Observed and expected background and signal effective mass distributions for SR4j-2200. For signal, a gluino direct decay model where squarks have mass of 1800 GeV and the neutralino1 has mass of 800 GeV is shown.

Signal region acceptance for simplified model with squark pair production and direct decays to a quark and neutralino in SR Meff-2jB-1600.

Signal region acceptance for simplified model with squark pair production and direct decays to a quark and neutralino in SR Meff-2jB-2400.

Signal region acceptance for simplified model with squark pair production and direct decays to a quark and neutralino in SR RJR-S1a.

Signal region acceptance for simplified model with squark pair production and direct decays to a quark and neutralino in SR RJR-S1b.

Signal region acceptance for simplified model with squark pair production and direct decays to a quark and neutralino in SR RJR-S2a.

Signal region acceptance for simplified model with squark pair production and direct decays to a quark and neutralino in SR RJR-S2b.

Signal region acceptance for simplified model with squark pair production and direct decays to a quark and neutralino in SR RJR-S3a.

Signal region acceptance for simplified model with squark pair production and direct decays to a quark and neutralino in SR RJR-S3b.

Signal region acceptance for simplified model with squark pair production and direct decays to a quark and neutralino in SR RJR-S4.

Signal region acceptance for simplified model with squark pair production and direct decays to a quark and neutralino in SR RJR-C1.

Signal region acceptance for simplified model with squark pair production and direct decays to a quark and neutralino in SR RJR-C2.

Signal region acceptance for simplified model with squark pair production and direct decays to a quark and neutralino in SR RJR-C3.

Signal region acceptance for simplified model with squark pair production and direct decays to a quark and neutralino in SR RJR-C4.

Signal region acceptance for simplified model with squark pair production and direct decays to a quark and neutralino in SR RJR-C5.

Signal region acceptance for simplified model with squark pair production and direct decays to a quark and neutralino in SR RJR-G1a.

Signal region acceptance for simplified model with squark pair production and decays to a quark and chargino in SR RJR-S2a.

Signal region acceptance for simplified model with squark pair production and decays to a quark and chargino in SR RJR-S2b.

Signal region acceptance for simplified model with squark pair production and decays to a quark and chargino in SR RJR-S3a.

Signal region acceptance for simplified model with squark pair production and decays to a quark and chargino in SR RJR-S3b.

Signal region acceptance for simplified model with squark pair production and decays to a quark and chargino in SR RJR-S4.

Signal region acceptance for simplified model with squark pair production and decays to a quark and chargino in SR RJR-C1.

Signal region acceptance for simplified model with squark pair production and decays to a quark and chargino in SR RJR-C2.

Signal region acceptance for simplified model with squark pair production and decays to a quark and chargino in SR RJR-C3.

Signal region acceptance for simplified model with squark pair production and decays to a quark and chargino in SR RJR-C4.

Signal region acceptance for simplified model with squark pair production and decays to a quark and chargino in SR RJR-C5.

Signal region acceptance for simplified model with squark pair production and decays to a quark and chargino in SR RJR-G1a.

Signal region acceptance for simplified model with squark pair production and decays to a quark and chargino in SR RJR-G1b.

Signal region acceptance for simplified model with squark pair production and decays to a quark and chargino in SR RJR-G2a.

Signal region acceptance for simplified model with squark pair production and decays to a quark and chargino in SR RJR-G2b.

Signal region acceptance for simplified model with squark pair production and decays to a quark and chargino in SR RJR-G3a.

The post-fit $m_{CT}$ distribution is shown in the validation region VR-offLM after all the selection requirements are applied other than the $m_{CT}$ cut. The stacked histograms show the expected SM backgrounds. The hatched bands represent the sum in quadrature of systematic and statistical uncertainties of the total SM background. The red line with arrow indicates the $m_{CT}$ cut used in SR selection. The first and the last bin include the underflow and overflow events (where present), respectively.

The post-fit $m_{CT}$ distribution is shown in the validation region VR-offMM after all the selection requirements are applied other than the $m_{CT}$ cut. The stacked histograms show the expected SM backgrounds. The hatched bands represent the sum in quadrature of systematic and statistical uncertainties of the total SM background. The red line with arrow indicates the $m_{CT}$ cut used in SR selection. The first and the last bin include the underflow and overflow events (where present), respectively.

The post-fit $m_{CT}$ distribution is shown in the validation region VR-offHM after all the selection requirements are applied other than the $m_{CT}$ cut. The stacked histograms show the expected SM backgrounds. The hatched bands represent the sum in quadrature of systematic and statistical uncertainties of the total SM background. The red line with arrow indicates the $m_{CT}$ cut used in SR selection. The first and the last bin include the underflow and overflow events (where present), respectively.

The post-fit $m_{CT}$ distribution for SR-HM. The stacked histograms show the expected SM backgrounds. The hatched bands represent the sum in quadrature of systematic and statistical uncertainties of the total SM background. For illustration, the distribution of the SUSY reference points are also shown as dashed lines. The overflow events, where present, are included in the last bin.

The post-fit $m_{CT}$ distribution for SR-MM. The stacked histograms show the expected SM backgrounds. The hatched bands represent the sum in quadrature of systematic and statistical uncertainties of the total SM background. For illustration, the distribution of the SUSY reference points are also shown as dashed lines. The overflow events, where present, are included in the last bin.

The post-fit $m_{CT}$ distribution for SR-LM. The stacked histograms show the expected SM backgrounds. The hatched bands represent the sum in quadrature of systematic and statistical uncertainties of the total SM background. For illustration, the distribution of the SUSY reference points are also shown as dashed lines. The overflow events, where present, are included in the last bin.

The post-fit $m_{bb}$ distribution is shown in the signal region SR-HM after all the selection requirements are applied other than the $m_{bb}$ cut. The stacked histograms show the expected SM backgrounds. The hatched bands represent the sum in quadrature of systematic and statistical uncertainties of the total SM background. For illustration, the distribution of the SUSY reference points are also shown as dashed lines. The red line with arrow indicates the $m_{bb}$ cut used in SR selection.The overflow events, where present, are included in the last bin.

The post-fit $m_{bb}$ distribution is shown in the signal region SR-MM after all the selection requirements are applied other than the $m_{bb}$ cut. The hatched bands represent the sum in quadrature of systematic and statistical uncertainties of the total SM background. For illustration, the distribution of the SUSY reference points are also shown as dashed lines. The red line with arrow indicates the $m_{bb}$ cut used in SR selection. The overflow events, where present, are included in the last bin.

The post-fit $m_{bb}$ distribution is shown in the signal region SR-LM after all the selection requirements are applied other than the $m_{bb}$ cut. The hatched bands represent the sum in quadrature of systematic and statistical uncertainties of the total SM background. For illustration, the distribution of the SUSY reference points are also shown as dashed lines. The red line with arrow indicates the $m_{bb}$ cut used in SR selection. The overflow events, where present, are included in the last bin.

The observed exclusion for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production. Experimental and theoretical systematic uncertainties are applied to background and signal samples and illustrated by the yellow band and the red dotted contour lines, respectively. The red dotted lines indicate the $\pm$ 1 standard-deviation variation on the observed exclusion limit due to theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section.

The observed exclusion up limit for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production. The red dotted lines indicate the $\pm 1 \sigma$ on the observed exclusion limit due to the theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section.

The observed exclusion down limit for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production. The red dotted lines indicate the $\pm 1 \sigma$ on the observed exclusion limit due to the theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section.

The expected exclusion for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production. Experimental and theoretical systematic uncertainties are applied to background and signal samples and illustrated by the yellow band and the red dotted contour lines, respectively. The red dotted lines indicate the $\pm$ 1 standard-deviation variation on the observed exclusion limit due to theoretical uncertainties in the signal cross-section.

Upper limits on the cross sections for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.

Signal acceptance in SR-LM for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.

Signal acceptance in SR-LM low $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.

Signal acceptance in SR-LM med. $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.

Signal acceptance in SR-LM high $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.

Signal acceptance in SR-MM for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.

Signal acceptance in SR-MM low $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.

Signal acceptance in SR-MM med. $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.

Signal acceptance in SR-MM high $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.

Signal acceptance in SR-HM for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production. 1lb\bar{b}$ production

Signal acceptance in SR-HM low $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.

Signal acceptance in SR-HM med. $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.

Signal acceptance in SR-HM high $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.

Signal efficiency in SR-LM for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.

Signal efficiency in SR-LM low $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.

Signal efficiency in SR-LM med. $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.

Signal efficiency in SR-LM high $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.

Signal efficiency in SR-MM for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.

Signal efficiency in SR-MM low $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.

Signal efficiency in SR-MM med. $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.

Signal efficiency in SR-MM high $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.

Signal efficiency in SR-HM for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.

Signal efficiency in SR-HM low $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.

Signal efficiency in SR-HM med. $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.

Signal efficiency in SR-HM high $m_{CT}$ for simplified models with $\tilde\chi^\pm_1 \tilde\chi^0_2 \rightarrow Wh\tilde\chi^0_1\tilde\chi^0_1, W \rightarrow l\nu, h \rightarrow b\bar{b}$ production.

Event selection cutflow for a representative signal sample for the SR-LM low $m_{CT}$. The masses of next-lightest-neutralinos and LSPs are reported. While the first row of the table reports the total raw MC events produced, all subsequent rows show weighted events. Only statistical uncertainties are shown. Samples are produced with generator filters which selects $h\rightarrow b\bar{b}$ and $W\rightarrow\ell\nu$ decays.

Event selection cutflow for a representative signal sample for the SR-LM med. $m_{CT}$. The masses of next-lightest-neutralinos and LSPs are reported. While the first row of the table reports the total raw MC events produced, all subsequent rows show weighted events. Only statistical uncertainties are shown. Samples are produced with generator filters which selects $h\rightarrow b\bar{b}$ and $W\rightarrow\ell\nu$ decays.

Event selection cutflow for a representative signal sample for the SR-LM high $m_{CT}$. The masses of next-lightest-neutralinos and LSPs are reported. While the first row of the table reports the total raw MC events produced, all subsequent rows show weighted events. Only statistical uncertainties are shown. Samples are produced with generator filters which selects $h\rightarrow b\bar{b}$ and $W\rightarrow\ell\nu$ decays.

Event selection cutflow for a representative signal sample for the SR-MM low $m_{CT}$. The masses of next-lightest-neutralinos and LSPs are reported. While the first row of the table reports the total raw MC events produced, all subsequent rows show weighted events. Only statistical uncertainties are shown. Samples are produced with generator filters which selects $h\rightarrow b\bar{b}$ and $W\rightarrow\ell\nu$ decays.

Event selection cutflow for a representative signal sample for the SR-MM med. $m_{CT}$. The masses of next-lightest-neutralinos and LSPs are reported. While the first row of the table reports the total raw MC events produced, all subsequent rows show weighted events. Only statistical uncertainties are shown. Samples are produced with generator filters which selects $h\rightarrow b\bar{b}$ and $W\rightarrow\ell\nu$ decays.

Event selection cutflow for a representative signal sample for the SR-MM high $m_{CT}$. The masses of next-lightest-neutralinos and LSPs are reported. While the first row of the table reports the total raw MC events produced, all subsequent rows show weighted events. Only statistical uncertainties are shown. Samples are produced with generator filters which selects $h\rightarrow b\bar{b}$ and $W\rightarrow\ell\nu$ decays.

Event selection cutflow for a representative signal sample for the SR-HM low $m_{CT}$. The masses of next-lightest-neutralinos and LSPs are reported. While the first row of the table reports the total raw MC events produced, all subsequent rows show weighted events. Only statistical uncertainties are shown. Samples are produced with generator filters which selects $h\rightarrow b\bar{b}$ and $W\rightarrow\ell\nu$ decays.

Event selection cutflow for a representative signal sample for the SR-HM med. $m_{CT}$. The masses of next-lightest-neutralinos and LSPs are reported. While the first row of the table reports the total raw MC events produced, all subsequent rows show weighted events. Only statistical uncertainties are shown. Samples are produced with generator filters which selects $h\rightarrow b\bar{b}$ and $W\rightarrow\ell\nu$ decays.

Event selection cutflow for a representative signal sample for the SR-HM high $m_{CT}$. The masses of next-lightest-neutralinos and LSPs are reported. While the first row of the table reports the total raw MC events produced, all subsequent rows show weighted events. Only statistical uncertainties are shown. Samples are produced with generator filters which selects $h\rightarrow b\bar{b}$ and $W\rightarrow\ell\nu$ decays.

Event selection cutflow for a representative signal sample for the discovery SR-LM. The masses of next-lightest-neutralinos and LSPs are reported. While the first row of the table reports the total raw MC events produced, all subsequent rows show weighted events. Only statistical uncertainties are shown. Samples are produced with generator filters which selects $h\rightarrow b\bar{b}$ and $W\rightarrow\ell\nu$ decays.

Event selection cutflow for a representative signal sample for the discovery SR-MM. The masses of next-lightest-neutralinos and LSPs are reported. While the first row of the table reports the total raw MC events produced, all subsequent rows show weighted events. Only statistical uncertainties are shown. Samples are produced with generator filters which selects $h\rightarrow b\bar{b}$ and $W\rightarrow\ell\nu$ decays.

Event selection cutflow for a representative signal sample for the discovery SR-HM. The masses of next-lightest-neutralinos and LSPs are reported. While the first row of the table reports the total raw MC events produced, all subsequent rows show weighted events. Only statistical uncertainties are shown. Samples are produced with generator filters which selects $h\rightarrow b\bar{b}$ and $W\rightarrow\ell\nu$ decays.

Distributions of MaxMin alternative algorithm $m(h_{\mathrm{cand1}},h_{\mathrm{cand2}})_{\mathrm{avg}}$ after the background-only fit. The backgrounds which contribute only a small amount (diboson, W+jets and ttbar+W/Z/h) are grouped and labelled as `Other'.

Distributions of Leading jet $p_T$ after the background-only fit. The backgrounds which contribute only a small amount (diboson, W+jets and ttbar+W/Z/h) are grouped and labelled as `Other'.

Distributions of MaxMin algorithm $m_{hcand}$ after the background-only fit. The backgrounds which contribute only a small amount (diboson, W+jets and ttbar+W/Z/h) are grouped and labelled as `Other'.

Signal efficiency in SRA_M_m60 for simplified models with '$\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$' production

Signal acceptance in SRC_28 for simplified models with $\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$ production

Signal acceptance in SRC_26 for simplified models with $\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$ production

Signal acceptance in SRC_24 for simplified models with $\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$ production

Signal acceptance in SRA_M_dm130 for simplified models with $\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$ production

Signal acceptance in SRB for simplified models with $\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$ production

Signal acceptance in SRA_L_dm130 for simplified models with $\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$ production

Signal acceptance in SRC_incl for simplified models with $\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$ production

Signal acceptance in SRA_L_m60 for simplified models with $\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$ production

Signal acceptance in SRA_incl_dm130 for simplified models with $\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$ production

Signal acceptance in SRA_incl_m60 for simplified models with $\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$ production

Signal efficiency in SRA_H_m60 for simplified models with '$\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$' production

Signal efficiency in SRA_L_dm130 for simplified models with '$\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$' production

Signal efficiency in SRB for simplified models with '$\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$' production

Signal acceptance in SRC_22 for simplified models with $\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$ production

Signal efficiency in SRA_H_dm130 for simplified models with '$\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$' production

Signal efficiency in SRC_24 for simplified models with '$\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$' production

Signal efficiency in SRC_26 for simplified models with '$\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$' production

Signal acceptance in SRA_H_m60 for simplified models with $\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$ production

Signal efficiency in SRA_incl_m60 for simplified models with '$\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$' production

Signal efficiency in SRC_22 for simplified models with '$\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$' production

Signal acceptance in SRA_M_m60 for simplified models with $\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$ production

Signal efficiency in SRC_28 for simplified models with '$\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$' production

Signal acceptance in SRA_H_dm130 for simplified models with $\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$ production

Signal efficiency in SRA_incl_dm130 for simplified models with '$\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$' production

Signal efficiency in SRA_L_m60 for simplified models with '$\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$' production

Signal efficiency in SRA_M_dm130 for simplified models with '$\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$' production

Signal efficiency in SRC_incl for simplified models with '$\widetilde{b}\widetilde{b}$ $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b} \widetilde{\chi}_2^0 \widetilde{\chi}_2^0$ $\rightarrow$ hh$\widetilde{\chi}_1^0 \widetilde{\chi}_1^0$, h $\rightarrow$ $b\bar{b}$' production

Observed 95% CLs exclusion limit for the $\Delta M(\widetilde{\chi}_{2}^{0},\widetilde{\chi}_{1}^{0})$=130GeV signal grid for the best combined signal regions.

Expected 95% CLs exclusion limit for the $\Delta M(\widetilde{\chi}_{2}^{0},\widetilde{\chi}_{1}^{0})$=130GeV signal grid for the best combined signal regions.

Observed 95% CLs exclusion limit for the $M(\widetilde{\chi}_{1}^{0})$=60GeV signal grid for the best combined signal regions.

Expected 95% CLs exclusion limit for the $\Delta M(\widetilde{\chi}_{2}^{0},\widetilde{\chi}_{1}^{0})$=130GeV signal grid for the best combined signal regions.

Model dependent upper limit on the best combined signal regions considered in the $\Delta M(\widetilde{\chi}_{2}^{0},\widetilde{\chi}_{1}^{0})$=130GeV signal grid

Model dependet upper limits on the best combined signal regions considered in the $\Delta M(\widetilde{\chi}_{2}^{0},\widetilde{\chi}_{1}^{0})$=130GeV signal grid

Result of background only fit applied to signal regions. Event yields from the signal regions compared with SM MC predictions for the 3 highest contributing backgrounds separately and combined minor backgrounds.

Expected background event yields and dominant systematic uncertainties on background estimates in the A-type (inclusive), B-type and C-type (inclusive) regions.

