Measured fiducial cross section times leptonic branching ratio for Z/gamma* production in the Z/gamma* -> e+e- final state.

Measured fiducial cross section times leptonic branching ratio for W+ production in the W+ -> mu+ nu final state.

Measured fiducial cross section times leptonic branching ratio for W- production in the W- -> mu- nubar final state.

Measured fiducial cross section times leptonic branching ratio for W+/- production in the combined W+ -> mu+ nu and W- -> mu- nubar final state.

Measured fiducial cross section times leptonic branching ratio for Z/gamma* production in the Z/gamma* -> mu+ mu- final state.

Measured total cross section times leptonic branching ratio for W+ production in the W+ -> e+ nu final state.

Measured total cross section times leptonic branching ratio for W- production in the W- -> e- nubar final state.

Measured total cross section times leptonic branching ratio for W+/- production in the combined W+ -> e+ nu and W- -> e- nubar final state.

Measured total cross section times leptonic branching ratio for Z/gamma* production in the Z/gamma* -> e+ e- final state.

Measured total cross section times leptonic branching ratio for W+ production in the W+ -> mu+ nu final state.

Measured total cross section times leptonic branching ratio for W- production in the W- -> mu- nubar final state.

Measured total cross section times leptonic branching ratio for W+/- production in the combined W+ -> mu+ nu and W- -> mu- nubar final state.

Measured total cross section times leptonic branching ratio for Z/gamma* production in the Z/gamma* -> mu+ mu- final state.

Measured total cross section times leptonic branching ratio for W+ production in the W+ -> l+ nu (l = e, mu) final states.

Measured total cross section times leptonic branching ratio for W- production in the W- -> l- nubar (l = e, mu) final states.

Measured total cross section times leptonic branching ratio for W+/- production in the combined W+ -> l+ nu and W- -> l- nubar (l = e, mu) final states.

Measured total cross section times leptonic branching ratio for Z/gamma* production in the combined Z/gamma* -> l+ l- (l = e, mu) final states.

Measured total cross-section ratio R_{W+/Z} = sigma (W+ -> e+ nu) / sigma (Z/gamma^* -> e+ e-).

Measured total cross-section ratio R_{W-/Z} = sigma (W- -> e- nubar) / sigma (Z/gamma^* -> e+ e-).

Measured total cross-section ratio R_{W+-/Z} = sigma (W+/- -> e+/- nu/nubar) / sigma (Z/gamma^* -> e+ e-).

Measured total cross-section ratio R_{W+/Z} = sigma (W+ -> mu+ nu) / sigma (Z/gamma^* -> mu+ mu-).

Measured total cross-section ratio R_{W-/Z} = sigma (W- -> mu- nubar) / sigma (Z/gamma^* -> mu+ mu-).

Measured total cross-section ratio R_{W+-/Z} = sigma (W+/- -> mu+/- nu/nubar) / sigma (Z/gamma^* -> mu+ mu-).

Measured total cross-section ratio R_{W+/Z} = sigma (W+ -> l+ nu) / sigma (Z/gamma^* -> l+ l-) where (l = e, mu).

Measured total cross-section ratio R_{W-/Z} = sigma (W- -> l- nubar) / sigma (Z/gamma^* -> l+ l-) where (l = e, mu).

Measured total cross-section ratio R_{W+-/Z} = sigma (W+/- -> l+/- nu/nubar) / sigma (Z/gamma^* -> l+ l-) where (l = e, mu).

Measured lepton asymmetry from W+ -> e+ nu and W- -> e- nubar, binned as a function pseudorapidity.

Measured lepton asymmetry from W+ -> e+ nu and W- -> e- nubar.

Measured lepton asymmetry from W+ -> mu+ nu and W- -> mu- nubar, binned as a function pseudorapidity.

Measured lepton asymmetry from W+ -> mu+ nu and W- -> mu- nubar.

Measured lepton asymmetry from W+ -> l+ nu and W- -> l- nubar (l = e, mu), binned as a function pseudorapidity.

Measured lepton asymmetry from W+ -> l+ nu and W- -> l- nubar (l = e, mu).

CHI distribution for mass bin > 1200 GeV.

Centrality Ratio.

Probability of finding at least one TAR jet, where the p_T-leading TAR jet passes the m_Wcand and D₂^β=1 requirements, as a function of m_s. The probability is determined in a sample of signal events with m_Z'=2100 GeV, with the preselections applied.

Probability of finding a W_had candidate reconstructed as a pair of R=0.4 PFlow jets, as a function of m_s. The probability is determined in a sample of signal events with m_Z'=500 GeV, with the preselections applied that do not pass the requirements of the merged category.

Probability of finding a W_had candidate reconstructed as a pair of R=0.4 PFlow jets, as a function of m_s. The probability is determined in a sample of signal events with m_Z'=1000 GeV, with the preselections applied that do not pass the requirements of the merged category.

Probability of finding a W_had candidate reconstructed as a pair of R=0.4 PFlow jets, as a function of m_s. The probability is determined in a sample of signal events with m_Z'=1700 GeV, with the preselections applied that do not pass the requirements of the merged category.

Probability of finding a W_had candidate reconstructed as a pair of R=0.4 PFlow jets, as a function of m_s. The probability is determined in a sample of signal events with m_Z'=2100 GeV, with the preselections applied that do not pass the requirements of the merged category.

Observed exclusion contour at 95% C.L. for the dark Higgs model in the (m_Z', m_s) plane for g_q=0.25, g_χ=1, m_χ=200 GeV, and sinθ=0.01.

Expected exclusion contour at 95% C.L. for the dark Higgs model in the (m_Z', m_s) plane for g_q=0.25, g_χ=1, m_χ=200 GeV, and sinθ=0.01.

Expected+1σ exclusion contour at 95% C.L. for the dark Higgs model in the (m_Z', m_s) plane for g_q=0.25, g_χ=1, m_χ=200 GeV, and sinθ=0.01.

Expected-1σ exclusion contour at 95% C.L. for the dark Higgs model in the (m_Z', m_s) plane for g_q=0.25, g_χ=1, m_χ=200 GeV, and sinθ=0.01.

Expected+2σ exclusion contour at 95% C.L. for the dark Higgs model in the (m_Z', m_s) plane for g_q=0.25, g_χ=1, m_χ=200 GeV, and sinθ=0.01.

Expected-2σ exclusion contour at 95% C.L. for the dark Higgs model in the (m_Z', m_s) plane for g_q=0.25, g_χ=1, m_χ=200 GeV, and sinθ=0.01.

Observed upper limits at 95% C.L. on σ(pp → s χχ) × B(s → W^± W^∓) for m_Z'=0.5 TeV as a function of m_s. The expected limits, varied up and down by one and two standard deviations, are shown as green and yellow bands, respectively. The observed and expected limits are compared to the theoretical LO cross section for the σ(pp → s χχ) × B(s → W^± W^∓) process for m_Z'=0.5 TeV, shown in dashed blue.

Observed upper limits at 95% C.L. on σ(pp → s χχ) × B(s → W^± W^∓) for m_Z'=1 TeV as a function of m_s. The expected limits, varied up and down by one and two standard deviations, are shown as green and yellow bands, respectively. The observed and expected limits are compared to the theoretical LO cross section for the σ(pp → s χχ) × B(s → W^± W^∓) process for m_Z'=1 TeV, shown in dashed blue.

Observed upper limits at 95% C.L. on σ(pp → s χχ) × B(s → W^± W^∓) for m_Z'=1.7 TeV as a function of m_s. The expected limits, varied up and down by one and two standard deviations, are shown as green and yellow bands, respectively. The observed and expected limits are compared to the theoretical LO cross section for the σ(pp → s χχ) × B(s → W^± W^∓) process for m_Z'=1.7 TeV, shown in dashed blue.

Observed upper limits at 95% C.L. on σ(pp → s χχ) × B(s → W^± W^∓) for m_Z'=2.1 TeV as a function of m_s. The expected limits, varied up and down by one and two standard deviations, are shown as green and yellow bands, respectively. The observed and expected limits are compared to the theoretical LO cross section for the σ(pp → s χχ) × B(s → W^± W^∓) process for m_Z'=2.1 TeV, shown in dashed blue.

Data overlaid on SM background yields stacked in each SR and CR category after the fit to data ('Post-fit'). The yields in the SR are broken down into their contributions to the individual bins. The maximum-likelihood estimators are set to the conditional values of the CR-only fit, and propagated to SR and CRs.

Dominant sources of uncertainty for three dark Higgs scenarios after the fit to data. The uncertainties are quantified in terms of their contribution to the fitted signal uncertainty that is expressed relative to the theory prediction. Three representative dark Higgs signal scenarios with g_q=0.25, g_χ=1.0, sinθ=0.01 and m_χ=200 GeV are considered, which are indicated using the (m_Z', m_s) format in units of GeV in the table columns.

Cumulative efficiencies in the merged category for three representative dark Higgs signal scenarios with g_q=0.25, g_χ=1.0, sinθ=0.01, m_Z' = 1 TeV, and m_χ=200 GeV considering s→W(ℓν)W(qq) decays only.

Cumulative efficiencies in the resolved category for three representative dark Higgs signal scenarios with g_q=0.25, g_χ=1.0, sinθ=0.01, m_Z' = 1 TeV, and m_χ=200 GeV considering s→W(ℓν)W(qq) decays only.

Theoretical cross section for &sigma;(pp &rarr; s&chi;&chi;) &times; B(s &rarr; W^&plusmn;W^&#8723;) for each of the dark Higgs signal points at m_Z′ ={300, 350, 400, 500, 750} GeV, with g_q = 0.25, g<sub>&chi; = 1.0, sin&theta; = 0.01, m_Z′ = 1 TeV , and m_&chi; = 200 GeV. Also shown are experimentally excluded cross sections of &sigma;(pp &rarr; s&chi;&chi;) &times; B(s &rarr; W^&plusmn;W^&#8723;) (Obs.) together with the expectations (Exp.) varied up and down by one standard deviation (&plusmn;1&sigma;).

Theoretical cross section for &sigma;(pp &rarr; s&chi;&chi;) &times; B(s &rarr; W^&plusmn;W^&#8723;) for each of the dark Higgs signal points at m_Z′ ={1000, 1700} GeV, with g_q = 0.25, g<sub>&chi; = 1.0, sin&theta; = 0.01, m_Z′ = 1 TeV , and m_&chi; = 200 GeV. Also shown are experimentally excluded cross sections of &sigma;(pp &rarr; s&chi;&chi;) &times; B(s &rarr; W^&plusmn;W^&#8723;) (Obs.) together with the expectations (Exp.) varied up and down by one standard deviation (&plusmn;1&sigma;).

Theoretical cross section for &sigma;(pp &rarr; s&chi;&chi;) &times; B(s &rarr; W^&plusmn;W^&#8723;) for each of the dark Higgs signal points at m_Z′ ={2100, 2500, 2900, 3300} GeV, with g_q = 0.25, g<sub>&chi; = 1.0, sin&theta; = 0.01, m_Z′ = 1 TeV , and m_&chi; = 200 GeV. Also shown are experimentally excluded cross sections of &sigma;(pp &rarr; s&chi;&chi;) &times; B(s &rarr; W^&plusmn;W^&#8723;) (Obs.) together with the expectations (Exp.) varied up and down by one standard deviation (&plusmn;1&sigma;).

