Signal-to-background (S/B) ratio as a function of transverse momentum, Au+Au 62.4 GeV, 0-60% central events with minimum bias trigger

Inclusive electron elliptic flow v2\{2\} as a function of transverse momentum, Au+Au 200 GeV, 0-60% central events with minimum bias trigger

Inclusive electron elliptic flow v2\{4\} as a function of transverse momentum, Au+Au 200 GeV, 0-60% central events with minimum bias trigger

Inclusive electron elliptic flow v2\{2\} as a function of transverse momentum, Au+Au 39 GeV, 0-60% central events with minimum bias trigger

Inclusive electron elliptic flow v2\{2\} as a function of transverse momentum, Au+Au 62.4 GeV, 0-60% central events with minimum bias trigger

Inclusive electron elliptic flow v2\{2\} as a function of transverse momentum, Au+Au 200 GeV, 0-60% central events with High Tower (high pT) trigger

Photonic electron elliptic flow v2 as a function of transverse momentum, Au+Au 39 GeV, 0-60% central events with minimum bias trigger

Photonic electron elliptic flow v2 as a function of transverse momentum, Au+Au 62.4 GeV, 0-60% central events with minimum bias trigger

Photonic electron elliptic flow v2 as a function of transverse momentum, Au+Au 200 GeV, 0-60% central events with minimum bias trigger

Elliptic flow v2\{2\} of electrons from heavy-flavor hadron decays, Au+Au 200 GeV, 0-60% central events with minimum bias trigger

Elliptic flow v2\{4\} of electrons from heavy-flavor hadron decays, Au+Au 200 GeV, 0-60% central events with minimum bias trigger

Elliptic flow v2\{2\} of electrons from heavy-flavor hadron decays, Au+Au 200 GeV, 0-60% central events with High Tower (high pT) trigger

Elliptic flow v2\{EP\} of electrons from heavy-flavor hadron decays, Au+Au 200 GeV, 0-60% central events with High Tower (high pT) trigger

Elliptic flow v2\{2\} of electrons from heavy-flavor hadron decays, Au+Au 39 GeV, 0-60% central events with minimum bias trigger

Elliptic flow v2\{2}\ of electrons from heavy-flavor hadron decays, Au+Au 62.4 GeV, 0-60% central events with minimum bias trigger

Projections of 2-D correlation functions on $\Delta \phi$ (a) (with $|\Delta \eta|$ < 1.0) and $\Delta \eta$ (b) (with $|\Delta \phi|$ < 0.7) for the hadrons associated with their respective triggers (T1 for near-side, T2 for away–side) are shown for d+Au (circles) and central 0-20% Au+Au (squares) data.

Projections of 2-D correlation functions on $\Delta \phi$ (a) (with $|\Delta \eta|$ < 1.0) and $\Delta \eta$ (b) (with $|\Delta \phi|$ < 0.7) for the hadrons associated with their respective triggers (T1 for near-side, T2 for away–side) are shown for d+Au (circles) and central 0-20% Au+Au (squares) data.

Projections of 2-D correlation functions on $\Delta \phi$ (a) (with $|\Delta \eta|$ < 1.0) and $\Delta \eta$ (b) (with $|\Delta \phi|$ < 0.7) for the hadrons associated with their respective triggers (T1 for near-side, T2 for away–side) are shown for d+Au (circles) and central 0-20% Au+Au (squares) data.

The relative di-jet energy imbalance estimate $\Delta(\Sigma E_{T})^{Au+Au}-\Delta(\Sigma E_{T})^{d+Au}$.

Conditional di-jet survival probability measured through di-jet relative suppression rates $I_{d+Au}^{Au+Au}$ as a function of centrality.

The $v_{dyn}$ and the three terms of $v_{dyn}$ vs $\sqrt{\langle N_{ch}\rangle \langle N_{\gamma}\rangle }$ for mixed events. $Corr_{\gamma\,-ch}^{real}$ is plotted.

The $v_{dyn}$ and the three terms of $v_{dyn}$ vs $\sqrt{\langle N_{ch}\rangle \langle N_{\gamma}\rangle }$ for mixed events. $Corr_{\gamma\,-ch}^{mixed}$ is plotted.

The $v_{dyn}$ and the three terms of $v_{dyn}$ vs $\sqrt{\langle N_{ch}\rangle \langle N_{\gamma}\rangle }$ for mixed events. $\omega_{\gamma}^{real}$ is plotted.

The $v_{dyn}$ and the three terms of $v_{dyn}$ vs $\sqrt{\langle N_{ch}\rangle \langle N_{\gamma}\rangle }$ for mixed events. $\omega_{\gamma}^{mixed}$ is plotted.

The $v_{dyn}$ and the three terms of $v_{dyn}$ vs $\sqrt{\langle N_{ch}\rangle \langle N_{\gamma}\rangle }$ for mixed events. $v_{dyn}^{real}$ is plotted.

The $v_{dyn}$ and the three terms of $v_{dyn}$ vs $\sqrt{\langle N_{ch}\rangle \langle N_{\gamma}\rangle }$ for mixed events. $v_{dyn}^{mixed}$ is plotted.

The values of the observable $v_{dyn}^{ch-\gamma}$ for the same side.

The values of the observable $v_{dyn}^{ch-\gamma}$ for the same side.

The values of the observable $v_{dyn}^{ch-\gamma}$ for the away-side.

The values of the observable $v_{dyn}^{ch-\gamma}$ for the away-side.

The correlation between positive and negative charged particles measured by the FTPC and photons measured by the PMD using $v_{dyn}$ for real events.

$r_{m,1}$ vs multiplicity for first order of m.

$r_{m,1}$ vs multiplicity for first order of m.

$r_{m,1}$ vs multiplicity for second order of m.

$r_{m,1}$ vs multiplicity for second order of m.

$r_{m,1}$ vs multiplicity for third order of m.

$r_{m,1}$ vs multiplicity for third order of m.

The moments $r_{m,1}$(m=1-3) for real and mixed events as a function of order m in a fixed multiplicity bin of 47$\langle \sqrt{\langle N_{ch}\rangle \langle N_{\gamma}\rangle }\langle 54$.

(Color online) (b) Integrated pion $R_{AA}$ over the range $5<p_{T}<8$ GeV/c versus $N_{part}$. The bands represent the systematic uncertainty on ratios. An additional scale error due to $pp$ normalization (∼14%) is not shown.

(Color online) (a) Nuclear modification factor, RAA, for protons and anti-protons ($p + \overline{p}$) in Cu+Cu (filled symbols) and Au+Au (open symbols) collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$=200 GeV. Error band is shown for most central Cu+Cu data to represent characteristic systematic uncertainties for Cu+Cu data. Error boxes at $R_{AA}$=1 represent Cu+Cu scale uncertainties due to the number of collisions and from pp spectra normalization.

(Color online) (a) Ratio of protons and anti-protons to charged pions, versus transverse momentum, for Cu+Cu collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$=200 GeV. For clarity, only one systematic error band is shown for Cu+Cu data (most central events), uncertainties on data in other centrality bins are similar in magnitude. Systematic errors for Au+Au data are not shown, for details see [9].

(Color online) (b) Average $(p+\overline{p})/(\pi^{+}+\pi^{-})$ ratio for $3<p_{T}<4$ GeV/c is shown as function of centrality ($N_{part}$) for Cu+Cu and Au+Au data. Error band represents the $pp$ measurement with uncertainty.

The $V_2${2} and difference between the pairs at ($\eta_{\alpha}$, $\eta_{\beta}$) and ($\eta_{\alpha}$, -$\eta_{\beta}$). The data are from 20-30% central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

The $V_2${2} and difference between the pairs at ($\eta_{\alpha}$, $\eta_{\beta}$) and ($\eta_{\alpha}$, -$\eta_{\beta}$). The data are from 20-30% central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

The $V_3${2} and difference between the pairs at ($\eta_{\alpha}$, $\eta_{\beta}$) and ($\eta_{\alpha}$, -$\eta_{\beta}$). The data are from 20-30% central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

The $V_3${2} and difference between the pairs at ($\eta_{\alpha}$, $\eta_{\beta}$) and ($\eta_{\alpha}$, -$\eta_{\beta}$). The data are from 20-30% central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

The $V_3${2} and difference between the pairs at ($\eta_{\alpha}$, $\eta_{\beta}$) and ($\eta_{\alpha}$, -$\eta_{\beta}$). The data are from 20-30% central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

The $V_3${2} and difference between the pairs at ($\eta_{\alpha}$, $\eta_{\beta}$) and ($\eta_{\alpha}$, -$\eta_{\beta}$). The data are from 20-30% central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

The $V_2^{1/2}$ difference between quadruplets at ($\eta_{\alpha}$, $\eta_{\alpha}$, $\eta_{\beta}$, $\eta_{\beta}$) and ($\eta_{\alpha}$, $\eta_{\alpha}$, -$\eta_{\beta}$, -$\eta_{\beta}$).

The two-particle cumulants, V2{2} as a function of $\eta$.

The two-particle cumulants, V2{2} as a function of $\eta$ for one particle while averaged over $\eta$ of the partner particle.

The difference in two-particle cumulants, V2{2} as a function of $\eta$ for one particle while averaged over $\eta$ of the partner particle.

No description provided.

V3{2} as a function of $\eta$.

<$V_3^2$> as a function of $\eta$.

The $\Delta\eta$-dependent component of the two-particle cumulant with $\Delta\eta$-gap, $D^-$ in Eq. (11), of the second harmonic is shown as a function of ??-gap |$\Delta\eta$| > x.

The $\Delta\eta$-dependent component of the two-particle cumulant with $\Delta\eta$-gap, $D^-$ in Eq. (11), of the third harmonic is shown as a function of ??-gap |$\Delta\eta$| > x.

The nonflow, $\sqrt{\bar{D}_2}$, $\sqrt{\delta_2}$, $\sqrt{\bar{D}_3}$ and flow, $\sqrt{v_2^2/2}$, $\sqrt{<v_2^2>}$ results are shown as a function of centrality percentile for the second harmonic.

The nonflow, $\sqrt{\bar{D}_2}$, $\sqrt{\delta_2}$, $\sqrt{\bar{D}_3}$ and flow, $\sqrt{v_2^2/2}$, $\sqrt{<v_2^2>}$ results are shown as a function of centrality percentile for the second harmonic.

The nonflow, $\sqrt{\bar{D}_2}$, $\sqrt{\delta_2}$, $sqrt{\bar{D}_3}$ and flow, $\sqrt{v_2^2/2}$, $\sqrt{<v_2^2>}$ results are shown as a function of centrality percentile for the second harmonic.

The nonflow, $\sqrt{\bar{D}_2}$, $\sqrt{\delta_2}$, $sqrt{\bar{D}_3}$ and flow, $\sqrt{v_2^2/2}$, $\sqrt{<v_2^2>}$ results are shown as a function of centrality percentile for the third harmonic.

The nonflow, $\sqrt{\bar{D}_2}$, $sqrt{\delta_2}$, $\sqrt{\bar{D}_3}$ and flow, $\sqrt{v_2^2/2}$, $\sqrt{<v_2^2>}$ results are shown as a function of centrality percentile for the third harmonic.

The relative elliptic flow fluctuation $\sigma_2/<v_2>$ centrality dependence in $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV Au+Au collisions.

$\Delta N_p$ multiplicity distributions in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=27$ GeV for 0-5 percent, 30-40 percent and 70-80 percent collision centralities at midrapidity.

$\Delta N_p$ multiplicity distributions in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=39$ GeV for 0-5 percent, 30-40 percent and 70-80 percent collision centralities at midrapidity.

$\Delta N_p$ multiplicity distributions in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=62.4$ GeV for 0-5 percent, 30-40 percent and 70-80 percent collision centralities at midrapidity.

$\Delta N_p$ multiplicity distributions in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=200$ GeV for 0-5 percent, 30-40 percent and 70-80 percent collision centralities at midrapidity.

Centrality dependence of the cumulants of $\Delta N_p$ distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=7.7$ GeV.

Centrality dependence of the cumulants of $\Delta N_p$ distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=11.5$ GeV.

Centrality dependence of the cumulants of $\Delta N_p$ distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=19.6$ GeV.

Centrality dependence of the cumulants of $\Delta N_p$ distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=27$ GeV.

Centrality dependence of the cumulants of $\Delta N_p$ distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=39$ GeV.

Centrality dependence of the cumulants of $\Delta N_p$ distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=62.4$ GeV.

Centrality dependence of the cumulants of $\Delta N_p$ distributions for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=200$ GeV.

Centrality dependence of $S\sigma$/Skellam and $\kappa\sigma^2$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=7.7$ GeV.

Centrality dependence of $S\sigma$/Skellam and $\kappa\sigma^2$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=11.5$ GeV.

Centrality dependence of $S\sigma$/Skellam and $\kappa\sigma^2$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=19.6$ GeV.

Centrality dependence of $S\sigma$/Skellam and $\kappa\sigma^2$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=27$ GeV.

Centrality dependence of $S\sigma$/Skellam and $\kappa\sigma^2$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=39$ GeV.

Centrality dependence of $S\sigma$/Skellam and $\kappa\sigma^2$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=62.4$ GeV.

