bins in PbPb collisions.

The energy-energy correlator PbPb/pp ratios constructed with charged particles with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 2$ GeV for energy weight $n=1$ and jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ selection $120 < p_{\mathrm{T,jet}} < 140$ GeV. The results are shown for different centrality bins in PbPb collisions.

The energy-energy correlator PbPb/pp ratios constructed with charged particles with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 2$ GeV for energy weight $n=1$ and jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ selection $140 < p_{\mathrm{T,jet}} < 160$ GeV. The results are shown for different centrality bins in PbPb collisions.

The energy-energy correlator PbPb/pp ratios constructed with charged particles with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 2$ GeV for energy weight $n=1$ and jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ selection $140 < p_{\mathrm{T,jet}} < 160$ GeV. The results are shown for different centrality bins in PbPb collisions.

The energy-energy correlator PbPb/pp ratios constructed with charged particles with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 2$ GeV for energy weight $n=1$ and jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ selection $160 < p_{\mathrm{T,jet}} < 180$ GeV. The results are shown for different centrality bins in PbPb collisions.

The energy-energy correlator PbPb/pp ratios constructed with charged particles with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 2$ GeV for energy weight $n=1$ and jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ selection $160 < p_{\mathrm{T,jet}} < 180$ GeV. The results are shown for different centrality bins in PbPb collisions.

The energy-energy correlator PbPb/pp ratios constructed with charged particles with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 2$ GeV for energy weight $n=1$ and jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ selection $180 < p_{\mathrm{T,jet}} < 200$ GeV. The results are shown for different centrality bins in PbPb collisions.

The energy-energy correlator PbPb/pp ratios constructed with charged particles with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 2$ GeV for energy weight $n=1$ and jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ selection $180 < p_{\mathrm{T,jet}} < 200$ GeV. The results are shown for different centrality bins in PbPb collisions.

The energy-energy correlator PbPb/pp ratios constructed with charged particles with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 2$ GeV for energy weight $n=2$ and jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ selection $120 < p_{\mathrm{T,jet}} < 140$ GeV. The results are shown for different centrality bins in PbPb collisions.

The energy-energy correlator PbPb/pp ratios constructed with charged particles with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 2$ GeV for energy weight $n=2$ and jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ selection $120 < p_{\mathrm{T,jet}} < 140$ GeV. The results are shown for different centrality bins in PbPb collisions.

The energy-energy correlator PbPb/pp ratios constructed with charged particles with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 2$ GeV for energy weight $n=2$ and jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ selection $140 < p_{\mathrm{T,jet}} < 160$ GeV. The results are shown for different centrality bins in PbPb collisions.

The energy-energy correlator PbPb/pp ratios constructed with charged particles with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 2$ GeV for energy weight $n=2$ and jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ selection $140 < p_{\mathrm{T,jet}} < 160$ GeV. The results are shown for different centrality bins in PbPb collisions.

The energy-energy correlator PbPb/pp ratios constructed with charged particles with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 2$ GeV for energy weight $n=2$ and jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ selection $160 < p_{\mathrm{T,jet}} < 180$ GeV. The results are shown for different centrality bins in PbPb collisions.

The energy-energy correlator PbPb/pp ratios constructed with charged particles with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 2$ GeV for energy weight $n=2$ and jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ selection $160 < p_{\mathrm{T,jet}} < 180$ GeV. The results are shown for different centrality bins in PbPb collisions.

The energy-energy correlator PbPb/pp ratios constructed with charged particles with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 2$ GeV for energy weight $n=2$ and jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ selection $180 < p_{\mathrm{T,jet}} < 200$ GeV. The results are shown for different centrality bins in PbPb collisions.

The energy-energy correlator PbPb/pp ratios constructed with charged particles with $p_{\mathrm{T}} > 2$ GeV for energy weight $n=2$ and jet $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ selection $180 < p_{\mathrm{T,jet}} < 200$ GeV. The results are shown for different centrality bins in PbPb collisions.

The double ratios of PbPb to pp single ratios with $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}}$ > 2 GeV and $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}}$ > 1 GeV.

The double ratios of PbPb to pp single ratios with $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} > 2$ GeV and $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} > 1$ GeV.

The double ratios of PbPb to pp single ratios with $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}}$ > 2 GeV and $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}}$ > 1 GeV.

The double ratios of PbPb to pp single ratios with $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} > 2$ GeV and $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} > 1$ GeV.

The double ratios of PbPb to pp single ratios with $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}}$ > 2 GeV and $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}}$ > 1 GeV.

The double ratios of PbPb to pp single ratios with $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} > 2$ GeV and $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} > 1$ GeV.

The double ratios of PbPb to pp single ratios with $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}}$ > 2 GeV and $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}}$ > 1 GeV.

The double ratios of PbPb to pp single ratios with $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} > 2$ GeV and $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} > 1$ GeV.

The double ratios of PbPb to pp single ratios with $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}}$ > 2 GeV and $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}}$ > 1 GeV.

The double ratios of PbPb to pp single ratios with $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} > 2$ GeV and $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} > 1$ GeV.

The double ratios of PbPb to pp single ratios with $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}}$ > 2 GeV and $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}}$ > 1 GeV.

The double ratios of PbPb to pp single ratios with $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} > 2$ GeV and $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} > 1$ GeV.

The double ratios of PbPb to pp single ratios with $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}}$ > 2 GeV and $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}}$ > 1 GeV.

The double ratios of PbPb to pp single ratios with $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} > 2$ GeV and $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} > 1$ GeV.

The double ratios of PbPb to pp single ratios with $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}}$ > 2 GeV and $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}}$ > 1 GeV.

The double ratios of PbPb to pp single ratios with $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} > 2$ GeV and $p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch}} > 1$ GeV.

Signal efficiencies with Full Run 2 dimuon channel in 1b final state for different bbll (destructive interference) signal scenarios

Signal efficiencies with Full Run 2 dimuon channel in 2b final state for different bbll signal scenarios

Signal efficiencies with Full Run 2 dimuon channel in 2b final state for different bbll (destructive interference) signal scenarios

Signal efficiencies with Full Run 2 dielectron channel for different bbll signal scenarios

Signal efficiencies with Full Run 2 dielectron channel for different bbll (destructive interference) signal scenarios

Signal efficiencies with Full Run 2 dielectron channel in 1b final state for different bbll signal scenarios

Signal efficiencies with Full Run 2 dielectron channel in 1b final state for different bbll (destructive interference) signal scenarios

Signal efficiencies with Full Run 2 dielectron channel in 2b final state for different bbll signal scenarios

Signal efficiencies with Full Run 2 dielectron channel in 2b final state for different bbll (destructive interference) signal scenarios

Signal efficiencies with Full Run 2 dimuon channel for bsll signal

Signal efficiencies with Full Run 2 dielectron channel for bsll signal

Observed and expected background yields for different mass ranges in the dielectron channel in 0 b jet final state. The sum of all background contributions is shown as well as a breakdown into the four main categories. The quoted uncertainty includes both the statistical and the systematic components.

Observed and expected background yields for different mass ranges in the dielectron channel in 1 b jet final state. The sum of all background contributions is shown as well as a breakdown into the four main categories. The quoted uncertainty includes both the statistical and the systematic components.

Observed and expected background yields for different mass ranges in the dielectron channel in 2 b jet final state. The sum of all background contributions is shown as well as a breakdown into the four main categories. The quoted uncertainty includes both the statistical and the systematic components.

Observed and expected background yields for different mass ranges in the dimuon channel in 0 b jet final state. The sum of all background contributions is shown as well as a breakdown into the four main categories. The quoted uncertainty includes both the statistical and the systematic components.

Observed and expected background yields for different mass ranges in the dimuon channel in 1 b jet final state. The sum of all background contributions is shown as well as a breakdown into the four main categories. The quoted uncertainty includes both the statistical and the systematic components.

Observed and expected background yields for different mass ranges in the dimuon channel in 2 b jet final state. The sum of all background contributions is shown as well as a breakdown into the four main categories. The quoted uncertainty includes both the statistical and the systematic components.

Measured flavor ratio from DY+jets MC and data in 0b channel. The quoted uncertainty includes both the statistical and the systematic components. The flavor ratio from DY+jets MC deviates slightly from unity as the ratio is not corrected for mass-dependent acceptance times efficiency.

Measured flavor ratio from DY+jets MC and data in 1b+2b channel. The quoted uncertainty includes both the statistical and the systematic components. The flavor ratio from DY+jets MC deviates slightly from unity as the ratio is not corrected for mass-dependent acceptance times efficiency.

Lower limits on the energy scale ($\Lambda$) at 95% CL for bbll signal with different chirality and interference assumptions in the dielectron channel combining all b jet final states. The limits are obtained for $m_{ee}>300$ GeV.

Lower limits on the energy scale ($\Lambda$) at 95% CL for bbll signal with different chirality and interference assumptions in the dimuon channel combining all b jet final states. The limits are obtained for $m_{\mu\mu}>300$ GeV.

Lower limits on the energy scale ($\Lambda$) at 95% CL for bbll signal with different chirality and interference assumptions in the combined (dimuon+dielectron) channel combining all b jet final states. The limits are obtained for $m_{\ell\ell}>300$ GeV.

Observed and Expected upper limits on the product of the production cross section for the bsll signal in the dielectron and dimuon channels for 0 b-tagged jets.

Observed and Expected upper limits on the product of the production cross section for the bsll signal in the dielectron and dimuon channels for 1 b-tagged jets.

Jet pairing efficiencies over the parameter space for the wide-width heavy resonance signals. The pairing efficiency is evaluated in the 6$b$ region when a correct pairing is possible — that is, the six leading jets are geometrically matched to truth-level b-quarks.

Distributions of scores for nonresDNN in 6b data and the background prediction after background-only fits to the observed data. The Low- and High-Score regions are included. Benchmark signal models (normalized to the background) are overlaid: SM HHH signal and non-resonant TRSM signal with $(m_X, m_S)=(400,200)$ GeV.

Distributions of scores for resDNN in 6b data and the background prediction after background-only fits to the observed data. The Low- and High-Score regions are included. A benchmark signal model (normalized to the background) is overlaid: resonant TRSM signal with $(m_X, m_S)=(500,350)$ GeV.

Distributions of scores for heavyresDNN in 6b data and the background prediction after background-only fits to the observed data. The Low- and High-Score regions are included. Benchmark signal models (normalized to the background) are overlaid: heavy-resonant signals with (mX, mS)=(900,325) GeV with a 1% or 20% width.

Expected 95% CL $HHH$ cross section upper limits for the phase space within the perturbative unitarity bounds of the TRSM signals. While the points were generated under Benchmark point 3 of the TRSM, they can also be interpreted in the DM-CPV model.

Observed 95% CL $HHH$ cross section upper limits for the phase space within the perturbative unitarity bounds of the TRSM signals. While the points were generated under Benchmark point 3 of the TRSM, they can also be interpreted in the DM-CPV model.

Expected 95% CL $HHH$ cross section upper limits for the narrow-width (1%) heavy resonance signals.

Expected 95% CL $HHH$ cross section upper limits for the wide-width (20%) heavy resonance signals.

Observed 95% CL $HHH$ cross section upper limits for the narrow-width (1%) heavy resonance signals.

Observed 95% CL $HHH$ cross section upper limits for the wide-width (20%) heavy resonance signals.

Expected 95% CL constraints on $\kappa_3$ and $\kappa_4$, the ratios of the Higgs tri-linear and quartic self-couplings to their predicted SM values.

Expected 68% CL constraints on $\kappa_3$ and $\kappa_4$, the ratios of the Higgs tri-linear and quartic self-couplings to their predicted SM values.

Observed 95% CL constraints on $\kappa_3$ and $\kappa_4$, the ratios of the Higgs tri-linear and quartic self-couplings to their predicted SM values.

Observed 68% CL constraints on $\kappa_3$ and $\kappa_4$, the ratios of the Higgs tri-linear and quartic self-couplings to their predicted SM values.

Unitarity limits, calculated in Eur. Phys. J. C 84 (2024) 366, are overlaid in the region bounded by the gray dashed line.

Overall acceptance x efficiency for events entering the 6$b$ region over the parameter space for the TRSM signals. Generator weights, and weights associated to pileup modeling corrections are applied. Jet trigger scale factors, NNJVT scale factors and scale factors associated to the $b$-tagging calibration are applied.

Overall acceptance x efficiency for events entering the 6$b$ region over the parameter space for the narrow-width heavy resonance signals. Generator weights, and weights associated to pileup modeling corrections are applied. Jet trigger scale factors, NNJVT scale factors and scale factors associated to the $b$-tagging calibration are applied.