The unfolded differential charge asymmetry as a function of the transverse momentum of the top pair system. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NNLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The scale uncertainty is obtained by varying renormalisation and factorisation scales independently by a factor of 2 or 0.5 around $\mu_0$ to calculate the maximum and minimum value of the asymmetry, respectively. The nominal value $\mu_0$ is chosen as $H_T/4$. The variations in which one scale is multiplied by 2 while the other scale is divided by 2 are excluded. Finally, the scale and MC integration uncertainties are added in quadrature.

The unfolded differential charge asymmetry as a function of the longitudinal boost of the top pair system. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NNLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The scale uncertainty is obtained by varying renormalisation and factorisation scales independently by a factor of 2 or 0.5 around $\mu_0$ to calculate the maximum and minimum value of the asymmetry, respectively. The nominal value $\mu_0$ is chosen as $H_T/4$. The variations in which one scale is multiplied by 2 while the other scale is divided by 2 are excluded. Finally, the scale and MC integration uncertainties are added in quadrature.

The unfolded inclusive leptonic asymmetry. The unfolded $A_C^{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ is obtained in the reduced phase-space defined by the requirement $|\Delta |\eta_{\ell\bar{\ell}}||<2.5$. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The theory uncertainty is obtained by varying both scales by a factor of 0.5 or 2.0 to calculate the minimum and maximum value of the asymmetry, respectively.

The unfolded differential leptonic asymmetry as a function of the invariant mass of the di-lepton pair. The unfolded $A_C^{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ is obtained in the reduced phase-space defined by the requirement $|\Delta |\eta_{\ell\bar{\ell}}||<2.5$. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The theory uncertainty is obtained by varying both scales by a factor of 0.5 or 2.0 to calculate the minimum and maximum value of the asymmetry, respectively.

The unfolded differential leptonic asymmetry as a function of the transverse momentum of the di-lepton pair. The unfolded $A_C^{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ is obtained in the reduced phase-space defined by the requirement $|\Delta |\eta_{\ell\bar{\ell}}||<2.5$. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The theory uncertainty is obtained by varying both scales by a factor of 0.5 or 2.0 to calculate the minimum and maximum value of the asymmetry, respectively.

The unfolded differential leptonic asymmetry as a function of the longitudinal boost of the di-lepton pair. The unfolded $A_C^{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ is obtained in the reduced phase-space defined by the requirement $|\Delta |\eta_{\ell\bar{\ell}}||<2.5$. The measured values are given with statistical and systematic uncertainties. The SM theory predictions calculated at NLO in QCD and NLO in EW theory are listed. The theory uncertainty is obtained by varying both scales by a factor of 0.5 or 2.0 to calculate the minimum and maximum value of the asymmetry, respectively.

Individual 68% and 95% CL bounds on the relevant Wilson coefficients of the SM Effective Field Theory in units of $\text{TeV}^{-2}$. The bounds are derived from the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ inclusive measurement. The experimental uncertainties are accounted for, in the form of the complete covariance matrix that keeps track of correlations between bins for the differential measurement. The theory uncertainty from the NNLO QCD + NLO EW calculation is included by explicitly varying the renormalization and factorization scales, or the parton density functions, in the calculation and registering the variations in the intervals.

Individual 68% and 95% CL bounds on the relevant Wilson coefficients of the SM Effective Field Theory in units of $\text{TeV}^{-2}$. The bounds are derived from the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement. The experimental uncertainties are accounted for, in the form of the complete covariance matrix that keeps track of correlations between bins for the differential measurement. The theory uncertainty from the NNLO QCD + NLO EW calculation is included by explicitly varying the renormalization and factorization scales, or the parton density functions, in the calculation and registering the variations in the intervals.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ inclusive measurement. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [0,0.3]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [0.3,0.6]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [0.6,0.8]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [0.8,1]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $m_{t\bar{t}}$ < 500 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $m_{t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [500,750] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $m_{t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [750,1000] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $m_{t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [1000,1500] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $m_{t\bar{t}}$ > 1500 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ < 30 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ $\in$ [30,120] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ measurement for $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ > 120 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ inclusive measurement. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$[0,0.3]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$[0.3,0.6]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$[0.6,0.8]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$[0.8,1]. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ < 200 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$ [200,300] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$ [300,400] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ > 400 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ < 20 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ $\in$ [20, 70] GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Ranking of the systematic uncertainties with marginalisation for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement for $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ > 70 GeV. The effect on unfolded $A_C$ for down and up variation of the systematic uncertainty is shown, respectively. The pulls and constraints of the ranked NPs are obtained from data.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ inclusive measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ inclusive measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Post-marginalisation correlation coefficients $\rho_{ij}$ of nuisance parameters for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement. Only $|\rho_{ij}| > 0.05$ values are included.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $m_{t\bar{t}}$ measurement.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $p_{T,t\bar{t}}$ measurement.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{t\bar{t}}$ vs $\beta_{z,t\bar{t}}$ measurement.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $m_{\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $p_{T,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement.

Covariance matrix for the $A_C^{\ell\ell}$ vs $\beta_{z,\ell\bar{\ell}}$ measurement.

Comparison between data and background prediction before the fit (Pre-Fit) for the mass of the FCNC top-quark candidate in SR1. The uncertainty band includes both the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the background prediction. The four FCNC LH signals are also shown separately, normalized to five times the cross-section corresponding to the most stringent observed branching ratio limits. The first (last) bin in all distributions includes the underflow (overflow). The lower panels show the ratios of the data (Data) to the background prediction (Bkg.).

Comparison between data and background prediction before the fit (Pre-Fit) for the mass of the SM top-quark candidate in SR2. The uncertainty band includes both the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the background prediction. The four FCNC LH signals are also shown separately, normalized to five times the cross-section corresponding to the most stringent observed branching ratio limits. The first (last) bin in all distributions includes the underflow (overflow). The lower panels show the ratios of the data (Data) to the background prediction (Bkg.).

Comparison between data and background prediction before the fit (Pre-Fit) for the transverse momentum of the Z boson candidate in SR2. The uncertainty band includes both the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the background prediction. The four FCNC LH signals are also shown separately, normalized to five times the cross-section corresponding to the most stringent observed branching ratio limits. The first (last) bin in all distributions includes the underflow (overflow). The lower panels show the ratios of the data (Data) to the background prediction (Bkg.).

Comparison between data and background prediction after the fit to data (Post-Fit) for the FCNC tZu LH coupling extraction. The distribution is for the $D_{1}$ discriminant in the mass sideband CR1. The uncertainty band includes both the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the background prediction. The FCNC tZu LH signals are also separately shown, normalized to 500 times the best fit of the signal yield. The lower panels show the ratios of the data (Data) to the background prediction (Bkg.).

Comparison between data and background prediction after the fit to data (Post-Fit) for the FCNC tZu LH coupling extraction. The distribution is for the $D_{2}^{u}$ discriminant in the mass sideband CR2. The uncertainty band includes both the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the background prediction. The FCNC tZu LH signals are also separately shown, normalized to 500 times the best fit of the signal yield. The lower panels show the ratios of the data (Data) to the background prediction (Bkg.).

Comparison between data and background prediction after the fit to data (Post-Fit) for the FCNC tZu LH coupling extraction. The distribution is for the $D_{1}$ discriminant in SR1. The uncertainty band includes both the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the background prediction. The FCNC tZu LH signals are also separately shown, normalized to 50 times the best fit of the signal yield. The lower panels show the ratios of the data (Data) to the background prediction (Bkg.).

Comparison between data and background prediction after the fit to data (Post-Fit) for the FCNC tZu LH coupling extraction. The distribution is for the $D_{2}^{u}$ discriminant in SR2. The uncertainty band includes both the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the background prediction. The FCNC tZu LH signals are also separately shown, normalized to 50 times the best fit of the signal yield. The lower panels show the ratios of the data (Data) to the background prediction (Bkg.).

Comparison between data and background prediction after the fit to data (Post-Fit) for the FCNC tZc LH coupling extraction. The distribution is for the $D_{1}$ discriminant in the mass sideband CR1. The uncertainty band includes both the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the background prediction. The FCNC tZc LH signals are also separately shown, normalized to 500 times the best fit of the signal yield. The lower panels show the ratios of the data (Data) to the background prediction (Bkg.).

Comparison between data and background prediction after the fit to data (Post-Fit) for the FCNC tZc LH coupling extraction. The distribution is for the $D_{2}^{c}$ discriminant in the mass sideband CR2. The uncertainty band includes both the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the background prediction. The FCNC tZc LH signals are also separately shown, normalized to 500 times the best fit of the signal yield. The lower panels show the ratios of the data (Data) to the background prediction (Bkg.).

Comparison between data and background prediction after the fit to data (Post-Fit) for the FCNC tZc LH coupling extraction. The distribution is for the $D_{1}$ discriminant in SR1. The uncertainty band includes both the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the background prediction. The FCNC tZc LH signals are also separately shown, normalized to 50 times the best fit of the signal yield. The lower panels show the ratios of the data (Data) to the background prediction (Bkg.).

Comparison between data and background prediction after the fit to data (Post-Fit) for the FCNC tZc LH coupling extraction. The distribution is for the $D_{2}^{c}$ discriminant in SR2. The uncertainty band includes both the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the background prediction. The FCNC tZc LH signals are also separately shown, normalized to 50 times the best fit of the signal yield. The lower panels show the ratios of the data (Data) to the background prediction (Bkg.).

Comparison between data and background prediction after the fit to data (Post-Fit) for the FCNC tZu LH coupling extraction. The distribution is for the leading lepton $p_{T}$ in the $t\bar{t}$ CR. The uncertainty band includes both the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the background prediction. The FCNC tZu LH signals are also shown separately, normalized to $10^{3}$ times the best fit of the signal yield. The last bin includes the overflow. The lower panels show the ratios of the data (Data) to the background prediction (Bkg.).

Comparison between data and background prediction after the fit to data (Post-Fit) for the FCNC tZu LH coupling extraction. The distribution is for the third lepton $p_{T}$ in the $t\bar{t}$ CR. The uncertainty band includes both the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the background prediction. The FCNC tZu LH signals are also shown separately, normalized to $10^{3}$ times the best fit of the signal yield. The last bin includes the overflow. The lower panels show the ratios of the data (Data) to the background prediction (Bkg.).

Comparison between data and background prediction after the fit to data (Post-Fit) for the FCNC tZu LH coupling extraction. The distribution is for the leading lepton $p_{T}$ in the $t\bar{t}Z$ CR. The uncertainty band includes both the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the background prediction. The FCNC tZu LH signals are also shown separately, normalized to $10^{3}$ times the best fit of the signal yield. The last bin includes the overflow. The lower panels show the ratios of the data (Data) to the background prediction (Bkg.).

