Photon-jet pT balance distributions (1/Ng)(dN/dxJg) in pp events (blue, reproduced on all panels) and Pb+Pb events (red) with each panel denoting a different centrality selection. These panels show results with pTg = 158-200 GeV. Total systematic uncertainties are shown as boxes, while statistical uncertainties are shown with vertical bars.

Selected comparisons of the nominal results in pp (blue) and 0-10% Pb+Pb (red) collisions with the central values obtained using a different photon-jet signal definition. Comparison of the nominal results (with DeltaPhi > 7pi/8) with those obtained using DeltaPhi > 3pi/4 for the pTg = 63.1-79.6 GeV range. Boxes indicate total systematic uncertainties, while vertical bars indicate statistical uncertainties.

Selected comparisons of the nominal results in pp (blue) and 0-10% Pb+Pb (red) collisions with the central values obtained using a different photon-jet signal definition. Comparison of the nominal results (inclusive jet selection) with those obtained using a photon-plus-leading-jet selection for the pTg = 100-158 GeV range. Boxes indicate total systematic uncertainties, while vertical bars indicate statistical uncertainties.

Comparison of the distribution of the scalar sum of small-$R$ jet and lepton transverse momenta, $S_T$, between data and the background prediction in the signal region of the pair-production (PP) $\geq 3\ell$ channel. The background prediction is shown post-fit, i.e. after the fit to the data $S_T$ distributions under the background-only hypothesis. The last bin contains the overflow. An example distribution for a $B\bar B$ signal in the singlet model with $m_B$ = 900 GeV is overlaid.

Comparison of the distribution of the invariant mass of the $Z$ boson candidate and the highest-$p_T$ top-tagged large-$R$ jet, $m_{Zt}$, between data and the background prediction in the signal region of the single-production (SP) 2$\ell$ channel. The background prediction is shown post-fit, i.e. after the fit to the data $m_{Zt}$ distributions under the background-only hypothesis. The last bin contains the overflow. An example distribution for a single-$T$-quark signal with $m_T$ = 900 GeV and $\kappa_T = 0.5$ is overlaid.

Comparison of the distribution of the scalar sum of small-$R$ jet and lepton transverse momenta, $S_T$, between data and the background prediction in the signal region of the single-production (SP) $\geq 3\ell$ channel. The background prediction is shown post-fit, i.e. after the fit to the data $S_T$ distributions under the background-only hypothesis. The last bin contains the overflow. An example distribution for a single-$T$-quark signal with $m_T$ = 900 GeV and $\kappa_T$ = 0.5 is overlaid.

Upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on the cross section of vector-like quark pair production (PP) for $T\bar T$ in the singlet model. The expected limits are shown for the combination of the channels, as are the observed limits.

Upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on the cross section of vector-like quark pair production (PP) for $B\bar B$ in the singlet model. The expected limits are shown for the combination of the channels, as are the observed limits.

Upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on the cross section of vector-like quark pair production (PP) for $T\bar T$ in the doublet model. The expected limits are shown for the combination of the channels, as are the observed limits.

Upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on the cross section of vector-like quark pair production (PP) for $B\bar B$ in the doublet model. The expected limits are shown for the combination of the channels, as are the observed limits.

Upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on the cross section of vector-like quark pair production (PP) for $T\bar T$ with a BR of 100$\%$ to $Zt$. The expected limits are shown for the combination of the channels, as are the observed limits.

Upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on the cross section of vector-like quark pair production (PP) for $B\bar B$ with a BR of 100$\%$ to $Zb$. The expected limits are shown for the combination of the channels, as are the observed limits.

Expected 95$\%$ CL lower limits from the combination of the pair-production channels on the mass of vector-like quarks for all combinations of BRs for $T\rightarrow Zt$, $T\rightarrow Ht$, $T\rightarrow Wb$, adding up to unity.

Observed 95$\%$ CL lower limits from the combination of the pair-production channels on the mass of vector-like quarks for all combinations of BRs for $T\rightarrow Zt$, $T\rightarrow Ht$, $T\rightarrow Wb$, adding up to unity.

Expected 95$\%$ CL lower limits from the combination of the pair-production channels on the mass of vector-like quarks for all combinations of BRs for $B\rightarrow Zb$, $B\rightarrow Hb$, $B\rightarrow Wt$, adding up to unity.

Observed 95$\%$ CL lower limits from the combination of the pair-production channels on the mass of vector-like quarks for all combinations of BRs for $B\rightarrow Zb$, $B\rightarrow Hb$, $B\rightarrow Wt$, adding up to unity.

Upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on the cross section times BR to $Zt$ of single production (SP) of a $T$-quark. The expected limits are shown for the combination of the channels, as are the observed limits. The expected cross section times BR to $Zt$ for single-$T$-quark production is also shown for a coupling $\kappa_T = 0.5$, which corresponds to a coupling of $c_W = \sqrt{c^2_{W,L} + c^2_{W,R}} = 0.45$ from Ref. [14]. The BR assumed here corresponds to the singlet benchmark model, i.e. $\approx 25\%$.

Expected and observed 95$\%$ CL limits from the combination of the single-production channels on the coupling of the $T$ quark to SM particles, $c_W = \sqrt c^2_L + c^2_R$, assuming the singlet-model BR of $\approx 25\%$, as a function of the mass of the $T$ quark, $m_T$. Values of $c_W$ larger than the observed limit are excluded.

Expected and observed 95$\%$ CL limits from the combination of the single-production channels on the mixing angle in the singlet model between the $T$ quark and the top quark, $|\sin\theta_L|$, as a function of the mass of the $T$ quark, $m_T$. Values of $|\sin\theta_L|$ enclosed by the observed limit are excluded, i.e. for $m_T$ larger than $\approx 1200$ GeV, no value of $|\sin\theta_L|$ is excluded.

Expected lower limit from the combination of the single-production channels on the mass of the $T$ quark as a function of the couplings of the $T$ quark to the $W$ boson, $\sqrt c^2_L + c^2_R$, and to the $Z$ boson, $\sqrt c^2_L + c^2_R$ with the assumption of equal BRs for $T\rightarrow Zt$ and $T\rightarrow Ht$ in the limit of large $T$-quark masses.

Observed lower limit from the combination of the single-production channels on the mass of the $T$ quark as a function of the couplings of the $T$ quark to the $W$ boson, $\sqrt c^2_L + c^2_R$, and to the $Z$ boson, $\sqrt c^2_L + c^2_R$ with the assumption of equal BRs for $T\rightarrow Zt$ and $T\rightarrow Ht$ in the limit of large $T$-quark masses.

Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow T\bar T)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $T\rightarrow Zt$, $T\rightarrow Ht$, $T\rightarrow Wb$ adding up to unity for a $T$-quark mass of 500 GeV.

Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow T\bar T)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $T\rightarrow Zt$, $T\rightarrow Ht$, $T\rightarrow Wb$ adding up to unity for a $T$-quark mass of 600 GeV.

Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow T\bar T)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $T\rightarrow Zt$, $T\rightarrow Ht$, $T\rightarrow Wb$ adding up to unity for a $T$-quark mass of 700 GeV.

Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow T\bar T)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $T\rightarrow Zt$, $T\rightarrow Ht$, $T\rightarrow Wb$ adding up to unity for a $T$-quark mass of 750 GeV.

Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow T\bar T)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $T\rightarrow Zt$, $T\rightarrow Ht$, $T\rightarrow Wb$ adding up to unity for a $T$-quark mass of 800 GeV.

Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow T\bar T)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $T\rightarrow Zt$, $T\rightarrow Ht$, $T\rightarrow Wb$ adding up to unity for a $T$-quark mass of 850 GeV.

Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow T\bar T)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $T\rightarrow Zt$, $T\rightarrow Ht$, $T\rightarrow Wb$ adding up to unity for a $T$-quark mass of 900 GeV.

Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow T\bar T)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $T\rightarrow Zt$, $T\rightarrow Ht$, $T\rightarrow Wb$ adding up to unity for a $T$-quark mass of 950 GeV.

Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow T\bar T)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $T\rightarrow Zt$, $T\rightarrow Ht$, $T\rightarrow Wb$ adding up to unity for a $T$-quark mass of 1000 GeV.

Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow T\bar T)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $T\rightarrow Zt$, $T\rightarrow Ht$, $T\rightarrow Wb$ adding up to unity for a $T$-quark mass of 1050 GeV.

Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow T\bar T)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $T\rightarrow Zt$, $T\rightarrow Ht$, $T\rightarrow Wb$ adding up to unity for a $T$-quark mass of 1100 GeV.

Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow T\bar T)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $T\rightarrow Zt$, $T\rightarrow Ht$, $T\rightarrow Wb$ adding up to unity for a $T$-quark mass of 1150 GeV.

Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow T\bar T)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $T\rightarrow Zt$, $T\rightarrow Ht$, $T\rightarrow Wb$ adding up to unity for a $T$-quark mass of 1200 GeV.

Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow T\bar T)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $T\rightarrow Zt$, $T\rightarrow Ht$, $T\rightarrow Wb$ adding up to unity for a $T$-quark mass of 1300 GeV.

Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow T\bar T)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $T\rightarrow Zt$, $T\rightarrow Ht$, $T\rightarrow Wb$ adding up to unity for a $T$-quark mass of 1400 GeV.

Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow B\bar B)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $B\rightarrow Zb$, $B\rightarrow Hb$, $B\rightarrow Wt$ adding up to unity for a $B$-quark mass of 500 GeV.

Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow B\bar B)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $B\rightarrow Zb$, $B\rightarrow Hb$, $B\rightarrow Wt$ adding up to unity for a $B$-quark mass of 600 GeV.

Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow B\bar B)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $B\rightarrow Zb$, $B\rightarrow Hb$, $B\rightarrow Wt$ adding up to unity for a $B$-quark mass of 700 GeV.

Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow B\bar B)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $B\rightarrow Zb$, $B\rightarrow Hb$, $B\rightarrow Wt$ adding up to unity for a $B$-quark mass of 750 GeV.

Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow B\bar B)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $B\rightarrow Zb$, $B\rightarrow Hb$, $B\rightarrow Wt$ adding up to unity for a $B$-quark mass of 800 GeV.

Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow B\bar B)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $B\rightarrow Zb$, $B\rightarrow Hb$, $B\rightarrow Wt$ adding up to unity for a $B$-quark mass of 850 GeV.

Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow B\bar B)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $B\rightarrow Zb$, $B\rightarrow Hb$, $B\rightarrow Wt$ adding up to unity for a $B$-quark mass of 900 GeV.

Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow B\bar B)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $B\rightarrow Zb$, $B\rightarrow Hb$, $B\rightarrow Wt$ adding up to unity for a $B$-quark mass of 950 GeV.

Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow B\bar B)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $B\rightarrow Zb$, $B\rightarrow Hb$, $B\rightarrow Wt$ adding up to unity for a $B$-quark mass of 1000 GeV.

Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow B\bar B)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $B\rightarrow Zb$, $B\rightarrow Hb$, $B\rightarrow Wt$ adding up to unity for a $B$-quark mass of 1050 GeV.

Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow B\bar B)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $B\rightarrow Zb$, $B\rightarrow Hb$, $B\rightarrow Wt$ adding up to unity for a $B$-quark mass of 1100 GeV.

Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow B\bar B)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $B\rightarrow Zb$, $B\rightarrow Hb$, $B\rightarrow Wt$ adding up to unity for a $B$-quark mass of 1150 GeV.

Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow B\bar B)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $B\rightarrow Zb$, $B\rightarrow Hb$, $B\rightarrow Wt$ adding up to unity for a $B$-quark mass of 1200 GeV.

Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow B\bar B)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $B\rightarrow Zb$, $B\rightarrow Hb$, $B\rightarrow Wt$ adding up to unity for a $B$-quark mass of 1300 GeV.

Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow B\bar B)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $B\rightarrow Zb$, $B\rightarrow Hb$, $B\rightarrow Wt$ adding up to unity for a $B$-quark mass of 1400 GeV.

Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on the cross section times BR to $Zt$ as a function of the vector-like $T$-quark mass and coupling $\kappa_T$ for the combination of the SP $2\ell$ and SP $\geq 3\ell$ channels.

Signal cutflows for the $B\bar B$ process in the singlet model in the PP $2\ell$ $0-1$J channel in the 0-large-$R$ jet SR. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

Signal cutflows for the $B\bar B$ process in the singlet model in the PP $2\ell$ $0-1$J channel in the 1-large-$R$ jet SR. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

Signal cutflows for the $B\bar B$ process in the doublet model in the PP $2\ell$ $0-1$J channel in the 0-large-$R$ jet SR. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

Signal cutflows for the $B\bar B$ process in the doublet model in the PP $2\ell$ $0-1$J channel in the 1-large-$R$ jet SR. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

Signal cutflows for the $B\bar B$ process in the case of 100$\%$ BR for $B \rightarrow Zb$ in the PP $2\ell$ $0-1$J channel in the 0-large-$R$ jet SR. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

Signal cutflows for the $B\bar B$ process in the case of 100$\%$ BR for $B \rightarrow Zb$ in the PP $2\ell$ $0-1$J channel in the 1-large-$R$ jet SR. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

Signal cutflows for the $T\bar T$ process in the singlet model in the PP $2\ell$ $0-1$J channel in the 0-large-$R$ jet SR. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

Signal cutflows for the $T\bar T$ process in the singlet model in the PP $2\ell$ $0-1$J channel in the 1-large-$R$ jet SR. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

Signal cutflows for the $T\bar T$ process in the doublet model in the PP $2\ell$ $0-1$J channel in the 0-large-$R$ jet SR. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

Signal cutflows for the $T\bar T$ process in the doublet model in the PP $2\ell$ $0-1$J channel in the 1-large-$R$ jet SR. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

Signal cutflows for the $T\bar T$ process in the case of 100$\%$ BR for $T \rightarrow Zt$ in the PP $2\ell$ $0-1$J channel in the 0-large-$R$ jet SR. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

Signal cutflows for the $T\bar T$ process in the case of 100$\%$ BR for $T \rightarrow Zt$ in the PP $2\ell$ $0-1$J channel in the 1-large-$R$ jet SR. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

Signal cutflows for the $T\bar T$ process in the singlet model in the PP $2\ell$ $\geq 2$J channel. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

Signal cutflows for the $B\bar B$ process in the singlet model in the PP $2\ell$ $\geq 2$J channel. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

Signal cutflows for the $T\bar T$ process in the doublet model in the PP $2\ell$ $\geq 2$J channel. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

Signal cutflows for the $B\bar B$ process in the doublet model in the PP $2\ell$ $\geq 2$J channel. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

Signal cutflows for the $T\bar T$ process in the case of 100$\%$ BR for $T \rightarrow Zt$ in the PP $2\ell$ $\geq 2$J channel. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

Signal cutflows for the $B\bar B$ process in the case of 100$\%$ BR for $B \rightarrow Zb$ in the PP $2\ell$ $\geq 2$J channel. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

Signal cutflows for the $T\bar T$ process in the singlet model in the PP $\geq 3\ell$ channel. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

Signal cutflows for the $B\bar B$ process in the singlet model in the PP $\geq 3\ell$ channel. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

Signal cutflows for the $T\bar T$ process in the doublet model in the PP $\geq 3\ell$ channel. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

Signal cutflows for the $B\bar B$ process in the doublet model in the PP $\geq 3\ell$ channel. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

Signal cutflows for the $T\bar T$ process in the case of 100$\%$ BR for $T \rightarrow Zt$ in the PP $\geq 3\ell$ channel. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

Signal cutflows for the $B\bar B$ process in the case of 100$\%$ BR for $B \rightarrow Zb$ in the PP $\geq 3\ell$ channel. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

Signal cutflows for single-$T$-quark production with $\kappa_T = 0.5$ in the SP $2\ell$ channel. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

Signal cutflows for single-$T$-quark production with $\kappa_T = 0.5$ in the SP $\geq 3\ell$ channel. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

Signal efficiencies in $\%$ in the PP $2\ell$ $0-1$J channel in the 0-large-$R$ jet SR. Uncertainties are statistical only.