Overall acceptance x efficiency for events entering the 6$b$ region over the parameter space for the wide-width heavy resonance signals. Generator weights, and weights associated to pileup modeling corrections are applied. Jet trigger scale factors, NNJVT scale factors and scale factors associated to the $b$-tagging calibration are applied.

Expected one-dimensional likelihood scan over the Higgs self-coupling modifier $\kappa_3$. Both of the modifiers are profiled in the profile-likelihood fit, and the likelihood scan keeps $\kappa_4$ fixed at one.

Observed one-dimensional likelihood scan over the Higgs self-coupling modifier $\kappa_3$. Both of the modifiers are profiled in the profile-likelihood fit, and the likelihood scan keeps $\kappa_4$ fixed at one.

Expected one-dimensional likelihood scan over the Higgs self-coupling modifier $\kappa_4$. Both of the modifiers are profiled in the profile-likelihood fit, and the likelihood scan keeps $\kappa_3$ fixed at one.

Observed one-dimensional likelihood scan over the Higgs self-coupling modifier $\kappa_4$. Both of the modifiers are profiled in the profile-likelihood fit, and the likelihood scan keeps $\kappa_3$ fixed at one.

Summary of the impact on the analysis of different sources of systematic uncertainty. The impact is estimated as the absolute value of the difference between the expected upper limit with all sources of uncertainty included and the upper limit with a subset of systematic uncertainties excluded. In the left-hand column, more heavily indented rows are a sub-category of the less indented row above.

Cutflow for selected signal points. Generator weights, and weights associated to pileup modeling corrections are applied from the second row onwards. These weight the SM events assuming the SM cross section, whilst the TRSM and Generic resonance events are weighted to 50 fb. Jet trigger scale factors are applied from the third row onwards. NNJVT scale factors are applied from the fourth row onwards. Scale factors associated to the b-tagging calibration are applied in the last three rows.

Distribution of $E_{\text{T}}^{\text{miss}}$ in SROS-on-b-$e\mu\mu$. The SR selections are applied for each distribution, except for the variable shown, for which the selection is indicated by a black arrow. The last bin includes the overflow. The `Others' category contains the production of Higgs boson, 3-top, 4-top, and single-top processes. Distributions for SBH signals are overlaid. The bottom panels show the ratio of the observed data to the predicted total background yields. The hatched band includes all statistical and systematic uncertainties.

Distribution of $m_{\text{T}}^{\text{min}}$ in SROS-on-b-$e\mu\mu$. The SR selections are applied for each distribution, except for the variable shown, for which the selection is indicated by a black arrow. The last bin includes the overflow. The `Others' category contains the production of Higgs boson, 3-top, 4-top, and single-top processes. Distributions for SBH signals are overlaid. The bottom panels show the ratio of the observed data to the predicted total background yields. The hatched band includes all statistical and systematic uncertainties.

Distribution of $E_{\text{T}}^{\text{miss}}$ in SRSS-$2\mu$. The SR selections are applied for each distribution, except for the variable shown, for which the selection is indicated by a black arrow. The last bin includes the overflow. The `Others' category contains the production of Higgs boson, 3-top, 4-top, and single-top processes. Distributions for SBH signals are overlaid. The bottom panels show the ratio of the observed data to the predicted total background yields. The hatched band includes all statistical and systematic uncertainties.

Observed ($N_{\text{obs}}$) and expected ($N_{\text{exp}}$) yields after the background-only fit for the flavor-merged inclusive SRs. The third and fourth columns list the 95\% CL upper limits on the visible cross-section ($\sigma_{\text{vis}}^{95}$) and on the number of signal events ($S_\text{obs}^{95}$). The fifth column ($S_\text{exp}^{95}$) shows the 95\% CL upper limit on the number of signal events, given the expected number of background events and its $\pm 1\sigma$ variations. The last two columns indicate the CL$_{\text{b}}$ value, i.e. the confidence level observed for the background-only hypothesis, and the discovery $p$-value ($p(s = 0)$) with its associated statistical significance $Z$. If the observed yield is below the expected yield, the $p$-value is capped at 0.5.

Observed and expected exclusion limits on the SBH model where mass-degenerate $\tilde{e}_{\text{L}}$, $\tilde{\mu}_{\text{L}}$ and $\tilde{\nu}$ are considered. The expected 95% CL exclusion limit is shown as a dashed black line, with the yellow band indicating $\pm1\sigma_{\text{exp}}$ including all uncertainties except for the signal cross-section uncertainty. The observed 95% CL exclusion limit is shown as a red solid line, with the dotted red lines indicating $\pm1\sigma_{\text{theory}}$ due to the signal cross-section uncertainty. The limits are shown projected onto the $m(\tilde{\ell}_{\text{L}}^{\pm})$ vs $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_3)$ plane, with $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)$ assumed to be 100~GeV.

Observed and expected exclusion limits on the SBH model where mass-degenerate $\tilde{e}_{\text{L}}$, $\tilde{\mu}_{\text{L}}$ and $\tilde{\nu}$ are considered. The expected 95% CL exclusion limit is shown as a dashed black line, with the yellow band indicating $\pm1\sigma_{\text{exp}}$ including all uncertainties except for the signal cross-section uncertainty. The observed 95% CL exclusion limit is shown as a red solid line, with the dotted red lines indicating $\pm1\sigma_{\text{theory}}$ due to the signal cross-section uncertainty. The limits are shown projected onto the $m(\tilde{\ell}_{\text{L}}^{\pm})$ vs $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_3)$ plane, with $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)$ assumed to be 100~GeV.

Observed and expected exclusion limits on the SBH model where mass-degenerate $\tilde{e}_{\text{L}}$, $\tilde{\mu}_{\text{L}}$ and $\tilde{\nu}$ are considered. The expected 95% CL exclusion limit is shown as a dashed black line, with the yellow band indicating $\pm1\sigma_{\text{exp}}$ including all uncertainties except for the signal cross-section uncertainty. The observed 95% CL exclusion limit is shown as a red solid line, with the dotted red lines indicating $\pm1\sigma_{\text{theory}}$ due to the signal cross-section uncertainty. The limits are shown projected onto the $m(\tilde{\ell}_{\text{L}}^{\pm})$ vs $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_3)$ plane, with $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)$ assumed to be 100~GeV.

Observed and expected exclusion limits on the SBH model where mass-degenerate $\tilde{e}_{\text{L}}$, $\tilde{\mu}_{\text{L}}$ and $\tilde{\nu}$ are considered. The expected 95% CL exclusion limit is shown as a dashed black line, with the yellow band indicating $\pm1\sigma_{\text{exp}}$ including all uncertainties except for the signal cross-section uncertainty. The observed 95% CL exclusion limit is shown as a red solid line, with the dotted red lines indicating $\pm1\sigma_{\text{theory}}$ due to the signal cross-section uncertainty. The limits are shown projected onto the $m(\tilde{\ell}_{\text{L}}^{\pm})$ vs $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_3)$ plane, with $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)$ assumed to be 100~GeV.

Observed and expected exclusion limits on the SBH model where mass-degenerate $\tilde{e}_{\text{L}}$, $\tilde{\mu}_{\text{L}}$ and $\tilde{\nu}$ are considered. The expected 95% CL exclusion limit is shown as a dashed black line, with the yellow band indicating $\pm1\sigma_{\text{exp}}$ including all uncertainties except for the signal cross-section uncertainty. The observed 95% CL exclusion limit is shown as a red solid line, with the dotted red lines indicating $\pm1\sigma_{\text{theory}}$ due to the signal cross-section uncertainty. The limits are shown projected onto the $m(\tilde{\ell}_{\text{L}}^{\pm})$ vs $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_3)$ plane, with $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)$ assumed to be 100~GeV.

Observed and expected exclusion limits on the SBH model where mass-degenerate $\tilde{e}_{\text{L}}$, $\tilde{\mu}_{\text{L}}$ and $\tilde{\nu}$ are considered. The expected 95% CL exclusion limit is shown as a dashed black line, with the yellow band indicating $\pm1\sigma_{\text{exp}}$ including all uncertainties except for the signal cross-section uncertainty. The observed 95% CL exclusion limit is shown as a red solid line, with the dotted red lines indicating $\pm1\sigma_{\text{theory}}$ due to the signal cross-section uncertainty. The limits are shown projected onto the $m(\tilde{\ell}_{\text{L}}^{\pm})$ vs $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_3)$ plane, with $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)$ assumed to be 100~GeV.

Observed and expected exclusion limits on the SBH model where only $\tilde{e}_{\text{L}}$ is considered. The expected 95% CL exclusion limit is shown as a dashed black line, with the yellow band indicating $\pm1\sigma_{\text{exp}}$ including all uncertainties except for the signal cross-section uncertainty. The observed 95% CL exclusion limit is shown as a red solid line, with the dotted red lines indicating $\pm1\sigma_{\text{theory}}$ due to the signal cross-section uncertainty. The limits are shown projected onto the $m(\tilde{\ell}_{\text{L}}^{\pm})$ vs $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_3)$ plane, with $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)$ assumed to be 100~GeV.

Observed and expected exclusion limits on the SBH model where only $\tilde{e}_{\text{L}}$ is considered. The expected 95% CL exclusion limit is shown as a dashed black line, with the yellow band indicating $\pm1\sigma_{\text{exp}}$ including all uncertainties except for the signal cross-section uncertainty. The observed 95% CL exclusion limit is shown as a red solid line, with the dotted red lines indicating $\pm1\sigma_{\text{theory}}$ due to the signal cross-section uncertainty. The limits are shown projected onto the $m(\tilde{\ell}_{\text{L}}^{\pm})$ vs $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_3)$ plane, with $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)$ assumed to be 100~GeV.

Observed and expected exclusion limits on the SBH model where only $\tilde{e}_{\text{L}}$ is considered. The expected 95% CL exclusion limit is shown as a dashed black line, with the yellow band indicating $\pm1\sigma_{\text{exp}}$ including all uncertainties except for the signal cross-section uncertainty. The observed 95% CL exclusion limit is shown as a red solid line, with the dotted red lines indicating $\pm1\sigma_{\text{theory}}$ due to the signal cross-section uncertainty. The limits are shown projected onto the $m(\tilde{\ell}_{\text{L}}^{\pm})$ vs $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_3)$ plane, with $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)$ assumed to be 100~GeV.

Observed and expected exclusion limits on the SBH model where only $\tilde{e}_{\text{L}}$ is considered. The expected 95% CL exclusion limit is shown as a dashed black line, with the yellow band indicating $\pm1\sigma_{\text{exp}}$ including all uncertainties except for the signal cross-section uncertainty. The observed 95% CL exclusion limit is shown as a red solid line, with the dotted red lines indicating $\pm1\sigma_{\text{theory}}$ due to the signal cross-section uncertainty. The limits are shown projected onto the $m(\tilde{\ell}_{\text{L}}^{\pm})$ vs $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_3)$ plane, with $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)$ assumed to be 100~GeV.

Observed and expected exclusion limits on the SBH model where only $\tilde{e}_{\text{L}}$ is considered. The expected 95% CL exclusion limit is shown as a dashed black line, with the yellow band indicating $\pm1\sigma_{\text{exp}}$ including all uncertainties except for the signal cross-section uncertainty. The observed 95% CL exclusion limit is shown as a red solid line, with the dotted red lines indicating $\pm1\sigma_{\text{theory}}$ due to the signal cross-section uncertainty. The limits are shown projected onto the $m(\tilde{\ell}_{\text{L}}^{\pm})$ vs $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_3)$ plane, with $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)$ assumed to be 100~GeV.

Observed and expected exclusion limits on the SBH model where only $\tilde{e}_{\text{L}}$ is considered. The expected 95% CL exclusion limit is shown as a dashed black line, with the yellow band indicating $\pm1\sigma_{\text{exp}}$ including all uncertainties except for the signal cross-section uncertainty. The observed 95% CL exclusion limit is shown as a red solid line, with the dotted red lines indicating $\pm1\sigma_{\text{theory}}$ due to the signal cross-section uncertainty. The limits are shown projected onto the $m(\tilde{\ell}_{\text{L}}^{\pm})$ vs $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_3)$ plane, with $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)$ assumed to be 100~GeV.

Observed and expected exclusion limits on the SBH model where only $\tilde{\mu}_{\text{L}}$ is considered. The expected 95% CL exclusion limit is shown as a dashed black line, with the yellow band indicating $\pm1\sigma_{\text{exp}}$ including all uncertainties except for the signal cross-section uncertainty. The observed 95% CL exclusion limit is shown as a red solid line, with the dotted red lines indicating $\pm1\sigma_{\text{theory}}$ due to the signal cross-section uncertainty. The limits are shown projected onto the $m(\tilde{\ell}_{\text{L}}^{\pm})$ vs $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_3)$ plane, with $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)$ assumed to be 100~GeV.

