The results of fits of the two-particle double-ratio correlation function $R_{2} (Q)$ for $\sqrt{s} = 0.9\ TeV$ events with the unlike-charge reference sample for various multiplicity intervals $n_{ch}$ for the exponential parametrization $\Omega^{(E)}$. The uncertainties for parameters $\lambda$ and $R$ are square root from the quadratic sum of statistical and systematic errors. Where only one error is shown for parameters $C_{0}$ and $\epsilon$, this represents the statistical uncertainty only.

The results of fits of the two-particle double-ratio correlation function $R_{2} (Q)$ for $\sqrt{s} = 7\ TeV$ events with the unlike-charge reference sample for various multiplicity intervals $n_{ch}$ for the exponential parametrization $\Omega^{(E)}$. The uncertainties for parameters $\lambda$ and $R$ are square root from the quadratic sum of statistical and systematic errors. The statistical uncertainties at $7\ TeV$ were corrected on the $\sqrt{\chi^{2}/ndf}$ and they more smaller than systematic uncertainties. Where only one error is shown for parameters $C_{0}$ and $\epsilon$, this represents the statistical uncertainty only.

The results of fits of the two-particle double-ratio correlation function $R_{2} (Q)$ for $\sqrt{s} = 7\ TeV\ HM$ events with the unlike-charge reference sample for various multiplicity intervals $n_{ch}$ for the exponential parametrization $\Omega^{(E)}$. The uncertainties for parameters $\lambda$ and $R$ are square root from the quadratic sum of statistical and systematic errors. Where only one error is shown for parameters $C_{0}$ and $\epsilon$, this represents the statistical uncertainty only.

The results of fits of the two-particle double-ratio correlation function $R_{2} (Q)$ for $\sqrt{s} = 0.9\ TeV$ ($n_{ch} \ge 2$) events with the unlike-charge reference sample for various $k_{T}$ intervals for the exponential parametrization $\Omega^{(E)}$. The uncertainties for parameters $\lambda$ and $R$ are square root from the quadratic sum of statistical and systematic errors. The statistical uncertainties were corrected on the $\sqrt{\chi^{2}/ndf}$ when $\chi^{2}/ndf > 1$. Where only one error is shown for parameters $C_{0}$ and $\epsilon$, this represents the statistical uncertainty only.

The results of fits of the two-particle double-ratio correlation function $R_{2} (Q)$ for $\sqrt{s} = 7\ TeV$ ($n_{ch} \ge 2$) events with the unlike-charge reference sample for various $k_{T}$ intervals for the exponential parametrization $\Omega^{(E)}$. The uncertainties for parameters $\lambda$ and $R$ are square root from the quadratic sum of statistical and systematic errors. Where only one error is shown for parameters $C_{0}$ and $\epsilon$ , this represents the statistical uncertainty only. The statistical uncertainties were corrected on the $\sqrt{\chi^{2}/ndf}$ when $\chi^{2}/ndf > 1$. The statistical uncertainties at $7\ TeV$ more smaller than systematic uncertainties.

The results of fits of the two-particle double-ratio correlation function $R_{2} (Q)$ for $\sqrt{s} = 7\ TeV\ HM$ ($n_{ch} \ge 150$) events with the unlike-charge reference sample for various $k_{T}$ intervals for the exponential parametrization $\Omega^{(E)}$. The uncertainties for parameters $\lambda$ and $R$ are square root from the quadratic sum of statistical and systematic errors. The statistical uncertainties were corrected on the $\sqrt{\chi^{2}/ndf}$ when $\chi^{2}/ndf > 1$.Where only one error is shown for parameters $C_{0}$ and $\epsilon$, this represents the statistical uncertainty only.

The results of fits of the two-particle double-ratio correlation function $R_{2} (Q)$ for $\sqrt{s} = 7\ TeV$ events with the unlike-charge reference sample for various $k_{T}$ intervals of different multiplicity regions $n_{ch}$ for the exponential parametrization $\Omega^{(E)}$. The statistical uncertainties were corrected on the $\sqrt{\chi^{2}/ndf}$ when $\chi^{2}/ndf > 1$. The statistical uncertainties smaller than systematic uncertainties. The uncertainties for parameters $\lambda$ and $R$ are square root from the quadratic sum of statistical and systematic errors. Where only one error is shown for parameters $C_{0}$ and $\epsilon$, this represents the statistical uncertainty only.

The $Q$ distribution measured at $0.9\ TeV$ for unlike-sign pairs for $p_{T} > 100\ MeV$ and $|\eta|<2.5$, renormalized to the total number of charged-particle pairs. The error bars represents the statistical uncertainties.

The $Q$ distribution measured at $0.9\ TeV$ for like-sign pairs for $p_{T} > 100\ MeV$ and $|\eta|<2.5$, renormalized to the total number of charged-particle pairs. The error bars represents the statistical uncertainties.

The $Q$ distribution measured at $7\ TeV$ for unlike-sign pairs for $p_{T} > 100\ MeV$ and $|\eta|<2.5$, renormalized to the total number of charged-particle pairs. The error bars represents the statistical uncertainties.

The $Q$ distribution measured at $7\ TeV$ for like-sign pairs for $p_{T} > 100\ MeV$ and $|\eta|<2.5$, renormalized to the total number of charged-particle pairs. The error bars represents the statistical uncertainties.

The $R_{2}(Q)$ correlation function measured at $0.9\ TeV$ using unlike-charge particle reference sample for different $n_{ch}$ intervals $p_{T} > 100\ MeV$ and $|\eta|<2.5$. The error bars represents only the statistical uncertainties.

The $R_{2}(Q)$ correlation function measured at $0.9\ TeV$ using unlike-charge particle reference sample for different $k_{T}$ intervals with multiplicity $n_{ch} \ge 2$. The error bars represents only the statistical uncertainties.

The $R_{2}(Q)$ correlation function measured at $7\ TeV$ using unlike-charge particle reference sample for different multiplicity intervals $n_{ch}$ with $p_{T} > 100\ MeV$ and $|\eta| < 2.5$. The error bars represents only the statistical uncertainties.

The $R_{2}(Q)$ correlation function measured at $7\ TeV$ using unlike-charge particle reference sample for different $k_{T}$ intervals with multiplicity $n_{ch} \ge 2$. The error bars represents only the statistical uncertainties.

The $R_{2}(Q)$ correlation function measured at $7\ TeV\ HM$ using unlike-charge particle reference sample for different $n_{ch}$ intervals $p_{T} > 100\ MeV$ and $|\eta|<2.5$. The error bars represents only the statistical uncertainties.

The $R_{2}(Q)$ correlation function measured with $7\ TeV\ HM$ data using unlike-charge particle reference sample for different $k_{T}$ intervals with multiplicity $n_{ch} \ge 150$. The error bars represents only the statistical uncertainties.

The $R_{2}(Q)$ correlation function measured at $7\ TeV$ using unlike-charge particle reference sample for different $k_{T}$ intervals within multiplicity interval $n_{ch} = 2-9$. The error bars represents only the statistical uncertainties.

The $R_{2}(Q)$ correlation function measured at $7\ TeV$ using unlike-charge particle reference sample for different $k_{T}$ intervals within multiplicity interval $n_{ch} = 10-24$. The error bars represents only the statistical uncertainties.

The $R_{2}(Q)$ correlation function measured at $7\ TeV$ using unlike-charge particle reference sample for different $k_{T}$ intervals within multiplicity interval $n_{ch} = 25-80$. The error bars represents only the statistical uncertainties.

The $R_{2}(Q)$ correlation function measured at $7\ TeV$ using unlike-charge particle reference sample for different $k_{T}$ intervals within multiplicity interval $n_{ch} = 81-125$. The error bars represents only the statistical uncertainties.

Detector response matrix (PROB) for the acoplanarity variable (ACO) for mu+ mu- channel (empty bins are not reported).

