Spin transfer $D_{LL}$ for positive and negative $\eta$ versus $p_T$ for JP1 and L2JetHigh triggered data samples, together with results previously published in [Phys.Rev. D80 (2009) 111102 (R)].

Spin transfer $D_{LL}$ for positive and negative $\eta$ versus $p_T$ for JP1 and L2JetHigh triggered data samples, together with results previously published in [Phys.Rev. D80 (2009) 111102 (R)]. Results updated with $\alpha_{\Lambda (\bar{\Lambda})} = 0.732$.

Spin transfer $D_{LL}$ for positive $\eta$ versus $p_T$.

Spin transfer $D_{LL}$ for positive $\eta$ versus $p_T$. Results updated with $\alpha_{\Lambda (\bar{\Lambda})} = 0.732$

Vertex selection efficiency for the $\tilde{t}$ $R$-hadron benchmark model as a function of the transverse decay distance $r_{DV}$.

Track multiplicity $n_{Tracks}$ for preselected DVs in MET-triggered events with at least one muon passing the full selection. Along with the data shown with black markers, the stacked filled histograms represent the background estimates, and predictions for signal scenarios are overlaid with dashed lines. The errors include statistical and systematic uncertainties and are indicated by hatched bands. The DV full selection requirements, $n_{Tracks} \geq 3$ and $m_{DV} > 20$ GeV are visualized with a black arrow.

Track multiplicity $n_{Tracks}$ for preselected DVs in MET-triggered events with at least one muon passing the full selection. Along with the data shown with black markers, the stacked filled histograms represent the background estimates, and predictions for signal scenarios are overlaid with dashed lines. The errors include statistical and systematic uncertainties and are indicated by hatched bands. The DV full selection requirements, $n_{Tracks} \geq 3$ and $m_{DV} > 20$ GeV are visualized with a black arrow.

Track multiplicity $n_{Tracks}$ for preselected DVs in muon-triggered events with at least one muon passing the full selection. Along with the data shown with black markers, the stacked filled histograms represent the background estimates, and predictions for signal scenarios are overlaid with dashed lines. The errors include statistical and systematic uncertainties and are indicated by hatched bands. The DV full selection requirements, $n_{Tracks} \geq 3$ and $m_{DV} > 20$ GeV are visualized with a black arrow.

Track multiplicity $n_{Tracks}$ for preselected DVs in muon-triggered events with at least one muon passing the full selection. Along with the data shown with black markers, the stacked filled histograms represent the background estimates, and predictions for signal scenarios are overlaid with dashed lines. The errors include statistical and systematic uncertainties and are indicated by hatched bands. The DV full selection requirements, $n_{Tracks} \geq 3$ and $m_{DV} > 20$ GeV are visualized with a black arrow.

Invariant mass $m_{DV}$ for the highest-mass preselected DV with at least three associated tracks in MET-triggered events with at least one muon passing the full selection. Along with the data shown with black markers, the stacked filled histograms represent the background estimates, and predictions for signal scenarios are overlaid with dashed lines. The errors include statistical and systematic uncertainties and are indicated by hatched bands. The DV full selection requirements, $n_{Tracks} \geq 3$ and $m_{DV} > 20$ GeV are visualized with a black arrow.

Invariant mass $m_{DV}$ for the highest-mass preselected DV with at least three associated tracks in MET-triggered events with at least one muon passing the full selection. Along with the data shown with black markers, the stacked filled histograms represent the background estimates, and predictions for signal scenarios are overlaid with dashed lines. The errors include statistical and systematic uncertainties and are indicated by hatched bands. The DV full selection requirements, $n_{Tracks} \geq 3$ and $m_{DV} > 20$ GeV are visualized with a black arrow.

Invariant mass $m_{DV}$ for the highest-mass preselected DV with at least three associated tracks in muon-triggered events with at least one muon passing the full selection. Along with the data shown with black markers, the stacked filled histograms represent the background estimates, and predictions for signal scenarios are overlaid with dashed lines. The errors include statistical and systematic uncertainties and are indicated by hatched bands. The DV full selection requirements, $n_{Tracks} \geq 3$ and $m_{DV} > 20$ GeV are visualized with a black arrow.

