Fig. 6b: Number density $N_{\rm ch}$ (left) and $\Sigma p_{\rm T}$ (right) distributions as a function of $p_{\rm T}^{\rm trig}$ in Away and Toward regions after the subtraction of Number density $N_{\rm ch}$ and $\Sigma p_{\rm T}$ distributions in the transverse region for p-Pb collisions for $p_{\rm T} >$ 0.5 GeV/$c$. The shaded areas and the error bars around the data points represent the systematic and statistical uncertainties, respectively.

Fig. 7a: $<p_{\rm T}>$ as a function of $p_{\rm T}^{\rm trig}$ in Toward (left) and Away (right) regions after the subtraction of transverse region for pp collisions for $p_{\rm T} >$ 0.5 GeV/$c$. The shaded areas and the error bars around the data points represent the systematic and statistical uncertainties, respectively.

Fig. 7b: $<p_{\rm T}>$ as a function of $p_{\rm T}^{\rm trig}$ in Toward (left) and Away (right) regions after the subtraction of transverse region for p-Pb collisions for $p_{\rm T} >$ 0.5 GeV/$c$. The shaded areas and the error bars around the data points represent the systematic and statistical uncertainties, respectively.

Fig. A1: Number density $N_{\rm ch}$ (left) and $\Sigma p_{\rm T}$ (right) distributions as a function of $p_{\rm T}^{\rm trig}$ in Transverse, Away, and Toward regions for $p_{\rm T} >$ 0.15 GeV/$c$. The shaded areas and the error bars around the data points represent the systematic and statistical uncertainties, respectively.

Fig. A2: Number density $N_{\rm ch}$ (left) and $\Sigma p_{\rm T}$ (right) distributions as a function of $p_{\rm T}^{\rm trig}$ in Transverse, Away, and Toward regions for $p_{\rm T} >$ 1.0 GeV/$c$. The shaded areas and the error bars around the data points represent the systematic and statistical uncertainties, respectively.

Fig. A3: Number density $N_{\rm ch}$ (left) and $\Sigma p_{\rm T}$ (right) distributions as a function of $p_{\rm T}^{\rm trig}$ in Transverse, Away, and Toward regions for $p_{\rm T} >$ 0.15 GeV/$c$. The shaded areas and the error bars around the data points represent the systematic and statistical uncertainties, respectively.

Fig. A4: Number density $N_{\rm ch}$ (left) and $\Sigma p_{\rm T}$ (right) distributions as a function of $p_{\rm T}^{\rm trig}$ in Transverse, Away, and Toward regions for $p_{\rm T} >$ 1.0 GeV/$c$. The shaded areas and the error bars around the data points represent the systematic and statistical uncertainties, respectively.

