The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, and branching fraction for the production of X$\to\phi\phi\to$4b, with $m_\phi$ = 40 GeV. The corresponding expected limits and their variations at the 1 and 2 standard deviation levels are also shown. Limits are compared to various extended higgs sector model cross sections as a function of the parameter $m_XN/f$.

The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, and branching fraction for the production of X$\to\phi\phi\to$4b, with $m_\phi$ = 45 GeV. The corresponding expected limits and their variations at the 1 and 2 standard deviation levels are also shown. Limits are compared to various extended higgs sector model cross sections as a function of the parameter $m_XN/f$.

The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, and branching fraction for the production of X$\to\phi\phi\to$4b, with $m_\phi$ = 50 GeV. The corresponding expected limits and their variations at the 1 and 2 standard deviation levels are also shown. Limits are compared to various extended higgs sector model cross sections as a function of the parameter $m_XN/f$.

The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, and branching fraction for the production of X$\to\phi\phi\to$4b, with $m_\phi$ = 55 GeV. The corresponding expected limits and their variations at the 1 and 2 standard deviation levels are also shown. Limits are compared to various extended higgs sector model cross sections as a function of the parameter $m_XN/f$.

The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, and branching fraction for the production of X$\to\phi\phi\to$4b, with $m_\phi$ = 60 GeV. The corresponding expected limits and their variations at the 1 and 2 standard deviation levels are also shown. Limits are compared to various extended higgs sector model cross sections as a function of the parameter $m_XN/f$.

The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, and branching fraction for the production of X$\to\phi\phi\to$4b, with $m_\phi$ = 65 GeV. The corresponding expected limits and their variations at the 1 and 2 standard deviation levels are also shown. Limits are compared to various extended higgs sector model cross sections as a function of the parameter $m_XN/f$.

The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, and branching fraction for the production of X$\to\phi\phi\to$4b, with $m_\phi$ = 70 GeV. The corresponding expected limits and their variations at the 1 and 2 standard deviation levels are also shown. Limits are compared to various extended higgs sector model cross sections as a function of the parameter $m_XN/f$.

The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, and branching fraction for the production of X$\to\phi\phi\to$4b, with $m_\phi$ = 75 GeV. The corresponding expected limits and their variations at the 1 and 2 standard deviation levels are also shown. Limits are compared to various extended higgs sector model cross sections as a function of the parameter $m_XN/f$.

The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, and branching fraction for the production of X$\to\phi\phi\to$4b, with $m_\phi$ = 80 GeV. The corresponding expected limits and their variations at the 1 and 2 standard deviation levels are also shown. Limits are compared to various extended higgs sector model cross sections as a function of the parameter $m_XN/f$.

The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, and branching fraction for the production of X$\to\phi\phi\to$4b, with $m_\phi$ = 85 GeV. The corresponding expected limits and their variations at the 1 and 2 standard deviation levels are also shown. Limits are compared to various extended higgs sector model cross sections as a function of the parameter $m_XN/f$.

The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, and branching fraction for the production of X$\to\phi\phi\to$4b, with $m_\phi$ = 90 GeV. The corresponding expected limits and their variations at the 1 and 2 standard deviation levels are also shown. Limits are compared to various extended higgs sector model cross sections as a function of the parameter $m_XN/f$.

The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, and branching fraction for the production of X$\to\phi\phi\to$4b, with $m_\phi$ = 95 GeV. The corresponding expected limits and their variations at the 1 and 2 standard deviation levels are also shown. Limits are compared to various extended higgs sector model cross sections as a function of the parameter $m_XN/f$.

The observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of the cross section, and branching fraction for the production of X$\to\phi\phi\to$4b, with $m_\phi$ = 100 GeV. The corresponding expected limits and their variations at the 1 and 2 standard deviation levels are also shown. Limits are compared to various extended higgs sector model cross sections as a function of the parameter $m_XN/f$.

Data event yields and predicted signal and background yields (including subdominant $t\bar{t}$) in bins of dijet and average jet mass.

The W' boson 95% CL limits on the product of cross section and branching fraction. The expected and observed limits are shown for the high VLQ mass range.

The W' boson 95% CL limits on the product of cross section and branching fraction. The expected and observed limits are shown for the low VLQ mass range.

Expected 95% CL limits for generalized hypotheses varying the fraction of tB (F(VLQ=B)) and bT (F(VLQ=T)) from the W′ decay

Expected 95% CL limits for generalized hypotheses varying the VLQ branching fraction to qH and qZ

Observed 95% CL limits for generalized hypotheses varying the fraction of tB (F(VLQ=B)) and bT (F(VLQ=T)) from the W′ decay

Observed 95% CL limits for generalized hypotheses varying the VLQ branching fraction to qH and qZ

The fraction of photon-induced background as compared with the total amount of DY signal plus photon-induced events ($N_{\gamma\gamma}/(N_{\gamma\gamma} + N_\mathrm{DY})$) in different dilepton mass bins. These numbers are averaged across the different years and channels.

Exclusion limits at 95% CL on the coupling K_L for a Z' in the sequential standard model as a function of the Z' mass.

Differential cross section times dimuon branching fraction of Y(1S) as a function of $y^{Y}_{CM}$ in pPb collisions. The global uncertainty arises from the integrated luminosity uncertainty in pPb collisions.

Differential cross section times dimuon branching fraction of Y(2S) as a function of $y^{Y}_{CM}$ in pPb collisions. The global uncertainty arises from the integrated luminosity uncertainty in pPb collisions.

Differential cross section times dimuon branching fraction of Y(3S) as a function of $y^{Y}_{CM}$ in pPb collisions. The global uncertainty arises from the integrated luminosity uncertainty in pPb collisions.