Comparison between data and background prediction after the fit to data (Post-Fit) for the FCNC tZu LH coupling extraction. The distribution is for the $D_{1}$ discriminant in the $t\bar{t}Z$ CR. The uncertainty band includes both the statistical and systematic uncertainties in the background prediction. The FCNC tZu LH signals are also shown separately, normalized to $10^{3}$ times the best fit of the signal yield. The lower panels show the ratios of the data (Data) to the background prediction (Bkg.).

Charged particle multiplicity distribution.

Average charged particle transverse momentum as a function of the number of charged particles in the event.

Inclusive jet double-differential cross sections in the |rapidity| range 1.2 to 2.1, using a jet resolution R value of 0.4. The three (sys) errors are respectively, the Absolute JES, the Unfolding and the Luminosity uncertainties.

Inclusive jet double-differential cross sections in the |rapidity| range 2.1 to 2.8, using a jet resolution R value of 0.4. The three (sys) errors are respectively, the Absolute JES, the Unfolding and the Luminosity uncertainties.

Inclusive jet double-differential cross sections in the |rapidity| range 0 to 0.3, using a jet resolution R value of 0.6. The three (sys) errors are respectively, the Absolute JES, the Unfolding and the Luminosity uncertainties.

Inclusive jet double-differential cross sections in the |rapidity| range 0.3 to 0.8, using a jet resolution R value of 0.6. The three (sys) errors are respectively, the Absolute JES, the Unfolding and the Luminosity uncertainties.

Inclusive jet double-differential cross sections in the |rapidity| range 0.8 to 1.2, using a jet resolution R value of 0.6. The three (sys) errors are respectively, the Absolute JES, the Unfolding and the Luminosity uncertainties.

Inclusive jet double-differential cross sections in the |rapidity| range 1.2 to 2.1, using a jet resolution R value of 0.6. The three (sys) errors are respectively, the Absolute JES, the Unfolding and the Luminosity uncertainties.

Inclusive jet double-differential cross sections in the |rapidity| range 2.1 to 2.8, using a jet resolution R value of 0.6. The three (sys) errors are respectively, the Absolute JES, the Unfolding and the Luminosity uncertainties.

Dijet double-differential cross sections in the |rapidity(max)| range 0 to 0.3, using a jet resolution R value of 0.4. The four (sys) errors are respectively, the Absolute JES, the Relative JES, the Unfolding and the Luminosity uncertainties.

Dijet double-differential cross sections in the |rapidity(max)| range 0.3 to 0.8, using a jet resolution R value of 0.4. The four (sys) errors are respectively, the Absolute JES, the Relative JES, the Unfolding and the Luminosity uncertainties.

Dijet double-differential cross sections in the |rapidity(max)| range 0.8 to 1.2, using a jet resolution R value of 0.4. The four (sys) errors are respectively, the Absolute JES, the Relative JES, the Unfolding and the Luminosity uncertainties.

Dijet double-differential cross sections in the |rapidity(max)| range 1.2 to 2.1, using a jet resolution R value of 0.4. The four (sys) errors are respectively, the Absolute JES, the Relative JES, the Unfolding and the Luminosity uncertainties.

Dijet double-differential cross sections in the |rapidity(max)| range 2.1 to 2.8, using a jet resolution R value of 0.4. The four (sys) errors are respectively, the Absolute JES, the Relative JES, the Unfolding and the Luminosity uncertainties.

Dijet double-differential cross sections in the |rapidity(max)| range 0 to 0.3, using a jet resolution R value of 0.6. The four (sys) errors are respectively, the Absolute JES, the Relative JES, the Unfolding and the Luminosity uncertainties.

Dijet double-differential cross sections in the |rapidity(max)| range 0.3 to 0.8, using a jet resolution R value of 0.6. The four (sys) errors are respectively, the Absolute JES, the Relative JES, the Unfolding and the Luminosity uncertainties.

Dijet double-differential cross sections in the |rapidity(max)| range 0.8 to 1.2, using a jet resolution R value of 0.6. The four (sys) errors are respectively, the Absolute JES, the Relative JES, the Unfolding and the Luminosity uncertainties.

Dijet double-differential cross sections in the |rapidity(max)| range 1.2 to 2.1, using a jet resolution R value of 0.6. The four (sys) errors are respectively, the Absolute JES, the Relative JES, the Unfolding and the Luminosity uncertainties.

Dijet double-differential cross sections in the |rapidity(max)| range 2.1 to 2.8, using a jet resolution R value of 0.6. The four (sys) errors are respectively, the Absolute JES, the Relative JES, the Unfolding and the Luminosity uncertainties.

Dijet double-differential cross sections in the |rapidity(max)| range 340 to 520, using a jet resolution R value of 0.4. The four (sys) errors are respectively, the Absolute JES, the Relative JES, the Unfolding and the Luminosity uncertainties.

Dijet double-differential cross sections in the |rapidity(max)| range 520 to 800, using a jet resolution R value of 0.4. The four (sys) errors are respectively, the Absolute JES, the Relative JES, the Unfolding and the Luminosity uncertainties.

Dijet double-differential cross sections in the |rapidity(max)| range 800 to 1200, using a jet resolution R value of 0.4. The four (sys) errors are respectively, the Absolute JES, the Relative JES, the Unfolding and the Luminosity uncertainties.

Dijet double-differential cross sections in the |rapidity(max)| range 340 to 520, using a jet resolution R value of 0.6. The four (sys) errors are respectively, the Absolute JES, the Relative JES, the Unfolding and the Luminosity uncertainties.

Dijet double-differential cross sections in the |rapidity(max)| range 520 to 800, using a jet resolution R value of 0.6. The four (sys) errors are respectively, the Absolute JES, the Relative JES, the Unfolding and the Luminosity uncertainties.

Dijet double-differential cross sections in the |rapidity(max)| range 800 to 1200, using a jet resolution R value of 0.6. The four (sys) errors are respectively, the Absolute JES, the Relative JES, the Unfolding and the Luminosity uncertainties.

The performance of jet energy resolution (JER) for jets with |y| < 2.1 evaluated as a function of pT_truth in different centrality bins. Simulated hard scatter events were overlaid onto events from a dedicated sample of minimum-bias Xe+Xe data. The fit parameters are listed in a sperate table (Extras 1)

The relative magnitude of systematic uncertainties for per-pair normalized xJ distributions in 0-10% Xe+Xe centrality

The relative magnitude of systematic uncertainties for absolutely normalized xJ distributions in 0-10% Xe+Xe centrality

The relative magnitude of systematic uncertainties for rho distributions for leading jets in 0-10% Xe+Xe centrality

Per-pair normalized xJ distribution evaluated in four centrality intervals and given pT1 interval.

Per-pair normalized xJ distribution evaluated in four centrality intervals and given pT1 interval.

Per-pair normalized xJ distribution evaluated in four centrality intervals and given pT1 interval.

Absolutely normalized xJ distribution evaluated in four centrality intervals and given pT1 interval.

Absolutely normalized xJ distribution evaluated in four centrality intervals and given pT1 interval.

Absolutely normalized xJ distribution evaluated in four centrality intervals and given pT1 interval.

Per-pair normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions.

Per-pair normalized xJ distribution in Pb+Pb collisions.

Per-pair normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions.

Per-pair normalized xJ distribution in Pb+Pb collisions.

Per-pair normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions.

Per-pair normalized xJ distribution in Pb+Pb collisions.

Absolutely normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions.

Absolutely normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions.

Absolutely normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions.

Absolutely normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions.

Absolutely normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions.

Absolutely normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions.

The ratios of Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb pair nuclear-modification factors, rho, evaluated as a function of leading jet pT in the same centrality intervals.

The ratios of Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb pair nuclear-modification factors, rho, evaluated as a function of leading jet pT in the same centrality intervals.

The ratios of Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb pair nuclear-modification factors, rho, evaluated as a function of leading jet pT in the same centrality intervals.

The ratios of Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb pair nuclear-modification factors, rho, evaluated as a function of subleading jet pT in the same centrality intervals.

The ratios of Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb pair nuclear-modification factors, rho, evaluated as a function of subleading jet pT in the same centrality intervals.

The ratios of Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb pair nuclear-modification factors, rho, evaluated as a function of subleading jet pT in the same centrality intervals.

The ratios of Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb pair nuclear-modification factors, rho, evaluated as a function of leading jet pT in the same SUM ETFCal intervals (selecting equivalent event activity)

The ratios of Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb pair nuclear-modification factors, rho, evaluated as a function of leading jet pT in the same SUM ETFCal intervals (selecting equivalent event activity)

The ratios of Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb pair nuclear-modification factors, rho, evaluated as a function of leading jet pT in the same SUM ETFCal intervals (selecting equivalent event activity)

The ratios of Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb pair nuclear-modification factors, rho, evaluated as a function of subleading jet pT in the same SUM ETFCal intervals (selecting equivalent event activity)

The ratios of Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb pair nuclear-modification factors, rho, evaluated as a function of subleading jet pT in the same SUM ETFCal intervals (selecting equivalent event activity)

The ratios of Xe+Xe and Pb+Pb pair nuclear-modification factors, rho, evaluated as a function of subleading jet pT in the same SUM ETFCal intervals (selecting equivalent event activity)

Parameter a,b, and c from JER fits in Figure 1b.

Per-pair normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions for selected Pb+Pb centrality and pT1 bin.

Per-pair normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions for selected Pb+Pb centrality and pT1 bin.

Per-pair normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions for selected Pb+Pb centrality and pT1 bin.

Per-pair normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions for selected Pb+Pb centrality and pT1 bin.

Per-pair normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions for selected Pb+Pb centrality and pT1 bin.

Per-pair normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions for selected Pb+Pb centrality and pT1 bin.

Per-pair normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions for selected Pb+Pb centrality and pT1 bin.

Per-pair normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions for selected Pb+Pb centrality and pT1 bin.

Per-pair normalized xJ distribution in Xe+Xe collisions for selected Pb+Pb centrality and pT1 bin.

Non-prompt fraction of jpsi production in 5.02 TeV PbPb collision data as a function of pT for integrated centrality in the rapidity range |y| < 2.

The nuclear modification factor as a function of pT for the prompt jpsi for |y|<2, in 0--80% centrality bin.

The nuclear modification factor as a function of pT for the prompt jpsi for |y|<2, in 0--10%, 20--40%, and 40--80% centrality bin.

The nuclear modification factor as a function of pT for the non-prompt jpsi for |y|<2, in 0--80% centrality bin.

The nuclear modification factor as a function of pT for the non-prompt jpsi for |y|<2, in 0--10%, 20--40%, and 40--80% centrality bin.

The nuclear modification factor as a function of pT for the prompt and non-prompt jpsi for |y|<2, in 0--20% centrality bin.

The nuclear modification factor as a function of eta for the prompt jpsi for 9 < pT < 40 GeV, in 0--80% centrality bin.

The nuclear modification factor as a function of eta for the prompt jpsi for 9 < pT < 40 GeV, in 0--10%, 20--40%, and 40--80% centrality bin.

The nuclear modification factor as a function of eta for the non-prompt jpsi for 9 < pT < 40 GeV, in 0--80% centrality bin.

The nuclear modification factor as a function of eta for the non-prompt jpsi for 9 < pT < 40 GeV, in 0--10%, 20--40%, and 40--80% centrality bin.

