Showing 10 of 1057 results
A measurement of prompt photon-pair production in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13$ TeV is presented. The data were recorded by the ATLAS detector at the LHC with an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$. Events with two photons in the well-instrumented region of the detector are selected. The photons are required to be isolated and have a transverse momentum of $p_\mathrm{T,\gamma_{1(2)}} > 40(30)$ GeV for the leading (sub-leading) photon. The differential cross sections as functions of several observables for the diphoton system are measured and compared with theoretical predictions from state-of-the-art Monte Carlo and fixed-order calculations. The QCD predictions from next-to-next-to-leading-order calculations and multi-leg merged calculations are able to describe the measured integrated and differential cross sections within uncertainties, whereas lower-order calculations show significant deviations, demonstrating that higher-order perturbative QCD corrections are crucial for this process. The resummed predictions with parton showers additionally provide an excellent description of the low transverse-momentum regime of the diphoton system.
We report on the measurement of the $\gamma p \rightarrow J/\psi p$ cross section from $E_\gamma = 11.8$ GeV down to the threshold at $8.2$ GeV using a tagged photon beam with the GlueX experiment. We find the total cross section falls toward the threshold less steeply than expected from two-gluon exchange models. The differential cross section $d\sigma /dt$ has an exponential slope of $1.67 \pm 0.39$ GeV$^{-2}$ at $10.7$ GeV average energy. The LHCb pentaquark candidates $P_c^+$ can be produced in the $s$-channel of this reaction. We see no evidence for them and set model-dependent upper limits on their branching fractions $\mathcal{B}(P_c^+ \rightarrow J/\psi p)$ and cross sections $\sigma(\gamma p \to P_c^+)\times\mathcal{B}(P_c^+ \to J/\psi p) $.
We report measurements of the photon beam asymmetry $\Sigma$ for the reaction $\vec{\gamma} p\to K^+\Sigma^0$(1193) using the GlueX spectrometer in Hall D at Jefferson Lab. Data were collected using a linearly polarized photon beam in the energy range of 8.2-8.8 GeV incident on a liquid hydrogen target. The beam asymmetry $\Sigma$ was measured as a function of the Mandelstam variable $t$, and a single value of $\Sigma$ was extracted for events produced in the $u$-channel. These are the first exclusive measurements of the photon beam asymmetry $\Sigma$ for the reaction in this energy range. For the $t$-channel, the measured beam asymmetry is close to unity over the $t$-range studied, $-t=(0.1-1.4)~$(GeV/$c$)$^{2}$, with an average value of $\Sigma = 1.00\pm 0.05$. This agrees with theoretical models that describe the reaction via the natural-parity exchange of the $K^{*}$(892) Regge trajectory. A value of $\Sigma = 0.41 \pm 0.09$ is obtained for the $u$-channel integrated up to $-u=2.0$~(GeV/$c$)$^{2}$.
We report on the measurement of the beam asymmetry $\Sigma$ for the reactions $\vec{\gamma}p\rightarrow p\eta$ and $\vec{\gamma}p \rightarrow p\eta^{\prime}$ from the GlueX experiment, using an 8.2--8.8 GeV linearly polarized tagged photon beam incident on a liquid hydrogen target in Hall D at Jefferson Lab. These measurements are made as a function of momentum transfer $-t$, with significantly higher statistical precision than our earlier $\eta$ measurements, and are the first measurements of $\eta^{\prime}$ in this energy range. We compare the results to theoretical predictions based on $t$--channel quasi-particle exchange. We also compare the ratio of $\Sigma_{\eta}$ to $\Sigma_{\eta^{\prime}}$ to these models, as this ratio is predicted to be sensitive to the amount of $s\bar{s}$ exchange in the production. We find that photoproduction of both $\eta$ and $\eta^{\prime}$ is dominated by natural parity exchange with little dependence on $-t$.