Background-only fit results for the A- and B-type regions performed using 139$fb^{-1}$ of data. The quoted uncertainties on the fitted SM background include both the statistical and systematic uncertainties.

Background-only fit results for the C-type region performed using 139$fb^{-1}$ of data. The quoted uncertainties on the fitted SM background include both the statistical and systematic uncertainties.

Observed 95% CL upper limits on the visible cross sections σvis, the observed (S95obs) and expected (S95exp) 95% CL upper limits on the number of signal events with ± 1 σ excursions of the expectation, the CL of the background-only hypothesis, CLB, the discovery p-value (p0), truncated at 0.5, and the associated significance.

Cutflow of the MC events scaled to 139 $fb^{-1}$ for the SRA selections, with a scalar bottom signal of m$(\widetilde{b}_{1},\widetilde{\chi}_2^0,\widetilde{\chi}_1^0) = (1100, 330, 200)$ GeV, considered.

Cutflow of the MC events scaled to 139 $fb^{-1}$ for the SRB selections, with a scalar bottom signal of m$(\widetilde{b}_{1},\widetilde{\chi}_2^0,\widetilde{\chi}_1^0) = (700, 680, 550)$ GeV, considered.

Cutflow of the MC events scaled to 139 $fb^{-1}$ for the SRC selections, with a scalar bottom signal of m$(\widetilde{b}_{1},\widetilde{\chi}_2^0,\widetilde{\chi}_1^0) = (1200, 1150, 60)$ GeV, considered.

The minus $1\sigma$ variation of observed exclusion contour obtained by varying the signal cross section within its uncertainty. The contour is given as a function of the $\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}$ vs. $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}$.

The plus $1\sigma$ variation of observed exclusion contour obtained by varying the signal cross section within its uncertainty. The contour is given as a function of the $\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}$ vs. $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}$.

The minus $1\sigma$ variation of expected exclusion contour obtained by varying MC statistical uncertainties, detector-related systematic uncertainties, and theoretical uncertainties (excluding signal cross section uncertainties). The contour is given as a function of the $\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}$ vs. $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}$.

The plus $1\sigma$ variation of expected exclusion contour obtained by varying MC statistical uncertainties, detector-related systematic uncertainties, and theoretical uncertainties (excluding signal cross section uncertainties). The contour is given as a function of the $\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}$ vs. $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}$.

The observed exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $\it{m}_{LQ_{3}^{u}}$ vs. $\mathrm{BR}(\it{m}_{LQ_{3}^{u}}\rightarrow b \tau)$. Points that are within the contours are excluded.

The expected exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $\it{m}_{LQ_{3}^{u}}$ vs. $\mathrm{BR}(\it{m}_{LQ_{3}^{u}}\rightarrow b \tau)$. Points that are within the contours are excluded.

The minus $1\sigma$ variation of observed exclusion contour obtained by varying the signal cross section within its uncertainty. The contour is given as a function of the $\it{m}_{LQ_{3}^{u}}$ vs. $\mathrm{BR}(\it{m}_{LQ_{3}^{u}}\rightarrow b \tau)$

The plus $1\sigma$ variation of observed exclusion contour obtained by varying the signal cross section within its uncertainty. The contour is given as a function of the $\it{m}_{LQ_{3}^{u}}$ vs. $\mathrm{BR}(\it{m}_{LQ_{3}^{u}}\rightarrow b \tau)$

The plus $1\sigma$ variation of expected exclusion contour obtained by varying MC statistical uncertainties, detector-related systematic uncertainties, and theoretical uncertainties (excluding signal cross section uncertainties). The contour is given as a function of the $\it{m}_{LQ_{3}^{u}}$ vs. $\mathrm{BR}(\it{m}_{LQ_{3}^{u}}\rightarrow b \tau)$

The minus $1\sigma$ variation of expected exclusion contour obtained by varying MC statistical uncertainties, detector-related systematic uncertainties, and theoretical uncertainties (excluding signal cross section uncertainties). The contour is given as a function of the $\it{m}_{LQ_{3}^{u}}$ vs. $\mathrm{BR}(\it{m}_{LQ_{3}^{u}}\rightarrow b \tau)$

Model dependent upper limit on the cross section for the $(\tilde{t},\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1})$ signal grid. The column titled 'Leading Region' stores information on which of the fit regions (SRA-B, SRC or SRD) is the dominant based on the expected CLs values.

Expected model dependent upper limit on the cross section for the $(\tilde{t},\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1})$ signal grid. The column titled 'Leading Region' stores information on which of the fit regions (SRA-B, SRC or SRD) is the dominant based on the expected CLs values.

Model dependent upper limit on the cross section for the $LQ_{3}^{u}$ signal grid with $\mathrm{BR}(\it{m}_{LQ_{3}^{u}}\rightarrow b \tau))=0$ %. Only the SRA-B fit region is considered in this interpretation.

Expected model dependent upper limit on the cross section for the $LQ_{3}^{u}$ signal grid with $\mathrm{BR}(\it{m}_{LQ_{3}^{u}}\rightarrow b \tau))=0$ %. Only the SRA-B fit region is considered in this interpretation.

The distributions of $S$ in SRA-TW. For each bin yields for the data, total SM prediction and a representative signal point are provided. The SM prediction is provided with the MC statistical uncertainties, labeled 'stat', and the remaining uncertainties, labeled 'syst' that include detector-related systematic uncertainties and theoretical uncertainties. The signal predictions is provided with the MC statistical uncertainties only. The rightmost bin includes overflow events.

The distributions of $\it{m}^{\mathrm{R=1.2}}_{1}$ in SRB-TT. For each bin yields for the data, total SM prediction and a representative signal point are provided. The SM prediction is provided with the MC statistical uncertainties, labeled 'stat', and the remaining uncertainties, labeled 'syst' that include detector-related systematic uncertainties and theoretical uncertainties. The signal predictions is provided with the MC statistical uncertainties only. The rightmost bin includes overflow events.

The distributions of R$_{ISR}$ in SRC signal regions before R$_{ISR}$ cuts are applied. For each bin yields for the data, total SM prediction and a representative signal point are provided. The SM prediction is provided with the MC statistical uncertainties, labeled 'stat', and the remaining uncertainties, labeled 'syst' that include detector-related systematic uncertainties and theoretical uncertainties. The signal predictions is provided with the MC statistical uncertainties only. The rightmost bin includes overflow events.

The distributions of $E^{miss}_{T}/\sqrt{H_{T}}$ in SRD0. For each bin yields for the data, total SM prediction and a representative signal point are provided. The SM prediction is provided with the MC statistical uncertainties, labeled 'stat', and the remaining uncertainties, labeled 'syst' that include detector-related systematic uncertainties and theoretical uncertainties. The signal predictions is provided with the MC statistical uncertainties only. The rightmost bin includes overflow events.

The distributions of $E^{miss}_{T}/\sqrt{H_{T}}$ in SRD1. For each bin yields for the data, total SM prediction and a representative signal point are provided. The SM prediction is provided with the MC statistical uncertainties, labeled 'stat', and the remaining uncertainties, labeled 'syst' that include detector-related systematic uncertainties and theoretical uncertainties. The signal predictions is provided with the MC statistical uncertainties only. The rightmost bin includes overflow events.

The distributions of $E^{miss}_{T}/\sqrt{H_{T}}$ in SRD2. For each bin yields for the data, total SM prediction and a representative signal point are provided. The SM prediction is provided with the MC statistical uncertainties, labeled 'stat', and the remaining uncertainties, labeled 'syst' that include detector-related systematic uncertainties and theoretical uncertainties. The signal predictions is provided with the MC statistical uncertainties only. The rightmost bin includes overflow events.

Cutflow for the reference point $(\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}, \it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}})= (1300,1)\ \mathrm{GeV} $ in SRA-TT. The column labelled ''Weighted yield'' shows the results including all correction factors applied to simulation, and is normalised to 139 fb$^{-1}$. A notable exception concerns results in the first row, labelled ''Total'', that corresponds to plain $\sigma \cdot \mathcal{L}$ expected. The ''Derivation skim'' includes the requirements that $H_{T}$, the scalar sum of $p_{T}$ of jets and leptons, $H_{T}>150\ \mathrm{GeV}$ or that a ''baseline'' electron or muon has $p_{T}>20\ \mathrm{GeV}$. The definition of ''baseline'' electron/muons, lepton and $\tau$ vetos are described in the main body of the paper. In total 30000 raw MC events were generated prior to the specified cuts, with the column ''Unweighted yield'' collecting the numbers after each cut.

Cutflow for the reference point $(\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}, \it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}})= (1300,1)\ \mathrm{GeV} $ in SRA-TW. The column labelled ''Weighted yield'' shows the results including all correction factors applied to simulation, and is normalised to 139 fb$^{-1}$. A notable exception concerns results in the first row, labelled ''Total'', that corresponds to plain $\sigma \cdot \mathcal{L}$ expected. The ''Derivation skim'' includes the requirements that $H_{T}$, the scalar sum of $p_{T}$ of jets and leptons, $H_{T}>150\ \mathrm{GeV}$ or that a ''baseline'' electron or muon has $p_{T}>20\ \mathrm{GeV}$. The definition of ''baseline'' electron/muons, lepton and $\tau$ vetos are described in the main body of the paper. In total 30000 raw MC events were generated prior to the specified cuts, with the column ''Unweighted yield'' collecting the numbers after each cut.

Cutflow for the reference point $(\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}, \it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}})= (1300,1)\ \mathrm{GeV} $ in SRA-T0. The column labelled ''Weighted yield'' shows the results including all correction factors applied to simulation, and is normalised to 139 fb$^{-1}$. A notable exception concerns results in the first row, labelled ''Total'', that corresponds to plain $\sigma \cdot \mathcal{L}$ expected. The ''Derivation skim'' includes the requirements that $H_{T}$, the scalar sum of $p_{T}$ of jets and leptons, $H_{T}>150\ \mathrm{GeV}$ or that a ''baseline'' electron or muon has $p_{T}>20\ \mathrm{GeV}$. The definition of ''baseline'' electron/muons, lepton and $\tau$ vetos are described in the main body of the paper. In total 30000 raw MC events were generated prior to the specified cuts, with the column ''Unweighted yield'' collecting the numbers after each cut.

Cutflow for the reference point $(\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}, \it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}})= (700,400)\ \mathrm{GeV} $ in signal regions SRB-TT, SRB-TW and SRB-T0. The regions differ by the last cut applied. The column labelled ''Weighted yield'' shows the results including all correction factors applied to simulation, and is normalised to 139 fb$^{-1}$. A notable exception concerns results in the first row, labelled ''Total'', that corresponds to plain $\sigma \cdot \mathcal{L}$ expected. The ''Derivation skim'' includes the requirements that $H_{T}$, the scalar sum of $p_{T}$ of jets and leptons, $H_{T}>150\ \mathrm{GeV}$ or that a ''baseline'' electron or muon has $p_{T}>20\ \mathrm{GeV}$. The definition of ''baseline'' electron/muons, lepton and $\tau$ vetos are described in the main body of the paper. In total 60000 raw MC events were generated prior to the specified cuts, with the column ''Unweighted yield'' collecting the numbers after each cut.

Cutflow for the reference point $(\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}, \it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}})= (500,327)\ \mathrm{GeV} $ in regions SRC-1, SRC-2, SRC-3, SRC-4 and SRC-5. The regions differ by the last cut applied. The column labelled ''Weighted yield'' shows the results including all correction factors applied to simulation, and is normalised to 139 fb$^{-1}$. A notable exception concerns results in the first row, labelled ''Total'', that corresponds to plain $\sigma \cdot \mathcal{L}$ expected. The ''Derivation skim'' includes the requirements that $H_{T}$, the scalar sum of $p_{T}$ of jets and leptons, $H_{T}>150\ \mathrm{GeV}$ or that a ''baseline'' electron or muon has $p_{T}>20\ \mathrm{GeV}$. The definition of ''baseline'' electron/muons, lepton and $\tau$ vetos are described in the main body of the paper. In total 150000 raw MC events with filter efficiency of 0.384 were generated prior to the specified cuts, with the column ''Unweighted yield'' collecting the numbers after each cut.

Cutflow for the reference point $(\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}, \it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}})= (550,500)\ \mathrm{GeV} $ in SRD0. The column labelled ''Weighted yield'' shows the results including all correction factors applied to simulation, and is normalised to 139 fb$^{-1}$. A notable exception concerns results in the first row, labelled ''Total'', that corresponds to plain $\sigma \cdot \mathcal{L}$ expected. The ''Derivation skim'' includes the requirements that $H_{T}$, the scalar sum of $p_{T}$ of jets and leptons, $H_{T}>150\ \mathrm{GeV}$ or that a ''baseline'' electron or muon has $p_{T}>20\ \mathrm{GeV}$. The definition of ''baseline'' electron/muons, lepton and $\tau$ vetos are described in the main body of the paper. In total 90000 raw MC events with filter efficiency of 0.428 were generated prior to the specified cuts, with the column ''Unweighted yield'' collecting the numbers after each cut.

Cutflow for the reference point $(\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}, \it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}})= (550,500)\ \mathrm{GeV} $ in SRD1. The column labelled ''Weighted yield'' shows the results including all correction factors applied to simulation, and is normalised to 139 fb$^{-1}$. A notable exception concerns results in the first row, labelled ''Total'', that corresponds to plain $\sigma \cdot \mathcal{L}$ expected. The ''Derivation skim'' includes the requirements that $H_{T}$, the scalar sum of $p_{T}$ of jets and leptons, $H_{T}>150\ \mathrm{GeV}$ or that a ''baseline'' electron or muon has $p_{T}>20\ \mathrm{GeV}$. The definition of ''baseline'' electron/muons, lepton and $\tau$ vetos are described in the main body of the paper. In total 90000 raw MC events with filter efficiency of 0.428 were generated prior to the specified cuts, with the column ''Unweighted yield'' collecting the numbers after each cut.

Cutflow for the reference point $(\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}, \it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}})= (550,500)\ \mathrm{GeV} $ in SRD2. The column labelled ''Weighted yield'' shows the results including all correction factors applied to simulation, and is normalised to 139 fb$^{-1}$. A notable exception concerns results in the first row, labelled ''Total'', that corresponds to plain $\sigma \cdot \mathcal{L}$ expected. The ''Derivation skim'' includes the requirements that $H_{T}$, the scalar sum of $p_{T}$ of jets and leptons, $H_{T}>150\ \mathrm{GeV}$ or that a ''baseline'' electron or muon has $p_{T}>20\ \mathrm{GeV}$. The definition of ''baseline'' electron/muons, lepton and $\tau$ vetos are described in the main body of the paper. In total 90000 raw MC events with filter efficiency of 0.428 were generated prior to the specified cuts, with the column ''Unweighted yield'' collecting the numbers after each cut.

Signal acceptance in SRA-TT for simplified $(\tilde{t},\tilde{\chi^{0}_1})$ model. Please mind that the acceptance given in the table is multiplied by factor of $10^{3}$

Signal efficiency in SRA-TT for simplified $(\tilde{t},\tilde{\chi^{0}_1})$ model. Please mind that the efficiency in the table is reported in %.

Signal acceptance in SRA-TW for simplified $(\tilde{t},\tilde{\chi^{0}_1})$ model. Please mind that the acceptance given in the table is multiplied by factor of $10^{3}$

Signal efficiency in SRA-TW for simplified $(\tilde{t},\tilde{\chi^{0}_1})$ model. Please mind that the efficiency in the table is reported in %.

Signal acceptance in SRA-T0 for simplified $(\tilde{t},\tilde{\chi^{0}_1})$ model. Please mind that the acceptance given in the table is multiplied by factor of $10^{3}$

Signal efficiency in SRA-T0 for simplified $(\tilde{t},\tilde{\chi^{0}_1})$ model. Please mind that the efficiency in the table is reported in %.

Signal acceptance in SRB-TT for simplified $(\tilde{t},\tilde{\chi^{0}_1})$ model. Please mind that the acceptance given in the table is multiplied by factor of $10^{3}$

Signal efficiency in SRB-TT for simplified $(\tilde{t},\tilde{\chi^{0}_1})$ model. Please mind that the efficiency in the table is reported in %.

Signal acceptance in SRB-TW for simplified $(\tilde{t},\tilde{\chi^{0}_1})$ model. Please mind that the acceptance given in the table is multiplied by factor of $10^{3}$

Signal efficiency in SRB-TW for simplified $(\tilde{t},\tilde{\chi^{0}_1})$ model. Please mind that the efficiency in the table is reported in %.

Signal acceptance in SRB-T0 for simplified $(\tilde{t},\tilde{\chi^{0}_1})$ model. Please mind that the acceptance given in the table is multiplied by factor of $10^{3}$

Signal efficiency in SRB-T0 for simplified $(\tilde{t},\tilde{\chi^{0}_1})$ model. Please mind that the efficiency in the table is reported in %.

Signal acceptance in SRC1 for simplified $(\tilde{t},\tilde{\chi^{0}_1})$ model. Please mind that the acceptance given in the table is multiplied by factor of $10^{5}$ and the results are given here in the $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}-\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}$ plane as opposed to the $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}-\Delta(\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}},\it{m}_{\tilde{t}})$ one showed in the paper plot.

Signal efficiency in SRC1 for simplified $(\tilde{t},\tilde{\chi^{0}_1})$ model. Please mind that the efficiency in the table is reported in % and the results are given here in the $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}-\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}$ plane as opposed to the $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}-\Delta(\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}},\it{m}_{\tilde{t}})$ one showed in the paper plot.

Signal acceptance in SRC2 for simplified $(\tilde{t},\tilde{\chi^{0}_1})$ model. Please mind that the acceptance given in the table is multiplied by factor of $10^{5}$ and the results are given here in the $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}-\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}$ plane as opposed to the $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}-\Delta(\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}},\it{m}_{\tilde{t}})$ one showed in the paper plot.

