Asymmetry results on $\vec e-^2$H parity-violating scattering from the PVDIS experiment at JLab, for RES IV settings.

Asymmetry results on $\vec e-^2$H parity-violating scattering from the PVDIS experiment at JLab, for RES III settings.

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W= 1.3147 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W= 1.3289 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W= 1.3430 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W= 1.3569 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W= 1.3707 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W= 1.3843 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W= 1.3978 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W= 1.4112 GeV

Photon beam asymmetry Sigma at W= 1.4244 GeV

Beam helicity dependent cross sections. The first systematic uncertainty is the combined correlated systematic uncertainty, the second is the point-to-point systematic uncertainty to add quadratically to the statistical uncertainty.

Beam helicity independent cross sections. The first systematic uncertainty is the combined correlated systematic uncertainty, the second is the point-to-point systematic uncertainty to add quadratically to the statistical uncertainty.

Beam helicity dependent cross sections. The first systematic uncertainty is the combined correlated systematic uncertainty, the second is the point-to-point systematic uncertainty to add quadratically to the statistical uncertainty.

Beam helicity independent cross sections. The first systematic uncertainty is the combined correlated systematic uncertainty, the second is the point-to-point systematic uncertainty to add quadratically to the statistical uncertainty.

Beam helicity dependent cross sections. The first systematic uncertainty is the combined correlated systematic uncertainty, the second is the point-to-point systematic uncertainty to add quadratically to the statistical uncertainty.

Beam helicity independent cross sections. The first systematic uncertainty is the combined correlated systematic uncertainty, the second is the point-to-point systematic uncertainty to add quadratically to the statistical uncertainty.

Beam helicity dependent cross sections. The first systematic uncertainty is the combined correlated systematic uncertainty, the second is the point-to-point systematic uncertainty to add quadratically to the statistical uncertainty.

Beam helicity independent cross sections. The first systematic uncertainty is the combined correlated systematic uncertainty, the second is the point-to-point systematic uncertainty to add quadratically to the statistical uncertainty.

Beam helicity dependent cross sections. The first systematic uncertainty is the combined correlated systematic uncertainty, the second is the point-to-point systematic uncertainty to add quadratically to the statistical uncertainty.

Beam helicity independent cross sections. The first systematic uncertainty is the combined correlated systematic uncertainty, the second is the point-to-point systematic uncertainty to add quadratically to the statistical uncertainty.

Beam helicity dependent cross sections. The first systematic uncertainty is the combined correlated systematic uncertainty, the second is the point-to-point systematic uncertainty to add quadratically to the statistical uncertainty.

Beam helicity independent cross sections. The first systematic uncertainty is the combined correlated systematic uncertainty, the second is the point-to-point systematic uncertainty to add quadratically to the statistical uncertainty.

Beam helicity dependent cross sections. The first systematic uncertainty is the combined correlated systematic uncertainty, the second is the point-to-point systematic uncertainty to add quadratically to the statistical uncertainty.

Beam helicity independent cross sections. The first systematic uncertainty is the combined correlated systematic uncertainty, the second is the point-to-point systematic uncertainty to add quadratically to the statistical uncertainty.

Beam helicity dependent cross sections. The first systematic uncertainty is the combined correlated systematic uncertainty, the second is the point-to-point systematic uncertainty to add quadratically to the statistical uncertainty.

Beam helicity independent cross sections. The first systematic uncertainty is the combined correlated systematic uncertainty, the second is the point-to-point systematic uncertainty to add quadratically to the statistical uncertainty.

Beam helicity dependent cross sections. The first systematic uncertainty is the combined correlated systematic uncertainty, the second is the point-to-point systematic uncertainty to add quadratically to the statistical uncertainty.

Beam helicity independent cross sections. The first systematic uncertainty is the combined correlated systematic uncertainty, the second is the point-to-point systematic uncertainty to add quadratically to the statistical uncertainty.

Beam helicity dependent cross sections. The first systematic uncertainty is the combined correlated systematic uncertainty, the second is the point-to-point systematic uncertainty to add quadratically to the statistical uncertainty.

Beam helicity independent cross sections. The first systematic uncertainty is the combined correlated systematic uncertainty, the second is the point-to-point systematic uncertainty to add quadratically to the statistical uncertainty.

Beam helicity dependent cross sections. The first systematic uncertainty is the combined correlated systematic uncertainty, the second is the point-to-point systematic uncertainty to add quadratically to the statistical uncertainty.