We report a measurement of the $\pi^-$ photoproduction beam asymmetry for the reaction $\vec{\gamma} p \rightarrow \pi^- \Delta^{++}$ using data from the GlueX experiment in the photon beam energy range 8.2--8.8 GeV. The asymmetry $\Sigma$ is measured as a function of four-momentum transfer $t$ to the $\Delta^{++}$ and compared to phenomenological models. We find that $\Sigma$ varies as a function of $t$: negative at smaller values and positive at higher values of $|t|$. The reaction can be described theoretically by $t$-channel particle exchange requiring pseudoscalar, vector, and tensor intermediaries. In particular, this reaction requires charge exchange, allowing us to probe pion exchange and the significance of higher-order corrections to one-pion exchange at low momentum transfer. Constraining production mechanisms of conventional mesons may aid in the search for and study of unconventional mesons. This is the first measurement of the process at this energy.
Exclusive dimuon production in ultraperipheral collisions (UPC), resulting from photon-photon interactions in the strong electromagnetic fields of colliding high-energy lead nuclei, $\mathrm{PbPb}(\gamma\gamma) \rightarrow \mu^+\mu^- (\mathrm{Pb}^{(\star)}\mathrm{Pb}^{(\star)} )$, is studied using $\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{int}} = 0.48$ nb$^{-1}$ of $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}=5.02$ TeV lead-lead collision data at the LHC with the ATLAS detector. Dimuon pairs are measured in the fiducial region $p_{\mathrm{T}\mu} > 4$ GeV, $|\eta_{\mu}| < 2.4$, invariant mass $m_{\mu\mu} > 10$ GeV, and $p_{\mathrm{T,\mu\mu}} < 2$ GeV. The primary background from single-dissociative processes is extracted from the data using a template fitting technique. Differential cross sections are presented as a function of $m_{\mu\mu}$, absolute pair rapidity ($|y_{\mu\mu}|$), scattering angle in the dimuon rest frame ($|\cos \vartheta^{\star}_{\mu\mu}|$) and the colliding photon energies. The total cross section of the UPC $\gamma \gamma \rightarrow \mu^{+}\mu^{-}$ process in the fiducial volume is measured to be $\sigma_{\mathrm{fid}}^{\mu\mu} = 34.1 \! \pm \! 0.3 \mathrm{(stat.)} \! \pm \! 0.7 \mathrm{(syst.)}$ $\mu\mathrm{b}$. Generally good agreement is found with calculations from STARlight, which incorporate the leading-order Breit-Wheeler process with no final-state effects, albeit differences between the measurements and theoretical expectations are observed. In particular, the measured cross sections at larger $|y_{\mu\mu}|$ are found to be about 10-20% larger in data than in the calculations, suggesting the presence of larger fluxes of photons in the initial state. Modification of the dimuon cross sections in the presence of forward and/or backward neutron production is also studied and is found to be associated with a harder incoming photon spectrum, consistent with expectations.
Differential UPC dimuon cross sections shown as a function of $|y_{\mu\mu}|$ in the interval $10 < |m_{\mu\mu}| < 20$ GeV.
Differential UPC dimuon cross sections shown as a function of $|y_{\mu\mu}|$ in the interval $20 < |m_{\mu\mu}| < 40$ GeV.
Differential UPC dimuon cross sections shown as a function of $|y_{\mu\mu}|$ in the interval $40 < |m_{\mu\mu}| < 80$ GeV.
Ratio of differential UPC dimuon cross sections from data and STARlight shown as a function of $|y_{\mu\mu}|$ in the interval $10 < |m_{\mu\mu}| < 20$ GeV.
Ratio of differential UPC dimuon cross sections from data and STARlight shown as a function of $|y_{\mu\mu}|$ in the interval $20 < |m_{\mu\mu}| < 40$ GeV.
Ratio of differential UPC dimuon cross sections from data and STARlight 2.0 shown as a function of $|y_{\mu\mu}|$ in the interval $40 < |m_{\mu\mu}| < 80$ GeV.
Differential UPC dimuon cross sections shown as a function of $|m_{\mu\mu}|$ in the interval $0 < |y_{\mu\mu}| < 0.8$.
Differential UPC dimuon cross sections shown as a function of $|m_{\mu\mu}|$ in the interval $0.8 < |y_{\mu\mu}| < 1.6$.
Differential UPC dimuon cross sections shown as a function of $|m_{\mu\mu}|$ in the interval $1.6 < |y_{\mu\mu}| < 2.4$.
Ratio of differential UPC dimuon cross sections from data and STARlight shown as a function of $|m_{\mu\mu}|$ in the interval $0 < |y_{\mu\mu}| < 0.8$.