Centrality dependence of $S\sigma$/Skellam and $\kappa\sigma^2$ for $\Delta N_p$ in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=200$ GeV.

Cumulants of net-proton distribution at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=7.7$ GeV. (efficiency corrected).

Cumulants of net-proton distribution at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=11.5$ GeV. (efficiency corrected).

Cumulants of net-proton distribution at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=19.6$ GeV. (efficiency corrected).

Cumulants of net-proton distribution at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=27$ GeV. (efficiency corrected).

Cumulants of net-proton distribution at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=39$ GeV. (efficiency corrected).

Cumulants of net-proton distribution at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=62.4$ GeV. (efficiency corrected).

Cumulants of net-proton distribution at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=200$ GeV. (efficiency corrected).

Cumulants of proton distribution at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=7.7$ GeV. (efficiency corrected).

Cumulants of proton distribution at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=11.5$ GeV. (efficiency corrected).

Cumulants of proton distribution at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=19.6$ GeV. (efficiency corrected).

Cumulants of proton distribution at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=27$ GeV. (efficiency corrected).

Cumulants of proton distribution at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=39$ GeV. (efficiency corrected).

Cumulants of proton distribution at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=62.4$ GeV. (efficiency corrected).

Cumulants of proton distribution at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=200$ GeV. (efficiency corrected).

Cumulants of anti-proton distribution at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=7.7$ GeV. (efficiency corrected).

Cumulants of anti-proton distribution at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=11.5$ GeV. (efficiency corrected).

Cumulants of anti-proton distribution at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=19.6$ GeV. (efficiency corrected).

Cumulants of anti-proton distribution at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=27$ GeV. (efficiency corrected).

Cumulants of anti-proton distribution at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=39$ GeV. (efficiency corrected).

Cumulants of anti-proton distribution at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=62.4$ GeV. (efficiency corrected).

Cumulants of anti-proton distribution at $\sqrt{S_{NN}}=200$ GeV. (efficiency corrected).

(Color online) Modulated sign correlations (msc) compared to the three-point correlator versus centrality for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$= 200 GeV. Shown with triangles is the msc, Eq. 5. The systematic uncertainties will be shown in detail in Fig. 7. Diamonds and circles show the three-point correlator, Eq. 1, and the grey bars reflect the conditions of $\Delta p_{T}$ > 0.15 GeV/c and $\Delta\eta$ > 0.15 applied to the three-point correlator, to be discussed in the text. For comparison, the model calculation of THERMINATOR [21] is also shown.

(Color online) The msc split into 2 composite parts versus centrality for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$= 200 GeV. Shaded areas represent the systematic uncertainty due to the event plane determination. For comparison with the $\Delta$msc term, we also put $−\nu_{2}/N$ and the model calculation of MEVSIM [24], to be described in the text.

(Color online) The msc split into 2 composite parts versus centrality for Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$= 200 GeV. Shaded areas represent the systematic uncertainty due to the event plane determination. For comparison with the $\Delta$msc term, we also put $−\nu_{2}/N$ and the model calculation of MEVSIM [24], to be described in the text.

(Color online) Three-point correlations split up into out-of-plane $(\langle sin(\Delta\phi_{\alpha}) sin(\Delta\phi_{\beta})\rangle)$ and in-plane $(\langle cos(\Delta\phi_{\alpha}) cos(\Delta\phi_{\beta})\rangle)$ composite parts for 40 − 60% Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ GeV. (a)shows the correlations versus $\langle\eta\rangle$ = $(\eta_{\alpha}+\eta_{\beta})/2$. (b) shows the correlations versus $|\Delta\eta|$ = $|\eta_{\alpha}-\eta_{\beta}|$. Statistical errors are smaller than the symbol size. Systematic errors are given by the shaded bands and apply only to the difference of in-plane and out-of-plane parts.

(Color online) Three-point correlations split up into out-of-plane $(\langle sin(\Delta\phi_{\alpha}) sin(\Delta\phi_{\beta})\rangle)$ and in-plane $(\langle cos(\Delta\phi_{\alpha}) cos(\Delta\phi_{\beta})\rangle)$ composite parts for 40 − 60% Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ GeV. (a)shows the correlations versus $\langle\eta\rangle$ = $(\eta_{\alpha}+\eta_{\beta})/2$. (b) shows the correlations versus $|\Delta\eta|$ = $|\eta_{\alpha}-\eta_{\beta}|$. Statistical errors are smaller than the symbol size. Systematic errors are given by the shaded bands and apply only to the difference of in-plane and out-of-plane parts.

(Color online) Three-point correlations split up into out-of-plane and in-plane composite parts for 40 − 60% Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$= 200 GeV. (a) shows the correlatios versus $\langle p_{T}\rangle$ = $(p_{T,\alpha}+p_{T,\beta})/2$. (b) shows the correlations versus $|\Delta p_{T}|$ = $|p_{T,\alpha}-p_{T,\beta}|$. Statistical errors are smaller than the symbol size. Systematic errors are given by the shaded bands and apply only to the difference of in-plane and out-of-plane parts.

(Color online) Three-point correlations split up into out-of-plane and in-plane composite parts for 40 − 60% Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$= 200 GeV. (a) shows the correlatios versus $\langle p_{T}\rangle$ = $(p_{T,\alpha}+p_{T,\beta})/2$. (b) shows the correlations versus $|\Delta p_{T}|$ = $|p_{T,\alpha}-p_{T,\beta}|$. Statistical errors are smaller than the symbol size. Systematic errors are given by the shaded bands and apply only to the difference of in-plane and out-of-plane parts.

Comparison of dynamical $\langle p_{t}\rangle$ fluctuations in Au+Au and Cu+Cu collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 62.4 and 200 GeV as a function of the number of participanting nucleons.

(a) $p_{t}$ correlations, (b) $p_{t}$ correlations multiplied by $\langle N_{part}\rangle/2$, (c) square root of $p_{t}$ correlations scaled by $\langle\langle p_{t}\rangle\rangle$, and (d) square root of $p_{t}$ correlations multiplied by $\langle N_{part}\rangle/2$ and scaled by $\langle\langle p_{t}\rangle\rangle$, plotted vs. $\langle N_{part}\rangle$

(a) $p_{t}$ correlations, (b) $p_{t}$ correlations multiplied by $\langle N_{part}\rangle/2$, (c) square root of $p_{t}$ correlations scaled by $\langle\langle p_{t}\rangle\rangle$, and (d) square root of $p_{t}$ correlations multiplied by $\langle N_{part}\rangle/2$ and scaled by $\langle\langle p_{t}\rangle\rangle$, plotted vs. $\langle N_{part}\rangle$

(a) $p_{t}$ correlations, (b) $p_{t}$ correlations multiplied by $\langle N_{part}\rangle/2$, (c) square root of $p_{t}$ correlations scaled by $\langle\langle p_{t}\rangle\rangle$, and (d) square root of $p_{t}$ correlations multiplied by $\langle N_{part}\rangle/2$ and scaled by $\langle\langle p_{t}\rangle\rangle$, plotted vs. $\langle N_{part}\rangle$

Comparison of scaled $p_{t}$ correlations between data and models for Au+Au [panels (a) and (c)] and Cu+Cu [panels (b) and (d)] collisions at 200 GeV.

Comparison of scaled $p_{t}$ correlations between data and models for Au+Au [panels (a) and (c)] and Cu+Cu [panels (b) and (d)] collisions at 200 GeV.

$p_{t}$ correlations for varying rapidity acceptance ($|\eta|$ <0.25, 0.5, and 1.0) for Cu+Cu collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV [panel (a)] and 62.4 GeV [panel (b)].

$p_{t}$ correlations for varying azimuthal acceptance for Cu+Cu collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV [panels (a) and (c)] and 62.4 GeV [panels (b) and (d)].

$p_{t}$ correlations for varying azimuthal acceptance for Cu+Cu collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV [panels (a) and (c)] and 62.4 GeV [panels (b) and (d)].

$p_{t}$ correlations plotted as a function of $\langle N_{part}\rangle$ for different $p_{t}$ ranges in Cu+Cu collisions at (a) 200 GeV and (b) 62.4 GeV.

$p_{t}$ correlations plotted as a function of $\langle N_{part}\rangle$ for different $p_{t}$ ranges in Cu+Cu collisions at (a) 200 GeV and (b) 62.4 GeV.

Correlations for varying $p_{t}$ ranges for different model calculations in Cu+Cu 200 GeV. (a) AMPT (SM), (b) URQMD, and (c) Hijing (no JQ).

Uncorrected inclusive charged particle $p_{t}$ spectrum for 0%–10% collision centrality for Cu+Cu 200 GeV (open circles).

Correlations scaled by $(d\langle p_{t}\rangle/dT)^{2}T^{2}$ vs. $\langle N_{part}\rangle$ for different $p_{t}$ ranges in Cu+Cu 200 GeV.

$v_2(p_T)$ of $\Xi^{-} + \Xi^{+}$ and $\Omega^{-} + \Omega^{+}$ from 200 GeV Au+Au minimum bias collisions.

Number of quark ($n_q$) scaled $v_2$ as a function of scaled $p_T$ for $\Xi^{-} + \Xi^{+}$ and $\Omega^{-} + \Omega^{+}$ from 200 GeV Au+Au minimum bias collisions.

The correlation differences $\Delta\langle A^{2}\rangle=\delta\langle A^{2}_{UD}\rangle-\delta\langle A^{2}_{ LR}\rangle$ and $\Delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle=\delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle_{ UD}-\delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle_{ LR}$ as a function of $p_{T}$. The data are from 20-40% central (upper) and 0-20% central (lower) Au+Au collisions.

The charge asymmetry correlations $\delta\langle A^{2}\rangle$ (left panels) and $\delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle$ (center panels), and correlation differences $\Delta\langle A^{2}\rangle=\delta\langle A^{2}_{ UD}\rangle-\delta\langle A^{2}_{ LR}\rangle$ and $\Delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle=\delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle_{ UD}-\delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle_{ LR}$ (right panels), as a function of the azimuthal elliptic anisotropy of high-$p_{T}$ ($p_{T}>2$~GeV/$c$) particles (upper panels) and low-$p_{T}$ ($p_{T}<2$~GeV/$c$) particles (lower panels). Data are from 20-40% Au+Au collisions. The particle $p_{T}$ range of $0.15<p_{T}<2$~GeV/$c$ is used for both EP construction and asymmetry calculation.

The charge asymmetry correlations $\delta\langle A^{2}\rangle$ (left panels) and $\delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle$ (center panels), and correlation differences $\Delta\langle A^{2}\rangle=\delta\langle A^{2}_{ UD}\rangle-\delta\langle A^{2}_{ LR}\rangle$ and $\Delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle=\delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle_{ UD}-\delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle_{ LR}$ (right panels), as a function of the azimuthal elliptic anisotropy of high-$p_{T}$ ($p_{T}>2$~GeV/$c$) particles (upper panels) and low-$p_{T}$ ($p_{T}<2$~GeV/$c$) particles (lower panels). Data are from 20-40% Au+Au collisions. The particle $p_{T}$ range of $0.15<p_{T}<2$~GeV/$c$ is used for both EP construction and asymmetry calculation.

The wedge size dependences of charge multiplicity asymmetry correlations (upper panel), and their differences between out-of-plane and in-plane, $\Delta\langle A^{2}\rangle$ and $\Delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle$ (lower panel) for 20-40% central Au+Au collisions.

The wedge size dependences of charge multiplicity asymmetry correlations (upper panel), and their differences between out-of-plane and in-plane, $\Delta\langle A^{2}\rangle$ and $\Delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle$ (lower panel) for 20-40% central Au+Au collisions.

Charge multiplicity asymmetry correlations as a function of the wedge location, $\phi_{ w}$, in 20-40% central Au+Au collisions. The wedge size is $30^{\circ}$. The curves are the characteristic $\cos(2\phi_{ w}$) to guide the eye.

The wedge size dependence of the difference between the same-sign and opposite-sign, $\Delta\langle A^{2}\rangle-\Delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle$.

The values of $\Delta\langle A^{2}\rangle-\Delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle$, scaled by $N_{part}$, as a function of the measured average elliptic anisotropy $<v^{obs}_{2}}>$ in Au+Au collisions. The centrality bin number is labeled by each data point, 0 for 70-80% up to 8 for 0-5%.

$\Delta=\Delta\langle A^{2}\rangle-\Delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle$ as a function of $v^{obs}_{2}$, the event-by-event elliptical anisotropy of particle distributions relative to the second-harmonic event plane reconstructed from TPC tracks (left panel) and the first harmonic event plane reconstructed from the ZDC-SMD neutron signals (middle panel), in 20-40% central Au+Au collisions. Right panel: Average $\Delta$ for events with $|v^{obs}_{2}|<0.04$ relative to the TPC event plane as a function of centrality.

$\Delta=\Delta\langle A^{2}\rangle-\Delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle$ as a function of $v^{obs}_{2}$, the event-by-event elliptical anisotropy of particle distributions relative to the second-harmonic event plane reconstructed from TPC tracks (left panel) and the first harmonic event plane reconstructed from the ZDC-SMD neutron signals (middle panel), in 20-40% central Au+Au collisions. Right panel: Average $\Delta$ for events with $|v^{obs}_{2}|<0.04$ relative to the TPC event plane as a function of centrality.