Beam helicity independent cross sections. The first systematic uncertainty is the combined correlated systematic uncertainty, the second is the point-to-point systematic uncertainty to add quadratically to the statistical uncertainty.

Beam helicity dependent cross sections. The first systematic uncertainty is the combined correlated systematic uncertainty, the second is the point-to-point systematic uncertainty to add quadratically to the statistical uncertainty.

Beam helicity independent cross sections. The first systematic uncertainty is the combined correlated systematic uncertainty, the second is the point-to-point systematic uncertainty to add quadratically to the statistical uncertainty.

Beam helicity dependent cross sections. The first systematic uncertainty is the combined correlated systematic uncertainty, the second is the point-to-point systematic uncertainty to add quadratically to the statistical uncertainty.

Beam helicity independent cross sections. The first systematic uncertainty is the combined correlated systematic uncertainty, the second is the point-to-point systematic uncertainty to add quadratically to the statistical uncertainty.

Beam helicity dependent cross sections. The first systematic uncertainty is the combined correlated systematic uncertainty, the second is the point-to-point systematic uncertainty to add quadratically to the statistical uncertainty.

Beam helicity independent cross sections. The first systematic uncertainty is the combined correlated systematic uncertainty, the second is the point-to-point systematic uncertainty to add quadratically to the statistical uncertainty.

Beam helicity dependent cross sections. The first systematic uncertainty is the combined correlated systematic uncertainty, the second is the point-to-point systematic uncertainty to add quadratically to the statistical uncertainty.

Beam helicity independent cross sections. The first systematic uncertainty is the combined correlated systematic uncertainty, the second is the point-to-point systematic uncertainty to add quadratically to the statistical uncertainty.

Beam helicity dependent cross sections. The first systematic uncertainty is the combined correlated systematic uncertainty, the second is the point-to-point systematic uncertainty to add quadratically to the statistical uncertainty.

Beam helicity independent cross sections. The first systematic uncertainty is the combined correlated systematic uncertainty, the second is the point-to-point systematic uncertainty to add quadratically to the statistical uncertainty.

Beam helicity dependent cross sections. The first systematic uncertainty is the combined correlated systematic uncertainty, the second is the point-to-point systematic uncertainty to add quadratically to the statistical uncertainty.

Beam helicity independent cross sections. The first systematic uncertainty is the combined correlated systematic uncertainty, the second is the point-to-point systematic uncertainty to add quadratically to the statistical uncertainty.

Beam helicity independent cross sections. The first systematic uncertainty is the combined correlated systematic uncertainty, the second is the point-to-point systematic uncertainty to add quadratically to the statistical uncertainty.

Beam helicity independent cross sections. The first systematic uncertainty is the combined correlated systematic uncertainty, the second is the point-to-point systematic uncertainty to add quadratically to the statistical uncertainty.

Beam helicity independent cross sections. The first systematic uncertainty is the combined correlated systematic uncertainty, the second is the point-to-point systematic uncertainty to add quadratically to the statistical uncertainty.

Inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 16.0-22.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 6 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 22.0-30.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 6 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 30.0-42.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 6 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 42.0-60.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 6 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 60.0-80.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 6 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 5.5-8.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 7 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 8.0-11.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 7 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 11.0-16.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 7 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 16.0-22.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 7 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 22.0-30.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 7 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 30.0-42.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 7 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 42.0-60.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 7 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 60.0-80.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 7 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 5.5-8.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 8 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 8.0-11.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 8 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 11.0-16.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 8 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 16.0-22.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 8 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 22.0-30.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 8 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 30.0-42.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 8 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 42.0-60.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 8 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 60.0-80.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 8 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 5.5-8.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 9 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 8.0-11.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 9 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 11.0-16.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 9 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 16.0-22.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 9 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 22.0-30.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 9 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 30.0-42.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 9 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 42.0-60.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 9 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised inclusive jet cross sections measured as a function of $P_T^{\rm jet}$ for $Q^2$ = 60.0-80.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 9 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 5.5-8.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 10 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 8.0-11.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 10 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 11.0-16.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 10 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 16.0-22.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 10 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 22.0-30.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 10 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 30.0-42.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 10 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 42.0-60.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 10 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised dijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_2$ for $Q^2$ = 60.0-80.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 10 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 5.5-8.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 11 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 8.0-11.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 11 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 11.0-16.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 11 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 16.0-22.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 11 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 22.0-30.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 11 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 30.0-42.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 11 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 42.0-60.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 11 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised trijet cross sections measured as a function of $\langle P_T \rangle_3$ for $Q^2$ = 60.0-80.0 GeV$^2$. The correction factors on the theoretical cross sections $c^{\rm had}$ are listed together with their uncertainties. The radiative correction factors $c^{\rm rad}$ are already included in the quoted cross sections. Note that the uncertainties labelled $\delta^{E_{e^\prime}}$ and $\delta^{\theta_{e^\prime}}$ in Table 11 of the paper (arXiv:1611.03421v3) should be swapped. See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Matrix of statistical correlation coefficients of the unfolded jet cross sections at low $Q^2$.