Invariant mass $m_{DV}$ for the highest-mass preselected DV with at least three associated tracks in muon-triggered events with at least one muon passing the full selection. Along with the data shown with black markers, the stacked filled histograms represent the background estimates, and predictions for signal scenarios are overlaid with dashed lines. The errors include statistical and systematic uncertainties and are indicated by hatched bands. The DV full selection requirements, $n_{Tracks} \geq 3$ and $m_{DV} > 20$ GeV are visualized with a black arrow.

The observed event yields in the control, validation and signal regions are shown for the MET Trigger selections, along with the predicted background yields. The bottom panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total background yields. The errors represent the total uncertainty of the backgrounds prediction, including the statistical and systematic uncertainties added in quadrature.

The observed event yields in the control, validation and signal regions are shown for the MET Trigger selections, along with the predicted background yields. The bottom panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total background yields. The errors represent the total uncertainty of the backgrounds prediction, including the statistical and systematic uncertainties added in quadrature.

The observed event yields in the control, validation and signal regions are shown for the Muon Trigger selections, along with the predicted background yields. The bottom panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total background yields. The errors represent the total uncertainty of the backgrounds prediction, including the statistical and systematic uncertainties added in quadrature.

The observed event yields in the control, validation and signal regions are shown for the Muon Trigger selections, along with the predicted background yields. The bottom panel shows the ratio of observed events to the total background yields. The errors represent the total uncertainty of the backgrounds prediction, including the statistical and systematic uncertainties added in quadrature.

Expected exclusion limits at 95% CL on m($\tilde{t}$) as a function of $\tau(\tilde{t})$.

Expected exclusion limits at 95% CL on m($\tilde{t}$) as a function of $\tau(\tilde{t})$.

Expected (1 sigma band) exclusion limits at 95% CL on m($\tilde{t}$) as a function of $\tau(\tilde{t})$.

Expected (1 sigma band) exclusion limits at 95% CL on m($\tilde{t}$) as a function of $\tau(\tilde{t})$.

Expected (2 sigma band) exclusion limits at 95% CL on m($\tilde{t}$) as a function of $\tau(\tilde{t})$.

Expected (2 sigma band) exclusion limits at 95% CL on m($\tilde{t}$) as a function of $\tau(\tilde{t})$.

Observed exclusion limits at 95% CL on m($\tilde{t}$) as a function of $\tau(\tilde{t})$.

Observed exclusion limits at 95% CL on m($\tilde{t}$) as a function of $\tau(\tilde{t})$.

Observed (+1 sigma) exclusion limits at 95% CL on m($\tilde{t}$) as a function of $\tau(\tilde{t})$.

Observed (+1 sigma) exclusion limits at 95% CL on m($\tilde{t}$) as a function of $\tau(\tilde{t})$.

Observed (-1 sigma) exclusion limits at 95% CL on m($\tilde{t}$) as a function of $\tau(\tilde{t})$.

Observed (-1 sigma) exclusion limits at 95% CL on m($\tilde{t}$) as a function of $\tau(\tilde{t})$.

Exclusion limits on the production cross section as a function of m($\tilde{t}$) are shown for several values of $\tau(\tilde{t})$ along with the nominal signal production cross section and its theoretical uncertainty.

Exclusion limits on the production cross section as a function of m($\tilde{t}$) are shown for several values of $\tau(\tilde{t})$ along with the nominal signal production cross section and its theoretical uncertainty.

Parameterized event selection efficiencies for the $E_{T}^{miss}$ Trigger SR. The event-level efficiencies for each SR are extracted for all events passing the acceptance of the corresponding SR.

Parameterized event selection efficiencies for the $E_{T}^{miss}$ Trigger SR. The event-level efficiencies for each SR are extracted for all events passing the acceptance of the corresponding SR.

Parameterized event selection efficiencies for the Muon Trigger SR. The event-level efficiencies for each SR are extracted for all events passing the acceptance of the corresponding SR.

Parameterized event selection efficiencies for the Muon Trigger SR. The event-level efficiencies for each SR are extracted for all events passing the acceptance of the corresponding SR.