Signal efficiency in SRC2 for simplified $(\tilde{t},\tilde{\chi^{0}_1})$ model. Please mind that the efficiency in the table is reported in % and the results are given here in the $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}-\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}$ plane as opposed to the $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}-\Delta(\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}},\it{m}_{\tilde{t}})$ one showed in the paper plot.

Signal acceptance in SRC3 for simplified $(\tilde{t},\tilde{\chi^{0}_1})$ model. Please mind that the acceptance given in the table is multiplied by factor of $10^{5}$ and the results are given here in the $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}-\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}$ plane as opposed to the $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}-\Delta(\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}},\it{m}_{\tilde{t}})$ one showed in the paper plot.

Signal efficiency in SRC3 for simplified $(\tilde{t},\tilde{\chi^{0}_1})$ model. Please mind that the efficiency in the table is reported in % and the results are given here in the $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}-\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}$ plane as opposed to the $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}-\Delta(\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}},\it{m}_{\tilde{t}})$ one showed in the paper plot.

Signal acceptance in SRC4 for simplified $(\tilde{t},\tilde{\chi^{0}_1})$ model. Please mind that the acceptance given in the table is multiplied by factor of $10^{5}$ and the results are given here in the $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}-\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}$ plane as opposed to the $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}-\Delta(\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}},\it{m}_{\tilde{t}})$ one showed in the paper plot.

Signal efficiency in SRC4 for simplified $(\tilde{t},\tilde{\chi^{0}_1})$ model. Please mind that the efficiency in the table is reported in % and the results are given here in the $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}-\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}$ plane as opposed to the $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}-\Delta(\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}},\it{m}_{\tilde{t}})$ plane showed in the paper plot.

Signal acceptance in SRC5 for simplified $(\tilde{t},\tilde{\chi^{0}_1})$ model. Please mind that the acceptance given in the table is multiplied by factor of $10^{5}$ and the results are given here in the $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}-\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}$ plane as opposed to the $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}-\Delta(\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}},\it{m}_{\tilde{t}})$ plane showed in the paper plot.

Signal efficiency in SRC5 for simplified $(\tilde{t},\tilde{\chi^{0}_1})$ model. Please mind that the efficiency in the table is reported in % and the results are given here in the $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}-\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}$ plane as opposed to the $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}-\Delta(\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}},\it{m}_{\tilde{t}})$ one showed in the paper plot.

Signal acceptance in SRD0 for simplified $(\tilde{t},\tilde{\chi^{0}_1})$ model. Please mind that the acceptance given in the table is multiplied by factor of $10^{5}$ and the results are given here in the $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}-\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}$ plane as opposed to the $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}-\Delta(\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}},\it{m}_{\tilde{t}})$ one showed in the paper plot.

Signal efficiency in SRD0 for simplified $(\tilde{t},\tilde{\chi^{0}_1})$ model. Please mind that the efficiency in the table is reported in % and the results are given here in the $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}-\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}$ plane as opposed to the $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}-\Delta(\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}},\it{m}_{\tilde{t}})$ one showed in the paper plot.

Signal acceptance in SRD1 for simplified $(\tilde{t},\tilde{\chi^{0}_1})$ model. Please mind that the acceptance given in the table is multiplied by factor of $10^{5}$ and the results are given here in the $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}-\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}$ plane as opposed to the $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}-\Delta(\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}},\it{m}_{\tilde{t}})$ one showed in the paper plot.

Signal efficiency in SRD1 for simplified $(\tilde{t},\tilde{\chi^{0}_1})$ model. Please mind that the efficiency in the table is reported in % and the results are given here in the $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}-\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}$ plane as opposed to the $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}-\Delta(\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}},\it{m}_{\tilde{t}})$ one showed in the paper plot.

Signal acceptance in SRD2 for simplified $(\tilde{t},\tilde{\chi^{0}_1})$ model. Please mind that the acceptance given in the table is multiplied by factor of $10^{5}$ and the results are given here in the $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}-\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}$ plane as opposed to the $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}-\Delta(\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}},\it{m}_{\tilde{t}})$ one showed in the paper plot.

Signal efficiency in SRD2 for simplified $(\tilde{t},\tilde{\chi^{0}_1})$ model. Please mind that the efficiency in the table is reported in % and the results are given here in the $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}-\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}$ plane as opposed to the $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}-\Delta(\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}},\it{m}_{\tilde{t}})$ one showed in the paper plot.

Expected 95% CL exclusion contours in signal region Rpv2L on the gluino and lightest top squark masses in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay into a top quark and an top squark, which in turn decays via non-zero baryon-number-violating RPV couplings $\lambda^{''}_{313}$, $\tilde g\to t\tilde{t}_1$ followed by $\tilde{t}_1\to b d$.

Observed 95% CL exclusion contours in the best combination of signal regions of Rpc2L1b and Rpc2L2b on the lightest bottom squark and lightest neutralino masses in a SUSY scenario where pairs of bottom-antibottom squarks are produced and decay into the lightest neutralino via a chargino, $\tilde b^{}_{1}\to t\tilde{\chi}_1^-$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm\to W^\pm\tilde{\chi}_1^0$.

Expected 95% CL exclusion contours in the best combination of signal regions of Rpc2L1b and Rpc2L2b on the lightest bottom squark and lightest neutralino masses in a SUSY scenario where pairs of bottom-antibottom squarks are produced and decay into the lightest neutralino via a chargino, $\tilde b^{}_{1}\to t\tilde{\chi}_1^-$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm\to W^\pm\tilde{\chi}_1^0$.

Number of signal events expected for 139 fb$^{-1}$ at different stages of the event selection for the signal region Rpc2L0b, in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay into the lightest neutralino via a two-steps cascade, $\tilde g\to q\bar{q}^{'}\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm\to W^\pm\tilde{\chi}_2^0$ and $\tilde{\chi}_2^0\to Z\tilde{\chi}_1^0$. The masses of the superpartners involved in the process are set to $m(\tilde g)$ = 1600 GeV, $m(\tilde \chi_1^\pm)$ = 1200 GeV, $m(\tilde \chi_2^0)$ = 1000 GeV and $m(\tilde \chi_1^0)$ = 800 GeV. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

Number of signal events expected for 139 fb$^{-1}$ at different stages of the event selection for the signal region Rpc2L1b, in a SUSY scenario where pairs of bottom-antibottom squarks are produced and decay into the lightest neutralino via a chargino, $\tilde b^{}_{1}\to t\tilde{\chi}_1^-$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm\to W^\pm\tilde{\chi}_1^0$. The masses of the superpartners involved in the process are set to $m(\tilde{b}^{}_1)$ = 850 GeV, $m(\tilde \chi_1^\pm)$ = 500 GeV and $m(\tilde \chi_1^0)$ = 400 GeV. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

Number of signal events expected for 139 fb$^{-1}$ at different stages of the event selection for the signal region Rpc2L2b, in a SUSY scenario where pairs of bottom-antibottom squarks are produced and decay into the lightest neutralino via a chargino, $\tilde b^{}_{1}\to t\tilde{\chi}_1^-$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm\to W^\pm\tilde{\chi}_1^0$. The masses of the superpartners involved in the process are set to $m(\tilde{b}^{}_1)$ = 850 GeV, $m(\tilde \chi_1^\pm)$ = 500 GeV and $m(\tilde \chi_1^0)$ = 400 GeV. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

Number of signal events expected for 139 fb$^{-1}$ at different stages of the event selection for the signal region Rpc3LSS1b, in a SUSY scenario where pairs of top-antitop squarks are produced and decay into the lightest neutralino via a two-steps cascade, $\tilde t^{}_{1}\to t\tilde{\chi}_2^0$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_2^0\to \tilde{\chi}_1^\pm W^\mp$ and $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm\to f\bar{f^{'}}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$. The lightest chargino and the lightest neutralino are assumed to be nearly mass-degenerate. The masses of the superpartners involved in the process are set to $m(\tilde{t}^{}_1)$ = 800 GeV, $m(\tilde \chi_2^0)$ = 625 GeV, $m(\tilde \chi_1^\pm)\approx m(\tilde \chi_1^0)$ = 525 GeV. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

Number of signal events expected for 139 fb$^{-1}$ at different stages of the event selection for the signal region Rpv2L, in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay into a top quark and an top squark which in turn decays via non-zero baryon-number-violating RPV couplings $\lambda^{''}_{313}$, $\tilde g\to t\tilde{t}_1$ followed by $\tilde{t}_1\to b d$. The masses of the superpartners involved in the process are set to $m(\tilde g)$ = 1600 GeV, $m(\tilde{t}^{}_{1})$ = 800 GeV. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.

Signal acceptance for Rpc2L0b signal region with sensitivity to $pp\to \tilde g\tilde g$ production cross-sections in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay into the lightest neutralino via a two-steps cascade, $\tilde g\to q\bar{q}^{'}\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm\to W^\pm\tilde{\chi}_2^0$ and $\tilde{\chi}_2^0\to Z\tilde{\chi}_1^0$.

Signal acceptance for Rpc2L1b signal region with sensitivity to $pp\to \tilde{b}^{}_1\tilde{b}^{*}_1$ production cross-sections in a SUSY scenario where pairs of bottom-antibottom squarks are produced and decay into the lightest neutralino via a chargino, $\tilde b^{}_{1}\to t\tilde{\chi}_1^-$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm\to W^\pm\tilde{\chi}_1^0$.

Signal acceptance for Rpc2L2b signal region with sensitivity to $pp\to \tilde{b}^{}_1\tilde{b}^{*}_1$ production cross-sections in a SUSY scenario where pairs of bottom-antibottom squarks are produced and decay into the lightest neutralino via a chargino, $\tilde b^{}_{1}\to t\tilde{\chi}_1^-$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm\to W^\pm\tilde{\chi}_1^0$.

Signal acceptance for Rpv2L signal region with sensitivity to $pp\to \tilde g\tilde g$ production cross-sections in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay into a top quark and an top squark, which in turn decays via non-zero baryon-number-violating RPV couplings $\lambda^{''}_{313}$, $\tilde g\to t\tilde{t}_1$ followed by $\tilde{t}_1\to b d$.

Signal acceptance for Rpc3LSS1b signal region with sensitivity to $pp\to \tilde{t}^{}_\mathrm{1}\tilde{t}^{*}_\mathrm{1}$ production cross-sections in a SUSY scenario where pairs of top-antitop squarks are produced and decay into the lightest neutralino via a two-steps cascade, $\tilde t^{}_{1}\to t\tilde{\chi}_2^0$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_2^0\to \tilde{\chi}_1^\pm W^\mp$ and $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm\to f\bar{f^{'}}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$. The lightest chargino and the lightest neutralino are assumed to be nearly mass-degenerate.

Signal efficiency for Rpc2L0b signal region with sensitivity to $pp\to \tilde g\tilde g$ production cross-sections in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay into the lightest neutralino via a two-steps cascade, $\tilde g\to q\bar{q}^{'}\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm\to W^\pm\tilde{\chi}_2^0$ and $\tilde{\chi}_2^0\to Z\tilde{\chi}_1^0$.

Signal efficiency for Rpc2L1b signal region with sensitivity to $pp\to \tilde{b}^{}_1\tilde{b}^{*}_1$ production cross-sections in a SUSY scenario where pairs of bottom-antibottom squarks are produced and decay into the lightest neutralino via a chargino, $\tilde b^{}_{1}\to t\tilde{\chi}_1^-$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm\to W^\pm\tilde{\chi}_1^0$.

Signal efficiency for Rpc2L2b signal region with sensitivity to $pp\to \tilde{b}^{}_1\tilde{b}^{*}_1$ production cross-sections in a SUSY scenario where pairs of bottom-antibottom squarks are produced and decay into the lightest neutralino via a chargino, $\tilde b^{}_{1}\to t\tilde{\chi}_1^-$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm\to W^\pm\tilde{\chi}_1^0$.

Signal efficiency for Rpv2L signal region with sensitivity to $pp\to \tilde g\tilde g$ production cross-sections in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay into a top quark and an top squark, which in turn decays via non-zero baryon-number-violating RPV couplings $\lambda^{''}_{313}$, $\tilde g\to t\tilde{t}_1$ followed by $\tilde{t}_1\to b d$.

Signal efficiency for Rpc3LSS1b signal region with sensitivity to $pp\to \tilde{t}^{}_\mathrm{1}\tilde{t}^{*}_\mathrm{1}$ production cross-sections in a SUSY scenario where pairs of top-antitop squarks are produced and decay into the lightest neutralino via a two-steps cascade, $\tilde t^{}_{1}\to t\tilde{\chi}_2^0$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_2^0\to \tilde{\chi}_1^\pm W^\mp$ and $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm\to f\bar{f^{'}}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$. The lightest chargino and the lightest neutralino are assumed to be nearly mass-degenerate.

Observed 95% CL upper limit on $pp\to \tilde g\tilde g$ production cross-sections in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay into the lightest neutralino via a two-steps cascade, $\tilde g\to q\bar{q}^{'}\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm\to W^\pm\tilde{\chi}_2^0$ and $\tilde{\chi}_2^0\to Z\tilde{\chi}_1^0$.

Observed 95% CL upper limit on $pp\to \tilde g\tilde g$ production cross-sections in a SUSY scenario where gluinos are produced in pairs and decay into a top quark and an top squark, which in turn decays via non-zero baryon-number-violating RPV couplings $\lambda^{''}_{313}$, $\tilde g\to t\tilde{t}_1$ followed by $\tilde{t}_1\to b d$.

Observed 95% CL upper limit on $pp\to \tilde{b}^{}_1\tilde{b}^{*}_1$ production cross-sections in a SUSY scenario where pairs of bottom-antibottom squarks are produced and decay into the lightest neutralino via a chargino, $\tilde b^{}_{1}\to t\tilde{\chi}_1^-$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm\to W^\pm\tilde{\chi}_1^0$.

Observed 95% CL upper limit on $pp\to \tilde{t}^{}_\mathrm{1}\tilde{t}^{*}_\mathrm{1}$ production cross-sections in a SUSY scenario where pairs of top-antitop squarks are produced and decay into the lightest neutralino via a two-steps cascade, $\tilde t^{}_{1}\to t\tilde{\chi}_2^0$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_2^0\to \tilde{\chi}_1^\pm W^\mp$ and $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm\to f\bar{f^{'}}\tilde{\chi}_1^0$. The lightest chargino and the lightest neutralino are assumed to be nearly mass-degenerate.

Best observed 95% CL exclusion contours selected from Rpc2L1b and Rpc2L2b on the lightest bottom squark and lightest neutralino masses in a SUSY scenario where pairs of bottom-antibottom squarks are produced and decay into the lightest neutralino via a chargino, $\tilde b^{}_{1}\to t\tilde{\chi}_1^-$ followed by $\tilde{\chi}_1^\pm\to W^\pm\tilde{\chi}_1^0$.

N-1 distributions for $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ of observed data and expected background towards Rpc2L0b from publication's Figure 5 . The last bin is inclusive.

N-1 distributions for $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}} / m_{\mathrm{eff}}$ of observed data and expected background towards Rpc2L1b from publication's Figure 5 . The last bin is inclusive.

N-1 distributions for $E_{\mathrm{T}}^{\mathrm{miss}}$ of observed data and expected background towards Rpc2L2b from publication's Figure 5 . The last bin is inclusive.

N-1 distributions for $m_{\mathrm{eff}}$ of observed data and expected background towards Rpv2L from publication's Figure 5 . The last bin is inclusive.

<b>Kinematics 4</b> Kinematic distributions after the background-only fit showing the data as well as the expected background in the inclusive electroweakino SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_{&#8467;&#8467;} [1, 60] (top) and slepton SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_T2¹⁰⁰ [100, &infin;] (bottom) signal regions. The arrow in the E_T^miss/H_T^lep variables indicates the minimum value of the requirement imposed in the final SR selection. The m_{&#8467;&#8467;} and m_T2 distributions (right) have all the SR requirements applied. Background processes containing fewer than two prompt leptons are categorized as `Fake/nonprompt'. The category `Others' contains rare backgrounds from triboson, Higgs boson, and the remaining top-quark production processes listed in Table 1. The uncertainty bands plotted include all statistical and systematic uncertainties. The last bin includes overflow. The dashed lines represent benchmark signal samples corresponding to the Higgsino H&#771; and slepton &#8467;&#771; simplified models. Orange arrows in the Data/SM panel indicate values that are beyond the y-axis range.

<b>Exclusion 1 (exp)</b> Expected 95% CL exclusion sensitivity (blue dashed line) with pm1&sigma;_exp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and observed limits (red solid line) with pm1&sigma;_theory (dotted red line) from signal cross-section uncertainties for simplified models of direct Higgsino (top) and wino (bottom) production. A fit of signals to the m_{&#8467;&#8467;} spectrum is used to derive the limit, which is projected into the &Delta; m(&chi;&#771;₂⁰, &chi;&#771;₁⁰) vs. m(&chi;&#771;₂⁰) plane. For Higgsino production, the chargino &chi;&#771;₁^pm mass is assumed to be halfway between the two lightest neutralino masses, while m(&chi;&#771;₂⁰) = m(&chi;&#771;₁^pm) is assumed for the wino--bino model. The gray regions denote the lower chargino mass limit from LEP [20]. The blue region in the lower plot indicates the limit from the 2&#8467;+3&#8467; combination of ATLAS Run 1 [41,42].

<b>Exclusion 1 (obs)</b> Expected 95% CL exclusion sensitivity (blue dashed line) with pm1&sigma;_exp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and observed limits (red solid line) with pm1&sigma;_theory (dotted red line) from signal cross-section uncertainties for simplified models of direct Higgsino (top) and wino (bottom) production. A fit of signals to the m_{&#8467;&#8467;} spectrum is used to derive the limit, which is projected into the &Delta; m(&chi;&#771;₂⁰, &chi;&#771;₁⁰) vs. m(&chi;&#771;₂⁰) plane. For Higgsino production, the chargino &chi;&#771;₁^pm mass is assumed to be halfway between the two lightest neutralino masses, while m(&chi;&#771;₂⁰) = m(&chi;&#771;₁^pm) is assumed for the wino--bino model. The gray regions denote the lower chargino mass limit from LEP [20]. The blue region in the lower plot indicates the limit from the 2&#8467;+3&#8467; combination of ATLAS Run 1 [41,42].