Matrix of statistical correlation coefficients of the unfolded normalised jet cross sections at low $Q^2$.

Inclusive jet cross sections for $P_T^{\rm jet}$ = 5-7 GeV$^2$ measured as a function of $Q^2$ in the range 150-15000 GeV$^2$. The cross section values and uncertainties have been determined in the scope of the analysis of an earlier H1 publication (<a href="https://inspirehep.net/record/1301218">INSPIRE</a>, <a href="https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins1301218">HEPData</a>). See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Normalised inclusive jet cross sections for $P_T^{\rm jet}$ = 5-7 GeV$^2$ measured as a function of $Q^2$ in the range 150-15000 GeV$^2$. The cross section values and uncertainties have been determined in the scope of the analysis of an earlier H1 publication (<a href="https://inspirehep.net/record/1301218">INSPIRE</a>, <a href="https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins1301218">HEPData</a>). See Table 5 of arXiv:1406.4709v2 for details of the correlation model.

Matrix of statistical correlation coefficients of the unfolded jet cross sections at high $Q^2$. The statistical correlations have been determined in the scope of the analysis of an earlier H1 publication (<a href="https://inspirehep.net/record/1301218">INSPIRE</a>, <a href="https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins1301218">HEPData</a>).

Matrix of statistical correlation coefficients of the unfolded normalised jet cross sections at high $Q^2$. The statistical correlations have been determined in the scope of the analysis of an earlier H1 publication (<a href="https://inspirehep.net/record/1301218">INSPIRE</a>, <a href="https://www.hepdata.net/record/ins1301218">HEPData</a>).

The strong coupling extracted from the normalised inclusive jet, dijet and trijet data at NLO as a function of the renormalisation scale $\mu_r$. For each $\mu_r$ the values of the strong coupling $\alpha_s(\mu_r)$ and the equivalent values $\alpha_s(M_Z)$ are given with experimental (exp) and theoretical (th) uncertainties.

PT dependences of the differential multiplicities for 0.0080 < x_Bjorken < 0.0120 and 1.00 < Q^2 < 1.50 GeV^2 for Positive hadrons.

PT dependences of the differential multiplicities for 0.0080 < x_Bjorken < 0.0120 and 1.50 < Q^2 < 2.10 GeV^2 for Positive hadrons.

PT dependences of the differential multiplicities for 0.0120 < x_Bjorken < 0.0180 and 1.00 < Q^2 < 1.50 GeV^2 for Positive hadrons.

PT dependences of the differential multiplicities for 0.0120 < x_Bjorken < 0.0180 and 1.50 < Q^2 < 2.50 GeV^2 for Positive hadrons.

PT dependences of the differential multiplicities for 0.0120 < x_Bjorken < 0.0180 and 2.50 < Q^2 < 3.50 GeV^2 for Positive hadrons.

PT dependences of the differential multiplicities for 0.0180 < x_Bjorken < 0.0250 and 1.00 < Q^2 < 1.50 GeV^2 for Positive hadrons.

PT dependences of the differential multiplicities for 0.0180 < x_Bjorken < 0.0250 and 1.50 < Q^2 < 2.50 GeV^2 for Positive hadrons.

PT dependences of the differential multiplicities for 0.0180 < x_Bjorken < 0.0250 and 2.50 < Q^2 < 3.50 GeV^2 for Positive hadrons.

PT dependences of the differential multiplicities for 0.0180 < x_Bjorken < 0.0250 and 3.50 < Q^2 < 5.00 GeV^2 for Positive hadrons.

PT dependences of the differential multiplicities for 0.0250 < x_Bjorken < 0.0350 and 1.00 < Q^2 < 1.20 GeV^2 for Positive hadrons.

