Measured differential cross section with associated uncertainties as a function of COS(THETA*). Each systematic uncertainty sources is fully uncorrelated with the other sources and fully correlated across bins, except for the background modelling systematics for which an uncorrelated treatment across bins is more appropriate.

Measured differential cross section with associated uncertainties as a function of DELTAYRAP(2GAMMA). Each systematic uncertainty sources is fully uncorrelated with the other sources and fully correlated across bins, except for the background modelling systematics for which an uncorrelated treatment across bins is more appropriate.

Measured differential cross section with associated uncertainties as a function of MULT(JET,PT>30 GEV). Each systematic uncertainty sources is fully uncorrelated with the other sources and fully correlated across bins, except for the background modelling systematics for which an uncorrelated treatment across bins is more appropriate.

Measured differential cross section with associated uncertainties as a function of MULT(JET,PT>50 GEV). Each systematic uncertainty sources is fully uncorrelated with the other sources and fully correlated across bins, except for the background modelling systematics for which an uncorrelated treatment across bins is more appropriate.

Measured differential cross section with associated uncertainties as a function of PT(JET1). Each systematic uncertainty sources is fully uncorrelated with the other sources and fully correlated across bins, except for the background modelling systematics for which an uncorrelated treatment across bins is more appropriate.

Measured differential cross section with associated uncertainties as a function of PT(JET2). Each systematic uncertainty sources is fully uncorrelated with the other sources and fully correlated across bins, except for the background modelling systematics for which an uncorrelated treatment across bins is more appropriate.

Measured differential cross section with associated uncertainties as a function of HT. Each systematic uncertainty sources is fully uncorrelated with the other sources and fully correlated across bins, except for the background modelling systematics for which an uncorrelated treatment across bins is more appropriate.

Measured differential cross section with associated uncertainties as a function of YRAP(JET1). Each systematic uncertainty sources is fully uncorrelated with the other sources and fully correlated across bins, except for the background modelling systematics for which an uncorrelated treatment across bins is more appropriate.

Measured differential cross section with associated uncertainties as a function of YRAP(JET2). Each systematic uncertainty sources is fully uncorrelated with the other sources and fully correlated across bins, except for the background modelling systematics for which an uncorrelated treatment across bins is more appropriate.

Measured differential cross section with associated uncertainties as a function of M(2JET). Each systematic uncertainty sources is fully uncorrelated with the other sources and fully correlated across bins, except for the background modelling systematics for which an uncorrelated treatment across bins is more appropriate.

Measured differential cross section with associated uncertainties as a function of DELTAYRAP(2JET). Each systematic uncertainty sources is fully uncorrelated with the other sources and fully correlated across bins, except for the background modelling systematics for which an uncorrelated treatment across bins is more appropriate.

Measured differential cross section with associated uncertainties as a function of ABSDPHI(2JET). Each systematic uncertainty sources is fully uncorrelated with the other sources and fully correlated across bins, except for the background modelling systematics for which an uncorrelated treatment across bins is more appropriate.

Measured differential cross section with associated uncertainties as a function of DPHI(2JET). Each systematic uncertainty sources is fully uncorrelated with the other sources and fully correlated across bins, except for the background modelling systematics for which an uncorrelated treatment across bins is more appropriate.

Measured differential cross section with associated uncertainties as a function of PT(2GAMMA2JET). Each systematic uncertainty sources is fully uncorrelated with the other sources and fully correlated across bins, except for the background modelling systematics for which an uncorrelated treatment across bins is more appropriate.

Measured differential cross section with associated uncertainties as a function of DPHI(2GAMMA,2JET). Each systematic uncertainty sources is fully uncorrelated with the other sources and fully correlated across bins, except for the background modelling systematics for which an uncorrelated treatment across bins is more appropriate.

Measured differential cross section with associated uncertainties as a function of TAUJET. Each systematic uncertainty sources is fully uncorrelated with the other sources and fully correlated across bins, except for the background modelling systematics for which an uncorrelated treatment across bins is more appropriate.

Measured differential cross section with associated uncertainties as a function of SUM(TAUJET). Each systematic uncertainty sources is fully uncorrelated with the other sources and fully correlated across bins, except for the background modelling systematics for which an uncorrelated treatment across bins is more appropriate.

Measured differential cross section with associated uncertainties as a function of PT(2GAMMA) [NJET=0,PT>30 GEV]. Each systematic uncertainty sources is fully uncorrelated with the other sources and fully correlated across bins, except for the background modelling systematics for which an uncorrelated treatment across bins is more appropriate.

Measured differential cross section with associated uncertainties as a function of PT(2GAMMA) [NJET=1,PT>30 GEV]. Each systematic uncertainty sources is fully uncorrelated with the other sources and fully correlated across bins, except for the background modelling systematics for which an uncorrelated treatment across bins is more appropriate.

Measured differential cross section with associated uncertainties as a function of PT(2GAMMA) [NJET=2,PT>30 GEV]. Each systematic uncertainty sources is fully uncorrelated with the other sources and fully correlated across bins, except for the background modelling systematics for which an uncorrelated treatment across bins is more appropriate.

Measured differential cross section with associated uncertainties as a function of PT(2GAMMA) [NJET>=3,PT>30 GEV]. Each systematic uncertainty sources is fully uncorrelated with the other sources and fully correlated across bins, except for the background modelling systematics for which an uncorrelated treatment across bins is more appropriate.

The measured cross sections or cross section limits of the diphoton, VBF-enhanced, Nlepton $\geq$ 1, high $E_{T}^{miss}$, and ttH-enhanced fiducial regions are shown.

Measured differential cross section with associated uncertainties as a function of diphoton transverse momentum in bins of ABS(COS(THETA*)). Each systematic uncertainty sources is fully uncorrelated with the other sources and fully correlated across bins, except for the background modelling systematics for which an uncorrelated treatment across bins is more appropriate.Each systematic uncertainty sources is fully uncorrelated with the other sources.