Differential cross section times dimuon branching fraction of Y(1S) as a function of pT in pp collisions. The global uncertainty arises from the integrated luminosity uncertainty in pp collisions.

Differential cross section times dimuon branching fraction of Y(2S) as a function of pT in pp collisions. The global uncertainty arises from the integrated luminosity uncertainty in pp collisions.

Differential cross section times dimuon branching fraction of Y(3S) as a function of pT in pp collisions. The global uncertainty arises from the integrated luminosity uncertainty in pp collisions.

Differential cross section times dimuon branching fraction of Y(1S) as a function of $|y^{Y}_{CM}|$ in pp collisions. The global uncertainty arises from the integrated luminosity uncertainty in pp collisions.

Differential cross section times dimuon branching fraction of Y(2S) as a function of $|y^{Y}_{CM}|$ in pp collisions. The global uncertainty arises from the integrated luminosity uncertainty in pp collisions.

Differential cross section times dimuon branching fraction of Y(3S) as a function of $|y^{Y}_{CM}|$ in pp collisions. The global uncertainty arises from the integrated luminosity uncertainty in pp collisions.

Nuclear modification factor of Y(1S) as a function of pT. The global uncertainty arises from the integrated luminosity uncertainties in pPb and pp collisions.

Nuclear modification factor of Y(2S) as a function of pT. The global uncertainty arises from the integrated luminosity uncertainties in pPb and pp collisions.

Nuclear modification factor of Y(3S) as a function of pT. The global uncertainty arises from the integrated luminosity uncertainties in pPb and pp collisions.

Nuclear modification factor of Y(1S) as a function of $y^{Y}_{CM}$. The global uncertainty arises from the integrated luminosity uncertainties in pPb and pp collisions.

Nuclear modification factor of Y(2S) as a function of $y^{Y}_{CM}$. The global uncertainty arises from the integrated luminosity uncertainties in pPb and pp collisions.

Nuclear modification factor of Y(3S) as a function of $y^{Y}_{CM}$. The global uncertainty arises from the integrated luminosity uncertainties in pPb and pp collisions.

Nuclear modification factor of Y(1S) at forward and backward $y^{Y}_{CM}$ for pT < 6 GeV/c. The global uncertainty arises from the integrated luminosity uncertainties in pPb and pp collisions.

Nuclear modification factor of Y(2S) at forward and backward $y^{Y}_{CM}$ for pT < 6 GeV/c. The global uncertainty arises from the integrated luminosity uncertainties in pPb and pp collisions.

Nuclear modification factor of Y(3S) at forward and backward $y^{Y}_{CM}$ for pT < 6 GeV/c. The global uncertainty arises from the integrated luminosity uncertainties in pPb and pp collisions.

Nuclear modification factor of Y(1S) at forward and backward $y^{Y}_{CM}$ for 6 < pT < 30 GeV/c. The global uncertainty arises from the integrated luminosity uncertainties in pPb and pp collisions.

Nuclear modification factor of Y(2S) at forward and backward $y^{Y}_{CM}$ for 6 < pT < 30 GeV/c. The global uncertainty arises from the integrated luminosity uncertainties in pPb and pp collisions.

Nuclear modification factor of Y(3S) at forward and backward $y^{Y}_{CM}$ for 6 < pT < 30 GeV/c. The global uncertainty arises from the integrated luminosity uncertainties in pPb and pp collisions.

RFB of Y(1S) versus $N^{|\eta_{lab}|<2.4}_{tracks}$.

RFB of Y(2S) versus $N^{|\eta_{lab}|<2.4}_{tracks}$.

RFB of Y(3S) versus $N^{|\eta_{lab}|<2.4}_{tracks}$.

RFB of Y(1S) versus $E^{|\eta_{lab}|>4}_{T}$.

RFB of Y(2S) versus $E^{|\eta_{lab}|>4}_{T}$.

RFB of Y(3S) versus $E^{|\eta_{lab}|>4}_{T}$.

Nuclear modification factor of Y(1S), Y(2S), and Y(3S) integrated over pT and $y^{Y}_{CM}$. The global uncertainty arises from the integrated luminosity uncertainties in pPb and pp collisions.

The $m_{lJ}$ distribution in the boosted DY control region, muon channel.

The $m_{lljj}$ distribution in the resolved flavor control region.

The $m_{lJ}$ distribution in the boosted flavor control region, with electron jet.

The $m_{lJ}$ distribution in the boosted flavor control region, with muon jet

The $m_{lljj}$ distribution in the resolved signal region, electron channel.

The $m_{lljj}$ distribution in the resolved signal region, muon channel.

The $m_{lJ}$ distribution in the boosted signal region, electron channel.

The $m_{lJ}$ distribution in the boosted signal region, muon channel.

The expected and observed $95\%$ CL upper limits on the production cross section times the branching fraction $\sigma (\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p} \rightarrow W_{R}) \mathcal{B}(W_{R} \rightarrow \mathrm{e}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{q}\overline{\mathrm{q}'})$ for $m_{N} = m_{W_{R}}/2$ GeV in the electron channel. The red solid lines represent the values expected from the theory.

The expected and observed $95\%$ CL upper limits on the production cross section times the branching fraction $\sigma (\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p} \rightarrow W_{R}) \mathcal{B}(W_{R} \rightarrow \mathrm{e}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{q}\overline{\mathrm{q}'})$ for $m_{N} = m_{W_{R}}/2$ GeV in the muon channel. The red solid lines represent the values expected from the theory.

The expected and observed $95\%$ CL upper limits on the production cross section times the branching fraction $\sigma (\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p} \rightarrow W_{R}) \mathcal{B}(W_{R} \rightarrow \mathrm{e}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{q}\overline{\mathrm{q}'})$ for $m_{N} = 200$ GeV in the electron channel. The red solid lines represent the values expected from the theory.