Signal efficiencies in $\%$ in the PP $2\ell$ $0-1$J channel in the 1-large-$R$ jet SR. Uncertainties are statistical only.

Signal efficiencies in $\%$ in the PP $2\ell$ $\geq 2$J channel. Uncertainties are statistical only.

Signal efficiencies in $\%$ in the PP $\geq 3\ell$ channel. Uncertainties are statistical only.

Signal efficiencies in $\%$ in the SP $2\ell$ channel for $\kappa_T = 0.5$. Uncertainties are statistical only.

Signal efficiencies in $\%$ in the SP $\geq 3\ell$ channel for $\kappa_T = 0.5$. Uncertainties are statistical only.

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-1%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-1%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-1%

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%

The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%

The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%

The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%

The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%

The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%

The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%

The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%

The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%

The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%

The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%

The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%

The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%

The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%

The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%

The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%

The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%

The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%

The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%

The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%

The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%

The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%

The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%

The V5 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The V5 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%

The V5 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%

The V5 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The V5 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%

The V5 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The V5 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%

The V5 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%

The V6 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The V6 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%

The V6 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%

The V6 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The V6 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%

The V6 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The V6 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%

The V6 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%

The ratio of V2{SP} over V2{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The ratio of V2{SP} over V2{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The ratio of V2{SP} over V2{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The ratio of V3{SP} over V3{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The ratio of V3{SP} over V3{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The ratio of V3{SP} over V3{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The ratio of V4{SP} over V4{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The ratio of V4{SP} over V4{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The ratio of V4{SP} over V4{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The ratio of V5{SP} over V5{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The ratio of V5{SP} over V5{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The ratio of V5{SP} over V5{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The ratio of V6{SP} over V6{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The ratio of V6{SP} over V6{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The ratio of V6{SP} over V6{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The ratio of V2{SP} over V2{EP} as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV

The ratio of V3{SP} over V3{EP} as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV

The ratio of V4{SP} over V4{EP} as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV

The ratio of V5{SP} over V5{EP} as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV

The ratio of V6{SP} over V6{EP} as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV

The ratio of V2{SP} over V2{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The ratio of V2{SP} over V2{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The ratio of V2{SP} over V2{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The ratio of V3{SP} over V3{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The ratio of V3{SP} over V3{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The ratio of V3{SP} over V3{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The ratio of V4{SP} over V4{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The ratio of V4{SP} over V4{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The ratio of V4{SP} over V4{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The ratio of V5{SP} over V5{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The ratio of V5{SP} over V5{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The ratio of V5{SP} over V5{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%. PT binning matched to RUN1.

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%. PT binning matched to RUN1.

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%. PT binning matched to RUN1.

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%. PT binning matched to RUN1.

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%. PT binning matched to RUN1.

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%. PT binning matched to RUN1.

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%. PT binning matched to RUN1.

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%. PT binning matched to RUN1.

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%. PT binning matched to RUN1.

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%. PT binning matched to RUN1.

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%. PT binning matched to RUN1.

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%. PT binning matched to RUN1.

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%. PT binning matched to RUN1.

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%. PT binning matched to RUN1.

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%. PT binning matched to RUN1.

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%

The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%

The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV

The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV

The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV

The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV

The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV

The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV

The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV

The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV

The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV

The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV

The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV

The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV

The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV

The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-15%

The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-25%

The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-35%

The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-45%

The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-55%

The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-15%

The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-25%

The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-35%

The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-45%

The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-55%

The scaled-V2(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 0-5%

The scaled-V2(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 10-15%

The scaled-V2(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 20-25%

The scaled-V2(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 30-35%

The scaled-V2(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 40-45%

The scaled-V2(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 50-55%

The scaled-V3(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 0-5%

The scaled-V3(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 10-15%

The scaled-V3(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 20-25%

The scaled-V3(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 30-35%

The scaled-V3(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 40-45%

The scaled-V3(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 50-55%

The PT scale factor for V2(PT) as a funtion of collision centrality

The PT scale factor for V3(PT) as a funtion of collision centrality

The V2 scale factor as a funtion of collision centrality

The V3 scale factor as a funtion of collision centrality

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-1%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-1%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-1%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-1%

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%

The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%

The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%

The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%

The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%

The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%

The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%

The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%

The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%

The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV

The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV

The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV

The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV

The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV

The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV

The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV

The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV

The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV

The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV

The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV

The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV

The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV

The expected upper limits on the production cross-section times the product of branching ratios for the benchmark signal scenario involving a scalar particle $X$ with narrow width decaying via $X\rightarrow aa\rightarrow 4\gamma$, $\sigma_X\times B(X\rightarrow aa)\times B(a\rightarrow\gamma\gamma)^2$. The limits for $m_{a}$ = 5 GeV and 10 GeV do not cover as large a range as the other mass points, since the region of interest is limited to $ m_{a} < 0.01 \times m_{X}$. Additionally, the expected limits are not provided for a small number of points, indicated with a hyphen, because of a technical failure with the computation.

The observed upper limits on the production cross-section times the product of branching ratios for the benchmark signal scenario involving a scalar particle $X$ with narrow width decaying via $X\rightarrow aa\rightarrow 6\pi^0$, $\sigma_X\times B(X\rightarrow aa)\times B(a\rightarrow 3\pi^0)^2$. The limits for $m_{a}$ = 5 GeV and 10 GeV do not cover as large a range as the other mass points, since the region of interest is limited to $ m_{a} < 0.01 \times m_{X}$.

The expected upper limits on the production cross-section times the product of branching ratios for the benchmark signal scenario involving a scalar particle $X$ with narrow width decaying via $X\rightarrow aa\rightarrow 6\pi^0$, $\sigma_X\times B(X\rightarrow aa)\times B(a\rightarrow 3\pi^0)^2$. The limits for $m_{a}$ = 5 GeV and 10 GeV do not cover as large a range as the other mass points, since the region of interest is limited to $ m_{a} < 0.01 \times m_{X}$. Additionally, the expected limits are not provided for a small number of points, indicated with a hyphen, because of a technical failure with the computation.

Observed 95% CL upper limits on the visible cross section as a function of $m_X$ and the fraction of events in the low-$\Delta E$ category.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 0.1 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 0.5 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 0.7 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 1 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 2 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 5 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 10 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 0.5 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 0.7 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 1 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 2 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 5 GeV.

Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 10 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 0.1 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 0.5 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 0.7 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 1 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 2 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 5 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 10 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 0.5 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 0.7 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 1 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 2 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 5 GeV.

Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 10 GeV.

Selection efficiency for photons originating from the BSM process $X\rightarrow\gamma\gamma$, where the $X$ particle is a high-mass narrow-width scalar particle originating from the gluon--gluon fusion process.

Fraction of photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for photons originating from the BSM process $X\rightarrow\gamma\gamma$, where the $X$ particle is a high-mass narrow-width scalar particle originating from the gluon--gluon fusion process.