Non-perturbative correction factors in percent accounting for the impact of hadronisation and the underlying event activity for all measured variables and fiducial regions. Regions of phase space where no reliable estimate could be obtained are listed as 100 without uncertainties. Uncertainties are evaluated by deriving these factors using different generators and tunes as described in the text. No factor are given for the Nlepton $\geq$ 1 and High-$E_{T}^{miss}$ fiducial regions as the gluon fusion contamination in both is negligible.

Isolation efficiencies in percent for gluon fusion $H\rightarrow\gamma\gamma$ for each fiducial region/variable bin measured in this analysis. The isolation efficiency is defined as the probability for both photons to fulfil the isolation criteria (as described in Section 9.1) for events that pass the diphoton kinematic criteria. Regions of phase space where no reliable estimate could be obtained are listed as 100 without uncertainties. Uncertainties are assigned in the same way as for the non-perturbative correction factors: by varying the fragmentation and underlying event modelling. These factors can be multiplied by the kinematic acceptance factors (see Table 29) to extrapolate an inclusive gluon fusion Higgs prediction to the fiducial volume used in this analysis. No factors for the Nlepton $\geq$ 1 and High $E_{T}^{miss}$ fiducial regions are provided as the gluon fusion contamination is negligible.

Combined non-perturbative (Table 27) and particle-level isolation correction factors (Table 28) in percent accounting for the impact of hadronisation and the underlying event activity for all measured variables and fiducial regions. Regions of phase space where no reliable estimate could be obtained are listed as 100 without uncertainties. The uncertainties on the combined values properly take into account the correlations between both multiplicative factors.

Diphoton kinematic acceptances in percent for gluon-gluon fusion for the diphoton fiducial region and all differential variable bins studied in this paper, defined as the probability to fulfill the diphoton kinematic criteria: $p_{T}$/$m_{\gamma\gamma}$ < 0.35 (0.25) for the leading (subleading) photon and $|\eta_{\gamma\gamma}|$ < 2.37. The factors are evaluated using the Powheg NNLOPSevent generator. Uncertainties are taken from PDF variations. QCD scale variations have a negligible impact on these factors. The range of each bin is given in Table 26.

observed statistical correlations between pTyy, Njets, mjj, |DeltaPhijj| and pTj1

ggH default MC + XH predictions

XH ( = VBF + VH + ttH + bbH ) MC predictions

Best-fit values and uncertainties of the production-mode cross sections times branching ratio.

Best-fit values and uncertainties of the simplified template cross sections times branching ratio.

Observed correlations between the measured simplified template cross sections, including both the statistical and systematic uncertainties.

Best-fit values and uncertainties of the simplified template cross sections times branching ratio.

Observed correlations between the measured simplified template cross sections, including both the statistical and systematic uncertainties.

Observed correlations between the measured simplified template cross sections, including both the statistical and systematic uncertainties.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 40 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 50 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 50 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 60 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 60 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 70 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 70 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 80 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 80 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 90 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 90 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 100 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 100 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 110 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 110 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 125 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 125 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 140 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 140 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 160 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 160 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 180 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 180 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 200 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 200 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 225 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 225 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 250 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 250 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 300 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 300 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 400 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 400 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 500 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 500 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 600 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 600 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 1000 GeV and 0 <|y|< 0.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 20 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 25 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 25 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 30 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 30 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 40 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 40 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 50 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 50 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 60 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 60 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 70 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 70 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 80 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 80 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 90 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 90 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 100 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 100 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 110 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 110 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 125 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 125 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 140 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 140 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 160 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 160 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 180 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 180 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 200 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 200 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 225 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 225 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 250 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 250 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 300 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 300 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 400 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 400 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 500 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 500 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 600 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 600 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 1000 GeV and 0.5 <|y|< 1.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 20 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 25 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 25 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 30 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 30 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 40 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 40 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 50 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 50 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 60 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 60 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 70 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 70 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 80 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 80 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 90 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 90 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 100 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 100 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 110 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 110 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 125 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 125 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 140 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 140 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 160 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 160 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 180 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 180 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 200 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 200 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 225 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 225 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 250 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 250 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 300 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 300 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 400 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 400 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 500 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 500 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 600 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 600 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 1000 GeV and 1.0 <|y|< 1.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 20 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 25 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 25 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 30 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 30 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 40 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 40 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 50 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 50 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 60 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 60 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 70 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 70 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 80 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 80 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 90 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 90 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 100 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 100 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 110 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 110 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 125 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 125 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 140 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 140 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 160 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 160 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 180 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 180 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 200 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 200 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 225 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 225 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 250 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 250 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 300 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 300 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 400 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 400 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 500 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 500 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 600 GeV and 1.5 <|y|< 2.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 20 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 25 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 25 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 30 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 30 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 40 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 40 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 50 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 50 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 60 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 60 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 70 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 70 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 80 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 80 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 90 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 90 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 100 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 100 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 110 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 110 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 125 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 125 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 140 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 140 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 160 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 160 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 180 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 180 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 200 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 200 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 225 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 225 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 250 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 250 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 300 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 300 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 400 GeV and 2.0 <|y|< 2.5. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 20 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 25 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 25 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 30 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 30 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 40 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 40 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 50 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 50 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 60 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 60 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 70 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 70 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 80 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 80 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 90 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 90 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 100 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 100 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 110 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 110 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 125 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 125 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 140 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 140 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 160 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 160 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 180 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 180 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 200 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 200 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 225 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 225 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 250 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 250 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 300 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The measured differential jet shape $\rho(r)$ for jets with 300 GeV $< p_{\mathrm{T}} <$ 400 GeV and 2.5 <|y|< 3.0. The CF in the table refers to unfolding correction factor from {\sc pythia6} Tune Z2. The systematic uncertainties from different sources, jet energy scale (JES), unfolding, and single particle response (SPR), are also presented.

