Results for the H_T^leptons signal regions for the >= 3 e/mu off-Z events. Irreducible sources include all backgrounds estimated with MC simulation. Results are presented in number of expected events as N +- (statistical uncertainty) +- (systematic uncertainty).

Results for the H_T^leptons signal regions for the 2 e/mu + >= 1 tau_had off-Z events. Irreducible sources include all backgrounds estimated with MC simulation. Results are presented in number of expected events as N +- (statistical uncertainty) +- (systematic uncertainty).

Results for the H_T^leptons signal regions for the >= 3 e/mu on-Z events. Irreducible sources include all backgrounds estimated with MC simulation. Results are presented in number of expected events as N +- (statistical uncertainty) +- (systematic uncertainty).

Results for the H_T^leptons signal regions for the 2 e/mu + >= 1 tau_had on-Z events. Irreducible sources include all backgrounds estimated with MC simulation. Results are presented in number of expected events as N +- (statistical uncertainty) +- (systematic uncertainty).

Results for the E_T^miss, H_T^jets<100 GeV signal regions for the >= 3 e/mu off-Z events. Irreducible sources include all backgrounds estimated with MC simulation. Results are presented in number of expected events as N +- (statistical uncertainty) +- (systematic uncertainty).

Results for the E_T^miss, H_T^jets<100 GeV signal regions for the 2 e/mu + >= 1 tau_had off-Z events. Irreducible sources include all backgrounds estimated with MC simulation. Results are presented in number of expected events as N +- (statistical uncertainty) +- (systematic uncertainty).

Results for the E_T^miss, H_T^jets<100 GeV signal regions for the >= 3 e/mu on-Z events. Irreducible sources include all backgrounds estimated with MC simulation. Results are presented in number of expected events as N +- (statistical uncertainty) +- (systematic uncertainty).

Results for the E_T^miss, H_T^jets<100 GeV signal regions for the 2 e/mu + >= 1 tau_had on-Z events. Irreducible sources include all backgrounds estimated with MC simulation. Results are presented in number of expected events as N +- (statistical uncertainty) +- (systematic uncertainty).

Results for the E_T^miss, H_T^jets>=100 GeV signal regions for the >= 3 e/mu off-Z events. Irreducible sources include all backgrounds estimated with MC simulation. Results are presented in number of expected events as N +- (statistical uncertainty) +- (systematic uncertainty).

Results for the E_T^miss, H_T^jets>=100 GeV signal regions for the 2 e/mu + >= 1 tau_had off-Z events. Irreducible sources include all backgrounds estimated with MC simulation. Results are presented in number of expected events as N +- (statistical uncertainty) +- (systematic uncertainty).

Results for the E_T^miss, H_T^jets>=100 GeV signal regions for the >= 3 e/mu on-Z events. Irreducible sources include all backgrounds estimated with MC simulation. Results are presented in number of expected events as N +- (statistical uncertainty) +- (systematic uncertainty).

Results for the E_T^miss, H_T^jets>=100 GeV signal regions for the 2 e/mu + >= 1 tau_had on-Z events. Irreducible sources include all backgrounds estimated with MC simulation. Results are presented in number of expected events as N +- (statistical uncertainty) +- (systematic uncertainty).

Results for the m_eff signal regions for the >= 3 e/mu off-Z events. Irreducible sources include all backgrounds estimated with MC simulation. Results are presented in number of expected events as N +- (statistical uncertainty) +- (systematic uncertainty).

Results for the m_eff signal regions for the 2 e/mu + >= 1 tau_had off-Z events. Irreducible sources include all backgrounds estimated with MC simulation. Results are presented in number of expected events as N +- (statistical uncertainty) +- (systematic uncertainty).

Results for the m_eff signal regions for the >= 3 e/mu on-Z events. Irreducible sources include all backgrounds estimated with MC simulation. Results are presented in number of expected events as N +- (statistical uncertainty) +- (systematic uncertainty).

Results for the m_eff signal regions for the 2 e/mu + >= 1 tau_had on-Z events. Irreducible sources include all backgrounds estimated with MC simulation. Results are presented in number of expected events as N +- (statistical uncertainty) +- (systematic uncertainty).

Results for the m_eff, E_T^miss>=75 GeV signal regions for the >= 3 e/mu off-Z events. Irreducible sources include all backgrounds estimated with MC simulation. Results are presented in number of expected events as N +- (statistical uncertainty) +- (systematic uncertainty).

Results for the m_eff, E_T^miss>=75 GeV signal regions for the 2 e/mu + >= 1 tau_had off-Z events. Irreducible sources include all backgrounds estimated with MC simulation. Results are presented in number of expected events as N +- (statistical uncertainty) +- (systematic uncertainty).

Results for the m_eff, E_T^miss>=75 GeV signal regions for the >= 3 e/mu on-Z events. Irreducible sources include all backgrounds estimated with MC simulation. Results are presented in number of expected events as N +- (statistical uncertainty) +- (systematic uncertainty).

Results for the m_eff, E_T^miss>=75 GeV signal regions for the 2 e/mu + >= 1 tau_had on-Z events. Irreducible sources include all backgrounds estimated with MC simulation. Results are presented in number of expected events as N +- (statistical uncertainty) +- (systematic uncertainty).

Limits in the H_T^leptons bins, for the >= 3 e/mu off-Z events, shown as the upper limit on the visible cross section sigma^vis_95 = N_95/int(Ldt).

Limits in the H_T^leptons bins, for the 2 e/mu + >= 1 tau_had off-Z events, shown as the upper limit on the visible cross section sigma^vis_95 = N_95/int(Ldt).

Limits in the H_T^leptons bins, for the >= 3 e/mu on-Z events, shown as the upper limit on the visible cross section sigma^vis_95 = N_95/int(Ldt).

Limits in the H_T^leptons bins, for the 2 e/mu + >= 1 tau_had on-Z events, shown as the upper limit on the visible cross section sigma^vis_95 = N_95/int(Ldt).

Limits in the E_T^miss bins, for the >= 3 e/mu off-Z events, with H_T^jets<100 GeV requirement shown as the upper limit on the visible cross section sigma^vis_95 = N_95/int(Ldt).

Limits in the E_T^miss bins, for the 2 e/mu + >= 1 tau_had off-Z events, with H_T^jets<100 GeV requirement shown as the upper limit on the visible cross section sigma^vis_95 = N_95/int(Ldt).

Limits in the E_T^miss bins, for the >= 3 e/mu on-Z events, with H_T^jets<100 GeV requirement shown as the upper limit on the visible cross section sigma^vis_95 = N_95/int(Ldt).

Limits in the E_T^miss bins, for the 2 e/mu + >= 1 tau_had on-Z events, with H_T^jets<100 GeV requirement shown as the upper limit on the visible cross section sigma^vis_95 = N_95/int(Ldt).

Limits in the E_T^miss bins, for the >= 3 e/mu off-Z events, with H_T^jets>=100 GeV requirement shown as the upper limit on the visible cross section sigma^vis_95 = N_95/int(Ldt).

Limits in the E_T^miss bins, for the 2 e/mu + >= 1 tau_had off-Z events, with H_T^jets>=100 GeV requirement shown as the upper limit on the visible cross section sigma^vis_95 = N_95/int(Ldt).

Limits in the E_T^miss bins, for the >= 3 e/mu on-Z events, with H_T^jets>=100 GeV requirement shown as the upper limit on the visible cross section sigma^vis_95 = N_95/int(Ldt).

Limits in the E_T^miss bins, for the 2 e/mu + >= 1 tau_had on-Z events, with H_T^jets>=100 GeV requirement shown as the upper limit on the visible cross section sigma^vis_95 = N_95/int(Ldt).

Limits in the m_eff bins, for the >= 3 e/mu off-Z events, shown as the upper limit on the visible cross section sigma^vis_95 = N_95/int(Ldt).

Limits in the m_eff bins, for the 2 e/mu + >= 1 tau_had off-Z events, shown as the upper limit on the visible cross section sigma^vis_95 = N_95/int(Ldt).

Limits in the m_eff bins, for the >= 3 e/mu on-Z events, shown as the upper limit on the visible cross section sigma^vis_95 = N_95/int(Ldt).

Limits in the m_eff bins, for the 2 e/mu + >= 1 tau_had on-Z events, shown as the upper limit on the visible cross section sigma^vis_95 = N_95/int(Ldt).

Limits in the m_eff bins, for the >= 3 e/mu off-Z events, with E_T^miss>=75 GeV requirement shown as the upper limit on the visible cross section sigma^vis_95 = N_95/int(Ldt).

Limits in the m_eff bins, for the 2 e/mu + >= 1 tau_had off-Z events, with E_T^miss>=75 GeV requirement shown as the upper limit on the visible cross section sigma^vis_95 = N_95/int(Ldt).

Limits in the m_eff bins, for the >= 3 e/mu on-Z events, with E_T^miss>=75 GeV requirement shown as the upper limit on the visible cross section sigma^vis_95 = N_95/int(Ldt).

Limits in the m_eff bins, for the 2 e/mu + >= 1 tau_had on-Z events, with E_T^miss>=75 GeV requirement shown as the upper limit on the visible cross section sigma^vis_95 = N_95/int(Ldt).

Normalized differential primary charged particle yield in the centrality interval 20-30%.

Normalized differential primary charged particle yield in the centrality interval 30-40%.

Normalized differential primary charged particle yield in the centrality interval 40-50%.

Normalized differential primary charged particle yield in the centrality interval 50-60%.

Normalized differential primary charged particle yield in the centrality interval 60-70%.

Normalized differential primary charged particle yield in the centrality interval 70-80%.

Normalized differential primary charged particle yield in the centrality interval 0-10%.

Normalized differential primary charged particle yield in the centrality interval 0-20%.

Normalized differential primary charged particle yield in the centrality interval 20-40%.

Normalized differential primary charged particle yield in the centrality interval 40-60%.

Normalized differential primary charged particle yield in the centrality interval 40-80%.

Normalized differential primary charged particle yield in the centrality interval 60-80%.

Nuclear Modification Factor RAA in the centrality interval 0-5%.

Nuclear Modification Factor RAA in the centrality interval 5-10%.

Nuclear Modification Factor RAA in the centrality interval 10-20%.

Nuclear Modification Factor RAA in the centrality interval 20-30%.

Nuclear Modification Factor RAA in the centrality interval 30-40%.

Nuclear Modification Factor RAA in the centrality interval 40-50%.

Nuclear Modification Factor RAA in the centrality interval 50-60%.

Nuclear Modification Factor RAA in the centrality interval 60-70%.