The expected and observed $95\%$ CL upper limits on the production cross section times the branching fraction $\sigma (\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p} \rightarrow W_{R}) \mathcal{B}(W_{R} \rightarrow \mathrm{e}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{q}\overline{\mathrm{q}'})$ for $m_{N} = 200$ GeV in the muon channel. The red solid lines represent the values expected from the theory.

The observed $95\%$ CL upper limits on the production cross section times the branching fraction $\sigma (\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p} \rightarrow W_{R}) \mathcal{B}(W_{R} \rightarrow \mathrm{e}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{q}\overline{\mathrm{q}'})$ divided by the theory cross sections in the electron channel. The observed exclusions are shown for the resolved (solid green), boosted (solid blue), and combined (solid black) channels, along with the expected exclusion for the combined result (dotted black). The dash-dotted lines represent the one standard deviation of the expected exclusion. The observed exclusions from the previous search performed by the CMS Collaboration (arXiv:1803.11116) is also shown in magenta.

The observed $95\%$ CL upper limits on the production cross section times the branching fraction $\sigma (\mathrm{p}\mathrm{p} \rightarrow W_{R}) \mathcal{B}(W_{R} \rightarrow \mathrm{e}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{q}\overline{\mathrm{q}'})$ divided by the theory cross sections in the muon channel. The observed exclusions are shown for the resolved (solid green), boosted (solid blue), and combined (solid black) channels, along with the expected exclusion for the combined result (dotted black). The dash-dotted lines represent the one standard deviation of the expected exclusion. The observed exclusions from the previous search performed by the CMS Collaboration (arXiv:1803.11116) is also shown in magenta.

Relative uncertainties in the total yields of the signal and background predictions.

Covariance matrix for all bins used in the background-only fit of the electron channel of this analysis. There are 243 bins in total, 81 for every data-taking year. For every year, each region has nine bins and the bins are grouped by rergion in the following order: ee boosted DY CR, #mu-jet flavor CR, ee resolved DY CR, resolved flavor CR, ee boosted SR, ee resolved SR, #mu#mu boosted DY CR, e-jet flavor CR, and #mu#mu resolved DY CR.

Covariance matrix for all bins used in the background-only fit of the muon channel of this analysis. There are 243 bins in total, 81 for every data-taking year. For every year, each region has nine bins and the bins are grouped by rergion in the following order: ee boosted DY CR, #mu-jet flavor CR, ee resolved DY CR, #mu#mu boosted DY CR, e-jet flavor CR, $#mu#mu$ resolved DY CR, resolved flavor CR, #mu#mu boosted SR, and the #mu#mu resolved SR.

Predicted signal yields for the 2016 data-taking period, corresponding to $35.9\,\text{fb}^{-1}$, after the application of each search requirement for the $m_{W_{R}} = 0.3$, 0.4, and 0.5 TeV and $m_{N} = 0.2$ TeV signal hypotheses for the boosted , dielectron channel.The requirements listed are cumulative such that only the events and objects passing a given requirement are considered in subsequent requirements.

Predicted signal yields for the 2016 data-taking period, corresponding to $35.9\,\text{fb}^{-1}$, after the application of each search requirement for the $(m_{W_{R}},m_{N}) = (3.0,1.4)$ TeV signal hypothesis for the resolved , dielectron channel.The requirements listed are cumulative such that only the events and objects passing a given requirement are considered in subsequent requirements.

Predicted signal yields for the 2016 data-taking period, corresponding to $35.9\,\text{fb}^{-1}$, after the application of each search requirement for the $(m_{W_{R}},m_{N}) = (4.0,2.0)$ TeV signal hypothesis for the resolved , dielectron channel.The requirements listed are cumulative such that only the events and objects passing a given requirement are considered in subsequent requirements.

Predicted signal yields for the 2016 data-taking period, corresponding to $35.9\,\text{fb}^{-1}$, after the application of each search requirement for the $(m_{W_{R}},m_{N}) = (5.0,3.0)$ TeV signal hypothesis for the resolved , dielectron channel.The requirements listed are cumulative such that only the events and objects passing a given requirement are considered in subsequent requirements.

Predicted signal yields for the 2016 data-taking period, corresponding to $35.9\,\text{fb}^{-1}$, after the application of each search requirement for the $m_{W_{R}} = 0.3$, 0.4, and 0.5 TeV and $m_{N} = 0.2$ TeV signal hypotheses for the boosted , dimuon channel.The requirements listed are cumulative such that only the events and objects passing a given requirement are considered in subsequent requirements.

Predicted signal yields for the 2016 data-taking period, corresponding to $35.9\,\text{fb}^{-1}$, after the application of each search requirement for the $(m_{W_{R}},m_{N}) = (3.0,1.4)$ TeV signal hypothesis for the resolved , dimuon channel.The requirements listed are cumulative such that only the events and objects passing a given requirement are considered in subsequent requirements.

Predicted signal yields for the 2016 data-taking period, corresponding to $35.9\,\text{fb}^{-1}$, after the application of each search requirement for the $(m_{W_{R}},m_{N}) = (4.0,2.0)$ TeV signal hypothesis for the resolved , dimuon channel.The requirements listed are cumulative such that only the events and objects passing a given requirement are considered in subsequent requirements.

Predicted signal yields for the 2016 data-taking period, corresponding to $35.9\,\text{fb}^{-1}$, after the application of each search requirement for the $(m_{W_{R}},m_{N}) = (5.0,3.0)$ TeV signal hypothesis for the resolved , dimuon channel.The requirements listed are cumulative such that only the events and objects passing a given requirement are considered in subsequent requirements.