Observed and expected exclusion limits on the SBH model where only $\tilde{\mu}_{\text{L}}$ is considered. The expected 95% CL exclusion limit is shown as a dashed black line, with the yellow band indicating $\pm1\sigma_{\text{exp}}$ including all uncertainties except for the signal cross-section uncertainty. The observed 95% CL exclusion limit is shown as a red solid line, with the dotted red lines indicating $\pm1\sigma_{\text{theory}}$ due to the signal cross-section uncertainty. The limits are shown projected onto the $m(\tilde{\ell}_{\text{L}}^{\pm})$ vs $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_3)$ plane, with $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)$ assumed to be 100~GeV.

Observed and expected exclusion limits on the SBH model where only $\tilde{\mu}_{\text{L}}$ is considered. The expected 95% CL exclusion limit is shown as a dashed black line, with the yellow band indicating $\pm1\sigma_{\text{exp}}$ including all uncertainties except for the signal cross-section uncertainty. The observed 95% CL exclusion limit is shown as a red solid line, with the dotted red lines indicating $\pm1\sigma_{\text{theory}}$ due to the signal cross-section uncertainty. The limits are shown projected onto the $m(\tilde{\ell}_{\text{L}}^{\pm})$ vs $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_3)$ plane, with $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)$ assumed to be 100~GeV.

Observed and expected exclusion limits on the SBH model where only $\tilde{\mu}_{\text{L}}$ is considered. The expected 95% CL exclusion limit is shown as a dashed black line, with the yellow band indicating $\pm1\sigma_{\text{exp}}$ including all uncertainties except for the signal cross-section uncertainty. The observed 95% CL exclusion limit is shown as a red solid line, with the dotted red lines indicating $\pm1\sigma_{\text{theory}}$ due to the signal cross-section uncertainty. The limits are shown projected onto the $m(\tilde{\ell}_{\text{L}}^{\pm})$ vs $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_3)$ plane, with $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)$ assumed to be 100~GeV.

Observed and expected exclusion limits on the SBH model where only $\tilde{\mu}_{\text{L}}$ is considered. The expected 95% CL exclusion limit is shown as a dashed black line, with the yellow band indicating $\pm1\sigma_{\text{exp}}$ including all uncertainties except for the signal cross-section uncertainty. The observed 95% CL exclusion limit is shown as a red solid line, with the dotted red lines indicating $\pm1\sigma_{\text{theory}}$ due to the signal cross-section uncertainty. The limits are shown projected onto the $m(\tilde{\ell}_{\text{L}}^{\pm})$ vs $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_3)$ plane, with $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)$ assumed to be 100~GeV.

Observed and expected exclusion limits on the SBH model where only $\tilde{\mu}_{\text{L}}$ is considered. The expected 95% CL exclusion limit is shown as a dashed black line, with the yellow band indicating $\pm1\sigma_{\text{exp}}$ including all uncertainties except for the signal cross-section uncertainty. The observed 95% CL exclusion limit is shown as a red solid line, with the dotted red lines indicating $\pm1\sigma_{\text{theory}}$ due to the signal cross-section uncertainty. The limits are shown projected onto the $m(\tilde{\ell}_{\text{L}}^{\pm})$ vs $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_3)$ plane, with $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)$ assumed to be 100~GeV.

Distribution of $E_{\text{T}}^{\text{miss}}$ in SROS-off-b-$e\mu\mu$. The SR selections are applied for each distribution, except for the variable shown, for which the selection is indicated by a black arrow. The last bin includes the overflow. The `Others' category contains the production of Higgs boson, 3-top, 4-top, and single-top processes. Distributions for SBH signals are overlaid. The bottom panels show the ratio of the observed data to the predicted total background yields. Ratio values outside the graph range are indicated by brown arrows. The hatched band includes all statistical and systematic uncertainties.

Distribution of $m_{\text{T}}^{\text{min}}$ in SROS-off-b-$e\mu\mu$. The SR selections are applied for each distribution, except for the variable shown, for which the selection is indicated by a black arrow. The last bin includes the overflow. The `Others' category contains the production of Higgs boson, 3-top, 4-top, and single-top processes. Distributions for SBH signals are overlaid. The bottom panels show the ratio of the observed data to the predicted total background yields. Ratio values outside the graph range are indicated by brown arrows. The hatched band includes all statistical and systematic uncertainties.

Distribution of $E_{\text{T}}^{\text{miss}}$ in SRSS-$eee$. The SR selections are applied for each distribution, except for the variable shown, for which the selection is indicated by a black arrow. The last bin includes the overflow. The `Others' category contains the production of Higgs boson, 3-top, 4-top, and single-top processes. Distributions for SBH signals are overlaid. The bottom panels show the ratio of the observed data to the predicted total background yields. Ratio values outside the graph range are indicated by brown arrows. The hatched band includes all statistical and systematic uncertainties.

Distribution of $E_{\text{T}}^{\text{miss}}$ in SRSS-$ee\mu$. The SR selections are applied for each distribution, except for the variable shown, for which the selection is indicated by a black arrow. The last bin includes the overflow. The `Others' category contains the production of Higgs boson, 3-top, 4-top, and single-top processes. Distributions for SBH signals are overlaid. The bottom panels show the ratio of the observed data to the predicted total background yields. Ratio values outside the graph range are indicated by brown arrows. The hatched band includes all statistical and systematic uncertainties.

Observed and expected exclusion limits on the SBH model where mass-degenerate $\tilde{e}_{\text{L}}$, $\tilde{\mu}_{\text{L}}$ and $\tilde{\nu}$ is considered. The expected 95% CL exclusion limit is shown as a dashed black line, with the yellow band indicating $\pm1\sigma_{\text{exp}}$ including all uncertainties except for the signal cross-section uncertainty. The observed 95% CL exclusion limit is shown as a red solid line, with the dotted red lines indicating $\pm1\sigma_{\text{theory}}$ due to the signal cross-section uncertainty. The limits are shown projected onto the $m(\tilde{\ell}_{\text{L}}^{\pm})$ vs $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_3)$ plane, with $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)$ assumed to be 150 GeV.

Observed and expected exclusion limits on the SBH model where mass-degenerate $\tilde{e}_{\text{L}}$, $\tilde{\mu}_{\text{L}}$ and $\tilde{\nu}$ is considered. The expected 95% CL exclusion limit is shown as a dashed black line, with the yellow band indicating $\pm1\sigma_{\text{exp}}$ including all uncertainties except for the signal cross-section uncertainty. The observed 95% CL exclusion limit is shown as a red solid line, with the dotted red lines indicating $\pm1\sigma_{\text{theory}}$ due to the signal cross-section uncertainty. The limits are shown projected onto the $m(\tilde{\ell}_{\text{L}}^{\pm})$ vs $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_3)$ plane, with $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)$ assumed to be 150 GeV.

Observed and expected exclusion limits on the SBH model where mass-degenerate $\tilde{e}_{\text{L}}$, $\tilde{\mu}_{\text{L}}$ and $\tilde{\nu}$ is considered. The expected 95% CL exclusion limit is shown as a dashed black line, with the yellow band indicating $\pm1\sigma_{\text{exp}}$ including all uncertainties except for the signal cross-section uncertainty. The observed 95% CL exclusion limit is shown as a red solid line, with the dotted red lines indicating $\pm1\sigma_{\text{theory}}$ due to the signal cross-section uncertainty. The limits are shown projected onto the $m(\tilde{\ell}_{\text{L}}^{\pm})$ vs $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_3)$ plane, with $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)$ assumed to be 150 GeV.

Observed and expected exclusion limits on the SBH model where mass-degenerate $\tilde{e}_{\text{L}}$, $\tilde{\mu}_{\text{L}}$ and $\tilde{\nu}$ is considered. The expected 95% CL exclusion limit is shown as a dashed black line, with the yellow band indicating $\pm1\sigma_{\text{exp}}$ including all uncertainties except for the signal cross-section uncertainty. The observed 95% CL exclusion limit is shown as a red solid line, with the dotted red lines indicating $\pm1\sigma_{\text{theory}}$ due to the signal cross-section uncertainty. The limits are shown projected onto the $m(\tilde{\ell}_{\text{L}}^{\pm})$ vs $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_3)$ plane, with $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)$ assumed to be 150 GeV.

Observed and expected exclusion limits on the SBH model where mass-degenerate $\tilde{e}_{\text{L}}$, $\tilde{\mu}_{\text{L}}$ and $\tilde{\nu}$ is considered. The expected 95% CL exclusion limit is shown as a dashed black line, with the yellow band indicating $\pm1\sigma_{\text{exp}}$ including all uncertainties except for the signal cross-section uncertainty. The observed 95% CL exclusion limit is shown as a red solid line, with the dotted red lines indicating $\pm1\sigma_{\text{theory}}$ due to the signal cross-section uncertainty. The limits are shown projected onto the $m(\tilde{\ell}_{\text{L}}^{\pm})$ vs $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_3)$ plane, with $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)$ assumed to be 150 GeV.

Observed and expected exclusion limits on the SBH model where mass-degenerate $\tilde{e}_{\text{L}}$, $\tilde{\mu}_{\text{L}}$ and $\tilde{\nu}$ is considered. The expected 95% CL exclusion limit is shown as a dashed black line, with the yellow band indicating $\pm1\sigma_{\text{exp}}$ including all uncertainties except for the signal cross-section uncertainty. The observed 95% CL exclusion limit is shown as a red solid line, with the dotted red lines indicating $\pm1\sigma_{\text{theory}}$ due to the signal cross-section uncertainty. The limits are shown projected onto the $m(\tilde{\ell}_{\text{L}}^{\pm})$ vs $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_3)$ plane, with $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)$ assumed to be 150 GeV.

Observed and expected exclusion limits on the SBH model where mass-degenerate $\tilde{e}_{\text{L}}$, $\tilde{\mu}_{\text{L}}$ and $\tilde{\nu}$ are considered. The expected 95% CL exclusion limit is shown as a dashed black line, with the yellow band indicating $\pm1\sigma_{\text{exp}}$ including all uncertainties except for the signal cross-section uncertainty. The observed 95% CL exclusion limit is shown as a red solid line, with the dotted red lines indicating $\pm1\sigma_{\text{theory}}$ due to the signal cross-section uncertainty. The limits are shown projected onto the $\Delta m(\tilde{\chi}^0_3, \tilde{\chi}^0_1)$ vs $\Delta m(\tilde{\ell}_{\text{L}}, \tilde{\chi}^0_3)$ plane, with $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)$ assumed to be 100 GeV.

Observed and expected exclusion limits on the SBH model where mass-degenerate $\tilde{e}_{\text{L}}$, $\tilde{\mu}_{\text{L}}$ and $\tilde{\nu}$ are considered. The expected 95% CL exclusion limit is shown as a dashed black line, with the yellow band indicating $\pm1\sigma_{\text{exp}}$ including all uncertainties except for the signal cross-section uncertainty. The observed 95% CL exclusion limit is shown as a red solid line, with the dotted red lines indicating $\pm1\sigma_{\text{theory}}$ due to the signal cross-section uncertainty. The limits are shown projected onto the $\Delta m(\tilde{\chi}^0_3, \tilde{\chi}^0_1)$ vs $\Delta m(\tilde{\ell}_{\text{L}}, \tilde{\chi}^0_3)$ plane, with $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)$ assumed to be 100 GeV.

Observed and expected exclusion limits on the SBH model where mass-degenerate $\tilde{e}_{\text{L}}$, $\tilde{\mu}_{\text{L}}$ and $\tilde{\nu}$ are considered. The expected 95% CL exclusion limit is shown as a dashed black line, with the yellow band indicating $\pm1\sigma_{\text{exp}}$ including all uncertainties except for the signal cross-section uncertainty. The observed 95% CL exclusion limit is shown as a red solid line, with the dotted red lines indicating $\pm1\sigma_{\text{theory}}$ due to the signal cross-section uncertainty. The limits are shown projected onto the $\Delta m(\tilde{\chi}^0_3, \tilde{\chi}^0_1)$ vs $\Delta m(\tilde{\ell}_{\text{L}}, \tilde{\chi}^0_3)$ plane, with $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)$ assumed to be 100 GeV.