$\Delta=\Delta\langle A^{2}\rangle-\Delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle$ as a function of $v^{obs}_{2}$, the event-by-event elliptical anisotropy of particle distributions relative to the second-harmonic event plane reconstructed from TPC tracks (left panel) and the first harmonic event plane reconstructed from the ZDC-SMD neutron signals (middle panel), in 20-40% central Au+Au collisions. Right panel: Average $\Delta$ for events with $|v^{obs}_{2}|<0.04$ relative to the TPC event plane as a function of centrality.

Left panel: $\Delta\langle A^{2}\rangle$ and $\Delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle$ as a function of $v^{obs}_{2}$ with a random EP in 20-40% Au+Au collisions. The lines depict the results with reconstructed EP lower right panel for comparison. Middle panel: The differences in $\Delta\langle A^{2}\rangle$ and $\Delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle$ between the reconstructed EP and random EP results, respectively. Right panel: $\Delta=\Delta\langle A^{2}\rangle-\Delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle$ as a function of $v^{obs}_{2}$ with a random EP (open triangles).

Left panel: $\Delta\langle A^{2}\rangle$ and $\Delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle$ as a function of $v^{obs}_{2}$ with a random EP in 20-40% Au+Au collisions. The lines depict the results with reconstructed EP lower right panel for comparison. Middle panel: The differences in $\Delta\langle A^{2}\rangle$ and $\Delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle$ between the reconstructed EP and random EP results, respectively. Right panel: $\Delta=\Delta\langle A^{2}\rangle-\Delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle$ as a function of $v^{obs}_{2}$ with a random EP (open triangles).

Left panel: $\Delta\langle A^{2}\rangle$ and $\Delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle$ as a function of $v^{obs}_{2}$ with a random EP in 20-40% Au+Au collisions. The lines depict the results with reconstructed EP lower right panel for comparison. Middle panel: The differences in $\Delta\langle A^{2}\rangle$ and $\Delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle$ between the reconstructed EP and random EP results, respectively. Right panel: $\Delta=\Delta\langle A^{2}\rangle-\Delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle$ as a function of $v^{obs}_{2}$ with a random EP (open triangles).

The correlation differences, $\langle A^{2}_{ LR}\rangle-\langle A^{2}_{ UD}\rangle$ and $\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle_{ LR}-\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle_{ UD}$, scaled by the number of participants $(\pi/4)^2 N_{part}$. Also shown are $\langle \cos(\phi_{\alpha}+\phi_{\beta}-2\phi_{c})\rangle/v_{2,c} \approx \langle \cos(\phi_{\alpha}+\phi_{\beta}-2\psi_{ RP}) \rangle$ of same- and opposite-sign particle pairs ($\alpha$ and $\beta$) calculated from particles used for the charge asymmetry correlations with particle $c$ from those used for EP construction. The upper panel shows the default results where particles are divided according to $\eta$; the lower panel shows results with particles divided randomly into two halves and compared to published correlators.

The correlation differences, $\langle A^{2}_{ LR}\rangle-\langle A^{2}_{ UD}\rangle$ and $\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle_{ LR}-\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle_{ UD}$, scaled by the number of participants $(\pi/4)^2 N_{part}$. Also shown are $\langle \cos(\phi_{\alpha}+\phi_{\beta}-2\phi_{c})\rangle/v_{2,c} \approx \langle \cos(\phi_{\alpha}+\phi_{\beta}-2\psi_{ RP}) \rangle$ of same- and opposite-sign particle pairs ($\alpha$ and $\beta$) calculated from particles used for the charge asymmetry correlations with particle $c$ from those used for EP construction. The upper panel shows the default results where particles are divided according to $\eta$; the lower panel shows results with particles divided randomly into two halves and compared to published correlators.

Upper panel: Positively charged particle multiplicity distributions versus the azimuthal angle, $\phi$, in 30-40% central Au+Au collisions. The data are shown separately for $\eta>0$ and $\eta<0$. The magnetic polarities of the STAR magnet have been summed and the $p_{T}$ is integrated over the range $0.15<p_{T}<2$~GeV/$c$. The inverse of these distributions, properly normalized, were used to correct for the track efficiency versus $\phi$. Lower panel: Reconstructed event-plane azimuthal angle distributions in 30-40% central Au+Au collisions. Particles within $0.15 < p_{T} < 2$~GeV/$c$ from $\eta<0$ and $\eta>0$ were used separately to reconstruct the EP.

Upper panel: Positively charged particle multiplicity distributions versus the azimuthal angle, $\phi$, in 30-40% central Au+Au collisions. The data are shown separately for $\eta>0$ and $\eta<0$. The magnetic polarities of the STAR magnet have been summed and the $p_{T}$ is integrated over the range $0.15<p_{T}<2$~GeV/$c$. The inverse of these distributions, properly normalized, were used to correct for the track efficiency versus $\phi$. Lower panel: Reconstructed event-plane azimuthal angle distributions in 30-40% central Au+Au collisions. Particles within $0.15 < p_{T} < 2$~GeV/$c$ from $\eta<0$ and $\eta>0$ were used separately to reconstruct the EP.

The relative charge asymmetry correlations, $\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle_{ UD}/\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle_{ LR}$, as a function of the number of participants, $N_{part}$, for four combinations of $\eta$ ranges used for EP reconstruction and asymmetry calculation.

The asymmetry correlations, $\langle A^{2}_{+,{ UD}}\rangle$ (left panel), $\langle A^{2}_{-,{ UD}}\rangle$ (middle panel), and $\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle_{ UD}$ (right panel), multiplied by the number of participants $N_{part}$, before and after the corrections for the $\phi$-dependent acceptance $\times$ efficiency. The colored curves are the corresponding statistical fluctuations and detector effects. The results are separated for $\eta>0$ and $\eta<0$. Only $\eta>0$ is shown for $\langle A^{2}_{+,{ UD}}\rangle$ and $\eta<0$ for $\langle A^{2}_{-,{ UD}}\rangle$ for clarity.

The asymmetry correlations, $\langle A^{2}_{+,{ UD}}\rangle$ (left panel), $\langle A^{2}_{-,{ UD}}\rangle$ (middle panel), and $\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle_{ UD}$ (right panel), multiplied by the number of participants $N_{part}$, before and after the corrections for the $\phi$-dependent acceptance $\times$ efficiency. The colored curves are the corresponding statistical fluctuations and detector effects. The results are separated for $\eta>0$ and $\eta<0$. Only $\eta>0$ is shown for $\langle A^{2}_{+,{ UD}}\rangle$ and $\eta<0$ for $\langle A^{2}_{-,{ UD}}\rangle$ for clarity.

The asymmetry correlations, $\langle A^{2}_{+,{ UD}}\rangle$ (left panel), $\langle A^{2}_{-,{ UD}}\rangle$ (middle panel), and $\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle_{ UD}$ (right panel), multiplied by the number of participants $N_{part}$, before and after the corrections for the $\phi$-dependent acceptance $\times$ efficiency. The colored curves are the corresponding statistical fluctuations and detector effects. The results are separated for $\eta>0$ and $\eta<0$. Only $\eta>0$ is shown for $\langle A^{2}_{+,{ UD}}\rangle$ and $\eta<0$ for $\langle A^{2}_{-,{ UD}}\rangle$ for clarity.

Left panel: Statistical fluctuation and detector effects in the charge asymmetry variance (multiplied by the number of participants $N_{part}$) from the $\eta<0$ region. The dotted curve shows the $1/N$ approximation, the dashed curve shows the statistical fluctuations $\langle A^{2}_{-,{ LR,stat}}\rangle$ obtained by the (50-50) method (see the text). The solid curve connecting the solid points shows the net effect of the statistical fluctuations and detector non-uniformities, $\langle A^{2}_{-,{ LR,stat+det}}\rangle$, obtained by the adding-$\pi$ method, and the crosses shows the same but obtained from the ``scramble'' method. See the text for details. Middle panel: The statistical fluctuation effects relative to the $1/N$ approximation (thin curves) and the effects due to the imperfect detector (thick curves). The dashed curves are for the region $\eta>0$ and the solid curves are for $\eta<0$. Right panel: The ratios of the statistical fluctuation and detector effects $\langle A^{2}_{+,{ LR,stat+det}}\rangle/\langle A^{2}_{-,{ LR,stat+det}}\rangle$ and $\langle A^{2}_{+,{ UD,stat+det}}\rangle/\langle A^{2}_{+,{ LR,stat+det}}\rangle$, separately for the $\eta>0$ and $\eta<0$ regions. The $\phi$-acceptance correction was applied for the results in this figure.

Left panel: Statistical fluctuation and detector effects in the charge asymmetry variance (multiplied by the number of participants $N_{part}$) from the $\eta<0$ region. The dotted curve shows the $1/N$ approximation, the dashed curve shows the statistical fluctuations $\langle A^{2}_{-,{ LR,stat}}\rangle$ obtained by the (50-50) method (see the text). The solid curve connecting the solid points shows the net effect of the statistical fluctuations and detector non-uniformities, $\langle A^{2}_{-,{ LR,stat+det}}\rangle$, obtained by the adding-$\pi$ method, and the crosses shows the same but obtained from the ``scramble'' method. See the text for details. Middle panel: The statistical fluctuation effects relative to the $1/N$ approximation (thin curves) and the effects due to the imperfect detector (thick curves). The dashed curves are for the region $\eta>0$ and the solid curves are for $\eta<0$. Right panel: The ratios of the statistical fluctuation and detector effects $\langle A^{2}_{+,{ LR,stat+det}}\rangle/\langle A^{2}_{-,{ LR,stat+det}}\rangle$ and $\langle A^{2}_{+,{ UD,stat+det}}\rangle/\langle A^{2}_{+,{ LR,stat+det}}\rangle$, separately for the $\eta>0$ and $\eta<0$ regions. The $\phi$-acceptance correction was applied for the results in this figure.

Left panel: Statistical fluctuation and detector effects in the charge asymmetry variance (multiplied by the number of participants $N_{part}$) from the $\eta<0$ region. The dotted curve shows the $1/N$ approximation, the dashed curve shows the statistical fluctuations $\langle A^{2}_{-,{ LR,stat}}\rangle$ obtained by the (50-50) method (see the text). The solid curve connecting the solid points shows the net effect of the statistical fluctuations and detector non-uniformities, $\langle A^{2}_{-,{ LR,stat+det}}\rangle$, obtained by the adding-$\pi$ method, and the crosses shows the same but obtained from the ``scramble'' method. See the text for details. Middle panel: The statistical fluctuation effects relative to the $1/N$ approximation (thin curves) and the effects due to the imperfect detector (thick curves). The dashed curves are for the region $\eta>0$ and the solid curves are for $\eta<0$. Right panel: The ratios of the statistical fluctuation and detector effects $\langle A^{2}_{+,{ LR,stat+det}}\rangle/\langle A^{2}_{-,{ LR,stat+det}}\rangle$ and $\langle A^{2}_{+,{ UD,stat+det}}\rangle/\langle A^{2}_{+,{ LR,stat+det}}\rangle$, separately for the $\eta>0$ and $\eta<0$ regions. The $\phi$-acceptance correction was applied for the results in this figure.

The asymmetry correlations, $\langle A^{2}_{+,{ UD}}\rangle$ (left panel), $\langle A^{2}_{-,{ UD}}\rangle$ (middle panel), and $\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle_{ UD}$ (right panel), multiplied by the number of participants $N_{part}$, separately for $\eta>0$ and $\eta<0$. The star and triangle depict the results from $d$+Au collisions. The net effects of the statistical fluctuations and detector non-uniformities are shown as the curves.

The asymmetry correlations, $\langle A^{2}_{+,{ UD}}\rangle$ (left panel), $\langle A^{2}_{-,{ UD}}\rangle$ (middle panel), and $\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle_{ UD}$ (right panel), multiplied by the number of participants $N_{part}$, separately for $\eta>0$ and $\eta<0$. The star and triangle depict the results from $d$+Au collisions. The net effects of the statistical fluctuations and detector non-uniformities are shown as the curves.

The asymmetry correlations, $\langle A^{2}_{+,{ UD}}\rangle$ (left panel), $\langle A^{2}_{-,{ UD}}\rangle$ (middle panel), and $\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle_{ UD}$ (right panel), multiplied by the number of participants $N_{part}$, separately for $\eta>0$ and $\eta<0$. The star and triangle depict the results from $d$+Au collisions. The net effects of the statistical fluctuations and detector non-uniformities are shown as the curves.

The statistical and detector effect subtracted asymmetry correlations, $\delta\langle A^{2}_{+,0^{\circ}\pm\Delta\phi_{w}}\rangle$ (left panel), $\delta\langle A^{2}_{-,0^{\circ}\pm\Delta\phi_{w}}\rangle$ (middle panel), and $\delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle_{ LR}$ (right panel), multiplied by the number of participants $N_{part}$, before and after the corrections for the $\phi$-dependent acceptance $\times$ efficiency.

The statistical and detector effect subtracted asymmetry correlations, $\delta\langle A^{2}_{+,0^{\circ}\pm\Delta\phi_{w}}\rangle$ (left panel), $\delta\langle A^{2}_{-,0^{\circ}\pm\Delta\phi_{w}}\rangle$ (middle panel), and $\delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle_{ LR}$ (right panel), multiplied by the number of participants $N_{part}$, before and after the corrections for the $\phi$-dependent acceptance $\times$ efficiency.