Acoplanarity (ACO) distributions unfolded for detector resolution, and lepton pair trigger, reconstruction and identification efficiencies for e+ e- channel (empty bins are not reported).

Acoplanarity (ACO) distributions unfolded for detector resolution, and lepton pair trigger, reconstruction and identification efficiencies for mu+ mu- channel (empty bins are not reported).

The lepton pair exclusive selection efficiency in the fiducial region for signal MC events as a function of M and Y for e+ e- channel.

The lepton pair exclusive selection efficiency in the fiducial region for signal MC events as a function of M and Y for mu+ mu- channel.

The lepton pair exclusive selection efficiency in the fiducial region for single-dissociative MC events as a function of M and Y for e+ e- channel.

The lepton pair exclusive selection efficiency in the fiducial region for single-dissociative MC events as a function of M and Y for mu+ mu- channel.

The cross section differential in the fraction of the proton four-momentum carried by the Pomeron, LOG10(C=XI), for events with at least two jets of pt > 20 GeV found by the anti-kt jet algorithm with R=0.4.

The cross section differential in the fraction of the proton four-momentum carried by the Pomeron, LOG10(C=XI), for events with at least two jets of pt > 20 GeV found by the anti-kt jet algorithm with R=0.6 and after requiring that the pseudorapidity gap > 2.

The cross section differential in the fraction of the proton four-momentum carried by the Pomeron, LOG10(C=XI), for events with at least two jets of pt > 20 GeV found by the anti-kt jet algorithm with R=0.4 and after requiring that the pseudorapidity gap > 2.

Measured double-differential inclusive-jet cross section for the range 1.5 <= |y| < 2.0 and for anti-kT jets with radius parameter R = 0.4. It is based on the data sample of proton-proton collisions at 7 TeV of centre-of-mass energy collected in 2011 by the ATLAS experiment at the LHC. The data sample corresponds to the integrated luminosity of 4.5 fb^-1. The statistical uncertainties arising from data and MC simulation have been combined. All the components of the systematic uncertainty are shown. They are: all the components of the jet energy scale uncertainty (jesX), the uncertainty of the jet energy resolution (jer), the uncertainty of the jet angular resolution (jar), the uncertainty of data unfolding (unfold), the uncertainty of the jet quality selection (qual), the luminosity uncertainty (lumi). All the components are assumed to be independent of each other. Each component is assumed to be fully correlated in pT and eta. Concerning the shape of the different components, Gaussian distribution assumption works for most of them. The three columns correspond to three different sets of the systematic uncertainty built with nominal, stronger or weaker assumptions on correlations between the jet energy scale uncertainty components. For more information on the systematic uncertainties, see the reference paper.

Measured double-differential inclusive-jet cross section for the range 2.0 <= |y| < 2.5 and for anti-kT jets with radius parameter R = 0.4. It is based on the data sample of proton-proton collisions at 7 TeV of centre-of-mass energy collected in 2011 by the ATLAS experiment at the LHC. The data sample corresponds to the integrated luminosity of 4.5 fb^-1. The statistical uncertainties arising from data and MC simulation have been combined. All the components of the systematic uncertainty are shown. They are: all the components of the jet energy scale uncertainty (jesX), the uncertainty of the jet energy resolution (jer), the uncertainty of the jet angular resolution (jar), the uncertainty of data unfolding (unfold), the uncertainty of the jet quality selection (qual), the luminosity uncertainty (lumi). All the components are assumed to be independent of each other. Each component is assumed to be fully correlated in pT and eta. Concerning the shape of the different components, Gaussian distribution assumption works for most of them. The three columns correspond to three different sets of the systematic uncertainty built with nominal, stronger or weaker assumptions on correlations between the jet energy scale uncertainty components. For more information on the systematic uncertainties, see the reference paper.

Measured double-differential inclusive-jet cross section for the range 2.5 <= |y| < 3.0 and for anti-kT jets with radius parameter R = 0.4. It is based on the data sample of proton-proton collisions at 7 TeV of centre-of-mass energy collected in 2011 by the ATLAS experiment at the LHC. The data sample corresponds to the integrated luminosity of 4.5 fb^-1. The statistical uncertainties arising from data and MC simulation have been combined. All the components of the systematic uncertainty are shown. They are: all the components of the jet energy scale uncertainty (jesX), the uncertainty of the jet energy resolution (jer), the uncertainty of the jet angular resolution (jar), the uncertainty of data unfolding (unfold), the uncertainty of the jet quality selection (qual), the luminosity uncertainty (lumi). All the components are assumed to be independent of each other. Each component is assumed to be fully correlated in pT and eta. Concerning the shape of the different components, Gaussian distribution assumption works for most of them. The three columns correspond to three different sets of the systematic uncertainty built with nominal, stronger or weaker assumptions on correlations between the jet energy scale uncertainty components. For more information on the systematic uncertainties, see the reference paper.

Measured double-differential inclusive-jet cross section for the range 0.0 <= |y| < 0.5 and for anti-kT jets with radius parameter R = 0.6. It is based on the data sample of proton-proton collisions at 7 TeV of centre-of-mass energy collected in 2011 by the ATLAS experiment at the LHC. The data sample corresponds to the integrated luminosity of 4.5 fb^-1. The statistical uncertainties arising from data and MC simulation have been combined. All the components of the systematic uncertainty are shown. They are: all the components of the jet energy scale uncertainty (jesX), the uncertainty of the jet energy resolution (jer), the uncertainty of the jet angular resolution (jar), the uncertainty of data unfolding (unfold), the uncertainty of the jet quality selection (qual), the luminosity uncertainty (lumi). All the components are assumed to be independent of each other. Each component is assumed to be fully correlated in pT and eta. Concerning the shape of the different components, Gaussian distribution assumption works for most of them. The three columns correspond to three different sets of the systematic uncertainty built with nominal, stronger or weaker assumptions on correlations between the jet energy scale uncertainty components. For more information on the systematic uncertainties, see the reference paper.

Measured double-differential inclusive-jet cross section for the range 0.5 <= |y| < 1.0 and for anti-kT jets with radius parameter R = 0.6. It is based on the data sample of proton-proton collisions at 7 TeV of centre-of-mass energy collected in 2011 by the ATLAS experiment at the LHC. The data sample corresponds to the integrated luminosity of 4.5 fb^-1. The statistical uncertainties arising from data and MC simulation have been combined. All the components of the systematic uncertainty are shown. They are: all the components of the jet energy scale uncertainty (jesX), the uncertainty of the jet energy resolution (jer), the uncertainty of the jet angular resolution (jar), the uncertainty of data unfolding (unfold), the uncertainty of the jet quality selection (qual), the luminosity uncertainty (lumi). All the components are assumed to be independent of each other. Each component is assumed to be fully correlated in pT and eta. Concerning the shape of the different components, Gaussian distribution assumption works for most of them. The three columns correspond to three different sets of the systematic uncertainty built with nominal, stronger or weaker assumptions on correlations between the jet energy scale uncertainty components. For more information on the systematic uncertainties, see the reference paper.

Measured double-differential inclusive-jet cross section for the range 1.0 <= |y| < 1.5 and for anti-kT jets with radius parameter R = 0.6. It is based on the data sample of proton-proton collisions at 7 TeV of centre-of-mass energy collected in 2011 by the ATLAS experiment at the LHC. The data sample corresponds to the integrated luminosity of 4.5 fb^-1. The statistical uncertainties arising from data and MC simulation have been combined. All the components of the systematic uncertainty are shown. They are: all the components of the jet energy scale uncertainty (jesX), the uncertainty of the jet energy resolution (jer), the uncertainty of the jet angular resolution (jar), the uncertainty of data unfolding (unfold), the uncertainty of the jet quality selection (qual), the luminosity uncertainty (lumi). All the components are assumed to be independent of each other. Each component is assumed to be fully correlated in pT and eta. Concerning the shape of the different components, Gaussian distribution assumption works for most of them. The three columns correspond to three different sets of the systematic uncertainty built with nominal, stronger or weaker assumptions on correlations between the jet energy scale uncertainty components. For more information on the systematic uncertainties, see the reference paper.