PT dependences of the differential multiplicities for 0.0250 < x_Bjorken < 0.0400 and 1.20 < Q^2 < 1.50 GeV^2 for Positive hadrons.

PT dependences of the differential multiplicities for 0.0250 < x_Bjorken < 0.0400 and 1.50 < Q^2 < 2.50 GeV^2 for Positive hadrons.

PT dependences of the differential multiplicities for 0.0250 < x_Bjorken < 0.0400 and 2.50 < Q^2 < 3.50 GeV^2 for Positive hadrons.

PT dependences of the differential multiplicities for 0.0250 < x_Bjorken < 0.0400 and 3.50 < Q^2 < 6.00 GeV^2 for Positive hadrons.

PT dependences of the differential multiplicities for 0.0400 < x_Bjorken < 0.0500 and 1.50 < Q^2 < 2.50 GeV^2 for Positive hadrons.

PT dependences of the differential multiplicities for 0.0400 < x_Bjorken < 0.0700 and 2.50 < Q^2 < 3.50 GeV^2 for Positive hadrons.

PT dependences of the differential multiplicities for 0.0400 < x_Bjorken < 0.0700 and 3.50 < Q^2 < 6.00 GeV^2 for Positive hadrons.

PT dependences of the differential multiplicities for 0.0400 < x_Bjorken < 0.0700 and 6.00 < Q^2 < 10.00 GeV^2 for Positive hadrons.

PT dependences of the differential multiplicities for 0.0700 < x_Bjorken < 0.1200 and 3.50 < Q^2 < 6.00 GeV^2 for Positive hadrons.

PT dependences of the differential multiplicities for 0.0700 < x_Bjorken < 0.1200 and 6.00 < Q^2 < 10.00 GeV^2 for Positive hadrons.

PT dependences of the differential multiplicities for 0.0045 < x_Bjorken < 0.0060 and 1.00 < Q^2 < 1.25 GeV^2 for Negative hadrons.

PT dependences of the differential multiplicities for 0.0060 < x_Bjorken < 0.0080 and 1.00 < Q^2 < 1.30 GeV^2 for Negative hadrons.

PT dependences of the differential multiplicities for 0.0060 < x_Bjorken < 0.0080 and 1.30 < Q^2 < 1.70 GeV^2 for Negative hadrons.

PT dependences of the differential multiplicities for 0.0080 < x_Bjorken < 0.0120 and 1.00 < Q^2 < 1.50 GeV^2 for Negative hadrons.

PT dependences of the differential multiplicities for 0.0080 < x_Bjorken < 0.0120 and 1.50 < Q^2 < 2.10 GeV^2 for Negative hadrons.

PT dependences of the differential multiplicities for 0.0120 < x_Bjorken < 0.0180 and 1.00 < Q^2 < 1.50 GeV^2 for Negative hadrons.

PT dependences of the differential multiplicities for 0.0120 < x_Bjorken < 0.0180 and 1.50 < Q^2 < 2.50 GeV^2 for Negative hadrons.

PT dependences of the differential multiplicities for 0.0120 < x_Bjorken < 0.0180 and 2.50 < Q^2 < 3.50 GeV^2 for Negative hadrons.

PT dependences of the differential multiplicities for 0.0180 < x_Bjorken < 0.0250 and 1.00 < Q^2 < 1.50 GeV^2 for Negative hadrons.

PT dependences of the differential multiplicities for 0.0180 < x_Bjorken < 0.0250 and 1.50 < Q^2 < 2.50 GeV^2 for Negative hadrons.

PT dependences of the differential multiplicities for 0.0180 < x_Bjorken < 0.0250 and 2.50 < Q^2 < 3.50 GeV^2 for Negative hadrons.

PT dependences of the differential multiplicities for 0.0180 < x_Bjorken < 0.0250 and 3.50 < Q^2 < 5.00 GeV^2 for Negative hadrons.

PT dependences of the differential multiplicities for 0.0250 < x_Bjorken < 0.0350 and 1.00 < Q^2 < 1.20 GeV^2 for Negative hadrons.

PT dependences of the differential multiplicities for 0.0250 < x_Bjorken < 0.0400 and 1.20 < Q^2 < 1.50 GeV^2 for Negative hadrons.

PT dependences of the differential multiplicities for 0.0250 < x_Bjorken < 0.0400 and 1.50 < Q^2 < 2.50 GeV^2 for Negative hadrons.