The statistical and detector effect subtracted asymmetry correlations, $\delta\langle A^{2}_{+,0^{\circ}\pm\Delta\phi_{w}}\rangle$ (left panel), $\delta\langle A^{2}_{-,0^{\circ}\pm\Delta\phi_{w}}\rangle$ (middle panel), and $\delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle_{ LR}$ (right panel), multiplied by the number of participants $N_{part}$, before and after the corrections for the $\phi$-dependent acceptance $\times$ efficiency.

Dynamical charge asymmetry variance after removing the statistical and detector effects, $\delta\langle A^{2}_{\pm,{ LR}}\rangle=\langle A^{2}_{\pm,{ LR}}\rangle-\langle A^{2}_{\pm,{ LR,stat+det}}\rangle$, scaled by the number of participants $N_{part}$. The results are consistent between positive and negative $\eta$ regions and between positive and negative charges.

The second-harmonic event-plane resolution of sub-events ($\eta<0$ and $\eta>0$) as a function of the number of participants.

Charge multiplicity asymmetry correlations, $\delta\langle A^{2}\rangle$ (left panel) and $\delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle$ (middle panel), and their differences between UD\ and LR\ (right panel) as a function of the event-plane resolution $\epsilon_{ EP}(f)=\sqrt{\mean{\cos2(\psi_{{ EP},\eta>0}(f)-\psi_{{ EP},\eta<0}(f))}}$ in 20-30% central Au+Au collisions. The solid lines are free linear fits to the data, while the dashed lines are linear fits with the intercept fixed to zero at $\epsilon_{ EP}(f)=0$.

Charge multiplicity asymmetry correlations, $\delta\langle A^{2}\rangle$ (left panel) and $\delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle$ (middle panel), and their differences between UD\ and LR\ (right panel) as a function of the event-plane resolution $\epsilon_{ EP}(f)=\sqrt{\mean{\cos2(\psi_{{ EP},\eta>0}(f)-\psi_{{ EP},\eta<0}(f))}}$ in 20-30% central Au+Au collisions. The solid lines are free linear fits to the data, while the dashed lines are linear fits with the intercept fixed to zero at $\epsilon_{ EP}(f)=0$.

TCharge multiplicity asymmetry correlations, $\delta\langle A^{2}\rangle$ (left panel) and $\delta\langle A_{+}A_{-}\rangle$ (middle panel), and their differences between UD\ and LR\ (right panel) as a function of the event-plane resolution $\epsilon_{ EP}(f)=\sqrt{\mean{\cos2(\psi_{{ EP},\eta>0}(f)-\psi_{{ EP},\eta<0}(f))}}$ in 20-30% central Au+Au collisions. The solid lines are free linear fits to the data, while the dashed lines are linear fits with the intercept fixed to zero at $\epsilon_{ EP}(f)=0$.

The TPC second-harmonic (upper left) and ZDC-SMD first harmonic (upper right) event-plane resolution as a function of $v^{obs}_{2}$ in 20-40% central Au+Au collisions. The TPC second-harmonic (lower left) and ZDC-SMD first harmonic (lower right) event-plane resolution for events with $|v^{obs}_{2}|<0.04$ as a function of centrality.

The TPC second-harmonic (upper left) and ZDC-SMD first harmonic (upper right) event-plane resolution as a function of $v^{obs}_{2}$ in 20-40% central Au+Au collisions. The TPC second-harmonic (lower left) and ZDC-SMD first harmonic (lower right) event-plane resolution for events with $|v^{obs}_{2}|<0.04$ as a function of centrality.

The TPC second-harmonic (upper left) and ZDC-SMD first harmonic (upper right) event-plane resolution as a function of $v^{obs}_{2}$ in 20-40% central Au+Au collisions. The TPC second-harmonic (lower left) and ZDC-SMD first harmonic (lower right) event-plane resolution for events with $|v^{obs}_{2}|<0.04$ as a function of centrality.

The TPC second-harmonic (upper left) and ZDC-SMD first harmonic (upper right) event-plane resolution as a function of $v^{obs}_{2}$ in 20-40% central Au+Au collisions. The TPC second-harmonic (lower left) and ZDC-SMD first harmonic (lower right) event-plane resolution for events with $|v^{obs}_{2}|<0.04$ as a function of centrality.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected mean (M) of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 27 GeV. The dotted lines represent calculations from the central limit theorem. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected mean (M) of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 39 GeV. The dotted lines represent calculations from the central limit theorem. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected mean (M) of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 62.4 GeV. The dotted lines represent calculations from the central limit theorem. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected mean (M) of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV. The dotted lines represent calculations from the central limit theorem. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected standard deviation ($\sigma$) of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 7.7 GeV. The dotted lines represent calculations from the central limit theorem. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected standard deviation ($\sigma$) of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 11.5 GeV. The dotted lines represent calculations from the central limit theorem. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected standard deviation ($\sigma$) of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 19.6 GeV. The dotted lines represent calculations from the central limit theorem. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected standard deviation ($\sigma$) of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 27 GeV. The dotted lines represent calculations from the central limit theorem. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected standard deviation ($\sigma$) of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 39 GeV. The dotted lines represent calculations from the central limit theorem. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected standard deviation ($\sigma$) of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 62.4 GeV. The dotted lines represent calculations from the central limit theorem. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected standard deviation ($\sigma$) of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV. The dotted lines represent calculations from the central limit theorem. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected skewness ($S$) of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 7.7 GeV. The dotted lines represent calculations from the central limit theorem. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected skewness ($S$) of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 11.5 GeV. The dotted lines represent calculations from the central limit theorem. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected skewness ($S$) of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 19.6 GeV. The dotted lines represent calculations from the central limit theorem. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected skewness ($S$) of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 27 GeV. The dotted lines represent calculations from the central limit theorem. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected skewness ($S$) of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 39 GeV. The dotted lines represent calculations from the central limit theorem. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected skewness ($S$) of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 62.4 GeV. The dotted lines represent calculations from the central limit theorem. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected skewness ($S$) of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV. The dotted lines represent calculations from the central limit theorem. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected kurtosis ($\kappa$) of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 7.7 GeV. The dotted lines represent calculations from the central limit theorem. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected kurtosis ($\kappa$) of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 11.5 GeV. The dotted lines represent calculations from the central limit theorem. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected kurtosis ($\kappa$) of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 19.6 GeV. The dotted lines represent calculations from the central limit theorem. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected kurtosis ($\kappa$) of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 27 GeV. The dotted lines represent calculations from the central limit theorem. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected kurtosis ($\kappa$) of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 39 GeV. The dotted lines represent calculations from the central limit theorem. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected kurtosis ($\kappa$) of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 62.4 GeV. The dotted lines represent calculations from the central limit theorem. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected kurtosis ($\kappa$) of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV. The dotted lines represent calculations from the central limit theorem. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected $S\sigma$ of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 7.7 GeV. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected $S\sigma$ of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 11.5 GeV. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected $S\sigma$ of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 19.6 GeV. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected $S\sigma$ of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 27 GeV. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected $S\sigma$ of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 39 GeV. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected $S\sigma$ of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 62.4 GeV. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected $S\sigma$ of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected $\kappa\sigma^2$ of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 7.7 GeV. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected $\kappa\sigma^2$ of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 11.5 GeV. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected $\kappa\sigma^2$ of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 19.6 GeV. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected $\kappa\sigma^2$ of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 27 GeV. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected $\kappa\sigma^2$ of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 39 GeV. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected $\kappa\sigma^2$ of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 62.4 GeV. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected $\kappa\sigma^2$ of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of number of participating nucleons $N_{part}$ for Au+Au collisions at 200 GeV. The error bars are statisticaland systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected $\sigma^2/M$ of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of collision energy for Au+Au collisions. The error bars are statistical and the caps represent systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected $S\sigma^2$ of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of collision energy for Au+Au collisions. The error bars are statistical and the caps represent systematic errors.

The efficiency and centrality bin width corrected $\kappa\sigma^2$ of the net-charge multiplicity distributions as a function of collision energy for Au+Au collisions. The error bars are statistical and the caps represent systematic errors.

Fig. 2. (Color online.) Event-by-event photon multiplicity distributions (solid circles) for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=62.4$ and $200 \mathrm{GeV} .$ The distributions for top $0-5 \%$ central $\mathrm{Au}+$ Au collisions and top $0-10 \%$ central $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ collisions are also shown (open circles). The photon multiplicity distributions for central collisions are observed to be Gaussian (solid line). Only statistical errors are shown. NOTE: For points with invisible error bars, the point size was considered as an absolute upper limit for the uncertainty.

Fig. 2. (Color online.) Event-by-event photon multiplicity distributions (solid circles) for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=62.4$ and $200 \mathrm{GeV} .$ The distributions for top $0-5 \%$ central $\mathrm{Au}+$ Au collisions and top $0-10 \%$ central $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ collisions are also shown (open circles). The photon multiplicity distributions for central collisions are observed to be Gaussian (solid line). Only statistical errors are shown. NOTE: For points with invisible error bars, the point size was considered as an absolute upper limit for the uncertainty.

Fig. 2. (Color online.) Event-by-event photon multiplicity distributions (solid circles) for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=62.4$ and $200 \mathrm{GeV} .$ The distributions for top $0-5 \%$ central $\mathrm{Au}+$ Au collisions and top $0-10 \%$ central $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ collisions are also shown (open circles). The photon multiplicity distributions for central collisions are observed to be Gaussian (solid line). Only statistical errors are shown. NOTE: For points with invisible error bars, the point size was considered as an absolute upper limit for the uncertainty.

Fig. 3. (Color online.) Photon pseudorapidity distributions for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ at $\sqrt{\mathrm{s}_{\mathrm{NN}}}=62.4$ and $200\mathrm{GeV}$. The results for several centrality classes are shown. The solid curves are results of HIJING simulations for central $(0-5 \%$ for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $0-10 \%$ for $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu})$ and $30-40 \%$ mid-central collisions. The errors shown are systematic, statistical errors are negligible in comparison. NOTE: For points with invisible error bars, the point size was considered as an absolute upper limit for the uncertainty.

Fig. 3. (Color online.) Photon pseudorapidity distributions for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ at $\sqrt{\mathrm{s}_{\mathrm{NN}}}=62.4$ and $200\mathrm{GeV}$. The results for several centrality classes are shown. The solid curves are results of HIJING simulations for central $(0-5 \%$ for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $0-10 \%$ for $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu})$ and $30-40 \%$ mid-central collisions. The errors shown are systematic, statistical errors are negligible in comparison. NOTE: For points with invisible error bars, the point size was considered as an absolute upper limit for the uncertainty.

Fig. 3. (Color online.) Photon pseudorapidity distributions for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ at $\sqrt{\mathrm{s}_{\mathrm{NN}}}=62.4$ and $200\mathrm{GeV}$. The results for several centrality classes are shown. The solid curves are results of HIJING simulations for central $(0-5 \%$ for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $0-10 \%$ for $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu})$ and $30-40 \%$ mid-central collisions. The errors shown are systematic, statistical errors are negligible in comparison. NOTE: For points with invisible error bars, the point size was considered as an absolute upper limit for the uncertainty.

Fig. 3. (Color online.) Photon pseudorapidity distributions for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ at $\sqrt{\mathrm{s}_{\mathrm{NN}}}=62.4$ and $200\mathrm{GeV}$. The results for several classes are shown. The solid curves are results of HIJING simulations for central $(0-5 \%$ for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $0-10 \%$ for $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu})$ and $30-40 \%$ mid-central collisions. The errors shown are systematic, statistical errors are negligible in comparison. NOTE: For points with invisible error bars, the point size was considered as an absolute upper limit for the uncertainty.

Fig. 4. (Color online.) Top panel: The number of photons divided by $\left\langle N_{\text{part}}\right\rangle / 2$ as a function of average number of participating nucleons for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ at $\sqrt{\mathrm{s} _{\mathrm{NN}}}=62.4$ and $200 \mathrm{GeV}$ for $-3.7<\eta<-2.3 .$ Errors shown are systematic only and include those for $\left\langle N_{\text {part }}\right\rangle .$ Results from HIJING are shown as lines (solid for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and dashed for $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ ). Bottom panel: Same as above, for both photons and charged particles from PHOBOS [10]. NOTE: For points with invisible error bars, the point size was considered as an absolute upper limit for the uncertainty.

Fig. 4. (Color online.) Top panel: The number of photons divided by $\left\langle N_{\text{part}}\right\rangle / 2$ as a function of average number of participating nucleons for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ at $\sqrt{\mathrm{s} _{\mathrm{NN}}}=62.4$ and $200 \mathrm{GeV}$ for $-3.7<\eta<-2.3 .$ Errors shown are systematic only and include those for $\left\langle N_{\text {part }}\right\rangle .$ Results from HIJING are shown as lines (solid for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and dashed for $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ ). Bottom panel: Same as above, for both photons and charged particles from PHOBOS [10]. NOTE: For points with invisible error bars, the point size was considered as an absolute upper limit for the uncertainty.

