HEPData Search

Max results

Sort by

relevance
collaborations
title
date
latest

Reverse order

Showing 1 of 1 results

Date

Collaboration

ATLAS 1

Subject_areas

hep-ex 1

Phrases

Cross Section 1
Inclusive 1
Integrated Cross Section 1
Proton-Proton Scattering 1

Reactions Reset

P P --> CHARGINO+ NEUTRALINO X 1
P P --> CHARGINO- NEUTRALINO X 1

Observables Reset

M 1
N 1
SIG 1

CM Energies (GeV)

0.0 ≤ √s < 1.0
1.0 ≤ √s < 2.0
2.0 ≤ √s < 5.0
5.0 ≤ √s < 10.0
10.0 ≤ √s < 100.0
100.0 ≤ √s < 1000.0
1000.0 ≤ √s < 7000.0
7000.0 ≤ √s < 8000.0
8000.0 ≤ √s < 13000.0
√s ≥ 13000.0

Reset Show All Next 5

Authors

Aad, Georges 1
Abajyan, Tatevik 1
Abbott, Brad 1
Abdallah, Jalal 1
Abdel Khalek, Samah 1
Abdinov, Ovsat 1
Aben, Rosemarie 1
Abi, Babak 1
Abolins, Maris 1
AbouZeid, Ossama 1

Search for direct production of charginos and neutralinos in events with three leptons and missing transverse momentum in sqrt(s) = 8TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector

The ATLAS collaboration Aad, Georges ; Abajyan, Tatevik ; Abbott, Brad ; et al.

JHEP 04 (2014) 169, 2014.

https://inspirehep.net/literature/1282905 Inspire Record 1282905 DOI 10.17182/hepdata.63114 https://doi.org/10.17182/hepdata.63114

A search for the direct production of charginos and neutralinos in final states with three leptons and missing transverse momentum is presented. The analysis is based on 20.3 fb-1 of sqrt(s) = 8 TeV proton--proton collision data delivered by the Large Hadron Collider and recorded with the ATLAS detector. Observations are consistent with the Standard Model expectations and limits are set in R-parity-conserving phenomenological Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Models and in simplified supersymmetric models, significantly extending previous results. For simplified supersymmetric models of direct chargino ($\tilde\chi^\pm_1$) and next-to-lightest neutralino ($\tilde{\chi}_2^0$) production with decays to lightest neutralino ($\tilde{\chi}_1^0$) via either all three generations of sleptons, staus only, gauge bosons, or Higgs bosons, $\tilde\chi^\pm_1$ and $\tilde{\chi}_2^0$ masses are excluded up to 700 GeV, 380 GeV, 345 GeV, or 148 GeV respectively, for a massless $\tilde{\chi}_1^0$.

67 data tables match query

Table 1

Number of expected and observed events in the validation region VR0taub.

Table 2

For events in the low-ETmiss validation region, the MT distribution in VR0taunoZa.

Table 3

For events in the low-ETmiss validation region, the MT distribution in VR0tauZa.

Table 4

For events in the low-ETmiss validation region, the M(l tau) distribution in VR1taua.

Table 5

For events in the low-ETmiss validation region, the MT2max distribution in VR2taua.

Table 6

For events in the high-ETmiss + b-tagged jet validation region, the ETmiss distribution in VR0taunoZb.

Table 7

For events in the high-ETmiss + b-tagged jet validation region, the ETmiss distribution in VR0tauZb.

Table 8

For events in the high-ETmiss + b-tagged jet validation region, the ETmiss distribution in VR1taub.

Table 9

For events in the high-ETmiss + b-tagged jet validation region, the ETmiss distribution in VR2taub.

Table 10

Expected distributions of SM background events and observed data distributions in the binned signal regions SR0taua.

Table 11

The distribution of ETmiss in the summation of all SR0taua regions prior to the requirements on this variable.

Table 12

The distribution of MT in the summation of all SR0taua regions prior to the requirements on this variable.

Table 13

The distribution of M(SFOS) in the summation of all SR0taua regions prior to the requirements on this variable.

Table 14

Expected distribution of SM background events and observed data distribution for the MIN(DELTA(PHI(ll))) variable in the SR0taub region, prior to the requirements on this variable.

Table 15

Expected distribution of SM background events and observed data distribution for the ETmiss variable in the SR1tau region, prior to the requirements on this variable.

Table 16

Expected distribution of SM background events and observed data distribution for the MT2max variable in the SR2taua region, prior to the requirements on this variable.

Table 17

Expected distribution of SM background events and observed data distribution for the M(tau tau) variable in the SR2taub region, prior to the requirements on this variable.

Table 18

Observed 95% CL exclusion contour for chargino and neutralino production in the sleptonL-mediated simplified model.