Ratio of differential UPC dimuon cross sections from data and STARlight shown as a function of $|m_{\mu\mu}|$ in the interval $0.8 < |y_{\mu\mu}| < 1.6$.
Ratio of differential UPC dimuon cross sections from data and STARlight 2.0 shown as a function of $|m_{\mu\mu}|$ in the interval $1.6 < |y_{\mu\mu}| < 2.4$.
Differential UPC dimuon cross sections shown as a function of $|\cos\theta^{\star}_{\mu\mu}|$ in the interval $10 < |m_{\mu\mu}| < 20$ GeV.
Differential UPC dimuon cross sections shown as a function of $|\cos\theta^{\star}_{\mu\mu}|$ in the interval $20 < |m_{\mu\mu}| < 40$ GeV.
Differential UPC dimuon cross sections shown as a function of $|\cos\theta^{\star}_{\mu\mu}|$ in the interval $40 < |m_{\mu\mu}| < 80$ GeV.
Ratio of differential UPC dimuon cross sections from data and STARlight shown as a function of $|\cos\theta^{\star}_{\mu\mu}|$ in the interval $10 < |m_{\mu\mu}| < 20$ GeV.
Ratio of differential UPC dimuon cross sections from data and STARlight shown as a function of $|\cos\theta^{\star}_{\mu\mu}|$ in the interval $20 < |m_{\mu\mu}| < 40$ GeV.
Ratio of differential UPC dimuon cross sections from data and STARlight 2.0 shown as a function of $|\cos\theta^{\star}_{\mu\mu}|$ in the interval $40 < |m_{\mu\mu}| < 80$ GeV.
Differential UPC dimuon cross sections shown as a function of $|\cos\theta^{\star}_{\mu\mu}|$ in the interval $10 < |m_{\mu\mu}| < 20$ GeV and $|y_{\mu\mu}|<0.8$.
Differential UPC dimuon cross sections shown as a function of $|\cos\theta^{\star}_{\mu\mu}|$ in the interval $20 < |m_{\mu\mu}| < 40$ GeV and $|y_{\mu\mu}|<0.8$.
Differential UPC dimuon cross sections shown as a function of $|\cos\theta^{\star}_{\mu\mu}|$ in the interval $40 < |m_{\mu\mu}| < 80$ GeV and $|y_{\mu\mu}|<0.8$.
Ratio of differential UPC dimuon cross sections from data and STARlight shown as a function of $|\cos\theta^{\star}_{\mu\mu}|$ in the interval $10 < |m_{\mu\mu}| < 20$ GeV and $|y_{\mu\mu}|<0.8$.
Ratio of differential UPC dimuon xsects from data and STARlight shown as a function of $|\cos\theta^{\star}_{\mu\mu}|$ in the interval $20 < |m_{\mu\mu}| < 40$ GeV and $|y_{\mu\mu}|<0.8$.
Ratio of differential UPC dimuon cross sections from data and STARlight 2.0 shown as a function of $|\cos\theta^{\star}_{\mu\mu}|$ in the interval $40 < |m_{\mu\mu}| < 80$ GeV and $|y_{\mu\mu}|<0.8$.