<b>Exclusion 2 (exp)</b> Expected 95% CL exclusion sensitivity (blue dashed line) with pm1&sigma;_exp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and observed limits (red solid line) with pm1&sigma;_theory (dotted red line) from signal cross-section uncertainties for simplified models of direct Higgsino (top) and wino (bottom) production. A fit of signals to the m_{&#8467;&#8467;} spectrum is used to derive the limit, which is projected into the &Delta; m(&chi;&#771;₂⁰, &chi;&#771;₁⁰) vs. m(&chi;&#771;₂⁰) plane. For Higgsino production, the chargino &chi;&#771;₁^pm mass is assumed to be halfway between the two lightest neutralino masses, while m(&chi;&#771;₂⁰) = m(&chi;&#771;₁^pm) is assumed for the wino--bino model. The gray regions denote the lower chargino mass limit from LEP [20]. The blue region in the lower plot indicates the limit from the 2&#8467;+3&#8467; combination of ATLAS Run 1 [41,42].

<b>Exclusion 2 (obs)</b> Expected 95% CL exclusion sensitivity (blue dashed line) with pm1&sigma;_exp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and observed limits (red solid line) with pm1&sigma;_theory (dotted red line) from signal cross-section uncertainties for simplified models of direct Higgsino (top) and wino (bottom) production. A fit of signals to the m_{&#8467;&#8467;} spectrum is used to derive the limit, which is projected into the &Delta; m(&chi;&#771;₂⁰, &chi;&#771;₁⁰) vs. m(&chi;&#771;₂⁰) plane. For Higgsino production, the chargino &chi;&#771;₁^pm mass is assumed to be halfway between the two lightest neutralino masses, while m(&chi;&#771;₂⁰) = m(&chi;&#771;₁^pm) is assumed for the wino--bino model. The gray regions denote the lower chargino mass limit from LEP [20]. The blue region in the lower plot indicates the limit from the 2&#8467;+3&#8467; combination of ATLAS Run 1 [41,42].

<b>Exclusion 3 (exp)</b> Expected 95% CL exclusion sensitivity (blue dashed line) with &plusmn; 1 &sigma;_exp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and observed limits (red solid line) with &plusmn; 1 &sigma;_theory (dotted red line) from signal cross-section uncertainties for simplified models of direct slepton production. A fit of slepton signals to the m_T2¹⁰⁰ spectrum is used to derive the limit, which is projected into the &Delta; m(&#8467;&#771;, &chi;&#771;₁⁰) vs. m(&#8467;&#771;) plane. Slepton &#8467;&#771; refers to the scalar partners of left- and right-handed electrons and muons, which are assumed to be fourfold mass degenerate m(e&#771;_L) = m(e&#771;_R) = m(&mu;&#771;_L) = m(&mu;&#771;_R). The gray region is the e&#771;_R limit from LEP [20,24], while the blue region is the fourfold mass degenerate slepton limit from ATLAS Run 1 [41].

<b>Exclusion 3 (obs)</b> Expected 95% CL exclusion sensitivity (blue dashed line) with &plusmn; 1 &sigma;_exp (yellow band) from experimental systematic uncertainties and observed limits (red solid line) with &plusmn; 1 &sigma;_theory (dotted red line) from signal cross-section uncertainties for simplified models of direct slepton production. A fit of slepton signals to the m_T2¹⁰⁰ spectrum is used to derive the limit, which is projected into the &Delta; m(&#8467;&#771;, &chi;&#771;₁⁰) vs. m(&#8467;&#771;) plane. Slepton &#8467;&#771; refers to the scalar partners of left- and right-handed electrons and muons, which are assumed to be fourfold mass degenerate m(e&#771;_L) = m(e&#771;_R) = m(&mu;&#771;_L) = m(&mu;&#771;_R). The gray region is the e&#771;_R limit from LEP [20,24], while the blue region is the fourfold mass degenerate slepton limit from ATLAS Run 1 [41].

<b>Upper Limits 1</b> The first two columns present observed (N_obs) and expected (N_exp) event yields in the inclusive signal regions. The latter are obtained by the background-only fit of the control regions, and the errors include both statistical and systematic uncertainties. The next two columns show the observed 95% CL upper limits on the visible cross-section (&lang;&epsilon;&sigma;&rang;_obs⁹⁵) and on the number of signal events (S_obs⁹⁵). The fifth column (S_exp⁹⁵) shows what the 95% CL upper limit on the number of signal events would be, given an observed number of events equal to the expected number (and +- 1 &sigma; deviations from the expectation) of background events. The last column indicates the discovery p-value (p(s = 0)), which is capped at 0.5.

<b>Cutflow 1</b> Observed event yields and exclusion fit results with the signal strength parameter set to zero for the exclusive electroweakino and slepton signal regions. Background processes containing fewer than two prompt leptons are categorized as `Fake/nonprompt'. The category `Others' contains rare backgrounds from triboson, Higgs boson, and the remaining top-quark production processes listed in Table 1. Uncertainties in the fitted background estimates combine statistical and systematic uncertainties.

<b>Acceptances 1</b> Truth acceptances for the Higgsino &chi;&#771;₂⁰&chi;&#771;₁^&plusmn; production process in the inclusive SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_{&#8467;&#8467;} regions. Numbers overlaid on the mass planes are the acceptance &times; 10⁴.

<b>Acceptances 2</b> Truth acceptances for the Higgsino &chi;&#771;₂⁰&chi;&#771;₁^&plusmn; production process in the inclusive SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_{&#8467;&#8467;} regions. Numbers overlaid on the mass planes are the acceptance &times; 10⁴.

<b>Acceptances 3</b> Truth acceptances for the Higgsino &chi;&#771;₂⁰&chi;&#771;₁^&plusmn; production process in the inclusive SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_{&#8467;&#8467;} regions. Numbers overlaid on the mass planes are the acceptance &times; 10⁴.

<b>Acceptances 4</b> Truth acceptances for the Higgsino &chi;&#771;₂⁰&chi;&#771;₁^&plusmn; production process in the inclusive SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_{&#8467;&#8467;} regions. Numbers overlaid on the mass planes are the acceptance &times; 10⁴.

<b>Acceptances 5</b> Truth acceptances for the Higgsino &chi;&#771;₂⁰&chi;&#771;₁^&plusmn; production process in the inclusive SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_{&#8467;&#8467;} regions. Numbers overlaid on the mass planes are the acceptance &times; 10⁴.

<b>Acceptances 6</b> Truth acceptances for the Higgsino &chi;&#771;₂⁰&chi;&#771;₁^&plusmn; production process in the inclusive SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_{&#8467;&#8467;} regions. Numbers overlaid on the mass planes are the acceptance &times; 10⁴.

<b>Acceptances 7</b> Truth acceptances for the Higgsino &chi;&#771;₂⁰&chi;&#771;₁^&plusmn; production process in the inclusive SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_{&#8467;&#8467;} regions. Numbers overlaid on the mass planes are the acceptance &times; 10⁴.

<b>Acceptances 8</b> Truth acceptances for the Higgsino &chi;&#771;₂⁰&chi;&#771;₁⁺ production process in the inclusive SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_{&#8467;&#8467;} regions. Numbers overlaid on the mass planes are the acceptance &times; 10⁴.

<b>Acceptances 9</b> Truth acceptances for the Higgsino &chi;&#771;₂⁰&chi;&#771;₁⁺ production process in the inclusive SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_{&#8467;&#8467;} regions. Numbers overlaid on the mass planes are the acceptance &times; 10⁴.

<b>Acceptances 10</b> Truth acceptances for the Higgsino &chi;&#771;₂⁰&chi;&#771;₁⁺ production process in the inclusive SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_{&#8467;&#8467;} regions. Numbers overlaid on the mass planes are the acceptance &times; 10⁴.

<b>Acceptances 11</b> Truth acceptances for the Higgsino &chi;&#771;₂⁰&chi;&#771;₁⁺ production process in the inclusive SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_{&#8467;&#8467;} regions. Numbers overlaid on the mass planes are the acceptance &times; 10⁴.

<b>Acceptances 12</b> Truth acceptances for the Higgsino &chi;&#771;₂⁰&chi;&#771;₁⁺ production process in the inclusive SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_{&#8467;&#8467;} regions. Numbers overlaid on the mass planes are the acceptance &times; 10⁴.

<b>Acceptances 13</b> Truth acceptances for the Higgsino &chi;&#771;₂⁰&chi;&#771;₁⁺ production process in the inclusive SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_{&#8467;&#8467;} regions. Numbers overlaid on the mass planes are the acceptance &times; 10⁴.

<b>Acceptances 14</b> Truth acceptances for the Higgsino &chi;&#771;₂⁰&chi;&#771;₁⁺ production process in the inclusive SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_{&#8467;&#8467;} regions. Numbers overlaid on the mass planes are the acceptance &times; 10⁴.

<b>Acceptances 15</b> Truth acceptances for the Higgsino &chi;&#771;₂⁰&chi;&#771;₁⁰ production process in the inclusive SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_{&#8467;&#8467;} regions. Numbers overlaid on the mass planes are the acceptance &times; 10⁴.

<b>Acceptances 16</b> Truth acceptances for the Higgsino &chi;&#771;₂⁰&chi;&#771;₁⁰ production process in the inclusive SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_{&#8467;&#8467;} regions. Numbers overlaid on the mass planes are the acceptance &times; 10⁴.

<b>Acceptances 17</b> Truth acceptances for the Higgsino &chi;&#771;₂⁰&chi;&#771;₁⁰ production process in the inclusive SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_{&#8467;&#8467;} regions. Numbers overlaid on the mass planes are the acceptance &times; 10⁴.

<b>Acceptances 18</b> Truth acceptances for the Higgsino &chi;&#771;₂⁰&chi;&#771;₁⁰ production process in the inclusive SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_{&#8467;&#8467;} regions. Numbers overlaid on the mass planes are the acceptance &times; 10⁴.

<b>Acceptances 19</b> Truth acceptances for the Higgsino &chi;&#771;₂⁰&chi;&#771;₁⁰ production process in the inclusive SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_{&#8467;&#8467;} regions. Numbers overlaid on the mass planes are the acceptance &times; 10⁴.

<b>Acceptances 20</b> Truth acceptances for the Higgsino &chi;&#771;₂⁰&chi;&#771;₁⁰ production process in the inclusive SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_{&#8467;&#8467;} regions. Numbers overlaid on the mass planes are the acceptance &times; 10⁴.

<b>Acceptances 21</b> Truth acceptances for the Higgsino &chi;&#771;₂⁰&chi;&#771;₁⁰ production process in the inclusive SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_{&#8467;&#8467;} regions. Numbers overlaid on the mass planes are the acceptance &times; 10⁴.

<b>Acceptances 22</b> Truth acceptances for the Higgsino &chi;&#771;₁⁺&chi;&#771;₁^- production process in the inclusive SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_{&#8467;&#8467;} regions. Numbers overlaid on the mass planes are the acceptance &times; 10⁴.

<b>Acceptances 23</b> Truth acceptances for the Higgsino &chi;&#771;₁⁺&chi;&#771;₁^- production process in the inclusive SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_{&#8467;&#8467;} regions. Numbers overlaid on the mass planes are the acceptance &times; 10⁴.

<b>Acceptances 24</b> Truth acceptances for the Higgsino &chi;&#771;₁⁺&chi;&#771;₁^- production process in the inclusive SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_{&#8467;&#8467;} regions. Numbers overlaid on the mass planes are the acceptance &times; 10⁴.

<b>Acceptances 25</b> Truth acceptances for the Higgsino &chi;&#771;₁⁺&chi;&#771;₁^- production process in the inclusive SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_{&#8467;&#8467;} regions. Numbers overlaid on the mass planes are the acceptance &times; 10⁴.

<b>Acceptances 26</b> Truth acceptances for the Higgsino &chi;&#771;₁⁺&chi;&#771;₁^- production process in the inclusive SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_{&#8467;&#8467;} regions. Numbers overlaid on the mass planes are the acceptance &times; 10⁴.

<b>Acceptances 27</b> Truth acceptances for the Higgsino &chi;&#771;₁⁺&chi;&#771;₁^- production process in the inclusive SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_{&#8467;&#8467;} regions. Numbers overlaid on the mass planes are the acceptance &times; 10⁴.

<b>Acceptances 28</b> Truth acceptances for the Higgsino &chi;&#771;₁⁺&chi;&#771;₁^- production process in the inclusive SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_{&#8467;&#8467;} regions. Numbers overlaid on the mass planes are the acceptance &times; 10⁴.

<b>Acceptances 29</b> Truth acceptances for the &#8467;&#771;&#8467;&#771; production in the inclusive SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_T2¹⁰⁰ regions. Numbers overlaid on the mass planes are the acceptance &times; 10³.

<b>Acceptances 30</b> Truth acceptances for the &#8467;&#771;&#8467;&#771; production in the inclusive SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_T2¹⁰⁰ regions. Numbers overlaid on the mass planes are the acceptance &times; 10³.

<b>Acceptances 31</b> Truth acceptances for the &#8467;&#771;&#8467;&#771; production in the inclusive SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_T2¹⁰⁰ regions. Numbers overlaid on the mass planes are the acceptance &times; 10³.

<b>Acceptances 32</b> Truth acceptances for the &#8467;&#771;&#8467;&#771; production in the inclusive SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_T2¹⁰⁰ regions. Numbers overlaid on the mass planes are the acceptance &times; 10³.

<b>Acceptances 33</b> Truth acceptances for the &#8467;&#771;&#8467;&#771; production in the inclusive SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_T2¹⁰⁰ regions. Numbers overlaid on the mass planes are the acceptance &times; 10³.

<b>Acceptances 34</b> Truth acceptances for the &#8467;&#771;&#8467;&#771; production in the inclusive SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_T2¹⁰⁰ regions. Numbers overlaid on the mass planes are the acceptance &times; 10³.

<b>Efficiencies 1</b> Efficiencies for the Higgsino &chi;&#771;₂⁰&chi;&#771;₁⁺ production process in the inclusive SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_{&#8467;&#8467;} regions. Efficiencies are computed as the ``acceptance times efficiency" divided by the acceptance. The black line indicates the maximum allowed value of &Delta; m or m_T2 for the inclusive signal region under study.

<b>Efficiencies 2</b> Efficiencies for the Higgsino &chi;&#771;₂⁰&chi;&#771;₁⁺ production process in the inclusive SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_{&#8467;&#8467;} regions. Efficiencies are computed as the ``acceptance times efficiency" divided by the acceptance. The black line indicates the maximum allowed value of &Delta; m or m_T2 for the inclusive signal region under study.

<b>Efficiencies 3</b> Efficiencies for the Higgsino &chi;&#771;₂⁰&chi;&#771;₁⁺ production process in the inclusive SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_{&#8467;&#8467;} regions. Efficiencies are computed as the ``acceptance times efficiency" divided by the acceptance. The black line indicates the maximum allowed value of &Delta; m or m_T2 for the inclusive signal region under study.

<b>Efficiencies 4</b> Efficiencies for the Higgsino &chi;&#771;₂⁰&chi;&#771;₁⁺ production process in the inclusive SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_{&#8467;&#8467;} regions. Efficiencies are computed as the ``acceptance times efficiency" divided by the acceptance. The black line indicates the maximum allowed value of &Delta; m or m_T2 for the inclusive signal region under study.

<b>Efficiencies 5</b> Efficiencies for the Higgsino &chi;&#771;₂⁰&chi;&#771;₁⁺ production process in the inclusive SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_{&#8467;&#8467;} regions. Efficiencies are computed as the ``acceptance times efficiency" divided by the acceptance. The black line indicates the maximum allowed value of &Delta; m or m_T2 for the inclusive signal region under study.

<b>Efficiencies 6</b> Efficiencies for the Higgsino &chi;&#771;₂⁰&chi;&#771;₁⁺ production process in the inclusive SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_{&#8467;&#8467;} regions. Efficiencies are computed as the ``acceptance times efficiency" divided by the acceptance. The black line indicates the maximum allowed value of &Delta; m or m_T2 for the inclusive signal region under study.

<b>Efficiencies 7</b> Efficiencies for the Higgsino &chi;&#771;₂⁰&chi;&#771;₁⁺ production process in the inclusive SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_{&#8467;&#8467;} regions. Efficiencies are computed as the ``acceptance times efficiency" divided by the acceptance. The black line indicates the maximum allowed value of &Delta; m or m_T2 for the inclusive signal region under study.

<b>Efficiencies 8</b> Efficiencies for the Higgsino &chi;&#771;₂⁰&chi;&#771;₁^- production process in the inclusive SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_{&#8467;&#8467;} regions. Efficiencies are computed as the ``acceptance times efficiency" divided by the acceptance. The black line indicates the maximum allowed value of &Delta; m or m_T2 for the inclusive signal region under study.

<b>Efficiencies 9</b> Efficiencies for the Higgsino &chi;&#771;₂⁰&chi;&#771;₁^- production process in the inclusive SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_{&#8467;&#8467;} regions. Efficiencies are computed as the ``acceptance times efficiency" divided by the acceptance. The black line indicates the maximum allowed value of &Delta; m or m_T2 for the inclusive signal region under study.

<b>Efficiencies 10</b> Efficiencies for the Higgsino &chi;&#771;₂⁰&chi;&#771;₁^- production process in the inclusive SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_{&#8467;&#8467;} regions. Efficiencies are computed as the ``acceptance times efficiency" divided by the acceptance. The black line indicates the maximum allowed value of &Delta; m or m_T2 for the inclusive signal region under study.