Observed and expected exclusion limits on the SBH model where mass-degenerate $\tilde{e}_{\text{L}}$, $\tilde{\mu}_{\text{L}}$ and $\tilde{\nu}$ are considered. The expected 95% CL exclusion limit is shown as a dashed black line, with the yellow band indicating $\pm1\sigma_{\text{exp}}$ including all uncertainties except for the signal cross-section uncertainty. The observed 95% CL exclusion limit is shown as a red solid line, with the dotted red lines indicating $\pm1\sigma_{\text{theory}}$ due to the signal cross-section uncertainty. The limits are shown projected onto the $\Delta m(\tilde{\chi}^0_3, \tilde{\chi}^0_1)$ vs $\Delta m(\tilde{\ell}_{\text{L}}, \tilde{\chi}^0_3)$ plane, with $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)$ assumed to be 100 GeV.

Observed and expected exclusion limits on the SBH model where mass-degenerate $\tilde{e}_{\text{L}}$, $\tilde{\mu}_{\text{L}}$ and $\tilde{\nu}$ are considered. The expected 95% CL exclusion limit is shown as a dashed black line, with the yellow band indicating $\pm1\sigma_{\text{exp}}$ including all uncertainties except for the signal cross-section uncertainty. The observed 95% CL exclusion limit is shown as a red solid line, with the dotted red lines indicating $\pm1\sigma_{\text{theory}}$ due to the signal cross-section uncertainty. The limits are shown projected onto the $\Delta m(\tilde{\chi}^0_3, \tilde{\chi}^0_1)$ vs $\Delta m(\tilde{\ell}_{\text{L}}, \tilde{\chi}^0_3)$ plane, with $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)$ assumed to be 100 GeV.

Observed and expected exclusion limits on the SBH model where mass-degenerate $\tilde{e}_{\text{L}}$, $\tilde{\mu}_{\text{L}}$ and $\tilde{\nu}$ are considered. The expected 95% CL exclusion limit is shown as a dashed black line, with the yellow band indicating $\pm1\sigma_{\text{exp}}$ including all uncertainties except for the signal cross-section uncertainty. The observed 95% CL exclusion limit is shown as a red solid line, with the dotted red lines indicating $\pm1\sigma_{\text{theory}}$ due to the signal cross-section uncertainty. The limits are shown projected onto the $\Delta m(\tilde{\chi}^0_3, \tilde{\chi}^0_1)$ vs $\Delta m(\tilde{\ell}_{\text{L}}, \tilde{\chi}^0_3)$ plane, with $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)$ assumed to be 100 GeV.

The expected upper limits on the cross-section for each signal point. The gray numbers represent the values. The expected (dashed) and observed (solid) 95% CL exclusion limits are overlaid. An asymptotic approximation is employed in the CL$_{\text{s}}$ calculation instead of the full calculation using pseudo-experiments.

The observed upper limits on the cross-section for each signal point. The gray numbers represent the values. The expected (dashed) and observed (solid) 95% CL exclusion limits are overlaid. An asymptotic approximation is employed in the CL$_{\text{s}}$ calculation instead of the full calculation using pseudo-experiments.

Acceptance for signals with $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)=100$ GeV in flavored-merged SRs. The acceptance is given by the ratio of weighted selected events in the SR to the weighted total number of generated events. The selection is based on generator-level particle information.

Acceptance for signals with $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)=100$ GeV in flavored-merged SRs. The acceptance is given by the ratio of weighted selected events in the SR to the weighted total number of generated events. The selection is based on generator-level particle information.

Acceptance for signals with $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)=100$ GeV in flavored-merged SRs. The acceptance is given by the ratio of weighted selected events in the SR to the weighted total number of generated events. The selection is based on generator-level particle information.

Acceptance for signals with $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)=100$ GeV in flavored-merged SRs. The acceptance is given by the ratio of weighted selected events in the SR to the weighted total number of generated events. The selection is based on generator-level particle information.

Acceptance for signals with $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)=100$ GeV in flavored-merged SRs. The acceptance is given by the ratio of weighted selected events in the SR to the weighted total number of generated events. The selection is based on generator-level particle information.

Acceptance for signals with $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)=100$ GeV in flavored-merged SRs. The acceptance is given by the ratio of weighted selected events in the SR to the weighted total number of generated events. The selection is based on generator-level particle information.

Acceptance for signals with $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)=100$ GeV in flavored-merged SRs. The acceptance is given by the ratio of weighted selected events in the SR to the weighted total number of generated events. The selection is based on generator-level particle information.

Efficiencies for signals with $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)=100$ GeV in the $m_{3\ell}$ merged SRSFOS and SRSS. The efficiency is defined by the number of events of reconstructed-level signal simulation divided by the number of events obtained at generator level. Efficiencies below 0.002% are rounded to 0. The efficiency values are affected by statistical fluctuations due to the limited number of events.

Efficiencies for signals with $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)=100$ GeV in the $m_{3\ell}$ merged SRSFOS and SRSS. The efficiency is defined by the number of events of reconstructed-level signal simulation divided by the number of events obtained at generator level. Efficiencies below 0.002% are rounded to 0. The efficiency values are affected by statistical fluctuations due to the limited number of events.

Efficiencies for signals with $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)=100$ GeV in the $m_{3\ell}$ merged SRSFOS and SRSS. The efficiency is defined by the number of events of reconstructed-level signal simulation divided by the number of events obtained at generator level. Efficiencies below 0.002% are rounded to 0. The efficiency values are affected by statistical fluctuations due to the limited number of events.

Efficiencies for signals with $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)=100$ GeV in the $m_{3\ell}$ merged SRSFOS and SRSS. The efficiency is defined by the number of events of reconstructed-level signal simulation divided by the number of events obtained at generator level. Efficiencies below 0.002% are rounded to 0. The efficiency values are affected by statistical fluctuations due to the limited number of events.

Efficiencies for signals with $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)=100$ GeV in the $m_{3\ell}$ merged SRSFOS and SRSS. The efficiency is defined by the number of events of reconstructed-level signal simulation divided by the number of events obtained at generator level. Efficiencies below 0.002% are rounded to 0. The efficiency values are affected by statistical fluctuations due to the limited number of events.

Efficiencies for signals with $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)=100$ GeV in the $m_{3\ell}$ merged SRSFOS and SRSS. The efficiency is defined by the number of events of reconstructed-level signal simulation divided by the number of events obtained at generator level. Efficiencies below 0.002% are rounded to 0. The efficiency values are affected by statistical fluctuations due to the limited number of events.

Efficiencies for signals with $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)=100$ GeV in the $m_{3\ell}$ merged SRSFOS and SRSS. The efficiency is defined by the number of events of reconstructed-level signal simulation divided by the number of events obtained at generator level. Efficiencies below 0.002% are rounded to 0. The efficiency values are affected by statistical fluctuations due to the limited number of events.

Efficiencies for signals with $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)=100$ GeV in the $m_{3\ell}$ merged SRSFOS and SRSS. The efficiency is defined by the number of events of reconstructed-level signal simulation divided by the number of events obtained at generator level. Efficiencies below 0.002% are rounded to 0. The efficiency values are affected by statistical fluctuations due to the limited number of events.

Efficiencies for signals with $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)=100$ GeV in the $m_{3\ell}$ merged SRSFOS and SRSS. The efficiency is defined by the number of events of reconstructed-level signal simulation divided by the number of events obtained at generator level. Efficiencies below 0.002% are rounded to 0. The efficiency values are affected by statistical fluctuations due to the limited number of events.

Efficiencies for signals with $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)=100$ GeV in the $m_{3\ell}$ merged SRSFOS and SRSS. The efficiency is defined by the number of events of reconstructed-level signal simulation divided by the number of events obtained at generator level. Efficiencies below 0.002% are rounded to 0. The efficiency values are affected by statistical fluctuations due to the limited number of events.

Efficiencies for signals with $m(\tilde{\chi}^0_1)=100$ GeV in the $m_{3\ell}$ merged SRSFOS and SRSS. The efficiency is defined by the number of events of reconstructed-level signal simulation divided by the number of events obtained at generator level. Efficiencies below 0.002% are rounded to 0. The efficiency values are affected by statistical fluctuations due to the limited number of events.

Summary of the number of events passing each selection for the $m(\tilde{\ell}_{\text{L}}^{\pm},\tilde{\chi}^0_3,\tilde{\chi}^0_1)=(300, 200, 100)$, $(550, 300, 100)$, $(450, 180, 100)$ GeV signal points, including all production processes. After the initial selections, the table is split into row blocks per inclusive region, and then further for each SR channel. Flavor-binned SRs are shown for SROS-on-b for reference. The generator level selections require to have two or more leptons.

Summary of the number of events passing each selection for the $m(\tilde{\ell}_{\text{L}}^{\pm},\tilde{\chi}^0_3,\tilde{\chi}^0_1)=(300, 200, 100)$, $(550, 300, 100)$, $(450, 180, 100)$ GeV signal points, including all production processes. After the initial selections, the table is split into row blocks per inclusive region, and then further for each SR channel. Flavor-binned SRs are shown for SROS-off-b for reference. The generator level selections require to have two or more leptons.

Summary of the number of events passing each selection for the $m(\tilde{\ell}_{\text{L}}^{\pm},\tilde{\chi}^0_3,\tilde{\chi}^0_1)=(300, 200, 100)$, $(550, 300, 100)$, $(450, 180, 100)$ GeV signal points, including all production processes. After the initial selections, the table is split into row blocks per inclusive region, and then further for each SR channel. Flavor-binned SRs are shown. The generator level selections require to have two or more leptons.

Distribution of the reconstructed $\tau\tau$ invariant mass ($m_{\tau\tau}$) for all events in the VBF_1 signal region for $p_{\text{T}}^{H}>200$ GeV. The observed Higgs boson signal corresponds to $(\sigma\times B)/(\sigma\times B)_{\text{SM}}\,=\,0.99$. Entries with values above the $x$-axis range are shown in the last bin of each distribution. The prediction for each sample is determined from the likelihood fit performed to measure the total $pp\rightarrow H\rightarrow\tau\tau$ cross-section.

Distribution of the reconstructed $\tau\tau$ invariant mass ($m_{\tau\tau}$) for all events in the VBF_0 signal region for $m_{jj}<1$ TeV. The observed Higgs boson signal corresponds to $(\sigma\times B)/(\sigma\times B)_{\text{SM}}\,=\,0.99$. Entries with values above the $x$-axis range are shown in the last bin of each distribution. The prediction for each sample is determined from the likelihood fit performed to measure the total $pp\rightarrow H\rightarrow \tau\tau$ cross-section.

Distribution of the reconstructed $\tau\tau$ invariant mass ($m_{\tau\tau}$) for all events in the VBF_0 signal region for $m_{jj}>1$ TeV. The observed Higgs boson signal corresponds to $(\sigma\times B)/(\sigma\times B)_{\text{SM}}\,=\,0.99$. Entries with values above the $x$-axis range are shown in the last bin of each distribution. The prediction for each sample is determined from the likelihood fit performed to measure the total $pp\rightarrow H \rightarrow \tau\tau$ cross-section.

Distribution of the reconstructed $\tau\tau$ invariant mass ($m_{\tau\tau}$) for all events in the VBF_1 signal region for $m_{jj}<1$ TeV. The observed Higgs boson signal corresponds to $(\sigma\times B)/(\sigma\times B)_{\text{SM}}\,=\,0.99$. Entries with values above the $x$-axis range are shown in the last bin of each distribution. The prediction for each sample is determined from the likelihood fit performed to measure the total $pp\rightarrow \rightarrow \tau\tau$ cross-section.

Distribution of the reconstructed $\tau\tau$ invariant mass ($m_{\tau\tau}$) for all events in the VBF_1 signal region for $m_{jj}>1$ TeV. The observed Higgs boson signal corresponds to $(\sigma\times B)/(\sigma\times B)_{\text{SM}}\,=\,0.99$. Entries with values above the $x$-axis range are shown in the last bin of each distribution. The prediction for each sample is determined from the likelihood fit performed to measure the total $pp\rightarrow H\rightarrow \tau\tau$ cross-section.

Comparison of the observed and expected event yields in the ttH categories. The window category contains events with $m_{\tau\tau} \in [100, 150]$ GeV, while events outside of this mass region are included in the sideband region. The observed Higgs boson signal corresponds to $(\sigma\times B)/(\sigma\times B)_{\text{SM}}\,=\,0.99$. The prediction for each sample is determined from the likelihood fit performed to measure the total $pp\rightarrow H\rightarrow\tau\tau$ cross-section.

The measured values of $\sigma_{H}\times B(H\rightarrow\tau\tau)$ relative to the SM expectations in the total (labelled as 'Combined') and per-production-mode fit. The total $\pm1\sigma$ uncertainty in each measurement is indicated by the error bar. The total systematic uncertainty in each measurement is also indicated.

The measured values for $\sigma_{H}\times B(H\rightarrow\tau\tau)$ relative to the SM expectations in the simplified template cross-section measurement. The total $\pm1\sigma$ uncertainty in each measurement is indicated by the error bar. The total systematic uncertainty in each measurement is also indicated.

