Inelastic electron proton scattering at high momentum transfers

Albrecht, W. ; Brasse, F.W. ; Dorner, H. ; et al.
Phys.Lett.B 28 (1968) 225-228, 1968.
Inspire Record 56843 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.29077

Inelastic electron proton scattering has been measured by detecting the scattered electron, thus obtaining the total absorption cross section for virtual photons. Two complete spectra from threshold to a pion nucleon mass of W = 2 GeV were taken at θ e = 48.3° and fixed primary energies of 3.963 GeV and 5.159 GeV, respectively, corresponding to a momentum transfer at the first resonance of q 2 = 3.98 (GeV/ c ) 2 and q 2 = 5.84 (GeV/ c ) 2 . In addition, a measurement at θ e = 47.9° and at a primary energy of 3.306 GeV in the region of the first resonance is reported.

1 data table

No description provided.


Comparisons of Deep Inelastic e p and e n Cross-Sections

Bodek, A. ; Breidenbach, M. ; Dubin, D.L. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.Lett. 30 (1973) 1087, 1973.
Inspire Record 83716 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.21415

Cross sections for inelastic scattering of electrons from hydrogen and deuterium were measured for incident energies from 4.5 to 18 GeV, at scattering angles of 18°, 26°, and 34°, and covering a range of squared four-momentum transfers up to 20 (GeVc)2. Neutron cross sections were extracted from the deuterium data using an impulse approximation. Comparisons with the proton measurements show significant differences between the neutron and proton cross sections.

1 data table

Axis error includes +- 1/1 contribution (DUE TO ERRORS IN ABOVE CORRECTIONSFOR DEAD-TIME LOSSES, INEFFICIENCIES IN E- IDENTIFICATION).


Inelastic electron proton scattering at small four-momentum transfers as a test of finite-energy sum rules

Moritz, J. ; Schmidt, K.H. ; Wegener, D. ; et al.
Nucl.Phys.B 41 (1972) 336-352, 1972.
Inspire Record 75163 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.45250

The twofold differential cross section for the inelastic scattering of electrons on protons wa was measured as a function of the scattered electron energy for an electron scattering angle of 12°. The kinematic region covered in this experiment was 0.3 (GeV/ c ) 2 < q 2 < 1.0 (GeV/ c ) 2 and W < 2.9 GeV. The Bloom-Gilman as well as the constant scattering angle sum rule of Rittenberg and Rubinstein were tested.

5 data tables

Axis error includes +- 0.0/0.0 contribution (3.7 TO 5////UNCERTAINTIES IN TARGET DENSITY, TARGET DIAMETER, SOLID ANGLE, E- SCATTERING ANGLE, INCIDENT E- ENERGY, DEAD TIME CORRECTIONS, CONSTANT OF FARADAY-CUP INTEGRATOR EFFICIENCY OF SPARK CHAMBERS, RADIATIVE CORRECTIONS).

Axis error includes +- 0.0/0.0 contribution (3.7 TO 5////UNCERTAINTIES IN TARGET DENSITY, TARGET DIAMETER, SOLID ANGLE, E- SCATTERING ANGLE, INCIDENT E- ENERGY, DEAD TIME CORRECTIONS, CONSTANT OF FARADAY-CUP INTEGRATOR EFFICIENCY OF SPARK CHAMBERS, RADIATIVE CORRECTIONS).

Axis error includes +- 0.0/0.0 contribution (3.7 TO 5////UNCERTAINTIES IN TARGET DENSITY, TARGET DIAMETER, SOLID ANGLE, E- SCATTERING ANGLE, INCIDENT E- ENERGY, DEAD TIME CORRECTIONS, CONSTANT OF FARADAY-CUP INTEGRATOR EFFICIENCY OF SPARK CHAMBERS, RADIATIVE CORRECTIONS).

More…