Deeply virtual and exclusive electroproduction of omega mesons.

The CLAS collaboration Morand, L. ; Dore, D. ; Garcon, M. ; et al.
Eur.Phys.J.A 24 (2005) 445-458, 2005.
Inspire Record 681604 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.43499

The exclusive omega electroproduction off the proton was studied in a large kinematical domain above the nucleon resonance region and for the highest possible photon virtuality (Q2) with the 5.75 GeV beam at CEBAF and the CLAS spectrometer. Cross sections were measured up to large values of the four-momentum transfer (-t < 2.7 GeV2) to the proton. The contributions of the interference terms sigma_TT and sigma_TL to the cross sections, as well as an analysis of the omega spin density matrix, indicate that helicity is not conserved in this process. The t-channel pi0 exchange, or more generally the exchange of the associated Regge trajectory, seems to dominate the reaction gamma* p -> omega p, even for Q2 as large as 5 GeV2. Contributions of handbag diagrams, related to Generalized Parton Distributions in the nucleon, are therefore difficult to extract for this process. Remarkably, the high-t behaviour of the cross sections is nearly Q2-independent, which may be interpreted as a coupling of the photon to a point-like object in this kinematical limit.

85 data tables

Total cross sections and interference terms (TT and TL).

Differential cross sections DSIG/DT for Q**2 = 1.725 GeV**2 and W = 2.77 GeV.

Differential cross sections DSIG/DT for Q**2 = 1.752 GeV**2 and W = 2.48 GeV.

More…

Charged Meson Pair Production in $\gamma \gamma$ Interactions

Boyer, J. ; Burke, D.L. ; Butler, F. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.Lett. 56 (1986) 207, 1986.
Inspire Record 220003 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.20236

The cross section for the production of π+π− or K+K− pairs in γγ interactions is measured for mππ between 1.7 and 3.5 GeV/c2 and for two intervals of γγ center-of-mass scattering angle. Results are compared with predictions of a QCD model.

2 data tables

Data read off graph.

Data read off graph.


Electron-Proton Elastic Scattering at 1 and 4 BeV

Dunning, J.R. ; Chen, K.W. ; Ramsey, N.F. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.Lett. 10 (1963) 500-504, 1963.
Inspire Record 944928 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.21855

None

7 data tables

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

More…

Measurement of Proton Electromagnetic Form Factors at High Momentum Transfers

Chen, K.W. ; Dunning, J.R. ; Cone, A.A. ; et al.
Phys.Rev. 141 (1966) 1267-1285, 1966.
Inspire Record 50783 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.26655

Elastic electron-proton scattering cross sections have been measured using the internal beam of the 6-BeV Cambridge Electron Accelerator at laboratory scattering angles between 31° and 90° for values of the four-momentum transfer squared ranging from q2=0.389 to 6.81 (BeV/c)2 (q2=10 to 175F−2). Incident electron energies ranged from 1.0 to 6.0 BeV. Scattered electrons from an internal liquid-hydrogen target were momentum-analyzed using a single quadrupole spectrometer capable of momentum analysis up to 3.0 BeV/c. Čerenkov and shower counters were used to help reject pion and low-energy background. The cross sections presented are absolute cross sections with experimental errors ranging from 6.8% to 20%. Separation of proton electromagnetic form factors have been made for all but the two highest momentum transfer points, using the Rosenbluth formula. Both form factors, GEp and GMp, were observed to continue to decrease as the momentum transfer increases. An upper limit to the possible asymptotic values of the proton electromagnetic form factors has been established.

9 data tables

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

More…

Backward-angle electron-proton elastic scattering and proton electromagnetic form-factors

Price, L.E. ; Dunning, J.R. ; Goitein, M. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.D 4 (1971) 45-53, 1971.
Inspire Record 67836 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.23074

Elastic electron-proton scattering cross sections were measured at backward angles (80°-90°) in the laboratory for four-momentum transfers between 7 F−2 and 45 F−2. Experimental errors range from 3.1% to 5.3%, including a systematic error estimated to be 1.9% added in quadrature. Electric and magnetic form factors are computed from all the recent data in this q2 range, with allowance made for possible normalization differences. The results show a deviation from the scaling law.