Parameterized muon-level reconstruction efficiencies as a function of the muon $p_{T}$ and $d_{0}$. The muon-level efficiencies are extracted using muons passing the muon acceptance criteria.

Parameterized muon-level reconstruction efficiencies as a function of the muon $p_{T}$ and $d_{0}$. The muon-level efficiencies are extracted using muons passing the muon acceptance criteria.

Parameterized vertex-level reconstruction efficiencies as a function of the radial position of the truth vertex. The efficiency is calculated independent of the muons originating from this truth vertex.

Parameterized vertex-level reconstruction efficiencies as a function of the radial position of the truth vertex. The efficiency is calculated independent of the muons originating from this truth vertex.

Parameterized vertex-level reconstruction efficiencies as a function of the radial position of the truth vertex. The efficiency is calculated only for truth vertices which have a muon originating from them which is matched to a reconstructed muon.

Parameterized vertex-level reconstruction efficiencies as a function of the radial position of the truth vertex. The efficiency is calculated only for truth vertices which have a muon originating from them which is matched to a reconstructed muon.

The $p_{T}$ distribution of all muons originating from LLP decays in the samples used to calculate and validate the efficiencies.

The $p_{T}$ distribution of all muons originating from LLP decays in the samples used to calculate and validate the efficiencies.

The invariant mass and multiplicity of selected decay products of all truth vertices used in the calculation and validation of the reconstructed efficiencies.

The invariant mass and multiplicity of selected decay products of all truth vertices used in the calculation and validation of the reconstructed efficiencies.

The intercept parameter as a function of kT using the HCS method in pp collisions at 13 TeV.

1/Rinv^2 as a function of mT using the HCS method in pp collisions at 13 TeV.

The depth of the anticorrelation as function of multiplicity for kT integrated values.

Correlation function from the double ratio technique, integrated in the range 0 < kT < 1 GeV, for 0=<Ntrkoffline<=4. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties.

Correlation function from the double ratio technique, integrated in the range 0 < kT < 1 GeV, for 10=<Ntrkoffline<=12. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties.

Correlation function from the double ratio technique, integrated in the range 0 < kT < 1 GeV, for 31=<Ntrkoffline<=33. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties.

Correlation function from the double ratio technique, integrated in the range 0 < kT < 1 GeV, for 80=<Ntrkoffline<=84. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties.

Correlation function from the double ratio technique, integrated in the range 0 < kT < 1 GeV, for 105=<Ntrkoffline<=109. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties.

Correlation function from the double ratio technique, integrated in the range 0 < kT < 1 GeV, for 130=<Ntrkoffline<=250. The error bars represent statistical uncertainties.

'The relative dynamical correlation as a function of $N_{part}$'

'The relative dynamical correlation as a function of $N_{part}$'

'The relative dynamical correlation as a function of $N_{part}$'

'The relative dynamical correlation as a function of $N_{part}$'

'The relative dynamical correlation as a function of $N_{part}$'

'The UrQMD calculations of relative dynamical correlation as a function of $N_{part}$'

'The UrQMD calculations of relative dynamical correlation as a function of $N_{part}$'

'The UrQMD calculations of relative dynamical correlation as a function of $N_{part}$'

'The UrQMD calculations of relative dynamical correlation as a function of $N_{part}$'

'The UrQMD calculations of relative dynamical correlation as a function of $N_{part}$'

'The UrQMD calculations of relative dynamical correlation as a function of $N_{part}$'

'The UrQMD calculations of relative dynamical correlation as a function of $N_{part}$'

'The UrQMD calculations of relative dynamical correlation as a function of $N_{part}$'

'ratios of the measured data to the power law as a function of $N_{part}$'

'ratios of the measured data to the power law as a function of $N_{part}$'

'ratios of the measured data to the power law as a function of $N_{part}$'

'ratios of the measured data to the power law as a function of $N_{part}$'

'ratios of the measured data to the power law as a function of $N_{part}$'

'ratios of the measured data to the power law as a function of $N_{part}$'

'ratios of the measured data to the power law as a function of $N_{part}$'

'ratios of the measured data to the power law as a function of $N_{part}$'