Measured double-differential inclusive-jet cross section for the range 1.5 <= |y| < 2.0 and for anti-kT jets with radius parameter R = 0.6. It is based on the data sample of proton-proton collisions at 7 TeV of centre-of-mass energy collected in 2011 by the ATLAS experiment at the LHC. The data sample corresponds to the integrated luminosity of 4.5 fb^-1. The statistical uncertainties arising from data and MC simulation have been combined. All the components of the systematic uncertainty are shown. They are: all the components of the jet energy scale uncertainty (jesX), the uncertainty of the jet energy resolution (jer), the uncertainty of the jet angular resolution (jar), the uncertainty of data unfolding (unfold), the uncertainty of the jet quality selection (qual), the luminosity uncertainty (lumi). All the components are assumed to be independent of each other. Each component is assumed to be fully correlated in pT and eta. Concerning the shape of the different components, Gaussian distribution assumption works for most of them. The three columns correspond to three different sets of the systematic uncertainty built with nominal, stronger or weaker assumptions on correlations between the jet energy scale uncertainty components. For more information on the systematic uncertainties, see the reference paper.

Measured double-differential inclusive-jet cross section for the range 2.0 <= |y| < 2.5 and for anti-kT jets with radius parameter R = 0.6. It is based on the data sample of proton-proton collisions at 7 TeV of centre-of-mass energy collected in 2011 by the ATLAS experiment at the LHC. The data sample corresponds to the integrated luminosity of 4.5 fb^-1. The statistical uncertainties arising from data and MC simulation have been combined. All the components of the systematic uncertainty are shown. They are: all the components of the jet energy scale uncertainty (jesX), the uncertainty of the jet energy resolution (jer), the uncertainty of the jet angular resolution (jar), the uncertainty of data unfolding (unfold), the uncertainty of the jet quality selection (qual), the luminosity uncertainty (lumi). All the components are assumed to be independent of each other. Each component is assumed to be fully correlated in pT and eta. Concerning the shape of the different components, Gaussian distribution assumption works for most of them. The three columns correspond to three different sets of the systematic uncertainty built with nominal, stronger or weaker assumptions on correlations between the jet energy scale uncertainty components. For more information on the systematic uncertainties, see the reference paper.

Measured double-differential inclusive-jet cross section for the range 2.5 <= |y| < 3.0 and for anti-kT jets with radius parameter R = 0.6. It is based on the data sample of proton-proton collisions at 7 TeV of centre-of-mass energy collected in 2011 by the ATLAS experiment at the LHC. The data sample corresponds to the integrated luminosity of 4.5 fb^-1. The statistical uncertainties arising from data and MC simulation have been combined. All the components of the systematic uncertainty are shown. They are: all the components of the jet energy scale uncertainty (jesX), the uncertainty of the jet energy resolution (jer), the uncertainty of the jet angular resolution (jar), the uncertainty of data unfolding (unfold), the uncertainty of the jet quality selection (qual), the luminosity uncertainty (lumi). All the components are assumed to be independent of each other. Each component is assumed to be fully correlated in pT and eta. Concerning the shape of the different components, Gaussian distribution assumption works for most of them. The three columns correspond to three different sets of the systematic uncertainty built with nominal, stronger or weaker assumptions on correlations between the jet energy scale uncertainty components. For more information on the systematic uncertainties, see the reference paper.

Parton-level normalized $t\bar t$ differential cross-sections for $t\bar t$ system mass $m_{t\bar t}$ at $\sqrt{s}$ = 8 TeV. The uncertainties quoted in the second column represent the statistical and systematic uncertainties added in quadrature.

Parton-level normalized $t\bar t$ differential cross-sections for the $t\bar t$ system transverse momentum $p_{T, t\bar t}$ at $\sqrt{s}$ = 8 TeV. The uncertainties quoted in the second column represent the statistical and systematic uncertainties added in quadrature.

Parton-level normalized $t\bar t$ differential cross-sections for the $t\bar t$ system absolute rapidity $|y_{t\bar t}|$ at $\sqrt{s}$ = 8 TeV. The uncertainties quoted in the second column represent the statistical and systematic uncertainties added in quadrature.

Parton-level absolute $t\bar t$ differential cross-sections for $t\bar t$ system mass $m_{t\bar t}$ at $\sqrt{s}$ = 7 TeV. The cross-sections in the last bins include events (if any) beyond of the bin edges. The uncertainties quoted in the second column represent the statistical and systematic uncertainties added in quadrature.

Parton-level absolute $t\bar t$ differential cross-sections for the $t\bar t$ system transverse momentum $p_{T, t\bar t}$ at $\sqrt{s}$ = 7 TeV. The cross-sections in the last bins include events (if any) beyond of the bin edges. The uncertainties quoted in the second column represent the statistical and systematic uncertainties added in quadrature.

Parton-level absolute $t\bar t$ differential cross-sections for the $t\bar t$ system absolute rapidity $|y_{t\bar t}|$ at $\sqrt{s}$ = 7 TeV. The cross-sections in the last bins include events (if any) beyond of the bin edges. The uncertainties quoted in the second column represent the statistical and systematic uncertainties added in quadrature.

Parton-level absolute $t\bar t$ differential cross-sections for $t\bar t$ system mass $m_{t\bar t}$ at $\sqrt{s}$ = 8 TeV. The uncertainties quoted in the second column represent the statistical and systematic uncertainties added in quadrature.

Parton-level absolute $t\bar t$ differential cross-sections for the $t\bar t$ system transverse momentum $p_{T, t\bar t}$ at $\sqrt{s}$ = 8 TeV. The uncertainties quoted in the second column represent the statistical and systematic uncertainties added in quadrature.

Parton-level absolute $t\bar t$ differential cross-sections for the $t\bar t$ system absolute rapidity $|y_{t\bar t}|$ at $\sqrt{s}$ = 8 TeV. The uncertainties quoted in the second column represent the statistical and systematic uncertainties added in quadrature.

Full covariance matrix of the normalized $t\bar t$ differential cross-sections for $t\bar t$ system mass $m_{t\bar t}$ at $\sqrt{s}$ = 7 TeV. The elements of the covariance matrix are in units of 10$^{-6}$ GeV$^{-2}$.

Full covariance matrix of the normalized $t\bar t$ differential cross-sections for $t\bar t$ system transverse momentum $p_{T, t\bar t}$ at $\sqrt{s}$ = 7 TeV. The elements of the covariance matrix are in units of 10$^{-6}$ GeV$^{-2}$.

Full covariance matrix of the normalized $t\bar t$ differential cross-sections for $t\bar t$ system absolute rapidity $|y_{t\bar t}|$ at $\sqrt{s}$ = 7 TeV. The elements of the covariance matrix are unit-less.

Full covariance matrix of the normalized $t\bar t$ differential cross-sections for $t\bar t$ system mass $m_{t\bar t}$ at $\sqrt{s}$ = 8 TeV. The elements of the covariance matrix are in units of 10$^{-6}$ GeV$^{-2}$.

Full covariance matrix of the normalized $t\bar t$ differential cross-sections for $t\bar t$ system transverse momentum $p_{T, t\bar t}$ at $\sqrt{s}$ = 8 TeV. The elements of the covariance matrix are in units of 10$^{-6}$ GeV$^{-2}$.

Full covariance matrix of the normalized $t\bar t$ differential cross-sections for $t\bar t$ system absolute rapidity $|y_{t\bar t}|$ at $\sqrt{s}$ = 8 TeV. The elements of the covariance matrix are unit-less.