Nuclear Modification Factor RAA in the centrality interval 70-80%.

Nuclear Modification Factor RAA in the centrality interval 0-10%.

Nuclear Modification Factor RAA in the centrality interval 0-20%.

Nuclear Modification Factor RAA in the centrality interval 20-40%.

Nuclear Modification Factor RAA in the centrality interval 40-60%.

Nuclear Modification Factor RAA in the centrality interval 40-80%.

Nuclear Modification Factor RAA in the centrality interval 60-80%.

The ratio of (BJET + Z0)/(JET + Z0) production as a function of the azimuthal angle between the Z0 and the closest jet.

The 95% CL upper limit on the production cross section for charge 5 particles.

The 95% CL upper limit on the production cross section for charge 6 particles.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the $N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 35 multiplicity class in pPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $K_{S}^{0}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 35 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 60 multiplicity class in pPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $K_{S}^{0}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 60 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 120 multiplicity class in pPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the $N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 35 multiplicity class in pPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 35 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 60 multiplicity class in pPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 60 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 120 multiplicity class in pPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for all charged particles as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the $N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 35 multiplicity class in PbPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for all charged particles as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 35 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 60 multiplicity class in PbPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for all charged particles as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 60 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 120 multiplicity class in PbPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $K_{S}^{0}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the $N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 35 multiplicity class in PbPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $K_{S}^{0}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 35 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 60 multiplicity class in PbPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $K_{S}^{0}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 60 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 120 multiplicity class in PbPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the $N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 35 multiplicity class in PbPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 35 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 60 multiplicity class in PbPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 60 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 120 multiplicity class in PbPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for all charged particles as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 120 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 150 multiplicity class in pPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for all charged particles as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 150 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 185 multiplicity class in pPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for all charged particles as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 185 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 220 multiplicity class in pPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for all charged particles as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 220 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 260 multiplicity class in pPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 120 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 150 multiplicity class in pPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 150 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 185 multiplicity class in pPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 185 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 220 multiplicity class in pPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 220 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 260 multiplicity class in pPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 120 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 150 multiplicity class in pPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 150 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 185 multiplicity class in pPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 185 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 220 multiplicity class in pPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 220 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 260 multiplicity class in pPb.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$)/$n_{q}$ extracted for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ from the correlation in the 120 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 150 multiplicity class in pPb.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$)/$n_{q}$ extracted for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ from the correlation in the 150 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 185 multiplicity class in pPb.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$)/$n_{q}$ extracted for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ from the correlation in the 185 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 220 multiplicity class in pPb.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$)/$n_{q}$ extracted for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ from the correlation in the 220 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 260 multiplicity class in pPb.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$)/$n_{q}$ extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ from the correlation in the 120 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 150 multiplicity class in pPb.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$)/$n_{q}$ extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ from the correlation in the 150 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 185 multiplicity class in pPb.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$)/$n_{q}$ extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ from the correlation in the 185 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 220 multiplicity class in pPb.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$)/$n_{q}$ extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ from the correlation in the 220 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 260 multiplicity class in pPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for all charged particles as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 120 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 150 multiplicity class in PbPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for all charged particles as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 150 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 185 multiplicity class in PbPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for all charged particles as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 185 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 220 multiplicity class in PbPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for all charged particles as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 220 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 260 multiplicity class in PbPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 120 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 150 multiplicity class in PbPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 150 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 185 multiplicity class in PbPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 185 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 220 multiplicity class in PbPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 220 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 260 multiplicity class in PbPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 120 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 150 multiplicity class in PbPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 150 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 185 multiplicity class in PbPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 185 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 220 multiplicity class in PbPb.

The elliptic flow v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 220 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 260 multiplicity class in PbPb.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$)/$n_{q}$ extracted for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ from the correlation in the 120 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 150 multiplicity class in PbPb.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$)/$n_{q}$ extracted for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ from the correlation in the 150 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 185 multiplicity class in PbPb.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$)/$n_{q}$ extracted for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ from the correlation in the 185 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 220 multiplicity class in PbPb.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$)/$n_{q}$ extracted for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ from the correlation in the 220 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 260 multiplicity class in PbPb.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$)/$n_{q}$ extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ from the correlation in the 120 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 150 multiplicity class in PbPb.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$)/$n_{q}$ extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ from the correlation in the 150 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 185 multiplicity class in PbPb.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$)/$n_{q}$ extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ from the correlation in the 185 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 220 multiplicity class in PbPb.

The elliptic flow per constituent quark v2(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$)/$n_{q}$ extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ from the correlation in the 220 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 260 multiplicity class in PbPb.

The triangular flow v3(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for all charged particles as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 185 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 350 multiplicity class in PbPb.

The triangular flow v3(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 185 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 350 multiplicity class in PbPb.

The triangular flow v3(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 185 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 350 multiplicity class in PbPb.

The triangular flow per constituent quark v3(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$)/$n_{q}$ extracted for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ from the correlation in the 185 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 350 multiplicity class in PbPb.

The triangular flow per constituent quark v3(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$)/$n_{q}$ extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ from the correlation in the 185 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 350 multiplicity class in PbPb.

The triangular flow v3(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for all charged particles as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 185 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 350 multiplicity class in pPb.

The triangular flow v3(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 185 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 350 multiplicity class in pPb.

The triangular flow v3(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$) extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from the correlation in the 185 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 350 multiplicity class in pPb.

The triangular flow per constituent quark v3(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$)/$n_{q}$ extracted for $K^{0}_{S}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ from the correlation in the 185 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 350 multiplicity class in pPb.

The triangular flow per constituent quark v3(2, $|\Delta\eta| > 2$)/$n_{q}$ extracted for $\Lambda/\bar{\Lambda}$ as a function of transverse kinetic energy per constituent quark $KE_{T}/n_{q}$ from the correlation in the 185 $\leq N_{offline}^{trk}$ < 350 multiplicity class in pPb.

Distribution of ETmiss in the signal region for data and for the background predicted from the fit in the CRs. Overflows are included in the final bin.

Limits at 90% C.L. on the EFT suppression scale M* as a function of the WIMP mass m_chi, for the vector operator D5. Results where EFT truncation is applied are also shown, assuming coupling values sqrt(g_f g_chi)= 1, 4pi.

Limits at 90% C.L. on the EFT suppression scale M* as a function of the WIMP mass m_chi, for the axial-vector operator D8. Results where EFT truncation is applied are also shown, assuming coupling values sqrt(g_f g_chi)= 1, 4pi.

Limits at 90% C.L. on the EFT suppression scale M* as a function of the WIMP mass m_chi, for the tensor operator D9. Results where EFT truncation is applied are also shown, assuming coupling values sqrt(g_f g_chi)= 1, 4pi.

Upper limits at 90% C.L. on the WIMP-nucleon scattering cross section as a function of m_chi for spin-independent and spin-dependent interactions, for a coupling strength g = sqrt(g_f g_chi) of unity or the maximum value (4 pi) that keeps the model within its perturbative regime. The truncation procedure is applied for both cases.

Upper limits at 95% C.L. on the WIMP simplified model coupling parameter, sqrt(g_f g_chi), with vector coupling and mediator width Gamma=m_V/3, as a function of WIMP (m_chi) and the mediator particle (m_V) masses.

Observed lower limits at 95% C.L. on the EFT suppression scale M* as a function of the mediator mass mV, for a Z'-like mediator with vector interactions. For a dark-matter mass m_chi of 50 or 400 GeV, results are shown for different values of the mediator total decay width Gamma.

Observed lower limits at 95% C.L. on the EFT suppression scale M* as a function of the mediator mass mV, for a Z'-like mediator with axial-vector interactions. For a dark-matter mass m_chi of 50 or 400 GeV, results are shown for different values of the mediator total decay width Gamma.

Limits at 95% C.L. on the effective mass scale M* in the (k2, k1) parameter plane for the s-channel EFT model inspired by Fermi-LAT gamma-ray line, for m_chi = 130 GeV. The upper part of the plane is excluded.

Lower limits at 95% C.L. on the mass scale M_D in the ADD models of large extra dimensions, for several values of the number of extra dimensions.

Upper limits at 95% C.L. on the cross section for the compressed squark model, as a function of the squark mass, m_squark, and of the difference between the squark mass and the mass of the neutralino, m_squark-m_neutralino, in the compressed region of m_squark-m_neutralino < 50 GeV.

Same as above with bigger centrality classes.

Same as above with bigger centrality classes.

Same as above with bigger centrality classes.

Selection efficiencies in % for the signal in the top squark search, estimated from the simulation.

The final $S_{\text{T}}$ distribution for the leptoquark search with the $\text{e}\tau_{\text{h}}$ and $\mu\tau_{\text{h}}$ channels combined. The last bin contains the overflow events.

The final $S_{\text{T}}$ distribution for the top squark search with the $\text{e}\tau_{\text{h}}$ and $\mu\tau_{\text{h}}$ channels combined. The last bin contains the overflow events.

The expected and observed combined upper limits on the third-generation LQ pair production cross section $\sigma$ times the square of the branching fraction, $\mathcal{B}^2$, at 95% CL, as a function of the LQ mass. These limits also apply to top squarks decaying directly via the coupling $\lambda^{\prime}_{333}$.

The expected and observed combined upper limits on the top squark pair production cross section $\sigma$ times the square of the branching fraction, $\mathcal{B}^2$, at 95% CL, as a function of the top squark mass. These limits apply to top squarks with a chargino-mediated decay through the coupling $\lambda^{\prime}_{3jk}$.

The expected and observed 95% CL upper limits on the branching fraction for the leptoquark decay to a tau lepton and a bottom quark, as a function of the leptoquark mass. A search for top squark pair production [EPJC 73(2013)2677] has the same kinematic signature as the leptoquark decay to a tau neutrino and a top quark. This search is reinterpreted to provide the expected and observed 95% CL upper limits for low values of $\mathcal{B}$, assuming the leptoquark only decays to third-generation fermions.

Number of data events (20.3 fb$^{-1}$), number of predicted events from the fit, statistical uncertainty on the fit, systematic uncertainty on the choice of control region, and on the choice of fit function versus inclusive $H_{\textrm{T}}^{\textrm{min}}$ lower bin edge for inclusive jet multiplicity $N_{\textrm{Jet}} \geq 6$. The total uncertainty is obtained by adding the three uncertainties linearly.

Number of data events (20.3 fb$^{-1}$), number of predicted events from the fit, statistical uncertainty on the fit, systematic uncertainty on the choice of control region, and on the choice of fit function versus inclusive $H_{\textrm{T}}^{\textrm{min}}$ lower bin edge for inclusive jet multiplicity $N_{\textrm{Jet}} \geq 7$. The total uncertainty is obtained by adding the three uncertainties linearly.