Differential cross section as a function of k_max
Ratio of data/STARlight for differential cross sections as a function of k_max
Differential cross section as a function of k_min
Ratio of data/STARlight for differential cross sections as a function of k_min
Differential cross sections in $\alpha$ (acoplanarity) integrated over the full fiducial volume
Fraction of Xn0n events as a function of $m_{\mu\mu}$ for $0<|y_{\mu\mu}|<0.8$
Fraction of Xn0n events as a function of $y_{\mu\mu}$ for $10<|m_{\mu\mu}|<20$ GeV
Fraction of Xn0n events as a function of $m_{\mu\mu}$ for $0.8<|y_{\mu\mu}|<1.6$
Fraction of Xn0n events as a function of $y_{\mu\mu}$ for $20<|m_{\mu\mu}|<40$ GeV
Fraction of Xn0n events as a function of $m_{\mu\mu}$ for $1.6<|y_{\mu\mu}|<2.4$
Fraction of Xn0n events as a function of $y_{\mu\mu}$ for $40<|m_{\mu\mu}|<80$ GeV
Fraction of XnXn events as a function of $m_{\mu\mu}$ for $0<|y_{\mu\mu}|<0.8$
Fraction of XnXn events as a function of $y_{\mu\mu}$ for $10<|m_{\mu\mu}|<20$ GeV
Fraction of XnXn events as a function of $m_{\mu\mu}$ for $0.8<|y_{\mu\mu}|<1.6$
Fraction of XnXn events as a function of $y_{\mu\mu}$ for $20<|m_{\mu\mu}|<40$ GeV
Fraction of XnXn events as a function of $m_{\mu\mu}$ for $1.6<|y_{\mu\mu}|<2.4$
Fraction of XnXn events as a function of $y_{\mu\mu}$ for $40<|m_{\mu\mu}|<80$ GeV
A search for the supersymmetric partners of quarks and gluons (squarks and gluinos) in final states containing jets and missing transverse momentum, but no electrons or muons, is presented. The data used in this search were recorded by the ATLAS experiment in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV during Run 2 of the Large Hadron Collider, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$. The results are interpreted in the context of various $R$-parity-conserving models where squarks and gluinos are produced in pairs or in association and a neutralino is the lightest supersymmetric particle. An exclusion limit at the 95% confidence level on the mass of the gluino is set at 2.30 TeV for a simplified model containing only a gluino and the lightest neutralino, assuming the latter is massless. For a simplified model involving the strong production of mass-degenerate first- and second-generation squarks, squark masses below 1.85 TeV are excluded if the lightest neutralino is massless. These limits extend substantially beyond the region of supersymmetric parameter space excluded previously by similar searches with the ATLAS detector.
Observed $m_{\mathrm{eff}}$ distributions in signal regions MB-SSd. The histograms show the MC background predictions normalised by the background-only fit. The hatched (red) error bands indicate experimental and MC statistical uncertainties. Expected distributions for benchmark signal model points, normalised using the approximate NNLO+NNLL cross-section times integrated luminosity, are also shown for comparison (masses in GeV).
Observed metSig distributions in signal regions MB-SSd. The histograms show the MC background predictions normalised by the background-only fit. The hatched (red) error bands indicate experimental and MC statistical uncertainties. Expected distributions for benchmark signal model points, normalised using the approximate NNLO+NNLL cross-section times integrated luminosity, are also shown for comparison (masses in GeV).
Observed $m_{\mathrm{eff}}$ distributions in signal regions MB-GGd. The histograms show the MC background predictions normalised by the background-only fit. The hatched (red) error bands indicate experimental and MC statistical uncertainties. Expected distributions for benchmark signal model points, normalised using the approximate NNLO+NNLL cross-section times integrated luminosity, are also shown for comparison (masses in GeV).
Observed metSig distributions in signal regions MB-GGd. The histograms show the MC background predictions normalised by the background-only fit. The hatched (red) error bands indicate experimental and MC statistical uncertainties. Expected distributions for benchmark signal model points, normalised using the approximate NNLO+NNLL cross-section times integrated luminosity, are also shown for comparison (masses in GeV).
Observed $m_{\mathrm{eff}}$ distributions in signal regions MB-C. The histograms show the MC background predictions normalised by the background-only fit. The hatched (red) error bands indicate experimental and MC statistical uncertainties. Expected distributions for benchmark signal model points, normalised using the approximate NNLO+NNLL cross-section times integrated luminosity, are also shown for comparison (masses in GeV).
Observed metSig distributions in signal regions MB-C. The histograms show the MC background predictions normalised by the background-only fit. The hatched (red) error bands indicate experimental and MC statistical uncertainties. Expected distributions for benchmark signal model points, normalised using the approximate NNLO+NNLL cross-section times integrated luminosity, are also shown for comparison (masses in GeV).
Observed BDT-GGd1 score distributions in signal regions GGd1. The histograms show the MC background predictions normalised by the background-only fit. The hatched (red) error bands indicate experimental and MC statistical uncertainties. Expected distributions for benchmark signal model points, normalised using the approximate NNLO+NNLL cross-section times integrated luminosity, are also shown for comparison (masses in GeV).