PT dependences of the differential multiplicities for 0.0250 < x_Bjorken < 0.0400 and 2.50 < Q^2 < 3.50 GeV^2 for Negative hadrons.

PT dependences of the differential multiplicities for 0.0250 < x_Bjorken < 0.0400 and 3.50 < Q^2 < 6.00 GeV^2 for Negative hadrons.

PT dependences of the differential multiplicities for 0.0400 < x_Bjorken < 0.0500 and 1.50 < Q^2 < 2.50 GeV^2 for Negative hadrons.

PT dependences of the differential multiplicities for 0.0400 < x_Bjorken < 0.0700 and 2.50 < Q^2 < 3.50 GeV^2 for Negative hadrons.

PT dependences of the differential multiplicities for 0.0400 < x_Bjorken < 0.0700 and 3.50 < Q^2 < 6.00 GeV^2 for Negative hadrons.

PT dependences of the differential multiplicities for 0.0400 < x_Bjorken < 0.0700 and 6.00 < Q^2 < 10.00 GeV^2 for Negative hadrons.

PT dependences of the differential multiplicities for 0.0700 < x_Bjorken < 0.1200 and 3.50 < Q^2 < 6.00 GeV^2 for Negative hadrons.

PT dependences of the differential multiplicities for 0.0700 < x_Bjorken < 0.1200 and 6.00 < Q^2 < 10.00 GeV^2 for Negative hadrons.

Fitted average PTs for positive hadrons.

Fitted average PTs for negative hadrons.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the cosine of the centre-of-mass scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 0.925 to 0.950 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the cosine of the centre-of-mass scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 0.950 to 0.975 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the cosine of the centre-of-mass scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 0.975 to 1.000 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the cosine of the centre-of-mass scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 1.000 to 1.025 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the cosine of the centre-of-mass scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 1.025 to 1.050 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the cosine of the centre-of-mass scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 1.050 to 1.075 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the cosine of the centre-of-mass scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 1.100 to 1.125 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the cosine of the centre-of-mass scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 1.125 to 1.150 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the cosine of the centre-of-mass scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 1.150 to 1.175 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the cosine of the centre-of-mass scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 1.175 to 1.200 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the cosine of the centre-of-mass scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 1.200 to 1.225 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the cosine of the centre-of-mass scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 1.225 to 1.250 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the cosine of the centre-of-mass scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 1.250 to 1.275 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the cosine of the centre-of-mass scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 1.275 to 1.300 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the cosine of the centre-of-mass scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 1.300 to 1.350 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the cosine of the centre-of-mass scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 1.350 to 1.400 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the cosine of the centre-of-mass scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 1.400 to 1.450 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the cosine of the centre-of-mass scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 1.450 to 1.500 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the cosine of the centre-of-mass scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 1.500 to 1.550 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the cosine of the centre-of-mass scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 1.550 to 1.600 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the cosine of the centre-of-mass scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 1.600 to 1.650 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the cosine of the centre-of-mass scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 1.650 to 1.700 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the cosine of the centre-of-mass scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 1.700 to 1.750 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the cosine of the centre-of-mass scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 1.750 to 1.800 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the cosine of the centre-of-mass scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 1.800 to 1.850 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the cosine of the centre-of-mass scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 1.850 to 1.900 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the cosine of the centre-of-mass scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 1.900 to 1.950 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the cosine of the centre-of-mass scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 1.950 to 2.000 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the cosine of the centre-of-mass scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 2.000 to 2.050 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the cosine of the centre-of-mass scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 2.050 to 2.100 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the cosine of the centre-of-mass scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 2.100 to 2.150 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the cosine of the centre-of-mass scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 2.150 to 2.200 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the cosine of the centre-of-mass scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 2.200 to 2.250 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the cosine of the centre-of-mass scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 2.250 to 2.300 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the cosine of the centre-of-mass scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 2.300 to 2.350 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the cosine of the centre-of-mass scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 2.350 to 2.400 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the cosine of the centre-of-mass scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 2.400 to 2.450 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the cosine of the centre-of-mass scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 2.450 to 2.500 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 0.850 to 0.875 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 0.875 to 0.900 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 0.900 to 0.925 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 0.925 to 0.950 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 0.950 to 0.975 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 0.975 to 1.000 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 1.000 to 1.025 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 1.025 to 1.050 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 1.050 to 1.075 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 1.100 to 1.125 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 1.125 to 1.150 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 1.150 to 1.175 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 1.175 to 1.200 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 1.200 to 1.225 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 1.225 to 1.250 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 1.250 to 1.275 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 1.275 to 1.300 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 1.300 to 1.350 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 1.350 to 1.400 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 1.400 to 1.450 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 1.450 to 1.500 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 1.500 to 1.550 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 1.550 to 1.600 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 1.600 to 1.650 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 1.650 to 1.700 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 1.700 to 1.750 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 1.750 to 1.800 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 1.800 to 1.850 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 1.850 to 1.900 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 1.900 to 1.950 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 1.950 to 2.000 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 2.000 to 2.050 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 2.050 to 2.100 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 2.100 to 2.150 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 2.150 to 2.200 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 2.200 to 2.250 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 2.250 to 2.300 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 2.300 to 2.350 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 2.350 to 2.400 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 2.400 to 2.450 GeV.

