Bonechi, L.
E+ E- --> CHARM X
Single Differential Cross Section
SIG
Max results
Sort by Reverse order

Showing 10 of 12 results

rivet Analysis
Observation of the D*0 (2459) in e+ e- Annihilation

The ARGUS collaboration Albrecht, H. ; Bockmann, P. ; Glaser, R. ; et al.
Phys.Lett.B 221 (1989) 422-426, 1989.
Inspire Record 268577 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.29827

Using the ARGUS detector at the DORIS II storage ring at DESY, we have observed a charmed meson of mass (2455±3±5) MeV/c2, decaying to D + π − . The natural width of this state is determined to be (15 +13+5 −10−10 ) MeV c 2 . The fragmentation function is hard, as expected for a leading charmed particle from nonresonant e + e − annihilation. Analysis of the decay angular distribution supports the hypothesis that the observed state is an L =1 excited charmed meson with spin-parity 2 + .

2 data tables
Table 1

Corrected to zero momentum using fragmentation function of Peterson et al., PR D29 (83) 105.

Table 2

Data read from graph.


rivet Analysis
$\eta$ and $\eta^\prime$ Production in $e^+ e^-$ Annihilation at 29-{GeV}: Indications for the $D(s$)+- Decays Into $\eta \pi^\pm$ and $\eta^\prime \pi^\pm$

Wormser, G. ; Abrams, G.S. ; Amidei, D. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.Lett. 61 (1988) 1057, 1988.
Inspire Record 261194 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.20080

η production has been investigated by the Mark II collaboration at the SLAC e+e− storage ring PEP. η particles are reconstructed by their γγ decay mode. The η fragmentation function has been measured and found to be in good agreement with the Lund-model prediction. η′ production has been measured for the first time in high-energy e+e− annihilation. There is evidence at the 3σ level for Ds± decay into ηπ± and η′π±.

4 data tables
Table 1

Numerical values supplied by G.Wormser.

Table 2

Z = 0.0 point extrapolated using LUND fragmentation model.

Table 3

Z = 0.0 point extrapolated using LUND fragmentation model.

More…

Charm Production in Nonresonant e+ e- Annihilations at s**(1/2) = 10.55-GeV

The CLEO collaboration Bortoletto, D. ; Goldberg, M. ; Holmes, R. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.D 37 (1988) 1719, 1988.
Inspire Record 22954 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.23269

We report results on the differential and total cross sections for inclusive production of the charmed particles D*+, D*0, D0, D+, Ds, and Λc in e+e− annihilations at √s=10.55 GeV. Widely used quark fragmentation models are discussed and compared with the measured charmed-particle momentum distributions. This comparison, as well as that with measurements at other center-of-mass energies, shows the need to take QCD corrections into account and their importance for a correct interpretation of the model parameters. The observed rate of D0 and D+ production is compared to the expected total charm production cross section. We measure the probability of a charmed meson being produced as a vector meson and the D*+ decay branching fraction into D0π+.

14 data tables
Table 1

No description provided.

Table 2

No description provided.

Table 3

No description provided.

More…

$\Lambda(c$) Production From $e^+ e^-$ Annihilation in the $\Upsilon$ Energy Region

The CLEO collaboration Bowcock, T.J.V. ; Giles, R.T. ; Hassard, J. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.Lett. 55 (1985) 923, 1985.
Inspire Record 214874 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.20302

We have observed Λc baryons in nonresonant e+e− annihilation at energies around s=10.5 GeV through their decay to Λπ+π+π−. We measure the branching fraction to be (2.8 ± 0.7 ± 1.1)%. The momentum spectrum of the Λc is similar to that of charmed mesons, providing a constraint on models of charmed-quark hadronization.

2 data tables
Table 1

No description provided.

Table 2

Data are extrapolated over whole x range using the 'Peterson' formula.


rivet Analysis
Production of $\phi$ and F (1970) $\to \phi \pi$ in $e^+ e^-$ Annihilation at 29-{GeV}

Derrick, M. ; Fernandez, E. ; Fries, R. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.Lett. 54 (1985) 2568, 1985.
Inspire Record 213242 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.20340

Data from the high-resolution spectrometer at PEP have been used to study the inclusive production of φ mesons and F± mesons decaying into φπ±. Fragmentation functions and cross sections are presented and compared to existing data. The total φ cross section at 29 GeV is 40±6 pb. The observed F signal in the region z>0.4, given the assumption that R(F)[R(F)+R(D)]=0.15, corresponds to an F→φπ branching ratio of (3.3±1.1)%. The measured F mass is 1963±3±3 MeV/c2.

5 data tables
Table 1

No description provided.

Table 2

No description provided.