The nuclear modification factor as a function of Npart for the prompt jpsi for |y|<2, and 9 < pT < 40 GeV

The nuclear modification factor as a function of Npart for the non-prompt jpsi for |y|<2, and 9 < pT < 40 GeV

The double ratio of nuclear modification factor as a function of Npart for the prompt jpsi and psi(2S) for |y|<2, and 9 < pT < 40 GeV

The double ratio nuclear modification factor as a function of Npart for the non-prompt jpsi and psi(2S) for |y|<2, and 9 < pT < 40 GeV

Breakdown of systematic uncertainties in the measured inclusive cross-section. The impact of the top-quark mass on the cross-section is included in the table and not counted in the total uncertainty entry in the paper.

Data bootstrap post unfolding for the inclusive cross-section. The replicas are obtained by reweighting each observed data event by a random integer generated according to Poisson statistics, using the BootstrapGenerator software package (https://gitlab.cern.ch/atlas-physics/sm/StandardModelTools_BootstrapGenerator/BootstrapGenerator), which implements a technique described in ATL-PHYS-PUB-2021-011 (https://cds.cern.ch/record/2759945). The ATLAS event number and run number of each event are used as seed to uniquely but reproducibly initialise the random number generator for each event. All the provided numbers originate from pseudo-data, including the 0th entry, and are in units of [fb].

Differential absolute cross-section for $\textrm{p}_{\textrm{T}}^{l}$. The impact of the top-quark mass on the cross-section is included in the table and not counted in the total uncertainty entry in the paper. The last bin of the distribution contains the overflow.

Covariance Matrix (statistical uncertainties only) for the differential absolute cross-section for $\textrm{p}_{\textrm{T}}^{l}$. The last bin of the distribution contains the overflow.

Data bootstrap post unfolding for the differential absolute cross-section for $\textrm{p}_{\textrm{T}}^{l}$. The replicas are obtained by reweighting each observed data event by a random integer generated according to Poisson statistics, using the BootstrapGenerator software package (https://gitlab.cern.ch/atlas-physics/sm/StandardModelTools_BootstrapGenerator/BootstrapGenerator), which implements a technique described in ATL-PHYS-PUB-2021-011 (https://cds.cern.ch/record/2759945). The ATLAS event number and run number of each event are used as seed to uniquely but reproducibly initialise the random number generator for each event. All the provided numbers originate from pseudo-data, including the 0th entry, and are in units of [fb/GeV]. The last bin of the distribution contains the overflow.

Differential absolute cross-section for $|\eta^{l}|$. The impact of the top-quark mass on the cross-section is included in the table and not counted in the total uncertainty entry in the paper.

Covariance Matrix (statistical uncertainties only) for the differential absolute cross-section for $|\eta^{l}|$.

Data bootstrap post unfolding for the differential absolute cross-section for $|\eta^{l}|$. The replicas are obtained by reweighting each observed data event by a random integer generated according to Poisson statistics, using the BootstrapGenerator software package (https://gitlab.cern.ch/atlas-physics/sm/StandardModelTools_BootstrapGenerator/BootstrapGenerator), which implements a technique described in ATL-PHYS-PUB-2021-011 (https://cds.cern.ch/record/2759945). The ATLAS event number and run number of each event are used as seed to uniquely but reproducibly initialise the random number generator for each event. All the provided numbers originate from pseudo-data, including the 0th entry, and are in units of [fb].

Differential absolute cross-section for $\textrm{E}^{e} + \textrm{E}^{\mu}$. The impact of the top-quark mass on the cross-section is included in the table and not counted in the total uncertainty entry in the paper. The last bin of the distribution contains the overflow.

Covariance Matrix (statistical uncertainties only) for the differential absolute cross-section for $\textrm{E}^{e} + \textrm{E}^{\mu}$. The last bin of the distribution contains the overflow.

Data bootstrap post unfolding for the differential absolute cross-section for $\textrm{E}^{e} + \textrm{E}^{\mu}$. The replicas are obtained by reweighting each observed data event by a random integer generated according to Poisson statistics, using the BootstrapGenerator software package (https://gitlab.cern.ch/atlas-physics/sm/StandardModelTools_BootstrapGenerator/BootstrapGenerator), which implements a technique described in ATL-PHYS-PUB-2021-011 (https://cds.cern.ch/record/2759945). The ATLAS event number and run number of each event are used as seed to uniquely but reproducibly initialise the random number generator for each event. All the provided numbers originate from pseudo-data, including the 0th entry, and are in units of [fb/GeV]. The last bin of the distribution contains the overflow.

Differential absolute cross-section for $m^{e\mu}$. The impact of the top-quark mass on the cross-section is included in the table and not counted in the total uncertainty entry in the paper. The last bin of the distribution contains the overflow.

Covariance Matrix (statistical uncertainties only) for the differential absolute cross-section for $m^{e\mu}$. The last bin of the distribution contains the overflow.

Data bootstrap post unfolding for the differential absolute cross-section for $m^{e\mu}$. The replicas are obtained by reweighting each observed data event by a random integer generated according to Poisson statistics, using the BootstrapGenerator software package (https://gitlab.cern.ch/atlas-physics/sm/StandardModelTools_BootstrapGenerator/BootstrapGenerator), which implements a technique described in ATL-PHYS-PUB-2021-011 (https://cds.cern.ch/record/2759945). The ATLAS event number and run number of each event are used as seed to uniquely but reproducibly initialise the random number generator for each event. All the provided numbers originate from pseudo-data, including the 0th entry, and are in units of [fb/GeV]. The last bin of the distribution contains the overflow.

Differential absolute cross-section for $\textrm{p}_{\textrm{T}}^{e} + \textrm{p}_{\textrm{T}}^{\mu}$. The impact of the top-quark mass on the cross-section is included in the table and not counted in the total uncertainty entry in the paper. The last bin of the distribution contains the overflow.

Covariance Matrix (statistical uncertainties only) for the differential absolute cross-section for $\textrm{p}_{\textrm{T}}^{e} + \textrm{p}_{\textrm{T}}^{\mu}$. The last bin of the distribution contains the overflow.

Data bootstrap post unfolding for the differential absolute cross-section for $\textrm{p}_{\textrm{T}}^{e} + \textrm{p}_{\textrm{T}}^{\mu}$. The replicas are obtained by reweighting each observed data event by a random integer generated according to Poisson statistics, using the BootstrapGenerator software package (https://gitlab.cern.ch/atlas-physics/sm/StandardModelTools_BootstrapGenerator/BootstrapGenerator), which implements a technique described in ATL-PHYS-PUB-2021-011 (https://cds.cern.ch/record/2759945). The ATLAS event number and run number of each event are used as seed to uniquely but reproducibly initialise the random number generator for each event. All the provided numbers originate from pseudo-data, including the 0th entry, and are in units of [fb/GeV]. The last bin of the distribution contains the overflow.

Differential absolute cross-section for $\textrm{p}_{\textrm{T}}^{e\mu}$. The impact of the top-quark mass on the cross-section is included in the table and not counted in the total uncertainty entry in the paper. The last bin of the distribution contains the overflow.

Covariance Matrix (statistical uncertainties only) for the differential absolute cross-section for $\textrm{p}_{\textrm{T}}^{e\mu}$. The last bin of the distribution contains the overflow.

Data bootstrap post unfolding for the differential absolute cross-section for $\textrm{p}_{\textrm{T}}^{e\mu}$. The replicas are obtained by reweighting each observed data event by a random integer generated according to Poisson statistics, using the BootstrapGenerator software package (https://gitlab.cern.ch/atlas-physics/sm/StandardModelTools_BootstrapGenerator/BootstrapGenerator), which implements a technique described in ATL-PHYS-PUB-2021-011 (https://cds.cern.ch/record/2759945). The ATLAS event number and run number of each event are used as seed to uniquely but reproducibly initialise the random number generator for each event. All the provided numbers originate from pseudo-data, including the 0th entry, and are in units of [fb/GeV]. The last bin of the distribution contains the overflow.

Differential absolute cross-section for $|\Delta\phi^{e\mu}|$. The impact of the top-quark mass on the cross-section is included in the table and not counted in the total uncertainty entry in the paper.

Covariance Matrix (statistical uncertainties only) for the differential absolute cross-section for $|\Delta\phi^{e\mu}|$.

Data bootstrap post unfolding for the differential absolute cross-section for $|\Delta\phi^{e\mu}|$. The replicas are obtained by reweighting each observed data event by a random integer generated according to Poisson statistics, using the BootstrapGenerator software package (https://gitlab.cern.ch/atlas-physics/sm/StandardModelTools_BootstrapGenerator/BootstrapGenerator), which implements a technique described in ATL-PHYS-PUB-2021-011 (https://cds.cern.ch/record/2759945). The ATLAS event number and run number of each event are used as seed to uniquely but reproducibly initialise the random number generator for each event. All the provided numbers originate from pseudo-data, including the 0th entry, and are in units of [fb/rad].

Differential absolute cross-section for $|y^{e\mu}|$. The impact of the top-quark mass on the cross-section is included in the table and not counted in the total uncertainty entry in the paper.

Covariance Matrix (statistical uncertainties only) for the differential absolute cross-section for $|y^{e\mu}|$.

Data bootstrap post unfolding for the differential absolute cross-section for $|y^{e\mu}|$. The replicas are obtained by reweighting each observed data event by a random integer generated according to Poisson statistics, using the BootstrapGenerator software package (https://gitlab.cern.ch/atlas-physics/sm/StandardModelTools_BootstrapGenerator/BootstrapGenerator), which implements a technique described in ATL-PHYS-PUB-2021-011 (https://cds.cern.ch/record/2759945). The ATLAS event number and run number of each event are used as seed to uniquely but reproducibly initialise the random number generator for each event. All the provided numbers originate from pseudo-data, including the 0th entry, and are in units of [fb].

Double differential absolute cross-section for $|y^{e\mu}|$ x $m^{e\mu}$. The impact of the top-quark mass on the cross-section is included in the table and not counted in the total uncertainty entry in the paper. The highest invariant mass bin of the two distributions contains the overflows.

Covariance Matrix (statistical uncertainties only) for the double differential absolute cross-section for $|y^{e\mu}|$ x $m^{e\mu}$. The highest invariant mass bin of the two distributions contains the overflows.

Data bootstrap post unfolding for the double differential absolute cross-section for $|y^{e\mu}|$ x $m^{e\mu}$. The replicas are obtained by reweighting each observed data event by a random integer generated according to Poisson statistics, using the BootstrapGenerator software package (https://gitlab.cern.ch/atlas-physics/sm/StandardModelTools_BootstrapGenerator/BootstrapGenerator), which implements a technique described in ATL-PHYS-PUB-2021-011 (https://cds.cern.ch/record/2759945). The ATLAS event number and run number of each event are used as seed to uniquely but reproducibly initialise the random number generator for each event. All the provided numbers originate from pseudo-data, including the 0th entry, and are in units of [fb/GeV]. The highest invariant mass bin of the two distributions contains the overflows.