Observed BDT-GGo1 score distributions in signal regions GGo1. The histograms show the MC background predictions normalised by the background-only fit. The hatched (red) error bands indicate experimental and MC statistical uncertainties. Expected distributions for benchmark signal model points, normalised using the approximate NNLO+NNLL cross-section times integrated luminosity, are also shown for comparison (masses in GeV).
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR BDT-GGd1
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR BDT-GGd2
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR BDT-GGd3
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR BDT-GGd4
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and chargino in SR BDT-GGo1
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and chargino in SR BDT-GGo2
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and chargino in SR BDT-GGo3
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and chargino in SR BDT-GGo4
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with squark pair production and decays to a quark and neutralino in SR 2j-1600
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with squark pair production and decays to a quark and neutralino in SR 2j-2200
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with squark pair production and decays to a quark and neutralino in SR 2j-2800
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR 4j-1000
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR 4j-2200
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR 4j-3400
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR 5j-1600
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and chargino in SR 6j-1000
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and chargino in SR 6j-2200
Signal region acceptance for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and chargino in SR 6j-3400
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR BDT-GGd1. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR BDT-GGd2. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR BDT-GGd3. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR BDT-GGd4. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and chargino in SR BDT-GGo1. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and chargino in SR BDT-GGo2. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and chargino in SR BDT-GGo3. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and chargino in SR BDT-GGo4. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with squark pair production and decays to a quark and neutralino in SR 2j-1600. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with squark pair production and decays to a quark and neutralino in SR 2j-2200. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with squark pair production and decays to a quark and neutralino in SR 2j-2800. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR 4j-1000. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR 4j-2200. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR 4j-3400. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and neutralino in SR 5j-1600. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and chargino in SR 6j-1000. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and chargino in SR 6j-2200. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Signal region efficiency for simplified model with gluino pair production and decays to two quarks and chargino in SR 6j-3400. Efficiencies on signal points with low statistics are not reported. The efficiency value -1.0 in the table corresponds to the case where efficiency cannot be calculated due to the null acceptance of the model point.
Exclusion limits in the mass plane of the lightest neutralino and first- and second-generation squarks assuming squark pair production and direct decays obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The expected limits are indicated with a dark dashed curve, with the light (yellow) band indicating the $1\sigma$ excursions due to experimental and background-only theoretical uncertainties.
Exclusion limits in the mass plane of the lightest neutralino and first- and second-generation squarks assuming squark pair production and direct decays obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The observed limits are indicated by the medium dark (maroon) curve where the solid contour represents the nominal limit, and the dotted lines are obtained by varying the signal cross-section by the renormalisation and factorisation scale and PDF uncertainties.
Exclusion limits in the mass plane of the lightest neutralino and non degenerated squark pair production and direct decays obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The expected limits are indicated with a dark dashed curve, with the light (yellow) band indicating the $1\sigma$ excursions due to experimental and background-only theoretical uncertainties.
Exclusion limits in the mass plane of the lightest neutralino and non degenerated squark pair production and direct decays obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The observed limits are indicated by the medium dark (maroon) curve where the solid contour represents the nominal limit, and the dotted lines are obtained by varying the signal cross-section by the renormalisation and factorisation scale and PDF uncertainties.
Exclusion limits in the mass plane of the lightest neutralino and the gluino for gluino pair production with direct decays obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The expected limits are indicated with a dark dashed curve, with the light (yellow) band indicating the $1\sigma$ excursions due to experimental and background-only theoretical uncertainties.
Exclusion limits in the mass plane of the lightest neutralino and the gluino for gluino pair production with direct decays obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The observed limits are indicated by the medium dark (maroon) curve where the solid contour represents the nominal limit, and the dotted lines are obtained by varying the signal cross-section by the renormalisation and factorisation scale and PDF uncertainties.
Exclusion limits in the mass plane of the lightest neutralino and squarks. The expected limits are indicated with dark dashed curves, with the light (yellow) bands indicating the $1\sigma$ excursions due to experimental and background-only theoretical uncertainties.
Exclusion limits in the mass plane of the lightest neutralino and squarks. The observed limits are indicated by the medium dark (maroon) curves where the solid contour represents the nominal limit, and the dotted lines are obtained by varying the signal cross-section by the renormalisation and factorisation scale and PDF uncertainties.