7 data tables

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

More…

Proton Compton scattering between 650 mev and 1350 mev

Barton, J.S. ; Booth, P.S.L. ; Carroll, L.J. ; et al.
Phys.Lett.B 42 (1972) 297-300, 1972.
Inspire Record 85012 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.28187

Compton scattering from protons has been measured between 650 MeV and 1350 MeV for angles between 60° and 140° CM.

1 data table

No description provided.


Elastic electron-proton scattering cross-sections measured by a coincidence technique

Goitein, M. ; Budnitz, R.J. ; Carroll, L. ; et al.
Phys.Rev.D 1 (1970) 2449-2476, 1970.
Inspire Record 61717 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.25070

We have measured elastic electron-proton scattering cross sections in the range of four-momentum transfers from 7 F−2[0.27 (GeV/c)2] to 150 F−2 [5.84 (GeV/c)2] and at scattered electron angles of between 20° and 34° in the laboratory. The estimated errors in the cross sections range from ±2.1% at the lowest momentum transfer to ±9.6% at the highest. Both the scattered electron and the recoil proton were detected, resulting in an overdetermination of the kinematics. When the constraint of a coincident proton is removed, there is no significant change in the estimated cross sections.

15 data tables

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

More…

Measurement of Anti-proton - Proton Small Angle Elastic Scattering at Low Momentum

Linssen, L. ; Beard, C.I. ; Birsa, R. ; et al.
Nucl.Phys.A 469 (1987) 726, 1987.
Inspire Record 245092 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.37014

Two high statistics measurements of antiproton-proton small-angle elastic scattering, at p = 233 MeV/ c and p = 272 MeV/ c , are presented. The measurements were carried out at the LEAR facility at CERN. By the Coulomb-nuclear interference method, values are obtained for the real-to-imaginary ratio ρ of the p̄p forward nuclear scattering amplitude and for its exponential slope b : ρ = + 0.041 ± 0.026 and b = 71.5 ± 4.5 (GeV/ c ) −2 at 233 MeV/ c and ρ = −0.014 ± 0.027 and b = 47.7 ± 2.7 (GeV/ c ) −2 at 272 MeV/ c . The method to derive these values is discussed in detail and so are the uncertainties contributing to their systematic error. The results are compared with predictions from forward dispersion relation calculations and with predictions from p̄p potential models.

3 data tables

The corrected cross section is the measured divided by the average folding correction given in the paper.

The corrected cross section is the measured divided by the average folding Correction given in the paper.

Fits to data use the value of total cross sections of 263 & 296 mb for 272 & 233 Mev respectively derived from the authors total cross sections measurement. ETA is the spin dependence parameter.


Real to Imaginary Ratio of the $\bar{p} p$ Forward Elastic Scattering Amplitude at 550-{MeV}/$c$, 757-{MeV}/$c$ and 1077-{MeV}/$c$

Schiavon, P. ; Birsa, R. ; Bos, K. ; et al.
Nucl.Phys.A 505 (1989) 595-609, 1989.
Inspire Record 277295 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.36894

The ratio of the real to the imaginary part of the pp forward elastic-scattering amplitude ϱ has been measured at 550, 757, and 1077 MeV/ c at LEAR, using the Coulomb-nuclear interference method. The results obtained for ρ and b , the nuclear slope, are ϱ = 0.084 ± 0.051 and b = 20.9 ± 2.1 (GeV/ c ) −2 at 550 MeV/ c , ϱ = 0.102 ± 0.043 and b = 18.0 ± 0.5 (GeV/ c ) −2 = at 757 MeV/ c , and ϱ = 0.059 ± 0.035 and b = 15.2 ± 0.3 (GeV/ c ) −2 at 1077 MeV/ c .

4 data tables

Error on SLOPE is statistical only.

Measured differential cross sections corrected for small-angle trigger efficiency and absorption losses. Statistical errors only.

Measured differential cross sections corrected for small-angle trigger efficiency and absorption losses. Statistical errors only.

More…