Predicted signal yields for the 2017 data-taking period, corresponding to $41.5\,\text{fb}^{-1}$, after the application of each search requirement for the $m_{W_{R}} = 0.3$, 0.4, and 0.5 TeV and $m_{N} = 0.2$ TeV signal hypotheses for the boosted , dielectron channel.The requirements listed are cumulative such that only the events and objects passing a given requirement are considered in subsequent requirements.

Predicted signal yields for the 2017 data-taking period, corresponding to $41.5\,\text{fb}^{-1}$, after the application of each search requirement for the $(m_{W_{R}},m_{N}) = (3.0,1.4)$ TeV signal hypothesis for the resolved , dielectron channel.The requirements listed are cumulative such that only the events and objects passing a given requirement are considered in subsequent requirements.

Predicted signal yields for the 2017 data-taking period, corresponding to $41.5\,\text{fb}^{-1}$, after the application of each search requirement for the $(m_{W_{R}},m_{N}) = (4.0,2.0)$ TeV signal hypothesis for the resolved , dielectron channel.The requirements listed are cumulative such that only the events and objects passing a given requirement are considered in subsequent requirements.

Predicted signal yields for the 2017 data-taking period, corresponding to $41.5\,\text{fb}^{-1}$, after the application of each search requirement for the $(m_{W_{R}},m_{N}) = (5.0,3.0)$ TeV signal hypothesis for the resolved , dielectron channel.The requirements listed are cumulative such that only the events and objects passing a given requirement are considered in subsequent requirements.

Predicted signal yields for the 2017 data-taking period, corresponding to $41.5\,\text{fb}^{-1}$, after the application of each search requirement for the $m_{W_{R}} = 0.3$, 0.4, and 0.5 TeV and $m_{N} = 0.2$ TeV signal hypotheses for the boosted , dimuon channel.The requirements listed are cumulative such that only the events and objects passing a given requirement are considered in subsequent requirements.

Predicted signal yields for the 2017 data-taking period, corresponding to $41.5\,\text{fb}^{-1}$, after the application of each search requirement for the $(m_{W_{R}},m_{N}) = (3.0,1.4)$ TeV signal hypothesis for the resolved , dimuon channel.The requirements listed are cumulative such that only the events and objects passing a given requirement are considered in subsequent requirements.

Predicted signal yields for the 2017 data-taking period, corresponding to $41.5\,\text{fb}^{-1}$, after the application of each search requirement for the $(m_{W_{R}},m_{N}) = (4.0,2.0)$ TeV signal hypothesis for the resolved , dimuon channel.The requirements listed are cumulative such that only the events and objects passing a given requirement are considered in subsequent requirements.

Predicted signal yields for the 2017 data-taking period, corresponding to $41.5\,\text{fb}^{-1}$, after the application of each search requirement for the $(m_{W_{R}},m_{N}) = (5.0,3.0)$ TeV signal hypothesis for the resolved , dimuon channel.The requirements listed are cumulative such that only the events and objects passing a given requirement are considered in subsequent requirements.

Predicted signal yields for the 2018 data-taking period, corresponding to $59.7\,\text{fb}^{-1}$, after the application of each search requirement for the $m_{W_{R}} = 0.3$, 0.4, and 0.5 TeV and $m_{N} = 0.2$ TeV signal hypotheses for the boosted , dielectron channel.The requirements listed are cumulative such that only the events and objects passing a given requirement are considered in subsequent requirements.

Predicted signal yields for the 2018 data-taking period, corresponding to $59.7\,\text{fb}^{-1}$, after the application of each search requirement for the $(m_{W_{R}},m_{N}) = (3.0,1.4)$ TeV signal hypothesis for the resolved , dielectron channel.The requirements listed are cumulative such that only the events and objects passing a given requirement are considered in subsequent requirements.

Predicted signal yields for the 2018 data-taking period, corresponding to $59.7\,\text{fb}^{-1}$, after the application of each search requirement for the $(m_{W_{R}},m_{N}) = (4.0,2.0)$ TeV signal hypothesis for the resolved , dielectron channel.The requirements listed are cumulative such that only the events and objects passing a given requirement are considered in subsequent requirements.

Predicted signal yields for the 2018 data-taking period, corresponding to $59.7\,\text{fb}^{-1}$, after the application of each search requirement for the $(m_{W_{R}},m_{N}) = (5.0,3.0)$ TeV signal hypothesis for the resolved , dielectron channel.The requirements listed are cumulative such that only the events and objects passing a given requirement are considered in subsequent requirements.

Predicted signal yields for the 2018 data-taking period, corresponding to $59.7\,\text{fb}^{-1}$, after the application of each search requirement for the $m_{W_{R}} = 0.3$, 0.4, and 0.5 TeV and $m_{N} = 0.2$ TeV signal hypotheses for the boosted , dimuon channel.The requirements listed are cumulative such that only the events and objects passing a given requirement are considered in subsequent requirements.

Predicted signal yields for the 2018 data-taking period, corresponding to $59.7\,\text{fb}^{-1}$, after the application of each search requirement for the $(m_{W_{R}},m_{N}) = (3.0,1.4)$ TeV signal hypothesis for the resolved , dimuon channel.The requirements listed are cumulative such that only the events and objects passing a given requirement are considered in subsequent requirements.

Predicted signal yields for the 2018 data-taking period, corresponding to $59.7\,\text{fb}^{-1}$, after the application of each search requirement for the $(m_{W_{R}},m_{N}) = (4.0,2.0)$ TeV signal hypothesis for the resolved , dimuon channel.The requirements listed are cumulative such that only the events and objects passing a given requirement are considered in subsequent requirements.

Predicted signal yields for the 2018 data-taking period, corresponding to $59.7\,\text{fb}^{-1}$, after the application of each search requirement for the $(m_{W_{R}},m_{N}) = (5.0,3.0)$ TeV signal hypothesis for the resolved , dimuon channel.The requirements listed are cumulative such that only the events and objects passing a given requirement are considered in subsequent requirements.