Fig. 5. (Color online.) Photon pseudorapidity distributions normalized by the average number of participating nucleon pairs for different collision centralities are plotted as a function of pseudorapidity shifted by the beam rapidity (-5.36 for $200 \mathrm{GeV}$ and -4.19 for $62.4 \mathrm{GeV}$ ) for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=62.4$ and $200 \mathrm{GeV}$. Errors are systematic only, statistical errors are negligible in comparison. For clarity of presentation, results for only four centralities are shown. The $\mathrm{Cu}+$ Cu data are shifted by 0.1 unit in $\eta-y_{\text {beam }} .$ The solid line is a second order polynomial fit to the data (see text for details).

Fig. 5. (Color online.) Photon pseudorapidity distributions normalized by the average number of participating nucleon pairs for different collision centralities are plotted as a function of pseudorapidity shifted by the beam rapidity (-5.36 for $200 \mathrm{GeV}$ and -4.19 for $62.4 \mathrm{GeV}$ ) for $\mathrm{Au}+\mathrm{Au}$ and $\mathrm{Cu}+\mathrm{Cu}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=62.4$ and $200 \mathrm{GeV}$. Errors are systematic only, statistical errors are negligible in comparison. For clarity of presentation, results for only four centralities are shown. The $\mathrm{Cu}+$ Cu data are shifted by 0.1 unit in $\eta-y_{\text {beam }} .$ The solid line is a second order polynomial fit to the data (see text for details).

Comparison of data to Monte Carlo for the distributions of two-photon invariant mass (left) and energy for the higher (center) and lower (right) energy photon.

Invariant mass distribution for the two-photon system with 7 < pT < 8 GeV/c.

Signal fractions calculated within the “peak region” of 0.1 < $M_{\gamma\gamma}$ < 0.2 $GeV/c^{2}$. Fractions for the full dataset as well as the subsets of longitudinal and transverse polarizations are shown as a function of pT (left), and the fractions for the transversely polarized data are shown as a function of $x_{F}$ integrated over 5 < pT < 12 GeV/c (right).

Signal fractions calculated within the “peak region” of 0.1 < $M_{\gamma\gamma}$ < 0.2 $GeV/c^{2}$. Fractions for the full dataset as well as the subsets of longitudinal and transverse polarizations are shown as a function of pT (left), and the fractions for the transversely polarized data are shown as a function of $x_{F}$ integrated over 5 < pT < 12 GeV/c (right).

Upper panel, the $\pi^{0}$ cross section (blue markers) is shown compared with an NLO pQCD cal- culation with three options for the scale parameter. The lower panel presents the ratio of the data to the pT-scale theory curve, as well as the ratio of the 2pT-scale and pT/2-scale theory curves to the pT-scale curve.

Upper panel, the $\pi^{0}$ cross section (blue markers) is shown compared with an NLO pQCD cal- culation with three options for the scale parameter. The lower panel presents the ratio of the data to the pT-scale theory curve, as well as the ratio of the 2pT-scale and pT/2-scale theory curves to the pT-scale curve.

The ALL results (blue markers) are presented with the DSSV prediction and the GRSV prediction using the best fit to polarized DIS ($\Delta$ g = std) and the maximum and minimum allowed values for gluon polarization.

The ALL results (blue markers) are presented with the DSSV prediction and the GRSV prediction using the best fit to polarized DIS ($\Delta$ g = std) and the maximum and minimum allowed values for gluon polarization.

The ALL results (blue markers) are presented with the DSSV prediction and the GRSV prediction using the best fit to polarized DIS ($\Delta$ g = std) and the maximum and minimum allowed values for gluon polarization.

The AN results are plotted versus $x_{F}$ integrated over 5 < pT < 12 GeV/c (left panel) and versus pT integrated over 0.06 < |$x_{F}$| < 0.27 (right panel).

The AN results are plotted versus $x_{F}$ integrated over 5 < pT < 12 GeV/c (left panel) and versus pT integrated over 0.06 < |$x_{F}$| < 0.27 (right panel).

The AN results are plotted versus $x_{F}$ integrated over 5 < pT < 12 GeV/c (left panel) and versus pT integrated over 0.06 < |x_{F}| < 0.27 (right panel).

The AN results are plotted versus $x_{F}$ integrated over 5 < pT < 12 GeV/c (left panel) and versus pT integrated over 0.06 < |$x_{F}$| < 0.27 (right panel).

$P_{\rm H}$ measurements are shown as a function of hyperon $p_{\rm T}$ at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$=19.6 and 27 GeV. Statistical uncertainties are represented as lines while systematic uncertainties are represented as boxes. There is no observed dependence of $P_{\rm H}$ on $p_{\rm T}$ at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$=19.6 or 27 GeV, consistent with previous observations.

$P_{\rm H}$ measurements are shown as a function of hyperon $y$ at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$=19.6 and 27 GeV. Statistical uncertainties are represented as lines while systematic uncertainties are represented as boxes. The data set at $\sqrt{s_{\rm NN}}$=19.6 GeV takes advantage of STAR upgrades to reach larger $|y|$.

Sample fit projections onto the $q_{out}$, $q_{side}$, and $q_{long}$ axes respectively for four angular bins relative to the reaction. These projections are from results for 10-20% central, 19.6 GeV Au+Au collisions with 0.15 < $k_T$ < 0.6 GeV/c.

Energy dependence of the HBT parameters for central Au+Au, Pb+Pb, and Pb+Au collisions at mid-rapidity and $\langle k_T \rangle \approx 0.22$ GeV/c. Errors on NA44, NA49, WA98, and CERES, points include systematic errors.The systematic errors for STAR points at all energies (from Table II) are of similar size to error bar for 39 GeV, shown as a representative example. Errors on other results are statistical only, to emphasize the trend.

Centrality dependence of the Fourier coefficients that describe azimuthal oscillations of the HBT radii, at mid-rapidity (−0.5 < y < 0.5), in 7.7 GeV collisions with ⟨$k_T$⟩ ≈ 0.31 GeV/c, from the HHLW method (Gaussian fits to each angular bin) and a single global fit to all angular bins to directly. Error bars include only statistical uncertainties.

Centrality dependence of the Fourier coefficients that describe azimuthal oscillations of the HBT radii, at mid-rapidity (−0.5 < y < 0.5), in 11.5 GeV collisions with ⟨$k_T$⟩ ≈ 0.31 GeV/c, from the HHLW method (Gaussian fits to each angular bin) and a single global fit to all angular bins to directly. Error bars include only statistical uncertainties.

Centrality dependence of the Fourier coefficients that describe azimuthal oscillations of the HBT radii, at mid-rapidity (−0.5 < y < 0.5), in 19.6 GeV collisions with ⟨$k_T$⟩ ≈ 0.31 GeV/c, from the HHLW method (Gaussian fits to each angular bin) and a single global fit to all angular bins to directly. Error bars include only statistical uncertainties.

Centrality dependence of the Fourier coefficients that describe azimuthal oscillations of the HBT radii, at mid-rapidity (−0.5 < y < 0.5), in 27 GeV collisions with ⟨$k_T$⟩ ≈ 0.31 GeV/c, from the HHLW method (Gaussian fits to each angular bin) and a single global fit to all angular bins to directly. Error bars include only statistical uncertainties.

Centrality dependence of the Fourier coefficients that describe azimuthal oscillations of the HBT radii, at mid-rapidity (−0.5 < y < 0.5), in 39 GeV collisions with ⟨$k_T$⟩ ≈ 0.31 GeV/c, from the HHLW method (Gaussian fits to each angular bin) and a single global fit to all angular bins to directly. Error bars include only statistical uncertainties.

Centrality dependence of the Fourier coefficients that describe azimuthal oscillations of the HBT radii, at mid-rapidity (−0.5 < y < 0.5), in 62.4 GeV collisions with ⟨$k_T$⟩ ≈ 0.31 GeV/c, from the HHLW method (Gaussian fits to each angular bin) and a single global fit to all angular bins to directly. Error bars include only statistical uncertainties.

Centrality dependence of the Fourier coefficients that describe azimuthal oscillations of the HBT radii, at mid-rapidity (−0.5 < y < 0.5), in 200 GeV collisions with ⟨$k_T$⟩ ≈ 0.31 GeV/c, from the HHLW method (Gaussian fits to each angular bin) and a single global fit to all angular bins to directly. Error bars include only statistical uncertainties.

The eccentricity of the collisions at kinetic freez-out, εF , as a function of initial eccentricity relative to the participant plane, ε$_{PP}$, at mid-rapidity. All results are for ⟨$k_T$⟩ ≈ 0.31 GeV/c. Error bars include only statistical uncertainties. The line has a slope of one indicating no change in shape.

The dependence of the kinetic freeze-out eccentricity of pions on collision energy in mid-central Au+Au collisions (E895, STAR) and Pb+Au collisions (CERES) for three rapidity regions and with ⟨$k_T$⟩ ≈ 0.31 GeV/c. Several (2+1)D hydrodynamical models and UrQMD calculations are shown. Model centralities correspond to the data.

The dependence of the kinetic freeze-out eccentricity of pions on collision energy in mid-central Au+Au collisions using UrQMD calculations, (2+1)D hydro MC-KLN and (2+1)D hydro MC-GLB models with ⟨$k_T$⟩ ≈ 0.31 GeV/c. Error bars include only statistical uncertainties. Model centralities correspond to the data.

The dependence of the kinetic freeze-out eccentricity of pions on collision energy in mid-central Au+Au collisions using (2+1)D hydro EOS-Q, (2+1)D hydro EOS-H, and (2+1)D hydro EOS-I models with ⟨$k_T$⟩ ≈ 0.31 GeV/c. Error bars include only statistical uncertainties. Model centralities correspond to the data.

The $\Lambda\Lambda$ interaction parameters from this experiment.

Two-dimensional $\Delta\phi$ vs. $\Delta\eta$ correlation functions for non-pion triggers from 0-10% most-central Au+Au data at 200 GeV. All trigger and associated charged hadrons are selected in the respective pT ranges 4 < $p_T^{trig}$ < 5 GeV/c and 1.5 < $p_T^{assoc}$ < 4 GeV/c.

Two-dimensional $\Delta\phi$ vs. $\Delta\eta$ correlation functions for pion triggers from minimum-bias d+Au data at 200 GeV. All trigger and associated charged hadrons are selected in the respective pT ranges 4 < $p_T^{trig}$ < 5 GeV/c and 1.5 < $p_T^{assoc}$ < 4 GeV/c.

Two-dimensional $\Delta\phi$ vs. $\Delta\eta$ correlation functions for pion triggers from 0-10% most-central Au+Au data at 200 GeV. All trigger and associated charged hadrons are selected in the respective pT ranges 4 < $p_T^{trig}$ < 5 GeV/c and 1.5 < $p_T^{assoc}$ < 4 GeV/c.

The $\Delta\phi$ projections of the pure-cone correlations for |$\Delta\phi$| < $\pi$/4 for pion triggers.

The $\Delta\eta$ projections of the pure-cone correlations for |$\Delta\eta$| < 0.78 for pion triggers.

The $\Delta\phi$ projections of the pure-cone correlations for |$\Delta\phi$| < $\pi$/4 non-pion triggers.

The $\Delta\eta$ projections of the pure-cone correlations for |$\Delta\eta$| < 0.78 non-pion triggers.

$\Delta\phi$ projections over |$\Delta\eta$| < 1.5 in 0-10% Au+Au and minimum-bias d+Au data at 200 GeV after subtracting the jet-like fit components.

Extracted Fourier coefficients from fitting in $\pi$ 2 < $\Delta\phi$ < 3$\pi/2$ ) x (|$\Delta\eta$| < 1.5) (1.52 for d+Au), for pion, non-pion, and charged hadron triggers in the flow-based model.

Extracted Fourier coefficients from fitting in $\pi$ 2 < $\Delta\phi$ < 3$\pi/2$ ) x (|$\Delta\eta$| < 1.5) (1.52 for d+Au), for pion, non-pion, and charged hadron triggers in the flow-based model.

V3/V2 ratio for pion and non-pion triggers in Au+Au, and the extrapolated value for "pure protons".

(color online) The $R_{CP}$ of mid-rapidity $\phi$-mesons produced in $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV Au+Au collisions: (top) 0-5% vs. 40-60% and (bottom) 0-5% vs. 60-80% The shaded bands represent the uncertainties in the Glauber model calculations for $\langle N_{bin}\rangle$ and $\langle N_{part}\rangle$ [32]. Also shown are results for $\Lambda$ and $K^{0}_{S}$ [11] and protons and $\pi^{+}$ [33].

(color online) The $R_{CP}$ of mid-rapidity $\phi$-mesons produced in $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV Au+Au collisions: (top) 0-5% vs. 40-60% and (bottom) 0-5% vs. 60-80% The shaded bands represent the uncertainties in the Glauber model calculations for $\langle N_{bin}\rangle$ and $\langle N_{part}\rangle$ [32]. Also shown are results for $\Lambda$ and $K^{0}_{S}$ [11] and protons and $\pi^{+}$ [33].

Transverse mass dependence of Gaussian radii Rout, Rside and Rlong and of experimental values of the Gaussian fit parameter lambda for midrapidity kaon pairs from the 30% most central Au+Au collisions at sqrt(sNN)=200 GeV. The PHENIX datapoints of the plot in the paper are from Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 142301 (2009).