The dependence of $\langle N_\mathrm{ch} \rangle$ on the transverse momentum of jets in two different rapidity regions, $|y| < 1$ and $1 < |y| < 2$.

The dependence of $\langle \delta R^2 \rangle$ on the transverse momentum of jets in two different rapidity regions, $|y| < 1$ and $ 1 < |y| < 2 $.

The dependence of $\langle\delta \eta^2\rangle/\langle\delta \phi^2\rangle$ on the transverse momentum for jets with $|y| < 1$.

Mean $p_T$, leading in-jet charged particle.

Mean $p_T$, charged particle jets, $p^{ch.jet}_T > 5$ GeV, $|\eta^{ch.jet}| < 1.9$.

Charged jet rate, $p^\text{ch.jet}_T > 5$ GeV, $|\eta^{ch.jet}| < 1.9$.

Charged jet rate, $p^\text{ch.jet}_T > 30$ GeV, $|\eta^{ch.jet}| < 1.9$.

Jet $p_T$ spectrum, $|\eta^{ch.jet}| < 1.9$, $10 < N_\text{ch} \le 30$.

Jet $p_T$ spectrum, $|\eta^{ch.jet}| < 1.9$, $30 < N_\text{ch} \le 50$.

Jet $p_T$ spectrum, $|\eta^{ch.jet}| < 1.9$, $50 < N_\text{ch} \le 80$.

Jet $p_T$ spectrum, $|\eta^{ch.jet}| < 1.9$, $80 < N_\text{ch} \le 110$.

Jet $p_T$ spectrum, $|\eta^{ch.jet}| < 1.9$, $110 < N_\text{ch} \le 140$.

Intrajet ring $p_{T}$ density, $10 < N_\text{ch} \le 30$.

Intrajet ring $p_{T}$ density, $30 < N_\text{ch} \le 50$.

Intrajet ring $p_{T}$ density, $50 < N_\text{ch} \le 80$.

Intrajet ring $p_{T}$ density, $80 < N_\text{ch} \le 110$.

Intrajet ring $p_{T}$ density, $110 < N_\text{ch} \le 140$.

Spin alignment RHO(00) extracted from the helicity angle distributions for PHI and OMEGA production in the given XF regions for different M(PV) regions. The uncertainty is the propagated uncertainty from the linear fits, which in turn includes the quadratic sum of statistical uncertainties and uncertainties from the background subtraction.

Spin alignment RHO(00) extracted using DELTA(P), the direction of the momentum transfer from the beam proton in the initial state to the fast proton in the final state, as the reference axis. The table includes PHI and OMEGA production. The results for different P(V) cuts are also given for OMEGA production. The uncertainty is the propagated uncertainty from the linear fits, which in turn includes the quadratic sum of statistical uncertainties and uncertainties from the background subtraction.

No description provided.

MULT(P=3) NORMALIZED ON TOPOLOGICAL CS TAKEN FROM C.COCHET ET AL.,NP B124, 61, 1977.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

Q**2 dependence of the GAMMA* P cross section for proton dissociative PHI meson production at mean W There is an additional overall normalization uncertainty of 5.3 PCT.

Q**2 dependence of the ratio pf the PHI to RHO0 elastic cross section for mean W There is an additional overall normalization uncertainty of 4.0 PCT.

Q**2 + MASS(V)**2 dependence of the ratio pf the PHI to RHO0 elastic cross section for mean W There is an additional overall normalization uncertainty of 4.0 PCT.

Q**2 dependence of the longitudinal and transverse GAMMA* P cross sections for elastic RHO0 production at mean W There is an additional overall normalization uncertainty of 3.9 PCT.

Q**2 dependence of the longitudinal and transverse GAMMA* P cross sections for elastic PHI production at mean W There is an additional overall normalization uncertainty of 4.7 PCT.

W dependence of the GAMMA* P cross section for elastic RHO0 production for Q**2 There is an additional overall normalization uncertainty of 3.9 PCT.

W dependence of the GAMMA* P cross section for elastic RHO0 production for Q**2 There is an additional overall normalization uncertainty of 3.9 PCT.

W dependence of the GAMMA* P cross section for elastic RHO0 production for Q**2 There is an additional overall normalization uncertainty of 3.9 PCT.

W dependence of the GAMMA* P cross section for elastic RHO0 production for Q**2 There is an additional overall normalization uncertainty of 3.9 PCT.

W dependence of the GAMMA* P cross section for elastic RHO0 production for Q**2 There is an additional overall normalization uncertainty of 3.9 PCT.

W dependence of the GAMMA* P cross section for dissociative RHO0 production for Q**2 There is an additional overall normalization uncertainty of 4.6 PCT.

W dependence of the GAMMA* P cross section for dissociative RHO0 production for Q**2 There is an additional overall normalization uncertainty of 4.6 PCT.

W dependence of the GAMMA* P cross section for dissociative RHO0 production for Q**2 There is an additional overall normalization uncertainty of 4.6 PCT.

W dependence of the GAMMA* P cross section for elastic PHI production for Q**2 There is an additional overall normalization uncertainty of 4.7 PCT.

W dependence of the GAMMA* P cross section for elastic PHI production for Q**2 There is an additional overall normalization uncertainty of 4.7 PCT.

W dependence of the GAMMA* P cross section for elastic PHI production for Q**2 There is an additional overall normalization uncertainty of 4.7 PCT.

W dependence of the GAMMA* P cross section for dissociative PHI production for Q**2 There is an additional overall normalization uncertainty of 5.3 PCT.

T dependence of the GAMMA* P cross section for elastic RHO0 production for several values. There is an additional overall normalization uncertainty of 3.9 PCT.