Cross sections calculated to next-to-leading (NLO) accuracy

GGsm vs -2dNLL (f_{#Lambda1} (u) observed)

GGsm vs -2dNLL (SM-like (f_{ai}=0) expected)

GGsm vs -2dNLL (f_{a2} (u) expected)

GGsm vs -2dNLL (f_{a3} (u) expected)

GGsm vs -2dNLL (f_{#Lambda1} (u) expected)

GGsm vs -2dNLL (2l2#nu off-shell + 4l on-shell observed)

GGsm vs -2dNLL (4l off-shell + 4l on-shell observed)

GGsm vs -2dNLL (2l2#nu off-shell + 4l on-shell expected)

GGsm vs -2dNLL (4l off-shell + 4l on-shell expected)

r_offshell vs -2dNLL (R_{V,F}^{off-shell}=1 observed)

r_offshell vs -2dNLL (R_{V,F}^{off-shell} (u) observed)

r_offshell vs -2dNLL (R_{V,F}^{off-shell}=1 (2l2#nu) observed)

r_offshell vs -2dNLL (R_{V,F}^{off-shell} (u, 2l2#nu) observed)

r_offshell vs -2dNLL (R_{V,F}^{off-shell}=1 expected)

r_offshell vs -2dNLL (R_{V,F}^{off-shell} (u) expected)

r_offshell vs -2dNLL (R_{V,F}^{off-shell}=1 (2l2#nu) expected)

r_offshell vs -2dNLL (R_{V,F}^{off-shell} (u, 2l2#nu) expected)

rf_offshell vs -2dNLL (2l2#nu+4l observed)

rf_offshell vs -2dNLL (Only 2l2#nu observed)

rf_offshell vs -2dNLL (2l2#nu+4l expected)

rf_offshell vs -2dNLL (Only 2l2#nu expected)

rv_offshell vs -2dNLL (2l2#nu+4l observed)

rv_offshell vs -2dNLL (Only 2l2#nu observed)

rv_offshell vs -2dNLL (2l2#nu+4l expected)

rv_offshell vs -2dNLL (Only 2l2#nu expected)

rf_offshell vs rv_offshell observed

fa2 vs -2dNLL (#Gamma_{H}=4.1 MeV observed)

fa2 vs -2dNLL (#Gamma_{H} (u) observed)

fa2 vs -2dNLL (On-shell 4l observed)

fa2 vs -2dNLL (#Gamma_{H}=4.1 MeV expected)

fa2 vs -2dNLL (#Gamma_{H} (u) expected)

fa2 vs -2dNLL (On-shell 4l expected)

fa3 vs -2dNLL (#Gamma_{H}=4.1 MeV observed)

fa3 vs -2dNLL (#Gamma_{H} (u) observed)

fa3 vs -2dNLL (On-shell 4l observed)

fa3 vs -2dNLL (#Gamma_{H}=4.1 MeV expected)

fa3 vs -2dNLL (#Gamma_{H} (u) expected)

fa3 vs -2dNLL (On-shell 4l expected)

fL1 vs -2dNLL (#Gamma_{H}=4.1 MeV observed)

fL1 vs -2dNLL (#Gamma_{H} (u) observed)

fL1 vs -2dNLL (On-shell 4l observed)

fL1 vs -2dNLL (#Gamma_{H}=4.1 MeV expected)

fL1 vs -2dNLL (#Gamma_{H} (u) expected)

fL1 vs -2dNLL (On-shell 4l expected)

${p}_{T}^{miss}$ distribution of data and MC events in the signal region with the signal stacked on top of the background prediction for a mass hypothesis of ${m}_{stop} = 225GeV$ and ${m}_{LSP} = 50 GeV$. Events from ttW, ttZ, DY, non-prompt leptons, and diboson processes are grouped into the 'Other' category. The lower panel contains the data-to-prediction ratio. The uncertainty band includes statistical, background normalization and all systematic uncertainties.

${p}_{T}^{miss}$ normalized distribution for signal points with different top squark and neutralino masses and SM ttbar events are compared.

${m}_{T2} (e\mu)$ normalized distribution for signal points with different top squark and neutralino masses and SM ttbar events are compared.

$\Delta\eta (e\mu)$ normalized distribution for signal points with different top squark and neutralino masses and SM ttbar events are compared.

$\Delta\phi (e\mu)$ normalized distribution for signal points with different top squark and neutralino masses and SM ttbar events are compared.

Normalized DNN score distribution in the signal region for two mass hypotheses to compare signal and ttbar background: $m_{LSP}=$ 50 (100) GeV and $m_{stop}=$ 225 (275) GeV.

Post-fit DNN score distributions in the signal region with the signal superimposed and scaled by a factor of 20 for different mass hypotheses of $({m}_{stop}, {m}_{LSP})=$ (225, 50) GeV. The uncertainty band includes statistical, background normalization, and all systematic uncertainties. Events from ttW, ttZ, DY, non-prompt leptons, and diboson processes are grouped into the 'Other' category. The lower panel contains the data-to-prediction ratio before the fit (line) and after (dots), each of them with their corresponding band of uncertainties, and the ratio between the sum of the signal and background predictions and the background prediction. The masses of the signal model correspond to the values of the DNN mass parameters in each distribution.

Post-fit DNN score distributions in the signal region with the signal superimposed and scaled by a factor of 20 for different mass hypotheses of $({m}_{stop}, {m}_{LSP})=$ (275, 100) GeV. The uncertainty band includes statistical, background normalization, and all systematic uncertainties. Events from ttW, ttZ, DY, non-prompt leptons, and diboson processes are grouped into the 'Other' category. The lower panel contains the data-to-prediction ratio before the fit (line) and after (dots), each of them with their corresponding band of uncertainties, and the ratio between the sum of the signal and background predictions and the background prediction. The masses of the signal model correspond to the values of the DNN mass parameters in each distribution.