Full covariance matrix of the absolute $t\bar t$ differential cross-sections for $t\bar t$ system mass $m_{t\bar t}$ at $\sqrt{s}$ = 7 TeV. The elements of the covariance matrix are in units of pb$^2$ GeV$^{-2}$.

Full covariance matrix of the absolute $t\bar t$ differential cross-sections for $t\bar t$ system transverse momentum $p_{T, t\bar t}$ at $\sqrt{s}$ = 7 TeV. The elements of the covariance matrix are in units of pb$^2$ GeV$^{-2}$.

Full covariance matrix of the normalized $t\bar t$ differential cross-sections for $t\bar t$ system absolute rapidity $|y_{t\bar t}|$ at $\sqrt{s}$ = 7 TeV. The elements of the covariance matrix are pb$^2$.

Full covariance matrix of the absolute $t\bar t$ differential cross-sections for $t\bar t$ system mass $m_{t\bar t}$ at $\sqrt{s}$ = 8 TeV. The elements of the covariance matrix are in units of pb$^2$ GeV$^{-2}$.

Full covariance matrix of the absolute $t\bar t$ differential cross-sections for $t\bar t$ system transverse momentum $p_{T, t\bar t}$ at $\sqrt{s}$ = 8 TeV. The elements of the covariance matrix are in units of pb$^2$ GeV$^{-2}$.

Full covariance matrix of the normalized $t\bar t$ differential cross-sections for $t\bar t$ system absolute rapidity $|y_{t\bar t}|$ at $\sqrt{s}$ = 8 TeV. The elements of the covariance matrix are pb$^2$.

Statistical bin-to-bin correlations in the normalized $t\bar t$ differential cross-sections for $t\bar t$ system mass $m_{t\bar t}$ at $\sqrt{s}$ = 7 TeV. The off-diagonal correlations mainly due to bin migrations in unfolding and the normalization condition.

Statistical bin-to-bin correlations in the normalized $t\bar t$ differential cross-sections for $t\bar t$ system transverse momentum $p_{T, t\bar t}$ at $\sqrt{s}$ = 7 TeV. The off-diagonal correlations mainly due to bin migrations in unfolding and the normalization condition.

Statistical bin-to-bin correlations in the normalized $t\bar t$ differential cross-sections for $t\bar t$ system absolute rapidity $|y_{t\bar t}|$ at $\sqrt{s}$ = 7 TeV. The off-diagonal correlations mainly due to bin migrations in unfolding and the normalization condition.

Statistical bin-to-bin correlations in the normalized $t\bar t$ differential cross-sections for $t\bar t$ system mass $m_{t\bar t}$ at $\sqrt{s}$ = 8 TeV. The off-diagonal correlations mainly due to bin migrations in unfolding and the normalization condition.

Statistical bin-to-bin correlations in the normalized $t\bar t$ differential cross-sections for $t\bar t$ system transverse momentum $p_{T, t\bar t}$ at $\sqrt{s}$ = 8 TeV. The off-diagonal correlations mainly due to bin migrations in unfolding and the normalization condition.

Statistical bin-to-bin correlations in the normalized $t\bar t$ differential cross-sections for $t\bar t$ system absolute rapidity $|y_{t\bar t}|$ at $\sqrt{s}$ = 8 TeV. The off-diagonal correlations mainly due to bin migrations in unfolding and the normalization condition.

Statistical bin-to-bin correlations in the absolute $t\bar t$ differential cross-sections for $t\bar t$ system mass $m_{t\bar t}$ at $\sqrt{s}$ = 7 TeV. The off-diagonal correlations mainly due to bin migrations in unfolding and the normalization condition.

Statistical bin-to-bin correlations in the absolute $t\bar t$ differential cross-sections for $t\bar t$ system transverse momentum $p_{T, t\bar t}$ at $\sqrt{s}$ = 7 TeV. The off-diagonal correlations mainly due to bin migrations in unfolding and the normalization condition.

Statistical bin-to-bin correlations in the absolute $t\bar t$ differential cross-sections for $t\bar t$ system absolute rapidity $|y_{t\bar t}|$ at $\sqrt{s}$ = 7 TeV. The off-diagonal correlations mainly due to bin migrations in unfolding and the normalization condition.

Statistical bin-to-bin correlations in the absolute $t\bar t$ differential cross-sections for $t\bar t$ system mass $m_{t\bar t}$ at $\sqrt{s}$ = 8 TeV. The off-diagonal correlations mainly due to bin migrations in unfolding and the normalization condition.

Statistical bin-to-bin correlations in the absolute $t\bar t$ differential cross-sections for $t\bar t$ system transverse momentum $p_{T, t\bar t}$ at $\sqrt{s}$ = 8 TeV. The off-diagonal correlations mainly due to bin migrations in unfolding and the normalization condition.

Statistical bin-to-bin correlations in the absolute $t\bar t$ differential cross-sections for $t\bar t$ system absolute rapidity $|y_{t\bar t}|$ at $\sqrt{s}$ = 8 TeV. The off-diagonal correlations mainly due to bin migrations in unfolding and the normalization condition.

Ratios of integrated fiducial CC and NC cross sections obtained from the combination of electron and muon channels with statistical (stat) and systematic (syst) uncertainties. The common fiducial regions are defined in Section 2.3.

Total cross sections times leptonic branching ratios obtained from the combination of electron and muon channels with statistical and systematic uncertainties, for $W^+$, $W^-$, their sum and the $Z/\gamma^*$ process measured at $\sqrt{s}=7$ TeV. The $Z/\gamma^*$ cross section is defined for the dilepton mass window $m_{\ell\ell} = 66 - 116$ GeV. The uncertainties denote the statistical (stat), the experimental systematic (syst), the luminosity (lumi), and acceptance extrapolation (acc) contributions.

Ratios of total CC and NC cross sections obtained from the combination of electron and muon channels with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The $Z/\gamma^*$ cross section is defined for the dilepton mass window $m_{\ell\ell} = 66 - 116$ GeV. The uncertainties denote the statistical (stat), the experimental systematic (syst), and acceptance extrapolation (acc) contributions.

The correlation coefficients of the $W^+$, $W^-$ and $Z$ fiducial cross-section measurements.

Measurement of the electron-to-muon cross-section ratios for the $W$ and $Z$ production, $R_W$ and $R_Z$. The uncertainties denote the statistical (stat) and the experimental systematic (syst) contributions.

Differential cross section for the $W^+ \to \ell^+\nu$ processes combined from $\ell = e, \mu$ decays extrapolated to the common fiducial region. The statistical, uncorrelated systematic, correlated systematic and luminosity uncertainties are given in percent.

Differential cross section for the $W^- \to \ell^-\bar{\nu}$ processes combined from $\ell = e, \mu$ decays extrapolated to the common fiducial region. The statistical, uncorrelated systematic, correlated systematic and luminosity uncertainties are given in percent.

Differential cross section for the central $Z/\gamma^* \to \ell\ell$ processes in the invariant mass region $46 < m_{\ell\ell} < 66$ GeV combined from $\ell = e, \mu$ decays extrapolated to the common fiducial region. The statistical, uncorrelated systematic, correlated systematic and luminosity uncertainties are given in percent.

Differential cross section for the central $Z/\gamma^* \to \ell\ell$ processes in the invariant mass region $66 < m_{\ell\ell} < 116$ GeV combined from $\ell = e, \mu$ decays extrapolated to the common fiducial region. The statistical, uncorrelated systematic, correlated systematic and luminosity uncertainties are given in percent.

Differential cross section for the central $Z/\gamma^* \to \ell\ell$ processes in the invariant mass region $116 < m_{\ell\ell} < 150$ GeV combined from $\ell = e, \mu$ decays extrapolated to the common fiducial region. The statistical, uncorrelated systematic, correlated systematic and luminosity uncertainties are given in percent.

