Showing 10 of 787 results
A measurement of the four-lepton invariant mass spectrum is made with the ATLAS detector, using an integrated luminosity of 36.1 fb$^{-1}$ of proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV delivered by the Large Hadron Collider. The differential cross-section is measured for events containing two same-flavour opposite-sign lepton pairs. It exhibits a rich structure, with different mass regions dominated in the Standard Model by single $Z$ boson production, Higgs boson production, and $Z$ boson pair production, and non-negligible interference effects at high invariant masses. The measurement is compared with state-of-the-art Standard Model calculations, which are found to be consistent with the data. These calculations are used to interpret the data in terms of $gg\rightarrow ZZ \rightarrow 4\ell$ and $Z \rightarrow 4\ell$ subprocesses, and to place constraints on a possible contribution from physics beyond the Standard Model.
Measured and expected differential cross-section $\text{d}\sigma / \text{d} m_{4l}$ as a function of $m_{4l}$
Measured and expected differential cross-section $\text{d}\sigma / \text{d} m_{4l}$ as a function of $m_{4l}$ in bin of 0$< p_{T}^{4l} <$20 GeV
Measured and expected differential cross-section $\text{d}\sigma / \text{d} m_{4l}$ as a function of $m_{4l}$ in bin of 20$< p_{T}^{4l} <$50 GeV
Measured and expected differential cross-section $\text{d}\sigma / \text{d} m_{4l}$ as a function of $m_{4l}$ in bin of 50$< p_{T}^{4l} <$100 GeV
Measured and expected differential cross-section $\text{d}\sigma / \text{d} m_{4l}$ as a function of $m_{4l}$ in bin of 100$< p_{T}^{4l} <$600 GeV
Measured and expected double differential cross-section $\text{d}\sigma / \text{d} m_{4l}$ as a function of $m_{4l}$ in bin of 0.0$< y_{4l} <$0.4
Measured and expected double differential cross-section $\text{d}\sigma / \text{d} m_{4l}$ as a function of $m_{4l}$ in bin of 0.4$< y_{4l} <$0.8
Measured and expected double differential cross-section $\text{d}\sigma / \text{d} m_{4l}$ as a function of $m_{4l}$ in bin of 0.8$< y_{4l} <$1.2
Measured and expected double differential cross-section $\text{d}\sigma / \text{d} m_{4l}$ as a function of $m_{4l}$ in bin of 1.2$< y_{4l} <$2.5
Measured and expected double differential cross-section $\text{d}\sigma / \text{d} m_{4l}$ as a function of $m_{4l}$ for MELA$<$1.4 bin
Measured and expected double differential cross-section $\text{d}\sigma / \text{d} m_{4l}$ as a function of $m_{4l}$ for MELA$>$1.4 bin
Measured and expected double differential cross-section $\text{d}\sigma / \text{d} m_{4l}$ as a function of $m_{4l}$ for $\mu\mu\mu\mu$ events
Measured and expected double differential cross-section $\text{d}\sigma / \text{d} m_{4l}$ as a function of $m_{4l}$ for $eeee$ events
Measured and expected double differential cross-section $\text{d}\sigma / \text{d} m_{4l}$ as a function of $m_{4l}$ for $ee\mu\mu$ events
Systematic covariance matrix for the differential $m_{4l}$ distribution.
Statistical covariance matrix for the differential $m_{4l}$ distribution.
Background covariance matrix for the differential $m_{4l}$ distribution.
Systematic covariance matrix for the differential $m_{4l}$-$p_{T}^{4l}$ distribution.<br><br> Bins labelled 1-9 correspond to the 0$< p_{T}^{4l} < $20 GeV bin with $m_{4l}$ values as listed in Table 2.<br> Bins labelled 10-16 correspond to the 20$< p_{T}^{4l} <$50 GeV bin with $m_{4l}$ values as listed in Table 3.<br> Bins labelled 17-23 correspond to the 50$< p_{T}^{4l} <$100 GeV bin with $m_{4l}$ values as listed in Table 4.<br> Bins labelled 24-30 correspond to the 100$< p_{T}^{4l} <$600 GeV bin with $m_{4l}$ values as listed in Table 5.
Statistical covariance matrix for the differential $m_{4l}$-$p_{T}^{4l}$ distribution. <br><br> Bins labelled 1-9 correspond to the 0$< p_{T}^{4l} < $20 GeV bin with $m_{4l}$ values as listed in Table 2.<br> Bins labelled 10-16 correspond to the 20$< p_{T}^{4l} <$50 GeV bin with $m_{4l}$ values as listed in Table 3.<br> Bins labelled 17-23 correspond to the 50$< p_{T}^{4l} <$100 GeV bin with $m_{4l}$ values as listed in Table 4.<br> Bins labelled 24-30 correspond to the 100$< p_{T}^{4l} <$600 GeV bin with $m_{4l}$ values as listed in Table 5.
Background covariance matrix for the differential $m_{4l}$-$p_{T}^{4l}$ distribution. <br><br> Bins labelled 1-9 correspond to the 0$< p_{T}^{4l} < $20 GeV bin with $m_{4l}$ values as listed in Table 2.<br> Bins labelled 10-16 correspond to the 20$< p_{T}^{4l} <$50 GeV bin with $m_{4l}$ values as listed in Table 3.<br> Bins labelled 17-23 correspond to the 50$< p_{T}^{4l} <$100 GeV bin with $m_{4l}$ values as listed in Table 4.<br> Bins labelled 24-30 correspond to the 100$< p_{T}^{4l} <$600 GeV bin with $m_{4l}$ values as listed in Table 5.
Systematic covariance matrix for the differential $m_{4l}$-$y_{4l}$ distribution. <br><br> Bins labelled 1-9 correspond to the 0.0$< y_{4l} < $0.4 bin with $m_{4l}$ values as listed in Table 6.<br> Bins labelled 10-18 correspond to the 0.4$< y_{4l} <$0.8 bin with $m_{4l}$ values as listed in Table 7.<br> Bins labelled 19-26 correspond to the 0.8$< y_{4l} <$1.2 bin with $m_{4l}$ values as listed in Table 8.<br> Bins labelled 27-34 correspond to the 1.2$< y_{4l} <$2.5 bin with $m_{4l}$ values as listed in Table 9.
Statistical covariance matrix for the differential $m_{4l}$-$y_{4l}$ distribution. <br><br> Bins labelled 1-9 correspond to the 0.0$< y_{4l} < $0.4 bin with $m_{4l}$ values as listed in Table 6.<br> Bins labelled 10-18 correspond to the 0.4$< y_{4l} <$0.8 bin with $m_{4l}$ values as listed in Table 7.<br> Bins labelled 19-26 correspond to the 0.8$< y_{4l} <$1.2 bin with $m_{4l}$ values as listed in Table 8.<br> Bins labelled 27-34 correspond to the 1.2$< y_{4l} <$2.5 bin with $m_{4l}$ values as listed in Table 9.
Background covariance matrix for the differential $m_{4l}$-$y_{4l}$ distribution. <br><br> Bins labelled 1-9 correspond to the 0.0$< y_{4l} < $0.4 bin with $m_{4l}$ values as listed in Table 6.<br> Bins labelled 10-18 correspond to the 0.4$< y_{4l} <$0.8 bin with $m_{4l}$ values as listed in Table 7.<br> Bins labelled 19-26 correspond to the 0.8$< y_{4l} <$1.2 bin with $m_{4l}$ values as listed in Table 8.<br> Bins labelled 27-34 correspond to the 1.2$< y_{4l} <$2.5 bin with $m_{4l}$ values as listed in Table 9.