Number of data events (20.3 fb$^{-1}$), number of predicted events from the fit, statistical uncertainty on the fit, systematic uncertainty on the choice of control region, and on the choice of fit function versus inclusive $H_{\textrm{T}}^{\textrm{min}}$ lower bin edge for inclusive jet multiplicity $N_{\textrm{Jet}} \geq 8$. The total uncertainty is obtained by adding the three uncertainties linearly.

Upper limits on the visible cross section (cross section ($\sigma$) times acceptance ($A$) times efficiency ($\epsilon$)) at the 95% CL versus inclusive $H_{\textrm{T}}^{\textrm{min}}$ for $N_{\textrm{Jet}}\geq 3$.

Upper limits on the visible cross section (cross section ($\sigma$) times acceptance ($A$) times efficiency ($\epsilon$)) at the 95% CL versus inclusive $H_{\textrm{T}}^{\textrm{min}}$ for $N_{\textrm{Jet}}\geq 4$.

Upper limits on the visible cross section (cross section ($\sigma$) times acceptance ($A$) times efficiency ($\epsilon$)) at the 95% CL versus inclusive $H_{\textrm{T}}^{\textrm{min}}$ for $N_{\textrm{Jet}}\geq 5$.

Upper limits on the visible cross section (cross section ($\sigma$) times acceptance ($A$) times efficiency ($\epsilon$)) at the 95% CL versus inclusive $H_{\textrm{T}}^{\textrm{min}}$ for $N_{\textrm{Jet}}\geq 6$.

Upper limits on the visible cross section (cross section ($\sigma$) times acceptance ($A$) times efficiency ($\epsilon$)) at the 95% CL versus inclusive $H_{\textrm{T}}^{\textrm{min}}$ for $N_{\textrm{Jet}}\geq 7$.

Upper limits on the visible cross section (cross section ($\sigma$) times acceptance ($A$) times efficiency ($\epsilon$)) at the 95% CL versus inclusive $H_{\textrm{T}}^{\textrm{min}}$ for $N_{\textrm{Jet}}\geq 8$.

Mean reconstruction efficiencies $(\epsilon)$ and RMS of the reconstruction efficiencies for various black hole and string ball models.

The cumulant $c_2\{8\}$ extracted for all charged particles with $0.3 < p_T < 3.0$ GeV/c as a function of $N_{trk}^{offline}$ in pPb collisions.

The elliptic flow $v_2\{6\}$ extracted for all charged particles with $0.3 < p_T < 3.0$ GeV/c as a function of $N_{trk}^{offline}$ in PbPb collisions.

The elliptic flow $v_2\{8\}$ extracted for all charged particles with $0.3 < p_T < 3.0$ GeV/c as a function of $N_{trk}^{offline}$ in PbPb collisions.

The elliptic flow $v_2\{\text{LYZ}\}$ extracted for all charged particles with $0.3 < p_T < 3.0$ GeV/c as a function of $N_{trk}^{offline}$ in PbPb collisions.

The elliptic flow $v_2\{6\}$ extracted for all charged particles with $0.3 < p_T < 3.0$ GeV/c as a function of $N_{trk}^{offline}$ in pPb collisions.

The elliptic flow $v_2\{8\}$ extracted for all charged particles with $0.3 < p_T < 3.0$ GeV/c as a function of $N_{trk}^{offline}$ in pPb collisions.

The elliptic flow $v_2\{\text{LYZ}\}$ extracted for all charged particles with $0.3 < p_T < 3.0$ GeV/c as a function of $N_{trk}^{offline}$ in pPb collisions.

The cumulant ratio $c_2\{6\}/v_2\{4\}$ as a function of $c_2\{4\}/v_2\{2\}$ in pPb collisions.

The cumulant ratio $c_2\{8\}/v_2\{6\}$ as a function of $c_2\{4\}/v_2\{2\}$ in pPb collisions.

The cumulant ratio $c_2\{6\}/v_2\{4\}$ as a function of $c_2\{4\}/v_2\{2\}$ in PbPb collisions.

The cumulant ratio $c_2\{8\}/v_2\{6\}$ as a function of $c_2\{4\}/v_2\{2\}$ in PbPb collisions.

Charged-particle spectra in different centrality intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different centrality intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different centrality intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for pp.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for pp.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for pp.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for pp.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for pp.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for pp.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for pp.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for pp.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Rcp in different centrality intervals.

Rcp in different centrality intervals.

Rcp in different centrality intervals.

Rcp in different centrality intervals.

Raa in different centrality intervals.

Raa in different centrality intervals.

Raa in different centrality intervals.

Raa in different centrality intervals.

Raa in different centrality intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa.

Raa as a function of <Npart>.

Raa as a function of <Npart>.

Raa as a function of <Npart>.

Raa as a function of <Npart>.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for pp.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for pp.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for pp.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for pp.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals.

Charged-particle spectra in different eta intervals for Pb+Pb.

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals (not shown in Fig. 18).

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals (not shown in Fig. 18).

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals (not shown in Fig. 18).

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals (not shown in Fig. 18).

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals (not shown in Fig. 18).

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals (not shown in Fig. 18).

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals (not shown in Fig. 18).

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals (not shown in Fig. 18).

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals (not shown in Fig. 18).

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals (not shown in Fig. 18).

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals (not shown in Fig. 18).

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals (not shown in Fig. 18).

Raa in different eta intervals.

Raa in different eta intervals.

Femtoscopic radii as a function od pair transverse momentum $k_{\rm T}$ for seven centrality ranges.

One-dimensional femtoscopic radius $R_{\mathrm inv}$ as a function od pair transverse momentum $k_{\rm T}$ for seven centrality ranges.

Invariant mass-squared distributions of the $2h^- h^+ 3\pi^0 \nu_{\tau}$ decay channel.

Invariant mass-squared distribution of the $3h^- 2h^+ \pi^0 \nu_{\tau}$ decay channel.

$\tau^- \to \pi^- \pi^0 \nu_{\tau}$ invariant mass spectrum. The error has been set to zero if it is smaller than the point size. A dash indicates a data point lying outside the plot range.

The expected invariant mass distribution of signal Z'@0.75TeV and $\tilde{\nu}_{\tau}$@1TeV. The arbitrary choice of couplings are: $\lambda_{311}^{'}=0.11$ and $\lambda_{i3k}=0.07$ for $\tilde{\nu}_{\tau}$, $Q_{ll^{'}}=1$ for Z' .

Observed and predicted $\mu\tau$ invariant mass distributions.

The expected invariant mass distribution of signal Z'@0.75TeV and $\tilde{\nu}_{\tau}$@1TeV. The arbitrary choice of couplings are: $\lambda_{311}^{'}=0.11$ and $\lambda_{i3k}=0.07$ for $\tilde{\nu}_{\tau}$, $Q_{ll^{'}}=1$ for Z' .

Expected cross section times branching ratio as a function of $\tilde{\nu}_{\tau}$ mass in the $e\mu$ channel for the arbitrary choice of couplings $\lambda_{311}^{'}=0.11$ and $\lambda_{i3k}=0.07$.

The 95% CL limits on cross section times branching ratio as a function of $\tilde{\nu}_{\tau}$ mass in the $e\mu$ channel.

Expected cross section times branching ratio as a function of Z' mass in the $e\mu$ channel for the arbitrary choice of couplings $Q_{ll^{'}}=1$.

The 95% CL limits on cross section times branching ratio as a function of Z' mass in the $e\mu$ channel.

The 95% CL limits on cross section times branching ratio as a function of $\tilde{\nu}_{\tau}$ mass in the $e\tau$ channel.

The 95% CL limits on cross section times branching ratio as a function of Z' mass in the $e\tau$ channel.

The 95% CL limits on cross section times branching ratio as a function of $\tilde{\nu}_{\tau}$ mass in the $\mu\tau$ channel.

The 95% CL limits on cross section times branching ratio as a function of Z' mass in the $\mu\tau$ channel.

The 95% CL limits on lambda'_311 as a function of sneutrino mass for assumed value of lambda_i3k=0.07 for $e\mu$, $e\tau$ and $\mu\tau$ modes.

Estimated SM backgrounds and observed event yields for the validation and search region.

Cut flow for signal $\tilde{\nu}_{\tau}$ and Z' at 1TeV mass point.

Gaussian standard deviation of M(ll') distributions at various signal mass.

Inputs used for the Z'-->$e\mu$ channel limit setting.

Inputs used for the $\tilde{\nu}_{\tau}$-->$e\mu$ channel limit setting.

Inputs used for the Z'-->$e\tau$ channel limit setting.

Inputs used for the $\tilde{\nu}_{\tau}$ -->$e\tau$ channel limit setting.

Inputs used for the Z'-->$\mu\tau$ channel limit setting.

Inputs used for the $\tilde{\nu}_{\tau}$-->$\mu\tau$ channel limit setting.

Ratio of the jet spectrum with a leading track $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ > 5 GeV/$c$ over the inclusive jet spectrum for $R=0.2$ in pp collisions at $\sqrt{s}=2.76$ TeV.

Ratios of jet spectra with different leading track $p_{\mathrm{T}}$ requirements ("$0$ over $5$", "$3$ over $5$", "$7$ over $5$" and "$10$ over $5$") for $R=0.2$ jets in 0-10% most central Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=2.76$ TeV.

$R_{\mathrm{AA}}$ for $R=0.2$ jets with the leading track requirement of $5$ GeV/$c$ in 0-10% most central Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=2.76$ TeV.

$R_{\mathrm{AA}}$ for $R=0.2$ jets with the leading track requirement of $5$ GeV/$c$ in 10-30% most central Pb-Pb collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=2.76$ TeV.

$\rm dN_{ch}/dy$ versus y distribution derived from the $\rm dN_{ch}/d\eta$ distribution along with pt distributions and particle ratios measured in ALICE. Errors are systematic.

The ratio of the standard deviation of the rapidity distribution of charged particles to that expected from Landau hydrodynamics versus versus $\sqrt{s}$/nucleon-pair. The standard deviation for data for all charged particles is derived from the $\rm dN_{ch}/d\eta$ distributions measured at various energies and converted to $\rm dN_{ch}/dy$ in a consistent manner. The data from the BRAHMS and PHOBOS experiments derived by the present authors from these experiments $dN/d\eta$ distributions.

Correlation matrix for the asymmetries as a function of $p_\text{T}^\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ in the fiducial phase space. Both statistical and systematic effects are considered.