The $p_{T}$-differential $v_2$ measured with two-particle correlations with a pseudorapidity gap of $|\Delta \eta| > 0.8$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The $p_{T}$-differential $v_2$ measured with two-particle correlations with a pseudorapidity gap of $|\Delta \eta| > 0.8$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The $p_{T}$-differential $v_2$ measured with two-particle correlations with a pseudorapidity gap of $|\Delta \eta| > 0.8$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The $p_{T}$-differential $v_2$ measured with two-particle correlations with a pseudorapidity gap of $|\Delta \eta| > 0.8$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The $p_{T}$-differential $v_2$ measured with two-particle correlations with a pseudorapidity gap of $|\Delta \eta| > 0.8$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The $p_{T}$-differential $v_2$ measured with two-particle correlations with a pseudorapidity gap of $|\Delta \eta| > 0.8$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The $p_{T}$-differential $v_2$ measured with two-particle correlations with a pseudorapidity gap of $|\Delta \eta| > 0.8$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The $p_{T}$-differential $v_2$ measured with two-particle correlations with a pseudorapidity gap of $|\Delta \eta| > 0.8$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The $p_{T}$-differential $v_2$ measured with two-particle correlations with a pseudorapidity gap of $|\Delta \eta| > 0.8$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The $p_{T}$-differential $v_2$ measured with two-particle correlations with a pseudorapidity gap of $|\Delta \eta| > 0.8$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The $p_{T}$-differential $v_2$ measured with two-particle correlations with a pseudorapidity gap of $|\Delta \eta| > 0.8$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The $p_{T}$-differential $v_2$ measured with two-particle correlations with a pseudorapidity gap of $|\Delta \eta| > 0.8$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The $p_{T}$-differential $v_2$ measured with two-particle correlations with a pseudorapidity gap of $|\Delta \eta| > 0.8$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The $p_{T}$-differential $v_2$ measured with two-particle correlations with a pseudorapidity gap of $|\Delta \eta| > 0.8$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The $p_{T}$-differential $v_2$ measured with two-particle correlations with a pseudorapidity gap of $|\Delta \eta| > 0.8$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The $p_{T}$-differential $v_2$ measured with two-particle correlations with a pseudorapidity gap of $|\Delta \eta| > 0.8$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The $p_{T}$-differential $v_2$ measured with two-particle correlations with a pseudorapidity gap of $|\Delta \eta| > 0.8$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The $p_{T}$-differential $v_2$ measured with two-particle correlations with a pseudorapidity gap of $|\Delta \eta| > 0.8$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The $p_{T}$-differential $v_2$ measured with two-particle correlations with a pseudorapidity gap of $|\Delta \eta| > 0.8$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The $p_{T}$-differential $v_2$ measured with two-particle correlations with a pseudorapidity gap of $|\Delta \eta| > 0.8$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The $p_{T}$-differential $v_2$ measured with two-particle correlations with a pseudorapidity gap of $|\Delta \eta| > 0.8$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The $p_{T}$-differential $v_2$ measured with two-particle correlations with a pseudorapidity gap of $|\Delta \eta| > 0.8$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The $p_{T}$-differential $v_2$ measured with two-particle correlations with a pseudorapidity gap of $|\Delta \eta| > 0.8$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The $p_{T}$-differential $v_2$ measured with two-particle correlations with a pseudorapidity gap of $|\Delta \eta| > 0.8$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The $p_{T}$-differential $v_2$ measured with two-particle correlations with a pseudorapidity gap of $|\Delta \eta| > 0.8$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The $p_{T}$-differential $v_2$ measured with two-particle correlations with a pseudorapidity gap of $|\Delta \eta| > 0.8$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The $p_{T}$-differential $v_2$ measured with two-particle correlations with a pseudorapidity gap of $|\Delta \eta| > 0.8$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The $p_{T}$-differential $v_2$ measured with two-particle correlations with a pseudorapidity gap of $|\Delta \eta| > 0.8$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The $p_{T}$-differential $v_2$ measured with two-particle correlations with a pseudorapidity gap of $|\Delta \eta| > 0.8$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The $p_{T}$-differential $v_2$ measured with two-particle correlations with a pseudorapidity gap of $|\Delta \eta| > 0.8$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The $p_{T}$-differential $v_2$ measured with two-particle correlations with a pseudorapidity gap of $|\Delta \eta| > 0.8$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The $p_{T}$-differential $v_2$ measured with two-particle correlations with a pseudorapidity gap of $|\Delta \eta| > 0.8$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The $p_{T}$-differential $v_2$ measured with two-particle correlations with a pseudorapidity gap of $|\Delta \eta| > 0.8$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The $p_{T}$-differential $v_2$ measured with four-particle correlations for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The $p_{T}$-differential $v_2$ measured with four-particle correlations for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The $p_{T}$-differential $v_2$ measured with four-particle correlations for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The $p_{T}$-differential $v_2$ measured with four-particle correlations for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The $p_{T}$-differential $v_2$ measured with four-particle correlations for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The $p_{T}$-differential $v_2$ measured with four-particle correlations for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The $p_{T}$-differential $v_2$ measured with four-particle correlations for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The $p_{T}$-differential $v_2$ measured with four-particle correlations for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The $p_{T}$-differential $v_2$ measured with four-particle correlations for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The $p_{T}$-differential $v_2$ measured with four-particle correlations for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The $p_{T}$-differential $v_2$ measured with four-particle correlations for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The $p_{T}$-differential $v_2$ measured with four-particle correlations for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The $p_{T}$-differential $v_2$ measured with four-particle correlations for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The $p_{T}$-differential $v_2$ measured with four-particle correlations for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The $p_{T}$-differential $v_2$ measured with four-particle correlations for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The $p_{T}$-differential $v_2$ measured with four-particle correlations for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The $p_{T}$-differential $v_2$ measured with four-particle correlations for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The $p_{T}$-differential $v_2$ measured with four-particle correlations for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The $p_{T}$-differential $v_2$ measured with four-particle correlations for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The $p_{T}$-differential $v_2$ measured with four-particle correlations for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The $p_{T}$-differential $v_2$ measured with four-particle correlations for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The $p_{T}$-differential $v_2$ measured with four-particle correlations for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The $p_{T}$-differential $v_2$ measured with four-particle correlations for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The $p_{T}$-differential $v_2$ measured with four-particle correlations for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The $p_{T}$-differential $v_2$ measured with four-particle correlations for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The $p_{T}$-differential $v_2$ measured with four-particle correlations for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The $p_{T}$-differential $v_2$ measured with four-particle correlations for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The $p_{T}$-differential $v_2$ measured with four-particle correlations for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The $p_{T}$-differential $v_2$ measured with four-particle correlations for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The $p_{T}$-differential $v_2$ measured with four-particle correlations for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The $p_{T}$-differential $v_2$ measured with four-particle correlations for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The $p_{T}$-differential $v_2$ measured with four-particle correlations for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The $p_{T}$-differential $v_2$ measured with four-particle correlations for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The $p_{T}$-differential $v_2$ measured with four-particle correlations for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The $p_{T}$-differential $v_2$ measured with four-particle correlations for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The $p_{T}$-differential $v_2$ measured with four-particle correlations for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The dependence of the mean value of $v_2$ ($\langle v_2 \rangle$) on $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The dependence of the mean value of $v_2$ ($\langle v_2 \rangle$) on $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The dependence of the mean value of $v_2$ ($\langle v_2 \rangle$) on $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The dependence of the mean value of $v_2$ ($\langle v_2 \rangle$) on $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The dependence of the mean value of $v_2$ ($\langle v_2 \rangle$) on $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The dependence of the mean value of $v_2$ ($\langle v_2 \rangle$) on $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The dependence of the mean value of $v_2$ ($\langle v_2 \rangle$) on $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The dependence of the mean value of $v_2$ ($\langle v_2 \rangle$) on $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The dependence of the mean value of $v_2$ ($\langle v_2 \rangle$) on $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The dependence of the mean value of $v_2$ ($\langle v_2 \rangle$) on $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The dependence of the mean value of $v_2$ ($\langle v_2 \rangle$) on $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The dependence of the mean value of $v_2$ ($\langle v_2 \rangle$) on $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The dependence of the mean value of $v_2$ ($\langle v_2 \rangle$) on $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The dependence of the mean value of $v_2$ ($\langle v_2 \rangle$) on $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The dependence of the mean value of $v_2$ ($\langle v_2 \rangle$) on $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The dependence of the mean value of $v_2$ ($\langle v_2 \rangle$) on $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The dependence of the mean value of $v_2$ ($\langle v_2 \rangle$) on $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The dependence of the mean value of $v_2$ ($\langle v_2 \rangle$) on $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The dependence of the mean value of $v_2$ ($\langle v_2 \rangle$) on $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The dependence of the mean value of $v_2$ ($\langle v_2 \rangle$) on $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The dependence of the mean value of $v_2$ ($\langle v_2 \rangle$) on $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The dependence of the mean value of $v_2$ ($\langle v_2 \rangle$) on $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The dependence of the mean value of $v_2$ ($\langle v_2 \rangle$) on $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The dependence of the mean value of $v_2$ ($\langle v_2 \rangle$) on $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The dependence of the mean value of $v_2$ ($\langle v_2 \rangle$) on $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The dependence of the mean value of $v_2$ ($\langle v_2 \rangle$) on $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The dependence of the mean value of $v_2$ ($\langle v_2 \rangle$) on $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The dependence of the mean value of $v_2$ ($\langle v_2 \rangle$) on $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The dependence of the mean value of $v_2$ ($\langle v_2 \rangle$) on $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The dependence of the mean value of $v_2$ ($\langle v_2 \rangle$) on $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The dependence of the mean value of $v_2$ ($\langle v_2 \rangle$) on $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The dependence of the mean value of $v_2$ ($\langle v_2 \rangle$) on $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The dependence of the standard deviation of $v_2$ ($\sigma_{v_2}$) on $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The dependence of the standard deviation of $v_2$ ($\sigma_{v_2}$) on $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The dependence of the standard deviation of $v_2$ ($\sigma_{v_2}$) on $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The dependence of the standard deviation of $v_2$ ($\sigma_{v_2}$) on $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The dependence of the standard deviation of $v_2$ ($\sigma_{v_2}$) on $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The dependence of the standard deviation of $v_2$ ($\sigma_{v_2}$) on $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The dependence of the standard deviation of $v_2$ ($\sigma_{v_2}$) on $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The dependence of the standard deviation of $v_2$ ($\sigma_{v_2}$) on $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The dependence of the standard deviation of $v_2$ ($\sigma_{v_2}$) on $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The dependence of the standard deviation of $v_2$ ($\sigma_{v_2}$) on $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The dependence of the standard deviation of $v_2$ ($\sigma_{v_2}$) on $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The dependence of the standard deviation of $v_2$ ($\sigma_{v_2}$) on $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The dependence of the standard deviation of $v_2$ ($\sigma_{v_2}$) on $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The dependence of the standard deviation of $v_2$ ($\sigma_{v_2}$) on $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The dependence of the standard deviation of $v_2$ ($\sigma_{v_2}$) on $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The dependence of the standard deviation of $v_2$ ($\sigma_{v_2}$) on $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The dependence of the standard deviation of $v_2$ ($\sigma_{v_2}$) on $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The dependence of the standard deviation of $v_2$ ($\sigma_{v_2}$) on $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The dependence of the standard deviation of $v_2$ ($\sigma_{v_2}$) on $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The dependence of the standard deviation of $v_2$ ($\sigma_{v_2}$) on $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The dependence of the standard deviation of $v_2$ ($\sigma_{v_2}$) on $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The dependence of the standard deviation of $v_2$ ($\sigma_{v_2}$) on $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The dependence of the standard deviation of $v_2$ ($\sigma_{v_2}$) on $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The dependence of the standard deviation of $v_2$ ($\sigma_{v_2}$) on $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The dependence of the standard deviation of $v_2$ ($\sigma_{v_2}$) on $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The dependence of the standard deviation of $v_2$ ($\sigma_{v_2}$) on $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The dependence of the standard deviation of $v_2$ ($\sigma_{v_2}$) on $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The dependence of the standard deviation of $v_2$ ($\sigma_{v_2}$) on $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The dependence of the standard deviation of $v_2$ ($\sigma_{v_2}$) on $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The dependence of the standard deviation of $v_2$ ($\sigma_{v_2}$) on $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The dependence of the standard deviation of $v_2$ ($\sigma_{v_2}$) on $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The dependence of the standard deviation of $v_2$ ($\sigma_{v_2}$) on $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The relative elliptic flow fluctuations ($F(v_2)$) as a function of $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The relative elliptic flow fluctuations ($F(v_2)$) as a function of $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The relative elliptic flow fluctuations ($F(v_2)$) as a function of $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The relative elliptic flow fluctuations ($F(v_2)$) as a function of $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The relative elliptic flow fluctuations ($F(v_2)$) as a function of $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The relative elliptic flow fluctuations ($F(v_2)$) as a function of $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The relative elliptic flow fluctuations ($F(v_2)$) as a function of $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The relative elliptic flow fluctuations ($F(v_2)$) as a function of $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The relative elliptic flow fluctuations ($F(v_2)$) as a function of $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The relative elliptic flow fluctuations ($F(v_2)$) as a function of $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The relative elliptic flow fluctuations ($F(v_2)$) as a function of $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The relative elliptic flow fluctuations ($F(v_2)$) as a function of $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The relative elliptic flow fluctuations ($F(v_2)$) as a function of $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The relative elliptic flow fluctuations ($F(v_2)$) as a function of $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The relative elliptic flow fluctuations ($F(v_2)$) as a function of $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The relative elliptic flow fluctuations ($F(v_2)$) as a function of $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The relative elliptic flow fluctuations ($F(v_2)$) as a function of $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The relative elliptic flow fluctuations ($F(v_2)$) as a function of $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The relative elliptic flow fluctuations ($F(v_2)$) as a function of $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The relative elliptic flow fluctuations ($F(v_2)$) as a function of $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The relative elliptic flow fluctuations ($F(v_2)$) as a function of $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The relative elliptic flow fluctuations ($F(v_2)$) as a function of $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The relative elliptic flow fluctuations ($F(v_2)$) as a function of $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The relative elliptic flow fluctuations ($F(v_2)$) as a function of $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The relative elliptic flow fluctuations ($F(v_2)$) as a function of $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The relative elliptic flow fluctuations ($F(v_2)$) as a function of $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The relative elliptic flow fluctuations ($F(v_2)$) as a function of $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The relative elliptic flow fluctuations ($F(v_2)$) as a function of $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The relative elliptic flow fluctuations ($F(v_2)$) as a function of $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The relative elliptic flow fluctuations ($F(v_2)$) as a function of $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The relative elliptic flow fluctuations ($F(v_2)$) as a function of $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The relative elliptic flow fluctuations ($F(v_2)$) as a function of $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The ratio $v_2\{4\}/v_2\{2,|\Delta \eta| > 0.8\}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The ratio $v_2\{4\}/v_2\{2,|\Delta \eta| > 0.8\}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The ratio $v_2\{4\}/v_2\{2,|\Delta \eta| > 0.8\}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The ratio $v_2\{4\}/v_2\{2,|\Delta \eta| > 0.8\}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The ratio $v_2\{4\}/v_2\{2,|\Delta \eta| > 0.8\}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The ratio $v_2\{4\}/v_2\{2,|\Delta \eta| > 0.8\}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The ratio $v_2\{4\}/v_2\{2,|\Delta \eta| > 0.8\}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The ratio $v_2\{4\}/v_2\{2,|\Delta \eta| > 0.8\}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The ratio $v_2\{4\}/v_2\{2,|\Delta \eta| > 0.8\}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The ratio $v_2\{4\}/v_2\{2,|\Delta \eta| > 0.8\}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The ratio $v_2\{4\}/v_2\{2,|\Delta \eta| > 0.8\}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The ratio $v_2\{4\}/v_2\{2,|\Delta \eta| > 0.8\}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The ratio $v_2\{4\}/v_2\{2,|\Delta \eta| > 0.8\}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The ratio $v_2\{4\}/v_2\{2,|\Delta \eta| > 0.8\}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The ratio $v_2\{4\}/v_2\{2,|\Delta \eta| > 0.8\}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The ratio $v_2\{4\}/v_2\{2,|\Delta \eta| > 0.8\}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The ratio $v_2\{4\}/v_2\{2,|\Delta \eta| > 0.8\}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The ratio $v_2\{4\}/v_2\{2,|\Delta \eta| > 0.8\}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The ratio $v_2\{4\}/v_2\{2,|\Delta \eta| > 0.8\}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The ratio $v_2\{4\}/v_2\{2,|\Delta \eta| > 0.8\}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The ratio $v_2\{4\}/v_2\{2,|\Delta \eta| > 0.8\}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The ratio $v_2\{4\}/v_2\{2,|\Delta \eta| > 0.8\}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The ratio $v_2\{4\}/v_2\{2,|\Delta \eta| > 0.8\}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The ratio $v_2\{4\}/v_2\{2,|\Delta \eta| > 0.8\}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The ratio $v_2\{4\}/v_2\{2,|\Delta \eta| > 0.8\}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The ratio $v_2\{4\}/v_2\{2,|\Delta \eta| > 0.8\}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The ratio $v_2\{4\}/v_2\{2,|\Delta \eta| > 0.8\}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The ratio $v_2\{4\}/v_2\{2,|\Delta \eta| > 0.8\}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The ratio $v_2\{4\}/v_2\{2,|\Delta \eta| > 0.8\}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The ratio $v_2\{4\}/v_2\{2,|\Delta \eta| > 0.8\}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The ratio $v_2\{4\}/v_2\{2,|\Delta \eta| > 0.8\}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