Upper limits at 95% CL on simplified template cross-sections in the individual ttH $p_{\text{T}}^{H}$ bins relative to their SM expectation in the $H\rightarrow\tau\tau$ decay channel, derived using the CL$_\text{s}$ method. The observed upper limits, together with the expected limits both in the background-only hypothesis and in the SM hypothesis (dotted red lines) are included. In the case of the expected limits in the background-only hypothesis, one- and two-standard-deviation uncertainty bands are also shown.

Measured fiducial differential cross-sections as a function of $p_\text{T}(j_0)$. The measurements are compared with particle-level SM predictions from the POWHEG+PYTHIA8, POWHEG+HERWIG7 and MadGraph5_aMC@NLO+Pythia8 generators for the combined VBF, ggF, $VH$, and $t\bar{t}H$ Higgs boson production modes. The shaded box around each data point shows the statistical uncertainty, while the total uncertainty is indicated by the error bar. The contribution from the ggF, $VH$, and $t\bar{t}H$ production modes as predicted by POWHEG+PYTHIA8 is also shown.

Measured fiducial differential cross-sections as a function of $p_\text{T}^{H}$. The measurements are compared with particle-level SM predictions from the POWHEG+PYTHIA8, POWHEG+HERWIG7 and MadGraph5_aMC@NLO+Pythia8 generators for the combined VBF, ggF, $VH$, and $t\bar{t} H$ Higgs boson production modes. The shaded box around each data point shows the statistical uncertainty, while the total uncertainty is indicated by the error bar. The contribution from the ggF, $VH$, and $t\bar{t} H$ production modes as predicted by POWHEG+PYTHIA8 is also shown.

Measured fiducial differential cross-sections as a function of $\Delta\phi_{jj}^{\text{signed}}$. The measurements are compared with particle-level SM predictions from the POWHEG+PYTHIA8, POWHEG+HERWIG7 and MadGraph5_aMC@NLO+Pythia8 generators for the combined VBF, ggF, $VH$, and $t\bar{t}H$ Higgs boson production modes. The shaded box around each data point shows the statistical uncertainty, while the total uncertainty is indicated by the error bar. The contribution from the ggF, $VH$, and $t\bar{t} H$ production modes as predicted by POWHEG+PYTHIA8 is also shown.

Measured fiducial differential cross-sections as a function of $\Delta\phi_{jj}^{\text{signed}}$ vs $p_\text{T}^\text{H}$. The measurements are compared with particle-level SM predictions from the POWHEG+PYTHIA8, POWHEG+HERWIG7 and MadGraph5_aMC@NLO+Pythia8 generators for the combined VBF, ggF, $VH$, and $t\bar{t}H$ Higgs boson production modes. The shaded box around each data point shows the statistical uncertainty, while the total uncertainty is indicated by the error bar. The contribution from the ggF, $VH$, and $t\bar{t}H$ production modes as predicted by POWHEG+PYTHIA8 is also shown.

The unfolded data compared with the nominal SM predictions from POWHEG+PYTHIA8, as well as the predictions for several values of Wilson coefficients in the SMEFT, for $\Delta\phi_{jj}^{\text{signed}}$.

The unfolded data compared with the nominal SM predictions from POWHEG+PYTHIA8, as well as the predictions for several values of Wilson coefficients in the SMEFT, for $\Delta\phi_{jj}^{\text{signed}}$.

The unfolded data compared with the nominal SM predictions from POWHEG+PYTHIA8, as well as the predictions for several values of Wilson coefficients in the SMEFT, for $\Delta\phi_{jj}^{\text{signed}}$ vs $p_\text{T}^{H}$.

The unfolded data compared with the nominal SM predictions from POWHEG+PYTHIA8, as well as the predictions for several values of Wilson coefficients in the SMEFT, for $p_\text{T}^{H}$.

The 95% expected and observed confidence intervals for each of the six considered Wilson coefficients. Each coefficient is treated individually and both the linear and linear + quadratic models are considered when evaluating the sensitivity to the terms that enter at $\mathcal{O}(\Lambda^{-4})$. For the CP-even operators the $\Delta\phi_{jj}^{\text{signed}}$ distribution is used to extract the confidence interval. The limits are computed at a new-physics scale $\Lambda=1$ TeV.

The 95% expected and observed confidence intervals for each of the six considered Wilson coefficients. Each coefficient is treated individually and both the linear and linear + quadratic models are considered when evaluating the sensitivity to the terms that enter at $\mathcal{O}(\Lambda^{-4})$. For the CP-odd operators the $\Delta\phi_{jj}^{\text{signed}}$ vs $p_\text{T}^{H}$ distribution is used to extract the confidence interval. The limits are computed at a new-physics scale $\Lambda=1$ TeV.

Two-dimensional observed and expected limits at 68% and 95% confidence level obtained from $c_{HW}$ and $c_{HB}$ using only the SM-dimension-6 interference in the SMEFT basis. The limits are computed at a new-physics scale $\Lambda$ = 1 TeV. In this case, the $\Delta\phi_{jj}^{signed}$ distribution is used. IMPORTANT: HEPData requires the same number of rows for each column. However, each curve of on the plot has a different number of points. For that reason, the curves are padded with data of "0.0, 0.0". The "0.0, 0.0" points should be omitted in analysis.

Two-dimensional observed and expected limits at 68% and 95% confidence level obtained from $c_{H\tilde{W}}$ and $c_{H\tilde{B}}$ using only the SM-dimension-6 interference in the SMEFT basis. The limits are computed at a new-physics scale $\Lambda$ = 1 TeV. In this purely CP-odd case, the $\Delta\phi_{jj}^{signed}$ vs $p_{T}^{H}$ distribution is used. IMPORTANT: HEPData requires the same number of rows for each column. However, each curve of on the plot has a different number of points. For that reason, the curves are padded with data of "0.0, 0.0". The "0.0, 0.0" points should be omitted in analysis.

Two-dimensional observed and expected limits at 68% and 95% confidence level obtained from $c_{HW}$ and $c_{H\tilde{W}}$ using only the SM-dimension-6 interference in the SMEFT basis. The limits are computed at a new-physics scale $\Lambda$ = 1 TeV. In this case, the $\Delta\phi_{jj}^{signed}$ distribution is used. IMPORTANT: HEPData requires the same number of rows for each column. However, each curve of on the plot has a different number of points. For that reason, the curves are padded with data of "0.0, 0.0". The "0.0, 0.0" points should be omitted in analysis.

The expected values of $\sigma_{H}\times B(H\rightarrow\tau\tau)$ relative to the SM expectations in the total (labelled as 'Combined') and per-production-mode fit. The total $\pm1\sigma$ uncertainty in each measurement is indicated by the error bar. The total systematic uncertainty in each measurement is also indicated.

The expected values for $\sigma_{H}\times B(H\rightarrow\tau\tau)$ relative to the SM expectations in the simplified template cross-section measurement. The total $\pm1\sigma$ uncertainty in each measurement is indicated by the error bar. The total systematic uncertainty in each measurement is also indicated.

The measured values for $\sigma_{H}\times B(H\rightarrow\tau\tau)$ in the simplified template cross-section measurement. The total $\pm1\sigma$ uncertainty in the measurement is indicated by the black error bars, with the individual contribution from the statistical uncertainty in blue.

The measured correlations between differential fiducial cross-sections, $\sigma$, and the normalisation factors, $\alpha$, for the $Z(\to\tau\tau) + \text{jets}$ and top backgrounds for $p_\text{T}(j_0)$. The bins denoted as $\sigma_{1,2,3,4}$ correspond to the measurements in the four bins listed elsewhere for each observable.

The measured correlations between differential fiducial cross-sections, $\sigma$, and the normalisation factors, $\alpha$, for the $Z(\to\tau\tau) + \text{jets}$ and top backgrounds for $p_\text{T}^{H}}$. The bins denoted as $\sigma_{1,2,3,4}$ correspond to the measurements in the four bins listed elsewhere for each observable.

The measured correlations between differential fiducial cross-sections, $\sigma$, and the normalisation factors, $\alpha$, for the $Z(\to\tau\tau) + \text{jets}$ and top backgrounds for $\Delta\phi_{jj}^{\text{signed}}$. The bins denoted as $\sigma_{1,2,3,4}$ correspond to the measurements in the four bins listed elsewhere for each observable.

The measured correlations between differential fiducial cross-sections, $\sigma$, and the normalisation factors, $\alpha$, for the $Z(\to\tau\tau) + \text{jets}$ and top backgrounds for $\Delta\phi_{jj}^{\text{signed}}$ vs $p_\text{T}^{H}$. The bins denoted as $\sigma_{1,2,3,4}$ correspond to the measurements in the four bins listed elsewhere for each observable.

The observed EFT limits at 95% CL, shown for the linear+quadratic electron, muon, and combined fits.

The expected EFT limits at 95% CL, shown for the linear-only electron, muon, and combined fits. The PDF eigenvectors in the theoretical uncertainty are used at 68% CL.

The expected EFT limits at 95% CL, shown for the linear+quadratic electron, muon, and combined fits. The PDF eigenvectors in the theoretical uncertainty are used at 68% CL.

The observed EFT limits at 95% CL, shown for the linear-only electron, muon, and combined fits. The PDF eigenvectors in the theoretical uncertainty are used at 68% CL.

The observed EFT limits at 95% CL, shown for the linear+quadratic electron, muon, and combined fits. The PDF eigenvectors in the theoretical uncertainty are used at 68% CL.

Born-level single-differential cross section $\frac{d\sigma (W^+\to e^+\nu) }{d m_{\text{T}}^{W} } $ including the absolute statistical and systematic uncertainties. Symmetric uncertainties are denoted by $\pm$ or $\mp$, where the upper sign corresponds to the one standard deviation upward shift of the uncertainty source. The systematic uncertainties are related to the unfolding procedure (``unf.''), the jet energy scale/resolution (``JER/JES''), the \met scale and resolution, the electron and muon scale, resolution and efficiency (``Eff.''), the multijet and $t\bar{t}$ (where RW refers to a reweighting to NNLO) background estimates and normalization of small background processes (``Norm.''). The luminosity uncertainty of $0.83\%$ is not included.

Born-level single-differential cross section $\frac{d\sigma (W^-\to e^-\bar{\nu}) }{d m_{\text{T}}^{W} } $ including the absolute statistical and systematic uncertainties. Symmetric uncertainties are denoted by $\pm$ or $\mp$, where the upper sign corresponds to the one standard deviation upward shift of the uncertainty source. The systematic uncertainties are related to the unfolding procedure (``unf.''), the jet energy scale/resolution (``JER/JES''), the \met scale and resolution, the electron and muon scale, resolution and efficiency (``Eff.''), the multijet and $t\bar{t}$ (where RW refers to a reweighting to NNLO) background estimates and normalization of small background processes (``Norm.''). The luminosity uncertainty of $0.83\%$ is not included.

Born-level single-differential cross section $\frac{d\sigma (W\to e\nu) }{d m_{\text{T}}^{W} } $ including the absolute statistical and systematic uncertainties. Symmetric uncertainties are denoted by $\pm$ or $\mp$, where the upper sign corresponds to the one standard deviation upward shift of the uncertainty source. The systematic uncertainties are related to the unfolding procedure (``unf.''), the jet energy scale/resolution (``JER/JES''), the \met scale and resolution, the electron and muon scale, resolution and efficiency (``Eff.''), the multijet and $t\bar{t}$ (where RW refers to a reweighting to NNLO) background estimates and normalization of small background processes (``Norm.''). The luminosity uncertainty of $0.83\%$ is not included.

Born-level double-differential cross section $\frac{d^2\sigma (W^+\to e^+\nu) }{d m_{\text{T}}^{W} d |\eta| } $ for $m_T^W$ = [200-300] GeV including the absolute statistical and systematic uncertainties. Symmetric uncertainties are denoted by $\pm$ or $\mp$, where the upper sign corresponds to the one standard deviation upward shift of the uncertainty source. The systematic uncertainties are related to the unfolding procedure (``unf.''), the jet energy scale/resolution (``JER/JES''), the \met scale and resolution, the electron and muon scale, resolution and efficiency (``Eff.''), the multijet and $t\bar{t}$ (where RW refers to a reweighting to NNLO) background estimates and normalization of small background processes (``Norm.''). The luminosity uncertainty of $0.83\%$ is not included.