Corrected asymmetry as a function of $m_\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ in the fiducial phase space, using three bins in $m_\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$. The value 9999 is used as a placeholder for infinity. The correlation matrix for these values can be found in a separate table.

Correlation matrix for the asymmetries as a function of $m_\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ in the fiducial phase space, using three bins in $m_\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$. Both statistical and systematic effects are considered.

Corrected asymmetry as a function of $m_\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ in the fiducial phase space, using six bins in $m_\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$. The value 9999 is used as a placeholder for infinity. The correlation matrix for these values can be found in a separate table.

Correlation matrix for the asymmetries as a function of $m_\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ in the fiducial phase space, using six bins in $m_\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$. Both statistical and systematic effects are considered.

Corrected asymmetry as a function of $|y_\mathrm{t\bar{t}}|$ in the full phase space. The value 9999 is used as a placeholder for infinity. The correlation matrix for these values can be found in a separate table.

Correlation matrix for the asymmetries as a function of $|y_\mathrm{t\bar{t}}|$ in the full phase space. Both statistical and systematic effects are considered.

Corrected asymmetry as a function of $p_\text{T}^\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ in the full phase space. The value 9999 is used as a placeholder for infinity. The correlation matrix for these values can be found in a separate table.

Correlation matrix for the asymmetries as a function of $p_\text{T}^\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ in the full phase space. Both statistical and systematic effects are considered.

Corrected asymmetry as a function of $m_\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ in the full phase space, using three bins in $m_\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$. The value 9999 is used as a placeholder for infinity. The correlation matrix for these values can be found in a separate table.

Correlation matrix for the asymmetries as a function of $m_\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ in the full phase space, using three bins in $m_\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$. Both statistical and systematic effects are considered.

Corrected asymmetry as a function of $m_\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ in the full phase space, using six bins in $m_\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$. The value 9999 is used as a placeholder for infinity. The correlation matrix for these values can be found in a separate table.

Correlation matrix for the asymmetries as a function of $m_\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$ in the full phase space, using six bins in $m_\mathrm{t\bar{t}}$. Both statistical and systematic effects are considered.

Measured dijet angular distributions in bin of dijet invariant mass. P=3 and P=4 refers to the two jets in the final state.

Measured dijet angular distributions in bin of dijet invariant mass. P=3 and P=4 refers to the two jets in the final state.

Vertex-level efficiency if no re-tracking is performed, as a function of the vertex radial position for an RPV SUSY model of squark production with $\tilde{q}\to q[\tilde{\chi}_1^0\to\mu qq]$, where $m(\tilde{q}) = 700$ GeV, $m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0) = 494$ GeV and $c\tau(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ = 175 mm. The result with re-tracking is tabulated in http://hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1362183/d1.

Upper limits (95% CL) on the number of DV+muon displaced vertices in 20.3 fb$^{-1}$ and the corresponding vertex-level efficiencies (from Auxiliary Figure 7a) for four RPV SUSY models as a function of the $\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ proper decay distance $c\tau$. The models consider squark or gluino pair production, with masses in GeV as indicated, with either $\tilde{q}\to q[\tilde{\chi}_1^0\to\mu qq]$ or $\tilde{g}\to qq[\tilde{\chi}_1^0\to\mu qq]$ decays, respectively.

Upper limits (95% CL) on the number of DV+muon displaced vertices in 20.3 fb$^{-1}$ and the corresponding vertex-level efficiencies (from Auxiliary Figure 7b) for four RPV SUSY models as a function of the $\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ proper decay distance $c\tau$. The models consider squark or gluino pair production, with masses in GeV as indicated, with either $\tilde{q}\to q\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ or $\tilde{g}\to qq\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ decays, respectively.

Upper limits (95% CL) on the number of DV+electron displaced vertices in 20.3 fb$^{-1}$ and the corresponding vertex-level efficiencies (from Auxiliary Figure 7c) for four RPV SUSY models as a function of the $\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ proper decay distance $c\tau$. The models consider squark or gluino pair production, with masses in GeV as indicated, with either $\tilde{q}\to q[\tilde{\chi}_1^0\to e qq]$ or $\tilde{g}\to qq[\tilde{\chi}_1^0\to e qq]$ decays, respectively.

Upper limits (95% CL) on the number of DV+electron displaced vertices in 20.3 fb$^{-1}$ and the corresponding vertex-level efficiencies (from Auxiliary Figure 7d) for four RPV SUSY models as a function of the $\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ proper decay distance $c\tau$. The models consider squark or gluino pair production, with masses in GeV as indicated, with either $\tilde{q}\to q\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ or $\tilde{g}\to qq\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ decays, respectively.

Upper limits (95% CL) on the number of dilepton $e^+e^-$ displaced vertices in 20.3 fb$^{-1}$ and the corresponding vertex-level efficiencies (from Auxiliary Figure 5a) for four RPV SUSY models as a function of the $\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ proper decay distance $c\tau$. The models consider gluino pair production, with $\tilde{g}\to qq[\tilde{\chi}_1^0\to ee\nu]$ decays and masses in GeV as indicated. A dash indicates results omitted due to limited statistical precision.

Upper limits (95% CL) on the number of dilepton $e^{\pm}\mu^{\mp}$ displaced vertices in 20.3 fb$^{-1}$ and the corresponding vertex-level efficiencies (from Auxiliary Figure 5b) for four RPV SUSY models as a function of the $\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ proper decay distance $c\tau$. The models consider gluino pair production, with $\tilde{g}\to qq[\tilde{\chi}_1^0\to e\mu\nu]$ decays and masses in GeV as indicated.

Upper limits (95% CL) on the number of $\mu^+\mu^-$ displaced vertices in 20.3 fb$^{-1}$ and the corresponding vertex-level efficiencies (from Auxiliary Figure 5c) for four RPV SUSY models as a function of the $\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ proper decay distance $c\tau$. The models consider gluino pair production, with $\tilde{g}\to qq[\tilde{\chi}_1^0\to \mu\mu\nu]$ decays and masses in GeV as indicated. A dash indicates results omitted due to limited statistical precision.

Upper limits (95% CL) on the number of dilepton ($e^+e^-+e^{\pm}\mu^{\mp}+\mu^+\mu^-$) displaced vertices in 20.3 fb$^{-1}$ and the corresponding vertex-level efficiencies (from Auxiliary Figure 5d) for two GGM SUSY models as a function of the $\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ proper decay distance $c\tau$. The models consider gluino pair production, with $\tilde{g}\to qq[\tilde{\chi}_1^0\to Z\tilde{G}]$ decays, $m(\tilde{g})$ = 1100 GeV and $m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ = 400 GeV.

Upper limits (95% CL) on the number of dilepton ($e^+e^-+e^{\pm}\mu^{\mp}+\mu^+\mu^-$) displaced vertices in 20.3 fb$^{-1}$ and the corresponding vertex-level efficiencies (from Auxiliary Figure 5d) for two GGM SUSY models as a function of the $\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ proper decay distance $c\tau$. The models consider gluino pair production, with $\tilde{g}\to qq[\tilde{\chi}_1^0\to Z\tilde{G}]$ decays, $m(\tilde{g})$ = 1100 GeV and $m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ = 1000 GeV.

Upper limits (95% CL) from the dilepton $e^+e^-+e^{\pm}\mu^{\mp}$ channels on the production cross-section and the corresponding event-level efficiencies (from Auxiliary Figure 6a) for four RPV SUSY models as a function of the $\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ proper decay distance $c\tau$. The models consider gluino pair production, with $\tilde{g}\to qq[\tilde{\chi}_1^0\to e\mu\nu/ee\nu]$ decays and masses in GeV as indicated. For comparison, the production cross-sections for $m(\tilde{g})$ = 600 GeV and 1300 GeV are $1280\pm230$ fb and $1.7\pm0.7$ fb, respectively.

Upper limits (95% CL) from the dilepton $e^{\pm}\mu^{\mp}+\mu^+\mu^-$ channels on the production cross-section and the corresponding event-level efficiencies (from Auxiliary Figure 6b) for four RPV SUSY models as a function of the $\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ proper decay distance $c\tau$. The models consider gluino pair production, with $\tilde{g}\to qq[\tilde{\chi}_1^0\to e\mu\nu/\mu\mu\nu]$ decays and masses in GeV as indicated. For comparison, the production cross-sections for $m(\tilde{g})$ = 600 GeV and 1300 GeV are $1280\pm230$ fb and $1.7\pm0.7$ fb, respectively. A dash indicates results omitted due to limited statistical precision.

Upper limits (95% CL) from the dilepton $e^+e^-+e^{\pm}\mu^{\mp}+\mu^+\mu^-$ channels on the production cross-section and the corresponding event-level efficiencies (from Auxiliary Figure 6c) for two GGM SUSY models as a function of the $\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ proper decay distance $c\tau$. The models consider gluino pair production, with $\tilde{g}\to qq[\tilde{\chi}_1^0\to Z\tilde{G}]$ decays, $m(\tilde{g})$ = 1100 GeV and $m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ = 400 GeV. For comparison, the production cross-section for $m(\tilde{g})$ = 1100 GeV is $7.6\pm2.8$ fb.

Upper limits (95% CL) from the dilepton $e^+e^-+e^{\pm}\mu^{\mp}+\mu^+\mu^-$ channels on the production cross-section and the corresponding event-level efficiencies (from Auxiliary Figure 6c) for two GGM SUSY models as a function of the $\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ proper decay distance $c\tau$. The models consider gluino pair production, with $\tilde{g}\to qq[\tilde{\chi}_1^0\to Z\tilde{G}]$ decays, $m(\tilde{g})$ = 1100 GeV and $m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ = 1000 GeV. For comparison, the production cross-section for $m(\tilde{g})$ = 1100 GeV is $7.6\pm2.8$ fb.

Upper limits (95% CL) from the DV+jets channel on the production cross-section and the corresponding event-level efficiencies (from Auxiliary Figure 8a) for four RPV SUSY models as a function of the $\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ proper decay distance $c\tau$. The models consider squark pair production, with $\tilde{q}\to q\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ decays, $m(\tilde{q})$ = 700 GeV and $m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ = 494 GeV. For comparison, the production cross-section for $m(\tilde{q})$ = 700 GeV is $124\pm17$ fb. A dash indicates where the limit-setting procedure did not converge.