'The ratios of the measured data to UrQMD calculations as a function of $N_{part}$'

'The ratios of the measured data to UrQMD calculations as a function of $N_{part}$'

'The ratios of the measured data to UrQMD calculations as a function of $N_{part}$'

'The ratios of the measured data to UrQMD calculations as a function of $N_{part}$'

'The ratios of the measured data to UrQMD calculations as a function of $N_{part}$'

'The ratios of the measured data to UrQMD calculations as a function of $N_{part}$'

'The ratios of the measured data to UrQMD calculations as a function of $N_{part}$'

'The ratios of the measured data to UrQMD calculations as a function of $N_{part}$'

'The UrQMD calculations of relative dynamical correlation as a function of $N_{part}$'

'The UrQMD calculations of relative dynamical correlation as a function of $N_{part}$'

'The UrQMD calculations of relative dynamical correlation as a function of $N_{part}$'

'The UrQMD calculations of relative dynamical correlation as a function of $N_{part}$'

'The UrQMD calculations of relative dynamical correlation as a function of $N_{part}$'

'The UrQMD calculations of relative dynamical correlation as a function of $N_{part}$'

'The UrQMD calculations of relative dynamical correlation as a function of $N_{part}$'

'The UrQMD calculations of relative dynamical correlation as a function of $N_{part}$'

'Comparison of a model incorporating a Boltzmann-Langevin approach to the calculation of thermalization effects for the relative dynamical correlation as a function of $N_{part}$'

'Comparison of a model incorporating a Boltzmann-Langevin approach to the calculation of thermalization effects for the relative dynamical correlation as a function of $N_{part}$'

'Comparison of a model incorporating a Boltzmann-Langevin approach to the calculation of thermalization effects for the relative dynamical correlation as a function of $N_{part}$'

'Comparison of a model incorporating a Boltzmann-Langevin approach to the calculation of thermalization effects for the relative dynamical correlation as a function of $N_{part}$'

'Comparison of a model incorporating a Boltzmann-Langevin approach to the calculation of thermalization effects for the relative dynamical correlation as a function of $N_{part}$'

'Comparison of a model incorporating a Boltzmann-Langevin approach to the calculation of thermalization effects for the relative dynamical correlation as a function of $N_{part}$'

'Comparison of a model incorporating a Boltzmann-Langevin approach to the calculation of thermalization effects for the relative dynamical correlation as a function of $N_{part}$'

'Comparison of a model incorporating a Boltzmann-Langevin approach to the calculation of thermalization effects for the relative dynamical correlation as a function of $N_{part}$'

'Comparison of a model incorporating a Boltzmann-Langevin approach to the calculation of thermalization effects for the relative dynamical correlation as a function of $N_{part}$'

'relative dynamical correlation as a function of $N_{part}$'

'relative dynamical correlation as a function of $N_{part}$'

'relative dynamical correlation as a function of $N_{part}$'

'relative dynamical correlation as a function of collision energy for the 0-5\% centrality bin'

'relative dynamical correlation as a function of collision energy for the 0-5\% centrality bin'

'relative dynamical correlation as a function of collision energy for the 0-5\% centrality bin'

'relative dynamical correlation as a function of collision energy for the 0-5\% centrality bin'

'relative dynamical correlation as a function of collision energy for the 0-5\% centrality bin'