Post-fit DNN score distributions in the signal region with the signal superimposed and scaled by a factor of 20 for different mass hypotheses of $({m}_{stop}, {m}_{LSP})=$ (275, 70) GeV. The uncertainty band includes statistical, background normalization, and all systematic uncertainties. Events from ttW, ttZ, DY, non-prompt leptons, and diboson processes are grouped into the 'Other' category. The lower panel contains the data-to-prediction ratio before the fit (line) and after (dots), each of them with their corresponding band of uncertainties, and the ratio between the sum of the signal and background predictions and the background prediction. The masses of the signal model correspond to the values of the DNN mass parameters in each distribution.

Post-fit DNN score distributions in the signal region with the signal superimposed and scaled by a factor of 20 for different mass hypotheses of $({m}_{stop}, {m}_{LSP})=$ (245, 100) GeV. The uncertainty band includes statistical, background normalization, and all systematic uncertainties. Events from ttW, ttZ, DY, non-prompt leptons, and diboson processes are grouped into the 'Other' category. The lower panel contains the data-to-prediction ratio before the fit (line) and after (dots), each of them with their corresponding band of uncertainties, and the ratio between the sum of the signal and background predictions and the background prediction. The masses of the signal model correspond to the values of the DNN mass parameters in each distribution.

Upper limit at 95% CL on the signal cross section as a function of the top squark and neutralino masses. The model is excluded for all of the colored region inside the black boundary.

Upper limit at 95% CL on the signal cross section as a function of the top squark mass for mass difference of 175 GeV. The green and yellow bands represent the regions containing 68 and 95%, respectively, of the distribution of limits expected under the background-only hypothesis. The purple dotted line indicates the approximate NNLO + NNLL productioncross section.

Upper limit at 95% CL on the signal cross section as a function of the top squark mass for mass difference of 185 GeV. The green and yellow bands represent the regions containing 68 and 95%, respectively, of the distribution of limits expected under the background-only hypothesis. The purple dotted line indicates the approximate NNLO + NNLL productioncross section.

Upper limit at 95% CL on the signal cross section as a function of the top squark mass for mass difference of 165 GeV. The green and yellow bands represent the regions containing 68 and 95%, respectively, of the distribution of limits expected under the background-only hypothesis. The purple dotted line indicates the approximate NNLO + NNLL productioncross section.

Summary of the contributions of the experimental uncertainties in the DNN score distribution for signal and the ttbar background. The values represent the relative variation in the number of expected events across different signal models in the signal region.

Summary of the contribution of each modeling uncertainty source to the DNN score distribution for the ttbar background.

95% CL expected upper limit on top squark cross section for the direct decay model.

95% CL observed upper limit on top squark cross section for the direct decay model.

Contour of the region excluded with 95% CL (expected).

Contour of the region excluded with 95% CL (observed).

95% CL expected upper limit on top squark cross section for the cascade decay model.

95% CL observed upper limit on top squark cross section for the cascade decay model.

Contour of the region excluded with 95% CL (expected).

Contour of the region excluded with 95% CL (observed).

95% CL expected upper limit on top squark cross section for the mixed decay model.

95% CL observed upper limit on top squark cross section for the mixed decay model.

Contour of the region excluded with 95% CL (expected).

Contour of the region excluded with 95% CL (observed).

95% CL expected limit on $\sigma/\sigma_{theory}$ for a fermionic DM particle with m = 1 GeV, as a function of the mediator mass for a scalar.

95% CL observed limit on $\sigma/\sigma_{theory}$ for a fermionic DM particle with m = 1 GeV, as a function of the mediator mass for a scalar.

95% CL expected limit on $\sigma/\sigma_{theory}$ for a fermionic DM particle with m = 1 GeV, as a function of the mediator mass for a pseudoscalar.

95% CL observed limit on $\sigma/\sigma_{theory}$ for a fermionic DM particle with m = 1 GeV, as a function of the mediator mass for a pseudoscalar.

Expected event yields in each $m_{jj}$ bin for the different background processes in the SR of the VTR category, in the 2017 and 2018 samples. The background yields and the corresponding uncertainties are obtained after performing a combined fit across all of the CRs and SR. The expected signal contributions for a Higgs boson, produced in the non-VBF and VBF modes, decaying to invisible particles with a branching fraction of $\mathcal{B}(\text{H} \to \text{inv}) = 1$, and the observed event yields are also reported.

Event yields for the postfit background model from the background-only and signal-plus-background fits, as well as the observed event yields for MTR, 2017, signal region. All signal and control regions from the 2017 and 2018 data sets are included in the fit.

Event yields for the postfit background model from the background-only and signal-plus-background fits, as well as the observed event yields for MTR, 2017, dimuon region. All signal and control regions from the 2017 and 2018 data sets are included in the fit.

Event yields for the postfit background model from the background-only and signal-plus-background fits, as well as the observed event yields for MTR, 2018, signal region. All signal and control regions from the 2017 and 2018 data sets are included in the fit.

Event yields for the postfit background model from the background-only and signal-plus-background fits, as well as the observed event yields for MTR, 2018, dimuon region. All signal and control regions from the 2017 and 2018 data sets are included in the fit.

Event yields for the postfit background model from the background-only and signal-plus-background fits, as well as the observed event yields for VTR, 2017, signal region. All signal and control regions from the 2017 and 2018 data sets are included in the fit.

Event yields for the postfit background model from the background-only and signal-plus-background fits, as well as the observed event yields for VTR, 2017, dimuon region. All signal and control regions from the 2017 and 2018 data sets are included in the fit.