Upper limits (95% CL) from the DV+jets channel on the production cross-section and the corresponding event-level efficiencies (from Auxiliary Figure 8b) for four RPV SUSY models as a function of the $\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ proper decay distance $c\tau$. The models consider squark pair production, with $\tilde{q}\to q\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ decays, $m(\tilde{q})$ = 1000 GeV and $m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ = 108 GeV. For comparison, the production cross-section for $m(\tilde{q})$ = 1000 GeV is $11.9\pm1.5$ fb. A dash indicates where the limit-setting procedure did not converge.

Upper limits (95% CL) from the DV+$E_T^{miss}$ channel on the production cross-section and the corresponding event-level efficiencies (from Auxiliary Figure 9a) for two GGM SUSY models as a function of the $\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ proper decay distance $c\tau$. The models consider gluino pair production, with $\tilde{g}\to qq[\tilde{\chi}_1^0\to Z\tilde{G}]$ decays, $m(\tilde{g})$ = 1100 GeV and a $\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ mass in GeV as indicated. For comparison, the production cross-section for $m(\tilde{g})$ = 1100 GeV is $7.6\pm2.8$ fb.

Upper limits (95% CL) from the DV+jets channel on the production cross-section and the corresponding event-level efficiencies (from Auxiliary Figure 9b) for two GGM SUSY models as a function of the $\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ proper decay distance $c\tau$. The models consider gluino pair production, with $\tilde{g}\to qq[\tilde{\chi}_1^0\to Z\tilde{G}]$ decays, $m(\tilde{g})$ = 1100 GeV and a $\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ mass in GeV as indicated. For comparison, the production cross-section for $m(\tilde{g})$ = 1100 GeV is $7.6\pm2.8$ fb. A dash indicates where the limit-setting procedure did not converge.

Upper limits (95% CL) from the DV+$E_T^{miss}$ channel on the production cross-section and the corresponding event-level efficiencies (from Auxiliary Figure 10a) for four split-SUSY models as a function of the $\tilde{g}$ proper decay distance $c\tau$. The models consider gluino pair production, with $[\tilde{g}\to g/qq \tilde{\chi}_1^0]$ decays, $\tilde{g}$ masses in GeV as indicated and $m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ = 100 GeV. For comparison, the production cross-sections for $m(\tilde{g})$ = 400 GeV, 800 GeV and 1400 GeV are $18700\pm2800$ fb, $149\pm31$ fb and $0.71\pm0.32$ fb, respectively.

Upper limits (95% CL) from the DV+jets channel on the production cross-section and the corresponding event-level efficiencies (from Auxiliary Figure 10b) for four split-SUSY models as a function of the $\tilde{g}$ proper decay distance $c\tau$. The models consider gluino pair production, with $[\tilde{g}\to g/qq \tilde{\chi}_1^0]$ decays, $\tilde{g}$ masses in GeV as indicated and $m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ = 100 GeV. For comparison, the production cross-sections for $m(\tilde{g})$ = 400 GeV, 800 GeV and 1400 GeV are $18700\pm2800$ fb, $149\pm31$ fb and $0.71\pm0.32$ fb, respectively. A dash indicates where the limit-setting procedure did not converge or the limit is greater than $10^8$ fb.

Upper limits (95% CL) from the DV+$E_T^{miss}$ channel on the production cross-section and the corresponding event-level efficiencies (from Auxiliary Figure 10c) for three split-SUSY models as a function of the $\tilde{g}$ proper decay distance $c\tau$. The models consider gluino pair production, with $[\tilde{g}\to tt \tilde{\chi}_1^0]$ decays, $\tilde{g}$ masses in GeV as indicated and $m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ = 100 GeV. For comparison, the production cross-sections for $m(\tilde{g})$ = 600 GeV, 1000 GeV and 1400 GeV are $1270\pm230$ fb, $22\pm6$ fb and $0.71\pm0.32$ fb, respectively.

Upper limits (95% CL) from the DV+jets channel on the production cross-section and the corresponding event-level efficiencies (from Auxiliary Figure 10d) for three split-SUSY models as a function of the $\tilde{g}$ proper decay distance $c\tau$. The models consider gluino pair production, with $[\tilde{g}\to tt \tilde{\chi}_1^0]$ decays, $\tilde{g}$ masses in GeV as indicated and $m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ = 100 GeV. For comparison, the production cross-sections for $m(\tilde{g})$ = 600 GeV, 1000 GeV and 1400 GeV are $1270\pm230$ fb, $22\pm6$ fb and $0.71\pm0.32$ fb, respectively. A dash indicates where the limit-setting procedure did not converge.

Upper limits (95% CL) from the DV+$E_T^{miss}$ channel on the production cross-section and the corresponding event-level efficiencies (from Auxiliary Figure 10e) for four split-SUSY models as a function of the $\tilde{g}$ proper decay distance $c\tau$. The models consider gluino pair production, with $[\tilde{g}\to tt \tilde{\chi}_1^0]$ decays, $\tilde{g}$ masses in GeV as indicated and $m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ = $m(\tilde{g}) - 480$ GeV. For comparison, the production cross-sections for $m(\tilde{g})$ = 500 GeV, 800 GeV and 1400 GeV are $4450\pm700$ fb, $149\pm31$ fb and $0.71\pm0.32$ fb, respectively.

Upper limits (95% CL) from the DV+jets channel on the production cross-section and the corresponding event-level efficiencies (from Auxiliary Figure 10f) for four split-SUSY models as a function of the $\tilde{g}$ proper decay distance $c\tau$. The models consider gluino pair production, with $[\tilde{g}\to tt \tilde{\chi}_1^0]$ decays, $\tilde{g}$ masses in GeV as indicated and $m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ = $m(\tilde{g}) - 480$ GeV. For comparison, the production cross-sections for $m(\tilde{g})$ = 500 GeV, 800 GeV and 1400 GeV are $4450\pm700$ fb, $149\pm31$ fb and $0.71\pm0.32$ fb, respectively. A dash indicates where the limit-setting procedure did not converge.

Observed 95% CL exclusion contour in the $m(\tilde{g})$-$c\tau$ plane for the split-SUSY model with gluino production, $[\tilde{g}\to g/qq \tilde{\chi}_1^0]$ decays and $m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ = 100 GeV. These results are obtained from the DV+$E_T^{miss}$ and DV+jets channels, see http://hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1362183/d34 for details.

Expected 95% CL exclusion contour in the $m(\tilde{g})$-$c\tau$ plane for the split-SUSY model with gluino production, $[\tilde{g}\to g/qq \tilde{\chi}_1^0]$ decays and $m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ = 100 GeV. These results are obtained from the DV+$E_T^{miss}$ and DV+jets channels, see http://hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1362183/d34 for details.

Observed 95% CL exclusion contour in the $m(\tilde{g})$-$c\tau$ plane for the split-SUSY model with gluino production, $[\tilde{g}\to tt \tilde{\chi}_1^0]$ decays and $m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ = 100 GeV. These results are obtained from the DV+$E_T^{miss}$ and DV+jets channels, see http://hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1362183/d34 for details.

Expected 95% CL exclusion contour in the $m(\tilde{g})$-$c\tau$ plane for the split-SUSY model with gluino production, $[\tilde{g}\to tt \tilde{\chi}_1^0]$ decays and $m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ = 100 GeV. These results are obtained from the DV+$E_T^{miss}$ and DV+jets channels, see http://hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1362183/d34 for details.

Observed 95% CL exclusion contour in the $m(\tilde{g})$-$c\tau$ plane for the split-SUSY model with gluino production, $[\tilde{g}\to g/qq \tilde{\chi}_1^0]$ decays and $m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ = $m(\tilde{g})$ - 480 GeV. These results are obtained from the DV+$E_T^{miss}$ and DV+jets channels, see http://hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1362183/d34 for details.

Expected 95% CL exclusion contour in the $m(\tilde{g})$-$c\tau$ plane for the split-SUSY model with gluino production, $[\tilde{g}\to g/qq \tilde{\chi}_1^0]$ decays and $m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ = $m(\tilde{g})$ - 480 GeV. These results are obtained from the DV+$E_T^{miss}$ and DV+jets channels, see http://hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1362183/d34 for details.

Choice of signal region in the $m(\tilde{g})$-$c\tau$ plane for the split-SUSY models with gluino decays and neutralino masses in GeV as indicated. A value of 1 indicates that the DV+$E_T^{miss}$ channel provided the best expected constraint for that point, while a value of -1 indicates the DV+jets channel. A dash indicates where results were not calculated for a particular mass/lifetime combination.

Upper limits (95% CL) from the DV+$E_T^{miss}$ channel on the production cross-section and the corresponding event-level efficiencies (from Auxiliary Figure 11a) for four RPV SUSY models as a function of the $\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ proper decay distance $c\tau$. The models consider squark or gluino pair production, with masses in GeV as indicated, with either $\tilde{q}\to q[\tilde{\chi}_1^0\to \nu qq]$ or $\tilde{g}\to qq[\tilde{\chi}_1^0\to \nu qq]$ decays, respectively. For comparison, the production cross-sections for $m(\tilde{g})$ = 700 GeV, $m(\tilde{q})$ = 700 GeV and $m(\tilde{q})$ = 1000 GeV are $430\pm80$ fb, $124\pm17$ fb and $11.9\pm1.5$ fb, respectively.

Upper limits (95% CL) from the DV+$E_T^{miss}$ channel on the production cross-section and the corresponding event-level efficiencies (from Auxiliary Figure 11b) for four RPV SUSY models as a function of the $\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ proper decay distance $c\tau$. The models consider squark pair production, with $\tilde{q}\to q\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ decays and masses in GeV as indicated. For comparison, the production cross-sections for $m(\tilde{q})$ = 700 GeV and 1000 GeV are $124\pm17$ fb and $11.9\pm1.5$ fb, respectively.

Vertex mass distributions in data and one RPV SUSY signal model, for vertices with 3, 4 and $\geq$5 tracks in the DV+muon channel. The entries are the number of DVs in each bin, not normalized according to bin size. The signal model is for squark pair production, with $\tilde{q}\to q[\tilde{\chi}_1^0\to\mu qq]$ decays, $m(\tilde{q})$ = 700 GeV, $m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ = 494 GeV and $c\tau(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ = 175 mm.

Vertex mass distributions in data and one GGM SUSY signal model, for vertices with 3, 4 and $\geq$5 tracks in the DV+jets channel. The entries are the number of DVs in each bin, not normalized according to bin size. The signal model is for gluino pair production, with $\tilde{g}\to qq[\tilde{\chi}_1^0\to Z\tilde{G}]$ decays, $m(\tilde{g})$ = 1100 GeV, $m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ = 400 GeV and $c\tau(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ = 175 mm.