Differential cross section for the process GAMMA P --> PI0 P as a function of the scattering angle of the PI0 for photon energies from 2.450 to 2.500 GeV.

The effective exponential slope, $b_n$, obtained from the fit of double differential photoproduction cross sections ${\rm d^2}\sigma_{\gamma p}/{\rm d}x_L{\rm d}p_{T,n}^2$ to a single exponential function in bins of $x_L$. The first uncertainty represents the fit error from the statistical and uncorrelated systematic uncertainty and the second one is due to the correlated systematic uncertainty.

Differential photoproduction cross section ${\rm d}\sigma_{\gamma p}/{\rm d}\eta$ for the exclusive process $\gamma p \to \rho^0 n \pi^+$ as a function of the $\rho^0$ pseudorapidity in the kinematic range $0.35 < x_L < 0.95$, $\theta_n < 0.75$ mrad and $20 < W_{\gamma p} < 100$ GeV. The statistical, uncorrelated and correlated systematic uncertainties, $\delta_{stat}$, $\delta_{sys}^{unc}$ and $\delta_{sys}^{cor}$ respectively, are given, which does not include the global normalisation error of $4.4\%$.

Differential photoproduction cross section ${\rm d}\sigma_{\gamma p}/{\rm d}t^{\prime}$ for the exclusive process $\gamma p \to \rho^0 n \pi^+$ as a function of the $\rho^0$ four-momentum transfer squared, $t^{\prime}$, in the kinematic range $0.35 < x_L < 0.95$, $\theta_n < 0.75$ mrad and $20 < W_{\gamma p} < 100$ GeV. The statistical, uncorrelated and correlated systematic uncertainties, $\delta_{stat}$, $\delta_{sys}^{unc}$ and $\delta_{sys}^{cor}$ respectively, are given, which does not include the global normalisation error of $4.4\%$.

Exponential slopes, $b_1$ and $b_2$, and the ratio $\sigma_1/\sigma_2$, obtained from the components of fit, Eq. (14) of paper, to the differential cross section ${\rm d}\sigma_{\gamma p}/{\rm d}t^{\prime}$ in bins of $x_L$. The errors represent the statistical and systematic uncertainties added in quadrature.

Exponential slopes, $b_1$ and $b_2$, and the ratio $\sigma_1/\sigma_2$, obtained from the components of fit, Eq. (14) of paper, to the differential cross section ${\rm d}\sigma_{\gamma p}/{\rm d}t^{\prime}$ in bins of $p_{T,n}^2$. The errors represent the statistical and systematic uncertainties added in quadrature.

Energy dependence of elastic $\rho^0$ photoproduction on the pion, $\gamma \pi^+ \to \rho^0 \pi^+$, extracted in the one-pion-exchange approximation using OPE1 sample. The first uncertainty represents the full experimental error and the second is the model error coming from the pion flux uncertainty (see text). $\Gamma_\pi(x_L)$ represents the value of the pion flux, Eqs. (5-6) of paper, integrated over the $p_{T,n}<0.2$ GeV range, at a given $x_L$.

Cross section of elastic $\rho^0$ photoproduction on the pion, $\gamma \pi^+ \to \rho^0 \pi^+$, extracted in the one-pion-exchange approximation using three different samples: full sample, OPE1 and OPE2. The first uncertainty represents the full experimental error and the second is the model error coming from the pion flux uncertainty (see text). $\Gamma_\pi$ represents the value of the pion flux, Eqs. (5-6) of paper, integrated over the corresponding $(x_L,p_{T,n})$ range.