Double differential absolute cross-section for $|\Delta\phi^{e\mu}|$ x $m^{e\mu}$. The impact of the top-quark mass on the cross-section is included in the table and not counted in the total uncertainty entry in the paper. The highest invariant mass bin of the two distributions contains the overflows.

Covariance Matrix (statistical uncertainties only) for the double differential absolute cross-section for $|\Delta\phi^{e\mu}|$ x $m^{e\mu}$. The highest invariant mass bin of the two distributions contains the overflows.

Data bootstrap post unfolding for the double differential absolute cross-section for $|\Delta\phi^{e\mu}|$ x $m^{e\mu}$. The replicas are obtained by reweighting each observed data event by a random integer generated according to Poisson statistics, using the BootstrapGenerator software package (https://gitlab.cern.ch/atlas-physics/sm/StandardModelTools_BootstrapGenerator/BootstrapGenerator), which implements a technique described in ATL-PHYS-PUB-2021-011 (https://cds.cern.ch/record/2759945). The ATLAS event number and run number of each event are used as seed to uniquely but reproducibly initialise the random number generator for each event. All the provided numbers originate from pseudo-data, including the 0th entry, and are in units of [fb/GeV/rad]. The highest invariant mass bin of the two distributions contains the overflows.

Double differential absolute cross-section for $|\Delta\phi^{e\mu}|$ x $\textrm{p}_{\textrm{T}}^{e\mu}$. The impact of the top-quark mass on the cross-section is included in the table and not counted in the total uncertainty entry in the paper. The highest $\textrm{p}_{\textrm{T}}^{e\mu}$ bin contains the overflows.

Covariance Matrix (statistical uncertainties only) for the double differential absolute cross-section for $|\Delta\phi^{e\mu}|$ x $\textrm{p}_{\textrm{T}}^{e\mu}$. The highest $\textrm{p}_{\textrm{T}}^{e\mu}$ bin contains the overflows.

Data bootstrap post unfolding for the double differential absolute cross-section for $|\Delta\phi^{e\mu}|$ x $\textrm{p}_{\textrm{T}}^{e\mu}$. The replicas are obtained by reweighting each observed data event by a random integer generated according to Poisson statistics, using the BootstrapGenerator software package (https://gitlab.cern.ch/atlas-physics/sm/StandardModelTools_BootstrapGenerator/BootstrapGenerator), which implements a technique described in ATL-PHYS-PUB-2021-011 (https://cds.cern.ch/record/2759945). The ATLAS event number and run number of each event are used as seed to uniquely but reproducibly initialise the random number generator for each event. All the provided numbers originate from pseudo-data, including the 0th entry, and are in units of [fb/GeV/rad]. The highest $\textrm{p}_{\textrm{T}}^{e\mu}$ bin contains the overflows.

Double differential absolute cross-section for $|\Delta\phi^{e\mu}|$ x $\textrm{E}^{e} + \textrm{E}^{\mu}$. The impact of the top-quark mass on the cross-section is included in the table and not counted in the total uncertainty entry in the paper. The highest $\textrm{E}^{e} + \textrm{E}^{\mu}$ bin contains the overflows.

Covariance Matrix (statistical uncertainties only) for the double differential absolute cross-section for $|\Delta\phi^{e\mu}|$ x $\textrm{E}^{e} + \textrm{E}^{\mu}$. The highest $\textrm{E}^{e} + \textrm{E}^{\mu}$ bin contains the overflows.

Data bootstrap post unfolding for the double differential absolute cross-section for $|\Delta\phi^{e\mu}|$ x $\textrm{E}^{e} + \textrm{E}^{\mu}$. The replicas are obtained by reweighting each observed data event by a random integer generated according to Poisson statistics, using the BootstrapGenerator software package (https://gitlab.cern.ch/atlas-physics/sm/StandardModelTools_BootstrapGenerator/BootstrapGenerator), which implements a technique described in ATL-PHYS-PUB-2021-011 (https://cds.cern.ch/record/2759945). The ATLAS event number and run number of each event are used as seed to uniquely but reproducibly initialise the random number generator for each event. All the provided numbers originate from pseudo-data, including the 0th entry, and are in units of [fb/GeV/rad]. The highest $\textrm{E}^{e} + \textrm{E}^{\mu}$ bin contains the overflows.

Differential normalised cross-section for $\textrm{p}_{\textrm{T}}^{l}$. The impact of the top-quark mass on the cross-section is included in the table and not counted in the total uncertainty entry in the paper. The last bin of the distribution contains the overflow.

Covariance Matrix (statistical uncertainties only) for the differential normalised cross-section for $\textrm{p}_{\textrm{T}}^{l}$. The last bin of the distribution contains the overflow.

Data bootstrap post unfolding for the differential normalised cross-section for $\textrm{p}_{\textrm{T}}^{l}$. The replicas are obtained by reweighting each observed data event by a random integer generated according to Poisson statistics, using the BootstrapGenerator software package (https://gitlab.cern.ch/atlas-physics/sm/StandardModelTools_BootstrapGenerator/BootstrapGenerator), which implements a technique described in ATL-PHYS-PUB-2021-011 (https://cds.cern.ch/record/2759945). The ATLAS event number and run number of each event are used as seed to uniquely but reproducibly initialise the random number generator for each event. All the provided numbers originate from pseudo-data, including the 0th entry, and are in units of [1/GeV]. The last bin of the distribution contains the overflow.

Differential normalised cross-section for $|\eta^{l}|$. The impact of the top-quark mass on the cross-section is included in the table and not counted in the total uncertainty entry in the paper.

Covariance Matrix (statistical uncertainties only) for the differential normalised cross-section for $|\eta^{l}|$.

Data bootstrap post unfolding for the differential normalised cross-section for $|\eta^{l}|$. The replicas are obtained by reweighting each observed data event by a random integer generated according to Poisson statistics, using the BootstrapGenerator software package (https://gitlab.cern.ch/atlas-physics/sm/StandardModelTools_BootstrapGenerator/BootstrapGenerator), which implements a technique described in ATL-PHYS-PUB-2021-011 (https://cds.cern.ch/record/2759945). The ATLAS event number and run number of each event are used as seed to uniquely but reproducibly initialise the random number generator for each event. All the provided numbers originate from pseudo-data, including the 0th entry.

Differential normalised cross-section for $\textrm{E}^{e} + \textrm{E}^{\mu}$. The impact of the top-quark mass on the cross-section is included in the table and not counted in the total uncertainty entry in the paper. The last bin of the distribution contains the overflow.

Covariance Matrix (statistical uncertainties only) for the differential normalised cross-section for $\textrm{E}^{e} + \textrm{E}^{\mu}$. The last bin of the distribution contains the overflow.

Data bootstrap post unfolding for the differential normalised cross-section for $\textrm{E}^{e} + \textrm{E}^{\mu}$. The replicas are obtained by reweighting each observed data event by a random integer generated according to Poisson statistics, using the BootstrapGenerator software package (https://gitlab.cern.ch/atlas-physics/sm/StandardModelTools_BootstrapGenerator/BootstrapGenerator), which implements a technique described in ATL-PHYS-PUB-2021-011 (https://cds.cern.ch/record/2759945). The ATLAS event number and run number of each event are used as seed to uniquely but reproducibly initialise the random number generator for each event. All the provided numbers originate from pseudo-data, including the 0th entry. The last bin of the distribution contains the overflow.

Differential normalised cross-section for $m^{e\mu}$. The impact of the top-quark mass on the cross-section is included in the table and not counted in the total uncertainty entry in the paper. The last bin of the distribution contains the overflow.

Covariance Matrix (statistical uncertainties only) for the differential normalised cross-section for $m^{e\mu}$. The last bin of the distribution contains the overflow.

Data bootstrap post unfolding for the differential normalised cross-section for $m^{e\mu}$. The replicas are obtained by reweighting each observed data event by a random integer generated according to Poisson statistics, using the BootstrapGenerator software package (https://gitlab.cern.ch/atlas-physics/sm/StandardModelTools_BootstrapGenerator/BootstrapGenerator), which implements a technique described in ATL-PHYS-PUB-2021-011 (https://cds.cern.ch/record/2759945). The ATLAS event number and run number of each event are used as seed to uniquely but reproducibly initialise the random number generator for each event. All the provided numbers originate from pseudo-data, including the 0th entry. The last bin of the distribution contains the overflow.

Differential normalised cross-section for $\textrm{p}_{\textrm{T}}^{e} + \textrm{p}_{\textrm{T}}^{\mu}$. The impact of the top-quark mass on the cross-section is included in the table and not counted in the total uncertainty entry in the paper. The last bin of the distribution contains the overflow.

Covariance Matrix (statistical uncertainties only) for the differential normalised cross-section for $\textrm{p}_{\textrm{T}}^{e} + \textrm{p}_{\textrm{T}}^{\mu}$. The last bin of the distribution contains the overflow.

Data bootstrap post unfolding for the differential normalised cross-section for $\textrm{p}_{\textrm{T}}^{e} + \textrm{p}_{\textrm{T}}^{\mu}$. The replicas are obtained by reweighting each observed data event by a random integer generated according to Poisson statistics, using the BootstrapGenerator software package (https://gitlab.cern.ch/atlas-physics/sm/StandardModelTools_BootstrapGenerator/BootstrapGenerator), which implements a technique described in ATL-PHYS-PUB-2021-011 (https://cds.cern.ch/record/2759945). The ATLAS event number and run number of each event are used as seed to uniquely but reproducibly initialise the random number generator for each event. All the provided numbers originate from pseudo-data, including the 0th entry, and are in units of [1/GeV]. The last bin of the distribution contains the overflow.

Differential normalised cross-section for $\textrm{p}_{\textrm{T}}^{e\mu}$. The impact of the top-quark mass on the cross-section is included in the table and not counted in the total uncertainty entry in the paper. The last bin of the distribution contains the overflow.

Covariance Matrix (statistical uncertainties only) for the differential normalised cross-section for $\textrm{p}_{\textrm{T}}^{e\mu}$. The last bin of the distribution contains the overflow.

Data bootstrap post unfolding for the differential normalised cross-section for $\textrm{p}_{\textrm{T}}^{e\mu}$. The replicas are obtained by reweighting each observed data event by a random integer generated according to Poisson statistics, using the BootstrapGenerator software package (https://gitlab.cern.ch/atlas-physics/sm/StandardModelTools_BootstrapGenerator/BootstrapGenerator), which implements a technique described in ATL-PHYS-PUB-2021-011 (https://cds.cern.ch/record/2759945). The ATLAS event number and run number of each event are used as seed to uniquely but reproducibly initialise the random number generator for each event. All the provided numbers originate from pseudo-data, including the 0th entry, and are in units of [1/GeV]. The last bin of the distribution contains the overflow.

Differential normalised cross-section for $|\Delta\phi^{e\mu}|$. The impact of the top-quark mass on the cross-section is included in the table and not counted in the total uncertainty entry in the paper.

Covariance Matrix (statistical uncertainties only) for the differential normalised cross-section for $|\Delta\phi^{e\mu}|$.