T dependence of the GAMMA* P cross section for dissociative RHO0 production for several values. There is an additional overall normalization uncertainty of 4.6 PCT.

T dependence of the GAMMA* P cross section for elastic PHI production for several values. There is an additional overall normalization uncertainty of 4.7 PCT.

T dependence of the GAMMA* P cross section for dissociative PHI production for several values. There is an additional overall normalization uncertainty of 5.3 PCT.

Q**2 dependence of the slope of the T distribution in elastic RHO0 production.

Q**2 dependence of the slope of the T distribution in elastic PHI production.

Q**2 dependence of the slope of the T distribution in dissociative RHO0 production.

Q**2 dependence of the slope of the T distribution in dissociative PHI production.

W dependence of the GAMMA* P cross section for dissociative RHO0 production in four ABS(T) bins at Q**2 There is an additional normalization uncertainty of 4 PCT.

W dependence of the GAMMA* P cross section for dissociative RHO0 production in four ABS(T) bins at Q**2 There is an additional normalization uncertainty of 4 PCT.

Q**2 dependence of the ratio of proton dissociative to elastic RHO0 meson total cross section. There is an additional overall normalization uncertainty of 2.4 PCT.

Q**2 dependence of the ratio of proton dissociative to elastic PHI meson total cross section. There is an additional overall normalization uncertainty of 2.4 PCT.

Q**2 dependence of the ratio of proton dissociative to elastic RHO0 meson differential cross section at T=0. There is an additional overall normalization uncertainty of 2.4 PCT.

Q**2 dependence of the ratio of proton dissociative to elastic PHI mesondifferential cross section at T=0. There is an additional overall normalization uncertainty of 2.4 PCT.

Slope differences between elastic and proton dissociative scattering for RHO0 meson production.

Slope differences between elastic and proton dissociative scattering for PHI meson production.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of Q**2.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of Q**2.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of Q**2.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of Q**2.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of Q**2.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of PHI mesons as a function of Q**2.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of PHI mesons as a function of Q**2.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of PHI mesons as a function of Q**2.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of PHI mesons as a function of Q**2.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of PHI mesons as a function of Q**2.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of W.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of W.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of W.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of W.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of W.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of W.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of W.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of W.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of W.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of W.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of W.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of W.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of W.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of W.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of W.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of T.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of T.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of T.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of T.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of T.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of T.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of T.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of T.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of T.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of T.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of PHI mesons as a function of T.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of PHI mesons as a function of T.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of PHI mesons as a function of T.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of PHI mesons as a function of T.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of PHI mesons as a function of T.

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of M(PI+PI-).

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of M(PI+PI-).

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of M(PI+PI-).

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of M(PI+PI-).

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of M(PI+PI-).

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of M(PI+PI-).

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of M(PI+PI-).

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of M(PI+PI-).

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of M(PI+PI-).

Spin density matrix elements for diffractive electroproduction of RHO0 mesons as a function of M(PI+PI-).

Q**2 dependence of the matrix element combination RHO(JJ=5,MM=00) + 2*RHO(JJ=5,MM=11).

Q**2 dependence of the matrix element combination RHO(JJ=1,MM=00) + 2*RHO(JJ=1,MM=11).

T dependence of the matrix element combination RHO(JJ=5,MM=00) + 2*RHO(JJ=5,MM=11).

T dependence of the matrix element combination RHO(JJ=1,MM=00) + 2*RHO(JJ=1,MM=11).

Q**2 dependence of the ratio R.

Q**2 dependence of the ratio R.

W dependence of the ratio R.

W dependence of the ratio R.

W dependence of the ratio R.

T dependence of the ratio R.

T dependence of the ratio R.

Di-pion mass dependence of the ratio R.

Di-pion mass dependence of the ratio R.

Dependence of the exponential slope of the T distribution as a function of the di-pion mass for the Q**2 range 2.5 to 5 GeV**2.

Dependence of the exponential slope of the T distribution as a function of the di-pion mass for the Q**2 range 5 to 60 GeV**2.

Q**2 dependence of the ratio of the helicity amplitudes (assumed purely imaginary) and phase difference between the T11 and T00 amplitudes for RHO0 production.

Q**2 dependence of the ratio of the helicity amplitudes (assumed purely imaginary) and phase difference between the T11 and T00 amplitudes for PHI production.

T dependence of the ratio of the helicity amplitudes (assumed purely imaginary) and phase difference between the T11 and T00 amplitudes for RHO0 production in the Q**2 range 2.5 to 5 GeV**2.

T dependence of the ratio of the helicity amplitudes (assumed purely imaginary) and phase difference between the T11 and T00 amplitudes for RHO0 production in the Q**2 range 5 to 60 GeV**2.

T dependence of the ratio of the helicity amplitudes (assumed purely imaginary) and phase difference between the T11 and T00 amplitudes for PHI production in the Q**2 range 2.5 to 60 GeV**2.

Di-pion mass dependence of the helicity amplitudes (assumed purely imaginary) and phase difference between the T11 and T00 amplitudes for RHO0 production in the Q**2 range 2.5 to 5 GeV**2.

Di-pion mass dependence of the helicity amplitudes (assumed purely imaginary) and phase difference between the T11 and T00 amplitudes for RHO0 production in the Q**2 range 5 to 60 GeV**2.

The differential cross section DSIG/DT as a function of W in the ABS(T) range 3.0 to 4.0 GeV**2.

The differential cross section DSIG/DT as a function of W in the ABS(T) range 4.0 to 5.0 GeV**2.

The differential cross section DSIG/DT as a function of W in the ABS(T) range 5.0 to 6.5 GeV**2.

The differential cross section DSIG/DT as a function of W in the ABS(T) range 6.5 to 8.0 GeV**2.