Barrel Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=200$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Barrel Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=400$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Barrel Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=600$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Barrel Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=1000$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Barrel Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for all Stealth SUSY benchmark samples. The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Barrel Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for baryogenesis $\chi \rightarrow \nu b \bar{b}$ benchmark samples ($m_{h}=125$ GeV). The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Barrel Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for baryogenesis $\chi \rightarrow cbs$ benchmark samples ($m_{h}=125$ GeV). The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Barrel Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for baryogenesis $\chi \rightarrow lcb$ benchmark samples ($m_{h}=125$ GeV). The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Barrel Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for baryogenesis $\chi \rightarrow \tau\tau\nu$ benchmark samples ($m_{h}=125$ GeV). The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Endcap Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=100$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Endcap Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Endcap Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=200$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Endcap Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=400$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Endcap Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=600$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Endcap Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=1000$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Endcap Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for all Stealth SUSY benchmark samples. The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Endcap Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for baryogenesis $\chi \rightarrow \nu b \bar{b}$ benchmark samples ($m_{h}=125$ GeV). The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Endcap Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for baryogenesis $\chi \rightarrow cbs$ benchmark samples ($m_{h}=125$ GeV). The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Endcap Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for baryogenesis $\chi \rightarrow lcb$ benchmark samples ($m_{h}=125$ GeV). The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Endcap Muon RoI Cluster trigger efficiencies (in %) for baryogenesis $\chi \rightarrow \tau\tau\nu$ benchmark samples ($m_{h}=125$ GeV). The trigger efficiency is defined as the fraction of LLPs selected by the Muon RoI Cluster trigger as a function of the LLP decay position. The trigger is efficient for hadronic decays of LLPs that occur anywhere from the outer regions of the HCal to the middle station of the MS. These efficiencies are obtained from the subset of events with only a single LLP decay in the muon spectrometer in order to ensure that the result of the trigger is due to a single burst of MS activity. The uncertainties shown are statistical only. The relative differences in efficiencies of the benchmark samples are a result of the different kinematics.

Barrel MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=100$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Barrel MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Barrel MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=200$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Barrel MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=400$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Barrel MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=600$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Barrel MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=1000$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Barrel MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for all Stealth SUSY benchmark samples. The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Barrel MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for baryogenesis $\chi \rightarrow \nu b \bar{b}$ benchmark samples ($m_{h}=125$ GeV). The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Barrel MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for baryogenesis $\chi \rightarrow cbs$ benchmark samples ($m_{h}=125$ GeV). The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Barrel MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for baryogenesis $\chi \rightarrow lcb$ benchmark samples ($m_{h}=125$ GeV). The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Barrel MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for baryogenesis $\chi \rightarrow \tau\tau\nu$ benchmark samples ($m_{h}=125$ GeV). The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Endcap MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=100$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Endcap MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Endcap MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=200$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Endcap MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=400$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Endcap MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=600$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Endcap MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for $m_{\Phi}=1000$ GeV scalar benchmark samples. The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Endcap MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for all Stealth SUSY benchmark samples. The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Endcap MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for baryogenesis $\chi \rightarrow \nu b \bar{b}$ benchmark samples ($m_{h}=125$ GeV). The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Endcap MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for baryogenesis $\chi \rightarrow cbs$ benchmark samples ($m_{h}=125$ GeV). The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Endcap MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for baryogenesis $\chi \rightarrow lcb$ benchmark samples ($m_{h}=125$ GeV). The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Endcap MS vertex efficiencies (in %) for baryogenesis $\chi \rightarrow \tau\tau\nu$ benchmark samples ($m_{h}=125$ GeV). The vertex reconstruction efficiency is defined as the fraction of simulated LLP decays in the MS fiducial volume that match a reconstructed vertex ($\Delta R(\textrm{LLP,vertex}) = 0.4$) passing the baseline event selection and satisfying the vertex isolation criteria. A vertex is considered matched to a displaced decay if the vertex is within $\Delta R = 0.4$ of the simulated decay position. The MS vertex efficiency is parameterized as a function of the LLP decay position.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma/\sigma_{\textrm{SM}}\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV and $m_{s}=5$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma/\sigma_{\textrm{SM}}\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV and $m_{s}=5$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma/\sigma_{\textrm{SM}}\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV and $m_{s}=5$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma/\sigma_{\textrm{SM}}\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV and $m_{s}=8$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma/\sigma_{\textrm{SM}}\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV and $m_{s}=8$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma/\sigma_{\textrm{SM}}\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV and $m_{s}=8$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma/\sigma_{\textrm{SM}}\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV and $m_{s}=15$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma/\sigma_{\textrm{SM}}\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV and $m_{s}=15$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma/\sigma_{\textrm{SM}}\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV and $m_{s}=15$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma/\sigma_{\textrm{SM}}\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV and $m_{s}=25$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma/\sigma_{\textrm{SM}}\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV and $m_{s}=25$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma/\sigma_{\textrm{SM}}\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV and $m_{s}=25$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma/\sigma_{\textrm{SM}}\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV and $m_{s}=40$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma/\sigma_{\textrm{SM}}\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV and $m_{s}=40$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma/\sigma_{\textrm{SM}}\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=125$ GeV and $m_{s}=40$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma \times B_{\tilde{g} \rightarrow \tilde{S} g}$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\tilde{g}}=250$ GeV for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma \times B_{\tilde{g} \rightarrow \tilde{S} g}$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\tilde{g}}=500$ GeV for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma \times B_{\tilde{g} \rightarrow \tilde{S} g}$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\tilde{g}}=500$ GeV for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma \times B_{\tilde{g} \rightarrow \tilde{S} g}$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\tilde{g}}=500$ GeV for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits $\sigma \times B_{\tilde{g} \rightarrow \tilde{S} g}$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\tilde{g}}=800$ GeV for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits $\sigma \times B_{\tilde{g} \rightarrow \tilde{S} g}$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\tilde{g}}=800$ GeV for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits $\sigma \times B_{\tilde{g} \rightarrow \tilde{S} g}$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\tilde{g}}=800$ GeV for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits $\sigma \times B_{\tilde{g} \rightarrow \tilde{S} g}$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\tilde{g}}=1200$ GeV for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits $\sigma \times B_{\tilde{g} \rightarrow \tilde{S} g}$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\tilde{g}}=1200$ GeV for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits $\sigma \times B_{\tilde{g} \rightarrow \tilde{S} g}$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\tilde{g}}=1200$ GeV for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits $\sigma \times B_{\tilde{g} \rightarrow \tilde{S} g}$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\tilde{g}}=1500$ GeV for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits $\sigma \times B_{\tilde{g} \rightarrow \tilde{S} g}$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\tilde{g}}=1500$ GeV for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits $\sigma \times B_{\tilde{g} \rightarrow \tilde{S} g}$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\tilde{g}}=1500$ GeV for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits $\sigma \times B_{\tilde{g} \rightarrow \tilde{S} g}$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\tilde{g}}=2000$ GeV for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits $\sigma \times B_{\tilde{g} \rightarrow \tilde{S} g}$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\tilde{g}}=2000$ GeV for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits $\sigma \times B_{\tilde{g} \rightarrow \tilde{S} g}$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\tilde{g}}=2000$ GeV for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma \times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=100$ GeV and $m_{s}=8$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma \times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=100$ GeV and $m_{s}=25$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma \times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=200$ GeV and $m_{s}=8$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma \times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=200$ GeV and $m_{s}=25$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma \times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=200$ GeV and $m_{s}=50$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma \times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=400$ GeV and $m_{s}=50$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma \times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=400$ GeV and $m_{s}=100$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma \times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=600$ GeV and $m_{s}=50$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma \times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=600$ GeV and $m_{s}=150$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma \times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=1000$ GeV and $m_{s}=50$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma \times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=1000$ GeV and $m_{s}=150$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma \times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $m_{\Phi}=1000$ GeV and $m_{s}=400$ GeV scalar benchmark sample for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow \nu b \bar{b}$ channel with $m_{\chi}=10$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow \nu b \bar{b}$ channel with $m_{\chi}=10$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow \nu b \bar{b}$ channel with $m_{\chi}=10$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow \nu b \bar{b}$ channel with $m_{\chi}=30$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow \nu b \bar{b}$ channel with $m_{\chi}=30$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow \nu b \bar{b}$ channel with $m_{\chi}=30$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow \nu b \bar{b}$ channel with $m_{\chi}=50$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow \nu b \bar{b}$ channel with $m_{\chi}=50$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow \nu b \bar{b}$ channel with $m_{\chi}=50$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow \nu b \bar{b}$ channel with $m_{\chi}=100$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow c b s$ channel with $m_{\chi}=10$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow c b s$ channel with $m_{\chi}=10$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow c b s$ channel with $m_{\chi}=10$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow c b s$ channel with $m_{\chi}=30$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow c b s$ channel with $m_{\chi}=30$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow c b s$ channel with $m_{\chi}=30$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow c b s$ channel with $m_{\chi}=50$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow c b s$ channel with $m_{\chi}=50$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow c b s$ channel with $m_{\chi}=50$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow c b s$ channel with $m_{\chi}=100$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow l c b$ channel with $m_{\chi}=10$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow l c b$ channel with $m_{\chi}=10$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow l c b$ channel with $m_{\chi}=10$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow l c b$ channel with $m_{\chi}=30$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow l c b$ channel with $m_{\chi}=30$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow l c b$ channel with $m_{\chi}=30$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow l c b$ channel with $m_{\chi}=50$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow l c b$ channel with $m_{\chi}=50$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 1MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow l c b$ channel with $m_{\chi}=50$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for the combination of 1MSVx and 2MSVx strategies.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow l c b$ channel with $m_{\chi}=100$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow \tau \tau \nu$ channel with $m_{\chi}=10$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow \tau \tau \nu$ channel with $m_{\chi}=30$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow \tau \tau \nu$ channel with $m_{\chi}=50$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 2MSVx strategy.