Data bootstrap post unfolding for the differential normalised cross-section for $|\Delta\phi^{e\mu}|$. The replicas are obtained by reweighting each observed data event by a random integer generated according to Poisson statistics, using the BootstrapGenerator software package (https://gitlab.cern.ch/atlas-physics/sm/StandardModelTools_BootstrapGenerator/BootstrapGenerator), which implements a technique described in ATL-PHYS-PUB-2021-011 (https://cds.cern.ch/record/2759945). The ATLAS event number and run number of each event are used as seed to uniquely but reproducibly initialise the random number generator for each event. All the provided numbers originate from pseudo-data, including the 0th entry, and are in units of [1/rad].

Differential normalised cross-section for $|y^{e\mu}|$. The impact of the top-quark mass on the cross-section is included in the table and not counted in the total uncertainty entry in the paper.

Covariance Matrix (statistical uncertainties only) for the differential normalised cross-section for $|y^{e\mu}|$.

Data bootstrap post unfolding for the differential normalised cross-section for $|y^{e\mu}|$. The replicas are obtained by reweighting each observed data event by a random integer generated according to Poisson statistics, using the BootstrapGenerator software package (https://gitlab.cern.ch/atlas-physics/sm/StandardModelTools_BootstrapGenerator/BootstrapGenerator), which implements a technique described in ATL-PHYS-PUB-2021-011 (https://cds.cern.ch/record/2759945). The ATLAS event number and run number of each event are used as seed to uniquely but reproducibly initialise the random number generator for each event. All the provided numbers originate from pseudo-data, including the 0th entry.

Double differential normalised cross-section for $|y^{e\mu}|$ x $m^{e\mu}$. The impact of the top-quark mass on the cross-section is included in the table and not counted in the total uncertainty entry in the paper. The highest invariant mass bin of the two distributions contains the overflows.

Covariance Matrix (statistical uncertainties only) for the double differential normalised cross-section for $|y^{e\mu}|$ x $m^{e\mu}$. The highest invariant mass bin of the two distributions contains the overflows.

Data bootstrap post unfolding for the double differential normalised cross-section for $|y^{e\mu}|$ x $m^{e\mu}$. The replicas are obtained by reweighting each observed data event by a random integer generated according to Poisson statistics, using the BootstrapGenerator software package (https://gitlab.cern.ch/atlas-physics/sm/StandardModelTools_BootstrapGenerator/BootstrapGenerator), which implements a technique described in ATL-PHYS-PUB-2021-011 (https://cds.cern.ch/record/2759945). The ATLAS event number and run number of each event are used as seed to uniquely but reproducibly initialise the random number generator for each event. All the provided numbers originate from pseudo-data, including the 0th entry, and are in units of [1/GeV]. The highest invariant mass bin of the two distributions contains the overflows.

Double differential normalised cross-section for $|\Delta\phi^{e\mu}|$ x $m^{e\mu}$. The impact of the top-quark mass on the cross-section is included in the table and not counted in the total uncertainty entry in the paper. The highest invariant mass bin of the two distributions contains the overflows.

Covariance Matrix (statistical uncertainties only) for the double differential normalised cross-section for $|\Delta\phi^{e\mu}|$ x $m^{e\mu}$. The highest invariant mass bin of the two distributions contains the overflows.

Data bootstrap post unfolding for the double differential normalised cross-section for $|\Delta\phi^{e\mu}|$ x $m^{e\mu}$. The replicas are obtained by reweighting each observed data event by a random integer generated according to Poisson statistics, using the BootstrapGenerator software package (https://gitlab.cern.ch/atlas-physics/sm/StandardModelTools_BootstrapGenerator/BootstrapGenerator), which implements a technique described in ATL-PHYS-PUB-2021-011 (https://cds.cern.ch/record/2759945). The ATLAS event number and run number of each event are used as seed to uniquely but reproducibly initialise the random number generator for each event. All the provided numbers originate from pseudo-data, including the 0th entry, and are in units of [1/GeV/rad]. The highest invariant mass bin of the two distributions contains the overflows.

Double differential normalised cross-section for $|\Delta\phi^{e\mu}|$ x $\textrm{p}_{\textrm{T}}^{e\mu}$. The impact of the top-quark mass on the cross-section is included in the table and not counted in the total uncertainty entry in the paper. The highest $\textrm{p}_{\textrm{T}}^{e\mu}$ bin contains the overflows.

Covariance Matrix (statistical uncertainties only) for the double differential normalised cross-section for $|\Delta\phi^{e\mu}|$ x $\textrm{p}_{\textrm{T}}^{e\mu}$. The highest $\textrm{p}_{\textrm{T}}^{e\mu}$ bin contains the overflows.

Data bootstrap post unfolding for the double differential normalised cross-section for $|\Delta\phi^{e\mu}|$ x $\textrm{p}_{\textrm{T}}^{e\mu}$. The replicas are obtained by reweighting each observed data event by a random integer generated according to Poisson statistics, using the BootstrapGenerator software package (https://gitlab.cern.ch/atlas-physics/sm/StandardModelTools_BootstrapGenerator/BootstrapGenerator), which implements a technique described in ATL-PHYS-PUB-2021-011 (https://cds.cern.ch/record/2759945). The ATLAS event number and run number of each event are used as seed to uniquely but reproducibly initialise the random number generator for each event. All the provided numbers originate from pseudo-data, including the 0th entry, and are in units of [1/GeV/rad]. The highest $\textrm{p}_{\textrm{T}}^{e\mu}$ bin contains the overflows.

Double differential normalised cross-section for $|\Delta\phi^{e\mu}|$ x $\textrm{E}^{e} + \textrm{E}^{\mu}$. The impact of the top-quark mass on the cross-section is included in the table and not counted in the total uncertainty entry in the paper. The highest $\textrm{E}^{e} + \textrm{E}^{\mu}$ bin contains the overflows.

Covariance Matrix (statistical uncertainties only) for the double differential normalised cross-section for $|\Delta\phi^{e\mu}|$ x $\textrm{E}^{e} + \textrm{E}^{\mu}$. The highest $\textrm{E}^{e} + \textrm{E}^{\mu}$ bin contains the overflows.

Data bootstrap post unfolding for the double differential normalised cross-section for $|\Delta\phi^{e\mu}|$ x $\textrm{E}^{e} + \textrm{E}^{\mu}$. The replicas are obtained by reweighting each observed data event by a random integer generated according to Poisson statistics, using the BootstrapGenerator software package (https://gitlab.cern.ch/atlas-physics/sm/StandardModelTools_BootstrapGenerator/BootstrapGenerator), which implements a technique described in ATL-PHYS-PUB-2021-011 (https://cds.cern.ch/record/2759945). The ATLAS event number and run number of each event are used as seed to uniquely but reproducibly initialise the random number generator for each event. All the provided numbers originate from pseudo-data, including the 0th entry, and are in units of [1/GeV/rad]. The highest $\textrm{E}^{e} + \textrm{E}^{\mu}$ bin contains the overflows.

Normalized differential cross section, $(1/\sigma_\text{fid})d\sigma_\text{fid}/d\log(m_{bb}/p_\text{T})$, as a function of $\log(m_{bb}/p_\text{T})$ for $m_{bb}$ the invariant mass of the two b-jets.

The nuclear modification factor R_pPb for prompt, isolated photons with rapidity in (1.09,1.90).

The nuclear modification factor R_pPb for prompt, isolated photons with rapidity in (−1.84,0.91).

The nuclear modification factor R_pPb for prompt, isolated photons with rapidity in (−2.83,−2.02).

The ratio of R_{pPb} from rapidity (1.09,1.90) to that of rapidity (−2.83,−2.02).

Observed 95% CL exclusion contours in the $(m_{N_R}, m_{W_R})$ plane in the muon channel.

Measured fiducial cross-section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $p_\text{T}^{\text{lead }\ell}$.

Statistical correlation between bins in data for the measured fiducial cross-section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $p_\text{T}^{\text{lead }\ell}$.

Total correlation between bins in data for the measured fiducial cross-section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $p_\text{T}^{\text{lead }\ell}$.

Measured fiducial cross-section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $m_{e\mu}$.

Statistical correlation between bins in data for the measured fiducial cross-section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $m_{e\mu}$.

Total correlation between bins in data for the measured fiducial cross-section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $m_{e\mu}$.

Measured fiducial cross-section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $p_{T}^{e\mu}$.

Statistical correlation between bins in data for the measured fiducial cross-section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $p_{T}^{e\mu}$.

Total correlation between bins in data for the measured fiducial cross-section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $p_{T}^{e\mu}$.

Measured fiducial cross-section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $|y_{e\mu}|$.

Statistical correlation between bins in data for the measured fiducial cross-section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $|y_{e\mu}|$.

Total correlation between bins in data for the measured fiducial cross-section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $|y_{e\mu}|$.

Measured fiducial cross-section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $\Delta\phi_{e\mu}$.

Statistical correlation between bins in data for the measured fiducial cross-section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $\Delta\phi_{e\mu}$.

Total correlation between bins in data for the measured fiducial cross-section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $\Delta\phi_{e\mu}$.

Measured fiducial cross-section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $|cos(\theta^*)|$.

Statistical correlation between bins in data for the measured fiducial cross-section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $|cos(\theta^*)|$.

Total correlation between bins in data for the measured fiducial cross-section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $|cos(\theta^*)|$.

Measured normalized fiducial cross-section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $p_\text{T}^{\text{lead }\ell}$.

Statistical correlation between bins in data for the measured normalized fiducial cross-section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $p_\text{T}^{\text{lead }\ell}$.

Total correlation between bins in data for the measured normalized fiducial cross-section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $p_\text{T}^{\text{lead }\ell}$.

Measured normalized fiducial cross-section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $m_{e\mu}$.

Statistical correlation between bins in data for the measured normalized fiducial cross-section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $m_{e\mu}$.

Total correlation between bins in data for the measured normalized fiducial cross-section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $m_{e\mu}$.

Measured normalized fiducial cross-section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $p_{T}^{e\mu}$.

Statistical correlation between bins in data for the measured normalized fiducial cross-section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $p_{T}^{e\mu}$.

Total correlation between bins in data for the measured normalized fiducial cross-section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $p_{T}^{e\mu}$.

Measured normalized fiducial cross-section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $|y_{e\mu}|$.

Statistical correlation between bins in data for the measured normalized fiducial cross-section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $|y_{e\mu}|$.

Total correlation between bins in data for the measured normalized fiducial cross-section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $|y_{e\mu}|$.

Measured normalized fiducial cross section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $\Delta\phi_{e\mu}$.

Statistical correlation between bins in data for the measured normalized fiducial cross section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $\Delta\phi_{e\mu}$.

Total correlation between bins in data for the measured normalized fiducial cross section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $\Delta\phi_{e\mu}$.

Measured normalized fiducial cross section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $|cos(\theta^*)|$.

Statistical correlation between bins in data for the measured normalized fiducial cross section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $|cos(\theta^*)|$.

Total correlation between bins in data for the measured normalized fiducial cross section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production for the observable $|cos(\theta^*)|$.

List of experimentally considered systematic uncertainties for the WW cross section measurement.

Extrapolated unfolded fiducial cross-section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production as a function of $p_\text{T}^{\text{lead }\ell}$.

Extrapolated unfolded fiducial cross-section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production as a function of $m_{e\mu}$.