'transverse momentum spectra for deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'transverse momentum spectra for deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'transverse momentum spectra for deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'transverse momentum spectra for deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'transverse momentum spectra for deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'transverse momentum spectra for deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'transverse momentum spectra for deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'transverse momentum spectra for deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'transverse momentum spectra for deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'transverse momentum spectra for deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'transverse momentum spectra for deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'transverse momentum spectra for deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'transverse momentum spectra for deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'transverse momentum spectra for deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'transverse momentum spectra for deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'transverse momentum spectra for deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'transverse momentum spectra for deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'transverse momentum spectra for deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'transverse momentum spectra for deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'transverse momentum spectra for deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'transverse momentum spectra for deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'transverse momentum spectra for deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'transverse momentum spectra for deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'transverse momentum spectra for deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'transverse momentum spectra for deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'transverse momentum spectra for deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'transverse momentum spectra for deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'transverse momentum spectra for deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'transverse momentum spectra for deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'transverse momentum spectra for deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'transverse momentum spectra for deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'transverse momentum spectra for deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'transverse momentum spectra for deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'transverse momentum spectra for deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'transverse momentum spectra for deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'transverse momentum spectra for deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'transverse momentum spectra for deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'transverse momentum spectra for anti-deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'transverse momentum spectra for anti-deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'transverse momentum spectra for anti-deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'transverse momentum spectra for anti-deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'transverse momentum spectra for anti-deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'transverse momentum spectra for anti-deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'transverse momentum spectra for anti-deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'transverse momentum spectra for anti-deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'transverse momentum spectra for anti-deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'transverse momentum spectra for anti-deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'transverse momentum spectra for anti-deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'transverse momentum spectra for anti-deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'transverse momentum spectra for anti-deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'transverse momentum spectra for anti-deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'transverse momentum spectra for anti-deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'transverse momentum spectra for anti-deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'transverse momentum spectra for anti-deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'transverse momentum spectra for anti-deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'transverse momentum spectra for anti-deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'transverse momentum spectra for anti-deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'transverse momentum spectra for anti-deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'transverse momentum spectra for anti-deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'transverse momentum spectra for anti-deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'transverse momentum spectra for anti-deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'transverse momentum spectra for anti-deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'transverse momentum spectra for anti-deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'transverse momentum spectra for anti-deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'transverse momentum spectra for anti-deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'transverse momentum spectra for anti-deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'transverse momentum spectra for anti-deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'transverse momentum spectra for anti-deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'transverse momentum spectra for anti-deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'transverse momentum spectra for anti-deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'transverse momentum spectra for anti-deuterons in Au+Au collisions'

'Centrality dependence of $<p_{T}>$ of deuterons (top panel) in Au+Au collisions'

'Centrality dependence of $<p_{T}>$ of deuterons (top panel) in Au+Au collisions'

'Centrality dependence of $<p_{T}>$ of deuterons (top panel) in Au+Au collisions'

'Centrality dependence of $<p_{T}>$ of deuterons (top panel) in Au+Au collisions'

'Centrality dependence of $<p_{T}>$ of deuterons (top panel) in Au+Au collisions'

'Centrality dependence of $<p_{T}>$ of deuterons (top panel) in Au+Au collisions'

'Centrality dependence of $<p_{T}>$ of deuterons (top panel) in Au+Au collisions'

'Centrality dependence of $<p_{T}>$ of deuterons (top panel) in Au+Au collisions'

'Centrality dependence of $<p_{T}>$ of anti-deuterons (bottom panel) in Au+Au collisions'

'Centrality dependence of $<p_{T}>$ of anti-deuterons (bottom panel) in Au+Au collisions'

'Centrality dependence of $<p_{T}>$ of anti-deuterons (bottom panel) in Au+Au collisions'

'Centrality dependence of $<p_{T}>$ of anti-deuterons (bottom panel) in Au+Au collisions'

'Centrality dependence of $<p_{T}>$ of anti-deuterons (bottom panel) in Au+Au collisions'

'Centrality dependence of dN/dy normalized by 0.5$<N_{part}>$ of deuterons (top panel) in Au+Au collisions'

'Centrality dependence of dN/dy normalized by 0.5$<N_{part}>$ of deuterons (top panel) in Au+Au collisions'

'Centrality dependence of dN/dy normalized by 0.5$<N_{part}>$ of deuterons (top panel) in Au+Au collisions'

'Centrality dependence of dN/dy normalized by 0.5$<N_{part}>$ of deuterons (top panel) in Au+Au collisions'

'Centrality dependence of dN/dy normalized by 0.5$<N_{part}>$ of deuterons (top panel) in Au+Au collisions'

'Centrality dependence of dN/dy normalized by 0.5$<N_{part}>$ of deuterons (top panel) in Au+Au collisions'

'Centrality dependence of dN/dy normalized by 0.5$<N_{part}>$ of deuterons (top panel) in Au+Au collisions'