The differential cross section DSIG/DT as a function of W in the ABS(T) range 8.0 to 11.0 GeV**2.

The differential cross section DSIG/DT as a function of W in the ABS(T) range 11.0 to 20.0 GeV**2.

The differential cross section DSIG/DT as a function of W in the ABS(T) range 2 to 3 GeV**2.

The differential cross section DSIG/DT as a function of W in the ABS(T) range 3 to 5 GeV**2.

The differential cross section DSIG/DT as a function of W in the ABS(T) range 5 to 10 GeV**2.

The differential cross section DSIG/DT as a function of W in the ABS(T) range 10 to 20 GeV**2.

Spin density events as a function of T.

The multiplicity of charged hadrons for three intervals of mass of the charged hadron system in the forward region.

The multiplicity of charged hadrons for three intervals of mass of the charged hadron system in the backward region.

The multiplicity of positively charged hadrons for three intervals of mass of the charged hadron system in the full phase space region.

The multiplicity of negatively charged hadrons for three intervals of mass of the charged hadron system in the full phase space region.

Charged particle rapidity spectra for three intervals of the mass of the charged haron system.

The central region charged particle density.

The parameter RHO which relects the correlation between the number of particles in the forward and backward hemisphere.

Mean value of the event shape variable C-PARAM.

Mean value of the event shape variable 1-THRUST(C=G).

Mean value of the event shape variable B(C=G).

Differential distribution for event shape RHO**2 corrected to the hadron level for the Q**2 range 80 TO 160 GeV**2.

Differential distribution for event shape RHO**2 corrected to the hadron level for the Q**2 range 160 TO 320 GeV**2.

Differential distribution for event shape RHO**2 corrected to the hadron level for the Q**2 range 320 TO 640 GeV**2.

Differential distribution for event shape RHO**2 corrected to the hadron level for the Q**2 range 640 TO 1280 GeV**2.

Differential distribution for event shape RHO**2 corrected to the hadron level for the Q**2 range 1280 TO 2560 GeV**2.

Differential distribution for event shape RHO**2 corrected to the hadron level for the Q**2 range 2560 TO 5120 GeV**2.

Differential distribution for event shape RHO**2 corrected to the hadron level for the Q**2 range 5120 TO 10240 GeV**2.

Differential distribution for event shape RHO**2 corrected to the hadron level for the Q**2 range 10240 TO 20480 GeV**2.

Differential distribution for event shape C-PARAM corrected to the hadron level for the Q**2 range 80 TO 160 GeV**2.

Differential distribution for event shape C-PARAM corrected to the hadron level for the Q**2 range 160 TO 320 GeV**2.

Differential distribution for event shape C-PARAM corrected to the hadron level for the Q**2 range 320 TO 640 GeV**2.

Differential distribution for event shape C-PARAM corrected to the hadron level for the Q**2 range 640 TO 1280 GeV**2.

Differential distribution for event shape C-PARAM corrected to the hadron level for the Q**2 range 1280 TO 2560 GeV**2.

Differential distribution for event shape C-PARAM corrected to the hadron level for the Q**2 range 2560 TO 5120 GeV**2.

Differential distribution for event shape C-PARAM corrected to the hadron level for the Q**2 range 5120 TO 10240 GeV**2.

Differential distribution for event shape C-PARAM corrected to the hadron level for the Q**2 range 10240 TO 20480 GeV**2.

Differential distribution for event shape THRUST(C=T) corrected to the hadron level for the Q**2 range 80 TO 160 GeV**2.

Differential distribution for event shape THRUST(C=T) corrected to the hadron level for the Q**2 range 160 TO 320 GeV**2.

Differential distribution for event shape THRUST(C=T) corrected to the hadron level for the Q**2 range 320 TO 640 GeV**2.

Differential distribution for event shape THRUST(C=T) corrected to the hadron level for the Q**2 range 640 TO 1280 GeV**2.

Differential distribution for event shape THRUST(C=T) corrected to the hadron level for the Q**2 range 1280 TO 2560 GeV**2.

Differential distribution for event shape THRUST(C=T) corrected to the hadron level for the Q**2 range 2560 TO 5120 GeV**2.

Differential distribution for event shape THRUST(C=T) corrected to the hadron level for the Q**2 range 5120 TO 10240 GeV**2.

Differential distribution for event shape THRUST(C=T) corrected to the hadron level for the Q**2 range 10240 TO 20480 GeV**2.

Differential distribution for event shape B(C=T) corrected to the hadron level for the Q**2 range 80 TO 160 GeV**2.

Differential distribution for event shape B(C=T) corrected to the hadron level for the Q**2 range 160 TO 320 GeV**2.

Differential distribution for event shape B(C=T) corrected to the hadron level for the Q**2 range 320 TO 640 GeV**2.

Differential distribution for event shape B(C=T) corrected to the hadron level for the Q**2 range 640 TO 1280 GeV**2.

Differential distribution for event shape B(C=T) corrected to the hadron level for the Q**2 range 1280 TO 2560 GeV**2.

Differential distribution for event shape B(C=T) corrected to the hadron level for the Q**2 range 2560 TO 5120 GeV**2.

Differential distribution for event shape B(C=T) corrected to the hadron level for the Q**2 range 5120 TO 10240 GeV**2.

Differential distribution for event shape B(C=T) corrected to the hadron level for the Q**2 range 10240 TO 20480 GeV**2.

Differential distribution for event shape THRUST(C=G) corrected to the hadron level for the Q**2 range 80 TO 160 GeV**2.

Differential distribution for event shape THRUST(C=G) corrected to the hadron level for the Q**2 range 160 TO 320 GeV**2.

Differential distribution for event shape THRUST(C=G) corrected to the hadron level for the Q**2 range 320 TO 640 GeV**2.