<b>Efficiencies 11</b> Efficiencies for the Higgsino &chi;&#771;₂⁰&chi;&#771;₁^- production process in the inclusive SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_{&#8467;&#8467;} regions. Efficiencies are computed as the ``acceptance times efficiency" divided by the acceptance. The black line indicates the maximum allowed value of &Delta; m or m_T2 for the inclusive signal region under study.

<b>Efficiencies 12</b> Efficiencies for the Higgsino &chi;&#771;₂⁰&chi;&#771;₁^- production process in the inclusive SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_{&#8467;&#8467;} regions. Efficiencies are computed as the ``acceptance times efficiency" divided by the acceptance. The black line indicates the maximum allowed value of &Delta; m or m_T2 for the inclusive signal region under study.

<b>Efficiencies 13</b> Efficiencies for the Higgsino &chi;&#771;₂⁰&chi;&#771;₁^- production process in the inclusive SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_{&#8467;&#8467;} regions. Efficiencies are computed as the ``acceptance times efficiency" divided by the acceptance. The black line indicates the maximum allowed value of &Delta; m or m_T2 for the inclusive signal region under study.

<b>Efficiencies 14</b> Efficiencies for the Higgsino &chi;&#771;₂⁰&chi;&#771;₁^- production process in the inclusive SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_{&#8467;&#8467;} regions. Efficiencies are computed as the ``acceptance times efficiency" divided by the acceptance. The black line indicates the maximum allowed value of &Delta; m or m_T2 for the inclusive signal region under study.

<b>Efficiencies 15</b> Efficiencies for the Higgsino &chi;&#771;₂⁰&chi;&#771;₁⁰ production process in the inclusive SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_{&#8467;&#8467;} regions. Efficiencies are computed as the ``acceptance times efficiency" divided by the acceptance. The black line indicates the maximum allowed value of &Delta; m or m_T2 for the inclusive signal region under study.

<b>Efficiencies 16</b> Efficiencies for the Higgsino &chi;&#771;₂⁰&chi;&#771;₁⁰ production process in the inclusive SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_{&#8467;&#8467;} regions. Efficiencies are computed as the ``acceptance times efficiency" divided by the acceptance. The black line indicates the maximum allowed value of &Delta; m or m_T2 for the inclusive signal region under study.

<b>Efficiencies 17</b> Efficiencies for the Higgsino &chi;&#771;₂⁰&chi;&#771;₁⁰ production process in the inclusive SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_{&#8467;&#8467;} regions. Efficiencies are computed as the ``acceptance times efficiency" divided by the acceptance. The black line indicates the maximum allowed value of &Delta; m or m_T2 for the inclusive signal region under study.

<b>Efficiencies 18</b> Efficiencies for the Higgsino &chi;&#771;₂⁰&chi;&#771;₁⁰ production process in the inclusive SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_{&#8467;&#8467;} regions. Efficiencies are computed as the ``acceptance times efficiency" divided by the acceptance. The black line indicates the maximum allowed value of &Delta; m or m_T2 for the inclusive signal region under study.

<b>Efficiencies 19</b> Efficiencies for the Higgsino &chi;&#771;₂⁰&chi;&#771;₁⁰ production process in the inclusive SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_{&#8467;&#8467;} regions. Efficiencies are computed as the ``acceptance times efficiency" divided by the acceptance. The black line indicates the maximum allowed value of &Delta; m or m_T2 for the inclusive signal region under study.

<b>Efficiencies 20</b> Efficiencies for the Higgsino &chi;&#771;₂⁰&chi;&#771;₁⁰ production process in the inclusive SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_{&#8467;&#8467;} regions. Efficiencies are computed as the ``acceptance times efficiency" divided by the acceptance. The black line indicates the maximum allowed value of &Delta; m or m_T2 for the inclusive signal region under study.

<b>Efficiencies 21</b> Efficiencies for the Higgsino &chi;&#771;₂⁰&chi;&#771;₁⁰ production process in the inclusive SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_{&#8467;&#8467;} regions. Efficiencies are computed as the ``acceptance times efficiency" divided by the acceptance. The black line indicates the maximum allowed value of &Delta; m or m_T2 for the inclusive signal region under study.

<b>Efficiencies 22</b> Efficiencies for the Higgsino &chi;&#771;₁⁺&chi;&#771;₁^- production process in the inclusive SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_{&#8467;&#8467;} regions. Efficiencies are computed as the ``acceptance times efficiency" divided by the acceptance. The black line indicates the maximum allowed value of &Delta; m or m_T2 for the inclusive signal region under study.

<b>Efficiencies 23</b> Efficiencies for the Higgsino &chi;&#771;₁⁺&chi;&#771;₁^- production process in the inclusive SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_{&#8467;&#8467;} regions. Efficiencies are computed as the ``acceptance times efficiency" divided by the acceptance. The black line indicates the maximum allowed value of &Delta; m or m_T2 for the inclusive signal region under study.

<b>Efficiencies 24</b> Efficiencies for the Higgsino &chi;&#771;₁⁺&chi;&#771;₁^- production process in the inclusive SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_{&#8467;&#8467;} regions. Efficiencies are computed as the ``acceptance times efficiency" divided by the acceptance. The black line indicates the maximum allowed value of &Delta; m or m_T2 for the inclusive signal region under study.

<b>Efficiencies 25</b> Efficiencies for the Higgsino &chi;&#771;₁⁺&chi;&#771;₁^- production process in the inclusive SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_{&#8467;&#8467;} regions. Efficiencies are computed as the ``acceptance times efficiency" divided by the acceptance. The black line indicates the maximum allowed value of &Delta; m or m_T2 for the inclusive signal region under study.

<b>Efficiencies 26</b> Efficiencies for the Higgsino &chi;&#771;₁⁺&chi;&#771;₁^- production process in the inclusive SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_{&#8467;&#8467;} regions. Efficiencies are computed as the ``acceptance times efficiency" divided by the acceptance. The black line indicates the maximum allowed value of &Delta; m or m_T2 for the inclusive signal region under study.

<b>Efficiencies 27</b> Efficiencies for the Higgsino &chi;&#771;₁⁺&chi;&#771;₁^- production process in the inclusive SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_{&#8467;&#8467;} regions. Efficiencies are computed as the ``acceptance times efficiency" divided by the acceptance. The black line indicates the maximum allowed value of &Delta; m or m_T2 for the inclusive signal region under study.

<b>Efficiencies 28</b> Efficiencies for the Higgsino &chi;&#771;₁⁺&chi;&#771;₁^- production process in the inclusive SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_{&#8467;&#8467;} regions. Efficiencies are computed as the ``acceptance times efficiency" divided by the acceptance. The black line indicates the maximum allowed value of &Delta; m or m_T2 for the inclusive signal region under study.

<b>Efficiencies 29</b> Efficiencies for the &#8467;&#771;&#8467;&#771; production in the inclusive SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_T2¹⁰⁰ regions. Efficiencies are computed as the ``acceptance times efficiency" divided by the acceptance. The black line indicates the maximum allowed value of &Delta; m or m_T2 for the inclusive signal region under study.

<b>Efficiencies 30</b> Efficiencies for the &#8467;&#771;&#8467;&#771; production in the inclusive SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_T2¹⁰⁰ regions. Efficiencies are computed as the ``acceptance times efficiency" divided by the acceptance. The black line indicates the maximum allowed value of &Delta; m or m_T2 for the inclusive signal region under study.

<b>Efficiencies 31</b> Efficiencies for the &#8467;&#771;&#8467;&#771; production in the inclusive SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_T2¹⁰⁰ regions. Efficiencies are computed as the ``acceptance times efficiency" divided by the acceptance. The black line indicates the maximum allowed value of &Delta; m or m_T2 for the inclusive signal region under study.

<b>Efficiencies 32</b> Efficiencies for the &#8467;&#771;&#8467;&#771; production in the inclusive SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_T2¹⁰⁰ regions. Efficiencies are computed as the ``acceptance times efficiency" divided by the acceptance. The black line indicates the maximum allowed value of &Delta; m or m_T2 for the inclusive signal region under study.

<b>Efficiencies 33</b> Efficiencies for the &#8467;&#771;&#8467;&#771; production in the inclusive SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_T2¹⁰⁰ regions. Efficiencies are computed as the ``acceptance times efficiency" divided by the acceptance. The black line indicates the maximum allowed value of &Delta; m or m_T2 for the inclusive signal region under study.

<b>Efficiencies 34</b> Efficiencies for the &#8467;&#771;&#8467;&#771; production in the inclusive SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_T2¹⁰⁰ regions. Efficiencies are computed as the ``acceptance times efficiency" divided by the acceptance. The black line indicates the maximum allowed value of &Delta; m or m_T2 for the inclusive signal region under study.

<b>Cross-Sections 1</b> Cross-sections of the Higgsino signal grid for each production process denoted in the caption.

<b>Cross-Sections 2</b> Cross-sections of the Higgsino signal grid for each production process denoted in the caption.

<b>Cross-Sections 3</b> Cross-sections of the Higgsino signal grid for each production process denoted in the caption.

<b>Cross-Sections 4</b> Cross-sections of the Higgsino signal grid for each production process denoted in the caption.

<b>Cross-Sections 5</b> Cross-sections of the wino--bino signal grid for each production process in the caption.

<b>Cross-Sections 6</b> Cross-sections of the wino--bino signal grid for each production process in the caption.

<b>Cross-Sections 7</b> Total cross-sections of the slepton simplified model signal grid. Slepton refers to a the scalar partners of the left- and right-handed electrons and muons, which are assumed to be mass degenerate m(e&#771;_L) = m(e&#771;_R) = m(&mu;&#771;_L) = m(&mu;&#771;_R).

<b>Kinematics 5</b> Distributions after the background-only fit of kinematic variables used to define selections common to all signal regions, i.e. not including requirements specific to the electroweakino or slepton SR definitions. Blue arrows in the upper panel denote the final requirement used to define the common SR, otherwise all selections are applied. The category `Others' contains rare backgrounds from triboson, Higgs boson, and the remaining top-quark production processes listed in Table 1. The first (last) bin includes underflow (overflow). Benchmark Higgsino H&#771; and slepton &#8467;&#771; signals are overlaid as dashed lines. Orange arrows in the Data/SM panel indicate values that are beyond the y-axis range.

<b>Kinematics 6</b> Distributions after the background-only fit of kinematic variables used to define selections common to all signal regions, i.e. not including requirements specific to the electroweakino or slepton SR definitions. Blue arrows in the upper panel denote the final requirement used to define the common SR, otherwise all selections are applied. The category `Others' contains rare backgrounds from triboson, Higgs boson, and the remaining top-quark production processes listed in Table 1. The first (last) bin includes underflow (overflow). Benchmark Higgsino H&#771; and slepton &#8467;&#771; signals are overlaid as dashed lines. Orange arrows in the Data/SM panel indicate values that are beyond the y-axis range.

<b>Kinematics 7</b> Distributions after the background-only fit of kinematic variables used to define selections common to all signal regions, i.e. not including requirements specific to the electroweakino or slepton SR definitions. Blue arrows in the upper panel denote the final requirement used to define the common SR, otherwise all selections are applied. The category `Others' contains rare backgrounds from triboson, Higgs boson, and the remaining top-quark production processes listed in Table 1. The first (last) bin includes underflow (overflow). Benchmark Higgsino H&#771; and slepton &#8467;&#771; signals are overlaid as dashed lines. Orange arrows in the Data/SM panel indicate values that are beyond the y-axis range.

<b>Kinematics 8</b> Distributions after the background-only fit of kinematic variables used to define selections common to all signal regions, i.e. not including requirements specific to the electroweakino or slepton SR definitions. Blue arrows in the upper panel denote the final requirement used to define the common SR, otherwise all selections are applied. The category `Others' contains rare backgrounds from triboson, Higgs boson, and the remaining top-quark production processes listed in Table 1. The first (last) bin includes underflow (overflow). Benchmark Higgsino H&#771; and slepton &#8467;&#771; signals are overlaid as dashed lines. Orange arrows in the Data/SM panel indicate values that are beyond the y-axis range.

<b>Kinematics 9</b> Distributions after the background-only fit of kinematic variables used to define selections common to all signal regions, i.e. not including requirements specific to the electroweakino or slepton SR definitions. Blue arrows in the upper panel denote the final requirement used to define the common SR, otherwise all selections are applied. The category `Others' contains rare backgrounds from triboson, Higgs boson, and the remaining top-quark production processes listed in Table 1. The first (last) bin includes underflow (overflow). Benchmark Higgsino H&#771; and slepton &#8467;&#771; signals are overlaid as dashed lines. Orange arrows in the Data/SM panel indicate values that are beyond the y-axis range.

<b>Kinematics 10</b> Distributions after the background-only fit of kinematic variables used to define selections common to all signal regions, i.e. not including requirements specific to the electroweakino or slepton SR definitions. Blue arrows in the upper panel denote the final requirement used to define the common SR, otherwise all selections are applied. The category `Others' contains rare backgrounds from triboson, Higgs boson, and the remaining top-quark production processes listed in Table 1. The first (last) bin includes underflow (overflow). Benchmark Higgsino H&#771; and slepton &#8467;&#771; signals are overlaid as dashed lines. Orange arrows in the Data/SM panel indicate values that are beyond the y-axis range.

<b>Kinematics 11</b> Distributions after the background-only fit of kinematic variables used to define selections common to all signal regions, i.e. not including requirements specific to the electroweakino or slepton SR definitions. Blue arrows in the upper panel denote the final requirement used to define the common SR, otherwise all selections are applied. The category `Others' contains rare backgrounds from triboson, Higgs boson, and the remaining top-quark production processes listed in Table 1. The first (last) bin includes underflow (overflow). Benchmark Higgsino H&#771; and slepton &#8467;&#771; signals are overlaid as dashed lines. Orange arrows in the Data/SM panel indicate values that are beyond the y-axis range.

<b>Kinematics 12</b> Distributions after the background-only fit of kinematic variables used to define selections common to all signal regions, i.e. not including requirements specific to the electroweakino or slepton SR definitions. Blue arrows in the upper panel denote the final requirement used to define the common SR, otherwise all selections are applied. The category `Others' contains rare backgrounds from triboson, Higgs boson, and the remaining top-quark production processes listed in Table 1. The first (last) bin includes underflow (overflow). Benchmark Higgsino H&#771; and slepton &#8467;&#771; signals are overlaid as dashed lines. Orange arrows in the Data/SM panel indicate values that are beyond the y-axis range.

<b>Kinematics 13</b> Distributions after the background-only fit of kinematic variables used to define selections common to all signal regions, i.e. not including requirements specific to the electroweakino or slepton SR definitions. Blue arrows in the upper panel denote the final requirement used to define the common SR, otherwise all selections are applied. The category `Others' contains rare backgrounds from triboson, Higgs boson, and the remaining top-quark production processes listed in Table 1. The first (last) bin includes underflow (overflow). Benchmark Higgsino H&#771; and slepton &#8467;&#771; signals are overlaid as dashed lines. Orange arrows in the Data/SM panel indicate values that are beyond the y-axis range.

<b>Kinematics 14</b> Distributions after the background-only fit of kinematic variables used to define selections common to all signal regions, i.e. not including requirements specific to the electroweakino or slepton SR definitions. Blue arrows in the upper panel denote the final requirement used to define the common SR, otherwise all selections are applied. The category `Others' contains rare backgrounds from triboson, Higgs boson, and the remaining top-quark production processes listed in Table 1. The first (last) bin includes underflow (overflow). Benchmark Higgsino H&#771; and slepton &#8467;&#771; signals are overlaid as dashed lines. Orange arrows in the Data/SM panel indicate values that are beyond the y-axis range.

<b>Kinematics 15</b> Distributions after the background-only fit of kinematic variables used to define selections common to all signal regions, i.e. not including requirements specific to the electroweakino or slepton SR definitions. Blue arrows in the upper panel denote the final requirement used to define the common SR, otherwise all selections are applied. The category `Others' contains rare backgrounds from triboson, Higgs boson, and the remaining top-quark production processes listed in Table 1. The first (last) bin includes underflow (overflow). Benchmark Higgsino H&#771; and slepton &#8467;&#771; signals are overlaid as dashed lines. Orange arrows in the Data/SM panel indicate values that are beyond the y-axis range.

<b>Upper Limits 2</b> Numbers show 95% CL model-dependent upper limits on the inclusive Higgsino signal cross-sections.

<b>Upper Limits 3</b> Numbers show 95% CL model-dependent upper limits on the inclusive Higgsino signal cross-sections.

<b>Upper Limits 4</b> Numbers show 95% CL model-dependent upper limits on the inclusive signal cross-sections of the wino--bino model.

<b>Upper Limits 5</b> Numbers show 95% CL model-dependent upper limits on the inclusive signal cross-sections of the wino--bino model.

<b>Upper Limits 6</b> Numbers show the 95% CL model-dependent upper limits on the slepton signal cross-sections, assuming a fourfold mass degeneracy m(e&#771;_L,R) = m(&mu;&#771;_L,R).

<b>Upper Limits 7</b> Numbers show the 95% CL model-dependent upper limits on the slepton signal cross-sections, assuming a fourfold mass degeneracy m(e&#771;_L,R) = m(&mu;&#771;_L,R).

<b>Upper Limits 8</b> Expected and observed 95% CL cross-section upper limits as a function of the universal gaugino mass m_1/2 for the NUHM2 model. The gray numbers indicate the values of the observed limit. The green and yellow bands around the expected limit indicate the &plusmn; 1&sigma; and &plusmn; 2&sigma; uncertainties, respectively. The expected signal production cross-sections as well as the associated uncertainty are indicated with the blue solid and dashed lines. The lower x-axis indicates the difference between the &chi;&#771;₂⁰ and &chi;&#771;₁⁰ masses for different values of m_1/2. A fit of signals to the m_{&#8467;&#8467;} spectrum is used to derive this limit.