Relative production rates for jets and di-jets in Au+Au collisions of different centralities with respect to d+Au data.

Calculations of the Glauber-based core/corona model that accommodates inclusive hadron suppression and single jet production rate results.

Conditional di-jet survival probability in Au+Au data compared to d+Au reference.

Conditional di-jet survival probability in Au+Au data compared to d+Au reference.

Distribution of p_{T,jet}^{reco,ch} for Au + Au collisions at \sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200 GeV for R = 0.2 jets in peripheral events, mixed events.

Distribution of p_{T,jet}^{reco,ch} for Au + Au collisions at \sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200 GeV for R = 0.3 jets in central events.

Distribution of p_{T,jet}^{reco,ch} for Au + Au collisions at \sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200 GeV for R = 0.3 jets in central events, mixed events.

Distribution of p_{T,jet}^{reco,ch} for Au + Au collisions at \sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200 GeV for R = 0.3 jets in peripheral events.

Distribution of p_{T,jet}^{reco,ch} for Au + Au collisions at \sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200 GeV for R = 0.3 jets in peripheral events, mixed events.

Distribution of p_{T,jet}^{reco,ch} for Au + Au collisions at \sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200 GeV for R = 0.4 jets in central events.

Distribution of p_{T,jet}^{reco,ch} for Au + Au collisions at \sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200 GeV for R = 0.4 jets in central events, mixed events.

Distribution of p_{T,jet}^{reco,ch} for Au + Au collisions at \sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200 GeV for R = 0.4 jets in peripheral events.

Distribution of p_{T,jet}^{reco,ch} for Au + Au collisions at \sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200 GeV for R = 0.4 jets in peripheral events, mixed events.

Distribution of p_{T,jet}^{reco,ch} for Au + Au collisions at \sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200 GeV for R = 0.5 jets in central events.

Distribution of p_{T,jet}^{reco,ch} for Au + Au collisions at \sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200 GeV for R = 0.5 jets in central events, mixed events.

Distribution of p_{T,jet}^{reco,ch} for Au + Au collisions at \sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200 GeV for R = 0.5 jets in peripheral events.

Distribution of p_{T,jet}^{reco,ch} for Au + Au collisions at \sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200 GeV for R = 0.5 jets in peripheral events, mixed events.

Recoil jet distributions for peripheral Au+Au STAR events after mixed event subtraction as a function of \Delta\phi for p_{T,jet}^{reco,ch} range of 9-13 GeV/c.

Recoil jet distributions after mixed event subtraction as a function of \Delta\phi for p_{T,jet}^{reco,ch} range of 9-13 GeV/c for p+p PYTHIA detector-level simulations.

Recoil jet distributions for peripheral Au+Au STAR events after mixed event subtraction as a function of \Delta\phi for p_{T,jet}^{reco,ch} range of 13-33 GeV/c.

Recoil jet distributions after mixed event subtraction as a function of \Delta\phi for p_{T,jet}^{reco,ch} range of 13-33 GeV/c for p+p PYTHIA detector-level simulations.

Recoil jet distributions for central Au+Au STAR events after mixed event subtraction as a function of \Delta\phi for p_{T,jet}^{reco,ch} range of 9-13 GeV/c.

Recoil jet distributions after mixed event subtraction as a function of \Delta\phi for p_{T,jet}^{reco,ch} range of 9-13 GeV/c for p+p PYTHIA detector-level simulations embeded into mixed events from central Au + Au STAR data at the track level.

Recoil jet distributions for central Au+Au STAR events after mixed event subtraction as a function of \Delta\phi for p_{T,jet}^{reco,ch} range of 13-33 GeV/c.

Recoil jet distributions after mixed event subtraction as a function of \Delta\phi for p_{T,jet}^{reco,ch} range of 13-33 GeV/c for p+p PYTHIA detector-level simulations embeded into mixed events from central Au + Au STAR data at the track level.

Fully corrected distributions of Y(p_{t,jet}^{ch}) for central AU + Au collisions at \sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200 GeV, for anti-k_T jets with R = 0.2.

Fully corrected distributions of Y(p_{t,jet}^{ch}) for peripheral AU + Au collisions at \sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200 GeV, for anti-k_T jets with R = 0.2.

Ratio of fully corrected distributions of Y(p_{t,jet}^{ch}) of central to peripheral events for AU + Au collisions at \sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200 GeV, for anti-k_T jets with R = 0.2 (i.e. ratio of Table 17 to Table 18 in this HEPData entry).

Fully corrected distributions of Y(p_{t,jet}^{ch}) for central AU + Au collisions at \sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200 GeV, for anti-k_T jets with R = 0.3.

Fully corrected distributions of Y(p_{t,jet}^{ch}) for peripheral AU + Au collisions at \sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200 GeV, for anti-k_T jets with R = 0.3.

Ratio of fully corrected distributions of Y(p_{t,jet}^{ch}) of central to peripheral events for AU + Au collisions at \sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200 GeV, for anti-k_T jets with R = 0.3 (i.e. ratio of Table 20 to Table 21 in this HEPData entry).

Fully corrected distributions of Y(p_{t,jet}^{ch}) for central AU + Au collisions at \sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200 GeV, for anti-k_T jets with R = 0.4.

Fully corrected distributions of Y(p_{t,jet}^{ch}) for peripheral AU + Au collisions at \sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200 GeV, for anti-k_T jets with R = 0.4.

Ratio of fully corrected distributions of Y(p_{t,jet}^{ch}) of central to peripheral events for AU + Au collisions at \sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200 GeV, for anti-k_T jets with R = 0.4 (i.e. ratio of Table 23 to Table 24 in this HEPData entry).

Fully corrected distributions of Y(p_{t,jet}^{ch}) for central AU + Au collisions at \sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200 GeV, for anti-k_T jets with R = 0.5.

Fully corrected distributions of Y(p_{t,jet}^{ch}) for peripheral AU + Au collisions at \sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200 GeV, for anti-k_T jets with R = 0.5.

Ratio of fully corrected distributions of Y(p_{t,jet}^{ch}) of central to peripheral events for AU + Au collisions at \sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200 GeV, for anti-k_T jets with R = 0.4 (i.e. ratio of Table 26 to Table 27 in this HEPData entry).

Ratio of distributions of Y(p_{T,jet}^{ch}) for R = 0.2 to R = 0.5 in peripheral Au + Au collisions at \sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200 GeV.

Ratio of distributions of Y(p_{T,jet}^{ch}) for R = 0.2 to R = 0.5 in central Au + Au collisions at \sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200 GeV.

Azimuthal distribution of recoil jets, \PSI(\DELTA\phi) in central Au + Au collisions at \sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200 GeV measured at STAR.

Azimuthal distribution of R=0.3 recoil jets, \PSI(\DELTA\phi) in peripheral Au + Au collisions at \sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200 GeV measured at STAR.

Azimuthal distribution of recoil jets, \PSI(\DELTA\phi) in PYTHIA generated pp collisiions at sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200 GeV.

Azimuthal distribution of recoil jets, \PSI(\DELTA\phi) in PYTHIA generated pp collisiions embedded in central Au + Au Mixed Events at sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200 GeV.

The three-point correlator, $\gamma$, as a function of centrality for Au+Au collisions at 19.6 GeV.

The three-point correlator, $\gamma$, as a function of centrality for Au+Au collisions at 11.5 GeV.

The three-point correlator, $\gamma$, as a function of centrality for Au+Au collisions at 7.7.

The two-particle correlation as a function of centrality for Au+Au collisions at 62.4 GeV.

The two-particle correlation as a function of centrality for Au+Au collisions at 39 GeV.

The two-particle correlation as a function of centrality for Au+Au collisions at 27 GeV.

The two-particle correlation as a function of centrality for Au+Au collisions at 19.6 GeV.

The two-particle correlation as a function of centrality for Au+Au collisions at 11.5 GeV.

The two-particle correlation as a function of centrality for Au+Au collisions at 7.7 GeV.

Jet-hadron correlations after background subtraction. Shown with Gaussian fits to jet peaks and systematic uncertanty bands Au+Au(4-6 GeV).

Gaussian widths of the awayside jet peaks in p+p(10-15 GeV).

Gaussian widths of the awayside jet peaks in Au+Au(10-15 GeV).

Gaussian widths of the awayside jet peaks in p+p(20-40 GeV).

Gaussian widths of the awayside jet peaks in Au+Au(20-40 GeV).

Awayside momentum difference(DAA) shown for 10-15 GeV.

Awayside momentum difference(DAA) shown for 10-15 GeV.

The invariant yield versus transverse momentum for |y| < 1 in 0-60% centrality in Au+Au collisions (solid circles). The results are compared to high-$p_T$ (3 < $p_T$ < 10 GeV/c) results from STAR [9] (solid squares) and PHENIX data [8] (open squares). Also shown is the yield in 0-60% centrality Cu+Cu collisions for low $p_T$ (solid triangles) and high $p_T$ [48] (open triangles). The models are described in the text [49, 50]. The $J/\psi$ cross section in p+p collisions is also shown at STAR (stars) and PHENIX [51] (diamonds), and the scale is indicated on the right axis.

The $J/\psi$ nuclear modification factor versus transverse momentum for |y| < 1 and $p_T$ < 5 GeV/c for 0-60% centrality Au+Au collisions (solid circles). The data are compared with STAR high-$p_T$ (5 < $p_T$ < 10 GeV/c) results [9] and PHENIX results [8] in |y| < 0.35 (open squares). The statistical and systematic uncertainties on the baseline $J/\psi$ cross section in p+p collisions are indicated by the hatched and solid bands, respectively. Boxes on the vertical axes represent the uncertainty on $N_{coll}$ combined with the uncertainty on the inelastic cross section in p+p collisions

The $J/\psi$ nuclear modification factor versus transverse momentum for |y| < 1 and $p_T$ < 5 GeV/c for 0-20% centrality Au+Au collisions (solid circles). The data are compared with STAR high-$p_T$ (5 < $p_T$ < 10 GeV/c) results [9] and PHENIX results [8] in |y| < 0.35 (open squares). The statistical and systematic uncertainties on the baseline $J/\psi$ cross section in p+p collisions are indicated by the hatched and solid bands, respectively. Boxes on the vertical axes represent the uncertainty on $N_{coll}$ combined with the uncertainty on the inelastic cross section in p+p collisions

The $J/\psi$ nuclear modification factor versus transverse momentum for |y| < 1 and $p_T$ < 5 GeV/c for 20-40% centrality Au+Au collisions (solid circles). The data are compared with STAR high-$p_T$ (5 < $p_T$ < 10 GeV/c) results [9] and PHENIX results [8] in |y| < 0.35 (open squares). The statistical and systematic uncertainties on the baseline $J/\psi$ cross section in p+p collisions are indicated by the hatched and solid bands, respectively. Boxes on the vertical axes represent the uncertainty on $N_{coll}$ combined with the uncertainty on the inelastic cross section in p+p collisions

The $J/\psi$ nuclear modification factor versus transverse momentum for |y| < 1 and $p_T$ < 5 GeV/c for 40-60% centrality Au+Au collisions (solid circles). The data are compared with STAR high-$p_T$ (5 < $p_T$ < 10 GeV/c) results [9] and PHENIX results [8] in |y| < 0.35 (open squares). The statistical and systematic uncertainties on the baseline $J/\psi$ cross section in p+p collisions are indicated by the hatched and solid bands, respectively. Boxes on the vertical axes represent the uncertainty on $N_{coll}$ combined with the uncertainty on the inelastic cross section in p+p collisions

The $J/\psi$ invariant yield and nuclear modification factor as a function of centrality for |y| < 1 in Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

The $J/\psi$ invariant yield $Bd^2N/(2\pi p_Tdydp_T) [(GeV/c)^{-2}]$ and nuclear modification factor as a function of transverse momentum for |y| < 1 in Cu+Cu collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

The $J/\psi$ invariant yield and nuclear modification factor for |y| < 1 in Cu+Cu collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

(Color online) $E^{e}_{T}$ distribution of $W^{+}$ (top) and $W^{−}$ (bottom) candidate events, background components, and $W \to e\nu$ MC signal for comparison. Note the factor of two difference in the vertical scales.

(Color online) Lepton pseudorapidity distribution of $W^{+}$ (left) and $W^{−}$ (right) candidate events, background components, and $W \to e\nu$ MC signal for comparison.

(Color online) Lepton pseudorapidity distribution of $W^{+}$ (left) and $W^{−}$ (right) candidate events, background components, and $W \to e\nu$ MC signal for comparison.

Integrated $D^0$ $R_{\rm AA}$ as a function of $N_{\mathrm{part}}$ in different $p_{\rm T}$ regions, 0$-$8 ${\mathrm{GeV/}}c$ (squares), 0.7$-$2.2 ${\mathrm{GeV/}}c$ (diamonds) and 3$-$8 ${\mathrm{GeV/}}c$ (circles). Open symbols are for the 0$-$80% minimum bias events. The vertical bar around unity denotes the overall normalization uncertainty from p+p reference.

Inclusive jet $A_{LL}$ vs. parton jet $p_T$ for 0.5<|eta|<1.0.