Differential distribution for event shape THRUST(C=G) corrected to the hadron level for the Q**2 range 640 TO 1280 GeV**2.

Differential distribution for event shape THRUST(C=G) corrected to the hadron level for the Q**2 range 1280 TO 2560 GeV**2.

Differential distribution for event shape THRUST(C=G) corrected to the hadron level for the Q**2 range 2560 TO 5120 GeV**2.

Differential distribution for event shape THRUST(C=G) corrected to the hadron level for the Q**2 range 5120 TO 10240 GeV**2.

Differential distribution for event shape THRUST(C=G) corrected to the hadron level for the Q**2 range 10240 TO 20480 GeV**2.

Differential distribution for event shape B(C=G) corrected to the hadron level for the Q**2 range 80 TO 160 GeV**2.

Differential distribution for event shape B(C=G) corrected to the hadron level for the Q**2 range 160 TO 320 GeV**2.

Differential distribution for event shape B(C=G) corrected to the hadron level for the Q**2 range 320 TO 640 GeV**2.

Differential distribution for event shape B(C=G) corrected to the hadron level for the Q**2 range 640 TO 1280 GeV**2.

Differential distribution for event shape B(C=G) corrected to the hadron level for the Q**2 range 1280 TO 2560 GeV**2.

Differential distribution for event shape B(C=G) corrected to the hadron level for the Q**2 range 2560 TO 5120 GeV**2.

Differential distribution for event shape B(C=G) corrected to the hadron level for the Q**2 range 5120 TO 10240 GeV**2.

Differential distribution for event shape B(C=G) corrected to the hadron level for the Q**2 range 10240 TO 20480 GeV**2.

Differential distribution for event shape Y2 corrected to the hadron level for the Q**2 range 80 TO 160 GeV**2.

Differential distribution for event shape Y2 corrected to the hadron level for the Q**2 range 160 TO 320 GeV**2.

Differential distribution for event shape Y2 corrected to the hadron level for the Q**2 range 320 TO 640 GeV**2.

Differential distribution for event shape Y2 corrected to the hadron level for the Q**2 range 640 TO 1280 GeV**2.

Differential distribution for event shape Y2 corrected to the hadron level for the Q**2 range 1280 TO 2560 GeV**2.

Differential distribution for event shape Y2 corrected to the hadron level for the Q**2 range 2560 TO 5120 GeV**2.

Differential distribution for event shape Y2 corrected to the hadron level for the Q**2 range 5120 TO 10240 GeV**2.

Differential distribution for event shape Y2 corrected to the hadron level for the Q**2 range 10240 TO 20480 GeV**2.

Differential distribution for event shape (KOUT/Q) corrected to the hadron level for the Q**2 range 80 TO 160 GeV**2.

Differential distribution for event shape (KOUT/Q) corrected to the hadron level for the Q**2 range 160 TO 320 GeV**2.

Differential distribution for event shape (KOUT/Q) corrected to the hadron level for the Q**2 range 320 TO 640 GeV**2.

Differential distribution for event shape (KOUT/Q) corrected to the hadron level for the Q**2 range 640 TO 1280 GeV**2.

Differential distribution for event shape (KOUT/Q) corrected to the hadron level for the Q**2 range 1280 TO 2560 GeV**2.

Differential distribution for event shape (KOUT/Q) corrected to the hadron level for the Q**2 range 2560 TO 5120 GeV**2.

Differential distribution for event shape (KOUT/Q) corrected to the hadron level for the Q**2 range 5120 TO 10240 GeV**2.

Exclusive GAMMA* P --> PHI P cross section in the Q**2 range 9 to 30 GeV**2.

Parameter of the fit SIG of the form W**POWER as a function of Q**2.

Exclusive GAMMA* P --> PHI P cross section as a function of Q**2 for W=75 GeV.

Differential DSIG/DT distribution for the exclusive reaction GAMMA* P --> PHI P at W=75 GeV at Q**2=2.4 GeV**2.

Differential DSIG/DT distribution for the exclusive reaction GAMMA* P --> PHI P at W=75 GeV at Q**2=3.6 GeV**2.

Differential DSIG/DT distribution for the exclusive reaction GAMMA* P --> PHI P at W=75 GeV at Q**2=5.2 GeV**2.

Differential DSIG/DT distribution for the exclusive reaction GAMMA* P --> PHI P at W=75 GeV at Q**2=6.9 GeV**2.

Differential DSIG/DT distribution for the exclusive reaction GAMMA* P --> PHI P at W=75 GeV at Q**2=9.2 GeV**2.

Differential DSIG/DT distribution for the exclusive reaction GAMMA* P --> PHI P at W=75 GeV at Q**2=12.6 GeV**2.

Differential DSIG/DT distribution for the exclusive reaction GAMMA* P --> PHI P at W=75 GeV at Q**2=19.7 GeV**2.

The slope parameter and DSIG/DT at T=0 for the exclusive reaction GAMMA* P --> PHI P at W=75 GeV.

Differential DSIG/DT distribution for the exclusive reaction GAMMA* P --> PHI P as a function of W at Q**2=5 GeV**2 and ABS(T) = 0.73 GeV**2.. Error is combined statistics and systematics.

Differential DSIG/DT distribution for the exclusive reaction GAMMA* P --> PHI P as a function of W at Q**2=5 GeV**2 and ABS(T) = 0.45 GeV**2.. Error is combined statistics and systematics.

Differential DSIG/DT distribution for the exclusive reaction GAMMA* P --> PHI P as a function of W at Q**2=5 GeV**2 and ABS(T) = 0.25 GeV**2.. Error is combined statistics and systematics.

Differential DSIG/DT distribution for the exclusive reaction GAMMA* P --> PHI P as a function of W at Q**2=5 GeV**2 and ABS(T) = 0.12 GeV**2.. Error is combined statistics and systematics.