<b>Upper Limits 9</b> Expected and observed 95% CL cross-section upper limits as a function of the universal gaugino mass m_1/2 for the NUHM2 model. The gray numbers indicate the values of the observed limit. The green and yellow bands around the expected limit indicate the &plusmn; 1&sigma; and &plusmn; 2&sigma; uncertainties, respectively. The expected signal production cross-sections as well as the associated uncertainty are indicated with the blue solid and dashed lines. The lower x-axis indicates the difference between the &chi;&#771;₂⁰ and &chi;&#771;₁⁰ masses for different values of m_1/2. A fit of signals to the m_{&#8467;&#8467;} spectrum is used to derive this limit.

<b>Upper Limits 10</b> Expected and observed 95% CL cross-section upper limits as a function of the universal gaugino mass m_1/2 for the NUHM2 model. The gray numbers indicate the values of the observed limit. The green and yellow bands around the expected limit indicate the &plusmn; 1&sigma; and &plusmn; 2&sigma; uncertainties, respectively. The expected signal production cross-sections as well as the associated uncertainty are indicated with the blue solid and dashed lines. The lower x-axis indicates the difference between the &chi;&#771;₂⁰ and &chi;&#771;₁⁰ masses for different values of m_1/2. A fit of signals to the m_{&#8467;&#8467;} spectrum is used to derive this limit.

<b>Cutflow 2</b> Observed event yields and exclusion fit results with the signal strength parameter set to zero for the exclusive electroweakino and slepton signal regions. Background processes containing fewer than two prompt leptons are categorized as `Fake/nonprompt'. The category `Others' contains rare backgrounds from triboson, Higgs boson, and the remaining top-quark production processes listed in Table 1. Uncertainties in the fitted background estimates combine statistical and systematic uncertainties.

<b>Cutflow 3</b> Observed event yields and background-only fit results for the inclusive electroweakino and slepton signal regions. Background processes containing fewer than two prompt leptons are categorized as `Fake/nonprompt'. The category `Others' contains rare backgrounds from triboson, Higgs boson, and the remaining top-quark production processes listed in Table 1. Uncertainties in the fitted background estimates combine statistical and systematic uncertainties.

<b>Exclusion 4</b> Nominal observed and expected CLs values for Higgsino signals.

<b>Exclusion 5</b> Nominal observed and expected CLs values for wino--bino signals.

<b>Exclusion 6</b> Nominal observed and expected CLs values for slepton signals.

<b>Upper Limits 11</b> Upper limits on observed (expected) Higgsino simplified model signal cross section &sigma;_{obs (exp)}⁹⁵ and signal strength &sigma;_{obs (exp)}⁹⁵ / &sigma;_theory.

<b>Upper Limits 12</b> Upper limits on observed (expected) wino--bino simplified model signal cross section &sigma;_{obs (exp)}⁹⁵ and signal strength &sigma;_{obs (exp)}⁹⁵ / &sigma;_theory.

<b>Upper Limits 13</b> Upper limits on observed (expected) slepton simplified model signal cross section &sigma;_{obs (exp)}⁹⁵ and signal strength &sigma;_{obs (exp)}⁹⁵ / &sigma;_theory.

<b>Cutflow 4</b> Event counts for Higgsino H and slepton &#8467; signals after sequential selections for the inclusive SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_{&#8467;&#8467;} and SR&#8467;&#8467;-m_T2¹⁰⁰ regions. Weighted events are normalised to mathcalL = 36.1 fb^-1 and the inclusive cross section &sigma;, while raw MC events are also shown. The generator filter with efficiency &epsilon;_filt applied to the Higgsino signal requires truth E_T^miss &gt; 50 GeV and at least 2 leptons with p_T &gt; 3 GeV, while only the E_T^miss &gt; 50 GeV requirement is applied to the slepton signal. The mathcalB refers to the branching ratio Z^(*) &rarr; &#8467;⁺&#8467;^- in the Higgsino processes. ``Lepton truth matching" requires that the selected leptons are consistent with being decay products of the SUSY process. ``Lepton author 16 veto" removes a class of electron candidates reconstructed with algorithms designed to identify photon conversions.

<b>Cutflow 5</b> Event counts for the &chi;&#771;₂⁰&chi;&#771;₁⁺ process of the Higgsino m(&chi;&#771;₂⁰, &chi;&#771;₁⁰) = (110, 100) GeV signal and sequentially with each addition requirement for selections common to all signal regions (SRs), followed by those optimised for Higgsinos and sleptons. ``Lepton truth matching" requires that the selected leptons are consistent with being decay products of the SUSY process. ``Lepton author 16 veto" removes a class of electron candidates reconstructed with algorithms designed to identify photon conversions. Weighted events are normalised to 36.1 fb^-1 and the raw Monte Carlo events are also displayed.

<b>Cutflow 6</b> Event counts for the &chi;&#771;₂⁰&chi;&#771;₁^- process of the Higgsino m(&chi;&#771;₂⁰, &chi;&#771;₁⁰) = (110, 100) GeV signal and sequentially with each addition requirement for selections common to all signal regions (SRs), followed by those optimised for Higgsinos and sleptons. ``Lepton truth matching" requires that the selected leptons are consistent with being decay products of the SUSY process. ``Lepton author 16 veto" removes a class of electron candidates reconstructed with algorithms designed to identify photon conversions. Weighted events are normalised to 36.1 fb^-1 and the raw Monte Carlo events are also displayed.

<b>Cutflow 7</b> Event counts for the &chi;&#771;₂⁰&chi;&#771;₁⁰ process of the Higgsino m(&chi;&#771;₂⁰, &chi;&#771;₁⁰) = (110, 100) GeV signal and sequentially with each addition requirement followed by those optimised for Higgsinos and sleptons. Weighted events are normalised to 36.1 fb^-1 and the raw Monte Carlo events are also displayed.

<b>Cutflow 8</b> Event counts for the &chi;&#771;₁⁺&chi;&#771;₁^- process of the Higgsino m(&chi;&#771;₂⁰, &chi;&#771;₁⁰) = (110, 100) GeV signal and sequentially with each addition requirement for selections common to all signal regions (SRs). ``Lepton truth matching" requires that the selected leptons are consistent with being decay products of the SUSY process. ``Lepton author 16 veto" removes a class of electron candidates reconstructed with algorithms designed to identify photon conversions. Weighted events are normalised to 36.1 fb^-1 and the raw Monte Carlo events are also displayed.

The expected background and observed data with eight jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 40 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.

The expected background and observed data with nine jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 40 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.

The expected background and observed data with ten jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 40 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.

The expected background and observed data with eleven jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 40 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.

The expected background and observed data with twelve-or-more jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 40 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.

The expected background and observed data with five jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 60 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.

The expected background and observed data with six jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 60 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.

The expected background and observed data with seven jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 60 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.

The expected background and observed data with eight jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 60 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.

The expected background and observed data with nine jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 60 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.

The expected background and observed data with ten-or-more jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 60 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.

The expected background and observed data with five jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 80 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.

The expected background and observed data with six jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 80 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.

The expected background and observed data with seven jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 80 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.

The expected background and observed data with eight jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 80 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.

The expected background and observed data with nine jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 80 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.

The expected background and observed data with ten-or-more jets in the different b-tag multiplicity bins for the 80 GeV jet pT threshold. The background shown is estimated by including all bins in the fit.

Observed exclusion contours on the gluino and neutralino masses in a model where the gluino decays via a virtual top squark to two top quarks and the lightest neutralino, with the neutralino decaying to three light quarks (neutralino --> uds) via the RPV coupling lambda''_112.

Expected exclusion contours on the gluino and neutralino masses in a model where the gluino decays via a virtual top squark to two top quarks and the lightest neutralino, with the neutralino decaying to three light quarks (neutralino --> uds) via the RPV coupling lambda''_112.

Observed exclusion contours on the gluino and stop masses in a model where the gluino decays to a top quark and a top squark, with the top squark decaying to an s-quark and a b-quark via a non-zero lambda''_323 RPV coupling.

Expected exclusion contours on the gluino and stop masses in a model where the gluino decays to a top quark and a top squark, with the top squark decaying to an s-quark and a b-quark via a non-zero lambda''_323 RPV coupling.

Observed exclusion contours on the gluino and neutralino masses in a model with a gluino decaying to two light quarks (q=u,d,s,c) and the neutralino, which then decays to two light quarks and a charged lepton or a neutrino.

Expected exclusion contours on the gluino and neutralino masses in a model with a gluino decaying to two light quarks (q=u,d,s,c) and the neutralino, which then decays to two light quarks and a charged lepton or a neutrino.

Observed exclusion contours on the stop and neutralino masses in a model where the stop decays to a third-generation quark and a higgsino, which decays via the RPV coupling lambda''_323.

Expected exclusion contours on the stop and neutralino masses in a model where the stop decays to a third-generation quark and a higgsino, which decays via the RPV coupling lambda''_323.

Observed exclusion contours on the stop and neutralino masses in a model where the stop decays to a top and a bino-like neutralino, which decays via the RPV coupling lambda''_323.

Expected exclusion contours on the stop and neutralino masses in a model where the stop decays to a top and a bino-like neutralino, which decays via the RPV coupling lambda''_323.

Observed upper limits on the model cross-section in units of pb as a function of the gluino and neutralino masses in a model where the gluino decays via a virtual top squark to two top quarks and the lightest neutralino, with the neutralino decaying to three light quarks (neutralino --> uds) via the RPV coupling lambda''_112.

Observed upper limits on the model cross-section in units of pb as a function of the gluino and stop masses in a model where the gluino decays to a top quark and a top squark, with the top squark decaying to an s-quark and a b-quark via a non-zero lambda''_323 RPV coupling.

Observed upper limits on the model cross-section in units of pb as a function of the gluino and neutralino masses in a model with a gluino decaying to two light quarks (q=u,d,s,c) and the neutralino, which then decays to two light quarks and a charged lepton or a neutrino.

Observed upper limits on the model cross-section in units of pb as a function of the stop and neutralino masses in a model where the stop decays to a third-generation quark and a higgsino, which decays via the RPV coupling lambda''_323.

Observed upper limits on the model cross-section in units of pb as a function of the stop and neutralino masses in a model where the stop decays to a top and a bino-like neutralino, which decays via the RPV coupling lambda''_323.

Acceptance as a function of the gluino and stop masses in a model where the gluino decays to a top quark and a top squark, with the top squark decaying to an s-quark and a b-quark via a non-zero lambda''_323 RPV coupling.

Efficiency as a function of the gluino and stop masses in a model where the gluino decays to a top quark and a top squark, with the top squark decaying to an s-quark and a b-quark via a non-zero lambda''_323 RPV coupling.

Acceptance as a function of the gluino and neutralino masses in a model with a gluino decaying to two light quarks (q=u,d,s,c) and the neutralino, which then decays to two light quarks and a charged lepton or a neutrino.

Efficiency as a function of the gluino and neutralino masses in a model with a gluino decaying to two light quarks (q=u,d,s,c) and the neutralino, which then decays to two light quarks and a charged lepton or a neutrino.

Cut flow for a model of gluino pair production where the gluino decays to two (u, d, s, c) quarks and the neutralino, which then decays to two (u, d, s, c) quarks and a lepton via a lambda' RPV coupling, where each RPV decay can produce any of the four first and second generation leptons (e, mu, nu_e, nu_mu) with equal probability (m_gluino = 1800 GeV, m_neutralino = 900 GeV). The events are skimmed by requiring at least one electron or muon that satisfies very loose identification criteria, where the lepton satisfies pT > 25 GeV. The efficiency of this cut is considered in the quoted efficiency of the lepton trigger requirement. Selections with negligible inefficiencies on the given sample, such as data quality requirements, are not displayed.

Cut flow for a model of gluino pair production where each gluino decays to a top quark and a top squark, with the top squark decaying to an s- and a b- quark via a non-zero lambda''_323 RPV coupling (m_gluino = 1600 GeV, m_stop = 1000 GeV). The events are skimmed by requiring at least one electron or muon that satisfies very loose identification criteria, where the lepton satisfies pT > 25 GeV. The efficiency of this cut is considered in the quoted efficiency of the lepton trigger requirement. Selections with negligible inefficiencies on the given sample, such as data quality requirements, are not displayed.

Cut flow for a model of gluino pair production where each gluino decays via an off-shell top squark to two top quarks and the lightest neutralino, with the neutralino decaying to three light quarks (neutralino -> uds) via the RPV coupling lambda''_112 (m_gluino = 2000 GeV, m_neutralino = 941 GeV). The events are skimmed by requiring at least one electron or muon that satisfies very loose identification criteria, where the lepton satisfies pT > 25 GeV. The efficiency of this cut is considered in the quoted efficiency of the lepton trigger requirement. Selections with negligible inefficiencies on the given sample, such as data quality requirements, are not displayed.

Cut flow for a model of right-handed top squark pair production with the top squark decaying to the lightest supersymmetric particle (LSP) which is considered to be purely higgsino. The higgsino-like LSP decays through the non-zero RPV coupling lambda''_323 (m_stop = 975 GeV, m_neutralino = 600 GeV). The events are skimmed by requiring at least one electron or muon that satisfies very loose identification criteria, where the lepton satisfies pT > 25 GeV. The efficiency of this cut is considered in the quoted efficiency of the lepton trigger requirement. Selections with negligible inefficiencies on the given sample, such as data quality requirements, are not displayed.

Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of signal ($\tau_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ = 0.2 ns and $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ = 400 GeV) in electroweak channel in the low-Emiss region.

Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of total background in electroweak channel in the low-Emiss region.

Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of observed data in electroweak channel in the low-Emiss region.

Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of fake tracklet in strong channel in the low-Emiss region.

Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of muon background in strong channel in the low-Emiss region.

Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of hadron and electron background in strong channel in the low-Emiss region.

Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of signal ($m_{\tilde{g}}$ = 1600 GeV, $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}} = 500 GeV$) in strong channel in the low-Emiss region.

Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of total background in strong channel in the low-Emiss region.

Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of observed data in strong channel in the low-Emiss region.

Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of fake tracklet in electroweak channel in the high-Emiss region.

Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of muon background in electroweak channel in the high-Emiss region.

Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of hadron and electron background in electroweak channel in the high-Emiss region.

Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of signal ($\tau_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ = 0.2 ns and $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ = 400 GeV) in electroweak channel in the high-Emiss region.

Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of total background in electroweak channel in the high-Emiss region.

Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of observed data in electroweak channel in the high-Emiss region.

Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of fake tracklet in strong channel in the high-Emiss region.

Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of muon background in strong channel in the high-Emiss region.

Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of hadron and electron background in strong channel in the high-Emiss region.

Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of signal ($m_{\tilde{g}}$ = 1600 GeV, $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}} = 500 GeV$) in strong channel in the high-Emiss region.

Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of total background in strong channel in the high-Emiss region.

Pixel-tracklet $p_{T}$ spectrum of observed data in strong channel in the high-Emiss region.

Expected exclusion limit at 95% CL obtained in the electroweak production channel in terms of the chargino lifetime ($\tau_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$) and mass ($m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$).

Observed exclusion limit at 95% CL obtained in the electroweak production channel in terms of the chargino lifetime ($\tau_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$) and mass ($m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$).

Expected exclusion limit at 95% CL obtained in the strong production channel in terms of the gluino and chargino masses. The limit is shown assuming a chargino lifetime 0.2 ns.

Observed exclusion limit at 95% CL obtained in the strong production channel in terms of the gluino and chargino masses. The limit is shown assuming a chargino lifetime 0.2 ns.

Expected exclusion limit at 95% CL obtained in the strong production channel in terms of the gluino and chargino masses. The limit is shown assuming a chargino lifetime 1.0 ns.

Observed exclusion limit at 95% CL obtained in the strong production channel in terms of the gluino and chargino masses. The limit is shown assuming a chargino lifetime 1.0 ns.

Expected exclusion limit at 95% CL obtained in the electroweak production channel in terms of the chargino lifetime ($\tau_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$) and mass ($m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$).

Observed exclusion limit at 95% CL obtained in the electroweak production channel in terms of the chargino lifetime ($\tau_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$) and mass ($m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$).

Model dependent upper limits on cross-section (fb) for the electroweak production are shown by grey numbers in terms of the chargino lifetime ($\tau_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$) and mass ($m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$).

Total acceptance $\times$ efficiency of the electroweak channel. The total signal acceptance $\times$ efficiency is defined as the probability of an event passing the signal region selection when an electroweak gaugino pair is produced in a pp collision.

Total acceptance $\times$ efficiency of the strong channel. In white regions, no simulation sample is available. The left-upper triangle region is not allowed kinematically in wino-LSP scenarios. The total signal acceptance $\times$ efficiency is calculated relative to events in which the gluinos decay into electroweak gaugino pairs.

The generator-level acceptance after reconstruction, for selecting and reconstructing charginos as a function of the chargino $eta$ and chargino decay radius (at generator level).

The generator-level acceptance $\times$ efficiency after reconstruction, for selecting and reconstructing charginos as a function of the chargino $\eta$ and chargino decay radius (at generator level). The acceptance $\times$ efficiency after reconstruction is the probability of a signal event, which passes all the event-level requirements, passing all the track/tracklet requirements after reconstruction.

The generator-level acceptance after reconstruction, for selecting and reconstructing charginos as a function of the chargino $\eta$ and chargino decay radius (at generator level).

The generator-level acceptance $\times$ efficiency after reconstruction, for selecting and reconstructing charginos as a function of the chargino $\eta$ and chargino decay radius (at generator level). The acceptance $\times$ efficiency after reconstruction is the probability of a signal event, which passes all the event-level requirements, passing all the track/tracklet requirements after reconstruction.

Summary of the selection criteria, and the corresponding observed number of events in data as well as the expected number of signal events in simulation for two benchmark models: a chargino produced in direct electroweak production with ($m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$, $\tau_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$) = (400 GeV, 0.2 ns) in the high-Emiss region. The expected number of signal events is normalised to 36.1 fb${}^{-1}$. The signal selection efficiencies are also shown in parentheses. The first row shows the number of events after the application of detector and data quality conditions. Requirements below the dashed line are applied to tracks and tracklets.