Differential cross section for the forward $Z/\gamma^* \to \ell\ell$ processes in the invariant mass region $66 < m_{\ell\ell} < 116$ GeV combined from $\ell = e, \mu$ decays extrapolated to the common fiducial region. The statistical, uncorrelated systematic, correlated systematic and luminosity uncertainties are given in percent.

Differential cross section for the forward $Z/\gamma^* \to \ell\ell$ processes in the invariant mass region $116 < m_{\ell\ell} < 150$ GeV combined from $\ell = e, \mu$ decays extrapolated to the common fiducial region. The statistical, uncorrelated systematic, correlated systematic and luminosity uncertainties are given in percent.

Differential cross section for the $W^- \to e^-\bar{\nu}$ process extrapolated to the common fiducial region. The statistical, uncorrelated systematic, correlated systematic and luminosity uncertainties are given in percent.

Differential cross section for the $W^+ \to e^+\nu$ process extrapolated to the common fiducial region. The statistical, uncorrelated systematic, correlated systematic and luminosity uncertainties are given in percent.

Differential cross section for the central $Z/\gamma^* \to ee$ process in the invariant mass region $46 < m_{\ell\ell} < 66$ GeV extrapolated to the common fiducial region. The statistical, uncorrelated systematic, correlated systematic and luminosity uncertainties are given in percent.

Differential cross section for the central $Z/\gamma^* \to ee$ process in the invariant mass region $66 < m_{\ell\ell} < 116$ GeV extrapolated to the common fiducial region. The statistical, uncorrelated systematic, correlated systematic and luminosity uncertainties are given in percent.

Differential cross section for the forward $Z/\gamma^* \to ee$ process in the invariant mass region $66 < m_{\ell\ell} < 116$ GeV extrapolated to the common fiducial region. The statistical, uncorrelated systematic, correlated systematic and luminosity uncertainties are given in percent.

Differential cross section for the central $Z/\gamma^* \to ee$ process in the invariant mass region $116 < m_{\ell\ell} < 150$ GeV extrapolated to the common fiducial region. The statistical, uncorrelated systematic, correlated systematic and luminosity uncertainties are given in percent.

Differential cross section for the forward $Z/\gamma^* \to ee$ process in the invariant mass region $116 < m_{\ell\ell} < 150$ GeV extrapolated to the common fiducial region. The statistical, uncorrelated systematic, correlated systematic and luminosity uncertainties are given in percent.

Differential cross section for the $W^- \to \mu^-\bar{\nu}$ process extrapolated to the common fiducial region. The statistical, uncorrelated systematic, correlated systematic and luminosity uncertainties are given in percent.

Differential cross section for the $W^+ \to \mu^+\nu$ process extrapolated to the common fiducial region. The statistical, uncorrelated systematic, correlated systematic and luminosity uncertainties are given in percent.

Differential cross section for the central $Z/\gamma^* \to \mu\mu$ process in the invariant mass region $66 < m_{\ell\ell} < 116$ GeV extrapolated to the common fiducial region. The statistical, uncorrelated systematic, correlated systematic and luminosity uncertainties are given in percent.

Differential cross section for the central $Z/\gamma^* \to \mu\mu$ process in the invariant mass region $46 < m_{\ell\ell} < 66$ GeV extrapolated to the common fiducial region. The statistical, uncorrelated systematic, correlated systematic and luminosity uncertainties are given in percent.

Differential cross section for the central $Z/\gamma^* \to \mu\mu$ process in the invariant mass region $116 < m_{\ell\ell} < 150$ GeV extrapolated to the common fiducial region. The statistical, uncorrelated systematic, correlated systematic and luminosity uncertainties are given in percent.

Values of $E(W[Z])$ and $A(W[Z])$ correction factors for integrated $W\to\ell\nu$ and $Z\to\ell\ell$ measurements together with the total estimated uncertainties in percent. The separate electron and muon measurements are divided by the $E(W[Z])$ factors, as defined in Eq.(8), to correct them to the corresponding common fiducial region. The $A(W[Z])$ factors, defined in Eq. (9), are used to extract a total cross section. Finally, the ratios of $A(W[Z])$ correction factors are given for four combinations of $W^+$, $W^-$ and $Z$ treating all components of the $A(W[Z])$ uncertainties as correlated between processes, which is relevant for the acceptance uncertainties on the total cross-section ratios.

Values of $E(W)$ correction factors for the differential $W\to\ell\nu$ measurements together with the total estimated uncertainties in percent. The separate electron and muon measurements are divided by the $E(W)$ factors, as defined in Eq.(8), to correct them to the corresponding common fiducial region. This only affects the bin of highest $\eta_\ell$, all other $E(W)$ factors are exactly 1 without uncertainties.

Values of $E(Z)$ correction factors for the differential $Z/\gamma^*\to e^+e^-$ measurements together with the total estimated uncertainties in percent. The separate electron and muon measurements are divided by the $E(Z)$ factors, as defined in Eq.(8), to correct them to the corresponding common fiducial region.

Values of $E(Z)$ correction factors for the differential $Z/\gamma^*\to \mu^+\mu^-$ measurements together with the total estimated uncertainties in percent. The separate electron and muon measurements are divided by the $E(Z)$ factors, as defined in Eq.(8), to correct them to the corresponding common fiducial region.

Values of $E(Z)$ correction factors for the differential forward $Z/\gamma^*\to e^+e^-$ measurements together with the total estimated uncertainties in percent. The separate electron and muon measurements are divided by the $E(Z)$ factors, as defined in Eq.(8), to correct them to the corresponding common fiducial region.

Correlation coefficients between integrated cross sections extrapolated to the total phase space, $\sigma^\mathrm{tot}_{W \to \ell\nu}$ and $\sigma^\mathrm{tot}_{Z/\gamma^* \to \ell\ell}$ for four combinations of $W^+, W^-, W^{\pm}$ and $Z$. Values are given including and excluding the luminosity uncertainties.

Correlation coefficients between integrated fiducial cross sections in electron and muon channels for $W^{\pm}$ and $Z$. Values are given including and excluding the luminosity uncertainties.

The differential W charge asymmetry $A_{\ell}$ as defined in Eq. (19) from the combined electron and muon channel measurements. All uncertainties are quoted in % with respect to the $A_{\ell}$ values. The statistical (stat), uncorrelated (uncor) and correlated (cor) systematic uncertainties are reported.

Combined NNLO QCD and NLO EW predictions as defined in Eq. (15), c.f. Section 6.1.2 and Ref. [110] Chapter III.2.3, for the integrated common fiducial cross sections using Table 15 input parameters and various NNLO PDFs. The given uncertainties correspond to the statistical accuracy from the numerical DYNNLO 1.5 integration (stat) and the PDF uncertainties, where the latter are evaluated following the different prescriptions of the PDF groups.

Combined NNLO QCD and NLO EW predictions as defined in Eq. (15), c.f. Section 6.1.2 and Ref. [110] Chapter III.2.3, for the differential common fiducial cross sections for the $W^+ \to \ell^+\nu$ process using Table 15 input parameters and various NNLO PDFs. The given uncertainties correspond to the statistical accuracy from the numerical DYNNLO 1.5 integration (stat) and the PDF uncertainties, where the latter are evaluated following the different prescriptions of the PDF groups.

Combined NNLO QCD and NLO EW predictions as defined in Eq. (15), c.f. Section 6.1.2 and Ref. [110] Chapter III.2.3, for the differential common fiducial cross sections for the $W^- \to \ell^-\bar{\nu}$ process$ using Table 15 input parameters and various NNLO PDFs. The given uncertainties correspond to the statistical accuracy from the numerical DYNNLO 1.5 integration (stat) and the PDF uncertainties, where the latter are evaluated following the different prescriptions of the PDF groups.