The ratio $v_2\{4\}/v_2\{2,|\Delta \eta| > 0.8\}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ for different particle species and centralities in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}} = 5.02$ TeV.

Comparisons of the data and the expected background distributions of the WZ invariant mass in the ANN-based VBF signal region. The background predictions are obtained through a background-only simultaneous fit to the VBF signal region and the WZ-QCD and ZZ VBF control regions. The yields are normalized to the bin width

Comparisons of the observed data and the expected background distributions of the WZ invariant mass using the cut-based VBF selection. The background predictions are obtained through a background-only simultaneous fit to the VBF cut-based signal region and the WZ-QCD and ZZ VBF control regions. The yields are normalized to the bin width.

Comparisons of the observed data and the expected background distributions of the WZ invariant mass using the cut-based VBF selection. The background predictions are obtained through a background-only simultaneous fit to the VBF cut-based signal region and the WZ-QCD and ZZ VBF control regions. The yields are normalized to the bin width.

Drell-Yan signal region selection cutflow for a simulated W' in the HVT model A with m_W' = 1 TeV. The unweighted number of events is shown.

Drell-Yan signal region selection cutflow for a simulated W' in the HVT model A with m_W' = 1 TeV. The unweighted number of events is shown.

VBF signal region selection cutflow for a simulated W' in the HVT model C with m_W' = 500 GeV. The unweighted number of events is shown.

VBF signal region selection cutflow for a simulated W' in the HVT model C with m_W' = 500 GeV. The unweighted number of events is shown.

VBF signal region selection cutflow for a simulated H5+ in the GM model with m_H5+ = 450 GeV. The unweighted number of events is shown.

VBF signal region selection cutflow for a simulated H5+ in the GM model with m_H5+ = 450 GeV. The unweighted number of events is shown.

The acceptancetimes efficiencyof the HVT W' in the Drell-Yan signal region for different mass points and for the individual channels and the sum of all channels. The uncertainty includes both statistical and experimental systematic components.

The acceptancetimes efficiencyof the HVT W' in the Drell-Yan signal region for different mass points and for the individual channels and the sum of all channels. The uncertainty includes both statistical and experimental systematic components.

The acceptancetimes efficiencyof VBF H5+ selection after the ANN-based VBF selection at different mass points for the individual channels and the sum of all channels. The uncertainty includes both statistical and experimental systematic components.

The acceptancetimes efficiencyof VBF H5+ selection after the ANN-based VBF selection at different mass points for the individual channels and the sum of all channels. The uncertainty includes both statistical and experimental systematic components.

The acceptancetimes efficiencyof VBF HVT W' selection after the ANN-based VBF selection at different mass points for the individual channels and the sum of all channels. The uncertainty includes both statistical and experimental systematic components.

The acceptancetimes efficiencyof VBF HVT W' selection after the ANN-based VBF selection at different mass points for the individual channels and the sum of all channels. The uncertainty includes both statistical and experimental systematic components.

The acceptancetimes efficiencyof VBF H5+ selection after the cut-based VBF selection at different mass points for the individual channels and the sum of all channels. The uncertainty includes both statistical and experimental systematic components.

The acceptancetimes efficiencyof VBF H5+ selection after the cut-based VBF selection at different mass points for the individual channels and the sum of all channels. The uncertainty includes both statistical and experimental systematic components.

The acceptancetimes efficiencyof VBF HVT W' selection after the cut-based VBF selection at different mass points for the individual channels and the sum of all channels. The uncertainty includes both statistical and experimental systematic components.

The acceptancetimes efficiencyof VBF HVT W' selection after the cut-based VBF selection at different mass points for the individual channels and the sum of all channels. The uncertainty includes both statistical and experimental systematic components.

Observed and expected 95% CL exclusion upper limits on sigma * B(W' -> WZ) for the Drell-Yan production of a W' boson in the HVT model as a function of its mass. The LO theory predictions for HVT Model A with g_V=1 and Model B with g_V=$ are also shown.

Observed and expected 95% CL exclusion upper limits on sigma * B(W' -> WZ) for the Drell-Yan production of a W' boson in the HVT model as a function of its mass. The LO theory predictions for HVT Model A with g_V=1 and Model B with g_V=3 are also shown.

Using the ANN VBF selection, observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on sigma * B(W' -> WZ) for the VBF production of a W' boson in the HVT with parameter c_F=0, as a function of its mass. The LO theory predictions for HVT VBF model with different values of the coupling parameters g_V and c_H are also shown.

Using the ANN VBF selection, observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on sigma * B(W' -> WZ) for the VBF production of a W' boson in the HVT with parameter c_F=0, as a function of its mass. The LO theory predictions for HVT VBF model with different values of the coupling parameters g_V and c_H are also shown.

Using the ANN VBF selection, observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on sigma * B(W' -> WZ) of the GM model as a function of m_H_5.

Using the ANN VBF selection, observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on sigma * B(W' -> WZ) of the GM model as a function of m_H_5.

Using the ANN VBF selection, observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on sin(thetaH) of the GM model as a function of m_H_5.

Using the ANN VBF selection, observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on sin(thetaH) of the GM model as a function of m_H_5.

Using the cut-based VBF selection, observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on sigma * B(W' -> WZ) for the VBF production of a W' boson in the HVT with parameter c_F=0, as a function of its mass. The LO theory predictions for HVT VBF model with different values of the coupling parameters g_V and c_H are also shown.

Using the cut-based VBF selection, observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on sigma * B(W' -> WZ) for the VBF production of a W' boson in the HVT with parameter c_F=0, as a function of its mass. The LO theory predictions for HVT VBF model with different values of the coupling parameters g_V and c_H are also shown.