'Centrality dependence of dN/dy normalized by 0.5$<N_{part}>$ of deuterons (top panel) in Au+Au collisions'

'Centrality dependence of dN/dy normalized by 0.5$<N_{part}>$ of anti-deuterons (bottom panel) in Au+Au collisions'

'Centrality dependence of dN/dy normalized by 0.5$<N_{part}>$ of anti-deuterons (bottom panel) in Au+Au collisions'

'Centrality dependence of dN/dy normalized by 0.5$<N_{part}>$ of anti-deuterons (bottom panel) in Au+Au collisions'

'Centrality dependence of dN/dy normalized by 0.5$<N_{part}>$ of anti-deuterons (bottom panel) in Au+Au collisions'

'Centrality dependence of dN/dy normalized by 0.5$<N_{part}>$ of anti-deuterons (bottom panel) in Au+Au collisions'

'Centrality dependence of dN/dy normalized by 0.5$<N_{part}>$ of anti-deuterons (bottom panel) in Au+Au collisions'

'Centrality dependence of dN/dy normalized by 0.5$<N_{part}>$ of anti-deuterons (bottom panel) in Au+Au collisions'

'Energy dependence of $\bar{d}/d$ ratios from Au+Au collisions at RHIC'

'Energy dependence of $d/p$ yield ratios'

'Energy dependence of $\bar{d}/\bar{p}$ yield ratios'

'Energy dependence of $d/p^{2}$ yield ratios (top panel)'

'Energy dependence of $\bar{d}/\bar{p}^{2}$ yield ratios (top panel)'

'Coalescence parameter $B_{2}$ as a function of $m_{T}$ $-$ $m_{0}$ for deuterons (left panel)'

'Coalescence parameter $B_{2}$ as a function of $m_{T}$ $-$ $m_{0}$ for anti-deuterons (right panel)'

'Energy dependence of the coalescence parameter for $B_{2}(d)$'

'Energy dependence of the coalescence parameter for $B_{2}(\bar{d})$'

Non-prompt fraction of jpsi production in 5.02 TeV PbPb collision data as a function of pT for integrated centrality in the rapidity range |y| < 2.

The nuclear modification factor as a function of pT for the prompt jpsi for |y|<2, in 0--80% centrality bin.

The nuclear modification factor as a function of pT for the prompt jpsi for |y|<2, in 0--10%, 20--40%, and 40--80% centrality bin.

The nuclear modification factor as a function of pT for the non-prompt jpsi for |y|<2, in 0--80% centrality bin.

The nuclear modification factor as a function of pT for the non-prompt jpsi for |y|<2, in 0--10%, 20--40%, and 40--80% centrality bin.

The nuclear modification factor as a function of pT for the prompt and non-prompt jpsi for |y|<2, in 0--20% centrality bin.

The nuclear modification factor as a function of eta for the prompt jpsi for 9 < pT < 40 GeV, in 0--80% centrality bin.

The nuclear modification factor as a function of eta for the prompt jpsi for 9 < pT < 40 GeV, in 0--10%, 20--40%, and 40--80% centrality bin.

The nuclear modification factor as a function of eta for the non-prompt jpsi for 9 < pT < 40 GeV, in 0--80% centrality bin.

The nuclear modification factor as a function of eta for the non-prompt jpsi for 9 < pT < 40 GeV, in 0--10%, 20--40%, and 40--80% centrality bin.

The nuclear modification factor as a function of Npart for the prompt jpsi for |y|<2, and 9 < pT < 40 GeV

The nuclear modification factor as a function of Npart for the non-prompt jpsi for |y|<2, and 9 < pT < 40 GeV

The double ratio of nuclear modification factor as a function of Npart for the prompt jpsi and psi(2S) for |y|<2, and 9 < pT < 40 GeV

The double ratio nuclear modification factor as a function of Npart for the non-prompt jpsi and psi(2S) for |y|<2, and 9 < pT < 40 GeV