Born-level double-differential cross section $\frac{d^2\sigma (W^+\to e^+\nu) }{d m_{\text{T}}^{W} d |\eta| } $ for $m_T^W$ = [300-425] GeV including the absolute statistical and systematic uncertainties. Symmetric uncertainties are denoted by $\pm$ or $\mp$, where the upper sign corresponds to the one standard deviation upward shift of the uncertainty source. The systematic uncertainties are related to the unfolding procedure (``unf.''), the jet energy scale/resolution (``JER/JES''), the \met scale and resolution, the electron and muon scale, resolution and efficiency (``Eff.''), the multijet and $t\bar{t}$ (where RW refers to a reweighting to NNLO) background estimates and normalization of small background processes (``Norm.''). The luminosity uncertainty of $0.83\%$ is not included.

Born-level double-differential cross section $\frac{d^2\sigma (W^+\to e^+\nu) }{d m_{\text{T}}^{W} d |\eta| } $ for $m_T^W$ = [425-600] GeV including the absolute statistical and systematic uncertainties. Symmetric uncertainties are denoted by $\pm$ or $\mp$, where the upper sign corresponds to the one standard deviation upward shift of the uncertainty source. The systematic uncertainties are related to the unfolding procedure (``unf.''), the jet energy scale/resolution (``JER/JES''), the \met scale and resolution, the electron and muon scale, resolution and efficiency (``Eff.''), the multijet and $t\bar{t}$ (where RW refers to a reweighting to NNLO) background estimates and normalization of small background processes (``Norm.''). The luminosity uncertainty of $0.83\%$ is not included.

Born-level double-differential cross section $\frac{d^2\sigma (W^+\to e^+\nu) }{d m_{\text{T}}^{W} d |\eta| } $ for $m_T^W$ = [600-900] GeV including the absolute statistical and systematic uncertainties. Symmetric uncertainties are denoted by $\pm$ or $\mp$, where the upper sign corresponds to the one standard deviation upward shift of the uncertainty source. The systematic uncertainties are related to the unfolding procedure (``unf.''), the jet energy scale/resolution (``JER/JES''), the \met scale and resolution, the electron and muon scale, resolution and efficiency (``Eff.''), the multijet and $t\bar{t}$ (where RW refers to a reweighting to NNLO) background estimates and normalization of small background processes (``Norm.''). The luminosity uncertainty of $0.83\%$ is not included.

Born-level double-differential cross section $\frac{d^2\sigma (W^+\to e^+\nu) }{d m_{\text{T}}^{W} d |\eta| } $ for $m_T^W$ = [900-2000] GeV including the absolute statistical and systematic uncertainties. Symmetric uncertainties are denoted by $\pm$ or $\mp$, where the upper sign corresponds to the one standard deviation upward shift of the uncertainty source. The systematic uncertainties are related to the unfolding procedure (``unf.''), the jet energy scale/resolution (``JER/JES''), the \met scale and resolution, the electron and muon scale, resolution and efficiency (``Eff.''), the multijet and $t\bar{t}$ (where RW refers to a reweighting to NNLO) background estimates and normalization of small background processes (``Norm.''). The luminosity uncertainty of $0.83\%$ is not included.

Born-level double-differential cross section $\frac{d^2\sigma (W^-\to e^-\bar{\nu}) }{d m_{\text{T}}^{W} d |\eta| } $ for $m_T^W$ = [200-300] GeV including the absolute statistical and systematic uncertainties. Symmetric uncertainties are denoted by $\pm$ or $\mp$, where the upper sign corresponds to the one standard deviation upward shift of the uncertainty source. The systematic uncertainties are related to the unfolding procedure (``unf.''), the jet energy scale/resolution (``JER/JES''), the \met scale and resolution, the electron and muon scale, resolution and efficiency (``Eff.''), the multijet and $t\bar{t}$ (where RW refers to a reweighting to NNLO) background estimates and normalization of small background processes (``Norm.''). The luminosity uncertainty of $0.83\%$ is not included.

Born-level double-differential cross section $\frac{d^2\sigma (W^-\to e^-\bar{\nu}) }{d m_{\text{T}}^{W} d |\eta| } $ for $m_T^W$ = [300-425] GeV including the absolute statistical and systematic uncertainties. Symmetric uncertainties are denoted by $\pm$ or $\mp$, where the upper sign corresponds to the one standard deviation upward shift of the uncertainty source. The systematic uncertainties are related to the unfolding procedure (``unf.''), the jet energy scale/resolution (``JER/JES''), the \met scale and resolution, the electron and muon scale, resolution and efficiency (``Eff.''), the multijet and $t\bar{t}$ (where RW refers to a reweighting to NNLO) background estimates and normalization of small background processes (``Norm.''). The luminosity uncertainty of $0.83\%$ is not included.

Born-level double-differential cross section $\frac{d^2\sigma (W^-\to e^-\bar{\nu}) }{d m_{\text{T}}^{W} d |\eta| } $ for $m_T^W$ = [425-600] GeV including the absolute statistical and systematic uncertainties. Symmetric uncertainties are denoted by $\pm$ or $\mp$, where the upper sign corresponds to the one standard deviation upward shift of the uncertainty source. The systematic uncertainties are related to the unfolding procedure (``unf.''), the jet energy scale/resolution (``JER/JES''), the \met scale and resolution, the electron and muon scale, resolution and efficiency (``Eff.''), the multijet and $t\bar{t}$ (where RW refers to a reweighting to NNLO) background estimates and normalization of small background processes (``Norm.''). The luminosity uncertainty of $0.83\%$ is not included.

Born-level double-differential cross section $\frac{d^2\sigma (W^-\to e^-\bar{\nu}) }{d m_{\text{T}}^{W} d |\eta| } $ for $m_T^W$ = [600-900] GeV including the absolute statistical and systematic uncertainties. Symmetric uncertainties are denoted by $\pm$ or $\mp$, where the upper sign corresponds to the one standard deviation upward shift of the uncertainty source. The systematic uncertainties are related to the unfolding procedure (``unf.''), the jet energy scale/resolution (``JER/JES''), the \met scale and resolution, the electron and muon scale, resolution and efficiency (``Eff.''), the multijet and $t\bar{t}$ (where RW refers to a reweighting to NNLO) background estimates and normalization of small background processes (``Norm.''). The luminosity uncertainty of $0.83\%$ is not included.

Born-level double-differential cross section $\frac{d^2\sigma (W^-\to e^-\bar{\nu}) }{d m_{\text{T}}^{W} d |\eta| } $ for $m_T^W$ = [900-2000] GeV including the absolute statistical and systematic uncertainties. Symmetric uncertainties are denoted by $\pm$ or $\mp$, where the upper sign corresponds to the one standard deviation upward shift of the uncertainty source. The systematic uncertainties are related to the unfolding procedure (``unf.''), the jet energy scale/resolution (``JER/JES''), the \met scale and resolution, the electron and muon scale, resolution and efficiency (``Eff.''), the multijet and $t\bar{t}$ (where RW refers to a reweighting to NNLO) background estimates and normalization of small background processes (``Norm.''). The luminosity uncertainty of $0.83\%$ is not included.

Born-level double-differential cross section $\frac{d^2\sigma (W\to e\nu) }{d m_{\text{T}}^{W} d |\eta| } $ for $m_T^W$ = [200-300] GeV including the absolute statistical and systematic uncertainties. Symmetric uncertainties are denoted by $\pm$ or $\mp$, where the upper sign corresponds to the one standard deviation upward shift of the uncertainty source. The systematic uncertainties are related to the unfolding procedure (``unf.''), the jet energy scale/resolution (``JER/JES''), the \met scale and resolution, the electron and muon scale, resolution and efficiency (``Eff.''), the multijet and $t\bar{t}$ (where RW refers to a reweighting to NNLO) background estimates and normalization of small background processes (``Norm.''). The luminosity uncertainty of $0.83\%$ is not included.

Born-level double-differential cross section $\frac{d^2\sigma (W\to e\nu) }{d m_{\text{T}}^{W} d |\eta| } $ for $m_T^W$ = [300-425] GeV including the absolute statistical and systematic uncertainties. Symmetric uncertainties are denoted by $\pm$ or $\mp$, where the upper sign corresponds to the one standard deviation upward shift of the uncertainty source. The systematic uncertainties are related to the unfolding procedure (``unf.''), the jet energy scale/resolution (``JER/JES''), the \met scale and resolution, the electron and muon scale, resolution and efficiency (``Eff.''), the multijet and $t\bar{t}$ (where RW refers to a reweighting to NNLO) background estimates and normalization of small background processes (``Norm.''). The luminosity uncertainty of $0.83\%$ is not included.

Born-level double-differential cross section $\frac{d^2\sigma (W\to e\nu) }{d m_{\text{T}}^{W} d |\eta| } $ for $m_T^W$ = [425-600] GeV including the absolute statistical and systematic uncertainties. Symmetric uncertainties are denoted by $\pm$ or $\mp$, where the upper sign corresponds to the one standard deviation upward shift of the uncertainty source. The systematic uncertainties are related to the unfolding procedure (``unf.''), the jet energy scale/resolution (``JER/JES''), the \met scale and resolution, the electron and muon scale, resolution and efficiency (``Eff.''), the multijet and $t\bar{t}$ (where RW refers to a reweighting to NNLO) background estimates and normalization of small background processes (``Norm.''). The luminosity uncertainty of $0.83\%$ is not included.

Born-level double-differential cross section $\frac{d^2\sigma (W\to e\nu) }{d m_{\text{T}}^{W} d |\eta| } $ for $m_T^W$ = [600-900] GeV including the absolute statistical and systematic uncertainties. Symmetric uncertainties are denoted by $\pm$ or $\mp$, where the upper sign corresponds to the one standard deviation upward shift of the uncertainty source. The systematic uncertainties are related to the unfolding procedure (``unf.''), the jet energy scale/resolution (``JER/JES''), the \met scale and resolution, the electron and muon scale, resolution and efficiency (``Eff.''), the multijet and $t\bar{t}$ (where RW refers to a reweighting to NNLO) background estimates and normalization of small background processes (``Norm.''). The luminosity uncertainty of $0.83\%$ is not included.

Born-level double-differential cross section $\frac{d^2\sigma (W\to e\nu) }{d m_{\text{T}}^{W} d |\eta| } $ for $m_T^W$ = [900-2000] GeV including the absolute statistical and systematic uncertainties. Symmetric uncertainties are denoted by $\pm$ or $\mp$, where the upper sign corresponds to the one standard deviation upward shift of the uncertainty source. The systematic uncertainties are related to the unfolding procedure (``unf.''), the jet energy scale/resolution (``JER/JES''), the \met scale and resolution, the electron and muon scale, resolution and efficiency (``Eff.''), the multijet and $t\bar{t}$ (where RW refers to a reweighting to NNLO) background estimates and normalization of small background processes (``Norm.''). The luminosity uncertainty of $0.83\%$ is not included.

Born-level single-differential cross-section $\frac{d\sigma (W^+\to\mu^+\nu) }{d m_{\text{T}}^{W} } $ including the absolute statistical and systematic uncertainties. Symmetric uncertainties are denoted by $\pm$ or $\mp$, where the upper sign corresponds to the one standard deviation upward shift of the uncertainty source. The systematic uncertainties are related to the unfolding procedure (``unf.''), the jet energy scale/resolution (``JER/JES''), the \met scale and resolution, the electron and muon scale, resolution and efficiency (``Eff.''), the multijet and $t\bar{t}$ (where $t\bar{t}$ RW refers to a reweighting to NNLO) background estimates and normalization of small background processes (``Norm.''). The luminosity uncertainty of $0.83\%$ is not included.

Born-level single-differential cross-section $\frac{d\sigma (W^-\to\mu^-\bar{\nu}) }{d m_{\text{T}}^{W} } $ including the absolute statistical and systematic uncertainties. Symmetric uncertainties are denoted by $\pm$ or $\mp$, where the upper sign corresponds to the one standard deviation upward shift of the uncertainty source. The systematic uncertainties are related to the unfolding procedure (``unf.''), the jet energy scale/resolution (``JER/JES''), the \met scale and resolution, the electron and muon scale, resolution and efficiency (``Eff.''), the multijet and $t\bar{t}$ (where $t\bar{t}$ RW refers to a reweighting to NNLO) background estimates and normalization of small background processes (``Norm.''). The luminosity uncertainty of $0.83\%$ is not included.

Born-level single-differential cross-section $\frac{d\sigma (W\to\mu\nu) }{d m_{\text{T}}^{W} } $ including the absolute statistical and systematic uncertainties. Symmetric uncertainties are denoted by $\pm$ or $\mp$, where the upper sign corresponds to the one standard deviation upward shift of the uncertainty source. The systematic uncertainties are related to the unfolding procedure (``unf.''), the jet energy scale/resolution (``JER/JES''), the \met scale and resolution, the electron and muon scale, resolution and efficiency (``Eff.''), the multijet and $t\bar{t}$ (where $t\bar{t}$ RW refers to a reweighting to NNLO) background estimates and normalization of small background processes (``Norm.''). The luminosity uncertainty of $0.83\%$ is not included.