Exclusion limits for squark pair production with a one-step decay via an intermediate chargino. The neutralino mass is fixed at 60 GeV and exclusion limits are given for mass difference ratio, $X$, as a function of the squark mass. Exclusion limits are obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The expected limits are indicated with dark dashed curves, with the light (yellow) bands indicating the $1\sigma$ excursions due to experimental and background-only theoretical uncertainties.
Exclusion limits for squark pair production with a one-step decay via an intermediate chargino. The neutralino mass is fixed at 60 GeV and exclusion limits are given for mass difference ratio, $X$, as a function of the squark mass. Exclusion limits are obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The observed limits are indicated by the medium dark (maroon) curves where the solid contour represents the nominal limit, and the dotted lines are obtained by varying the signal cross-section by the renormalisation and factorisation scale and PDF uncertainties.
Exclusion limits in the mass plane of the lightest neutralino and gluinos. The expected limits are indicated with dark dashed curves, with the light (yellow) bands indicating the $1\sigma$ excursions due to experimental and background-only theoretical uncertainties.
Exclusion limits in the mass plane of the lightest neutralino and gluinos. The observed limits are indicated by the medium dark (maroon) curve where the solid contour represents the nominal limit, and the dotted lines are obtained by varying the signal cross-section by the renormalisation and factorisation scale and PDF uncertainties.
Exclusion limits for gluino pair production with a one-step decay via an intermediate chargino. The neutralino mass is fixed at 60 GeV and exclusion limits are given for mass difference ratio, $X$, as a function of the gluino mass. Exclusion limits are obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The expected limits are indicated with dark dashed curves, with the light (yellow) bands indicating the $1\sigma$ excursions due to experimental and background-only theoretical uncertainties.
Exclusion limits for gluino pair production with a one-step decay via an intermediate chargino. The neutralino mass is fixed at 60 GeV and exclusion limits are given for mass difference ratio, $X$, as a function of the gluino mass. Exclusion limits are obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The observed limits are indicated by the medium dark (maroon) curves where the solid contour represents the nominal limit, and the dotted lines are obtained by varying the signal cross-section by the renormalisation and factorisation scale and PDF uncertainties.
Exclusion limits for the model with combined production of squark pairs, gluino pairs, and of squark--gluino pairs. The neutralino mass is fixed at 0 GeV. Exclusion limits are obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The expected limits are indicated with dark dashed curves, with the light (yellow) bands indicating the $1\sigma$ excursions due to experimental and background-only theoretical uncertainties.
Exclusion limits for the model with combined production of squark pairs, gluino pairs, and of squark--gluino pairs. The neutralino mass is fixed at 0 GeV. Exclusion limits are obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The observed limits are indicated by the medium dark (maroon) curves where the solid contour represents the nominal limit, and the dotted lines are obtained by varying the signal cross-section by the renormalisation and factorisation scale and PDF uncertainties.
Exclusion limits for the model with combined production of squark pairs, gluino pairs, and of squark--gluino pairs. The neutralino mass is fixed at 995 GeV. Exclusion limits are obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The expected limits are indicated with dark dashed curves, with the light (yellow) bands indicating the $1\sigma$ excursions due to experimental and background-only theoretical uncertainties.
Exclusion limits for the model with combined production of squark pairs, gluino pairs, and of squark--gluino pairs. The neutralino mass is fixed at 995 GeV. Exclusion limits are obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The observed limits are indicated by the medium dark (maroon) curves where the solid contour represents the nominal limit, and the dotted lines are obtained by varying the signal cross-section by the renormalisation and factorisation scale and PDF uncertainties.
Exclusion limits for the model with combined production of squark pairs, gluino pairs, and of squark--gluino pairs. The neutralino mass is fixed at 1495 GeV. Exclusion limits are obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The expected limits are indicated with dark dashed curves, with the light (yellow) bands indicating the $1\sigma$ excursions due to experimental and background-only theoretical uncertainties.
Exclusion limits for the model with combined production of squark pairs, gluino pairs, and of squark--gluino pairs. The neutralino mass is fixed at 1495 GeV. Exclusion limits are obtained by using the signal region with the best expected sensitivity at each point. The observed limits are indicated by the medium dark (maroon) curves where the solid contour represents the nominal limit, and the dotted lines are obtained by varying the signal cross-section by the renormalisation and factorisation scale and PDF uncertainties.