Event yields for the postfit background model from the background-only and signal-plus-background fits, as well as the observed event yields for VTR, 2018, signal region. All signal and control regions from the 2017 and 2018 data sets are included in the fit.

Event yields for the postfit background model from the background-only and signal-plus-background fits, as well as the observed event yields for VTR, 2018, single electron region. All signal and control regions from the 2017 and 2018 data sets are included in the fit.

Event yields for the postfit background model from the background-only and signal-plus-background fits, as well as the observed event yields for VTR, 2018, dielectron region. All signal and control regions from the 2017 and 2018 data sets are included in the fit.

Event yields for the postfit background model from the background-only and signal-plus-background fits, as well as the observed event yields for VTR, 2018, dimuon region. All signal and control regions from the 2017 and 2018 data sets are included in the fit.

Event yields for the postfit background model from the background-only and signal-plus-background fits, as well as the observed event yields for MTR, 2017, photon region. All signal and control regions from the 2017 and 2018 data sets are included in the fit.

Event yields for the postfit background model from the background-only and signal-plus-background fits, as well as the observed event yields for MTR, 2018, photon region. All signal and control regions from the 2017 and 2018 data sets are included in the fit.

Event yields for the postfit background model from the background-only and signal-plus-background fits, as well as the observed event yields for MTR, 2017, single electron region. All signal and control regions from the 2017 and 2018 data sets are included in the fit.

Event yields for the postfit background model from the background-only and signal-plus-background fits, as well as the observed event yields for MTR, 2017, single muon region. All signal and control regions from the 2017 and 2018 data sets are included in the fit.

Event yields for the postfit background model from the background-only and signal-plus-background fits, as well as the observed event yields for MTR, 2017, dielectron region. All signal and control regions from the 2017 and 2018 data sets are included in the fit.

Event yields for the postfit background model from the background-only and signal-plus-background fits, as well as the observed event yields for MTR, 2018, single electron region. All signal and control regions from the 2017 and 2018 data sets are included in the fit.

Event yields for the postfit background model from the background-only and signal-plus-background fits, as well as the observed event yields for MTR, 2018, single muon region. All signal and control regions from the 2017 and 2018 data sets are included in the fit.

Event yields for the postfit background model from the background-only and signal-plus-background fits, as well as the observed event yields for MTR, 2018, dielectron region. All signal and control regions from the 2017 and 2018 data sets are included in the fit.

Event yields for the postfit background model from the background-only and signal-plus-background fits, as well as the observed event yields for VTR, 2017, single electron region. All signal and control regions from the 2017 and 2018 data sets are included in the fit.

Event yields for the postfit background model from the background-only and signal-plus-background fits, as well as the observed event yields for VTR, 2017, single muon region. All signal and control regions from the 2017 and 2018 data sets are included in the fit.

Event yields for the postfit background model from the background-only and signal-plus-background fits, as well as the observed event yields for VTR, 2017, dielectron region. All signal and control regions from the 2017 and 2018 data sets are included in the fit.

Event yields for the postfit background model from the background-only and signal-plus-background fits, as well as the observed event yields for VTR, 2018, single muon region. All signal and control regions from the 2017 and 2018 data sets are included in the fit.

Trigger efficiency measured as a function of $p_{T}^{miss}$ in data for the 2017 and 2018 samples for the MTR category. The efficiency is measured in a phase space with at least two jets in which the leading (trailing) jet has $p_{T}>80~\text{GeV}$ ($>40~\text{GeV}$). The two jets are required to form a system with $m_{jj}>200~\text{GeV}$ and $\Delta\Phi_{jj}<1.5$.

Trigger efficiency measured as a function of $p_{T}^{miss}$ in data for the 2017 and 2018 samples for the MTR category. The efficiency is measured in a phase space with at least two jets in which the leading (trailing) jet has $p_{T}>140~\text{GeV}$ ($>70~\text{GeV}$). The two jets are required to form a system with $m_{jj}>900~\text{GeV}$ and $\Delta\Phi_{jj}<1.8$.

Expected and observed limits at 95% CL on the branching fraction B(hb --> PHI X) . B(PHI --> mu+mu-) as a function of signal mass for signal lifetime of 100 mm

Expected and observed limits at 95% CL on the branching fraction B(H --> ZD ZD) . B(ZD --> mu+mu-) as a function of signal mass for signal lifetime of 1 mm

Expected and observed limits at 95% CL on the branching fraction B(H --> ZD ZD) . B(ZD --> mu+mu-) as a function of signal mass for signal lifetime of 1 mm

Expected and observed limits at 95% CL on the branching fraction B(H --> ZD ZD) . B(ZD --> mu+mu-) as a function of signal mass for signal lifetime of 100 mm

Expected and observed limits at 95% CL on the branching fraction B(H --> ZD ZD) . B(ZD --> mu+mu-) as a function of signal mass for signal lifetime of 100 mm

Expected and observed limits at 95% CL on the branching fraction B(H --> ZD ZD) as a function of signal mass for signal lifetime of 1 mm

Expected and observed limits at 95% CL on the branching fraction B(H --> ZD ZD) as a function of signal mass for signal lifetime of 1 mm

Expected and observed limits at 95% CL on the branching fraction B(H --> ZD ZD) as a function of signal mass for signal lifetime of 100 mm

Expected and observed limits at 95% CL on the branching fraction B(H --> ZD ZD) as a function of signal mass for signal lifetime of 100 mm

Observed limits at 95% CL on the branching fraction B(hb --> PHI X) . B(PHI --> mu+mu-) in the parameter space containing signal mass and signal lifetime. The ROOT file containing the values are available as additional resource

Observed limits at 95% CL on the branching fraction B(hb --> PHI X) . B(PHI --> mu+mu-) in the parameter space containing signal mass and signal lifetime. The ROOT file containing the values is available as additional resource