Extrapolated unfolded fiducial cross-section of $WW\rightarrow e\mu$ production as a function of $p_{T}^{e\mu}$.

Observed 95% confidence-level upper limits on the cross section for Drell-Yan spin-1/2 HECO production as a function of mass for various values of electric charge in the range $20\le|z|\le100$.

Selection efficiency as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for $g=1g_\textrm{D}$ monopoles of mass 200 GeV.

Selection efficiency as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for $g=1g_\textrm{D}$ monopoles of mass 500 GeV.

Selection efficiency as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for $g=1g_\textrm{D}$ monopoles of mass 1000 GeV.

Selection efficiency as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for $g=1g_\textrm{D}$ monopoles of mass 1500 GeV.

Selection efficiency as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for $g=1g_\textrm{D}$ monopoles of mass 2000 GeV.

Selection efficiency as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for $g=1g_\textrm{D}$ monopoles of mass 2500 GeV.

Selection efficiency as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for $g=1g_\textrm{D}$ monopoles of mass 3000 GeV.

Selection efficiency as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for $g=1g_\textrm{D}$ monopoles of mass 4000 GeV.

Selection efficiency as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for $g=2g_\textrm{D}$ monopoles of mass 200 GeV.

Selection efficiency as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for $g=2g_\textrm{D}$ monopoles of mass 500 GeV.

Selection efficiency as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for $g=2g_\textrm{D}$ monopoles of mass 1000 GeV.

Selection efficiency as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for $g=2g_\textrm{D}$ monopoles of mass 1500 GeV.

Selection efficiency as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for $g=2g_\textrm{D}$ monopoles of mass 2000 GeV.

Selection efficiency as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for $g=2g_\textrm{D}$ monopoles of mass 2500 GeV.

Selection efficiency as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for $g=2g_\textrm{D}$ monopoles of mass 3000 GeV.

Selection efficiency as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for $g=2g_\textrm{D}$ monopoles of mass 4000 GeV.

Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=20$ of mass 200 GeV.

Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=20$ of mass 500 GeV.

Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=20$ of mass 1000 GeV.

Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=20$ of mass 1500 GeV.

Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=20$ of mass 2000 GeV.

Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=20$ of mass 2500 GeV.

Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=20$ of mass 3000 GeV.

Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=20$ of mass 4000 GeV.

Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=40$ of mass 200 GeV.

Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=40$ of mass 500 GeV.

Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=40$ of mass 1000 GeV.

Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=40$ of mass 1500 GeV.

Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=40$ of mass 2000 GeV.

Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=40$ of mass 2500 GeV.

Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=40$ of mass 3000 GeV.

Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=40$ of mass 4000 GeV.

Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=60$ of mass 200 GeV.

Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=60$ of mass 500 GeV.

Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=60$ of mass 1000 GeV.

Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=60$ of mass 1500 GeV.

Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=60$ of mass 2000 GeV.

Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=60$ of mass 2500 GeV.

Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=60$ of mass 3000 GeV.

Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=60$ of mass 4000 GeV.

Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=80$ of mass 200 GeV.

Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=80$ of mass 500 GeV.

Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=80$ of mass 1000 GeV.

Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=80$ of mass 1500 GeV.

Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=80$ of mass 2000 GeV.

Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=80$ of mass 2500 GeV.

Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=80$ of mass 3000 GeV.

Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=80$ of mass 4000 GeV.

Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=100$ of mass 200 GeV.

Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=100$ of mass 500 GeV.

Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=100$ of mass 1000 GeV.

Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=100$ of mass 1500 GeV.

Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=100$ of mass 2000 GeV.

Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=100$ of mass 2500 GeV.

Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=100$ of mass 3000 GeV.

Total selection efficiency (i.e., the fraction of MC HECOs surviving the trigger and offline selection criteria) as a function of transverse kinetic energy $E^\text{kin}_\text{T}=E_\text{kin}\sin\theta$ and pseudorapidity $|\eta|$ for HECOs of charge $|z|=100$ of mass 4000 GeV.

The measured fiducial production cross-sections times branching ratio for $W^+\rightarrow\mu^+\nu$ and $W^-\rightarrow\mu^-\bar{\nu}$, their sum, and their ratio for data

The measured fiducial production cross-sections times branching ratio for $W^+\rightarrow\mu^+ u$ and $W^-\rightarrow\mu^-\bar{\nu}$, their sum, and their ratio for the predictions from DYNNLO (CT14 NNLO PDF set)

Size of the $W^{+}$ the cross-section (differential in $\eta_{\mu}$, as a function of $|\eta_{\mu}|$. The central values are provided along with the statistical and systematic uncertainties together with the sign information. gThe uncertainties are given in percent.

Size of the $W^{+}$ the cross-section (differential in $\eta_{\mu}$, as a function of $|\eta_{\mu}|$. The central values are provided along with the statistical and systematic uncertainties together with the sign information. gThe uncertainties are given in percent.

Size of the asymmetry as a function of $|\eta_{\mu}|$. The central values are provided along with the statistical and systematic uncertainties together with the sign information. The uncertainties are given as an absolute difference from the nominal.

transmax region : Mean sum of transverse momenta ($\langle \Sigma p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)

away region : Mean sum of transverse momenta ($\langle \Sigma p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)

Figure 09b, mean nTracks toward, toward region: Mean charged particle multiplicity ($\langle N_{ch} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.$)

transverse region: Mean charged particle multiplicity ($\langle N_{ch} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.$)

Figure 09a, mean nTracks transmin, transmin region: Mean charged particle multiplicity ($\langle N_{ch} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.$)

transmax region: Mean charged particle multiplicity ($\langle N_{ch} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.$)

away region: Mean charged particle multiplicity ($\langle N_{ch} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.$)

Figure 10b, mean meanPt toward, toward region : Mean of arithmetic mean of transverse momenta ($\langle mean p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det.\pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)

transverse region : Mean of arithmetic mean of transverse momenta ($\langle mean p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det.\pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)

Figure 10a, mean meanPt transmin, transmin region : Mean of arithmetic mean of transverse momenta ($\langle mean p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det.\pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)

transmax region : Mean of arithmetic mean of transverse momenta ($\langle mean p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det.\pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)

away region : Mean of arithmetic mean of transverse momenta ($\langle mean p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det.\pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)

Figure 04c from auxiliary figures, mean sumPt toward low thrust, toward region : low thrust ($T<0.75$) Mean sum of transverse momenta ($\langle \Sigma p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)

transverse region : low thrust ($T<0.75$) Mean sum of transverse momenta ($\langle \Sigma p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)

Figure 11c, mean sumPt transmin low thrust, transmin region : low thrust ($T<0.75$) Mean sum of transverse momenta ($\langle \Sigma p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)

transmax region : low thrust ($T<0.75$) Mean sum of transverse momenta ($\langle \Sigma p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)

away region : low thrust ($T<0.75$) Mean sum of transverse momenta ($\langle \Sigma p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)

Figure 04a from auxiliary figures, mean nTracks toward low thrust, toward region : low thrust ($T<0.75$) Mean charged particle multiplicity ($\langle N_{ch} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.$)

transverse region : low thrust ($T<0.75$) Mean charged particle multiplicity ($\langle N_{ch} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.$)

Figure 11a, mean nTracks transmin low thrust, transmin region : low thrust ($T<0.75$) Mean charged particle multiplicity ($\langle N_{ch} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.$)

transmax region : low thrust ($T<0.75$) Mean charged particle multiplicity ($\langle N_{ch} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.$)

away region : low thrust ($T<0.75$) Mean charged particle multiplicity ($\langle N_{ch} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.$)

Figure 06a from auxiliary figures, mean meanPt toward low thrust, toward region : low thrust ($T<0.75$) Mean of arithmetic mean of transverse momenta ($\langle mean p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det.\pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)

transverse region : low thrust ($T<0.75$) Mean of arithmetic mean of transverse momenta ($\langle mean p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det.\pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)

Figure 12a, mean meanPt transmin low thrust, transmin region : low thrust ($T<0.75$) Mean of arithmetic mean of transverse momenta ($\langle mean p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det.\pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)

transmax region : low thrust ($T<0.75$) Mean of arithmetic mean of transverse momenta ($\langle mean p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det.\pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)

away region : low thrust ($T<0.75$) Mean of arithmetic mean of transverse momenta ($\langle mean p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det.\pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)

Figure 04d from auxiliary figures, mean sumPt toward high thrust, toward region : hight thrust ($0.75\leq T$) Mean sum of transverse momenta ($\langle \Sigma p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)

transverse region : hight thrust ($0.75\leq T$) Mean sum of transverse momenta ($\langle \Sigma p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)

Figure 11d, mean sumPt transmin high thrust, transmin region : hight thrust ($0.75\leq T$) Mean sum of transverse momenta ($\langle \Sigma p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)

transmax region : hight thrust ($0.75\leq T$) Mean sum of transverse momenta ($\langle \Sigma p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)

away region : hight thrust ($0.75\leq T$) Mean sum of transverse momenta ($\langle \Sigma p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)

Figure 04b from auxiliary figures, mean nTracks toward high thrust, toward region : hight thrust ($0.75\leq T$) Mean charged particle multiplicity ($\langle N_{ch} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.$)

transverse region : hight thrust ($0.75\leq T$) Mean charged particle multiplicity ($\langle N_{ch} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.$)

Figure 11b, mean nTracks transmin high thrust, transmin region : hight thrust ($0.75\leq T$) Mean charged particle multiplicity ($\langle N_{ch} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.$)

transmax region : hight thrust ($0.75\leq T$) Mean charged particle multiplicity ($\langle N_{ch} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.$)

away region : hight thrust ($0.75\leq T$) Mean charged particle multiplicity ($\langle N_{ch} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det. \pm syst.gen.$)

Figure 06b from auxiliary figures, mean meanPt toward high thrust, toward region : hight thrust ($0.75\leq T$) Mean of arithmetic mean of transverse momenta ($\langle mean p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det.\pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)

transverse region : hight thrust ($0.75\leq T$) Mean of arithmetic mean of transverse momenta ($\langle mean p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det.\pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)

Figure 12b, mean meanPt transmin high thrust, transmin region : hight thrust ($0.75\leq T$) Mean of arithmetic mean of transverse momenta ($\langle mean p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det.\pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)

transmax region : hight thrust ($0.75\leq T$) Mean of arithmetic mean of transverse momenta ($\langle mean p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det.\pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)

away region : hight thrust ($0.75\leq T$) Mean of arithmetic mean of transverse momenta ($\langle mean p_{T} \rangle \pm stat. \pm syst.det.\pm syst.gen.[GeV]$)

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

Figure 01a from auxiliary figures, ptSpec toward_zptregion2, $\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

Figure 02a from auxiliary figures, ptSpec toward_zptregion7, $\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

Figure 04a, ptSpec transmin_zptregion2, $\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

Figure 05a, ptSpec transmin_zptregion7, $\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,toward region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

Figure 01b from auxiliary figures, nTracks toward_zptregion2, $\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,toward region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,toward region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,toward region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,toward region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,toward region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

Figure 02b from auxiliary figures, nTracks toward_zptregion7, $\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,toward region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,toward region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transverse region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transverse region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transverse region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transverse region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transverse region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transverse region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transverse region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transverse region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transmin region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