The uncertainties on the parton jet pT values are strongly correlated across the bins. The point-to-point statistical and systematic uncertainties on the measured A_LL values given above are only weakly correlated among the bins. The correlation matrix for the quadrature sum of the point-to-point statistical and systematic uncertainties is given below. In that matrix, the order of the rows and columns matches the bin numbering above. In addition to the point-to-point statistical and systematic uncertainties, there are two systematic uncertainties that are common to all the measured A_LL values (and not included in the systematic uncertainty numbers quoted above): (a) +/-0.0005 vertical shift uncertainty from relative luminosity and (b) +/-6.5% vertical scale uncertainty from polarization.

$A_{LL}$ model predictions for |eta|<0.5.

$A_{LL}$ model predictions for 0.5<|eta|<1.0.

Upper panel, Azimuthal distributions of associated particles for trigger particles in-plane (squares) and out-of-plane (triangles) for Au+Au collisions at centrality 20-60%. Open symbols are reflections of solid symbols around $\Delta \phi$ = 0 and $\Delta \phi$ = $\pi$. Elliptic flow contribution is shown by dashed lines. Lower panel, Distributions after substracting elliptic flow, and the corresponding measurement in p + p collisions (histogram).

$v_{2}$ at 3 ≤ $p_{t}$ ≤ 6 GeV/c versus impact parameter, b, compared to models of particle emission by a static source (see text).

$E_T^e$ distribution of $W^{\pm}$ candidate events, background contributions, and sum of backgrounds and W -> ev MC signal. This plot is for Positron 0.5<|eta|<1.1.

Signed $P_T$-balance distribution for e+/e- candidates reconstructed in the EEMC.

Distribution of the product of the TPC reconstructed charge sign and $E_T/p_T$.

Distribution of the invariant mass of Z/$\gamma^*$ -> e+ e- candidate events, with MC for comparison.

Longitudinal single-spin asymmetry $A_L$ for W+ production as a function of lepton pseudorapidity.

Longitudinal single-spin asymmetry $A_L$ for W- production as a function of lepton pseudorapidity.

Longitudinal single-spin asymmetry $A_L$ for W+ production as a function of lepton pseudorapidity.

Longitudinal double-spin asymmetry $A_{LL}$ for W+ production as a function of lepton pseudorapidity.

Longitudinal double-spin asymmetry $A_{LL}$ for W- production as a function of lepton pseudorapidity.

Longitudinal double-spin asymmetry $A_{LL}$ for theory $W^{+/-}$ production as a function of lepton pseudorapidity.

The dielectron $v_2$ as a function of $p_T$ in minimum-bias Au + Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV for the $\eta$ mass region.

The dielectron $v_2$ as a function of $p_T$ in minimum-bias Au + Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV for the charm + $ ho^0$ mass region.

The dielectron $v_2$ as a function of $p_T$ in minimum-bias Au + Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV for the $\omega$ mass region.

The dielectron $v_2$ as a function of $p_T$ in minimum-bias Au + Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV for the $\phi$ mass region.

The dielectron $v_2$ as a function of $p_T$ in minimum-bias Au + Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV for the charm + thermal radiation mass region.

The dielectron $v_2$ as a function of $p_T$ in minimum-bias Au + Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV expected from decays of a mesonic cocktail.

The dielectron $v_2$ as a function of $p_T$ in minimum-bias Au + Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV expected from decays of a mesonic cocktail.

The dielectron $v_2$ as a function of $p_T$ in minimum-bias Au + Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV expected from decays of a mesonic cocktail.

The dielectron $v_2$ as a function of $p_T$ in minimum-bias Au + Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV expected from decays of a mesonic cocktail.

The dielectron $v_2$ as a function of $p_T$ in minimum-bias Au + Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV expected from decays of a mesonic cocktail.

The dielectron $v_2$ as a function of $p_T$ in minimum-bias Au + Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV expected from the $car{c}$ contribution.

The $p_T$-integrated dielectron $v_2$ as a function of $M_{ee}$ in minimum-bias Au + Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV.

The $v_2$ of hadrons $\pi$, $K$, $p$, $\phi$ and $\Lambda$ in minimum-bias Au + Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV for the $\pi^0$ mass region.

The $p_T$-integrated dielectron $v_2$ as a function of $M_{ee}$ in minimum-bias Au + Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV, expected from the decays of $\pi^0$, $\eta$, $\omega$ and $\phi$ and from the $car{c}$ contribution.

The elliptic flow $v_{2}$ of protons and anti-protons as a function of the transverse momentum, $p_{T}$, for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions. The lower panels show the difference in $v_{2}(p_{T})$ between the particles and anti-particles. The solid curves are fits with a horizontal line. The shaded areas depict the magnitude of the systematic errors.

The elliptic flow $v_{2}$ of protons and anti-protons as a function of the transverse momentum, $p_{T}$, for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions. The lower panels show the difference in $v_{2}(p_{T})$ between the particles and anti-particles. The solid curves are fits with a horizontal line. The shaded areas depict the magnitude of the systematic errors.

The elliptic flow $v_{2}$ of protons and anti-protons as a function of the transverse momentum, $p_{T}$, for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions. The lower panels show the difference in $v_{2}(p_{T})$ between the particles and anti-particles. The solid curves are fits with a horizontal line. The shaded areas depict the magnitude of the systematic errors.

The elliptic flow $v_{2}$ of protons and anti-protons as a function of the transverse momentum, $p_{T}$, for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions. The lower panels show the difference in $v_{2}(p_{T})$ between the particles and anti-particles. The solid curves are fits with a horizontal line. The shaded areas depict the magnitude of the systematic errors.

The elliptic flow $v_{2}$ of protons and anti-protons as a function of the transverse momentum, $p_{T}$, for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions. The lower panels show the difference in $v_{2}(p_{T})$ between the particles and anti-particles. The solid curves are fits with a horizontal line. The shaded areas depict the magnitude of the systematic errors.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The upper panels depict the elliptic flow, $v_{2}$, as a function of reduced transverse mass, $(m_{T} − m_{0})$, for particles, frames a) and b), and anti-particles, frames c) and d), in 0-80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV. Simultaneous fits to the mesons except the pions are shown as the dashed lines. The difference of the baryon $v_{2}$ and the meson fits are shown in the lower panels.

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

The number-of-constituent quark scaled elliptic flow $(v_{2}/n_{q})((m_{T} − m_{0})/n_{q})$ for 0–80$\%$ central Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 11.5 and 62.4 GeV for selected particles, frames a) and b), and corresponding anti-particles, frames c) and d). The dashed lines are simultaneous fits [29] to all of the data sets at a given energy. The lower panels depict the ratios to the fits, while a $\pm10\%$ interval is shown as the shaded area to guide the eye. Some data points for $\varphi$ and $\Xi$ are out of the plot range in the lower panels of frames a) and c).

$R_{AA}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from $0-5\%$ and $60-80\%$ central Au+Au events for $\Lambda$. Stat. and syst. errors added in quadrature.The band at unity shows the systematic uncertainty on $⟨N_{bin}⟩$. The dashed line below unity shows the expected value of RAA should the yields scale with $⟨N_{part}⟩$, and the band around it shows the systematic uncertainty on ⟨Npart ⟩. $N_{bin}$ Scaling 1 $\pm$ 0.16 and $N_{part}$ Scaling 0.168 $\pm$ 0.02 .

$R_{AA}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from $0-5\%$ and $60-80\%$ central Au+Au events for $\Xi^{-} + \bar{\Xi}^{+}$. Stat. and syst. errors added in quadrature. The band at unity shows the systematic uncertainty on $⟨N_{bin}⟩$. The dashed line below unity shows the expected value of RAA should the yields scale with $⟨N_{part}⟩$, and the band around it shows the systematic uncertainty on ⟨Npart ⟩. $N_{bin}$ Scaling 1 $\pm$ 0.16 and $N_{part}$ Scaling 0.168 $\pm$ 0.02 .

$R_{AA}$ as a function of $p_{T}$ from $0-5\%$ and $60-80\%$ central Au+Au events for inclusive $p+\bar{p}$. Stat. and syst. errors added in quadrature. The band at unity shows the systematic uncertainty on $⟨N_{bin}⟩$. The dashed line below unity shows the expected value of RAA should the yields scale with $⟨N_{part}⟩$, and the band around it shows the systematic uncertainty on ⟨Npart ⟩. $N_{bin}$ Scaling 1 $\pm$ 0.16 and $N_{part}$ Scaling 0.168 $\pm$ 0.02 .

$R_{AA}$ from HIJING as a function of $p_{T}$ from $0-5\%$ central Au+Au events for inclusive $p+\bar{p}$.

$R_{AA}$ from HIJING as a function of $p_{T}$ from $0-5\%$ central Au+Au events for $\Lambda$.

$R_{AA}$ from HIJING as a function of $p_{T}$ from $0-5\%$ central Au+Au events for $\Xi^{-}+\bar{\Xi}^{+}$.

$R_{AA}$ from EPOS as a function of $p_{T}$ from $0-5\%$ central Au+Au events for inclusive $p+\bar{p}$.

$R_{AA}$ from EPOS as a function of $p_{T}$ from $0-5\%$ central Au+Au events for $\Lambda$.

$R_{AA}$ from EPOS as a function of $p_{T}$ from $0-5\%$ central Au+Au events for $\Xi^{-}+\bar{\Xi}^{+}$.

$R_{AA}$ from HIJING as a function of $p_{T}$ from $60-80\%$ central Au+Au events for inclusive $p+\bar{p}$.

$R_{AA}$ from HIJING as a function of $p_{T}$ from $60-80\%$ central Au+Au events for $\Lambda$.

$R_{AA}$ from HIJING as a function of $p_{T}$ from $60-80\%$ central Au+Au events for $\Xi^{-}+\bar{\Xi}^{+}$.

$R_{AA}$ from EPOS as a function of $p_{T}$ from $60-80\%$ central Au+Au events for inclusive $p+\bar{p}$.

$R_{AA}$ from EPOS as a function of $p_{T}$ from $60-80\%$ central Au+Au events for $\Lambda$.

$R_{AA}$ from EPOS as a function of $p_{T}$ from $60-80\%$ central Au+Au events for $\Xi^{-}+\bar{\Xi}^{+}$.

$R_{dAu}$ vs. $y$.

Comparison of our d+Au measurements to the pA measurements from E772. Ratio of $\Upsilon$ production in pA to pp scaled by mass number as a function of mass number. Shown are the 1S and 2S+3S $\Upsilon$ measurements from E772 and our 1S measurement.

Comparison of our d+Au measurements to the pA measurements from E772. Exponent $\alpha$ as a function of $x_{F}$.

Invariant mass distributions of electron pairs in the region $|y_{ee}| < 1.0$ for the centrality selections $30-60\%$.

Invariant mass distributions of electron pairs in the region $|y_{ee}| < 1.0$ for the centrality selections $10-30\%$.

Invariant mass distributions of electron pairs in the region $|y_{ee}| < 1.0$ for the centrality selections $0-10\%$.

Nuclear modification factor for $\Upsilon$(1S+2S+3S), in $|y| < 1.0$ in d+Au and Au+Au collisions as a function of $N_{part}$.

Nuclear modification factor for $\Upsilon$(1S+2S+3S), in $|y| < 0.5$, in d+Au and Au+Au collisions as a function of $N_{part}$.

Nuclear modification factor for $\Upsilon$(1S) in $|y| < 1.0$, in d+Au and Au+Au collisions as a function of $N_{part}$.

Nuclear modification factor for $\Upsilon$(1S) in $|y| < 0.5$, in d+Au and Au+Au collisions as a function of $N_{part}$.

Nuclear modification factor of quarkonium states as a function of binding energy as measured by STAR.

Total $J/\psi$ efficiency as a function of cos$\theta$ for $2 < p_{T}^{J/\psi} < 3$ GeV/c

Total $J/\psi$ efficiency as a function of cos$\theta$ for $3 < p_{T}^{J/\psi} < 4$ GeV/c

Total $J/\psi$ efficiency as a function of cos$\theta$ for $4 < p_{T}^{J/\psi} < 6$ GeV/c

Different contributions to total $J/\psi$ efficiency as a function of cos$\theta$ for $2 < p_{T}^{J/\psi} < 3$ GeV/c

Different contributions to total $J/\psi$ efficiency as a function of cos$\theta$ for $3 < p_{T}^{J/\psi} < 4$ GeV/c

Different contributions to total $J/\psi$ efficiency as a function of cos$\theta$ for $4 < p_{T}^{J/\psi} < 6$ GeV/c

Corrected cos$\theta$ distribution for $2 < p_{T}^{J/\psi} < 3$ GeV/c

Corrected cos$\theta$ distribution for $3 < p_{T}^{J/\psi} < 4$ GeV/c

Corrected cos$\theta$ distribution for $4 < p_{T}^{J/\psi} < 6$ GeV/c

$J/\psi$ polarization parameter $\lambda_{\theta}$ as a function of $J/\psi$ $p_{T}$ for rapidity |y|<1

The simulated electron pair invariant mass distributions for electrons at $8 < p_{T} < 10$ GeV/c

The distribution of the minimum distance $\Delta$Z (cm) between an electron track projection point at the Barrel Electromagnetic Calorimeter (BEMC) and all BEMC clusters along the beam direction from unlike-sign electron candidate pairs, like-sign electron candidate pairs and unlike-minus-like.