Observed limits at 95% CL on the branching fraction B(H --> ZD ZD) in the parameter space containing signal mass and signal lifetime. The ROOT file containing the values are available as additional resource

Observed limits at 95% CL on the branching fraction B(H --> ZD ZD) in the parameter space containing signal mass and signal lifetime. The ROOT file containing the values is available as additional resource

Region excluded at 95% CL using this search for the inflaton model in the parameter space containing signal mass and square of the signal mixing angle

Region excluded at 95% CL using this search for the inflaton model in the parameter space containing signal mass and square of the signal mixing angle

Observed limits at 95% CL on the branching fraction B(H --> ZD ZD) in the parameter space containing signal mass and kinetic mixing parameter. The ROOT file containing the values are available as additional resource

Observed limits at 95% CL on the branching fraction B(H --> ZD ZD) in the parameter space containing signal mass and kinetic mixing parameter. The ROOT file containing the values is available as additional resource

Observed limits at 95% CL on the branching fraction B(hb --> PHI X) . B(PHI --> mu+mu-) as a function of signal lifetime for various representative signal mass hypotheses

Observed limits at 95% CL on the branching fraction B(H --> ZD ZD) as a function of signal lifetime for various representative signal mass hypotheses

CMS and LHCb observed limits at 95% CL on the branching fraction B(hb --> PHI X) . B(PHI --> mu+mu-) as a function of signal mass for signal lifetime of 1 mm

CMS and LHCb observed limits at 95% CL on the branching fraction B(hb --> PHI X) . B(PHI --> mu+mu-) as a function of signal mass for signal lifetime of 10 mm

CMS and LHCb observed limits at 95% CL on the branching fraction B(hb --> PHI X) . B(PHI --> mu+mu-) as a function of signal mass for signal lifetime of 100 mm

Observed limits at 95% CL on number of signal events in aggregate signal region 0.2 cm $\leq$ lxy < 11.0 cm, dimuon pt $\geq$ 0 GeV and no requirement on muon isolation

Observed limits at 95% CL on number of signal events in aggregate signal region 0.2 cm $\leq$ lxy < 11.0 cm, dimuon pt $\geq$ 0 GeV and two isolated muons

Observed limits at 95% CL on number of signal events in aggregate signal region 0.2 cm $\leq$ lxy < 11.0 cm, dimuon pt $\geq$ 25 GeV and no requirement on muon isolation

Observed limits at 95% CL on number of signal events in aggregate signal region 0.2 cm $\leq$ lxy < 11.0 cm, dimuon pt $\geq$ 25 GeV and two isolated muons

Observed limits at 95% CL on number of signal events in aggregate signal region 1.0 cm $\leq$ lxy < 11.0 cm, dimuon pt $\geq$ 0 GeV and no requirement on muon isolation

Observed limits at 95% CL on number of signal events in aggregate signal region 1.0 cm $\leq$ lxy < 11.0 cm, dimuon pt $\geq$ 0 GeV and two isolated muons

Observed limits at 95% CL on number of signal events in aggregate signal region 1.0 cm $\leq$ lxy < 11.0 cm, dimuon pt $\geq$ 25 GeV and no requirement on muon isolation

Observed limits at 95% CL on number of signal events in aggregate signal region 1.0 cm $\leq$ lxy < 11.0 cm, dimuon pt $\geq$ 25 GeV and two isolated muons

Observed limits at 95% CL on number of signal events in aggregate signal region 2.4 cm $\leq$ lxy < 11.0 cm, dimuon pt $\geq$ 0 GeV and no requirement on muon isolation

Observed limits at 95% CL on number of signal events in aggregate signal region 2.4 cm $\leq$ lxy < 11.0 cm, dimuon pt $\geq$ 0 GeV and two isolated muons

Observed limits at 95% CL on number of signal events in aggregate signal region 2.4 cm $\leq$ lxy < 11.0 cm, dimuon pt $\geq$ 25 GeV and no requirement on muon isolation

Observed limits at 95% CL on number of signal events in aggregate signal region 2.4 cm $\leq$ lxy < 11.0 cm, dimuon pt $\geq$ 25 GeV and two isolated muons

Observed limits at 95% CL on number of signal events in aggregate signal region 3.1 cm $\leq$ lxy < 11.0 cm, dimuon pt $\geq$ 0 GeV and no requirement on muon isolation

Observed limits at 95% CL on number of signal events in aggregate signal region 3.1 cm $\leq$ lxy < 11.0 cm, dimuon pt $\geq$ 0 GeV and two isolated muons

Observed limits at 95% CL on number of signal events in aggregate signal region 3.1 cm $\leq$ lxy < 11.0 cm, dimuon pt $\geq$ 25 GeV and no requirement on muon isolation

Observed limits at 95% CL on number of signal events in aggregate signal region 3.1 cm $\leq$ lxy < 11.0 cm, dimuon pt $\geq$ 25 GeV and two isolated muons

Observed limits at 95% CL on number of signal events in aggregate signal region 7.0 cm $\leq$ lxy < 11.0 cm, dimuon pt $\geq$ 0 GeV and no requirement on muon isolation

Observed limits at 95% CL on number of signal events in aggregate signal region 7.0 cm $\leq$ lxy < 11.0 cm, dimuon pt $\geq$ 0 GeV and two isolated muons

Observed limits at 95% CL on number of signal events in aggregate signal region 7.0 cm $\leq$ lxy < 11.0 cm, dimuon pt $\geq$ 25 GeV and no requirement on muon isolation

Observed limits at 95% CL on number of signal events in aggregate signal region 7.0 cm $\leq$ lxy < 11.0 cm, dimuon pt $\geq$ 25 GeV and two isolated muons