Combined NNLO QCD and NLO EW predictions as defined in Eq. (15), c.f. Section 6.1.2 and Ref. [110] Chapter III.2.3, for the differential common fiducial W charge asymmetry $A_{\ell}$ using Table 15 input parameters and various NNLO PDFs. The given uncertainties correspond to the statistical accuracy from the numerical DYNNLO 1.5 integration (stat) and the PDF uncertainties, where the latter are evaluated following the different prescriptions of the PDF groups.

Combined NNLO QCD and NLO EW predictions as defined in Eq. (15), c.f. Section 6.1.2 and Ref. [110] Chapter III.2.3, for the differential common fiducial cross sections for the central $Z/\gamma^* \to \ell\ell$ processes in the invariant mass region $46 < m_{\ell\ell} < 66$ GeV using Table 15 input parameters and various NNLO PDFs. The given uncertainties correspond to the statistical accuracy from the numerical DYNNLO 1.5 integration (stat) and the PDF uncertainties, where the latter are evaluated following the different prescriptions of the PDF groups. The term 'EW' quantifies the deviation in case of using the NNLO QCD and NLO EW combination procedure as defined in Eq. (13) from the nominal prescription in Eq. (15), where the effect is symmetrised ($\pm$). All predictions are corrected for leading two-loop EW contributions.

Combined NNLO QCD and NLO EW predictions as defined in Eq. (15), c.f. Section 6.1.2 and Ref. [110] Chapter III.2.3, for the differential common fiducial cross sections for the central $Z/\gamma^* \to \ell\ell$ processes in the invariant mass region $66 < m_{\ell\ell} < 116$ GeV using Table 15 input parameters and various NNLO PDFs. The given uncertainties correspond to the statistical accuracy from the numerical DYNNLO 1.5 integration (stat) and the PDF uncertainties, where the latter are evaluated following the different prescriptions of the PDF groups. The term 'EW' quantifies the deviation in case of using the NNLO QCD and NLO EW combination procedure as defined in Eq. (13) from the nominal prescription in Eq. (15), where the effect is symmetrised ($\pm$).

Combined NNLO QCD and NLO EW predictions as defined in Eq. (15), c.f. Section 6.1.2 and Ref. [110] Chapter III.2.3, for the differential common fiducial cross sections for the central $Z/\gamma^* \to \ell\ell$ processes in the invariant mass region $116 < m_{\ell\ell} < 150$ GeV using Table 15 input parameters and various NNLO PDFs. The given uncertainties correspond to the statistical accuracy from the numerical DYNNLO 1.5 integration (stat) and the PDF uncertainties, where the latter are evaluated following the different prescriptions of the PDF groups. The term 'EW' quantifies the deviation in case of using the NNLO QCD and NLO EW combination procedure as defined in Eq. (13) from the nominal prescription in Eq. (15), where the effect is symmetrised ($\pm$).

Combined NNLO QCD and NLO EW predictions as defined in Eq. (15), c.f. Section 6.1.2 and Ref. [110] Chapter III.2.3, for the differential common fiducial cross sections for the forward $Z/\gamma^* \to \ell\ell$ processes in the invariant mass region $66 < m_{\ell\ell} < 116$ GeV using Table 15 input parameters and various NNLO PDFs. The given uncertainties correspond to the statistical accuracy from the numerical DYNNLO 1.5 integration (stat) and the PDF uncertainties, where the latter are evaluated following the different prescriptions of the PDF groups. The term 'EW' quantifies the deviation in case of using the NNLO QCD and NLO EW combination procedure as defined in Eq. (13) from the nominal prescription in Eq. (15), where the effect is symmetrised ($\pm$).

Combined NNLO QCD and NLO EW predictions as defined in Eq. (15), c.f. Section 6.1.2 and Ref. [110] Chapter III.2.3, for the differential common fiducial cross sections for the forward $Z/\gamma^* \to \ell\ell$ processes in the invariant mass region $116 < m_{\ell\ell} < 150$ GeV using Table 15 input parameters and various NNLO PDFs. The given uncertainties correspond to the statistical accuracy from the numerical DYNNLO 1.5 integration (stat) and the PDF uncertainties, where the latter are evaluated following the different prescriptions of the PDF groups. The term 'EW' quantifies the deviation in case of using the NNLO QCD and NLO EW combination procedure as defined in Eq. (13) from the nominal prescription in Eq. (15), where the effect is symmetrised ($\pm$).

Nominal NNLO QCD + NLO EW $K_f$-factors as defined in Eq. (20) for the differential $W^+ \to \ell^+\nu$ process. The $K_f$-factor is calculated as ratio of the best NNLO QCD + NLO EW prediction to the NLO QCD calculation using the MCFM/APPLGRID calculation, both using the ATLAS-epWZ12 NNLO PDF set, c.f. Section 7.1. In addition to the nominal $K_f$-factor, a full set of alternative $K$-factors is presented reflecting the following systematic variations, c.f. Tables 19 and 21. The factor $K_{FEWZ}$ uses FEWZ 3.1.b2 for the NNLO QCD prediction, combined with NLO EW. The factors $K_\mu$ reflect the variation of the renormalisation and factorisations scales ($\mu_R, \mu_F$ up/down) by factors of 2 and 0.5, respectively. The statistical uncertainty on each $K_f$-factor (stat) is obtained from the NNLO QCD calculation, while the numerical uncertainties from all other contributions are negligible.

Nominal NNLO QCD + NLO EW $K_f$-factors as defined in Eq. (20) for the differential $W^- \to \ell^-\bar{\nu}$ process. The $K_f$-factor is calculated as ratio of the best NNLO QCD + NLO EW prediction to the NLO QCD calculation using the MCFM/APPLGRID calculation, both using the ATLAS-epWZ12 NNLO PDF set, c.f. Section 7.1. In addition to the nominal $K_f$-factor, a full set of alternative $K$-factors is presented reflecting the following systematic variations, c.f. Tables 19 and 21. The factor $K_{FEWZ}$ uses FEWZ 3.1.b2 for the NNLO QCD prediction, combined with NLO EW. The factors $K_\mu$ reflect the variation of the renormalisation and factorisations scales ($\mu_R, \mu_F$ up/down) by factors of 2 and 0.5, respectively. The statistical uncertainty on each $K_f$-factor (stat) is obtained from the NNLO QCD calculation, while the numerical uncertainties from all other contributions are negligible.

Nominal NNLO QCD + NLO EW $K_f$-factors as defined in Eq. (20) for the differential central $Z/\gamma^* \to \ell\ell$ process in the invariant mass region $46 < m_{\ell\ell} < 66$ GeV. The $K_f$-factor is calculated as ratio of the best NNLO QCD + NLO EW prediction to the NLO QCD calculation using the MCFM/APPLGRID calculation, both using the ATLAS-epWZ12 NNLO PDF set, c.f. Section 7.1. In addition to the nominal $K_f$-factor, a full set of alternative $K$-factors is presented reflecting the following systematic variations, c.f. Tables 19 and 21. The factor $K_{FEWZ}$ uses the FEWZ 3.1.b2 NNLO QCD prediction, combined with NLO EW. The factors $K_\mu$ reflect the variation of the renormalisation and factorisations scales ($\mu_R, \mu_F$ up/down) by factors 2 and 0.5, respectively. The factors $K_{EW}$ quantify the deviation in case of using the NNLO QCD and NLO EW combination procedure as defined in Eq. (13) from the nominal prescription in Eq. (15), where the effect is symmetrised (EW up/down). The statistical uncertainty on each $K_f$-factor (stat) is obtained from the NNLO QCD calculation, while the numerical uncertainties from all other contributions is negligible.