Born-level double-differential cross-section $\frac{d^2\sigma (W^+\to\mu^+\nu) }{d m_{\text{T}}^{W} d |\eta| } $ for $m_T^W$ = [200-300] GeV including the absolute statistical and systematic uncertainties. Symmetric uncertainties are denoted by $\pm$ or $\mp$, where the upper sign corresponds to the one standard deviation upward shift of the uncertainty source. The systematic uncertainties are related to the unfolding procedure (``unf.''), the jet energy scale/resolution (``JER/JES''), the \met scale and resolution, the electron and muon scale, resolution and efficiency (``Eff.''), the multijet and $t\bar{t}$ (where $t\bar{t}$ RW refers to a reweighting to NNLO) background estimates and normalization of small background processes (``Norm.''). The luminosity uncertainty of $0.83\%$ is not included.

Born-level double-differential cross-section $\frac{d^2\sigma (W^+\to\mu^+\nu) }{d m_{\text{T}}^{W} d |\eta| } $ for $m_T^W$ = [300-425] GeV including the absolute statistical and systematic uncertainties. Symmetric uncertainties are denoted by $\pm$ or $\mp$, where the upper sign corresponds to the one standard deviation upward shift of the uncertainty source. The systematic uncertainties are related to the unfolding procedure (``unf.''), the jet energy scale/resolution (``JER/JES''), the \met scale and resolution, the electron and muon scale, resolution and efficiency (``Eff.''), the multijet and $t\bar{t}$ (where $t\bar{t}$ RW refers to a reweighting to NNLO) background estimates and normalization of small background processes (``Norm.''). The luminosity uncertainty of $0.83\%$ is not included.

Born-level double-differential cross-section $\frac{d^2\sigma (W^+\to\mu^+\nu) }{d m_{\text{T}}^{W} d |\eta| } $ for $m_T^W$ = [425-600] GeV including the absolute statistical and systematic uncertainties. Symmetric uncertainties are denoted by $\pm$ or $\mp$, where the upper sign corresponds to the one standard deviation upward shift of the uncertainty source. The systematic uncertainties are related to the unfolding procedure (``unf.''), the jet energy scale/resolution (``JER/JES''), the \met scale and resolution, the electron and muon scale, resolution and efficiency (``Eff.''), the multijet and $t\bar{t}$ (where $t\bar{t}$ RW refers to a reweighting to NNLO) background estimates and normalization of small background processes (``Norm.''). The luminosity uncertainty of $0.83\%$ is not included.

Born-level double-differential cross-section $\frac{d^2\sigma (W^+\to\mu^+\nu) }{d m_{\text{T}}^{W} d |\eta| } $ for $m_T^W$ = [600-900] GeV including the absolute statistical and systematic uncertainties. Symmetric uncertainties are denoted by $\pm$ or $\mp$, where the upper sign corresponds to the one standard deviation upward shift of the uncertainty source. The systematic uncertainties are related to the unfolding procedure (``unf.''), the jet energy scale/resolution (``JER/JES''), the \met scale and resolution, the electron and muon scale, resolution and efficiency (``Eff.''), the multijet and $t\bar{t}$ (where $t\bar{t}$ RW refers to a reweighting to NNLO) background estimates and normalization of small background processes (``Norm.''). The luminosity uncertainty of $0.83\%$ is not included.

Born-level double-differential cross-section $\frac{d^2\sigma (W^+\to\mu^+\nu) }{d m_{\text{T}}^{W} d |\eta| } $ for $m_T^W$ = [900-2000] GeV including the absolute statistical and systematic uncertainties. Symmetric uncertainties are denoted by $\pm$ or $\mp$, where the upper sign corresponds to the one standard deviation upward shift of the uncertainty source. The systematic uncertainties are related to the unfolding procedure (``unf.''), the jet energy scale/resolution (``JER/JES''), the \met scale and resolution, the electron and muon scale, resolution and efficiency (``Eff.''), the multijet and $t\bar{t}$ (where $t\bar{t}$ RW refers to a reweighting to NNLO) background estimates and normalization of small background processes (``Norm.''). The luminosity uncertainty of $0.83\%$ is not included.

Born-level double-differential cross-section $\frac{d^2\sigma (W^-\to\mu^-\bar{\nu}) }{d m_{\text{T}}^{W} d |\eta| } $ for $m_T^W$ = [200-300] GeV including the absolute statistical and systematic uncertainties. Symmetric uncertainties are denoted by $\pm$ or $\mp$, where the upper sign corresponds to the one standard deviation upward shift of the uncertainty source. The systematic uncertainties are related to the unfolding procedure (``unf.''), the jet energy scale/resolution (``JER/JES''), the \met scale and resolution, the electron and muon scale, resolution and efficiency (``Eff.''), the multijet and $t\bar{t}$ (where $t\bar{t}$ RW refers to a reweighting to NNLO) background estimates and normalization of small background processes (``Norm.''). The luminosity uncertainty of $0.83\%$ is not included.

Born-level double-differential cross-section $\frac{d^2\sigma (W^-\to\mu^-\bar{\nu}) }{d m_{\text{T}}^{W} d |\eta| } $ for $m_T^W$ = [300-425] GeV including the absolute statistical and systematic uncertainties. Symmetric uncertainties are denoted by $\pm$ or $\mp$, where the upper sign corresponds to the one standard deviation upward shift of the uncertainty source. The systematic uncertainties are related to the unfolding procedure (``unf.''), the jet energy scale/resolution (``JER/JES''), the \met scale and resolution, the electron and muon scale, resolution and efficiency (``Eff.''), the multijet and $t\bar{t}$ (where $t\bar{t}$ RW refers to a reweighting to NNLO) background estimates and normalization of small background processes (``Norm.''). The luminosity uncertainty of $0.83\%$ is not included.

Born-level double-differential cross-section $\frac{d^2\sigma (W^-\to\mu^-\bar{\nu}) }{d m_{\text{T}}^{W} d |\eta| } $ for $m_T^W$ = [425-600] GeV including the absolute statistical and systematic uncertainties. Symmetric uncertainties are denoted by $\pm$ or $\mp$, where the upper sign corresponds to the one standard deviation upward shift of the uncertainty source. The systematic uncertainties are related to the unfolding procedure (``unf.''), the jet energy scale/resolution (``JER/JES''), the \met scale and resolution, the electron and muon scale, resolution and efficiency (``Eff.''), the multijet and $t\bar{t}$ (where $t\bar{t}$ RW refers to a reweighting to NNLO) background estimates and normalization of small background processes (``Norm.''). The luminosity uncertainty of $0.83\%$ is not included.

Born-level double-differential cross-section $\frac{d^2\sigma (W^-\to\mu^-\bar{\nu}) }{d m_{\text{T}}^{W} d |\eta| } $ for $m_T^W$ = [600-900] GeV including the absolute statistical and systematic uncertainties. Symmetric uncertainties are denoted by $\pm$ or $\mp$, where the upper sign corresponds to the one standard deviation upward shift of the uncertainty source. The systematic uncertainties are related to the unfolding procedure (``unf.''), the jet energy scale/resolution (``JER/JES''), the \met scale and resolution, the electron and muon scale, resolution and efficiency (``Eff.''), the multijet and $t\bar{t}$ (where $t\bar{t}$ RW refers to a reweighting to NNLO) background estimates and normalization of small background processes (``Norm.''). The luminosity uncertainty of $0.83\%$ is not included.

Born-level double-differential cross-section $\frac{d^2\sigma (W^-\to\mu^-\bar{\nu}) }{d m_{\text{T}}^{W} d |\eta| } $ for $m_T^W$ = [900-2000] GeV including the absolute statistical and systematic uncertainties. Symmetric uncertainties are denoted by $\pm$ or $\mp$, where the upper sign corresponds to the one standard deviation upward shift of the uncertainty source. The systematic uncertainties are related to the unfolding procedure (``unf.''), the jet energy scale/resolution (``JER/JES''), the \met scale and resolution, the electron and muon scale, resolution and efficiency (``Eff.''), the multijet and $t\bar{t}$ (where $t\bar{t}$ RW refers to a reweighting to NNLO) background estimates and normalization of small background processes (``Norm.''). The luminosity uncertainty of $0.83\%$ is not included.

Born-level double-differential cross-section $\frac{d^2\sigma (W\to\mu\nu) }{d m_{\text{T}}^{W} d |\eta| } $ for $m_T^W$ = [200-300] GeV including the absolute statistical and systematic uncertainties. Symmetric uncertainties are denoted by $\pm$ or $\mp$, where the upper sign corresponds to the one standard deviation upward shift of the uncertainty source. The systematic uncertainties are related to the unfolding procedure (``unf.''), the jet energy scale/resolution (``JER/JES''), the \met scale and resolution, the electron and muon scale, resolution and efficiency (``Eff.''), the multijet and $t\bar{t}$ (where $t\bar{t}$ RW refers to a reweighting to NNLO) background estimates and normalization of small background processes (``Norm.''). The luminosity uncertainty of $0.83\%$ is not included.

Born-level double-differential cross-section $\frac{d^2\sigma (W\to\mu\nu) }{d m_{\text{T}}^{W} d |\eta| } $ for $m_T^W$ = [300-425] GeV including the absolute statistical and systematic uncertainties. Symmetric uncertainties are denoted by $\pm$ or $\mp$, where the upper sign corresponds to the one standard deviation upward shift of the uncertainty source. The systematic uncertainties are related to the unfolding procedure (``unf.''), the jet energy scale/resolution (``JER/JES''), the \met scale and resolution, the electron and muon scale, resolution and efficiency (``Eff.''), the multijet and $t\bar{t}$ (where $t\bar{t}$ RW refers to a reweighting to NNLO) background estimates and normalization of small background processes (``Norm.''). The luminosity uncertainty of $0.83\%$ is not included.

Born-level double-differential cross-section $\frac{d^2\sigma (W\to\mu\nu) }{d m_{\text{T}}^{W} d |\eta| } $ for $m_T^W$ = [425-600] GeV including the absolute statistical and systematic uncertainties. Symmetric uncertainties are denoted by $\pm$ or $\mp$, where the upper sign corresponds to the one standard deviation upward shift of the uncertainty source. The systematic uncertainties are related to the unfolding procedure (``unf.''), the jet energy scale/resolution (``JER/JES''), the \met scale and resolution, the electron and muon scale, resolution and efficiency (``Eff.''), the multijet and $t\bar{t}$ (where $t\bar{t}$ RW refers to a reweighting to NNLO) background estimates and normalization of small background processes (``Norm.''). The luminosity uncertainty of $0.83\%$ is not included.

Born-level double-differential cross-section $\frac{d^2\sigma (W\to\mu\nu) }{d m_{\text{T}}^{W} d |\eta| } $ for $m_T^W$ = [600-900] GeV including the absolute statistical and systematic uncertainties. Symmetric uncertainties are denoted by $\pm$ or $\mp$, where the upper sign corresponds to the one standard deviation upward shift of the uncertainty source. The systematic uncertainties are related to the unfolding procedure (``unf.''), the jet energy scale/resolution (``JER/JES''), the \met scale and resolution, the electron and muon scale, resolution and efficiency (``Eff.''), the multijet and $t\bar{t}$ (where $t\bar{t}$ RW refers to a reweighting to NNLO) background estimates and normalization of small background processes (``Norm.''). The luminosity uncertainty of $0.83\%$ is not included.

Born-level double-differential cross-section $\frac{d^2\sigma (W\to\mu\nu) }{d m_{\text{T}}^{W} d |\eta| } $ for $m_T^W$ = [900-2000] GeV including the absolute statistical and systematic uncertainties. Symmetric uncertainties are denoted by $\pm$ or $\mp$, where the upper sign corresponds to the one standard deviation upward shift of the uncertainty source. The systematic uncertainties are related to the unfolding procedure (``unf.''), the jet energy scale/resolution (``JER/JES''), the \met scale and resolution, the electron and muon scale, resolution and efficiency (``Eff.''), the multijet and $t\bar{t}$ (where $t\bar{t}$ RW refers to a reweighting to NNLO) background estimates and normalization of small background processes (``Norm.''). The luminosity uncertainty of $0.83\%$ is not included.