Vertex mass distributions in data and one RPV SUSY signal model, for vertices with 3, 4 and $\geq$5 tracks in the DV+electron channel. The entries are the number of DVs in each bin, not normalized according to bin size. The signal model is for squark pair production, with $\tilde{q}\to q[\tilde{\chi}_1^0\to e qq]$ decays, $m(\tilde{q})$ = 700 GeV, $m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ = 494 GeV and $c\tau(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ = 175 mm.

Vertex mass distributions in data and one split-SUSY signal model, for vertices with 3, 4 and $\geq$5 tracks in the DV+$E_T^{miss}$ channel. The entries are the number of DVs in each bin, not normalized according to bin size. The signal model is for gluino pair production, with $[\tilde{g}\to g/qq \tilde{\chi}_1^0]$ decays, $m(\tilde{g})$ = 1400 GeV, $m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ = 100 GeV and $c\tau(\tilde{g})$ = 175 mm.

Vertex mass distributions in data and one RPV SUSY signal model, for vertices with 0, 1 and $\geq$2 charged leptons in the dilepton $e^+e^-$ channel. The entries are the number of DVs in each bin, not normalized according to bin size. The signal model is for gluino pair production, with $\tilde{g}\to qq[\tilde{\chi}_1^0\to e\mu\nu/ee\nu]$ decays, $m(\tilde{g})$ = 1300 GeV, $m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ = 50 GeV and $c\tau(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ = 30 mm.

Vertex mass distributions in data and one RPV SUSY signal model, for vertices with 0, 1 and $\geq$2 charged leptons in the dilepton $e^{\pm}\mu^{\mp}$ channel. The entries are the number of DVs in each bin, not normalized according to bin size. The signal model is for gluino pair production, with $\tilde{g}\to qq[\tilde{\chi}_1^0\to e\mu\nu/ee\nu]$ decays, $m(\tilde{g})$ = 1300 GeV, $m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ = 50 GeV and $c\tau(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ = 30 mm.

Vertex mass distributions in data and one RPV SUSY signal model, for vertices with 0, 1 and $\geq$2 charged leptons in the dilepton $\mu^+\mu^-$ channel. The entries are the number of DVs in each bin, not normalized according to bin size. The signal model is for gluino pair production, with $\tilde{g}\to qq[\tilde{\chi}_1^0\to e\mu\nu/\mu\mu\nu]$ decays, $m(\tilde{g})$ = 1300 GeV, $m(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ = 50 GeV and $c\tau(\tilde{\chi}_1^0)$ = 30 mm.

Details of sparticle decay modes, model parameters, approximate number of generated events $N_{\rm evts}$ and total production cross-section $\sigma$ for selected models considered in this analysis. The long-lived particle (LLP) is the $\tilde{\chi}_1^0$ in all cases except for the model used for DV+$E_T^{miss}$, where it is the $\tilde{g}$. Events in some models are filtered to make better use of computing resources, details are given in the original table and the associated efficiency is already taken into account in the quoted cross-sections.

Numbers of events satisfying each selection criterion in turn for the DV+muon channel, using the model listed in http://hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1362183/d44. The ''Filter and trigger'' line includes the requirements placed on the primary vertex.

Numbers of events satisfying each selection criterion in turn for the DV+electron channel, using the model listed in http://hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1362183/d44. The ''Filter and trigger'' line includes the requirements placed on the primary vertex.

Numbers of events satisfying each selection criterion in turn for the DV+jets channel, using the model listed in http://hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1362183/d44. The ''Filter and trigger'' line includes the requirements placed on the primary vertex.

Numbers of events satisfying each selection criterion in turn for the DV+$E_T^{miss}$ channel, using the model listed in http://hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1362183/d44. The ''Filter and trigger'' line includes the requirements placed on the primary vertex.

Numbers of events satisfying each selection criterion in turn for the dilepton $e^+e^-$ channel, using the model listed in http://hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1362183/d44. The ''Trigger'' line includes the event-level cosmic-muon veto and the requirements placed on the primary vertex, but not the offline filter selection. This is included in the ''Lepton reconstruction and DV match'' line, along with all other requirements placed on offline-reconstructed leptons. About 20,000 events of the full sample are analyzed, which contain an equal mixture of $\tilde{\chi}_1^0 \to e^{\pm}\mu^{\mp}\nu$ and $\tilde{\chi}_1^0 \to e^+e^-\nu$ decays.

Numbers of events satisfying each selection criterion in turn for the dilepton $e^{\pm}\mu^{\mp}$ channel, using the model listed in http://hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1362183/d44. The ''Trigger'' line includes the event-level cosmic-muon veto and the requirements placed on the primary vertex, but not the offline filter selection. This is included in the ''Lepton reconstruction and DV match'' line, along with all other requirements placed on offline-reconstructed leptons. The sample contains about 50% $\tilde{\chi}_1^0 \to e^{\pm}\mu^{\mp}\nu$ decays, 25% $\tilde{\chi}_1^0 \to e^+e^-\nu$ and 25% $\tilde{\chi}_1^0 \to \mu^+\mu^-\nu$ decays.

Numbers of events satisfying each selection criterion in turn for the dilepton $\mu^+\mu^-$ channel, using the model listed in http://hepdata.cedar.ac.uk/view/ins1362183/d44. The ''Trigger'' line includes the event-level cosmic-muon veto and the requirements placed on the primary vertex, but not the offline filter selection. This is included in the ''Lepton reconstruction and DV match'' line, along with all other requirements placed on offline-reconstructed leptons. About 20,000 events of the full sample are analyzed, which contain an equal mixture of $\tilde{\chi}_1^0 \to e^{\pm}\mu^{\mp}\nu$ and $\tilde{\chi}_1^0 \to \mu^+\mu^-\nu$ decays.

Measured jet multiplicity distribution in the $W\mu\nu$+jets control region for the inclusive SR1 selection, compared to the background expectations. The latter include the global normalization factors extracted from the data. Where appropriate, the last bin of the distribution includes overflows.

Measured dilepton invariant mass distribution in the $Z\mu\mu$+jets control region for the inclusive SR1 selection, compared to the background expectations. The latter include the global normalization factors extracted from the data. Where appropriate, the last bin of the distribution includes overflows. P P --> Z0 JET(S) X.

Measured $E_{T}^{miss}$ distribution in the $Z\mu\mu$+jets control region for the inclusive SR1 selection, compared to the background expectations. The latter include the global normalization factors extracted from the data. Where appropriate, the last bin of the distribution includes overflows. P P --> Z0 JET(S) X.

Measured leading jet $p_{T}$ distribution in the $Z\mu\mu$+jets control region for the inclusive SR1 selection, compared to the background expectations. The latter include the global normalization factors extracted from the data. Where appropriate, the last bin of the distribution includes overflows. P P --> Z0 JET(S) X.

Measured jet multiplicity distribution in the $Z\mu\mu$+jets control region for the inclusive SR1 selection, compared to the background expectations. The latter include the global normalization factors extracted from the data. Where appropriate, the last bin of the distribution includes overflows. P P --> Z0 JET(S) X.

Measured transverse mass distribution in the $We\nu$+jets control region for the inclusive SR1 selection, compared to the background expectations. The latter include the global normalization factors extracted from the data. Where appropriate, the last bin of the distribution includes overflows.

Measured $E_{T}^{miss}$ distribution in the $We\nu$+jets control region for the inclusive SR1 selection, compared to the background expectations. The latter include the global normalization factors extracted from the data. Where appropriate, the last bin of the distribution includes overflows.

Measured leading jet $p_{T}$ distribution in the $We\nu$+jets control region for the inclusive SR1 selection, compared to the background expectations. The latter include the global normalization factors extracted from the data. Where appropriate, the last bin of the distribution includes overflows.

Measured jet multiplicity distribution in the $We\nu$+jets control region for the inclusive SR1 selection, compared to the background expectations. The latter include the global normalization factors extracted from the data. Where appropriate, the last bin of the distribution includes overflows.

Measured dilepton invariant mass distribution in the $Zee$+jets control region for the inclusive SR1 selection, compared to the background expectations. The latter include the global normalization factors extracted from the data. Where appropriate, the last bin of the distribution includes overflows.

Measured $E_{T}^{miss}$ distribution in the $Zee$+jets control region for the inclusive SR1 selection, compared to the background expectations. The latter include the global normalization factors extracted from the data. Where appropriate, the last bin of the distribution includes overflows.

Measured leading jet $p_{T}$ distribution in the $Zee$+jets control region for the inclusive SR1 selection, compared to the background expectations. The latter include the global normalization factors extracted from the data. Where appropriate, the last bin of the distribution includes overflows.

Measured jet multiplicity distribution in the $Zee$+jets control region for the inclusive SR1 selection, compared to the background expectations. The latter include the global normalization factors extracted from the data. Where appropriate, the last bin of the distribution includes overflows.

Measured distribution of the jet multiplicity for the SR1 selection compared to the SM expectations. The $Z\nu\nu$+jets contribution is shown as constrained by the $W\mu\nu$+jets control sample. Where appropriate, the last bin of the distribution includes overflows. The distribution of different ADD, WIMP and GMSB scenarios are included.

Measured distribution of $E_{T}^{miss}$ for the SR1 selection compared to the SM expectations. The $Z\nu\nu$+jets contribution is shown as constrained by the $W\mu\nu$+jets control sample. Where appropriate, the last bin of the distribution includes overflows. The distribution of different ADD, WIMP and GMSB scenarios are included.

Measured distribution of leading jet $p_{T}$ for the SR1 selection compared to the SM expectations. The $Z\nu\nu$+jets contribution is shown as constrained by the $W\mu\nu$+jets control sample. Where appropriate, the last bin of the distribution includes overflows. The distribution of different ADD, WIMP and GMSB scenarios are included.

Measured distribution of the leading jet $p_{T}$ to $E_{T}^{miss}$ ratio for the SR1 selection compared to the SM expectations. The $Z\nu\nu$+jets contribution is shown as constrained by the $W\mu\nu$+jets control sample. Where appropriate, the last bin of the distribution includes overflows. The distribution of different ADD, WIMP and GMSB scenarios are included.

Measured distribution of the jet multiplicity for SR7 selection compared to the SM expectations. The $Z\nu\nu$+jets contribution is shown as constrained by the $W\mu\nu$+jets control sample. Where appropriate, the last bin of the distribution includes overflows. The distribution of different ADD, WIMP and GMSB scenarios are included.

Measured distribution of the jet multiplicity for SR7 selection compared to the SM expectations. The $Z\nu\nu$+jets contribution is shown as constrained by the $W\mu\nu$+jets control sample. Where appropriate, the last bin of the distribution includes overflows. The distribution of different ADD, WIMP and GMSB scenarios are included.