Table 19

Expected 95% CL exclusion contour for chargino and neutralino production in the sleptonL-mediated simplified model.

Table 20

Observed 95% CL exclusion contour for chargino and neutralino production in the WZ-mediated simplified model.

Table 21

Expected 95% CL exclusion contour for chargino and neutralino production in the WZ-mediated simplified model.

Table 22

Observed 95% CL exclusion contour for chargino and neutralino production in the stauL-mediated simplified model.

Table 23

Expected 95% CL exclusion contour for chargino and neutralino production in the stauL-mediated simplified model.

Table 24

Observed 95% CL exclusion contour for chargino and neutralino production in the Wh-mediated simplified model.

Table 25

Expected 95% CL exclusion contour for chargino and neutralino production in the Wh-mediated simplified model.

Table 26

Observed 95% CL exclusion contour in the pMSSM model with sleptons and M1 = 100 GeV.

Table 27

Expected 95% CL exclusion contour in the pMSSM model with sleptons and M1 = 100 GeV.

Table 28

Observed 95% CL exclusion contour in the pMSSM model with sleptons and M1 = 140 GeV.

Table 29

Expected 95% CL exclusion contour in the pMSSM model with sleptons and M1 = 140 GeV.

Table 30

Observed 95% CL exclusion contour in the pMSSM model with sleptons and M1 = 250 GeV.

Table 31

Expected 95% CL exclusion contour in the pMSSM model with sleptons and M1 = 250 GeV.

Table 32

Observed 95% CL exclusion contour in the pMSSM model with staus.

Table 33

Expected 95% CL exclusion contour in the pMSSM model with staus.

Table 34

Observed 95% CL exclusion contour in the pMSSM model with no sleptons.

Table 35

Expected 95% CL exclusion contour in the pMSSM model with no sleptons.

Table 36

Excluded model cross-sections at 95% confidence level for the slepL-mediated simplified model.

Table 37

Excluded model cross-sections at 95% confidence level for WZ-mediated simplified model.

Table 38

Excluded model cross-sections at 95% confidence level for stauL-mediated simplified model.

Table 39

Excluded model cross-sections at 95% confidence level for Wh-mediated simplified model.

Table 40

Number of generated signal events for slepL-mediated simplified model.

Table 41

Number of generated signal events for WZ-mediated simplified model.

Table 42

Number of generated signal events for stauL-mediated simplified model.

Table 43

Number of generated signal events for Wh-mediated simplified model.

Table 44

Cross-sections for slepL-mediated simplified model.

Table 45

Cross-sections for WZ-mediated simplified model.

Table 46

Cross-sections for stauL-mediated simplified model.

Table 47

Cross-sections for Wh-mediated simplified model.

Table 48

Acceptance for slepL-mediated simplified model using SR0taua bin 20.

Table 49

Acceptance for WZ-mediated simplified model using SR0taua bin 16.

Table 50

Acceptance for stauL-mediated simplified model using SR2taua.

Table 51

Acceptance for Wh-mediated simplified model using SR2taub.

Table 52

Efficiency for slepL-mediated simplified model using SR0taua bin 20.

Table 53

Efficiency for WZ-mediated simplified model using SR0taua bin 16.

Table 54

Efficiency for stauL-mediated simplified model using SR2taua.

Table 55

Efficiency for Wh-mediated simplified model using SR2taub.

Table 56

The total experimental uncertainty, not including Monte Carlo statistics, for the slepL-mediated simplified model using SR0taua bin 20.

Table 57

The total experimental uncertainty, not including Monte Carlo statistics, for the WZ-mediated simplified model using SR0taua bin 16.

Table 58

The total experimental uncertainty, not including Monte Carlo statistics, for the stauL-mediated simplified model using SR2taua.

Table 59

The total experimental uncertainty, not including Monte Carlo statistics, for the Wh-mediated simplified model using SR2taub.

Table 60

The expected CL for slepL-mediated simplified model using SR0taua bin 20, using pseudo-experiments.

Table 61

The expected CL for WZ-mediated simplified model using SR0taua bin 16, using pseudo-experiments.

Table 62

The expected CL for stauL-mediated simplified model using SR2taua, using pseudo-experiments.

Table 63

The expected CL for Wh-mediated simplified model using SR2taub, using pseudo-experiments.

Table 64

The observed CL for slepL-mediated simplified model using SR0taua bin 20, using pseudo-experiments.

Table 65

The observed CL for WZ-mediated simplified model using SR0taua bin 16, using pseudo-experiments.

Table 66

The observed CL for stauL-mediated simplified model using SR2taua, using pseudo-experiments.

Table 67

The observed CL for Wh-mediated simplified model using SR2taub, using pseudo-experiments.

More…