Expected and observed exclusion limits for heavy higgs boson mass 360 GeV

Expected and observed exclusion limits for heavy higgs boson mass 400 GeV

Expected and observed exclusion limits for heavy higgs boson mass 450 GeV

Expected and observed exclusion limits for heavy higgs boson mass 500 GeV

Expected and observed exclusion limits for heavy higgs boson mass 550 GeV

Expected and observed exclusion limits for heavy higgs boson mass 600 GeV

Expected and observed exclusion limits for heavy higgs boson mass 700 GeV

Expected and observed exclusion limits for heavy higgs boson mass 800 GeV

Expected and observed exclusion limits for heavy higgs boson mass 900 GeV

Expected and observed exclusion limits for heavy higgs boson mass 1000 GeV

Expected and observed exclusion limits for heavy higgs boson mass 1200 GeV

Expected and observed exclusion limits for heavy higgs boson mass 1400 GeV

Expected and observed exclusion limits for heavy higgs boson mass 1600 GeV

Expected and observed exclusion limits for heavy higgs boson mass 1800 GeV

Expected and observed exclusion limits for heavy higgs boson mass 2000 GeV

Expected and observed exclusion limits for heavy higgs boson mass 2500 GeV

Expected and observed exclusion limits for heavy higgs boson mass 3000 GeV

Corrected inclusive charged-particle jet distributions in Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV for R=0.2, 0.3, and 0.4 in peripheral (60-80%) Au+Au collisions for pTlead,min = 7 GeV/c. The first uncertainty is statistical (symmetric), followed by shape uncertainty (asymmetric) and correlated uncertainty (asymmetric).

pTlead,min (7/5 GeV/c) ratios of inclusive charged-particle jet distributions in Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV for R=0.2, 0.3, and 0.4 in peripheral Au+Au collisions. The first uncertainty is statistical (symmetric), followed by shape uncertainty (asymmetric) and correlated uncertainty (asymmetric).

pTlead,min (7/5 GeV/c) ratios of inclusive charged-particle jet distributions in Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV for R=0.2, 0.3, and 0.4 in central Au+Au collisions. The first uncertainty is statistical (symmetric), followed by shape uncertainty (asymmetric) and correlated uncertainty (asymmetric).

R_CP (0-10%/60-80%) ratios of inclusive charged-particle jet distributions in Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV for R = 0.2, 0.3, and 0.4 for pTlead,min = 5 GeV/c. The first uncertainty is statistical (symmetric), followed by shape uncertainty (asymmetric) and correlated uncertainty (asymmetric). In addition, the systematic uncertainty for the T_AA normalization (30%) has to be added.

R_CP (0-10%/60-80%) ratios of inclusive charged-particle jet distributions in Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV for R = 0.2 and 0.3 for pTlead,min = 5 GeV/c. The first uncertainty is statistical (symmetric), followed by shape uncertainty (asymmetric) and correlated uncertainty (asymmetric). In the paper are shown all these three uncertainty sources (statistical, shape, correlated) summed in quadrature. The systematic uncertainty for the T_AA normalization (30%) has not been included (as for the other measurements compared with the STAR data).

R_AA for peripheral (60-80%) Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV for R = 0.2, 0.3, and 0.4 for pTlead,min = 5 GeV/c. The first uncertainty is statistical (symmetric), followed by shape uncertainty (asymmetric) and correlated uncertainty (asymmetric). In addition, the systematic uncertainty for the T_AA normalization (29%) and PYTHIA reference (22%, 20%, 18% for R = 0.2, 0.3 and 0.4) have to be added.

R_AA for central (0-10%) Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV for R = 0.2, 0.3, and 0.4 for pTlead,min = 5 GeV/c. The first uncertainty is statistical (symmetric), followed by shape uncertainty (asymmetric) and correlated uncertainty (asymmetric). In addition, the systematic uncertainty for the T_AA normalization (7%) and PYTHIA reference (22%, 20%, 18% for R = 0.2, 0.3 and 0.4) have to be added. The unbiased data points are the 4 highest for R=0.2 and 3 highest for R=0.3 and 0.4, resp.

Ratio of inclusive charged-particle jet yields for R=0.2/R=0.4 for peripheral (60-80%) Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV for pTlead,min = 5 GeV/c (only unbiased region). The first uncertainty is statistical (symmetric), followed by shape uncertainty (asymmetric) and correlated uncertainty (asymmetric). Please note that in the paper, the uncertainties shown are the quadrature sums of the uncertainties listed in the table.