Summary of the selection criteria, and the corresponding observed number of events in data as well as the expected number of signal events in simulation for two benchmark models: a chargino produced in the strong channel with ($m_{\tilde{g}}$, $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$, $\tau_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$) = (1600 GeV, 500 GeV, 0.2 ns) in the high-Emiss region. The expected number of signal events is normalised to 36.1 fb${}^{-1}$. The signal selection efficiencies are also shown in parentheses. The first row shows the number of events after the application of detector and data quality conditions. Requirements below the dashed line are applied to tracks and tracklets.

The event and tracklet generator-level acceptance and selection efficiency for a few electroweak signal models studied in this search. The last column shows the probability ($P$) for a reconstructed tracklet to have $p_{T}$ greater than 100 GeV.

The event and tracklet generator-level acceptance and selection efficiency for a few strong signal models studied in this search. The last column shows the probability ($P$) for a reconstructed tracklet to have $p_{T}$ greater than 100 GeV.

Systematic uncertainties in the signal event yields at $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ = 400 GeV for the electroweak channel and at $m_{\tilde{g}}$ = 1600 GeV, $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ = 500 GeV for the strong channel. The lifetime of the chargino is not relevant here. The uncertainty in the cross-section of the strong production is large due to the large effect from the PDF uncertainty.

Observed events, expected background for null signal, and expected signal yields for two benchmark models: electroweak channel with ($m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$, $\tau_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$) = (400 GeV, 0.2 ns) and strong channel with ($m_{\tilde{g}}$, $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$, $\tau_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$) = (1600 GeV, 500 GeV, 0.2 ns) in the high-Emiss region. Also shown are the probability of a background-only experiment being more signal-like than observed ($p_0$) and the upper limit on the model-independent visible cross-section at 95\% CL. The uncertainty in the total background yield is different from the sum of uncertainties in quadrature due to anticorrelation between different backgrounds.

Effects of systematic uncertainties on the signal exclusion significance at $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ = 400 GeV for the electroweak channel and at $m_{\tilde{g}}$ = 1600 GeV, $m_{\tilde{\chi}_{1}^{\pm}}$ = 500 GeV for the strong channel. The lifetime of the chargino is not relevant here. Effects of uncertainties on the fake-tracklet background is smaller in the strong channel analysis because the estimated number of the fake-tracket background events is small.

Cross-section upper limits for the strong production, presented in unit of fb. Left-upper triangle region is unphysical because the wino mass is larger than the gluino mass.

The observed exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}$ vs. $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}$. Masses that are within the contours are excluded. Limits are shown in the case of a higgsino LSP. The results are constrained by the kinematic limits of the top-squark decay into a chargino and a bottom quark (upper diagonal line) and into a neutralino and a top quark (lower diagonal line), respectively.

The expected exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}$ vs. $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}$. Masses that are within the contours are excluded. Limits are shown in the case of a higgsino LSP. The results are constrained by the kinematic limits of the top-squark decay into a chargino and a bottom quark (upper diagonal line) and into a neutralino and a top quark (lower diagonal line), respectively.

The observed exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}$ vs. $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}$. Masses that are within the contours are excluded. Limits are shown for the region $m_{\tilde{t}} - m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_{1,2}, \tilde{\chi}^\pm_{1}} \geq m_\text{top}$ where $B(\tilde{t} \rightarrow b \chi^{+}_{1}) = B(\tilde{t} \rightarrow t \chi^{0}_{1,2}) = 0.5$.

The expected exclusion contour at 95% CL as a function of the $\it{m}_{\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1}}$ vs. $\it{m}_{\tilde{t}}$. Masses that are within the contours are excluded. Limits are shown for the region $m_{\tilde{t}} - m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_{1,2}, \tilde{\chi}^\pm_{1}} \geq m_\text{top}$ where $B(\tilde{t} \rightarrow b \chi^{+}_{1}) = B(\tilde{t} \rightarrow t \chi^{0}_{1,2}) = 0.5$.

Observed model-dependent upper limit on the cross section for the $(\tilde{t},\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_{1})$ signal grid. Limits are shown for $B(\tilde{t} \rightarrow b \chi^{+}_{1})$ equal to unity.

Observed model-dependent upper limit on the cross section for the $(\tilde{t},\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_{1} / \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1,2})$ signal grid. Limits are shown in the case of a higgsino LSP. The results are constrained by the kinematic limits of the top-squark decay into a chargino and a bottom quark (upper diagonal line) and into a neutralino and a top quark (lower diagonal line), respectively.

Expected model-dependent upper limit on the cross section for the $(\tilde{t},\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_{1})$ signal grid. Limits are shown for $B(\tilde{t} \rightarrow b \chi^{+}_{1})$ equal to unity.

Expected model-dependent upper limit on the cross section for the $(\tilde{t},\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_{1} / \tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1,2})$ signal grid. Limits are shown in the case of a higgsino LSP. The results are constrained by the kinematic limits of the top-squark decay into a chargino and a bottom quark (upper diagonal line) and into a neutralino and a top quark (lower diagonal line), respectively.

Expected background and observed number of events in different jet and $b$-tag multiplicity bins.

Cut flow for a model of top-squark pair production with the top squark decaying to a $b$-quark and a chargino. The chargino decays through the non-zero RPV coupling $\lambda^{''}_{323}$ via a virtual top squark to $bbs$ quark triplets ($m_{\tilde{t}}$ = 800 GeV, $m_{\tilde{\chi}^{\pm}_{1}}$ = 750 GeV). The multijet trigger consists of four jets satisfying $p_{\text{T}}\geq(100)120$ GeV for the 2015-2016 (2017-2018) data period. Selections with negligible inefficiencies on the given sample, such as data quality requirements, are not displayed. The numbers in $N_{\text{weighted}}$ are normalized by the integrated luminosity of 139 fb$^{-1}$.

Signal acceptance for $\tilde{t} \rightarrow b\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1}(\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1} \rightarrow \bar{b}\bar{b}\bar{s}) $ and c.c. model. Please mind that the acceptance given in the table is reported in %.

Signal acceptance for $\tilde{t} \rightarrow b\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1}(\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1} \rightarrow \bar{b}\bar{b}\bar{s}) $ and c.c. model. Please mind that the acceptance given in the table is reported in %.

Signal acceptance for $\tilde{t} \rightarrow b\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1}(\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1} \rightarrow \bar{b}\bar{b}\bar{s}) $ and c.c. model. Please mind that the acceptance given in the table is reported in %.

Signal acceptance for $\tilde{t} \rightarrow b\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1}(\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1} \rightarrow \bar{b}\bar{b}\bar{s}) $ and c.c. model. Please mind that the acceptance given in the table is reported in %.

Signal acceptance for $\tilde{t} \rightarrow b\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1}(\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1} \rightarrow \bar{b}\bar{b}\bar{s}) $ and c.c. model. Please mind that the acceptance given in the table is reported in %.

Signal acceptance for $\tilde{t} \rightarrow b\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1}(\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1} \rightarrow \bar{b}\bar{b}\bar{s}) $ and c.c. model. Please mind that the acceptance given in the table is reported in %.

Signal acceptance for $\tilde{t} \rightarrow b\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1}(\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1} \rightarrow \bar{b}\bar{b}\bar{s}) $ and c.c. model. Please mind that the acceptance given in the table is reported in %.

Signal acceptance for $\tilde{t} \rightarrow b\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1}(\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1} \rightarrow \bar{b}\bar{b}\bar{s}) $ and c.c. model. Please mind that the acceptance given in the table is reported in %.

Signal acceptance for $\tilde{t} \rightarrow b\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1}(\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1} \rightarrow \bar{b}\bar{b}\bar{s}) $ and c.c. model. Please mind that the acceptance given in the table is reported in %.

Signal efficiency for $\tilde{t} \rightarrow b\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1}(\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1} \rightarrow \bar{b}\bar{b}\bar{s}) $ and c.c. model. Please mind that the efficiency given in the table is reported in %.

Signal efficiency for $\tilde{t} \rightarrow b\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1}(\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1} \rightarrow \bar{b}\bar{b}\bar{s}) $ and c.c. model. Please mind that the efficiency given in the table is reported in %.

Signal efficiency for $\tilde{t} \rightarrow b\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1}(\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1} \rightarrow \bar{b}\bar{b}\bar{s}) $ and c.c. model. Please mind that the efficiency given in the table is reported in %.

Signal efficiency for $\tilde{t} \rightarrow b\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1}(\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1} \rightarrow \bar{b}\bar{b}\bar{s}) $ and c.c. model. Please mind that the efficiency given in the table is reported in %.

Signal efficiency for $\tilde{t} \rightarrow b\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1}(\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1} \rightarrow \bar{b}\bar{b}\bar{s}) $ and c.c. model. Please mind that the efficiency given in the table is reported in %.

Signal efficiency for $\tilde{t} \rightarrow b\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1}(\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1} \rightarrow \bar{b}\bar{b}\bar{s}) $ and c.c. model. Please mind that the efficiency given in the table is reported in %.

Signal efficiency for $\tilde{t} \rightarrow b\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1}(\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1} \rightarrow \bar{b}\bar{b}\bar{s}) $ and c.c. model. Please mind that the efficiency given in the table is reported in %.

Signal efficiency for $\tilde{t} \rightarrow b\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1}(\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1} \rightarrow \bar{b}\bar{b}\bar{s}) $ and c.c. model. Please mind that the efficiency given in the table is reported in %.

Signal efficiency for $\tilde{t} \rightarrow b\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1}(\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1} \rightarrow \bar{b}\bar{b}\bar{s}) $ and c.c. model. Please mind that the efficiency given in the table is reported in %.

Signal acceptance for $\tilde{t} \rightarrow t\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1,2}(\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1,2} \rightarrow tbs) / b\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1}(\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1} \rightarrow \bar{b}\bar{b}\bar{s}) $ and c.c. model. Please mind that the acceptance given in the table is reported in %.

Signal acceptance for $\tilde{t} \rightarrow t\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1,2}(\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1,2} \rightarrow tbs) / b\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1}(\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1} \rightarrow \bar{b}\bar{b}\bar{s}) $ and c.c. model. Please mind that the acceptance given in the table is reported in %.

Signal acceptance for $\tilde{t} \rightarrow t\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1,2}(\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1,2} \rightarrow tbs) / b\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1}(\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1} \rightarrow \bar{b}\bar{b}\bar{s}) $ and c.c. model. Please mind that the acceptance given in the table is reported in %.

Signal acceptance for $\tilde{t} \rightarrow t\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1,2}(\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1,2} \rightarrow tbs) / b\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1}(\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1} \rightarrow \bar{b}\bar{b}\bar{s}) $ and c.c. model. Please mind that the acceptance given in the table is reported in %.

Signal acceptance for $\tilde{t} \rightarrow t\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1,2}(\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1,2} \rightarrow tbs) / b\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1}(\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1} \rightarrow \bar{b}\bar{b}\bar{s}) $ and c.c. model. Please mind that the acceptance given in the table is reported in %.

Signal acceptance for $\tilde{t} \rightarrow t\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1,2}(\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1,2} \rightarrow tbs) / b\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1}(\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1} \rightarrow \bar{b}\bar{b}\bar{s}) $ and c.c. model. Please mind that the acceptance given in the table is reported in %.

Signal acceptance for $\tilde{t} \rightarrow t\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1,2}(\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1,2} \rightarrow tbs) / b\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1}(\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1} \rightarrow \bar{b}\bar{b}\bar{s}) $ and c.c. model. Please mind that the acceptance given in the table is reported in %.

Signal acceptance for $\tilde{t} \rightarrow t\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1,2}(\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1,2} \rightarrow tbs) / b\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1}(\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1} \rightarrow \bar{b}\bar{b}\bar{s}) $ and c.c. model. Please mind that the acceptance given in the table is reported in %.

Signal acceptance for $\tilde{t} \rightarrow t\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1,2}(\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1,2} \rightarrow tbs) / b\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1}(\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1} \rightarrow \bar{b}\bar{b}\bar{s}) $ and c.c. model. Please mind that the acceptance given in the table is reported in %.

Signal acceptance for $\tilde{t} \rightarrow t\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1,2}(\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1,2} \rightarrow tbs) / b\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1}(\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1} \rightarrow \bar{b}\bar{b}\bar{s}) $ and c.c. model. Please mind that the acceptance given in the table is reported in %.

Signal acceptance for $\tilde{t} \rightarrow t\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1,2}(\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1,2} \rightarrow tbs) / b\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1}(\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1} \rightarrow \bar{b}\bar{b}\bar{s}) $ and c.c. model. Please mind that the acceptance given in the table is reported in %.

Signal acceptance for $\tilde{t} \rightarrow t\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1,2}(\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1,2} \rightarrow tbs) / b\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1}(\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1} \rightarrow \bar{b}\bar{b}\bar{s}) $ and c.c. model. Please mind that the acceptance given in the table is reported in %.

Signal acceptance for $\tilde{t} \rightarrow t\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1,2}(\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1,2} \rightarrow tbs) / b\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1}(\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1} \rightarrow \bar{b}\bar{b}\bar{s}) $ and c.c. model. Please mind that the acceptance given in the table is reported in %.

Signal acceptance for $\tilde{t} \rightarrow t\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1,2}(\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1,2} \rightarrow tbs) / b\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1}(\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1} \rightarrow \bar{b}\bar{b}\bar{s}) $ and c.c. model. Please mind that the acceptance given in the table is reported in %.

Signal acceptance for $\tilde{t} \rightarrow t\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1,2}(\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1,2} \rightarrow tbs) / b\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1}(\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1} \rightarrow \bar{b}\bar{b}\bar{s}) $ and c.c. model. Please mind that the acceptance given in the table is reported in %.

Signal acceptance for $\tilde{t} \rightarrow t\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1,2}(\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1,2} \rightarrow tbs) / b\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1}(\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1} \rightarrow \bar{b}\bar{b}\bar{s}) $ and c.c. model. Please mind that the acceptance given in the table is reported in %.

Signal acceptance for $\tilde{t} \rightarrow t\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1,2}(\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1,2} \rightarrow tbs) / b\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1}(\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1} \rightarrow \bar{b}\bar{b}\bar{s}) $ and c.c. model. Please mind that the acceptance given in the table is reported in %.

Signal acceptance for $\tilde{t} \rightarrow t\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1,2}(\tilde{\chi}^{0}_{1,2} \rightarrow tbs) / b\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1}(\tilde{\chi}^{+}_{1} \rightarrow \bar{b}\bar{b}\bar{s}) $ and c.c. model. Please mind that the acceptance given in the table is reported in %.

The number of data and fitted simulated events in each bin of the $|d_{0}^{\mu}|$ distribution in the $10<p_{\textrm{T}}^{\mu}<20$ GeV selection in the $\mu-\mu$ channel.

The number of data and fitted simulated events in each bin of the $|d_{0}^{\mu}|$ distribution in the $20<p_{\textrm{T}}^{\mu}<250$ GeV selection in the $e-\mu$ channel.

The number of data and fitted simulated events in each bin of the $|d_{0}^{\mu}|$ distribution in the $20<p_{\textrm{T}}^{\mu}<250$ GeV selection in the $\mu-\mu$ channel.

The measurement of the ratio of the rate of decay of W bosons to τ-leptons and muons, $R(\tau/\mu)=B(W\rightarrow\tau\nu_\tau)/B(W\rightarrow \mu\nu_\mu)$.

The mllbb mass distribution for the mbb window defined for (mA, mH)=(600, 300) GeV in the 3 tag category with b-associated production is shown. The number of entries shown in each bin is the number of events in that bin divided by the width of the bin. The signal distribution for (mA, mH) = (600, 300) GeV is also shown, and is normalised such that the production cross-section times the branching ratios B(A->ZH)xB(H->bb) corresponds to 1 pb. Background components are displayed separately.

The mllbb mass distribution for the mbb window defined for (mA, mH)=(670, 500) GeV in the 2 tag category with gluon-gluon fusion production is shown. The number of entries shown in each bin is the number of events in that bin divided by the width of the bin. The signal distribution for (mA, mH) = (670, 500) GeV is also shown, and is normalised such that the production cross-section times the branching ratios B(A->ZH)xB(H->bb) corresponds to 1 pb. Background components are displayed separately.

The mllbb mass distribution for the mbb window defined for (mA, mH) = (670, 500) GeV in the 3 tag category with b-associated production is shown. The number of entries shown in each bin is the number of events in that bin divided by the width of the bin. The signal distribution for (mA, mH) = (670, 500) GeV is also shown, and is normalised such that the production cross-section times the branching ratios B(A->ZH)xB(H->bb) corresponds to 1 pb. Background components are displayed separately.

Upper bounds at 95% CL on the production cross-section times the branching ratio B(A->ZH)xB(H->bb) in pb for a narrow width A boson produced via gluon-gluon fusion. For each signal point, characterised by the mass pair (mA, mH), two limits are provided, the observed and the expected.

Upper bounds at 95% CL on the production cross-section times the branching ratio B(A->ZH)xB(H->bb) in pb for a narrow width A boson produced via b-associated production. For each signal point, characterised by the mass pair (mA, mH), two limits are provided, the observed and the expected.

Upper bounds at 95% CL on the total production cross-section (ggA + bbA) times the branching ratio B(A->ZH)xB(H->bb) for an A boson in the 2HDM of type-1 with tan(beta)=1. For each signal point, characterised by the mass pair (mA, mH), two limits are provided, the observed and the expected. The correct width as predicted by this particular parameter choice of the 2HDM is used and cos(beta-alpha)=0 is assumed. The excluded contours in the figure correspond to the points of the 2HDM parameter space where the expected and observed limits match the theoretical prediction for the cross-section in the model.