Using the cut-based VBF selection, observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on sigma * B(W' -> WZ) of the GM model as a function of m_H_5.

Using the cut-based VBF selection, observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on sigma * B(W' -> WZ) of the GM model as a function of m_H_5.

Using the cut-based VBF selection, observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on sin(thetaH) of the GM model as a function of m_H_5.

Using the cut-based VBF selection, observed and expected 95% CL upper limits on sin(thetaH) of the GM model as a function of m_H_5.

The unfolded differential charge asymmetry as a function of the transverse momentum of the top pair system. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NNLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The scale uncertainty is obtained by varying renormalisation and factorisation scales independently by a factor of 2 or 0.5 around $\mu_0$ to calculate the maximum and minimum value of the asymmetry, respectively. The nominal value $\mu_0$ is chosen as $H_T/4$. The variations in which one scale is multiplied by 2 while the other scale is divided by 2 are excluded. Finally, the scale and MC integration uncertainties are added in quadrature.

The unfolded differential charge asymmetry as a function of the longitudinal boost of the top pair system. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NNLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The scale uncertainty is obtained by varying renormalisation and factorisation scales independently by a factor of 2 or 0.5 around $\mu_0$ to calculate the maximum and minimum value of the asymmetry, respectively. The nominal value $\mu_0$ is chosen as $H_T/4$. The variations in which one scale is multiplied by 2 while the other scale is divided by 2 are excluded. Finally, the scale and MC integration uncertainties are added in quadrature.

The unfolded inclusive leptonic asymmetry. The unfolded $A_C^{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ is obtained in the reduced phase-space defined by the requirement $|\Delta |\eta_{\ell\bar{\ell}}||<2.5$. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The theory uncertainty is obtained by varying both scales by a factor of 0.5 or 2.0 to calculate the minimum and maximum value of the asymmetry, respectively.

The unfolded differential leptonic asymmetry as a function of the invariant mass of the di-lepton pair. The unfolded $A_C^{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ is obtained in the reduced phase-space defined by the requirement $|\Delta |\eta_{\ell\bar{\ell}}||<2.5$. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The theory uncertainty is obtained by varying both scales by a factor of 0.5 or 2.0 to calculate the minimum and maximum value of the asymmetry, respectively.

The unfolded differential leptonic asymmetry as a function of the transverse momentum of the di-lepton pair. The unfolded $A_C^{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ is obtained in the reduced phase-space defined by the requirement $|\Delta |\eta_{\ell\bar{\ell}}||<2.5$. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The theory uncertainty is obtained by varying both scales by a factor of 0.5 or 2.0 to calculate the minimum and maximum value of the asymmetry, respectively.

The unfolded differential leptonic asymmetry as a function of the longitudinal boost of the di-lepton pair. The unfolded $A_C^{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ is obtained in the reduced phase-space defined by the requirement $|\Delta |\eta_{\ell\bar{\ell}}||<2.5$. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The theory uncertainty is obtained by varying both scales by a factor of 0.5 or 2.0 to calculate the minimum and maximum value of the asymmetry, respectively.

Individual 68% and 95% CL bounds on the relevant Wilson coefficients of the SM Effective Field Theory in units of $\text{TeV}^{-2}$. The bounds are derived from the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ inclusive measurement. The experimental uncertainties are accounted for, in the form of the complete covariance matrix that keeps track of correlations between bins for the differential measurement. The theory uncertainty from the NNLO QCD + NLO EW calculation is included by explicitly varying the renormalization and factorization scales, or the parton density functions, in the calculation and registering the variations in the intervals.

Individual 68% and 95% CL bounds on the relevant Wilson coefficients of the SM Effective Field Theory in units of $\text{TeV}^{-2}$. The bounds are derived from the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement. The experimental uncertainties are accounted for, in the form of the complete covariance matrix that keeps track of correlations between bins for the differential measurement. The theory uncertainty from the NNLO QCD + NLO EW calculation is included by explicitly varying the renormalization and factorization scales, or the parton density functions, in the calculation and registering the variations in the intervals.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ inclusive measurement. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [0,0.3]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [0.3,0.6]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [0.6,0.8]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [0.8,1]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $m_{t\bar{t}}$ < 500 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $m_{t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [500,750] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $m_{t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [750,1000] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $m_{t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [1000,1500] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $m_{t\bar{t}}$ > 1500 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ < 30 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [30,120] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ > 120 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ inclusive measurement. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$[0,0.3]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$[0.3,0.6]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$[0.6,0.8]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$[0.8,1]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ < 200 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$ [200,300] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$ [300,400] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ > 400 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ < 20 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$ [20, 70] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ > 70 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ inclusive measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ inclusive measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ measurement.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement.

Negative log-likelihood difference in $\text{c}_{\varphi\text{Q}}^{3}$ where the other Wilson coefficients are fixed to 0.

Negative log-likelihood difference in $\text{c}_{\varphi\text{t}}$ where the other Wilson coefficients are fixed to 0.

Negative log-likelihood difference in $\text{c}_{\varphi\text{tb}}$ where the other Wilson coefficients are fixed to 0.

Negative log-likelihood difference in $\text{c}_{\text{tW}}$ where the other Wilson coefficients are fixed to 0.

Negative log-likelihood difference in $\text{c}_{\text{bW}}$ where the other Wilson coefficients are fixed to 0.