Upper 95% CL limits on $\sigma\times B$ as a function of the proper lifetime $c\tau$ for $\chi \rightarrow \tau \tau \nu$ channel with $m_{\chi}=100$ GeV ($m_{h}=125$ GeV) for 2MSVx strategy.

Observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on the cross-section of gluon-fusion initialted resonant production of the mass of the resonance times the branch ratio of X to HH and the BR of HH to gammagamma WW, without assuming the BR of H to gammagamma and H to WW.

The symmetric cumulant $sc_{2\,3}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

The symmetric cumulant $sc_{2\,3}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The symmetric cumulant $sc_{2\,4}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The symmetric cumulant $sc_{2\,4}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV

The symmetric cumulant $sc_{2\,4}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV

The symmetric cumulant $sc_{2\,4}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

The symmetric cumulant $sc_{2\,4}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

The symmetric cumulant $sc_{2\,4}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The symmetric cumulant $sc_{2\,4}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The asymmetric cumulant $ac_{2}\{3\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV

The asymmetric cumulant $ac_{2}\{3\}$results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV

The asymmetric cumulant $ac_{2}\{3\}$results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

The asymmetric cumulant $ac_{2}\{3\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

The asymmetric cumulant $ac_{2}\{3\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The asymmetric cumulant $ac_{2}\{3\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The normalized symmetric cumulant $nsc_{2\,3}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV

The normalized symmetric cumulant $nsc_{2\,4}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV

The normalized asymmetric cumulant $nac_{2}\{3\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV

The normalized symmetric cumulant $nsc_{2\,3}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV

The normalized symmetric cumulant $nsc_{2\,4}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV

The normalized asymmetric cumulant $nac_{2}\{3\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV

The normalized symmetric cumulant $nsc_{2\,3}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

The normalized symmetric cumulant $nsc_{2\,4}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

The normalized asymmetric cumulant $nac_{2}\{3\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

The normalized symmetric cumulant $nsc_{2\,3}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

The normalized symmetric cumulant $nsc_{2\,4}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

The normalized asymmetric cumulant $nac_{2}\{3\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

The normalized symmetric cumulant $nsc_{2\,3}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The normalized symmetric cumulant $nsc_{2\,4}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The normalized asymmetric cumulant $nac_{2}\{3\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The normalized symmetric cumulant $nsc_{2\,3}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The normalized symmetric cumulant $nsc_{2\,4}\{4\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The normalized asymmetric cumulant $nac_{2}\{3\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The $v_{2}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV

The $v_{3}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV

The $v_{4}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV

The $v_{2}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

The $v_{3}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

The $v_{4}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

The $v_{2}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The $v_{3}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The $v_{4}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The $v_{2}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV

The $v_{3}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV

The $v_{4}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 13 TeV

The $v_{2}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

The $v_{3}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

The $v_{4}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in pPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

The $v_{2}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The $v_{3}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The $v_{4}\{2\}$ results as a function of multiplicity ($N_{ch}$) in PbPb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 2.76 TeV

The symmetric cumulant $ac_{2}\{3\}$ in Pb+Pb from different methods

The symmetric cumulant $ac_{2}\{3\}$ in Pb+Pb from different methods

The symmetric cumulant $ac_{2}\{3\}$ in p+Pb from different methods

The symmetric cumulant $ac_{2}\{3\}$ in p+Pb from different methods

The symmetric cumulant $ac_{2}\{3\}$ in pp from different methods

The symmetric cumulant $ac_{2}\{3\}$ in pp from different methods

Expected and observed upper limits on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{H^{+}}$ in the hMSSM scenario of the MSSM. Limits are shown for $\tan\beta$ values in the range of 0.5-60, where predictions are available from both scenarios. The bands surrounding the expected limits show the 68% and 95% confidence intervals. The limits are based on the combination of the $\ell+$jets and $\ell\ell$ final states. The production cross-section of $t\bar{t}H$ and $tH$, as well as the branching ratios of the $H$, are fixed to their SM values at each point in the plane. Uncertainties on the predicted $H^{+}$ cross-sections or branching ratios are not considered.

Expected and observed lower limits on $\tan\beta$ as a function of $m_{H^{+}}$ in the hMSSM scenario of the MSSM. Limits are shown for $\tan\beta$ values in the range of 0.5-60, where predictions are available from both scenarios. The bands surrounding the expected limits show the 68% and 95% confidence intervals. The limits are based on the combination of the $\ell+$jets and $\ell\ell$ final states. The production cross-section of $t\bar{t}H$ and $tH$, as well as the branching ratios of the $H$, are fixed to their SM values at each point in the plane. Uncertainties on the predicted $H^{+}$ cross-sections or branching ratios are not considered.

Exclusion limits on higgsino pair production divided by the theory cross-section.The results of the low-mass analysis are used below m(higgsino) = 300 GeV, while those of the high-mass analysis are used above. The figure shows the observed and expected 95% upper limits on the higgsino pair production cross-section as a function of m(higgsino).

Observed and expected 95% limits in the m(higgsino) vs BR(higgsino to higgs+gravitino) plane. The regions above the lines are excluded by the analyses.

The observed and expected 95% upper limits on the total pair production cross section for degenerate higgsinos as a function of m(higgsino) for the high-mass search. Only the high-mass analysis results are used in this figure.

The observed and expected 95% upper limits on the total pair production cross section for degenerate higgsinos as a function of m(higgsino) for the high-mass search, divided by the theory cross section. Only the high-mass analysis results are used in this figure.