Table 3

WITH THE FOLLOWING ANGLE CUTS ON THE DECAY REGIONS. PHI DECAY - ABS(COS(THETA)) >0.5.

More…

Evidence for the $F^*$ meson

The TPC/Two Gamma collaboration Aihara, H. ; Alston-Garnjost, M. ; Badtke, D.H. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.Lett. 53 (1984) 2465, 1984.
Inspire Record 203890 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.20409

Evidence for a narrow state decaying into an F meson and a photon has been obtained in e+e− annihilation events at 29-GeV c.m. energy. This state lies 139.5 ± 8.3(stat.) ± 9.7(syst.) MeV above the F-meson mass and is consistent with the expected F* meson. The F mesons are identified by a peak in the K+K−Kπ± mass at 1.948±0.028±0.010 GeV.

2 data tables
Table 1

DATA REQUESTED FROM AUTHORS.

Table 2

IN (K+K-PI+) THE AUTHORS INCLUDE OTHER DECAY MODES SUCH AS (AK*0 K+),(PHI PI+),(K+ K- PI+,PI0),(K+ K- MU+ NU) WHICH CANNOT BE RESOLVED.


Production and Decay of the Charged D* Mesons in e+ e- Annihilation at 10-GeV Center-Of-Mass Energy

The ARGUS collaboration Albrecht, H. ; Binder, U. ; Drews, G. ; et al.
Phys.Lett.B 150 (1985) 235-241, 1985.
Inspire Record 204851 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.30448

Using the ARGUS detector at DORIS we have observed the prediction of the charged D ∗ meson in e + e − annihilation at a center of mass energy of 10 GeV. The D ∗ fragmentation function has been measured using the decay channels D ∗+ → D 0 π + and D 0 → K − π + and K − π + π + π − .

2 data tables
Table 1

RESULTS EXTRAPOLATED TO X>O. SYSTEMATIC ERRORS INCLUDED.

Table 2

ERRORS ARE STATISTICAL ONLY.


Inclusive D0 and $D^+$ Production in $e^+ e^-$ Annihilation at 29-{GeV}

Derrick, M. ; Fernandez, E. ; Fries, R. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.Lett. 53 (1984) 1971, 1984.
Inspire Record 202899 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.51258

We have observed inclusive production of D0 and D+ mesons, and their charge conjugates, in e+e− annihilation at 29 GeV on the basis of a data sample of 106 pb−1. These signals correspond to R values of R(D0+D―0)=1.8±0.5 and R(D++D−)=1.2±0.4. Taking the D+ and D0 data together, we measure a charge asymmetry of A=−0.08±0.12 for charmed quarks. A comparison of R(D+D―) with R(D*+D―*) obtained via the process D*+→D0π+ gives a DD* ratio of 1.0−0.2+0.3, indicating that direct D* production dominates over direct D production.

4 data tables
Table 1

No description provided.

Table 2

EXTRAPOLATED TO ALL Z.

Table 3

No description provided.

More…

rivet Analysis
Observation of F Meson Production in High-energy $e^+ e^-$ Annihilation

The TASSO collaboration Althoff, M. ; Braunschweig, W. ; Kirschfink, F.J. ; et al.
Phys.Lett.B 136 (1984) 130-134, 1984.
Inspire Record 194774 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.30586

Production of the F meson by e + e − annihilation at high energies has been obsrved in the ϕπ final state with a mass of 1.975 ± 0.009 ± 0.010 GeV and a width consistent with the mass resolution. The yield of F production times branching ratio relative to μ pair production is R F ( x ⩾ 0.3) B (F ± → ϕπ ± ) = 0.061 ± 0.012 ± 0.018.

2 data tables
Table 1

No description provided.

Table 2

CROSS BETWEEN X BRANCHING RATIO DETERMINATION. EXTRAPOLATION BELOW X=0.3 IS USED.


Inclusive $D$ and $D^*$ Production in $e^+ e^-$ Annihilation at 29-{GeV}

The HRS collaboration Ahlen, S.P. ; Akerlof, C. ; Baranko, G. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.Lett. 51 (1983) 1147, 1983.
Inspire Record 191536 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.20523

Inclusive production of (D0, D¯0) and D± mesons have been observed in e+e− annihilation at 29 GeV. The signals correspond to R values of R(D0+D¯0)=3.25±1.2 and R(D++D−)=1.35±0.6. D*± production is also observed via the process D*+→D0π+ and its charge conjugate. The D and D* production rates are compared.

7 data tables
Table 1

EXTRAPOLATION TO ALL Z.

Table 2

EXTRAPOLATION TO ALL Z.

Table 3

EXTRAPOLATION TO ALL Z.

More…