Negative log-likelihood difference in $\text{c}_{\text{tZ}}$ where the other Wilson coefficients are fixed to 0.

Negative log-likelihood difference in $\text{c}_{\text{t}\varphi}$ where the other Wilson coefficients are simultaneously fit.

Negative log-likelihood difference in $\text{c}_{\varphi\text{Q}}^{-}$ where the other Wilson coefficients are simultaneously fit.

Negative log-likelihood difference in $\text{c}_{\varphi\text{Q}}^{3}$ where the other Wilson coefficients are simultaneously fit.

Negative log-likelihood difference in $\text{c}_{\varphi\text{t}}$ where the other Wilson coefficients are simultaneously fit.

Negative log-likelihood difference in $\text{c}_{\varphi\text{tb}}$ where the other Wilson coefficients are simultaneously fit.

Negative log-likelihood difference in $\text{c}_{\text{tW}}$ where the other Wilson coefficients are simultaneously fit.

Negative log-likelihood difference in $\text{c}_{\text{bW}}$ where the other Wilson coefficients are simultaneously fit.

Negative log-likelihood difference in $\text{c}_{\text{tZ}}$ where the other Wilson coefficients are simultaneously fit.

Negative log-likelihood difference in $\text{c}_{\varphi\text{t}}, \text{c}_{\varphi\text{Q}}^{-}$ where the other Wilson coefficients are fixed to 0.

Negative log-likelihood difference in $\text{c}_{\varphi\text{Q}}^{3}, \text{c}_{\varphi\text{Q}}^{-}$ where the other Wilson coefficients are fixed to 0.

Negative log-likelihood difference in $\text{c}_{\text{tW}}, \text{c}_{\text{tZ}}$ where the other Wilson coefficients are fixed to 0.

Lepton-charge asymmetry $A_{ch} = \frac{N_{\mu^+} - N_{\mu^-}}{N_{\mu^+} + N_{\mu^-}}$ in p-Pb, in rapidity bins

Nuclear modification factor $R_{pPb} = \frac{1}{208}\frac{\sigma_{pPb}}{\sigma_{pp}}$ in p-Pb. pp reference from POWHEG+CT10 calculations.

Nuclear modification factor $R_{pPb} = \frac{1}{208}\frac{\sigma_{pPb}}{\sigma_{pp}}$ in p-Pb, in rapidity bins. pp reference from POWHEG+CT10 calculations.

Cross section vs. multiplicity, scaled with the average number of binary nucleon-nucleon collisions $< N^{\rm mult}_{\rm coll} >$ in p-Pb

$\sigma$ of muons from W decays in Pb-Pb with 0-90% centrality

Lepton-charge asymmetry $A_{ch} = \frac{N_{\mu^+} - N_{\mu^-}}{N_{\mu^+} + N_{\mu^-}}$ in Pb-Pb with 0-90% centrality

Yield of muons from W decays per Minimum Bias (MB) event scaled with the average nuclear overlap $< T_{\rm AA} >$ ($\frac{1}{<T_{\rm AA}>} \frac{N_{\mu \leftarrow W}}{N^{\rm MB}_{\rm events}}$) in Pb-Pb

Nuclear modification factor $R_{PbPb} = \frac{1}{< T_{\rm AA} >} \frac{N^{\rm MB}_{\mu^\pm \leftarrow W^\pm}}{\sigma_{pp}}$ in Pb-Pb. pp reference from POWHEG+CT10 calculations.

Nuclear modification factor $R_{PbPb} = \frac{1}{< T_{\rm AA} >} \frac{N^{\rm MB}_{\mu^\pm \leftarrow W^\pm}}{\sigma_{pp}}$ in Pb-Pb in centrality bins. pp reference from POWHEG+CT10 calculations.

Groomed jet radius (scaled) $\theta_{{\mathrm{g}}}$ $60<p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch\;jet}}<80$ GeV/$c$, soft drop $z_{\mathrm{cut}}=0.1, \beta=0$. Note: The first bin corresponds to the Soft Drop untagged fraction. For the "trkeff" and "generator" systematic uncertainty sources, the signed systematic uncertainty breakdowns ($\pm$ vs. $\mp$), denote correlation across bins (both within this table, and across tables). For the remaining sources ("unfolding") no correlation information is specified ($\pm$ is always used).

Groomed jet radius (scaled) $\theta_{{\mathrm{g}}}$ $60<p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch\;jet}}<80$ GeV/$c$, soft drop $z_{\mathrm{cut}}=0.1, \beta=1$. Note: The first bin corresponds to the Soft Drop untagged fraction. For the "trkeff" and "generator" systematic uncertainty sources, the signed systematic uncertainty breakdowns ($\pm$ vs. $\mp$), denote correlation across bins (both within this table, and across tables). For the remaining sources ("unfolding") no correlation information is specified ($\pm$ is always used).

Groomed jet radius (scaled) $\theta_{{\mathrm{g}}}$ $60<p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch\;jet}}<80$ GeV/$c$, soft drop $z_{\mathrm{cut}}=0.1, \beta=2$. Note: The first bin corresponds to the Soft Drop untagged fraction. For the "trkeff" and "generator" systematic uncertainty sources, the signed systematic uncertainty breakdowns ($\pm$ vs. $\mp$), denote correlation across bins (both within this table, and across tables). For the remaining sources ("unfolding") no correlation information is specified ($\pm$ is always used).