Nominal NNLO QCD + NLO EW $K_f$-factors as defined in Eq. (20) for the differential central $Z/\gamma^* \to \ell\ell$ process in the invariant mass region $66 < m_{\ell\ell} < 116$ GeV. The $K_f$-factor is calculated as ratio of the best NNLO QCD + NLO EW prediction to the NLO QCD calculation using the MCFM/APPLGRID calculation, both using the ATLAS-epWZ12 NNLO PDF set, c.f. Section 7.1. In addition to the nominal $K_f$-factor, a full set of alternative $K$-factors is presented reflecting the following systematic variations, c.f. Tables 19 and 21. The factor $K_{FEWZ}$ uses the FEWZ 3.1.b2 NNLO QCD prediction, combined with NLO EW. The factors $K_\mu$ reflect the variation of the renormalisation and factorisations scales ($\mu_R, \mu_F$ up/down) by factors 2 and 0.5, respectively. The factors $K_{EW}$ quantify the deviation in case of using the NNLO QCD and NLO EW combination procedure as defined in Eq. (13) from the nominal prescription in Eq. (15), where the effect is symmetrised (EW up/down). The statistical uncertainty on each $K_f$-factor (stat) is obtained from the NNLO QCD calculation, while the numerical uncertainties from all other contributions is negligible.

Nominal NNLO QCD + NLO EW $K_f$-factors as defined in Eq. (20) for the differential central $Z/\gamma^* \to \ell\ell$ process in the invariant mass region $116 < m_{\ell\ell} < 150$ GeV. The $K_f$-factor is calculated as ratio of the best NNLO QCD + NLO EW prediction to the NLO QCD calculation using the MCFM/APPLGRID calculation, both using the ATLAS-epWZ12 NNLO PDF set, c.f. Section 7.1. In addition to the nominal $K_f$-factor, a full set of alternative $K$-factors is presented reflecting the following systematic variations, c.f. Tables 19 and 21. The factor $K_{FEWZ}$ uses the FEWZ 3.1.b2 NNLO QCD prediction, combined with NLO EW. The factors $K_\mu$ reflect the variation of the renormalisation and factorisations scales ($\mu_R, \mu_F$ up/down) by factors 2 and 0.5, respectively. The factors $K_{EW}$ quantify the deviation in case of using the NNLO QCD and NLO EW combination procedure as defined in Eq. (13) from the nominal prescription in Eq. (15), where the effect is symmetrised (EW up/down). The statistical uncertainty on each $K_f$-factor (stat) is obtained from the NNLO QCD calculation, while the numerical uncertainties from all other contributions is negligible.

Nominal NNLO QCD + NLO EW $K_f$-factors as defined in Eq. (20) for the differential forward $Z/\gamma^* \to \ell\ell$ process in the invariant mass region $66 < m_{\ell\ell} < 116$ GeV. The $K_f$-factor is calculated as ratio of the best NNLO QCD + NLO EW prediction to the NLO QCD calculation using the MCFM/APPLGRID calculation, both using the ATLAS-epWZ12 NNLO PDF set, c.f. Section 7.1. In addition to the nominal $K_f$-factor, a full set of alternative $K$-factors is presented reflecting the following systematic variations, c.f. Tables 19 and 21. The factor $K_{FEWZ}$ uses the FEWZ 3.1.b2 NNLO QCD prediction, combined with NLO EW. The factors $K_\mu$ reflect the variation of the renormalisation and factorisations scales ($\mu_R, \mu_F$ up/down) by factors 2 and 0.5, respectively. The factors $K_{EW}$ quantify the deviation in case of using the NNLO QCD and NLO EW combination procedure as defined in Eq. (13) from the nominal prescription in Eq. (15), where the effect is symmetrised (EW up/down). The statistical uncertainty on each $K_f$-factor (stat) is obtained from the NNLO QCD calculation, while the numerical uncertainties from all other contributions is negligible.

Nominal NNLO QCD + NLO EW $K_f$-factors as defined in Eq. (20) for the differential forward $Z/\gamma^* \to \ell\ell$ process in the invariant mass region $116 < m_{\ell\ell} < 150$ GeV. The $K_f$-factor is calculated as ratio of the best NNLO QCD + NLO EW prediction to the NLO QCD calculation using the MCFM/APPLGRID calculation, both using the ATLAS-epWZ12 NNLO PDF set, c.f. Section 7.1. In addition to the nominal $K_f$-factor, a full set of alternative $K$-factors is presented reflecting the following systematic variations, c.f. Tables 19 and 21. The factor $K_{FEWZ}$ uses the FEWZ 3.1.b2 NNLO QCD prediction, combined with NLO EW. The factors $K_\mu$ reflect the variation of the renormalisation and factorisations scales ($\mu_R, \mu_F$ up/down) by factors 2 and 0.5, respectively. The factors $K_{EW}$ quantify the deviation in case of using the NNLO QCD and NLO EW combination procedure as defined in Eq. (13) from the nominal prescription in Eq. (15), where the effect is symmetrised (EW up/down). The statistical uncertainty on each $K_f$-factor (stat) is obtained from the NNLO QCD calculation, while the numerical uncertainties from all other contributions is negligible.

Correction factors estimated from Powheg+Pythia6+Photos samples, c.f. Section 2.2, to convert the integrated common fiducial cross-section measurements from Born QED level, c.f. Section 6.1.2, to a "dressed" and "bare" QED FSR definition. The "dressed" level is obtained from the charged final-state lepton(s) combined with all FSR photons within a cone R, as defined in Footnote 1, of R<0.1. The "bare" level is obtained from the charged final-state lepton(s) after QED FSR losses. The factors $C_{dressed}$ ($C_{bare}$) are defined as the ratio of the dressed (bare) to the Born QED level cross sections. The statistical uncertainties are negligible on these correction factors.

Correction factors estimated from Powheg+Pythia6+Photos samples, c.f. Section 2.2, to convert the differential common fiducial $W^+ \to e^+\nu$ cross-section measurements from Born QED level, c.f. Section 6.1.2, to a "dressed" and "bare" QED FSR definition. The "dressed" level is obtained from the charged final-state lepton(s) combined with all FSR photons within a cone R, as defined in Footnote 1, of R<0.1. The "bare" level is obtained from the charged final-state lepton(s) after QED FSR losses. The factors $C_{dressed}$ ($C_{bare}$) are defined as the ratio of the dressed (bare) to the Born QED level cross sections. The statistical uncertainties (stat) are given.

Correction factors estimated from Powheg+Pythia6+Photos samples, c.f. Section 2.2, to convert the differential common fiducial $W^- \to e^-\bar{\nu}$ cross-section measurements from Born QED level, c.f. Section 6.1.2, to a "dressed" and "bare" QED FSR definition. The "dressed" level is obtained from the charged final-state lepton(s) combined with all FSR photons within a cone R, as defined in Footnote 1, of R<0.1. The "bare" level is obtained from the charged final-state lepton(s) after QED FSR losses. The factors $C_{dressed}$ ($C_{bare}$) are defined as the ratio of the dressed (bare) to the Born QED level cross sections. The statistical uncertainties (stat) are given.

Correction factors estimated from Powheg+Pythia6+Photos samples, c.f. Section 2.2, to convert the differential common fiducial $W^+ \to \mu^+\nu$ cross-section measurements from Born QED level, c.f. Section 6.1.2, to a "dressed" and "bare" QED FSR definition. The "dressed" level is obtained from the charged final-state lepton(s) combined with all FSR photons within a cone R, as defined in Footnote 1, of R<0.1. The "bare" level is obtained from the charged final-state lepton(s) after QED FSR losses. The factors $C_{dressed}$ ($C_{bare}$) are defined as the ratio of the dressed (bare) to the Born QED level cross sections. The statistical uncertainties (stat) are given.