Systematic covariance matrix for the differential $m_{4l}$-MELA distribution. <br><br> Bins labelled 1-7 correspond to the MELA$<$ 0.4 bin with $m_{4l}$ values as listed in Table 10.<br> Bins labelled 8-12 correspond to the MELA$>$ 0.4 bin with $m_{4l}$ values as listed in Table 11.
Statistical covariance matrix for the differential $m_{4l}$-MELA distribution. <br><br> Bins labelled 1-7 correspond to the MELA$<$ 0.4 bin with $m_{4l}$ values as listed in Table 10.<br> Bins labelled 8-12 correspond to the MELA$>$ 0.4 bin with $m_{4l}$ values as listed in Table 11.
Background covariance matrix for the differential $m_{4l}$-MELA distribution. <br><br> Bins labelled 1-7 correspond to the MELA$<$ 0.4 bin with $m_{4l}$ values as listed in Table 10.<br> Bins labelled 8-12 correspond to the MELA$>$ 0.4 bin with $m_{4l}$ values as listed in Table 11.
Systematic covariance matrix for the differential $m_{4l}$-lepton flavour distribution. <br><br> Bins labelled 1-9 correspond to $\mu\mu\mu\mu$ events with $m_{4l}$ values as listed in Table 12.<br> Bins labelled 10-18 correspond to $eeee$ events with $m_{4l}$ values as listed in Table 13.<br> Bins labelled 19-27 correspond to $\mu\mu\mu\mu$ events with $m_{4l}$ values as listed in Table 14.<br>
Statistical covariance matrix for the differential $m_{4l}$-lepton flavour distribution. <br><br> Bins labelled 1-9 correspond to $\mu\mu\mu\mu$ events with $m_{4l}$ values as listed in Table 12.<br> Bins labelled 10-18 correspond to $eeee$ events with $m_{4l}$ values as listed in Table 13.<br> Bins labelled 19-27 correspond to $\mu\mu\mu\mu$ events with $m_{4l}$ values as listed in Table 14.<br>
Background covariance matrix for the differential $m_{4l}$-lepton flavour distribution. <br><br> Bins labelled 1-9 correspond to $\mu\mu\mu\mu$ events with $m_{4l}$ values as listed in Table 12.<br> Bins labelled 10-18 correspond to $eeee$ events with $m_{4l}$ values as listed in Table 13.<br> Bins labelled 19-27 correspond to $\mu\mu\mu\mu$ events with $m_{4l}$ values as listed in Table 14.<br>
The inclusive and fiducial $t\bar{t}$ production cross-sections are measured in the lepton+jets channel using 20.2 fb$^{-1}$ of proton-proton collision data at a centre-of-mass energy of 8 TeV recorded with the ATLAS detector at the LHC. Major systematic uncertainties due to the modelling of the jet energy scale and $b$-tagging efficiency are constrained by separating selected events into three disjoint regions. In order to reduce systematic uncertainties in the most important background, the W+jets process is modelled using Z+jets events in a data-driven approach. The inclusive $t\bar{t}$ cross-section is measured with a precision of 5.7% to be $\sigma_{\text{inc}}(t\bar{t})$ = 248.3 $\pm$ 0.7 (stat.) $\pm$ 13.4 (syst.) $\pm$ 4.7 (lumi.) pb, assuming a top-quark mass of 172.5 GeV. The result is in agreement with the Standard Model prediction. The cross-section is also measured in a phase space close to that of the selected data. The fiducial cross-section is $\sigma_{\text{fid}}(t\bar{t})$ = 48.8 $\pm$ 0.1 (stat.) $\pm$ 2.0 (syst.) $\pm$ 0.9 (lumi.) pb with a precision of 4.5%.
The measured inclusive cross section. The first systematic uncertainty (sys_1) is the combined systematic uncertainty excluding luminosity, the second (sys_2) is the luminosity
The measured fiducial cross section. The first systematic uncertainty (sys_1) is the combined systematic uncertainty excluding luminosity, the second (sys_2) is the luminosity
The cross section of a top-quark pair produced in association with a photon is measured in proton-proton collisions at a centre-of-mass energy of $\sqrt{s} = 8$ TeV with $20.2$ fb$^{-1}$ of data collected by the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider in 2012. The measurement is performed by selecting events that contain a photon with transverse momentum $p_\mathrm{T} > 15$ GeV, an isolated lepton with large transverse momentum, large missing transverse momentum, and at least four jets, where at least one is identified as originating from a $b$-quark. The production cross section is measured in a fiducial region close to the selection requirements. It is found to be $139 \pm 7 (\mathrm{stat.}) \pm 17 (\mathrm{syst.})$ fb, in good agreement with the theoretical prediction at next-to-leading order of $151 \pm 24$ fb. In addition, differential cross sections in the fiducial region are measured as a function of the transverse momentum and pseudorapidity of the photon.
The measured fiducial cross sections. The first uncertainty is the statistical uncertainty and the second is the systematic uncertainty
differential cross section as function of the photon pT. The first uncertainty is the statistical uncertainty and the second is the systematic uncertainty
differential cross section as function of the photon pseudorapidity. The first uncertainty is the statistical uncertainty and the second is the systematic uncertainty
Two-particle pseudorapidity correlations are measured in $\sqrt{s_{\rm{NN}}}$ = 2.76 TeV Pb+Pb, $\sqrt{s_{\rm{NN}}}$ = 5.02 TeV $p$+Pb, and $\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV $pp$ collisions at the LHC, with total integrated luminosities of approximately 7 $\mu\mathrm{b}^{-1}$, 28 $\mathrm{nb}^{-1}$, and 65 $\mathrm{nb}^{-1}$, respectively. The correlation function $C_{\rm N}(\eta_1,\eta_2)$ is measured as a function of event multiplicity using charged particles in the pseudorapidity range $|\eta|<2.4$. The correlation function contains a significant short-range component, which is estimated and subtracted. After removal of the short-range component, the shape of the correlation function is described approximately by $1+\langle{a_1^2}\rangle \eta_1\eta_2$ in all collision systems over the full multiplicity range. The values of $\sqrt{\langle{a_1^2}\rangle}$ are consistent between the opposite-charge pairs and same-charge pairs, and for the three collision systems at similar multiplicity. The values of $\sqrt{\langle{a_1^2}\rangle}$ and the magnitude of the short-range component both follow a power-law dependence on the event multiplicity. The $\eta$ distribution of the short-range component, after symmetrizing the proton and lead directions in $p$+Pb collisions, is found to be smaller than that in $pp$ collisions with comparable multiplicity.