The observed and expected 95% upper limits on the total pair production cross section for degenerate higgsinos as a function of m(higgsino) for the low-mass search. Only the low-mass analysis results are used in this figure.

The observed and expected 95% upper limits on the total pair production cross section for degenerate higgsinos as a function of m(higgsino) for the low-mass search, divided by the theory cross section. Only the low-mass analysis results are used in this figure.

Particle-level acceptance for the low-mass discovery signal regions low-SR-MET0-meff440 and low-SR-MET150-meff440, shown as a function of higgsino mass. The acceptance is defined as the fraction of signal events passing the particle-level event selection that emulates the detector-level selection. The acceptance calculation considers only those signal events where both higgsinos decay to Higgs bosons that subsequently both decay to b-quarks.

The experimental efficiency of the low-mass analysis, for the two discovery signal regions low-SR-MET0-meff440 and low-SR-MET150-meff440, as a function of higgsino mass. The experimental efficiency is defined as the number of events passing the detector-level event selection divided by the number of events passing the event selection for a perfect detector. The denominator is obtained by implementing particle-level event selection that emulate the detector-level selection. Such particle-level selection is not applied on the numerator.

Particle-level acceptance for the high-mass discovery signal regions SR-4b-meff1-A-disc and SR-3b-meff3-A, shown as a function of higgsino mass. The acceptance is defined as the fraction of signal events passing the particle-level event selection that emulates the detector-level selection. The acceptance calculation considers only those signal events where both higgsinos decay to Higgs bosons that subsequently both decay to b-quarks.

The experimental efficiency of the high-mass analysis, for the two discovery signal regions SR-4b-meff1-A-disc and SR-3b-meff3-A, as a function of higgsino mass. The experimental efficiency is defined as the number of events passing the detector-level event selection divided by the number of events passing the event selection for a perfect detector. The denominator is obtained by implementing particle-level event selection that emulate the detector-level selection. Such particle-level selection is not applied on the numerator.

Example cutflow for SR-3b-meff3-A.

Example cutflow for SR-4b-meff1-A-disc.

Cutflow for low-mass analysis for each signal mass point.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

Expected 95% CL exclusion contour in the $m_{W_R}–m_{N_R}$ plane for the Majorana $N_R$ neutrino $\mu\mu$ channel.

Observed 95% CL exclusion contour in the $m_{W_R}–m_{N_R}$ plane for the Majorana $N_R$ neutrino $\mu\mu$ channel.

Observed and expected 95% CL exclusion, for the tested signal mass hypotheses in the $m_{W_R}–m_{N_R}$ plane, for the Majorana $N_R$ neutrino $\mu\mu$ channel.

Expected 95% CL exclusion contour in the $m_{W_R}–m_{N_R}$ plane for the Dirac $N_R$ neutrino $ee$ channel.

Observed 95% CL exclusion contour in the $m_{W_R}–m_{N_R}$ plane for the Dirac $N_R$ neutrino $ee$ channel.

Observed and expected 95% CL exclusion, for the tested signal mass hypotheses in the $m_{W_R}–m_{N_R}$ plane, for the Dirac $N_R$ neutrino $ee$ channel.

Expected 95% CL exclusion contour in the $m_{W_R}–m_{N_R}$ plane for the Dirac $N_R$ neutrino $\mu\mu$ channel.

Observed 95% CL exclusion contour in the $m_{W_R}–m_{N_R}$ plane for the Dirac $N_R$ neutrino $\mu\mu$ channel.

Observed and expected 95% CL exclusion, for the tested signal mass hypotheses in the $m_{W_R}–m_{N_R}$ plane, for the Dirac $N_R$ neutrino $\mu\mu$ channel.

Observed 95% CL upper limit on cross-section times branching ratio to the $ee$ final state for the Keung-Senjanovic process in the $m_{W_R}–m_{N_R}$ plane for the Majorana $N_R$ neutrino $ee$ channel.

Observed 95% CL upper limit on cross-section times branching ratio to the $\mu\mu$ final state for the Keung-Senjanovic process in the $m_{W_R}–m_{N_R}$ plane for the Majorana $N_R$ neutrino $\mu\mu$ channel.

Observed 95% CL upper limit on cross-section times branching ratio to the $\mu\mu$ final state for the Keung-Senjanovic process in the $m_{W_R}–m_{N_R}$ plane for the Dirac $N_R$ neutrino $ee$ channel.

Observed 95% CL upper limit on cross-section times branching ratio to the $\mu\mu$ final state for the Keung-Senjanovic process in the $m_{W_R}–m_{N_R}$ plane for the Dirac $N_R$ neutrino $\mu\mu$ channel.

Efficiencies times acceptance for signal region selection as a function of the signal $W_R$ and $N_R$ masses for the SS $e^{\pm}e^{\pm}$ channel.

Efficiencies times acceptance for signal region selection as a function of the signal $W_R$ and $N_R$ masses for the SS $\mu^{\pm}\mu^{\pm}$ channel.

Efficiencies times acceptance for signal region selection as a function of the signal $W_R$ and $N_R$ masses for the OS $e^{\pm}e^{\mp}$ channel.

Efficiencies times acceptance for signal region selection as a function of the signal $W_R$ and $N_R$ masses for the OS $\mu^{\pm}\mu^{\mp}$ channel.

Expected 95% CL exclusion contour in the tan$\beta$ - $m_H$ plane shown in the context of the hMSSM, for the regions in which theoretical predictions are available (0.5$\leq\text{tan}\beta\leq60$).

Observed a95% CL exclusion contour in the tan$\beta$ - $m_H$ plane shown in the context of the $m_{H}^{mod-}$ scenario, for the regions in which theoretical predictions are available (0.5$\leq\text{tan}\beta\leq60$).

Expected 95% CL exclusion contour in the tan$\beta$ - $m_H$ plane shown in the context of the $m_{H}^{mod-}$ scenario, for the regions in which theoretical predictions are available (0.5$\leq\text{tan}\beta\leq60$).

Integrated fiducial cross-sections for QCD+EW and EW-only $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 1.0$ TeV.

Integrated fiducial cross-sections for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 0.5$ TeV.

Integrated fiducial cross-sections for QCD+EW and EW-only $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 2.0$ TeV.

Integrated fiducial cross-sections for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the forward-lepton/central-jet region.

Integrated fiducial cross-sections for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the central-jet region.

Integrated fiducial cross-sections for EW $Wjj$ production in the signal region with $m_{jj} > 0.5$ TeV.