Measured distribution of the leading jet $p_T$ for SR7 selection compared to the SM expectations. The $Z\nu\nu$+jets contribution is shown as constrained by the $W\mu\nu$+jets control sample. Where appropriate, the last bin of the distribution includes overflows. The distribution of different ADD, WIMP and GMSB scenarios are included.

Measured distribution of the leading jet $p_T$ for SR9 selection compared to the SM expectations. The $Z\nu\nu$+jets contribution is shown as constrained by the $W\mu\nu$+jets control sample. Where appropriate, the last bin of the distribution includes overflows. The distribution of different ADD, WIMP and GMSB scenarios are included.

Measured distribution of the leading jet $p_T$ to $E_{T}^{miss}$ ratio for SR7 selection compared to the SM expectations. The $Z\nu\nu$+jets contribution is shown as constrained by the $W\mu\nu$+jets control sample. Where appropriate, the last bin of the distribution includes overflows. The distribution of different ADD, WIMP and GMSB scenarios are included.

Measured distribution of the leading jet $p_T$ to $E_{T}^{miss}$ ratio for SR9 selection compared to the SM expectations. The $Z\nu\nu$+jets contribution is shown as constrained by the $W\mu\nu$+jets control sample. Where appropriate, the last bin of the distribution includes overflows. The distribution of different ADD, WIMP and GMSB scenarios are included.

Observed and expected 95$\%$ CL limit on the fundamental Planck scale in $4+n$ dimensions, $M_D$, as a function of the number of extra dimensions. In the figure the two results overlap. The shaded areas around the expected limit indicate the expected $\pm 1\sigma$ and $\pm 2\sigma$ ranges of limits in the absence of a signal. The 95$\%$ CL observed limits after the suppression of the events with $\hat{s} > M_D^2$ is applied (truncated) are also given.

Limits at 95% C.L. on the EFT suppression scale M* as a function of the WIMP mass m_chi, for the scalar operator D1. Results where EFT truncation is applied are also shown for couplings of 1 and the perturbative limit.

Limits at 95% C.L. on the EFT suppression scale M* as a function of the WIMP mass m_chi, for the vector operator D5. Results where EFT truncation is applied are also shown for couplings of 1 and the perturbative limit.

Limits at 95% C.L. on the EFT suppression scale M* as a function of the WIMP mass m_chi, for the axial vector operator D8. Results where EFT truncation is applied are also shown for couplings of 1 and the perturbative limit.

Limits at 95% C.L. on the EFT suppression scale M* as a function of the WIMP mass m_chi, for the tensor operator D9. Results where EFT truncation is applied are also shown for couplings of 1 and the perturbative limit.

Limits at 95% C.L. on the EFT suppression scale M* as a function of the WIMP mass m_chi, for the gluon operator D11. Results where EFT truncation is applied are also shown for couplings of 1 and the perturbative limit.

Limits at 95% C.L. on the EFT suppression scale M* as a function of the WIMP mass m_chi, for the gluon operator C5. Results where EFT truncation is applied are also shown for couplings of 1 and the perturbative limit.

Observed 95% CL limits on the suppression scale M* as a function of the mediator mass Mmed, assuming a Z'-like boson in a simplified model and a DM mass of 50 GeV and 400 GeV. The width of the mediator is varied between Mmed/3 and Mmed/8pi.

Observed 95% CL upper limits on the product of couplings of the simplified model vertex in the plane of mediator and WIMP mass (Mmed versus m_chi).

Upper limits at 90% C.L. on the WIMP-nucleon scattering cross section as a function of m_chi for spin-independent interactions, for a coupling strength of unity or the maximum value that keeps the model within its perturbative regime. The truncation procedure is applied for both cases.

Upper limits at 90% C.L. on the WIMP-nucleon scattering cross section as a function of m_chi for spin-dependent interactions, for a coupling strength of unity or the maximum value that keeps the model within its perturbative regime. The truncation procedure is applied for both cases.

Upper limits at 90% C.L. on the WIMP-nucleon annihilation cross section as a function of m_chi, for a coupling strength of unity or the maximum value that keeps the model within its perturbative regime. The truncation procedure is applied for both cases.

95$\%$ CL lower limits on the gravitino mass $m_{\tilde{G}}$ as a function of the squark mass $m_{\tilde{q}}$ for degenerate squark/gluino masses.

95$\%$ CL lower limits on the gravitino mass $m_{\tilde{G}}$ as a function of the squark mass $m_{\tilde{q}}$ for non-degenerate squark/gluino masses: $ m_{\tilde{g}} = 1/2 \times m_{\tilde{q}}$.

95$\%$ CL lower limits on the gravitino mass $m_{\tilde{G}}$ as a function of the squark mass $m_{\tilde{q}}$ for non-degenerate squark/gluino masses: $ m_{\tilde{g}} = 1/4 \times m_{\tilde{q}}$.

95$\%$ CL lower limits on the gravitino mass $m_{\tilde{G}}$ as a function of the squark mass $m_{\tilde{q}}$ for non-degenerate squark/gluino masses: $ m_{\tilde{g}} = 2 \times m_{\tilde{q}}$.

95$\%$ CL lower limits on the gravitino mass $m_{\tilde{G}}$ as a function of the squark mass $m_{\tilde{q}}$ for non-degenerate squark/gluino masses: $ m_{\tilde{g}} = 4 \times m_{\tilde{q}}$.

Observed and expected 95$\%$ CL upper limit on $\sigma \times {\rm{BR}}(H \to {\rm{invisible}})$ as a function of the Higgs boson mass.

Limits at 95% C.L. on the EFT suppression scale M* as a function of the WIMP mass m_chi, for the scalar operator C1. Results where EFT truncation is applied are also shown for couplings of 1 and the perturbative limit.

Efficiency for the calorimetric MET>80 GeV trigger as a function of the metastable R-hadron mass. The R-hadron decays to g/qq plus neutralino of mass = m(gluino) - 100 GeV with a lifetime of 1 ns.

Efficiency for the calorimetric MET>80 GeV trigger as a function of the metastable R-hadron mass. The R-hadron decays to g/qq plus neutralino of mass 100 GeV with a lifetime of 1 ns.

Efficiency for the calorimetric MET>80 GeV trigger as a function of the stable chargino mass.

Total selection efficiency as a function of the stable R-hadron mass.

Total selection efficiency as a function of the metastable R-hadron mass. The R-hadron decays to g/qq plus neutralino of mass 100 GeV with a lifetime of 10 ns.

Total selection efficiency as a function of the metastable R-hadron mass. The R-hadron decays to g/qq plus neutralino of mass = m(gluino) - 100 GeV with a lifetime of 10 ns.

Total selection efficiency as a function of the metastable R-hadron mass. The R-hadron decays to g/qq plus neutralino of mass 100 GeV with a lifetime of 1 ns.

Total selection efficiency as a function of the stable chargino mass.

Ionisation distribution of all the CR2 tracks, and those not matched to a reconstructed muon. The two distributions are normalised to their total number of entries.

Distribution of the mass of selected candidates, derived from the specific ionisation loss, for an example of gluino R-hadron signal, for searches for stable particles. The signal distributions are stacked on the expected background, and a narrower binning is used for them to allow the signal shape to be seen more clearly. The number of signal events is that expected according to the theoretical cross sections.

Distribution of the mass of selected candidates, derived from the specific ionisation loss, for one example of chargino signal, for searches for stable particles. The signal distributions are stacked on the expected background, and a narrower binning is used for them to allow the signal shape to be seen more clearly. The number of signal events is that expected according to the theoretical cross sections.

Distribution of the mass of selected candidates, derived from the specific ionisation loss, for background and data, for searches for stable particles. The expected background is shown with its total uncertainty (sum in quadrature of statistical, normalisation and systematic errors).

Distribution of the mass of selected candidates, derived from the specific ionisation loss, for an example of gluino R-hadron signal, for searches for metastable particles. The signal distributions are stacked on the expected background, and a narrower binning is used for them to allow the signal shape to be seen more clearly. The number of signal events is that expected according to the theoretical cross sections.

Distribution of the mass of selected candidates, derived from the specific ionisation loss, for an example of chargino signal, for searches for metastable particles. The signal distributions are stacked on the expected background, and a narrower binning is used for them to allow the signal shape to be seen more clearly. The number of signal events is that expected according to the theoretical cross sections.

Distribution of the mass of selected candidates, derived from the specific ionisation loss, for background and data. The expected background is shown with its total uncertainty (sum in quadrature of statistical, normalisation and systematic errors).

Theoretical values for the cross section of gluino pairs production with their uncertainty.

Expected upper limits on the production cross section as a function of mass for metastable gluino R-hadrons, with lifetime tau =10 ns, decaying into g/qq plus a light neutralino of mass 100 GeV, in the background-only case, with its 1 sigma band.

Observed 95 PCT upper limits on the production cross section as a function of mass for metastable gluino R-hadrons, with lifetime tau =10 ns, decaying into g/qq plus a light neutralino of mass 100 GeV.

Expected upper limits on the production cross section as a function of mass for metastable gluino R-hadrons, with lifetime tau =10 ns, decaying into g/qq plus a heavy neutralino of mass(gluino) - 100 GeV, in the background-only case, with its 1 sigma band.

Observed 95 PCT upper limits on the production cross section as a function of mass for metastable gluino R-hadrons, with lifetime tau =10 ns, decaying into g/qq plus a heavy neutralino of mass(gluino) - 100 GeV.

The expected excluded range of lifetimes as a function of gluino mass for gluino R-hadrons decaying into g/qq plus a light neutralino of mass 100 GeV, with respect to the nominal theoretical cross section.

The expected excluded range of lifetimes as a function of gluino mass for gluino R-hadrons decaying into g/qq plus a light neutralino of mass 100 GeV, with respect to the nominal theoretical cross section, plus 1 experimental sigma.

The expected excluded range of lifetimes as a function of gluino mass for gluino R-hadrons decaying into g/qq plus a light neutralino of mass 100 GeV, with respect to the nominal theoretical cross section, minus 1 experimental sigma.

The observed excluded range of lifetimes as a function of gluino mass for gluino R-hadrons decaying into g/qq plus a light neutralino of mass 100 GeV, with respect to the nominal theoretical cross section.

The observed excluded range of lifetimes as a function of gluino mass for gluino R-hadrons decaying into g/qq plus a light neutralino of mass 100 GeV, with respect to the nominal theoretical cross section minus its uncertainty.