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (260<=Nch<300)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (260<=Nch<300)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (240<=Nch<260)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (240<=Nch<260)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (220<=Nch<240)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (220<=Nch<240)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (200<=Nch<220)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (200<=Nch<220)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (180<=Nch<200)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (180<=Nch<200)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (160<=Nch<180)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (160<=Nch<180)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (140<=Nch<160)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (140<=Nch<160)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (120<=Nch<140)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (120<=Nch<140)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (100<=Nch<120)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (100<=Nch<120)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (80<=Nch<100)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (80<=Nch<100)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (60<=Nch<80)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (60<=Nch<80)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (40<=Nch<60)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (40<=Nch<60)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (20<=Nch<40)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (20<=Nch<40)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (10<=Nch<20)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (10<=Nch<20)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (260<=Nch<300)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (260<=Nch<300)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (240<=Nch<260)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (240<=Nch<260)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (220<=Nch<240)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (220<=Nch<240)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (200<=Nch<220)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (200<=Nch<220)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (180<=Nch<200)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (180<=Nch<200)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (160<=Nch<180)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (160<=Nch<180)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (140<=Nch<160)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (140<=Nch<160)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (120<=Nch<140)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (120<=Nch<140)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (100<=Nch<120)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (100<=Nch<120)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (80<=Nch<100)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (80<=Nch<100)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (60<=Nch<80)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (60<=Nch<80)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (40<=Nch<60)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (40<=Nch<60)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (20<=Nch<40)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (20<=Nch<40)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (10<=Nch<20)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (10<=Nch<20)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (260<=Nch<300)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (260<=Nch<300)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (240<=Nch<260)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (240<=Nch<260)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (220<=Nch<240)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (220<=Nch<240)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (200<=Nch<220)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (200<=Nch<220)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (180<=Nch<200)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (180<=Nch<200)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (160<=Nch<180)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (160<=Nch<180)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (140<=Nch<160)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (140<=Nch<160)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (120<=Nch<140)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (120<=Nch<140)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (100<=Nch<120)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (100<=Nch<120)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (80<=Nch<100)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (80<=Nch<100)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (60<=Nch<80)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (60<=Nch<80)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (40<=Nch<60)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (40<=Nch<60)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (20<=Nch<40)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (20<=Nch<40)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (10<=Nch<20)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (10<=Nch<20)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (260<=Nch<300)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (260<=Nch<300)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (240<=Nch<260)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (240<=Nch<260)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (220<=Nch<240)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (220<=Nch<240)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (200<=Nch<220)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (200<=Nch<220)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (180<=Nch<200)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (180<=Nch<200)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (160<=Nch<180)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (160<=Nch<180)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (140<=Nch<160)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (140<=Nch<160)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (120<=Nch<140)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (120<=Nch<140)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (100<=Nch<120)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (100<=Nch<120)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (80<=Nch<100)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (80<=Nch<100)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (60<=Nch<80)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (60<=Nch<80)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (40<=Nch<60)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (40<=Nch<60)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (20<=Nch<40)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (20<=Nch<40)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (10<=Nch<20)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (10<=Nch<20)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (260<=Nch<300)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (260<=Nch<300)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (240<=Nch<260)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (240<=Nch<260)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (220<=Nch<240)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (220<=Nch<240)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (200<=Nch<220)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (200<=Nch<220)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (180<=Nch<200)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (180<=Nch<200)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (160<=Nch<180)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (160<=Nch<180)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (140<=Nch<160)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (140<=Nch<160)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (120<=Nch<140)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (120<=Nch<140)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (100<=Nch<120)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (100<=Nch<120)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (80<=Nch<100)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (80<=Nch<100)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (60<=Nch<80)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (60<=Nch<80)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (40<=Nch<60)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (40<=Nch<60)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (20<=Nch<40)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (20<=Nch<40)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (10<=Nch<20)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (10<=Nch<20)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (260<=Nch<300)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (260<=Nch<300)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (240<=Nch<260)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (240<=Nch<260)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (220<=Nch<240)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (220<=Nch<240)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (200<=Nch<220)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (200<=Nch<220)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (180<=Nch<200)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (180<=Nch<200)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (160<=Nch<180)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (160<=Nch<180)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (140<=Nch<160)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (140<=Nch<160)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (120<=Nch<140)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (120<=Nch<140)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (100<=Nch<120)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (100<=Nch<120)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (80<=Nch<100)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (80<=Nch<100)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (60<=Nch<80)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (60<=Nch<80)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (40<=Nch<60)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (40<=Nch<60)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (20<=Nch<40)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (20<=Nch<40)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, (10<=Nch<20)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, (10<=Nch<20)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (140<=Nch<160)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (140<=Nch<160)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (120<=Nch<140)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (120<=Nch<140)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (100<=Nch<120)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (100<=Nch<120)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (80<=Nch<100)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (80<=Nch<100)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (60<=Nch<80)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (60<=Nch<80)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (40<=Nch<60)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (40<=Nch<60)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (20<=Nch<40)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (20<=Nch<40)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (10<=Nch<20)
C_N(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (10<=Nch<20)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (140<=Nch<160)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (140<=Nch<160)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (120<=Nch<140)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (120<=Nch<140)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (100<=Nch<120)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (100<=Nch<120)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (80<=Nch<100)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (80<=Nch<100)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (60<=Nch<80)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (60<=Nch<80)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (40<=Nch<60)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (40<=Nch<60)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (20<=Nch<40)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (20<=Nch<40)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (10<=Nch<20)
SRC(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (10<=Nch<20)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (140<=Nch<160)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (140<=Nch<160)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (120<=Nch<140)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (120<=Nch<140)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (100<=Nch<120)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (100<=Nch<120)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (80<=Nch<100)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (80<=Nch<100)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (60<=Nch<80)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (60<=Nch<80)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (40<=Nch<60)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (40<=Nch<60)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (20<=Nch<40)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (20<=Nch<40)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.5GeV, (10<=Nch<20)
C_N^sub(eta_1, eta_2) for pp, pT>0.2GeV, (10<=Nch<20)
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 260<=Nch<300, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 260<=Nch<300, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 260<=Nch<300, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 260<=Nch<300, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 260<=Nch<300, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 260<=Nch<300, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 240<=Nch<260, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 240<=Nch<260, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 240<=Nch<260, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 240<=Nch<260, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 240<=Nch<260, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 240<=Nch<260, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 220<=Nch<240, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 220<=Nch<240, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 220<=Nch<240, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 220<=Nch<240, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 220<=Nch<240, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 220<=Nch<240, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 200<=Nch<220, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 200<=Nch<220, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 200<=Nch<220, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 200<=Nch<220, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 200<=Nch<220, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 200<=Nch<220, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 180<=Nch<200, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 180<=Nch<200, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 180<=Nch<200, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 180<=Nch<200, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 180<=Nch<200, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 180<=Nch<200, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 160<=Nch<180, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 160<=Nch<180, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 160<=Nch<180, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 160<=Nch<180, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 160<=Nch<180, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 160<=Nch<180, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 140<=Nch<160, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 140<=Nch<160, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 140<=Nch<160, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 140<=Nch<160, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 140<=Nch<160, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 140<=Nch<160, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 120<=Nch<140, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 120<=Nch<140, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 120<=Nch<140, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 120<=Nch<140, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 120<=Nch<140, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 120<=Nch<140, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 100<=Nch<120, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 100<=Nch<120, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 100<=Nch<120, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 100<=Nch<120, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 100<=Nch<120, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 100<=Nch<120, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 80<=Nch<100, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 80<=Nch<100, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 80<=Nch<100, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 80<=Nch<100, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 80<=Nch<100, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 80<=Nch<100, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 60<=Nch<80, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 60<=Nch<80, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 60<=Nch<80, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 60<=Nch<80, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 60<=Nch<80, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 60<=Nch<80, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 40<=Nch<60, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 40<=Nch<60, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 40<=Nch<60, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 40<=Nch<60, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 40<=Nch<60, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 40<=Nch<60, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 20<=Nch<40, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 20<=Nch<40, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 20<=Nch<40, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 20<=Nch<40, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 20<=Nch<40, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 20<=Nch<40, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 10<=Nch<20, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 10<=Nch<20, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 10<=Nch<20, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 10<=Nch<20, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 10<=Nch<20, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for Pb+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 10<=Nch<20, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 260<=Nch<300, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 260<=Nch<300, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 260<=Nch<300, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 260<=Nch<300, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 260<=Nch<300, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 260<=Nch<300, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 240<=Nch<260, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 240<=Nch<260, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 240<=Nch<260, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 240<=Nch<260, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 240<=Nch<260, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 240<=Nch<260, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 220<=Nch<240, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 220<=Nch<240, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 220<=Nch<240, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 220<=Nch<240, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 220<=Nch<240, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 220<=Nch<240, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 200<=Nch<220, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 200<=Nch<220, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 200<=Nch<220, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 200<=Nch<220, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 200<=Nch<220, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 200<=Nch<220, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 180<=Nch<200, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 180<=Nch<200, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 180<=Nch<200, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 180<=Nch<200, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 180<=Nch<200, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 180<=Nch<200, w SRC, all pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 160<=Nch<180, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 160<=Nch<180, w SRC, opposite pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 160<=Nch<180, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.2GeV, 160<=Nch<180, w SRC, same pairs
<a_n a_m> for p+Pb, pT>0.5GeV, 160<=Nch<180, w SRC, all pairs
This paper presents measurements of $t\bar{t}$ production in association with additional $b$-jets in $pp$ collisions at the LHC at a centre-of-mass energy of 13 TeV. The data were recorded with the ATLAS detector and correspond to an integrated luminosity of 36.1 fb$^{-1}$. Fiducial cross-section measurements are performed in the dilepton and lepton-plus-jets $t\bar{t}$ decay channels. Results are presented at particle level in the form of inclusive cross-sections of $t\bar{t}$ final states with three and four $b$-jets as well as differential cross-sections as a function of global event properties and properties of $b$-jet pairs. The measured inclusive fiducial cross-sections generally exceed the $t\bar{t}b\bar{b}$ predictions from various next-to-leading-order matrix element calculations matched to a parton shower but are compatible within the total uncertainties. The experimental uncertainties are smaller than the uncertainties in the predictions. Comparisons of state-of-the-art theoretical predictions with the differential measurements are shown and good agreement with data is found for most of them.