Figure 04b, nTracks transmin_zptregion2, $\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transmin region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transmin region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transmin region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transmin region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transmin region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

Figure 05b, nTracks transmin_zptregion7, $\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transmin region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transmin region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transmax region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transmax region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transmax region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transmax region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transmax region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transmax region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transmax region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,transmax region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,away region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,away region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,away region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,away region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,away region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,away region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,away region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,away region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

Figure 01c from auxiliary figures, sumPt toward_zptregion2, $\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

Figure 02c from auxiliary figures, sumPt toward_zptregion7, $\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

Figure 04c, sumPt transmin_zptregion2, $\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

Figure 05c, sumPt transmin_zptregion7, $\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

Figure 01d from auxiliary figures, meanPt toward_zptregion2, $\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

Figure 02d from auxiliary figures, meanPt toward_zptregion7, $\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,toward region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transverse region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

Figure 04d, meanPt transmin_zptregion2, $\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

Figure 05d, meanPt transmin_zptregion7, $\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmin region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,transmax region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,away region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

Figure 03a from auxiliary figures, ptSpec toward_zptregion2 low thrust, $\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

Figure 03c from auxiliary figures, ptSpec toward_zptregion7 low thrust, $\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

Figure 06a, ptSpec transmin_zptregion2 low thrust, $\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

Figure 06c, ptSpec transmin_zptregion7 low thrust, $\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{t}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

Figure 05a from auxiliary figures, nTracks toward_zptregion2 low thrust, $\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

Figure 07a, nTracks transmin_zptregion2 low thrust, $\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,low thrust(T<0.75),away region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),toward region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transverse region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transmin region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),transmax region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),away region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),away region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),away region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),away region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),away region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),away region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),away region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{N_{ev}}{d(mean p_{t})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust(T<0.75),away region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),toward region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

Figure 03b from auxiliary figures, ptSpec toward_zptregion2 high thrust, $\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),toward region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),toward region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),toward region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),toward region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),toward region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

Figure 03d from auxiliary figures, ptSpec toward_zptregion7 high thrust, $\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),toward region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),toward region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transverse region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transverse region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transverse region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transverse region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transverse region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transverse region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transverse region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transverse region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmin region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

Figure 06b, ptSpec transmin_zptregion2 high thrust, $\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmin region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmin region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmin region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmin region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmin region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

Figure 06d, ptSpec transmin_zptregion7 high thrust, $\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmin region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmin region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmax region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmax region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmax region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmax region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmax region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmax region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmax region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmax region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),away region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),away region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),away region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),away region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),away region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),away region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),away region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ch}} \frac{dN_{ch}}{dp_{T}}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),away region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),toward region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

Figure 05b from auxiliary figures, nTracks toward_zptregion2 high thrust, $\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),toward region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),toward region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),toward region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),toward region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),toward region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),toward region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),toward region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transverse region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transverse region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transverse region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transverse region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transverse region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transverse region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transverse region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transverse region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transmin region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

Figure 07b, nTracks transmin_zptregion2 high thrust, $\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transmin region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transmin region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transmin region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transmin region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transmin region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transmin region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transmin region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transmax region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transmax region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transmax region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transmax region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transmax region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transmax region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transmax region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),transmax region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),away region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),away region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),away region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),away region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),away region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),away region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),away region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{dN_{ch}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.$,high thrust (0.75<=T$),away region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),toward region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),toward region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),toward region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),toward region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),toward region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),toward region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),toward region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),toward region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transverse region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transverse region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transverse region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transverse region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transverse region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transverse region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transverse region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transverse region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmin region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmin region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmin region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmin region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmin region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmin region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmin region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmin region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmax region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmax region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmax region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmax region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmax region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmax region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmax region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),transmax region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),away region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),away region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),away region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),away region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),away region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),away region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),away region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d\Sigma p_{t}/\delta\eta\delta\phi}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75=<T),away region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),toward region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),toward region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),toward region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),toward region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),toward region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),toward region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),toward region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),toward region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transverse region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transverse region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transverse region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transverse region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transverse region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transverse region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transverse region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transverse region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transmin region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transmin region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transmin region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transmin region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transmin region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transmin region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transmin region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transmin region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transmax region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transmax region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transmax region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transmax region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transmax region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transmax region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transmax region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),transmax region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),away region,$0GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<10GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),away region,$10GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<20GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),away region,$20GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<40GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),away region,$40GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<60GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),away region,$60GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<80GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),away region,$80GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<120GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),away region,$120GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<200GeV$

$\frac{1}{N_{ev}} \frac{dN_{ev}}{d(mean p_{T})}\pm stat.\pm syst.gen.\pm syst.det.[GeV^{-1}]$,high thrust (0.75<=T),away region,$200GeV<p_{T}^{Z}<500GeV$

Measured cross sections for inclusive isolated-photon production as a function of $E_{\rm T}^{\gamma}$ for $1.81<|\eta^{\gamma}|<2.37$.

Predicted cross sections for inclusive isolated-photon production as a function of $E_{\rm T}^{\gamma}$ for $|\eta^{\gamma}|<0.6$.

Predicted cross sections for inclusive isolated-photon production as a function of $E_{\rm T}^{\gamma}$ for $0.6<|\eta^{\gamma}|<1.37$.

Predicted cross sections for inclusive isolated-photon production as a function of $E_{\rm T}^{\gamma}$ for $1.56<|\eta^{\gamma}|<1.81$.

Predicted cross sections for inclusive isolated-photon production as a function of $E_{\rm T}^{\gamma}$ for $1.81<|\eta^{\gamma}|<2.37$.

The double-differential Z + jets production cross-section as a function of |y_{jet}| in the 100 GeV < p_{T}^{jet} < 200 GeV range. The particle level phase space definition: - 66 GeV < m_{ee} < 116 GeV - |eta_{electron}| < 2.47 - p_{T}^{electron} > 20 GeV - anti-kt R=0.4 jets N>=1 - |y_{jet}| < 3.4 - p_{T}^{jet} > 25 GeV - Delta R(jet, electron) > 0.4

The double-differential Z + jets production cross-section as a function of |y_{jet}| in the 200 GeV < p_{T}^{jet} < 300 GeV range. The particle level phase space definition: - 66 GeV < m_{ee} < 116 GeV - |eta_{electron}| < 2.47 - p_{T}^{electron} > 20 GeV - anti-kt R=0.4 jets N>=1 - |y_{jet}| < 3.4 - p_{T}^{jet} > 25 GeV - Delta R(jet, electron) > 0.4

The double-differential Z + jets production cross-section as a function of |y_{jet}| in the 300 GeV < p_{T}^{jet} < 400 Gev range. The particle level phase space definition: - 66 GeV < m_{ee} < 116 GeV - |eta_{electron}| < 2.47 - p_{T}^{electron} > 20 GeV - anti-kt R=0.4 jets N>=1 - |y_{jet}| < 3.4 - p_{T}^{jet} > 25 GeV - Delta R(jet, electron) > 0.4

The double-differential Z + jets production cross-section as a function of |y_{jet}| in the 400 GeV < p_{T}^{jet} < 1050 GeV range. The particle level phase space definition: - 66 GeV < m_{ee} < 116 GeV - |eta_{electron}| < 2.47 - p_{T}^{electron} > 20 GeV - anti-kt R=0.4 jets N>=1 - |y_{jet}| < 3.4 - p_{T}^{jet} > 25 GeV - Delta R(jet, electron) > 0.4

The non-perturbative correction for the Z + jets production cross-section as a function of |y_{jet}| in the 25 GeV < p_{T}^{jet} < 50 GeV range. The particle level phase space definition: - 66 GeV < m_{ee} < 116 GeV - |eta_{electron}| < 2.47 - p_{T}^{electron} > 20 GeV - anti-kt R=0.4 jets N>=1 - |y_{jet}| < 3.4 - p_{T}^{jet} > 25 GeV - Delta R(jet, electron) > 0.4

The non-perturbative correction for the Z + jets production cross-section as a function of |y_{jet}| in the 50 GeV < p_{T}^{jet} < 100 GeV range. The particle level phase space definition: - 66 GeV < m_{ee} < 116 GeV - |eta_{electron}| < 2.47 - p_{T}^{electron} > 20 GeV - anti-kt R=0.4 jets N>=1 - |y_{jet}| < 3.4 - p_{T}^{jet} > 25 GeV - Delta R(jet, electron) > 0.4

The non-perturbative correction for the Z + jets production cross-section as a function of |y_{jet}| in the 100 GeV < p_{T}^{jet} < 200 GeV range. The particle level phase space definition: - 66 GeV < m_{ee} < 116 GeV - |eta_{electron}| < 2.47 - p_{T}^{electron} > 20 GeV - anti-kt R=0.4 jets N>=1 - |y_{jet}| < 3.4 - p_{T}^{jet} > 25 GeV - Delta R(jet, electron) > 0.4

The non-perturbative correction for the Z + jets production cross-section as a function of |y_{jet}| in the 200 GeV < p_{T}^{jet} < 300 GeV range. The particle level phase space definition: - 66 GeV < m_{ee} < 116 GeV - |eta_{electron}| < 2.47 - p_{T}^{electron} > 20 GeV - anti-kt R=0.4 jets N>=1 - |y_{jet}| < 3.4 - p_{T}^{jet} > 25 GeV - Delta R(jet, electron) > 0.4

The non-perturbative correction for the Z + jets production cross-section as a function of |y_{jet}| in the 300 GeV < p_{T}^{jet} < 400 Gev range. The particle level phase space definition: - 66 GeV < m_{ee} < 116 GeV - |eta_{electron}| < 2.47 - p_{T}^{electron} > 20 GeV - anti-kt R=0.4 jets N>=1 - |y_{jet}| < 3.4 - p_{T}^{jet} > 25 GeV - Delta R(jet, electron) > 0.4

The non-perturbative correction for the Z + jets production cross-section as a function of |y_{jet}| in the 400 GeV < p_{T}^{jet} < 1050 GeV range. The particle level phase space definition: - 66 GeV < m_{ee} < 116 GeV - |eta_{electron}| < 2.47 - p_{T}^{electron} > 20 GeV - anti-kt R=0.4 jets N>=1 - |y_{jet}| < 3.4 - p_{T}^{jet} > 25 GeV - Delta R(jet, electron) > 0.4

The correction for QED radiation effects for the Z + jets production cross-section as a function of |y_{jet}| in the 25 GeV < p_{T}^{jet} < 50 GeV range. The particle level phase space definition: - 66 GeV < m_{ee} < 116 GeV - |eta_{electron}| < 2.47 - p_{T}^{electron} > 20 GeV - anti-kt R=0.4 jets N>=1 - |y_{jet}| < 3.4 - p_{T}^{jet} > 25 GeV - Delta R(jet, electron) > 0.4

The correction for QED radiation effects for the Z + jets production cross-section as a function of |y_{jet}| in the 50 GeV < p_{T}^{jet} < 100 GeV range. The particle level phase space definition: - 66 GeV < m_{ee} < 116 GeV - |eta_{electron}| < 2.47 - p_{T}^{electron} > 20 GeV - anti-kt R=0.4 jets N>=1 - |y_{jet}| < 3.4 - p_{T}^{jet} > 25 GeV - Delta R(jet, electron) > 0.4