Integrated fiducial cross-sections for QCD+EW and EW-only $Wjj$ production in the signal region with $m_{jj} > 0.5$ TeV.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of the dijet $p_\text{T}$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 1.5$ TeV.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of $\Delta\phi(j_1,j_2) / \pi$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 1.5$ TeV.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of $\Delta y(j_1, j_2)$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 1.5$ TeV.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of the leading-jet $p_\text{T}$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 1.5$ TeV.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of the jet centrality for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 1.5$ TeV.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of the lepton centrality for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 1.5$ TeV.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of the number of jets in the rapidity gap for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 1.5$ TeV.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of the dijet mass for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the forward-lepton region.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of the dijet $p_\text{T}$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the forward-lepton region.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of $\Delta\phi(j_1,j_2) / \pi$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the forward-lepton region.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of $\Delta y(j_1, j_2)$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the forward-lepton region.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of the leading-jet $p_\text{T}$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the forward-lepton region.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of the dijet $p_\text{T}$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the signal region with $m_{jj} > 1.0$ TeV.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of $\Delta\phi(j_1,j_2) / \pi$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the signal region with $m_{jj} > 1.0$ TeV.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of $\Delta y(j_1, j_2)$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the signal region with $m_{jj} > 1.0$ TeV.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of the leading-jet $p_\text{T}$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the signal region with $m_{jj} > 1.0$ TeV.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of the dijet $p_\text{T}$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 1.0$ TeV.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of $\Delta\phi(j_1,j_2) / \pi$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 1.0$ TeV.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of $\Delta y(j_1, j_2)$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 1.0$ TeV.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of the leading-jet $p_\text{T}$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 1.0$ TeV.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of the jet centrality for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 1.0$ TeV.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of the lepton centrality for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 1.0$ TeV.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of the number of jets in the rapidity gap for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 1.0$ TeV.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of the dijet mass for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 0.5$ TeV.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of the dijet $p_\text{T}$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 0.5$ TeV.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of $\Delta\phi(j_1,j_2) / \pi$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 0.5$ TeV.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of $\Delta y(j_1, j_2)$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 0.5$ TeV.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of the leading-jet $p_\text{T}$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 0.5$ TeV.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of the jet centrality for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 0.5$ TeV.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of the lepton centrality for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 0.5$ TeV.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of the number of jets in the rapidity gap for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 0.5$ TeV.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of the dijet $p_\text{T}$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 2.0$ TeV.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of $\Delta\phi(j_1,j_2) / \pi$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 2.0$ TeV.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of $\Delta y(j_1, j_2)$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 2.0$ TeV.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of the leading-jet $p_\text{T}$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 2.0$ TeV.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of the jet centrality for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 2.0$ TeV.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of the lepton centrality for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 2.0$ TeV.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of the number of jets in the rapidity gap for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 2.0$ TeV.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of the dijet mass for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the forward-lepton/central-jet region.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of the dijet $p_\text{T}$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the forward-lepton/central-jet region.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of $\Delta\phi(j_1,j_2) / \pi$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the forward-lepton/central-jet region.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of $\Delta y(j_1, j_2)$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the forward-lepton/central-jet region.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of the leading-jet $p_\text{T}$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the forward-lepton/central-jet region.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of the dijet mass for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the central-jet region.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of the dijet $p_\text{T}$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the central-jet region.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of $\Delta\phi(j_1,j_2) / \pi$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the central-jet region.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of $\Delta y(j_1, j_2)$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the central-jet region.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of the leading-jet $p_\text{T}$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the central-jet region.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of the dijet mass for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the signal region with $m_{jj} > 0.5$ TeV.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of the dijet $p_\text{T}$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the signal region with $m_{jj} > 0.5$ TeV.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of $\Delta\phi(j_1,j_2) / \pi$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the signal region with $m_{jj} > 0.5$ TeV.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of $\Delta y(j_1, j_2)$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the signal region with $m_{jj} > 0.5$ TeV.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of the leading-jet $p_\text{T}$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the signal region with $m_{jj} > 0.5$ TeV.

Absolute differential fiducial cross-section of the dijet $p_\text{T}$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 1.5$ TeV.

Absolute differential fiducial cross-section of $\Delta\phi(j_1,j_2) / \pi$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 1.5$ TeV.

Absolute differential fiducial cross-section of $\Delta y(j_1, j_2)$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 1.5$ TeV.

Absolute differential fiducial cross-section of the leading-jet $p_\text{T}$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 1.5$ TeV.

Absolute differential fiducial cross-section of the jet centrality for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 1.5$ TeV.

Absolute differential fiducial cross-section of the lepton centrality for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 1.5$ TeV.

Absolute differential fiducial cross-section of the number of jets in the rapidity gap for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 1.5$ TeV.

Absolute differential fiducial cross-section of the dijet mass for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the forward-lepton region.

Absolute differential fiducial cross-section of the dijet $p_\text{T}$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the forward-lepton region.

Absolute differential fiducial cross-section of $\Delta\phi(j_1,j_2) / \pi$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the forward-lepton region.

Absolute differential fiducial cross-section of $\Delta y(j_1, j_2)$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the forward-lepton region.

Absolute differential fiducial cross-section of the leading-jet $p_\text{T}$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the forward-lepton region.

Absolute differential fiducial cross-section of the dijet $p_\text{T}$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the signal region with $m_{jj} > 1.0$ TeV.

Absolute differential fiducial cross-section of $\Delta\phi(j_1,j_2) / \pi$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the signal region with $m_{jj} > 1.0$ TeV.

Absolute differential fiducial cross-section of $\Delta y(j_1, j_2)$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the signal region with $m_{jj} > 1.0$ TeV.

Absolute differential fiducial cross-section of the leading-jet $p_\text{T}$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the signal region with $m_{jj} > 1.0$ TeV.

Absolute differential fiducial cross-section of the dijet $p_\text{T}$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 1.0$ TeV.

Absolute differential fiducial cross-section of $\Delta\phi(j_1,j_2) / \pi$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 1.0$ TeV.

Absolute differential fiducial cross-section of $\Delta y(j_1, j_2)$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 1.0$ TeV.

Absolute differential fiducial cross-section of the leading-jet $p_\text{T}$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 1.0$ TeV.

Absolute differential fiducial cross-section of the jet centrality for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 1.0$ TeV.

Absolute differential fiducial cross-section of the lepton centrality for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 1.0$ TeV.

Absolute differential fiducial cross-section of the number of jets in the rapidity gap for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 1.0$ TeV.

Absolute differential fiducial cross-section of the dijet mass for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 0.5$ TeV.

Absolute differential fiducial cross-section of the dijet $p_\text{T}$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 0.5$ TeV.

Absolute differential fiducial cross-section of $\Delta\phi(j_1,j_2) / \pi$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 0.5$ TeV.

Absolute differential fiducial cross-section of $\Delta y(j_1, j_2)$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 0.5$ TeV.

Absolute differential fiducial cross-section of the leading-jet $p_\text{T}$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 0.5$ TeV.

Absolute differential fiducial cross-section of the jet centrality for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 0.5$ TeV.

Absolute differential fiducial cross-section of the lepton centrality for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 0.5$ TeV.

Absolute differential fiducial cross-section of the number of jets in the rapidity gap for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 0.5$ TeV.

Absolute differential fiducial cross-section of the dijet $p_\text{T}$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 2.0$ TeV.

Absolute differential fiducial cross-section of $\Delta\phi(j_1,j_2) / \pi$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 2.0$ TeV.

Absolute differential fiducial cross-section of $\Delta y(j_1, j_2)$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 2.0$ TeV.

Absolute differential fiducial cross-section of the leading-jet $p_\text{T}$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 2.0$ TeV.

Absolute differential fiducial cross-section of the jet centrality for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 2.0$ TeV.

Absolute differential fiducial cross-section of the lepton centrality for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 2.0$ TeV.

Absolute differential fiducial cross-section of the number of jets in the rapidity gap for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 2.0$ TeV.

Absolute differential fiducial cross-section of the dijet mass for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the forward-lepton/central-jet region.

Absolute differential fiducial cross-section of the dijet $p_\text{T}$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the forward-lepton/central-jet region.

Absolute differential fiducial cross-section of $\Delta\phi(j_1,j_2) / \pi$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the forward-lepton/central-jet region.

Absolute differential fiducial cross-section of $\Delta y(j_1, j_2)$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the forward-lepton/central-jet region.

Absolute differential fiducial cross-section of the leading-jet $p_\text{T}$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the forward-lepton/central-jet region.

Absolute differential fiducial cross-section of the dijet mass for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the central-jet region.

Absolute differential fiducial cross-section of the dijet $p_\text{T}$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the central-jet region.

Absolute differential fiducial cross-section of $\Delta\phi(j_1,j_2) / \pi$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the central-jet region.

Absolute differential fiducial cross-section of the leading-jet $p_\text{T}$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the central-jet region.

Absolute differential fiducial cross-section of the dijet mass for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the signal region with $m_{jj} > 0.5$ TeV.