The measured fiducial cross sections
The measured fiducial cross sections
Relative differential cross section as a function of the b-jet multiplicity in emu channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of the b-jet multiplicity in emu channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of H_T in emu channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of H_T in emu channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of H_Thad in emu channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of H_Thad in emu channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of H_T in leptons+jets channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of H_T in leptons+jets channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of H_Thad in leptons+jets channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of H_Thad in leptons+jets channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of pT of leading b-jet in emu channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of pT of leading b-jet in emu channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of pT of sub-leading b-jet in emu channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of pT of sub-leading b-jet in emu channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of pT of third-leading b-jet in emu channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of pT of third-leading b-jet in emu channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of pT of leading b-jet in lepton+jets channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of pT of leading b-jet in lepton+jets channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of pT of sub-leading b-jet in lepton+jets channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of pT of sub-leading b-jet in lepton+jets channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of pT of third-leading b-jet in lepton+jets channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of pT of third-leading b-jet in lepton+jets channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of pT of fourth-leading b-jet in lepton+jets channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of pT of fourth-leading b-jet in lepton+jets channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of invarant mass of two highest pT b-jets in emu channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of invarant mass of two highest pT b-jets in emu channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of pT of two highest pT b-jets in emu channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of pT of two highest pT b-jets in emu channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of deltaR of two highest pT b-jets in emu channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of deltaR of two highest pT b-jets in emu channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of invariant mass of two highest pT b-jets in lepton+jets channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of invariant mass of two highest pT b-jets in lepton+jets channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of pT of two highest pT b-jets in lepton+jets channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of pT of two highest pT b-jets in lepton+jets channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of deltaR of two highest pT b-jets in lepton+jets channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of deltaR of two highest pT b-jets in lepton+jets channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of invariant mass of two closest b-jets in deltaR in emu channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of invariant mass of two closest b-jets in deltaR in emu channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of pT of two closest b-jets in deltaR in emu channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of pT of two closest b-jets in deltaR in emu channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of deltaR of two closest b-jets in deltaR in emu channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of deltaR of two closest b-jets in deltaR in emu channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of invariant mass of two closest b-jets in deltaR in lepton+jets channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of invariant mass of two closest b-jets in deltaR in lepton+jets channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of pT of two closest b-jets in deltaR in lepton+jets channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of pT of two closest b-jets in deltaR in lepton+jets channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of deltaR of two closest b-jets in deltaR in lepton+jets channel
Relative differential cross section as a function of deltaR of two closest b-jets in deltaR in lepton+jets channel
Jets created in association with a photon can be used as a calibrated probe to study energy loss in the medium created in nuclear collisions. Measurements of the transverse momentum balance between isolated photons and inclusive jets are presented using integrated luminosities of 0.49 nb$^{-1}$ of Pb+Pb collision data at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}}=5.02$ TeV and 25 pb$^{-1}$ of $pp$ collision data at $\sqrt{s}=5.02$ TeV recorded with the ATLAS detector at the LHC. Photons with transverse momentum $63.1 < p_\mathrm{T}^{\gamma} < 200$ GeV and $\left|\eta^{\gamma}\right| < 2.37$ are paired inclusively with all jets in the event that have $p_\mathrm{T}^\mathrm{jet} > 31.6$ GeV and pseudorapidity $\left|\eta^\mathrm{jet}\right| < 2.8$. The transverse momentum balance given by the jet-to-photon $p_\mathrm{T}$ ratio, $x_\mathrm{J\gamma}$, is measured for pairs with azimuthal opening angle $\Delta\phi > 7\pi/8$. Distributions of the per-photon jet yield as a function of $x_\mathrm{J\gamma}$, $(1/N_\gamma)(\mathrm{d}N/\mathrm{d}x_\mathrm{J\gamma})$, are corrected for detector effects via a two-dimensional unfolding procedure and reported at the particle level. In $pp$ collisions, the distributions are well described by Monte Carlo event generators. In Pb+Pb collisions, the $x_\mathrm{J\gamma}$ distribution is modified from that observed in $pp$ collisions with increasing centrality, consistent with the picture of parton energy loss in the hot nuclear medium. The data are compared with a suite of energy-loss models and calculations.
Photon-jet pT balance distributions (1/Ng)(dN/dxJg) in pp events (blue, reproduced on all panels) and Pb+Pb events (red) with each panel denoting a different centrality selection. These panels show results with pTg = 63.1-79.6 GeV. Total systematic uncertainties are shown as boxes, while statistical uncertainties are shown with vertical bars.
Photon-jet pT balance distributions (1/Ng)(dN/dxJg) in pp events (blue, reproduced on all panels) and Pb+Pb events (red) with each panel denoting a different centrality selection. These panels show results with pTg = 79.6-100 GeV. Total systematic uncertainties are shown as boxes, while statistical uncertainties are shown with vertical bars.
Photon-jet pT balance distributions (1/Ng)(dN/dxJg) in pp events (blue, reproduced on all panels) and Pb+Pb events (red) with each panel denoting a different centrality selection. These panels show results with pTg = 100-158 GeV. Total systematic uncertainties are shown as boxes, while statistical uncertainties are shown with vertical bars.
Photon-jet pT balance distributions (1/Ng)(dN/dxJg) in pp events (blue, reproduced on all panels) and Pb+Pb events (red) with each panel denoting a different centrality selection. These panels show results with pTg = 158-200 GeV. Total systematic uncertainties are shown as boxes, while statistical uncertainties are shown with vertical bars.
Selected comparisons of the nominal results in pp (blue) and 0-10% Pb+Pb (red) collisions with the central values obtained using a different photon-jet signal definition. Comparison of the nominal results (with DeltaPhi > 7pi/8) with those obtained using DeltaPhi > 3pi/4 for the pTg = 63.1-79.6 GeV range. Boxes indicate total systematic uncertainties, while vertical bars indicate statistical uncertainties.
Selected comparisons of the nominal results in pp (blue) and 0-10% Pb+Pb (red) collisions with the central values obtained using a different photon-jet signal definition. Comparison of the nominal results (inclusive jet selection) with those obtained using a photon-plus-leading-jet selection for the pTg = 100-158 GeV range. Boxes indicate total systematic uncertainties, while vertical bars indicate statistical uncertainties.