Differential DSIG/DT distribution for the exclusive reaction GAMMA* P --> PHI P as a function of W at Q**2=5 GeV**2 and ABS(T) = 0.025 GeV**2.. Error is combined statistics and systematics.

The parameter of the fit SIG of the form W**POWER as a function of T. From this the pomeron trajectory can be calculated a(1+POWER/4).

The spin density matrix element R04_00 and ratios of longitudinal and transversely polarized photons as a function of Q**2.

The spin density matrix element R04_00 and ratios of longitudinal and transversely polarized photons as a function of W for the Q**2 region 2 to 5 GeV**2.

The spin density matrix element R04_00 and ratios of longitudinal and transversely polarized photons as a function of W for the Q**2 region 5 to 20 GeV**2.

Jet fractions using the JADE algorithm as a function of the jet resolution parameter YCUT at c.m. energy 172.3 GeV.

Jet fractions using the JADE algorithm as a function of the jet resolution parameter YCUT at c.m. energy 182.8 GeV.

Jet fractions using the JADE algorithm as a function of the jet resolution parameter YCUT at c.m. energy 188.6 GeV.

Jet fractions using the JADE algorithm as a function of the jet resolution parameter YCUT at c.m. energy 194.4 GeV.

Jet fractions using the JADE algorithm as a function of the jet resolution parameter YCUT at c.m. energy 200.2 GeV.

Jet fractions using the JADE algorithm as a function of the jet resolution parameter YCUT at c.m. energy 206.2 GeV.

Jet fractions using the KT(Durham) algorithm as a function of the jet resolution parameter YCUT at c.m. energy 130.1 GeV.

Jet fractions using the KT(Durham) algorithm as a function of the jet resolution parameter YCUT at c.m. energy 136.1 GeV.

Jet fractions using the KT(Durham) algorithm as a function of the jet resolution parameter YCUT at c.m. energy 161.3 GeV.

Jet fractions using the KT(Durham) algorithm as a function of the jet resolution parameter YCUT at c.m. energy 172.3 GeV.

Jet fractions using the KT(Durham) algorithm as a function of the jet resolution parameter YCUT at c.m. energy 182.8 GeV.

Jet fractions using the KT(Durham) algorithm as a function of the jet resolution parameter YCUT at c.m. energy 188.6 GeV.

Jet fractions using the KT(Durham) algorithm as a function of the jet resolution parameter YCUT at c.m. energy 194.4 GeV.

Jet fractions using the KT(Durham) algorithm as a function of the jet resolution parameter YCUT at c.m. energy 200.2 GeV.

Jet fractions using the KT(Durham) algorithm as a function of the jet resolution parameter YCUT at c.m. energy 206.2 GeV.

Jet fractions using the Cambridge algorithm as a function of the jet resolution parameter YCUT at c.m. energy 202.2 GeV.

Jet fractions using the Cambridge algorithm as a function of the jet resolution parameter YCUT at c.m. energy 206.2 GeV.

Differential distributions for event thrust.

Differential distributions for event thrust.

Differential distributions for event thrust.

Differential distributions for event thrust.

Differential distributions for event thrust.

Differential distributions for the scaled heavy jet mass (RHO(C=HEAVY)).

Differential distributions for the scaled heavy jet mass (RHO(C=HEAVY)).

Differential distributions for the scaled heavy jet mass (RHO(C=HEAVY)).

Differential distributions for the scaled heavy jet mass (RHO(C=HEAVY)).

Differential distributions for the scaled heavy jet mass (RHO(C=HEAVY)).

Differential distributions for total jet broadening (BT).

Differential distributions for total jet broadening (BT).

Differential distributions for total jet broadening (BT).

Differential distributions for total jet broadening (BT).

Differential distributions for total jet broadening (BT).

Differential distributions for wide jet broadening (BW).

Differential distributions for wide jet broadening (BW).

Differential distributions for wide jet broadening (BW).

Differential distributions for wide jet broadening (BW).

Differential distributions for wide jet broadening (BW).

Differential distributions for the C-Parameter.

Differential distributions for the C-Parameter.

Differential distributions for the C-Parameter.

Differential distributions for the D-Parameter.

Differential distributions for the D-Parameter.

Differential distributions for the D-Parameter.

Differential distributions for the THRUST at c.m. energy 91.2 GeV for light quark (udsc) and b quark events.

Differential distributions for the RHO(C=HEAVY) at c.m. energy 91.2 GeV forlight quark (udsc) and b quark events.

Differential distributions for the BT at c.m. energy 91.2 GeV for light quark (udsc) and b quark events.

Differential distributions for the BW at c.m. energy 91.2 GeV for light quark (udsc) and b quark events.

Differential distributions for the C-PARAM at c.m. energy 91.2 GeV for light quark (udsc) and b quark events.

Differential distributions for the D-PARAM at c.m. energy 91.2 GeV for light quark (udsc) and b quark events.

Mean values (first moment) and dispersion (second moment) of the THRUST distribution as a function of c.m. energy.

Mean values (first moment) and dispersion (second moment) of the scaled heavy jet mass (RHO(C=HEAVY)) as a function of c.m. energy.

Mean values (first moment) and dispersion (second moment) of the total jet broadening (BT) as a function of c.m. energy.

Mean values (first moment) and dispersion (second moment) of the wide jet broadening (BW) as a function of c.m. energy.

Mean values (first moment) and dispersion (second moment) of the C-PARAM as a function of c.m. energy.

Mean values (first moment) and dispersion (second moment) of the D-PARAM as a function of c.m. energy.

Charged particle multiplicities at c.m. energy 91.2 GeV for all flavour, light quark (udsc) and bottom (b) flavour events.

Charged particle multiplicity.

Charged particle multiplicity.

Charged particle multiplicity.