Absolute differential fiducial cross-section of the dijet $p_\text{T}$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the signal region with $m_{jj} > 0.5$ TeV.

Absolute differential fiducial cross-section of $\Delta\phi(j_1,j_2) / \pi$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the signal region with $m_{jj} > 0.5$ TeV.

Absolute differential fiducial cross-section of $\Delta y(j_1, j_2)$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the signal region with $m_{jj} > 0.5$ TeV.

Absolute differential fiducial cross-section of the leading-jet $p_\text{T}$ for QCD+EW $Wjj$ production in the signal region with $m_{jj} > 0.5$ TeV.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of $\Delta\phi(j_1,j_2) / \pi$ for EW-only $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 1.5$ TeV.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of the leading-jet $p_\text{T}$ for EW-only $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 1.5$ TeV.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of the lepton centrality for EW-only $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 1.5$ TeV.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of the number of jets in the rapidity gap for EW-only $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 1.5$ TeV.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of the dijet mass for EW-only $Wjj$ production in the signal region with $m_{jj} > 1.0$ TeV.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of the dijet $p_\text{T}$ for EW-only $Wjj$ production in the signal region with $m_{jj} > 1.0$ TeV.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of $\Delta\phi(j_1,j_2) / \pi$ for EW-only $Wjj$ production in the signal region with $m_{jj} > 1.0$ TeV.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of $\Delta y(j_1, j_2)$ for EW-only $Wjj$ production in the signal region with $m_{jj} > 1.0$ TeV.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of the leading-jet $p_\text{T}$ for EW-only $Wjj$ production in the signal region with $m_{jj} > 1.0$ TeV.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of the dijet mass for EW-only $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 1.0$ TeV.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of $\Delta\phi(j_1,j_2) / \pi$ for EW-only $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 1.0$ TeV.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of $\Delta y(j_1, j_2)$ for EW-only $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 1.0$ TeV.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of the leading-jet $p_\text{T}$ for EW-only $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 1.0$ TeV.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of the lepton centrality for EW-only $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 1.0$ TeV.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of the number of jets in the rapidity gap for EW-only $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 1.0$ TeV.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of $\Delta\phi(j_1,j_2) / \pi$ for EW-only $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 2.0$ TeV.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of the leading-jet $p_\text{T}$ for EW-only $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 2.0$ TeV.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of the lepton centrality for EW-only $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 2.0$ TeV.

Normalised differential fiducial cross-section of the number of jets in the rapidity gap for EW-only $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 2.0$ TeV.

Absolute differential fiducial cross-section of $\Delta\phi(j_1,j_2) / \pi$ for EW-only $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 1.5$ TeV.

Absolute differential fiducial cross-section of $\Delta y(j_1, j_2)$ for EW-only $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 1.5$ TeV.

Absolute differential fiducial cross-section of the leading-jet $p_\text{T}$ for EW-only $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 1.5$ TeV.

Absolute differential fiducial cross-section of the number of jets in the rapidity gap for EW-only $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 1.5$ TeV.

Absolute differential fiducial cross-section of $\Delta\phi(j_1,j_2) / \pi$ for EW-only $Wjj$ production in the signal region with $m_{jj} > 1.0$ TeV.

Absolute differential fiducial cross-section of $\Delta y(j_1, j_2)$ for EW-only $Wjj$ production in the signal region with $m_{jj} > 1.0$ TeV.

Absolute differential fiducial cross-section of the leading-jet $p_\text{T}$ for EW-only $Wjj$ production in the signal region with $m_{jj} > 1.0$ TeV.

Absolute differential fiducial cross-section of $\Delta\phi(j_1,j_2) / \pi$ for EW-only $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 1.0$ TeV.

Absolute differential fiducial cross-section of $\Delta y(j_1, j_2)$ for EW-only $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 1.0$ TeV.

Absolute differential fiducial cross-section of the leading-jet $p_\text{T}$ for EW-only $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 1.0$ TeV.

Absolute differential fiducial cross-section of the number of jets in the rapidity gap for EW-only $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 1.0$ TeV.

Absolute differential fiducial cross-section of $\Delta\phi(j_1,j_2) / \pi$ for EW-only $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 2.0$ TeV.

Absolute differential fiducial cross-section of $\Delta y(j_1, j_2)$ for EW-only $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 2.0$ TeV.

Absolute differential fiducial cross-section of the leading-jet $p_\text{T}$ for EW-only $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 2.0$ TeV.

Absolute differential fiducial cross-section of the number of jets in the rapidity gap for EW-only $Wjj$ production in the inclusive region with $m_{jj} > 2.0$ TeV.

Measured total production cross sections of WW production in the total phase space. Both, resonant and non-resonant WW, production are considered as signal.

Normalised differential cross sections and corresponding uncertainties in bins of $\Delta R(J/\psi,\mu) (p_{T} \ge 20 { GeV})$.

Transfer functions for $\Delta R(b-hadron,b-hadron) (p_{T} \ge 20 { GeV})$.

$B_{c}$ and $B + D$ corrections removed from the fitted data for $\Delta R(J/\psi,\mu) (p_{T} \ge 20 { GeV})$.

Normalised differential cross sections and corresponding uncertainties in bins of $\Delta R(J/\psi,\mu) (p_{T} < 20 { GeV})$.

Transfer functions for $\Delta R(b-hadron,b-hadron) (p_{T} < 20 { GeV})$.

$B_{c}$ and $B + D$ corrections removed from the fitted data for $\Delta R(J/\psi,\mu) (p_{T} < 20 { GeV})$.

Normalised differential cross sections and corresponding uncertainties in bins of $\Delta\phi(J/\psi,\mu)$ [rad].

Transfer functions for $\Delta\phi(b-hadron,b-hadron)$ [rad].

$B_{c}$ and $B + D$ corrections removed from the fitted data for $\Delta\phi(J/\psi,\mu)$ [rad].

Normalised differential cross sections and corresponding uncertainties in bins of $\Delta y(J/\psi,\mu)$.

Transfer functions for $\Delta y(b-hadron,b-hadron)$.

$B_{c}$ and $B + D$ corrections removed from the fitted data for $\Delta y(J/\psi,\mu)$.

Normalised differential cross sections and corresponding uncertainties in bins of $m^{\mu\mu\mu} / p_{T}^{\mu\mu\mu}$.

Transfer functions for $m^{b-hadron,b-hadron} / p_{T}^{b-hadron,b-hadron}$.

$B_{c}$ and $B + D$ corrections removed from the fitted data for $m^{\mu\mu\mu} / p_{T}^{\mu\mu\mu}$.

Normalised differential cross sections and corresponding uncertainties in bins of $p_{T}^{\mu\mu\mu} / m^{\mu\mu\mu}$.

Transfer functions for $p_{T}^{b-hadron,b-hadron} / m^{b-hadron,b-hadron}$.

$B_{c}$ and $B + D$ corrections removed from the fitted data for $p_{T}^{\mu\mu\mu} / m^{\mu\mu\mu}$.

Normalised differential cross sections and corresponding uncertainties in bins of $p_{T}(J/\psi,\mu)$ [GeV].

Transfer functions for $p_{T}(b-hadron,b-hadron)$ [GeV].

$B_{c}$ and $B + D$ corrections removed from the fitted data for $p_{T}(J/\psi,\mu)$ [GeV].

Normalised differential cross sections and corresponding uncertainties in bins of $m(J/\psi,\mu)$ [GeV].

Transfer functions for $m(b-hadron,b-hadron)$ [GeV].

$B_{c}$ and $B + D$ corrections removed from the fitted data for $m(J/\psi,\mu)$ [GeV].

Transfer functions for $y_{boost}(b-hadron,b-hadron)$.

Normalised differential cross sections and corresponding uncertainties in bins of $y_{boost}(J/\psi,\mu)$.