Groomed jet momentum splitting fraction $z_{{\mathrm{g}}}$ $60<p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch\;jet}}<80$ GeV/$c$, dynamical grooming $a=0.1$. For the "trkeff" and "generator" systematic uncertainty sources, the signed systematic uncertainty breakdowns ($\pm$ vs. $\mp$), denote correlation across bins (both within this table, and across tables). For the remaining sources ("unfolding") no correlation information is specified ($\pm$ is always used).

Groomed jet momentum splitting fraction $z_{{\mathrm{g}}}$ $60<p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch\;jet}}<80$ GeV/$c$, dynamical grooming $a=1.0$. For the "trkeff" and "generator" systematic uncertainty sources, the signed systematic uncertainty breakdowns ($\pm$ vs. $\mp$), denote correlation across bins (both within this table, and across tables). For the remaining sources ("unfolding") no correlation information is specified ($\pm$ is always used).

Groomed jet momentum splitting fraction $z_{{\mathrm{g}}}$ $60<p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch\;jet}}<80$ GeV/$c$, dynamical grooming $a=2.0$. For the "trkeff" and "generator" systematic uncertainty sources, the signed systematic uncertainty breakdowns ($\pm$ vs. $\mp$), denote correlation across bins (both within this table, and across tables). For the remaining sources ("unfolding") no correlation information is specified ($\pm$ is always used).

Groomed jet radius (scaled) $\theta_{{\mathrm{g}}}$ $60<p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch\;jet}}<80$ GeV/$c$, dynamical grooming $a=0.1$. For the "trkeff" and "generator" systematic uncertainty sources, the signed systematic uncertainty breakdowns ($\pm$ vs. $\mp$), denote correlation across bins (both within this table, and across tables). For the remaining sources ("unfolding") no correlation information is specified ($\pm$ is always used).

Groomed jet radius (scaled) $\theta_{{\mathrm{g}}}$ $60<p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch\;jet}}<80$ GeV/$c$, dynamical grooming $a=1.0$. For the "trkeff" and "generator" systematic uncertainty sources, the signed systematic uncertainty breakdowns ($\pm$ vs. $\mp$), denote correlation across bins (both within this table, and across tables). For the remaining sources ("unfolding") no correlation information is specified ($\pm$ is always used).

Groomed jet radius (scaled) $\theta_{{\mathrm{g}}}$ $60<p_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{ch\;jet}}<80$ GeV/$c$, dynamical grooming $a=2.0$. For the "trkeff" and "generator" systematic uncertainty sources, the signed systematic uncertainty breakdowns ($\pm$ vs. $\mp$), denote correlation across bins (both within this table, and across tables). For the remaining sources ("unfolding") no correlation information is specified ($\pm$ is always used).

Summary of the total efficiencies. Quoted uncertainties correspond to statistical uncertainties of the simulated samples used. For the $B_c^+\to J/\psi \pi^+$ channel, the efficiency $\epsilon_{B_c^+\to J/\psi \pi^+}$ entering the equations for $R_{D_s^{(*)+}/\pi^+}$ is shown, while the efficiency for the full dataset is not defined.

Centrality dependence of $\rho\left(v_{2}^{2}, v_{3}^{2}, [p_{\rm T}] \right)$ in Pb--Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$ = 5.02 TeV

The $M_{JJ}$ distribution for the number of observed events (black markers) compared with the estimated backgrounds (filled histograms) and their uncertainties (hatched areas) in the SR1. The distributions expected from the signal under three $M_X$ and $M_Y$ hypotheses and assuming a cross section of 1 fb are also shown. The lower panels show the ''Pulls'' defined as (observed events - expected events)/$\sqrt{\smash[b]{\sigma_{obs}^{2} - \sigma_{exp}^{2}}}$, where $\sigma_{obs}$ and $\sigma_{exp}$ are the statistical and total uncertainties in the observation and the background estimation, respectively. The minus sign accounts for the correlation between data and the data-driven estimation.

The 95% confidence level expected and observed upper limits on $\sigma$(pp->X->YH->4b) for different values of $M_X$ and $M_Y$. The areas within the red and black contours represent the regions where the cross sections predicted by NMSSM and TRSM, respectively, are larger than the experimental limits. The areas within the dashed and dotted contours show the excluded masses at -1 standard deviation from the expected limits.

The soft-drop mass distribution of the top quark candidate jets in the 2018 jets+lepton category, in the tight ParticleNet region, after the joint fit in all-jets and jets+lepton categories. Observed data (black markers) and the postfit estimate (filled histograms) are shown for the three jet categories. The lower panel shows the ''Pulls'' defined as (observed events - expected events)/$\sqrt{\smash[b]{\sigma_{obs}^{2} + \sigma_{exp}^{2}}}$, where $\sigma_{obs}$ and $\sigma_{exp}$ are the statistical and total uncertainties in the observation and the background estimation, respectively.

The 95% confidence level expected and observed upper limits on $\sigma$(pp->X->YH->4b) for different values of $M_X$ and $M_Y$. The areas within the red and black contours represent the regions where the cross sections predicted by NMSSM and TRSM, respectively, are larger than the experimental limits. The areas within the dashed and dotted contours on the left show the excluded masses at -1 standard deviation from the expected limits.