The observed upper limits on signal cross section corresponding to the best expected signal region in each mass point for squark-pair production with direct decays.
The observed upper limits on signal cross section corresponding to the best expected signal region in each mass point for gluino-pair production with direct decays
The observed upper limits on signal cross section corresponding to the best expected signal region in each mass point for squark-pair production with a one-step decay via an intermediate chargino.
The observed upper limits on signal cross section corresponding to the best expected signal region in each mass point for squark-pair production with a one-step decay via an intermediate chargino. The neutralino mass is fixed at 60 GeV and exclusion limits are given for mass difference ratio, $X$, as a function of the squark mass.
The observed upper limits on signal cross section corresponding to the best expected signal region in each mass point for gluino-pair production with a one-step decay via an intermediate chargino.
The observed upper limits on signal cross section corresponding to the best expected signal region in each mass point for gluino-pair production with a one-step decay via an intermediate chargino. The neutralino mass is fixed at 60~GeV and exclusio limits are given for mass difference ratio, $X$, as a function of the gluino mass.
Cut-flow for model-independent search regions targeting squarks for SS direct model points. Expected yields are normalized to a luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$.
Cut-flow for model-independent search regions targeting gluinos for GG direct model points. Expected yields are normalized to a luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$.
Cut-flow for model-independent search regions targeting squarks and gluinos in models with one-step decay. Expected yields are normalized to a luminosity of 139 $fb^{-1}$.
Cut-flow for BDT search regions targeting gluinos in models with one-step decays. Expected yields are normalized to a luminosity of 139 $fb^{-1}$.
Cut-flow for BDT search regions targeting gluinos in models with direct decays. Expected yields are normalized to a luminosity of 139 $fb^{-1}$.
Dihadron azimuthal correlations containing a high transverse momentum ($\pt$) trigger particle are sensitive to the properties of the nuclear medium created at RHIC through the strong interactions occurring between the traversing parton and the medium, i.e. jet-quenching. Previous measurements revealed a strong modification to dihadron azimuthal correlations in Au+Au collisions with respect to \pp\ and \dAu\ collisions. The modification increases with the collision centrality, suggesting a path-length dependence to the jet-quenching effect. This paper reports STAR measurements of dihadron azimuthal correlations in mid-central (20-60\%) Au+Au collisions at $\snn=200$~GeV as a function of the trigger particle's azimuthal angle relative to the event plane, $\phis=|\phit-\psiEP|$. The azimuthal correlation is studied as a function of both the trigger and associated particle $\pt$. The subtractions of the combinatorial background and anisotropic flow, assuming Zero Yield At Minimum (\zyam), are described. The away-side correlation is strongly modified, and the modification varies with $\phis$, which is expected to be related to the path-length that the away-side parton traverses. The pseudo-rapidity ($\deta$) dependence of the near-side correlation, sensitive to long range $\deta$ correlations (the ridge), is also investigated. The ridge and jet-like components of the near-side correlation are studied as a function of $\phis$. The ridge appears to drop with increasing $\phis$ while the jet-like component remains approximately constant. ...