A search for vectorlike quarks is presented, which targets their decay into a $Z$ boson and a third-generation Standard Model quark. In the case of a vectorlike quark $T$ ($B$) with charge $+2/3e$ ($-1/3e$), the decay searched for is $T \rightarrow Zt$ ($B \rightarrow Zb$). Data for this analysis were taken during 2015 and 2016 with the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider and correspond to an integrated luminosity of 36.1 fb$^{-1}$ of $pp$ collisions at $\sqrt{s} = 13$ TeV. The final state used is characterized by the presence of $b$-tagged jets, as well as a $Z$ boson with high transverse momentum, which is reconstructed from a pair of opposite-sign same-flavor leptons. Pair and single production of vectorlike quarks are both taken into account and are each searched for using optimized dileptonic exclusive and trileptonic inclusive event selections. In these selections, the high scalar sum of jet transverse momenta, the presence of high-transverse-momentum large-radius jets, as well as - in the case of the single-production selections - the presence of forward jets are used. No significant excess over the background-only hypothesis is found and exclusion limits at 95% confidence level allow masses of vectorlike quarks of $m_T > 1030$ GeV ($m_T > 1210$ GeV) and $m_B > 1010$ GeV ($m_B > 1140$ GeV) in the singlet (doublet) model. In the case of 100% branching ratio for $T\rightarrow Zt$ ($B\rightarrow Zb$), the limits are $m_T > 1340$ GeV ($m_B > 1220$ GeV). Limits at 95% confidence level are also set on the coupling to Standard Model quarks for given vectorlike quark masses.
Comparison of the distribution of the scalar sum of small-$R$ jet transverse momenta, $H_T$, between data and the background prediction in the 0-large-$R$ jet-signal region of the pair-production (PP) $2\ell$ $0-1$J channel. The background prediction is shown post-fit, i.e. after the fit to the data $H_T$ distributions under the background-only hypothesis. The last bin contains the overflow. An example distribution for a $B\bar B$ signal in the singlet model with $m_B$ = 900 GeV is overlaid.
Comparison of the distribution of the scalar sum of small-$R$ jet transverse momenta, $H_T$, between data and the background prediction in the 1-large-$R$ jet-signal region of the pair-production (PP) $2\ell$ $0-1$J channel. The background prediction is shown post-fit, i.e. after the fit to the data $H_T$ distributions under the background-only hypothesis. The last bin contains the overflow. An example distribution for a $B\bar B$ signal in the singlet model with $m_B$ = 900 GeV is overlaid.
Comparison of the distribution of the invariant mass of the $Z$ boson candidate and the highest-$p_T$ $b$-tagged jet, $m(Zb)$, between data and the background prediction in the signal region of the pair-production (PP) $2\ell$ $\geq 2$J channel. The background prediction is shown post-fit, i.e. after the fit to the data $m(Zb)$ distributions under the background-only hypothesis. The last bin contains the overflow. An example distribution for a $B\bar B$ signal in the singlet model with $m_B$ = 900 GeV is overlaid.
Comparison of the distribution of the scalar sum of small-$R$ jet and lepton transverse momenta, $S_T$, between data and the background prediction in the signal region of the pair-production (PP) $\geq 3\ell$ channel. The background prediction is shown post-fit, i.e. after the fit to the data $S_T$ distributions under the background-only hypothesis. The last bin contains the overflow. An example distribution for a $B\bar B$ signal in the singlet model with $m_B$ = 900 GeV is overlaid.
Comparison of the distribution of the invariant mass of the $Z$ boson candidate and the highest-$p_T$ top-tagged large-$R$ jet, $m_{Zt}$, between data and the background prediction in the signal region of the single-production (SP) 2$\ell$ channel. The background prediction is shown post-fit, i.e. after the fit to the data $m_{Zt}$ distributions under the background-only hypothesis. The last bin contains the overflow. An example distribution for a single-$T$-quark signal with $m_T$ = 900 GeV and $\kappa_T = 0.5$ is overlaid.
Comparison of the distribution of the scalar sum of small-$R$ jet and lepton transverse momenta, $S_T$, between data and the background prediction in the signal region of the single-production (SP) $\geq 3\ell$ channel. The background prediction is shown post-fit, i.e. after the fit to the data $S_T$ distributions under the background-only hypothesis. The last bin contains the overflow. An example distribution for a single-$T$-quark signal with $m_T$ = 900 GeV and $\kappa_T$ = 0.5 is overlaid.
Upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on the cross section of vector-like quark pair production (PP) for $T\bar T$ in the singlet model. The expected limits are shown for the combination of the channels, as are the observed limits.
Upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on the cross section of vector-like quark pair production (PP) for $B\bar B$ in the singlet model. The expected limits are shown for the combination of the channels, as are the observed limits.
Upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on the cross section of vector-like quark pair production (PP) for $T\bar T$ in the doublet model. The expected limits are shown for the combination of the channels, as are the observed limits.
Upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on the cross section of vector-like quark pair production (PP) for $B\bar B$ in the doublet model. The expected limits are shown for the combination of the channels, as are the observed limits.
Upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on the cross section of vector-like quark pair production (PP) for $T\bar T$ with a BR of 100$\%$ to $Zt$. The expected limits are shown for the combination of the channels, as are the observed limits.
Upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on the cross section of vector-like quark pair production (PP) for $B\bar B$ with a BR of 100$\%$ to $Zb$. The expected limits are shown for the combination of the channels, as are the observed limits.
Expected 95$\%$ CL lower limits from the combination of the pair-production channels on the mass of vector-like quarks for all combinations of BRs for $T\rightarrow Zt$, $T\rightarrow Ht$, $T\rightarrow Wb$, adding up to unity.
Observed 95$\%$ CL lower limits from the combination of the pair-production channels on the mass of vector-like quarks for all combinations of BRs for $T\rightarrow Zt$, $T\rightarrow Ht$, $T\rightarrow Wb$, adding up to unity.
Expected 95$\%$ CL lower limits from the combination of the pair-production channels on the mass of vector-like quarks for all combinations of BRs for $B\rightarrow Zb$, $B\rightarrow Hb$, $B\rightarrow Wt$, adding up to unity.
Observed 95$\%$ CL lower limits from the combination of the pair-production channels on the mass of vector-like quarks for all combinations of BRs for $B\rightarrow Zb$, $B\rightarrow Hb$, $B\rightarrow Wt$, adding up to unity.
Upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on the cross section times BR to $Zt$ of single production (SP) of a $T$-quark. The expected limits are shown for the combination of the channels, as are the observed limits. The expected cross section times BR to $Zt$ for single-$T$-quark production is also shown for a coupling $\kappa_T = 0.5$, which corresponds to a coupling of $c_W = \sqrt{c^2_{W,L} + c^2_{W,R}} = 0.45$ from Ref. [14]. The BR assumed here corresponds to the singlet benchmark model, i.e. $\approx 25\%$.
Expected and observed 95$\%$ CL limits from the combination of the single-production channels on the coupling of the $T$ quark to SM particles, $c_W = \sqrt c^2_L + c^2_R$, assuming the singlet-model BR of $\approx 25\%$, as a function of the mass of the $T$ quark, $m_T$. Values of $c_W$ larger than the observed limit are excluded.
Expected and observed 95$\%$ CL limits from the combination of the single-production channels on the mixing angle in the singlet model between the $T$ quark and the top quark, $|\sin\theta_L|$, as a function of the mass of the $T$ quark, $m_T$. Values of $|\sin\theta_L|$ enclosed by the observed limit are excluded, i.e. for $m_T$ larger than $\approx 1200$ GeV, no value of $|\sin\theta_L|$ is excluded.