The momentum over energy $p/E_0$ distribution ($p$ - momentum, $E_0$ - the energy of the most energetic tower in a Barrel Electromagnetic Calorimeter cluster) from unlike-sign electron candidate pairs, like-sign electron candidate pairs and unlike-minus-like.

Electron identification efficiency of the cuts on number of TPC points, n$\sigma_e$ and Barrel Electromagnetic Calorimeter cuts in the Run2008 analysis. The total efficiency is the product of all individual ones.

Electron identification efficiency of the cuts on number of TPC points, n$\sigma_e$ and Barrel Electromagnetic Calorimeter cuts in the Run2005 analysis. The total efficiency is the product of all individual ones.

n$\sigma_e$ distribution in the Run2008 analysis for unlike-sign, like-sign and unlike-minus-like pairs at $2.5 < p_T < 3.0$ GeV after applying all the electron identification cuts except the n$\sigma_e$ cut.

n$\sigma_e$ distribution in the Run2008 analysis for unlike-sign, like-sign and unlike-minus-like pairs at $8 < p_T < 10$ GeV after applying all the electron identification cuts except the n$\sigma_e$ cut.

The mean and width of the Gaussian fitting functions for pure photonic electron (unlike - minus-like) n$\sigma_e$ distribution as shown in Fig. 4(a) and Fig 4(b) for each $p_T$ bin.

n$\sigma_e$ distribution for inclusive electrons at (a) $2.5 < p_T < 3.0$ GeV/c in the Run2008 analysis, (b) $2.5< p_T < 3.5$ GeV/c in the Run2005 analysis and (c) $8.0 < p_T < 10.0$ GeV/c in the Run2008 analysis after applying all electron identification cuts except the n$\sigma_e$ cut.

Purity of the inclusive electron sample as a function of $p_T$ in data from Run 2008.

Purity of the inclusive electron sample as a function of $p_T$ in data from Run 2005 with High Tower HT1 trigger.

Purity of the inclusive electron sample as a function of $p_T$ in data from Run 2005 with High Tower HT2 trigger.

Derived $p_T$ spectrum for inclusive photons and the uncertainty represented by the region between the spectra of $\pi^0$ and $\eta$ decay photons and inclusive photon with doubled direct photon yield.

Ratio of photon $p_T$ spectra from Fig. 7(a) to inclusive photons $p_T$ spectrum.

Photonic electron reconstruction efficiency as a function of $p_T$ for $\gamma$ conversion, $\pi^0$ and $\eta$ Dalitz decay for the Run2008 analysis, and for their combination for the Run2008 analysis.

Photonic electron reconstruction efficiency as a function of $p_T$ for $\gamma$ conversion for the Run2005 analysis.

The adc0 distribution for high-tower trigger events. The adc0 is the offline ADC value of a BEMC cluster’s most energetic tower which is one of the high-towers responsible for firing a high-tower trigger.

The $\chi^2$ as a function of the adc0 cut.

Raw inclusive electron $p_T$ spectrum from VPD trigger in Run2008 d+Au collisions before (open squares) and after applying the adc0 > 193 cut.

The adc0 distribution for data at $p_T$ = 4.0 − 5.0 GeV/c

The adc0 distribution for simulations at $p_T$ = 4.0 − 5.0 GeV/c

The $p_T$ dependence of high-tower trigger efficiency from VPD data for Run2008 analysis.

The $p_T$ dependence of high-tower trigger efficiency from simulation for Run2008 analysis.

The $p_T$ dependence of high-tower trigger efficiency for combined VPD data and simulation for Run2008 analysis.

Raw inclusive electron $p_T$ spectrum for minimum-bias (MB) and two high-tower triggers, i.e. HT1 and HT2 for Run2005 analysis.

Raw inclusive electron $p_T$ spectrum for high-tower trigge HT1 for Run2005 analysis.

Raw inclusive electron $p_T$ spectrum for high-tower trigge HT2 for Run2005 analysis.

The $p_T$ dependence of trigger efficiency for the high-tower trigger HT1 data for Run2005.

The $p_T$ dependence of trigger efficiency for the high-tower trigger HT2 data for Run2005.

Distribution of the calculated BBC cross section $\sigma_{BBC}$ before and after removing events at the beginning and the end of Run2008.

Invariant cross section of the electron from decays of $J/\psi$.

Invariant cross section of the electron from decays of $\varUpsilon$.

Invariant cross section of the electron from Drell-Yan decays.

Invariant cross section of the electron from decays of light vector mesons ($\rho,\omega, \phi$).

The uncertainty of the $J/\psi$ feeddown.

Ratio of non-photonic to photonic electron yield from the Run2008 analysis.

Ratio of non-photonic to photonic electron yield from the Run2005 analysis.

Invariant cross section for non-photonic electron production $(e^+ + e^-)/2$ in p+p collisions from the Run2008 analysis.

Invariant cross section for non-photonic electron production $(e^+ + e^-)/2$ in p+p collisions from the Run2005 analysis.

Invariant cross section for non-photonic electron production $(e^+ + e^-)/2$ in p+p collisions from the combined Run2005 and 2008 analyses.

Invariant cross section for non-photonic electron production $(e^+ + e^-)/2$ in p+p collisions (update on PRL 98 (2007) 192301).

Ratio of invariant cross section for non-photonic electron production $(e^+ + e^-)/2$ in p+p collisions from the combined Run2005 and 2008 analyses over FONLL.

Ratio of invariant cross section for non-photonic electron production $(e^+ + e^-)/2$ in p+p collisions (update on PRL 98 (2007) 192301) over FONLL.

Invariant cross section for electrons $(e^+ + e^-)/2$ from bottom meson decay, together with the ratio of the measurements to the FONLL predictions.

Invariant cross section for electrons $(e^+ + e^-)/2$ from charm meson decay, together with the ratio of the measurements to the FONLL predictions.

Non photonic electrons yield versus transverse momentum in D+AU collisions.

Non photonic electrons yield versus transverse momentum in P+P collisions.

D0 differential yield at mid rapidity and corresponding calculated differential charm cross section at midrapidity.

Sum of the non photonic electrons/positrons and D0 differential yield at mid rapidity and corresponding calculated differential charm cross section at midrapidity.

Total charm cross section per nucleon nucleon collision IN D+AU collisions.

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 0

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 1

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 2

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 3

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 4

flow background with default flow Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 5

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 0

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 1

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 2

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 3

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 4

flow background with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 5

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 0

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 1

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 2

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 3

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 4

flow background with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 5

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 0

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 1

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 2

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 3

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 4

raw correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 5

dN/deta phis=045 deg, pt=0.151 GeV/c

dN/deta phis=045 deg, pt=0.153 GeV/c

dN/deta phis=090 deg, pt=0.51 GeV/c

dN/deta phis=090 deg, pt=12 GeV/c

dN/deta phis=4590 deg, pt=0.151 GeV/c

sigma vs phis pt=0.151 GeV/c

sigma vs phis pt=0.153 GeV/c

sigma vs phis pt=0.51 GeV/c

sigma vs phis pt=12 GeV/c

sigma vs pt phis=045 deg

sigma vs pt phis=090 deg

sigma vs pt phis=4590 deg

background uncertainty caps in the figure

flow uncertainty curves in the figure

leadage uncertainty arrows in the figure

total uncertainty boxes in the figure

background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0

background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1

background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2

background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3

background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4

background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5

background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 0

background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 1

background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 2

background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 3

background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 4

background normalization systematic uncertainty band Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 5

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 0

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 1

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 2

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 3

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 4

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 5

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 0

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 1

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 2

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 3

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 4

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 5

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 0

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 1

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 2

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 3

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 4

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 5

d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c

d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c

0^{o} < phi_{s} < 45^{o}

45^{o} < phi_{s} < 90^{o}

Previous in-plane result published in 2004

Previous out-of-plane result published in 2004

3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, 0^{o} < phi_{s} < 45^{o}

3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, 45^{o} < phi_{s} < 90^{o}

3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<3 GeV/c, 0^{o} < phi_{s} < 45^{o}

3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<3 GeV/c, 45^{o} < phi_{s} < 90^{o}

4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, 0^{o} < phi_{s} < 45^{o}

4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, 45^{o} < phi_{s} < 90^{o}

4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<3 GeV/c, 0^{o} < phi_{s} < 45^{o}

4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<3 GeV/c, 45^{o} < phi_{s} < 90^{o}

3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c

4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c

3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c

3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 0^{o}15^{o}

3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 75^{o}90^{o}

Cone region, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c

one region, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c

one region, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c

one region, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c

i region, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c

Pi region, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c

i region, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c

i region, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c

d+Au, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c

20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, (a) 0^{o}<#phi_{s}<15^{o}

20-60%, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, (b) 75^{o}<#phi_{s}<90^{o}

20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, (a) 0^{o}<phi_{s}<15^{o}

20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, (b) 75^{o}<phi_{s}<90^{o}

20-60% Au+Au, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 0, jet

20-60% Au+Au, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 1, jet

20-60% Au+Au, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 2, jet

20-60% Au+Au, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 3, jet

20-60% Au+Au, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 4, jet

20-60% Au+Au, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 5, jet

1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, jet

0-60% Au+Au, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/, slice 0, ridge

20-60% Au+Au, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 1, ridge

20-60% Au+Au, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 2, ridge

20-60% Au+Au, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 3, ridge

20-60% Au+Au, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 4, ridge

20-60% Au+Au, 3<p_{T}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{T}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 5, ridge

1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, ridge

jet (Deltaphi|<1.0, |Deltaeta|<0.7) 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c

jet (Deltaphi|<1.0, |Deltaeta|<0.7) 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c

ridge (Deltaphi|<1.0, |Deltaeta|>0.7) 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c

ridge (Deltaphi|<1.0, |Deltaeta|>0.7) 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c

ridge (Deltaphi|<1.0, |Deltaeta|>0.7) 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c

ridge (Deltaphi|<1.0, |Deltaeta|>0.7) 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c

3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c Ridge (75^{o}<|phi_{s}|<90^{o}) / Ridge (0^{o}<|phi_{s}|<15^{o})

4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c Ridge (75^{o}<|phi_{s}|<90^{o}) / Ridge (0^{o}<|phi_{s}|<15^{o})

3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c Ridge (30^{o}<|phi_{s}|<45^{o}) / Ridge (0^{o}<|phi_{s}|<15^{o})

4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c Ridge (30^{o}<|phi_{s}|<45^{o}) / Ridge (0^{o}<|phi_{s}|<15^{o})

3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c Ridge (0^{o}<|phi_{s}|<15^{o}) / Jet (0^{o}<|phi_{s}|<15^{o})

4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c Ridge (0^{o}<|phi_{s}|<15^{o}) / Jet (0^{o}<|phi_{s}|<15^{o})

3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, cone region

4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, cone region

3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, jetlike

4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, jetlike

3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, pi region

4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, pi region

3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, ridge

4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, ridge

fig17_ampl_pt_inclusive

3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 0^{o}<phi_{s}<45^{o}, cone region

3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 0^{o}<phi_{s}<45^{o}, jetlike

3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 0^{o}<phi_{s}<45^{o}, pi region

3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 0^{o}<phi_{s}<45^{o}, pi region ridge

3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 0^{o}<phi_{s}<45^{o}, ridge

3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 45^{o}<phi_{s}<90^{o}, cone region

3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 45^{o}<phi_{s}<90^{o}, jetlike

3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 45^{o}<phi_{s}<90^{o}, pi region

3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 45^{o}<phi_{s}<90^{o}, pi region ridge

3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 45^{o}<phi_{s}<90^{o}, ridge

4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 0^{o}<phi_{s}<45^{o}, cone region

4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 0^{o}<phi_{s}<45^{o}, jetlike

4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 0^{o}<phi_{s}<45^{o}, pi region

4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 0^{o}<phi_{s}<45^{o}, pi region ridge

4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 0^{o}<phi_{s}<45^{o}, ridge

4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 45^{o}<phi_{s}<90^{o}, cone region

4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 45^{o}<phi_{s}<90^{o}, jetlike

4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 45^{o}<phi_{s}<90^{o}, pi region

4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 45^{o}<phi_{s}<90^{o}, pi region ridge

4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 45^{o}<phi_{s}<90^{o}, ridge

jetlike eta sigma

cone peak phi sigma

jetlike phi sigma

ridge phi sigma

jetlike eta sigma

cone peak phi sigma

jetlike phi sigma

ridge phi sigma

dAu jetlike eta sigma

dAu jetlike phi sigma

cone peak centroid

cone peak centroid

cone peak centroid

cone peak centroid

cone peak centroid

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 0

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 1

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 2

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 3

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 4

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 5

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 0

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 1

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 2

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 3

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 4

background subtracted correlation with lower flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 5

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 0

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 1

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 2

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 3

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 4

background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 5

d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c

d+Au background subtracted correlation Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 0

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 1

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 2

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 3

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 4

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 4<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<6 GeV/c, 2<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<4 GeV/c, slice 5

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 0

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 1

background subtracted correlation with upper flow systematic uncertainty Au+Au 20-60%, 3<p_{\text{T}}^{(t)}<4 GeV/c, 1<p_{\text{T}}^{(a)}<2 GeV/c, slice 2