Combined Born-level single-differential cross-section including the absolute statistical and systematic uncertainties in the $\ell^+$-channel. Physical sources of systematic uncertainties are shown. The upper sign corresponds to the one standard deviation upward shift of the uncertainty source. The systematic uncertainties are related to the unfolding procedure (``unf.''), the jet energy scale/resolution (``JER/JES''), the \met scale and resolution, the electron and muon scale, resolution and efficiency (``Eff.''), the multijet and $t\bar{t}$ (where $t\bar{t}$ RW refers to a reweighting to NNLO) background estimates and normalization of small background processes (``Norm.''). The luminosity uncertainty of $0.83\%$ is not included.

Combined Born-level single-differential cross-section including the absolute statistical and systematic uncertainties in the $\ell^-$-channel. Physical sources of systematic uncertainties are shown. The upper sign corresponds to the one standard deviation upward shift of the uncertainty source. The systematic uncertainties are related to the unfolding procedure (``unf.''), the jet energy scale/resolution (``JER/JES''), the \met scale and resolution, the electron and muon scale, resolution and efficiency (``Eff.''), the multijet and $t\bar{t}$ (where $t\bar{t}$ RW refers to a reweighting to NNLO) background estimates and normalization of small background processes (``Norm.''). The luminosity uncertainty of $0.83\%$ is not included.

Combined Born-level single-differential cross-section including the absolute statistical and systematic uncertainties in the $\ell^\pm$-channel. Physical sources of systematic uncertainties are shown. The upper sign corresponds to the one standard deviation upward shift of the uncertainty source. The systematic uncertainties are related to the unfolding procedure (``unf.''), the jet energy scale/resolution (``JER/JES''), the \met scale and resolution, the electron and muon scale, resolution and efficiency (``Eff.''), the multijet and $t\bar{t}$ (where $t\bar{t}$ RW refers to a reweighting to NNLO) background estimates and normalization of small background processes (``Norm.''). The luminosity uncertainty of $0.83\%$ is not included.

Combined Born-level single-differential cross-section including the absolute statistical and systematic uncertainties in the $\ell^+$-channel. Orthogonal sources of systematic uncertainties are shown. The upper sign corresponds to the one standard deviation upward shift of the uncertainty source. The luminosity uncertainty of $0.83\%$ is not included.

Combined Born-level single-differential cross-section including the absolute statistical and systematic uncertainties in the $\ell^-$-channel. Orthogonal sources of systematic uncertainties are shown. The upper sign corresponds to the one standard deviation upward shift of the uncertainty source. The luminosity uncertainty of $0.83\%$ is not included.

Combined Born-level single-differential cross-section including the absolute statistical and systematic uncertainties in the $\ell^\pm$-channel. Orthogonal sources of systematic uncertainties are shown. The upper sign corresponds to the one standard deviation upward shift of the uncertainty source. The luminosity uncertainty of $0.83\%$ is not included.

Combined Born-level double-differential cross-section including the absolute statistical and systematic uncertainties for $m_T^W=[200,300]\,\mathrm{GeV}$ in the $\ell^\pm$-channel. Physical sources of systematic uncertainties are shown. The upper sign corresponds to the one standard deviation upward shift of the uncertainty source. The systematic uncertainties are related to the unfolding procedure (``unf.''), the jet energy scale/resolution (``JER/JES''), the \met scale and resolution, the electron and muon scale, resolution and efficiency (``Eff.''), the multijet and $t\bar{t}$ (where $t\bar{t}$ RW refers to a reweighting to NNLO) background estimates and normalization of small background processes (``Norm.''). The luminosity uncertainty of $0.83\%$ is not included.

Combined Born-level double-differential cross-section including the absolute statistical and systematic uncertainties for $m_T^W=[300,425]\,\mathrm{GeV}$ in the $\ell^\pm$-channel. Physical sources of systematic uncertainties are shown. The upper sign corresponds to the one standard deviation upward shift of the uncertainty source. The systematic uncertainties are related to the unfolding procedure (``unf.''), the jet energy scale/resolution (``JER/JES''), the \met scale and resolution, the electron and muon scale, resolution and efficiency (``Eff.''), the multijet and $t\bar{t}$ (where $t\bar{t}$ RW refers to a reweighting to NNLO) background estimates and normalization of small background processes (``Norm.''). The luminosity uncertainty of $0.83\%$ is not included.

Combined Born-level double-differential cross-section including the absolute statistical and systematic uncertainties for $m_T^W=[425,600]\,\mathrm{GeV}$ in the $\ell^\pm$-channel. Physical sources of systematic uncertainties are shown. The upper sign corresponds to the one standard deviation upward shift of the uncertainty source. The systematic uncertainties are related to the unfolding procedure (``unf.''), the jet energy scale/resolution (``JER/JES''), the \met scale and resolution, the electron and muon scale, resolution and efficiency (``Eff.''), the multijet and $t\bar{t}$ (where $t\bar{t}$ RW refers to a reweighting to NNLO) background estimates and normalization of small background processes (``Norm.''). The luminosity uncertainty of $0.83\%$ is not included.

Combined Born-level double-differential cross-section including the absolute statistical and systematic uncertainties for $m_T^W=[600,900]\,\mathrm{GeV}$ in the $\ell^\pm$-channel. Physical sources of systematic uncertainties are shown. The upper sign corresponds to the one standard deviation upward shift of the uncertainty source. The systematic uncertainties are related to the unfolding procedure (``unf.''), the jet energy scale/resolution (``JER/JES''), the \met scale and resolution, the electron and muon scale, resolution and efficiency (``Eff.''), the multijet and $t\bar{t}$ (where $t\bar{t}$ RW refers to a reweighting to NNLO) background estimates and normalization of small background processes (``Norm.''). The luminosity uncertainty of $0.83\%$ is not included.

Combined Born-level double-differential cross-section including the absolute statistical and systematic uncertainties for $m_T^W=[900,2000]\,\mathrm{GeV}$ in the $\ell^\pm$-channel. Physical sources of systematic uncertainties are shown. The upper sign corresponds to the one standard deviation upward shift of the uncertainty source. The systematic uncertainties are related to the unfolding procedure (``unf.''), the jet energy scale/resolution (``JER/JES''), the \met scale and resolution, the electron and muon scale, resolution and efficiency (``Eff.''), the multijet and $t\bar{t}$ (where $t\bar{t}$ RW refers to a reweighting to NNLO) background estimates and normalization of small background processes (``Norm.''). The luminosity uncertainty of $0.83\%$ is not included.

Combined Born-level double-differential cross-section including the absolute statistical and systematic uncertainties for $m_T^W=[200,300]\,\mathrm{GeV}$ in the $\ell^\pm$-channel. Physical sources of systematic uncertainties are shown. The upper sign corresponds to the one standard deviation upward shift of the uncertainty source. The systematic uncertainties are related to the unfolding procedure (``unf.''), the jet energy scale/resolution (``JER/JES''), the \met scale and resolution, the electron and muon scale, resolution and efficiency (``Eff.''), the multijet and $t\bar{t}$ (where $t\bar{t}$ RW refers to a reweighting to NNLO) background estimates and normalization of small background processes (``Norm.''). The luminosity uncertainty of $0.83\%$ is not included.

Combined Born-level double-differential cross-section including the absolute statistical and systematic uncertainties for $m_T^W=[300,425]\,\mathrm{GeV}$ in the $\ell^\pm$-channel. Physical sources of systematic uncertainties are shown. The upper sign corresponds to the one standard deviation upward shift of the uncertainty source. The systematic uncertainties are related to the unfolding procedure (``unf.''), the jet energy scale/resolution (``JER/JES''), the \met scale and resolution, the electron and muon scale, resolution and efficiency (``Eff.''), the multijet and $t\bar{t}$ (where $t\bar{t}$ RW refers to a reweighting to NNLO) background estimates and normalization of small background processes (``Norm.''). The luminosity uncertainty of $0.83\%$ is not included.

Combined Born-level double-differential cross-section including the absolute statistical and systematic uncertainties for $m_T^W=[425,600]\,\mathrm{GeV}$ in the $\ell^\pm$-channel. Physical sources of systematic uncertainties are shown. The upper sign corresponds to the one standard deviation upward shift of the uncertainty source. The systematic uncertainties are related to the unfolding procedure (``unf.''), the jet energy scale/resolution (``JER/JES''), the \met scale and resolution, the electron and muon scale, resolution and efficiency (``Eff.''), the multijet and $t\bar{t}$ (where $t\bar{t}$ RW refers to a reweighting to NNLO) background estimates and normalization of small background processes (``Norm.''). The luminosity uncertainty of $0.83\%$ is not included.

Combined Born-level double-differential cross-section including the absolute statistical and systematic uncertainties for $m_T^W=[600,900]\,\mathrm{GeV}$ in the $\ell^\pm$-channel. Physical sources of systematic uncertainties are shown. The upper sign corresponds to the one standard deviation upward shift of the uncertainty source. The systematic uncertainties are related to the unfolding procedure (``unf.''), the jet energy scale/resolution (``JER/JES''), the \met scale and resolution, the electron and muon scale, resolution and efficiency (``Eff.''), the multijet and $t\bar{t}$ (where $t\bar{t}$ RW refers to a reweighting to NNLO) background estimates and normalization of small background processes (``Norm.''). The luminosity uncertainty of $0.83\%$ is not included.

Combined Born-level double-differential cross-section including the absolute statistical and systematic uncertainties for $m_T^W=[900,2000]\,\mathrm{GeV}$ in the $\ell^\pm$-channel. Physical sources of systematic uncertainties are shown. The upper sign corresponds to the one standard deviation upward shift of the uncertainty source. The systematic uncertainties are related to the unfolding procedure (``unf.''), the jet energy scale/resolution (``JER/JES''), the \met scale and resolution, the electron and muon scale, resolution and efficiency (``Eff.''), the multijet and $t\bar{t}$ (where $t\bar{t}$ RW refers to a reweighting to NNLO) background estimates and normalization of small background processes (``Norm.''). The luminosity uncertainty of $0.83\%$ is not included.

Combined Born-level double-differential cross-section including the absolute statistical and systematic uncertainties for $m_T^W=[200,300]\,\mathrm{GeV}$ in the $\ell^\pm$-channel. Physical sources of systematic uncertainties are shown. The upper sign corresponds to the one standard deviation upward shift of the uncertainty source. The systematic uncertainties are related to the unfolding procedure (``unf.''), the jet energy scale/resolution (``JER/JES''), the \met scale and resolution, the electron and muon scale, resolution and efficiency (``Eff.''), the multijet and $t\bar{t}$ (where $t\bar{t}$ RW refers to a reweighting to NNLO) background estimates and normalization of small background processes (``Norm.''). The luminosity uncertainty of $0.83\%$ is not included.

Combined Born-level double-differential cross-section including the absolute statistical and systematic uncertainties for $m_T^W=[300,425]\,\mathrm{GeV}$ in the $\ell^\pm$-channel. Physical sources of systematic uncertainties are shown. The upper sign corresponds to the one standard deviation upward shift of the uncertainty source. The systematic uncertainties are related to the unfolding procedure (``unf.''), the jet energy scale/resolution (``JER/JES''), the \met scale and resolution, the electron and muon scale, resolution and efficiency (``Eff.''), the multijet and $t\bar{t}$ (where $t\bar{t}$ RW refers to a reweighting to NNLO) background estimates and normalization of small background processes (``Norm.''). The luminosity uncertainty of $0.83\%$ is not included.

Combined Born-level double-differential cross-section including the absolute statistical and systematic uncertainties for $m_T^W=[425,600]\,\mathrm{GeV}$ in the $\ell^\pm$-channel. Physical sources of systematic uncertainties are shown. The upper sign corresponds to the one standard deviation upward shift of the uncertainty source. The systematic uncertainties are related to the unfolding procedure (``unf.''), the jet energy scale/resolution (``JER/JES''), the \met scale and resolution, the electron and muon scale, resolution and efficiency (``Eff.''), the multijet and $t\bar{t}$ (where $t\bar{t}$ RW refers to a reweighting to NNLO) background estimates and normalization of small background processes (``Norm.''). The luminosity uncertainty of $0.83\%$ is not included.

Combined Born-level double-differential cross-section including the absolute statistical and systematic uncertainties for $m_T^W=[600,900]\,\mathrm{GeV}$ in the $\ell^\pm$-channel. Physical sources of systematic uncertainties are shown. The upper sign corresponds to the one standard deviation upward shift of the uncertainty source. The systematic uncertainties are related to the unfolding procedure (``unf.''), the jet energy scale/resolution (``JER/JES''), the \met scale and resolution, the electron and muon scale, resolution and efficiency (``Eff.''), the multijet and $t\bar{t}$ (where $t\bar{t}$ RW refers to a reweighting to NNLO) background estimates and normalization of small background processes (``Norm.''). The luminosity uncertainty of $0.83\%$ is not included.