Correction factors estimated from Powheg+Pythia6+Photos samples, c.f. Section 2.2, to convert the differential common fiducial $W^- \to \mu^-\bar{\nu}$ cross-section measurements from Born QED level, c.f. Section 6.1.2, to a "dressed" and "bare" QED FSR definition. The "dressed" level is obtained from the charged final-state lepton(s) combined with all FSR photons within a cone R, as defined in Footnote 1, of R<0.1. The "bare" level is obtained from the charged final-state lepton(s) after QED FSR losses. The factors $C_{dressed}$ ($C_{bare}$) are defined as the ratio of the dressed (bare) to the Born QED level cross sections. The statistical uncertainties (stat) are given.

Correction factors estimated from Powheg+Pythia6+Photos samples, c.f. Section 2.2, to convert the differential common fiducial central $Z/\gamma^* \to ee$ cross-section measurements from Born QED level, c.f. Section 6.1.2, to a "dressed" and "bare" QED FSR definition. The "dressed" level is obtained from the charged final-state lepton(s) combined with all FSR photons within a cone R, as defined in Footnote 1, of R<0.1. The "bare" level is obtained from the charged final-state lepton(s) after QED FSR losses. The factors $C_{dressed}$ ($C_{bare}$) are defined as the ratio of the dressed (bare) to the Born QED level cross sections. The statistical uncertainties (stat) are given.

Correction factors estimated from Powheg+Pythia6+Photos samples, c.f. Section 2.2, to convert the differential common fiducial central $Z/\gamma^* \to \mu\mu$ cross-section measurements from Born QED level, c.f. Section 6.1.2, to a "dressed" and "bare" QED FSR definition. The "dressed" level is obtained from the charged final-state lepton(s) combined with all FSR photons within a cone R, as defined in Footnote 1, of R<0.1. The "bare" level is obtained from the charged final-state lepton(s) after QED FSR losses. The factors $C_{dressed}$ ($C_{bare}$) are defined as the ratio of the dressed (bare) to the Born QED level cross sections. The statistical uncertainties (stat) are given.

Correction factors estimated from Powheg+Pythia6+Photos samples, c.f. Section 2.2, to convert the differential common fiducial forward $Z/\gamma^* \to ee$ cross-section measurements from Born QED level, c.f. Section 6.1.2, to a "dressed" and "bare" QED FSR definition. The "dressed" level is obtained from the charged final-state lepton(s) combined with all FSR photons within a cone R, as defined in Footnote 1, of R<0.1. The "bare" level is obtained from the charged final-state lepton(s) after QED FSR losses. The factors $C_{dressed}$ ($C_{bare}$) are defined as the ratio of the dressed (bare) to the Born QED level cross sections. The statistical uncertainties (stat) are given.

The measured differential cross sections $\rm{d}\sigma/\rm{d}|\eta|$ of $D^{*\pm}$ and $D^\pm$ production with $20<p_T<100\,$GeV. The first and second errors are the statistical and systematic uncertainties, respectively. The systematic uncertainty fractions corresponding to the tracking ($\delta_2$) uncertainties (Table 2 of the paper) are strongly correlated. The fully correlated uncertainties linked with the luminosity measurement ($3.5\%$) and branching fractions ($1.5\%$ and $2.1\%$ for $D^{*\pm}$ and $D^\pm$, respectively) are not shown.

Measured $t\bar{t}$ differential cross-section and relative uncertainty as a function of the hadronic pseudo-top-quark $|y(\hat{t}_{\mathrm{h}})|$ in the electron channel. The results shown in this table are one of the inputs for the combined results.

Measured $t\bar{t}$ differential cross-section and relative uncertainty as a function of the leptonic pseudo-top-quark $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{t}_{\mathrm{l}})$ in the muon channel. The results shown in this table are one of the inputs for the combined results.

Measured $t\bar{t}$ differential cross-section and relative uncertainty as a function of the leptonic pseudo-top-quark $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{t}_{\mathrm{l}})$ in the electron channel. The results shown in this table are one of the inputs for the combined results.

Measured $t\bar{t}$ differential cross-section and relative uncertainty as a function of the leptonic pseudo-top-quark $|y(\hat{t}_{\mathrm{l}})|$ in the muon channel. The results shown in this table are one of the inputs for the combined results.

Measured $t\bar{t}$ differential cross-section and relative uncertainty as a function of the leptonic pseudo-top-quark $|y(\hat{t}_{\mathrm{l}})|$ in the electron channel. The results shown in this table are one of the inputs for the combined results.

Measured $t\bar{t}$ differential cross-section and relative uncertainty as a function of the pseudo-top-quark-pair $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{t}_{\mathrm{l}}\hat{t}_{\mathrm{h}})$ in the muon channel.The results shown in this table are one of the inputs for the combined results.

Measured $t\bar{t}$ differential cross-section and relative uncertainty as a function of the pseudo-top-quark-pair $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{t}_{\mathrm{l}}\hat{t}_{\mathrm{h}})$ in the electron channel. The results shown in this table are one of the inputs for the combined results.

Measured $t\bar{t}$ differential cross-section and relative uncertainty as a function of the pseudo-top-quark-pair $|y(\hat{t}_{\mathrm{l}}\hat{t}_{\mathrm{h}})|$ in the muon channel. The results shown in this table are one of the inputs for the combined results.

Measured $t\bar{t}$ differential cross-section and relative uncertainty as a function of the pseudo-top-quark-pair $|y(\hat{t}_{\mathrm{l}}\hat{t}_{\mathrm{h}})|$ in the electron channel. The results shown in this table are one of the inputs for the combined results.

Measured $t\bar{t}$ differential cross-section and relative uncertainty as a function of the pseudo-top-quark-pair $m(\hat{t}_{\mathrm{l}}\hat{t}_{\mathrm{h}})$ in the muon channel. The results shown in this table are one of the inputs for the combined results.

Measured $t\bar{t}$ differential cross-section and relative uncertainty as a function of the pseudo-top-quark-pair $m(\hat{t}_{\mathrm{l}}\hat{t}_{\mathrm{h}})$ in the electron channel. The results shown in this table are one of the inputs for the combined results.

Measured $t\bar{t}$ differential cross-section and relative uncertainty as a function of the hadronic pseudo-top-quark $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{t}_{\mathrm{h}})$ after the electron and muon channel combination. The results shown in this table correspond to the results presented in figure 11(a).

Measured $t\bar{t}$ differential cross-section and relative uncertainty as a function of the hadronic pseudo-top-quark $|y(\hat{t}_{\mathrm{h}})|$ after the electron and muon channel combination. The results shown in this table correspond to the results presentedin figure 12(a).

Measured $t\bar{t}$ differential cross-section and relative uncertainty as a function of theleptonic pseudo-top-quark $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{t}_{\mathrm{l}})$ after the electron and muon channel combination.The results shown in this table correspond to the results presented in figure 11(b).

Measured $t\bar{t}$ differential cross-section and relative uncertaintyas a function of the leptonic pseudo-top-quark $|y(\hat{t}_{\mathrm{l}})|$ after the electron and muon channel combination.The results shown in this table correspond to the results presented in figure 12(b).

Measured $t\bar{t}$ differential cross-section and relative uncertainty as a function ofthe pseudo-top-quark-pair $p_{\mathrm{T}}(\hat{t}_{\mathrm{l}}\hat{t}_{\mathrm{h}})$ after the electron and muon channel combination.The results shown in this table correspond to the results presented in figure 13(a).

Measured $t\bar{t}$ differential cross-section and relative uncertainty as a function of the pseudo-top-quark-pair $|y(\hat{t}_{\mathrm{l}}\hat{t}_{\mathrm{h}})|$ after the electron and muon channel combination.The results shown in this table correspond to the results presented in figure 13(b).

Measured $t\bar{t}$ differential cross-section and relative uncertainty as a function of the pseudo-top-quark-pair $m(\hat{t}_{\mathrm{l}}\hat{t}_{\mathrm{h}})$after the electron and muon channel combination. The results shown in this table correspond to the results presented in figure 13(c).