Upper bounds at 95% CL on the total production cross-section (ggA + bbA) times the branching ratio B(A->ZH)xB(H->bb) for an A boson in the 2HDM of type-1 with tan(beta)=5. For each signal point, characterised by the mass pair (mA, mH), two limits are provided, the observed and the expected. The correct width as predicted by this particular parameter choice of the 2HDM is used and cos(beta-alpha)=0 is assumed. The excluded contours in the figure correspond to the points of the 2HDM parameter space where the expected and observed limits match the theoretical prediction for the cross-section in the model.

Upper bounds at 95% CL on the total production cross-section (ggA + bbA) times the branching ratio B(A->ZH)xB(H->bb) for an A boson in the 2HDM of type-1 with tan(beta)=10. For each signal point, characterised by the mass pair (mA, mH), two limits are provided, the observed and the expected. The correct width as predicted by this particular parameter choice of the 2HDM is used and cos(beta-alpha)=0 is assumed. The excluded contours in the figure correspond to the points of the 2HDM parameter space where the expected and observed limits match the theoretical prediction for the cross-section in the model.

Upper bounds at 95% CL on the total production cross-section (ggA + bbA) times the branching ratio B(A->ZH)xB(H->bb) for an A boson in the 2HDM of type-2 with tan(beta)=1. For each signal point, characterised by the mass pair (mA, mH), two limits are provided, the observed and the expected. The correct width as predicted by this particular parameter choice of the 2HDM is used and cos(beta-alpha)=0 is assumed. The excluded contours in the figure correspond to the points of the 2HDM parameter space where the expected and observed limits match the theoretical prediction for the cross-section in the model.

Upper bounds at 95% CL on the total production cross-section (ggA + bbA) times the branching ratio B(A->ZH)xB(H->bb) for an A boson in the 2HDM of type-2 with tan(beta)=5. For each signal point, characterised by the mass pair (mA, mH), two limits are provided, the observed and the expected. The correct width as predicted by this particular parameter choice of the 2HDM is used and cos(beta-alpha)=0 is assumed. The excluded contours in the figure correspond to the points of the 2HDM parameter space where the expected and observed limits match the theoretical prediction for the cross-section in the model.

Upper bounds at 95% CL on the total production cross-section (ggA + bbA) times the branching ratio B(A->ZH)xB(H->bb) for an A boson in the 2HDM of type-2 with tan(beta)=10. For each signal point, characterised by the mass pair (mA, mH), two limits are provided, the observed and the expected. The correct width as predicted by this particular parameter choice of the 2HDM is used and cos(beta-alpha)=0 is assumed. The excluded contours in the figure correspond to the points of the 2HDM parameter space where the expected and observed limits match the theoretical prediction for the cross-section in the model.

Upper bounds at 95% CL on the total production cross-section (ggA + bbA) times the branching ratio B(A->ZH)xB(H->bb) for an A boson in the 2HDM of type-2 with tan(beta)=20. For each signal point, characterised by the mass pair (mA, mH), two limits are provided, the observed and the expected. The correct width as predicted by this particular parameter choice of the 2HDM is used and cos(beta-alpha)=0 is assumed. The excluded contours in the figure correspond to the points of the 2HDM parameter space where the expected and observed limits match the theoretical prediction for the cross-section in the model.

Upper bounds at 95% CL on the total production cross-section (ggA + bbA) times the branching ratio B(A->ZH)xB(H->bb) for an A boson in the lepton specific 2HDM with tan(beta)=1. For each signal point, characterised by the mass pair (mA, mH), two limits are provided, the observed and the expected. The correct width as predicted by this particular parameter choice of the 2HDM is used and cos(beta-alpha)=0 is assumed. The excluded contours in the figure correspond to the points of the 2HDM parameter space where the expected and observed limits match the theoretical prediction for the cross-section in the model.

Upper bounds at 95% CL on the total production cross-section (ggA + bbA) times the branching ratio B(A->ZH)xB(H->bb) for an A boson in the lepton specific 2HDM with tan(beta)=2. For each signal point, characterised by the mass pair (mA, mH), two limits are provided, the observed and the expected. The correct width as predicted by this particular parameter choice of the 2HDM is used and cos(beta-alpha)=0 is assumed. The excluded contours in the figure correspond to the points of the 2HDM parameter space where the expected and observed limits match the theoretical prediction for the cross-section in the model.

Upper bounds at 95% CL on the total production cross-section (ggA + bbA) times the branching ratio B(A->ZH)xB(H->bb) for an A boson in the lepton specific 2HDM with tan(beta)=3. For each signal point, characterised by the mass pair (mA, mH), two limits are provided, the observed and the expected. The correct width as predicted by this particular parameter choice of the 2HDM is used and cos(beta-alpha)=0 is assumed. The excluded contours in the figure correspond to the points of the 2HDM parameter space where the expected and observed limits match the theoretical prediction for the cross-section in the model.

Upper bounds at 95% CL on the total production cross-section (ggA + bbA) times the branching ratio B(A->ZH)xB(H->bb) for an A boson in the flipped 2HDM with tan(beta)=1. For each signal point, characterised by the mass pair (mA, mH), two limits are provided, the observed and the expected. The correct width as predicted by this particular parameter choice of the 2HDM is used and cos(beta-alpha)=0 is assumed. The excluded contours in the figure correspond to the points of the 2HDM parameter space where the expected and observed limits match the theoretical prediction for the cross-section in the model.

Upper bounds at 95% CL on the total production cross-section (ggA + bbA) times the branching ratio B(A->ZH)xB(H->bb) for an A boson in the flipped 2HDM with tan(beta)=5. For each signal point, characterised by the mass pair (mA, mH), two limits are provided, the observed and the expected. The correct width as predicted by this particular parameter choice of the 2HDM is used and cos(beta-alpha)=0 is assumed. The excluded contours in the figure correspond to the points of the 2HDM parameter space where the expected and observed limits match the theoretical prediction for the cross-section in the model.

Upper bounds at 95% CL on the total production cross-section (ggA + bbA) times the branching ratio B(A->ZH)xB(H->bb) for an A boson in the flipped 2HDM with tan(beta)=10. For each signal point, characterised by the mass pair (mA, mH), two limits are provided, the observed and the expected. The correct width as predicted by this particular parameter choice of the 2HDM is used and cos(beta-alpha)=0 is assumed. The excluded contours in the figure correspond to the points of the 2HDM parameter space where the expected and observed limits match the theoretical prediction for the cross-section in the model.

Upper bounds at 95% CL on the total production cross-section (ggA + bbA) times the branching ratio B(A->ZH)xB(H->bb) for an A boson in the flipped 2HDM with tan(beta)=20. For each signal point, characterised by the mass pair (mA, mH), two limits are provided, the observed and the expected. The correct width as predicted by this particular parameter choice of the 2HDM is used and cos(beta-alpha)=0 is assumed. The excluded contours in the figure correspond to the points of the 2HDM parameter space where the expected and observed limits match the theoretical prediction for the cross-section in the model.

The mass distribution of the 4q system before any m4q window cuts for gluon-gluon fusion for the llWW channel. The signal distribution for (mA, mH) = (600, 300) GeV is also shown, and is normalised such that the production cross-section times the branching ratios B(A->ZH)xB(H->WW) corresponds to 1 pb. Background components are displayed separately.

The m2l4q mass distribution for the m4q window defined for (mA, mH)=(600, 300) GeV with gluon-gluon fusion production is shown for the llWW channel. The number of entries shown in each bin is the number of events in that bin divided by the width of the bin. The signal distribution for (mA, mH) = (600, 300) GeV is also shown, and is normalised such that the production cross-section times the branching ratios B(A->ZH)xB(H->WW) corresponds to 1 pb. Background components are displayed separately.

The m2l4q mass distribution for the m4q window defined for (mA, mH)=(670, 500) GeV with gluon-gluon fusion production is shown for the llWW channel. The number of entries shown in each bin is the number of events in that bin divided by the width of the bin. The signal distribution for (mA, mH) = (670, 500) GeV is also shown, and is normalised such that the production cross-section times the branching ratios B(A->ZH)xB(H->WW) corresponds to 1 pb. Background components are displayed separately.

Upper bounds at 95% CL on the production cross-section times the branching ratio B(A->ZH)xB(H->WW) in pb for a narrow width A boson produced via gluon-gluon fusion production. For each signal point, characterised by the mass pair (mA, mH), two limits are provided, the observed and the expected.

Upper bounds at 95% CL on the production cross-section times the branching ratio B(A->ZH)xB(H->bb) in pb for an A boson with a natural width that is 10% with respect to its mass, produced via gluon-gluon fusion for the llbb final state. For each signal point, characterised by the mass pair (mA, mH), two limits are provided, the observed and the expected.

Upper bounds at 95% CL on the production cross-section times the branching ratio B(A->ZH)xB(H->bb) in pb for an A boson with a natural width that is 10% with respect to its mass, via b-associated production for the llbb final state. For each signal point, characterised by the mass pair (mA, mH), two limits are provided, the observed and the expected.

Upper bounds at 95% CL on the production cross-section times the branching ratio B(A->ZH)xB(H->bb) in pb for an A boson with a natural width that is 20% with respect to its mass, produced via gluon-gluon fusion for the llbb final state. For each signal point, characterised by the mass pair (mA, mH), two limits are provided, the observed and the expected.

Upper bounds at 95% CL on the production cross-section times the branching ratio B(A->ZH)xB(H->bb) in pb for an A boson with a natural width that is 20% with respect to its mass, via b-associated production for the llbb final state. For each signal point, characterised by the mass pair (mA, mH), two limits are provided, the observed and the expected.

Upper bounds at 95% CL on the production cross-section times the branching ratio B(A->ZH)xB(H->WW) in pb for an A boson with a natural width that is 10% with respect to its mass, produced via gluon-gluon fusion for the llWW final state. For each signal point, characterised by the mass pair (mA, mH), two limits are provided, the observed and the expected.

Upper bounds at 95% CL on the production cross-section times the branching ratio B(A->ZH)xB(H->WW) in pb for an A boson with a natural width that is 20% with respect to its mass, produced via gluon-gluon fusion for the llWW final state. For each signal point, characterised by the mass pair (mA, mH), two limits are provided, the observed and the expected.

The mllbb mass distribution for the mbb window defined for (mA, mH) = (440, 130) GeV in the 2 tag category with b-associated production is shown. The number of entries shown in each bin is the number of events in that bin divided by the width of the bin. The signal distribution for (mA, mH) = (440, 130) GeV is also shown, and is normalised such that the production cross-section times the branching ratios B(A->ZH)xB(H->bb) corresponds to 1 pb. Background components are displayed separately.

The mllbb mass distribution for the mbb window defined for (mA, mH) = (450, 140) GeV in the 2 tag category with b-associated production is shown. The number of entries shown in each bin is the number of events in that bin divided by the width of the bin. The signal distribution for (mA, mH) = (450, 140) GeV is also shown, and is normalised such that the production cross-section times the branching ratios B(A->ZH)xB(H->bb) corresponds to 1 pb. Background components are displayed separately.

The mllbb mass distribution for the mbb window defined for (mA, mH) = (460, 150) GeV in the 2 tag category with b-associated production is shown. The number of entries shown in each bin is the number of events in that bin divided by the width of the bin. The signal distribution for (mA, mH) = (460, 150) GeV is also shown, and is normalised such that the production cross-section times the branching ratios B(A->ZH)xB(H->bb) corresponds to 1 pb. Background components are displayed separately.

The mllbb mass distribution for the mbb window defined for (mA, mH) = (460, 160) GeV in the 2 tag category with b-associated production is shown. The number of entries shown in each bin is the number of events in that bin divided by the width of the bin. The signal distribution for (mA, mH) = (460, 160) GeV is also shown, and is normalised such that the production cross-section times the branching ratios B(A->ZH)xB(H->bb) corresponds to 1 pb. Background components are displayed separately.

The mllbb mass distribution for the mbb window defined for (mA, mH) = (470, 170) GeV in the 2 tag category with b-associated production is shown. The number of entries shown in each bin is the number of events in that bin divided by the width of the bin. The signal distribution for (mA, mH) = (470, 170) GeV is also shown, and is normalised such that the production cross-section times the branching ratios B(A->ZH)xB(H->bb) corresponds to 1 pb. Background components are displayed separately.

The mllbb mass distribution for the mbb window defined for (mA, mH) = (470, 180) GeV in the 2 tag category with b-associated production is shown. The number of entries shown in each bin is the number of events in that bin divided by the width of the bin. The signal distribution for (mA, mH) = (470, 180) GeV is also shown, and is normalised such that the production cross-section times the branching ratios B(A->ZH)xB(H->bb) corresponds to 1 pb. Background components are displayed separately.

The mllbb mass distribution for the mbb window defined for (mA, mH) = (420, 190) GeV in the 2 tag category with b-associated production is shown. The number of entries shown in each bin is the number of events in that bin divided by the width of the bin. The signal distribution for (mA, mH) = (420, 190) GeV is also shown, and is normalised such that the production cross-section times the branching ratios B(A->ZH)xB(H->bb) corresponds to 1 pb. Background components are displayed separately.

The mllbb mass distribution for the mbb window defined for (mA, mH) = (490, 200) GeV in the 2 tag category with b-associated production is shown. The number of entries shown in each bin is the number of events in that bin divided by the width of the bin. The signal distribution for (mA, mH) = (490, 200) GeV is also shown, and is normalised such that the production cross-section times the branching ratios B(A->ZH)xB(H->bb) corresponds to 1 pb. Background components are displayed separately.

The mllbb mass distribution for the mbb window defined for (mA, mH) = (430, 210) GeV in the 2 tag category with b-associated production is shown. The number of entries shown in each bin is the number of events in that bin divided by the width of the bin. The signal distribution for (mA, mH) = (430, 210) GeV is also shown, and is normalised such that the production cross-section times the branching ratios B(A->ZH)xB(H->bb) corresponds to 1 pb. Background components are displayed separately.

The mllbb mass distribution for the mbb window defined for (mA, mH) = (440, 220) GeV in the 2 tag category with b-associated production is shown. The number of entries shown in each bin is the number of events in that bin divided by the width of the bin. The signal distribution for (mA, mH) = (440, 220) GeV is also shown, and is normalised such that the production cross-section times the branching ratios B(A->ZH)xB(H->bb) corresponds to 1 pb. Background components are displayed separately.

The mllbb mass distribution for the mbb window defined for (mA, mH) = (500, 230) GeV in the 2 tag category with b-associated production is shown. The number of entries shown in each bin is the number of events in that bin divided by the width of the bin. The signal distribution for (mA, mH) = (500, 230) GeV is also shown, and is normalised such that the production cross-section times the branching ratios B(A->ZH)xB(H->bb) corresponds to 1 pb. Background components are displayed separately.

The mllbb mass distribution for the mbb window defined for (mA, mH) = (510, 240) GeV in the 2 tag category with b-associated production is shown. The number of entries shown in each bin is the number of events in that bin divided by the width of the bin. The signal distribution for (mA, mH) = (510, 240) GeV is also shown, and is normalised such that the production cross-section times the branching ratios B(A->ZH)xB(H->bb) corresponds to 1 pb. Background components are displayed separately.

The mllbb mass distribution for the mbb window defined for (mA, mH) = (520, 250) GeV in the 2 tag category with b-associated production is shown. The number of entries shown in each bin is the number of events in that bin divided by the width of the bin. The signal distribution for (mA, mH) = (520, 250) GeV is also shown, and is normalised such that the production cross-section times the branching ratios B(A->ZH)xB(H->bb) corresponds to 1 pb. Background components are displayed separately.

The mllbb mass distribution for the mbb window defined for (mA, mH) = (520, 260) GeV in the 2 tag category with b-associated production is shown. The number of entries shown in each bin is the number of events in that bin divided by the width of the bin. The signal distribution for (mA, mH) = (520, 260) GeV is also shown, and is normalised such that the production cross-section times the branching ratios B(A->ZH)xB(H->bb) corresponds to 1 pb. Background components are displayed separately.

The mllbb mass distribution for the mbb window defined for (mA, mH) = (530, 270) GeV in the 2 tag category with b-associated production is shown. The number of entries shown in each bin is the number of events in that bin divided by the width of the bin. The signal distribution for (mA, mH) = (530, 270) GeV is also shown, and is normalised such that the production cross-section times the branching ratios B(A->ZH)xB(H->bb) corresponds to 1 pb. Background components are displayed separately.

The mllbb mass distribution for the mbb window defined for (mA, mH) = (540, 280) GeV in the 2 tag category with b-associated production is shown. The number of entries shown in each bin is the number of events in that bin divided by the width of the bin. The signal distribution for (mA, mH) = (540, 280) GeV is also shown, and is normalised such that the production cross-section times the branching ratios B(A->ZH)xB(H->bb) corresponds to 1 pb. Background components are displayed separately.

The mllbb mass distribution for the mbb window defined for (mA, mH) = (540, 290) GeV in the 2 tag category with b-associated production is shown. The number of entries shown in each bin is the number of events in that bin divided by the width of the bin. The signal distribution for (mA, mH) = (540, 290) GeV is also shown, and is normalised such that the production cross-section times the branching ratios B(A->ZH)xB(H->bb) corresponds to 1 pb. Background components are displayed separately.

The mllbb mass distribution for the mbb window defined for (mA, mH) = (550, 300) GeV in the 2 tag category with b-associated production is shown. The number of entries shown in each bin is the number of events in that bin divided by the width of the bin. The signal distribution for (mA, mH) = (550, 300) GeV is also shown, and is normalised such that the production cross-section times the branching ratios B(A->ZH)xB(H->bb) corresponds to 1 pb. Background components are displayed separately.

The mllbb mass distribution for the mbb window defined for (mA, mH) = (550, 310) GeV in the 2 tag category with b-associated production is shown. The number of entries shown in each bin is the number of events in that bin divided by the width of the bin. The signal distribution for (mA, mH) = (550, 310) GeV is also shown, and is normalised such that the production cross-section times the branching ratios B(A->ZH)xB(H->bb) corresponds to 1 pb. Background components are displayed separately.