Expected lower limit from the combination of the single-production channels on the mass of the $T$ quark as a function of the couplings of the $T$ quark to the $W$ boson, $\sqrt c^2_L + c^2_R$, and to the $Z$ boson, $\sqrt c^2_L + c^2_R$ with the assumption of equal BRs for $T\rightarrow Zt$ and $T\rightarrow Ht$ in the limit of large $T$-quark masses.
Observed lower limit from the combination of the single-production channels on the mass of the $T$ quark as a function of the couplings of the $T$ quark to the $W$ boson, $\sqrt c^2_L + c^2_R$, and to the $Z$ boson, $\sqrt c^2_L + c^2_R$ with the assumption of equal BRs for $T\rightarrow Zt$ and $T\rightarrow Ht$ in the limit of large $T$-quark masses.
Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow T\bar T)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $T\rightarrow Zt$, $T\rightarrow Ht$, $T\rightarrow Wb$ adding up to unity for a $T$-quark mass of 500 GeV.
Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow T\bar T)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $T\rightarrow Zt$, $T\rightarrow Ht$, $T\rightarrow Wb$ adding up to unity for a $T$-quark mass of 600 GeV.
Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow T\bar T)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $T\rightarrow Zt$, $T\rightarrow Ht$, $T\rightarrow Wb$ adding up to unity for a $T$-quark mass of 700 GeV.
Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow T\bar T)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $T\rightarrow Zt$, $T\rightarrow Ht$, $T\rightarrow Wb$ adding up to unity for a $T$-quark mass of 750 GeV.
Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow T\bar T)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $T\rightarrow Zt$, $T\rightarrow Ht$, $T\rightarrow Wb$ adding up to unity for a $T$-quark mass of 800 GeV.
Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow T\bar T)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $T\rightarrow Zt$, $T\rightarrow Ht$, $T\rightarrow Wb$ adding up to unity for a $T$-quark mass of 850 GeV.
Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow T\bar T)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $T\rightarrow Zt$, $T\rightarrow Ht$, $T\rightarrow Wb$ adding up to unity for a $T$-quark mass of 900 GeV.
Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow T\bar T)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $T\rightarrow Zt$, $T\rightarrow Ht$, $T\rightarrow Wb$ adding up to unity for a $T$-quark mass of 950 GeV.
Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow T\bar T)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $T\rightarrow Zt$, $T\rightarrow Ht$, $T\rightarrow Wb$ adding up to unity for a $T$-quark mass of 1000 GeV.
Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow T\bar T)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $T\rightarrow Zt$, $T\rightarrow Ht$, $T\rightarrow Wb$ adding up to unity for a $T$-quark mass of 1050 GeV.
Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow T\bar T)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $T\rightarrow Zt$, $T\rightarrow Ht$, $T\rightarrow Wb$ adding up to unity for a $T$-quark mass of 1100 GeV.
Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow T\bar T)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $T\rightarrow Zt$, $T\rightarrow Ht$, $T\rightarrow Wb$ adding up to unity for a $T$-quark mass of 1150 GeV.
Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow T\bar T)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $T\rightarrow Zt$, $T\rightarrow Ht$, $T\rightarrow Wb$ adding up to unity for a $T$-quark mass of 1200 GeV.
Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow T\bar T)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $T\rightarrow Zt$, $T\rightarrow Ht$, $T\rightarrow Wb$ adding up to unity for a $T$-quark mass of 1300 GeV.
Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow T\bar T)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $T\rightarrow Zt$, $T\rightarrow Ht$, $T\rightarrow Wb$ adding up to unity for a $T$-quark mass of 1400 GeV.
Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow B\bar B)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $B\rightarrow Zb$, $B\rightarrow Hb$, $B\rightarrow Wt$ adding up to unity for a $B$-quark mass of 500 GeV.
Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow B\bar B)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $B\rightarrow Zb$, $B\rightarrow Hb$, $B\rightarrow Wt$ adding up to unity for a $B$-quark mass of 600 GeV.
Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow B\bar B)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $B\rightarrow Zb$, $B\rightarrow Hb$, $B\rightarrow Wt$ adding up to unity for a $B$-quark mass of 700 GeV.
Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow B\bar B)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $B\rightarrow Zb$, $B\rightarrow Hb$, $B\rightarrow Wt$ adding up to unity for a $B$-quark mass of 750 GeV.
Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow B\bar B)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $B\rightarrow Zb$, $B\rightarrow Hb$, $B\rightarrow Wt$ adding up to unity for a $B$-quark mass of 800 GeV.
Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow B\bar B)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $B\rightarrow Zb$, $B\rightarrow Hb$, $B\rightarrow Wt$ adding up to unity for a $B$-quark mass of 850 GeV.
Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow B\bar B)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $B\rightarrow Zb$, $B\rightarrow Hb$, $B\rightarrow Wt$ adding up to unity for a $B$-quark mass of 900 GeV.
Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow B\bar B)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $B\rightarrow Zb$, $B\rightarrow Hb$, $B\rightarrow Wt$ adding up to unity for a $B$-quark mass of 950 GeV.
Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow B\bar B)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $B\rightarrow Zb$, $B\rightarrow Hb$, $B\rightarrow Wt$ adding up to unity for a $B$-quark mass of 1000 GeV.
Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow B\bar B)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $B\rightarrow Zb$, $B\rightarrow Hb$, $B\rightarrow Wt$ adding up to unity for a $B$-quark mass of 1050 GeV.
Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow B\bar B)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $B\rightarrow Zb$, $B\rightarrow Hb$, $B\rightarrow Wt$ adding up to unity for a $B$-quark mass of 1100 GeV.
Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow B\bar B)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $B\rightarrow Zb$, $B\rightarrow Hb$, $B\rightarrow Wt$ adding up to unity for a $B$-quark mass of 1150 GeV.
Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow B\bar B)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $B\rightarrow Zb$, $B\rightarrow Hb$, $B\rightarrow Wt$ adding up to unity for a $B$-quark mass of 1200 GeV.
Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow B\bar B)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $B\rightarrow Zb$, $B\rightarrow Hb$, $B\rightarrow Wt$ adding up to unity for a $B$-quark mass of 1300 GeV.
Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on $\sigma(pp\rightarrow B\bar B)$ for the combination of the pair-production channels for all combinations of BRs for $B\rightarrow Zb$, $B\rightarrow Hb$, $B\rightarrow Wt$ adding up to unity for a $B$-quark mass of 1400 GeV.
Observed upper limits at 95$\%$ CL on the cross section times BR to $Zt$ as a function of the vector-like $T$-quark mass and coupling $\kappa_T$ for the combination of the SP $2\ell$ and SP $\geq 3\ell$ channels.
Signal cutflows for the $B\bar B$ process in the singlet model in the PP $2\ell$ $0-1$J channel in the 0-large-$R$ jet SR. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.
Signal cutflows for the $B\bar B$ process in the singlet model in the PP $2\ell$ $0-1$J channel in the 1-large-$R$ jet SR. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.
Signal cutflows for the $B\bar B$ process in the doublet model in the PP $2\ell$ $0-1$J channel in the 0-large-$R$ jet SR. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.
Signal cutflows for the $B\bar B$ process in the doublet model in the PP $2\ell$ $0-1$J channel in the 1-large-$R$ jet SR. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.
Signal cutflows for the $B\bar B$ process in the case of 100$\%$ BR for $B \rightarrow Zb$ in the PP $2\ell$ $0-1$J channel in the 0-large-$R$ jet SR. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.
Signal cutflows for the $B\bar B$ process in the case of 100$\%$ BR for $B \rightarrow Zb$ in the PP $2\ell$ $0-1$J channel in the 1-large-$R$ jet SR. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.