First and second moment of the charged particle multiplicity distribution at c.m. energy 91.2 GeV for all flavours and for udsc an b flavours.

First and second moment of the charged particle multiplicity distribution at c.m. energy.

Distribution of LN(1/X) at c.m. energy 91.2 GeV.

Distribution of LN(1/X) at higher c.m. energies.

Distribution of LN(1/X) at higher c.m. energies.

Distribution of LN(1/X) at higher c.m. energies.

The luminosity weighted average polarized differential cross sections. The data are averaged over the eight centre of mass energies and over the COS(THETA(W)) bin width.

The luminosity weighted average CP-odd and CPThat-odd observables. For definition of SIG(C=+-) etc. see the text of the paper.

The luminosity weighted average CP-odd and CPThat-odd observables. For definition of SIG(C=+0) etc. see the text of the paper.

The luminosity weighted average CP-odd and CPThat-odd observables. For definition of SIG(C=-0) etc. see the text of the paper.

Mean value of the event shape variables C-PARAM in different Q**2 and X bins.

Mean value of the event shape variables 1-THRUST(C=G) in different Q**2 and X bins.

Mean value of the event shape variables B(C=G) in different Q**2 and X bins.

The mean values of the five event shape variable distributions.

The corrected distributions of (1-TRUST).

The corrected distributions for the scaled heavy jet mass, RHO.

The corrected distributions for the total jet broadening, BT.

The corrected distributions for the wide jet broadening, BW.

The corrected distributions for the C-parameter, C-PARAM.

Measured differential jet shapes, corrected to the hadron level, in neutral-current DIS for jets with ET greater than 14 GeV in different etarap regions.

Measured differential jet shapes, corrected to the hadron level, in neutral-current DIS for jets in the etarap range -1 to 2 in different ET regions.

Measured differential jet shapes, corrected to the hadron level, in neutral-current DIS for jets in the etarap range -1 to 2 in different ET regions.

Measured differential jet shapes, corrected to the hadron level, in neutral-current DIS for jets in the etarap range -1 to 2 in different ET regions.

Measured differential jet shapes, corrected to the hadron level, in neutral-current DIS for jets in the etarap range -1 to 2 in different ET regions.

The measured integrated jet shape, corrected to the hadron level, in neutral-current DIS at a fixed value of R=0.5 as a function of the jet rapidity.

The measured integrated jet shape, corrected to the hadron level, in neutral-current DIS at a fixed value of R=0.5 as a function of the jet ET.

Measured differential jet shapes, corrected to the hadron level, in charged-current DIS for jets in the etarap range -1 to 2 in different ET regions.

Measured differential jet shapes, corrected to the hadron level, in charged-current DIS for jets in the etarap range -1 to 2 in different ET regions.

Measured differential jet shapes, corrected to the hadron level, in charged-current DIS for jets in the etarap range -1 to 2 in different ET regions.

Measured differential jet shapes, corrected to the hadron level, in charged-current DIS for jets in the etarap range -1 to 2 in different ET regions.

The measured integrated jet shape, corrected to the hadron level, in charged-current DIS at a fixed value of R=0.5 as a function of the jet rapidity.

The measured integrated jet shape, corrected to the hadron level, in charged-current DIS at a fixed value of R=0.5 as a function of the jet ET.

Comparison of the charged-current and neutral-current differential jet shapes for different ET regions.

Comparison of the charged-current and neutral-current differential jet shapes for different ET regions.

Comparison of the charged-current and neutral-current differential jet shapes for different ET regions.

Comparison of the charged-current and neutral-current differential jet shapes for different ET regions.

The measured integrated jet shape, corrected to the hadron level, in neutral-current DIS as a function of R.

Comparison of the differential jet shape with those from E+E- interactions obtained in a comparable data from OPAL (Alees et al. ZP C63 (94) 197).

Measured integrated jet shapes, corrected to the hadron level, in neutral-current DIS as a function of R.

Measured integrated jet shapes, corrected to the hadron level, in charged-current DIS as a function of R.

Helicity density matrices elements.

Decay Angular Distributions - Spin Density Matrices.

Note that the data is plotted in fig 5 a factor of 5 too large. The numbers here are correct.

Note that the data is plotted in fig. 5 a factor of 5 too large. The numbers here are correct.

Note that the data is plotted in fig 5 a factor of 5 too large. The numbers here are correct.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

SLOPE parameter from exponential fit to PT**2 distribution.

SLOPE parameter from exponential fit to PT**2 distribution.

SLOPE parameter from exponential fit to PT**2 distributions.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

DENSITY MATRIX ELEMENTS OF THE RHO0 DECAY INTO PI+ PI-.

SPIN DENSITY MATRIX ELEMENTS.

SPIN DENSITY MATRIX ELEMENTS.

SPIN DENSITY MATRIX ELEMENTS.

SPIN DENSITY MATRIX ELEMENTS.

SPIN DENSITY MATRIX ELEMENTS.

SPIN DENSITY MATRIX ELEMENTS.

RESULTS OF FITS OF THE FORM A*EXP(-B*ABS(T)+C*T**2) TO THE DIFFERENTIAL CROSS SECTIONS. USING ALL DATA IN THE RHO0 MASS REGION 0.56 TO 0.92 GEV.

RESULTS OF FITS OF THE FORM A*EXP(-B*ABS(T) + C*T**2) TO THE DIFFERENTIAL CROSS SECTIONS. USING ALL DATA IN THE OMEGA MASS REGION 0.72 TO 0.84 GEV.

NORMALIZED SPHERICAL HARMONIC MOMENTS AS A FUNCTION OF MASS (PI+ PI-).

SPIN DENSITY MATRIX ELEMENTS AS A FUNCTION OF T.

No description provided.

No description provided.

No description provided.

DENSITY MATRIX ELEMENTS.