Ratio of inclusive charged-particle jet yields for R=0.2/R=0.4 for central (0-10%) Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV for pTlead,min = 5 GeV/c (only unbiased region). The first uncertainty is statistical (symmetric), followed by shape uncertainty (asymmetric) and correlated uncertainty (asymmetric). Please note that in the paper, the uncertainties shown are the quadrature sums of the uncertainties listed in the table.

Polarization of $\Lambda$ and $\bar\Lambda$ as a function of $\eta$ for the $20\%–60\%$ centrality bin in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200$ GeV. Open boxes and vertical lines show systematic and statistical uncertainties. Note that the data points for Λ are slightly shifted for visibility.

Polarization of $\Lambda$ and $\bar\Lambda$ as a function of observed charge asymmetry $A_{ch}$ normalized with its RMS $\sigma_{A_{ch}}$ for the $20\%–60\%$ centrality bin in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200$ GeV. Open boxes and vertical lines show systematic and statistical uncertainties. Solid and dashed lines show linear fitting functions.

Global polarization of $\Lambda$ and $\bar{\Lambda}$ using the new $\alpha_\Lambda=0.732$ updated on PDG2020 as a function of the collision energy $\sqrt{s_{_{NN}}}$ for 20-50% centrality Au+Au collisions. Thin lines show calculations from a 3+1D cascade + viscous hydrodynamic model (UrQMD+vHLLE) and bold lines show the AMPT model calculations. In the case of each model, primary $\Lambda$ with and without the feed-down effect are indicated by dashed and solid lines, respectively. Open boxes and vertical lines show systematic and statistical uncertainties, respectively. Note that the data points at 200 GeV and for $\bar{\Lambda}$ are slightly horizontally shifted for visibility.

$\Lambda$ ($\bar\Lambda$) polarization using the new $\alpha_\Lambda=0.732$ updated on PDG2020 as a function of the collision centrality in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200$ GeV. Open boxes and vertical lines show systematic and statistical uncertainties. The data points for Λ are slightly shifted for visibility.

Polarization of $\Lambda$ and $\bar\Lambda$ using the new $\alpha_\Lambda=0.732$ updated on PDG2020 as a function of $p_{T}$ for the $20\%–60\%$ centrality bin in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200$ GeV. Open boxes and vertical lines show systematic and statistical uncertainties, respectively. Hydrodynamic model calculations for Λ with two different initial conditions (IC) are compared. Note that the data points for Λ are slightly shifted for visibility.

Polarization of $\Lambda$ and $\bar\Lambda$ using the new $\alpha_\Lambda=0.732$ updated on PDG2020 as a function of $\eta$ for the $20\%–60\%$ centrality bin in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200$ GeV. Open boxes and vertical lines show systematic and statistical uncertainties. Note that the data points for Λ are slightly shifted for visibility.

Polarization of $\Lambda$ and $\bar\Lambda$ using the new $\alpha_\Lambda=0.732$ updated on PDG2020 as a function of observed charge asymmetry $A_{ch}$ normalized with its RMS $\sigma_{A_{ch}}$ for the $20\%–60\%$ centrality bin in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200$ GeV. Open boxes and vertical lines show systematic and statistical uncertainties. Solid and dashed lines show linear fitting functions.

'$J/\Psi$ $R_{AA}$ for U+U collisions 193 GeV as a function of $p_T$'

'$J/\Psi$ yield with the expected hadronic contribution subtracted for Au+Au collisions 200 GeV as a function of the negative momentum transfer squared'

'$J/\Psi$ yield with the expected hadronic contribution subtracted for U+U collisions 193 GeV as a function of the negative momentum transfer squared'

'The $p_{T}$-integrated $J/\Psi$ yields ($p_{T}$ < 0.1 GeV/c) with the expected hadronic contribution subtracted for Au+Au collisions 200 GeV as a function of $N_{part}$'

'The $p_{T}$-integrated $J/\Psi$ yields ($p_{T}$ < 0.1 GeV/c) with the expected hadronic contribution subtracted for U+U collisions 193 GeV as a function of $N_{part}$'