Signal cutflows for the $T\bar T$ process in the singlet model in the PP $2\ell$ $0-1$J channel in the 0-large-$R$ jet SR. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.
Signal cutflows for the $T\bar T$ process in the singlet model in the PP $2\ell$ $0-1$J channel in the 1-large-$R$ jet SR. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.
Signal cutflows for the $T\bar T$ process in the doublet model in the PP $2\ell$ $0-1$J channel in the 0-large-$R$ jet SR. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.
Signal cutflows for the $T\bar T$ process in the doublet model in the PP $2\ell$ $0-1$J channel in the 1-large-$R$ jet SR. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.
Signal cutflows for the $T\bar T$ process in the case of 100$\%$ BR for $T \rightarrow Zt$ in the PP $2\ell$ $0-1$J channel in the 0-large-$R$ jet SR. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.
Signal cutflows for the $T\bar T$ process in the case of 100$\%$ BR for $T \rightarrow Zt$ in the PP $2\ell$ $0-1$J channel in the 1-large-$R$ jet SR. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.
Signal cutflows for the $T\bar T$ process in the singlet model in the PP $2\ell$ $\geq 2$J channel. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.
Signal cutflows for the $B\bar B$ process in the singlet model in the PP $2\ell$ $\geq 2$J channel. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.
Signal cutflows for the $T\bar T$ process in the doublet model in the PP $2\ell$ $\geq 2$J channel. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.
Signal cutflows for the $B\bar B$ process in the doublet model in the PP $2\ell$ $\geq 2$J channel. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.
Signal cutflows for the $T\bar T$ process in the case of 100$\%$ BR for $T \rightarrow Zt$ in the PP $2\ell$ $\geq 2$J channel. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.
Signal cutflows for the $B\bar B$ process in the case of 100$\%$ BR for $B \rightarrow Zb$ in the PP $2\ell$ $\geq 2$J channel. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.
Signal cutflows for the $T\bar T$ process in the singlet model in the PP $\geq 3\ell$ channel. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.
Signal cutflows for the $B\bar B$ process in the singlet model in the PP $\geq 3\ell$ channel. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.
Signal cutflows for the $T\bar T$ process in the doublet model in the PP $\geq 3\ell$ channel. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.
Signal cutflows for the $B\bar B$ process in the doublet model in the PP $\geq 3\ell$ channel. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.
Signal cutflows for the $T\bar T$ process in the case of 100$\%$ BR for $T \rightarrow Zt$ in the PP $\geq 3\ell$ channel. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.
Signal cutflows for the $B\bar B$ process in the case of 100$\%$ BR for $B \rightarrow Zb$ in the PP $\geq 3\ell$ channel. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.
Signal cutflows for single-$T$-quark production with $\kappa_T = 0.5$ in the SP $2\ell$ channel. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.
Signal cutflows for single-$T$-quark production with $\kappa_T = 0.5$ in the SP $\geq 3\ell$ channel. Only statistical uncertainties are shown.
Signal efficiencies in $\%$ in the PP $2\ell$ $0-1$J channel in the 0-large-$R$ jet SR. Uncertainties are statistical only.
Signal efficiencies in $\%$ in the PP $2\ell$ $0-1$J channel in the 1-large-$R$ jet SR. Uncertainties are statistical only.
Signal efficiencies in $\%$ in the PP $2\ell$ $\geq 2$J channel. Uncertainties are statistical only.
Signal efficiencies in $\%$ in the PP $\geq 3\ell$ channel. Uncertainties are statistical only.
Signal efficiencies in $\%$ in the SP $2\ell$ channel for $\kappa_T = 0.5$. Uncertainties are statistical only.
Signal efficiencies in $\%$ in the SP $\geq 3\ell$ channel for $\kappa_T = 0.5$. Uncertainties are statistical only.
Combined ATLAS and CMS measurements of the Higgs boson production and decay rates, as well as constraints on its couplings to vector bosons and fermions, are presented. The combination is based on the analysis of five production processes, namely gluon fusion, vector boson fusion, and associated production with a $W$ or a $Z$ boson or a pair of top quarks, and of the six decay modes $H \to ZZ, WW$, $\gamma\gamma, \tau\tau, bb$, and $\mu\mu$. All results are reported assuming a value of 125.09 GeV for the Higgs boson mass, the result of the combined measurement by the ATLAS and CMS experiments. The analysis uses the CERN LHC proton--proton collision data recorded by the ATLAS and CMS experiments in 2011 and 2012, corresponding to integrated luminosities per experiment of approximately 5 fb$^{-1}$ at $\sqrt{s}=7$ TeV and 20 fb$^{-1}$ at $\sqrt{s} = 8$ TeV. The Higgs boson production and decay rates measured by the two experiments are combined within the context of three generic parameterisations: two based on cross sections and branching fractions, and one on ratios of coupling modifiers. Several interpretations of the measurements with more model-dependent parameterisations are also given. The combined signal yield relative to the Standard Model prediction is measured to be 1.09 $\pm$ 0.11. The combined measurements lead to observed significances for the vector boson fusion production process and for the $H \to \tau\tau$ decay of $5.4$ and $5.5$ standard deviations, respectively. The data are consistent with the Standard Model predictions for all parameterisations considered.
Measurements of the azimuthal anisotropy in lead-lead collisions at $\sqrt{s_\mathrm{NN}} = 5.02$ TeV are presented using a data sample corresponding to 0.49 $\mathrm{nb}^{-1}$ integrated luminosity collected by the ATLAS experiment at the LHC in 2015. The recorded minimum-bias sample is enhanced by triggers for "ultra-central" collisions, providing an opportunity to perform detailed study of flow harmonics in the regime where the initial state is dominated by fluctuations. The anisotropy of the charged-particle azimuthal angle distributions is characterized by the Fourier coefficients, $v_{2}-v_{7}$, which are measured using the two-particle correlation, scalar-product and event-plane methods. The goal of the paper is to provide measurements of the differential as well as integrated flow harmonics $v_{n}$ over wide ranges of the transverse momentum, 0.5 $
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-1%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-1%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-1%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-1%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%
The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The V4 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%
The V5 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V5 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V5 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V5 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V5 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V5 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V5 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V5 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The V6 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V6 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V6 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V6 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V6 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V6 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V6 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V6 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The ratio of V2{SP} over V2{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The ratio of V2{SP} over V2{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The ratio of V2{SP} over V2{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The ratio of V3{SP} over V3{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The ratio of V3{SP} over V3{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The ratio of V3{SP} over V3{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The ratio of V4{SP} over V4{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The ratio of V4{SP} over V4{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The ratio of V4{SP} over V4{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The ratio of V5{SP} over V5{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The ratio of V5{SP} over V5{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The ratio of V5{SP} over V5{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The ratio of V6{SP} over V6{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The ratio of V6{SP} over V6{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The ratio of V6{SP} over V6{EP} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The ratio of V2{SP} over V2{EP} as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The ratio of V3{SP} over V3{EP} as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The ratio of V4{SP} over V4{EP} as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The ratio of V5{SP} over V5{EP} as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The ratio of V6{SP} over V6{EP} as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The ratio of V2{SP} over V2{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The ratio of V2{SP} over V2{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The ratio of V2{SP} over V2{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The ratio of V3{SP} over V3{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The ratio of V3{SP} over V3{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The ratio of V3{SP} over V3{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The ratio of V4{SP} over V4{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The ratio of V4{SP} over V4{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The ratio of V4{SP} over V4{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The ratio of V5{SP} over V5{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The ratio of V5{SP} over V5{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The ratio of V5{SP} over V5{2PC} as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%. PT binning matched to RUN1.