The observed excluded range of lifetimes as a function of gluino mass for gluino R-hadrons decaying into g/qq plus a light neutralino of mass 100 GeV, with respect to the nominal theoretical cross section plus its uncertainty.

The expected excluded range of lifetimes as a function of gluino mass for gluino R-hadrons decaying into g/qq plus a heavy neutralino of mass = m(gluino) - 100 GeV, with respect to the nominal theoretical cross section.

The expected excluded range of lifetimes as a function of gluino mass for gluino R-hadrons decaying into g/qq plus a heavy neutralino of mass = m(gluino) - 100 GeV, with respect to the nominal theoretical cross section, plus 1 experimental sigma.

The expected excluded range of lifetimes as a function of gluino mass for gluino R-hadrons decaying into g/qq plus a heavy neutralino of mass = m(gluino) - 100 GeV, with respect to the nominal theoretical cross section, minus 1 experimental sigma.

The observed excluded range of lifetimes as a function of gluino mass for gluino R-hadrons decaying into g/qq plus a heavy neutralino of mass = m(gluino) - 100 GeV, with respect to the nominal theoretical cross section.

The observed excluded range of lifetimes as a function of gluino mass for gluino R-hadrons decaying into g/qq plus a heavy neutralino of mass = m(gluino) - 100 GeV, with respect to the nominal theoretical cross section minus its uncertainty.

The observed excluded range of lifetimes as a function of gluino mass for gluino R-hadrons decaying into g/qq plus a heavy neutralino of mass = m(gluino) - 100 GeV, with respect to the nominal theoretical cross section plus its uncertainty.

Expected upper limits on the production cross section as a function of mass for metastable gluino R-hadrons, with lifetime tau =10 ns, decaying into tt plus a light neutralino of mass 100 GeV, in the background-only case, with its 1 sigma band.

Observed 95 PCT upper limits on the production cross section as a function of mass for metastable gluino R-hadrons, with lifetime tau =10 ns, decaying into tt plus a light neutralino of mass 100 GeV.

Expected upper limits on the production cross section as a function of mass for metastable gluino R-hadrons, with lifetime tau =10 ns, decaying into tt plus a heavy neutralino of mass(gluino) - 100 GeV, in the background-only case, with its 1 sigma band.

Observed 95 PCT upper limits on the production cross section as a function of mass for metastable gluino R-hadrons, with lifetime tau =10 ns, decaying into tt plus a heavy neutralino of mass(gluino) - 100 GeV.

The expected excluded range of lifetimes as a function of gluino mass for gluino R-hadrons decaying into tt plus a light neutralino of mass 100 GeV, with respect to the nominal theoretical cross section.

The expected excluded range of lifetimes as a function of gluino mass for gluino R-hadrons decaying into tt plus a light neutralino of mass 100 GeV, with respect to the nominal theoretical cross section, plus 1 experimental sigma.

The expected excluded range of lifetimes as a function of gluino mass for gluino R-hadrons decaying into tt plus a light neutralino of mass 100 GeV, with respect to the nominal theoretical cross section, minus 1 experimental sigma.

The observed excluded range of lifetimes as a function of gluino mass for gluino R-hadrons decaying into tt plus a light neutralino of mass 100 GeV, with respect to the nominal theoretical cross section.

The observed excluded range of lifetimes as a function of gluino mass for gluino R-hadrons decaying into tt plus a light neutralino of mass 100 GeV, with respect to the nominal theoretical cross section minus its uncertainty.

The observed excluded range of lifetimes as a function of gluino mass for gluino R-hadrons decaying into tt plus a light neutralino of mass 100 GeV, with respect to the nominal theoretical cross section plus its uncertainty.

The expected excluded range of lifetimes as a function of gluino mass for gluino R-hadrons decaying into tt plus a heavy neutralino of mass = m(gluino) - 100 GeV, with respect to the nominal theoretical cross section.

The expected excluded range of lifetimes as a function of gluino mass for gluino R-hadrons decaying into tt plus a heavy neutralino of mass = m(gluino) - 100 GeV, with respect to the nominal theoretical cross section, plus 1 experimental sigma.

The expected excluded range of lifetimes as a function of gluino mass for gluino R-hadrons decaying into tt plus a heavy neutralino of mass = m(gluino) - 100 GeV, with respect to the nominal theoretical cross section, minus 1 experimental sigma.

The observed excluded range of lifetimes as a function of gluino mass for gluino R-hadrons decaying into tt plus a heavy neutralino of mass = m(gluino) - 100 GeV, with respect to the nominal theoretical cross section.

The observed excluded range of lifetimes as a function of gluino mass for gluino R-hadrons decaying into tt plus a heavy neutralino of mass = m(gluino) - 100 GeV, with respect to the nominal theoretical cross section minus its uncertainty.

The observed excluded range of lifetimes as a function of gluino mass for gluino R-hadrons decaying into tt plus a heavy neutralino of mass = m(gluino) - 100 GeV, with respect to the nominal theoretical cross section plus its uncertainty.

Theoretical values for the production cross section of charginos or chargino/neutralino pairs, with their uncertainty.

Expected upper limits on the production cross section as a function of mass for metastable charginos, with lifetime tau =1.0 ns, decaying into neutralino + pion, in the background-only case, with its 1 sigma band.

Observed 95 PCT upper limits on the production cross section as a function of mass for metastable charginos, with lifetime tau =1.0 ns, decaying into neutralino + pion.

The expected excluded range of lifetimes as a function of chargino mass for charginos decaying into neutralino plus pion, with respect to the nominal theoretical cross section.

The expected excluded range of lifetimes as a function of chargino mass for charginos decaying into neutralino plus pion, with respect to the nominal theoretical cross section, plus 1 experimental sigma.

The expected excluded range of lifetimes as a function of chargino mass for charginos decaying into neutralino plus pion, with respect to the nominal theoretical cross section, minus 1 experimental sigma.

The observed excluded range of lifetimes as a function of chargino mass for charginos decaying into neutralino plus pion, with respect to the nominal theoretical cross section.

The observed excluded range of lifetimes as a function of chargino mass for charginos decaying into neutralino plus pion, with respect to the nominal theoretical cross section minus its uncertainty.

The observed excluded range of lifetimes as a function of gluino mass for chargino mass for charginos decaying into neutralino plus pion, with respect to the nominal theoretical cross section plus its uncertainty.

dEdx ionization for data, 1 TeV gluino R-hadrons stable and decaying in 100 GeV neutralinos with a 10 ns lifetime and for charginos of 350 GeV. Tracks that fulfil all the requirements up to including the High-m_T (see Tab.1 in the paper) are considered at this stage and normalised to an integrated luminosity of 18.4 fb^-1.

Expected upper limits on the production cross section as a function of mass for stable gluino R-hadrons, in case of background only, with its 1 sigma band.

Observed 95 PCT upper limits on the production cross section as a function of mass for stable gluino R-hadrons.

Theoretical values for the cross section of squark pairs production with their uncertainty.

Expected upper limits on the production cross section as a function of mass for stable sbottom R-hadrons, in case of background only, with its 1 sigma band.

Observed 95 PCT upper limits on the production cross section as a function of mass for stable sbottom $R$-hadrons. Cross section IN PB.

Expected upper limits on the production cross section as a function of mass for stop R-hadrons, in case of background only, with its 1 sigma band.

Observed 95 PCT upper limits on the production cross section as a function of mass for stop R-hadrons.

Expected upper limits on the production cross section as a function of mass for stable charginos, in case of background only, with its 1 sigma band.

Observed 95 PCT upper limits on the production cross section as a function of mass for stable charginos.

Expected upper limits on the production cross section as a function of mass for metastable gluino R-hadrons, with lifetime tau=1.0 ns, decaying to g/qq plus a light neutralino of mass 100 GeV.

Observed 95 PCT upper limits on the production cross section as a function of mass for metastable gluino R-hadrons, with lifetime tau=1.0 ns, decaying to g/qq plus a light neutralino of mass 100 GeV.

Expected upper limits on the production cross section as a function of mass for metastable gluino R-hadrons, with lifetime tau=1.0 ns, decaying to g/qq plus a heavy neutralino of mass = m(gluino) - 100 GeV.

Observed 95 PCT upper limits on the production cross section as a function of mass for metastable gluino R-hadrons, with lifetime tau=1.0 ns, decaying to g/qq plus a heavy neutralino of mass = m(gluino) - 100 GeV.

Expected upper limits on the production cross section as a function of mass for metastable gluino R-hadrons, with lifetime tau=1.0 ns, decaying to tt plus a light neutralino of mass 100 GeV.

Observed 95 PCT upper limits on the production cross section as a function of mass for metastable gluino R-hadrons, with lifetime tau=1.0 ns, decaying to tt plus a light neutralino of mass 100 GeV.

Expected upper limits on the production cross section as a function of mass for metastable gluino R-hadrons, with lifetime tau=1.0 ns, decaying to tt plus a heavy neutralino of mass = m(gluino) - 100 GeV.

Observed 95 PCT upper limits on the production cross section as a function of mass for metastable gluino R-hadrons, with lifetime tau=1.0 ns, decaying to tt plus a heavy neutralino of mass = m(gluino) - 100 GeV.

Expected upper limits on the production cross section as a function of mass for metastable charginos, with lifetime tau =15 ns, decaying to neutralino and pion, in case of background only, with its 1 sigma band.

Observed 95 PCT upper limits on the production cross section as a function of mass for metastable charginos, with lifetime tau =15 ns, decaying to neutralino and pion, in case of background only, with its 1 sigma band.

Expected and observed event yields for signal regions with at least 7 jets as a function of transverse momentum requirements.

Expected and observed event yields for signal regions with at least 7 jets with at least 1 b-tag as a function of transverse momentum requirements.

Expected and observed event yields for signal regions with at least 7 jets with at least 2 b-tags as a function of transverse momentum requirements.

Table showing the predicted yields in the SM and observed number of events in SR1 as well as all signal mass points.

Table showing the predicted yields in the SM and observed number of events in SR100 as well as three representative signal scenarios.

Table showing the predicted yields in the SM and observed number of events in SR250 as well as three representative signal scenarios.

Expected 95% CL exclusion contour using the best expected limit from SR100 or SR250.

Observed 95% CL exclusion contour using the best expected limit from SR100 or SR250.

Expected 95% CL exclusion contour using the best expected limit from the jet-counting analysis when using signal regions without b-tag requirements.

Observed 95% CL exclusion contour using the best expected limit from the jet-counting analysis when using signal regions without b-tag requirements.

Expected 95% CL exclusion contour using the best expected limit from the jet-counting analysis when allowing b-tags.