red data points
black histogram
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 0
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 1
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 2
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 3
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 4
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 5
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 0
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 1
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 2
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 3
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 4
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 5
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 0
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 1
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 2
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 3
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 4
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 5
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 0
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 1
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 2
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 3
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 4
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 5
dN/deta phis=045 deg, pt=0.151 GeV/c
dN/deta phis=045 deg, pt=0.153 GeV/c
dN/deta phis=090 deg, pt=0.51 GeV/c
dN/deta phis=090 deg, pt=12 GeV/c
dN/deta phis=4590 deg, pt=0.151 GeV/c
sigma vs phis pt=0.151 GeV/c
sigma vs phis pt=0.153 GeV/c
sigma vs phis pt=0.51 GeV/c
sigma vs phis pt=12 GeV/c
sigma vs pt phis=045 deg
sigma vs pt phis=090 deg
sigma vs pt phis=4590 deg
background uncertainty caps in the figure
flow uncertainty curves in the figure
leadage uncertainty arrows in the figure
total uncertainty boxes in the figure
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 0
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 1
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 2
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 3
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 4
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 5
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 0
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 1
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 2
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 3
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 4
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 5
d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c
d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c
0^{o} < phi_{s} < 45^{o}
45^{o} < phi_{s} < 90^{o}
Previous in-plane result published in 2004
Previous out-of-plane result published in 2004
3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, 0^{o} < phi_{s} < 45^{o}
3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, 45^{o} < phi_{s} < 90^{o}
3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<3 GeV/c, 0^{o} < phi_{s} < 45^{o}
3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<3 GeV/c, 45^{o} < phi_{s} < 90^{o}
4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, 0^{o} < phi_{s} < 45^{o}
4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, 45^{o} < phi_{s} < 90^{o}
4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<3 GeV/c, 0^{o} < phi_{s} < 45^{o}
4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<3 GeV/c, 45^{o} < phi_{s} < 90^{o}
3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c
4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c
3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c
3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 0^{o}15^{o}
3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 75^{o}90^{o}
Cone region, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c
one region, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c
one region, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c
one region, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c
i region, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c
Pi region, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c
i region, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c
i region, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c
d+Au, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c
20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, (a) 0^{o}<#phi_{s}<15^{o}
20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, (b) 75^{o}<#phi_{s}<90^{o}
20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, (a) 0^{o}<phi_{s}<15^{o}
20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, (b) 75^{o}<phi_{s}<90^{o}
20-60% Au+Au, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 0, jet
20-60% Au+Au, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 1, jet
20-60% Au+Au, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 2, jet
20-60% Au+Au, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 3, jet
20-60% Au+Au, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 4, jet
20-60% Au+Au, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 5, jet
1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, jet
0-60% Au+Au, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/, slice 0, ridge
20-60% Au+Au, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 1, ridge
20-60% Au+Au, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 2, ridge
20-60% Au+Au, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 3, ridge
20-60% Au+Au, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 4, ridge
20-60% Au+Au, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 5, ridge
1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, ridge
jet (Deltaphi|<1.0, |Deltaeta|<0.7) 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c
jet (Deltaphi|<1.0, |Deltaeta|<0.7) 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c
ridge (Deltaphi|<1.0, |Deltaeta|>0.7) 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c
ridge (Deltaphi|<1.0, |Deltaeta|>0.7) 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c
ridge (Deltaphi|<1.0, |Deltaeta|>0.7) 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c
ridge (Deltaphi|<1.0, |Deltaeta|>0.7) 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c
3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c Ridge (75^{o}<|phi_{s}|<90^{o}) / Ridge (0^{o}<|phi_{s}|<15^{o})
4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c Ridge (75^{o}<|phi_{s}|<90^{o}) / Ridge (0^{o}<|phi_{s}|<15^{o})
3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c Ridge (30^{o}<|phi_{s}|<45^{o}) / Ridge (0^{o}<|phi_{s}|<15^{o})
4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c Ridge (30^{o}<|phi_{s}|<45^{o}) / Ridge (0^{o}<|phi_{s}|<15^{o})
3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c Ridge (0^{o}<|phi_{s}|<15^{o}) / Jet (0^{o}<|phi_{s}|<15^{o})
4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c Ridge (0^{o}<|phi_{s}|<15^{o}) / Jet (0^{o}<|phi_{s}|<15^{o})
3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, cone region
4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, cone region
3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, jetlike
4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, jetlike
3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, pi region
4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, pi region
3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, ridge
4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, ridge
fig17_ampl_pt_inclusive
3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 0^{o}<phi_{s}<45^{o}, cone region
4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 45^{o}<phi_{s}<90^{o}, jetlike
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 2
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
background subtracted correlation EP^{ } include |Deltaeta|<0.5 particles, slice 0
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7
d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7
d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7
d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7
d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7
d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7
d+Au jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c
d+Au jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c
d+Au jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c
d+Au jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c
d+Au jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5
d+Au jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c
d+Au jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c
d+Au jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c
d+Au jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c
d+Au jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c
d+Au jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 0
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 1
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 2
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 3
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 4
jet correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7
d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7
d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7
d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7
d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 4
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 5
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 0
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 1
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 2
background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, |Deltaeta|>0.7, slice 3