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV
The V2 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV
The V3 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV
The V4 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV
The V5 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV
The V6 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV
The V7 harmonic measured with the scalar product method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-15%
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-25%
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-35%
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-45%
The V2 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-55%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-15%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-25%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-35%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-45%
The V3 harmonic measured with the two particle correlation method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-55%
The scaled-V2(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 0-5%
The scaled-V2(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 10-15%
The scaled-V2(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 20-25%
The scaled-V2(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 30-35%
The scaled-V2(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 40-45%
The scaled-V2(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 50-55%
The scaled-V3(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 0-5%
The scaled-V3(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 10-15%
The scaled-V3(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 20-25%
The scaled-V3(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 30-35%
The scaled-V3(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 40-45%
The scaled-V3(PT) measured with the two particle correlation method in centrality bin 50-55%
The PT scale factor for V2(PT) as a funtion of collision centrality
The PT scale factor for V3(PT) as a funtion of collision centrality
The V2 scale factor as a funtion of collision centrality
The V3 scale factor as a funtion of collision centrality
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-1%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-1%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-1%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-1%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 60-70%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 70-80%
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 0-5%
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 5-10%
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 10-20%
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 20-30%
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 30-40%
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 40-50%
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of transverse momentum in centrality bin 50-60%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 2 < PT < 3 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 60-70%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-0.1%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 0-5%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 10-20%
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a function of pseudorapidity for transverse momentum range 7 < PT < 60 GeV in centrality bin 30-40%
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV
The V2 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV
The V3 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV
The V4 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV
The V5 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV
The V6 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 0.8 GeV
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.8 < PT < 1 GeV
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 1 < PT < 2 GeV
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 2 < PT < 4 GeV
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 4 < PT < 8 GeV
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 8 < PT < 60 GeV
The V7 harmonic measured with the event plane method as a funtion of MEAN(Npart) integrated over 0.5 < PT < 60 GeV
Results of a search for the pair production of photon-jets$-$collimated groupings of photons$-$in the ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider are reported. Highly collimated photon-jets can arise from the decay of new, highly boosted particles that can decay to multiple photons collimated enough to be identified in the electromagnetic calorimeter as a single, photonlike energy cluster. Data from proton-proton collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV, corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 36.7 fb$^{-1}$, were collected in 2015 and 2016. Candidate photon-jet pair production events are selected from those containing two reconstructed photons using a set of identification criteria much less stringent than that typically used for the selection of photons, with additional criteria applied to provide improved sensitivity to photon-jets. Narrow excesses in the reconstructed diphoton mass spectra are searched for. The observed mass spectra are consistent with the Standard Model background expectation. The results are interpreted in the context of a model containing a new, high-mass scalar particle with narrow width, $X$, that decays into pairs of photon-jets via new, light particles, $a$. Upper limits are placed on the cross section times the product of branching ratios $\sigma \times \mathcal{B}(X \rightarrow aa) \times \mathcal {B}(a \rightarrow \gamma \gamma)^{2}$ for 200 GeV $< m_{X} <$ 2 TeV and for ranges of $ m_a $ from a lower mass of 100 MeV up to between 2 and 10 GeV, depending upon $ m_X $. Upper limits are also placed on $\sigma \times \mathcal{B}(X \rightarrow aa) \times \mathcal {B}(a \rightarrow 3\pi^{0})^{2}$ for the same range of $ m_X $ and for ranges of $ m_a $ from a lower mass of 500 MeV up to between 2 and 10 GeV.
Distribution of the reconstructed diphoton mass for data events passing the analysis selection, in the low-$\Delta E$ category. There are no data events above 2700 GeV.
Distribution of the reconstructed diphoton mass for data events passing the analysis selection, in the high-$\Delta E$ category. There are no data events above 2700 GeV.
The observed upper limits on the production cross-section times the product of branching ratios for the benchmark signal scenario involving a scalar particle $X$ with narrow width decaying via $X\rightarrow aa\rightarrow 4\gamma$, $\sigma_X\times B(X\rightarrow aa)\times B(a\rightarrow\gamma\gamma)^2$. The limits for $m_{a}$ = 5 GeV and 10 GeV do not cover as large a range as the other mass points, since the region of interest is limited to $ m_{a} < 0.01 \times m_{X}$.
The expected upper limits on the production cross-section times the product of branching ratios for the benchmark signal scenario involving a scalar particle $X$ with narrow width decaying via $X\rightarrow aa\rightarrow 4\gamma$, $\sigma_X\times B(X\rightarrow aa)\times B(a\rightarrow\gamma\gamma)^2$. The limits for $m_{a}$ = 5 GeV and 10 GeV do not cover as large a range as the other mass points, since the region of interest is limited to $ m_{a} < 0.01 \times m_{X}$. Additionally, the expected limits are not provided for a small number of points, indicated with a hyphen, because of a technical failure with the computation.
The observed upper limits on the production cross-section times the product of branching ratios for the benchmark signal scenario involving a scalar particle $X$ with narrow width decaying via $X\rightarrow aa\rightarrow 6\pi^0$, $\sigma_X\times B(X\rightarrow aa)\times B(a\rightarrow 3\pi^0)^2$. The limits for $m_{a}$ = 5 GeV and 10 GeV do not cover as large a range as the other mass points, since the region of interest is limited to $ m_{a} < 0.01 \times m_{X}$.
The expected upper limits on the production cross-section times the product of branching ratios for the benchmark signal scenario involving a scalar particle $X$ with narrow width decaying via $X\rightarrow aa\rightarrow 6\pi^0$, $\sigma_X\times B(X\rightarrow aa)\times B(a\rightarrow 3\pi^0)^2$. The limits for $m_{a}$ = 5 GeV and 10 GeV do not cover as large a range as the other mass points, since the region of interest is limited to $ m_{a} < 0.01 \times m_{X}$. Additionally, the expected limits are not provided for a small number of points, indicated with a hyphen, because of a technical failure with the computation.
Observed 95% CL upper limits on the visible cross section as a function of $m_X$ and the fraction of events in the low-$\Delta E$ category.
Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 0.1 GeV.
Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 0.5 GeV.
Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 0.7 GeV.
Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 1 GeV.
Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 2 GeV.
Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 5 GeV.
Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 10 GeV.
Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 0.5 GeV.
Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 0.7 GeV.
Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 1 GeV.
Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 2 GeV.
Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 5 GeV.
Selection efficiency for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 10 GeV.
Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 0.1 GeV.
Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 0.5 GeV.
Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 0.7 GeV.
Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 1 GeV.
Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 2 GeV.
Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 5 GeV.
Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 2\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 10 GeV.
Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 0.5 GeV.
Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 0.7 GeV.
Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 1 GeV.
Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 2 GeV.
Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 5 GeV.
Fraction of reconstructed photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for reconstructed photons originating from the decay $a\rightarrow 3\pi^0\rightarrow 6\gamma$ with $m_a$ = 10 GeV.
Selection efficiency for photons originating from the BSM process $X\rightarrow\gamma\gamma$, where the $X$ particle is a high-mass narrow-width scalar particle originating from the gluon--gluon fusion process.
Fraction of photons with a value of shower shape variable $\Delta E$ lower than the threshold, for photons originating from the BSM process $X\rightarrow\gamma\gamma$, where the $X$ particle is a high-mass narrow-width scalar particle originating from the gluon--gluon fusion process.
When you search on a word, e.g. 'collisions', we will automatically search across everything we store about a record. But, sometimes you may wish to be more specific. Here we show you how.
Guidance and examples on the query string syntax can be found in the Elasticsearch documentation.
About HEPData Submitting to HEPData HEPData File Formats HEPData Coordinators HEPData Terms of Use HEPData Cookie Policy
Status
Email
Forum
Twitter
GitHub
Copyright ~1975-Present, HEPData | Powered by Invenio, funded by STFC, hosted and originally developed at CERN, supported and further developed at IPPP Durham.